Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
Support of the show comes from Apple last
0:03
year with a news story about a I
0:05
come out seemingly every guy you can be
0:07
hard to know exactly what it means for
0:09
you and your new job and last and
0:12
thinks there's a lot to be excited about
0:14
and the Ai powered future even right now
0:16
And lashings, A I powered software can help
0:18
you boost productivity by eliminating menial tasks, generating
0:21
insights, and helping you find information about projects,
0:23
policies and processes no matter if your team
0:25
of to or two million or if you're
0:27
around the quarter or on another continent. And
0:30
last in Software keeps everyone connected
0:32
and living together as one toward
0:34
shared goals. Learn how to unleash
0:36
the potential of your team. Added
0:38
Last and.com that's a T L
0:40
A S as I am got
0:42
Tom at Last in. This.
0:50
Week's number four hundred and sixty one
0:52
Fi that's the record French baker said
0:55
for the world long. as big a
0:57
true story after World War Two different
0:59
for so embarrassed or thought about changing
1:01
the name of their country. Unfortunately Iran
1:03
was already taken Mats not fair. Use.
1:16
As read to scream Go Go Go
1:19
and I remember the wrong Podcast and
1:21
welcome to Property Markets Today. You.
1:23
Know they don't masturbate in France.
1:25
Daves shock off ad space Jag
1:27
as I better as good. Yeah
1:30
Eric I welcome to Property Market
1:32
Today We're discussing streaming earnings Trump's
1:34
media's auditing firm and robbers huge
1:36
loss Here at the news is
1:38
proxy media analyst add else and
1:41
add what is the good? What
1:43
are you basking in the glow
1:45
of Thirty Four? That's actually the
1:47
number we should had property as
1:50
of today. The property pod is
1:52
the thirty. Fourth most downloaded podcast
1:54
in the world where number
1:56
thirty four add property markets
1:58
are new podcast. And
2:01
we haven't even released our first episode. All we have as
2:03
a trailer is number 21 in the world. So
2:06
I think we're even better than that. Where'd
2:08
you get that 34 number from? I
2:10
use Chartable to think about just not
2:12
to diminish our achievement here, but I
2:14
think it's more about momentum than actual
2:16
downloads. That's probably right. And because,
2:19
I don't know if you know about this, Ed,
2:21
but I was actually at TED last week
2:24
where I gave what Chris Anderson described
2:27
as a scorching talk. But
2:30
since then, and since my appearance on, what's the name
2:32
of that show? Bill
2:34
Maher. Since I was on that, we have everything
2:37
as kind of like the flywheel is flying,
2:39
Ed. You're welcome. But
2:42
Prof G Markets is doing better than the Prof G
2:44
Pod, so I'm trying to think what the difference is.
2:46
I don't get that. How'd that happen?
2:48
We haven't had an episode yet. Yeah, it must be
2:50
something. I can't tell what it is, but it feels
2:53
like it must be me, right? We sexted up with
2:55
young Ed Elson. All right, Ed, enough of that. Get
2:57
to the news. I will do that. I
2:59
just want to remind everyone, if you haven't done so yet,
3:01
please go subscribe to Prof G Markets. It's
3:03
our separate channel. It's overtaking the Prof
3:05
G Pod, so please go subscribe.
3:09
Okay, let's start with our weekly review of Market Vitals. The
3:12
S&P 500 climbed. The
3:19
dollar was stable. Bitcoin declined. And the
3:22
yield on Tenure Treasury slumped, shifting
3:24
to the headlines. Microsoft is
3:26
investing more than $3 billion to
3:28
build AI infrastructure in Wisconsin. The
3:31
money will go towards a new data center
3:33
and training programs focused on AI manufacturing. Microsoft
3:35
said the new location would create more than
3:37
4,000 construction and data
3:39
center jobs. FDX's lawyers
3:41
announced that its creditors will receive all
3:43
of the money they lost plus interest.
3:46
Payouts will amount to 118% of
3:48
creditors' assets based on their November
3:50
2022 value when
3:53
the company filed for bankruptcy. In
3:55
its first earnings report as a public company, Reddit
3:58
reported a revenue increase of $14 88%
4:00
from last year and a 37% increase
4:02
in daily active users. That beat analyst
4:05
expectations. However, Reddit has yet to turn
4:07
a profit, reporting a net loss of
4:09
$575 million. Shares popped
4:12
as much as 15%. Airbnb
4:15
reported first quarter revenue that exceeded
4:17
analyst expectations, growing 18% year
4:20
over year. The stocks fell the most in
4:22
a year, however, after reporting lower than expected
4:24
revenue guidance for the second quarter. The
4:27
company is expecting international events like the Summer
4:29
Olympics to reaccelerate revenue growth and travel demand
4:31
in the second half of the year. And
4:34
finally, TikTok is suing the US government
4:36
over claims that the fourth sale or
4:39
ban violates the First Amendment. The company
4:41
is arguing that the government's national security
4:43
concerns are not a sufficient reason to
4:45
restrict free speech. The legal proceedings will
4:47
delay the timeline on the ban, meaning
4:49
it could take years to go into
4:52
effect. Scott, your thoughts? A lot
4:54
here, so let's start with Microsoft. It's
4:56
just staggering. The Infrastructure
4:58
Act at the
5:01
US government, largest economic
5:03
power in history, $1.2 trillion. Just the three or
5:06
four companies we talked about invested $32 billion
5:09
or an annual run rate of $120 billion.
5:12
So the Infrastructure Act is supposed to take place, I
5:15
think that's spending over probably the better part of a
5:17
decade. So you could argue that these
5:19
companies are kind of, at least
5:21
right now, and granted it won't
5:23
continue this way, but these companies
5:25
are essentially spending almost on pace
5:28
with the government is spending to try and
5:31
reinvigorate and upgrade America. It's
5:33
just staggering how much money these folks are spending
5:35
on. And it was this long winded way of
5:37
saying, it'd be very interesting to try and figure
5:39
out are there companies that make generators
5:42
that are especially good at cooling
5:44
data centers or specializing
5:46
in construction or selling
5:48
materials into the
5:51
types of infrastructure they're going to be
5:53
building? Because the amount of investment here,
5:55
I mean, it's just staggering.
5:57
What are your thoughts? Yeah, I just think it's fascinating. how
6:00
all of these big tech companies, which historically
6:03
we thought of as very different.
6:05
Amazon is e-commerce, Google search, Microsoft
6:08
is PCs. They're all basically turning into
6:10
the same company now. That
6:12
is, they're all Cloud service providers.
6:14
They all are building data centers and
6:17
they rent those data centers out to
6:19
smaller Internet companies. The
6:21
greatest evidence of that is just the
6:23
operating income of these companies. So just
6:26
as an example, 45
6:28
percent of Microsoft's business today, as
6:30
measured by operating income, is Cloud.
6:33
For Amazon, that number is 60 percent. It
6:37
feels like once you reach this level of scale,
6:40
like these companies have, it's almost
6:42
like the mission changes. The mission
6:45
today isn't, okay, we're going to
6:47
innovate, we're going to build great products. The mission is
6:50
we just need to own the rails. You
6:52
look at the history of markets and it feels
6:54
like exactly as you've said, that's always been true.
6:57
The largest companies have always been the ones that
6:59
have owned the rails, whether that means literally the
7:01
railroad, i.e. US Steel. But
7:05
in this case, I think they've identified that
7:07
owning the rails means we have to supply
7:09
and control the computing power.
7:12
I think that's why we're seeing all
7:14
of these massive tech companies morphing into
7:16
basically the same company. They want to
7:18
be the next US Steel, the next
7:20
Standard Oil of the next generation. So
7:23
they're just trying to own all of the
7:25
computing and processing power in America. The hard
7:27
part is, unless you
7:29
have the capital to invest, not
7:33
tens or hundreds of millions, not even billions,
7:35
but unless you have the capital to speculatively
7:39
invest tens of billions of
7:41
dollars, you can't play
7:43
in this. It's almost like there's
7:45
just no matter how bad you want to produce
7:47
or be an energy producer, it's very hard for
7:49
Japan in the 70s and 80s. They
7:52
just don't have the natural resources. You
7:54
have to sit on top of a sea
7:56
of oil somewhere. These guys essentially
7:58
sit on top of oil somewhere. on a sea of oil in
8:00
the form of intellectual property. They're very
8:03
smart. They have roots in cloud and AI,
8:05
and they sit on a reservoir
8:07
of capital. What I don't get is,
8:09
I was thinking about this, the
8:12
kingdom desperately wants to transition away from
8:14
fossil fuels to more of a services
8:16
or tech or tourism-based economy. I
8:19
would have thought that they would be the
8:21
second biggest investor behind Microsoft and AI, and be
8:23
trying to figure out a way to go all
8:25
in on tomorrow's energy,
8:27
and that is compute. Because not
8:30
only is the US currently the
8:32
biggest energy provider of traditional fossil
8:34
fuel and also renewable
8:37
energy in
8:39
the world, we're about to become
8:41
the largest producer by far of
8:44
the new form of energy, and that is compute. So
8:47
while we hate each other, and we
8:50
might tear each other apart from inside,
8:53
externally, in terms of our ability to produce
8:55
economic value, which unfortunately would be sequestered to
8:57
a smaller and smaller group of firms and
8:59
people, the US, it just strikes me at
9:01
an objective analysis when you zoom back and
9:03
look at the earth. The US is pulling
9:05
away from everybody. That's how I see it.
9:07
I think this has really
9:10
big implications geopolitically. I think it's fascinating
9:12
that these companies have this kind of
9:14
capital to make this type of forward-leaning
9:17
investment. And in general, where
9:20
I see, I'm almost saying, what's the investment opportunity?
9:22
I would want to look at everything that's
9:25
required to build a data
9:27
center and what companies sell
9:29
those products, what companies have
9:32
some sort of differentiation or distribution or
9:34
intellectual property or trademarks around that type
9:36
of product and find out if
9:38
they're public company. FTX,
9:40
well, and just the context, which is
9:42
you bought a bunch of FTX claims
9:45
ages ago. You basically called this, that you
9:47
thought that, I don't
9:49
think you expected 118 cents on the dollar, but
9:52
I think you were shooting for something like 70
9:54
cents on the dollar. I'm for 20. How
9:57
are you feeling about this? Well, all I can say is, hell.
10:00
Hello ladies, that's right.
10:03
This is the story. First off, let me, I
10:05
hate it when people just talk about their wins. And
10:08
last year I lost $15 million shorting
10:10
the market. That was a really
10:13
like a bad thing for me. I
10:16
am wealthy, but that kind of money was
10:18
like, very upsetting. That
10:20
was very upsetting Ed. This one,
10:23
I got this one right. It's super exciting.
10:25
And the learning here is the following. The
10:29
best investments I have ever made, first
10:31
and foremost, low
10:33
cost index funds, diversification, and then just
10:35
holding on and making sure you're diversified
10:37
and letting the American economy and
10:40
demographics and productivity take over and bring,
10:42
let the rising tide lift all boats.
10:45
The individual best
10:47
returns I've ever had that have been
10:49
just incredibly outsized have been
10:52
what I'll refer to as old people. And
10:55
that is what I've noticed is
10:57
generally speaking, that people have
10:59
a huge bias against old people. What
11:01
is the most successful small
11:03
business in the world that has the lowest failure
11:05
rate? There was just a study on this, senior
11:08
care facilities, because
11:11
nobody wants to be around
11:13
seniors. They don't wanna invest in them.
11:16
The whole idea sounds depressing. And
11:18
I can see why a lot of people think, oh
11:20
no, I wanna invest in a members only
11:22
club or artists and models or whatever, right?
11:25
But here's the thing, you wanna run into the fire. You
11:28
wanna run to the least sexiest things possible.
11:30
And FTX, people don't remember this. When
11:33
I bought these things in June or July of last year,
11:36
FTX stank.
11:39
I mean, nobody wanted near it.
11:41
People thought, I'm gonna lose everything.
11:43
This is fraud at Sam Bankman
11:45
Freed, crypto. The
11:48
narrative is this asset class at this
11:50
company is just awful and going to
11:52
zero. Look at it and look at
11:55
it hard and say, what if
11:57
they're wrong? Because if they're wrong, the
11:59
upside might be. four, five, eight fold.
12:01
And you can afford some zeros if
12:03
you do enough of those, because
12:05
the returns can be so outsized. But anyways,
12:08
the existential question this brings up is
12:10
the following. If everyone's getting their money
12:13
back, then should Sam Bankman
12:15
Freed still go to prison for 25 years?
12:18
And the answer is absolutely yes. What
12:20
he did was fraudulent. He took money
12:23
from depositors who did not think they were investing in
12:25
a hedge fund. He then probably
12:28
went on the worst from
12:31
a legal perspective, handled
12:33
his prosecution, his defense, I
12:36
should say, worse than any defendant I
12:38
have ever seen. A
12:40
poor person who does not have access
12:42
to top legal counsel, who
12:44
gets a public defender, the public defender
12:46
would have advised him much better
12:48
than his parents or his lawyers, or maybe
12:50
he wasn't listening to everyone. But running around
12:53
the world saying, shrugging his shoulders and saying,
12:55
oh, I didn't know. I'm just this sloppy
12:58
eight-year-old that just got out of bed.
13:00
I didn't know where all those billions
13:02
went. But wait, weren't you
13:05
sleeping with your co-founder and doing
13:07
drugs and setting up, incorporating
13:10
purposely in the Bahamas? Didn't
13:12
you hire a shady auditing firm? I mean,
13:15
all of these things just added up to your lying.
13:17
If he had gone to the authorities and said, you know
13:19
what? I fucked up. I'm guilty. I'm going to try and
13:22
get you all your money back. I want a cop-a-plea deal.
13:24
He probably would have gone to prison, but he would have gone to
13:26
prison for one to three years. I mean, this
13:28
might be a life sentence for the guy. So
13:31
I find it fascinating. There's going to be a big story
13:34
on him, but it doesn't in
13:36
any way exonerate or
13:38
make it less illegal what he did.
13:40
We've got to move through quickly here. Between
13:43
Reddit, Airbnb, TikTok, any initial
13:45
thoughts? The biggest question surrounding
13:47
Reddit is will they be able to monetize
13:49
their user base? By the way, their user
13:51
base is now bigger in America than Twitter
13:53
or Pinterest, and their average revenue per user
13:56
is now greater than Snap. Revenues
13:58
up 48%. I
14:00
mean and at 37% increase, I
14:02
mean they're firing on all cylinders
14:04
right now So this was and
14:07
I'm a small shareholder full disclosure not a
14:09
big shareholder. I'm a small shareholder here Reddit
14:12
is delivering and the question they needed
14:14
to answer is can you monetize this
14:16
incredible user base the answer is yes
14:18
in addition they get a
14:20
higher multiple because people are wondering if their
14:24
Content is especially rich like,
14:26
you know light sweet crude oil the
14:28
best kind of information for LLMs and they've
14:31
only monetized it to the extent of 50
14:33
million but people People think this might
14:35
be kind of an option They're
14:37
read it might end up being able to garner
14:39
or grow an exceptionally profitable revenue stream Selling
14:42
their data into LLMs Airbnb. I
14:45
got whacked and I'm a I'm a
14:47
shareholder I have a large position in
14:49
Airbnb and I got whacked and I
14:51
think that what's happening here is that
14:54
there was a bit of a post COVID bounce and travel
14:57
people were sick of being locked up so they were
14:59
traveling a lot and There's
15:01
fear in the market or general consensus
15:03
that that post COVID travel surge is
15:07
beginning to moderate is the way I would describe it because
15:09
if you look at the numbers they grew 18% and It
15:14
was their guidance that took them down. So still
15:16
a great company still trading at a solid multiple
15:18
It just felt like the air
15:20
got let out here and then tick-tock. This
15:22
is essentially an argument between
15:24
really powerful legal
15:28
constructs or orthodoxies one is First Amendment
15:30
and one is national
15:32
defense and The
15:34
First Amendment says that you need to
15:37
find other remedies first before you inhibit
15:39
someone's free speech But
15:42
at the same time occasionally national defense
15:45
or defense concerns Trump First
15:47
Amendment For example, we
15:49
didn't want foreign ownership or an individual to own
15:51
more than 25% of a broadcast
15:53
company So Rupert Murdoch had to become a citizen.
15:56
We do on a regular basis Let
15:59
national defense or concentration of
16:01
ownership, Trump First Amendment. I
16:04
think that as we get closer and
16:06
closer to the DC Circuit trial, if
16:08
in fact it goes to trial, I
16:11
think the odds, right now the odds are 70-30.
16:13
If you look at, you
16:15
can bet on anything now, you can bet on
16:18
this trial, they're saying it's 70% likelihood that the
16:20
government wins this case, 30% the TikTok
16:22
wins. Now, the thing
16:25
that I think will trump to be
16:27
the deciding factor here that will result
16:29
in the DC Circuit
16:31
winning if it goes to trial is the
16:33
following. The court
16:35
is typically very remiss to
16:37
overturn a decision that has the
16:40
backing of a bipartisan law passed
16:42
in Congress. Now,
16:44
having said that, and this is the
16:46
interesting part, does the
16:48
government win or does China win? The answer
16:51
is yes. And that is, this comes right up to
16:53
the date and I think you're going to see the
16:55
likelihood of a government win go from 70 to 75
16:57
to 80. And
17:00
then I think Beijing is going to decide
17:02
to negotiate directly with the White House, which
17:05
is a much easier way to negotiate than trying to
17:07
figure out public policy or laws or
17:09
negotiate through the courts. They will call the White House
17:12
and they will come to some sort of accommodation
17:15
that satisfies the White House and
17:17
that the CCP, not by dance, let's
17:19
be honest, the CCP is comfortable with
17:22
as the notion, the idea, the
17:24
threat that they're about to be
17:27
banned if they don't divest becomes a
17:29
more and more stark reality that that threat
17:32
comes into sharp relief. I think this is
17:34
similar to Twitter that when
17:36
Musk gets closer and closer to actually
17:38
having to get on the stand and
17:41
go to trial, his lawyers say, you
17:43
realize you're going to lose here, right?
17:45
And the day before he decided to close,
17:48
same thing's going to happen here. We're going to come right
17:50
up to the trial date. I don't think
17:52
it's going to go to court. I think they're going to
17:55
come to an accommodation because there's
17:57
two things here. There's the use as the
17:59
ultimate propaganda And then there's
18:01
two, hundreds of billions of dollars at stake. And
18:03
I think the CCP was hoping to hold on
18:05
to both of those things. When
18:07
it becomes increasingly clear they can only have number two,
18:09
they're just not going to have number one, they will
18:12
opt to hold on to number two and they'll come
18:14
to some sort of accommodation with the White House. What
18:16
are your thoughts on that? I just find it funny
18:18
that a Chinese company is suing the US government for
18:20
violating free speech laws. Well, you know, I don't know
18:22
if you know this ad, but in China, they have
18:24
free speech because no one has ever said otherwise. That's
18:28
good. It'll geopolitical humor.
18:32
We'll be right back after the break with a look
18:34
at Disney and Warner Brothers Discovery. Support
18:46
for the show comes from Atlassian. When you think
18:48
of AI, pizza may not be the first thing
18:50
that comes to mind. The global pizza chains are
18:52
actually using AI to scan their pies and make
18:54
sure they meet the quality standards. From
18:56
space exploration to making pizza to producing
18:58
podcasts like the one you're listening to
19:00
right now, Atlassian thinks there's
19:02
a lot about AI that companies should be
19:04
excited about. Atlassian's AI powered
19:07
software can help you glean new insights
19:09
from your data, boost individual productivity by
19:11
eliminating menial fast, and help your team
19:14
make faster, more informed decisions to produce
19:16
the best results for your customers. Plus,
19:19
Atlassian wants to ensure your data is
19:21
handled responsibly, which is why they adhere
19:23
to a strict set of responsible technology
19:25
principles. Learn how Atlassian's
19:27
AI powered software like Vira and
19:30
Confluence can help power high-performing teams
19:32
because individually we're great, but together we're
19:35
so much better. Learn
19:37
how to unleash the potential
19:39
of your team at atlassian.com.
19:41
That's a-t-l-a-s-s-i-a-n.com. Atlassian.
19:55
We're back with Prodigy Markets. For
19:58
the first time ever, Disney streamers turned
20:00
a profit for the quarter. That is, if
20:02
you don't count ESPN+. Hulu
20:04
and Disney Plus together made $47 million
20:06
in profits, but the sports platform dragged
20:08
the streaming segment to a combined loss
20:10
of $18 million. Still,
20:13
that's a huge improvement from its $659
20:16
million loss a year ago. Disney also
20:18
offered weak guidance for its Parks and
20:20
Experiences unit, citing the moderation of post-COVID
20:22
travel demand. The stock fell 10% its
20:24
worst day in more than a year. Meanwhile,
20:27
Warner Bros. Discovery reported earnings that
20:29
missed expectations on the top and
20:31
bottom lines. However, the streaming unit was
20:33
profitable and subscriber growth beat
20:36
expectations and outpaced last year's quarter.
20:38
The stock rose about 1%. Scott,
20:41
Disney and Warner Bros. were two of your stock picks
20:43
for 2024. Disney's up
20:46
15% year-to-date. Warner
20:48
Bros. is down around 30%
20:50
year-to-date. What do you make of their
20:52
performance so far? What I make of it is
20:54
my co-host is cherry picking. I had a third stock pick, bitch.
20:57
Why didn't you bring that up? You're
20:59
literally like Twitter right now. You're just
21:01
cherry picking something that makes me look bad. Oh,
21:04
no, no, no. We're discussing the two companies that
21:06
released their earnings. Anyway, I also
21:08
picked Google. What's Google up year-to-date? Let's
21:10
type that. Typing into Google. Okay,
21:14
year-to-date. Oh, it's
21:16
up 23%. Oh, but we
21:18
conveniently didn't mention that. Yeah, because we
21:20
covered Google last week. It's
21:23
up 30% since I picked it. Anyway, look,
21:27
I think it's somewhat related to Reddit because now
21:29
there's even a new ... If you
21:31
look at advertising as a share of GDP globally,
21:33
it's remarkably consistent. It's like
21:35
1.5% of GDP globally
21:37
and it hasn't been for the last 40 or 50 years.
21:40
The massive ascent of
21:43
digital platforms has come at the
21:45
cost of traditional platforms. If you
21:47
think about Reddit, if Reddit grossed
21:49
revenues 48%, that means they're increasing
21:53
their top line every year, 500 million.
21:56
That's not new economic activity. That's all coming
21:58
out of the hides. traditional
22:00
advertisers. So yet there's another player
22:02
sucking oxygen out of the room.
22:05
In Disney, I was shocked. This
22:07
was one of Disney's worst trading
22:09
days in the last decade. And I
22:11
think the thing that scared them was
22:13
the same thing that spooked Airbnb investors.
22:16
And that is, one, it looks like
22:18
the travel surge is a little bit over and people
22:20
were starting to take the parks and the $10 billion
22:22
in EBITDA that the parks create for Disney a little
22:24
bit for Grant. And then they thought, oh shit, if
22:27
the parks are going to not be the
22:29
gift that keeps on giving, we really don't
22:31
like this company. And that seemed to overwhelm.
22:33
I was surprised. If I had saw this
22:35
earnings report before the release of the market, I would
22:37
not have thought that stock would have been taken to the
22:39
woodshed. But people were really
22:42
disappointed. I also wonder if they look
22:44
at their ABC and they
22:46
look at ESPN and they say things are
22:48
only going to get worse here. And did
22:50
you see what Bob Iger said after
22:52
the opening bell the next day on Disney?
22:55
He said the following, fuck. That's
22:59
a joke. This was
23:01
a really bad day for Bob
23:04
Iger. Because you know who might
23:06
be back in about six months?
23:08
Nelson. Because the bottom
23:11
line is with activist investing, the
23:13
incumbent management team always
23:15
wins at the first election, unless they've done
23:17
something illegal. They usually win at the
23:20
second, but if the stock isn't up, they
23:22
get bounced at the third. And
23:25
if his stock goes back into the
23:27
double digits or gets down to like
23:29
80 bucks again, which
23:31
it may or may not, I actually don't think it will,
23:33
see about one of my stock picks. But if it does,
23:36
he has to fly down to Florida, kiss Nelson's ass, give
23:38
him a seat on the board, and
23:41
all of a sudden that succession plan gets
23:43
sped up. Because if the
23:45
stock underperforms, if the stock were to
23:47
go down from here, there's
23:50
then going to be new calls to break up
23:52
the company. And I don't entirely
23:54
understand why it was taken down this much. I
23:56
think it's related to Reddit. I think it's related to the same
23:59
things around. Airbnb, but I would
24:01
not have thought that Disney would have had one of
24:03
its worst days because as you pointed
24:05
out, the streaming service has great
24:07
momentum right now. But basically how this company
24:09
reforms over the next two or three quarters,
24:12
this is the crowning or
24:15
not crowning achievement on Bob's career.
24:18
He's not a young man. He's got
24:20
to announce a succession strategy probably in the next
24:22
24 months and it's either going to
24:24
be done. He's either going to take a victory lap or it's
24:26
going to be done under duress,
24:28
under the cloud of like, okay, Bob didn't figure
24:30
it out. So I
24:32
think he was crazy to come back. I mean,
24:34
literally fucking crazy to come back. He
24:37
was thought of as one of the most
24:39
talented, successful executives in history and
24:41
instead he's come back. I
24:44
just don't get it. It's like Mike Tyson
24:46
fighting again. It's all downside. It's all downside.
24:48
The other news that we should bring up
24:50
is that Disney and Warner Brothers Discovery have
24:53
announced that they're creating a new streaming bundle
24:55
that includes Disney Plus, Hulu and
24:57
Max, formerly HBO Max. It's
25:00
going to include content from
25:02
ABC, CNN, Discovery, Disney, HBO,
25:05
Hulu, Marvel, Pixar. The
25:07
list goes on. In other words, this
25:10
is cable, but on
25:12
a streaming platform. What are your thoughts on this? I
25:14
think the streaming, what's happened to the streaming market over the
25:16
last 15 years is the
25:19
only industry you'd need to look at to kind of
25:21
understand economics. The future
25:23
attracts way too much capital. The
25:26
unbelievable, the over investment results
25:28
in an unbelievable, but unsustainable
25:31
consumer value proposition, grows the
25:33
market substantially, but
25:35
unless you have cheap capital, you can't keep up. So
25:38
Netflix just basically use capital as a weapon,
25:41
outspent everybody. And then
25:43
all of a sudden the market said, okay, fun times
25:45
over. We're not just going to give you money to
25:47
acquire customers. You have to show that this is economically
25:49
viable. The company begins
25:51
to modulate and consolidate. It's consolidating everybody, but
25:53
kind of the big two or three is
25:55
looking for a dance partner real fast. They're
25:58
either going to go out a bit. or
26:00
they're going to sell to someone else. And
26:03
Netflix has not only cut its content budget,
26:06
it's raised prices, which creates cloud
26:08
cover for the other survivors to
26:11
raise prices. And you're seeing the
26:13
market just modulate, but it's
26:15
just fascinating that these
26:18
companies are basically now distressed assets. If
26:20
you look at their multiple on, Disney
26:23
still trades a decent multiple on Evita, but
26:26
people are sort of looking at Warner Brothers as
26:29
if it's going out of business. I think that's
26:31
right. And I think we haven't seen the political
26:33
advertising kick in yet. I mean, the TV network
26:36
revenue is down for Warner Brothers. I think that
26:39
scared a lot of people, but I think
26:41
it's going to come back up. The one thing I
26:43
will end this story with is a quote by Jim
26:45
Bockstahl, who is the former CEO of Netscape. So
26:48
there's only two ways to make money. You
26:50
can make money bundling and you can make
26:52
money unbundling. And it's just funny
26:54
that that's exactly what we've seen in the streaming industry.
27:00
The SEC charged the
27:03
accounting firm that
27:07
audited Trump Media with quote, massive
27:10
fraud. The agency found that
27:12
the firm BF Borgers failed
27:14
to actually order its clients before
27:16
putting its stamp of approval on
27:18
1500 public company regulatory filings. The
27:21
firm is now permanently barred from auditing public
27:23
companies, and it must also pay a $14
27:25
million fine. Trump
27:27
Media, along with all of Borgers' other clients
27:29
are now forced to find new
27:31
auditors. Scott, I'm
27:34
shocked that Trump's
27:36
auditing firm is fraudulent, what
27:38
do you think? This guy is literally a
27:40
crime boss. Everyone around him is either in
27:43
jail or has
27:45
a reputation. I mean, trying to think.
27:47
Who hasn't been, he's the definition of
27:49
toxic. Who comes in contact with this
27:51
guy and doesn't end up in
27:54
jail with a reputation ruined?
27:57
I mean, he's the definition of toxic. And
28:00
this firm, what a shocker, is
28:03
being massively accused of SEC. I was trying to
28:05
think of opportunity. The opportunity here is to get a
28:07
list of those firms that were
28:09
audited and create a basket
28:11
of shorts, because at some point in
28:13
the next one, two, three
28:15
weeks, Hindenburg or one of these short
28:18
players is gonna come out with a
28:20
research piece showing that they don't
28:22
believe a company's numbers and they're gonna highlight
28:25
that this company's auditors are BF
28:28
Borgers or Borgers or Borges or
28:30
hi, we're going to jail soon.
28:32
Big fucking deal, we lied about
28:34
everything, these guys. I
28:36
mean, my favorite status between 2019 and 2021, they
28:40
doubled their client list, but didn't
28:42
hire anybody. So they were just saying,
28:45
congratulations, send us over what you
28:47
want us to sign. And I
28:50
had, as someone who's served on a bunch of
28:52
boards and has served on the audit committee, we
28:56
work with blue chip firms, usually a Deloitte
28:59
or, wait a minute, see,
29:01
there's Deloitte, there's Deloitte. You know what I'm saying? This
29:03
is such a consolidated market. They
29:05
are so worried about getting sued that
29:08
they come back with the most ridiculous request for
29:10
disclosure and it's like, okay, aren't we being a
29:12
little overboard here? And they charge you
29:15
so much money. We keep
29:17
talking about your return
29:19
on your vested capital, it's
29:21
gonna be inversely correlated to
29:23
how sexy an industry is. A
29:26
really decent business to start
29:28
is an accounting firm or an auditing firm.
29:31
The tax code keeps getting more and more complex,
29:34
hardworking, smart, honest people to make a lot
29:36
of money in that business. Because
29:38
there just isn't a lot of competition as far as I can
29:40
tell. Yeah, I find this such
29:43
an interesting dynamic here because I think
29:46
what regulators are increasingly realizing about
29:48
Trump and honestly,
29:50
what makes him great, in my view, is
29:53
they basically realize that he is a honeypot for
29:56
criminals. I'll bet what
29:58
probably happened here is the SEC said... Hey,
30:00
I wonder what accounting firm in their
30:03
right mind would decide,
30:05
yeah, let's associate with Trump, let's associate with
30:07
Truth Social, and let's represent them as
30:10
their auditing firm. And so the SEC
30:12
investigating, and what do you know, 75% of the audits this firm
30:14
has ever
30:16
produced over its 15-year history
30:18
have been fraudulent. And
30:20
it has the eighth largest client list in the
30:22
US, yet it only employs, I mean, you kind
30:25
of made this point earlier, it only employs 10
30:28
certified public accountants across the whole company,
30:30
and operates out of this random
30:32
little one-story building in a suburb in Denver.
30:35
So this is a huge deal. There are
30:37
170 public companies that now need to find
30:39
a new accountant. But the
30:42
thing we should remember is that none of
30:44
this would have been possible if it weren't
30:46
for Donald Trump. I mean, whether
30:49
you like him or not, he has basically
30:51
been a phenomenal servant for the US justice
30:54
system, because he acts as a mousetrap for
30:56
all these other fraudsters and criminals, which are
30:58
now coming to light. It's also part of
31:00
a larger theme that's a really unfortunate thing
31:02
in America, and that is the
31:05
new superpower is shamelessness. And
31:09
that thread that sort of struck my eyes was
31:11
a woman
31:13
is giving testimony under oath outlining
31:16
the sexual encounter and graphic detail he had
31:18
with a porn star and then paying her
31:21
off. And it's like not
31:23
even that interesting news today, because there's so much other
31:25
shit going on. This is a guy running for president.
31:28
Gary Hart had an affair in
31:31
the election I had of 20, 30 years
31:33
ago, and basically it dominated the news every day.
31:36
Bill Clinton had an affair
31:38
with one of his interns and it dominated the
31:40
news every day. And this
31:42
barely even registers as news, because
31:45
shamelessness is everyone's new superpower. Oh, you killed
31:47
your dog and buried it in a gravel
31:50
pit and claimed you met with Kim Jong
31:52
Un and you actually didn't. Just
31:54
continue to lie. Don't back down. I'm
31:57
totally shameless about it. I
31:59
don't know entirely how to label it. It's literally
32:01
the toxic
32:03
shamelessness, but the market
32:06
seems to be rewarding it. So
32:08
it's an unfortunate thing that shamelessness
32:11
has become the superpower. And any one
32:13
of these things would have taken down any
32:16
other presidential candidate and anything. But again,
32:18
because there's so many of them, it
32:21
just gets lost in the noise of this
32:23
conspiracy that everyone's out to get them. No,
32:26
no, everything this guy
32:28
does is usually has
32:30
some connection to some
32:33
sort of criminal activity. It's just, it's
32:36
crazy. I don't, I don't, I
32:38
don't, I should move to London. We'll
32:41
be right back after the break. We're going to look at Uber's earnings.
32:55
Fox Creative. This is
32:57
advertiser content from Atlassian. One
33:00
of our customers who produces pizza at a
33:02
very large scale all across the world, believe
33:05
it or not, they use AI to review
33:07
the quality of the pizzas that are created.
33:09
That goes through a workflow that scans the
33:11
images of the pizzas and make sure they
33:14
visually look like what they should. So it's
33:16
pretty cool. That's
33:18
Sharif Monsoor, Atlassian's head of
33:20
AI. Sharif thinks there's a
33:22
lot for companies to be excited
33:25
about on the AI generated horizon,
33:27
spanning everything from making pizza to
33:29
producing podcasts like the one you're
33:31
listening to now. There'll be
33:33
far more jobs created on the other side of
33:35
this revolution. Instead of a
33:37
world of less, Sharif envisions an
33:39
AI powered world of law. In
33:42
everyone's day job, they're moving from doing
33:44
the thing to often being an architect
33:46
of the thing. It
33:48
unleashes the potential of every human. I think
33:50
we can go from a world where few
33:52
people have access to a high level of
33:54
intelligence to a lot more people having access
33:57
to this information. AI is really giving everyone
33:59
on the planet. more resources to do
34:01
great things and I'm very optimistic about that
34:03
opportunity that lies ahead. Transform
34:05
teamwork with the power of AI human
34:08
collaboration. Start using
34:10
Atlassian intelligence for your Atlassian
34:12
products like Jira and Confluence
34:14
now. Learn more
34:16
at atlassian.com. That's
34:20
a-t-l-a-s-s-i-a-n.com We're
34:32
back with Frofft markets. First
34:34
quarter bookings at Uber rose 20% from a year
34:36
earlier. However, that
34:38
number was below analysts expectations and the
34:40
stock fell 9%. The
34:43
company also posted a $654 million
34:45
loss for the quarter. Analysts had expected
34:47
a profit and that loss was largely
34:49
due to the revaluation of Uber's venture
34:52
investments, which were marked down by $721
34:55
million. Scott, this
34:57
is a huge hit to earnings and it's coming directly
35:00
after one of Uber's best ever quarters. What do
35:02
you make of this? I think Dara Kastashahi is
35:04
a great CEO. I think Uber is one of
35:06
the great turnarounds you could argue. They've
35:09
done an amazing job. The whole space
35:11
seems to be getting
35:13
better. They're paying their drivers more. Revenues are
35:15
up. I love the fact that the
35:17
number two looks like it's going to survive. Lift
35:20
is doing really well. On the whole, I
35:22
think ride hailing is doing great. This just
35:24
seems like a quarter. It feels like a
35:26
lot of these things, whether it was Airbnb
35:30
or Meta or Uber. Just their
35:32
stocks have gotten out a little
35:35
in front of their skis, if you will. The
35:38
reason that they're having this massive loss is
35:40
because of this $721 million
35:42
loss from revaluing
35:45
their investments, their equity investments,
35:47
i.e. DD, Aurora, Grab, Karim,
35:49
all these other
35:52
taxi-esque startups. That's
35:54
huge. That's basically their entire net
35:56
loss this quarter. I want to
35:58
talk about that. for a
36:00
moment because you compare that to last
36:03
quarter's earnings. They turned a
36:05
huge profit, and the
36:07
main reason for that profit was, again,
36:10
revaluing their equity investments. They
36:12
posted a $1 billion gain from
36:14
the value of their
36:17
venture investments. I just find
36:19
this kind of suspicious that
36:22
we're seeing these wild swings in
36:24
the value of their investments. $1
36:26
billion gain, one quarter to
36:28
a $720 million loss
36:30
the next quarter. Those
36:32
investments are ultimately dictating whether
36:35
their earnings, whether the bottom line is
36:37
positive or negative. Well, they couldn't have
36:39
done anything wrong here Ed, because they're
36:41
accounting from BF Borscher's signed off
36:43
on it. By the way, I don't
36:46
think that's true. I don't think Uber's
36:48
accounting firm is BF
36:50
Borscher's. I imagine
36:53
a bunch of French guys are
36:55
like, oh, they're stupid. Just
36:57
send them a bill. Yeah, whatever you
36:59
want. We're signing off on it. Jacques
37:01
Borscher. Jacques Borscher. Okay, so
37:04
technically what you're stating is this
37:06
all comes down to the mark. Private equity
37:08
firms and VC firms have been accused consistently
37:10
of fucking around with their marks, because
37:13
when they go into fundraising, they want to have good numbers
37:15
to raise a bunch of money or to
37:17
pay themselves. Now, typically a
37:20
firm that does responsible marks and has
37:22
them signed up by an auditor, the responsible auditor will
37:24
go, well, what are you basing your mark on? For
37:27
example, I donate stock to nonprofits and I have
37:29
to hire a third party firm to
37:32
value that stock. They do a
37:34
pretty good job and they come back and they say the stock is
37:36
worth this and this is why we think. They're not afraid to come
37:38
back and say it's worth less than it was last
37:41
year. Typically, with these kinds
37:43
of companies, the mark should be pretty obvious, because
37:46
they just look at a recent round of
37:48
financing, then they look at how the publicly
37:51
traded companies compare in terms of marks.
37:53
The best marks are from its valuation in the
37:56
public markets and if it's a private company, what
37:59
are the... the last round's
38:01
valuation of third party
38:03
investments, not related parties. And then they
38:05
look at what's happened in that time
38:07
to the whole sector. So
38:10
a responsible auditing firm will say,
38:12
okay, your mark is off, or
38:15
we're only signing off on
38:17
this valuation. But I don't
38:19
think, I've got to think that Uber with
38:21
the Dara and with the investors it has
38:24
is probably got as legitimate
38:27
a mark as anybody else has. The more, I
38:29
think interesting thing here is I think you're about
38:32
to see a massive
38:34
increase in venture capital investment from
38:37
corporate venture. I think you're
38:39
going to see a lot of this. I think a
38:41
lot of firms, especially this
38:43
size, are going to start buying
38:45
stakes or making investments almost
38:47
like a free option, not a free option. They're
38:50
going to start buying options in other companies. They
38:53
get access to information. They get an
38:55
inside track and acquisition. And sometimes
38:57
they say, we can help this firm grow
39:00
its value and recognize in the
39:02
upside. There's always a cycle here. Then
39:04
there'll be a bunch of losses and then external
39:07
shareholders or an activist will show up and say, what are
39:09
you, a VC firm or in the ride hailing business? But
39:12
I think we're going to see over the next three
39:14
to five years a surge in
39:16
corporate venture capital. We're already seeing
39:18
it 63% of venture funding
39:21
for Q3 of last year was corporate
39:23
VC. That's amazing. That's the
39:25
highest percentage in history for corporations.
39:28
I mean, think about that. Two
39:30
thirds VCs are only
39:32
a third of venture investment. I mean, that's
39:34
just the people are supposedly pros at
39:36
this. I mean, it's really interesting. You're probably
39:38
going to see a lot of what I see in the venture
39:40
capital, what I have a lot of friends who are venture capitalists.
39:43
The really big ones are raising enormous funds
39:45
and everybody else is struggling. I mean,
39:48
there's some niche firms that are very,
39:50
very focused, but for
39:52
the most part, fundraising has gotten harder and harder
39:55
for everyone but the biggest funds because big is
39:57
just better. I mean, there's literally a correlation between.
40:00
between returns
40:02
and the size of the firm right now.
40:04
The biggest firms are just doing better. And
40:06
that's also true in VCs and private equity
40:09
players, and they can diversify more, attract better
40:11
talent, they have the capital to defend their
40:13
positions, and on and on
40:15
and on. And they attract the best talent because
40:17
their management fees are bigger and they can pay
40:19
their people really well. So I
40:21
think you're going to see increased consolidation, which
40:23
isn't a good thing, but you're going
40:27
to see a lot of the players
40:30
from the smaller firms, really good firms, leave
40:32
and go run corporate
40:35
venture for General Electric or
40:37
for LVMH. I mean, LVMH actually has a
40:39
huge investment in a great firm called El
40:41
Catterton that has been very successful. But
40:44
I think you're going to see even more of that. I
40:46
think you're going to see firms that you wouldn't have thought
40:48
of being in the venture business have,
40:50
say, okay, we're going to take 100 million, a billion,
40:52
3 million, $5 billion, and
40:55
we're essentially going to start a
40:57
wing of Snowflake called Snowflake VC or whatever.
40:59
I think you're going to see a lot
41:01
of this. Which is going to bring up
41:03
a huge and interesting conversation for shareholders, which
41:06
is, do you want to be
41:08
a shareholder in Uber or do you want
41:10
to be an investor and a shareholder in
41:12
Uber Ventures? And those are two very, very
41:14
different things. And I think that's going to
41:16
be an important question for shareholders to
41:18
start asking themselves. But let's
41:20
move on to the week ahead. We'll
41:23
see earnings from Home Depot, Walmart, and Alibaba.
41:25
And we'll also see the consumer price and
41:28
producer price indices for April. Do
41:30
you have any predictions? Well, what I said earlier, my
41:32
prediction is that the case
41:34
filed by TikTok, I
41:36
think on the eve of the court case,
41:38
they come to a settlement. No
41:41
one loses their TikTok. A
41:43
ban doesn't happen and it never ends up
41:45
in court. And just
41:47
to follow on to that, the value
41:49
in the secondary market of ByteDance
41:52
shares skyrockets. And I predict Profft
41:54
G Market hits top 10 in
41:56
global podcasts. There you go. From
41:58
your words to God's ear. Oh
42:01
my god, I feel a date coming for
42:03
the little dog. That's right.
42:06
That's right. You should literally just have shirts
42:08
printed up that say, I'm 34. Ask
42:11
me why. That's
42:14
very exciting. Congratulations, Ed. We're two ahead of
42:16
Ben Shapiro. We're five behind
42:19
Andrew Huberman. We're two ahead of Ben
42:21
Shapiro. We're ahead of
42:23
Huberman? No, we're five behind Huberman. And
42:26
I think we're about 30 ahead of Pivot. Just
42:28
start saying you hate alcohol. You
42:30
hate alcohol. That'll get us up. Let
42:33
me just save you millions of hours of
42:35
Huberman lab. Don't drink alcohol.
42:38
Sunlight for 90 minutes. All right. This
42:41
episode was produced by Claire Miller and engineered
42:43
by Benjamin Spencer. Our associate producer is Jennifer
42:45
Sanchez and Alison Weiss. Our executive producer is
42:48
Jason Stavors and Catherine Dillon. Mia Silvera
42:50
is our research lead and Drew Burrows
42:52
is our technical director. Thank
42:54
you for listening to Prof G Markets from the Vox
42:56
Media Podcast Network. Join us on
42:58
Wednesday for office hours and we'll be back
43:00
with a fresh take on markets every Monday.
43:03
And don't forget to subscribe to the new
43:05
Prof G Markets channel, wherever you get
43:07
your podcasts.
43:50
Support for the show comes from Atlassian.
43:52
Whether you're exploring space, making pizza or
43:54
producing a podcast like this one here,
43:57
chances are your team is marching into
43:59
the AI. generated horizon. Atlassian
44:01
Intelligence is unleashing a new era of
44:04
teamwork. You can use Atlassian's AI-powered products
44:06
for everything from brainstorming ideas to finding
44:08
information to summarizing huge
44:10
documents, all by using normal, everyday
44:12
language. Atlassian AI-powered software, including JIRA
44:15
and Confluence, helps teams accomplish what
44:17
would otherwise be impossible alone. Because
44:20
individually we're great, but together
44:23
we're so much better. Learn
44:25
how you can transform teamwork
44:27
with the power of AI
44:30
at atlassian.com. Again, that's atlassian.com.
44:32
Atlassian.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More