Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
Hey, guys, ready or not, twenty twenty
0:02
four is here and we here at
0:04
breaking points, are already thinking of ways we can
0:06
up our game for this critical election.
0:08
We rely on our premium subs to expand coverage,
0:11
upgrade the studio ad staff, give you,
0:13
guys, the best independent.
0:15
Coverage that is possible.
0:16
If you like what we're all about, it just means
0:18
the absolute world to have your support. But enough
0:20
with that, let's get to the show.
0:25
Good morning, everybody, Happy Tuesday. We have an
0:27
amazing show for everybody today. What do we have, Crystal, indeed
0:30
we do.
0:30
Let's to get to this morning.
0:31
First of all, a nationwide freak
0:33
out over campus protests, NYU
0:36
going so far as to arrest their own
0:38
faculty. We have those images for
0:40
you. We also have the president and making some
0:43
somewhat confusing muddled comments as
0:45
his one, so we'll pullay that for you as well. We
0:47
got to have a recap of the first day of
0:50
the Trump trial opening statements, plus a little
0:52
bit from the prosecution's first
0:54
witness. That would be tabloid what's
0:56
the tabloid owner?
0:58
Is that what we call it?
0:59
David Packard?
0:59
Let's go with anyway, National Inquired dude David
1:01
Pecker, so interesting stuff to get into
1:03
there. We also have new poll with some interesting
1:06
data on RFK Junior and who he may
1:08
help hurt, et cetera. This comes as
1:10
he gains ballid access in a number
1:12
of new states, So lots of updates
1:14
for you there as well. We've got Biden sparking
1:17
a genuine diplomatic crisis
1:20
over his fake cannibalism
1:23
claims, so break that down for you. We've
1:25
got a new poll showing how
1:27
young people feel about the country, about Joe,
1:29
Biden, etc.
1:30
With a lot of interesting numbers as well.
1:32
A new report suggests that Israel had planned
1:34
a much larger attack on a run.
1:36
Is that true? Break that down for you.
1:38
We also have new revelations
1:40
horrifying of mass
1:42
graves in communists with hundreds
1:45
of bodies. I also
1:48
went on Pierce Morgan show yesterday and
1:50
it was quite an experience. So I'll show you the highlight.
1:53
Well, we goat it.
1:54
Love that, but a little bit for what our people need to
1:56
see.
1:57
I just want to say, I'm really grateful for
1:59
this program, grateful to get into the same
2:01
this show every day. So we'll just
2:03
we'll save the rest of the commentary for that segment incredible.
2:06
Okay, before we get to any of that, As we teased, Ryan and
2:08
Emiley are going to have a very big announcement soon. So
2:10
if you want to hear first what it is and get access
2:12
to whatever new content may be coming your way
2:14
Breakingpoints dot Com, you can become a subscriber
2:16
support all of the work that we're doing here. We have a couple other
2:18
things in the pipeline that I think everyone is going to be
2:21
really excited about. So sign up Breakingpoints
2:23
dot Com become a premium subscriber today.
2:25
Okay, So let's talk about these campus protests
2:27
in particular. This is pro Palestine and
2:29
Procese fire protests which are broken down across
2:32
the country. Columbia University has
2:34
become a real focus for a variety
2:36
of reasons. They're present testifying last
2:38
week in front of that anti Semitism panel
2:40
on the Hill. Then following
2:43
that, she immediately called the NYPD
2:45
in to arrest one hundred students
2:48
kick the mouth of the university property. That
2:50
sparks a massive backlash. We talked about
2:52
that yesterday with prem Talker, and not
2:55
only a backlash at Columbia University, we
2:57
can go ahead and put this up on the screen, because these are some
2:59
scenes from Columbia University
3:01
where you have a huge number of
3:03
faculty joining the
3:06
students in solidarity
3:08
and in an attempt to protect them
3:10
from further arrests or other disciplinary
3:13
actions. But you can see that this
3:15
movement has not only spread at Columbia,
3:18
but really truly nationwide. We have a sampling
3:20
here of some of these schools.
3:22
You got University of Michigan, NYU, MIT,
3:25
Vanderbilt USC where they
3:27
have also started
3:29
not just protest movements, but specifically
3:31
these gaza solidarity encampments.
3:34
There are more.
3:35
Actually I kept seeing more and more reports of
3:37
additional schools in a University of Maryland here
3:39
here as planning one as well. This is a map
3:41
of where some of the actions
3:44
have sprung up, these specifically
3:46
or solidarity camps calling for their
3:49
schools to divest from anything
3:51
connected to Israel. Let's
3:53
put the next piece up on the screen. This
3:56
is a truly extraordinary scene. What you're looking
3:58
at here is the police
4:00
who were called in to arrest faculty
4:04
at New York University who
4:06
had come in in solidarity again
4:09
with their students and were standing
4:11
at a chain attempting to protect those students, So
4:14
NYU calling.
4:15
The cops on their own faculty.
4:18
In that video, by the way, courtesy of Katie Smith, you could
4:20
see that up there in the corner. I want to make sure to
4:22
give credit there wild
4:24
situation unfolding. Of course,
4:27
the claim is that these protests
4:29
are anti Semitic, that they're violent.
4:32
I would just reiterate something I said
4:34
yesterday, which is that the NYPD themselves,
4:37
when brought in to clear out the and
4:40
arrest the one hundred students that they did the other
4:42
day, even the NYPD said
4:44
it was one hundred percent nonviolent.
4:46
So that's the reality of what's going on. Joe
4:49
Biden was asked about this. Of course, the
4:51
White House was put out this statement condemning
4:53
these protests as anti Semitic. Let's
4:55
take a listen to what he had to say and
4:57
the anti submitted protests on College
5:00
capass.
5:01
I condemn that protests. That's
5:03
why I've set up a program to deal
5:05
with that. I also condemn those who
5:08
don't understand what's going on with the Palestinians
5:10
and they're how they're doing.
5:12
The Columbia University president resigned,
5:14
but I didn't know that.
5:16
I'll not have to find out more sign oh
5:19
sorry, which is not there. It says,
5:21
I condemn, you know, anything that's anti
5:24
Semitic.
5:25
That's why we've set up a program to do
5:27
with that. That's I don't know what that is about.
5:29
And then he says, I also condemn those who
5:31
don't understand what's going
5:34
on with the Palestinians and
5:36
how they've been and then he just.
5:38
Sort of trails off.
5:39
Some might call it a very fine people on
5:41
both sides moment, very
5:44
very I think it's amusing from Biden because
5:46
I don't even really know what he's trying to get
5:48
across.
5:49
Don't either.
5:50
It's like, okay, got
5:52
it. You know your White House put out a statement on this.
5:55
Out of that, I will reiterate what you said.
5:57
It also is incredibly difficult, and this was huge,
6:00
deep frustration with the media. You know. Somebody
6:02
texted me yesterday, go, hey, what are these protests about?
6:04
And I said, you know what, let me get back
6:06
to you because I wasn't one hundred percent sure
6:08
whether it was ceasefire or not. So I went
6:11
back and I traced the entire thing from
6:13
Columbia. Columbia University President is
6:15
before Congress on Wednesday. The
6:17
encampments start on Wednesday.
6:20
The encampment demand is a
6:22
BDS specifically divestment
6:25
of Columbia University endowment funds
6:27
that are linked to Israel. Same
6:29
now with many of these other encampments. So there
6:32
is a misconception going on as to what exactly
6:34
sparked this and what you know,
6:37
what this specific demand or whatever the
6:39
protesters was. From that point forward, NYPD
6:42
was called in. This is another key part. Columbia
6:45
University is a private property. The
6:47
NYPD has to be invited onto
6:49
campus by the university to
6:51
clear out the encampment. Columbia University
6:54
claimed that they were disrupting classes,
6:56
so they come in and they have NYPD arrest
6:58
some one hundred odd students. This sparks
7:01
a huge backlash not only of
7:03
hundreds now students and others
7:05
who have taken to the quad, that major
7:07
area in Columbia University, and now faculty
7:10
members that have also joined much of
7:12
that as well, which has spread out much of
7:14
this part of the BDS movement. So anyway,
7:17
what I wanted to say was it's important to
7:19
understand, as I have not been able to see.
7:21
If you just read the news quote unquote, you won't
7:23
actually see why any of this really
7:25
began in the first place, and it is a step
7:28
by step really of escalation.
7:30
Now, as I said as well previously,
7:33
what you noted are there quote
7:35
unquote anti Semitic incidents. There
7:37
have been videos certainly that have been
7:40
circulating. Again, I'm
7:42
not necessarily some leftist free
7:44
palace and cafia person. So I go
7:46
and I look, and from what I have been able to find,
7:48
the organizers and all themselves have been
7:51
doing something that many BLM people never
7:53
did, is they have been setting out lots
7:55
of ground rules, and they're like, we are not violent,
7:57
we are not participating in violence. We do not want any
7:59
of this anti semitism. If you're chanting things
8:02
like this making people feel and safe, don't
8:04
join us. There's a lot of internal enforcement
8:06
going on inside some of these protests,
8:08
at least from what I've been able to see so far,
8:11
I think that's a frankly, very wise
8:13
decision on their parts, since they already know that the
8:15
deck is generally stacked against them. But
8:18
none the less, Nonetheless,
8:20
it has invited now a massive
8:23
call for intervention
8:25
on these campuses, including calling
8:27
in the National Guard, far beyond
8:30
much of the NYPD. I mean you've seen
8:32
large Columbia donors. We're about to get to this basically
8:34
call for a massed expulsion of every single student
8:36
and faculty that's participated in this protest. Donors
8:39
are calling in, So I have
8:41
no expectations that Columbia will quote unquote
8:44
hold the line because these people it's
8:46
a business, okay. And when you've got
8:48
Robert Kraft, who's got his name on a building there,
8:51
and you've got all these billionaire donors NYU,
8:53
and also who do you think is paying those bills?
8:55
And those folks, they will stand for
8:57
a lot.
8:57
They will not stand for anything that has any crem
9:00
of Israel.
9:01
So, just to elaborate on
9:03
some of what you said there, Soger, because there
9:05
are a lot of things being conflated here.
9:08
Listen, guys, it's no revelation that
9:10
number one, anti Semitism is real.
9:12
It exists, It's abhorrent. There's no excuse
9:15
for it. You know, I'm not here
9:17
to deny the reality of anti Semitism.
9:20
That's number one.
9:21
Number two, is it a
9:23
surprise that there are some assholes
9:26
associated with a protest?
9:27
No, this is not a surprise.
9:28
Okay, if you were going to try to shut down
9:31
every single protest that had an asshole associated
9:33
with it, there would.
9:34
Be no protests.
9:35
Okay.
9:36
Number three, Many
9:38
of the incidents, purported
9:40
incidents that have gone viral
9:43
have not even happened on a college campus.
9:45
Specifically with regards to Colombia.
9:47
Actually used to live right by Columbia,
9:49
and Colombia's right in the middle of northern Manhattan,
9:52
and you know.
9:52
You step off the campus and you're.
9:54
In New York City, and so literally
9:57
every incident I've seen that could
9:59
be colorably described as anti
10:01
Semitic or you know, aggressive
10:04
or violent in any fashion has happened
10:06
off the campus. So to blame
10:08
the student protesters who are there peacefully and
10:11
crack down on them and smear them all as anti
10:13
Semites or as one of their professors did, We're
10:15
going to show you this in a minute, as terrorists.
10:18
It's outrageous. It's frankly outrageous, and
10:20
you know, it's it's a trick like we've seen
10:22
this with various protest movements in
10:24
the past.
10:25
It's an easy thing to do.
10:26
You find like the worst actor in the protest movement,
10:28
you hold them up, the video goes viral, and you use
10:30
that to try to delegitimize the entire
10:33
thing. That's what's going on here. And then the other thing
10:35
that's being conflated is the same discourse about
10:37
the rally chants and whether you
10:39
know, from the river to the sea means
10:41
genocide. And listen, I'm
10:44
not here to tell you what you should or
10:46
shouldn't be offended by. If you're offended
10:48
by that, okay, you can be offended by
10:50
that. Now, I think if you talk to these students, they'll
10:52
tell you, no, what we mean is equal
10:54
rights for all, for Palestinians
10:56
and Israelis. That's what our call is for.
10:59
But listen, if you're offended, that's
11:01
your right. But guess what free
11:04
speech is also about protecting.
11:06
In fact, it's primarily about protecting
11:09
speech that could be offensive
11:11
or uncomfortable. So you
11:14
know, the whole free speech crowd, all
11:16
the free speech bros out there, who were
11:18
you know, when it was the right and there was
11:20
speech that was offensive coming from the right,
11:23
they were all for it, and they were all against the
11:25
campus censorship, et cetera. Now
11:27
I can't tell you how many times I've
11:29
heard these words, I'm all for
11:32
free speech, but oh
11:35
well, the butt means you're not for
11:37
free speech. That's what that means.
11:40
So listen some of the rally chants, like
11:42
they wouldn't be what I would say, It wouldn't be what I would
11:44
choose. I can understand why
11:46
people may say, hey, I don't like that, but
11:48
guess what that is?
11:50
Free speech.
11:52
One more thing I'll say about this and then go on
11:54
to the next part of the just absolutely
11:56
unhinged reaction that is happening
11:59
right now, very intentionally so because
12:02
you know, the Israel no matter what side,
12:04
has like basically lost the debate if
12:07
you look at popular opinion, especially if you look
12:09
at the Democratic Party, especially if
12:11
you look at young people. So this is an
12:13
attempt not only to legitimized but also
12:15
to distract. But with regard
12:18
to Columbia University itself, it is a private university.
12:20
They can make whatever rules they want
12:22
to make. I'm not saying they can't do
12:24
it. It's a question of what they should
12:27
do. And the you
12:30
know, the claims about safety of Jewish
12:32
students, et cetera, are really belied by
12:34
the fact that there are you know, uncomfortably
12:36
for the people who want to smear this whole movement as
12:38
anti Semitism as anti Semitic. There
12:41
are many Jewish students
12:43
who are at the core of these protests, who
12:45
are organizing these protests, who are out there with
12:48
signs that say Jews for Palestine.
12:50
In fact, to one of the groups that was blanket
12:52
banned very quickly after
12:54
October seventh from Columbia University
12:57
was Jewish Voices for Peace.
13:00
So why are you shutting down Jewish
13:03
How is that not anti Semitic if we're going to
13:05
play that particular game. So let
13:08
me move on to some of the more
13:10
unhinged reaction. Characteristically,
13:12
you've got the ADL's Jonathan Greenblatt
13:15
weigh and calling for the
13:17
National Guard to come
13:19
in and crack down on Colbia University
13:21
students.
13:22
Take a listen, Jewish.
13:23
Students don't feel safe on campus because
13:25
they are not I meaning President should
13:27
feet to do great things. Number
13:30
One, median NYPD
13:32
back on this campus or
13:34
bring in the national car. Number
13:37
two, no masks
13:39
on campus. This isn't Falujah,
13:42
this is Morningside Heights. And
13:45
number three, the students
13:47
who behave in this way to
13:49
be suspended immediately.
13:52
So by the way, many students have
13:55
been suspended. Many students
13:57
were arrested by the NYPD
13:59
and Sager. I mean, listen, the calls for the National
14:01
Guard are so deranged that I can't
14:03
even wrap my head around it.
14:05
They're peacefully protesting.
14:08
Okay.
14:09
Now you may talk about things happening off campus.
14:11
That's a different story, it's a little messier.
14:13
But in terms of the college campus
14:16
protests, you're talking about bringing
14:18
in the national What are you inviting another Kent
14:20
State.
14:20
It's insane.
14:22
Their allegation is this is some like Title nine
14:24
violation of the civil rights of many
14:26
of the Jewish students on campus. Now look
14:28
again, you actually said something important. Columbia
14:30
is a private university and they can do whatever they want.
14:32
I do think though, at a core of this, and
14:35
this is going to be difficult for those of
14:37
us who haven't ever seen elite circles. I
14:39
didn't go to an Ivy League school or anything. I know many
14:41
people who do. They have a religious
14:43
attachment to these places, which is difficult
14:45
for me to describe. And for them this
14:48
is personal because they're like, this is my space,
14:50
this is the place that I control, This
14:53
is the place where we have you know, I spent so
14:55
many of my fond memories and this is where Robert
14:57
Kraft has donated his thing, and there's a hill
14:59
else and we spent all this time on this. So
15:01
for them, it drives them nuts that
15:03
they don't have control over
15:06
campus discourse in a way that they
15:08
haven't now in quite a long time. And I actually
15:10
think the perfect example of this is a Columbia
15:12
University professor.
15:14
Who has gone very viral. I
15:16
guess it was. It's fair to say.
15:18
He's made himself a main character.
15:20
He has made himself a main character absolutely, Okay,
15:22
So how do we say this gentleman's name because he's upset?
15:24
Where are we going with Shihi Dividi? Shi
15:27
Dividi?
15:27
Okay?
15:28
So Shy Dividi is a Jewish Israeli
15:30
professor has been really
15:32
making himself a main character on campus
15:34
filming protests, calling them terrorists,
15:37
saying that they're anti Semitic. He joined in
15:39
Israeli news outlet I twenty four recently
15:42
specifically to say that the students themselves
15:44
are terrorists. Not terrorists, even supporters
15:46
as many people will say, but actual terrorists
15:49
themselves.
15:49
Let's take a listen.
15:50
This is an important topic. This is not
15:52
just about Columbia. This is every
15:55
US College. They have said that
15:57
they are going to bring down Columbia first
15:59
and as a domino effect, we'll have all
16:01
other universities. But I want
16:04
to make clear one thing before I talk about my own actions.
16:06
What we're seeing now at Columbia, and I don't
16:09
use this word lightly. We're not seeing
16:11
ideological war, We're not seeing
16:13
support for terrorism. We are
16:15
seeing terrorism. Last
16:17
night we had at Colombia a
16:20
protestant, one of the protesters in
16:22
the student mob, holding a sign pulling
16:24
the El Casam brigade, the Hamas
16:27
military wing who kill Jewish
16:29
students with a with
16:31
an arrow pointing at
16:33
the Jewish students that we're standing there right.
16:36
We are seeing Hamas on campus.
16:39
And this makes President Minushafik
16:42
a Hamas supporter every
16:44
minute, but she does not call let
16:46
in the NYPD because.
16:48
She's not letting them in.
16:49
That's why you see the NYPD outside and the
16:51
terrorists inside.
16:52
Well, Shai, I hate to break
16:54
it to you.
16:55
I know that in your country, Israel,
16:58
that signs may be considered
17:00
terrorism. In this country,
17:02
the United States, that is not considered
17:05
terrorism. That's actually free
17:07
speech and it does not ever cross into
17:10
the realm of violence. And this is
17:12
very difficult to say, you know, and remain
17:14
calm. But I cannot tell you how disgusting
17:16
it is to me personally to see this person
17:18
who is, as far as I know, not a US citizen,
17:21
and if he is, I know he calls himself a Jewish is realist.
17:23
So I'm just gonna say that come to here, then
17:26
try to police the speech of and
17:28
basically call in the National Guard, our
17:30
military to go after protesters
17:33
who he doesn't like. Again, that's perfectly
17:35
fine in your country, Israel. It
17:37
is not fine over here. It doesn't cross into
17:40
the line of violence. And this is part
17:42
of the other problem that I have with all of this is
17:44
that the escalation of rhetoric belies reality.
17:47
It's like, listen, we're not into what is
17:49
a July of twenty twenty. There is not
17:51
widespread looting and chaos in
17:53
the streets. Again in Columbia
17:56
University a private ivy league,
17:58
which that's part of the other thing.
18:00
That's the only reason this thing is getting so much attention.
18:01
It's because all these media elites and all these other people who
18:03
live in New York City and again to them,
18:05
and this is like hallowed special grounds.
18:08
So it really really bothers me, and
18:10
it drives me crazy to see some of the
18:12
ratcheting up of this and the wholesale embrace
18:14
of at least a segment of a lot of
18:17
the American right who are just you know, adopting
18:20
all of the safe space language. I
18:22
saw There's a woman named Campbell Brown. She used
18:25
to work over at CNN. Then
18:27
she was a Facebook executive and head of news partnerships
18:29
there, and she tweeted recently she said,
18:32
I'm heading with my two sons to Israel,
18:34
where they will be safer than
18:37
on the West side of New York. And
18:39
I'm like, it's like a meme.
18:41
It's like heading into an active war zone.
18:44
Because on a university campus, in
18:46
a contained protests zone or
18:48
whatever, some people are chanting things I
18:51
don't like and I could be five blocks away
18:53
and I wouldn't know anything about it.
18:54
Like, how stupid do you have to be to believe something
18:57
like that? It's ridiculous.
18:58
It is ridiculous. Words are
19:01
not literally violence. Yes, yeah,
19:04
part of becoming a grown up is dealing
19:06
with hearing things that you may
19:09
find to be apparent disgusting. Again,
19:12
that's your right, but to
19:14
pretend like and especially
19:17
I mean, this is part of why it's so disgusting, Like
19:19
you can't take it out of the context that
19:21
these students are protesting what they
19:23
and a majority of young people and a majority
19:25
of Biden voters, and the ICJ says is plausible,
19:28
and the US and YEN says there are reasonable grounds
19:30
say is a genocide.
19:33
Okay, look at the Gaza Strip.
19:35
Look at the devastation We're going to show
19:37
you here in a couple of minutes, mass grave
19:41
of hundreds of people, children
19:45
starving to death, under
19:47
a collective punishment and a siege.
19:50
Okay, you want to talk about safety
19:52
in higher education? Every
19:54
single university in the Gaza Strip
19:57
has been systematically demolished.
20:00
And I use that word very intentionally because at least
20:02
one of them they did a controlled
20:05
detonation. They went in, they set the charges.
20:07
It's not like this was in some battle with Hamas.
20:10
They intentionally set the charges
20:12
and blew up a university.
20:14
Okay.
20:15
So to put that up
20:17
against like I heard a rally chant that I
20:19
don't like get at, like, what are
20:22
we doing here? And that's why this conversation to
20:24
me just makes me so incredibly
20:27
insane.
20:28
Now with regard to shy.
20:32
Again, it's a free country.
20:34
He can say what he wants, right,
20:37
But somehow the standard he holds
20:39
of I don't want to hear a rally chant I don't like
20:42
because you know, then these people are terrorists
20:44
and they're violent, etcetera, et cetera, is
20:46
not applied to him. I mean, for
20:49
you to be a university professor, these
20:51
are your students. They're in some ways in your care
20:54
while they're there at that institution,
20:56
and you're smearing them as terrorists.
21:00
I saw somebody who tweeted out like, can
21:02
someone tell me what the body count is at Colombia?
21:04
How many people have died? How many casualties? And
21:07
it's a joke because obviously the answer is zero.
21:10
So you're rendering these words
21:13
utterly meaningless. You're
21:16
rendering the word anti Semitic utterly
21:18
meaningless. Now it just means like having a political
21:21
view that you don't like. You're rendering
21:23
the word now terrorist utterly
21:26
meaningless because again now it just applies
21:28
to as somebody has an ideology that I
21:30
don't like. And this man,
21:33
this grown man, pitched such a fit
21:35
when some of the actions that he has celebrated
21:38
and demanded more of, when applied to students
21:40
were also applied to him. He had his university
21:43
access to one part of campus revoked,
21:45
and people caught it on Cameron, I mean the fit that
21:47
he threw. He feels he
21:49
should even as he's calling students terrorists,
21:53
he feels he should be, you know, have full rights
21:55
to campus, but not the people
21:57
who he disagrees with. So it's
21:59
so incredibly selective and just
22:02
to show you also, and this to me is so
22:04
outrageous. So the official
22:07
Government of Israel Twitter
22:09
account picked up and reiterated
22:12
his charge that American students
22:15
at Columbia University and other places are
22:17
terrorists. Put this up on the screen. This is
22:20
outrageous. So he had tweeted out, this is
22:22
what's happening at Columbia right now. I know it's
22:24
confusing, so let me spell it out
22:26
for you. A. Terrorism is an ideology.
22:29
B they are openly supporting terror
22:31
C they are terrorists.
22:34
Terrorists have taken over Columbia
22:37
University. The government needs
22:39
to take over Colombia. Now think
22:42
about that in the context of the number of right wingers who
22:44
are celebrating a government takeover and
22:46
demanding a government takeover. National Guard to
22:48
come into censor students. Okay, put that aside. This
22:50
is important repost. If you agree, the
22:53
government of Israel takes him up on that repost.
22:55
If you agree, call and reiterates
22:58
his terrorism is an ideology. Either openly
23:00
supporting terror they are terrorists. The
23:02
government of Israel calling American
23:05
students protesting on campus, exercising
23:08
their First Amendment free speech rights, terrorists.
23:12
It is so despicable, It is so disgusting.
23:15
Yeah, and what it again illustrates
23:17
is that Israel a nation which
23:20
just the other day President Herzog, their
23:22
president, came out and said Americans
23:24
should stay out of Israeli politics. I was like, yeah,
23:26
I agree, I agree with you. That so why we shouldn't
23:28
pay you at all?
23:29
But why don't you say they got their hand down
23:31
That's what I mean, more weapons, more billions.
23:34
I'll take that trade any day you guys want, But
23:36
then you got to stay out of our politics.
23:38
Oh but on that one, it doesn't
23:40
really matter as much. It's like that is what
23:43
actually again just bugs the crap out
23:45
of me about this. I mean, what they the
23:47
problem to is what people never learn is
23:50
that if you're gonna, you know, try and put down
23:52
the boot or that you better go all out
23:54
because if you don't, you know what's going to happen, You're
23:56
going to have a widespread reaction. And sure
23:59
enough, it's already happening. Let's put this up there
24:01
on the screen. Just yesterday we
24:03
saw Yale University students who
24:06
were arrested at their protest again
24:08
over a BDS investment
24:10
in arms manufacturing. You've got multiple
24:13
other campuses now where you see
24:15
similar things that are beginning to break
24:18
out.
24:18
And I actually I will say this too.
24:20
I think it's a very smart strategy on part of these
24:22
students, because this is the other thing, you
24:24
know, these traffic people and all that.
24:26
We've had our debate.
24:27
I think it's idiotic, stupid, counterproductive,
24:30
and obviously they're also just going to get arrested in
24:32
the first place. But if you're on a university
24:34
squad, there is no actual plausible way
24:36
that you could say you're really like affecting
24:39
a lot of other people when you're on university
24:41
private Produm. Maybe public university is gonna be different because
24:44
then you're I think technically in terms of how
24:46
the law and all that. But it's for Columbia University,
24:48
for any of these other places, especially if you are
24:50
again an active student there and you have certain privileges
24:53
of what you're allowed and allowed not to exercise,
24:55
especially whenever it comes to First Amendment
24:58
rights, it's going to be a lot more difficult for people to
25:00
go after them. So anyways, I think it's I
25:02
think what we are going to see is there's a
25:05
couple of options, which is people could try
25:07
and quote unquote de escalate.
25:08
I don't really see that as possibility.
25:11
All of the money and
25:13
institutional pressure is one way, which is on
25:15
a crackdown. I think what is going to happen
25:18
is that Columbia no university
25:20
can withstand it's multi billionaire
25:23
donors and entire alumni base
25:25
freaking out at them on a consistent basis. Look
25:27
at how every single one of those Ivy League universities
25:30
you know, fired their presidents or whatever for
25:32
saying that the genocide against calling for the genocide
25:34
against the Jews is not a violation of the
25:37
student whatever harassment policy. They
25:39
all caved, right, they actually created more
25:42
speech codes on campus. So I
25:44
believe that in that effect is that there will be a epic
25:46
crackdown, and it's going to come soon.
25:48
I just don't see how it could possibly turn out
25:50
otherwise.
25:51
Well, and I think we've already seen the results
25:53
of the first waves of crackdowns.
25:56
I mean, we've now had arrest on multiple college
25:58
campuses, including a fact members
26:01
at NYU, and it has
26:03
only sparked a wider movement.
26:06
I mean, is poor gasoline on the fire
26:09
because other students who and
26:11
and by the way, sentiment on Columbia University
26:13
is also pulling the other day. It's
26:15
overwhelmingly in favor of what
26:18
these protesters support. Sure, so
26:22
the attempt to crack down, the arrest, the
26:24
media coverage, all of this has
26:27
only allowed
26:29
the movement to grow. So you
26:31
know, that's the other thing that's crazy to me,
26:33
is like they're acting like the Columbia University
26:35
president and is some great friend of these protesters,
26:38
and just like allowing them to run wild.
26:40
She suspended a whole bunch of them.
26:43
She called in the NYPD, who
26:45
again was like, these people are all one hundred percent
26:47
peaceful, But NYPD said that to
26:50
arrest one hundred of them, it's not
26:52
like there's been kid gloves here, okay.
26:55
So and what happened when she attempted
26:58
that, you know, hard fisted crackdown is a
27:00
huge backlash that just spawned even greater
27:02
protests, not only at Columbia, but even
27:05
further. I'm not going to claim that this isn't
27:07
going to have a negative impact on the
27:09
movement, because some people will see the clips
27:11
on a contest, they'll seep the media freak count, and
27:13
they'll be persuaded that, you know, some
27:16
number of these students or all of these students or.
27:18
Whatever are motivated by hatred.
27:21
Of Jews, in spite of the fact again that
27:23
there are so many Jewish students who
27:25
are involved with or actively organizing
27:27
these protests. It just makes me absolutely
27:30
crazy. But in terms of, you
27:32
know, the size of the protest movement, I think we're only seeing
27:34
it grow and expand the more that they try
27:36
to arrest, crackdown, suspend, etc.
27:42
Speaking of the media.
27:43
Piece, We've got a little compilation for you of
27:45
the way the media has bought into this the protests
27:47
or anti semitic line, hook
27:50
line and sinker. Let's take a listen
27:52
to a little bit of that.
27:53
By the way, they are both professors and
27:56
students within the university
27:58
who say things that I think
28:01
crossed the line, and there should
28:03
be accountability I believe
28:05
in free speech. Say whatever
28:07
you want, but pay the consequences
28:10
and don't have your face covered.
28:13
I don't think that should be allowed.
28:16
These are not protesters. These are violent
28:18
hate monitors.
28:19
The things that are coming out of the mouth burn down
28:21
Tel Aviv, tel Aviv genocide
28:24
October seventh. We did it once, We'll do it ten times.
28:26
We'll do one hundred times, We'll do it a thousand times, We'll do it
28:28
ten thousand times. This
28:31
is an atrocity. And I'm going to say
28:33
the quid put out loud. If there was any group
28:36
spewing hate and violence against
28:38
any other group Asians, Blacks, Hispanics,
28:42
gaze.
28:42
It would be shut down.
28:43
And this needs to be shut down immediately because and
28:45
once again those groups are back, those tenths
28:48
are back up, and this cannot go
28:50
unanswered.
28:51
It's very simple, and you know there's a continuum
28:54
of protesters.
28:55
There's a heinous, anti violent ones
28:57
that spewing hatreds, spewing death,
29:00
if you will, and then there's the less malignant
29:03
that say cease fire.
29:04
But even ceasefire doesn't
29:06
have the word piece in it.
29:08
Never do you hear the word piece because this
29:10
site doesn't want peace.
29:11
It wants a gihad.
29:12
And this is not propostinting, and this is anti
29:14
Israel, and anti Israel is a misnomer
29:17
because it's really anti jew.
29:19
And I'll even go further, it's not almost anti
29:21
Senmitism. It is anti Semitism.
29:24
And this is something that
29:26
is on display right now. But
29:28
the sort of roots
29:31
of this kind of devolving
29:34
from A to B go
29:36
back millennia. And this
29:39
is something the roots
29:41
of anti Semitism that pop up
29:44
in societies that frankly tend
29:47
to be a Canarian
29:49
the coal mine for a society
29:52
and democracy.
29:53
In this case that is in a lot of trouble.
29:55
Is I like to look
29:58
at this and replace Jews
30:00
with any other minority group here, and
30:03
what would the entire country be
30:05
doing?
30:05
They would be outraged, rightly.
30:07
So, So obviously, as you note, protest
30:09
is an important part of being an American. Free
30:12
speech is an important part of being an American.
30:15
Where is the line? For example, I've
30:17
seen video of somebody at the Gaza
30:19
Encampment at Columbia standing
30:21
up and talking about how great
30:24
October seventh Hamas attacks on Israel
30:26
was and calling the Hamas terrorists,
30:29
calling them freedom fighters. Is that hate
30:32
speech or is that protected free speech?
30:35
Where do you come down on that?
30:38
And that is believe it or not
30:41
as vile as it could be, because Hamas
30:43
should be destroyed from the
30:45
actions they did on October seventh and
30:47
other actions, But that does
30:50
not fall into a crime. If
30:52
someone makes a comment that
30:56
they want to join a terrorist organization,
30:58
that's going to come under investigation. But
31:01
the Commissioner of Legal
31:03
Matters at New York City Police Department is
31:05
going to really break this down
31:07
for New Yorkers.
31:09
Oh my god, there's a lot going on there
31:11
isn't there At least Eric Adams had
31:13
to inform Jake Taber like, yeah, that's
31:15
actually not illegal.
31:16
Well what did he say? May believe it, you
31:19
may not believe it.
31:20
But actually people can say things
31:22
even that are offensive, Like yeah, you're
31:25
a journalist, Jake Tapper, you don't know the
31:27
basics of the freaking First Amendment. Listen,
31:30
even if you say something incredibly
31:32
offensive, incredibly racist like
31:35
horrific. Know the clip he's talking about too,
31:37
which he mischaracterizes, but anyway, put
31:39
that aside. Even if it's as represented,
31:42
it's not even a borderline case.
31:44
It's not close. I
31:46
just listen, Donnie Deutschen there, His
31:49
was probably the worst.
31:50
It's in atrocity, a rally chant
31:52
that you don't like calling for ceasefire.
31:55
It's a atrocity, he says, because
31:58
it doesn't have the word peace in
32:00
it.
32:00
Are you I just?
32:03
And the erasure, the erasure
32:06
of all of the Jewish
32:08
students who are involved here
32:11
just makes me insane because
32:14
they keep conflating. They accuse these
32:16
protesters of doing it, but they're the ones doing it. Conflating
32:19
all Jewish people with the State
32:21
of Israel and the government of Israel and
32:24
their actions, that is
32:26
actually anti Semitic, okay, especially
32:29
when you have many, especially young
32:31
Jewish Americans, who are appalled
32:36
by the actions of this government and you
32:38
want to associate them with a government
32:40
that again is plausibly committing
32:43
a genocide in Gaza's strip. And
32:45
what impact do you think that's going to have If you force
32:47
every Jewish person to be conflated
32:50
with the State of Israel, that is not
32:52
condoning but predictably going to
32:54
lead to a rise in anti Semitism.
32:56
It's just makes me so insane.
32:58
And then Robert Kraft there at the beginning you
33:00
mentioned him before, Yeah, that's probably the
33:03
most consequential comments that we played.
33:05
Here's a billionaire donor, very.
33:07
Influential in Republican political circles
33:10
in particular, but political circles in general,
33:13
very influential at cub University because he's
33:15
given oodles of money, I don't know how much
33:17
to the school, saying he's pulling his
33:20
donations and he believes in
33:22
free.
33:22
Speech, but but not
33:25
when he disagrees with it, then he doesn't believe.
33:27
Part of what bugs me about a lot of this analysis
33:29
is it presumes that it's also okay. I
33:31
mean, look, maybe it's controversial, but you know, even
33:33
if white supremacists were on campus, as
33:35
long as it's not hurting anybody, it is free
33:37
speech.
33:40
To you, like the right like thing
33:42
being you know, being issued.
33:44
It was very controversial ACLU, and they sort of
33:46
like for each other apart. But that is
33:49
like, that is the foundations, even things
33:51
that are blatantly wrong, racist,
33:53
anti something like, even if they were, and that's
33:55
a mischaracterization of what's going on here. That's
33:58
when the First Amendment actually comes important.
34:01
When it's things that people agree, when they're comfortable
34:03
with them, you don't need it.
34:04
They're like, well, if they were saying the same thing about Jews
34:06
or a or about Asians or Blacks,
34:08
I'm like, well, you know, but I'm South Asian,
34:10
right or Indian? I guess the South Asian is a controversial
34:13
term. Here's a good example. If there
34:16
was a there's like seekh separatists who
34:18
are really big in America, and this drives
34:20
Indian people absolutely crazy, especially
34:22
the Indian government. And if there was
34:24
a seek protest whenever
34:26
I was going to college, you know.
34:28
What I would do. I would walk past and i would go
34:30
to the library and live.
34:31
My life because I'd be like, first of all, I'm born
34:33
here, I'm not from India. Second of all, I don't
34:35
give a shit about seek separatists.
34:38
But that's, you know, I guess more personal to me.
34:40
Let's like turn up the let's turn it up
34:42
even more. Let's say that there is a anti
34:45
what Like, there's a whole thing going on right now
34:47
with a title not nine or whatever with
34:50
the women's sports and trans and
34:52
all that, and there's even college athletes that
34:54
have been speaking out against that. If
34:56
there was a pro keep
34:58
women in women's sports rally on campus,
35:00
I'd be like, yeah, absolutely, you have to support
35:03
it, and I have no doubt also that all of these
35:05
other people would certainly also
35:08
they would call for a crackdown there, and they would think that that
35:10
is correct. So that's another thing where we have
35:13
to not buy Dana Bash and a lot
35:15
of the media framing here, which is they're like, imagine
35:17
if and RFK Junior said.
35:19
This too whenever he was here.
35:19
We were talking about the university presidents,
35:22
and he's like, imagine if they'd said that about blacks.
35:23
I'd be like, well, okay, I mean it's free country.
35:26
You know, I don't necessarily agree with it, but hey, like
35:28
you got to be allowed to be able to say whatever you want.
35:30
Let's not pretend like there aren't actual neo
35:32
Nazi protests that happen. They're like
35:35
sort of pathetic, you know, there was something that happened,
35:37
like in Florida. They're pathetic
35:40
and people find them disgusting, but the
35:42
White House isn't putting on a statement
35:44
on them. So I actually think it's all that should
35:46
either yea, No, I think it's
35:48
a polar opposite. Actually, I think there's much
35:51
more of a reaction to people,
35:53
you know, calling for divestment and
35:56
listen again, if you don't like the rally chance, that's fine.
35:59
You can be a friend of the rally chance, but you're
36:01
not. It's not violence, it's
36:03
not doesn't deserve the National Guard coming
36:05
in and a crack. It's non atrocity. You
36:07
want to see an atrocity, look at anything
36:10
coming out of the Gaza Strip every single day
36:12
if you want to know what an actual atrocity is.
36:15
So, since we aren't at
36:18
Columbia and neither are any
36:20
of those idiots that we just showed you opining
36:22
on what's happening there, thought we would bring you
36:25
a thread of someone who actually was
36:27
on the Columbia campus talking about what
36:29
they witnessed. So we can sort a little bit of fact
36:32
from fiction here on what's actually going on. Let's put
36:34
this up on the screen. So this is Alejandra
36:36
Ramos. She really works for the Today
36:39
Show. But she says, listen to my usual TVV is
36:41
food. But I'm also a current Columbia
36:43
student, and I'm so sad and so frustrated with
36:45
the way student protests on our campus are being reported.
36:48
This will be imperfect, but.
36:49
I can't watch things that are so contrary to
36:52
what I've actually seen and stay silent.
36:54
Go ahead to the next one.
36:55
I'm concerned by the reports broadcasting from outside
36:58
our campus gates with foot shot
37:00
almost entirely off campus. Look
37:02
closely at the videos. If there are
37:05
stores, subway stops, close gates
37:07
in the background, et cetera. This is not an
37:09
on campus protest. This context
37:12
matters. Continuing to the next one. Campus access
37:15
is limited to those of us with Columbia I d's. The
37:17
protesters on sidewalks, peaceful or otherwise,
37:19
are mostly those who are not allowed to enter.
37:22
Vile agitators screaming at students from
37:24
outside campus are not Columbia
37:26
students, and.
37:27
This must be made clear in reports.
37:29
Continue on reports that only show zoom
37:32
interviews with students sharing one perspective
37:34
feel irresponsible to me. How can you
37:36
report on protests without interviewing
37:38
a single protester? Why are
37:41
their voices being excluded when
37:43
there are so many of them willing
37:45
to speak? And of course we all know the answer
37:47
to that saga of why their voices are excluded by
37:49
the way, Emily and Ryan have an interview set for tomorrow
37:52
with one of the protest organizers at Columbia
37:55
who, apparently when Ryan
37:57
was in touch with her, she was busy buying the
38:01
items that they need for their passover
38:03
Sator dinner. So yeah, well know, there
38:06
you go, some real anti Sabitic stuff going on there,
38:08
that is it.
38:08
Yes, agreed, I think that we should hear it out.
38:10
I've done a lot of research, you know, I'm not necessarily
38:13
predisposed to be like loving these people. Everything
38:15
I have not found, you know, anything
38:17
I find like particularly all
38:19
that objectionable. And if you were to take a zoomed
38:22
out view of this, I would just say, like,
38:24
like you said, if you're offended by protest, chance,
38:26
that's fine, you know, grow up.
38:28
I don't know what to tell you.
38:29
I live in an area where I disagree with
38:31
like ninety five percent of my neighbors,
38:34
and it's annoying, you know, walking by those dumb ass
38:36
signs that are like in this house, we believe
38:38
racist, you know, whatever signs is real.
38:40
Et cetera.
38:41
I'm a bit bombarded with George Floyd's
38:43
face for the last four years, trans
38:45
flags and all this other nonsense.
38:47
Do I like it?
38:48
No?
38:48
But you know what, I just live. That's what you do.
38:50
That's like, That's why I don't understand why
38:53
it is so difficult to you know, live
38:55
in an area like that lady the Campbell Brown saying
38:57
that she literally thinks she's safer in Israel,
39:00
well then in the West Side. And you
39:02
know my other response, if you believe that, then
39:04
Leaf just leave, because honestly, if
39:06
you think that a country where you've evacuated
39:08
like two hundred thousand people of your population
39:10
from freaking rocket attacks and you're in the middle
39:12
of a war and you just had Iranian drones
39:15
come to your soil and where
39:17
they had to be shot down out of the sky by the US
39:19
military, if you think that is safer
39:22
than the United States of America, and you, honestly you
39:24
shouldn't be here.
39:25
That's my actual response to this.
39:26
I mean, it's so preposterous. Do you know I also
39:28
used to live on the Upper West Side. I lived in all
39:31
kinds of places in Manhattan. And do
39:34
you know how many like happy, successful
39:36
Jewish people there are. My daughter went to a JCC
39:38
preschool there.
39:39
Like it's just it's so delusional.
39:42
I don't even know what to say about it.
39:43
Like it's honestly, like the
39:46
desire to like this shy,
39:48
DIVIDI character, like the desire
39:52
to put himself in the center of this, the you
39:54
know, quest for this intense
39:56
victimhood. Again, you cannot like
39:58
what they're protesting, can you know, find
40:00
it? That's all fine, But you're.
40:02
A grown man like Deally.
40:05
You don't have anything else more important in your life
40:08
than not liking the rally chant
40:11
of these students who you're
40:13
there to teach.
40:13
I don't know, I don't know what to say about it.
40:15
Very stupid.
40:18
All right.
40:19
Let's move on to Donald Trump
40:21
the his trial opening statements.
40:23
All that stuff happened yesterday. Let's put this up on the
40:25
screen. We got a little bit of some of the synopsis.
40:28
Here is the New York Times opening
40:30
statements in Trump's criminal trial.
40:32
Five takeaways. Let me
40:34
read you a little bit of their report.
40:36
Remember there are no TV cameras a lot in the courtroom,
40:38
although they are releasing full transcripts
40:40
after the fact, which is appreciated anyway.
40:43
They write, the charges faced by mister Trump may sound
40:45
bland, falsifying business records doesn't
40:47
really set the heart racing, but the prosecution made clear
40:49
on Monday it plans on painting a much
40:51
broader picture. Matthew Colangelo,
40:54
prosecutor, laid down in his opening statement
40:56
a tale that touched on tabloid journalism, tawdry
40:58
affairs, covertly recorded phone
41:00
calls. Jurors will likely be told about
41:02
events inside fancy hotel rooms. Trump
41:04
towered even the Oval Office, and the stakes
41:07
the presidency. For the defense
41:09
side, mister Trump's lead lawyer, Todd Blanche,
41:12
used his opening statement to cast mister Trump's
41:14
actions leading to this case as run of the mill
41:16
business. Said, mister Trump is defending himself
41:18
at trial, just as any of us would do. He
41:21
argued the use of a non disclosure
41:23
agreement, the document that Stormy Daniels
41:25
signed after receiving the payment, was typical among
41:27
the wealthy and famous.
41:28
End quote nothing illegal.
41:30
He continued, there was nothing wrong with trying
41:32
to influence an election, adding it's called
41:34
democracy. He also in this was notable
41:37
and predicted, but aggressively
41:39
attacked mister Cohen. Michael Cohen, former
41:42
lawyer and fixer for mister Trump, said mister Cohen,
41:44
who pleaded guilty to federal campaign finance crimes
41:46
in twenty eighteen, was a criminal who can't be trusted.
41:49
At its Stormy Daniels was biased against
41:51
mister Trump and made a living off her story
41:53
about the sexual encounter and called the heart of
41:55
the prosecution case just thirty four
41:57
pieces of paper that don't involve
42:00
mister Trump. So you can see the you
42:02
know, they're both trying to tell his story right
42:05
in one story. This is an elaborate,
42:07
potentially election defining cover up,
42:10
you know, a criminal conspiracy where
42:13
there was a hush money payment that was made
42:15
in you know, under illicited circumstances. And the
42:17
crime they can get them on is these falsifying and business
42:19
records, basically lying about what the payments were for
42:22
in an attempt to hide from the American public. What
42:25
was going on the other side is saying,
42:27
listen, this is standard business. It was Yeah,
42:29
he was trying to win an election. That's not illegal, it's
42:31
not a crime. It's just what politicians do.
42:33
Nothing to see here, it's just you know, thirty
42:35
four business records.
42:37
No big deal. So and then also
42:39
the trying to undermine some of
42:41
the.
42:41
Key witnesses is going to be a key part of this
42:44
and Saga I mentioned this yesterday when
42:46
we talked about this. There's
42:48
an interaction in
42:50
particular between Michael Cohen and
42:53
Trump that Cohen claims occurred
42:56
in the White House and part of this is
42:58
you know, how much did Trump know?
42:59
How was he in all of this?
43:02
And that's a critical piece because
43:04
you know, if it's a he said, he said, and they can
43:06
really undermine the credibility of Michael Cohen.
43:09
You know, that's obviously going to be important
43:11
for their case. And obviously a lot of this also comes
43:13
down to the jurors and how unbiased they can
43:15
be and how they feel about Donald Trump and all of us.
43:17
Huge, Yeah, up to the jurors. Also up to
43:20
whether we believe Michael Cohen. We're going to get to mister
43:22
Cohen here in a little bit in terms of his own
43:24
credibility. And it also comes
43:26
to the felony interpretation, right about
43:28
how business records classify
43:31
under US law or under New York
43:33
law, and whether this was an intentional,
43:35
like vast criminal conspiracy in
43:38
addition to election interference.
43:40
We do have some video of Trump
43:43
who after the courtroom, where he spoke
43:45
to reporters. Let's take a listen.
43:47
But the point here is that the judge had no idea
43:51
what was happening. And this is the same judge
43:53
that two months ago made a ruling that
43:56
shook the world. It shook
43:59
the world everyone knows. Going to that
44:01
trail, I did nothing wrong, and over
44:03
here I did nothing wrong.
44:05
Also, this is a Biden witch
44:07
hunt to keep me off the
44:09
campaign trail.
44:11
Now, what are they going to look at comorans and what commerants
44:13
did, because that's bad stuff.
44:16
And what are they going to look at.
44:17
All the lies that Colin.
44:20
Did in the last trial.
44:21
He got caught lined in the last trial. So
44:24
he got caught lined, pure line.
44:27
And what are they going to look at that?
44:28
Okay, so that's what we've got. He's
44:31
going after Michael Cohen. But Crystal, Michael
44:33
Cole is not doing himself any favors. We're trying to
44:35
remain unbiased.
44:36
Is he not well?
44:37
Yesterday we reported on some.
44:41
Some liberal fans fiction.
44:45
About Trump's flatulence is
44:47
farting and passing out in court according to the
44:49
lips. Now, the sleeping part, I think is pretty well
44:52
sleeping big. That's real farting part unconfirmed,
44:55
we'll say so. Anyway, Cohen getting
44:57
in on the lib train with the
45:00
situation. Let's put this up on the screen. He
45:02
tweeted, Hey, von
45:05
shitz in pants, your attacks of me
45:07
stink of desperation. We are all
45:10
hoping that you take the stand in
45:12
your defense. So there you go, that's
45:14
the case.
45:15
Yeah, he's me.
45:15
And when you're trying to establish your creudit, I was gonna.
45:17
Say, you're trying to establish your
45:19
credibility and you are. Now you are a convicted
45:22
liar. This is the other thing that always tries to create
45:24
with Michael Cohen. Michael Cohen was one of the most craven
45:27
Trump sick of fans for years
45:30
until Trump screwed him and refused
45:33
to pay his legal bills. Right, and then he gets
45:35
convicted in court, okay, and then
45:37
he turns into some resistance liberal.
45:40
He met with Kanye West. I remember
45:42
at some point he's just been you know.
45:43
Writing books, just saw on the griff train ever
45:46
since he had to sign uh what ever,
45:48
since he served in federal prison. And now he the
45:51
reason he's acting this way is because his income
45:53
and his life depend on it, especially in the future
45:56
future MSNBC appearances. Just
45:58
so everybody knows, what's her name. Rachel matt was
46:00
actually in the court yesterday. I
46:03
mean, this is her superse This is literally her Super
46:05
Bowl.
46:06
Did you see the Michael Avenatti. Of course,
46:09
of course, now he's he's now he's back
46:11
on Trump's I mean it is. We
46:13
do have to comment though, on the cast of characters
46:16
that Donald Trump himself has surrounded
46:18
himself with, including Michael Cohen. So
46:22
okay, let's get to who they did actually
46:24
call. There was a very brief amount
46:27
of time. Apparently a juror had a medical issue
46:29
they had to deal with, so they called
46:31
the prosecution, called their first witness.
46:33
Put up what element is
46:36
that? The third one? Yeah, put
46:38
up this tear sheet from the Washington Post.
46:40
Who is David Packer, first witness and Trump
46:42
New York hush money case. This
46:45
is the guy who was the owner, is
46:47
the owner of the National Inquirer. And
46:50
he, you know, he's an interesting character.
46:53
Actually, just to hear what he has to say separate
46:55
and apart from this case is kind of kind
46:58
of interesting. He talked some of some
47:00
of the sort of trade secrets of the tabloid
47:03
business, talking about what he calls
47:05
checkbook journalism, meaning
47:07
you pay for stories, saying listen, anything over
47:10
ten k they had to get an official approval
47:12
from me, also saying listen, in this
47:14
business, I know that the only thing that matters
47:17
is the cover.
47:18
It's the front page. That's it.
47:20
That's the only thing that matters.
47:23
He testified for less than thirty minutes. But
47:25
you know this is a man. He's a former publisher
47:28
by the way of the National enquired just to get his title straight. He
47:31
has a lot to say about long time
47:33
interactions with Donald Trump, and this isn't
47:35
really disputed. They use this method
47:37
called quote unquote quote catch and kill,
47:40
where he would buy up a story that's
47:42
unflattering to Trump and then he would not run
47:44
it. So he did that in two instances that we know of.
47:47
One with the former Playboy models. Who's
47:49
Karen McDougall.
47:50
Who is that right?
47:51
And I got her name right right, No, that's right, Karen McDougal, who
47:54
claimed with some evidence that
47:57
she had an affair with Trump.
47:58
He bought that story, didn't run it.
48:00
And then this less credible
48:02
and I think not true story about a Dorman
48:04
and Trump Tower who claimed that someone
48:06
Trump had an affair with it was a mistress that had an abortion.
48:09
So both of those stories he killed.
48:11
The allegations are that they Stormy
48:14
Daniels came to him with this
48:16
story and she was asking too
48:18
much money. So rather than the National
48:21
Inquirer themselves doing
48:23
the catch and kill, they sent this alerted
48:25
Michael Cohen. He comes
48:28
into play arranging these payments, figuring out
48:30
how to do it in a way that's not going to be public.
48:33
And that's sort of the backstory
48:36
of this whole situation. So
48:38
in any case, David Pecker is
48:40
an interesting character and certainly has
48:42
some compelling information with regard to this case.
48:45
So it's not a huge.
48:46
Surprise that he would be the first individual
48:49
to take the stand on the prosecution's
48:51
behalf.
48:51
Yeah.
48:51
I mean it all comes back to the quote
48:54
unquote catch and kill scheme where
48:56
Pecker what is an American media
48:58
man.
48:58
I can't believe. I still even remember.
49:01
They go and they pay for the story, and they
49:03
keep it in their vault, and then it's a big question
49:06
about election interference. As you said, it's a question
49:08
also about whether this is legal, especially
49:11
to the extent about the way that Trump paid her paid
49:13
him. If Trump had just paid Michael
49:15
Cohen out of his own personal account, then none of
49:17
this would have been a story. But of course they
49:20
tried to write it off on some FEC thing
49:22
as an election expense. That then goes back
49:24
as to whether it was FEC fraud. That's eventually what
49:27
Michael Cohen pleads guilty to. Now, this
49:29
case goes to the question again of
49:31
falsifying business wrecords in New
49:34
York as a felony.
49:35
With the novel interpretation, the jurors
49:37
have to buy that to buy.
49:39
The felony falsification, they have
49:41
to buy the broader scheme that happened
49:43
as world trumpling.
49:44
The campaign finance piece in particular, I think,
49:46
is what's required.
49:47
For it to be a felony.
49:48
Right, So, and yeah, that is basically
49:51
Alvin Bragg is charging under
49:53
the theory that Trump committed a federal
49:56
felony crime, even though that
49:58
federal felony crime was never actually
50:00
prosecuted by the Feds. This is I believe,
50:03
and as we saw a little bit in the Trump defense, this
50:06
is going to also be a key part of creating
50:08
reasonable doubt.
50:09
As to why they should not vote to a quit.
50:11
And you know, the more I've been thinking about it, especially
50:13
with that one guy who said he admired Trump,
50:16
I think the likelihood of a hung jury in this is
50:18
a lot higher than people might have led on. Yeah,
50:20
just because of the novel interpretation that
50:22
you know the details, and you
50:24
really only got to convince one person that you're just going
50:26
a step too far, which is reasonable
50:29
enough in my opinion that you don't
50:31
get a conviction. So the more I've been looking and thinking
50:33
about it, I think Trump is a lot better shot here than people
50:35
might have given him a credible.
50:36
I think that's entirely possible.
50:38
You know, who knows what the jury is going
50:40
to find ultimately, but the campaign finance
50:43
piece is an important part of that, because what
50:46
the Trump team is likely to say is, like, listen,
50:48
this wasn't about hiding this from the American
50:50
public.
50:51
He didn't want his wife to know, right, you know, there were other
50:53
reasons.
50:54
Probably there are other reasons why he
50:56
didn't want this story to come to light, and it had
50:58
nothing to do with deceiving the American people. Now, you
51:00
know, is there are there conversations
51:03
that would test that would you know, be
51:05
a.
51:05
Testament to a different interpretation?
51:07
Are there, you know, conversations that he
51:09
had where he's directly saying like, we got
51:11
to keep this from the American people, And who cares what
51:14
Malania thinks? What sort of things
51:16
are going to come to light? We don't know, We don't know how
51:18
the jury's going to interpret any of this, so
51:21
we shall see. Let's put this last piece up on the screen.
51:23
One of the interesting things that David Packard
51:25
is very brief testimony
51:28
yes dreams expected to continue today, said
51:30
that he had two email accounts, one
51:33
for matters I didn't want my assistant
51:35
to see, which, again, is this kind of funny
51:37
insight into the way that he ran his
51:39
business.
51:40
And being a very interesting character at the heart
51:42
of this.
51:42
So there you go.
51:44
That's what we know thus far about the Trump
51:46
trial.
51:46
Keep everybody updated.
51:48
I know it can be boring, but it's one of those where
51:50
the details matter so much because of the implication
51:53
and who knows what.
51:54
Wild twists and turns, mister von Hitchens
51:58
that we will get out of it.
52:00
Yeah, nonetheless, we will at least get the diaper don
52:02
thing, which I was not aware of, and now I'm deeply
52:04
invested in in terms of conspiracy
52:07
theory. At
52:09
the same time, we don't want to take our eye off of RFK
52:12
Junior. There's been some major developments and a major
52:14
sign also that the Biden campaign certainly
52:17
sees him as a threat. They trotted
52:19
out all living Kennedy family
52:21
relatives who were willing to come
52:23
and endorse him.
52:24
Let's take a listen. My name is Joe Kennedy.
52:26
I'm Kerry Kennedy, Flory Kennedy, Kathin
52:28
Kennedy, Townsend.
52:29
Chris Kennedy, and I'm here to proudly endorse
52:32
Joe Biden.
52:33
Biden.
52:33
Joe Biden.
52:34
Our future is on the ballot in a way in
52:36
which we haven't seen in generations.
52:38
The only way to win this
52:40
selection is for everybody to go
52:42
out and vote for Joe Biden and come
52:45
alas.
52:46
What I think of modern politicians
52:48
in our country in this century. I
52:50
think Joe Biden is the RFK of
52:52
his generation.
52:53
Believes in democracy, believes
52:56
in human rights, believes in the
52:58
freedoms.
52:59
Is a president who embodies
53:02
the Kennedy legacy.
53:04
Oh my god, let me just say this.
53:06
He believes in the freedom scra Do you know how insulting
53:09
it is to RFK, the real
53:11
RFK, who is a great man and a great
53:13
politician, say that Joe Biden is.
53:16
The new RFK.
53:17
Whether his son is or not, that's up to him.
53:19
He still has to prove that. But RFK himself,
53:22
man, I think I used to at least have a
53:24
Yeah, there we go. Got Robert Kennedy in his Times. It's a
53:26
great book. I wish people would pick it up.
53:28
And that is just one of those which really bothers
53:30
me. But what is ironic about
53:33
this is that as the Biden campaign continues
53:35
to see RFK Junior as a threat,
53:37
there's actually a lot of polling now that has
53:40
come out to show that he may not necessarily
53:42
be just a problem for Joe Biden. Let's
53:45
put this up here on the screen. This is some new
53:47
data from NBC News.
53:49
They say how the race shifts in
53:51
a multi way field compared to a
53:53
binary choice. So what you guys can see
53:55
in front of you is that with the two named
53:58
candidates of Trump and Biden, that
54:00
you have Joe Biden at forty four, you have Trump
54:02
at forty six, and then you have ten percent who
54:04
are not sure, wouldn't vote and other
54:07
For five named candidates, you
54:09
have thirty nine percent for Biden, thirteen
54:12
percent for RFK Junior, thirty
54:14
seven percent for Trump. So obviously
54:16
that is a huge drop for
54:19
Trump from forty six to thirty seven.
54:22
Biden certainly does lose some, but
54:24
it appears that he's going to lose some of that four to
54:26
five percent Crystal, to Jill Stein and
54:28
to Cornell West and that RFK
54:30
Junior is actually pulling a
54:32
decent chunk of votes away from
54:34
the Trump campaign. It explains too why
54:36
Trump has been attacking RFK Junior recently.
54:39
But this is evidence I think that we you
54:42
know, this is the most evidence we've had so far
54:44
as a very high quality poll, just to demonstrate
54:46
that this very much could make
54:48
things a lot easier for Joe
54:51
Biden to win reelection. If
54:53
anything, we can think about it a little
54:55
bit. In the Ross perro Vane, you
54:58
know Bill Clinton, Yeah, he won
55:00
three hundred some electoral votes.
55:01
He only won forty two percent of the popular vote.
55:03
Okay, it was hw Bush and
55:06
Parrot that took the rest. Hw Bush
55:08
for the rest of his life basically refused
55:10
to say Ross Parrot's name. I think the closest
55:12
he came is he was like, He's like, I don't want
55:14
to like to say his name. I think it cost me the election.
55:16
And that was it.
55:17
I mean, he was bitter to the very very end,
55:20
and I mean maybe at a point I'm not really sure. But
55:22
my whole point is here is that just
55:24
with thirty nine percent for Joe Biden, If
55:27
RFK Junior is able to take away let's
55:29
say even within the margin of era, let's say ten percent
55:31
away from Trump, that's a disaster for
55:33
the Trump campaign.
55:34
So here's the breakdown of the numbers.
55:36
Specifically, if you take the Jill Stein and the
55:39
Cornell West effect out of the you know, instead
55:41
of the five gay ras, like, what happens with
55:43
just the RFK voters. So it's
55:46
fifteen percent of voters
55:48
who originally picked Trump when it's just Trump versus
55:50
Biden, fifteen percent
55:53
of them switched to Kennedy. When you
55:55
give them that option with Biden,
55:57
it's only seven percent who originally
55:59
picked Biden if it's just head to head Biden Trump
56:02
who switched to Kennedy. So fifteen percent
56:04
for Trump versus seven percent for
56:06
Biden. And then they
56:09
underscore something that I've been saying for a little
56:11
while here, which is that Republican voters
56:13
just have a much higher favorability
56:15
for RFK Junior than Democratic voters
56:17
do. So you've got among Republican
56:20
voters forty percent positive
56:23
and fifteen percent negative, so really
56:25
highly net positive for Kennedy among
56:27
Republican voters.
56:28
Democratic voters is.
56:30
Polar opposite only sixteen percent
56:32
have a positive rating of him versus
56:35
fifty three percent who have a negative
56:37
rating. Now, listen, other polls
56:40
have shown the opposite effect. So
56:42
I think it's very unclear at this point
56:44
because at the end of the day, he's
56:46
still a Kennedy. And also the other
56:48
dynamic is Trump supporters
56:51
tend to be more enthusiastic and more
56:53
locked in than Biden's supporters,
56:55
so there may be more disaffected
56:58
Biden voters for r K Junior to
57:00
pick up than Trump voters. But
57:02
it is I mean, this is something I originally
57:05
when RFK got in all of the theorizing
57:08
was like, no, he's definitely going to hurt Trump. Then it's sort
57:10
of switched to now it's definitely going to hurt Biden.
57:13
And I think it's unclear.
57:15
But if I had to say today, I think this is more of
57:17
a problem for Trump because you just can't
57:19
deny that there's this overwhelming negative
57:22
view of him among Democratic
57:25
voters.
57:26
And you also still have
57:29
think about the way our politics works.
57:31
I mean, everything is so centered around Trump and how you feel
57:33
about Trump and how Trump feels about you.
57:34
Et cetera. And he's gone after RFK Junior
57:36
a bit, but more on policy. The vibes
57:38
are like, I like him. I think it's better than Biden.
57:41
You said, So he's getting the friendly
57:43
treatment from Trump, he's getting the aggressively
57:46
negative treatment from the Democratic Party, and
57:48
I think that sends a signal to a lot of voters
57:50
of like which side he's more aligned
57:52
with. I mean, it shouldn't be that way, but that's just
57:54
the reality.
57:55
Good point negative polarization, Yeah, the biggest
57:57
driving forces in US politics exactly.
57:59
So in any case, it's interesting.
58:01
I think it's still unsettled, but I am
58:03
increasingly see There's a Wall Street Journal poll
58:05
that also showed RFK Junior taking
58:08
more from Trump than from Biden, which
58:10
begs an interesting question of why it is then that
58:12
the Biden campaign is like so much more freaked down
58:14
about him apparently than the Trump campaign.
58:16
Let's put this up there on the screen too.
58:18
For ballot access wise, we're seeing a big,
58:20
big development for RFK Junior. They
58:23
a campaign announced on Thursday
58:25
that they have gained ballot access in Michigan
58:28
for the twenty twenty four election. Obviously Michigan
58:31
key battleground state there both for Trump and for Biden.
58:33
Trump wanted by about ten thousand in
58:35
twenty sixteen. In twenty twenty,
58:37
Biden one, but not by actually an overwhelming
58:40
majority. There have been some issues there that
58:42
we cover, you know, thankfully we did in Rhage
58:44
and your focus group in Michigan, and we showed you that
58:46
there is some real support there on the ground.
58:49
Obviously, there's also a big Arab American contingent.
58:51
To voters that are in Michigan, are they
58:53
going to show up and are they going to vote for Biden?
58:56
All of these are completely unknown questions.
58:58
But the big picture is that he is
59:01
gaining ballot access slowly, but surely.
59:03
Let's go to the next one, please, because this also
59:06
demonstrates where because of some
59:09
of the money that they've got now, they're
59:11
able to at least contest some of these
59:13
challenges from the courts
59:15
to his ballot access. So, for example,
59:17
Hawaii's state Democratic Party, think
59:20
about that has sought to disqualify
59:23
We the People Party, which was formed
59:25
specifically to get RFK Junior
59:28
on the ballot. The state Democratic Party,
59:30
according to the order
59:33
from the Office of Elections late Friday in Hawaii,
59:35
said that the Democratic Party failed to meet
59:37
its burden of proof to boot the
59:39
Kennedy Party from the ballot.
59:42
So, as they say here too, while Hawaii's
59:44
four electoral votes are not likely to be consequential,
59:47
this is this victory, first victory
59:49
against challenges and assigns
59:52
to that keeping the independent off the ballot will
59:54
not be as easy as Democrats
59:57
have been thinking that it would be, and as
59:59
they plan to do this across
1:00:02
the entire nation. So this was a trial balloon.
1:00:04
But where they're really going to be gunning for him is
1:00:07
Michigan. If he does get Pennsylvania,
1:00:09
if he gets Georgia and California,
1:00:12
any of these places where he could either eat into the popular
1:00:14
vote or actually eat into the electoral college.
1:00:17
It's sort of.
1:00:17
Adorable the account of how this went down
1:00:20
because they didn't the
1:00:22
RFK junior team didn't actually have a
1:00:24
lawyer who was involved in these hearings. They
1:00:26
just had like whoever they're you
1:00:29
know, the like mom who's volunteering for their
1:00:31
campaign on the ground in Hawaii was
1:00:33
there. And in spite of the fact that you know,
1:00:35
the Democratic Party, they had their lawyers whoever,
1:00:37
you know, well paid, well trained, et cetera.
1:00:40
And she was still able to prevail in this
1:00:42
court in spite of the fact that Judge had to keep kind
1:00:44
of, you know, explaining how this works
1:00:46
and when she could speak in what sort
1:00:49
of objection she could make, et cetera, et cetera. But
1:00:51
ultimately they found there was really no merit to
1:00:53
the case that the Democratic Party was trying to
1:00:55
pursue against RFK Junior.
1:00:57
Again, I just find it.
1:00:58
I just find it really interesting that it's the Democrats
1:01:00
who are so panicked about the idea of having
1:01:04
RFK Junior in the race when it's really
1:01:06
unclear who he's going to take more from, and so
1:01:08
it's like, okay, well, rather than fixating on trying
1:01:11
to crush this person, kick
1:01:14
them off, the ballots offer voters any
1:01:16
sort of other choice. I feel like, you
1:01:18
know, in many ways, I don't really feel like RFK Junior
1:01:20
is a choice, because they were all the same on a number
1:01:22
of topics, but I won't put that aside for a moment. But rather
1:01:25
than actually appealing to voters, their instinct
1:01:27
is always just to like make
1:01:29
it so that people can't have any choice. There
1:01:32
was a really interesting I don't know if you guys saw
1:01:34
this on Twitter yesterday.
1:01:35
It was just so perfect. Did you see this.
1:01:37
Hillary Clinton tweet or this Nagan unto
1:01:39
your time, Oh was just too perfect. So she
1:01:41
tweeted out this chart. It was about climate
1:01:44
change, and it showed
1:01:46
under Trump the CO
1:01:49
two emissions, under Biden
1:01:52
the CO two emissions, and then what
1:01:54
the target level that Biden himself set, not even
1:01:56
like the bigger like European standards or whatever that
1:01:58
Biden himself set, And it showed Biden
1:02:01
wildly missing his own target that
1:02:03
he met, but being slightly better
1:02:06
than the Trump line. And she tweeted
1:02:08
that out and was like, here's what's on
1:02:10
the line.
1:02:11
This is why you got to vote Democrat.
1:02:12
And it's like this is just too perfect,
1:02:15
Like you tweeted out a chart showing that you're
1:02:17
honestly a little bit better than Trump, but
1:02:20
still not even coming.
1:02:21
Close to actually dealing with the issue. And
1:02:23
it's just it's such a perfect
1:02:25
encapsulation. Do you have what did she actually say?
1:02:28
I have it here in front of me yet, which she said, what's at stake
1:02:30
for our climate in this November's election?
1:02:31
Absolutely absolutely everything.
1:02:33
I'm blind the Biden line, the target.
1:02:34
Absolutely everything. But he's still not going to do enough
1:02:37
to actually like meet even the dumb
1:02:39
about this too is that modest target that
1:02:41
he himself said.
1:02:42
But here's the thing. There was also a pandemic.
1:02:44
You know, there was a massive drop in CO two
1:02:46
emissions and some of this is also so this
1:02:48
doesn't even reflective of policy.
1:02:50
It doesn't make it. This is what a stupid graphic
1:02:53
on so many levels. Yes, but isn't
1:02:55
it.
1:02:55
I just it's such a just pitch
1:02:58
perfect capsulation.
1:03:00
If you the climate, then yeah, that
1:03:02
makes sense.
1:03:03
Yeah, it's like, oh, okay, Biden's
1:03:05
going to be moderately better, but we're still going to all,
1:03:07
you know, die in the climate apocalypse because absolutely
1:03:10
everything is on the line.
1:03:11
Great, good to know, good to know if.
1:03:13
You accept that framing, Yes, I could see why
1:03:16
exactly that would be a problem. They're also let's
1:03:18
put this up there on the screen. Some news
1:03:21
from the Kennedy campaign. Nicole
1:03:23
Shanahan donated who is the
1:03:25
VP candidate for Urka Junior donated
1:03:27
two million dollars to
1:03:30
the campaign the day after that
1:03:32
she was named to the ticket. So on March
1:03:35
twenty seventh in the state of Nevada,
1:03:37
two million dollars literally just on
1:03:39
the day that she was named the VP. And
1:03:42
of course she's probably got hundreds of millions
1:03:44
of dollars at her disposal. This is going
1:03:46
to finance both ballot access to initiatives
1:03:48
and court challenges in the future
1:03:50
should they arise, and are is definitely
1:03:53
going to be a major asset
1:03:55
to the Kennedy campaign going forward. So I
1:03:57
think things are looking up for ourk Junior's campaign right
1:03:59
now in terms of the ballot access. I mean Michigan
1:04:02
alone, that's huge, just just as that
1:04:05
state have it right exactly, that state
1:04:07
could decide the entire election. If
1:04:09
he just gets Georgia, Arizona, Pennsylvania,
1:04:12
then that's it.
1:04:12
You know.
1:04:13
Now we're truly in the ballgame, and I think
1:04:15
some Democrats are starting to take notice. You know, we've been watching
1:04:17
some of the activists and others go after him.
1:04:19
But I'm very interested to see how it all
1:04:21
turns out. Let's
1:04:25
move on to the next part. This is the story been dying to
1:04:27
cover now for quite a long time, and now Joe Biden
1:04:29
is ignited an international incident after
1:04:32
President Biden has now been making
1:04:34
the rounds recently telling a terrible
1:04:37
tale. The tale is of his uncle,
1:04:39
and his uncle was on board a
1:04:41
US military aircraft. It was after
1:04:44
D Day his uncle went down
1:04:47
in Papua New Guinea while
1:04:49
fighting in the Pacific Campaign. His
1:04:51
plane crashed in this terrible incident,
1:04:54
and he was eventually eaten by
1:04:56
cannibals. This is the story according
1:04:58
to Biden, and then we'll tell you what actually happened.
1:05:01
And my uncle, they called
1:05:03
him Ambrose Brosie, they called him my
1:05:06
uncle Bosey. It's a hell of an athlete,
1:05:08
they tell me. When he was a kid, and
1:05:11
he became an Army Air Corps before
1:05:13
the Air Force came along. He's those
1:05:15
single engine planes as
1:05:17
reconnaissance over war
1:05:19
zones. He got shot down
1:05:22
in New Guinea and
1:05:24
they never found the body because there used to
1:05:26
be a lot of cannibals, for real,
1:05:29
in that part of New Guinea.
1:05:30
As President Biden saying he was shot
1:05:33
down, there's no evidence of that. And why
1:05:35
is he saying that his uncle was eaten by
1:05:37
cannibals. That is a bad way to go.
1:05:40
He lost his life.
1:05:41
It's not look, I'm not we should
1:05:43
not make jokes about it. I
1:05:47
mean your last line, it's
1:05:50
for a laugh. It's for a
1:05:52
funny, a funny statement. And he
1:05:55
takes us very seriously. His uncle, who served
1:05:58
and protected this country lost
1:06:00
his life serving and that should
1:06:02
matter.
1:06:03
Yeah, I agree, it should matter. And the details
1:06:05
of that should matter too. And let's
1:06:07
put this up there on the screen. It turns out
1:06:09
that basically none of that that Biden
1:06:12
said was true. President Biden,
1:06:14
it turns out was talking about
1:06:17
his uncle, Second Lieutenant Ambrose
1:06:19
J. Finnegan Junior now Finnigan,
1:06:22
who was the brother of Biden's mother,
1:06:25
according to Biden, got shot down over New
1:06:27
Guinea. However, the US government record
1:06:29
of the crash, says of the missing
1:06:32
service members, does not attribute Finnegan's
1:06:34
death to hostile actions or even
1:06:36
indicate Cannibal's were any factor.
1:06:39
According to US military records and
1:06:41
the Pentagon's MIA Accounting Agency,
1:06:44
he died on May fourteenth, nineteen
1:06:46
forty four, while he was a passenger on
1:06:48
an Army Air Force plane quote that for
1:06:51
unknown reasons, was forced
1:06:53
to ditch in the Pacific Ocean off
1:06:55
the northern coast of New Guinea.
1:06:57
Quote.
1:06:57
Both engines failed at low altitude aircraft
1:07:00
nos hit the water hard. Three men failed
1:07:02
to emerge from the sinking wreck and were lost in
1:07:04
the crash, according to a survivor
1:07:08
of the crash itself. The
1:07:10
agency also said Finnegan was a passenger
1:07:12
on that plane when it was lost. Quote, he
1:07:15
has not been associated with any remains
1:07:17
ever recovered from the area after the war and
1:07:20
is still accounted for. So again, he
1:07:22
didn't go over and he didn't go down
1:07:26
on New Guinea. He went down near New Guinea,
1:07:29
lost his life in a tragic accident. It appears
1:07:32
not due to hostile enemy
1:07:34
actions. Doesn't erase the man's service at all.
1:07:36
It took a lot of courage to fly on board
1:07:38
some of these aircraft in the Second World War. If
1:07:41
anybody wants to go watch Masters of the Air and see
1:07:43
exactly what it was like up there.
1:07:44
It was a total nightmare. So I'm not a racing his man's
1:07:46
service at all.
1:07:47
But I do think it's actually pretty despicable
1:07:50
that you would invent some horrible
1:07:52
death, you know, for political purposes
1:07:54
of your uncle who tragically
1:07:57
died in the Second World War.
1:07:59
And so this is either like a family tale
1:08:01
gone awry, very.
1:08:02
Possible, or just straight up Biden embellishment
1:08:05
for the sake of embellishment. And the
1:08:07
funny part is it has now caused international
1:08:10
incident. Let's put this up there on the screen.
1:08:12
The leader of Papua New Guinea quote
1:08:14
takes offense after Biden implies
1:08:17
that his uncle was eaten by cannibals.
1:08:19
The Prime Minister quote accused
1:08:21
Joe Biden of disparaging the island by
1:08:23
implying that the uncle was eaten by cannibals during
1:08:25
World War II. Biden's comments
1:08:27
now have offended a key strategic ally
1:08:30
in the South Pacific, and the
1:08:32
Prime Minister said in a statement that he appeared
1:08:35
to his imply his uncle was eaten by
1:08:37
cannibals, and his remarks may have been a slip of
1:08:39
the tongue. However, my country does not deserve to be
1:08:41
labeled as such. And you know what he's
1:08:43
right now, is true that they're cannibals
1:08:45
or whatever on Papua New Guinea. Yes, there have been
1:08:48
some documented instances and all that, but in this particular,
1:08:50
in this particular instance, Biden's straight
1:08:52
up wrong. According to the US government itself.
1:08:54
Yes, he goes on to say, perhaps
1:08:57
he says the remains of World War two like scattered
1:08:59
all over, including the plane that carried
1:09:01
President Biden's uncle. Perhaps, given President Biden's
1:09:03
comments and the strong reaction from
1:09:06
PNG and other parts of the world, it's time for the USA to
1:09:08
find as many remains of World War two and P and
1:09:10
G as possible, including those of servicemen
1:09:12
who lost their lives. Like Ambrose Finnegan,
1:09:14
The theaters of war in PNGG and Solomon
1:09:17
Islands are many and littered with the remains
1:09:19
of World War Two, including human remains, plane wrecked
1:09:21
shipwrecks, tunnels, and bombs. Are people daily
1:09:23
live with the fear of being killed
1:09:26
by detonated bombs of World War Two.
1:09:28
So he really touched a nerve
1:09:30
with these stupid, fake cannibal
1:09:33
comments. This is a corn
1:09:35
pop level Joe Biden's story, Like
1:09:38
it really has it all. You've got the like
1:09:41
you know, old man low key
1:09:43
or even high key racism, the
1:09:46
you know, just like why would you There's
1:09:48
so many stories that he makes up that you're like, why would
1:09:50
you even make that up? What
1:09:53
is going through your mind that you think that this somehow serves
1:09:55
you in this moment? And then the fact
1:09:57
that he just accidentally, through his
1:10:00
verbal cannibal diarrhea, stumbles
1:10:02
into some like international
1:10:05
diplomatic conflict. It's this is just
1:10:07
Joe Biden perfection, absolute
1:10:10
perfection. Here by the way, for what
1:10:13
it's worth, I looked into the whole cannibal situation
1:10:16
New Guinea at that time, and yes, you're
1:10:18
right, documented instances, but as
1:10:20
scholars immediately reacted, they're like, people
1:10:23
weren't just eating random guys
1:10:25
who fell from the sky.
1:10:26
There was as part of a funeral ritual.
1:10:29
There was some ritual. Can in that context,
1:10:32
It's not like everyone's just.
1:10:33
Going around eating people all the time. Just so people
1:10:36
out there know what the reality is of what was going
1:10:38
on.
1:10:38
Oh, thank you, Ristal.
1:10:39
Yeah, what is a Jared Diamond
1:10:41
is a great expert on Papua New Guinea. If you ever want
1:10:43
to go watch some of his videos on the
1:10:46
subject. There are some interesting there are some actually
1:10:48
interesting survival tales of World
1:10:51
War II planes that went down on Papua
1:10:53
New Guinea. But it is certainly not involving any
1:10:55
family members of Joseph Robin Ed Biden.
1:10:58
There you go, invidible.
1:10:59
Now, we would you remiss though, if we didn't at least tie
1:11:01
some politics into this. Let's put this up there on
1:11:03
the screen. What do we find that a
1:11:06
Harvard poll of young voters says
1:11:08
that Biden has a
1:11:11
lead with Trump, but just nine percent
1:11:13
of the country. Nine percent of these young voters
1:11:16
think that the country is moving in the
1:11:18
right direction. So despite the fact that
1:11:21
everything is going down, Biden does have that lead
1:11:23
over Donald Trump. This is according to registered voters,
1:11:25
with younger voters showing Biden pulling
1:11:28
a fifty percent support over thirty
1:11:30
years or younger compared to Trump's thirty seven percent,
1:11:32
But just nine percent say that the country is
1:11:34
quote generally headed in the wrong direction,
1:11:37
and a full sixty percent say that the country.
1:11:39
Is on the wrong track. There are some though
1:11:42
troubling findings though, Crystal inside the poll for
1:11:44
Biden on the topic of Israel.
1:11:46
Well, there's a number of interesting and difficult
1:11:48
findings in this poll for Biden, including
1:11:50
yes, he has a lead over Trump, but
1:11:53
it is not as large as his lead was
1:11:55
last time, so that matters. There's
1:11:57
also a tremendous gender gap. His
1:12:00
lead among young men is just six points.
1:12:02
Among young women, his lead is thirty three points.
1:12:04
There's some graphs you should take a look at that show
1:12:08
you know at the same time that young
1:12:10
men, in terms of their political preferences,
1:12:12
although not in terms of some of their issue support,
1:12:15
but are becoming more conservative.
1:12:16
Young women are becoming more liberal.
1:12:17
Something we've talked about before that shows
1:12:20
up in this poll, which is a very interesting
1:12:22
phenomenon. His lead overall
1:12:24
among eighteen to twenty four year old
1:12:27
So if you're looking at the youngest part of this
1:12:29
poll demographic is fourteen points,
1:12:31
and among the twenty five to twenty nine year old,
1:12:33
so the somewhat older ones, it's actually larger twenty
1:12:36
six points. So younger Americans,
1:12:38
the eighteen to twenty four are actually you know, I
1:12:40
mean, they're still favoring him by fourteen points, but
1:12:43
the gap is a little more and narrow, which is interesting as
1:12:45
well, in contrary to previous trends
1:12:48
and dynamics where young voters are getting like more and
1:12:50
more and more democratic, progressive, whatever,
1:12:53
huge gap in terms of college students
1:12:56
and college graduates versus the
1:12:58
races even among young people
1:13:01
who are not in college and who don't have a
1:13:03
four year degree. But you're right
1:13:05
to the point about Israel. I mean, there's
1:13:07
just like massive overwhelming support
1:13:10
for a ceasefire, including among every
1:13:12
demographic group that they test, including among young
1:13:15
Republicans. So it was across
1:13:17
the board, massive support for a ceasefire.
1:13:20
And then if you dig into his approval
1:13:22
rating by issue, the issue
1:13:24
on which he gets the lowest approval rating
1:13:27
of everything is what they
1:13:29
describe as the Israel Hamas.
1:13:30
War at just eighteen percent.
1:13:33
Wow, So a lot of warning signs
1:13:35
for him with regard to how
1:13:37
young voters are feeling about him, what direction
1:13:39
politically they're moving, what issues
1:13:41
they're prioritizing, and certainly how they're viewing
1:13:44
his unconditional support for Israel.
1:13:46
At this time.
1:13:47
Yeah, I think that it's a key point. We have talked
1:13:49
a lot about the gender divide and the
1:13:51
breakup. I mean, I think that's the barstool phenomenon.
1:13:54
I'm also very intrigued exactly by
1:13:56
what you pointed out about the tie between people who
1:13:58
didn't go to college. That is the education
1:14:01
phenomenon which is showing itself there.
1:14:03
So we continue to see where the I mean,
1:14:05
actually they're both bi directional, because whether
1:14:08
you are a woman or not is highly determinative
1:14:10
these days of whether you're going to college, as opposed
1:14:12
to if you're a man. They're a likelihood if you go into
1:14:14
college is a lot lower today than
1:14:16
it was in the past.
1:14:17
We're getting to a two to one.
1:14:19
Ratio very soon on some major college
1:14:21
campuses, so that will heavily inform our
1:14:23
politics and the economy, which.
1:14:24
We'll get to.
1:14:25
It's worth looking at the poll if you guys have time,
1:14:27
because there's some interesting questions they asked to to
1:14:29
try to get it, like how young people feel about
1:14:31
different gender dynamics. And they ask them questions
1:14:33
like, you know, do you agree with the statement
1:14:35
these days people are just too soft?
1:14:38
Or another one was
1:14:40
Another one was these days women
1:14:42
are too promiscuous.
1:14:45
Most people disagree.
1:14:46
I think too statist one tells
1:14:48
us that women are not that promiscuous anymore.
1:14:50
That's true according to.
1:14:51
Do Well, and most people disagree with that statement.
1:14:53
By the way, Republicans agreed with it the most.
1:14:56
On the too soft one, I think Republicans overwhelmingly
1:14:58
Young Republicans overwhelm agreed with that.
1:15:00
So anyway, they asked some interesting stuff that's worth
1:15:02
it.
1:15:03
I do agree people are too soft, but it's not it's
1:15:05
not a youth phenomenon. But that's a whole lot.
1:15:07
I think some of these people complaining about
1:15:09
college protesters are definitely too soft.
1:15:11
How about it.
1:15:12
I was going to say, that's exactly what I meant.
1:15:13
I think our elites are actually the ones who were softer
1:15:16
than anybody else.
1:15:17
Yeah, all right, let's go ahead and move
1:15:19
on to some very serious topics
1:15:21
with regard to Israel. Put this first report up on the
1:15:23
screen, and so we're still trying to figure out, you
1:15:25
know, what the hell happened with Iran,
1:15:28
what's likely to have in the future with Iran,
1:15:30
how this all unfolded.
1:15:31
New York Times has a report.
1:15:33
Take it with a grain of salt because it's frankly very
1:15:36
flattering to the Biden administration.
1:15:38
So good to keep that in mind.
1:15:39
But the headline here is Israel planned a
1:15:42
bigger attack on Iran, but scaled it back
1:15:44
to avoid war. The strike on Iran on Friday
1:15:46
was originally intended to be much broader in scope, but after
1:15:48
intense pressure from allies, Biden
1:15:50
being one of the key people that they talk about here,
1:15:53
Israeli leaders agreed to ratchet
1:15:55
it down. The story they tell for
1:15:58
what it's worth, and soagram interested to hear your read
1:16:00
on this is that basically, you know,
1:16:03
the Israelis are trying to sell this line
1:16:05
that they had no idea Ron would be so upset
1:16:07
over us bombing your embassy and
1:16:10
taking out your top military commanders.
1:16:12
That's bullshit.
1:16:12
There is no way, these people didn't know that
1:16:15
this was a big deal and a massive escalation.
1:16:17
Okay.
1:16:18
So then the Iranian retaliatory
1:16:21
attack, while it caused next to no damage
1:16:23
because all of the everything was
1:16:25
effectively shot down with very few things
1:16:28
that actually got through, it was
1:16:30
in its breadth much
1:16:32
larger than originally anticipated.
1:16:35
Again according to this article, and so
1:16:37
immediately afterwards, the war
1:16:39
cabinet had planned a much more aggressive
1:16:42
response and one that they
1:16:44
had planned to do like basically instantaneously.
1:16:47
And then the report says Bbe talked
1:16:50
to Biden and he was kind of talked down from
1:16:52
immediately doing that, put some time, and then did
1:16:54
the more limited strike which allowed
1:16:56
iron to save enough face to sort of it
1:16:58
appears back away from the conflict, although you
1:17:01
know, we're taking some of the fallout here because
1:17:03
our troops are now once again, our service members in
1:17:05
the region are now once again under fire
1:17:07
from you know, Irani and affiliated
1:17:10
proxy groups. So in any
1:17:12
case, this is the story that The New York Times has
1:17:14
to tell that President Biden was hero here and talked
1:17:17
Israel out of making the situation,
1:17:19
which was already incredibly dangerous, even
1:17:21
worse than it already is.
1:17:23
Yeah, what we can actually see also
1:17:25
is that they talked about this quote
1:17:27
huge offensive operation that
1:17:30
was going to be carried out again. Also
1:17:33
if the Iranian strike had materialized.
1:17:35
Initially, they actually believe somehow
1:17:38
that Iran had planned to attack with a swarm
1:17:40
of large drones up to ten ballistic
1:17:42
missiles. There Israeli and military
1:17:45
leaders that all agreed on a massive counter
1:17:47
strike. Some of this was eventually paired
1:17:50
back by the US. But I would note a couple
1:17:52
of things here. So it does turn out that we do have some influence
1:17:54
with these folks whenever we want to use it whenever
1:17:57
it comes to Iran. But second, also
1:18:00
under estimate the war mongering
1:18:03
like nature of a lot of the people inside
1:18:05
the military establishment inside
1:18:07
and political establishment inside of Israel. They
1:18:09
were ready basically to push the red button
1:18:12
and drag the entire world into a world
1:18:14
war. It's only because America tried
1:18:16
to push it back down a little bit and got them to do what
1:18:19
they want to do that we have somewhat of a release
1:18:21
vout. But don't be so sure that we'll be in control
1:18:23
there in the future. This is a very very dangerous
1:18:26
situation.
1:18:26
To me.
1:18:27
This lends credence to the report we brought you yesterday
1:18:29
that was from an Israeli TV
1:18:32
outlet that Biden was basically
1:18:35
like, all right, fine, you can do
1:18:37
your Rafa invasion if you
1:18:39
do a more limited attack on Iran.
1:18:42
If this report is true, I think it fits together
1:18:45
with like, so what did Biden say in that conversation
1:18:47
that.
1:18:47
Really persuaded babe? And
1:18:50
you know that was I guess the leverage
1:18:53
rather.
1:18:53
Than withholding weapons or doing ane of the things
1:18:55
we want him to do and study, He's like, how about I
1:18:57
sacrificed the Palestinians in Rafa, and
1:18:59
you know you feel good about that, and then you can do this more
1:19:01
limited strike.
1:19:03
So to me, that seems to be the picture
1:19:05
that's coming into focus.
1:19:07
So we covered yesterday there's already
1:19:09
been some strikes in Rafa, two
1:19:11
strikes that killed twenty two people eighteen
1:19:13
children, three women and
1:19:16
one man, including one of the women was pregnant.
1:19:18
They had to cut the baby from rebelly. Thank god
1:19:20
they were actually able to save this premature
1:19:23
infant. But that's the
1:19:25
picture of what's going on there. We also have some important
1:19:29
Israeli domestic political
1:19:31
news.
1:19:31
Let's put this up on the screen.
1:19:32
So the head of Israel's military intelligence
1:19:35
has actually resigned over
1:19:37
failures in anticipating and planning
1:19:39
for the October seventh attack, he
1:19:43
said. Major General Heron Haliva
1:19:45
said in his resignation letter that he took responsibility
1:19:48
for the military intelligence failings that preceded
1:19:50
Himas's attack, which is widely regardless of worst
1:19:52
security failure in the Jewish State's seventy six
1:19:54
year history. He also called for an
1:19:57
official investigation to be
1:19:59
carried And they say
1:20:01
that this departure is quote widely
1:20:03
expected to be followed by further resignations
1:20:06
among Israel's military intelligence leadership,
1:20:08
with several other senior officials having admitted
1:20:10
failings in the run up to Hamas's attack,
1:20:13
and it's also expected Sager to increase
1:20:15
some pressure on Netanyahu himself
1:20:18
to admit some mistakes
1:20:21
or launch this long anticipated
1:20:23
investigation into what the hell went wrong
1:20:25
in anticipated October seven because I don't
1:20:27
know if you guys remember these details, but multiple
1:20:31
confirmed reports at this point have come out saying,
1:20:33
yeah, they saw them planning, they
1:20:36
actually had the attack plans and were
1:20:38
just like, and they're not going to do it. We don't
1:20:40
think they're going to do anything. So and you
1:20:43
know, specifically with regard to BB and his coalition.
1:20:45
They had moved some of the IDF
1:20:48
units that were would have been in
1:20:50
that nearby the Gaza Strip part of Israel
1:20:54
to protect these you know, settler maniacs
1:20:56
in the West Bank to you know, Appeace
1:20:59
Ben Gavir and his people. And
1:21:01
so that's part of why not only they
1:21:04
fail to anticipate, but then the response
1:21:06
was horrible. It took hours and hours
1:21:09
for you know, many of these people
1:21:11
inno sence who were being slaughtered to have any
1:21:14
official help.
1:21:15
Yeah, it is especially ironic
1:21:17
because this means now that Bibi Netanyahu
1:21:20
is now the only member of these really military
1:21:22
establishment who was there on October seventh
1:21:24
who has not taken responsibility for them, and instead
1:21:27
he is actually sailing to re
1:21:29
establishing his power. I mean, you have
1:21:31
to in some ways just respect the cravenness
1:21:34
of the man and how good of a politician
1:21:36
he is. As you said, already polls are showing
1:21:38
some people are like, yeah, you know, it was definitely
1:21:40
bad, but he moved past it, and so you
1:21:43
know, we'll rescue him maybe. And the other
1:21:45
side they have few points, but
1:21:47
he's been working with them by and large
1:21:49
and so maybe we'll keep him. Actually, and that's exactly
1:21:52
what dragging yourself into a bigger
1:21:54
war despite a massive disaster was
1:21:56
meant to do in the first place,
1:21:59
which is, you know, pretty astounding.
1:22:01
And I do do think it is genuinely disgusting
1:22:04
that in their democratic society
1:22:06
and all that which they like to brag about all the time,
1:22:08
the person at the top who was genuinely
1:22:11
responsible at a very deep political level
1:22:13
and military level, has not had
1:22:15
any accountability, while the underlings,
1:22:18
who sure they definitely have some don't nearly
1:22:20
as much as he does have have been
1:22:22
allowed to take the fall.
1:22:23
It's not right.
1:22:24
The other thing is his whole thing
1:22:26
was mister security. His whole
1:22:28
thing was vote for me and I'll keep you safe.
1:22:31
Like your core thesis
1:22:33
about how to achieve that was completely
1:22:36
wrong, and you were sleep at the switch and you
1:22:38
are out there on the record multiple times
1:22:40
talking about how you need to support Hamas and
1:22:43
the you know, it's clear the ideology. We need
1:22:45
to make sure we have this talking point of there's no
1:22:47
partner for peace there. We can't possibly work with a mass.
1:22:49
We need to keep the West Bank and the Gaza Strip divided.
1:22:52
We can control the level of the flame quote unquote,
1:22:54
we can go in and quote unquote mow the grass from time
1:22:57
to time. That ideology
1:22:59
was a comp leet failure when it comes to his
1:23:02
core promise to the electorate being
1:23:05
a you know, a security
1:23:07
prime minister keeping them safe. That was
1:23:09
the core promise. And so the fact
1:23:12
that he's he keeps swishing it up, and that's
1:23:14
why the war for
1:23:16
him politically had to continue,
1:23:19
is because he's said,
1:23:21
listen, once this is over, then of course
1:23:24
we're going to ask all the hard questions. There's going to
1:23:26
be accountability, we're going to look into this, etc.
1:23:29
And so part of the motivation to keep
1:23:31
this thing going is because you postpone
1:23:33
indefinitely that reckoning.
1:23:36
Hope memories fade, Hope people feel different,
1:23:38
Hope you can bring them some sort of you know,
1:23:40
quote unquote victory that they find satisfactory,
1:23:43
that they forgive and forget the failures leading up
1:23:45
to October seventh. That's the game he's playing, and
1:23:47
so far, frankly, he's played it with regards
1:23:49
to his really domestic population very
1:23:52
well and also played Joe Biden
1:23:54
and the US political class like a
1:23:56
fiddle as well.
1:23:57
Very true.
1:23:58
All right, let's get into the very latest
1:24:00
atrocities discovered in the Gaza
1:24:02
Strip. So you'll recall there was an all
1:24:04
out assault on the city of Communis.
1:24:07
Now where people are finally returning to that city
1:24:10
and we're getting a sense of what the hell happened there.
1:24:12
The devastation, annihilation is just, I mean,
1:24:14
there are no words for it. And the latest discoveries
1:24:17
are some of the most horrifying I've seen. You put
1:24:19
this up on the screen. You've had multiple mass
1:24:21
graves now now uncovered by
1:24:23
the Gaza Civil Defense Agency in
1:24:26
Communis. They're
1:24:28
saying, and you know, mainstream media
1:24:30
outlets are by and large not able to get in the Gaza Strip,
1:24:32
but they're confirming the best way they can that you've
1:24:34
had somewhere around two hundred and eighty three
1:24:37
bodies, hundreds
1:24:40
of bodies discovered
1:24:42
decomposing in these mass
1:24:45
graves. One of them was
1:24:47
one of the large ones, was by NASA Hospital.
1:24:51
It's known that there was intense fighting,
1:24:54
shelling, bombing, all the rest in
1:24:56
and around that hospital.
1:25:00
We're seeing the horrors here. Reports
1:25:02
are.
1:25:02
This includes you know, not just men, but
1:25:05
women, the elderly, wounded, young people
1:25:07
with hospital tags still on their arms children.
1:25:11
Just an absolutely horrifying scene. CNN
1:25:14
had a report they had a stringer who
1:25:16
was able to visit the scene on Sunday. They
1:25:19
said that some people had buried their
1:25:21
family members around the grounds
1:25:23
of the hospital in January as a temporary
1:25:26
measure, and then when they returned
1:25:28
after the Israeli withdrawal, they found the bodies had
1:25:30
been exhumed, apparently because the IDF was using
1:25:32
DNA testing to determine whether any of the hostages
1:25:35
held and Gaza were among the dead, and then they
1:25:37
were dumped in these collective graves,
1:25:40
is what they're saying.
1:25:41
So just an absolute horror
1:25:43
here.
1:25:43
And you know, the other piece of this is
1:25:46
there's like a little bit of mainstream discussion
1:25:48
about this, but the New York
1:25:50
Times in particular, how many stories
1:25:53
did they do yesterday about like college protesters
1:25:55
and whatever.
1:25:56
This was nowhere
1:25:59
to be found.
1:26:00
I've got three in front of me right now, actually
1:26:02
on the front page page.
1:26:04
Ironically, Let's see what they just didn't
1:26:06
even cover, mass grave with hundreds
1:26:08
of bodies.
1:26:10
Not worthy of coverage.
1:26:11
Let's put the next one up there on the screen too, because this actually
1:26:13
highlights another important thing that you were talking about.
1:26:16
There was if we were all recall a
1:26:18
UN review
1:26:21
where they say Israel has yet
1:26:23
to provide evidence that the staffers
1:26:26
are actually terror group members. This
1:26:28
was important because this was why the US
1:26:30
and several other nations ended up pulling
1:26:33
funding from the organization, and
1:26:35
it significantly disrupted a lot of the aid
1:26:38
that was going into the Gaza strip. But Crystal
1:26:40
now several months later, you know, they
1:26:42
have not been able to provide any
1:26:44
evidence, both to the United States, to the UN,
1:26:47
and to any other large body with
1:26:49
evidence that they had initially claimed in
1:26:52
a so called dossiated news organizations
1:26:54
that have been able to actually.
1:26:55
Be backed up.
1:26:57
The UN oversight body that did look into
1:26:59
the allegations within their found you
1:27:01
know what was it like twelve instances or something
1:27:04
like that, but the vast majority of their staff were not
1:27:06
involved, and the Israelis have been able unable
1:27:08
to provide widespread evidence in the organization
1:27:11
itself.
1:27:12
To my knowledge, there was no confirmation
1:27:14
even if those twelve that was what the Israelis
1:27:17
had claimed. They still this is
1:27:19
months later, right, and this is after UNRA
1:27:21
was defunded by some sixteen different countries.
1:27:23
Now many of those have come back in but
1:27:26
the US has since passed legislation saying
1:27:28
UNRAS to be defunded at least until
1:27:30
twenty twenty five, the number one aid
1:27:32
organization on the ground, as we pretend
1:27:35
to care about Palestinians starving
1:27:38
in the Gaza strip. So no,
1:27:40
they haven't provided any evidence about
1:27:43
the twelve. They certainly didn't provide They made this much
1:27:45
broader claim of like, oh, there's hundreds of Hamas
1:27:47
affiliated people in UNRA.
1:27:50
They provided no evidence for any of this. The
1:27:52
unreinvestigation has been unable. And by
1:27:55
the way, this was led by a
1:27:57
former French foreign minister. Led
1:28:01
this what they call a neutrality
1:28:03
review after Israel alleged
1:28:05
that twelve UNRAS staff took part in October
1:28:08
seventh. So it wasn't like,
1:28:10
you know, an UNRESK staffer, which the Israeli
1:28:12
is a smirit As being like basically Hamas.
1:28:14
It was this attempt to bring in an independent.
1:28:17
Third party who could look at the allegations in a
1:28:19
serious way. And you'll recall
1:28:21
also so immediately fired
1:28:23
the twelve people just based on these allegations,
1:28:26
which frankly seems unfair at this point
1:28:28
given that there is a proof to back it up, and
1:28:31
the US immediately just
1:28:33
based on the allegation was with no proof,
1:28:36
and we saw the thing that was being shopped, the
1:28:39
dossier that was being shopped, and that mainstream
1:28:41
news antlets like the Wall Street Journal just you know,
1:28:43
printed like a press release effectively
1:28:46
with no evidence. So in
1:28:49
any case, that's we immediately
1:28:51
the US immediately. This was right after the ICJ
1:28:54
said it's plausible committing genocide. On that very
1:28:56
same day, we defund UNRA, helping to
1:28:58
further that plausible
1:29:00
genocide.
1:29:01
And now here we are.
1:29:03
Months later, this report will barely
1:29:05
be it won't even be remarked upon by
1:29:07
the most of the American media
1:29:09
or political class. It'll just like the
1:29:12
many other investigations that we're always
1:29:14
waiting for the results of, you know, this will
1:29:16
barely see the light of day.
1:29:17
So that's where we are.
1:29:19
I wanted to update you all on something that's
1:29:21
unfolding that I think could be very significant.
1:29:24
There is an AID flotilla that
1:29:27
is attempting to leave from Turkey
1:29:29
Medea. Benjamin of Code Pink is among the individuals
1:29:32
who is on that AID flotilla.
1:29:34
They're attempting to break the blockade
1:29:37
of Gaza. This isn't the first time that a
1:29:39
similar flotilla of aid has attempted to
1:29:42
reach the Gaza strip.
1:29:43
More on that in a moment.
1:29:44
Actually interviewed Medea before she
1:29:46
left over on Crystal Colin Friends
1:29:48
about their goals.
1:29:49
Let's take a listen to that.
1:29:51
I am going on a ship that we want to go to
1:29:53
Gaza. I don't know if we're going to mention.
1:29:55
That, well, I was on sure if it's public yet, well, yes,
1:29:58
we can.
1:29:58
Talk about that, which is part
1:30:00
of the Freedom Flotilla. And
1:30:03
this is a tradition that
1:30:05
in the beginning, when it first started, actually
1:30:08
a couple of times the boats landed
1:30:11
in Gaza. But then after that the Israelis
1:30:13
stopped the boats from going, and in twenty
1:30:15
ten they actually landed with by
1:30:20
air on the boat and killed ten
1:30:22
of the people on board.
1:30:23
I remember that the Lavi Marmara.
1:30:25
So this year very
1:30:28
soon, actually we will be leaving
1:30:31
very very soon, and there
1:30:34
are many hundreds of us, and we
1:30:36
represent people from thirty different countries
1:30:39
and we will be bringing many
1:30:41
many tons of humanitarian
1:30:43
goods to Gaza and
1:30:46
trying to make it by chip, and
1:30:49
of course we hope that we will make it. We are
1:30:51
prepared if we don't
1:30:53
make it. I mean, we were totally nonviolent. We
1:30:56
hope that the Israelis don't come on board
1:30:58
and start shooting people, but
1:31:00
we are determined to go because we
1:31:02
have to show that a
1:31:04
couple of things. One, the Israelis
1:31:07
are not letting in humanitarian aid. They
1:31:09
are and they should not be the ones
1:31:11
to inspect this AID. We've had other
1:31:14
inspectors and they will come and inspect
1:31:16
our boats, but not the Israelis because
1:31:19
they use any excuse to stop
1:31:21
the AID from going in, and they don't
1:31:23
have the legitimacy to be the ones
1:31:25
to inspect that AID. And we want to show
1:31:28
that Gaza should
1:31:31
have the ability to use
1:31:33
their ports, to use they
1:31:35
did have an airport, you know, until the Israelis
1:31:38
bombed it, and to be
1:31:40
able to come in and out by land. And that's why
1:31:42
there is a siege on Gaza. And there
1:31:44
was a sea John Gaza way before October
1:31:47
seventh, and so we think it's important
1:31:49
to try to break the siege of Gaza.
1:31:51
So she refers to the fact that in twenty
1:31:54
ten, the same group free to and Floatilla
1:31:56
is sort of a coalition of groups. They
1:31:58
attempted us similar you know, aid
1:32:01
mission with similar flotilla,
1:32:03
and the IDEA raided
1:32:06
the boat and killed ten people. Yeah,
1:32:08
that was massive, massive
1:32:10
diplomatic crisis. Let's put this up on the screen from
1:32:12
the Washington Post with a few details
1:32:14
here they say Gaza Aid flotilla plans to challenge
1:32:17
Israeli blockade.
1:32:18
The organizers say.
1:32:19
They say they're preparing to sail from Turkey in the coming
1:32:22
days on a mission aimed at breaching Israel's naval
1:32:24
blockade and highlighting the lack of aid reaching
1:32:26
Palestinians in the besieged enclave.
1:32:28
They go on to say the flotilla is well traveled route the
1:32:30
Mediterranean has gained new relevance during the current
1:32:32
conflict, as governments and relief organizations like
1:32:35
turn to sea deliveries to circumvent
1:32:37
what aid groups say is Israel's persistent
1:32:39
obstruction of deliveries to.
1:32:41
Gaza over land.
1:32:42
And Sagar I was able to get in touch with Medea
1:32:45
yesterday and she said, I can you know, share
1:32:47
this publicly because I was asking, you know, how are things
1:32:49
going, what's the update, how are things looking? And she says it
1:32:52
seems the US, Israel and Germany are
1:32:54
pressuring, pressuring Turkey's Artawan
1:32:57
not to allow the ships to leave Istanbul. We
1:32:59
hear the Deputy director for counter terrorism
1:33:02
from the State Department is here to talk about
1:33:04
this, but there's a lot of grassroots pressure in the
1:33:06
opposite direction, given that millions of people in
1:33:08
Turkey donated money for this mission. We'll see
1:33:10
what happens tomorrow, as we're supposed to leave
1:33:12
on Wednesdays. So this
1:33:15
could be potentially very significant because
1:33:17
it could really put the US if they're
1:33:19
allowed to leave Turkey, which apparently is an if,
1:33:22
could really put the US in a very difficult spot
1:33:24
here.
1:33:24
Yeah, that's why we're flagging into everybody, just because
1:33:26
we're aware of how crazy the last one
1:33:29
went and it caused a major stand up. I remember
1:33:31
that very vividly at the time. That was a huge news
1:33:33
story and it took over absolutely. It almost
1:33:35
broke diplomatic relations to turn into a
1:33:38
whole thing. So if this one is allowed to go through
1:33:40
or you know which air Towan, it certainly would be in
1:33:42
his political interest to do so. It's not as
1:33:44
if though the US wouldn't be trying to pressure it behind
1:33:47
the scenes to dr block it as well. But if
1:33:49
they find their way over there, everybody tune in because
1:33:52
that is going to be a standoff for you
1:33:54
know, for the ages.
1:33:55
I certainly believe, so yeah, absolutely,
1:34:00
let's move on.
1:34:01
Final thing, Crystal appeared on the
1:34:03
Piers what is it called Piers Morgan uncensored?
1:34:06
Is that what it is?
1:34:06
Okay, Beer's Moregan uncensored
1:34:08
And there were some fiery exchanges.
1:34:11
One gentleman in particular on the panel just wouldn't
1:34:14
shut up. But we did cut some of the highlight
1:34:16
reels to the extent that we were able to pull some. Let's
1:34:18
take a liston.
1:34:19
I mean, I can listen.
1:34:21
I believe fundamentally in the right to
1:34:24
free democratic protest. I mean it's
1:34:26
the bedrock of any free democratic
1:34:29
country, but I don't believe in
1:34:32
violent hate rhetoric. And if
1:34:34
you're a Jewish student at one of these colleges
1:34:37
hearing some of these chants, which we're all
1:34:39
hearing, it's pretty terrifying.
1:34:41
Isn't it.
1:34:43
Well here's what I would say.
1:34:44
First of all, I go wajahat and saying
1:34:46
I'm glad that both of our two co panelists
1:34:49
are okay, and I
1:34:51
certainly support the call for justice
1:34:54
for Joseph, and I hope his assailant
1:34:56
is in fact apprehended and accountability
1:34:58
is meted out. It's disgusting
1:35:00
and frankly a cheap trick to use
1:35:03
some isolated incidents to smear
1:35:05
an entire protest movement.
1:35:07
And I think it's very clear what's going on here. You
1:35:09
know, a majority of young people and a majority
1:35:12
of college students, majority of Biden voters
1:35:14
believe that Israel is committing a genocide and
1:35:17
that American taxpayer dollars are going
1:35:19
to assist in that genocide. They're outraged
1:35:21
by that, and they're protesting. And by the way,
1:35:24
the one.
1:35:27
On Jews
1:35:31
and you are clearly
1:35:34
you must and
1:35:37
Jews, am I going to be allowed.
1:35:38
To be here?
1:35:39
Am I going to be allowed to speak here?
1:35:41
Okay?
1:35:41
So a majority of.
1:35:45
Israel is committing a genocide and they
1:35:47
are protesting that. And by
1:35:50
the way, they've won the argument. If
1:35:52
you look at now, it's sixty forty against
1:35:55
sending military aid to Israel. It's
1:35:57
a majority that disapprove in America
1:35:59
of Israel's action with regards to the Gaza
1:36:02
strip. So it's a cheap
1:36:04
trick as old as time, use a few isolated
1:36:06
incidents to try to smear an entire
1:36:09
movement. Which has the benefit number one of
1:36:11
attempting to delegitimize it and number
1:36:13
two of distracting from the continued
1:36:15
atrocities which are unfolding
1:36:17
at the hands of the IDF in the Gaza strip.
1:36:20
So this is listen.
1:36:21
I condemn anti Semitism. I certainly
1:36:24
condemn violence. But
1:36:26
let's be serious about who the villains
1:36:29
are.
1:36:30
Right now, would you agree
1:36:32
that Hamas are the.
1:36:35
Hang on? I've asked a question. Would you agree?
1:36:38
Of course the villains terrorists,
1:36:41
and so is the Israeli government given
1:36:43
the number of civilians that they have intentionally targeted
1:36:46
and killed, including targeting with a
1:36:48
complete siege which has triggered
1:36:50
a famine. So, first of all, intefada
1:36:52
means uprising from the river to the sea.
1:36:55
Somehow, when it's you know, Benjamin Nan
1:36:57
Yahoo using that phraseology,
1:37:00
you're holding up a map that literally shows Israel.
1:37:02
From the river to the sea. Can
1:37:07
you please, dude, just for a
1:37:09
second, okay.
1:37:13
Calling you.
1:37:19
So listen, it's a lot there. I
1:37:21
don't really know that man is too
1:37:24
much.
1:37:24
That is did not shut up the entire
1:37:27
It was not just me, it was everyone,
1:37:30
including peers. Peers are trying to ask
1:37:32
me a question. You wouldn't even shut up to let the host
1:37:34
ask a question. It was such a waste of time, to be
1:37:36
honest with you, like that that you
1:37:38
saw there. It was a freaking forty minute
1:37:41
segment. That was the most I was
1:37:43
able to get in because this man was
1:37:45
just ranting and raving the entire time.
1:37:48
I was like, what are we doing here? What is
1:37:50
the point of this? And the point is just a circus, that's
1:37:52
it.
1:37:52
Yeah.
1:37:52
I mean, look, no, no shade
1:37:55
Peers, but I have feel like
1:37:57
that is just continuing the
1:38:00
what we saw there is exactly the issue
1:38:02
I've had with a lot of the clips that I've seen go viral
1:38:05
from his show, and that's I exactly
1:38:08
even told all the people when I moderated
1:38:10
at zero Hedge debate, I was like, look, guys,
1:38:12
I think everyone there had been on Peers or had
1:38:14
participated in something similar, and I was like, we're
1:38:16
not doing that here.
1:38:17
I was like, we're not screaming over each other.
1:38:19
And it does require I mean, in the future,
1:38:22
what I would recommend to them is, and I wish i'd had
1:38:24
this too, you should be able to cut people's bike they're doing
1:38:26
something, because there's just a nightmare otherwise
1:38:28
and it just destroys the entire discussion
1:38:30
absolutely super annoying. Yeah, it
1:38:32
makes it difficult on your part. It
1:38:34
makes it difficult, you know, even for the other people. What Jahad
1:38:37
and others who proticipated, it's like, hey man, this
1:38:39
takes time out of people's day, Like you got to make this actually
1:38:41
worth not just our while, but there's
1:38:43
an actual audience that is out there. They're
1:38:45
the ones who this is supposed to be to their
1:38:48
benefit. That is also lost in some of this too.
1:38:50
The other woman who was there said
1:38:52
all kinds of things that I wildly
1:38:55
disagree with, but he could
1:38:57
have had an exchange that was
1:38:59
much more more interesting than just this man
1:39:02
like ranting incoherently.
1:39:04
Right.
1:39:04
It was anyway, like I said before,
1:39:07
it made me very grateful for this
1:39:10
me. I always asked myself when I get asked
1:39:12
to do these things, like you know, go on peer short
1:39:14
show or whatever, I'm like, you know, do
1:39:17
I not want to do it just because it's like I'm my conference
1:39:19
zones, it's got to be confrontational whatever,
1:39:22
Like am I just being like a baby and that's why I don't
1:39:24
feel like doing it? Or is it like is there
1:39:26
a legitimate reason, and this was
1:39:28
a reminder that there are at least some legitimate
1:39:30
reasons. Although I do blame myself
1:39:33
in part because I made the very
1:39:35
rookie move of agreeing
1:39:38
before I knew who the other panelists
1:39:40
were going to be.
1:39:41
I knew the topic, yeah, but I
1:39:43
didn't know who I was going to be on with.
1:39:46
And next time, if there is a next time,
1:39:48
that I will not make that mistake again.
1:39:50
Although the other thing they'll do is.
1:39:52
You know, I don't know specifically in Peers, but people
1:39:54
will they'll like switch out guests and so
1:39:56
there's no sties.
1:39:57
Look, I had two hours to moderate Israel debate
1:39:59
before people, and it wasn't enough time.
1:40:01
You guys had what twenty minutes something like that. Yeah,
1:40:03
it's just it just it's not possible. In general, I
1:40:05
feel like four people is two. It is
1:40:07
way too get two people who are solid
1:40:10
and can really like get into it. And to
1:40:12
me, it's much more interesting because the
1:40:15
minute you add all these voices, you're just asking
1:40:17
for this chaos, circus
1:40:20
carnival atmosphere, and it becomes
1:40:22
very difficult to drill down on a point because
1:40:25
if you are trying to do a good job modering, make sure you
1:40:27
spread the time around, like you know, by giving
1:40:29
people equal time, it means that if you've got two
1:40:31
people are really going in on something, they're
1:40:33
going to be cut short too. So anyway, whatever
1:40:35
it is, it is what it is.
1:40:37
Thank you to Peers for having me on.
1:40:39
I do appreciate the opportunity and trying to be ungrateful
1:40:41
here and I you know, there
1:40:44
is an irony though to the fact that his show,
1:40:46
I guess is called Piers Morgan uncensertain He's
1:40:48
on there like let's censor these college kids.
1:40:52
Speaking. It does see a lot of that very different in.
1:40:54
The UK, which Kim's fairness, Yeah,
1:40:56
very true.
1:40:57
He definitely found that.
1:40:58
I mean, so it's funny because to me, I will
1:41:00
never forget Peers because of that whole gun control thing
1:41:02
back in twenty thirteen. Whenever
1:41:04
he's seeing the show is canceled because that is
1:41:06
when his like UK conservatism mashed
1:41:09
up against America and it did
1:41:11
not work out well.
1:41:12
And listen, he should give himself more credit
1:41:14
because he has been one of the big platforms
1:41:17
for pro Palestinian activists
1:41:20
that aren't allowed on a lot of other channels,
1:41:22
and so he has genuinely had
1:41:25
a platform that has been open to
1:41:28
free speech, so you know, don't
1:41:30
get squeamish about it when it's you know, things
1:41:32
that make people uncomfortable that's subject
1:41:35
to right now, just a total like unhinged
1:41:38
moral panic that.
1:41:39
Is really disconnected.
1:41:41
I think we've seen from reports on the ground, from
1:41:43
the reality of what's unfolding up these college campuses.
1:41:46
True what I would say, all right.
1:41:47
Thank you guys so much for watching.
1:41:48
Become a Premium member if you can, and look
1:41:50
out for tomorrow Ryan and Emiley You're gonna have a great counterpoint
1:41:53
show.
1:41:53
We will see you all on Thursday.
1:42:21
Keep Keep.
1:43:06
Shop,
1:43:53
ShopKeep
1:45:04
shut, Keep.
1:45:11
It shut
1:45:29
with
1:45:51
Shot
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More