Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
This message comes from NPR sponsored
0:02
progressive insurance, where drivers who
0:04
switch could save hundreds on car insurance.
0:06
Get your quote at progressive dot com today.
0:09
Progressive casualty insurance company,
0:11
and affiliates.
0:15
Previously, on White Lives.
0:17
Cuban inmates took over part of a
0:19
federal prison in Talladega, Alabama
0:21
today. You know, he just said it was our only
0:24
option. We had to do something, and
0:26
this was the only thing we can think of.
0:28
Undesirables who came here in the big Cuban
0:30
boat lift four years ago will be sent back.
0:33
Has the whole list been deported?
0:35
There wouldn't have been any more reason for my job.
0:37
So essentially, we are looking
0:40
for a needle in a haystack.
0:46
Linda Calhoun slept poorly the night before
0:48
it all happened. Her husband had
0:50
brought home a puppy he'd found abandoned outside
0:53
their house and Linda and her kids had spent
0:55
all night trying to calm the puppy down,
0:57
trying to get it to sleep. They
0:59
took turns feeding it with a doll bottle,
1:01
but it cried throughout the night in the next
1:03
morning, she was a wreck. So
1:05
I didn't get that much sleep that night. Maybe
1:07
I should have stayed home that day.
1:10
But Linda would work anyway. At her
1:12
job as an INS deportation docket
1:14
clerk at the Talladega Federal Correctional
1:16
Institution in rural Alabama. In
1:19
that morning, shortly after she arrived, she
1:21
and and others were taken hostage by group
1:24
of men being held in the prison. Men
1:26
who were not serving a sentence for a crime.
1:28
Men who had come from Cuba in a mass
1:30
exodus a decade before and had found
1:33
themselves detained for years of the immigration
1:35
service.
1:36
Okay. In immigration, we have regular
1:38
a files, and we have
1:41
temporary files. But
1:44
with the Cubans, we also had
1:46
blowback
1:47
files, and they were copies of
1:49
the original files. We heard
1:51
from Linda Calhoun at the very beginning
1:53
of our story. Linda had worked
1:55
at the prison at Talladega for a few years.
1:57
She'd gotten to know many of the men who held her captive
2:00
And she'd also seen their files, seen
2:02
why the AINAS said it was detaining
2:04
them. Used to amaze me
2:06
when I had nothing to do, to sit
2:08
down and open one of those and to
2:10
look and to read why
2:13
someone was in prison to
2:15
start with. You
2:18
know, some of them got sent
2:20
to prison in Cuba because they
2:23
stole shoes for their children. Or
2:26
they stole bread for their
2:28
family because they they weren't working
2:30
and the family was hungry. Think
2:32
different things like that. If they committed
2:34
that here,
2:36
I don't think there's no way that they
2:38
wouldn't gonna be sent to prison. For
2:43
years now, we've tracked down nearly everyone
2:46
we could who touched some part of the story.
2:48
We've reviewed thousands of pages in the files
2:50
in the basement of the Atlanta legal aid society
2:53
and an archives from DC to California.
2:56
And we did all this to tell a story about how
2:58
these men had gone from refugees fleeing
3:00
communism to immigration detainees,
3:03
denied due process, warehousing without
3:05
a charge in federal prisons for years
3:07
and years on
3:08
end. And in the background
3:10
of this entire story has been a secret
3:12
list The
3:13
men who found themselves detained in Talladega,
3:16
the men who took over the prison and then took
3:18
to the roof to unfurl banner that said
3:20
pray for us Those men had found
3:22
themselves there because they were on this list.
3:24
A list of two thousand seven hundred forty
3:27
six people would come over during the Mario
3:29
boatlift, but who the US had to decided
3:31
it wanted to exclude to send back
3:33
to Cuba. The list had
3:35
determined their fates, that much
3:37
we knew. But what we didn't know
3:39
and what no one else knew either were
3:41
the names of the people on the list.
3:44
The government claiming that people on the list were
3:46
the worst of the worst. A danger
3:48
to the American public. But our
3:50
reporting had shown so many stories of men
3:53
detained for a mistake, detained
3:55
for alleged crimes in Cuba detained
3:57
for reasons that would never hold up if these
3:59
men were granted any sort of constitutional protections.
4:03
For decades now, the government has refused
4:05
to say who is on the list and who is
4:07
not has refused to fully
4:09
explain how the list had been put together
4:12
and not knowing who was on the list has
4:14
made the final move in our
4:15
story, finding the men on the roof
4:18
virtually impossible. I
4:20
wonder what would happen
4:22
if if I would take a trip to
4:24
Cuba, and if I would see one
4:26
of them. I would wanna find
4:28
out what happened you know,
4:30
just you gotta wonder. Some
4:33
of them, they weren't gonna make
4:35
it to the prison there, and nobody
4:37
heard from them again. And the rest
4:39
of them that made it to the prison, to what?
4:41
To die in one of the prisons, to
4:44
stealing a loaf of bread, or
4:46
a pair of shoes, Too
4:49
many ifs. Would they
4:52
take it out on me because immigration
4:54
treated them like that? Or
4:57
would they say miss Linda? Or
5:00
would they even recognize with, you know,
5:04
that that would be, I think, the
5:06
main thing, you know, to make
5:08
sure that the fellas that
5:12
I knew that they were they were
5:14
alive and still well, that they still
5:16
weren't locked up in some little prison
5:18
or maybe in some home.
5:32
To finish telling the story, we knew we'd
5:34
have to somehow get a hold of the secret list.
5:37
This piece of tangible evidence that has always
5:39
felt like the key to fully understanding how
5:41
the United States had treated these
5:43
men. And not only that,
5:45
but the list was the clearest most direct
5:47
way to identify and find the middle
5:49
of the move. To hear them tell their own
5:51
stories. And so today,
5:53
the list, how it came to be,
5:56
and what happened when we finally got our hands
5:58
on.
6:26
From NPR, this is White Lies. I'm
6:29
Chip Brantley. And I'm Andrew Beck race.
6:31
What's
6:32
happening on NPR Podcast? More neighborhoods?
6:34
More
6:34
identities and more perspectives. The
6:36
more of the world that you hear. The
6:38
more you hear the world as it really is.
6:41
NPR podcasts or
6:43
voices, all ears. Sign NPR
6:45
wherever you get your podcasts.
6:48
This mysterious and secret list of two
6:50
thousand seven hundred and forty six names
6:52
has been a recurring theme in our
6:54
reporting. It's something that just
6:56
about everyone we've talked to has mentioned.
6:58
There was a list and I've always
7:00
wondered what happened to the ones, but
7:04
As you know, it's impossible to find
7:06
out. A
7:06
list has never been made public.
7:08
Nobody really knew who was
7:09
on the list and who was it. We never
7:12
saw the list. I
7:14
I've got all my shorthand
7:16
books with every phone call I took for thirteen
7:19
years up in the
7:19
attic. But I don't have a copy
7:21
of that list. The list has been confirmed.
7:24
We know that it exists, but
7:26
nobody has ever seen it.
7:28
That's like the unicorn. Has anybody
7:30
ever seen the list? I don't think anybody's ever
7:32
admitted to see the
7:33
list. If you find the list, I believe it's like
7:35
a science fiction creation. A
7:37
science fiction creation, a unicorn.
7:40
While everyone we've talked to seem to know of the
7:42
existence of the list, no one had
7:44
ever gotten their hands on it. But not for
7:46
lack of trying. From the moment the
7:48
list was announced, people started trying
7:50
to force the government to release it. Reporters
7:53
some and to keep an American community and Miami
7:56
family members. So the men being detained, and,
7:58
of course, the lawyers who are advocating on
8:00
their behalf. In the files in the
8:02
basement of the Atlanta legal aid society,
8:05
we found a reference to a lawsuit filed
8:07
by the ACLU. In nineteen
8:09
eighty five, the ACLU submitted a Freedom
8:11
of Information Act request to the State Department
8:14
asking for the list. The Freedom
8:16
of Information Act, also known as Foya,
8:18
gets the public. You mean anyone.
8:21
The right to request records and documents
8:23
from any agency in the executive branch
8:25
of the U. S. Government. So all those
8:27
departments and bureaus and commissions
8:29
and institutes By law, they all
8:31
have to produce previously unreleased documents
8:34
if someone requests them. That's
8:36
the good
8:36
news. The bad news is
8:38
that there are some pretty broad and open to
8:40
interpretation exemptions that an agency
8:43
can claim if they don't want to hand over the documents.
8:46
Exemption one, which is a popular one, is
8:48
that the disclosure would jeopardize national
8:50
security. There's an attorney client
8:52
privilege exemption also popular, a
8:54
privacy exemption, a trade secrets exemption,
8:57
strangely, there's even an exemption related
8:59
to geological information about wells.
9:02
Anyway, when the ACLU filed a four year
9:04
request to the state department for the list,
9:06
state denied the request and said that
9:08
releasing the names of people on the list would
9:10
be an invasion of their privacy. In
9:13
response, the ACLU sued the State
9:15
Department and Federal District Court in
9:17
DC. I don't know that we expect it to
9:19
get it from Department of State,
9:22
but it seemed that
9:24
a federal judge once
9:26
you could make a legal argument would
9:29
release the documents based on what we
9:31
knew. The point person on the suit was
9:33
the director of the ACLU's political asylum
9:35
project. An attorney named Carol Walchook.
9:38
She's now an English language teacher in DC
9:40
where she works with immigrants preparing to take the
9:42
US citizenship
9:43
exam. We met up with her one night in
9:45
a meeting room at her local public library.
9:47
We were a nonprofit organization
9:50
that provided free legal assistance to
9:53
immigrants, particularly those who are seeking
9:55
political asylum, which presumably
9:59
these cubin, detainees,
10:02
or seeking, and that
10:04
we would be available to
10:07
inform them of their rights and provide legal
10:10
assistance if we hit the list.
10:12
So
10:12
it's a practical matter. Like, in order
10:14
to do that, you have to hit the list. Of
10:16
course, they would otherwise have to somehow
10:18
know that we existed and be able to reach out
10:20
to us even if people were aware
10:23
of
10:23
us. When she sued the state department for
10:25
the list, Walsh did something that, at least,
10:27
for our knowledge, no other advocate for the
10:29
Cuban detainees had done. She
10:31
called the government's bluff on Ignat's
10:33
Maisonsé, on the entry fiction. She
10:36
said, alright state department. If the
10:38
US government says these men are exclutable,
10:40
if, like Ignats Mazai, legally
10:42
speaking, they are floating off the coast with no
10:44
constitutional rights, no due process,
10:47
then that means they don't have privacy rights
10:49
in the
10:50
US. So you can't withhold the list
10:52
because of the privacy exemption. Many
10:54
of the reasons the government could
10:56
withhold documents about individuals
10:59
who would be citizens or legal residents
11:01
or legally admitted to the US, would
11:04
not apply to this population. So,
11:07
it didn't have privacy rights as exlutable
11:10
aliens and we thought that
11:12
we should be able to get their names on that
11:14
basis. And the district court judge agreed
11:16
with her. He ordered the State Department to
11:18
hand the list over to the ACLU.
11:20
But then something very strange happened.
11:23
Well, then the government classified the document
11:26
and filed and affidavit explaining
11:28
to the judge
11:30
why they classified the document and why
11:32
it shouldn't be released to us. So
11:33
the judge
11:34
ruled in your favor -- Yes.
11:35
-- but then the state department and
11:37
response to it classifies a document.
11:40
And follows a secret affidavit with the
11:42
judge.
11:42
The same judge. With the same judge
11:45
telling the judge Why the document
11:47
now is classified and should not be released
11:49
to us?
12:03
So just to recap, the judge rules
12:05
in favor of the ACLU. Tels
12:07
the state department you gotta hand over the list.
12:10
But in response, the state department classifies
12:12
the list. Claiming that it would somehow jeopardize
12:15
national security to release it.
12:17
And to explain this decision, it submits an
12:19
affidavit to the court. But the
12:21
affidavit itself is classified.
12:24
Only the judge can read it. So then,
12:26
the judge reverses himself, his own decision,
12:28
and says to the
12:29
ACLU, Actually, I've changed
12:31
my mind, but I can't tell you why.
12:33
It's just so that that that did up to well, and
12:35
it just seems crazy. Like, how does that
12:38
is that and and I'll just not know enough about
12:40
how this works.
12:41
Imagine that it's not
12:43
the only time it's ever happened, but I've never heard
12:45
of it happening. We actually went
12:47
back to the judge to ask him to reconsider.
12:50
But again, we were in
12:53
a pretty difficult, you know, decision
12:56
considering we didn't see the
12:58
document, that the government
13:00
that the judge was
13:01
reviewing. We didn't have an access
13:03
-- Right. -- to the defendants, to
13:05
the state department's secret
13:08
affordated
13:10
in the court. We don't expect
13:12
our court system to operate that way.
13:14
I could understand too how you could
13:17
make the argument that it's in bad faith, given
13:19
that it wasn't classified as confidential before
13:22
the
13:22
lawsuit. And then it was classified just
13:24
because for the
13:26
Voya. They classified it because
13:28
the judge ordered its
13:30
release. That was the
13:32
trigger. So
13:35
that list was
13:38
and still remains classified.
13:45
So the list wasn't just hidden and mysterious.
13:47
It was classified. After
13:49
a little bedtime reading on the espionage act,
13:52
we can to understand that our search for the
13:54
list raised a whole new set of concerns.
13:57
Was it illegal for us to possess this list?
13:59
Was it illegal for us to even ask sources
14:01
for it? Why would the state department
14:03
have gone through such links to protect the
14:05
names of two thousand seven hundred forty
14:08
six people the US government had determined
14:10
were exclutable. People who were not
14:12
citizens, people who had no privacy
14:15
rights, To try and find out we
14:17
filed our own Foyer request to the Department
14:19
of State for records related to the list,
14:21
communicate diplomatic notes, correspondence
14:24
between the state department and the INS about
14:26
who to put on the list, internal mimos
14:28
about the negotiations with the Cubans. Basically,
14:31
whatever they could turn up, And of course,
14:33
the list itself classified or
14:35
not. We had very little expectation
14:38
that our requests would yield anything, that they would
14:40
even respond to us. State is
14:42
a foyer black hole someone told us.
14:44
So the request was just the first step.
14:47
When state dragged its feet we were prepared
14:49
to do what the ACLU had done in the nineteen
14:51
eighties. We intended to sue the Department
14:53
of State for those records. Most
14:55
of the records we requested from state
14:57
involved one man in particular, a
15:00
man named Michael Kozak. Kozak
15:03
had been the lead negotiator on the American side
15:05
when the list was hammered out between the US and
15:07
Cuba in nineteen eighty four. He's a longtime
15:09
diplomat with a storied career. He's
15:12
still at the state department actually, been there
15:14
fifty
15:14
years, a ten year spending ten presidents.
15:17
During the Clinton administration, he served for a
15:19
few years as chief of the US diplomatic mission
15:21
in Cuba, and then later as the US ambassador
15:24
to Belarus. But in the nineteen
15:26
eighties, he was working on issues in Latin America
15:28
and became a key point person the problem of
15:30
the Marielle detainees. Naturally,
15:33
we've wanted to talk with them, but through a state department
15:35
spokesperson ambassador Khozak declined
15:37
our request for an interview. Instead,
15:40
this spokesperson said, quote, we'd refer
15:42
you to the public statements made by ambassador
15:44
Kozak in the 1980s on this matter.
15:50
Betty will come to order.
15:51
So far as we can find, the only substantive
15:54
public statement made by ambassador Khozak
15:56
about this matter came when he was called
15:58
to testify in a House Sub Committee hearing
16:00
in nineteen eighty
16:01
eight. The hearing was about the long
16:03
saga of the Mario Exclutables And
16:05
so in many ways, it was a hearing about the list
16:07
itself. Here's ambassador Khozak
16:10
from his opening statement. think we
16:12
always should go back and remember what happened
16:14
in nineteen eighty. The
16:16
government of Cuba at that
16:18
time sent
16:21
a hundred and twenty five thousand people
16:23
to the United States without reference
16:26
to US immigration laws or US
16:28
sovereignty. And in
16:29
fact, these people were
16:32
were dumped on the United States.
16:34
He starts wide. The boatlift as an
16:36
incursion on US sovereignty. The
16:39
boatlift filled not only with relatives of
16:41
Cuban Americans who had chartered the boats in the first
16:43
place, but filled with Cuban prisoners
16:45
as well. And then he lays
16:47
out the predicament, the government faced
16:49
afterward. What do you do when somebody
16:51
like Fadel Castro takes
16:55
people out of his jails and sends him up your way.
16:57
You can either release him into your society. And
17:01
we did that and the results were they
17:03
committed more crimes. Or
17:05
you can keep them in jail indefinitely, and
17:07
we were in the process of doing that
17:09
too. And that has its downsides. Or
17:13
you can send them back where they where they came from,
17:15
recognizing that that may not be the most attractive
17:17
society in the world. But you
17:20
know, none of those are perfect options. And
17:23
we were basically
17:24
going on what the immigration law
17:26
of the United States provides for.
17:28
The US was placed in nearly impossible
17:31
spot, Kazak says. And his
17:33
job was to figure a way out. And
17:36
this telling the negotiations with Cuba, which
17:38
resulted in the list, were a resolution to the
17:40
indefinite detention of these Mario Cubans.
17:43
And so the rationale for the list makes
17:45
sense. But how did the federal government
17:47
determine who to put on the list? In
17:49
this case, the only people that we were
17:51
interested in sending back were people
17:53
who'd committed serious crimes or people
17:56
who had severe mental disorders. Okay.
17:59
A pretty clear answer. The people on the list
18:01
were people who committed serious crimes or
18:03
people who had severe mental disorders.
18:07
But elsewhere in the hearing, Kozak says
18:09
this. When we had been trying to get
18:11
names of exclutables and data on
18:13
them and so on, that there'd been a reluctance
18:16
to really go into that too
18:18
much in the in the prison system for fear
18:20
that that would upset the inmate population.
18:23
That if if they saw that we were
18:25
we were seeking information on them. The
18:27
more questions we asked, the more we would cause
18:29
people to worry about in
18:31
the prison so we get rumors
18:33
started. This is where we get tripped
18:35
up a little. Kozak has said that they
18:37
were only interested in sending people back
18:39
who had committed serious crimes or those who
18:41
had severe mental disorders. But
18:43
then he says that the government was reluctant
18:45
to ask too many questions about the background
18:47
of these men? To investigate the men
18:49
who would be put on the list because of fears
18:51
that it would start rumors among the prison
18:53
population. So what was
18:56
the criteria to get put on the list?
18:58
This is what we've wanted to ask ambassador Kozak.
19:01
These are the records we've requested from state.
19:04
It's the main question we've had about the list.
19:06
Since we first heard about its existence and
19:08
first realized how long people have been trying
19:10
to get a hold of it. How secret the government
19:12
has kept it? Given what we discovered
19:15
about who could wind up in INS detention,
19:17
Gennaro Saroglass detained for
19:19
mistranslation Alberto Herrera,
19:22
detained for the theft of goat cheese in Cuba
19:24
in the seventies. The men at Fort
19:26
Shaffee, detained for not being
19:29
able to get sponsored out of Fort Shaffee. It
19:31
made you wonder, what kind of due
19:33
diligence did the US government conduct
19:35
about these men in custody in nineteen eighty
19:37
four? I've been asked over the
19:39
years. How
19:40
did you get on the list? Were those the worst
19:42
people? No. That's Gary Lishaw
19:44
again. He's the one who'd given us access
19:46
to the files in the basement of the Atlanta legal
19:49
aid society. He'd represented hundreds
19:51
of Cuban men detained by the INS throughout
19:53
the nineteen eighties. And his read on the
19:55
list? You got on the list because
19:57
on that day, those are the
19:59
people that the US government could identify.
20:02
Who were either in immigration custody
20:05
or they were serving sentences somewhere or
20:07
that the government knew about that they wanted to send
20:10
back.
20:10
We knew there were hundreds of people who had been
20:12
detained since arrival, suspected of serious
20:15
criminal activity in Cuba. But
20:17
there were two thousand seven hundred people on the
20:19
list. Which meant that the majority of those
20:21
on the list had somehow run afoul of the law
20:23
here in the
20:24
US. But what could they have
20:26
done to find themselves on the list?
20:28
If
20:29
they committed a serious crime, they were probably
20:31
serving a sentence. But if they
20:33
serve whatever sense they were had been sentenced
20:35
to, In finished, immigration
20:37
would pick them up and move them to Atlanta.
20:39
Remember the precarious situation that
20:41
faced all of the Morio Cubans? The
20:43
legal fiction that they weren't here at all,
20:46
that they were floating off the coast of Key West
20:48
asking for admission into the country.
20:50
And this status was still at play for thousands
20:53
of Moriel Cubans. They had only been paroled
20:55
into the US. And so if one of
20:57
them was convicted of a crime, that parole
20:59
would be revoked and they would be deemed inadmissible
21:02
into the US. Functionally,
21:04
what this meant is that if a Mario Cuban
21:06
served time in a state prison or local jail,
21:09
sometimes frequent minor offenses. The
21:11
INS would show up to take them into custody
21:13
after their sentence was complete. And
21:16
it's not like Eventually, the INS took
21:18
debit to custody after their sentence was complete.
21:20
In many cases, the person never even
21:23
left the jail. One person
21:25
who served sixteen months in a prison in New
21:27
York state would later tell us how this worked.
21:29
He had served as senate released early for
21:31
good behavior, he was being processed out
21:33
at the Sally Port of the Prison collecting his personal
21:36
effects. He could see his family there
21:38
on the outside waiting to take him home.
21:40
And as he walked toward the door to the outside,
21:43
INS agents stepped in and took custody
21:45
of him right there in the vestibule of prison.
21:48
That night, the government plane took him to
21:50
the Federal Penn in Atlanta. And
21:53
this person who had served as sixteen months
21:55
since he would end up spending years
21:57
more in prison detained by the INS.
22:00
And in some cases, the INS detained people
22:02
who had not served any time in the jail.
22:04
It detained people it only suspected of
22:06
having committed a crime or people they
22:08
believed would soon be charged with the
22:10
crime. You
22:11
might have had some people who didn't committed
22:13
crime. We're not charged with committing a crime, but
22:15
they caused some other problem. You might have
22:17
people who have picked up from minor things, a guy
22:19
got drunk through a rock, or
22:21
something. They didn't press charges, but immigration
22:24
found out they took them to Atlanta. The
22:26
Reagan administration, and an internal memo
22:28
from this time seems to acknowledge the reality
22:31
that some of the men being held in Atlanta were
22:33
never charged with the crime. Writing
22:35
about the implications, a Supreme Court case
22:37
might have on the indefinite detention and now
22:40
planned deportation of these Mario Cubans,
22:42
a government attorney wrote in a memo what
22:45
for my money stands as a monumental
22:47
achievement in legalese. Quote,
22:49
their guilt in the offense which resulted
22:52
in their incarceration has never been
22:54
adjudicated. Their
22:59
guilt has never been adjudicated This
23:02
Reagan administration lawyer is hedging
23:04
with his loopy sentence structured, but
23:06
a declassified document released by the state
23:09
defer. Years ago, says the same
23:11
thing, but in a much more direct way.
23:13
It states that while the justice department and
23:15
the INS maintained that all persons on
23:17
the list had serious criminal backgrounds, quote,
23:20
the dossiers supplied by the INS
23:23
frequently do not show commissions of
23:25
such crimes. End quote. One
23:29
case we read about in the files in the basement of
23:31
the Atlanta legal aid society involved a man
23:33
named Pedro Priore
23:34
Rodriguez. He had no criminal record.
23:36
He was
23:37
sponsored out to halfway house in Rochester, New
23:39
York. And one night, in November of nineteen
23:41
eighty three, he was walking home. He was
23:43
mugged by three men. And attacks
23:45
so brutal he would wind up losing an eye.
23:48
Claiming he needed specialized medical
23:49
care, the INS revoked his immigration role
23:51
and sent him to Atlanta. He was
23:54
told by the
23:54
INS that he would be released later that
23:56
year, but he was not. He was
23:58
told again, he'd be released in nineteen eighty
24:00
six, with the INS saying, quote,
24:02
we have made a positive recommendation. But
24:06
in March of nineteen eighty seven, he was
24:08
still in immigration detention. My
24:11
only crime he told a reporter was
24:13
losing my eye. Which
24:18
brings us back to the list Was
24:21
this man who lost his eye? Pedro
24:23
Priore Rodriguez? Was he on the
24:25
list? How did this list come together
24:28
in the first place?
24:29
During the Marietta negotiations, we
24:32
spent days and days, if not
24:34
weeks, going over these
24:36
lists of names.
24:38
Stephanie Van Rygersburg was the interpreter
24:40
for the American delegation during the list negotiations.
24:43
You know, it was it was completely chaotic,
24:47
let's say. And then every
24:49
once in a while, we would come back and we'd sit
24:51
down and pretend to be organized, but
24:53
it was basically a mess. It was
24:56
the most exacting
24:59
thing I've ever done. I mean, these pages
25:02
were just enough to make you blind.
25:04
They were just you know, maybe fifty
25:06
names on a page and you'd have
25:08
to use a ruler or you'd get mixed up
25:10
because the line would run into another line.
25:13
And it was so difficult about it because
25:16
the names, as far as
25:18
I know, were drawn up by us.
25:20
And at least to judge from
25:22
the guy from the INS who
25:26
was completely ignorant of
25:28
the system of naming in
25:30
Latin American countries. He
25:33
didn't even know that everybody in
25:35
Latin America has two last names.
25:38
So he thought that Juan Gonzales
25:41
and Juan Perez were different people.
25:43
If it was Juan Gonzales Perez, he
25:45
thought it was a mistake. So
25:49
untangling that was
25:51
one of the more idiotic
25:53
things we had to do was the huge waste
25:56
time. So the list that was presented
25:58
to the Cuban side had
26:00
not been filtered at all
26:03
for mistakes.
26:04
So they're reading the names one after another
26:06
over a course of about eighteen hours.
26:09
It's a very long tedious task.
26:11
That's William Leo Grande, co author
26:13
of the book Backchannel to Cuba,
26:15
the hidden history of negotiations between
26:18
Washington and Havana. Which chronicles
26:20
fifty years of diplomatic relations between
26:22
the US and Cuba, including the negotiations
26:25
about the list.
26:26
And at one point, the US
26:28
delegation reading
26:30
the name said, Nomei
26:32
Hodes. And the Cubans
26:34
all began to laugh and
26:36
the US side didn't understand it.
26:38
Well, it turns out that that this particular
26:41
Cuban being interviewed by
26:43
INS when he was asked what his name
26:45
was, he said, Spanish
26:50
for don't fuck with me. The interrogator
26:52
just dutifully wrote that down thinking that
26:54
it was the guy's name. It just
26:57
I
26:57
mean, it it cut sort of boggles the mind because
26:59
are we talking about a man, a human man
27:02
who came over in the Mario Boatlift in nineteen
27:04
eighty, who's sitting in the Atlanta federal penitentiary
27:07
in nineteen eighty four. And all
27:09
the US government knows about him is
27:11
that he has a alias of Nomaejotis.
27:13
Well, this this speaks directly to
27:16
your point as to how much did
27:18
did INS interviewers really
27:20
know about these people.
27:40
They are unwanted. Two thousand five hundred criminals
27:42
and mental patients who got into this country
27:44
from Cuba They were among more than a
27:46
hundred thousand Cubans who came here in the
27:48
nineteen eighty
27:49
Boatlift. Now a deal to return
27:51
them to Cuba may be close. The announcement from
27:53
see Tom Brokall was the first news
27:55
of the repatriation agreement made on December
27:58
fourteenth nineteen eighty four. And
28:00
just a couple of months later, the deportations
28:02
of Mario Cubans began. The
28:05
first twenty three men to be deported were
28:07
transferred from the Atlanta federal penitentiary
28:09
to an air force base just north of
28:11
city. But I fully well expect to
28:13
hear six months or three months or a year from
28:15
now that some of these people have fallen
28:17
onto some disastrous times when they've returned
28:19
to
28:19
Cuba. God knows what's gonna happen to
28:21
these fellows when they go back up. That's the voice
28:23
of Dale Schwartz at a press conference on the
28:25
Tarmac of the Air Force Base on the day
28:27
of the first deportation flights. Schwartz
28:30
was one of the immigration attorneys recruited by
28:32
the Atlanta legal aid society to help represent
28:34
the Mario detainees. Two people
28:36
have yet to go before any judge
28:38
anywhere and and tell their story.
28:41
In the files in the basement of Atlanta legal
28:43
aid society, we found a legal brief filed
28:45
by shorts and other lawyers on behalf
28:47
of the Cuban detainees. It's from January
28:50
nineteen eighty five, just a few weeks after
28:52
the list was announced, but before repatriation flights
28:55
began. The government would not hand
28:57
over the list, so the legal aid lawyers can
28:59
ask the government to respond to some questions
29:01
about him. Were there people on
29:03
the list who had been deemed excludable solely
29:05
for lacking entry papers? Yes,
29:08
the government responded. Were
29:10
there people on the list who had been approved
29:12
for release from the prison, but were still waiting
29:14
for a sponsorship yes, the government
29:16
responded. Were there people on the
29:18
list who had already been sponsored out and
29:20
were no longer being detained? Yes,
29:23
the government responded. For those
29:25
Mario Cubans on the list who have children
29:27
in the United States and wives who are citizens
29:29
or permanent residents, Does the government
29:31
intend to inform them that their father or
29:33
husband is about to be deported? No.
29:36
The government responded. That would be,
29:38
quote, overly burdensome and would require
29:41
an individual search of each Cuban's
29:43
file. But
29:45
even as questions swirled about the list,
29:47
who was on it and why the flights
29:50
to repatriate these men continue?
29:53
Officials would not say what if anything the
29:55
prisoners said as they left. After years
29:57
of legal struggle, the events seemed almost
30:00
anticlimactic to observers as
30:02
seven twenty seven soared into the air
30:04
for the two hour flight to
30:05
Havana. In the first few months of
30:07
nineteen eighty five, a total of two hundred
30:09
and one Mario Cubans were repatriated. But
30:12
all of that ended abruptly in May of
30:14
eighty five, when the Reagan administration launched
30:16
the pro democracy network radio marty,
30:19
which broadcast from South Florida and
30:21
reached deep into Cuba. Castro
30:23
was furious, and to retaliate,
30:26
he immediately scuttle the freshly inked
30:28
immigration accord. For the men
30:30
detained by the INS it was a double edged
30:32
sword. While they didn't have to fear
30:34
immediate repatriation to Cuba,
30:36
their stay in federal prisons had become
30:39
indefinite once again.
30:47
Set out to tell the definitive story of
30:49
the Mario d tenies, and inevitably,
30:51
you have to decide how best to deal with the
30:53
many different uprisings because
30:55
there were a lot of uprisings. There
30:57
was a one in Talladega in nineteen ninety one
30:59
that we told you about at the very start of the story.
31:02
There were the protests at Fort Chaffe that led
31:04
to the barbed wire and the national guard at the
31:06
camp back in nineteen eighty. Then
31:08
there was the uprising at the Atlanta Penn in
31:10
nineteen eighty four. You heard about that one last
31:12
time. The investigator, Susan Miller,
31:14
remember she put the uprisings into a
31:16
larger context. What
31:19
they were doing is they were trying
31:21
to speak about their
31:23
condition. And of course, their condition
31:26
was not good. The United States
31:28
government insisted that in the eyes of the law,
31:30
the Mario detainees weren't really here.
31:32
The presence in the country, a legal fiction,
31:35
a fiction not subject to the protections
31:37
of the constitution. Yet,
31:40
they sat in federal prisons. Definitely
31:42
contained year after
31:43
year. And in November of nineteen
31:45
eighty seven, their desperation led
31:47
to another uprising, the big
31:49
one, the biggest one of all. Mario
31:52
Cubans took over the federal penitentiary in
31:54
Atlanta for eleven days. It
31:56
took ninety hostages. Thick
31:58
black smoke hangs over Atlanta's gonna OPENETENTRIE
32:01
WHERE SOME fifteen hundred MARIOITOs ARE
32:03
BEING HELPED. AND IT ALL STARTED
32:06
BECAUSE OF THE LIST. After
32:08
the radio marty fiasco scheduled the
32:10
repatriation agreement in nineteen eighty five,
32:12
negotiators from the US and Cuba met
32:14
throughout nineteen eighty six and eighty seven trying
32:17
to get back to terms. And finally,
32:19
in nineteen eighty seven, just before Thanksgiving,
32:22
the two countries agreed to reinstate the
32:24
migration agreement. Same terms,
32:26
same names, same secrets, same
32:29
list. And once word of the agreement
32:31
reached the men detained in
32:32
Atlanta, They decided once more
32:35
to speak about their condition.
32:37
123123I
32:40
got a message into the public opinion of
32:42
the United States.
32:49
Because many of the men inside the prison
32:51
had lived free in the US for years,
32:53
It started lives here. They've gotten married,
32:55
had children, helped jobs. But
32:57
because of a conviction or even suspicion
32:59
of criminal activity, they'd found themselves
33:01
locked up in immigration detention. And
33:04
during the takeover of
33:05
Atlanta, many of their families were speaking
33:07
to the press. What's your greatest spirit
33:09
about your husband right now? That he can be
33:11
deployed and I have a daughter five year old.
33:14
And what I'm gonna do is gonna happen to
33:16
my daughter without a
33:17
father. I can't let that happen. Was
33:19
he on his interview? A session
33:21
of marijuana. Many of the crimes
33:23
committed by the Mario Cubans detained by
33:25
the INS had been nonviolent. Drug
33:28
charges or property crimes comprise most
33:30
violations. There were indeed some
33:32
Mario Cubans who committed serious and
33:35
violent crimes here in the US. But
33:37
most of those people were still serving sentences
33:39
in state prisons for those convictions. They
33:42
were not being released early for good behavior.
33:44
They were not being intercepted by the INS
33:47
and the vestibule of the jail as their families
33:49
waited outside for them to be released.
33:51
What do you want from this? What do you want it's
33:54
for them to look at the files to see that
33:56
they committed a narrative like anybody else that
33:58
commits a narrative, they serve the time and
34:01
he has been between a year and a half after
34:03
he served the fifteen months since
34:04
then. Up.
34:06
Oh, witness news, jeez.
34:08
Emotions spilling over in Atlanta, there's finally
34:10
something to cheer about. Good evening, the prisoner
34:13
deal is
34:13
over. All hostages are safe. Cuban
34:15
prisoners being scattered across the country
34:17
tonight while hostage families enjoy their first
34:19
night to get The Atlanta riot ended after
34:21
eleven days. And just like in Talladega,
34:24
none of the hostages were badly injured. And
34:26
many of them had felt solidarity with the
34:28
aims of the Cubans. And it was
34:30
easy to sympathize with what the Cubans
34:32
were going through, especially since none
34:35
of the men or their families knew
34:37
if they were on the list to be deported. And
34:40
of course, this was why Carol Wachuk
34:42
and the ACLU wanted to see the list
34:44
in the first place to find out
34:46
who was an urgent need of legal aid.
34:48
But the ACL used efforts to obtain
34:51
the list and thus to advocate on their behalf,
34:53
it only made the list more hidden.
34:55
And that's why we wound up suing the state
34:57
department. As we expected, the state
34:59
department ignored our initial Foyer request.
35:02
So we filed a suit in federal court.
35:05
Ten months later, after some predictable and
35:07
not interesting legal ping pong between
35:09
NPR's lawyers and the assistant US attorney
35:11
representing the government. We finally received
35:13
word that the state department would produce an
35:16
initial batch of records. Six
35:18
weeks after that, they made good on that promise.
35:21
So nearly a year after suing the State
35:23
Department, we got an email with the first batch
35:25
of records as an attachment. So we
35:27
hopped on the phone call to open the email
35:29
together. We opened the attachment and
35:31
it was five pages.
35:33
This could not be further off the access of
35:35
what we asked for.
35:36
It's kind of amazing that they waited almost
35:38
two months to send us this. The five
35:40
pages were sloppily redacted records
35:43
related to something vaguely about Cuba
35:45
but nothing at all to do with our story and the
35:47
records we'd asked for in the
35:48
lawsuit. What a bunch of bullshit?
35:51
I mean, I'm not surprised, but panicked.
35:54
That is incredibly
35:55
unhelpful. I gotta say, to
35:58
send to anything and to send this
36:00
feels like a bigger slap
36:02
in the face and just to say nothing at
36:04
all. Anybody in the state who
36:06
saw our request knows that this has nothing to do with
36:08
our request. That's
36:09
the thing that's frustrating. It's like, what do you how do
36:11
you even respond to that? We responded
36:13
to that with a strongly worded letter to the
36:15
assistant US attorney. Pointing out
36:17
that the record state had sent were in no
36:19
way related to our request and reiterating
36:22
that we were interested only in the list of two
36:24
thousand seven hundred and forty six names and
36:26
any records related to the creation of that
36:28
list. Six weeks later, we
36:30
received another email with an attachment from
36:32
the state department. This time, it was
36:34
only one page and it was letter from lawyer
36:37
at state to tell us that the agency had
36:39
processed one hundred, quote, potentially
36:41
responsive records, end quote, but
36:43
that none of those records were ready for release.
36:46
And then six weeks after that, another email,
36:49
another attachment. This one actually
36:51
did contain some relevant documents. Knew
36:53
they're relevant right away because we'd already found
36:55
these exact same documents in the state department's
36:58
so called virtual reading room, an online
37:00
database of records that have already been made
37:02
public through some other four year request. So
37:05
the state department was basically saying, Nomejodis
37:08
and PR. We were never going to
37:10
get them to hand over the list.
37:12
But it turned out we didn't need
37:14
the state department to hand over the list
37:17
because one day a package showed
37:18
up. When I saw it, it
37:21
brought to mind an earlier
37:23
era of of mail. Yeah.
37:26
It brought to mind the word parcel.
37:29
Yeah. Well, it's it is interesting
37:31
to have an anonymous source
37:33
send you
37:34
a package that looks like a package
37:36
that would be a prop. Kennis spy movie. That's
37:39
exactly what this looks like to put out.
37:41
Once we learned that the list might be classified,
37:43
we knew that we couldn't just go around asking
37:45
people for it. Because it could potentially
37:48
be a federal crime to solicit classified
37:50
material, which is, well,
37:52
kind of what we've been doing for years before
37:54
we heard that had been classified. But
37:56
none of that had worked anyway. At least
37:59
until the day, this package showed up,
38:01
leaked to us by a source. We
38:03
weren't certain the package would really contain
38:05
the list, but we decided to air on the side
38:07
of caution and leave our phones and laptops
38:09
out of the room whenever we talked about this package,
38:11
even before it was open. And so there
38:14
we sat in the office with only our recorder
38:16
staring at a package that we thought might
38:18
contain the
38:19
list. Should we open it?
38:21
I
38:21
think we should have.
38:22
Do you mind? Can I do the honors?
38:23
Do you wanna do that?
38:24
Okay.
38:28
Alright. So inside the brown paper
38:30
is a brown paper box, which I think
38:33
is this
38:33
way. The package was wrapped neatly
38:36
in brown paper. Inside that was
38:38
a box that contained a heavy stack of papers.
38:40
On top was the English translation of speech
38:43
Casanova delivered around the time the list was announced.
38:46
And here's the next thing. Approved
38:49
list of persons found ineligible
38:51
for legal admission to the United States.
38:53
As referred to in the communicated agreed
38:56
upon by the United States in Cuba
38:58
December
38:59
fourteen, nineteen eighty four. And
39:02
there are two signatures. One of them looks
39:04
like Michael Kozak. And
39:06
the
39:06
other, I'm assuming, would
39:08
be Allercon.
39:10
Yeah. Swoopy a right there. Ricardo
39:12
Allercon was a lead negotiator for the Cuban
39:15
side. So and it looks
39:17
to be quite a number of pages, which if you had
39:19
a list of two thousand seven hundred and forty six
39:21
names, it might be a lot of pages.
39:23
You feeling right now? Well, it's a little strange.
39:25
little strange. I'm gonna flip the page and see
39:27
names that people for generations
39:29
I feel like you've been trying to get access to.
39:33
There it is.
39:35
Name, a number.
39:36
It's the ailing number. It's INS number. That's right.
39:38
The INS number. And date of
39:40
birth.
39:44
This top page. There's
39:45
an a's.
39:46
It says It's alphabetical. There
39:48
are no numbers, so we will have to count.
39:51
But it
39:54
says two cuba 468
39:57
to twenty two. It appears that there are twenty two
40:00
names on the first page. And then each subsequent
40:02
page has twenty two, twenty four,
40:04
twenty five, twenty five on
40:06
each additional
40:07
page. Yeah.
40:09
You're gonna count the pages. I'm gonna go ahead and
40:11
get a pen and a piece paper so we can
40:13
do some multiplication.
40:14
Remember, we didn't have our phones in the room.
40:16
No phones meant no calculators. Of.
40:19
Okay. So it appears that there are a hundred
40:21
a hundred and nine pages
40:25
plus twenty five.
40:26
Twenty five plus twenty two.
40:31
Are you using new math or old math? This is
40:33
this is nineteen eighties math. Okay.
40:35
That's old math. That's very old math.
40:39
Two times nine is eighteen. Right?
40:41
Yeah. Carry the one. That's
40:44
1222 times
40:46
one. That's to two thousand
40:48
seven hundred and twenty five And what's twenty
40:50
three or twenty
40:52
three?
40:54
Two thousand seven hundred and forty eight. Which
40:56
probably means that on some of these pages, there's
40:58
there's somebody got kind of Or maybe this is the last
41:01
page, have
41:02
goal twenty five? No. Look at that. Look at
41:04
how smart you are. The last page
41:06
has three two minus. So
41:08
that's two thousand seven hundred and forty six.
41:10
That is two thousand seven hundred
41:12
and forty eight minus two. Is
41:15
two thousand. So and there's, again, the
41:17
very last page, and they're underneath the very last
41:19
name is Michael Kozak's signature
41:21
again. This is the list. We have list.
41:23
This is the We're holding the list. Well, what do we do
41:26
with the list now that we have
41:27
it? Let's check some names. Let's check for,
41:29
say, Jorge Marquez
41:30
and Dina.
41:31
Alright. Modena. Jorge Marquez's
41:33
Modena had been the leader of the uprising in
41:35
Talladega. He's the one who had protected
41:37
Linda Galhoun, the one she had called her guardian
41:39
angels. Mark is Jorge,
41:45
Mark is Medina. Here we
41:47
go. Jose Hernandez Mesa.
41:50
Mesa, who'd asked Albemails not to
41:52
send his letter to the mailbox of forgetfulness.
41:55
Oh,
41:55
man.
41:56
Whoa. Nineteen sixty
41:58
four. Wow. As
42:01
getting the list, we saw a surprising number
42:03
of people who were really young in the nineteen eighties.
42:05
What's putting that is wood US officials
42:07
detain a sixteen year old
42:09
immediately. I don't know. So
42:11
one way to find out.
42:13
I mean, how long could a sixteen year old have been
42:15
in prison in Cuba. I know. That's
42:17
so crazy. Can you imagine
42:20
being born in nineteen sixty four in Cuba and
42:22
coming over to the US in nineteen eighty
42:24
on a shrimp boat and being detained
42:26
and finding yourself on the list and being
42:28
repatriated. Who
42:30
the guy that Ham calls goat cheese guy
42:32
was a young woman. That man, Alberto Herrera,
42:35
He was there on the list, and so
42:37
was Pedro Priore Rodriguez, whose
42:39
only crime was getting mugged in Rochester
42:41
and losing his eye. We wanted
42:43
to start using the list to research all the other
42:45
people whose names were on it, but there was
42:47
still that lingering concern about the list
42:50
being classified. Could
42:52
it still be classified? There
42:54
were no classified markings on the copy we received,
42:56
and it was clear that Cuban government had copy
42:59
of this list too. So what kind
43:01
of national security interests could be endangered
43:03
by its release? Without revealing
43:05
to them that the list had been leaked to us, we
43:07
just decided to ask our contact at the state
43:09
department. Is the list classified?
43:12
Getting the answer took a little while, but
43:15
finally, this spokesperson responded, quote,
43:17
The Exclutable List is not classified,
43:20
but it contains personally identifiable information
43:23
likely protected under the Privacy
43:25
Act. It is not a public document,
43:27
end quote. The spokesperson
43:30
was right. The list did contain
43:32
personally identifiable information. And
43:35
we started using that information to confirm
43:37
some of the theories we developed about the list.
43:40
The man who'd been stranded in Fort Shaffee
43:42
before being transferred to the penitentiary in
43:44
Atlanta in nineteen eighty two, they
43:46
were on the list. The names of
43:48
men we'd read about in the basement of the Atlanta
43:50
legal aid society who've been arrested in the
43:52
US for minor drug crimes and bar
43:54
fights, offenses that no reasonable
43:56
person would call a serious crime. They
43:59
were on the list.
44:03
And perhaps the most telling were five names
44:05
we'd seen before. When we'd found their
44:07
tombstones in the graveyard behind the
44:09
Atlanta
44:10
pin. Five of the men who
44:12
had died in the prison before the list had
44:14
ever been announced had somehow found
44:16
their way onto
44:17
it. When the US government
44:19
said it hadn't asked too many questions of the
44:21
names they were adding to the list, they
44:23
weren't kidding. It seems they
44:25
neglected to ask even the most basic
44:27
questions about these men. So
44:33
now that we finally had the list, we had
44:35
to take it and go where
44:38
else to Cuba. To
44:40
finally find the men on the roof.
44:47
Please, Kevin. Welcome. Huma,
44:50
where the local time is eleven seventeen
44:53
approximately AM. That's
44:55
next time. On the final episode
44:58
of White Lies.
45:26
If you wanna hear our final episode right
45:28
now, sign up for embedded plus
45:30
plus dot NPR dot org slash
45:32
embedded. It's a great way to support
45:34
our work, And for our show ends, there's
45:36
a new show coming that we think you'll love.
45:39
It's called taking cover. And if you've
45:41
already signed up for Embedded Plus, you'll get access
45:43
to episodes of that show early and sponsor
45:45
free. So to support NPR's investigative
45:48
journalism, go to plus dot NPR
45:50
dot org slash embedded or find
45:52
the embedded channel in
45:53
Apple. White Lives is reported, written
45:55
and produced by us, and Connor town, O'Neil.
45:58
Liana's Instagram is supervising producer,
46:00
Annie Yetsi, as our associate producer.
46:03
Robert Little edits the show with help from Bruce
46:05
Oster, Keith Woods, Christopher Turpin, and
46:07
Kamala Kelker. Our incredible
46:09
score is composed and performed by Jeff
46:11
t
46:12
Byrd. Emily Bogle, a senior visual
46:14
editor Barbara Van Werkam. As
46:16
our fact checker, Our audio engineer
46:19
is Maggie Luthar. Huge
46:21
thanks to Radiohead for the use of their
46:23
song in the National
46:24
Anthem, courtesy of XL recordings,
46:26
and Warner Chapel Music. Archival
46:28
tape in this episode comes from the American Archive
46:30
of Public Broadcasting, NBC, Seaspan,
46:33
Miami Dade College's Wolfson
46:34
Archives, and The Kona Archive. Special
46:36
thanks to Michael Allen, Tom Burke,
46:39
Patricia Peña, Ayesha Lewis,
46:41
Michelle Kellerman, Robert Beninkasa, Jeff
46:43
Guo, Rachel Sellar, Laura Layner,
46:46
Eduardo Marceli, Rafael Penaúver,
46:48
Ernesto Perez, Willy Allen.
46:51
Juliana Lombardo Larry Orton,
46:53
Duke Austin, Alfredo Villoche, Carl
46:55
Kukuchi, Monica Wilson, Matthew
46:58
Story, Louise Detman, and
47:00
Monica Johnson, and Heather Ash at the Foreign
47:02
Affairs oral History Collection at the Association
47:05
for Diplomatic Studies and
47:06
Training. We are grateful for the work of
47:08
Micah Ratner in NPR's legal team. Especially
47:10
in this episode. And Tony Cavin, NPR's
47:12
Standards and Practices's Editor. Our project
47:15
manager is Margaret Price. Irene Naguchi
47:17
is the executive producer of NPR's Storytelling
47:19
unit. And Anja Gruntman is NPR's Senior
47:21
Vice President for Programming and Audience Development.
48:53
This message comes from NPR sponsor
48:55
NerdWallet. Looking to make a smart financial
48:58
decision, compare and find the top
49:00
credit cards savings accounts and
49:02
more at nerdwallet dot com. Nerdwallet,
49:04
the smartest decision for all your
49:07
financial decisions.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More