Podchaser Logo
Home
Prof G Markets: Bob Iger’s Bad Day, Trump Media’s Fraudulent Auditor, and Uber’s Venture Investments

Prof G Markets: Bob Iger’s Bad Day, Trump Media’s Fraudulent Auditor, and Uber’s Venture Investments

Released Monday, 13th May 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Prof G Markets: Bob Iger’s Bad Day, Trump Media’s Fraudulent Auditor, and Uber’s Venture Investments

Prof G Markets: Bob Iger’s Bad Day, Trump Media’s Fraudulent Auditor, and Uber’s Venture Investments

Prof G Markets: Bob Iger’s Bad Day, Trump Media’s Fraudulent Auditor, and Uber’s Venture Investments

Prof G Markets: Bob Iger’s Bad Day, Trump Media’s Fraudulent Auditor, and Uber’s Venture Investments

Monday, 13th May 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:00

Support of the show comes from Apple last

0:03

year with a news story about a I

0:05

come out seemingly every guy you can be

0:07

hard to know exactly what it means for

0:09

you and your new job and last and

0:12

thinks there's a lot to be excited about

0:14

and the Ai powered future even right now

0:16

And lashings, A I powered software can help

0:18

you boost productivity by eliminating menial tasks, generating

0:21

insights, and helping you find information about projects,

0:23

policies and processes no matter if your team

0:25

of to or two million or if you're

0:27

around the quarter or on another continent. And

0:30

last in Software keeps everyone connected

0:32

and living together as one toward

0:34

shared goals. Learn how to unleash

0:36

the potential of your team. Added

0:38

Last and.com that's a T L

0:40

A S as I am got

0:42

Tom at Last in. This.

0:50

Week's number four hundred and sixty one

0:52

Fi that's the record French baker said

0:55

for the world long. as big a

0:57

true story after World War Two different

0:59

for so embarrassed or thought about changing

1:01

the name of their country. Unfortunately Iran

1:03

was already taken Mats not fair. Use.

1:16

As read to scream Go Go Go

1:19

and I remember the wrong Podcast and

1:21

welcome to Property Markets Today. You.

1:23

Know they don't masturbate in France.

1:25

Daves shock off ad space Jag

1:27

as I better as good. Yeah

1:30

Eric I welcome to Property Market

1:32

Today We're discussing streaming earnings Trump's

1:34

media's auditing firm and robbers huge

1:36

loss Here at the news is

1:38

proxy media analyst add else and

1:41

add what is the good? What

1:43

are you basking in the glow

1:45

of Thirty Four? That's actually the

1:47

number we should had property as

1:50

of today. The property pod is

1:52

the thirty. Fourth most downloaded podcast

1:54

in the world where number

1:56

thirty four add property markets

1:58

are new podcast. And

2:01

we haven't even released our first episode. All we have as

2:03

a trailer is number 21 in the world. So

2:06

I think we're even better than that. Where'd

2:08

you get that 34 number from? I

2:10

use Chartable to think about just not

2:12

to diminish our achievement here, but I

2:14

think it's more about momentum than actual

2:16

downloads. That's probably right. And because,

2:19

I don't know if you know about this, Ed,

2:21

but I was actually at TED last week

2:24

where I gave what Chris Anderson described

2:27

as a scorching talk. But

2:30

since then, and since my appearance on, what's the name

2:32

of that show? Bill

2:34

Maher. Since I was on that, we have everything

2:37

as kind of like the flywheel is flying,

2:39

Ed. You're welcome. But

2:42

Prof G Markets is doing better than the Prof G

2:44

Pod, so I'm trying to think what the difference is.

2:46

I don't get that. How'd that happen?

2:48

We haven't had an episode yet. Yeah, it must be

2:50

something. I can't tell what it is, but it feels

2:53

like it must be me, right? We sexted up with

2:55

young Ed Elson. All right, Ed, enough of that. Get

2:57

to the news. I will do that. I

2:59

just want to remind everyone, if you haven't done so yet,

3:01

please go subscribe to Prof G Markets. It's

3:03

our separate channel. It's overtaking the Prof

3:05

G Pod, so please go subscribe.

3:09

Okay, let's start with our weekly review of Market Vitals. The

3:12

S&P 500 climbed. The

3:19

dollar was stable. Bitcoin declined. And the

3:22

yield on Tenure Treasury slumped, shifting

3:24

to the headlines. Microsoft is

3:26

investing more than $3 billion to

3:28

build AI infrastructure in Wisconsin. The

3:31

money will go towards a new data center

3:33

and training programs focused on AI manufacturing. Microsoft

3:35

said the new location would create more than

3:37

4,000 construction and data

3:39

center jobs. FDX's lawyers

3:41

announced that its creditors will receive all

3:43

of the money they lost plus interest.

3:46

Payouts will amount to 118% of

3:48

creditors' assets based on their November

3:50

2022 value when

3:53

the company filed for bankruptcy. In

3:55

its first earnings report as a public company, Reddit

3:58

reported a revenue increase of $14 88%

4:00

from last year and a 37% increase

4:02

in daily active users. That beat analyst

4:05

expectations. However, Reddit has yet to turn

4:07

a profit, reporting a net loss of

4:09

$575 million. Shares popped

4:12

as much as 15%. Airbnb

4:15

reported first quarter revenue that exceeded

4:17

analyst expectations, growing 18% year

4:20

over year. The stocks fell the most in

4:22

a year, however, after reporting lower than expected

4:24

revenue guidance for the second quarter. The

4:27

company is expecting international events like the Summer

4:29

Olympics to reaccelerate revenue growth and travel demand

4:31

in the second half of the year. And

4:34

finally, TikTok is suing the US government

4:36

over claims that the fourth sale or

4:39

ban violates the First Amendment. The company

4:41

is arguing that the government's national security

4:43

concerns are not a sufficient reason to

4:45

restrict free speech. The legal proceedings will

4:47

delay the timeline on the ban, meaning

4:49

it could take years to go into

4:52

effect. Scott, your thoughts? A lot

4:54

here, so let's start with Microsoft. It's

4:56

just staggering. The Infrastructure

4:58

Act at the

5:01

US government, largest economic

5:03

power in history, $1.2 trillion. Just the three or

5:06

four companies we talked about invested $32 billion

5:09

or an annual run rate of $120 billion.

5:12

So the Infrastructure Act is supposed to take place, I

5:15

think that's spending over probably the better part of a

5:17

decade. So you could argue that these

5:19

companies are kind of, at least

5:21

right now, and granted it won't

5:23

continue this way, but these companies

5:25

are essentially spending almost on pace

5:28

with the government is spending to try and

5:31

reinvigorate and upgrade America. It's

5:33

just staggering how much money these folks are spending

5:35

on. And it was this long winded way of

5:37

saying, it'd be very interesting to try and figure

5:39

out are there companies that make generators

5:42

that are especially good at cooling

5:44

data centers or specializing

5:46

in construction or selling

5:48

materials into the

5:51

types of infrastructure they're going to be

5:53

building? Because the amount of investment here,

5:55

I mean, it's just staggering.

5:57

What are your thoughts? Yeah, I just think it's fascinating. how

6:00

all of these big tech companies, which historically

6:03

we thought of as very different.

6:05

Amazon is e-commerce, Google search, Microsoft

6:08

is PCs. They're all basically turning into

6:10

the same company now. That

6:12

is, they're all Cloud service providers.

6:14

They all are building data centers and

6:17

they rent those data centers out to

6:19

smaller Internet companies. The

6:21

greatest evidence of that is just the

6:23

operating income of these companies. So just

6:26

as an example, 45

6:28

percent of Microsoft's business today, as

6:30

measured by operating income, is Cloud.

6:33

For Amazon, that number is 60 percent. It

6:37

feels like once you reach this level of scale,

6:40

like these companies have, it's almost

6:42

like the mission changes. The mission

6:45

today isn't, okay, we're going to

6:47

innovate, we're going to build great products. The mission is

6:50

we just need to own the rails. You

6:52

look at the history of markets and it feels

6:54

like exactly as you've said, that's always been true.

6:57

The largest companies have always been the ones that

6:59

have owned the rails, whether that means literally the

7:01

railroad, i.e. US Steel. But

7:05

in this case, I think they've identified that

7:07

owning the rails means we have to supply

7:09

and control the computing power.

7:12

I think that's why we're seeing all

7:14

of these massive tech companies morphing into

7:16

basically the same company. They want to

7:18

be the next US Steel, the next

7:20

Standard Oil of the next generation. So

7:23

they're just trying to own all of the

7:25

computing and processing power in America. The hard

7:27

part is, unless you

7:29

have the capital to invest, not

7:33

tens or hundreds of millions, not even billions,

7:35

but unless you have the capital to speculatively

7:39

invest tens of billions of

7:41

dollars, you can't play

7:43

in this. It's almost like there's

7:45

just no matter how bad you want to produce

7:47

or be an energy producer, it's very hard for

7:49

Japan in the 70s and 80s. They

7:52

just don't have the natural resources. You

7:54

have to sit on top of a sea

7:56

of oil somewhere. These guys essentially

7:58

sit on top of oil somewhere. on a sea of oil in

8:00

the form of intellectual property. They're very

8:03

smart. They have roots in cloud and AI,

8:05

and they sit on a reservoir

8:07

of capital. What I don't get is,

8:09

I was thinking about this, the

8:12

kingdom desperately wants to transition away from

8:14

fossil fuels to more of a services

8:16

or tech or tourism-based economy. I

8:19

would have thought that they would be the

8:21

second biggest investor behind Microsoft and AI, and be

8:23

trying to figure out a way to go all

8:25

in on tomorrow's energy,

8:27

and that is compute. Because not

8:30

only is the US currently the

8:32

biggest energy provider of traditional fossil

8:34

fuel and also renewable

8:37

energy in

8:39

the world, we're about to become

8:41

the largest producer by far of

8:44

the new form of energy, and that is compute. So

8:47

while we hate each other, and we

8:50

might tear each other apart from inside,

8:53

externally, in terms of our ability to produce

8:55

economic value, which unfortunately would be sequestered to

8:57

a smaller and smaller group of firms and

8:59

people, the US, it just strikes me at

9:01

an objective analysis when you zoom back and

9:03

look at the earth. The US is pulling

9:05

away from everybody. That's how I see it.

9:07

I think this has really

9:10

big implications geopolitically. I think it's fascinating

9:12

that these companies have this kind of

9:14

capital to make this type of forward-leaning

9:17

investment. And in general, where

9:20

I see, I'm almost saying, what's the investment opportunity?

9:22

I would want to look at everything that's

9:25

required to build a data

9:27

center and what companies sell

9:29

those products, what companies have

9:32

some sort of differentiation or distribution or

9:34

intellectual property or trademarks around that type

9:36

of product and find out if

9:38

they're public company. FTX,

9:40

well, and just the context, which is

9:42

you bought a bunch of FTX claims

9:45

ages ago. You basically called this, that you

9:47

thought that, I don't

9:49

think you expected 118 cents on the dollar, but

9:52

I think you were shooting for something like 70

9:54

cents on the dollar. I'm for 20. How

9:57

are you feeling about this? Well, all I can say is, hell.

10:00

Hello ladies, that's right.

10:03

This is the story. First off, let me, I

10:05

hate it when people just talk about their wins. And

10:08

last year I lost $15 million shorting

10:10

the market. That was a really

10:13

like a bad thing for me. I

10:16

am wealthy, but that kind of money was

10:18

like, very upsetting. That

10:20

was very upsetting Ed. This one,

10:23

I got this one right. It's super exciting.

10:25

And the learning here is the following. The

10:29

best investments I have ever made, first

10:31

and foremost, low

10:33

cost index funds, diversification, and then just

10:35

holding on and making sure you're diversified

10:37

and letting the American economy and

10:40

demographics and productivity take over and bring,

10:42

let the rising tide lift all boats.

10:45

The individual best

10:47

returns I've ever had that have been

10:49

just incredibly outsized have been

10:52

what I'll refer to as old people. And

10:55

that is what I've noticed is

10:57

generally speaking, that people have

10:59

a huge bias against old people. What

11:01

is the most successful small

11:03

business in the world that has the lowest failure

11:05

rate? There was just a study on this, senior

11:08

care facilities, because

11:11

nobody wants to be around

11:13

seniors. They don't wanna invest in them.

11:16

The whole idea sounds depressing. And

11:18

I can see why a lot of people think, oh

11:20

no, I wanna invest in a members only

11:22

club or artists and models or whatever, right?

11:25

But here's the thing, you wanna run into the fire. You

11:28

wanna run to the least sexiest things possible.

11:30

And FTX, people don't remember this. When

11:33

I bought these things in June or July of last year,

11:36

FTX stank.

11:39

I mean, nobody wanted near it.

11:41

People thought, I'm gonna lose everything.

11:43

This is fraud at Sam Bankman

11:45

Freed, crypto. The

11:48

narrative is this asset class at this

11:50

company is just awful and going to

11:52

zero. Look at it and look at

11:55

it hard and say, what if

11:57

they're wrong? Because if they're wrong, the

11:59

upside might be. four, five, eight fold.

12:01

And you can afford some zeros if

12:03

you do enough of those, because

12:05

the returns can be so outsized. But anyways,

12:08

the existential question this brings up is

12:10

the following. If everyone's getting their money

12:13

back, then should Sam Bankman

12:15

Freed still go to prison for 25 years?

12:18

And the answer is absolutely yes. What

12:20

he did was fraudulent. He took money

12:23

from depositors who did not think they were investing in

12:25

a hedge fund. He then probably

12:28

went on the worst from

12:31

a legal perspective, handled

12:33

his prosecution, his defense, I

12:36

should say, worse than any defendant I

12:38

have ever seen. A

12:40

poor person who does not have access

12:42

to top legal counsel, who

12:44

gets a public defender, the public defender

12:46

would have advised him much better

12:48

than his parents or his lawyers, or maybe

12:50

he wasn't listening to everyone. But running around

12:53

the world saying, shrugging his shoulders and saying,

12:55

oh, I didn't know. I'm just this sloppy

12:58

eight-year-old that just got out of bed.

13:00

I didn't know where all those billions

13:02

went. But wait, weren't you

13:05

sleeping with your co-founder and doing

13:07

drugs and setting up, incorporating

13:10

purposely in the Bahamas? Didn't

13:12

you hire a shady auditing firm? I mean,

13:15

all of these things just added up to your lying.

13:17

If he had gone to the authorities and said, you know

13:19

what? I fucked up. I'm guilty. I'm going to try and

13:22

get you all your money back. I want a cop-a-plea deal.

13:24

He probably would have gone to prison, but he would have gone to

13:26

prison for one to three years. I mean, this

13:28

might be a life sentence for the guy. So

13:31

I find it fascinating. There's going to be a big story

13:34

on him, but it doesn't in

13:36

any way exonerate or

13:38

make it less illegal what he did.

13:40

We've got to move through quickly here. Between

13:43

Reddit, Airbnb, TikTok, any initial

13:45

thoughts? The biggest question surrounding

13:47

Reddit is will they be able to monetize

13:49

their user base? By the way, their user

13:51

base is now bigger in America than Twitter

13:53

or Pinterest, and their average revenue per user

13:56

is now greater than Snap. Revenues

13:58

up 48%. I

14:00

mean and at 37% increase, I

14:02

mean they're firing on all cylinders

14:04

right now So this was and

14:07

I'm a small shareholder full disclosure not a

14:09

big shareholder. I'm a small shareholder here Reddit

14:12

is delivering and the question they needed

14:14

to answer is can you monetize this

14:16

incredible user base the answer is yes

14:18

in addition they get a

14:20

higher multiple because people are wondering if their

14:24

Content is especially rich like,

14:26

you know light sweet crude oil the

14:28

best kind of information for LLMs and they've

14:31

only monetized it to the extent of 50

14:33

million but people People think this might

14:35

be kind of an option They're

14:37

read it might end up being able to garner

14:39

or grow an exceptionally profitable revenue stream Selling

14:42

their data into LLMs Airbnb. I

14:45

got whacked and I'm a I'm a

14:47

shareholder I have a large position in

14:49

Airbnb and I got whacked and I

14:51

think that what's happening here is that

14:54

there was a bit of a post COVID bounce and travel

14:57

people were sick of being locked up so they were

14:59

traveling a lot and There's

15:01

fear in the market or general consensus

15:03

that that post COVID travel surge is

15:07

beginning to moderate is the way I would describe it because

15:09

if you look at the numbers they grew 18% and It

15:14

was their guidance that took them down. So still

15:16

a great company still trading at a solid multiple

15:18

It just felt like the air

15:20

got let out here and then tick-tock. This

15:22

is essentially an argument between

15:24

really powerful legal

15:28

constructs or orthodoxies one is First Amendment

15:30

and one is national

15:32

defense and The

15:34

First Amendment says that you need to

15:37

find other remedies first before you inhibit

15:39

someone's free speech But

15:42

at the same time occasionally national defense

15:45

or defense concerns Trump First

15:47

Amendment For example, we

15:49

didn't want foreign ownership or an individual to own

15:51

more than 25% of a broadcast

15:53

company So Rupert Murdoch had to become a citizen.

15:56

We do on a regular basis Let

15:59

national defense or concentration of

16:01

ownership, Trump First Amendment. I

16:04

think that as we get closer and

16:06

closer to the DC Circuit trial, if

16:08

in fact it goes to trial, I

16:11

think the odds, right now the odds are 70-30.

16:13

If you look at, you

16:15

can bet on anything now, you can bet on

16:18

this trial, they're saying it's 70% likelihood that the

16:20

government wins this case, 30% the TikTok

16:22

wins. Now, the thing

16:25

that I think will trump to be

16:27

the deciding factor here that will result

16:29

in the DC Circuit

16:31

winning if it goes to trial is the

16:33

following. The court

16:35

is typically very remiss to

16:37

overturn a decision that has the

16:40

backing of a bipartisan law passed

16:42

in Congress. Now,

16:44

having said that, and this is the

16:46

interesting part, does the

16:48

government win or does China win? The answer

16:51

is yes. And that is, this comes right up to

16:53

the date and I think you're going to see the

16:55

likelihood of a government win go from 70 to 75

16:57

to 80. And

17:00

then I think Beijing is going to decide

17:02

to negotiate directly with the White House, which

17:05

is a much easier way to negotiate than trying to

17:07

figure out public policy or laws or

17:09

negotiate through the courts. They will call the White House

17:12

and they will come to some sort of accommodation

17:15

that satisfies the White House and

17:17

that the CCP, not by dance, let's

17:19

be honest, the CCP is comfortable with

17:22

as the notion, the idea, the

17:24

threat that they're about to be

17:27

banned if they don't divest becomes a

17:29

more and more stark reality that that threat

17:32

comes into sharp relief. I think this is

17:34

similar to Twitter that when

17:36

Musk gets closer and closer to actually

17:38

having to get on the stand and

17:41

go to trial, his lawyers say, you

17:43

realize you're going to lose here, right?

17:45

And the day before he decided to close,

17:48

same thing's going to happen here. We're going to come right

17:50

up to the trial date. I don't think

17:52

it's going to go to court. I think they're going to

17:55

come to an accommodation because there's

17:57

two things here. There's the use as the

17:59

ultimate propaganda And then there's

18:01

two, hundreds of billions of dollars at stake. And

18:03

I think the CCP was hoping to hold on

18:05

to both of those things. When

18:07

it becomes increasingly clear they can only have number two,

18:09

they're just not going to have number one, they will

18:12

opt to hold on to number two and they'll come

18:14

to some sort of accommodation with the White House. What

18:16

are your thoughts on that? I just find it funny

18:18

that a Chinese company is suing the US government for

18:20

violating free speech laws. Well, you know, I don't know

18:22

if you know this ad, but in China, they have

18:24

free speech because no one has ever said otherwise. That's

18:28

good. It'll geopolitical humor.

18:32

We'll be right back after the break with a look

18:34

at Disney and Warner Brothers Discovery. Support

18:46

for the show comes from Atlassian. When you think

18:48

of AI, pizza may not be the first thing

18:50

that comes to mind. The global pizza chains are

18:52

actually using AI to scan their pies and make

18:54

sure they meet the quality standards. From

18:56

space exploration to making pizza to producing

18:58

podcasts like the one you're listening to

19:00

right now, Atlassian thinks there's

19:02

a lot about AI that companies should be

19:04

excited about. Atlassian's AI powered

19:07

software can help you glean new insights

19:09

from your data, boost individual productivity by

19:11

eliminating menial fast, and help your team

19:14

make faster, more informed decisions to produce

19:16

the best results for your customers. Plus,

19:19

Atlassian wants to ensure your data is

19:21

handled responsibly, which is why they adhere

19:23

to a strict set of responsible technology

19:25

principles. Learn how Atlassian's

19:27

AI powered software like Vira and

19:30

Confluence can help power high-performing teams

19:32

because individually we're great, but together we're

19:35

so much better. Learn

19:37

how to unleash the potential

19:39

of your team at atlassian.com.

19:41

That's a-t-l-a-s-s-i-a-n.com. Atlassian.

19:55

We're back with Prodigy Markets. For

19:58

the first time ever, Disney streamers turned

20:00

a profit for the quarter. That is, if

20:02

you don't count ESPN+. Hulu

20:04

and Disney Plus together made $47 million

20:06

in profits, but the sports platform dragged

20:08

the streaming segment to a combined loss

20:10

of $18 million. Still,

20:13

that's a huge improvement from its $659

20:16

million loss a year ago. Disney also

20:18

offered weak guidance for its Parks and

20:20

Experiences unit, citing the moderation of post-COVID

20:22

travel demand. The stock fell 10% its

20:24

worst day in more than a year. Meanwhile,

20:27

Warner Bros. Discovery reported earnings that

20:29

missed expectations on the top and

20:31

bottom lines. However, the streaming unit was

20:33

profitable and subscriber growth beat

20:36

expectations and outpaced last year's quarter.

20:38

The stock rose about 1%. Scott,

20:41

Disney and Warner Bros. were two of your stock picks

20:43

for 2024. Disney's up

20:46

15% year-to-date. Warner

20:48

Bros. is down around 30%

20:50

year-to-date. What do you make of their

20:52

performance so far? What I make of it is

20:54

my co-host is cherry picking. I had a third stock pick, bitch.

20:57

Why didn't you bring that up? You're

20:59

literally like Twitter right now. You're just

21:01

cherry picking something that makes me look bad. Oh,

21:04

no, no, no. We're discussing the two companies that

21:06

released their earnings. Anyway, I also

21:08

picked Google. What's Google up year-to-date? Let's

21:10

type that. Typing into Google. Okay,

21:14

year-to-date. Oh, it's

21:16

up 23%. Oh, but we

21:18

conveniently didn't mention that. Yeah, because we

21:20

covered Google last week. It's

21:23

up 30% since I picked it. Anyway, look,

21:27

I think it's somewhat related to Reddit because now

21:29

there's even a new ... If you

21:31

look at advertising as a share of GDP globally,

21:33

it's remarkably consistent. It's like

21:35

1.5% of GDP globally

21:37

and it hasn't been for the last 40 or 50 years.

21:40

The massive ascent of

21:43

digital platforms has come at the

21:45

cost of traditional platforms. If you

21:47

think about Reddit, if Reddit grossed

21:49

revenues 48%, that means they're increasing

21:53

their top line every year, 500 million.

21:56

That's not new economic activity. That's all coming

21:58

out of the hides. traditional

22:00

advertisers. So yet there's another player

22:02

sucking oxygen out of the room.

22:05

In Disney, I was shocked. This

22:07

was one of Disney's worst trading

22:09

days in the last decade. And I

22:11

think the thing that scared them was

22:13

the same thing that spooked Airbnb investors.

22:16

And that is, one, it looks like

22:18

the travel surge is a little bit over and people

22:20

were starting to take the parks and the $10 billion

22:22

in EBITDA that the parks create for Disney a little

22:24

bit for Grant. And then they thought, oh shit, if

22:27

the parks are going to not be the

22:29

gift that keeps on giving, we really don't

22:31

like this company. And that seemed to overwhelm.

22:33

I was surprised. If I had saw this

22:35

earnings report before the release of the market, I would

22:37

not have thought that stock would have been taken to the

22:39

woodshed. But people were really

22:42

disappointed. I also wonder if they look

22:44

at their ABC and they

22:46

look at ESPN and they say things are

22:48

only going to get worse here. And did

22:50

you see what Bob Iger said after

22:52

the opening bell the next day on Disney?

22:55

He said the following, fuck. That's

22:59

a joke. This was

23:01

a really bad day for Bob

23:04

Iger. Because you know who might

23:06

be back in about six months?

23:08

Nelson. Because the bottom

23:11

line is with activist investing, the

23:13

incumbent management team always

23:15

wins at the first election, unless they've done

23:17

something illegal. They usually win at the

23:20

second, but if the stock isn't up, they

23:22

get bounced at the third. And

23:25

if his stock goes back into the

23:27

double digits or gets down to like

23:29

80 bucks again, which

23:31

it may or may not, I actually don't think it will,

23:33

see about one of my stock picks. But if it does,

23:36

he has to fly down to Florida, kiss Nelson's ass, give

23:38

him a seat on the board, and

23:41

all of a sudden that succession plan gets

23:43

sped up. Because if the

23:45

stock underperforms, if the stock were to

23:47

go down from here, there's

23:50

then going to be new calls to break up

23:52

the company. And I don't entirely

23:54

understand why it was taken down this much. I

23:56

think it's related to Reddit. I think it's related to the same

23:59

things around. Airbnb, but I would

24:01

not have thought that Disney would have had one of

24:03

its worst days because as you pointed

24:05

out, the streaming service has great

24:07

momentum right now. But basically how this company

24:09

reforms over the next two or three quarters,

24:12

this is the crowning or

24:15

not crowning achievement on Bob's career.

24:18

He's not a young man. He's got

24:20

to announce a succession strategy probably in the next

24:22

24 months and it's either going to

24:24

be done. He's either going to take a victory lap or it's

24:26

going to be done under duress,

24:28

under the cloud of like, okay, Bob didn't figure

24:30

it out. So I

24:32

think he was crazy to come back. I mean,

24:34

literally fucking crazy to come back. He

24:37

was thought of as one of the most

24:39

talented, successful executives in history and

24:41

instead he's come back. I

24:44

just don't get it. It's like Mike Tyson

24:46

fighting again. It's all downside. It's all downside.

24:48

The other news that we should bring up

24:50

is that Disney and Warner Brothers Discovery have

24:53

announced that they're creating a new streaming bundle

24:55

that includes Disney Plus, Hulu and

24:57

Max, formerly HBO Max. It's

25:00

going to include content from

25:02

ABC, CNN, Discovery, Disney, HBO,

25:05

Hulu, Marvel, Pixar. The

25:07

list goes on. In other words, this

25:10

is cable, but on

25:12

a streaming platform. What are your thoughts on this? I

25:14

think the streaming, what's happened to the streaming market over the

25:16

last 15 years is the

25:19

only industry you'd need to look at to kind of

25:21

understand economics. The future

25:23

attracts way too much capital. The

25:26

unbelievable, the over investment results

25:28

in an unbelievable, but unsustainable

25:31

consumer value proposition, grows the

25:33

market substantially, but

25:35

unless you have cheap capital, you can't keep up. So

25:38

Netflix just basically use capital as a weapon,

25:41

outspent everybody. And then

25:43

all of a sudden the market said, okay, fun times

25:45

over. We're not just going to give you money to

25:47

acquire customers. You have to show that this is economically

25:49

viable. The company begins

25:51

to modulate and consolidate. It's consolidating everybody, but

25:53

kind of the big two or three is

25:55

looking for a dance partner real fast. They're

25:58

either going to go out a bit. or

26:00

they're going to sell to someone else. And

26:03

Netflix has not only cut its content budget,

26:06

it's raised prices, which creates cloud

26:08

cover for the other survivors to

26:11

raise prices. And you're seeing the

26:13

market just modulate, but it's

26:15

just fascinating that these

26:18

companies are basically now distressed assets. If

26:20

you look at their multiple on, Disney

26:23

still trades a decent multiple on Evita, but

26:26

people are sort of looking at Warner Brothers as

26:29

if it's going out of business. I think that's

26:31

right. And I think we haven't seen the political

26:33

advertising kick in yet. I mean, the TV network

26:36

revenue is down for Warner Brothers. I think that

26:39

scared a lot of people, but I think

26:41

it's going to come back up. The one thing I

26:43

will end this story with is a quote by Jim

26:45

Bockstahl, who is the former CEO of Netscape. So

26:48

there's only two ways to make money. You

26:50

can make money bundling and you can make

26:52

money unbundling. And it's just funny

26:54

that that's exactly what we've seen in the streaming industry.

27:00

The SEC charged the

27:03

accounting firm that

27:07

audited Trump Media with quote, massive

27:10

fraud. The agency found that

27:12

the firm BF Borgers failed

27:14

to actually order its clients before

27:16

putting its stamp of approval on

27:18

1500 public company regulatory filings. The

27:21

firm is now permanently barred from auditing public

27:23

companies, and it must also pay a $14

27:25

million fine. Trump

27:27

Media, along with all of Borgers' other clients

27:29

are now forced to find new

27:31

auditors. Scott, I'm

27:34

shocked that Trump's

27:36

auditing firm is fraudulent, what

27:38

do you think? This guy is literally a

27:40

crime boss. Everyone around him is either in

27:43

jail or has

27:45

a reputation. I mean, trying to think.

27:47

Who hasn't been, he's the definition of

27:49

toxic. Who comes in contact with this

27:51

guy and doesn't end up in

27:54

jail with a reputation ruined?

27:57

I mean, he's the definition of toxic. And

28:00

this firm, what a shocker, is

28:03

being massively accused of SEC. I was trying to

28:05

think of opportunity. The opportunity here is to get a

28:07

list of those firms that were

28:09

audited and create a basket

28:11

of shorts, because at some point in

28:13

the next one, two, three

28:15

weeks, Hindenburg or one of these short

28:18

players is gonna come out with a

28:20

research piece showing that they don't

28:22

believe a company's numbers and they're gonna highlight

28:25

that this company's auditors are BF

28:28

Borgers or Borgers or Borges or

28:30

hi, we're going to jail soon.

28:32

Big fucking deal, we lied about

28:34

everything, these guys. I

28:36

mean, my favorite status between 2019 and 2021, they

28:40

doubled their client list, but didn't

28:42

hire anybody. So they were just saying,

28:45

congratulations, send us over what you

28:47

want us to sign. And I

28:50

had, as someone who's served on a bunch of

28:52

boards and has served on the audit committee, we

28:56

work with blue chip firms, usually a Deloitte

28:59

or, wait a minute, see,

29:01

there's Deloitte, there's Deloitte. You know what I'm saying? This

29:03

is such a consolidated market. They

29:05

are so worried about getting sued that

29:08

they come back with the most ridiculous request for

29:10

disclosure and it's like, okay, aren't we being a

29:12

little overboard here? And they charge you

29:15

so much money. We keep

29:17

talking about your return

29:19

on your vested capital, it's

29:21

gonna be inversely correlated to

29:23

how sexy an industry is. A

29:26

really decent business to start

29:28

is an accounting firm or an auditing firm.

29:31

The tax code keeps getting more and more complex,

29:34

hardworking, smart, honest people to make a lot

29:36

of money in that business. Because

29:38

there just isn't a lot of competition as far as I can

29:40

tell. Yeah, I find this such

29:43

an interesting dynamic here because I think

29:46

what regulators are increasingly realizing about

29:48

Trump and honestly,

29:50

what makes him great, in my view, is

29:53

they basically realize that he is a honeypot for

29:56

criminals. I'll bet what

29:58

probably happened here is the SEC said... Hey,

30:00

I wonder what accounting firm in their

30:03

right mind would decide,

30:05

yeah, let's associate with Trump, let's associate with

30:07

Truth Social, and let's represent them as

30:10

their auditing firm. And so the SEC

30:12

investigating, and what do you know, 75% of the audits this firm

30:14

has ever

30:16

produced over its 15-year history

30:18

have been fraudulent. And

30:20

it has the eighth largest client list in the

30:22

US, yet it only employs, I mean, you kind

30:25

of made this point earlier, it only employs 10

30:28

certified public accountants across the whole company,

30:30

and operates out of this random

30:32

little one-story building in a suburb in Denver.

30:35

So this is a huge deal. There are

30:37

170 public companies that now need to find

30:39

a new accountant. But the

30:42

thing we should remember is that none of

30:44

this would have been possible if it weren't

30:46

for Donald Trump. I mean, whether

30:49

you like him or not, he has basically

30:51

been a phenomenal servant for the US justice

30:54

system, because he acts as a mousetrap for

30:56

all these other fraudsters and criminals, which are

30:58

now coming to light. It's also part of

31:00

a larger theme that's a really unfortunate thing

31:02

in America, and that is the

31:05

new superpower is shamelessness. And

31:09

that thread that sort of struck my eyes was

31:11

a woman

31:13

is giving testimony under oath outlining

31:16

the sexual encounter and graphic detail he had

31:18

with a porn star and then paying her

31:21

off. And it's like not

31:23

even that interesting news today, because there's so much other

31:25

shit going on. This is a guy running for president.

31:28

Gary Hart had an affair in

31:31

the election I had of 20, 30 years

31:33

ago, and basically it dominated the news every day.

31:36

Bill Clinton had an affair

31:38

with one of his interns and it dominated the

31:40

news every day. And this

31:42

barely even registers as news, because

31:45

shamelessness is everyone's new superpower. Oh, you killed

31:47

your dog and buried it in a gravel

31:50

pit and claimed you met with Kim Jong

31:52

Un and you actually didn't. Just

31:54

continue to lie. Don't back down. I'm

31:57

totally shameless about it. I

31:59

don't know entirely how to label it. It's literally

32:01

the toxic

32:03

shamelessness, but the market

32:06

seems to be rewarding it. So

32:08

it's an unfortunate thing that shamelessness

32:11

has become the superpower. And any one

32:13

of these things would have taken down any

32:16

other presidential candidate and anything. But again,

32:18

because there's so many of them, it

32:21

just gets lost in the noise of this

32:23

conspiracy that everyone's out to get them. No,

32:26

no, everything this guy

32:28

does is usually has

32:30

some connection to some

32:33

sort of criminal activity. It's just, it's

32:36

crazy. I don't, I don't, I

32:38

don't, I should move to London. We'll

32:41

be right back after the break. We're going to look at Uber's earnings.

32:55

Fox Creative. This is

32:57

advertiser content from Atlassian. One

33:00

of our customers who produces pizza at a

33:02

very large scale all across the world, believe

33:05

it or not, they use AI to review

33:07

the quality of the pizzas that are created.

33:09

That goes through a workflow that scans the

33:11

images of the pizzas and make sure they

33:14

visually look like what they should. So it's

33:16

pretty cool. That's

33:18

Sharif Monsoor, Atlassian's head of

33:20

AI. Sharif thinks there's a

33:22

lot for companies to be excited

33:25

about on the AI generated horizon,

33:27

spanning everything from making pizza to

33:29

producing podcasts like the one you're

33:31

listening to now. There'll be

33:33

far more jobs created on the other side of

33:35

this revolution. Instead of a

33:37

world of less, Sharif envisions an

33:39

AI powered world of law. In

33:42

everyone's day job, they're moving from doing

33:44

the thing to often being an architect

33:46

of the thing. It

33:48

unleashes the potential of every human. I think

33:50

we can go from a world where few

33:52

people have access to a high level of

33:54

intelligence to a lot more people having access

33:57

to this information. AI is really giving everyone

33:59

on the planet. more resources to do

34:01

great things and I'm very optimistic about that

34:03

opportunity that lies ahead. Transform

34:05

teamwork with the power of AI human

34:08

collaboration. Start using

34:10

Atlassian intelligence for your Atlassian

34:12

products like Jira and Confluence

34:14

now. Learn more

34:16

at atlassian.com. That's

34:20

a-t-l-a-s-s-i-a-n.com We're

34:32

back with Frofft markets. First

34:34

quarter bookings at Uber rose 20% from a year

34:36

earlier. However, that

34:38

number was below analysts expectations and the

34:40

stock fell 9%. The

34:43

company also posted a $654 million

34:45

loss for the quarter. Analysts had expected

34:47

a profit and that loss was largely

34:49

due to the revaluation of Uber's venture

34:52

investments, which were marked down by $721

34:55

million. Scott, this

34:57

is a huge hit to earnings and it's coming directly

35:00

after one of Uber's best ever quarters. What do

35:02

you make of this? I think Dara Kastashahi is

35:04

a great CEO. I think Uber is one of

35:06

the great turnarounds you could argue. They've

35:09

done an amazing job. The whole space

35:11

seems to be getting

35:13

better. They're paying their drivers more. Revenues are

35:15

up. I love the fact that the

35:17

number two looks like it's going to survive. Lift

35:20

is doing really well. On the whole, I

35:22

think ride hailing is doing great. This just

35:24

seems like a quarter. It feels like a

35:26

lot of these things, whether it was Airbnb

35:30

or Meta or Uber. Just their

35:32

stocks have gotten out a little

35:35

in front of their skis, if you will. The

35:38

reason that they're having this massive loss is

35:40

because of this $721 million

35:42

loss from revaluing

35:45

their investments, their equity investments,

35:47

i.e. DD, Aurora, Grab, Karim,

35:49

all these other

35:52

taxi-esque startups. That's

35:54

huge. That's basically their entire net

35:56

loss this quarter. I want to

35:58

talk about that. for a

36:00

moment because you compare that to last

36:03

quarter's earnings. They turned a

36:05

huge profit, and the

36:07

main reason for that profit was, again,

36:10

revaluing their equity investments. They

36:12

posted a $1 billion gain from

36:14

the value of their

36:17

venture investments. I just find

36:19

this kind of suspicious that

36:22

we're seeing these wild swings in

36:24

the value of their investments. $1

36:26

billion gain, one quarter to

36:28

a $720 million loss

36:30

the next quarter. Those

36:32

investments are ultimately dictating whether

36:35

their earnings, whether the bottom line is

36:37

positive or negative. Well, they couldn't have

36:39

done anything wrong here Ed, because they're

36:41

accounting from BF Borscher's signed off

36:43

on it. By the way, I don't

36:46

think that's true. I don't think Uber's

36:48

accounting firm is BF

36:50

Borscher's. I imagine

36:53

a bunch of French guys are

36:55

like, oh, they're stupid. Just

36:57

send them a bill. Yeah, whatever you

36:59

want. We're signing off on it. Jacques

37:01

Borscher. Jacques Borscher. Okay, so

37:04

technically what you're stating is this

37:06

all comes down to the mark. Private equity

37:08

firms and VC firms have been accused consistently

37:10

of fucking around with their marks, because

37:13

when they go into fundraising, they want to have good numbers

37:15

to raise a bunch of money or to

37:17

pay themselves. Now, typically a

37:20

firm that does responsible marks and has

37:22

them signed up by an auditor, the responsible auditor will

37:24

go, well, what are you basing your mark on? For

37:27

example, I donate stock to nonprofits and I have

37:29

to hire a third party firm to

37:32

value that stock. They do a

37:34

pretty good job and they come back and they say the stock is

37:36

worth this and this is why we think. They're not afraid to come

37:38

back and say it's worth less than it was last

37:41

year. Typically, with these kinds

37:43

of companies, the mark should be pretty obvious, because

37:46

they just look at a recent round of

37:48

financing, then they look at how the publicly

37:51

traded companies compare in terms of marks.

37:53

The best marks are from its valuation in the

37:56

public markets and if it's a private company, what

37:59

are the... the last round's

38:01

valuation of third party

38:03

investments, not related parties. And then they

38:05

look at what's happened in that time

38:07

to the whole sector. So

38:10

a responsible auditing firm will say,

38:12

okay, your mark is off, or

38:15

we're only signing off on

38:17

this valuation. But I don't

38:19

think, I've got to think that Uber with

38:21

the Dara and with the investors it has

38:24

is probably got as legitimate

38:27

a mark as anybody else has. The more, I

38:29

think interesting thing here is I think you're about

38:32

to see a massive

38:34

increase in venture capital investment from

38:37

corporate venture. I think you're

38:39

going to see a lot of this. I think a

38:41

lot of firms, especially this

38:43

size, are going to start buying

38:45

stakes or making investments almost

38:47

like a free option, not a free option. They're

38:50

going to start buying options in other companies. They

38:53

get access to information. They get an

38:55

inside track and acquisition. And sometimes

38:57

they say, we can help this firm grow

39:00

its value and recognize in the

39:02

upside. There's always a cycle here. Then

39:04

there'll be a bunch of losses and then external

39:07

shareholders or an activist will show up and say, what are

39:09

you, a VC firm or in the ride hailing business? But

39:12

I think we're going to see over the next three

39:14

to five years a surge in

39:16

corporate venture capital. We're already seeing

39:18

it 63% of venture funding

39:21

for Q3 of last year was corporate

39:23

VC. That's amazing. That's the

39:25

highest percentage in history for corporations.

39:28

I mean, think about that. Two

39:30

thirds VCs are only

39:32

a third of venture investment. I mean, that's

39:34

just the people are supposedly pros at

39:36

this. I mean, it's really interesting. You're probably

39:38

going to see a lot of what I see in the venture

39:40

capital, what I have a lot of friends who are venture capitalists.

39:43

The really big ones are raising enormous funds

39:45

and everybody else is struggling. I mean,

39:48

there's some niche firms that are very,

39:50

very focused, but for

39:52

the most part, fundraising has gotten harder and harder

39:55

for everyone but the biggest funds because big is

39:57

just better. I mean, there's literally a correlation between.

40:00

between returns

40:02

and the size of the firm right now.

40:04

The biggest firms are just doing better. And

40:06

that's also true in VCs and private equity

40:09

players, and they can diversify more, attract better

40:11

talent, they have the capital to defend their

40:13

positions, and on and on

40:15

and on. And they attract the best talent because

40:17

their management fees are bigger and they can pay

40:19

their people really well. So I

40:21

think you're going to see increased consolidation, which

40:23

isn't a good thing, but you're going

40:27

to see a lot of the players

40:30

from the smaller firms, really good firms, leave

40:32

and go run corporate

40:35

venture for General Electric or

40:37

for LVMH. I mean, LVMH actually has a

40:39

huge investment in a great firm called El

40:41

Catterton that has been very successful. But

40:44

I think you're going to see even more of that. I

40:46

think you're going to see firms that you wouldn't have thought

40:48

of being in the venture business have,

40:50

say, okay, we're going to take 100 million, a billion,

40:52

3 million, $5 billion, and

40:55

we're essentially going to start a

40:57

wing of Snowflake called Snowflake VC or whatever.

40:59

I think you're going to see a lot

41:01

of this. Which is going to bring up

41:03

a huge and interesting conversation for shareholders, which

41:06

is, do you want to be

41:08

a shareholder in Uber or do you want

41:10

to be an investor and a shareholder in

41:12

Uber Ventures? And those are two very, very

41:14

different things. And I think that's going to

41:16

be an important question for shareholders to

41:18

start asking themselves. But let's

41:20

move on to the week ahead. We'll

41:23

see earnings from Home Depot, Walmart, and Alibaba.

41:25

And we'll also see the consumer price and

41:28

producer price indices for April. Do

41:30

you have any predictions? Well, what I said earlier, my

41:32

prediction is that the case

41:34

filed by TikTok, I

41:36

think on the eve of the court case,

41:38

they come to a settlement. No

41:41

one loses their TikTok. A

41:43

ban doesn't happen and it never ends up

41:45

in court. And just

41:47

to follow on to that, the value

41:49

in the secondary market of ByteDance

41:52

shares skyrockets. And I predict Profft

41:54

G Market hits top 10 in

41:56

global podcasts. There you go. From

41:58

your words to God's ear. Oh

42:01

my god, I feel a date coming for

42:03

the little dog. That's right.

42:06

That's right. You should literally just have shirts

42:08

printed up that say, I'm 34. Ask

42:11

me why. That's

42:14

very exciting. Congratulations, Ed. We're two ahead of

42:16

Ben Shapiro. We're five behind

42:19

Andrew Huberman. We're two ahead of Ben

42:21

Shapiro. We're ahead of

42:23

Huberman? No, we're five behind Huberman. And

42:26

I think we're about 30 ahead of Pivot. Just

42:28

start saying you hate alcohol. You

42:30

hate alcohol. That'll get us up. Let

42:33

me just save you millions of hours of

42:35

Huberman lab. Don't drink alcohol.

42:38

Sunlight for 90 minutes. All right. This

42:41

episode was produced by Claire Miller and engineered

42:43

by Benjamin Spencer. Our associate producer is Jennifer

42:45

Sanchez and Alison Weiss. Our executive producer is

42:48

Jason Stavors and Catherine Dillon. Mia Silvera

42:50

is our research lead and Drew Burrows

42:52

is our technical director. Thank

42:54

you for listening to Prof G Markets from the Vox

42:56

Media Podcast Network. Join us on

42:58

Wednesday for office hours and we'll be back

43:00

with a fresh take on markets every Monday.

43:03

And don't forget to subscribe to the new

43:05

Prof G Markets channel, wherever you get

43:07

your podcasts.

43:50

Support for the show comes from Atlassian.

43:52

Whether you're exploring space, making pizza or

43:54

producing a podcast like this one here,

43:57

chances are your team is marching into

43:59

the AI. generated horizon. Atlassian

44:01

Intelligence is unleashing a new era of

44:04

teamwork. You can use Atlassian's AI-powered products

44:06

for everything from brainstorming ideas to finding

44:08

information to summarizing huge

44:10

documents, all by using normal, everyday

44:12

language. Atlassian AI-powered software, including JIRA

44:15

and Confluence, helps teams accomplish what

44:17

would otherwise be impossible alone. Because

44:20

individually we're great, but together

44:23

we're so much better. Learn

44:25

how you can transform teamwork

44:27

with the power of AI

44:30

at atlassian.com. Again, that's atlassian.com.

44:32

Atlassian.

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features