Podchaser Logo
Home
Exposing Capitol Security Failures: Reveals January 6th Insights and Constitutional Concerns- with Barry Loudermilk

Exposing Capitol Security Failures: Reveals January 6th Insights and Constitutional Concerns- with Barry Loudermilk

Released Monday, 6th May 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Exposing Capitol Security Failures: Reveals January 6th Insights and Constitutional Concerns- with Barry Loudermilk

Exposing Capitol Security Failures: Reveals January 6th Insights and Constitutional Concerns- with Barry Loudermilk

Exposing Capitol Security Failures: Reveals January 6th Insights and Constitutional Concerns- with Barry Loudermilk

Exposing Capitol Security Failures: Reveals January 6th Insights and Constitutional Concerns- with Barry Loudermilk

Monday, 6th May 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:07

Welcome to Wall Butters! I'm Rick Green, America's Constitution Coach here

0:09

with David and Tim Barton. We're taking on the hot topics

0:11

of the day from a

0:14

biblical, historical, and constitutional perspective.

0:16

All right, David and Tim, we've got Barry Lauterman

0:18

back, our friend from Georgia that's in the U.S. Congress,

0:20

and actually chairing this committee. Of course, we've talked to

0:22

him about this. Very, very important

0:24

role, looking into January 6th, looking specifically

0:26

into the January 6th committee that was

0:28

really a show trial, but

0:31

really with a genuine heart, trying to figure out

0:33

what really happened and why

0:35

was this not stopped. As

0:37

you've said before, David, all

0:40

the tours that we've all done at the Capitol

0:42

and all the security we always see, it was

0:44

shocking to us that there wasn't

0:46

better preparation and of course the

0:48

National Guard. And Barry's

0:51

committee has discovered why with a bunch

0:54

of whistle blowers testifying. Yeah,

0:56

and we were with Barry on

0:58

the very day that he had

1:00

just uncovered what he's going to talk to us about.

1:03

Obviously, we haven't heard the interview yet. Barry's going to be

1:05

on it in a few minutes. But I know generally what

1:08

the topic is. So I was thinking about it and

1:10

thinking about the fact that what we've got here

1:12

is the Democrats who really don't like the optics

1:14

of being made to look bad. If

1:17

there's something that comes out that would make them look

1:19

bad, even if it's constitutionally protected, even

1:21

if it's a guarantee under the Bill of Rights,

1:23

we don't like it. So we're going to shut

1:25

it down because the optics are all bad. And

1:28

I was thinking about that and thought, well, you

1:30

know, the book we just finished, The American Story

1:32

2, we deal with Andrew

1:34

Jackson there, who's the first Democrat president.

1:37

He starts the Democrat Party. And

1:39

he so did not like people

1:42

criticizing him or making him look bad, that

1:44

he literally gave the post office the

1:46

right to hold back any mail that was

1:49

delivered that would be contrary to what they

1:51

believe. So, I mean, literally, he's saying

1:53

it's OK for the post office, the censor

1:55

stuff, optics. It's really important to

1:57

have optics that people support what we want.

2:00

want to do and the position we have, post-labor, etc.

2:03

And then you get past that and I'm writing

2:05

right now about World War I. And

2:07

so I've learned a lot of things about World War I,

2:09

but what really stood out was in

2:11

every war, you're going to have people who don't

2:13

like war. Jeanette Branken was the

2:15

female congressman in Congress at World War I

2:17

and she voted against World War I. She

2:19

said, I would not want my son being

2:22

killed and I'm not going to vote for

2:24

war ever. As a mother, I will not

2:26

vote for war and there are always people

2:28

who don't want war of any kind, Quakers

2:30

or whoever else. And so

2:32

Woodrow Wilson made it a crime,

2:34

made it sedition, made it jailable to criticize

2:36

what the government was doing in World War

2:38

I because they didn't want bad optics, they

2:41

didn't want people making claims that would make

2:43

them look bad as a leader. And

2:45

then you find that in World War II,

2:48

Franklin Roosevelt did the same thing. If

2:51

you criticize the war actions, that was sedition

2:53

and so that was punishable by crime. And

2:55

then you get to Biden and we got

2:57

the same thing going with Biden in the

3:00

2020 election, things

3:02

that would make the Democrats look bad and

3:04

what happened with J6, even though the Speaker

3:06

of the House is Pelosi and they're in

3:08

charge of what happened. If

3:11

something's going to make it look bad, we're going

3:13

to kind of hide that and not bring that

3:15

out in committee report. And there's just a real

3:17

pattern here that has stuck out to me in

3:19

just recent weeks about how the Democrats

3:21

are willing to violate constitutional standards in order to

3:23

make sure that they have the right optics, that

3:26

things look good for them and what they're trying

3:28

to do. So when Barry was talking to us

3:30

about this, when we were talking at the Capitol,

3:32

you know, that kind of stood out again. They

3:34

just are really concerned about optics more than Constitution

3:36

and that's just not a good position for America

3:39

to be in with the leaders. Well,

3:41

guys, add on to that. Not only is the

3:43

Biden administration working to silence

3:45

opposition, silence Americans, which there's so

3:47

many stories we get into of

3:50

what's happened. Really we know with

3:52

social media and we know of what

3:55

search engines and Google, all these different

3:57

platforms, they've done a lot partnering with

3:59

the Biden administration. working to silence people,

4:02

but not just stopping the voices

4:05

literally where they're not – they

4:07

didn't want to release any footage, right? How

4:10

many tens of thousands of hours from January

4:12

6th specifically that we've talked about and they

4:14

didn't want to release footage? And

4:16

then when footage started being released, you realize, wait a

4:18

second. That's not quite what we thought was

4:21

what we had heard. The narrative was

4:23

different, and we've always been

4:25

of the opinion. We've always taken the position that

4:27

the truth is what matters. You

4:30

should pursue truth, and if

4:32

the truth is something really bad and evil happens, then you

4:34

should say that's really bad and evil. If

4:36

the truth is that it's not

4:39

as bad and evil as it's being made

4:41

to be, or like the truth is like

4:43

George Washington, really great guy, historically amazing figure,

4:45

the role he played, you

4:48

ought to just tell the truth. What

4:50

was going on? What happened? The good,

4:52

the bad, the ugly? Unapologetically pursue what

4:54

the truth is. And when you

4:57

have one side that is not releasing video

4:59

footage, and then they're selectively editing footage, and

5:01

then they're saying that so-and-so told something, and

5:03

they bring somebody in, and they're not even

5:05

letting that person testify to what they said

5:07

that person said and what they saw, and

5:09

it's so convoluted you can tell they're trying

5:11

to manipulate and shape the narrative to add

5:13

to your point to make them look better.

5:15

They don't want a narrative that's honest or

5:17

truthful if it makes them look bad, and

5:20

this is not a position anybody should have. The

5:23

position should be what's true, and that's what

5:25

we should pursue, and fortunately. That,

5:27

as you mentioned, our friend Barry Loudermilk, congressman from

5:29

Georgia, he is one of the guys who said

5:31

let's just pursue the truth. If

5:33

the truth is Trump did some really bad things leading

5:35

up to January 6th, and that's why that happened, then

5:37

let's say that's what happened. But if the

5:40

truth is it wasn't Trump's fault, there

5:42

was something else at play, maybe something

5:44

really sinister, maybe something that was not

5:46

sinister, very benign, it wasn't a bad

5:49

thing, you should say that, but just tell the truth. It's

5:52

so refreshing that there's finally somebody there to tell the

5:54

truth, and as you mentioned, we've got to

5:56

talk with them for a little bit, And

5:59

he told us some interesting things. that he had

6:01

just got out and committee and out of know

6:03

what. Always use any interview but I am. I'm

6:05

very excited for more this information to become public

6:08

so that people can become aware of what didn't

6:10

didn't app and will. What is the good, the

6:12

bad and ugly of the story in the narrative.

6:14

Just frankly it's not the narrative that we've heard

6:17

promoted for the last several years. Very.

6:19

Lot of her costs are special. Just a once we

6:21

rebecca on the wobbles you. See.

6:31

Guys, it's important and I'm going to tell

6:33

you about our new book The American Story

6:35

Building the Republic. We start with George Washington

6:38

President and into we've already become a nation

6:40

Some really now it's how do we function

6:42

as a nation and if we look back

6:44

in American history be stability That prosperity success

6:46

we enjoyed as Americans is because the foundation

6:49

that are only presence late Because examples they

6:51

said how do we live in America under

6:53

the constitution, what as a rule, the federal

6:55

government and really what part did each one

6:57

of these early president's play be up to

7:00

the first seven presidents? And a lot of

7:02

people probably know the names Washington, Adams, Jefferson

7:04

and Madison. Virtue. People know about Monroe or

7:06

John Quincy Adams or Andrew Jackson That we

7:08

we might know some of their names. We

7:11

really don't know their stories. We want you

7:13

to. We learn, rediscover American history and see

7:15

how it applies to the day. Good a

7:17

while but there's a com and get your

7:19

copy of the American Story Building The Republic.

7:29

What about while or sex for stay? was always good

7:31

to have Congress to bury lot of my back with

7:33

us Congressmen. Thank you for some time and know you're

7:35

running like crazy And B C. O

7:38

A Any time for Iraqi, know that the case

7:40

or you know we we will to bring the

7:42

government to a halt the I get a few

7:44

minutes. was sought

7:47

talk about regular gov to all men

7:49

are you your uncovering all kinds of

7:51

stuff with this committee you've got on

7:53

investigating january six than investigating the committee

7:55

and the previous comedian all the things

7:58

that happened and I know you've been

8:00

burning the midnight oil. I cannot imagine

8:03

just the breadth of all

8:05

of the material and the video and all the stuff

8:07

that you're having to cover, let

8:10

alone, man, it's got

8:12

to get you down sometimes, but you always

8:14

stay optimistic. I don't know how you do

8:16

it, but thank you for

8:18

digging deep. We've said it many times when we've had

8:20

you on to talk about this stuff. Having somebody we

8:22

know is a man of integrity that

8:24

will literally just, as you told the

8:26

speaker, go wherever the facts go and

8:30

bring out the truth no matter who it

8:32

helps or hurts, has given us even a

8:34

little bit of peace just in knowing somebody

8:36

like you is at the helm of looking into

8:38

this. All of that to say, thank you for

8:40

what you're doing and thank you for taking a

8:43

few minutes to update us on what's been going

8:45

on. Wherever you want to

8:47

go with this, man, I know you've got a lot

8:49

you could cover and a lot of different areas of this.

8:51

What do you think our listeners maybe haven't heard

8:53

a lot about in the media? As

8:55

you've been reporting it, but a lot of, obviously, major media is

8:58

not going to cover it, what do you think would be the

9:00

most important points for us to cover today? Well,

9:02

that's difficult because there are just so many

9:04

avenues that we're going down. You

9:07

and I think we're together right after we

9:09

issued our interim report, which really

9:11

opened the door for a lot of

9:13

informants and whistleblowers because we knew there

9:16

was a lot more out there. That

9:19

interim report pretty much showed that what

9:21

we were doing was an unbiased approach

9:24

to get to the truth and many

9:26

felt confident that that's what we were doing. Just

9:30

a couple of weeks ago, we

9:32

had a hearing that, in fact,

9:34

some of the House Armed Services

9:36

Committee claimed that it was probably

9:38

the hearing of the year. It

9:43

didn't get a lot of coverage because it

9:45

was the same day that the Senate was

9:47

dealing with the Mallorca's impeachment and we had

9:50

a potential motion to vacate over here. We're

9:52

trying to get some

9:54

foreign aid bills to the floor. There was a

9:57

lot of heavy-hitting news that day, so we did get some

9:59

coverage, but it didn't really hit the

10:01

mainstream coverage, but this was

10:03

specifically looking at a three-hour

10:05

and 19-minute delay on

10:08

January 6th after the

10:11

request for the National Guard

10:13

was received by Capitol Police

10:17

finally got around to

10:19

officially asking for the National Guard. And

10:21

if you go back to other interviews

10:24

we've had here, there was a

10:26

significant delay here at the Capitol of even

10:28

getting the request done because, as you know,

10:30

there's a separation of powers. And so

10:33

the executive branch just can't send the National

10:35

Guard over. It has to be requested. So

10:37

we believe that delay was caused by Nancy

10:39

Pelosi not liking the optics of having the

10:42

National Guard. But finally, when there were shots

10:44

fired at the Capitol, she approved

10:46

the request to go to the National

10:48

Guard to be deployed. Now

10:51

unlike our state, the Texans and Georgia, we

10:53

had the ballots in 2020. Our

10:56

governor just called out the National Guard to go

10:58

help handle the riots. That's what they do. The

11:01

chain of command is a little different in D.C.

11:03

because we do have D.C. National Guard, but they

11:05

report up through the Pentagon to the Secretary of

11:08

Defense. On January 3rd, President

11:10

Trump ordered the National Guard to be ready

11:12

to deploy to the Capitol

11:15

on January 6th to help with, you

11:17

know, as intelligence to say, and there could be

11:19

some violent riots. Once

11:22

the Pentagon received the

11:24

request and the Secretary of Defense gave

11:26

the order to the Secretary of the

11:29

Army to deploy the National Guard, it

11:31

took three hours and 19 minutes before

11:33

they were sent. That's

11:35

what we were looking at. That was the background.

11:37

What was the source of the delay? Now

11:40

the Pentagon official report on that was that

11:42

the National Guard was not just they weren't

11:44

ready and it took them that long to

11:46

get ready. These were

11:48

whistleblowers. Were part of the

11:51

command staff. I mean, we had

11:53

Colonel, we had General, we

11:56

had Command Master Sergeant.

12:00

We had the aid to camp to

12:02

the the commander of the DC

12:04

National Guard. They were there in the room They're

12:07

in the room. I mean they're there. They're

12:09

observing the decision-making Right and

12:12

their testimony was they were

12:14

ready with the riot gear in the

12:17

buses waiting that entire three hours Wow,

12:20

what we found out through all this

12:22

was it was an intentional delay now

12:24

This is for their testimony It was

12:26

an intentional delay by some

12:28

of the generals in the Pentagon because they

12:31

didn't like the optics of the National Guard

12:33

showing up During while the violence was going

12:35

on and one of them even testified that

12:38

what they were told was they

12:41

Wanted the National Guard to come after the violence

12:43

was over with but the purpose of having the

12:45

National Guard I mean their yeah, their

12:47

motto is the defenders of DC I

12:50

mean they are the defenders of the Capitol their job

12:52

is to do that and they wanted to wait till

12:54

the So the violence

12:56

was over to send them so that was that

12:59

was kind of a crush of what was going

13:01

on now We have this Pentagon

13:03

official report, which now we've drawn

13:06

into question Why is this telling

13:08

a different story than these these four whistleblowers

13:10

and they were actually more that came to

13:12

testify to us These four were willing to

13:14

go public that under oath They

13:18

testified that it

13:20

was a purposeful delay by

13:22

the Pentagon Because they didn't

13:24

like the optics and This

13:26

is a this is so backing up like you

13:28

said, you know Trump asked for them to be

13:30

ready on the third. So three days before the

13:32

Intel's, you know got some concerns

13:35

and In it and so they're like hey, well,

13:37

let's be ready for this massive crowd And if

13:39

there's troublemakers, we want to be able to repel

13:41

them and then you

13:44

know Pelosi doesn't ask for it until

13:46

after shots are fired and

13:48

and then after she asks Three three

13:50

and a half hours before they deploy

13:52

and and the whole reason bad optics

13:55

So who who takes responsibility

13:57

for that? Like where do we lay

13:59

that? feet do we lay that at? Well,

14:02

it's going to result in additional investigation

14:04

on our part. We do know that

14:07

the chain of command was the Secretary

14:09

of Defense. The Secretary

14:11

of Defense gave the order. The

14:16

Army is the one who is to carry that

14:18

out. When the Secretary of

14:20

Defense called the Secretary of the Army

14:22

and said, deploy the National Guard, I

14:25

think they actually were in the same room

14:27

because they were having a conference call with

14:29

the Capitol Police and the

14:31

Metropolitan Police at that time. But

14:34

he turned to the Secretary of the Army and

14:36

said, get the National Guard over there. The

14:39

Secretary of the Army, instead of picking up

14:42

the phone and calling the Commanding General of

14:44

the National Guard, who was sitting ready waiting

14:46

for the orders to go, he left

14:49

and went and attended a

14:51

press conference at the Metropolitan

14:53

Police Department, the DC Police,

14:57

and said he was going over there to work on

14:59

an op plan. The problem is they weren't being deployed

15:01

there. They were being deployed to the US Capitol. The

15:04

op plan is pretty simple. Get on the bus,

15:06

drive to the US Capitol, get sworn in by

15:08

the Capitol Police and take your orders from there.

15:12

But there was that delay. He did

15:14

a press conference. He continued supposedly

15:16

working on a plan. Everybody

15:20

is calling, even the Vice President is

15:22

calling saying, where is the National Guard?

15:24

Where are they? And so

15:26

finally, from

15:29

one of their testimonies, they were all

15:31

sitting in the room. They had a

15:33

video conference waiting for somebody to

15:36

tell them something new. When another general walks by and says,

15:38

what are you guys doing? You're supposed to be on your

15:40

way to the Capitol. He goes, we're waiting on the order.

15:42

He said, you got it. Go, go, go, go.

15:45

So apparently, once the Secretary of

15:47

the Army decided, yeah, he was going to go ahead and

15:49

send them. Nobody told them.

15:51

So it's a

15:53

combination of bad decision making. Politics

15:57

is playing a huge role in this.

16:00

and it sounds like some incompetence as well. So

16:02

we're going to have to take another step. We

16:04

know that there were two generals in

16:08

the Pentagon that had

16:10

expressed concern with the optics. We

16:13

know the Secretary of the Army delayed actually

16:16

passing the order along and we are

16:20

finding some evidence that some of this may tie

16:22

to General Milley as well. Wow.

16:24

Man, I'm

16:27

trying to remember who it was

16:29

now on your committee. Congressman

16:32

from North Carolina, I think Murphy, had

16:34

said this is a dereliction of

16:36

duty by the Secretary

16:38

of the Army. It's important for

16:43

people to know this because they act

16:45

like so much of the, let's use

16:48

their word, optics, has been,

16:51

this is all Trump's fault. He didn't call. He didn't ask

16:53

for help. He didn't do anything. He didn't tweet

16:55

until a certain time, blah, blah, blah. What

16:58

I'm hearing is in terms of chain

17:00

of command, it was really out of his decision

17:02

making. This was strictly Pelosi had

17:05

to be the one to ask

17:07

for it. Exactly. And once he finally asked for

17:09

it, then there's a delay over at the Pentagon.

17:12

And so this was a brass issue at the

17:14

Pentagon in terms of the delay. There really wasn't

17:16

anything Trump could have done at that point. No.

17:19

In fact, it was asked by one of the

17:23

whistleblowers in the hearing was because the

17:25

Democrats on the committee were trying to

17:27

make the point that Trump never picked

17:29

up the phone and called. Well, he

17:31

didn't have to. He had already delegated

17:33

that authority to the Secretary

17:35

of Defense. And they said,

17:37

well, when they weren't there, why didn't the president pick up

17:39

the phone and call the Secretary of the Army and say,

17:41

why haven't you sent them? And one

17:44

of the whistleblowers said, well, because the

17:46

Secretary of Army wouldn't have taken his

17:48

call. Wow. There was

17:50

that much animosity between him

17:53

and President Trump. And they,

17:56

you know, it's it was politics.

17:58

Yeah. the Secretary of

18:01

the Army was looking to get a job in

18:03

the Biden administration. So he's weighing that as well.

18:05

That was one of the things that was testified

18:07

to. And so it really

18:10

boils down. I mean, in reality,

18:12

and as a constitutional expert,

18:14

you know, this Rick, that we

18:16

have separate branches of government, and

18:19

the executive branch is

18:21

not even welcome to the to come

18:23

to the Capitol unless they're invited because

18:25

of the separation of powers. The president

18:28

cannot send the military to

18:30

the Capitol without Congress

18:32

requesting it because then you could have

18:34

a take of the people's outs, right?

18:36

So right, right, the National Guard is

18:38

ready to deploy, they know that there's

18:41

the potential for violence, they had, they

18:43

had actually called everyone in everyone was

18:45

already there ready to go. And in

18:48

fact, also on January 3, and

18:51

the Secretary of Defense, Miller

18:53

had testified to this that, and

18:56

we and and we also uncovered transcribed

18:59

interviews that the Select Committee on

19:01

January 6, just for

19:03

some reason didn't make public, where

19:06

the President told the Secretary of Defense

19:08

get 10,000 troops ready. I

19:11

mean, that's how serious they were about it. We've also

19:14

uncovered more information that we're,

19:16

we're investigating right now that is that the

19:19

Secret Service had recommended

19:22

that Pelosi put up non scalable

19:24

security fences around the Capitol prior

19:26

to January 6. But she

19:29

didn't like the optics, Robin, so she didn't do it.

19:31

But right after the violence

19:33

and right after they cleared the Capitol,

19:36

she made the statement that she wanted those fences

19:38

up then with razor wire on the top, so

19:40

the world could see what Donald Trump just did.

19:42

So she liked those optics. Uh huh.

19:45

Yep. She liked the politics of going after Donald

19:47

Trump, but she didn't like the optics when it

19:49

came to the safety and security of people in

19:51

the cap. Yep, exactly.

19:54

Exactly. Congressman, love you

19:56

and your family, man. God bless you guys.

19:58

I know you're You're in

20:01

the belly of the beast and on the front

20:03

lines. And so just know that we're sending our

20:05

prayers your way and pray for joy and in

20:07

the fight and in the ability to

20:10

just be steadfast, man. And

20:13

thank you. Thank you. Thank

20:15

you for your service. Well, thank you, Rick. You're

20:17

accolades mean a lot to me and to the

20:19

staff and the team over here that's doing the

20:22

work and we appreciate all that you're doing. Well,

20:24

y'all keep it up and we'll get you back in

20:26

a few weeks and get an update and let it

20:28

you know, just let us know. Anytime

20:30

something happens that we need to get out, you know, because we know the

20:32

major media is not going to cover what

20:34

you're doing. They had their show trial already and

20:36

they don't want that narrative to change. So that's

20:39

right for seeking the truth and we'll do everything

20:41

we can to help you get it out. All

20:43

right. We sure appreciate you. Thanks.

20:46

Appreciate that. Congressman Barry Lauterboek. Stay with

20:48

us. We'll be right back with David and Tim Barton. Hey,

20:52

guys, we want to let you know about a new

20:55

resource we have at Wald Builder's called the American Story.

20:57

For so many years, people have asked us to do

20:59

a history book to help tell more of the story

21:01

that's just not known or not told today. And

21:04

we would say very providentially in the midst of

21:06

all of the new attacks coming out against America,

21:08

whether it be from things like the 1619 Project

21:11

that say America is evil and everything

21:13

in America was built off slavery, which

21:15

is certainly not true or things like

21:17

even the Black Lives Matter movement, the

21:19

organization itself, not not the statement Black

21:21

Lives Matter, but the organization that says

21:23

we're against everything that America was built on.

21:25

And this is part of the Marxist ideology.

21:27

There's so many things attacking America. Well, is

21:29

America worth defending? What is the true story

21:32

of America? We actually have written and told

21:34

that story, starting with Christopher Columbus going roughly

21:36

through Abraham Lincoln. We tell the story of

21:38

America, not as the story of a perfect

21:40

nation or a perfect people, but the story

21:43

of how God used these imperfect people and

21:45

did great things through this nation. It's a

21:47

story you want to check out. waldbuilder.com,

21:50

the American Story. Welcome

21:56

back to the WaldBuilder show. Thanks for staying with us. Thanks to

21:58

Barry Lauterma for joining us. David Timm, we

22:00

always keep a lot of praise on Berry and

22:03

people are probably thinking, wow, it's like a mutual

22:05

admiration society, but it's well deserved and it's hard

22:07

to find that in Washington, DC. So we really

22:09

do appreciate him taking on this gig. Yeah,

22:12

it's really important. But you know, just listening

22:14

to what he just covered, there are some

22:16

things that really disturb me here. And

22:19

one is basic constitutional principles. You know,

22:21

we talk about basic things like separation

22:23

of powers. You absolutely have to have

22:25

that. It's Congress that makes the law.

22:27

It's not agencies that make law. The

22:29

executive doesn't comment. But the other one

22:31

that really is unequivocal is the fact

22:33

that you have absolute 100% civilian control

22:36

of the military. The military

22:39

is under civilian control. This is why the

22:41

founding fathers in the constitution specifically banned any

22:43

type of what they called a standing military,

22:45

because it's always the lesson history that eventually

22:47

the military guys think they know better than

22:50

the political guys. And so we're going to

22:52

do what we're going to do. And this

22:54

really was disturbing when we found out that

22:56

chairman of Joint Chiefs of Staff like Milley

22:58

had called China after the election said, hey,

23:01

China, I'm calling you for America. We have

23:03

an election between Biden and Trump. I'm just

23:05

telling you things are going to be okay.

23:07

All this turmoil over here. What's

23:10

the head of the Joint Chiefs of Staff doing

23:12

initiating calls to an enemy to let them know

23:14

things are going to be okay? That's not his

23:16

role. And so when you have when

23:19

you specifically have Pelosi and the civil

23:21

leaders telling the military, send the guys

23:23

up, send the guard up here now,

23:26

send the National Guard right now. And they

23:28

say, well, we just don't think the optics look

23:30

good. This is such a huge, huge,

23:32

huge constitutional violation. This is why the

23:34

founding fathers did not want standing armies

23:36

because they start thinking they're smarter than

23:39

civilians. And that's a problem. Well,

23:41

and let's also remember that Pelosi didn't call

23:43

for it until it had been going on

23:45

for a while, right? It wasn't until there

23:47

was a gunshot and now it's an issue.

23:49

And she's the one who said we don't

23:51

need to have any kind of border up

23:53

here. We don't need any kind of protection

23:55

up here, which if you go back to

23:57

the suggestions of what Trump.

24:00

What the intelligence community had

24:02

suspected might happen. How she

24:04

put up a fifth? I mean, obviously we don't

24:06

know. But. It's it's interesting to

24:08

say about. Had there been a sense up

24:10

around the capitol building, it's very possible that

24:12

people don't break the perimeter of as they

24:15

get to the capital. right? Edited

24:17

use are attacking. That said benny, you call

24:19

for the guard and they have time to

24:22

get their time to respond and they can

24:24

get there quickly, not just sitting on a

24:26

bus for three hours. And they're right dear,

24:28

not being deployed right, but they didn't get

24:30

there before you bruce of women are the

24:32

capital. A What? Will we look back right?

24:35

And we talk about the officers that were

24:37

injured. And we talk about

24:39

right that that that this email

24:41

veteran who ended up being killed

24:43

in that situation as well. They're.

24:45

Didn't have to be any kind of

24:48

loss of white, their didn't ask to

24:50

be any kind of these injuries along

24:52

the way. Add some of the basic

24:54

precautions been taken by Nancy Pelosi and

24:56

other leaders based on the soldiers a

24:58

god within the go further wants to

25:00

the finally the guard is called then

25:02

and you have generals in charge who

25:04

a seemingly years as having them stand

25:06

down four hours because they want to

25:08

have a photo op or something of

25:10

this nature sub at some other location.

25:13

It is utterly ridiculous, but you see

25:15

the political motivation. Behind it because we wanted

25:17

to have really bad for Trump and then we're

25:19

going after com in a rescue as a present.

25:21

for that I see years easy close the hours

25:23

a day to up around the capital or it

25:25

as as is perimeter more Wow The American people

25:27

into the American people do dangerous. And

25:29

you see this narrative unfold.

25:32

And and to find out that is information

25:34

that they were steps easily the could him

25:36

as a candidates are down and then they

25:38

didn't even want to help for several hours

25:40

because it didn't help that their narrative. It

25:43

is absolutely. Despicable.

25:46

What happened yet to i'm a dad

25:49

to it is birds that it was

25:51

three hours and nineteen minutes after the

25:53

command came down from the civilian leadership.

25:56

Three. Hours a night he minutes the military said

25:58

when I go to do press. And

26:00

so the head of the army runs off and does this press

26:02

conference and I mean just everything

26:04

and by the way The whistleblower pointed out

26:07

that some of those leaders were wanting a

26:09

position in the Biden administration So

26:11

they're doing what they're doing not following civilian orders,

26:13

but they're doing what they're doing because they want

26:16

to be political someday This

26:18

is absolutely wrong, but I'm gonna go back

26:20

to something else This is absolutely one of

26:23

the reasons why I now think education and

26:25

schools This is one of the

26:27

biggest problems we have in America if schools are

26:29

not teaching Civilian control of military and separation

26:31

powers. It has to change so important to teach

26:33

these things That's why you need to not only

26:35

listen to wall builders But share it with your

26:37

friends and family check out wall builders show today

26:39

and also go to wall builders calm Thanks so

26:41

much for listening to the wall builder shows You

Rate

Join Podchaser to...

  • Rate podcasts and episodes
  • Follow podcasts and creators
  • Create podcast and episode lists
  • & much more

Episode Tags

Do you host or manage this podcast?
Claim and edit this page to your liking.
,

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features