0:00

I'm gonna

0:08

now bring in the real star

0:10

of the show, Dave Rubin. Thank you. Switch

0:17

mics. Switch mics. Alright, we're

0:19

switching mics. Make some noise for Bobby,

0:21

everybody. I

0:26

have to say, I fled

0:28

California very publicly about two

0:30

years ago. I campaigned... It's

0:33

mic. I campaigned... Oh, there we

0:35

go. Holding

0:38

the antenna. Okay. Sorry, it's

0:40

my first time doing this in front of an audience. I

0:44

fled California very publicly. I campaigned,

0:46

actually, for the recall alongside

0:49

Larry Elder, which obviously did

0:51

not end up going the way we might have wanted

0:53

here in Cali, but I got audited by

0:55

the state three days after the recall,

0:58

and that's actually the day that I put my house for

1:00

sale. I mention that only

1:02

because this is one of the few things that would bring

1:05

me back to California, because I've

1:07

soured on this. I now live in the free

1:09

state of Florida, but it's a pleasure listening

1:12

to you and my friend Dennis Prager. And

1:14

I thought we'd start with something a little bizarre,

1:16

because obviously there's plenty to talk about, and

1:19

the world seems to be in a bit of a chaotic place. But

1:22

on the way here, as I was in the car, I looked

1:24

at your Twitter, and I want to read your

1:26

last

1:26

tweet, because I think this encapsulates

1:28

a lot of people's frustrations with

1:30

what's going on here in California. You wrote,

1:33

yesterday, an intruder climbed the

1:35

fence at my home and was arrested. After

1:38

being released from police custody

1:40

later in the day, he immediately

1:43

returned to my home and was

1:45

arrested again. So,

1:48

twice in one day at your house, you

1:50

mentioned that your wife Cheryl was doing a Facebook

1:52

livestream at that moment. Is

1:55

that a perfect

1:56

example of the frustrations

1:58

that people are having? in this town,

2:00

in this state, and really, really

2:03

across the country at this point.

2:05

Yeah, I was, this is, you were with

2:07

me a few minutes ago when I was up

2:09

on my Twitter, and I didn't really want to put it up

2:12

on my Twitter, because I didn't want to see it like

2:14

I was lying. My

2:16

wife saw it from over the

2:18

fence, and she was doing a Twitter space

2:21

with any of her Facebook

2:23

files, or Instagram

2:25

on.

2:26

And then she saw

2:29

these wonderful guys from, probably

2:31

after the security guys, that

2:33

there had been a short incident that

2:35

was being passed on, but he

2:37

was not, and he threw her away.

2:41

I had written me over 400 emails

2:44

over the week of the month, including many

2:46

members of the month that I made a

2:50

week ago, and that threatened

2:52

to pull it in all your head. And so,

2:54

you know,

2:56

it was one

2:58

of several incidents that had

3:00

happened where you can hate,

3:02

including the guy who showed

3:04

up in LA at

3:08

a theater in Wilshire, where he was doing a rally,

3:10

and asked for me, and he was wearing a

3:13

US Marshall badge, along

3:15

with that, and a federal

3:17

ID, and he, these guys,

3:23

patted him because they thought the badge

3:25

was too shiny, and he asked to see

3:27

me,

3:29

and they pulled him aside, and

3:31

he had two shoulder holsters on, and they were

3:33

photo loaded with, each one with

3:35

a magazine, and the word was eight bullets.

3:38

He

3:39

did make a new picture,

3:41

and it loaded me in a big, little,

3:44

small picture magazine, and

3:46

I had knives and other weapons in

3:48

there, and

3:49

his house later

3:52

on, and he

3:54

gave me a, he had given a TikTok,

3:56

a real TikTok that said it wasn't from

3:58

back then. self-contact

4:01

your commander and people, etc. So

4:03

it was a... We

4:06

repeatedly asked these by the administration

4:09

for a secret service protection on the

4:11

only candidate to have a seat who

4:14

has asked for a present-day candidate who

4:16

has requested to keep a city protection

4:18

as they divide. Most

4:22

people get... They immediately have

4:24

to give it to you on a dedicated offer. Ultimately,

4:27

he's given an uncle-guided 500

4:29

days out that he had a paper

4:32

basis available through programs

4:37

before he had the primaries after

4:39

my father was killed. And

4:41

ever since, people are just...

4:44

Hopefully, I'm not giving...

4:47

I think Obama got it 500 days out and

4:49

now 365 days out. So

4:52

none of those kind of things you had

4:54

when they survived earlier in the

4:57

day. It's disturbing

4:58

to me because I'm watching a

5:01

politicization of the other

5:04

primaries. And

5:07

when my father got his justice office, the

5:09

first office president who brought

5:11

all the attorneys together and the one

5:13

thing he said to me is, we are not going to

5:16

do... We are not going to do anything against justice

5:18

in this country. And

5:20

I don't know if you're at this age or three, but

5:23

just when we held a conversation, I was

5:25

going to grab some phone calls and I'm going to be

5:27

treatment. And today, that is why I got all

5:29

this. This is Biden.

5:32

His essentially made father behind

5:35

him in the Oval Office. And

5:39

his family members get secret

5:42

service protection. And

5:44

he actually made all the

5:46

secret service protection. And

5:51

I don't like him. He's

5:55

a guy that I've gone home to. Here

5:58

he is after the Obama. I

6:01

imagine that as

6:04

a whole, they're doing it exactly what I think.

6:07

I think they understand

6:09

it very good. And

6:12

they probably do. So

6:15

that's why I'm now, I just want to say

6:17

this. I'm

6:29

involved in a number of lawsuits against

6:32

the administration. One

6:37

of those states is now in Texas Supreme

6:39

Court getting very surprised. And

6:42

that, and I'm not sure

6:45

about any case, but certainly this. We

6:49

got a lower court decision than Judge

6:51

Dolly the candidate said. And

6:54

the decision is that Americans

6:57

should have to read it and sit it to class because

6:59

it shows what happens when you close out of the

7:01

state of the state of the country. It

7:05

shows that when you go to the state

7:08

of the country, you have a body of the state

7:10

that you look to the right side of it. And

7:13

the argument of the White House

7:15

is early in Twitter and Facebook and Instagram,

7:17

and Twitter and Facebook. And I'm glad to remember

7:19

something that you saw last day

7:22

where it was like, I think it was a private

7:24

group of such a few, so many people,

7:27

all the special people, they could

7:29

not say their business would die.

7:33

The A-MOC, like Section

7:35

230A, and what we found from the political

7:38

and the community, and I think it's coming

7:40

in. There's a White House,

7:43

there's a national White House, Facebook,

7:45

and the other social media sites

7:47

for how important. Media,

7:50

FBI, who go

7:52

in directly and send in material.

7:55

And the FBI has gave access

7:57

to the CIA. DHS

8:01

to the ALS and to about 12

8:03

other federal agencies. So

8:06

you had, you know, listen, I've

8:08

been sent here for 18 years, but

8:11

not officially by the government. And,

8:15

you know, the new department, CNN,

8:17

CNN, all the way on, you can't get out

8:19

of the law, you have to go out there. That's

8:21

not, that's not the only person out

8:23

there. You ought to be impressed. You

8:27

can choose what defense, what's not to say. You

8:30

own a cable station. How

8:33

do you deal with it? You own a cable

8:35

station. You can decide what defense or

8:37

not to say. But on the

8:39

government, they didn't

8:42

follow you. And now,

8:44

they're a first amendment. Because

8:47

they think that we probably have a first amendment to

8:49

make sure that the government could not silence

8:52

its critic. And I

8:54

think it allows them that a

8:57

government in the religious world has license

8:59

for every apartment. Because,

9:02

you know, what the people think of the people

9:04

who are this, there's no end to the power that

9:08

you can then claim. So

9:14

I guess that's a great segue. And I know a

9:16

lot of people obviously want to talk about what's going on in Israel.

9:19

We'll get to that. But that's a great segue to

9:22

what has happened to the Democrat Party.

9:25

You know, the day that you announced, I

9:27

said on my show, and my audience tends to lean

9:30

a little more conservative now. I said to my

9:32

audience, by the end of this thing, I

9:34

don't know that he will be a Republican, but

9:36

he will not be a Democrat. And you are now

9:38

running independent. I

9:41

said it on my show. We'll send you the clip.

9:43

I said it the day you announced. It was obvious.

9:45

I had seen Dennis mention the YLF,

9:47

the left video that I did. I

9:50

had seen that path, even just from Chinese to

9:52

some of the people here this evening. They're

9:54

on that path as well. I think a lot

9:56

of people are awake. But what do

9:58

you think happened? really to

10:00

that party that has led to the radicalism

10:03

and or, I would argue, utter incompetence

10:06

that we're seeing right now. I

10:09

think a couple of things happened. One

10:11

is, the Democratic

10:14

Party

10:17

was interesting because the

10:20

Democratic Party I grew up in could

10:23

not... I watched this

10:25

evolution happen because I was involved

10:27

in the medical freedom issues and

10:30

that was really the spirit of what happened

10:32

to

10:32

the Democratic Party. The Democratic

10:35

Party

10:35

I grew up in always had trouble federalism

10:38

because the groups

10:41

of the fundwares were very limited. They

10:43

could fund really some trial lawyers, they

10:46

could fund a firm union.

10:50

But most of the big corporations

10:54

were off limits and I'm like, you

10:56

know, a really pure Democrat wouldn't take any

10:58

corporate money which meant a part

11:00

of an election. Meanwhile

11:03

the big money was going to

11:05

me in the oil industry,

11:08

the oil industry, the oil industry,

11:11

the food,

11:11

the ag industry was

11:14

mainly going to Republicans. There were a lot of Midwestern

11:17

ag, you know, ag state Democrats that

11:19

were taking money from

11:20

Cargill and Monsanto

11:23

and Smithfield and Purdue and both both

11:25

of them. The Democrats

11:28

wouldn't take pharmaceutical money. Another

11:32

one, in 2016 when they were

11:34

fighting and potential all of those hating

11:36

on the economic era. In

11:39

the years preceding, 2012,

11:40

20th century, the

11:43

Democrat, the

11:46

Obama administration had to make a deal with

11:48

the pharmaceutical companies. And what did

11:52

that Obamacare

11:53

throw? The farm is the biggest,

11:55

the body is sent out all along, the Democratic Party

11:58

all along. And

12:00

they are off the

12:01

church and what's the problem?

12:07

And the Obama administration had to make a deal

12:09

with them. And

12:13

the deal they made

12:14

is that we're going to do a Medicare

12:16

and we are going to buy your without

12:20

bargaining, we're going to buy everybody

12:22

a few drugs

12:23

and we're going to go really rich. And

12:26

we won't buy some property in it. And

12:29

so they got the money.

12:32

And that was

12:35

capable of the Democrats' influence

12:37

and they just started

12:39

making it. And then President Trump

12:42

ran it 2016

12:45

and President Trump said, on three

12:47

occasions while he went running, at

12:50

this time Democrats or Republicans were using the

12:52

list of our vaccines. And

12:55

you could go and talk to Democrats about it.

12:58

And President Trump on three occasions said that

13:00

he believed that vaccines turned out to mean

13:02

new people looked through it. And

13:04

the moderates, they told me, they still... We

13:07

went through it, and those

13:09

kids had gotten all done for nothing. So

13:11

he said that and Democrats,

13:14

that issue then became a revelation.

13:17

Democrats put that issue in the

13:19

same dumpster, the anti-pilots dumpster,

13:22

as climate denial and the other stuff, and

13:24

it was just part of Trump's insanity.

13:28

Well after that, after 2016,

13:30

you could not talk about that

13:32

issue, and

13:35

it became, you know, they

13:39

started protecting the pharmaceutical

13:41

company. And

13:43

then we saw this complete insanity,

13:46

which people called Trump, or

13:48

sorry, probably Trump's arrangement center,

13:51

which is Donald Trump began dictating

13:54

the entire platform to

13:56

the Democratic Party. So the only call for it is

13:59

always hate it.

13:59

NAFTA. Who

14:02

does Trump said, I don't like NAFTA, they

14:04

started loving it. As

14:07

soon as Trump said, I'm

14:09

anti-war, the Democrats

14:11

started loving war. And

14:14

it happened

14:16

with every issue. It was extraordinary. It was

14:18

just like the kids who made their parents

14:20

and become their parents because they hate them so much.

14:23

The Democratic Party became the

14:26

very thing that the tyrant and you

14:28

know, that served on the internet,

14:31

they were matted. Trump first.

14:32

They were making a Republican

14:35

secession, Boston maybe, and the United States

14:37

and the American nation. So all this weird

14:40

stuff, I mean that's the evolution that I watched

14:42

happen and I think a lot of it now is just

14:44

driven by

14:46

many things. You know people are asking me to talk

14:48

on party because they say it's dangerous. They keep

14:50

using that word. It's just dangerous. I've

14:52

never heard anybody say anything about

14:55

it. They say,

14:58

you want President Biden because

15:00

he has a vision to this

15:02

country and he has the vigor

15:04

and energy to really lead this

15:06

country in this critical period.

15:08

Nobody ever said that. They

15:11

say, you've got to vote for Biden or Trump

15:13

again. So it's all about using

15:16

here any

15:18

of the Democratic Party. The byline

15:20

of the Democratic Party was sent to Delaware,

15:23

the first of learning that the only

15:25

thing we have to feel is here itself. The

15:28

reason he said that in 1932 is

15:30

since he was watching

15:32

what was happening in Europe, which

15:34

was in Spain and Italy and Germany,

15:37

was that the authoritarian systems were emerging

15:40

and right wing was out there and left

15:42

wing was out there. And so

15:44

he came in and he promised

15:46

that they were all using here

15:49

and disabled the capacity to get

15:51

up and vote42 Well,

16:01

the truth is,

16:04

who's the crack of all oppression? As

16:07

long as we don't have a lot to fear, as we

16:09

get through it with our democracy and ties

16:11

with pre-war capitalism, talking is able

16:14

to save capitalism at that time. About

16:17

a third of the people in this country had a fast

16:20

system, about a third were dominant, and

16:22

only a third had a good. And everybody

16:25

felt the system had broken, and he

16:27

was able to prove our period. The

16:30

economy was in fantastic effect. The

16:33

Democratic Party was not the party of fear, now

16:35

it's the party of fear. We

16:37

sought to engulf it and we see it down in

16:39

action. So

16:43

speaking of those thirds, what does the coalition

16:46

look like to you that you could put together that

16:48

maybe

16:48

some of the other candidates can't? Taking

16:50

the disaffected

16:51

liberal, I suspect there's a bunch of them

16:54

here, taking the more moderate conservative. What

16:57

does that actually look like? What are the common

16:59

points that could lead you to

17:01

the White House? I

17:04

think people are asking who my constituency

17:07

is, and I always say

17:09

that it's

17:10

the Milgram experiment of constituency.

17:13

It's the 30%

17:15

of people who walked

17:17

out of the Milgram experiment, which is the Milgram

17:19

experiment, and they also, the CIA experiment,

17:22

it was done at the end,

17:24

and they were in an A-bar, and they

17:26

shot me. The

17:28

Soviets were going to shot me

17:31

through the wall at the top of the island,

17:33

and that's where I was considered a third of the world. He

17:37

was screaming and shouting and struggling

17:39

and pleading, and they turned it on. The

17:47

people were crying, and they so said

17:49

they shot me there, and he was wearing a small,

17:52

a lab coat, a doctor,

17:54

all these acoustics of the anxiety, and

17:57

he was also of the local authorities.

18:01

And so they were doing what he said, and 67% of

18:03

them ended up putting a George

18:06

Lucas at the polls. There

18:08

was more potentially evil. And

18:11

so it was out, and what program

18:14

concluded is they were people

18:17

and then 42 by

18:21

a person of a story called,

18:24

and the good result was that 33% of them had an audience.

18:34

And those were the people who

18:36

did not have the benefit

18:38

of having the benefit of being disabled. And

18:41

I would say that would include almost everybody

18:44

in the school. And

19:15

the reason was because of the first time I had

19:17

an inside meeting with George Lucas. All

19:21

of them had a false side to the past meeting,

19:23

and none of them had to be disabled.

19:26

And I see myself as

19:28

a, as my single king was actually some

19:31

heart of the old character. And we were out

19:33

of the actual heart of the old character. And

19:35

it was just a beautiful year that we were

19:38

about the same day. So,

19:40

you know, experts, you

19:43

can't trust the experts. In a democracy,

19:45

you know, one of

19:47

the big gains of a democracy

19:50

is that you actually do

19:53

have a duty to maintain a posture

19:55

of few opposition towards firms on the floor. That

19:59

was also true.

19:59

question everything. And

20:03

so I took the people

20:04

that I was involved in, you know, false cause.

20:07

On my job, a group of those,

20:10

these are people that people were questioning,

20:12

you know, everything I did this morning.

20:16

The Harvey ours only came out this week, and

20:18

they were 20%. And

20:20

what is it that people that

20:24

are joining us, the

20:26

people who are watching and seeing

20:30

and thinking. If you

20:32

watch, the only thing that you

20:34

watch is CNN and MSNBC and the New York Times.

20:38

If I read the article,

20:40

if I was in that information bubble,

20:42

I would have a very low opinion on myself.

20:45

And so they were the three and completely

20:48

did it to a very poor category. What

20:51

we find is that when we can get

20:53

them to listen to a podcast,

20:56

that within 10 minutes, most of them are concerned.

20:59

And they start thinking, you know, what are the different

21:01

things in the game? I

21:04

go in and do this

21:06

with this particular example of

21:08

the case, and I'm going off with

21:10

a lot of certain thoughts. So let's talk

21:13

about

21:15

the thing that's obviously

21:18

on everyone's mind, what's happening in Israel.

21:21

But I thought maybe before we do the macro, sort of political

21:23

version of that, we can maybe talk about

21:25

how people are seeing here in America, because there

21:28

really is a new level

21:30

of fear.

21:31

And you addressed fear earlier. We're

21:33

seeing what's happening on the college campuses. We're

21:35

seeing the radicalism within

21:37

the Democrat Party with

21:40

the eight members who I call the Hamas

21:42

caucus. What

21:46

do you think is happening here in America connected

21:49

to what's going on in the Middle East? And then we can talk about

21:51

it sort of politically, geopolitically. Well,

21:54

I mean, I think there's this insanity going on on

21:56

the campuses that, you know, was already...

22:00

And what Dennis had in the left wing

22:02

of the Democratic Party, where there's, um,

22:04

where

22:06

they just adopted

22:09

this false narrative about Israel,

22:11

about the entire history of Israel, where

22:13

people, and I see,

22:18

I'm shocked to see, because my kids

22:20

are very well educated, and they,

22:23

I'd say most of their friends are Jewish,

22:26

and even with their Jewish friends,

22:28

there is this kind of, um,

22:32

there's ignorance about, you

22:34

know, mainstream Israel, and they all

22:37

adopted this,

22:39

uh, narrative that Israel

22:42

is a white oppressor nation

22:44

that was dropped down on these, you know,

22:46

indigenous Palestinians,

22:48

and has been dominated them

22:50

in the land. And,

22:53

as an apartheid state, and,

22:55

um, and, um, and, you

22:57

know, it's, you know, I think that

23:03

one of my jobs is to, is to

23:05

make them appropriate for Israel, and I think it's

23:07

an easy case to make.

23:10

Um, and, you know, I was talking to an

23:13

interview, and, and, and, and, and, and,

23:15

and, um, Jesus,

23:17

he was an IPL clerk

23:18

he came before he died.

23:20

Here's a, there's a really

23:22

good speech that was done

23:24

by Prince Banda, which I urge

23:26

you all to get ahold of, and it was done in

23:29

2020, and at that point the Prince Banda

23:31

Ah-Ah was that person's yesterday,

23:34

and it was the only time of the

23:36

day before he was, uh, as well as the time. Prince

23:40

Banda is the successor of

23:42

Prince Twinkie in Washington,

23:45

and his body print, who took over as

23:47

Chief of the Intelligence Agency,

23:50

also a vast United States, and he,

23:52

we talked a lot about this, about the history

23:54

of Palestine. They're

23:56

very pro-Palestinian, but they

23:58

also are very, about

24:00

what the issue is. And

24:03

they understand and are goes

24:05

through this history that the Palestinians,

24:08

he says, and this is

24:10

what I think people are asking to say

24:12

because anybody's faith is primary narrative

24:16

that if

24:16

they just really came from how it came from

24:18

here and I think we are in a world

24:22

of guilty of all the

24:24

things that are wrong with God. That

24:28

God is just a open air demon

24:31

because

24:31

he's real nature. And

24:33

nobody understands the history of God,

24:36

it's just real. You know,

24:39

in 2006, 2005, and in Gaza, and I think of one

24:41

Gaza, they

24:45

tried to take the Egyptians and come into

24:47

it.

24:48

And the decision was taken. Nobody

24:52

complained in the Gaza for 20 years

24:54

when Gaza was for the Egypt. Nobody

24:56

wanted to balance anything. And

24:59

when, and, and, and Charon

25:03

gave it in the penitent. At

25:05

that time, Shimon Parris said, we want

25:07

to help Gaza. We want to turn

25:09

it into the Singapore of the West.

25:13

We

25:13

will pay, Israel will pay to

25:15

develop a port of Gaza. The

25:18

greatest port in the Caribbean.

25:20

They gave Israel donated 3,000

25:23

greenhouses that were paid to

25:25

be our greenhouses to make Gaza

25:27

sufficient food. Gaza

25:30

became the greatest recipient

25:32

of international aid of any

25:35

people in the world. Getting to any

25:37

people and instead of being a part

25:40

of our plan, they get there in 2006

25:42

through,

25:44

and I've never seen a very easy one, even

25:46

after the three of them from Jerusalem. And

25:48

we don't want to have this. The only

25:50

thing Israel is dirty and

25:53

they smash all the coal houses. They reject

25:55

the bodies of the world. It's

25:57

taken almost every time in the world. and

26:00

they turned it

26:02

into an used to fly weapon instead

26:05

of making it a better thing for people. And

26:08

of course, we really can't put up a plan.

26:11

It has a 30,000 rockets and motors

26:14

in it, and it has 30,000. There's

26:20

no country in the world that

26:22

would put up with that. And that's

26:24

a solution target. And

26:26

imagine if two of

26:29

us sent one missile on

26:31

Miami. How long

26:33

would it take us before we occupied

26:36

the full island? It would

26:38

be a good day. So,

26:41

odd days. And

26:44

then they do this raid. I mean,

26:46

if you leave that, Americans can't

26:48

even remember what happened to us on 9-11. We

26:52

got ahead and we immediately went over

26:54

and found a guy who did it in Torporia.

26:58

And of course Israel has an absolute

27:00

right to go into Gaza, and

27:03

they have a moral obligation to protect their

27:05

people, like any country in the world

27:08

has that moral obligation, the number one moral

27:10

obligation. Now,

27:13

I hope they won't

27:15

go into Gaza,

27:16

and for one, for a number

27:18

of reasons. One, I

27:20

think it will be a terrible battle, and

27:23

the more rubble I think it will be like Solengrad.

27:26

And, you know, as guys in all of Hamas, fight's

27:29

dirty. It's like this person

27:31

that's making civilian-simmons shields. They're

27:33

going to have their fighters hanging out in the

27:35

tunnels. The hostages are going to be in the tunnels.

27:39

And there's wormholes all over the place,

27:41

and rabbit holes when they can come up and fight.

27:44

And it's like Solengrad. The more

27:46

rubble it was, the easier it

27:48

was for the resistance to operate. So

27:50

I think a lot of Israeli kids are going to die,

27:52

you know, potentially tens of thousands

27:54

of them. And

27:56

the

27:56

publicity

27:59

around the very end.

27:59

world is going to amplify

28:02

all these beliefs of anti-Semitism that are

28:04

happening now all over the world. I

28:08

think the saddest part of this was

28:10

the, let's

28:10

see, you

28:13

know, what that model did

28:15

was one point one point that $3.00 in

28:18

feature

28:18

mods which really

28:21

injured the politics for this single-headed

28:24

man. So it was a bit

28:26

more proof there to

28:28

have this pure case which I think

28:31

we had prior to that. And

28:34

also, I know we're under

28:37

the political war. We did

28:39

this. It's very very, you

28:42

know, Lebanon could come in here

28:45

and Egypt already

28:47

has 350,000 troops staged to come in

28:49

there threatening to Turkey. Cece

28:51

is saying that he's going to come

28:53

in.

28:55

And if that happens, Russia

28:57

almost certainly can. We can easily

28:59

sleepwalk into a world of Muslims. And,

29:02

you know, the United States, the

29:04

people who are running are coming now. I don't think

29:06

we can. I think it's all been able

29:09

hangs. It's worth it.

29:11

I don't think any of them have a healthy

29:13

fear of the

29:14

good world. We also

29:16

have the diminished army. And, you know,

29:18

we're fighting a two-time war. And

29:22

it's going to be tempting

29:24

to go through the

29:27

punchline to the endgame because

29:29

we have this, you know, army

29:31

is not a cold war.

29:34

So there's this whole situation here

29:36

in Israel that had to be, you know, they've

29:38

been doing police actions and they were

29:40

real fighting. And

29:43

as our punches have been

29:45

very long, it's not the

29:47

kind of nice, thin punches that they were fighting.

29:50

And, you know, it was the 67

29:52

and on the 73, all these other, you know,

29:55

I think it's a very, very different

29:57

question

29:57

for those fighting now.

30:00

So I'm very worried and I

30:02

completely keep me off the latest

30:04

site and I work in the White House.

30:08

I would be reaching out to President

30:10

Sanders and his team and

30:13

I would reject Putin. I

30:15

would reach out to other countries and say,

30:17

how do we make this not

30:20

only with the United States and the Russians

30:22

with a thousand more nuclear weapons than we do?

30:26

And much better nuclear weapons than we do. I have

30:28

defensive weapons which we don't know how they

30:30

can shoot down our weapons with a hard touch

30:33

in a day and day. They

30:36

have a defensive strategy. They

30:38

know how to shoot down our stuff. The

30:43

project only has one game around the world.

30:45

It has one basis here and

30:48

China has one and a half basis. And

30:51

also then you get a notification

30:53

of full-state industries and you have the perfect

30:55

time to try to develop a timeline. And

30:58

we cannot live without that timeline. I

31:01

want to make the micro-process

31:04

team to be a friendly smart

31:06

US weapon. I think this one has some

31:08

every...all of our weapons

31:11

needs these activities. It

31:14

doesn't mean we can't live without

31:16

some threats that are only made in Taiwan.

31:20

It's like the oil of the past, it's

31:24

kind of a hold of our resources.

31:26

We simply need a little help from that. And

31:32

it's a perfect time for them to go to Taiwan

31:34

and learn about the principles of oil. So I have

31:36

all these scenarios going on. And

31:40

I had that job, what I would be doing... I

31:42

don't think the people who are in that job now

31:44

are in it.

31:46

And

31:48

that gets really scary now. I

31:51

just want to say one last thing. There's

31:54

a Van D'Ar speech which I urge

31:56

you

31:56

to read. He

31:59

talks about it. that

32:02

this long history going back to 1947

32:04

and into the Grand Mokhi

32:07

of Jerusalem, who

32:11

was working with Hitler on the

32:14

final solution, and

32:17

that in 1937 they were offered a

32:20

two-state creation, 47 are offered a two-state

32:22

creation, 67 are offered a two-state

32:25

solution, and they come up with

32:27

all the subconscious, come up with the three nodes,

32:30

peace, negotiation, or recognition.

32:34

And in 1984 they then offered

32:36

a two-state solution, and

32:38

Gerstner and 2001, the province and David

32:41

Corbs, Ayla Barak, offered hard-paying

32:44

discussions, including all complete

32:46

returns to the 67 boundaries, accepted 3%

32:50

of the West Bank, and given 3%

32:52

of the Israel land. Barak

32:55

didn't do it, didn't want to do it, nobody

32:57

in Israel did, Clinton twisted

33:00

his arms, made him do it, and they

33:02

offered it to him. And he,

33:04

Yasser Arafat, walked

33:07

away from that without a cover-up. And, yes,

33:09

and the West, the same kind of situation

33:12

that Arafat had,

33:16

and he goes

33:18

through, his descriptions of Arafat

33:21

are really interesting

33:23

and insane. And

33:25

he goes through,

33:27

he goes through, he

33:30

says to Arafat at that time, he says, you

33:32

know, the deal you got in Arafat was not

33:35

as near as good as it did, often

33:37

through that decade of 2001. He

33:40

wasn't, he was very

33:43

anxious, he was very anxious

33:45

on his way out of it. And

33:48

Arafat

33:48

said that deal was ten

33:50

times better than what he's designed. And,

33:53

and, and, and I was just like, why are

33:55

you taking this? Because my

33:58

own people would have killed me if I didn't. The

34:00

only solution is the extermination

34:03

of every pill and obliteration

34:05

of Israel. And that is to anybody

34:08

like Hamas in its charter.

34:11

Because negotiations

34:13

are fruitless, anybody who

34:15

gains them should be guilty. It's

34:18

a tragedy. You are to pay a inflam

34:20

to negotiate. So

34:22

how do you have a negotiation partner? How

34:25

do you know the kids at Harvard, what

34:27

do they think that, you know, what,

34:31

here's what I always say, if you want to

34:33

stay calm, it

34:35

is a good technique for

34:37

staying calm if you're in an argument

34:40

about Palestine.

34:41

Ask the person

34:44

what do the Palestinians want?

34:48

They want an extension of the government's

34:50

mayhem, which are apartheid

34:55

governments. Let's

34:57

use them to write to run

34:59

for office in Gaza.

35:00

And to infiltrate the

35:03

region's union in the river. And

35:05

you also talked about brutal apartheid regimes. Those

35:13

countries are, as you know, are

35:15

identified

35:15

as public in their own populations. What's

35:19

it about

35:20

the new ones, if they want a democracy? No.

35:23

There's better than any blend by

35:25

ethnosis. There's no way one of us is a democracy.

35:28

And what do you say to the nation? Hey,

35:30

hey, hey, maybe we can answer a question.

35:33

The question is, the answer to it is,

35:35

they want to eliminate every Jew. And

35:39

they want to obliterate Israel. And it's been

35:41

the same answer since 1937, 1938. It's

35:46

always been consistent. If

35:49

we own the land, if we own

35:51

the land, the Quran, noted

35:54

an offense against Allah,

35:57

the good of land that was once caused by Israel,

36:00

and the Let it App embodied

36:02

that you get up and are

36:17

you knowing TV at night from him

36:21

at opportunity angles if

36:24

it was all throw reduced

36:58

there's no end to that in every case

37:01

it's almost all the best work

37:04

when they gave it away, when they divided up the

37:07

police came in and they interviewed

37:09

the grandpa and they said, can

37:12

you run with Jews? and

37:14

he said no,

37:15

he said we'll exterminate them he's

37:18

very faint about it and

37:21

they said the only thing that we can do is

37:23

have two states and so we'll take the parts

37:25

and tell it that our majority

37:27

Jewish people in those recruits will take

37:29

the parts and then the carry out will disappear

37:32

they were both images that used in their

37:34

continued speech in 3700 years the

37:38

Arabs mainly arrived in East

37:40

Libya, sent me in the Middle

37:43

East, they returned from the Middle East to

37:45

the Jews, they were classified by

37:48

the British oil industry and all

37:50

of that was in any state of the world they looked

37:52

at their names, their Egyptian names, their Moroccan

37:55

names so

37:57

they all arrived around the same time

38:01

science professor. But

38:03

there was a majority of each. It had nothing to

38:05

do with it. It was there. It was small.

38:07

That's what they did with it. It had to

38:09

be an automatic case. They said, if I had

38:11

the automatic case, there is no automatic case. I

38:14

had to put a giver to the

38:16

indigenous people. And

38:20

if

38:20

I was fine, there would do growth. I'd edit

38:22

the name.

38:24

Isn't it refreshing hearing a politician

38:26

who actually knows history and

38:29

dates

38:29

and morality and geography? You

38:33

know, I always play clips of

38:35

all the politicians on my show, obviously, and I always

38:37

find in a few moments that I can get it with

38:39

you and I can get it with the salthus. Where it's like,

38:42

oh, there's somebody that's telling the truth.

38:44

And when you hear the truth, you're

38:46

not contorted. You're not twisted.

38:47

It's easy to hear the truth. Everything

38:50

you just said there was cruel, unfortunately, with

38:53

the algorithms of TikTok and everything else. They

38:55

brainwashed the generation not to believe

38:58

any of that. But what if it makes

39:00

me think, as you were talking about the history, because

39:02

I don't know how many people we can win over in history. Maybe

39:04

there's something

39:05

else we can win over. Can you

39:07

talk about why you think it

39:09

matters? Israel may matter

39:11

to some of these people who are Jewish here,

39:14

but why does it matter for America and Americans? Because

39:17

I also see another version right

39:19

now of sort of the libertarian

39:21

version of, oh, just

39:22

forget that land, forget all that.

39:24

It has nothing to do with America. I personally

39:27

see it very differently. What do you think about that? I

39:29

mean,

39:30

you know, but my philosophy with

39:32

America is that we need to unravel

39:34

the empire. So

39:36

we have 800 bases abroad.

39:38

We pay 10 times for our military.

39:41

We pay more for our military than the next 10

39:43

nations combined. Oh,

39:47

you know, we can

39:49

cut our military expenditure in half. It's

39:53

now 1.3 trillion if you include

39:56

the national security

39:58

of the world.

39:59

USAID

40:04

and the national data to the policies

40:06

which I will, my uncle started them,

40:08

I will end them because they are completely

40:11

perverted what they have and what they've got.

40:14

I don't do anything good for our country. I'm going

40:16

to cut those

40:19

edges substantially, but under 500

40:21

billion, which is the same that it was when

40:24

under 100,000, when I was

40:26

an hour and 60,000 was in there. And

40:30

what we need to do is arm ourselves

40:32

to teeth and arms, so we

40:34

can protect our borders, make ourselves do what we

40:36

can to ever we can do, and then

40:38

protect the ceilings, protect the

40:41

neutral areas like the Arctic, and

40:43

make sure that we have the

40:46

reasons for the principles of us, including

40:49

the oil resources that are critical to the

40:51

world, that we have a strike

40:53

capacity to make sure that the evidence becomes

40:55

false.

40:57

And Israel is critical,

40:59

and the reason is critical is because the bulwark

41:01

for us in the Middle East, it's almost

41:03

like an aircraft carrier in the Middle East, it's our

41:06

oldest ally, our ally for 75 years. It

41:10

has been an incredible ally for us

41:13

in terms of the technology exchange,

41:17

and building the eyes of which we paid

41:19

a lot for has also taught

41:21

us enormously about how to defend

41:24

ourselves and all the business.

41:26

So those military

41:28

expenditures

41:32

are all going 75% of it

41:34

goes to the US under the

41:36

agreement of the MOA.

41:39

But if you look

41:41

at what's happening in the Middle East now, Iran

41:44

is now the closest

41:46

ally to Iran or Russia and China.

41:50

Iran also controls all Venezuela's

41:52

oil. In Bala,

41:54

it is in Venezuela. They

41:57

have popped up the material machine.

42:00

And so they control that oil supply.

42:04

Brick, Saudi Arabia,

42:06

South, and Jordan, Turkey.

42:08

Those countries will control 90% of

42:11

the oil in the world. It is

42:13

real good to be the

42:16

fashion of the Middle East, which is our

42:18

investments,

42:18

our

42:20

presence, our beach ahead of the Middle East. And

42:23

it gives us, it gives us ears

42:25

and eyes in the Middle East. It

42:27

gives us intelligence. It gives us the

42:29

capacity to

42:31

get

42:33

through a full comparison.

42:35

It is real good to hear Russia

42:38

try to open key controls for the Middle East. They

42:40

control 90% of the oil supply. And

42:43

that would be kind of a business for US

42:45

actions. That would be a bad

42:48

business. Why don't

42:50

we get one more topic, and then I think we're going to take a couple

42:52

questions from you guys. You mentioned a little

42:54

bit in your

42:54

talk about big tech, and you've been fighting

42:57

big tech as hard as anybody

42:58

for quite some time.

43:00

Do you ever feel that we're

43:02

too deep in it now in some ways

43:05

to reverse some of the effect

43:07

of the censorship and what we learned

43:09

from the Twitter files and the

43:12

algorithmic tricks that we know of, but as I always say, I'm

43:15

more worried about the ones that I don't know of and

43:17

how they might be shadow banning you at this very moment and

43:20

how much the agencies are still

43:22

probably entangled, and even you, Arne said,

43:24

he thinks he might have holes still at Twitter

43:27

even now. Do you

43:29

really see a way

43:30

out of that juggernaut problem? I

43:34

think it's very dangerous. We

43:37

can't really afford to be at war right now

43:39

with Russia and these

43:41

kind of conflicts with China, and even Iran.

43:44

We need to be sitting down with

43:47

each other and figuring out how to control

43:49

AI. We cannot

43:52

chase AI out of this country. We cannot

43:55

make this an all-sport habit.

43:59

is terrifying.

44:03

We better have it better here than anybody

44:05

else if we want to protect our national security

44:07

because we don't. It wouldn't be owned by

44:09

somebody else. Whoever controls that super intelligence

44:12

is going to control the world and humanity may not

44:15

be able to control

44:18

so long. We have this kind of turnkey totalitarianism

44:21

that is waiting there in the wings where if they

44:23

give off a bad

44:24

picture to go over, you know,

44:26

the others are able to just

44:30

follow you as it was even

44:32

though you're

44:32

in a secure conversation

44:34

to record. I think there's everything

44:37

about you. I think all

44:39

of us have this experience where we talk to my

44:43

wife and say that we need a new mattress and both

44:45

of us got, you know, indebted pay and

44:47

both of us got three mattress mats on our

44:49

phones at the next point. So it's

44:51

not just a mattress company. It's

44:55

like NSA. We've sorted all these

44:57

conversations. It is terrifying but

45:00

I think there are only, if he gets better people on

45:02

our own like you are, he's a game

45:05

man. And we can do, at

45:07

least mitigate the intrusive

45:10

impact of the controlling capacity of

45:14

this new surveillance technology. I had

45:16

dinner with the testors and I asked

45:19

them that very

45:20

question. Well

45:22

how would you control it? He said, you need to

45:25

have absolutely

45:26

transparent algorithms

45:31

and we need to give people a choice about what

45:33

kind of, what their algorithm is and

45:35

make it completely transparent. So if

45:38

you want to have a republican

45:41

algorithm, you can

45:43

have that. If you want to have a democratic algorithm,

45:45

you choose it yourself. If

45:48

you want to have an algorithm

45:50

that just is neutral and produces that,

45:53

like you know the most red news or science

45:55

news, whatever.

45:57

You choose it and you know what it says.

45:59

and you know it's going to end as a much more

46:02

difficult thing if you are a

46:04

part of the particular agenda. We're

46:06

now all this manipulatory. We're all

46:08

this manipulatory. It's an algorithm that we don't

46:10

understand. And

46:14

right now the algorithms have various

46:18

objectives. They have an agenda.

46:21

And the agenda

46:22

may be just to keep you interested,

46:25

to keep your eyeballs in the side. That's

46:27

a lead minister agenda. I think it's

46:29

very sinister. But

46:31

as we know, the way that you keep people

46:34

on the side

46:35

is by reinforcing their

46:38

biases

46:38

and their prejudices. And that

46:41

amplifies the polarization that is now

46:43

tearing our country apart. If

46:46

you and I are living right next door to each other and

46:48

you're a Republican and I'm a Democrat, we

46:51

both have to send a motion on Google. We're going

46:53

to get entirely different results. The

46:55

Google algorithm is sending

46:58

us things that it thinks are going to

47:00

hold us on the side. And

47:02

as it turns out, people

47:05

like creating things that reinforce

47:07

their existing prejudices

47:08

and their existing biases,

47:10

their existing worlds. And

47:14

so, and then you've

47:16

got all these other people, intelligence

47:18

agencies, and they're now designing the algorithms that

47:21

are manipulating

47:22

us. And

47:24

I'm saying, you can't see this information. We don't

47:26

want you to hear. We want

47:28

you to believe that. I'll be believing

47:31

it.

47:32

So the, Dorothy said,

47:34

the best solution to

47:36

that is to have us able to choose

47:39

our

47:39

own algorithms. And that way, we

47:41

know how we're being manipulated

47:42

and we're going to create ourselves organic

47:45

ones that are very good and effective.

47:48

And I said, that's a brilliant solution. And I told you, how powerful

47:51

these are, so that's

47:53

a bad time for people to know. Well,

48:00

anyway, if I get in there, I'm going to do

48:02

that stuff.