0:44

Hey y'all , it's Kate and Bri . Welcome

0:46

to the fourth episode of the Texas

0:48

Missing podcast .

0:49

Now , Bri , I believe you have a small announcement to

0:51

make yeah , I just

0:53

wanted to let everybody know that I am sick , so

0:56

if I sound a little wonky on

0:58

this episode , that's why , um

1:01

, this is my man voice , basically so

1:04

we're gonna try something a little bit different

1:07

with this episode .

1:08

So normally , both of us will research

1:10

the case and then we'll kind of go back and forth during

1:12

the episode . Well , for this episode

1:14

, I am the only one that researched the case

1:16

, so Brie doesn't

1:19

know anything about it , and we'll

1:21

just try and kind of like more or less

1:23

have like a natural conversation about it , and

1:25

maybe she'll be asking questions that

1:28

you guys will have too . So

1:30

that's what we're gonna try for this episode . We

1:33

appreciate all feedback as well . So

1:35

once you listen to the episode , send us

1:37

a message , let us know how you like this

1:39

format or , if you like , the format

1:41

where both of us are researching the case

1:44

.

1:44

Yeah , we're new , so we're just testing stuff out

1:46

and seeing what works best and what people like

1:48

to listen to exactly so

1:50

.

1:50

With that being said , let's get

1:52

into it . So , Patricia

1:55

Ann Becks , who also went

1:57

by Patricia , and Mason I'm pretty

1:59

sure Mason was her maiden name . She

2:01

was born august 6 of 1966

2:04

, so that would have made her about 27

2:06

years old when she went missing . Patricia

2:09

, she went missing in Waxahachie,

2:11

Texas , which is about 30

2:14

miles south of Dallas . It's

2:16

not a huge town . Population is maybe

2:19

around 45,000 at this point

2:21

. Um , so the day

2:23

of July 7th 1994

2:26

, Patricia was seen at work

2:28

at the Golden Corral in Waukesha , hatchie

2:30

. Later that day she

2:32

was picked up from work by a friend and

2:34

dropped off at her home . Now

2:36

I have two potential addresses

2:39

where her home was , just because

2:41

I've been looking at police

2:44

reports and also online

2:46

, and it was either the tuner

2:48

block of Murdock or an apartment

2:50

complex off of Martin Luther

2:52

King Boulevard . So it was one

2:55

of the two . So from her residence

2:57

, Patricia was last seen walking

2:59

to her friend's home , which was within

3:02

the vicinity of Patricia's home . So

3:05

the last person to see Patricia

3:07

was an unknown person

3:09

who told police that they had watched

3:12

Patricia's estranged husband

3:14

, Archie Becks , and an

3:16

acquaintance of his , possibly a

3:18

Dennis Miller , approach Patricia

3:21

while she was walking to her friend's house

3:23

. That instance is the last

3:25

time she was seen and the subject

3:27

she reported this did not see Patricia

3:29

get into a vehicle with the men

3:31

, nor did they see the actual encounter

3:34

. But whoever reported

3:37

this obviously knew who Patricia's

3:39

husband was . So I'm thinking maybe

3:41

it was her , her neighbor or

3:44

even her friend that

3:46

you know she was supposed to be going to meet that

3:48

night . But I would assume that

3:50

it's got to be someone that at least semi knows her . If

3:52

they knew who Archie was and

3:54

that he approached her did they say

3:56

where they saw it , like ?

3:57

was it in front of her house or was it

4:00

they did ?

4:01

not it just on the street . Yeah , like they literally

4:03

said , just on the street when

4:05

she was walking .

4:06

They watched Archie approach

4:08

well , at this point and

4:10

you know the mid

4:13

90s walks of

4:15

hatchy is not that , it's not that big right

4:17

now . No , yeah , it would have been very

4:20

small town at that point in time

4:22

.

4:22

So , yeah , yeah so

4:24

, speaking of Archie

4:27

, he will play a very big part

4:29

in this case . So with that

4:31

let's take a look at Patricia and

4:33

Archie's relationship timeline

4:35

, as it is very tumultuous

4:38

and it'll be tied back to some of the

4:40

theories that maybe happen to Patricia

4:42

and I do want to talk

4:44

about a trigger warning with

4:47

domestic violence and sexual assault

4:49

. We'll be talking about those quite a bit in this episode

4:52

. So Patricia and

4:54

Archie were married in 1988

4:56

and by address records

4:58

it appears that they lived in

5:01

Waukesa Hatchie for their entire relationship

5:03

. In October of 1992

5:06

Patricia was arrested for aggravated

5:09

assault in Texas

5:11

. The elements of this offense are assaults

5:13

with the addition of either family violence

5:16

or exhibiting or using a deadly

5:18

weapon during the commission of an assault

5:20

, and in this case it appears

5:22

that both were present . According

5:25

to court documents obtained from

5:27

Ellis County , Patricia was

5:29

charged with ag assault and the verdict

5:31

stated the following Patricia and

5:33

Bex did then and there intentionally

5:36

and knowingly threatened to cause bodily

5:38

injury or death to Archie

5:41

Becks by shooting in his direction

5:43

with a deadly weapon , to wit a

5:45

handgun . Now , unfortunately

5:47

I was unable to

5:49

find the original offense

5:51

report so we could at least get a better understanding

5:54

of the incident . You know

5:56

how it was going on domestic disturbances

5:59

. Oftentimes they are

6:01

super convoluted and it

6:03

ends up being a he said , she said

6:05

incident , and so I don't

6:07

think we get the full picture when we're just

6:09

reading the court documents , and I

6:12

think we can get a much better understanding if you at

6:14

least read the entire offense

6:16

report that occurred that night .

6:18

Yeah , so let me just get this straight she

6:21

actually shot at him

6:23

.

6:23

Yes , that's what the court documents state

6:25

, that she had the gun and she shot

6:28

in his direction , but

6:30

we don't know what happened before . You know

6:32

, that's all , that's all that we have to go

6:34

off of , and I and I tried to get the

6:36

offense report and nothing

6:38

came up . I received no

6:41

feedback other than it wasn't available

6:43

, and so it's hard to

6:45

really judge what happened during that

6:47

incident without that .

6:49

Yeah , I think before

6:52

the cases were

6:54

digital . I

6:57

think it's hard going back and finding

6:59

some of us because they're literally just on

7:01

paper .

7:02

Yeah , and almost all of them

7:04

are . There's no digital record

7:06

of them , so it's it's hard to obtain

7:11

them . Yeah , so it's something

7:13

odd , though , is that there is

7:15

within those court documents , there was an order of

7:18

dismissal that was dated 6 11

7:20

of 93 . So my guess is Archie

7:22

dropped the charges or

7:25

there was insufficient evidence , but most

7:27

of the time when there's something like that , it's

7:29

difficult to get those charges just completely

7:32

dropped . Well , it's , the state

7:34

picks them up . Yeah , at that point , that didn't

7:36

happen . They're dropped . Yeah

7:38

, so , according to , because there's a ledger

7:40

that came with the court documents and

7:42

the last portion of that ledger is that

7:45

it was dropped .

7:47

Interesting .

7:48

Yeah , so , and you know that would

7:50

have been in . It would have been nice to get a little bit more information

7:52

on that , but nothing . So

7:55

, moving on , in September

7:57

of 1993 , archie

7:59

apparently beat Patricia and

8:01

held a gun to her head and threatened to

8:03

kill her . There is no police

8:06

report for this that I could find . So

8:08

either there was a port and no offense came

8:10

from it or the police were just never

8:12

called . In general , and all explained how

8:14

I got that information later on , and

8:17

finally , july 13 of 1994

8:20

, archie once again beat Patricia

8:22

, putting her in the hospital and

8:24

also threatened to shoot her . This

8:27

offense report was also not found

8:29

, but I'll explain again how I

8:31

obtained this information as well . So

8:34

sometime between July

8:36

13 and July 20 of 1994

8:39

, patricia filed for and

8:41

received a temporary ex parte

8:44

order , which is a protective order

8:46

that can be filed when a member of a

8:48

household can articulate to the courts a

8:50

clear and present danger of family

8:52

violence . It's Patricia filed the

8:54

order on Archie and he was listed

8:56

as the respondent . I

8:58

was able to find the actual order

9:00

that Patricia filed and it stated

9:02

the following On July

9:04

13 , 1994 , family

9:07

violence occurred when Archie began beating

9:09

Patricia . Patricia woke up

9:11

in the hospital . Archie later

9:13

made the statement to her wait until we

9:15

get home , bitch , I've got something for

9:18

you . Patricia strongly believes

9:20

that Archie is talking about using the gun

9:22

, since he has made numerous threats

9:24

that he will shoot her . In September

9:27

of 1993 , archie came

9:29

to a friend's house where Patricia was and

9:31

began beating her . He dragged

9:33

her down the street to his house and then held a

9:35

gun to her head and if y'all

9:37

remember , I said that Patricia went missing

9:39

July 28 , which is literally

9:42

just a few days after she filed

9:44

that protective order and the

9:46

day before Archie was supposed

9:48

to make a court appearance in regards

9:50

to the protective order . So

9:53

I find that very

9:55

suspicious . Yeah

9:58

, just the timeframe of it . What

10:01

a coincidence . Oh yeah , I don't

10:03

think there is coincidences .

10:05

Yeah , I

10:08

think it's really interesting that she

10:11

was able to receive a protective order

10:13

without any

10:15

case

10:17

being filed against Archie , because

10:20

typically in the state of Texas I

10:22

don't know what it was like in 1997

10:25

, but here you have to have

10:27

clear and convincing evidence

10:29

that an

10:32

offense has taken place and that you're in

10:34

danger of further threat of violence

10:36

, extreme violence

10:39

, because just

10:42

a class C assault . A

10:44

judge is not gonna sign off on a protective order

10:46

. So I

10:49

don't know if she had maybe

10:52

health records or medical records

10:54

saying hey , she was

10:56

beaten up , whatever , and provided that

10:58

. But even then you would think that the

11:01

police department would file

11:03

a case after the fact .

11:05

Yeah , and I even thought

11:07

maybe there was just offense reports

11:09

that I wasn't able

11:11

to find . But if you look at

11:13

Archie's criminal history , there

11:15

is nothing for domestic violence

11:17

, there's no arrests for domestic violence . So

11:20

I mean , my guess is that maybe the hospital

11:22

she had to have something we're

11:24

damning and they showed evidence

11:26

of abuse and assault . And

11:29

when she mentioned the

11:31

incident that happened in

11:33

September , she was at

11:35

a friend's house and I mean

11:37

obviously those friends watched

11:39

him drag her out of the house so

11:42

maybe she was able to gain

11:44

witnesses to kind of contribute

11:46

to the pattern of abuse from

11:48

him .

11:49

Yeah , well , and maybe they did file an offense report

11:51

later , but she's gone

11:54

now , so I felt like they could have arrested

11:56

him .

11:58

There's no victim ? There probably wasn't .

11:59

Yeah , it ended up being dropped , yeah and

12:02

that adds another aspect

12:04

to this case too , like if she did

12:06

file an offense report for domestic

12:09

violence and it could have been the

12:11

event at the friend's house and

12:14

that would cause Archie

12:16

to incur very serious charges

12:18

. So but if there's no

12:21

victim , really , and

12:23

it kind of goes away .

12:24

Yeah , yeah , and maybe that was his

12:27

thinking if he was the culprit

12:29

, which I'm leaning towards , but we'll

12:31

go into more of that later . So unfortunately

12:33

, that is really the

12:36

end of the timeline . That

12:38

includes Patricia , but

12:41

not so much for Archie

12:43

. So fast forward to

12:45

2013 . If you

12:48

didn't already have your suspicions about

12:50

Archie and his morality , this

12:52

will probably push you in the right direction . So

12:55

in September of 2013 , archie

12:58

was sentenced to prison for 60

13:00

years for sexual assault of a child

13:02

. The Dallas Morning News

13:04

reported that Archie repeatedly molested

13:07

a 13-year-old female and

13:09

continued to do so after his

13:11

initial arrest and release

13:13

. First , I kind

13:15

of have several questions about how

13:18

he was still able to be in contact

13:20

with her after he initially was arrested

13:23

and released , because he was right

13:25

back where she was . So

13:28

I have some questions about how

13:30

he was allowed to be around

13:33

her after that . But

13:35

something interesting also in the article

13:37

is that

13:39

one of the victim's siblings

13:41

stated even

13:44

after Archie was arrested

13:46

he often went into the teen's

13:48

room during the night and

13:50

touched her inappropriately . So

13:52

I'm not for sure the dynamic of

13:55

the victim in Archie

13:57

. See

14:00

, he was probably dating the mom

14:02

of his own , and that's kind of where my head

14:04

went is that he was living with them and

14:06

then he was dating

14:08

their mother , yeah , and I think , as

14:11

a parent , if you don't protect your

14:13

child , that's

14:15

on you and you

14:17

should also be charged with that . Yeah , he's allowed it

14:19

to be right back into the home

14:21

. Yeah , as the victim

14:23

, I can't imagine how traumatizing

14:26

it would be to have

14:29

the bravery to come out and

14:33

list him as a suspect . But

14:35

then , once he's arrested and

14:37

released , he's allowed to be back in

14:39

your home , and that's disgusting

14:41

. Now , something good

14:43

that came from this is , as

14:46

I said , archie was sentenced to 60

14:48

years and he has

14:51

to serve at least 30 of those years

14:53

before he has a chance

14:55

for parole . So he would be

14:57

just about , I think , 82 or

15:00

83 when that happened . So

15:02

at least he's tucked away

15:05

for what

15:07

seems to be quite a while .

15:09

Yeah he needs to be . Yeah , all

15:12

of that . He's not

15:14

safe to the general public , like

15:16

he's a danger to society . He needs to

15:18

be locked away . Yeah , to

15:21

keep him Strombly . Keep him . Probably

15:23

not going to live till he's 82 anyway . No , probably

15:26

not .

15:27

So let's skip to the

15:29

present day . This part

15:31

of the case to me is I

15:33

don't want to use exciting I think we've

15:36

talked about using the word excited when it comes

15:38

to these cases , but maybe

15:40

compelling might be the better word . So

15:43

I filed for an open records request

15:46

for Patricia's initial missing

15:48

person case from the Waukesahatchee Police

15:50

Department .

15:50

And remember every time we

15:53

filed an open records request . Up to

15:55

this point , every single

15:57

bit of it has been redacted

15:59

, or they say that they can't find

16:01

it .

16:02

Right , and that's going to be

16:04

a majority of the case when

16:06

we're applying for these open records requests

16:09

, because these cases are not closed , they

16:11

have not been solved , they are still

16:13

open and , although most of them are considered

16:15

cold cases because they

16:18

are still open and they're active

16:20

, a lot of the information is not

16:23

public . So

16:25

, although I didn't receive her original

16:27

case , I did receive

16:29

a supplement to her original case . This

16:32

supplement included the first

16:35

updates on the case since 1994

16:37

. In 2012

16:39

, detectives were contacted by

16:42

an acquaintance of Archie's . This

16:45

subject stated that on several occasions

16:47

in 2009 , he would go over

16:50

to Archie's home to drink alcohol

16:52

in that , in an indirect way

16:54

, archie may have implicated

16:56

himself as the person who murdered

16:58

Patricia . The subject noted

17:01

that he did not have proof of this and

17:03

Archie never directly stated that

17:05

he killed Patricia . Now I'm

17:08

not going to go into detail about the

17:10

specifics that he told the detective

17:12

, but just know they are gruesome

17:14

and heinous . They're terrible , yeah

17:17

it's gross .

17:18

I don't think that this acquaintance

17:21

would have made up something

17:23

that terrible . So

17:26

if Archie told this acquaintance

17:28

about the incident

17:30

in 2009 , why did

17:34

it take him so long to contact the police

17:36

? Did you ever find that out ?

17:38

No , and I also caught on

17:40

to that . I thought it was a little odd , like

17:42

what would bring you , after three

17:44

years , to all of a sudden

17:46

go and tell police

17:49

this information . Usually , there's some

17:51

type of driving factor . Was Archie

17:53

already imprisoned in 2012

17:55

? No , he went to prison in 2013

17:58

. He was sentenced in 2013

18:00

. Now , I know there

18:04

was a moment where he was arrested

18:06

for the initial charge

18:09

and then he was released , but

18:11

I don't have that exact info .

18:13

So at some point in 2012 , he

18:15

could have been in jail he

18:18

might have felt safe , like finally

18:20

coming to police , because he was like , hey , maybe this

18:24

guy is not going to get out .

18:25

Yeah , well , I mean , obviously

18:27

he has a history

18:30

of violence , so he could have very

18:32

well been afraid of him and

18:34

once he was arrested

18:36

, that he felt safer to go to the police

18:38

and talk to them about this . Because I mean

18:40

, from all accounts

18:43

it kind of appears that Archie

18:46

was possibly

18:48

getting back at Patricia for going to

18:50

the police on him , so maybe that's

18:52

that was his thought process . Well , you know , he

18:54

potentially did something to Patricia

18:56

. So when I found

18:58

, or when I received the supplement

19:01

, I also found the detective's name and

19:03

I reached out to him .

19:04

Yeah , I know you called me and you were nervous about

19:06

reaching out to him because you thought he was going

19:08

to tell you to hand the

19:10

whole thing I was going to like shut me down

19:12

, and I'm not for sure why . Because

19:14

it's because you're not used to receiving

19:17

information like that . Like you got

19:19

that full , unredacted supplement

19:21

, which is surprising . I honestly

19:24

thought he was probably going to tell you to , can it ?

19:25

Yeah , I thought he was going to be like , oh , you

19:27

accidentally received that , yeah

19:30

, but no , he was actually

19:32

really nice and

19:34

he was more just wanting to

19:36

figure out how I stumbled

19:38

upon Patricia's case . He

19:41

specifically said that there is not a

19:43

lot of information about her and

19:45

even publicity just

19:48

about . You know , no one in Waukes , a Hatchee , a

19:50

majority of the town , even know

19:52

who she is . And so

19:54

what happened so long ago ? Well , yeah , absolutely

19:56

Almost in 30 years , yeah , and

19:59

it is coming up on 30 years . But

20:01

basically I just went in

20:03

with the detective on our purpose

20:05

and how our entire

20:08

purpose is to highlight those cases that

20:10

are less known , and so

20:12

he completely understood . So obviously

20:16

the detective wasn't able to give me a whole

20:18

lot of detail , as the case as

20:20

we talked about it's still ongoing , but he

20:22

was able to confirm that on the

20:24

original report there was a witness

20:27

that did state they saw Archie approach

20:29

Patricia on the street that night . She

20:31

went missing . And there is one

20:33

more bit of information that could be incredibly

20:36

important . The detective stated

20:38

that recently there has been

20:40

some information received that could

20:43

possibly break the case wide open

20:45

and he had to kind of leave it at that

20:47

. He couldn't tell me anything more

20:49

, but has he gone back ? and interviewed

20:51

Archie by new chance , so I don't

20:54

know if he specifically has

20:56

spoken to Archie , but he

20:59

was . He did tell me that previous

21:01

detectives have went in , spoken

21:03

to Archie , but

21:05

they have not been able to find definitive

21:07

proof to tie him to her disappearance

21:10

, and so that's why . That's

21:13

why it's still open . There's just an

21:15

all around lack of information

21:17

and evidence .

21:18

But he's sitting on something that could potentially

21:21

yeah , like the case wide open .

21:24

And he had to leave it at that . He couldn't go into

21:26

more detail , which I totally understood

21:28

. But you know , after

21:30

almost 30 years I think

21:32

that would be great if her

21:35

remains could at least be found and

21:37

that she could be , you

21:40

know , have a proper burial

21:42

.

21:42

But Based on some of the information

21:44

, yeah , that were excluding

21:47

from the podcast . I don't necessarily

21:49

know if remains will be

21:51

found , but as long as justice

21:53

can be served , that would be a start .

21:55

Yeah , and you know , I mean he's probably not getting out

21:57

of prison anyway , but Well , and I was

21:59

thinking , you know , because

22:02

he will not have

22:04

the opportunity to make parole until

22:07

30 years , maybe they

22:09

can use that as leverage , like you know

22:11

what is ? What else does he have

22:13

to lose ? You know , he's probably going to

22:15

be in prison the rest of his life , like why

22:17

not just go ahead and come out

22:20

and and say what happened ? But

22:23

I don't think he's that type . No , I don't say well , based

22:25

off of his history , he

22:28

probably doesn't give a shit .

22:29

Yeah , because at this point , even though it's

22:31

you know , he's got a chance

22:34

for parole , even though it's in

22:36

the distant future . He'd be 82 if

22:38

he admits to murder he's

22:40

. There is no chance . There is no chance

22:42

for parole .

22:43

Yeah At all . But

22:45

what is he ? What would he

22:48

gain from telling

22:50

the truth or helping detectives

22:52

? He wouldn't gain anything .

22:53

I don't know . Maybe they could sweeten his deal a little

22:55

bit , some kind of special accommodations

22:58

or something , not necessarily early

23:00

parole , because nobody wants him released

23:02

at this point . There's a danger to the general

23:05

public .

23:05

Yeah , well , and I think that would be

23:08

the only way that he

23:10

would even be willing to help investigators

23:12

if they were able to cut time

23:15

, and no one wants to cut his time . No , he

23:17

needs to be in prison for the rest of his life

23:19

. Yeah , and I just I don't think

23:21

that he would be willing to offer up any of that information

23:23

unless the deal really , um , maybe

23:26

special privileges in prison . You know

23:28

, I don't know , I don't know what they could

23:30

possibly give him

23:32

that would make him want to give

23:35

him Maybe like a facility transfer

23:38

yeah , you know literally any lines

23:40

something that would , you know , benefit

23:42

him in any type of way , because he sure as

23:44

hell doesn't seem like the type that would do

23:46

anything unless he's benefited from it .

23:48

Yeah Well , and I've seen this picture and I don't think

23:50

he's going to be making an escape anytime soon

23:52

, so I don't think that like a prison

23:55

transfer would really be uh

23:57

you know , dangerous or hazardous

23:59

.

23:59

So so , based off all the information

24:01

that I have told you today

24:04

, is there any kind of raising

24:06

questions that you have ?

24:08

regarding any of it . No , I think

24:10

, um , I think it'll just be interesting

24:13

to see this case evolve , especially

24:16

since the detective has something

24:18

that we are not privy to so

24:21

kind of information . Um

24:23

, I hope that they're able to act on that

24:25

and charge him Um with

24:27

her murder , if she is indeed

24:29

deceased , which I think she

24:31

is , because , um , I know

24:35

that you told me that

24:37

there was also possibly like a jail

24:39

informant that had also said

24:42

kind of a similar story as yeah

24:44

, um , so that was another

24:47

little bit of information that

24:49

the detective was able to share that there was

24:51

someone in

24:53

prison that was going to be in

24:56

prison For life .

24:58

And they had contacted the police

25:00

Waxahashi police stating that they had information

25:03

. But the information was all hearsay

25:06

. It wasn't anything that they

25:08

could use to bring charges

25:10

against Archie or to locate

25:13

uh , her remains .

25:15

The story was similar to what the first

25:18

.

25:18

Yes , so , um

25:20

, the most

25:23

prevalent theory is that

25:25

Archie did kill Patricia

25:27

, um because she filed

25:29

the uh , temporary order on

25:32

him , and I think my guess

25:34

is that charges were coming

25:36

for him involving domestic

25:38

violence . Because of that temporary

25:41

order was um was

25:43

activated , and so my

25:45

math think he did it purely out

25:48

of out of spite and to get rid

25:50

of her . For sure , um , and

25:52

that is the the

25:54

overlapping theory , um that

25:56

he did have something to do with it and , matter of fact

25:58

, I haven't seen or heard a theory

26:01

that involves anybody else other

26:03

than Archie ?

26:03

Yeah , cause I know you said her social security

26:06

has never been used since . No

26:08

, there's been no activity , no Grace .

26:10

Um , cause , you know , sometimes you can

26:13

um Google missing person names

26:15

and they'll be like last spotted here , last

26:17

sighted here . Um , there is nothing

26:19

on her , matter of fact , there is not even news

26:22

articles that include her name

26:24

. The only thing that pops up when you

26:26

Google her is the DPS

26:28

missing website , the Jane Doe website

26:31

, where someone has entered in all of her criteria

26:33

in her photo and then a name

26:35

is and that's it . Yeah , and

26:37

so you know , that's that's

26:39

kind of where we leave

26:41

it . Um , but Patricia is

26:44

a black female and at the

26:46

time of her disappearance , she was five

26:48

foot six inches and weighed 120

26:50

pounds . Today she would be 57

26:53

years old . If you have any

26:55

information regarding her disappearance

26:57

, please reach out to walks of hatching

26:59

police department and , as

27:01

always , make sure to follow us on social

27:04

media , as I will post Patricia's photos

27:06

and case info on our social media

27:08

platforms Instagram , facebook

27:11

, twitter threads and Tik Tok , which

27:13

are all under the handle at the Texas

27:15

missing , and make sure to subscribe

27:17

wherever you're listening to this podcast and

27:20

, with that being said , I'm Kate and I'm Brie

27:22

, and this is the Texas missing podcast .