Podchaser Logo
Home
The List

The List

Released Thursday, 9th March 2023
Good episode? Give it some love!
The List

The List

The List

The List

Thursday, 9th March 2023
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:00

This message comes from NPR sponsored

0:02

progressive insurance, where drivers who

0:04

switch could save hundreds on car insurance.

0:06

Get your quote at progressive dot com today.

0:09

Progressive casualty insurance company,

0:11

and affiliates.

0:15

Previously, on White Lives.

0:17

Cuban inmates took over part of a

0:19

federal prison in Talladega, Alabama

0:21

today. You know, he just said it was our only

0:24

option. We had to do something, and

0:26

this was the only thing we can think of.

0:28

Undesirables who came here in the big Cuban

0:30

boat lift four years ago will be sent back.

0:33

Has the whole list been deported?

0:35

There wouldn't have been any more reason for my job.

0:37

So essentially, we are looking

0:40

for a needle in a haystack.

0:46

Linda Calhoun slept poorly the night before

0:48

it all happened. Her husband had

0:50

brought home a puppy he'd found abandoned outside

0:53

their house and Linda and her kids had spent

0:55

all night trying to calm the puppy down,

0:57

trying to get it to sleep. They

0:59

took turns feeding it with a doll bottle,

1:01

but it cried throughout the night in the next

1:03

morning, she was a wreck. So

1:05

I didn't get that much sleep that night. Maybe

1:07

I should have stayed home that day.

1:10

But Linda would work anyway. At her

1:12

job as an INS deportation docket

1:14

clerk at the Talladega Federal Correctional

1:16

Institution in rural Alabama. In

1:19

that morning, shortly after she arrived, she

1:21

and and others were taken hostage by group

1:24

of men being held in the prison. Men

1:26

who were not serving a sentence for a crime.

1:28

Men who had come from Cuba in a mass

1:30

exodus a decade before and had found

1:33

themselves detained for years of the immigration

1:35

service.

1:36

Okay. In immigration, we have regular

1:38

a files, and we have

1:41

temporary files. But

1:44

with the Cubans, we also had

1:46

blowback

1:47

files, and they were copies of

1:49

the original files. We heard

1:51

from Linda Calhoun at the very beginning

1:53

of our story. Linda had worked

1:55

at the prison at Talladega for a few years.

1:57

She'd gotten to know many of the men who held her captive

2:00

And she'd also seen their files, seen

2:02

why the AINAS said it was detaining

2:04

them. Used to amaze me

2:06

when I had nothing to do, to sit

2:08

down and open one of those and to

2:10

look and to read why

2:13

someone was in prison to

2:15

start with. You

2:18

know, some of them got sent

2:20

to prison in Cuba because they

2:23

stole shoes for their children. Or

2:26

they stole bread for their

2:28

family because they they weren't working

2:30

and the family was hungry. Think

2:32

different things like that. If they committed

2:34

that here,

2:36

I don't think there's no way that they

2:38

wouldn't gonna be sent to prison. For

2:43

years now, we've tracked down nearly everyone

2:46

we could who touched some part of the story.

2:48

We've reviewed thousands of pages in the files

2:50

in the basement of the Atlanta legal aid society

2:53

and an archives from DC to California.

2:56

And we did all this to tell a story about how

2:58

these men had gone from refugees fleeing

3:00

communism to immigration detainees,

3:03

denied due process, warehousing without

3:05

a charge in federal prisons for years

3:07

and years on

3:08

end. And in the background

3:10

of this entire story has been a secret

3:12

list The

3:13

men who found themselves detained in Talladega,

3:16

the men who took over the prison and then took

3:18

to the roof to unfurl banner that said

3:20

pray for us Those men had found

3:22

themselves there because they were on this list.

3:24

A list of two thousand seven hundred forty

3:27

six people would come over during the Mario

3:29

boatlift, but who the US had to decided

3:31

it wanted to exclude to send back

3:33

to Cuba. The list had

3:35

determined their fates, that much

3:37

we knew. But what we didn't know

3:39

and what no one else knew either were

3:41

the names of the people on the list.

3:44

The government claiming that people on the list were

3:46

the worst of the worst. A danger

3:48

to the American public. But our

3:50

reporting had shown so many stories of men

3:53

detained for a mistake, detained

3:55

for alleged crimes in Cuba detained

3:57

for reasons that would never hold up if these

3:59

men were granted any sort of constitutional protections.

4:03

For decades now, the government has refused

4:05

to say who is on the list and who is

4:07

not has refused to fully

4:09

explain how the list had been put together

4:12

and not knowing who was on the list has

4:14

made the final move in our

4:15

story, finding the men on the roof

4:18

virtually impossible. I

4:20

wonder what would happen

4:22

if if I would take a trip to

4:24

Cuba, and if I would see one

4:26

of them. I would wanna find

4:28

out what happened you know,

4:30

just you gotta wonder. Some

4:33

of them, they weren't gonna make

4:35

it to the prison there, and nobody

4:37

heard from them again. And the rest

4:39

of them that made it to the prison, to what?

4:41

To die in one of the prisons, to

4:44

stealing a loaf of bread, or

4:46

a pair of shoes, Too

4:49

many ifs. Would they

4:52

take it out on me because immigration

4:54

treated them like that? Or

4:57

would they say miss Linda? Or

5:00

would they even recognize with, you know,

5:04

that that would be, I think, the

5:06

main thing, you know, to make

5:08

sure that the fellas that

5:12

I knew that they were they were

5:14

alive and still well, that they still

5:16

weren't locked up in some little prison

5:18

or maybe in some home.

5:32

To finish telling the story, we knew we'd

5:34

have to somehow get a hold of the secret list.

5:37

This piece of tangible evidence that has always

5:39

felt like the key to fully understanding how

5:41

the United States had treated these

5:43

men. And not only that,

5:45

but the list was the clearest most direct

5:47

way to identify and find the middle

5:49

of the move. To hear them tell their own

5:51

stories. And so today,

5:53

the list, how it came to be,

5:56

and what happened when we finally got our hands

5:58

on.

6:26

From NPR, this is White Lies. I'm

6:29

Chip Brantley. And I'm Andrew Beck race.

6:31

What's

6:32

happening on NPR Podcast? More neighborhoods?

6:34

More

6:34

identities and more perspectives. The

6:36

more of the world that you hear. The

6:38

more you hear the world as it really is.

6:41

NPR podcasts or

6:43

voices, all ears. Sign NPR

6:45

wherever you get your podcasts.

6:48

This mysterious and secret list of two

6:50

thousand seven hundred and forty six names

6:52

has been a recurring theme in our

6:54

reporting. It's something that just

6:56

about everyone we've talked to has mentioned.

6:58

There was a list and I've always

7:00

wondered what happened to the ones, but

7:04

As you know, it's impossible to find

7:06

out. A

7:06

list has never been made public.

7:08

Nobody really knew who was

7:09

on the list and who was it. We never

7:12

saw the list. I

7:14

I've got all my shorthand

7:16

books with every phone call I took for thirteen

7:19

years up in the

7:19

attic. But I don't have a copy

7:21

of that list. The list has been confirmed.

7:24

We know that it exists, but

7:26

nobody has ever seen it.

7:28

That's like the unicorn. Has anybody

7:30

ever seen the list? I don't think anybody's ever

7:32

admitted to see the

7:33

list. If you find the list, I believe it's like

7:35

a science fiction creation. A

7:37

science fiction creation, a unicorn.

7:40

While everyone we've talked to seem to know of the

7:42

existence of the list, no one had

7:44

ever gotten their hands on it. But not for

7:46

lack of trying. From the moment the

7:48

list was announced, people started trying

7:50

to force the government to release it. Reporters

7:53

some and to keep an American community and Miami

7:56

family members. So the men being detained, and,

7:58

of course, the lawyers who are advocating on

8:00

their behalf. In the files in the

8:02

basement of the Atlanta legal aid society,

8:05

we found a reference to a lawsuit filed

8:07

by the ACLU. In nineteen

8:09

eighty five, the ACLU submitted a Freedom

8:11

of Information Act request to the State Department

8:14

asking for the list. The Freedom

8:16

of Information Act, also known as Foya,

8:18

gets the public. You mean anyone.

8:21

The right to request records and documents

8:23

from any agency in the executive branch

8:25

of the U. S. Government. So all those

8:27

departments and bureaus and commissions

8:29

and institutes By law, they all

8:31

have to produce previously unreleased documents

8:34

if someone requests them. That's

8:36

the good

8:36

news. The bad news is

8:38

that there are some pretty broad and open to

8:40

interpretation exemptions that an agency

8:43

can claim if they don't want to hand over the documents.

8:46

Exemption one, which is a popular one, is

8:48

that the disclosure would jeopardize national

8:50

security. There's an attorney client

8:52

privilege exemption also popular, a

8:54

privacy exemption, a trade secrets exemption,

8:57

strangely, there's even an exemption related

8:59

to geological information about wells.

9:02

Anyway, when the ACLU filed a four year

9:04

request to the state department for the list,

9:06

state denied the request and said that

9:08

releasing the names of people on the list would

9:10

be an invasion of their privacy. In

9:13

response, the ACLU sued the State

9:15

Department and Federal District Court in

9:17

DC. I don't know that we expect it to

9:19

get it from Department of State,

9:22

but it seemed that

9:24

a federal judge once

9:26

you could make a legal argument would

9:29

release the documents based on what we

9:31

knew. The point person on the suit was

9:33

the director of the ACLU's political asylum

9:35

project. An attorney named Carol Walchook.

9:38

She's now an English language teacher in DC

9:40

where she works with immigrants preparing to take the

9:42

US citizenship

9:43

exam. We met up with her one night in

9:45

a meeting room at her local public library.

9:47

We were a nonprofit organization

9:50

that provided free legal assistance to

9:53

immigrants, particularly those who are seeking

9:55

political asylum, which presumably

9:59

these cubin, detainees,

10:02

or seeking, and that

10:04

we would be available to

10:07

inform them of their rights and provide legal

10:10

assistance if we hit the list.

10:12

So

10:12

it's a practical matter. Like, in order

10:14

to do that, you have to hit the list. Of

10:16

course, they would otherwise have to somehow

10:18

know that we existed and be able to reach out

10:20

to us even if people were aware

10:23

of

10:23

us. When she sued the state department for

10:25

the list, Walsh did something that, at least,

10:27

for our knowledge, no other advocate for the

10:29

Cuban detainees had done. She

10:31

called the government's bluff on Ignat's

10:33

Maisonsé, on the entry fiction. She

10:36

said, alright state department. If the

10:38

US government says these men are exclutable,

10:40

if, like Ignats Mazai, legally

10:42

speaking, they are floating off the coast with no

10:44

constitutional rights, no due process,

10:47

then that means they don't have privacy rights

10:49

in the

10:50

US. So you can't withhold the list

10:52

because of the privacy exemption. Many

10:54

of the reasons the government could

10:56

withhold documents about individuals

10:59

who would be citizens or legal residents

11:01

or legally admitted to the US, would

11:04

not apply to this population. So,

11:07

it didn't have privacy rights as exlutable

11:10

aliens and we thought that

11:12

we should be able to get their names on that

11:14

basis. And the district court judge agreed

11:16

with her. He ordered the State Department to

11:18

hand the list over to the ACLU.

11:20

But then something very strange happened.

11:23

Well, then the government classified the document

11:26

and filed and affidavit explaining

11:28

to the judge

11:30

why they classified the document and why

11:32

it shouldn't be released to us. So

11:33

the judge

11:34

ruled in your favor -- Yes.

11:35

-- but then the state department and

11:37

response to it classifies a document.

11:40

And follows a secret affidavit with the

11:42

judge.

11:42

The same judge. With the same judge

11:45

telling the judge Why the document

11:47

now is classified and should not be released

11:49

to us?

12:03

So just to recap, the judge rules

12:05

in favor of the ACLU. Tels

12:07

the state department you gotta hand over the list.

12:10

But in response, the state department classifies

12:12

the list. Claiming that it would somehow jeopardize

12:15

national security to release it.

12:17

And to explain this decision, it submits an

12:19

affidavit to the court. But the

12:21

affidavit itself is classified.

12:24

Only the judge can read it. So then,

12:26

the judge reverses himself, his own decision,

12:28

and says to the

12:29

ACLU, Actually, I've changed

12:31

my mind, but I can't tell you why.

12:33

It's just so that that that did up to well, and

12:35

it just seems crazy. Like, how does that

12:38

is that and and I'll just not know enough about

12:40

how this works.

12:41

Imagine that it's not

12:43

the only time it's ever happened, but I've never heard

12:45

of it happening. We actually went

12:47

back to the judge to ask him to reconsider.

12:50

But again, we were in

12:53

a pretty difficult, you know, decision

12:56

considering we didn't see the

12:58

document, that the government

13:00

that the judge was

13:01

reviewing. We didn't have an access

13:03

-- Right. -- to the defendants, to

13:05

the state department's secret

13:08

affordated

13:10

in the court. We don't expect

13:12

our court system to operate that way.

13:14

I could understand too how you could

13:17

make the argument that it's in bad faith, given

13:19

that it wasn't classified as confidential before

13:22

the

13:22

lawsuit. And then it was classified just

13:24

because for the

13:26

Voya. They classified it because

13:28

the judge ordered its

13:30

release. That was the

13:32

trigger. So

13:35

that list was

13:38

and still remains classified.

13:45

So the list wasn't just hidden and mysterious.

13:47

It was classified. After

13:49

a little bedtime reading on the espionage act,

13:52

we can to understand that our search for the

13:54

list raised a whole new set of concerns.

13:57

Was it illegal for us to possess this list?

13:59

Was it illegal for us to even ask sources

14:01

for it? Why would the state department

14:03

have gone through such links to protect the

14:05

names of two thousand seven hundred forty

14:08

six people the US government had determined

14:10

were exclutable. People who were not

14:12

citizens, people who had no privacy

14:15

rights, To try and find out we

14:17

filed our own Foyer request to the Department

14:19

of State for records related to the list,

14:21

communicate diplomatic notes, correspondence

14:24

between the state department and the INS about

14:26

who to put on the list, internal mimos

14:28

about the negotiations with the Cubans. Basically,

14:31

whatever they could turn up, And of course,

14:33

the list itself classified or

14:35

not. We had very little expectation

14:38

that our requests would yield anything, that they would

14:40

even respond to us. State is

14:42

a foyer black hole someone told us.

14:44

So the request was just the first step.

14:47

When state dragged its feet we were prepared

14:49

to do what the ACLU had done in the nineteen

14:51

eighties. We intended to sue the Department

14:53

of State for those records. Most

14:55

of the records we requested from state

14:57

involved one man in particular, a

15:00

man named Michael Kozak. Kozak

15:03

had been the lead negotiator on the American side

15:05

when the list was hammered out between the US and

15:07

Cuba in nineteen eighty four. He's a longtime

15:09

diplomat with a storied career. He's

15:12

still at the state department actually, been there

15:14

fifty

15:14

years, a ten year spending ten presidents.

15:17

During the Clinton administration, he served for a

15:19

few years as chief of the US diplomatic mission

15:21

in Cuba, and then later as the US ambassador

15:24

to Belarus. But in the nineteen

15:26

eighties, he was working on issues in Latin America

15:28

and became a key point person the problem of

15:30

the Marielle detainees. Naturally,

15:33

we've wanted to talk with them, but through a state department

15:35

spokesperson ambassador Khozak declined

15:37

our request for an interview. Instead,

15:40

this spokesperson said, quote, we'd refer

15:42

you to the public statements made by ambassador

15:44

Kozak in the 1980s on this matter.

15:50

Betty will come to order.

15:51

So far as we can find, the only substantive

15:54

public statement made by ambassador Khozak

15:56

about this matter came when he was called

15:58

to testify in a House Sub Committee hearing

16:00

in nineteen eighty

16:01

eight. The hearing was about the long

16:03

saga of the Mario Exclutables And

16:05

so in many ways, it was a hearing about the list

16:07

itself. Here's ambassador Khozak

16:10

from his opening statement. think we

16:12

always should go back and remember what happened

16:14

in nineteen eighty. The

16:16

government of Cuba at that

16:18

time sent

16:21

a hundred and twenty five thousand people

16:23

to the United States without reference

16:26

to US immigration laws or US

16:28

sovereignty. And in

16:29

fact, these people were

16:32

were dumped on the United States.

16:34

He starts wide. The boatlift as an

16:36

incursion on US sovereignty. The

16:39

boatlift filled not only with relatives of

16:41

Cuban Americans who had chartered the boats in the first

16:43

place, but filled with Cuban prisoners

16:45

as well. And then he lays

16:47

out the predicament, the government faced

16:49

afterward. What do you do when somebody

16:51

like Fadel Castro takes

16:55

people out of his jails and sends him up your way.

16:57

You can either release him into your society. And

17:01

we did that and the results were they

17:03

committed more crimes. Or

17:05

you can keep them in jail indefinitely, and

17:07

we were in the process of doing that

17:09

too. And that has its downsides. Or

17:13

you can send them back where they where they came from,

17:15

recognizing that that may not be the most attractive

17:17

society in the world. But you

17:20

know, none of those are perfect options. And

17:23

we were basically

17:24

going on what the immigration law

17:26

of the United States provides for.

17:28

The US was placed in nearly impossible

17:31

spot, Kazak says. And his

17:33

job was to figure a way out. And

17:36

this telling the negotiations with Cuba, which

17:38

resulted in the list, were a resolution to the

17:40

indefinite detention of these Mario Cubans.

17:43

And so the rationale for the list makes

17:45

sense. But how did the federal government

17:47

determine who to put on the list? In

17:49

this case, the only people that we were

17:51

interested in sending back were people

17:53

who'd committed serious crimes or people

17:56

who had severe mental disorders. Okay.

17:59

A pretty clear answer. The people on the list

18:01

were people who committed serious crimes or

18:03

people who had severe mental disorders.

18:07

But elsewhere in the hearing, Kozak says

18:09

this. When we had been trying to get

18:11

names of exclutables and data on

18:13

them and so on, that there'd been a reluctance

18:16

to really go into that too

18:18

much in the in the prison system for fear

18:20

that that would upset the inmate population.

18:23

That if if they saw that we were

18:25

we were seeking information on them. The

18:27

more questions we asked, the more we would cause

18:29

people to worry about in

18:31

the prison so we get rumors

18:33

started. This is where we get tripped

18:35

up a little. Kozak has said that they

18:37

were only interested in sending people back

18:39

who had committed serious crimes or those who

18:41

had severe mental disorders. But

18:43

then he says that the government was reluctant

18:45

to ask too many questions about the background

18:47

of these men? To investigate the men

18:49

who would be put on the list because of fears

18:51

that it would start rumors among the prison

18:53

population. So what was

18:56

the criteria to get put on the list?

18:58

This is what we've wanted to ask ambassador Kozak.

19:01

These are the records we've requested from state.

19:04

It's the main question we've had about the list.

19:06

Since we first heard about its existence and

19:08

first realized how long people have been trying

19:10

to get a hold of it. How secret the government

19:12

has kept it? Given what we discovered

19:15

about who could wind up in INS detention,

19:17

Gennaro Saroglass detained for

19:19

mistranslation Alberto Herrera,

19:22

detained for the theft of goat cheese in Cuba

19:24

in the seventies. The men at Fort

19:26

Shaffee, detained for not being

19:29

able to get sponsored out of Fort Shaffee. It

19:31

made you wonder, what kind of due

19:33

diligence did the US government conduct

19:35

about these men in custody in nineteen eighty

19:37

four? I've been asked over the

19:39

years. How

19:40

did you get on the list? Were those the worst

19:42

people? No. That's Gary Lishaw

19:44

again. He's the one who'd given us access

19:46

to the files in the basement of the Atlanta legal

19:49

aid society. He'd represented hundreds

19:51

of Cuban men detained by the INS throughout

19:53

the nineteen eighties. And his read on the

19:55

list? You got on the list because

19:57

on that day, those are the

19:59

people that the US government could identify.

20:02

Who were either in immigration custody

20:05

or they were serving sentences somewhere or

20:07

that the government knew about that they wanted to send

20:10

back.

20:10

We knew there were hundreds of people who had been

20:12

detained since arrival, suspected of serious

20:15

criminal activity in Cuba. But

20:17

there were two thousand seven hundred people on the

20:19

list. Which meant that the majority of those

20:21

on the list had somehow run afoul of the law

20:23

here in the

20:24

US. But what could they have

20:26

done to find themselves on the list?

20:28

If

20:29

they committed a serious crime, they were probably

20:31

serving a sentence. But if they

20:33

serve whatever sense they were had been sentenced

20:35

to, In finished, immigration

20:37

would pick them up and move them to Atlanta.

20:39

Remember the precarious situation that

20:41

faced all of the Morio Cubans? The

20:43

legal fiction that they weren't here at all,

20:46

that they were floating off the coast of Key West

20:48

asking for admission into the country.

20:50

And this status was still at play for thousands

20:53

of Moriel Cubans. They had only been paroled

20:55

into the US. And so if one of

20:57

them was convicted of a crime, that parole

20:59

would be revoked and they would be deemed inadmissible

21:02

into the US. Functionally,

21:04

what this meant is that if a Mario Cuban

21:06

served time in a state prison or local jail,

21:09

sometimes frequent minor offenses. The

21:11

INS would show up to take them into custody

21:13

after their sentence was complete. And

21:16

it's not like Eventually, the INS took

21:18

debit to custody after their sentence was complete.

21:20

In many cases, the person never even

21:23

left the jail. One person

21:25

who served sixteen months in a prison in New

21:27

York state would later tell us how this worked.

21:29

He had served as senate released early for

21:31

good behavior, he was being processed out

21:33

at the Sally Port of the Prison collecting his personal

21:36

effects. He could see his family there

21:38

on the outside waiting to take him home.

21:40

And as he walked toward the door to the outside,

21:43

INS agents stepped in and took custody

21:45

of him right there in the vestibule of prison.

21:48

That night, the government plane took him to

21:50

the Federal Penn in Atlanta. And

21:53

this person who had served as sixteen months

21:55

since he would end up spending years

21:57

more in prison detained by the INS.

22:00

And in some cases, the INS detained people

22:02

who had not served any time in the jail.

22:04

It detained people it only suspected of

22:06

having committed a crime or people they

22:08

believed would soon be charged with the

22:10

crime. You

22:11

might have had some people who didn't committed

22:13

crime. We're not charged with committing a crime, but

22:15

they caused some other problem. You might have

22:17

people who have picked up from minor things, a guy

22:19

got drunk through a rock, or

22:21

something. They didn't press charges, but immigration

22:24

found out they took them to Atlanta. The

22:26

Reagan administration, and an internal memo

22:28

from this time seems to acknowledge the reality

22:31

that some of the men being held in Atlanta were

22:33

never charged with the crime. Writing

22:35

about the implications, a Supreme Court case

22:37

might have on the indefinite detention and now

22:40

planned deportation of these Mario Cubans,

22:42

a government attorney wrote in a memo what

22:45

for my money stands as a monumental

22:47

achievement in legalese. Quote,

22:49

their guilt in the offense which resulted

22:52

in their incarceration has never been

22:54

adjudicated. Their

22:59

guilt has never been adjudicated This

23:02

Reagan administration lawyer is hedging

23:04

with his loopy sentence structured, but

23:06

a declassified document released by the state

23:09

defer. Years ago, says the same

23:11

thing, but in a much more direct way.

23:13

It states that while the justice department and

23:15

the INS maintained that all persons on

23:17

the list had serious criminal backgrounds, quote,

23:20

the dossiers supplied by the INS

23:23

frequently do not show commissions of

23:25

such crimes. End quote. One

23:29

case we read about in the files in the basement of

23:31

the Atlanta legal aid society involved a man

23:33

named Pedro Priore

23:34

Rodriguez. He had no criminal record.

23:36

He was

23:37

sponsored out to halfway house in Rochester, New

23:39

York. And one night, in November of nineteen

23:41

eighty three, he was walking home. He was

23:43

mugged by three men. And attacks

23:45

so brutal he would wind up losing an eye.

23:48

Claiming he needed specialized medical

23:49

care, the INS revoked his immigration role

23:51

and sent him to Atlanta. He was

23:54

told by the

23:54

INS that he would be released later that

23:56

year, but he was not. He was

23:58

told again, he'd be released in nineteen eighty

24:00

six, with the INS saying, quote,

24:02

we have made a positive recommendation. But

24:06

in March of nineteen eighty seven, he was

24:08

still in immigration detention. My

24:11

only crime he told a reporter was

24:13

losing my eye. Which

24:18

brings us back to the list Was

24:21

this man who lost his eye? Pedro

24:23

Priore Rodriguez? Was he on the

24:25

list? How did this list come together

24:28

in the first place?

24:29

During the Marietta negotiations, we

24:32

spent days and days, if not

24:34

weeks, going over these

24:36

lists of names.

24:38

Stephanie Van Rygersburg was the interpreter

24:40

for the American delegation during the list negotiations.

24:43

You know, it was it was completely chaotic,

24:47

let's say. And then every

24:49

once in a while, we would come back and we'd sit

24:51

down and pretend to be organized, but

24:53

it was basically a mess. It was

24:56

the most exacting

24:59

thing I've ever done. I mean, these pages

25:02

were just enough to make you blind.

25:04

They were just you know, maybe fifty

25:06

names on a page and you'd have

25:08

to use a ruler or you'd get mixed up

25:10

because the line would run into another line.

25:13

And it was so difficult about it because

25:16

the names, as far as

25:18

I know, were drawn up by us.

25:20

And at least to judge from

25:22

the guy from the INS who

25:26

was completely ignorant of

25:28

the system of naming in

25:30

Latin American countries. He

25:33

didn't even know that everybody in

25:35

Latin America has two last names.

25:38

So he thought that Juan Gonzales

25:41

and Juan Perez were different people.

25:43

If it was Juan Gonzales Perez, he

25:45

thought it was a mistake. So

25:49

untangling that was

25:51

one of the more idiotic

25:53

things we had to do was the huge waste

25:56

time. So the list that was presented

25:58

to the Cuban side had

26:00

not been filtered at all

26:03

for mistakes.

26:04

So they're reading the names one after another

26:06

over a course of about eighteen hours.

26:09

It's a very long tedious task.

26:11

That's William Leo Grande, co author

26:13

of the book Backchannel to Cuba,

26:15

the hidden history of negotiations between

26:18

Washington and Havana. Which chronicles

26:20

fifty years of diplomatic relations between

26:22

the US and Cuba, including the negotiations

26:25

about the list.

26:26

And at one point, the US

26:28

delegation reading

26:30

the name said, Nomei

26:32

Hodes. And the Cubans

26:34

all began to laugh and

26:36

the US side didn't understand it.

26:38

Well, it turns out that that this particular

26:41

Cuban being interviewed by

26:43

INS when he was asked what his name

26:45

was, he said, Spanish

26:50

for don't fuck with me. The interrogator

26:52

just dutifully wrote that down thinking that

26:54

it was the guy's name. It just

26:57

I

26:57

mean, it it cut sort of boggles the mind because

26:59

are we talking about a man, a human man

27:02

who came over in the Mario Boatlift in nineteen

27:04

eighty, who's sitting in the Atlanta federal penitentiary

27:07

in nineteen eighty four. And all

27:09

the US government knows about him is

27:11

that he has a alias of Nomaejotis.

27:13

Well, this this speaks directly to

27:16

your point as to how much did

27:18

did INS interviewers really

27:20

know about these people.

27:40

They are unwanted. Two thousand five hundred criminals

27:42

and mental patients who got into this country

27:44

from Cuba They were among more than a

27:46

hundred thousand Cubans who came here in the

27:48

nineteen eighty

27:49

Boatlift. Now a deal to return

27:51

them to Cuba may be close. The announcement from

27:53

see Tom Brokall was the first news

27:55

of the repatriation agreement made on December

27:58

fourteenth nineteen eighty four. And

28:00

just a couple of months later, the deportations

28:02

of Mario Cubans began. The

28:05

first twenty three men to be deported were

28:07

transferred from the Atlanta federal penitentiary

28:09

to an air force base just north of

28:11

city. But I fully well expect to

28:13

hear six months or three months or a year from

28:15

now that some of these people have fallen

28:17

onto some disastrous times when they've returned

28:19

to

28:19

Cuba. God knows what's gonna happen to

28:21

these fellows when they go back up. That's the voice

28:23

of Dale Schwartz at a press conference on the

28:25

Tarmac of the Air Force Base on the day

28:27

of the first deportation flights. Schwartz

28:30

was one of the immigration attorneys recruited by

28:32

the Atlanta legal aid society to help represent

28:34

the Mario detainees. Two people

28:36

have yet to go before any judge

28:38

anywhere and and tell their story.

28:41

In the files in the basement of Atlanta legal

28:43

aid society, we found a legal brief filed

28:45

by shorts and other lawyers on behalf

28:47

of the Cuban detainees. It's from January

28:50

nineteen eighty five, just a few weeks after

28:52

the list was announced, but before repatriation flights

28:55

began. The government would not hand

28:57

over the list, so the legal aid lawyers can

28:59

ask the government to respond to some questions

29:01

about him. Were there people on

29:03

the list who had been deemed excludable solely

29:05

for lacking entry papers? Yes,

29:08

the government responded. Were

29:10

there people on the list who had been approved

29:12

for release from the prison, but were still waiting

29:14

for a sponsorship yes, the government

29:16

responded. Were there people on the

29:18

list who had already been sponsored out and

29:20

were no longer being detained? Yes,

29:23

the government responded. For those

29:25

Mario Cubans on the list who have children

29:27

in the United States and wives who are citizens

29:29

or permanent residents, Does the government

29:31

intend to inform them that their father or

29:33

husband is about to be deported? No.

29:36

The government responded. That would be,

29:38

quote, overly burdensome and would require

29:41

an individual search of each Cuban's

29:43

file. But

29:45

even as questions swirled about the list,

29:47

who was on it and why the flights

29:50

to repatriate these men continue?

29:53

Officials would not say what if anything the

29:55

prisoners said as they left. After years

29:57

of legal struggle, the events seemed almost

30:00

anticlimactic to observers as

30:02

seven twenty seven soared into the air

30:04

for the two hour flight to

30:05

Havana. In the first few months of

30:07

nineteen eighty five, a total of two hundred

30:09

and one Mario Cubans were repatriated. But

30:12

all of that ended abruptly in May of

30:14

eighty five, when the Reagan administration launched

30:16

the pro democracy network radio marty,

30:19

which broadcast from South Florida and

30:21

reached deep into Cuba. Castro

30:23

was furious, and to retaliate,

30:26

he immediately scuttle the freshly inked

30:28

immigration accord. For the men

30:30

detained by the INS it was a double edged

30:32

sword. While they didn't have to fear

30:34

immediate repatriation to Cuba,

30:36

their stay in federal prisons had become

30:39

indefinite once again.

30:47

Set out to tell the definitive story of

30:49

the Mario d tenies, and inevitably,

30:51

you have to decide how best to deal with the

30:53

many different uprisings because

30:55

there were a lot of uprisings. There

30:57

was a one in Talladega in nineteen ninety one

30:59

that we told you about at the very start of the story.

31:02

There were the protests at Fort Chaffe that led

31:04

to the barbed wire and the national guard at the

31:06

camp back in nineteen eighty. Then

31:08

there was the uprising at the Atlanta Penn in

31:10

nineteen eighty four. You heard about that one last

31:12

time. The investigator, Susan Miller,

31:14

remember she put the uprisings into a

31:16

larger context. What

31:19

they were doing is they were trying

31:21

to speak about their

31:23

condition. And of course, their condition

31:26

was not good. The United States

31:28

government insisted that in the eyes of the law,

31:30

the Mario detainees weren't really here.

31:32

The presence in the country, a legal fiction,

31:35

a fiction not subject to the protections

31:37

of the constitution. Yet,

31:40

they sat in federal prisons. Definitely

31:42

contained year after

31:43

year. And in November of nineteen

31:45

eighty seven, their desperation led

31:47

to another uprising, the big

31:49

one, the biggest one of all. Mario

31:52

Cubans took over the federal penitentiary in

31:54

Atlanta for eleven days. It

31:56

took ninety hostages. Thick

31:58

black smoke hangs over Atlanta's gonna OPENETENTRIE

32:01

WHERE SOME fifteen hundred MARIOITOs ARE

32:03

BEING HELPED. AND IT ALL STARTED

32:06

BECAUSE OF THE LIST. After

32:08

the radio marty fiasco scheduled the

32:10

repatriation agreement in nineteen eighty five,

32:12

negotiators from the US and Cuba met

32:14

throughout nineteen eighty six and eighty seven trying

32:17

to get back to terms. And finally,

32:19

in nineteen eighty seven, just before Thanksgiving,

32:22

the two countries agreed to reinstate the

32:24

migration agreement. Same terms,

32:26

same names, same secrets, same

32:29

list. And once word of the agreement

32:31

reached the men detained in

32:32

Atlanta, They decided once more

32:35

to speak about their condition.

32:37

123123I

32:40

got a message into the public opinion of

32:42

the United States.

32:49

Because many of the men inside the prison

32:51

had lived free in the US for years,

32:53

It started lives here. They've gotten married,

32:55

had children, helped jobs. But

32:57

because of a conviction or even suspicion

32:59

of criminal activity, they'd found themselves

33:01

locked up in immigration detention. And

33:04

during the takeover of

33:05

Atlanta, many of their families were speaking

33:07

to the press. What's your greatest spirit

33:09

about your husband right now? That he can be

33:11

deployed and I have a daughter five year old.

33:14

And what I'm gonna do is gonna happen to

33:16

my daughter without a

33:17

father. I can't let that happen. Was

33:19

he on his interview? A session

33:21

of marijuana. Many of the crimes

33:23

committed by the Mario Cubans detained by

33:25

the INS had been nonviolent. Drug

33:28

charges or property crimes comprise most

33:30

violations. There were indeed some

33:32

Mario Cubans who committed serious and

33:35

violent crimes here in the US. But

33:37

most of those people were still serving sentences

33:39

in state prisons for those convictions. They

33:42

were not being released early for good behavior.

33:44

They were not being intercepted by the INS

33:47

and the vestibule of the jail as their families

33:49

waited outside for them to be released.

33:51

What do you want from this? What do you want it's

33:54

for them to look at the files to see that

33:56

they committed a narrative like anybody else that

33:58

commits a narrative, they serve the time and

34:01

he has been between a year and a half after

34:03

he served the fifteen months since

34:04

then. Up.

34:06

Oh, witness news, jeez.

34:08

Emotions spilling over in Atlanta, there's finally

34:10

something to cheer about. Good evening, the prisoner

34:13

deal is

34:13

over. All hostages are safe. Cuban

34:15

prisoners being scattered across the country

34:17

tonight while hostage families enjoy their first

34:19

night to get The Atlanta riot ended after

34:21

eleven days. And just like in Talladega,

34:24

none of the hostages were badly injured. And

34:26

many of them had felt solidarity with the

34:28

aims of the Cubans. And it was

34:30

easy to sympathize with what the Cubans

34:32

were going through, especially since none

34:35

of the men or their families knew

34:37

if they were on the list to be deported. And

34:40

of course, this was why Carol Wachuk

34:42

and the ACLU wanted to see the list

34:44

in the first place to find out

34:46

who was an urgent need of legal aid.

34:48

But the ACL used efforts to obtain

34:51

the list and thus to advocate on their behalf,

34:53

it only made the list more hidden.

34:55

And that's why we wound up suing the state

34:57

department. As we expected, the state

34:59

department ignored our initial Foyer request.

35:02

So we filed a suit in federal court.

35:05

Ten months later, after some predictable and

35:07

not interesting legal ping pong between

35:09

NPR's lawyers and the assistant US attorney

35:11

representing the government. We finally received

35:13

word that the state department would produce an

35:16

initial batch of records. Six

35:18

weeks after that, they made good on that promise.

35:21

So nearly a year after suing the State

35:23

Department, we got an email with the first batch

35:25

of records as an attachment. So we

35:27

hopped on the phone call to open the email

35:29

together. We opened the attachment and

35:31

it was five pages.

35:33

This could not be further off the access of

35:35

what we asked for.

35:36

It's kind of amazing that they waited almost

35:38

two months to send us this. The five

35:40

pages were sloppily redacted records

35:43

related to something vaguely about Cuba

35:45

but nothing at all to do with our story and the

35:47

records we'd asked for in the

35:48

lawsuit. What a bunch of bullshit?

35:51

I mean, I'm not surprised, but panicked.

35:54

That is incredibly

35:55

unhelpful. I gotta say, to

35:58

send to anything and to send this

36:00

feels like a bigger slap

36:02

in the face and just to say nothing at

36:04

all. Anybody in the state who

36:06

saw our request knows that this has nothing to do with

36:08

our request. That's

36:09

the thing that's frustrating. It's like, what do you how do

36:11

you even respond to that? We responded

36:13

to that with a strongly worded letter to the

36:15

assistant US attorney. Pointing out

36:17

that the record state had sent were in no

36:19

way related to our request and reiterating

36:22

that we were interested only in the list of two

36:24

thousand seven hundred and forty six names and

36:26

any records related to the creation of that

36:28

list. Six weeks later, we

36:30

received another email with an attachment from

36:32

the state department. This time, it was

36:34

only one page and it was letter from lawyer

36:37

at state to tell us that the agency had

36:39

processed one hundred, quote, potentially

36:41

responsive records, end quote, but

36:43

that none of those records were ready for release.

36:46

And then six weeks after that, another email,

36:49

another attachment. This one actually

36:51

did contain some relevant documents. Knew

36:53

they're relevant right away because we'd already found

36:55

these exact same documents in the state department's

36:58

so called virtual reading room, an online

37:00

database of records that have already been made

37:02

public through some other four year request. So

37:05

the state department was basically saying, Nomejodis

37:08

and PR. We were never going to

37:10

get them to hand over the list.

37:12

But it turned out we didn't need

37:14

the state department to hand over the list

37:17

because one day a package showed

37:18

up. When I saw it, it

37:21

brought to mind an earlier

37:23

era of of mail. Yeah.

37:26

It brought to mind the word parcel.

37:29

Yeah. Well, it's it is interesting

37:31

to have an anonymous source

37:33

send you

37:34

a package that looks like a package

37:36

that would be a prop. Kennis spy movie. That's

37:39

exactly what this looks like to put out.

37:41

Once we learned that the list might be classified,

37:43

we knew that we couldn't just go around asking

37:45

people for it. Because it could potentially

37:48

be a federal crime to solicit classified

37:50

material, which is, well,

37:52

kind of what we've been doing for years before

37:54

we heard that had been classified. But

37:56

none of that had worked anyway. At least

37:59

until the day, this package showed up,

38:01

leaked to us by a source. We

38:03

weren't certain the package would really contain

38:05

the list, but we decided to air on the side

38:07

of caution and leave our phones and laptops

38:09

out of the room whenever we talked about this package,

38:11

even before it was open. And so there

38:14

we sat in the office with only our recorder

38:16

staring at a package that we thought might

38:18

contain the

38:19

list. Should we open it?

38:21

I

38:21

think we should have.

38:22

Do you mind? Can I do the honors?

38:23

Do you wanna do that?

38:24

Okay.

38:28

Alright. So inside the brown paper

38:30

is a brown paper box, which I think

38:33

is this

38:33

way. The package was wrapped neatly

38:36

in brown paper. Inside that was

38:38

a box that contained a heavy stack of papers.

38:40

On top was the English translation of speech

38:43

Casanova delivered around the time the list was announced.

38:46

And here's the next thing. Approved

38:49

list of persons found ineligible

38:51

for legal admission to the United States.

38:53

As referred to in the communicated agreed

38:56

upon by the United States in Cuba

38:58

December

38:59

fourteen, nineteen eighty four. And

39:02

there are two signatures. One of them looks

39:04

like Michael Kozak. And

39:06

the

39:06

other, I'm assuming, would

39:08

be Allercon.

39:10

Yeah. Swoopy a right there. Ricardo

39:12

Allercon was a lead negotiator for the Cuban

39:15

side. So and it looks

39:17

to be quite a number of pages, which if you had

39:19

a list of two thousand seven hundred and forty six

39:21

names, it might be a lot of pages.

39:23

You feeling right now? Well, it's a little strange.

39:25

little strange. I'm gonna flip the page and see

39:27

names that people for generations

39:29

I feel like you've been trying to get access to.

39:33

There it is.

39:35

Name, a number.

39:36

It's the ailing number. It's INS number. That's right.

39:38

The INS number. And date of

39:40

birth.

39:44

This top page. There's

39:45

an a's.

39:46

It says It's alphabetical. There

39:48

are no numbers, so we will have to count.

39:51

But it

39:54

says two cuba 468

39:57

to twenty two. It appears that there are twenty two

40:00

names on the first page. And then each subsequent

40:02

page has twenty two, twenty four,

40:04

twenty five, twenty five on

40:06

each additional

40:07

page. Yeah.

40:09

You're gonna count the pages. I'm gonna go ahead and

40:11

get a pen and a piece paper so we can

40:13

do some multiplication.

40:14

Remember, we didn't have our phones in the room.

40:16

No phones meant no calculators. Of.

40:19

Okay. So it appears that there are a hundred

40:21

a hundred and nine pages

40:25

plus twenty five.

40:26

Twenty five plus twenty two.

40:31

Are you using new math or old math? This is

40:33

this is nineteen eighties math. Okay.

40:35

That's old math. That's very old math.

40:39

Two times nine is eighteen. Right?

40:41

Yeah. Carry the one. That's

40:44

1222 times

40:46

one. That's to two thousand

40:48

seven hundred and twenty five And what's twenty

40:50

three or twenty

40:52

three?

40:54

Two thousand seven hundred and forty eight. Which

40:56

probably means that on some of these pages, there's

40:58

there's somebody got kind of Or maybe this is the last

41:01

page, have

41:02

goal twenty five? No. Look at that. Look at

41:04

how smart you are. The last page

41:06

has three two minus. So

41:08

that's two thousand seven hundred and forty six.

41:10

That is two thousand seven hundred

41:12

and forty eight minus two. Is

41:15

two thousand. So and there's, again, the

41:17

very last page, and they're underneath the very last

41:19

name is Michael Kozak's signature

41:21

again. This is the list. We have list.

41:23

This is the We're holding the list. Well, what do we do

41:26

with the list now that we have

41:27

it? Let's check some names. Let's check for,

41:29

say, Jorge Marquez

41:30

and Dina.

41:31

Alright. Modena. Jorge Marquez's

41:33

Modena had been the leader of the uprising in

41:35

Talladega. He's the one who had protected

41:37

Linda Galhoun, the one she had called her guardian

41:39

angels. Mark is Jorge,

41:45

Mark is Medina. Here we

41:47

go. Jose Hernandez Mesa.

41:50

Mesa, who'd asked Albemails not to

41:52

send his letter to the mailbox of forgetfulness.

41:55

Oh,

41:55

man.

41:56

Whoa. Nineteen sixty

41:58

four. Wow. As

42:01

getting the list, we saw a surprising number

42:03

of people who were really young in the nineteen eighties.

42:05

What's putting that is wood US officials

42:07

detain a sixteen year old

42:09

immediately. I don't know. So

42:11

one way to find out.

42:13

I mean, how long could a sixteen year old have been

42:15

in prison in Cuba. I know. That's

42:17

so crazy. Can you imagine

42:20

being born in nineteen sixty four in Cuba and

42:22

coming over to the US in nineteen eighty

42:24

on a shrimp boat and being detained

42:26

and finding yourself on the list and being

42:28

repatriated. Who

42:30

the guy that Ham calls goat cheese guy

42:32

was a young woman. That man, Alberto Herrera,

42:35

He was there on the list, and so

42:37

was Pedro Priore Rodriguez, whose

42:39

only crime was getting mugged in Rochester

42:41

and losing his eye. We wanted

42:43

to start using the list to research all the other

42:45

people whose names were on it, but there was

42:47

still that lingering concern about the list

42:50

being classified. Could

42:52

it still be classified? There

42:54

were no classified markings on the copy we received,

42:56

and it was clear that Cuban government had copy

42:59

of this list too. So what kind

43:01

of national security interests could be endangered

43:03

by its release? Without revealing

43:05

to them that the list had been leaked to us, we

43:07

just decided to ask our contact at the state

43:09

department. Is the list classified?

43:12

Getting the answer took a little while, but

43:15

finally, this spokesperson responded, quote,

43:17

The Exclutable List is not classified,

43:20

but it contains personally identifiable information

43:23

likely protected under the Privacy

43:25

Act. It is not a public document,

43:27

end quote. The spokesperson

43:30

was right. The list did contain

43:32

personally identifiable information. And

43:35

we started using that information to confirm

43:37

some of the theories we developed about the list.

43:40

The man who'd been stranded in Fort Shaffee

43:42

before being transferred to the penitentiary in

43:44

Atlanta in nineteen eighty two, they

43:46

were on the list. The names of

43:48

men we'd read about in the basement of the Atlanta

43:50

legal aid society who've been arrested in the

43:52

US for minor drug crimes and bar

43:54

fights, offenses that no reasonable

43:56

person would call a serious crime. They

43:59

were on the list.

44:03

And perhaps the most telling were five names

44:05

we'd seen before. When we'd found their

44:07

tombstones in the graveyard behind the

44:09

Atlanta

44:10

pin. Five of the men who

44:12

had died in the prison before the list had

44:14

ever been announced had somehow found

44:16

their way onto

44:17

it. When the US government

44:19

said it hadn't asked too many questions of the

44:21

names they were adding to the list, they

44:23

weren't kidding. It seems they

44:25

neglected to ask even the most basic

44:27

questions about these men. So

44:33

now that we finally had the list, we had

44:35

to take it and go where

44:38

else to Cuba. To

44:40

finally find the men on the roof.

44:47

Please, Kevin. Welcome. Huma,

44:50

where the local time is eleven seventeen

44:53

approximately AM. That's

44:55

next time. On the final episode

44:58

of White Lies.

45:26

If you wanna hear our final episode right

45:28

now, sign up for embedded plus

45:30

plus dot NPR dot org slash

45:32

embedded. It's a great way to support

45:34

our work, And for our show ends, there's

45:36

a new show coming that we think you'll love.

45:39

It's called taking cover. And if you've

45:41

already signed up for Embedded Plus, you'll get access

45:43

to episodes of that show early and sponsor

45:45

free. So to support NPR's investigative

45:48

journalism, go to plus dot NPR

45:50

dot org slash embedded or find

45:52

the embedded channel in

45:53

Apple. White Lives is reported, written

45:55

and produced by us, and Connor town, O'Neil.

45:58

Liana's Instagram is supervising producer,

46:00

Annie Yetsi, as our associate producer.

46:03

Robert Little edits the show with help from Bruce

46:05

Oster, Keith Woods, Christopher Turpin, and

46:07

Kamala Kelker. Our incredible

46:09

score is composed and performed by Jeff

46:11

t

46:12

Byrd. Emily Bogle, a senior visual

46:14

editor Barbara Van Werkam. As

46:16

our fact checker, Our audio engineer

46:19

is Maggie Luthar. Huge

46:21

thanks to Radiohead for the use of their

46:23

song in the National

46:24

Anthem, courtesy of XL recordings,

46:26

and Warner Chapel Music. Archival

46:28

tape in this episode comes from the American Archive

46:30

of Public Broadcasting, NBC, Seaspan,

46:33

Miami Dade College's Wolfson

46:34

Archives, and The Kona Archive. Special

46:36

thanks to Michael Allen, Tom Burke,

46:39

Patricia Peña, Ayesha Lewis,

46:41

Michelle Kellerman, Robert Beninkasa, Jeff

46:43

Guo, Rachel Sellar, Laura Layner,

46:46

Eduardo Marceli, Rafael Penaúver,

46:48

Ernesto Perez, Willy Allen.

46:51

Juliana Lombardo Larry Orton,

46:53

Duke Austin, Alfredo Villoche, Carl

46:55

Kukuchi, Monica Wilson, Matthew

46:58

Story, Louise Detman, and

47:00

Monica Johnson, and Heather Ash at the Foreign

47:02

Affairs oral History Collection at the Association

47:05

for Diplomatic Studies and

47:06

Training. We are grateful for the work of

47:08

Micah Ratner in NPR's legal team. Especially

47:10

in this episode. And Tony Cavin, NPR's

47:12

Standards and Practices's Editor. Our project

47:15

manager is Margaret Price. Irene Naguchi

47:17

is the executive producer of NPR's Storytelling

47:19

unit. And Anja Gruntman is NPR's Senior

47:21

Vice President for Programming and Audience Development.

48:53

This message comes from NPR sponsor

48:55

NerdWallet. Looking to make a smart financial

48:58

decision, compare and find the top

49:00

credit cards savings accounts and

49:02

more at nerdwallet dot com. Nerdwallet,

49:04

the smartest decision for all your

49:07

financial decisions.

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features