0:00

Next , on the Sean Morgan Report , we have Joel Kast

0:02

and he was giving us his analysis on the

0:04

war in the Middle East . We are going to question the mainstream

0:06

narrative and expose media propaganda right

0:09

now . That's a great question . That's a good

0:11

question .

0:11

That's a great question . That's a great question . Well

0:13

, that's a really good question . It's a great question . Well

0:15

, you're right .

0:30

It is great to have Joel Kast and the editor of the

0:32

World Affairs Brief with us . So

0:34

, joel , I've read your analysis on the war

0:36

in the Middle East . It's very nuanced , including

0:39

the fact that it seems

0:41

pretty obvious that Israel

0:43

allowed this type of attack

0:46

to initiate this war . And

0:48

why would they do that you were mentioning

0:51

, I believe , a faction of

0:53

Israel has a deep state , just like

0:55

in our country we have a faction

0:57

of the US that is deep state , and so

0:59

they were the ones that allowed that attack

1:01

. Could you give us your analysis there ?

1:05

Yes , benjamin

1:08

Netanyahu , the prime minister , is

1:10

a globalist . He's

1:12

a Henry Kissinger protégé

1:14

. Henry Kissinger and associates paid

1:16

for his education in the United States . They

1:19

set him up in Wall Street for his

1:21

first job and then he set him up in politics

1:24

in Israel by allowing

1:26

him to create an anti-terrorism

1:29

worldwide conference in Israel to which

1:31

all the bigwigs

1:35

in US politics attended

1:37

. Anybody can do that in Israel as an instant

1:39

hero in Israeli politics . That's

1:41

how we got to start . So

1:44

marching to a globalist

1:46

agenda , which is a lot about creating wars

1:49

and conflicts so

1:51

that you can talk your own citizens

1:53

into something that they would otherwise not

1:57

accept is standard

1:59

, fair . And of course , this

2:02

Netanyahu

2:04

and Israel claims was their own 9-11

2:06

. It was different than

2:08

our 9-11 in the sense that

2:12

our own deep state actually created

2:14

. They hired the terrorists , they loaded the buildings

2:16

with explosives , they

2:19

used high-tech technology

2:21

to remote control airplanes that the

2:23

hijackers could not fly , and

2:26

I can tell you , as a fighter pilot , that you

2:28

wouldn't even know how to turn off the autopilot in an

2:30

airliner if you trained on a Cessna

2:32

and failed at that training to boot

2:34

. But in

2:36

this case , this was not

2:39

actually created . Hamas

2:42

has given funding and initially

2:45

helped create Hamas in the Gaza

2:47

Strip as a counterbalance to the PLO

2:49

under Yassir Erfatt . And

2:53

they continue to fund Hamas

2:55

through Qatar , which

2:58

houses the Hamas leaders in luxury

3:00

and five-star hotels which

3:02

they do nothing about to try to capture for

3:04

humanitarian purposes . But in

3:07

any case , hamas

3:10

had been planning this for over a year . In

3:13

fact , the New York Times got the leaked

3:15

intelligence that the Israeli

3:18

intelligence had for over a year , which

3:21

the Israeli intelligence claimed , in response

3:23

to the New York Times article that they dismissed

3:25

because it was quote aspirational

3:27

, meaning that they didn't think Hamas

3:30

could do it . Now they know better

3:32

than that . Hamas had 10 years

3:34

to prepare for this attack and there

3:37

was all kinds of other intelligence confirming

3:39

it was coming , including private

3:42

intelligence sources which the IDF provided

3:44

equipment to

3:47

over to eavesdrop

3:49

on cell phone conversations throughout Gaza

3:51

which he continued to warn Israel

3:53

that this attack was coming , and they

3:55

finally took his equipment away and told him

3:57

to shut up because they don't want to hear it . They

4:00

also moved the Israeli Gaza

4:04

battalion 80 percent of it . They

4:06

moved out of southern Israel

4:08

into the West Bank , now

4:10

putting Israeli quick response

4:13

troops more than seven hours away

4:15

from being able to respond , and

4:17

all of that confirmed that this was

4:19

in fact a stand down to

4:21

allow it to happen , so that they could not respond

4:24

in a timely manner . And that's

4:26

how they started . And I asked the question , sean

4:28

, about why . I

4:31

initially thought , in my World Affairs

4:33

Brief article covering this , that

4:35

it was to

4:38

provoke a wider war with Iran

4:40

, since Iran is the primary sponsor of

4:42

the military equipment in both Hezbollah

4:45

in Yemen , the Houthis

4:47

and in Gaza . But

4:51

Iran didn't take the bait . Even

4:53

though Israel has been attacking Iranian

4:56

militia in Syria for the

4:58

past two years , they've never

5:00

arisen to take retaliatory measures

5:02

against Israel because

5:05

they're not ready yet to tackle . They know that

5:07

the West will piggyback on that

5:09

attack , so

5:12

they're not ready to take on the entire West , so

5:14

they didn't rise to the bait . It has not expanded

5:16

into a wider war , so

5:18

that leaves Israel with the vow that

5:20

they're going into Gaza to eliminate

5:22

Hamas militarily , and

5:25

as a military expert , I don't think that's feasible

5:28

. Frankly , I think when you have the network

5:30

of underground tunnels that they have , which are over

5:33

400 kilometers , it's very difficult to

5:35

ferret out them all , though they have gotten

5:37

a great deal of them . But

5:39

you're talking about at most , 50,000

5:42

troops in Hamas in a sea of 2.3

5:44

million people in an urban jungle

5:47

, and that's very , very difficult to eradicate

5:49

. If you don't eradicate them all

5:51

, this war is going to create , of course

5:53

, many more thousands of Hamas activists

5:56

, which will then swell the ranks , and

5:58

there'll be another hiatus , like there

6:01

was last time , of five or six years

6:03

before another attack . So I think

6:05

the cost in

6:07

civilian life is not worth the

6:09

fact , though . You have to go after your

6:11

enemies , I mean to be sure , but clearly

6:13

they're choosing the route that

6:16

minimizes military

6:18

casualties and maximize civilian

6:20

casualties by using aerial bombardment

6:23

when Hamas is

6:25

generally underground .

6:27

Right and destroying the infrastructure

6:30

. Is it going to be a livable

6:32

place by the time Israel's done with it ?

6:35

Well , you know what happens in these things

6:37

the international community ends up footing the bill

6:39

of rebuilding all these countries

6:42

. So it's not livable right now , Only

6:45

about oh , I would say 20%

6:47

of the buildings are probably destroyed in

6:50

northern Gaza and they're now in southern Gaza

6:52

, doing a lot of destruction of infrastructure

6:55

. The

6:57

international community , including the US , will have

6:59

to rebuild

7:02

everything at great expense , and

7:04

you know they end up importing a lot of

7:06

explosives and other things under the guise of

7:08

construction and military equipment . So the

7:11

cycle of violence will continue

7:13

and what's worse is that the world

7:15

, one of the globalist agenda in creating

7:17

war in other countries , is to create

7:19

refugee flows so that

7:21

they can interdict in Western culture and

7:23

water it down with Muslim

7:25

culture and other conflicting

7:27

cultures , which don't lead to

7:29

greater peace , as we're finding out in Europe

7:32

and in the United States . So

7:35

there are left-wing refugee

7:37

organizations pushing for massive acceptance

7:40

of Palestinians within the United States

7:42

and that's going to bring in a lot of hatred against

7:45

the US for supporting Israel .

7:48

Right . It's a very divisive issue

7:51

in the US . It seems like the

7:53

left and the right can't really seem to

7:55

figure out which side they're on . They're

7:57

not united necessarily , although you have more of the

7:59

evangelical right besides with Israel

8:01

and you have more of the radical leftist

8:03

side with Hamas

8:06

basically . But it's not totally

8:08

united and you see Biden trying

8:11

to play both sides , which is very strange

8:14

to watch the president do . But

8:17

let's get back at the bigger picture that

8:19

Israel wants a war with Iran . They

8:22

tried to bait them . They didn't take the bait . So

8:24

Israel , or one faction of Israel

8:26

, thinks they're ready to take on Iran

8:29

. But you've had

8:31

a few neocons , a few people

8:33

talk about doing an unprovoked attack

8:35

, a first strike

8:38

on Iran . What's the likelihood

8:40

in your mind of that happening soon

8:42

?

8:44

Well , israel has been practicing

8:47

an attack on Iranian

8:49

nuclear facilities now for over two years

8:51

. They do simulated aerial

8:53

interdiction and bombardment using electronic

8:56

jamming techniques to be able to get through Iran's

8:58

radar early warning systems

9:00

. So we know they're actively

9:02

prepared for such an attack

9:05

. But I don't think they

9:07

want to have the image of

9:09

being the aggressor in this . So they've wanted

9:11

to have a provocation . They wanted to induce

9:14

or get Iran to retaliate so they

9:16

can go after them , and that hasn't happened . So

9:18

if you go in , they have to build a bigger

9:20

narrative

9:23

about the danger of Iran's nuclear

9:25

program . Now it's true that Iran is

9:27

building towards a nuclear weapon . Israel

9:29

already has nuclear weapons and they feel like

9:32

they need them to be able to counterbalance

9:34

that . But I think you'll

9:36

probably find a leak somewhere that

9:38

Israel will claim that they're about

9:40

ready to unleash a nuclear weapon and that

9:42

will justify a strike . They'll have to have some

9:44

rationale for going in

9:46

unprovoked and I think that's what it'll be

9:49

. It will be a nuclear threat .

9:52

And how might this ripple

9:54

effect occur throughout the

9:56

Middle East ? Which sides , which

9:59

countries will feel obligated to take

10:01

sides ? And let's

10:03

talk about the bigger players , like

10:05

Saudi Arabia , the United

10:08

States , of course . Where

10:10

do you think the EU and NATO would land

10:12

on this ?

10:14

Well , first of all , the United States

10:17

keeps troops in Iraq unnecessarily

10:20

and Syria to act as bait for

10:22

Iran , and

10:24

our American troops don't know that we're

10:26

really illegally in Syria

10:29

. There's no reason for us to be in Syria . Syria

10:31

has never been an antagonist . In fact , we

10:33

imported the terrorists into

10:36

Syria . That

10:39

was the effect of having bombed Libya

10:41

and Tunisia and going

10:43

after Gaddafi as we created a wave

10:45

of Muslim terrorists which we imported

10:47

and moved into Iraq . Then we took

10:49

50% of those and retitled

10:52

them as ISIS gave them priority . I'm talking

10:54

about we in the sense of the American deep state

10:56

. Isis was a total

10:58

American creation of the deep state

11:01

based upon 50%

11:03

of the Arab terrorists . And

11:05

so we've used terrorism

11:08

as an excuse to occupy the northern

11:10

oil fields of Syria , denying Syria

11:12

the money to be able to rebuild . And

11:15

we're continuing to occupy areas of Iraq

11:17

, even though the Iraqi Polar man has refused

11:19

to reauthorize that we're there in

11:22

spite of Iraq refusal

11:24

to agree . And so and

11:27

I think we're doing that to provide bait so

11:29

that our soldiers get bloodied by Iran

11:32

and therefore justifies a US intervention

11:34

. It's a US intervenes and

11:36

then Saudi Arabia

11:38

will probably intervene , because Iran and Saudi Arabia

11:40

don't have an amicable relationship

11:43

at all , and if Saudi

11:45

Arabia joins the battle against Iran , they'll

11:47

get attacked either . Now , iran will be a formidable

11:49

military it's

11:52

no pushover by any means as a formidable

11:55

Navy and it has a huge amount

11:57

of missiles and things . So

11:59

the US is going to take casualties in

12:01

this war , and so will Israel , and

12:04

Hezbollah will get involved as well , and

12:06

Hezbollah has not done

12:08

but token attacks on Israel , and they've got probably

12:11

300,000 missiles in Hezbollah

12:13

they can launch at Israel

12:15

and overwhelm the Iron Dome and

12:17

Arrow system , israel's

12:20

self-defense forces .

12:23

And you've got the BRICS nations with their economic

12:26

alliance , and it makes you wonder if

12:28

they really are a military alliance as well

12:30

, specifically , of course , russia

12:32

and China . Would they be on the sidelines

12:34

for this type of conflict ? Do you think they would play

12:36

a role , supplying intelligence

12:39

and munitions , at the very least

12:41

?

13:22

Well , right now Russia is

13:25

gearing up for a

13:27

full wartime economy . Right now

13:29

they've geared up to full missile

13:32

production and wartime artillery production

13:34

. Most of that's being used up in Ukraine

13:36

. So how much extra they would have

13:39

to add to Iran's ? But

13:41

remember , russia is using Iranian drones

13:43

already and some of their missiles . I

13:46

don't think China and Russia would want to get

13:48

drawn into this . I think they would like to see

13:51

this as a means of drawing

13:53

down US and Israeli military

13:55

capacity , as we're seeing

13:57

the Ukraine war sap Russia's

14:00

conventional military capacity rather

14:03

than join it actively . When

14:05

Russia and China do join or

14:08

get into an attack on the West , they're going to begin

14:11

not with a conventional military

14:13

armored attack on NATO

14:15

or Europe . They'll start

14:17

with a preemptive nuclear missile

14:20

strike on US and NATO military forces

14:22

, trying to blackmail the West into

14:24

submission .

14:27

That's a very bold prediction . I want

14:29

to ask you about that . We are going to take a quick break

14:31

and when we get back we'll dive into the

14:33

grand strategy of play .

15:01

The world's safest and most private assets

15:03

silver and gold . Call

15:05

Kirk Elliott PhD . 720

15:08

605 3900

15:10

.

15:17

We are talking to Joel Scousen of World

15:19

Affairs Brief about the conflict in the Middle

15:21

East and how that could play out perhaps

15:23

Russia and China getting involved

15:26

or maybe waiting it out . You

15:28

did mention the idea that

15:30

there could be a first strike

15:32

on US military bases , nuclear first

15:34

strike from Russia-China

15:37

. Why would they

15:39

choose to do that ? You mentioned blackmail

15:41

to get us to just submit right away . Do

15:43

you think that would work ?

15:46

Well , I don't think it will work . But let me go

15:49

through the rationale of my theory

15:51

on this . First of all , to

15:55

apply any conventional military strategy

15:58

to Russia and China is really not

16:00

wise . Why would they

16:02

use a recraine type

16:04

strategy , with tanks rolling

16:06

into Western Europe when they can't

16:09

even occupy Ukraine right now ? You

16:12

see , that's the big problem . Why not

16:14

use your nukes to neuter the

16:17

opposition's military and

16:19

then either try to blackmail and if they don't

16:21

respond to the blackmail , to give in ? Then

16:23

you can go to a conventional

16:26

warfare and the US and NATO would be

16:28

far less capable of waging

16:30

that war after absorbing a nuclear first

16:32

strike . That's the rationale for that . But

16:34

Russia and China have to have a trigger band . They don't

16:36

want to appear as the aggressors

16:41

. The most likely trigger events for World

16:43

War III are really Taiwan

16:46

or South Korea in a war

16:48

with North Korea . These have become

16:50

intertwined , since North Korea has threatened

16:53

that if the US tries to intervene and stop

16:55

China from taking back Taiwan , that they will

16:57

intervene in the war and attack

16:59

not only US forces in the Pacific

17:01

but South Korea as well . Seoul

17:04

is within artillery range of North Korean

17:06

artillery tubes , and so they

17:09

can really obliterate that city within

17:12

a matter of weeks with artillery fire

17:14

alone . And of course , north

17:18

Korea claims to have nuclear weapons as well , which

17:20

I don't doubt that they

17:23

don't have . So here's

17:25

how I think that might play out . Now

17:27

, a likely scenario is that

17:30

the US could be over committed

17:32

in Ukraine and in an

17:34

Iran war if that starts up and

17:36

that might induce China to start

17:39

their attack on Taiwan , knowing that the US

17:41

would be hard-pressed to be able to handle a

17:43

two or three front war . And

17:46

if they do intervene in North

17:48

Korea , then and

17:50

by the way , North Korea is a total puppet state of China

17:52

they won't start an attack , no matter what Kim

17:54

Young-un threatens to do , unless

17:56

China gives the go-ahead . But

17:59

if the North Koreans attack South

18:01

Korea , the US has now this is what's

18:03

different in Ukraine and in Israel

18:05

. The US doesn't

18:07

have troops in Israel and doesn't have troops

18:09

in Ukraine , at least except for a few secret

18:12

advisors . But we do have

18:14

26,000 troops in South Korea

18:16

and the US would be required

18:18

to come to their defense if North Korea

18:20

attacks South

18:22

Korea . And so if we attacks

18:25

North Korea in defense of South Korea

18:27

, that's an excuse

18:29

for China then to launch a preemptive

18:31

nuclear strike to stop those attacks , and

18:34

they would basically attack all of us . Yes

18:37

, that's

18:39

exactly what I was going to ask you . What would

18:41

be their objective ?

18:42

They're trying to destroy our equipment and our

18:44

men .

18:45

Right , they're not after attacking

18:47

cities because , you see , they want to occupy

18:50

both North or US

18:53

and Canada . China's run out

18:55

of living space . They've run out of agricultural

18:57

space . It's mostly desert in China . They

19:00

can hardly feed their people , especially with periodic

19:02

famines and floods and things that flood

19:06

the various agricultural lands . General

19:10

Hao Tian

19:12

, the former Defense Minister , in

19:14

a speech in 2011 , did threaten

19:16

Now this was leaked to the press

19:18

through the epic times , an anti-communist

19:21

Chinese outfit in the United States , telling

19:23

how they're going to be ruthless . They want to

19:25

cleanse the nation of people . If they

19:27

can't do it by biological warfare , they

19:29

want to do it by occupation in

19:33

order to have more living space . They said you

19:35

know , we're not going to be easy on the West like

19:37

the Nazis were . We're going to be ruthless . I

19:40

should understand

19:42

that the Chinese do have a ruthless

19:44

streak in them about treating

19:46

other conquered people , as anyone who's lived

19:48

under Chinese occupation has found

19:50

out . But

19:53

you see , the problem

19:55

that we're facing is that not only do

19:57

Russia which , as I've

19:59

explained to my World Affairs Brief subscribers

20:02

fake their own demise in 1989 and 1990

20:04

in order to get Western aid and trade and

20:07

put Russian peoples into Ukraine

20:09

, into the borders of Ukraine in the Baltic

20:11

states , to have an excuse to attack someday

20:14

in the future when they wanted to reconstitute the

20:16

Soviet Union . Both Russia

20:18

, china want this war and also

20:20

the Western globalists want this Third

20:23

World War . Your readers need

20:25

to understand that the US

20:28

globalists have been building communist

20:30

enemies for decades . They

20:32

gave $20 million to the Bolsheviks

20:35

to start the revolution . Britain gave

20:37

an additional $20 million in gold

20:39

to the Bolsheviks . We cut

20:41

off military aid to the White Russians to make

20:43

sure the Bolsheviks won . We

20:46

brought Mao Zedong to power by cutting

20:48

off military aid to Batey—to Chiang

20:50

Kai-shek . We brought Castro

20:53

to power by cutting off military aid to Bateysta

20:55

. We brought the Sandinistas to power in

20:57

Nicaragua by cutting off military

20:59

aid to Samosa , and

21:02

the list goes on and on about how we've undermined

21:04

Western countries in order to bring communists to

21:06

power . Not because the globalists

21:08

are communists . There are too many conservatives

21:11

talking about letting

21:14

the communists take over this country . No

21:16

, it's the globalists that are a threat . They're

21:18

using communists , and even BLM and

21:20

Antifa communists , in order to break

21:22

down the social order in

21:25

a Hegelian dialectic where they create

21:27

conflict and crises so that they come

21:29

in and save us with a solution that we would

21:31

not normally attend and the reason

21:33

for the globalists wanting this

21:36

preemptive nuclear strike on our military

21:38

so they can come out of their bunkers and say well

21:40

, we didn't know this was going to happen , which is

21:42

a lie , but

21:44

now that has happened . The only way that we can defend

21:47

ourselves and prosecute this war is

21:49

by joining an immilitarized global

21:51

government , and I believe this new EU

21:53

army that is being formed and

21:55

funded in secret in Europe is

21:57

the seed stock for a new

22:00

global military post-nuclear

22:03

strike . But I think you

22:06

might ask the question well , how does the US intend to

22:08

win a nuclear war when you absorb a nuclear

22:10

first strike ? And , by the way , we have

22:12

a military doctrine that was signed in 1997

22:15

during the Clinton administration Presidential

22:18

Decision Directive 60 , which specifically

22:20

dictates to our missile

22:22

forces to absorb a nuclear first strike

22:24

and not launch on warning . Now

22:27

, launch on warning is very important because if

22:29

you launch on warning

22:31

when our satellites detect a launch

22:33

by Chinese and Russian missile

22:36

forces , then their missiles hit

22:38

empty silos and our missiles

22:40

that launch hit legitimate

22:42

targets . So the one who launches on warning wins

22:44

the war , not the one who launches first

22:47

. And that's one of

22:49

the reasons why I think our pacifists

22:51

dictated such a suicidal

22:53

policy in 1997

22:56

. General Butch Neal of the Marine Corps said retaliate

22:58

with what Once you've absorbed a nuclear

23:00

first strike ? Now we have some

23:02

submarines out there . About half

23:05

of our 14 ballistic missile submarines

23:07

are on duty at any one time . The rest are important

23:09

and can be targeted , but

23:12

those warheads on the

23:14

Trident missiles are not capable of hitting

23:16

hardened underground targets like Yamato

23:19

Mountain and the 3,000

23:21

miles of underground Chinese military

23:23

targets . So

23:25

it's a difficult scenario . But

23:27

I think that the most likely

23:30

trigger event for World War III is going

23:32

to be a war in Taiwan or South

23:34

Korea and if you see that happen

23:36

within a week I think we'll be in

23:38

a third world war .

23:42

That could be the match that lights everything

23:44

on fire . That's

23:46

very interesting , and I do want to

23:48

do a follow up episode with you to get

23:50

into the Russia-China possibilities

23:52

. But going back to the war in the Middle East , I

23:54

find it really fascinating that

23:57

this whole anti-Semitic

23:59

college campus free

24:01

speech issue came to the fore , where

24:03

you have the majority of

24:05

the Ivy League schools actually have Jewish

24:08

presidents , and then the

24:10

few that are not Jewish

24:12

were put up on the stand and grilled

24:14

about why they allowed anti-Semitic

24:16

comments and protests

24:18

and speech on their campus , and

24:20

two of them stepped down or were fired

24:23

. And so I just

24:25

wanted to find out from you what

24:27

is the Israel lobby

24:29

like , the Israel power

24:32

structure like ? Is it embedded in the US

24:34

? What is that relationship

24:37

like ? Who's

24:39

the puppet master when it comes to the US and Israel

24:41

?

24:43

Well , it's a complex question

24:45

because it

24:49

goes clear back to the Holocaust and

24:52

why the

24:54

mainstream media

24:56

promoted to such an degree

24:59

the Holocaust and while it did happen

25:01

, and clearly they went after the

25:03

Jews unjustly . There

25:06

was some exaggeration about the numbers and about

25:08

the use of the gas chambers , et cetera , and

25:10

has been disputed . But

25:12

what I think wanted to happen is that because

25:15

there's so many intellectual

25:19

Jews in the hierarchy

25:21

of the globalist conspiracy against

25:23

national sovereignty and liberty

25:25

, the globalist wanted

25:27

to create a kind of immunity for

25:30

Jewish leaders involved

25:33

in those things so that any criticism would

25:35

be viewed as anti-Semitism . And

25:37

so you can't criticize Israel legitimately

25:40

without being called an anti-Semite and

25:44

you can't criticize the war without

25:46

being anti-Semitic . The Jewish lobby

25:48

is extremely powerful . Almost no politician

25:51

can get elected in the United States if

25:53

they don't at least give tacit

25:56

, verbal support to Israel . And

25:59

, as I say , no nation is completely free

26:01

of guilt in

26:04

wars that they create , let alone the United States

26:06

. But we've created

26:08

a mantra within Western society

26:11

that any criticism of Jews is anti-Semitic

26:13

, even if it's legitimate or

26:15

not . Now I don't pretend

26:18

. There's a lot of conservatives that talk about

26:20

the Zionists . Well , not all Jews

26:22

are Zionists and in fact Zionists

26:24

don't end up being religious

26:26

Jews at all . They could care less about their own

26:28

religion , but

26:31

I choose to criticize globalism

26:33

as the real entity . Now that includes

26:35

significant Jews like George Soros

26:37

and Zbigniew Brzezinski and Henry

26:39

Kissinger , who just died , etc . There

26:42

have been a lot of Jews involved , especially

26:45

in the rise of the Soviet Union Leon Trotsky

26:48

, for example , and

26:50

others involved

26:53

in the Bolsheviks were Jews , and

26:55

even against their own people . But

26:57

it's not because that they are religious

27:00

Jews or defending the peoples because they are

27:03

part of a globalist

27:05

conspiracy . So I condemn globalist

27:08

leaders , and that includes what Jews

27:10

are involved there , not Jews in

27:12

particular . The world doesn't

27:14

run , not , a lot of people will

27:16

say . Well , the Jews

27:18

did 9-11 , and that isn't true at all . That

27:21

was our own deep state that

27:23

did 9-11 , from

27:25

the hiring of the terrorists to the loading of the

27:27

buildings with explosives , to the technology

27:30

that allowed them to remote control some of the airliners

27:32

.

27:35

Right , and so what you've said before

27:37

is that these globalists don't

27:39

have a communist ideology

27:41

. It's a convenient ideology for them to

27:44

use to weaken our

27:46

national sovereignty and the sovereignty

27:48

of other countries , and

27:51

so same deal goes for Judaism

27:54

. It's not necessarily their ideology

27:57

or their religion . It's something that

28:00

they can identify with as

28:02

a form of immunity , is the way you

28:04

described it . So , in that case , what

28:06

is the globalist ideology

28:08

? Is it just pure fascism

28:10

, that type of grandiose

28:14

, narcissistic , psychopathic kind of idea

28:16

, or is there a

28:18

religiosity to them , satanic

28:22

kind of thing ? What's your take on that ? You

28:24

only have a few minutes left , but

28:26

it's a big question .

28:26

But whatever you have , Well

28:30

, it is my belief that all three

28:32

globalist predator centers

28:34

Russia , china and the

28:37

Anglo-American globalists are

28:40

satanic based . There's

28:42

no way that these conspiracies can go on for

28:44

centuries , generations , without being

28:46

spiritually driven , and

28:48

this is not religion in the sense that it's anti-religion

28:51

being satan based

28:53

. But

28:55

there's no mafia chief that can establish

28:58

a 200 year plan for

29:00

his own conspiracy and expect

29:02

his family to continue that

29:04

. It just doesn't happen . You

29:07

have to have continual spiritual direction . So

29:09

, just as I believe in God , I think that there is

29:11

satanic revelation as well to his people , but

29:13

only at the very top . There's

29:15

a whole mix of globalists Most

29:17

of the globalists like in the world economic form

29:20

, klaus Schwab who consider

29:22

an AI robotic society . They

29:25

don't know that the top

29:27

level globalists are going

29:29

to give us a world war that's going to destroy

29:31

the ability to have an AI robotic society

29:34

. This war is going to be preceded

29:36

by about 15 , 20 minutes by an

29:38

EMP strike that's going to take down the grid for

29:40

over a year , because we

29:42

don't stockpile the long distance transformers

29:45

that allow you to they're

29:47

all made in China to get

29:50

the grid back up and running , and

29:52

so you can't have an AI robotic society

29:54

without a constant flow of electricity and

29:56

a constant flow of good , moral people to

29:58

keep order in society . We're losing that as

30:00

well , right

30:03

?

30:04

Well , this is fascinating . I definitely want to do a follow

30:06

up episode about World War III . So

30:09

thank you for your insight , joel

30:11

really appreciate it . And everyone can go to your website

30:13

sign up for World Affairs brief and this

30:16

is Sean Morgan signing out . You can go to get

30:18

my breaking news updates at Sean Morgan reportcom

30:20

. God bless all you patriots

30:22

. Good night , good

30:33

luck .