Podchaser Logo
Home
Everything You Need to Know About Super Tuesday

Everything You Need to Know About Super Tuesday

BonusReleased Tuesday, 5th March 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Everything You Need to Know About Super Tuesday

Everything You Need to Know About Super Tuesday

Everything You Need to Know About Super Tuesday

Everything You Need to Know About Super Tuesday

BonusTuesday, 5th March 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:00

Hey, Esteb. Hey, thank you for coming. I really appreciate

0:02

this. I'm pumped for it. Yeah, okay. We're

0:05

going to try to make Super Tuesday

0:08

not feel so tepid. Yes.

0:12

Today is Super Tuesday. So

0:14

people in 15 states and one territory

0:16

are going to the polls in

0:19

Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas,

0:21

California, Colorado, Maine,

0:23

Massachusetts, Minnesota, North

0:25

Carolina, Oklahoma, Tennessee,

0:27

Texas, Utah, Vermont,

0:29

Virginia, and American

0:31

Samoa. Usually,

0:34

it's one of the biggest days of

0:36

the political calendar. But

0:39

this year, there's nothing to indicate that

0:41

it'll change the broader picture of the

0:43

presidential race. That Trump

0:45

and Biden are seemingly headed to a rematch. It's

0:48

a day when a lot of people will make their voices

0:50

heard. And there are

0:52

also important down-ballot primaries happening. And

0:55

races that could matter for control of the House, Senate,

0:58

and governorships. So

1:00

I called Amy Walter. She's the

1:02

publisher and editor-in-chief of the Cook Political

1:05

Report, which analyzes elections

1:07

and campaigns. And

1:09

she's someone I trust to help me understand

1:11

what is worth paying attention to this Super

1:13

Tuesday. You know,

1:16

I was thinking about it today of,

1:18

all right, what am I going to

1:20

be looking for in some of these

1:22

states for the presidential contest? And

1:25

look, I'm going to be

1:27

looking in particular in some of these

1:29

areas where Nikki Haley

1:31

has been doing better, which

1:34

is suburban areas around

1:37

major metro areas, or

1:39

suburban areas that have

1:41

been trending more

1:43

democratic in the last eight

1:46

years or so. So we know, for example,

1:48

in South Carolina, where did she do best?

1:50

She did best in and

1:52

around Charleston and Hilton

1:54

Head, where many of

1:56

these voters may still be

1:58

voting for Donald Trump. that they would like

2:01

a different type of Republican, the kind of

2:03

Republican they grew up with. What

2:06

she's doing is highlighting the challenge

2:08

Trump has long had, which is

2:10

suburban white college

2:13

educated voters, especially women, are

2:15

his real Achilles heel.

2:17

And he has done nothing between 2020

2:19

and today to

2:22

win them back. But that

2:24

doesn't mean that he's going to

2:26

lose more of them than

2:28

he did in 2020. And that to me is

2:30

the big question. It's not so much, is he going

2:32

to lose these, many of these voters? Of course. But

2:35

is it going to be worse than

2:37

where he was four years

2:40

ago? And that's the

2:42

real issue instead, is that the primaries can't

2:44

really tell us that. We're

2:46

only going to know as we get deeper into

2:50

the election year and see

2:52

if there are indeed Nikki

2:55

Haley voters who were two time Trump

2:57

voters who say today, you

2:59

know what? I just can't go

3:01

a third round. What

3:03

about on the Democratic side? When you look

3:05

at the landscape of either the early primaries

3:08

that we've seen or the polling numbers

3:10

that we've seen, I'm curious of what your

3:12

kind of temperature check-ins on just

3:14

how much trouble Biden is in, or

3:16

is some of this a freak out

3:19

with lack of evidence? Right.

3:22

There's definitely a reason to

3:24

be worried or freaked out,

3:27

the term is if you're in the

3:29

Biden camp, because it's pretty clear that

3:31

there is a significant group of voters

3:33

who are not yet sold on Donald

3:35

Trump, but who really

3:37

aren't into Joe Biden either. These

3:40

may be voters who voted against Trump in

3:42

the last two elections, or maybe

3:44

they're voters that haven't been particularly involved

3:46

in politics yet. Maybe they were too

3:48

young to vote in 2020, for example,

3:52

but they just are not, even

3:54

though they may not, as I said, vote for Trump,

3:57

they're not voting for Biden. But The

3:59

other piece too, Matt in A

4:01

one of the things that Biden

4:03

had going for him in Twenty

4:06

Twenty was this idea that. For

4:08

voters who identify themselves as independents

4:11

are may be more moderate centrist

4:13

types that he was going to

4:15

be the better candidate for them.

4:18

And now those voters. And then

4:20

again, if you look at the

4:22

polling, which I think right now

4:25

is too much too early, but

4:27

he's not doing particularly well with

4:29

independent voters, Trump is doing much,

4:32

much better. There's clearly been a

4:34

Roseanne with voters of color, both

4:36

Latino voters and black voters. And

4:39

so how real is that? How

4:41

significant is that? Just as

4:43

I said again, we can't know

4:46

from these primaries alone, because I

4:48

think so much of the erosion

4:51

is among the kinds of voters

4:53

who are not particularly. Engaged.

4:56

In politics? Yup, Yup, certainly not this

4:58

far out, just that's a great point.

5:00

I mean we hear this consistently. I

5:02

remember when we talk to Make Home.

5:04

He made this point that the people

5:06

that the evidence is pointing to that

5:08

Biden is having the most trouble with

5:10

her could be the potential vulnerabilities for

5:12

November or said with different group of

5:14

people than who are deeply involved and

5:17

primary critically this primary with seems even

5:19

like less engage them previous ones were

5:21

simply talking about a difference slice of

5:23

pie. That's right, I guess with that

5:25

landscape. We really wanted to have you

5:27

help us kind of understand be non

5:29

top of the take it all races

5:31

and specifically loves as some of the

5:33

races that are happening on Super Tuesday

5:35

to the can be a big picture

5:37

on how things are shaping up when

5:39

it comes to the race for House

5:41

and Senate control. Sure, we

5:43

can start with the Senate because

5:45

that's one where the math and

5:48

the map really work against the

5:50

democrat. If you look at than

5:52

just a number of seats that

5:54

are up, the democrats have to

5:56

defend twenty three seats republicans dispense,

5:59

but it's. More than that, it's

6:01

the kinds of seats they have to

6:03

defend. So the we have the seeds

6:05

of those twenty three. Are.

6:07

States that. Trump carried in

6:09

twenty Twenty so: West Virginia,

6:12

Ohio, Montana, Obviously in West

6:14

Virginia, Joe Manchin has announced that

6:16

he's retiring truck that is a

6:18

seat that Republicans are almost guaranteed

6:20

to win. By same as an

6:23

automatically that's right for that are

6:25

so. In a state that

6:27

from carried by like forty points, yeah,

6:29

I think that the pretty easy thing

6:31

to say, but. That also means

6:33

that we should think about this election

6:36

going into twenty twenty four, that the

6:38

Senate is sixty sixty, And in that.

6:41

Scenario. It means that

6:43

if Trump wins, the senate is

6:45

already republican. The only

6:47

way the senate stays democratic is

6:49

if Biden wins and they don't

6:51

lose anything. Didn't lose: Montana, Ohio,

6:53

Arizona, Nevada, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, all those

6:55

states they have to defend now

6:57

they can that? Not saying they're

6:59

going to lose all of those,

7:01

but to save gotta win every

7:03

single want you can afford to

7:05

lose any of those. That is

7:08

a. Very very difficult thing. Civil

7:10

Rights? Me to sweep both all of

7:12

a competitive races. And when the White

7:14

House yeah, because the receipt they're almost

7:16

guaranteed to lose in West Virginia means

7:18

are almost inevitably looking at a Fifty

7:20

fifty Senate in the best case scenario

7:22

for Democrats? Ogre. Yeah, So that's

7:24

the Senate and on Super Tuesday

7:26

we're going have an answer. In

7:29

a state that's not exactly his

7:31

onset competitive Less and less California.

7:33

this is primary. That is really

7:35

about the question of which kind

7:38

of democrat is gonna come. To

7:40

Washington, not so much. Will republicans flip this

7:42

state Rex that we're not. To me, many

7:44

of the answers to the divorces are in

7:47

the primary season right now, but there are

7:49

some states that are having kind of inter

7:51

compared to the battles one being California, one.

7:53

been california where the big

7:56

question right now is will

7:58

the to top two candidates,

8:01

because this is how California's primary

8:03

works, the two top vote-getters go

8:05

on to face each other in

8:08

November, will those top two

8:10

vote-getters be two Democrats, or will it

8:12

be a Democrat and a Republican? Two

8:15

leading candidates for Senate, two

8:17

very different visions for California.

8:19

Steve Garvey, the leading Republican,

8:21

is too conservative for California.

8:23

He voted for Trump twice

8:25

and supported Republicans for years,

8:28

including far-right conservatives. Adam Schiff,

8:30

the leading Democrat, descended democracy

8:32

against Trump and the insurrectionists.

8:35

Right now I think everybody agrees, and

8:37

the polls say the same, that Adam

8:39

Schiff, congressman from the Los Angeles area,

8:42

is the front-runner here, and is pretty

8:44

much guaranteed a spot in the runoff. The question

8:47

is whether a Republican, Steve Garvey,

8:49

former, for those of us who grew up

8:51

in the 70s and 80s, remember

8:53

him as the Los Angeles

8:56

Dodgers star? Mm-hmm. They

8:58

called Claire. I've decided to get

9:00

off the bench, to suit up again, and

9:03

get back in the game. And now

9:05

for me the ultimate challenge, to

9:07

change your life for the better by being

9:10

a U.S. senator. Go to stevegarvey.com. If you

9:12

did not, then no, you probably don't know who

9:14

he is, but as a child

9:16

of the 80s, I do remember him.

9:19

Or he will face Schiff, that

9:21

is, will face Katie Porter from

9:24

Orange County, who comes from the

9:27

Elizabeth Warren wing of the party. Washington,

9:29

the U.S. is drowning in Wall

9:31

Street money and big pharma lobbyists.

9:33

Katie Porter says, in time

9:36

to shake the Senate. Schiff,

9:38

of course, made his name with the

9:41

impeachment proceedings, the very first impeachment of

9:43

Donald Trump. And that helped him, you

9:46

know, in a state that is really expensive and

9:48

really hard to get known, that

9:50

got him a lot of name ID and also helped

9:52

him raise a ton of money. Yeah, yeah.

9:55

What About the House? How Is the

9:57

race shaping up when it comes to...

10:00

Control of the House in November. That.

10:02

Thing is just an absolute toss

10:04

up. I think the easiest way

10:06

to think about it is Republicans

10:09

have five seat majority, and there

10:11

are about twenty five seats that

10:13

we consider to be the most

10:16

competitive, pretty evenly divided between the

10:18

two. Parties. And

10:20

sofort democrats to when. They.

10:23

Need to win something like

10:25

sixty five, seventy years percent

10:27

of the closest races in

10:29

order to just narrowly take

10:31

control of the house? That's

10:33

possible. But again, it's not

10:35

like, oh, they only need

10:37

five seats. How hard can

10:39

that pages. Yeah, get outside for a

10:41

be so much of like talk about

10:43

republican slim majority their mouths, retirements but

10:45

enough and even democrats feeling good at

10:48

their prospects of the house by hear

10:50

you saying like they still need to

10:52

have a good election night even get

10:54

with marrow with the margins. Exactly, they

10:56

really do, because. Yes,

10:58

they have a lot of

11:00

target namely republicans who sit

11:03

in. This. Or said

11:05

biden period. But they've got their

11:07

own vulnerable incumbents, some of whom

11:09

sit. In district said Trump

11:11

carried and Twenty Twenty and then

11:13

redistricting in North Carolina, which basically

11:15

drew three democrats out of their

11:17

seats. So the house is really

11:20

a battle of inches more than

11:22

anything else. It feels if we're

11:24

playing a football game that is

11:26

literally just between the end zone

11:28

and the five yard line. It's

11:30

literally who can grind their way

11:32

to those few seats that they

11:34

need to be in the majority

11:37

and. You. Know likely not a

11:39

very big majority. At that you know One

11:41

thing that really comes through and are reporting

11:43

is that people really don't like their options.

11:45

The top of the take it with that

11:47

some one big thing we hear whether on

11:49

the road or from listeners it's like why

11:51

do we have these options and like. that

11:53

they bombed them out about the

11:55

prospects of are both in november

11:57

when we think about turn out

12:00

for this year or when we

12:02

think about people's level of engagement or

12:04

investment in the race, is there any

12:06

signs about whether this was going

12:08

to be like a robustly participated in the election?

12:10

Because in some ways, I feel like people are

12:12

checked out, but I also think that we had

12:15

big engagement in 2022 and we have big engagement

12:17

in 2020. How should I

12:19

weigh those things? Gosh, I'm with

12:21

you on that, Estetta. I'm

12:23

very torn about that because you're right. On the one

12:25

hand, if you just look at

12:27

the data that says people are really

12:29

dispirited with their choices, they

12:32

are so disappointed in a Congress

12:34

that it looks more and more

12:36

dysfunctional every day. They are

12:38

tuning out of the news. We're seeing more

12:40

and more evidence of this. And

12:43

so this idea of like, I don't want

12:45

to participate. I don't know that that is

12:47

really what's going on. And certainly by the

12:49

time we get to November, because I

12:52

think much like 2020, the

12:55

stakes of the election for both

12:57

sides are going to be very,

12:59

very clear and be broadcast over

13:02

and over again, that there are

13:04

not subtle differences between these candidates.

13:07

There are pretty significant differences

13:09

between Joe Biden and Donald

13:12

Trump and what their agenda

13:14

will be for the next

13:17

four years. So it seems

13:19

to me that those things are going

13:21

to be critically important. I mean,

13:24

remember that, you know, at this

13:26

time in 2022, it was like, man,

13:28

Democrats are going to get crushed in the

13:30

midterms. Yeah, absolutely. They have no enthusiasm, right?

13:33

No one wants to turn out. People

13:35

are checked out. The economy is bad,

13:38

etc., etc. And then, of course, the

13:40

jobs decision comes out and that changes everything.

13:42

But even then, we couldn't

13:45

really measure how important

13:48

that issue of abortion was, in

13:51

the sense that you still in the polls,

13:53

you would see people responding

13:55

that, yes, the issue of abortion

13:57

rights is important, but I'm really, really, really, really,

13:59

really, really concerned about the economy. Or, yeah, I'm

14:03

concerned about abortion rights, but I

14:05

also think Biden's doing a terrible

14:07

job. And so I think those

14:09

crosscurrents are going to still,

14:11

they're going to be there. And

14:14

maybe we are living in a

14:16

moment where voters are going to

14:18

have to sort of adjust

14:20

their expectations in

14:22

terms of each of these

14:25

elections is incredibly consequential, even

14:28

if the candidates themselves are

14:30

not appealing. Yeah, I think you really

14:32

helped us understand that phenomenon. In 2022,

14:34

you made a kind of

14:37

specific reference to the type of voters who

14:39

I remember you calling med voters, right? Like

14:41

I remember the explanation that some people can

14:44

express displeasure with the president or express

14:46

displeasure with the party and still actually

14:48

come out. It's like hard for me

14:50

to think that if we actually have

14:52

an election where whether Donald Trump goes

14:54

to jail or not, it's like basically

14:56

up to whether that president that people

14:58

are going to not care about that.

15:00

Like it's hard for me to actually

15:03

agree completely. I've taken

15:05

to using the Green

15:08

Day song of wake me up when September

15:10

ends as my motto for this year. But

15:12

I do think that's where a lot of

15:14

voters are like, I'll check back

15:16

in tell me when it's October and

15:18

I'll check in, you know, outside

15:20

of the candidates who were, you know,

15:22

as we're talking about, a lot of

15:25

people don't find all that inspiring. What

15:27

are the themes or policies or issues

15:29

that you think are going to

15:31

be what the election's about? Is there any

15:33

hints if you look at the Super Tuesday

15:35

landscape or even some of the races that

15:38

we've seen so far about whether some of

15:40

the defining themes that could really be where

15:42

November is won or lost on? Yeah,

15:45

I think, unfortunately, the primaries don't

15:47

give us a great insight into that.

15:49

What I do think they tell us

15:51

a lot about though, is especially on

15:53

the Republican side, where so many of

15:55

these primaries are happening in

15:57

states like North Carolina, where they redrew

15:59

the map and so we

16:01

have a number of open

16:03

very Republican districts that will get a

16:06

new member and So

16:08

you're seeing it there and in some of these

16:11

other states that have primaries the top

16:13

issue Which shouldn't be surprising to

16:15

anybody who follows politics is Immigration

16:19

I'm running for Congress because with Joe

16:21

Biden's open border the criminals walk right

16:23

in I think Every

16:25

single ad that I've watched and every one of

16:27

these races Mentions immigration.

16:30

Yeah, Joe Biden and

16:32

Democrats have turned our border over

16:34

to cartels and the woke left-wing

16:36

mob America is crumbling and being

16:38

invaded under Joe Biden Joe Biden

16:40

broke our border our economy our

16:42

spirits And I will fight for

16:44

a secure border and then the

16:47

next most popular Term

16:49

is Trump Bo Hines and

16:52

President Trump will get us back

16:54

on track Trump and buck out

16:56

together They'll beat sleepy Joe. I'm

16:58

standing with Addison McDowell the only

17:00

candidate in the race That's endorsed

17:02

by Donald Trump vote Sandy Smith

17:04

and President Trump by marks fifth

17:06

to save America And

17:10

pass an issue And

17:12

Trump as an endorser and then Trump

17:15

as I will stand with him or

17:17

my opponent hasn't been as supportive

17:20

of Donald Trump, you

17:22

know thinking back to 2017 and

17:26

what the Congress looked like

17:28

the Republican Congress looked like then

17:30

and What Donald Trump

17:33

was sort of up against in terms

17:35

of the quote-unquote now We think of it as the

17:37

old guard of the Republican

17:39

Party, but the more the pre-Trumpian

17:42

Republican Party just in

17:44

the last six years that

17:46

party has been completely transformed and

17:49

When I look at these primaries and

17:51

the people who again the win these

17:53

primaries are coming to Washington in November

17:56

because their districts are So Republican they

17:58

won't have a serious challenge

18:01

in November, they're going

18:03

to look a lot more like Donald Trump. And

18:06

if he wins reelection, it means

18:08

that the Congress, there are very

18:11

few speed bumps in the way

18:13

that there were for him in 2017. So

18:16

that makes for a Congress

18:19

that is going to be much

18:22

easier for Donald Trump to get

18:24

anything, not anything through, but he

18:26

will have an easier time. Let's put it that way.

18:28

Or harder for Joe Biden in the second term. Well,

18:30

that's another great way to think about it, exactly, which is

18:32

the folks who are coming in right now are not running

18:35

on. You know what would be so great is if we

18:37

did some more compromising. Let's

18:40

work with the other side. Yeah, yeah.

18:43

Let's look at some Super Tuesday specific

18:45

races. You know, there's been some

18:47

that we looked at. You mentioned North Carolina,

18:49

the first district there. There's a couple in

18:51

California, California in 22, California in 47, some

18:53

of those places where the House races might

18:55

be won or lost. But there's also some

18:57

important governors races. I'm thinking about

19:00

North Carolina again, which has going to be what's a

19:02

closely watched one. If you look at

19:04

something that's going down literally today as or as

19:06

folks are listening to this, what would be a

19:08

race that you point to and

19:10

say that's one to have my eye on? Yeah,

19:13

I am looking at the

19:15

North Carolina district. It's

19:18

the first district. It's a

19:20

Democratic held district, but it is

19:23

very swingy and was made even

19:25

a little bit tougher in redistricting.

19:28

The candidate that comes out of that primary

19:30

is going to matter a lot on the

19:32

Republican side. The two time

19:35

losing candidate, her last name Smith,

19:38

if she wins there, that probably makes

19:40

again, doesn't take it off the table,

19:43

but it may give the

19:45

Democrat there, the Congress, the Democratic

19:47

Congressman there a better opportunity to

19:49

hold on. Then if he gets

19:51

a new challenger who is not

19:53

quite as burdened, let's say, with

19:56

a lot of political problems like this

19:58

former candidate. In other words

20:01

if we're talking about the house as being a battle

20:03

of inches then this is One

20:06

of those inches there, right? I

20:09

also like it instead of this is my East Coast

20:11

bias showing because I Don't

20:13

have to stay up late and then

20:15

you have the you pointed out the governor's

20:17

race, which is also really interesting you

20:20

know, North Carolina is sort of

20:22

like the Charlie and the football for Democrats

20:25

they come so close at the federal

20:27

level and yet Never

20:30

seem to score that Goal

20:33

or that field goal or whatever what Georgia

20:35

used to be for them. Yeah, exactly

20:37

exactly and You

20:40

know the opportunity here for Republicans

20:42

to pick up the governor seat

20:44

It's pretty high, you know, you've

20:46

had a Democratic governor for two

20:48

terms again. You've got the legislature

20:50

that is Super

20:52

majority Republican you've got

20:55

two Republican senators right now The

20:57

polling suggests that while it's competitive

20:59

Trump's he's I saw a poll

21:01

recently He was right around 50% and yet Republicans

21:06

are likely to nominate a

21:08

candidate very very far

21:11

to the right who will fit

21:13

into that same category that we

21:15

saw in 2022 with Kerry Lake

21:17

from Arizona and the

21:20

candidate in Pennsylvania

21:22

who was very much

21:24

to the right on social issues

21:26

cultural issues and that's where this

21:28

candidate Mark Robinson is everything

21:32

from Abortion

21:35

to gay rights to

21:37

the Holocaust. I mean it's pretty

21:39

dramatic About

21:50

Any of that and yes This

21:57

isn't just oh, this is

22:00

a Trump Trump-like candidate. God

22:02

formed me because he knew there was going to be a time

22:05

when God's learning was going to be

22:07

intolerable to the wicked, when

22:09

children were going to be dragged down to

22:11

go see the drag show. You

22:14

know, this has been the challenge in the

22:16

era of Trump, right, which is state parties

22:20

or primary voters who

22:22

want to see candidates who

22:25

aren't necessarily built for

22:27

a swing state. They want a

22:29

candidate that's built for a red

22:32

state who's going to be a fighter

22:34

for values of, you know,

22:36

cultural and otherwise conservative or

22:39

Trump conservative voters. But that's

22:42

not the state. Yeah. I

22:44

mean, the candidate you're referring to, Mark Robinson,

22:47

is a good example of this type of

22:49

phenomenon in the Trump era. As

22:51

we had in 2022, there are

22:53

candidates who have kind of fashioned

22:56

themselves as the tell

22:58

it like it is straight shooter

23:00

grievance driven, politically incorrect style, MAGA

23:02

candidates. And this guy's really at

23:04

the top of the list. He

23:06

has called the Holocaust hogwash in

23:08

a Facebook post. He has,

23:11

you know, been completely out of step,

23:13

even on issues like abortion and

23:15

denying the last election. I

23:17

mean, when you look

23:19

at the landscape of Republican candidates,

23:22

is it feeling as I don't

23:24

have a better word as Trumpy as the 2022

23:27

slate was? I

23:29

mean, that famously failed, right? Like

23:31

you would think that in a

23:33

competitive race, like a North Carolina

23:35

governor's race, like we would

23:37

not be back here with the same type

23:39

of candidate. Exactly. That you

23:41

would say, I don't know, I kind of feel like

23:44

we've seen this movie before, but it

23:47

seems to me that that

23:49

is not really if the

23:51

priority is the fight, then

23:53

winning isn't necessarily

23:57

what you're always aiming for. That's

24:00

really not really the main event that. That

24:02

the site is what you want

24:04

and the fight is for something

24:06

bigger and more. I. Guess existential

24:09

than just did we win this

24:11

last election and this I think

24:13

it it. It also speaks to

24:16

this a d and that. The.

24:19

Bubbles the case and maybe of

24:21

our party right that each of

24:23

them are speaking only to the

24:25

groups that they are most closely

24:27

aligned with as opposed to understanding

24:29

that in a state that is

24:31

purple, you got to be able

24:33

to. Win over independent voters.

24:35

You can't just get your

24:37

base. Is. Is fascinating. Those

24:39

said, because it just as we discussed how

24:41

close the race for the house will be,

24:44

we're. Pretty. Sure that the. Presidential.

24:46

Race. Also gonna come down to just

24:49

like right few thousand votes here and

24:51

there if you're always just a few

24:53

thousand votes from winning. Then

24:55

it makes it really hard for used

24:57

to take a good honest looks in

25:00

the mirror and say maybe we should

25:02

change. The way we

25:04

do things right when you're polarization. The

25:06

thoughts were if it's forty nine, fifty

25:08

one every time, right? Like. It's.

25:10

Hard to get that ship to change

25:12

courses that Wrexham says. He say will

25:15

next year it can be the other

25:17

way round. We can give sixties and

25:19

veto the times when the parties have

25:22

really sort of gotten themselves back on

25:24

track is when they got walloped riot

25:26

like losing of Lax and after election

25:28

not just by like a point or

25:31

two but light. Oh see the good

25:33

democrats throughout the eighties and the presidential

25:35

elections there were they are just getting

25:37

wiped out. That's when you say okay

25:40

what we're doing isn't working but if

25:42

we still live in an. Era where

25:44

you're just counseling going back and forth about who

25:46

as the White House and who has The House.

25:49

and maybe the Center's up for grabs here in

25:51

their well. And he doesn't

25:53

give you much incentive to change. you

25:56

know when people wake up on wednesday morning

25:58

what should they be looking for What

26:00

should be the first place they look to on the

26:02

map? Hmm. That's a very

26:04

good question. I think what we will

26:06

be curious to see is at the

26:08

presidential level did Donald Trump

26:11

put numbers on the map even in

26:13

states and in places where a

26:16

Nikki Haley on paper

26:18

would do well? To me what

26:20

that suggests is that whatever energy

26:22

there is or was for

26:25

a Nikki Haley to keep up this

26:27

fight that that has pretty much gone

26:30

away. So I'll be

26:33

curious to see that because you know we

26:36

have places like Massachusetts and Vermont and

26:38

Virginia. So I'm here in northern

26:41

Virginia. I am very curious to

26:43

see what turnout looks like here.

26:45

This is a state that notably

26:48

has been shifting more

26:51

and more from even purple to blue.

26:54

But what if Trump is doing

26:56

really really well here? To me

26:59

that suggests that as I said

27:01

that whatever energy there was behind sort

27:03

of sending a message to Trump or

27:05

supporting Nikki Haley has gone. And

27:07

then as I said I would like

27:09

to think we'll have an answer in

27:11

California for the Senate race. I don't

27:14

know that we will. And in

27:16

these House races in these primaries

27:18

the kinds of candidates that came

27:21

out is going to tell us

27:23

a story of were

27:26

any of the candidates who

27:28

did not style themselves in

27:31

the House Freedom

27:33

Caucus mold or who

27:36

were say backed by

27:38

more quote unquote establishment

27:41

types make it through. Thank

27:46

you so much Amy. I appreciate your time. Yeah

27:48

thanks Ted. That's

27:52

it for this special Super Tuesday edition of the

27:54

run up. We'll be

27:56

back on Thursday with a look at

27:58

President Biden's campaign. Hey

28:14

there, it's Ira Glass from This American Life. If

28:16

you don't know our show, it's true stories that

28:19

unfold like little movies for radio. Lots

28:21

of them funny with surprising moments and pot

28:23

twists. We've been on the radio for years.

28:26

We teamed up with The New York Times to

28:28

bring you new episodes of This American Life a

28:30

full day and a half where you

28:33

can find them anywhere else online. The

28:35

place you can do that is The New York

28:37

Times Audio App every Saturday

28:39

morning. The app you also find

28:41

the best of our archive, hundreds of episodes, plus

28:44

This American Life shorts which are handpicked stories when you're

28:46

in the mood to hear something good but you don't

28:48

have time for a whole episode. The

28:50

New York Times Audio App can I say is chock

28:52

full of tons of other stories and podcasts curated every

28:54

day for those moments that you want to listen to

28:57

something and you don't know what you want to listen

28:59

to. You can download

29:01

it at nytimes.com/audio app and

29:03

subscribe to start listening. And

29:06

if you're not already a New York Times subscriber, well,

29:08

this is another reason to become one. Again,

29:11

that's nytimes.com/audio app.

29:18

The run-up is reported by me, it's Nat Herndon.

29:20

And produced by Elisa Gutierrez, Caitlin

29:22

O'Keeffe and Anna Foley. It's

29:25

edited by Rachel Dry, Lisa Tobin

29:27

and Franny Cartoff. With

29:30

original music by Dan Powell,

29:32

Marion Lozano, Pat McCusker, Sian

29:34

Wong, Sophia Landman and Alicia

29:36

Beattu. It was mixed

29:38

with Sophia Landman and thank you by Caitlin Love.

29:42

Special thanks to Paula Schumann,

29:44

Sam Dolnick, Larissa Anderson, David

29:46

Halfinger, Maddie Bassiello, Mahima

29:48

Chablani and Jeffrey Miranda. Do you have

29:51

a question about the 2024 election? Email

29:54

us at therunup at nytimes.com or

29:56

better yet, record your question using

29:59

the voicemail app on your phone and

30:01

then send us the file. The

30:03

email again is the run-up at

30:06

nytimes.com. And

30:08

finally, if you like the show and

30:10

want to get updates on latest episodes,

30:12

follow our feed wherever you get your

30:14

podcasts. Thanks for listening, y'all.

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features