0:00

Hey, it's me Blippi and

0:02

this is my best friend,

0:04

Mika. Hi, I'm Mika and

0:07

this is our brand new

0:09

podcast, Blippi and Mika's Road

0:11

Trip. The Blippi

0:13

Mobile will take us to

0:16

amazing places. And we'll meet

0:18

new friends along the way. Listen to

0:20

Blippi and Mika's Road Trip Podcast on

0:23

the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts,

0:25

or wherever you get your

0:27

podcasts. The

0:31

Big Take from Bloomberg News brings you what's

0:33

shaping the world's economies with the smartest

0:35

and best informed business reporters around the

0:38

world. We cover

0:40

the stories behind what's moving money in markets

0:44

and help you understand what's happening, what it

0:46

means, and why it matters every

0:48

afternoon. I'm

0:50

Sarah Holder. I'm Saleh Emosin. And

0:53

I'm David Gurrah. Listen to The Big Take

0:55

on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever

0:57

you get your podcasts. I'm

1:01

Saleh Emosin. And I've covered economic policy

1:03

for years and reported on how it

1:05

impacts people across the United States. In

1:08

2016, I saw how voters were leaning

1:11

towards Trump and how so many Americans

1:13

felt misunderstood by Washington. So I started

1:15

The Big Take DC. We dig into

1:17

how money, politics, and power shape government

1:20

and the consequences for voters. With new

1:22

episodes every Thursday, you can listen to

1:24

The Big Take DC on the iHeartRadio

1:26

app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get

1:29

your podcasts. Hey guys,

1:31

ready or not, 2024 is here and we

1:33

here at Breaking Points are already thinking of

1:36

ways we can up our game for this

1:38

critical election. We rely on our premium subs

1:40

to expand coverage, upgrade the studio, add staff,

1:42

give you guys the best independent coverage that

1:44

is possible. If you like what we're all

1:46

about, it just means the absolute world to

1:48

have your support. But enough with that, let's

1:50

get to the show. Good

1:55

morning, everybody. Happy Thursday. We have an amazing show for

1:57

everybody today. What do we have for us, Stahl? Indeed

1:59

we do. Many things percolating here

2:01

in Washington DC. We're going to start off by

2:03

taking a look at this gigantic foreign

2:05

aid package They are trying to

2:08

shove down all of our throats the

2:10

very latest and what its prospects are

2:12

for passage or failure Just really great

2:14

stuff there We also have new developments

2:17

in terms of the political fallout in

2:19

Arizona specifically over that 1800s

2:21

era abortion ban how Republicans are reacting to

2:24

it the chances that that changes the Senate

2:26

prospects a lot going on there We've

2:28

got a new report that details

2:30

torture of Palestinian detainees and how

2:32

the US is responding to that

2:35

We also have some blockbuster testimony

2:38

Yesterday in two separate hearings

2:40

from Boeing whistleblowers who are

2:42

making some stunning and frankly

2:44

Purifying allegations against that company

2:46

so a break back down

2:48

for you've also have some

2:50

big news at Volkswagen Once

2:53

again workers are voting on whether or not they

2:55

want to join the UAW This

2:57

could be a huge deal in terms

2:59

of unionizing foreign automakers in the United

3:02

States and UAW seems to feel pretty

3:04

good About how it's gonna go

3:06

this time around so break that down for you Stunning

3:09

developments also with Bob Menendez you remember

3:11

he's been indicted for some pretty wild

3:13

corruption allegations involving gold bars And many

3:15

other things or getting a sneak peek

3:18

at what his plan defense

3:20

is and basically he's gonna throw his

3:22

own wife under the best Really

3:25

just dumb. We're in the

3:27

crime guy. They're really really great

3:29

guy. They're unbelievable And

3:32

we've got a first look at some of

3:34

the jurors who have been selected in that

3:36

hush money trial up in New York City

3:38

And yeah, I mean it's just interesting to

3:40

think about how anyone in this country at

3:42

this point Could be unbiased

3:45

about Donald Trump. I don't envy them

3:47

this task that is set before them But you know,

3:49

we'll take a look at who they are and what

3:52

that may indicate about how this trial is gonna

3:54

go for them Yes, that's right. We will get into

3:56

all of that before we get to that though Thank

3:58

you to everybody who's been subscribing to the show. We

4:00

finally got to show off our nice gold plaque, our

4:02

1 million plaque. So instead of

4:05

the normal pitch, how about this? Why don't

4:07

you guys help us grow our YouTube channel,

4:09

subscribe to the show. If you're listening to

4:11

this on the podcast, one of the best

4:13

things that you can do is give us

4:15

a five-star review or send an episode, one

4:17

of your favorite episodes, to a friend. That's

4:19

one of the best, word of mouth, it's

4:21

the best advertising that exists. We don't spend

4:23

a dollar on that. Or if you can

4:25

help us out, breakingpoints.com. And by the way,

4:27

thanks to everybody who checked out Sagar's moderation.

4:30

I was in the big debate last night, I was, it was fun. Tried

4:32

my best. You did a great job. It's not an

4:34

easy task with so many people. That's

4:37

a lot of people. It's a lot of people.

4:39

And all of them, the personalities and all of

4:41

that. You did an excellent job, being neutral and

4:44

controlling things and keeping it more or less.

4:46

We streamed it on our channel. It was

4:48

a zero hedge debate on Israel. It was

4:50

Dave Smith, Cenk Uygur versus Dennis Prager and

4:52

Bacha, or I can never say her phone.

4:54

On Gar-Sargan. I'm gonna go with Bacha. All

4:56

right, Bacha. Anyway, so you can watch it.

4:58

We have it streamed on our channel. I

5:00

think we may release it as a podcast,

5:03

maybe. Any reflections? Well,

5:05

I'll tell you what. It was interesting.

5:07

I thought that the exchanges were, the

5:09

real thing that I took away from

5:11

it is that sometimes, even when

5:13

we're quote unquote debating, is that even

5:15

trying to define the clarity of the

5:17

terms was very, very difficult because the

5:19

resolution was about how Israel should respond

5:22

after October 7th. And I actually

5:24

thought one of the key differences was that Dave

5:26

and Cenk, I mean, they're not defined just by

5:28

October 7th. They were trying to go to the

5:30

bigger picture. Bigger contact. Where they were talking about

5:33

occupation. They were talking about Gaza. They were talking

5:35

about the formation of Israel, about what the future

5:37

needs to look like, peace deal. Whereas the other

5:39

two were not as engaged on that question necessarily.

5:42

And so that is part of the problem

5:44

with quote unquote debating this and how much context

5:46

you're even allowed to bring in. But it was

5:48

two hours, which I still, I honestly didn't even

5:50

think was long enough. It probably needed to go

5:52

two and three. It flew by. I mean, especially

5:54

with that number of people

5:56

and all of them having a lot to

5:59

say. I thought everybody behaved themselves

6:01

well. I mean, listen, obviously I thought

6:03

David and Frank did fantastic. You're not

6:05

gonna be surprised to learn. But I

6:07

enjoyed the exchanges and it's just interesting

6:09

to see at this point,

6:12

I think it's difficult to defend the things that people

6:14

are seeing on the ground. So

6:17

how are some of the

6:19

more equipped Israel supporters going

6:22

about mounting that defense at

6:24

this point is always interesting. Take a look.

6:26

Yeah, watch it for yourself. You can hear it. I

6:28

tried my best, let them all speak. So take a

6:30

look, it's on our channel or at least sometime later.

6:32

All right, let's go ahead and talk about foreign

6:34

aid, which is very germane to the topic. Now

6:36

I get to actually voice my opinion. That

6:39

for me would have been hard. There's no way I have kept

6:42

my mouth shut the way you did. I had to

6:44

bite my tongue a couple of times, make sure that

6:46

the camera wasn't on me. And I was like, wow,

6:48

that's a wild thing to say. It's

6:51

not me saying it. Let's go ahead

6:53

and begin with speaker Mike Johnson, who

6:55

in my opinion is currently undertaking one

6:58

of the greatest betrayals of his own

7:00

caucus in quite a long time. And

7:02

I will get into some of the

7:05

historical context. This is a man who

7:07

came into his job after the whole

7:09

speaker fracas when Kevin McCarthy is

7:11

kicked out. The right flank says that they're

7:14

okay with him. He starts getting wishy washy

7:16

on Ukraine aid. He's like, yeah, maybe. And

7:18

then the start of the hawk start to

7:20

go after him. And then we start to

7:22

see some signs, Crystal. We start to see

7:24

a little bit of rhetoric about, oh, we

7:26

got to stand up to Russia. Okay, well,

7:28

what does that mean? And then we see

7:30

him flip flop on FISA. And when he

7:32

flip flops, he says, well, if you hadn't

7:34

gotten the classified briefing I'd gotten, then you

7:36

would flip flop too. That's how you always

7:38

know. That's how you know that the IC,

7:40

the intelligence community, got the little knife in

7:43

you and they're starting to twist. And the

7:45

money starts coming in. Now you're responsible for

7:47

fundraising. And now all of a sudden, this

7:49

man who had a very different record on

7:51

Ukraine whenever he was a normal congressman, is

7:53

starting to talk like he's Ronald Reagan in

7:56

1982. Perfect

7:58

example, actually, honestly worse. than

8:00

1982, the level of grandeur you have to

8:02

have to say what he said, which we're

8:05

about to play for you, is insane, let's

8:07

take a listen. We're an unprecedented times, okay?

8:10

We're in dangerous times. This has been articulated here, around

8:12

the world and here at home. We

8:15

need steady leadership, we need steady hands at

8:17

the wheel. Look, I regard myself as a

8:19

wartime speaker. I mean, in a literal sense,

8:21

we are. I knew that when I took

8:24

the gavel. I didn't anticipate that

8:26

this would be an easy path. Former

8:28

speaker, Newt Gingrich posted a couple of days ago on

8:30

his social media that this is the

8:32

hardest challenge that's faced a speaker probably in the history of

8:34

the country, in the moment we're in right now. He

8:37

said arguably, maybe

8:39

comparable to the Civil War, but maybe worse.

8:41

Right, maybe comparable to the Civil

8:43

War. Yeah. Or maybe

8:45

worse. You're just like Skyler Kofax, my

8:48

dude. That's exactly right. I mean, practically

8:50

Abraham Lincoln for being honest. Yeah, definitely

8:52

Sam Rayburn and all those other guys

8:54

during the Great Depression and during the

8:57

World War II. They never faced anything

8:59

like, who do you think you are? War

9:02

time speaker, America is not at war.

9:04

Except if you were one of these

9:06

people, now apparently we are. Now, oh,

9:08

we're fighting in Ukraine. We're the ones

9:10

who are fighting in Israel. That is

9:12

one of the best views into the

9:15

minds of these ghouls that I've ever

9:17

seen. America, which is not at war,

9:19

shouldn't be either involved in either of

9:21

these conflicts. And look at the level

9:23

of passion, the way that this man

9:25

talks to Crystal, about two foreign nations,

9:28

and the way that he sees his role in

9:30

propping this up. And some of the

9:32

details here on this package are, I

9:36

mean, just outrageous. Let's go and put this up

9:38

there, please, on the screen. And I'm just gonna

9:40

read you guys the top line numbers. The legislation

9:42

that Speaker Johnson is pushing, $60

9:45

billion for Ukraine. We've gotten

9:47

through this. This completely depletes US

9:50

military assets, US military stockpiles. It

9:52

is a gift to the military

9:54

industrial complex. It will not change

9:56

a single iota on the... in

9:59

Ukraine except allowing the government to

10:01

kidnap more people who are mentally

10:03

disabled and physically disabled and throw

10:05

them at a Russian bullet. Even

10:07

with this, the Russians will still

10:09

outproduce and outmatch the Ukrainians whenever

10:11

it comes to ammunition. Two, $26

10:13

billion for Israel

10:16

and humanitarian aid for civilians in

10:19

Gaza. Now, who wants to guess

10:21

the ratio of military to civilian

10:23

aid there, Crystal? Right? Okay. And

10:25

then finally, quote unquote, eight billion

10:28

for the Indo-Pacific. As a realist,

10:30

I'm so insulted by this because it's actually

10:32

a stack of the least, the least priority

10:34

for American interest gets the most money. The

10:37

middle priority for American interest gets the second

10:39

most amount of money. And the region of

10:41

the world, which matters the single most of

10:43

the US economy, gets the least amount of

10:46

money. And then that doesn't even belie the

10:48

question of what the hell is all this

10:50

money going to do anyway? I mean, this

10:52

is strategic in Sam. Yeah. I

10:55

mean, with the Israel piece, it's once

10:57

again, you guys have probably seen these

10:59

photos where there's literal bombs dropping on

11:01

Gaza as these little piddly food packages

11:03

are dropping as well. You know,

11:05

it just makes me sick. And it

11:08

is so tired and cliche at

11:10

this point, but I cannot help

11:12

but note, they move heaven

11:14

and frickin earth. Yes. When

11:16

it comes to making sure

11:19

the military industrial complex is

11:21

fed, making sure APAC is

11:24

fed, making sure we keep

11:26

these conflicts going endlessly because

11:28

there is so much money

11:31

at stake. They will

11:33

come together in a bipartisan

11:35

way. Joe Biden writing an

11:38

op-ed backing the Republican speaker

11:40

Mike Johnson. They will do

11:42

whatever they need to do

11:44

from a legislative perspective using

11:46

all these procedural tricks of the

11:48

trade to try to steamroll this

11:50

thing through when it comes to

11:53

forever war. When it comes

11:55

to healthcare, lifting the

11:57

minimum wage, dealing with the American

11:59

people, with homelessness, any

12:02

other domestic priority, ah, we can't,

12:04

sorry, it's not our priority, we

12:07

tried, it's too hard, we're divided,

12:09

et cetera, et cetera. It

12:12

is disgusting, it's such an emblem

12:15

of just how rotten and

12:17

corrupt and out of touch and

12:19

what a bubble these people are in and

12:21

how misplaced their

12:23

priorities are in the most corrupt way

12:25

imaginable. That is very well said, and look, this

12:28

is sometimes a trite thing, but it's April 18th.

12:30

How many of us are self-employed and just had

12:32

to pay our taxes on April 15th, had

12:34

to wire the IRS, had money taken

12:36

out of our bank accounts, for what?

12:39

And this is what it's going to.

12:41

This is what we are paying for,

12:43

billions and billions of dollars, not a

12:45

single change, iota of change on the

12:47

ground in Ukraine, doing nothing. We are

12:49

funding the deaths of, at not even

12:52

young Ukrainian men at this point, middle-aged

12:54

Ukrainians. I hope we will

12:56

enjoy the pictures of Ukrainian grandfathers who are

12:58

missing their limbs and that the young men

13:00

who are partying in Vienna and in Budapest

13:03

and all across of Central Europe, while we're

13:05

the ones who are paying for the ammunition

13:07

so that the people who are too poor

13:09

or too dumb to stay in the country

13:12

and who don't even wanna fight are the

13:14

ones who are thrown into this. On the

13:16

Israel packages, so what are we paying for

13:18

exactly? So we are assuming all of the

13:20

cost of Israel's military actions abroad, and now

13:23

they're about to go and strike Iran.

13:25

Whose military do you think is

13:27

going to be funding that bill?

13:29

And like I said too, Taiwan,

13:31

Indo-Pacific, these are regions of the

13:33

country, Japan and others, they actually,

13:35

or of the world, they matter.

13:37

They actually matter. They're actually being

13:39

shortchanged in terms of what would

13:41

genuinely be militarily useful to them

13:44

for these conflicts which mean nothing

13:46

to all of us. And the

13:48

craziest part is this is a

13:50

total uni-party takeover. Let's put this

13:52

up there on the screen. Speaker

13:54

Mike Johnson's plan relies entirely on Democrats.

13:57

Let me be very clear here. This is a...

14:00

GOP and Democratic plan to let

14:03

this go through. It's a little

14:05

bit convoluted, so please stick with

14:07

me. Basically, what Speaker Johnson has

14:09

done is he's taking these four

14:12

packages. It's gonna be Ukraine, it's gonna

14:14

be Israel, Indo-Pacific, and there's a fourth

14:16

bill, which is not yet out, which

14:19

is some pay for, TikTok, and sometimes

14:21

other stuff. Okay, so let's just be

14:23

very clear here. They're not together. They're

14:25

gonna pass them each individually. What he

14:28

is doing is sending

14:30

them to the House Rules Committee. The

14:32

House Rules Committee, by tradition, decades of

14:34

procedure, basically says that the ruling party

14:36

is the one who is supposed to

14:39

pass the rule to allow the advance

14:41

of the vote, okay? Well, currently, the

14:43

Rules Committee, one of the deals that

14:45

was struck within the Republican Party was

14:48

that the Rules Committee would have powerful

14:50

members of the Freedom Caucus and others

14:52

who would nix the Ukraine aid, even

14:54

the Israel aid in some cases here,

14:57

that would be of their makeup. What

14:59

Johnson is doing is explicitly screwing over

15:02

his own party members, working with Democrats

15:04

and Hakeem Jeffries to advance this foreign

15:06

aid to the floor and then allow

15:09

votes where both parties, and this is

15:11

another very key thing I wanna make

15:13

clear, what with Ukraine, for example, a

15:15

sizable part of the GOP caucus is

15:18

going to vote against Ukraine aid. A

15:20

sizable part of the Democratic caucus is

15:22

going to vote against Israel aid. What

15:24

they're doing is a corrupt bargain where

15:27

they both work for each other and

15:29

then they allow majority votes to come

15:32

together and then they throw the little

15:34

Taiwan piddly thing on the third. There

15:36

was an excellent scholar of congressional procedure,

15:38

Josh Huter, and he wrote this this

15:40

morning, I'm gonna read it to you,

15:42

quote. He says, rather

15:44

than simply allow members to

15:46

sign a discharge petition or

15:48

vote for a parliamentary question

15:50

or other maneuver, Johnson has

15:52

raised the specter of forming

15:54

a procedural coalition with Democrats

15:56

to overrun GOP opposition, potentially

15:58

the most grievous... betrayal of

16:00

partisan politics in the modern era. This

16:03

is a step further than the sins

16:05

of John Boehner and Paul Ryan who

16:07

were run out of office just for

16:10

using Democrats to pass spending bills. Johnson

16:12

will now work with Democrats to snuff

16:14

out opposition from his GOP colleagues. Reverse

16:17

that as well. Democrats do not bail

16:19

out Republicans when they don't have votes

16:21

on the rule. They are doing it

16:24

for this one instance crystal so they

16:26

can fund Ukraine and so they can

16:28

fund Israel. We are basically this

16:30

is a color revolution. This is

16:33

a uniparty war exception takeover of

16:35

all of our governmental procedure so

16:37

we can send 80 billion

16:40

dollars to foreign countries. That's right. Yeah.

16:42

Your tax dollars going to

16:45

put a gun in the hand of

16:47

a mentally disabled Ukrainian who doesn't want

16:49

to fight. Thank you. And to bomb

16:51

babies. It really does make

16:53

me very sympathetic to our libertarian brothers and sisters.

16:55

So Dave. I've never felt this way about

16:58

taxes before when I sent in my tax

17:00

check where you know normally I don't mind

17:02

paying my taxes. I don't mind paying my

17:04

fair share whatsoever. But when it's

17:06

so naked this is

17:08

going to fund more bombs to

17:10

be dropped on a refugee camp

17:12

or more bullets to massacre Gazans

17:14

who are seeking aid desperately trying

17:16

to get flour. No it's

17:19

it's disgusting. And if

17:21

the American people had a say in this

17:23

they would say no. But

17:25

you have so much corrupting

17:28

influence of money. You have

17:30

the yes the deep state using all

17:32

of their scare tactics to try to

17:34

you know force some sort of unanimity

17:37

whatever that they did to Mike Johnson

17:39

got him to flip on a dime.

17:41

And I really think with him part

17:43

of it too is

17:46

he is so fervently ideologically

17:49

committed to Israel that

17:51

in order to get the Israel aid

17:53

through which is so important to him

17:56

he was basically willing to do whatever

17:58

else he needed to do. And

18:00

this is what the whatever else looks like.

18:03

So since you had him on Israel, it

18:05

only took a little turn of the screw to

18:08

get him on FISA apparently, and to get him

18:10

on Ukraine as well. And now,

18:12

you know, this is where we

18:14

are. Yeah, I mean, Dave

18:16

Smith and Cenk both yesterday, Cenk in particular,

18:19

he's like, if a single American goes to

18:21

fight in this war, I'm gonna stop paying

18:23

taxes and I'm gonna rally the people. By

18:25

the way Cenk, I will be in the

18:27

streets with you. Dave made a joke as

18:29

a libertarian. He's like, hey, why don't we

18:31

all just start now? I agree with you.

18:34

I am very rarely the online libertarian poster.

18:36

I am so hopping mad about this one.

18:38

Because once again, if we were sticking with

18:40

the way that our government functions, anytime, let's

18:42

say, what are our services, Crystal, that

18:44

you or I or any others, let's

18:46

everybody just take a moment and think

18:49

about a service in your life, let's

18:51

say healthcare, maybe something like that, where

18:53

you would like the federal government to

18:55

move heaven and earth to make it

18:57

easier for you. Maybe buying a house,

18:59

your wage, how do we work in

19:01

conditions, getting married, tax credits, that

19:04

could go on forever. They are not doing

19:06

any of that. For you. They're

19:08

doing it for a foreign country and they're

19:10

using our money to do it. And they

19:12

won't even use our money to actually pay

19:15

for anything inside of this country. It genuinely

19:17

makes me sick. Israel is

19:19

a wealthy, advanced nation. They brag about

19:21

it all the time. They have universal

19:23

healthcare. We don't, they do. And we're sending

19:25

billions to them. It's just,

19:27

it's, so it's preposterous on

19:29

that level. And then it's so

19:31

outrageously immoral on the

19:34

level of what we've seen unfold.

19:36

And you hear the Biden administration, worried

19:39

about civilian life, et cetera, et cetera,

19:41

you can't take them seriously when this

19:44

is their number one priority. We

19:46

can actually put up there. The other thing that's astonishing is

19:48

some of the arguments that they're making in front of this.

19:51

Put A5, this Wall Street Journal tear sheet

19:53

up on the screen. This is the Biden

19:56

op-ed that he published here. Moment of truth

19:58

on Ukraine and Israel. both countries

20:01

urgently need U.S. aid to

20:03

defend themselves against brazen adversaries

20:05

that seek their annihilation. One

20:08

of the arguments that he makes here

20:11

is directly about how this

20:13

will help to fund and

20:15

finance the American war machine,

20:17

military industrial complex. He

20:19

says, if Congress passes military aid for Ukraine

20:22

and Israel, we won't write blank checks. We'd

20:24

send military equipment from our own

20:27

stockpiles, then use the money authorized

20:29

by Congress to replenish those stockpiles

20:31

by buying from American suppliers. Oh,

20:33

Boeing, Raytheon, they'll be so happy.

20:35

It includes Patriot missiles made in

20:37

Arizona, Javelin missiles made in Alabama,

20:39

and artillery shells made in Pennsylvania,

20:41

Ohio, and Texas. It's just astonishing

20:44

to me that they are affirmatively

20:46

leaning into the pitch that, guess

20:48

what, guys? This is going to

20:50

go to our great military industrial

20:52

complex suppliers. So it's not like the money

20:54

even leaves within like 50 miles

20:56

of where we sit right now. It's

20:59

so naked and it's so incredibly manipulative

21:01

and disgusting. Yeah. By

21:03

the way, a quote just came across my dad. I love this

21:06

from Mike Johnson. Here's why he decided to flip

21:08

flop. Listen to this quote. Quote, I

21:10

really believe the intel and the

21:13

briefings that we've gotten, I

21:15

believe she, Vladimir Putin

21:17

and Iran are the axis of

21:19

evil. They are in court. Jesus

21:21

Christ. What year are we

21:24

in? What year? I feel the Jumanji

21:26

meme. What year is it? What year is it?

21:28

It's in 1972. This is madness. It's

21:32

complete madness. We have a video

21:34

here of some of the

21:36

House Republicans who rightfully are furious

21:39

about this. They were interviewed

21:41

by CNN's Manu Raju. Let's take a listen.

21:43

For hours last night and proposed a

21:45

different path to the session speaker that

21:48

would have avoided the abject surrender represented

21:50

by his strategic choice here. There's no

21:52

other way to describe it. Surrender. It's

21:55

disappointing. I won't support it. It's

21:58

disappointing. It's completely disappointing. detached

22:00

from what our base wants, what our voters

22:02

want. This strategy is

22:04

not to try. I think the

22:06

strategy is to fall on his sword.

22:09

So when I asked the Congressman Chip Roy about whether

22:11

or not it was time for him to oust Mike

22:13

Johnson from the speakership, he said that he

22:16

went right up to the line, Dana, and

22:18

didn't go across that line, perhaps because he

22:21

needs to talk with the speaker, which is

22:23

happening right now. Now, the question is, will

22:25

the numbers add up to oust him from

22:27

the speakership? Because Democrats, as you mentioned, could

22:30

step in to save him because of what

22:32

he's doing here on Ukraine. So this is

22:34

a different situation than the fall when Martin

22:37

McCarthy was ousted from the speakership, but no

22:39

doubt about it. Mike Johnson opening up a

22:41

revolt on the far right with his conference,

22:43

with his move here. So yeah, I mean,

22:45

screwing over your own party. It's just incredible.

22:48

And finally, we have the word from Speaker

22:50

Johnson himself went on CNN's Jake Tapper show

22:52

of all places to make the case for

22:54

this. Just listen to his own words. Look

22:57

at the way that this man talks right

22:59

now. And let's also not leave Trump out

23:01

of this because as Ryan and I covered, he

23:03

was singularly important in making sure that this happened.

23:05

Let's take a listen. Look, we know what the

23:07

timetable is. We know the urgency in Ukraine and

23:09

in Israel. And we are going to stand by

23:12

Israel, our close ally and dear friend. And we

23:14

were going to stand for freedom and make sure

23:16

that Vladimir Putin doesn't march through Europe. These

23:18

are important responsibilities. A strong America

23:21

is good for the entire world

23:23

since World War Two. Really, really.

23:25

The responsibility for the free

23:27

world has been shifted onto our shoulders. And

23:29

we accept that role. We're an exceptional nation.

23:31

We're the greatest nation on the planet. We

23:33

have to act like it. And we have

23:35

to project to Putin and Xi and

23:38

Iran and North Korea and anybody else that we

23:40

will defend freedom. It doesn't mean boots on the

23:42

ground. We're not the world's policemen. But

23:44

we're going to do the right thing. And I did tell

23:47

the president of the plan on all of this. And I

23:49

think he clearly understands why we're running

23:51

this play and why we need to do this. I

23:53

think this sets up the next election,

23:55

the next administration, the next president. And I believe

23:57

he's going to win in a better

23:59

position. So Trump endorsed the

24:01

plan, spoke with Mike Johnson.

24:04

He's an idiot. So when he hears from Lindsey Graham,

24:06

or he hears from Lindsey Graham, it's a loan. Trump

24:08

is like, I love loans. Let's do it. And

24:12

so now we're doing a fake loan to the

24:14

most corrupt government on the planet. The aid actually

24:16

allows you to cancel the aid or to cancel

24:18

the loan. If you're the president, what do you

24:20

think Biden is going to do on day one

24:23

after this thing passes? We're never going to pay

24:25

back. Not that it matters. We're never going to pay back,

24:27

whether it's technically a debt or a loan or whatever. It's

24:29

fake loan, of course. It's not going to happen. Yeah.

24:31

I mean, listen, I never want to hear

24:33

from a single soul ever again that Trump

24:36

is some anti-war president. It's

24:38

always been preposterous. If you looked at his

24:40

record last time around, I mean, he was

24:42

actually very hawkish towards Russia

24:44

in spite of the rhetoric and

24:47

the Russiagate, you know, phenomenon and

24:49

obsession and derangement and whatever. It

24:51

was actually in his policy quite

24:53

hawkish towards Russia. He was

24:55

consistently rolled by the deep state, by

24:58

the intel community in the same way

25:00

that Mike Johnson is here and, you

25:02

know, standing right beside Mike Johnson on

25:04

the same thing. The last thing

25:06

I want to make clear to people is there

25:08

are really two reasons why this is happening

25:11

right now, as far as I can see. Number

25:14

one is Israel's provocation

25:17

vis-a-vis Iran bombing

25:19

their embassy and then the inevitable

25:22

recession. That is part of

25:24

what gave this thing momentum right now.

25:26

So once again, B.B. playing

25:28

us like a fiddle, getting

25:31

his way, getting the A that has been

25:33

hung up until now. So that's

25:35

number one. And number two is what you

25:37

just heard there, Donald Trump giving it the

25:39

go-ahead and, you know, putting his hands

25:42

on this and saying basically, yes, this

25:44

has my blessing. He's incredibly influential with

25:46

the Republican caucus. He basically followed his

25:48

lead on many things. And so I

25:50

think the fact that it had his

25:52

buy-in was essential to creating this

25:55

moment. Sagar, I have a question for you, which

25:57

is, you know, is this a fait

25:59

accompli? Or is there any chance

26:01

that Democrats don't want to go along, that

26:03

they're nervous? Because I know there's some nervousness

26:05

from some Democrats about, all right, we passed

26:07

the rule that puts us in their hands.

26:09

We don't know if we're going to get

26:11

the humanitarian aid that we need to pretend

26:13

like we care about civilians being massacred in

26:15

Gaza. Do you think there's any chance that

26:17

this gets blocked? There is. So there's

26:19

several things. The vote is going to

26:21

happen on Saturday night. It's a long

26:23

time from now till Saturday. It's somehow

26:25

shenanigans. It's possible that the motion to

26:27

vacate comes up. That would require the

26:30

whole speakership thing. However, there's been some

26:32

indications currently that the Democrats, at least

26:34

some Democrats, would save Mike Johnson's speakership

26:36

just to make sure that there is

26:38

no more chaos in the House. Josh

26:40

Gottheimer in particular wants to fund Israel.

26:42

That's right. You guessed it. And that's

26:44

one of the reasons why he's decided

26:46

to do so. That guy, Moskowitz, too,

26:48

Jared Moskowitz, is the name. So these individuals,

26:50

look, I mean, there is enough room here

26:52

to work with where I would say it

26:54

is likelier than not. This is based upon

26:56

the sources that I've spoken to.

26:58

Keep in mind, my sources, at least the people who

27:01

talk to me, these are the people who don't want

27:03

this stuff to pass. So when they tell me, I

27:05

know it's actually likely on this one, I

27:08

believe them because their analysis of the situation

27:10

and the coalitions and all that involved are

27:12

that because you've got the Dems willing to

27:14

work on Ukraine and the Republicans willing to

27:16

work so hard on Israel, that

27:19

it is allowing the corrupt bargain

27:21

to go through without enough objection.

27:23

You've also basically bought off the

27:26

progressives with this piddly humanitarian aid

27:28

and giving them enough, let's

27:30

say the Congressional Progressive Caucus and others, a

27:33

decent portion of them are going to vote

27:35

for it because it does include humanitarian aid

27:37

for Gaza. And also, that

27:39

gives an out to the Senate Democrats

27:41

should whenever this moves over to the

27:43

Senate, even the people like Chris

27:45

Van Hollen and all others, they've indicated they would

27:48

vote for Israel aid. One of the ways they

27:50

can do it is, yeah, it sends weapons, but

27:52

it sends humanitarian aid, too, which is there is

27:54

something sick, right, about paying for the

27:57

wounds of the people who are people who are

27:59

wounded by bombs. Yeah, you bomb

28:01

them and you send them a loaf of bread. The other thing is,

28:04

the problem in Gaza in terms

28:06

of the humanitarian situation isn't a

28:08

lack of availability of aid. There's

28:12

hundreds of trucks that are

28:14

still backed up at the

28:16

borders. The problem is our

28:18

great ally Israel blocking food and

28:21

fuel and water from being able

28:23

to come in. And there

28:25

are a lot of indications that in spite of

28:27

their claims that they're improving the humanitarian situation, that

28:29

they're certainly not living up to the pledges that

28:32

they made. And what's getting in is still wildly

28:35

insufficient. So the

28:38

humanitarian aid is

28:40

ass-covering so that people like

28:42

Chris Van Hollen, who has made a big

28:44

show of saying some really important things with

28:47

regard to Gaza, can point

28:49

to that to justify shipping

28:51

more bombs to massacre women,

28:53

children. I mean, some of the

28:55

reports coming out about this is

28:57

the largest cohort of children who've

28:59

had amputations that we've ever seen.

29:01

They're going to be maimed for

29:04

life, the trauma that they're going

29:06

to experience. And you're going to

29:08

you're going to get more more bombs to create

29:10

more death, destruction, annihilation, trauma, et cetera. But don't

29:12

worry, we'll send you a loaf of bread as

29:14

well. That'll make it better. Yeah, look,

29:17

it's total chaos. And it is it is

29:19

certainly possible that this may not pass. But

29:21

right now I would bet on it passing.

29:23

And honestly, I should never have gotten my

29:26

hopes up. We only got a three month

29:28

reprieve. I should have known that they will

29:30

net they always win in the end. How

29:32

they figure it out every time the military

29:34

industrial complex, the neocons, no matter what you

29:37

or I think, no matter the fact that

29:39

the vast majority of the American people are

29:41

not for any of this aid to Ukraine

29:43

and to Israel. It doesn't matter. And

29:46

it's just days after tax day, just

29:48

a little bit too on the nose. Hey,

29:52

it's me, Blippi, and this is

29:54

my best friend, Mika. Hi,

29:57

I'm Mika. This

30:00

is our brand new plaid-a-cad!

30:02

Flippy and Meekin Road Trip!

30:05

The Flippy Mobile will take us

30:08

to amazing places! Quick, quick,

30:10

we should be bounce on!

30:12

Getting ready for a ride, we're

30:14

gonna have some fun! You'll explore

30:16

and listen to the signs of

30:18

awesome places like P.A.W. Race

30:21

travel and even

30:23

construction cars! Follow

30:26

your ears when you're here!

30:29

And we'll meet new friends along the way!

30:31

They'll see just awesome new things about

30:34

the places and things we see and

30:36

hear! But did we learn today?

30:38

It's so cool! Listen to Flippy

30:40

and Meekin's Road Trip Podcast on

30:43

the iHeartRadio app! Apple

30:45

Podcasts or wherever you get your

30:48

podcasts! The

30:52

Van Heezing Cool Flex Man Stretch Suit

30:54

is perfect for going to the office

30:56

or any weddings and formal events you

30:58

have coming up. The Van Heezing Cool

31:01

Flex Suit has engineered stretch technology, giving

31:03

you the most comfortable fit and mobility.

31:05

Wrinkle-resistant fabric and cool moisture wicking makes

31:08

it perfect for all formal and business

31:10

occasions. The new style is looking sharp

31:12

while feeling cool and comfortable. Shop Van

31:14

Heezing's Cool Flex Man Stretch Suits at

31:17

JCPenney or online at jcpenney.com. Groceries,

31:28

tickets, dining and more! Thousands

31:30

of experiences, thousands of ways

31:33

to save! Join today at

31:35

aaa.com/join! Let's

31:38

move on. Let's talk a little bit about

31:40

Israel as we just talked about and where some

31:42

of this money may be going and who is

31:44

going to be funding and what exactly they're going

31:46

to do about it. So here we have Benjamin

31:48

Netanyahu who is speaking about the striking

31:50

Iran in retaliation. We can go ahead and

31:52

play it and I'm going to read. They

31:54

say they also have some objections. I appreciate

31:57

it, but I want to clarify. He

31:59

says that we will... make our own decision.

32:01

He's talking here about the United States.

32:03

He says the state of Israel will

32:05

do everything necessary to defend

32:07

itself today. The cabinet

32:09

will approve a plan to rebuild the

32:11

settlements of the Gaza Strip. We will

32:14

invest a very large sum of shekels

32:16

to make the settlements of Gaza available

32:18

to generations. We will invest in housing,

32:20

infrastructure, education, and employment. So he's talking

32:23

there about two things. He's talking about

32:25

striking Iran, the state of Israel, we

32:27

will do whatever we want to do.

32:29

And he's also talking about using money,

32:33

U.S. money, presumably, right? Some of these shekels,

32:35

where do you think exactly they're coming from?

32:37

Shekel, by the way, is the currency of

32:39

the state of Israel, in case people didn't

32:41

know that. Using

32:44

that to build settlements in the Gaza Strip

32:46

and complete contravention of U.S. policy. And

32:48

we will get to some of the changes

32:50

in U.S. policy and all of that

32:52

in a little bit. But this comes

32:54

as the entire world, the Western world,

32:56

is trying to descend upon Israel, begging

32:59

them, please, please don't get us into

33:01

a war with Iran. And yet they

33:03

continue to walk away being told

33:05

by their, being told straight to the

33:08

face of their own benefactors that they are going to

33:10

do it anyway. Let's put this up there on the

33:12

screen. This is from the Times of Israel. You can

33:14

take it. You've got after

33:16

meeting with President Herzog of

33:18

Israel, David Cameron, the U.K.

33:20

foreign minister, says, quote, it is now

33:23

clear that Israel will respond to the

33:25

Iran attack. The British foreign minister, quote,

33:27

hopes retaliation will not further escalating tensions.

33:30

Calls for the G7 to sanction Iran

33:32

and the visiting German foreign minister also

33:34

says all parties must act prudently and

33:37

responsibility. So you have Tony Blinken, who

33:39

is pressuring them, President Biden. Here you've

33:41

got the freaking British foreign

33:43

minister, a huge supporter of the state of

33:46

Israel. You've got the German foreign minister, all

33:48

of these people descending there. Apparently, Prime Minister

33:50

Netanyahu even put a call off for several hours with

33:52

the prime minister of the U.K., where the prime minister

33:54

was like, hey, man, like maybe just keep us out

33:56

of this one because it would it would just be

33:58

easier for all of us. if we didn't

34:00

have to shoot down missiles for you. And yet,

34:02

that's not what, this is a government acting in

34:05

complete impunity. We've seen this many, many times. But

34:07

again, let's just play it for the whole world,

34:09

for all of us since we're the ones who

34:11

are funding this. And here's the

34:13

thing. Things were getting a

34:15

little tougher than Yahoo. There was

34:18

a little bit of scrutiny about

34:20

what was going on in Gaza.

34:22

The Americans were getting increasingly uncomfortable,

34:24

it was becoming increasingly untenable. How

34:26

much has the horrific annihilation and

34:28

humanitarian disaster, the famine in Northern

34:31

Gaza, how much has that fallen out

34:33

of the news as everybody

34:36

starts beating the war drums and

34:38

getting all hyped up about this

34:40

conflict with Iran? There were

34:42

these reports, Sagar, I don't know if you buy these or not, because

34:44

it was from a like, not

34:46

totally certain news source, that

34:49

the US back channeled Iran and was like, how

34:51

much you let Israel do a little bit of

34:53

a retaliatory attack and just let it be? Can

34:56

you imagine if we were

34:58

directly attacked, can you imagine if

35:01

our embassy was attacked, how

35:03

we would respond? Yesterday, Emily and I played

35:05

this exchange with Matt Miller, I don't know

35:07

if you saw him, Matt Lee pressing him

35:09

on. All right, because

35:12

their dodge is, well, we don't

35:14

know if it was really a

35:16

consulate building that Israel hit, we're

35:19

investigating, we haven't really figured that

35:21

out yet. That's their dodge to

35:23

avoid condemning Israel for starting this

35:26

whole terrifying chain of escalation that

35:28

risks dragging us directly into conflict

35:30

with Iran, even though I genuinely

35:33

think that the Biden administration actually

35:35

wants to avoid this direct conflict,

35:37

but they haven't done a single

35:40

thing to try to forestall

35:42

that eventuality. So

35:44

yeah, Bibi and Israel,

35:46

they act like toddlers who

35:48

haven't been disciplined, who know they can get

35:51

away with whatever the hell they wanna get

35:53

away with because they always do, because we'll

35:55

do things like, pretend we're having

35:57

an investigation into whether or not they really hit

35:59

an embassy. Trust me, if they

36:01

didn't hit an embassy or consulate building,

36:04

we would have said it right away. The

36:06

fact that we're out here pretending like we've

36:08

got to do some months-long investigation to figure

36:10

that out tells you everything you need to

36:13

know about what actually unfolded here. But

36:15

we will deny reality. We will lie. We will cover

36:17

up. And we will continue moving heaven and earth to

36:20

ship them their bombs to continue doing

36:22

whatever the hell they want to do.

36:25

Our interest and the safety

36:27

of our service members and our people be

36:29

damned. Yeah, this is America last. It's

36:31

fine. Let's put this up there on

36:34

the screen. Just like I want to

36:36

reiterate again how many world leaders are,

36:38

quote, urging restraint. You again have the

36:40

war cabinet and the far right who

36:42

are all saying that we need to

36:44

have swift action. But then you have

36:46

basically every leader of a G7 nation

36:48

who is urging restraint, who is even

36:50

rhetorically backing up Israel, but is reaching

36:52

out and urging caution and not to

36:54

have retaliation. It is just virtual certainty.

36:57

This is going to lead for some

36:59

sort of tit-for-tat escalation. The United States

37:01

will be involved. We already know that because

37:03

we already were involved. We shot down the

37:05

majority of the missiles. If there is more

37:07

of an escalation, then we'll be even more

37:09

involved in shooting that down. And Bibi has

37:11

been in the split for so long. Bibi

37:13

has wanted this and urged us to do

37:15

this for years. Yesterday on the zero-hedge debate,

37:18

we played a clip of him advocating

37:20

for the overthrow of the Iranian regime in

37:22

2002. We're Congress.

37:25

This is on tape. It's literally right there, out

37:27

in the open. He has urged

37:30

every president from George

37:32

W. Bush onward to overthrow the Iranian regime

37:34

and to bomb Iran. He tried to get

37:36

Trump to do it. He tried to get

37:38

Obama to do it. There's a whole interesting

37:41

Atlantic series. You guys can go read it

37:43

if you want. Jeffrey Goldberg sat there and

37:45

let Bibi spout his BS about why America

37:47

should go to war. He came to our

37:49

soil against our own

37:51

president of the United States and spoke against the

37:54

Iran deal. He tried to get George W. Bush,

37:56

as I said, multiple times. after

38:00

Iraq and he had many supporters in the cabinet.

38:02

The only thing that saved us from going to

38:05

war with Iran is that the Iraq war was

38:07

such a disaster. Because if it had gone even

38:09

remotely well, then he could have convinced Condoleezza Rice

38:11

and all these other idiots to

38:13

do that as well. So just keep in

38:15

mind exactly who we're dealing with. He says

38:18

all these things out in the open. He

38:20

feels totally comfortable. Any last things for a

38:22

moment? Yeah, I mean, even though it's

38:24

utterly psychotic, like I genuinely can't wrap

38:26

my head around the psychopathy that it

38:28

requires to just like casually flirt with

38:31

this gigantic war. You

38:33

can see why he did it, because now

38:36

the frame of conversation isn't,

38:38

oh my God, here's a baby who

38:41

you're starving to death in Gaza. Now

38:43

the frame of conversation is freaking Mike Johnson out

38:46

there talking about the axis of evil. That's

38:49

much stronger ground for

38:51

BB Netanyahu with the political

38:53

class here, certainly with the Democrats.

38:55

So we're in power here. Frankly,

38:59

it's just a much better conversation

39:01

for him to take the focus

39:03

off the suffering of Palestinians their

39:05

hands and at our hands that

39:07

completely shifts the frame in a

39:09

way that is much more favorable for him. And

39:11

also by the way, it's not an accident

39:13

that this is right at the moment when

39:16

there was a harass op-ed saying, listen, we

39:18

gotta face it. This has been a disaster.

39:20

We have lost on every reasonable metric of

39:22

success in Gaza. So he also has to

39:25

shift the frame domestically to some

39:27

other victory that he can chase

39:29

after. So the logic of it

39:31

is sick, but you

39:33

can see exactly how he made this

39:35

calculation and decided to thrust all of

39:37

us into this incredible chaos. All

39:41

right, let's move on to Arizona. This is

39:44

very, very impactful in terms of

39:46

the electoral news. So just yesterday, there

39:48

was major breaking in terms of after

39:51

the Arizona Supreme Court upheld

39:53

a Civil War era law,

39:55

which banned abortion across the

39:57

board in the entire state.

40:00

been now an intra GOP fight

40:02

on whether to try and repeal

40:04

that law or not. Well, let's

40:06

put this up there on the

40:08

screen. Just yesterday, the state Senate

40:10

introduced a bill to repeal that

40:12

abortion ban. And by the way,

40:14

by repeal, I just mean adding

40:17

exceptions for rape incest and the

40:19

life of the mother. But the

40:21

House actually blocked the effort to

40:23

do so, showing that the House

40:25

Republican leadership, quote, shows no signs

40:27

of relenting despite pressure from prominent

40:29

Republicans, including Trump, to toss the

40:32

ban that many voters, quote, view as

40:34

extreme and archaic. I think that that's

40:36

a reasonable way to put it. Well,

40:39

the House Republican leader, the House

40:41

Speaker, the House legislature was controlled

40:43

by the Republicans in Arizona. They

40:45

just seemed content on throwing this

40:47

entire election. And it is astounding

40:50

because this is a position that

40:52

is not held by even like

40:54

a majority of the minority, I guess,

40:57

of the people who are pro life.

40:59

And yet that's the current law on

41:01

the books in a critical battleground state.

41:03

What's even more astounding to me is

41:05

how the politicians there are navigating it.

41:07

So Kerry Lake, somebody who is the

41:10

Arizona Senate candidate, previously on tape saying she

41:12

was completely fine with the ban. Then after

41:14

the ban came out, she said, well, yeah,

41:16

we should have some sort of repeal. We

41:19

need to come sort of a consensus, but

41:21

I support exceptions for the life and the

41:23

mother. Well, here she is just yesterday in

41:26

an interview in local Arizona media where now

41:29

she's changing her tune a little bit. She

41:31

does support the ban. She says something else,

41:33

which you listen out for him. We'll

41:35

flag it after we listen. Let's take a listen. Can

41:37

you explain your shift on abortion

41:39

from civil war, civil

41:41

war law to now, uh,

41:44

no federal ban on abortion? Cause I

41:46

believe that truly that's something that people do

41:48

want to hear, uh, from what we've heard. Well,

41:51

first of all, I've never shifted from the

41:53

no federal ban. You know, if you're my

41:55

age or older, you've been on this planet

41:57

for more than 50 years. Groovy Wade. It's

42:00

the law of the land, even though both sides

42:03

knew it was unconstitutional. And the

42:05

Supreme Court struck that down and brought the decision

42:07

back to the state. So we're going to have

42:09

50 different state laws. So we need to

42:11

find some common sense approach. I'm never going to

42:13

apologize for wanting to save babies and bring being

42:16

pro-life. But I also realized

42:18

the world that we're living in, even if

42:20

we have a restrictive law here, you can go three

42:22

hours that way, three hours that way. And

42:24

you're going to be able to have an abortion. We have to start working the

42:27

minds and hearts of women. Yeah, one of

42:29

the ways to win over the minds and hearts of women,

42:32

Crystal, is to say, yeah, I know in our

42:34

state, the state that you live in and that

42:36

you pay taxes, I know that's really tough. And

42:38

that's why it's OK that you have to get

42:40

into a car and you can drive three hours

42:43

that way or three hours that way. Also, depending

42:45

on where you live in Arizona, it may be

42:47

several hours. And also, you may have to get

42:49

on a plane. So it's actually going to cost

42:52

you some money as opposed to being able to

42:54

pursue what you want to do in your own

42:56

home state. That sounds really comforting to

42:58

a lot of voters who are concerned about this.

43:00

What are these people? Are they living in an

43:02

alternative reality? Right. What is happening here? They are.

43:05

Am I losing my mind here? Yeah. Yeah.

43:07

So the line is basically, oh, it's no

43:09

big deal. You can just like go over

43:11

state lines and still do the same thing.

43:14

She's framing it in terms of like, that's

43:16

a bad thing. But the subtext here is

43:18

like, yeah, don't freak out because, you know,

43:20

there are other states around that aren't using

43:23

1864 laws passed by settler pedophiles. You can

43:25

avail yourself of the rights

43:27

that you previously enjoyed in our

43:29

state. You know, just to help

43:31

people understand why the Republicans

43:33

in the House and Arizona may have

43:36

made way in terms of the American

43:38

people, that can end up being a

43:40

real political threat to you. And,

43:42

you know, the other thing is you have

43:44

to deal with the situation that Kerry Lake

43:46

is dealing with of, wait a second, voters

43:48

looking at you and going, wait a second.

43:51

Previously, you said you love the span.

43:53

Previously, you said you believed in, you know,

43:55

heartbeat bills and fetal personhood and all this

43:57

stuff. So why the change?

44:00

Why suddenly is there this incredible moral

44:02

flip-flop? And listen, to be fair to

44:05

that position, if you

44:07

are a person who genuinely believes

44:09

that abortion is murder, if

44:11

that's your principled position, then this like, leave it

44:13

up to the states and it's cool if they

44:15

have murder in California and actually I want to

44:18

allow a little bit more murder here in Arizona

44:20

because I'm doing this political calculus and it doesn't

44:22

look good to me. Like, I think it's fair

44:24

for people who hold that moral position and believe

44:26

you when you were all in with them when

44:29

there were no consequences are disgusted with the flip-flop.

44:31

No, you should be. Yeah, if you're very pro-life,

44:33

you should be repulsed also by people who are

44:35

basically willing to use you as a pawn. And

44:37

if you're pro-choice, you should just look at this

44:39

and be like, wow, this is freaking crazy. Yeah.

44:43

Electorially, we already know what's going to happen here. Lo

44:45

and behold, let's put this up there on the screen.

44:47

What do we got? A key

44:49

change in the way that the

44:51

Arizona Senate race is being rated

44:54

in terms of which way it's going to

44:56

go. Kerry has now gone from toss-up to

44:58

lean Democratic. And in terms of

45:00

the House rating, same thing. In the Arizona

45:02

6th District, leans Republican to toss-up. So

45:04

he's safe seat, easy seat, one that

45:07

you're supposed to be a checkbox, leans

45:09

Republican. It's Arizona for God's sake, right?

45:11

Nope, not anymore. And

45:13

now Kerry had all kinds of problems

45:15

already with stop the steal, with abortion,

45:18

health care, we can all go on

45:20

forever. So her highlight reel was going

45:22

to be a problem for her no

45:24

matter what, especially in a state where

45:27

we've had multiple races now, both presidential

45:29

and statewide, where Democrats did better than

45:32

expected. But this is just the gift to Democrats.

45:34

This is the greatest gift you could ever get.

45:36

You have one of the most extreme abortion laws

45:38

in the whole country. And now you got a

45:40

lady who's used to support it, is on tape,

45:43

and now is like kind of wishy washy on

45:45

where things could go. Good luck. You

45:47

know, Republicans, you know, you're taking some of the

45:49

best headwinds in a presidential election, and you're just

45:52

throwing it away on an issue where you're not

45:54

even going to win in the first place. I've

45:56

seen somebody actually, I think it was Mike

45:58

Cernovich who said this, he was like, Hey, pro-life. I'm not

46:00

sure if you know this, but there's actually

46:02

been a net increase in abortion in the

46:04

United States since Roe vs. Wade. So you

46:06

guys are drawing your red lines and saying

46:08

you won't vote for Trump and causing all

46:10

these problems electorally and not only are

46:12

you gonna cause future electoral losses, you didn't even win

46:14

the fight, you know, that you allegedly set out to

46:17

do. So it's just been it's just ridiculous all the

46:19

way around. Yeah, and just so you know, it's not

46:21

an accident that these ratings changes come right now. The

46:25

political actually pointed specifically to

46:28

this 1864 abortion ban

46:30

and also the fact by the way, remember

46:32

there's likely to be ballot initiatives on the

46:35

ballot in November that will allow voters to

46:37

repeal that ban, which is very motivating obviously

46:40

for people who are even remotely on

46:42

the pro-choice side of the ledger. And

46:45

also the fact, and this is something we'll have to cover another

46:47

time, that Republican fundraising

46:50

is dramatically lagging

46:52

behind Democratic fundraising

46:54

and that's actually not just an Arizona

46:56

phenomenon. That's almost across the board and

46:59

you know, there could be a lot of reasons

47:01

for that. I think Donald Trump is a big

47:03

reason for it. He is like just sucked dry

47:06

to be Republican donor-based. There's also a report that

47:08

he's now demanding any Republican

47:10

candidate that uses his name in

47:12

a fundraising pitch. He's demanding that they give

47:14

him a 5% kickback of

47:18

whatever they raise off of it. So

47:20

I mean he's sort of single-handedly undermining

47:23

Republicans ability to fundraise and I

47:25

also think that abortion plays into

47:27

the fundraising piece too here because

47:29

it's very motivating issue for Democratic-aligned

47:32

individuals and specifically donors

47:34

and Republicans are kind

47:36

of like demoralized around the way that all

47:38

of this has unfolded. Just

47:41

to show you to this Data for

47:43

Progress poll demonstrating just how

47:45

unpopular the Arizona

47:48

abortion ban actually is. They asked the question.

47:50

Let's put this up on the screen. So 66%

47:54

of voters, two-thirds of the country,

47:57

disapprove of the Arizona

47:59

Supreme Court's near total ban on abortion.

48:01

That includes 82 percent of

48:03

Democrats, 66 percent of independents, and

48:06

Republicans even. Basically

48:08

split 50-50, 49 percent

48:10

of Republicans even disapprove

48:13

of that ban. So just to give you

48:15

a sense of just how toxic this

48:18

particular iteration of

48:20

abortion bans really is,

48:22

and Republicans can't really

48:24

run away from it at this point

48:26

because they spent so many years establishing

48:29

themselves in this very hardline position that you

48:31

can't try to pull a Kerry Lake and

48:34

just do a 180 and pretend like you

48:36

didn't say the things that you said in

48:38

the past because we can all roll the

48:40

tape. You're exactly right, Crystal. And just by the way,

48:43

in terms of more messaging

48:45

from Republicans, which is not

48:47

exactly helpful, here we have

48:50

Senator Marsha Blackburn of Tennessee,

48:52

where she says that Griswold

48:54

versus Connecticut is

48:56

constitutionally unsound. Griswold, for those of you

48:59

who don't know, is the one that

49:01

legalized birth control less take a listen.

49:04

Constitutionally unsound rulings like

49:07

Griswold versus Connecticut, Kelo

49:09

versus City of New

49:11

London and NFIB versus

49:13

Sebelius confused Tennesseans and

49:15

left Congress wondering who

49:18

gave the court permission to

49:20

bypass our system of checks

49:22

and balances. Okay, good luck.

49:24

Now we're against the case that legalized

49:26

birth control. All right. Unless

49:29

you guys are literally going to pass a

49:32

law almost immediately after said gets

49:34

repealed. I don't even know. Yeah. How's

49:36

that gone with IVF? I know. You know,

49:39

I mean, Republicans are blocking at the federal level. Yeah.

49:42

There's at least a pro-life case for

49:44

IVF, right? Absolutely. More babies. If

49:46

your family values, you want more babies.

49:48

Like IVF is an important part of

49:50

that. So yeah, you can see, you

49:52

know, even when they recognize this is

49:54

politically disastrous, like in Arizona, Kerry Lake

49:56

trying to backtrack, Donald Trump's like, Oh,

49:58

of course we support IBS, etc,

50:01

etc. When it comes down

50:03

to how they actually vote, they

50:05

just can't do it because there's

50:07

still so much influence from the

50:10

very organized pro-life crowd, which has been able

50:12

over decades. I mean, listen, you have to

50:14

give it to them in terms of their

50:17

stick to it. In terms of

50:19

their determination, in terms of like the savvy

50:21

tactics that they used, but to

50:23

basically force a minority fringe position on

50:25

the entire country. And the part that

50:28

they failed on though, was having any

50:30

sort of plan for what happens next.

50:32

So in that way, they really are the

50:35

dog that caught the car with regards to

50:37

Roe being overturned and the Dobbs decision and

50:39

it's a wild, wild west out there. That's

50:41

all I'll say. Exactly right.

50:45

So we don't want to lose sight of some of the updates

50:47

that are coming out of Israel, including

50:49

a bombshell new report from

50:51

UNRWA. Now, as we head into the segment, I

50:54

just want you to keep in mind as a

50:56

context that our government

50:58

just officially certified that

51:01

they have no evidence Israel is

51:03

violating international humanitarian law. Okay. Keep

51:05

that in mind as we move

51:07

forward. Let's put this latest report

51:09

from UNRWA on detainees,

51:12

Palestinian detainees being held by Israel being

51:14

tortured. This matches up by the way

51:17

with a number of prior media accounts,

51:19

but I want to give you some

51:21

of the specifics here because they really

51:24

matter. So first of all, let me

51:26

read a little bit from this report.

51:28

They say ill treatment of detainees was

51:30

reported to have occurred primarily while

51:33

in the barracks and to have

51:35

intensified in advance of interrogation sessions.

51:37

This included being subjected to beatings

51:39

while meaning to lie on a

51:41

thin mattress on top of rubble

51:43

for hours without food, water or

51:46

access to a toilet with their

51:48

legs and hands bound with plastic

51:50

ties. As a side note, there

51:52

are doctors who came out and

51:54

said that amputations of limbs because

51:56

of handcuffing procedures was commonplace in

51:59

these facilities. The report goes on

52:01

to say several detainees reported being forced into

52:03

cages and attacked by dogs. Some

52:06

released detainees, including a child, had dog

52:08

bite wounds on their body. Detainees

52:11

were threatened with prolonged detention, injury

52:13

or the killing of family members

52:15

if they did not provide requested

52:18

information. One detainee said,

52:20

and this is difficult to hear,

52:23

so warning there, but this is their

52:25

quote, They made me sit

52:27

on something like a hot metal stick, and

52:29

it felt like I have

52:31

burns in the anus. The

52:33

soldiers hit me with their shoes on my chest

52:35

and used something like a metal stick that had

52:38

a small nail on the side. They asked us

52:40

to drink from the toilet and made the dogs

52:42

attack us. There were people who

52:44

were detained and killed, maybe nine of

52:46

them. One of them died

52:48

after they put the electric stick up his

52:51

anus. He got so sick, we

52:53

saw worms coming out of his body.

52:55

And then he died. That

52:57

was an adult male detainee who was aged 41

52:59

years. There have

53:01

been thousands of Palestinians that we know

53:03

who have been detained by the Israelis

53:05

since October 7th. In

53:07

addition, in cyber, this is very significant to

53:09

the US and our policy because you'll recall.

53:13

We led the charge in terms

53:15

of defunding UNRWA, UNRWA being the

53:18

number one aid organization on the

53:20

ground in Gaza. That is part

53:22

of what has contributed to these

53:24

disastrous humanitarian conditions, including mass

53:27

epidemic of starvation in children, literally starving to

53:30

death. So we led the charge on that.

53:33

Our Congress has now passed legislation

53:35

that requires we continue the

53:37

defunding of UNRWA through at least

53:39

2025. Well,

53:41

and this was all based on these

53:44

allegations that some UNRWA staff members participated

53:46

in some way, some small number of

53:48

UNRWA staff members. This was the allegation,

53:51

participated in some way alongside Hamas on

53:53

October 7th. Well, in

53:55

addition, what this report says is that

53:57

UNRWA staff members reported being in terror.

53:59

about the work performed by UNRWA and

54:02

the specific functions they perform on behalf

54:04

of UNRWA. They also reported

54:06

being subjected to threats and coercion while

54:08

in detention and being pressured to

54:10

make forced concessions against

54:13

the agency, including that the

54:15

agency has affiliations with Hamas and

54:17

the UNRWA staff took part in

54:19

the October 7 attacks against Israel.

54:22

So what this report indicates is

54:24

that those supposed confessions were

54:27

obtained under torture. This

54:29

again, Sagar, is something that had

54:31

been previously reported in the press,

54:33

but confirmation here coming from a

54:36

UN body of the outright torture

54:38

being committed routinely against Palestinian detainees

54:40

being held by Israel. We got

54:42

some statement from the State Department of

54:44

like, you know, we want answers from Israel.

54:46

I'm sure we'll never get those. Yeah, that's

54:48

the it's ironic, right? And it's also one

54:50

of those interesting point that Dave brought up

54:52

last night at the zero hedge debate is

54:54

he kept saying like one of the reasons

54:56

that we're able to have hostage swaps

54:59

is he's like because Israel has a bunch

55:01

of hostages, excuse me, prisoners. And it was

55:03

one of those things where I was thinking,

55:06

you know what, that really doesn't get a

55:08

lot more attention about who exactly some of

55:10

these prisoners are. And in terms of

55:12

the way not only that they're

55:15

treated, but in terms of the way that

55:17

they're like, desperately viewed. And I think that

55:19

that is part of the issue overall with

55:21

US policy. We focus a lot on one

55:23

group. We completely obscure the actions of another

55:25

group. And the real issue

55:28

from what I really, you know, what

55:30

came home to me yesterday is that

55:32

for the pro Israel side, moral relativism

55:34

itself is the enemy and the enemy

55:36

of that. And I understand

55:38

that to a certain extent. But

55:40

the issue is that whenever we're talking

55:43

here specifically about the

55:45

government, a third party actor allegedly for

55:47

the US and our disparate treatment and

55:49

the way that we view one group

55:51

and not the other group, I think

55:53

that's where everything just completely falls apart

55:55

because we're not even talking about our

55:57

interests here. We're just like blindly supporting

55:59

another group. Well, there's just a

56:01

blanket assumption that if it's the

56:03

actions of Israelis, if

56:05

they do something wrong, which, you know, comes with

56:07

a lot of, well, I don't know who said

56:09

that, we need proof, whatever. And maybe it's just

56:11

Hamas made this up or you're anti-Semitic. That's why

56:13

you're saying this. But if they

56:16

in some rare instance did something wrong,

56:18

it was always with the best of intentions. Whereas

56:21

if it was a Palestinian and certainly

56:23

if it was Hamas, they did something

56:25

wrong. Well, the worst possible intentions are

56:27

assumed. And so you can, you know,

56:30

some of the comments that were made with

56:32

a straight face about like, well, Israel doesn't

56:35

intentionally target civilians. It's like, have you been

56:37

watching the same word that we have where

56:39

they literally announce a complete siege

56:42

that definitionally targets literally

56:44

every civilian in the God and Strip?

56:47

Not to mention, you know, the revelations that

56:49

just came out about this A.I. software, where's

56:52

daddy, where they're intentionally waiting for

56:54

militants to go home so that

56:57

they are killed alongside their wives,

56:59

children, other relatives, any other civilian

57:01

who happens to be around. There's

57:03

something else that is very

57:06

disturbing about the way

57:08

the Israelis have talked about and

57:10

conducted this assault, which is they've

57:12

just made the blanket assumption that

57:14

any man who is even

57:16

proximately fighting age is a terrorist. And

57:19

it's been sort of accepted by the media.

57:21

And I get it in terms of when

57:24

we're looking at how many people have been

57:26

killed, you know, for sure, if

57:28

it's a woman or a child, OK, they're

57:30

a civilian. So we'll count them. And then

57:32

you just sort of assume then that every

57:35

man who's being slaughtered

57:37

deserve to be killed or deserve to

57:39

be detained and tortured and had a

57:41

metal rod shoved up their ass. There

57:45

that is there's like an actual war

57:47

on men and assumption that

57:49

they are inherently guilty if

57:51

they happen to be a fighting

57:54

age that I find to be

57:56

very deeply, deeply disturbing. At

57:58

the same time, we're getting. another bombshell

58:00

report about our own government, which

58:03

again, remember the context of this segment, just

58:05

certified so that we can continue

58:08

to ship Israel weapons, that Israel

58:10

is not violating international humanitarian law

58:12

or committing war crimes. Okay, put

58:15

this up on the screen. So

58:17

our Secretary of State, Tony Blinken, is

58:21

sitting on staff recommendations to

58:23

sanction certain Israeli military

58:25

units, which were linked to killings

58:28

or rapes. This

58:30

is a pro-Publica report. Let me read you

58:32

a little bit of this. A special State

58:35

Department panel recommended months ago that Tony

58:37

Blinken disqualify multiple Israeli military and

58:40

police units from receiving US aid

58:42

after reviewing allegations they committed serious

58:44

human rights abuses. But Blinken has

58:46

failed to act on a proposal

58:48

in the face of growing international

58:50

criticisms of the Israeli military's conduct

58:52

in Gaza. The incidents under review

58:55

mostly took place in the West

58:57

Bank and occurred before

58:59

October They include

59:02

reports of extrajudicial killings by the

59:04

Israeli border police, an incident in

59:06

which a battalion gagged, handcuffed, and

59:09

left an elderly Palestinian-American man for

59:11

dead, and an allegation

59:14

that interrogators tortured and

59:16

raped a teenager who

59:18

had been accused of throwing rocks

59:20

and Molotov cocktails. And part of

59:22

that torture was attempting to obtain

59:24

a confession from

59:27

this teenager who they

59:29

allegedly raped with an object

59:32

and tortured in a variety

59:34

of other ways. So

59:36

let me just underscore for you, number

59:38

one, this was before October 7. So

59:41

this idea that everything was all hunky-dory and

59:43

peaceful and there was a ceasefire and whatever

59:45

before October 7. Clearly nonsense. This

59:47

was the West Bank. This wasn't even Gaza. So

59:49

you can't do, you know, butt-homos with any of

59:52

this. And second of all, when

59:55

the State Department came out and said, we have

59:57

no evidence that they've committed human rights abuses. It's

1:00:00

a lie. It's just a lie. Your

1:00:04

own state department panel

1:00:07

told you they were

1:00:09

committing human rights abuses. You

1:00:11

have the report. It's sitting in your briefcase

1:00:13

or in your desk or in your email

1:00:15

file or wherever. You have it. So

1:00:18

when you say we have no

1:00:21

evidence of that, you are just

1:00:23

directly bold faced lying, which isn't

1:00:25

a surprise, but it's still important

1:00:27

to have this direct confirmation from

1:00:29

ProPublica. Yeah, absolutely. I mean, the reason

1:00:31

why it matters, I think, just to

1:00:33

reiterate is that if you find them

1:00:36

officially in violation, then you can't give

1:00:38

them any aid because of the Leahy

1:00:40

law. We have laws on the books

1:00:42

that are designed specifically for this purpose.

1:00:45

But I will also say they have always found

1:00:47

a way. And like I

1:00:49

said, one of the first stories that I chased

1:00:51

hard here in Washington is that

1:00:53

the U.S. government had direct evidence

1:00:56

that the Afghan military, who we

1:00:58

were funding, very similar cases,

1:01:00

were raping little boys

1:01:03

straight up and that our money

1:01:05

was directly supporting the warlords who were

1:01:07

participating in this. And in fact, one

1:01:09

of the sources that I had told

1:01:11

me that in some cases, U.S. military

1:01:13

equipment, Humvees and others provided to the

1:01:15

Afghans were actually being used to transport

1:01:18

some of these children. And

1:01:20

what ended up happening, all of this, by the way, is sitting

1:01:22

in a vault. It's in Congress. They

1:01:24

just won't let you and I see it. There's

1:01:26

an unclassified version that was eventually, some

1:01:28

of it was released, some of it was leaked to

1:01:30

the Washington Post. But because if

1:01:33

they released those findings, we would have

1:01:35

to shut off the whole war in Afghanistan. And

1:01:37

this was while we were still involved

1:01:39

in that. So what do you think they did?

1:01:41

They just classified the entire thing. And then they

1:01:43

also started doing all kinds of other things where

1:01:45

certain casualty numbers and others ended up being released. That's

1:01:47

when we could tell how badly the Afghan military was

1:01:50

doing. So what they would do is they would just

1:01:52

classify the number of dead for the first time in

1:01:54

19 years or whatever of our

1:01:56

experience in Afghanistan. And this is textbook, the

1:01:58

ways that you get around. laws

1:02:00

like this. And it is just this is the

1:02:03

real deep state right here. Yeah, the deep state.

1:02:05

You know, there have been a few

1:02:07

State Department officials, employees who have resigned

1:02:10

out of horror at the Biden administration's

1:02:12

policy vis-a-vis Israel. And one of the

1:02:14

things they point to is that

1:02:17

Israel gets this special

1:02:20

treatment. You know, if it was another

1:02:22

country, certainly anyone who was remotely adversarial,

1:02:25

okay, we've got our process, we had

1:02:27

our panel. This panel

1:02:29

specifically exists to

1:02:31

look at potential human rights abuses with

1:02:33

regards to Israel specifically, like that's the

1:02:36

whole point in the panel. Any other

1:02:38

country has that panel, they make their

1:02:40

recommendations, actions are generally taken. You're

1:02:42

making a good point about how there

1:02:44

are other exceptions as well, but that Israel is

1:02:46

treated unlike other nation. And it really turns on

1:02:48

the head, you know, the thing that gets thrown

1:02:50

at people who are especially trying

1:02:53

to support Palestinian rights or who are deeply concerned

1:02:55

about this conflict or saying, Hey, I'm going to

1:02:57

vote based on Joe Biden's

1:02:59

facilitation of the slaughter of

1:03:01

Palestinians here. Why are you

1:03:03

singling out Israel? Why are you

1:03:06

just picking on Israel? And

1:03:08

it really turns that on its head, because what

1:03:10

you can see is actually the US government singles

1:03:13

out Israel time and time

1:03:15

again for special treatment and

1:03:17

allows our own,

1:03:20

you know, our own government to flout

1:03:22

laws put in place to

1:03:24

constrain behavior and make sure that we

1:03:26

aren't shipping the bombs that get dropped

1:03:28

on refugee camps as one example. But

1:03:31

when it comes to Israel, all of that

1:03:33

gets buried, it gets pushed aside, there's a

1:03:35

special procedure that's different from when it comes

1:03:37

to other countries. And so you see it

1:03:40

very clearly in this instance, you know, I'm

1:03:42

curious to see how Matt

1:03:44

Miller or whoever is at the podium today

1:03:47

in the State Department briefing, if they have

1:03:49

one, how they deal with this latest, very

1:03:51

inconvenient fact, it'll be some version of like,

1:03:53

we're investigating, we are investigating, I haven't

1:03:56

seen the report, we'll look into it,

1:03:58

we'll get back to you. take

1:04:00

it seriously, of course, but they're

1:04:02

always investigating and they're never coming to any

1:04:04

conclusions when it comes to Israel. Yep, that's right.

1:04:09

All right, let's go ahead to another

1:04:11

important issue that we did not want

1:04:13

to miss, which is yesterday. There are

1:04:15

actually two separate Senate hearings into what

1:04:17

the hell is going on over at

1:04:20

Boeing. There were two different

1:04:22

Boeing whistleblowers who raised extraordinary

1:04:25

concerns about what they reportedly

1:04:27

saw when they were in

1:04:29

Boeing's employees. Here is

1:04:31

a snippet of one of the

1:04:34

whistleblowers. This is Ed Pearson, who

1:04:36

said, in no uncertain terms, Boeing

1:04:38

is engaged in a criminal cover-up

1:04:41

with regard to safety violations. Let's take a listen.

1:04:43

Boeing routinely states that their airplanes

1:04:45

meet or exceed all safety standards.

1:04:47

This is untrue and misrepresents

1:04:49

the safety of the airplanes. The

1:04:52

company illegally removed thousands of quality

1:04:54

control inspections on individual airplanes without

1:04:56

the FAA's knowledge and without the

1:04:58

knowledge of the airlines. Although

1:05:00

many of these inspections have been reinstated,

1:05:02

hundreds of airplanes have left Boeing factories

1:05:04

without those thousands of inspections. My

1:05:07

last point is the Department of Justice

1:05:09

and FBI relied on the slanted results

1:05:11

of the first accident investigation

1:05:13

to develop an illegal and

1:05:15

unjust deferred prosecution agreement. The

1:05:18

NTSB chair reiterated to Congress last week

1:05:20

that Boeing has said there are no

1:05:22

records documenting the removal of the Alaska

1:05:24

Airlines' door. I'm not going to

1:05:27

sugarcoat this. This is a biased line, which

1:05:29

isn't a surprise, but it's still important

1:05:31

to have this direct confirmation from

1:05:33

the public. Yeah, absolutely. I mean, the

1:05:35

reason why it matters, I think, just

1:05:37

to reiterate, is that if you find

1:05:39

them officially in violation, then you can't

1:05:41

give them any aid, because of the

1:05:43

Leahy law. We have laws on the

1:05:45

books that are designed specifically for this

1:05:47

purpose. But I will also

1:05:50

say they have always found a way. And

1:05:53

like I said, one of the first

1:05:55

stories that I chased hard here in

1:05:57

Washington is that the U.S. government had

1:05:59

direct evidence. that the Afghan

1:06:01

military who we were funding,

1:06:03

very similar cases, were raping

1:06:05

little boys. Straight up.

1:06:08

And that our money was directly supporting

1:06:10

the warlords who were participating in this.

1:06:12

And in fact, one of the sources

1:06:14

that I had told me that in

1:06:16

some cases U.S. military equipment, humvees,

1:06:19

and others provided to the Afghans were actually

1:06:21

being used to transport some of these children.

1:06:23

And what ended up happening, all of this, by the way,

1:06:25

is sitting in a vault. It's in Congress. They

1:06:28

just won't let you and I see it. There's an

1:06:30

unclassified version that was eventually, some of

1:06:32

it was released, some of it was leaked to the

1:06:35

Washington Post. Because if they

1:06:37

released those findings, we would have to shut

1:06:39

off the whole war in Afghanistan. And this was

1:06:41

while we were still involved in that.

1:06:43

So what do you think they did? They just classified the

1:06:45

entire thing. And then they also started doing all kinds of

1:06:47

other things where certain casualty

1:06:50

numbers and others ended up being

1:06:52

released. That's when we could tell how badly the Afghan military

1:06:54

was doing. So what they would do is they would just

1:06:56

classify the number of dead for the first time in 19

1:06:59

years or whatever of our experience in Afghanistan.

1:07:01

And this is textbook, the ways that you

1:07:03

get around laws like this. And it is

1:07:05

just this. This is the real deep state

1:07:07

right here. This is the deep state. You know, there

1:07:09

have been a few State Department officials,

1:07:12

employees who have resigned out

1:07:15

of horror at the Biden administration's policy

1:07:17

vis-a-vis Israel. And one of

1:07:19

the things they point to is

1:07:21

that Israel gets this special

1:07:24

treatment. You know, if it was

1:07:26

another country, certainly anyone who was

1:07:28

remotely adversarial, OK, we've got our process.

1:07:31

We had our panel. This panel

1:07:33

specifically is exist to

1:07:35

look at potential human rights abuses with

1:07:37

regards to Israel specifically. Like, that's the

1:07:40

whole point in the panel. Any other

1:07:42

country has that panel. They make their

1:07:44

recommendations. Actions are generally taken. You're making

1:07:46

a good point about how there are

1:07:48

other exceptions as well. But that Israel is

1:07:50

treated unlike other nation. And it really turns on

1:07:52

the head, you know, the thing that gets thrown

1:07:54

at people who are especially trying

1:07:57

to support Palestinian rights or who are deeply

1:07:59

concerned about this. were saying, hey, I'm

1:08:01

going to vote based on Joe

1:08:03

Biden's facilitation of the slaughter of

1:08:05

Palestinians here. It's, well, why are

1:08:07

you singling out Israel? Why

1:08:09

are you just picking on Israel? And

1:08:12

it really turns out on its head, because what you

1:08:14

can see is actually the U.S. government singles

1:08:17

out Israel time and time again

1:08:19

for special treatment and

1:08:21

allows our own,

1:08:24

you know, our own government to flout

1:08:26

laws put in place to

1:08:28

constrain behavior and make sure that

1:08:30

we aren't shipping the bombs that get

1:08:32

dropped on refugee camps as one example.

1:08:35

But when it comes to Israel, all of

1:08:37

that gets buried, it gets pushed aside. There

1:08:39

is a special procedure that's different from when

1:08:41

it comes to other countries. And

1:08:43

so you see it very clearly in

1:08:45

this instance. I'm curious to see how

1:08:48

Matt Miller or whoever is at the

1:08:50

podium today in the State Department briefing,

1:08:52

if they have one, how they deal

1:08:54

with this latest, very inconvenient fact. It'll

1:08:57

be some version of like we are

1:08:59

investigating. I haven't seen the report. We'll

1:09:01

look into it. We'll get back to

1:09:03

you. We take it seriously, of course.

1:09:06

But they're always investigating and they're never coming

1:09:08

to any conclusions when it comes to Israel. Yep,

1:09:10

that's right. Why you should choose

1:09:12

Alto for your next ride. Reason

1:09:14

number one, your first ride is

1:09:16

free. Yeah, free. We're so confident

1:09:18

that you'll be blown away by

1:09:20

Alto's professional employee drivers, luxury SUVs

1:09:22

and superior safety features that we're

1:09:24

giving you your first ride for

1:09:26

free. You'll never go back to

1:09:28

those other ride shares. And

1:09:30

that's okay. First ride on us. Download

1:09:33

the app or go to alto.com/radio

1:09:35

and use code try alto for

1:09:38

your free ride. That's code try

1:09:40

alto. Terms and conditions apply. Hey,

1:09:42

it's me Blippi and this

1:09:44

is my best friend, Mika. Hi, I'm Mika and

1:09:46

this is our brand new podcast. Blippi

1:09:52

and Mika's Road Trip. The

1:09:57

Blippi mobile will take us to a maze.

1:10:00

places We'll

1:10:07

explore and listen to the sounds of

1:10:10

awesome places like Pawn,

1:10:12

Race Travel, and even

1:10:15

Construction Stars! Follow

1:10:17

your ears what to hear

1:10:20

and we'll meet new friends along the

1:10:22

way so see just awesome new things

1:10:25

about the places and things we see

1:10:27

and hear and see what we

1:10:29

learn today It's so cool! Listen

1:10:31

to Plumpian Mika's Road Trip

1:10:33

Podcast on the iHeartRadio app

1:10:36

Apple Podcasts or wherever you get

1:10:39

your podcasts Bring

1:10:42

a little optimism into your life with The

1:10:44

Bright Side a new kind of daily podcast

1:10:46

from Hello Sunshine hosted by me, Danielle Robe

1:10:49

and me, Simone Boyce. Every

1:10:51

weekday we're bringing you conversations about culture, the

1:10:53

latest trends, inspiration, and so much more. Thank

1:10:55

you for taking the light and you're going

1:10:57

to shine it all over the world and it

1:10:59

makes me really happy. I never imagined that I

1:11:01

would get the chance to carry this honor

1:11:03

and help be a part of this legacy.

1:11:05

Listen to The Bright Side on America's number

1:11:07

one podcast network, iHeart. Open your

1:11:10

free iHeart app and search The Bright Side. Alright,

1:11:14

let's go ahead to another important issue

1:11:16

that we did not want to miss,

1:11:18

which is yesterday. There are actually two

1:11:21

separate Senate hearings into what the hell

1:11:23

is going on over at Boeing. There

1:11:26

were two different Boeing

1:11:28

whistleblowers who raised extraordinary

1:11:31

concerns about what they reportedly saw

1:11:33

when they were in Boeing's employ.

1:11:35

Here is a snippet of one

1:11:37

of the whistleblowers. This is Ed

1:11:39

Pearson, who said, in no uncertain

1:11:42

terms, Boeing is engaged in a

1:11:44

criminal cover-up with regard to safety

1:11:46

violations. Let's take a listen. Boeing

1:11:48

routinely states that their airplanes meet or

1:11:50

exceed all safety standards. This

1:11:53

is untrue and misrepresents the safety

1:11:55

of the airplanes. The company illegally

1:11:57

removed thousands of quality control inspections.

1:12:00

on individual airplanes without the FAA's

1:12:02

knowledge and without the knowledge of

1:12:04

the airlines. Although many of

1:12:06

these inspections have been reinstated, hundreds of

1:12:08

airplanes have left Boeing factories without those

1:12:10

thousands of inspections. My last point

1:12:12

is the Department of Justice and FBI relied

1:12:14

on the slanted results of

1:12:17

the first accident investigation to

1:12:19

develop an illegal and unjust

1:12:21

deferred prosecution agreement. The

1:12:23

NTSB chair reiterated to Congress last week

1:12:25

that Boeing has said there are no

1:12:27

records documenting the removal of the Alaska

1:12:30

Airlines' door. I'm not going to

1:12:32

sugarcoat this. This is a criminal cover-up. Records

1:12:34

do in fact exist. I

1:12:36

know this because I've personally passed them to the

1:12:39

FBI. Now, I want to underscore what

1:12:41

he's saying right there because

1:12:43

these hearings are of course directly about

1:12:45

that Alaska Airlines' door plug, which came

1:12:47

out in mid-flight. Terrifying, thank God no

1:12:49

one was injured, really by the grace

1:12:51

of God it could have been that

1:12:53

everyone on board that aircraft was deceased.

1:12:56

And in the context of that

1:12:58

investigation, Boeing said, oh, some of these safety

1:13:01

records, I don't know what happened to them.

1:13:04

We misplaced them. Oops, just

1:13:06

an honest mistake here. And

1:13:08

he's saying very directly, no, no,

1:13:10

no, you didn't misplace them. Those

1:13:12

records existed. And I know, and

1:13:15

I'm calling this a criminal

1:13:17

cover-up directly because I handed

1:13:20

those records to the federal

1:13:22

government. So an extraordinary

1:13:24

claim, their saga, there

1:13:27

was another whistleblower, Sam Solopur,

1:13:29

a Boeing quality engineer who

1:13:32

testified to Josh Hawley, their

1:13:34

planes are not safe. And

1:13:36

he claims he was threatened and silenced

1:13:39

by the company as well as take a listen to a

1:13:41

little bit of what he had to say. Are these planes safe?

1:13:45

Right now, I would not say, you know, it's

1:13:47

like an earthquake. You know, the

1:13:49

big earthquake is coming, but when

1:13:52

that hits, the building that, you know,

1:13:54

let's say if you're talking of a

1:13:56

building, have to be prepared to accommodate

1:13:59

the that type of a, let's say, shakeup.

1:14:01

You know, it has to be built properly.

1:14:04

Right now, from what I've seen, the airplanes

1:14:06

are not being built per spec

1:14:08

and per requirement. So your testimony is

1:14:10

the 787 line and

1:14:13

the 777, the 777 line, you

1:14:17

think are not? Well, they

1:14:19

are doing stuff that increases

1:14:21

the risk factors, okay?

1:14:23

When you increase the risk factors, you

1:14:26

know, it's not just one. You are

1:14:28

doing stress concentrations that those

1:14:30

stress concentrations, like, you know, breaking a

1:14:32

paperclip, you know, you do it once

1:14:34

or twice, it doesn't break, but it

1:14:36

breaks at some time. As the plane

1:14:38

gets older, you know, all of

1:14:40

these things that, you know, you took, you

1:14:43

know, you said it's not a safety issue, it

1:14:45

becomes a safety issue. And the company's response to

1:14:47

you was to threaten you? Threaten

1:14:52

you, sideline you, you

1:14:54

know, transfer you. You raised concerns about

1:14:56

the 787, so they transferred you

1:14:59

to the 777, right? Well,

1:15:01

yes. Initially, they just cut me

1:15:03

off of all the meetings. They took

1:15:05

my name out, and then so I

1:15:08

was just doing nothing. I wasn't informed of

1:15:10

what. Then they transferred me, and they do

1:15:12

it pretty stealthy. Oh, we have a job

1:15:14

over here, we want to go over there.

1:15:16

So they move you down there, and you

1:15:18

know, I come from like 40 years of

1:15:20

engineering background. So when I see, and I've

1:15:23

taken a lot of stress classes, even

1:15:26

though I'm not an specialist on that,

1:15:29

but when there's a problematic area that

1:15:31

you see, you can recognize. So

1:15:34

another, let's put this last tear sheet up

1:15:36

on the screen. He made an additional comment

1:15:38

that really jumped out. I mean, I'm sure

1:15:40

you'll find it noteworthy as well, Sagar. He

1:15:42

said, quote, in regards to retaliation, I was

1:15:44

sidelined, I was told to shut up, I

1:15:47

received physical threats. My boss said,

1:15:49

I would have killed someone who

1:15:51

said what you said in that

1:15:53

meeting. Center Richard Blumenthal in

1:15:55

addition asked about, hey, what about the

1:15:57

FAA? What if we hired more inspectors?

1:16:00

would that help? And one

1:16:02

of these individuals who was a former

1:16:04

FAA engineer said, yeah, that would help.

1:16:06

But the attitude right now at the

1:16:09

FAA is that Boeing dictates to the

1:16:12

FAA. So, I mean,

1:16:14

these are deep seated problems here.

1:16:16

And the consistent issue

1:16:18

that comes up very clearly

1:16:20

over and over again is it

1:16:23

was about profits over safety.

1:16:25

They were willing to cut corners. There

1:16:27

are some horrifying examples about employees

1:16:30

who were jumping on plane parts

1:16:33

to try to bend them so they would fit in. And

1:16:35

now you think you're going to be

1:16:37

safe on that airplane? That

1:16:39

they have completely lost their

1:16:41

way. And the FAA, you

1:16:44

know, has become really captured

1:16:46

by this corporation and effectively

1:16:48

has outsourced their own regulatory

1:16:50

capabilities to the company itself.

1:16:52

Yeah, he says that Boeing should ground every

1:16:54

single 787 Dreamliner, which is

1:16:56

in the sky. He says 1,000

1:16:59

Boeing planes are currently in a danger

1:17:01

of structural failure because of premature fatigue.

1:17:03

On the 787 specifically, he

1:17:05

says that tiny gaps in plane parts

1:17:07

have not yet been properly filled. According

1:17:10

to him, they have not been properly

1:17:12

addressed 98.7% of the time. And that debris

1:17:14

is now lodged in 80% of these unfilled gaps, which could

1:17:20

easily result in a fire. He

1:17:23

claims, as you said, that people are

1:17:25

literally using their feet to jump on top

1:17:27

of pieces of the airplane to get them

1:17:29

to align and that none of the stress

1:17:31

testing which is happening, which is leaving

1:17:34

catastrophic gaps of error.

1:17:37

Combine that with the criminal coverup safety

1:17:39

documents that the other gentleman said that

1:17:41

he's given to the FBI. And it's

1:17:43

like, what more evidence do we need

1:17:45

here? We need a complete national takeover

1:17:47

of Boeing until we can figure out

1:17:49

what the hell is going on. Especially

1:17:52

because we are the ones paying back to

1:17:54

the tax situation. Yes, Boeing makes a

1:17:56

lot of money in their private business. They also wouldn't

1:17:58

survive without the US government. company

1:18:00

out a million times since its

1:18:02

inception and recently in 2020. We

1:18:06

fund huge portions of their

1:18:08

business through the military industrial

1:18:10

complex. It's not just

1:18:12

passengers which are unsafe, it's our service members.

1:18:14

And then look at the F-35 program, which

1:18:16

is a complete nightmare. Not Boeing, but still,

1:18:18

it's a similar situation. My point is just

1:18:20

that commercial aviation,

1:18:22

there's 100 million Americans

1:18:24

who step foot on a plane at

1:18:26

some point in a year, on a

1:18:29

yearly basis. It's one third of the

1:18:31

entire country. And there's a great shot

1:18:33

that you're stepping on a Boeing aircraft.

1:18:35

I've been counting recently, seven out of

1:18:37

the 10 last planes that

1:18:39

I've been on were Boeing. And

1:18:41

it's like in every single one of these,

1:18:43

you just look at that and you're like,

1:18:45

well, you know, hope it works out. And

1:18:47

yes, commercial aviation is very safe statistically and

1:18:49

all of that. But the catastrophic failures, which

1:18:52

we see today, were not ever part

1:18:54

of commercial aviation before. It

1:18:56

was all a result of the pursuit of

1:18:59

profit, the sacrifice of safety, the lack of

1:19:01

government regulation and just a complete criminal cover

1:19:03

up now at this point, because lives are

1:19:05

not just at stake. Lives have been lost.

1:19:07

Hundreds of people died as a result of

1:19:10

Boeing's mistakes not just that long ago. And

1:19:12

now this is the second instance in just

1:19:14

a matter of five years where people's lives

1:19:16

directly put at risk as a result of

1:19:18

a failure at this company. And the number

1:19:21

of safety instances that are stacking up at

1:19:23

this point, I mean, it has been essential

1:19:26

to the commercial airline industry that they have

1:19:28

this pristine safety record because guess what? People

1:19:30

feel a little nervous getting on an airplane

1:19:32

and flying so high up there and thinking

1:19:34

about what could happen. And

1:19:37

the only reason that prospect works is

1:19:39

because you can look at it statistically and say, I'm

1:19:41

actually more at risk when I get in my car.

1:19:44

Well, what is that calculus starts to

1:19:46

change? And then, you know, to

1:19:48

your tax point, a modest proposal. How about

1:19:50

you send our tax dollars instead of going

1:19:53

to bomb babies? How about you

1:19:55

send our tax dollars to have a real FAA

1:19:57

that has the capability to actually regulate

1:20:00

and not just say, hey, Boeing, are you

1:20:02

doing a good job? OK, great work. Keep

1:20:05

it up. Because that's what we have right now. And by the way, this is

1:20:07

a problem across the board with regulatory

1:20:09

agencies. This was a whole sort

1:20:12

of like neoliberal ideological project of

1:20:14

we're effectively going to gut these

1:20:16

agencies. They're not going to have

1:20:18

the technical know-how to even, you

1:20:20

know, credibly regulate

1:20:23

these complex industries, let

1:20:25

alone the manpower or the funding. So

1:20:27

this is that's part of why this

1:20:29

story is so important. It's important on

1:20:31

its own just because of how significant

1:20:33

this one company is and how entangled

1:20:35

it is with the American taxpayer in

1:20:37

all of our lives. But

1:20:40

it's also important because it's so

1:20:42

symbolic of a deeper rot that

1:20:44

really exists in almost every industry

1:20:46

that you care to dig into.

1:20:48

So extraordinarily significant testimony that we

1:20:51

heard yesterday. And of course, we

1:20:53

can't forget about the

1:20:55

prior whistleblower who raised similar,

1:20:57

very significant concerns about a

1:21:00

lack of attention to detail,

1:21:02

about taking parts that had

1:21:04

been discarded as, you know,

1:21:06

these are defective, pulling them out of the

1:21:08

heap and putting them into airplanes.

1:21:10

And then lo and behold, while he is

1:21:13

in the middle of testifying, he is, quote

1:21:15

unquote, found dead. And at least

1:21:17

some of his coworkers do not believe that he

1:21:19

committed suicide. Still a lot of questions around

1:21:21

what the hell happened there. So kudos to these two

1:21:23

men who know that their safety is at risk. There's

1:21:26

no doubt about it. As he said, he literally said

1:21:28

his boss said that he would have killed somebody who

1:21:30

said what he said. So I guess we

1:21:32

should just state for the record, neither of these men are suicidal. And

1:21:34

I hope that they have some records and

1:21:36

all of that ready and that their families and all that

1:21:39

are prepared for their safety as well. Yeah, indeed.

1:21:42

We wanted to track a really important

1:21:44

labor story. Of course, we covered extensively

1:21:46

the United Auto Worker negotiations with the

1:21:48

big three, which netted a significant contract

1:21:50

improvement for all of the workers there.

1:21:53

That seems to have sparked quite a

1:21:55

bit of momentum in terms of unionizing

1:21:58

more auto workers around the country. country,

1:22:00

including at foreign automakers, and

1:22:02

the UAW's new president, Sean Fain,

1:22:05

very aggressively going after these

1:22:07

new organizing drives. And

1:22:10

one of the big places where

1:22:12

they are laying their claim is

1:22:14

in a Tennessee Volkswagen plan, which

1:22:17

has previously—they previously attempted to unionize

1:22:19

this workforce, and it got voted

1:22:21

down twice before, but they feel really good

1:22:23

about their prospects this time around for a variety of

1:22:25

reasons I'll get into. You put this up

1:22:28

on the screen from Bloomberg. Headline here,

1:22:30

how the UAW is winning over new

1:22:32

plants, starting with Volkswagen. So

1:22:34

this factory is actually voting right

1:22:36

now on whether to become the

1:22:38

only foreign commercial carmaker that is

1:22:40

unionized in the United States would

1:22:42

also be the first plant to

1:22:44

join the UAW since that strike

1:22:46

last fall that we covered so

1:22:48

extensively. One of the members of

1:22:50

the organizing committee, one of the workers there at

1:22:52

the Tennessee factory, says, quote, we're going to be

1:22:54

the first domino to fall and encourage

1:22:56

these other plants to get out there with

1:22:59

us. As I referenced before, there

1:23:01

were two prior attempts.

1:23:04

Now, the South is notoriously difficult

1:23:06

in terms of unionizing. They have

1:23:08

right to work laws, quote, unquote,

1:23:10

right to work laws and a

1:23:14

general anti-union climate. There was a lot

1:23:16

of sort of political involvement from the

1:23:18

governor at the time, effectively threatening these

1:23:20

workers that if they do decide to

1:23:22

unionize, then the plant is going to

1:23:24

be shut down. Now, that is illegal

1:23:26

to do, but there

1:23:28

was, of course, no accountability. So

1:23:31

this time around, they

1:23:33

have gotten a supermajority of workers

1:23:36

to sign the card indicating they

1:23:38

would like to unionize. So that's

1:23:40

significant. They really have made it

1:23:43

a very local worker

1:23:45

ground up movement to try to

1:23:47

unionize this time. And I

1:23:49

think the two other things I would point to

1:23:51

here, why they feel so good about this, is

1:23:54

that, number one, you have, as opposed to 2019

1:23:57

under Trump, you have a much more pro-union

1:23:59

president. much more pro-Union NLRB.

1:24:02

So you've got a friendlier climate in terms

1:24:04

of some of the, you know, decisions that

1:24:06

could come from the NLRB in terms of

1:24:09

unionizing. But the big thing is this momentum

1:24:11

from UAW. You know, you

1:24:14

look at what they were able to achieve,

1:24:16

and these workers are saying, hey, I'm doing

1:24:18

literally the same job, and I'm

1:24:21

not getting nearly what they're getting. So

1:24:23

that's an incredibly powerful motivator

1:24:26

as well. You've got some

1:24:28

Republican politicians in Tennessee and in

1:24:30

other states that UAW also has

1:24:33

their eyes set on, really trying

1:24:35

to trash this and undermine this effort.

1:24:38

A Tennessee state senator said voting against

1:24:40

the UAW is protecting Tennessee's values. In

1:24:42

Alabama, the UAW is making inroads at

1:24:45

a Hyundai plant. The governor there, K.

1:24:47

Ivey, has denounced the union as a

1:24:49

threat from Detroit, warned that the Alabama

1:24:52

model for economic success is under attack.

1:24:54

And Sean Fain, the president of

1:24:56

UAW, replied to that. She's damn

1:24:58

right it is. It's under attack because workers

1:25:00

are fed up with getting screwed. So yeah,

1:25:03

interesting there. It is actually, especially

1:25:05

because so much of what's

1:25:08

going on in the South. One of

1:25:10

the things I'm really watching is how

1:25:12

politics are changing down in the South

1:25:14

and in the Sun Belt. We've had

1:25:16

a huge population influx. The economies of

1:25:18

these states are booming, manufacturing, but they're

1:25:20

still controlled by older red

1:25:22

state ideology, despite the fact that their

1:25:25

voters have significantly changed. So, for example,

1:25:27

this is happening in the state of

1:25:29

Tennessee. Tennessee is not that many people.

1:25:31

They have had a huge influx, specifically

1:25:33

in the city of Nashville, the rich suburbs

1:25:35

of Franklin, and others from California, from all

1:25:38

over New York, etc. The question now is

1:25:40

that in the combination also with a lot

1:25:42

of the economic growth, is are they going

1:25:44

to stick to some of this right-to-work policy

1:25:47

and other things that they traditionally have? Now,

1:25:49

for right now, it does seem like that

1:25:51

is the direction. But with the change

1:25:53

in voters, but also what I think is

1:25:56

going to be a change in their economy.

1:25:58

I mean, no offense, Georgia. You

1:26:00

weren't exactly an economic powerhouse, but

1:26:02

nowadays like you really are becoming

1:26:05

one, Florida, Alabama, Tennessee There's a

1:26:07

ton of manufacturing that is down

1:26:09

there from BMW Toyota and all

1:26:11

these other Volkswagen etc

1:26:13

And they're gonna have to grapple and kind

1:26:16

of change with some of the new Updates

1:26:19

to their population and to their economies as

1:26:21

well So yeah, I think that's this is

1:26:23

actually a preview of what I expect big

1:26:25

big fights in the Sunbelt Arctic It's a

1:26:27

real test case of whether or

1:26:29

not, you know And it's very

1:26:31

symbolic to since the vote failed

1:26:33

here twice if they could pull

1:26:35

it off It really does show that it's a new

1:26:37

day that it's a new climate The other factor I

1:26:39

forgot to mention is just unions are way more popular

1:26:41

than they used to be Yeah, that's true. You know,

1:26:43

they're sort of a historic high in

1:26:45

terms of popularity and receptivity I saw this course

1:26:48

trying to find it specifically from a worker But

1:26:50

who said, you know, they looked at the UAW

1:26:52

contract and they said I want my

1:26:54

life to be more like what they've

1:26:56

got Yeah, nothing could be more powerful

1:26:58

than seeing that model of success and that is

1:27:01

a 180 From what

1:27:03

has been happening our entire lives with

1:27:05

regard to the labor movement where every

1:27:07

contract is Concessionary and they're having to take cuts

1:27:09

and cuts and cuts and so yeah Rationally

1:27:12

if you're a worker you look at that and you're like, yeah

1:27:14

This is risky and they're telling me they're gonna shut down the

1:27:16

plant and it's not even looking like they're got booming

1:27:19

manufacturing But they're still controlled

1:27:21

by older red state ideology

1:27:23

Despite the fact that there are voters that

1:27:26

significantly changed So for example, this is happening

1:27:28

in the state of Tennessee Tennessee is not

1:27:30

that many people where they have had a

1:27:32

huge influx Specifically in the city of

1:27:35

Nashville the rich suburbs of Franklin and

1:27:37

others from California from all over New

1:27:39

York Etc. The question now is that

1:27:41

in the combination also with a lot

1:27:43

of the economic growth is are they

1:27:45

gonna stick to some of this? You

1:27:48

know right to work policy and other things

1:27:50

that they traditionally have now for right now

1:27:52

It does seem like that is the direction

1:27:54

but with the change in voters But also

1:27:56

what I think is gonna be a change

1:27:58

in their economy. I mean no offense in

1:28:00

Georgia, you weren't exactly an economic

1:28:02

powerhouse. But nowadays, you really are

1:28:04

becoming one. Florida, Alabama,

1:28:06

Tennessee, there's a ton of manufacturing

1:28:08

that is down there for BMW,

1:28:11

Toyota, and all these other Volkswagen,

1:28:14

etc. And they're going to have to grapple

1:28:16

and kind of change with some of the

1:28:18

new updates to their population

1:28:20

and to their economies as well. So I

1:28:22

think this is actually a preview of what

1:28:24

I expect big, big fights in the Sun

1:28:26

Belt article. It's a real test

1:28:29

case of whether or not, you know, and

1:28:31

it's very symbolic, too, since the vote failed

1:28:33

here twice. If they could pull

1:28:36

it off, it really does show that it's a new

1:28:38

day, that it's a new climate. The other factor I

1:28:40

forgot to mention is just unions are way more popular

1:28:42

than they used to be. They're

1:28:44

sort of a historic high in terms of popularity

1:28:46

and receptivity. I saw this court, I was

1:28:48

trying to find it specifically from a worker

1:28:50

who said, you know, they looked at the

1:28:52

UAW contract and they said, I

1:28:54

want my life to be more like what

1:28:56

they've got. Nothing could be

1:28:58

more powerful than seeing that model of success.

1:29:01

And that is a 180 from

1:29:03

what has been happening our entire lives

1:29:05

with regard to the labor movement, where

1:29:07

every contract is concessionary and they're having to

1:29:09

take cuts and cuts and cuts. And

1:29:11

so, yeah, rationally, if you're a worker, you look

1:29:14

at that and you're like, this is risky. And

1:29:17

it's not even looking like they're getting that good

1:29:19

of a deal over there. So why should I

1:29:21

stick my neck out? Now that

1:29:24

calculation has really flipped. UAW

1:29:26

has their site on, as I said,

1:29:28

this Hyundai plant in Alabama. They also

1:29:31

are looking at Tesla. I mean, they really

1:29:33

want to make a push kind of across the board.

1:29:36

And there is no place that's more

1:29:38

important or more difficult to organize than

1:29:40

these auto plants in the South, which

1:29:42

specifically located in these states in

1:29:44

part because of their anti-union politics.

1:29:46

And they want to get away with paying

1:29:48

their workers less and giving them less benefits, et

1:29:50

cetera. And the union has been

1:29:52

doing a characteristic great job

1:29:54

covering this union drive. They

1:29:57

spoke to a worker there named

1:30:00

Robert about why he thinks this time is

1:30:02

going to be different and why some of

1:30:04

the intimidation tactics are not going to work

1:30:06

this time around. Let's listen to what he

1:30:08

had to say. The loudest voices of the

1:30:10

anti-union, they keep trying to impress this notion that

1:30:12

if we unionize, both wagons can shut us down.

1:30:14

They're going to close our factory. They're

1:30:17

not going to pull it out just because 4,000 employees out of 600,000

1:30:19

want to be organized.

1:30:24

Not to mention the fact that all of

1:30:26

their other factories are organized. The US is

1:30:28

a huge market for any auto

1:30:31

manufacturer. They all want in this

1:30:33

place. It really boils down to if you

1:30:35

have a bad union, it's bad leadership. It

1:30:37

has nothing to do with the philosophy of

1:30:39

unions or what unions can

1:30:41

gain as a whole. So there's

1:30:43

really not really great meat to

1:30:46

sink your teeth into when it comes to trying to tear

1:30:48

the idea of a union apart. And so they use the

1:30:51

old reliability like it's going to shut

1:30:54

your union down. The other

1:30:56

thing to note here, Sagar, is a

1:30:58

Volkswagen, because they work with unions in

1:31:00

other countries, I'm not going

1:31:02

to say that they've been like open

1:31:04

arms. The union drive, I'm sure the

1:31:06

organizers on the ground could point to

1:31:08

some nefarious dealings, but they have not

1:31:11

been as aggressively anti-union as

1:31:13

some other like Starbucks and

1:31:15

other Amazon and other corporate giants have

1:31:18

been. The last thing for this last element

1:31:20

up on the screen, I referred to the

1:31:22

anti-union climate and where this

1:31:24

goes next. So after this vote, there's

1:31:26

an organizing drive happening in that Alabama

1:31:28

Hyundai plant. And lawmakers

1:31:30

are there, are really trying

1:31:33

to go after any

1:31:35

companies that would even be like

1:31:37

receptive to unions. So they are

1:31:39

working on a bill that would

1:31:41

bar any sort of state incentives

1:31:43

to companies that voluntarily recognize unions.

1:31:46

So what this means is, theoretically,

1:31:49

they used to work more like this. Once

1:31:51

you have a majority of workers in the

1:31:53

bargaining unit who sign a card saying, yeah,

1:31:55

I want to unionize, employers

1:31:58

can say, OK, great. voluntarily

1:32:00

recognize it, that's it, you have a union, and

1:32:02

not go through the straw now, okay, now we

1:32:04

have to vote, blah, blah, blah, and there's this

1:32:07

battle going on at the workplace, et cetera, et

1:32:09

cetera. Okay, we got a majority here, they want

1:32:11

to be in the union there, it's a done

1:32:13

deal. So companies have that option, and Alabama lawmakers

1:32:16

are effectively, not that a lot of companies avail

1:32:18

themselves of that option, but Alabama lawmakers are trying

1:32:20

to take that option off the

1:32:22

table altogether. And you can imagine, Zara,

1:32:24

that at this point, if you do

1:32:26

have a victory at Volkswagen after some

1:32:28

of the other victors that we've

1:32:31

seen, how companies may calculate that

1:32:33

it's better for them to build goodwill for

1:32:35

their employees if they see the writing on

1:32:37

the wall, that union is definitely coming in,

1:32:39

that the workers are almost definitely going to

1:32:42

win, that they can avoid all of that,

1:32:44

save the expense, and just voluntarily recognize that

1:32:46

you move from there. Alabama

1:32:48

trying to undermine that direction. The other thing

1:32:50

about unionization is even if it's not successful,

1:32:52

for example, Costco leadership put out this statement,

1:32:54

which I thought was fantastic, where some

1:32:57

Costco shop decided

1:32:59

to unionize, and the executives

1:33:02

put out a statement, they said, hey,

1:33:04

you guys voted to unionize clearly, we're

1:33:06

doing something wrong, and I want to

1:33:08

hear what you guys want. And I want to make sure

1:33:10

that all my employees in this entire country are so well

1:33:12

taken care of, they don't feel like they have to do

1:33:14

this. Now, I mean, obviously, you've got an incentive to do

1:33:16

so, but the mere act of it was enough for them

1:33:18

to be like, okay, I guess we got to pay people

1:33:20

more. I guess we got to pay people a lot more.

1:33:23

That's such an important point. It's

1:33:25

such an important point because the

1:33:27

rise of unionism doesn't just benefit those

1:33:29

workers who happen to be in the

1:33:31

union, which is still a titillate percentage

1:33:34

of the American workforce. We've

1:33:36

seen this in the auto industry. Other

1:33:39

automakers, including Tesla, had

1:33:41

to increase their wages because they could see

1:33:43

the writing on the wall. Amazon,

1:33:46

after the Amazon labor union had

1:33:48

that historic success on organizing

1:33:51

the Staten Island warehouse, they

1:33:53

had to lift some of their wages.

1:33:55

They felt the pressure that even though

1:33:57

it was just this one warehouse. Roger.

1:34:00

I'm going on across the country that not

1:34:02

only a few, you've got the teamsters with

1:34:05

an organized amazon as Laos and so they're

1:34:07

under pressure So we are at. We gotta

1:34:09

do something to try to make our employers

1:34:11

on for you happier so that they don't

1:34:14

She is unionized as we still you know

1:34:16

what household top down control of what we've

1:34:18

got going on here. So it isn't just

1:34:20

the wages and benefits of union workers that

1:34:23

are at stake here, A really does sort

1:34:25

of set the pace. For the entire

1:34:27

industry, The entire economy. Yes, that's right, Splits

1:34:33

if is my. Guess

1:34:38

is is our brand. New. Will

1:34:46

take us to what. He

1:34:48

says. It's

1:35:19

appropriate make us road trip thought.

1:35:21

Test on the I Heart Radio

1:35:24

at Apple podcasts or wherever you

1:35:26

get your foot tests. Hey,

1:35:30

what's going on? it's preschool we

1:35:33

know. The one time radio voice

1:35:35

of the Brooklyn Nets inviting you

1:35:37

to join me for my podcast,

1:35:39

Have Enough with Chris. Presented by

1:35:41

six. Over two

1:35:44

decades I have had the privilege

1:35:46

and honor of telling the story

1:35:48

of the Nets franchise to radio

1:35:50

play by play on the podcast

1:35:52

take a little bit of a

1:35:54

deeper dive, not only remove those

1:35:57

iconic moments, would peel back the

1:35:59

curtain share. Unique insights

1:36:01

in stories through estimate conversations with

1:36:03

a great roster of guests including

1:36:05

some of your favorite players and

1:36:08

coaches. So Brooklyn that feds don't

1:36:10

miss a second of the action

1:36:12

in states For exclusive in listen

1:36:15

have a voice of it as

1:36:17

with me personally, the Army hi

1:36:19

my radio as Apple podcasts or

1:36:22

wherever you get your pocket. Bring.

1:36:31

A little optimism in your life with the

1:36:33

bright side. A new kind of daily podcast

1:36:35

I'm Hello Sunshine posted by me Danny Well

1:36:37

and me some advice. Every weekday we're bringing

1:36:40

new conversations about culture, the latest trends, inspiration

1:36:42

and so much more. Thank you for city

1:36:44

know my and you're going to send in

1:36:46

a live in a world and he really

1:36:48

happy. I never imagined that I would get

1:36:51

the chance. To carry this honor and help

1:36:53

be a part of this legacy. Listen to

1:36:55