Podchaser Logo
Home
S24 E3: Operation Artemis | "Hunting Warhead"

S24 E3: Operation Artemis | "Hunting Warhead"

Released Sunday, 4th February 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
S24 E3: Operation Artemis | "Hunting Warhead"

S24 E3: Operation Artemis | "Hunting Warhead"

S24 E3: Operation Artemis | "Hunting Warhead"

S24 E3: Operation Artemis | "Hunting Warhead"

Sunday, 4th February 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:00

I'm speaking to you at a moment of grave

0:03

crisis. I'm

0:05

Jeff Turner and this is Recall. It's

0:08

a series about history, not

0:10

the ancient past, but history that's still

0:12

hot to the touch. In

0:15

this first season, I explore a revolutionary

0:17

political movement that brought a modern democracy

0:19

to the brink. You

0:21

can find Recall, how to start a

0:23

revolution on the CBC Listen app, or

0:26

wherever you get your podcasts. This

0:32

is a CBC Podcast. The

0:34

following episode contains difficult subject

0:36

matter. Listener discretion is

0:39

advised. When

0:41

they were arrested, Paul Gryffokner, where

0:44

were you all? Were you and the team inside

0:46

the room listening to the arrest? I mean, how

0:48

did it work? No, I mean, there

0:50

was no remote monitoring or anything

0:52

like that. That's Paul

0:54

Griffiths, one of the investigators

0:56

with Task Force Argos. We

0:59

were kept in fairly constant

1:01

touch over the course of the whole weekend.

1:04

Griffiths is based in Brisbane, Australia. He

1:07

works for the Queensland Police Service. Time

1:11

zones obviously present something

1:13

of a challenge. He

1:16

and the rest of Task Force Argos were

1:18

waiting for the news of Warhead's arrest. We

1:21

knew that they were at the address in

1:24

the US, then it was getting into the

1:26

evening here. Waiting for information

1:29

that might help launch the next phase of

1:31

the operation. Yeah, I

1:34

would say it was within the first hour after

1:36

the arrest that we had at least

1:38

one password that allowed us to get into the site.

1:42

Warhead, the Canadian Benjamin Faulkner, soon

1:44

gave up all the passwords necessary

1:46

to access his abuse site, Child's

1:48

Play. But access

1:50

alone wasn't enough. They

1:53

had security measures in

1:55

place that would, they thought, prevent

1:57

law enforcement taking over their accounts.

2:01

It was one thing to have an account

2:03

password and have access to the site, but

2:05

to get yourself into a position where you

2:07

could securely post

2:09

as them was a

2:12

bigger challenge that almost undid

2:14

us. It almost undid you? Yeah, we

2:16

almost didn't get ourselves into a situation

2:18

where we could do that. Overcoming

2:23

the hidden security measures took time, which

2:26

was an issue because Warhead had often posted

2:29

on Child's Place several times a day. So

2:32

if the form didn't hear from him soon,

2:34

its million-plus members would figure out that something

2:36

was off. They might delete their accounts and

2:38

disappear, only to surface later

2:41

as another anonymous user on

2:43

another encrypted site. Griffiths

2:46

wanted to keep them on the site and

2:48

in his crosshairs. The

2:50

operation depended on it. This

2:52

operation, does it have some kind of name? It's

2:55

got various names, to be honest, depending on which

2:57

country you're in. So what do you call it? Here

3:01

in Queensland, it's Artemis. Artemis?

3:03

Yeah. Do you like that? We

3:06

don't have reasons for operation names here,

3:08

they're just a generic name that's given.

3:10

I think it's something from Greek mythology,

3:12

actually. In

3:16

Greek mythology, Artemis was a goddess.

3:19

She was associated with the

3:21

moon, with chastity, childbirth, nature.

3:25

But Artemis, Artemis

3:27

was also the goddess of the

3:29

hunt. So

3:33

random or not, it's fitting. Because

3:35

even though Ben Faulkner and Patrick Faulty

3:38

had been arrested, the real hunt had

3:41

only just begun. I'm

3:45

Damon Fairless, and this

3:48

is Hunting Warhead. When

4:06

people think of the word child pornography, they

4:08

might think of a 13-year-old teenager in

4:12

a skimpy bathing suit who could almost pass

4:14

for 16 or 18 or 20. That's

4:18

not what this is. That's

4:21

investigative journalist Julian Cher. We're

4:23

talking about infants. We're talking

4:25

about school children being forced

4:27

to endure some of

4:29

the worst forms of systematic

4:32

sexual abuse. Julian

4:36

literally wrote the book on the rise of Internet

4:38

child abuse, as well as the type of police

4:40

work Paul Griffiths and his colleagues around the world

4:43

do every day. His book is

4:45

called One Child at a Time. Child

4:48

pornography is just the wrong term.

4:51

This is child abuse.

4:54

These are crime scene photos.

5:00

What people don't realize is how

5:02

different this is from every other

5:04

crime. In almost

5:06

every case, they know where the crime took

5:08

place. They almost

5:10

always know who the victim is,

5:12

and often the bad guy leaves

5:15

obvious evidence. When it

5:17

comes to child abuse online, police

5:19

have a much harder job. They

5:24

have a photo, a little four-year-old

5:27

sitting naked on a bed.

5:31

They don't know who she is. They

5:33

don't know where she is, and they

5:35

certainly don't know who's doing the abuse.

5:39

And they have this mad race around

5:41

the world to try to find her.

5:47

It's like investigating a missing person's case

5:50

without really knowing who's missing. So

5:54

the priority for police is not

5:56

catching the offenders, it's rescuing

5:59

the children. because there is a life

6:01

at stake. So

6:07

do we have any measures of how prevalent child

6:09

pornography is? The largest center

6:11

in the world that monitors this

6:13

is in Washington, D.C. It's

6:15

the National Center for

6:18

Exploited and Missing Children,

6:20

NICMC. In

6:22

1998, the center started at Cyber Tip Line,

6:25

a way of gathering together all reported cases

6:27

of online child abuse and passing

6:30

them on to the appropriate law enforcement

6:32

agencies. In its first few years,

6:34

the tip line got about 10,000 reports a year. But

6:37

that's been growing exponentially. In

6:40

2017 alone, it received 9.6 million reports. In

6:45

2018, the total number of cases was

6:47

about 43 million. And

6:50

by all accounts, that's just the tip of

6:52

the iceberg. All

6:55

we know is that it's growing, it's exploding,

6:58

and it's a volcano of abuse

7:00

that's out there. About

7:08

half of child abuse imagery depicts

7:10

kids under the age of 10.

7:14

And nearly a third of it involves

7:16

rape and torture. When

7:21

police first began trying to rescue these children, they

7:24

had a lot of catching up to do. The

7:54

latest encryption software and

7:56

the latest camera equipment and

7:59

other stuff. Well, the police would do

8:01

the same thing. And so

8:03

one of the things that I find really

8:05

intriguing is that they've got this real world

8:07

network, the set of relationships

8:09

between these different agencies in Europe, here

8:11

in North America and Australia. Can

8:14

you tell me about the nature of that relationship

8:16

between the different agencies? Yeah,

8:18

it's really something that's very special.

8:21

Because if you think about it,

8:23

by definition, police are territorial,

8:26

right? Their mandate is

8:28

to protect and serve the people of the

8:30

city who pay their taxes and hire

8:32

them and run them. The

8:35

problem is online child abuse, by

8:37

definition, is borderless. So the police

8:40

had to come up with ways

8:42

where they could fight a borderless

8:44

crime by breaking down the very

8:46

borders that are built into the

8:48

police mandate and to the police

8:51

budget. So one

8:53

of the things that meant is they had

8:55

to go to their bosses and say, we

8:58

need more money because we're going to rescue children

9:00

around the world. And that commitment had to be

9:02

made. Second, they had to

9:05

set up some formal structure. They

9:07

had to find quick ways of being

9:09

able to share images. So when a

9:11

picture of a little girl is found

9:14

by the Toronto police, they could immediately

9:16

figure out ways to work with the

9:18

FBI and the UK police and eventually

9:21

locate her in North Carolina. Interpol

9:24

set up coordinating bodies. There

9:26

were international databases so that

9:28

pictures found in Canada, in

9:30

the US and Australia could

9:32

be shared, matched, correlated.

9:35

And then finally, and in many

9:38

ways most importantly, were the personal

9:40

relationships that developed. So Paul

9:42

Griffiths used to be in the

9:44

UK and had a huge reputation

9:46

as one of the best hunters

9:48

of clues in the photographs.

9:51

He would work closely with the

9:53

Canadians. When he moved down to

9:55

Australia, he stayed in touch with

9:57

the Canadians and the French and

9:59

the Germans. So you have this important

10:02

network built on trust

10:04

and sharing and competence.

10:07

And so just like the online

10:10

pedophile community had its

10:12

hidden network of, you know, secret

10:14

handshakes and codes, so did the

10:16

police. And it has just grown

10:18

stronger and stronger over the years. How

10:22

did you get involved in the Internet? I

10:28

first met Paul Griffiths when he was

10:31

working in the UK. He

10:33

had been an officer in Manchester,

10:35

England, tackling sex crimes. And

10:38

he began to realize how the Internet

10:40

had radically changed things. I think it

10:42

was back in 1990, about 84% of

10:45

his UNIT cases were with adult

10:47

obscenity, and only about 3% dealt

10:50

with child abuse. By 2000, it

10:52

had been completely reversed. 87%

10:56

of their cases involved children. So

10:58

Griffiths decided to devote his

11:00

career and really his life to this.

11:02

So he begins to work with online

11:05

child images. And he told me a

11:07

story of one incident that really changed

11:10

things. There

11:13

was a complaint in Manchester, England, against a

11:15

man, and they made the arrest. And they

11:17

found that the man had abused a girl

11:19

who was about eight or nine years old.

11:23

When they made the arrest, Griffiths and

11:26

his colleagues realized that they had seen

11:28

her photos in collections on the web.

11:30

They just had never connected her with

11:33

abuse that was really going on almost

11:35

around the corner from the police station.

11:38

So it was a kind of epiphany

11:40

for Griffiths because he said, well, wait

11:43

a minute. Instead of waiting to arrest

11:45

some sexual offender and then hoping that

11:47

will lead to the rescue of children,

11:50

what if we look at these pictures

11:52

as potential clues to try to

11:54

find out who the offenders are and

11:56

rescue the kids proactively? So,

12:02

he had to set out to

12:05

figure out ways to hunt for

12:07

these clues. I remember talking with

12:09

him, he would explain how, for

12:11

example, in one picture, he would

12:13

see some computer boxes on

12:15

some gray steel shelves in the background,

12:17

and he would zoom in and read

12:19

the barcode, and then contact the company

12:21

to figure out where the shipment had

12:23

been sent. In another photo,

12:25

there was a TV commercial in the

12:27

background for a chocolate bar,

12:29

and he was able to figure out where

12:32

and when that ad, that specific

12:34

ad, had read. I've

12:40

seen him put together

12:42

a photo of a

12:44

suspected offender from a

12:47

glimmer of an eye here, a reflection

12:49

in a mirror there. It's

12:51

the passion of somebody putting together a

12:54

jigsaw puzzle, but knowing that if he

12:56

can put the pieces together, there might

12:58

be a little child somewhere that he

13:01

could rescue. In

13:05

2009, Griffiths moved from the UK to Australia

13:08

to join Task Force Argos. There

13:10

are several agencies around the

13:12

world that are entirely devoted

13:14

to the rescuing of children,

13:16

and specifically children who are

13:19

victims of online child abuse.

13:21

Toronto has an internationally

13:24

famous squad. The RCMP

13:26

has some units. The FBI has

13:29

a dedicated unit. Interpol

13:31

has an international

13:33

cooperating body. Task

13:36

Force Argos has earned

13:38

quite deservedly a reputation

13:41

for being one of the best,

13:43

for being leaders, for being bold

13:45

and innovative and even aggressive. And

13:50

now, thanks to Homeland Security's work

13:52

in Virginia, Argos was close to gaining

13:55

access to the largest child abuse

13:57

site on the dark web. The

14:03

first two hours after these guys were taken,

14:06

they were quite intense. Do you

14:08

feel that that's? Yes, so

14:11

we knew that the operation

14:13

was happening. Inspector Paul Griffiths. We

14:15

knew that the arrest was imminent

14:17

and of course we were on

14:19

standby waiting for any information that

14:21

would come out of that. I

14:23

don't think we were entirely surprised

14:25

when it sounded as if

14:27

there was some amount of cooperation force

14:29

coming from, I think, Fort Neffers in

14:32

terms of access to accounts and access to

14:34

passwords and things like that. It's

14:38

very rare that anything like this was run 100% smoothly. Just

14:43

because Task Force Argos had all of

14:45

Warhead's passwords, it didn't mean that

14:48

they had full control of child's play and

14:50

they needed full control for what they planned next.

14:53

First, they'd have to secure the

14:56

server that hosted the site, which meant

14:58

moving it to Australia. We

15:00

would normally choose to move the server because we'd want

15:02

it in a situation where we had full control over

15:04

it and we'd also want it within our jurisdiction if

15:06

we were going to operate it. The

15:10

original child's play server was somewhere in Europe.

15:13

Hulken and Einer are pretty sure it was in

15:15

Germany. Argos isn't willing to say

15:17

one way or another. What we

15:20

do know is that Argos had the support

15:22

of their European colleagues, which would

15:24

allow them to take over the site and transfer

15:26

it to an Australian server. But

15:30

there was another problem. So

15:33

there was a third admin, so there was another guy

15:35

who we knew that had the same amount of access

15:37

to the servers and the sites. Warhead

15:45

and Crazy Monk, Faulkner and Faulty,

15:47

were child's plays and main administrators.

15:50

But there were others, including a user

15:52

named Deadpool, who had the same kind

15:54

of high-level access to the site. At

15:58

this point, the police didn't yet know who Deadpool was. was

16:00

and so they couldn't arrest them meaning

16:03

they had to tread carefully. So

16:09

you can't just close the site

16:11

down you can't just pick it up and move it

16:13

you can't do any of those things without alerting this

16:16

other guy and potentially other people as well

16:19

so what you don't have is full control

16:21

so you need some amount of social engineering

16:23

there to explain why you're going to move

16:25

the server and what you're going to do

16:27

exactly when you move it and

16:29

if you're not careful just as easily

16:31

as you could kick them out they

16:33

could kick you out as well. As

16:40

if this wasn't tricky enough there was one

16:42

final challenge. Benjamin

16:44

Faulkner had developed a protocol for precisely

16:47

this kind of situation to ensure the

16:49

site couldn't be taken over by an

16:51

undercover unit something

16:53

he called a canary. How

16:56

can explains? He told the

16:58

community the rest of the users on Childplay that every

17:01

month at the beginning of every month Warhead

17:04

the administrator would post a

17:07

message where he would share

17:09

some information about the status of this

17:11

forum and if he didn't if

17:14

this message wasn't posted the community

17:16

was to assume that Childplay

17:18

was being compromised or being taken over by

17:21

the police or someone else. The

17:25

challenge for Aragos was that Homeland

17:27

Security had arrested Faulkner on Monday,

17:29

October 3rd and Warhead was

17:31

expected to post a canary the next

17:33

day which put Task

17:35

Force Aragos under even more

17:37

pressure. And we

17:39

also knew that other people would expect us to

17:42

post something in that secure manner that we weren't

17:44

yet in a position to do. So

17:48

Paul Griffiths worked around the clock

17:51

poring over Warhead's posts studying his

17:53

spelling errors, his punctuation, mastering his

17:55

style, his linguistic quirks, even

17:57

a sense of humor. Four

18:01

days after Faulkner's arrest, Griffith

18:03

brings Warhead back online. He

18:07

posts the canary. It

18:09

reads, Phew, what a month

18:11

that was. A month of my life that I

18:13

won't get back. Although technically most of

18:16

the really screwed up shit happened in

18:18

October, not September, hence my

18:20

late foray into this month. Sorry

18:22

again about the late arrival, but I did ask

18:25

the staff team to step in and cover for

18:27

me in my enforced absences. I'm

18:34

not sure that any of the other users

18:36

knew categorically what had

18:38

happened. I think one or two

18:40

had very strong suspicions

18:44

and they, some

18:46

of them chose at least to raise

18:48

their suspicions and of course that then makes

18:50

other members of the community a little bit

18:52

jittery. So

18:54

Paul Griffiths hands over the reins of

18:56

the undercover operation to his colleagues. One

18:59

of the big jobs then for the

19:01

undercover guys is to quieten

19:04

those rumours down and so you know, as if

19:06

you've not got a hard enough job, A,

19:09

running the site, B, conversing

19:11

with all the people you've got to

19:13

converse with and being that guy online,

19:16

you've then also got to sweep up

19:19

after yourself and make sure that the

19:21

damage is limited as much as possible.

19:26

By the end of October, Child's Play

19:28

had been successfully transferred to a server

19:30

in Australia. There were

19:32

some suspicions initially, but

19:34

now the majority of the site's users

19:36

believe Child's Play is safe and secure.

19:40

And so Task Force Argos is

19:42

right where it wants to be. On

19:44

the hunt. A

19:50

web of manipulation and terrifying abuse.

19:53

If you'd have said to do anything, I would

19:55

have done it. With a powerful religious figure at

19:57

its centre. There was no safe place. don't

20:00

say no to him. World of

20:02

Secrets from the BBC World Service

20:04

is back to the brand new

20:07

season, investigating allegations surrounding the preacher,

20:09

T.V Joshua. Sequelger or secrecy need

20:11

to be broken. Search for World

20:13

of Secrets wherever you get your

20:16

BBC podcast. What

20:21

have you been doing on the site

20:24

these months in regards to Trustlay? Just

20:26

monitoring the activities on the site, trying

20:28

to identify new material and trying to

20:30

identify people who are either producers or

20:33

are close to the production of the

20:35

material, and then trying to do

20:37

what we can to identify who they are or

20:39

who the children in the images are basically. After

20:42

months of watching from the sidelines, Hauk-Gun and

20:44

his colleagues are finally granted a second interview

20:46

with Task Force Argos in August of 2017.

20:50

At this point, Paul Griffiths and the rest

20:52

of the unit have been running Child's Play

20:54

undercover for 10 months. My

20:57

area of expertise, if you like, is

20:59

the analysis of the images and investigating

21:02

the producers of those images and identifying

21:04

the victims. It

21:07

goes without saying that this involves looking

21:09

at a lot of pictures of children

21:11

being abused. I've

21:13

been working in this area for 22 years now.

21:17

I usually say if one human being has done

21:19

it to another human being, then I've seen a

21:21

photograph or a video of it happening. Have

21:24

you ever cried? No.

21:28

Close. But no. When

21:30

was that? A long time ago. Long

21:33

time ago. I

21:44

kind of get a little bit desensitized to it,

21:46

I suppose, but I think the main motivator for

21:50

the staff who are working victim identification is that they know

21:52

that they can do some good, basically.

21:55

They can achieve a result by examining

21:57

that image, examining that video. looking

22:00

at the associated information about it and

22:02

actually finding the child and removing them

22:04

from a harmful situation. As

22:08

we heard earlier, Griffith is a pioneer in the field

22:10

of victim ID and he's still one

22:12

of the world's best. It's

22:15

just that I remember things as photographs.

22:18

So when I think about an event

22:21

or when I think about something that I did,

22:23

I can see that in

22:25

my mind. And

22:27

I found fairly early on when

22:29

I was doing this work that I could store

22:32

that image as an image and

22:34

I could remember that I'd seen it previously. So

22:37

even now where we're talking, you know,

22:39

millions of images in circulation, I

22:41

can very often just look at an image and

22:43

tell you, you know, yes, but I've

22:46

seen it before. I could probably tell

22:48

you when I first saw it. I can probably tell

22:50

you where it was seized from. And yeah,

22:53

we have great databases that allow us to find

22:55

these things. But occasionally I find that I'm quicker

22:58

than the database and I can actually find

23:00

where it is before the database finds it.

23:03

This is something that's helped him with past cases.

23:06

We were dealing with an investigation where

23:08

we'd been looking for this guy for a while.

23:10

He was running a darknet site and we knew

23:13

he was an abuser. He

23:15

was one of the higher end in

23:17

terms of the level of

23:19

abuse in his images that was bondage and

23:21

there was torture in the images. And

23:25

when you look at the images and

23:27

you analyze them for all sorts of

23:29

clues, looking for information that might help,

23:31

I noticed this guy had a particular

23:34

mark on his body that was faint,

23:37

but identifiable. And

23:39

I would say a week, two, three,

23:41

four weeks later, I was looking at a video

23:44

and it was a video I'd seen 100 more

23:47

times previously. I thought,

23:50

wait a minute, this guy looks like he's

23:52

got the same kind of mark. That

23:54

mark was on the guy's penis. And

23:57

when I look closely at it, I realize. It

24:00

was clearly the same mark in the

24:02

same location and it

24:05

was the same guy. Griffiths

24:09

cross-referenced the two sets of images

24:11

which eventually led to... Identifying

24:16

and rescuing kids is Task Force

24:18

Argo's primary objective and

24:21

running child's play as an undercover operation as

24:23

Warhead was a means to that end. It's

24:27

not something I feel particularly comfortable with

24:29

actually. Putting yourself in the shoes of

24:31

those people especially when you know the

24:33

mindset that they have and the sexual

24:36

attraction to children that they have. It's

24:38

a testing piece of work. It's not

24:41

something everyone can do and it's quite

24:43

challenging. You've also got to get yourself

24:45

into their mind a little bit and you've got to

24:47

think the way that they think and it's a fairly

24:49

uncomfortable way to think to be honest. But

24:53

it is vital to what Argos does. So

24:56

along with specialists and victim ID, guys like

24:58

Griffiths, Argos has several experienced undercover investigators. It's

25:05

an awful lot of effort, an awful lot of work. To become somebody online is

25:07

not just a case of becoming

25:10

them on the site but you've also got to

25:12

be aware of how they interact off the site

25:14

with other members of the site maybe or with

25:16

other people that they know in the community. So

25:18

for instance when you're

25:20

talking about an individual who you

25:22

know has written a security and

25:24

anti-forensics guide then you know that

25:26

people are going to come to

25:28

him for advice on computer security

25:30

and anti-forensics. And of course that's

25:32

a difficult balance there because you

25:35

need to kind of put yourself across as

25:37

knowing as much as he knows but then

25:39

you don't want to give people information that

25:42

are then going to make them harder to

25:44

catch, harder to find, harder to prosecute at

25:46

the end of the day. So you know

25:48

it sounds almost trivial but you've got to

25:50

understand the mindset of the person that you're

25:53

being. But

25:58

this raises a big question. one

26:00

that's relevant to all undercover operations.

26:04

What ethical boundaries might you cross? If

26:07

you're a police officer pretending to be

26:09

an online child abuser, how

26:12

far should you go? And

26:14

how do you know when you've gone too

26:16

far? How

26:26

can an INR had been monitoring activity on

26:28

child's play since Argos had taken it over?

26:31

Warhead was no longer as present on the site,

26:34

but his Canary messages were still

26:36

being posted like clockwork. Health

26:39

Force Argos, they were the

26:42

ones who had to post these Canary

26:44

messages every month. And

26:46

we were obviously interested and curious to see

26:48

what they posted. And we find it interesting

26:50

that the police actually are posting child abuse

26:52

images. I mean,

26:55

they are spreading something that they are trying

26:58

to combat. As

27:03

Warhead, Ben Faulkner had designed his Canary in

27:05

a way he thought was failsafe. A

27:08

way that would prove to other users that he was

27:10

still in control of child's play. They

27:13

had to have two images of child abuse attached

27:15

to this message, because they thought that

27:18

this is something the police can't do. Faulkner

27:20

was right. Sort of. In

27:23

many jurisdictions, police don't have the authority

27:25

to post child abuse images, at least

27:28

not that easily. But Argos

27:30

is an exception. I

27:33

think collectively within this unit, we've

27:35

been working for so long that

27:37

we've identified the fact that legislation

27:39

needs to keep up with the

27:41

way that offenders are using technology.

27:45

That's John Rouse, the other guy Halkin met at

27:47

the Burger Bar in his first trip to Brisbane.

27:49

He's the officer in charge of Task Force

27:52

Argos, as well as the unit's founder. So

27:55

we've been very much on the

27:57

front foot in talking to, possibly, the

28:01

Attorney General's office and the government,

28:03

about the challenges that we're facing

28:06

to successfully prosecute these people. And

28:08

we've been fortunate that, not just from within our

28:10

organisation in the Queensland Police Service, but

28:12

across government, there's been support and an ear

28:15

to help us do our job. I've

28:20

been in the unit now for 17 years. Some

28:22

of the other guys have been here for the same amount of

28:24

time. So we've seen the internet evolve

28:26

into what it is today, from fax

28:29

modems and bulletin boards back

28:31

in the 90s. And we recognised that we

28:33

were deficient in legislation in the early 2000s.

28:36

And in fact, we didn't have

28:38

legislation that really clearly criminalised

28:41

the images of children being sexually abused. Progressively

28:47

over the years, we've consistently

28:49

sought new laws to help.

28:53

So for example, when you're dealing with a network

28:55

of offenders like we are in this board, we

28:57

now have a legislative provision that criminalises

29:00

the fact that they network. It

29:02

criminalises the fact that they're using Tor to

29:05

hide their IP addresses. It

29:08

criminalises if they share information about how to defeat

29:10

law enforcement. All of those things are criminal offences

29:12

here in Queensland. And that's way ahead of any

29:14

country that I've heard of. We

29:17

have the power to demand their

29:19

passwords, or they commit a criminal offence. And

29:22

that's the kind of tools you need to be able to do your job. And

29:26

that job sometimes entails breaking the law in

29:28

order to enforce it. We

29:32

have a management board with a judge

29:34

sitting on it. And

29:37

that judge gives us authority to commit

29:39

certain ranges of criminal activity. So

29:44

our legislation allows us to assume the identities of both

29:46

children and offenders. It

29:48

allows us to infiltrate and take over networks like this.

29:52

It allows us to, in instances

29:54

where it's required, to share child exploitation

29:56

material to keep your membership. If

29:59

you don't do it... Well, immediately

30:01

you're detected as a police officer.

30:07

It's similar to how undercover officers can sell

30:09

or buy drugs when they're going after a

30:11

drug cartel. You're doing

30:13

the same thing that criminals do to

30:16

achieve the objective of dismantling and destroying

30:18

a criminal network. We're not

30:20

producing child exploitation material. They're

30:22

the ones that are producing it. They're the ones that are

30:24

circulating it around the world. They're

30:27

taking it and under certain rules we

30:29

are using it, if

30:32

it can possibly, it's the only way I can

30:34

put it, for good. I

30:36

can't fix what happened to the child in that picture,

30:39

but I can use the fact that that picture's been

30:41

circulating in the globe for the last 10, 15, 20

30:43

years for some good to

30:46

stop the further abuse of a child. Using

30:54

child abuse images as an undercover

30:56

cop was considered unorthodox. Even

30:59

Paul Griffiths was unsure about it at

31:01

first. When

31:04

I came to Australia, it was something

31:06

that I wasn't entirely sure about, but

31:08

it becomes obvious when you start

31:11

to work in the area and you start to

31:13

look at that as a tactic. It

31:15

becomes obvious how it should be used and why

31:17

it should be used, basically. I hope

31:19

that any child who'd been

31:22

abused would understand that law enforcement

31:24

are trying to catch as many of those abuses as

31:26

they can and identify as many

31:28

of the victims as possible. And I hope

31:30

that they would support us in our attempts

31:32

to do that. The

31:35

simple fact is that if we close the site

31:37

down, it would reappear within days

31:40

in another guise and

31:42

someone else would be running the site.

31:44

That's unfortunately what happened. It's

31:47

a compelling argument. But Hulken,

31:49

watching from afar, had some reservations.

31:52

And he wasn't the only one. So

31:55

this is where it gets hard, right? Because

31:57

law enforcement may tell themselves a story that...

32:00

will be able to free a child

32:03

if we either commit these

32:05

crimes or allow other people to commit these

32:07

other crimes. This is Carissa Hessek.

32:10

She's a law professor at the University

32:12

of North Carolina and an expert in

32:14

child pornography law. They don't

32:16

know that they'll actually be able to free a child, right?

32:18

So what they should probably be weighing in that balance is,

32:21

you know, the probability that they'll free

32:23

a child with the certainty of what they're

32:25

doing now. Another problem

32:27

though is when

32:29

should these undercover

32:32

investigations end? So,

32:35

you know, back when we

32:37

had undercover agents who had infiltrated the

32:39

Italian mafia, they had these

32:41

sort of unspoken rules, right? They'd never let a

32:43

murder go ahead. They'd sort

32:45

of set limits for when they

32:47

had to wrap up the investigation

32:50

because they couldn't let that particular

32:52

crime go forward. Because

32:55

if the site is being used

32:57

to facilitate the actual abuse of

33:00

children and law enforcement is continuing

33:02

to run it, then I have

33:04

real questions about their ability to

33:07

strike this balance and

33:09

it suggests to me that maybe

33:11

some independent oversight is needed.

33:16

It wasn't the first time Argos had run this

33:19

kind of operation. In 2014, the unit had taken

33:21

over another dark website, a forum called The

33:23

Love Zone. They

33:37

identified a high-level administrator, a 32-year-old

33:39

Australian youth worker who was later

33:41

charged with abusing at least seven

33:43

kids in his care. He

33:46

was arrested and Argos took over

33:48

his account and eventually the site's server. They

33:51

ran The Love Zone for six months,

33:53

identifying hundreds of members around the world

33:55

before shutting the site down. reasons

34:00

for why the police should run this undercover

34:03

operation. I see that. And

34:06

I understand that. What

34:08

concerned Huycken was that it wasn't clear, at

34:10

least it wasn't then, just how

34:12

many kids these kinds of operations

34:15

rescued. He worried that

34:17

maybe the ends didn't entirely justify the

34:19

means. For instance, I mean, one

34:21

thing is that the police were sharing

34:24

images in this Canary message. They

34:27

were also writing things in

34:30

these messages that I find rather

34:32

disturbing. For instance,

34:34

there's this Canary message from

34:37

the beginning of January 2017, where

34:43

the police officer acting as Warhead, he

34:45

writes, I hope that some of you were able

34:47

to give a special present to

34:49

the little ones in your lives and spend

34:52

some time with them. It's

34:54

a great time of year to snuggle up near

34:56

a fire and make some memories. For

35:04

me, this sentence, it's a great time of

35:06

year to snuggle up near a fire and

35:08

make some memories? What the hell? It's almost

35:11

like you're encouraging the users to abuse children.

35:18

Here's my question back to you. Did we create the

35:20

board? Did we create the environment that they're using? No,

35:23

we didn't. We didn't make it. They made

35:26

it. So what we've done is we've infiltrated

35:28

it, we've taken it over,

35:30

and we're now going to destroy it. But

35:33

during that period, we're going to identify as many

35:35

children and as many of those people that built

35:37

that temple that they worship at, we're going to

35:40

take them down. What

35:47

I find interesting is they're sort

35:49

of this explorers.

36:00

or cartographers into this unknown

36:02

territory, which is this online

36:05

community. They want to know

36:07

as much about these communities as possible, so that

36:09

no one else will be able to know

36:11

anything about these communities. Because their goal is

36:14

to burn the community down. So

36:16

it's like, if no one ever

36:18

knows what Paul is talking about when

36:20

he's describing his work, he

36:23

has succeeded. It's interesting to hear

36:25

you describe him as an explorer or cartographer,

36:27

because really that's what you and particularly Einar

36:29

were doing on your own, right?

36:31

Your own expedition into this

36:33

dark territory. Did

36:36

you feel a kind

36:38

of professional kinship in

36:41

a way with the police? Because you guys were both

36:43

kind of exploring the

36:45

same territory. Did you feel a sense of

36:47

commonality with what they were doing? Yeah,

36:50

I did so. So

36:58

I guess I'm not clear on what point did you know they

37:01

were going to shut down the website and

37:04

finish their operation. Were they in contact with you? No,

37:06

we didn't know. They had told us,

37:08

you know, we'll let you know in a couple

37:10

of weeks beforehand when we're going to shut down

37:12

Chosley, so that we would be able

37:14

to prepare our publication of the story. But

37:19

I think it was in the middle

37:21

of September. I now came

37:23

to me and said they shut down the

37:25

site two days ago. This

37:31

was September 2017, almost

37:33

a year after Benjamin Faulkner and Patrick

37:35

Fulte had been arrested. Hargos

37:39

had been running Child's Play for 11

37:41

months. So

37:45

after they had shut down the website without

37:48

telling us, we started preparing the article. But

37:51

Hulken wasn't able to get all the information

37:53

he felt was important to the story. I

37:56

was surprised because we asked John and

37:58

Paul and Toss-Cors-Argos Many times

38:00

can you give us any numbers? Know

38:02

how many children do you think it'll

38:05

be possible to save in this operation?

38:07

How many producers or of users as

38:09

as we would call them to think

38:11

it's possible to to arrest and they

38:14

refused to give us any number. Because

38:16

I said we feared that numbers will

38:18

be used as a weapon or the

38:21

media and you could interpret it that

38:23

they thought if we give this slow

38:25

number if we allow this long number

38:27

to be published and and be peace

38:29

agreement for is it really worth reading

38:31

it with. So it's to the be

38:33

Some ups and Eleven have to save

38:36

these cute kids. It's

38:40

possible to save one one child by running

38:43

i target of his website for eleven months.

38:46

Isn't worth it? Is.

38:54

Hop can also points out that another

38:56

reason Argos may have been reluctant is

38:58

that pinning down these numbers is actually

39:00

quite complicated. The

39:05

users, producers, and victims are all scattered

39:07

across the world. Operation

39:11

Hard must involve police forces from

39:13

about a dozen countries. Once argus

39:15

past evidence on to their international

39:17

colleagues, it wasn't easy to keep

39:19

track of the results. One.

39:21

Arrests beast more evidence which leads

39:23

to more arrests and so it's

39:25

a never ending scene of investigations.

39:27

Not to mention the fact that

39:29

these investigations to just take a

39:32

long time. So

39:39

how can draft the story he writes

39:42

about? I are finding the sites Ip

39:44

address, stumbling on operation Hard to miss

39:46

discovering that Warhead was Benjamin Soccer. And

39:50

you voices his concerns about Argos running the

39:52

site for as long as they did, as

39:54

well as his concerns about them posting child

39:56

abuse material. I

40:01

contacted John in Poland said you know these are

40:03

the quotes that I want to use. Because we

40:05

had been working so close with them, I let

40:07

them see the article. I don't always do that,

40:09

but I'm because we'd been very close for almost

40:11

a year or thought that would be. The.

40:14

Right thing to do. And

40:17

they were surprised. Are

40:20

you really going to publish the article

40:22

now? They. Told. Me

40:24

at that time that they had thought that

40:26

we would wait at we would delay are

40:28

polluting until the fault and Faulkner were sentenced.

40:34

John and said we want you to wait. And

40:37

they also reacted quite negatively to the

40:39

article the they thought we were being

40:42

too critical towards but they had done

40:44

so. They didn't like that and don't

40:46

Told me that if you are going

40:49

forward to polish this week I'll stop

40:51

you better than they will be. No

40:53

more contact. Vg

40:57

published a story in October two thousand

41:00

and Seventeen. I haven't

41:02

heard from him since. August.

41:12

Ten months later, in August, two

41:14

thousand eighteen, how can heard from

41:16

Task Force Argos? In a roundabout

41:19

sort away for a press release

41:21

he reads: In the

41:23

last year or detectives have contributed

41:25

to the removal of eighty three

41:27

children from sexual harm nationally and

41:29

internationally, and arrested two hundred child

41:31

sex offenders on one thousand, two

41:34

hundred and fifty four criminal charges.

41:37

The press release also pointed out that

41:39

the evidence Argos gathered lead to over

41:41

three hundred new please cases around the

41:43

world. so

41:48

after this is published you continue to

41:51

work on the stuff and if you

41:53

continue to do research on this story

41:55

i guess most importantly been in touch

41:58

with and faulkner Yeah,

42:00

that was one thing I felt lacking in

42:03

our reporting, because we mostly

42:05

wrote about the police and the police

42:07

operation and the criticism towards the methods

42:09

that the police were using. But

42:14

I think it's important to try

42:16

to understand

42:22

it in the right word. I mean, it's not like

42:24

you want to understand why Foltian Faulkner did what they

42:26

did, but you have to... Analyse maybe?

42:29

You have to analyze why they did it. So

42:35

that's why I contacted Foltian Faulkner, because

42:38

by being able to understand how they become what they

42:40

are, we can help others. How

42:50

does someone like Benjamin Faulkner

42:52

transform himself into something

42:54

like Warhead? That's

42:58

a crucial question to ask, because no

43:01

matter how many sites the police can infiltrate

43:03

and shut down, no matter

43:05

how many kids they save and abusers they arrest,

43:08

the harm's already been done. To

43:11

prevent that harm from ever happening, you

43:14

have to understand its inception. And

43:17

so, like Hawken, I've written to

43:19

Benjamin Faulkner, asking if he'd be willing to

43:22

talk. I've also

43:24

made calls to the people who

43:26

know him best. His

43:28

closest friends and

43:30

his family. You

43:34

think, you know, you see all this stuff

43:36

on TV and you watch true crime like,

43:39

nobody's gonna grow me. I'll

43:43

never be groomed. I

43:45

mean, nobody's safe. Nobody's

43:49

truly safe. The

44:19

Hunting Warhead is written and produced by

44:21

Chris Oak and me, Damon Fairless. The

44:24

series is co-produced by Halkin Heudl and

44:26

associate producer, Michal Arana. And

44:29

our executive producer, Zaref

44:31

Narani. Hunting

44:36

Warhead is a co-production

44:38

of CBC podcasts and the Norwegian

44:40

newspaper, Fiji. Coming

44:54

up on Hunting Warhead. It's

44:57

kind of out of the blue. He says, hey,

44:59

what's up? I want to come down and see you and

45:01

the kiddos. Is

45:03

that your little one? That's my oldest and there

45:05

he is crouching behind her. So

45:09

you're at home, you're here. Typical

45:11

day. And

45:14

my phone rings. And this

45:16

gentleman says, I'm with

45:19

Homeland Security and I'm headed to your house

45:21

right now. For

45:29

more CBC podcasts, go

45:31

to cbc.ca/ podcasts.

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features