Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:01
You don't help the poor by
0:03
making everybody poorer. The media
0:06
has a frame, and the frame is
0:08
Israel is the oppressor, and the Palestinians
0:10
are the oppressed. I shouldn't be forced
0:12
to acknowledge my privilege unless I desire
0:14
for that to be part of my
0:16
interaction with somebody else. What I know
0:19
to be true and what all of my fellow
0:21
Gen Z know to be true is that
0:23
this is the most talented generation yet.
0:25
With respect to every indicia
0:27
of disadvantage, there is still
0:29
a racial hierarchy. And though I
0:32
am of course an Anglo, I'm certainly
0:34
not a f***ing sex addict. Welcome
0:37
to the Monk Debates. Every episode we provide
0:39
you with a civil and substantive debate on
0:41
the big issue of the day. Our goal
0:43
is to arm you, the listener, with enough
0:45
information to make up your own mind. Today's
0:49
debate be resolved. Elites have
0:51
betrayed America. With
0:55
Richmond North of Richmond, the
0:57
Lord knows that all just
0:59
want to have total control.
1:02
Want to know what you think,
1:04
want to know what you do,
1:06
and they don't think you know.
1:08
But I know that you do,
1:10
because your dollar ain't shit, and
1:13
his tax to no end. Cause
1:15
a rich man, don't the rich
1:17
man. In
1:23
the end, the politician, Oliver Anthony debuted at number one
1:25
on the charts in the fall of 2023, giving
1:29
voice to the anger and frustration felt by
1:31
a generation of Americans struggling to make ends
1:33
meet. Populists
1:35
argue that government agencies and our
1:37
culture as a whole have been
1:39
captured by an elite college educated
1:42
class whose policies benefit
1:44
them, the privileged few while
1:46
ignoring the needs of working
1:48
Americans. That's why I'm
1:50
here with Trump's former Chief of Staff, Steve Bannon. based
2:00
in this country has been eviscerated in
2:02
the elites, the ascended economy of Silicon
2:04
Valley, Wall Street, Hollywood and
2:07
Washington DC, and she's got the gall to sit
2:09
up there. Populism's critics
2:11
believe that the rising tide
2:13
in anti-establishment thinking ignores the
2:15
incredible progress being made on
2:18
healthcare, education, technology, all the
2:20
factors and forces transforming our
2:22
lives for the better, forces
2:25
brought about by the
2:27
skills, the fortitude, the
2:29
intellectual curiosity of elites.
2:32
Populist anger, the critics
2:34
argue, represents a grave threat
2:36
to Western democracies and the
2:38
trusted institutions that have underwritten
2:41
our security and prosperity.
2:45
On this installment of the Monk Debates
2:47
podcast, we challenge the essence of these
2:49
arguments by debating the motion, be it
2:51
resolved, elites have betrayed America. Moving
2:54
in favor of the motion is Batya
2:56
Angar Sargun. She's the opinion editor
2:58
of Newsweek and author of the
3:00
new book, Second Class, How the
3:03
Elites Betrayed America's Working Men and
3:05
Women. Arguing against the
3:07
motion is Joel Stein. He's a former columnist
3:09
at Time Magazine and author
3:11
of In Defense of the Leads. Batya,
3:15
Joel, welcome to the Monk Debates.
3:18
Hi, thanks for having me. Hey, good to
3:20
be here. Great debate
3:22
today. It's one
3:24
that we've wanted to do for a
3:26
while now on the Monk Debates podcast,
3:29
so the opportunity to dig into this
3:31
meaty topic with you both is appreciated.
3:33
Batya, as per our debate convention here,
3:35
we're going to put two minutes on
3:37
our show clock. Turn the
3:40
program over to you. You're arguing for our motion,
3:42
be it resolved, elites have betrayed
3:45
America. In
3:47
the next hour, I'm going to convince you
3:49
that the elites have betrayed America. Who
3:52
are these elites? You Can define
3:54
them economically as people who are wealthier than
3:56
the average American. You can define them as
3:58
the expert class, people with credential. You
4:01
can provide them culturally as the
4:03
media or the political class. But
4:05
here's the thing however you define
4:08
elite, the truth remains the same.
4:10
The elites have betrayed the American
4:12
people because be expert and the
4:14
cultural elites have become the economic
4:17
elites through an intentional plunder of
4:19
the middle class. Of course the
4:21
experts betrayed America with bad expertise
4:24
to economist convinced us set free
4:26
trade would be great when the
4:28
true is is devastated. The working
4:31
class, the medical establishment told us that
4:33
the vaccinated can't catch cove it and
4:35
their children would die of it, which
4:37
was nonsense that led to social and
4:40
economic devastation. The foreign policy experts told
4:42
us that we needed to wage endless
4:44
wars, fruitless bloody endeavors that made the
4:46
world less safe, and a journalist cast
4:49
told us that every Trump voter is
4:51
racist. Well, the black and Hispanic voters
4:53
fleeing the Democratic party for Trump would
4:55
beg to differ. The real scandal, though,
4:58
is that while giving us this. Terrible
5:00
expert advice. The Elites were engaged
5:03
in class warfare against the working
5:05
class, literally lining their pockets with
5:07
the proceeds of their policies. Steaks
5:10
sported good paying manufacturing jobs to
5:12
China and imported cheap goods for
5:15
themselves and then created an economy
5:17
that rewards knowledge, industry jobs and
5:19
destroys working class communities. Stay smeared
5:22
Working class Americans as racists for
5:24
wanting less competition from illegal migrants
5:26
and then opened the border to
5:29
demolish working. Class wages. Further back
5:31
in the nineties, the average working
5:33
class person earned and income commensurate
5:36
to that of the average college
5:38
professor. The majority of the Gdp
5:40
was in the middle class today.
5:42
the top twenty percent, though same
5:45
college professors and other elites control
5:47
over fifty percent of the Gdp,
5:49
while the working class struggle. So
5:51
for groceries, this didn't happen by
5:53
accident, but by an over credentialed
5:56
elite who use their positions to
5:58
create policy that actively. The remind
6:00
the middle class with it up or
6:02
transfer of wealth to themselves. Be it
6:05
resolved, The Elites have betrayed the American
6:07
people. Thank you
6:09
Basher for that hoping. Same as
6:11
you're listening to or debates. Had
6:13
day on a Leafs healthy betrayed
6:15
us or not, it's Jaws arguing
6:17
against the most. I'm jealous of
6:19
your. Opening. Statement Now. That.
6:22
Was that was a lot? Okay, I'll
6:25
stop worrying about populism back in two
6:27
thousand it is. When. I heard
6:29
Sarah Palin say i'm never going to pretend
6:31
like I know more than the next person.
6:34
I'm not going to pretend to be an
6:36
elitist. In fact, I'm going to fight the
6:38
of buddhist. Surveillance.
6:40
Seemingly was unaware there's a third option.
6:43
To learn something so you know something more
6:45
than the next person? This
6:47
myth that the elite or selfishly
6:49
rigging the system while doing nothing
6:52
useful conveniently ignores the fact that
6:54
the system we built is also.
6:57
If. This were an argument for any other
6:59
group of your besides the elite. I'd
7:01
now list all the amazing things we've
7:03
accomplished and contributed throughout history, but I
7:05
don't need to do that. Because.
7:08
Elites have created everything that
7:10
ever existed. Except. Maybe like
7:12
jello wrestling? As honestly,
7:14
the Ancient Greeks created wrestling. And
7:17
I think I'm Peter Cooper who founded
7:19
the Universe. These. Discovered. Gelatin
7:21
so all the now beats every i
7:23
put jello and wrestling together. That's
7:25
or big accomplishment. And know
7:28
it's now. go over the great
7:30
successes of Populism where we define
7:32
the sky. A mythical real American
7:34
or real German. The working class
7:36
who knows from their got what
7:38
his way. To. Accomplish months
7:40
of populism include. The. Dark
7:42
Ages. China's. Cultural Revolution.
7:45
North. Korea, Pol.
7:48
Pot skimmers, Andrew
7:50
Jackson. Network Television
7:52
says disaster after disaster.
7:56
Know the Elites haven't gotten
7:58
everything right. New One. The
8:00
in every part of society that runs
8:02
it is ever going to get everything
8:04
right. But. They've done a hell of
8:06
a job. A. Leaders, I'm
8:08
his expertise. And. Is
8:11
an ever more complex society? We
8:13
need expertise. He. Attack on
8:15
the Elites is nothing but fear. It's
8:17
the political expression of this anxiety.
8:20
That. We would like to return to it's
8:22
simpler pre modern life. And.
8:24
If we get rid of the elite. That's exactly
8:27
what's gonna happen. And. No one's gonna
8:29
like it. Thank. You
8:31
Joe for that, don't think same And now
8:33
we move on to rip bottles or basher
8:35
your opportunity of react to what you just
8:37
heard from show. Now. You.
8:39
Know most working class people don't
8:41
want to go back to a
8:43
pre modern time. They wanna go
8:46
back to the seventies when working
8:48
class wages and productivity moved hand
8:50
in hand. What happened in Nineteen
8:52
seventy One is that productivity and
8:54
wages, the couples and all of
8:56
the Gdp that was created by
8:58
increasing exponentially process and productivity went
9:00
to the elites and not and
9:02
away from the working class who
9:04
produced all that profits and mean
9:06
what they really want is a
9:08
return to a very. Recent past
9:10
in which it felt like the
9:12
middle class was stronger because it
9:14
objective leads wise and to your
9:16
point about the elite creating everything
9:18
and populism been terrible. The populist
9:20
vision is that when the majority
9:22
of a country wants and saying
9:24
it should have and that's really
9:26
another word for democracy. The vast
9:29
majority of working class Americans which
9:31
is the majority of this country
9:33
has a very clear vision of
9:35
how it there are lots could
9:37
be improved and how they have
9:39
been sold. down the river economically they
9:41
don't want to return to any cultural pass
9:43
in fact they're much more tolerant and they
9:45
have ever been there extremely propagates their into
9:47
diversity and interracial marriage the idea that this
9:49
has been to riven by it's you know
9:52
this feeling of you know bigotry or or
9:54
racial animus and all of this it's just
9:56
nonsense as you know because you spent time
9:58
with a lot of the people, Joel.
10:00
So to me, what they want is what
10:02
everybody wants, which is for a country to
10:04
be built on a strong middle class. And
10:07
it is the elites that have made that
10:09
increasingly impossible. Thank you,
10:11
Baccia. Okay, Joel, you're rebuttal now.
10:13
You can react to Baccia's opening
10:15
statement or her remarks in response
10:17
to your opening. First
10:20
of all, I am honored to be debating
10:22
you. You've written
10:24
for New York Times. You've been
10:26
on NPR. You have a PhD
10:28
from Berkeley, and I believe the
10:31
18th century novel. So I
10:33
love talking about elitism with you.
10:36
The desire to return to the 1970s is definitely going
10:40
back in time and to a
10:42
time that we can't return to. The problem,
10:44
I think you're conflating the
10:46
word elite in a
10:49
way that you shouldn't, which is there is
10:51
an economic elite and there's a
10:53
cultural elite. And they're not the same
10:55
people. There's plenty of people in the
10:57
middle of the country who are entrepreneurs, who started
10:59
businesses where they own a bunch of
11:02
gas stations, et cetera, who are part of the
11:04
economic elite. What I think populist,
11:07
at least in this country, tend to
11:09
focus on is the intellectual elite.
11:12
And to say that people, it's
11:14
a democracy and people can vote for
11:16
whoever they want, the
11:19
majority of people they vote for
11:21
are experts. Most people
11:23
in the Senate or Congress, they've
11:25
almost all gone to college. More
11:28
of them have gone to Harvard than
11:30
any other college. This is who people
11:32
choose because we know it's a complex
11:34
society. We're going through a great shift
11:37
to a knowledge economy, which is devastated,
11:40
the middle class, devastated men,
11:42
particularly in the middle class. And
11:44
to just ask for things to go
11:46
back is not the way to save
11:48
it. I think elites know that the
11:50
only way economically to improve the situation
11:53
of the middle class is to
11:55
move them on board into the knowledge economy. And there's great
11:57
shifts coming again. And it's going to be hard for them
11:59
to do that. hard, just like
12:01
the agricultural revolution was harder for
12:03
generations of farmers. If
12:06
we look at the industrial revolution, you
12:08
had a bunch of craftspeople who went
12:11
to factories and literally
12:13
destroyed them with hammers and left notes
12:15
from Ned Ludd. It's where we get
12:17
Luddites. It's a difficult
12:19
period, but just to wish the
12:21
pass back isn't going to help. We need
12:23
to move people into the elites. We need
12:25
to move people into colleges. We need to
12:27
find a way to make men enjoy going
12:30
to college and enjoy learning. Otherwise, it's just
12:32
going to get worse. Thank
12:35
you both for some terrific opening
12:37
statements and rebuttals. You're listening to
12:39
our debate today, be it resolve,
12:41
elites have betrayed America. I'm
12:43
going to join now with some questions kind of
12:45
top of mind for our listeners tuning in. Let's
12:47
just spend a moment with definitions
12:49
because I think in a debate like this, definitions are
12:52
important. So I want to hear from both of you,
12:55
your definition of an elite. What are we
12:57
talking about here? Who is this?
13:00
How do you characterize an
13:02
elite in 21st century
13:05
America or the West today? Batia, why don't
13:07
you start? Well, so
13:09
they open my opening remarks. You
13:11
can define it sort of three ways. You can define
13:13
it economically. You can define it culturally or you
13:16
can define it in terms of credentials. The
13:19
thing is, is that the economic
13:21
component now maps onto the cultural
13:23
question and the expertise question. So
13:25
if you get a college degree
13:28
today, you are much more
13:30
likely to enter into to achieve the American
13:32
dream. You're much more likely to be a
13:34
homeowner. You will on average make one million
13:36
dollars more over the course of your career
13:38
than somebody who doesn't have a college degree. You
13:40
live longer. Your health outcomes are better and
13:43
and that sort of piece of things
13:45
where the top 20 percent controls over
13:47
50 percent of the GDP and getting
13:50
into that top 20 percent involves getting
13:52
a credential or multiple credentials. That
13:54
To me is how you define the elites and the working
13:56
class would be people who work in jobs who are sort
13:58
of the non-elites, you know. The working jobs that
14:01
don't require skills he would pick up in
14:03
college and who are locked out of that
14:05
top twenty percent. I will just point out
14:07
that so you know the obvious question would
14:09
be, you know why isn't all right that
14:11
we should just be sending everybody to College
14:14
of Arts College is correlated with all these
14:16
wonderful outcomes. Shouldn't we just send everybody to
14:18
college? And the answer to that is twofold.
14:20
The first piece of it is. Fifty.
14:23
Percent of people with a college degree
14:25
are quote what's called under employed, Which
14:27
means they're working in jobs that don't
14:29
require the skills that they picked up
14:31
in college. Although infuriatingly, they still make
14:33
more than working class people in the
14:35
same jobs. This is just a statistic
14:38
that the Wall Street Journal reported on
14:40
a few months ago that's been born
14:42
out again and again. Get used to
14:44
be forty percent now fifty percent. and
14:46
those were over producing already college degrees.
14:48
In terms of what our economy can
14:50
sustain, we have a massive, massive. Shortage
14:53
of skilled trades folks. Because President
14:55
Obama be funded, it's a vocational
14:57
training. We actually will always need
14:59
people to be plumbers, electricians and
15:01
truck drivers and certified nurses, aides
15:03
and worked in working class jobs
15:05
whereas we pretty much hit or
15:08
limit of Accountants and Gender Studies
15:10
podcast or that cetera et cetera,
15:12
all these things that come out
15:14
of you know, colleges and so
15:16
what what? By saying what's his
15:18
final everybody into college our economy
15:20
can't sustain that. and plus. A
15:23
lot of people aren't suited for that. they don't
15:25
want that and we are so lucky. But.
15:27
They want to be janitors rather than wanting
15:29
to be gender studies podcasts. You know how
15:31
lucky we are that there are people who
15:34
get dignity out of cleaning the diapers of
15:36
the elderly? You know who's going to do
15:38
those jobs over the left? The Liberals. They
15:40
will just import people to do those jobs
15:43
within. What? What are those seventy percent of
15:45
this country were working class supposed to do
15:47
know? The answer is is that we should
15:49
restore dignity to the working class and stop
15:52
saying you need credentials Inward would see the
15:54
most basic, modest version of the American dream.
15:58
So. jewels more question for you do
16:00
Except Batia's kind of
16:02
multifaceted, multi-layered definitions of
16:04
elites, do you see
16:07
also her point that to
16:09
define elite is to define
16:11
a convergence. So it's a
16:13
convergence of economic privilege, of
16:15
educational privilege, of material
16:18
privilege, one through credentialization.
16:20
Is that how you see elites also or
16:22
do you have a different view? I
16:26
think there are two different kinds of elites that
16:28
we're shoving together here. First, I want
16:30
to object to the idea that there's people
16:32
who are really eager to clean the diapers
16:34
of the elderly. I'm going
16:37
to question the truth of that. And
16:39
I'm also wondering, it was kind of timely on
16:41
my watch to see how long it would take
16:43
for you to mention plumbers and electricians. Because
16:46
every time you have this debate with someone, they
16:48
talk about plumbers and electricians. Those are
16:51
well-paid jobs that you don't necessarily have
16:53
to have a college degree for. There
16:55
are not that many plumbers. We are not going
16:57
to have a nation of plumbers. We can't shut
16:59
down factory jobs and assume everyone's going
17:02
to be a plumber. That's not what happens. People
17:05
mention plumbers because the
17:07
populace love masculinity. And it's
17:10
a masculine job and it's a well-paid job
17:12
and it's a job that's expertise. If you
17:14
don't go to college, you don't become a
17:16
plumber. We don't need 100 million plumbers. What
17:19
you become is either a service
17:21
worker at a restaurant or
17:23
someone who works in the healthcare industry, i.e.
17:27
working in someone's house who's elderly
17:29
and rich, taking care
17:31
of their diapers. You become a servant. And
17:34
that's really the options left in the society.
17:37
And when you move further and further into a
17:39
knowledge economy, those are the
17:41
choices. And we do not... You can talk
17:43
about how great these kind of ancient
17:46
masculine jobs are, but they're just not going
17:48
to be around. And to tell people that,
17:50
I think is doing them a horrible disservice.
17:53
As far as the types of elites, I
17:55
talk in my book about the boat elite versus
17:58
the intellectual elite. have
18:00
right now is this fight between two
18:02
different kinds of elites. One
18:04
is the kind that lives in an honor culture,
18:07
believes in masculinity in an old-fashioned
18:10
way, believes in power and
18:13
money. And the other half
18:15
is the kind that's your listener. It's
18:18
the kind of person who would rather give
18:20
a TED Talk than own a yacht.
18:23
And I think that's the kind that really
18:25
threatens people. Is the, was it
18:27
the gender podcaster? This
18:30
is the kind of person who is
18:32
considered not of the people,
18:34
not American enough. And the
18:36
elite are always contrasted with the true
18:39
people who know in their gut what's
18:41
right. And the elites,
18:43
honestly, they're vilified as
18:46
either feminists or gay. And
18:48
really, I think this is the heart of it, Jews. It's
18:52
these kind of urban elite that everyone is threatened
18:54
by. And this desire
18:56
to get to a true national
18:58
American populace that's somewhere in the middle
19:00
of the country and knows right
19:02
and wrong in their gut is a very,
19:05
very dangerous idea. Hi, Monk
19:07
listeners. I
19:10
wanted to tell you about our
19:12
upcoming Monk debate on anti-Zionism. On
19:15
June 17th, author and journalist Douglas
19:17
Murray and UK-based international law expert
19:19
Natasha Hochstorf will debate former MSNBC
19:22
commentator and columnist Mity Hassan and
19:24
Israeli journalist Gideon Levy on stage
19:27
in Toronto in front of a
19:29
live audience of 3,000 people.
19:33
The debate will be streamed, so if you
19:35
can't make it in person, you can watch
19:37
it from the comfort of your living room.
19:40
Find out how to become a Monk
19:42
member and get more live stream access
19:44
to the Monk debate on anti-Zionism. This
19:47
is our website
19:49
right now, www.munkdebates.com.
19:54
Listening to our debate today be it
19:56
resolved, elites have betrayed America. Batch,
19:58
I want to come to you. Time. For.
20:01
The process conversation along the line
20:03
that we're currently on which trying
20:05
to define who elites are. A
20:08
Lot of this debate. Does it
20:10
not seem cultural as Shaw said,
20:12
it's it's about perceived grievances. It's
20:14
about one group feeling left out.
20:17
another group. Feeling. That
20:19
side they want to defend. Their.
20:21
Privileges and their their powers.
20:24
In. If if we accept that, if
20:26
we accept that it's this is a
20:28
cultural debate as much or more than
20:31
it might be an economic or political
20:33
debate. Doesn't That suggests that you know
20:35
elites are here. Sustain that. This is
20:37
a timeless debates. This is a debate
20:39
we could have had. Fifty years. Three
20:41
hundred years. A. Thousand years
20:43
ago, we're counting Angels on the head
20:46
of appear. So. Let
20:48
me just get it straight: the
20:50
Elites and plunder for the middle
20:52
class now control fifty percent of
20:54
the Gdp. Okay, and from that
20:57
Parker said extreme economic privilege. They
20:59
look at the losers who can
21:01
no longer afford a home who
21:03
don't have four hundred dollars to
21:05
rub together and say, oh, This
21:08
is a cultural grievance. All
21:10
this is racism. Break:
21:13
This is purely economic and I just
21:15
spent the year traveling the country interviewing
21:17
working class people for my book Second
21:20
Class and what I found was remarkable.
21:22
Consensus between are working class people who
21:24
are democrats and who are conservative vote
21:26
for republicans. Other mostly, they don't look
21:29
for Republicans anymore. They vote for Donald
21:31
Trump. They have huge economic problems, The
21:33
American Dream. It's totally out of reach
21:36
for them. By What right does the
21:38
top twenty percent sneer at these people
21:40
and say this is a cultural. Issue
21:43
I need stat went out the window with
21:45
Thomas Frank spots. How could anybody still believe
21:47
that looking at people can't afford groceries? What
21:49
spots! And by the way, the people in
21:51
my book are of all races of all
21:54
religious backgrounds in many, many industries. and I'm
21:56
sorry it's all you should read the book
21:58
because you'll meet people who take a lot
22:00
of finity and being a janitor and a
22:02
lot of dignity. And yes, working in nursing
22:05
homes and taking care of the elderly. I
22:07
guess that the elites think that that job
22:09
is beneath contempt. But lucky for us, there's
22:11
a lot of people who get a lot
22:13
of dignity from doing that, and we should
22:16
respect them instead of sneering at them and
22:18
under cutting their wages by importing millions and
22:20
millions of people from spell socialist states to
22:22
compete with them and drive down the wages.
22:25
They que vous you're super building on his
22:28
show. And. You can
22:30
sense the anger that the Bass
22:32
You has around this debate an
22:34
issue and we know that that
22:37
is shared amongst are broad section
22:39
of public's in the western world
22:41
isn't the issue Joel that it's
22:43
become gross that that the economic
22:46
inequality, the divisions, the the hoarding
22:48
by elites of these you know.
22:50
Scare social goods like highly
22:53
credential ized education that elite
22:55
institutions were the infirmary with
22:58
one another. usually in the
23:00
same county or postal code.
23:02
it's all just become too
23:05
much. This is
23:07
new. This is different now. We
23:09
are the type of a lead
23:12
in the concentration as the elites,
23:14
economically politically culturally has reached a
23:16
level of toxicity that is now
23:19
eliciting this backlash. I.
23:21
Really do want us to be careful in completing these
23:23
two types. of all the. The kind of
23:25
a lead. The. Cultural leads to do
23:28
control. The. Media and went to
23:30
the certain colleges. Are these what used to be
23:32
The Media. And Verizon, but a
23:34
government. That. Is an intellectual.
23:36
We'd the the money. Is. Controlled
23:38
by as a different elite that overlaps a
23:40
little bit but not completely and I think
23:43
we should keep these two ideas separate. Agri
23:46
be wealth inequality has
23:49
become gross, although. Historically.
23:52
Near the Eighty Twenty prayed a rule is
23:54
in effect. There was a period of time
23:57
after Robert to were in certain western democracies.
23:59
It was not sure the this is generally
24:01
true. If. It's most probably
24:03
going to be solved. In.
24:05
North easily solved through
24:07
taxation and redistribution which.
24:10
The. Average populace does not want because they all
24:12
think they're about to become millionaires. But.
24:14
That's true. It was seen as
24:16
biggest if you remove Silicon Valley
24:18
and Seattle where the Elites control
24:20
a lot of the world from.
24:23
This, This is not a hugely
24:25
successful country. A. Lot of lot
24:27
of the wealth has been generated by a very
24:29
small number of people on those two places in the
24:31
elite. So. You
24:34
know, I think there's a lot of dignity
24:36
the can be Hadn't all kinds of jobs
24:38
specially for helping people working there? I just
24:40
want people have much choice as possible. In
24:43
what they choose to do for let me And that
24:45
means at this point in time. Getting.
24:47
An education and going to college. So
24:50
Vasquez, We. Start. To bring
24:53
this debate homeless to spend a
24:55
little time. Talking about solutions
24:57
because sometimes proving an assertion in
24:59
this case only to a train
25:02
America as the American people. Might.
25:05
Be more convincing, if so, If.
25:07
There was a solution to,
25:09
you know, a problem. The
25:11
Joel just outlined their that.
25:14
Elites are the product of underlying structures.
25:16
They're in your society. In America, they
25:18
are products of your global dominance in
25:21
tax and the suits you know concentration
25:23
of of wealth creation in a few
25:25
select he knows zip codes in Palo
25:27
Alto and one or two other places
25:30
in the country. You know this is
25:32
happening. It's real. We all get that,
25:34
but. What? Do you see as
25:36
any kind of fair solution? Something
25:39
that could lead to greater? I'm
25:41
a quality. Is that what years
25:43
you're you're seeking between Americans without.
25:46
With the be no acknowledging the structural features of
25:48
the of this moment in the challenge that. You.
25:50
Know economies face today and.
25:53
The. potential cost aus uprooting america's
25:55
elites why would that mean what
25:58
are the and celery effect of
26:00
that? How would that impact less
26:03
fortunate Americans? The
26:05
solutions are so simple that it is
26:07
embarrassing that we are even fighting over
26:09
them. I mean, control
26:12
the border and drastically reduce the number
26:14
of immigrants, legal and illegal, will immediately
26:16
have an impact on working class wages
26:18
as we saw in the very recent
26:21
past. Vocational training,
26:23
get it back into high schools so that
26:25
people have more choices and aren't told you're
26:27
a loser if you don't go to college
26:29
and there are pathways to the American dream
26:31
that don't involve that degree. Get rid of
26:33
degree requirements for jobs that don't require skills
26:36
you pick up in college, which is many, and
26:39
make it illegal to use software that keeps people
26:41
out of those jobs because they don't have a
26:43
degree. Trade is hugely
26:45
important to working class Americans. Tradeware
26:48
with China is incredibly important. Tariffs
26:50
is incredibly important. Working class people
26:52
will tell you, tariffs on steel
26:54
and aluminum, I mean, that puts
26:56
money in their pockets. All of
26:58
these things were choices that were
27:01
made by leftist elites to put
27:03
money in their pockets. It was
27:05
an upward transfer of wealth. And
27:07
with five or six totally nonpartisan
27:09
policy things, we could help the
27:11
working class so much get rid
27:13
of zoning laws that protect the property
27:16
values of those couples you mentioned, rich
27:18
liberal doctors married to each other who
27:20
make it illegal to build a duplex
27:22
in their neighborhood. You could immediately build
27:24
a million units in one year and
27:26
solve our housing crisis in a decade.
27:29
Build a duplex so your cleaning lady
27:31
can live walking distance from you. Why
27:33
should that be unthinkable? It is unthinkable
27:35
to the leftist elites who control these
27:38
local boards. These are such simple,
27:41
obvious things. You wouldn't have to
27:43
uproot anybody. The thing that working
27:45
class people don't want, liberal and conservative,
27:47
who I interviewed is taxes. They don't
27:49
want handouts from the government. They don't
27:51
want to live off the government. They
27:53
don't want food stamps. They don't want
27:55
affordable housing. They want the dignity that
27:57
comes from being well paid for hard
27:59
work. And it is very easy
28:01
to turn that around. It's simple supply and
28:03
demand. You limit the supply of workers, you
28:06
get more wages. It's like the most obvious
28:08
thing, although the ex the entire economics expert
28:10
class will tell you that this is not
28:12
true. It is obviously true. Joel,
28:17
do you see these solutions as as
28:19
feasible? I mean isn't at
28:21
the end of the day this really about fairness
28:24
and I think you would concede that profit
28:27
as it has been accumulated is
28:29
shared more often with shareholders than
28:31
with workers. Isn't it just a
28:33
question of rebalancing? um
28:35
some of our assumptions about how
28:37
our society works, how our economy functions. We
28:39
could do a lot here to I
28:42
don't know what's the word de-elitize American
28:45
society, do it quickly, do it
28:47
relatively painfully, and have a
28:49
more equal just and fair society as a
28:51
result. I've heard
28:54
populace called terrifying
28:57
simplifiers and whenever someone
28:59
tells you there's a simple solution, I
29:02
really really question that. The
29:05
idea that more vocational training is going to
29:07
somehow create a a
29:09
hundred million jobs for plumbers is
29:11
just not true. It's
29:14
just not where our society is going and
29:16
the idea that immigration is
29:18
taking jobs from people, which Batia tells
29:20
you every economist will tell you is
29:22
wrong, is clearly not true. The
29:25
reason our GDP has grown over the last couple years
29:27
is this is this enormous number
29:29
of immigrants who have come and they
29:31
don't take jobs, they create jobs, and
29:34
we have a shrinking population. So it's
29:36
it's just a populous job to blame
29:39
immigrants, to blame the
29:42
elite, and to wish a world
29:44
into existence that somehow maybe
29:46
existed in the past but didn't really.
29:49
I don't want to go back to the 70s. I
29:51
was alive in the 70s. The 70s
29:54
sucked. The idea that we should go
29:56
backwards seems so insane
29:58
to me. Batia You're the
30:01
opinion editor of Newsweek. How
30:03
many of the last like 20 something
30:07
columns that you've run were written by someone who
30:09
didn't go to college? We
30:11
run working class people every week. When's
30:14
the last, what percentage of people do
30:16
you run who didn't go to college?
30:19
We run two or three pieces by working class people
30:21
every week. Compared to how many of you
30:24
went to college? I
30:27
don't know the exact numbers because there's a lot of us in
30:29
the section. I
30:32
would say it's about a quarter of the people that
30:34
I personally run. It's not enough, but it's 25% more
30:37
than anybody else is doing it. I'm very proud of it and
30:39
very glad that you asked me that so I could tell people.
30:42
Yeah, no, that is impressive because I'm assuming
30:44
they are hard to find. They're
30:47
all around us. But
30:50
they're not in, yeah, they're around us, but they're-
30:53
But they have been silenced. I agree with you.
30:55
They have been cut out of American public discourse.
30:57
I totally agree with you. Yeah,
31:00
of course they're in other places.
31:02
They're on YouTube. I mean, the
31:04
media has grown to include a lot more people,
31:06
I think. Yeah, because they're
31:09
fewer experts. I'm totally with
31:11
you on the idea that
31:13
zoning has been a problem and that should
31:15
be fixed. But the
31:18
idea that the people who didn't go
31:20
to college should be in our
31:22
increasingly complicated times to
31:25
be elected to the
31:27
Senate or Congress seems really dubious to me.
31:29
If you look at the people who didn't
31:31
go to college, which seems
31:33
to be what we're talking about, who are in Congress,
31:37
you get Lauren Boebert, you get, well,
31:40
he's not there anymore, Madison Cawthorn, you
31:42
get Matthew Rosendale. These aren't people who
31:44
are solving our society's problems. Bachelors,
31:47
you wanna respond to that? It's a
31:50
kind of argument. While
31:53
standing goes back to Plato, the
31:55
philosopher king, people are
31:58
equipped through education to. to
32:00
assume leadership. I
32:02
feel very blessed because Joel is making
32:04
my argument for me, like the contempt
32:06
of the working class in a democracy
32:08
that suggests that they literally are not
32:10
qualified to do what a
32:13
democracy promises us can happen,
32:15
which is a person by being elected.
32:18
What makes them qualified is
32:20
the fact that they were
32:22
chosen by Americans to lead.
32:24
And the expert classes I
32:26
opened with, they have delivered
32:28
so many face plants, just
32:30
disastrous, disastrous policy. NAFTA
32:33
was created by a bunch
32:35
of eggheads with multiple degrees
32:37
and devastated the working class.
32:39
There was no reason to do that.
32:42
There was no reason to ship 5
32:44
million good manufacturing jobs overseas. It's not
32:46
like the horse and buggy. Those cars
32:48
are still being made. They're just
32:50
being made by Chinese middle class people
32:52
now instead of by American middle
32:54
class people. That's what happens when
32:57
you have rule by elite. You
32:59
want an oligarchy of the credentials.
33:01
That is not a democracy. And
33:03
it is fueled by contempt for people who
33:05
work with their hands for a living of
33:07
all races and of all occupations and of
33:10
all genders. You've been
33:12
to car factories. They're robots now. These
33:14
jobs are not returning. And
33:17
we have to deal with that. We have an
33:19
opioid epidemic because we're not dealing with that. We
33:21
have a problem with men because we're not dealing
33:23
with these structural problems. And
33:26
they're not just going to be fixed by
33:28
giving people vocational training for jobs that don't
33:30
exist. Let's
33:32
go to closing statements. I'm conscious
33:34
of our time. So Joel, you've
33:36
been arguing against our motion. This
33:38
debate, be it resolve elite that
33:41
betrayed America. What are the
33:43
couple key arguments or points that you
33:46
want to leave our audience with as they
33:48
reflect on this excellent debate? Well,
33:50
like a true elite, I'm going to
33:52
bring up an old text, which is
33:54
this 1901 treatise that
33:56
called the rise and fall of elites, Which
33:59
was the first time this where it only being used
34:01
in the weren't the way that we're using it. Ah,
34:04
Is Italian economist of Alfredo parade
34:06
out. But. For this theory
34:08
that there's a circulation of it's. When.
34:10
Which argues that revolutions never occur when
34:13
conditions are so far about that the
34:15
masses like take to the streets with
34:17
their guitars and paper mishap puppets. They
34:19
occur when one group of elites
34:21
season opportunity to take power from
34:24
another. The. The phrase used
34:26
was history is a graveyard of
34:28
Elites. So. This this myth
34:30
that the common people, the working class, are
34:32
going to take over and run everything. Never
34:35
ever happens, There's always going to be
34:37
a group of Elites running things and
34:39
you better choose the right one. So.
34:43
Great. A Call them Speculators Who are
34:45
these innovative cooperatives? sneaky people who were
34:47
like everyone I know. And
34:49
they rentiers who are tough
34:51
moyal, hardworking, tribal and traditional.
34:54
I call them the boat elite and
34:56
the intellectually. And the boat of
34:58
the are steeped in on our culture. There
35:01
like real housewives who throw their
35:03
faces at the end of an
35:05
insult. And he quite well he would
35:07
never do that because our or wind is too good.
35:10
And the boat a lead tend to
35:12
win every dispute. That. They
35:14
need to win every dispute that that
35:16
everything either win or a loss because
35:18
they don't understand that humans when by
35:20
cooperating. Whereas. Be intellectually,
35:23
money isn't really are motivating factor.
35:25
And I'll close with this. this quote
35:28
from Thomas Man who dealt with the
35:30
same issue when he traveled across America
35:32
and Nineteen Thirty Eight after fleeing Nazi
35:34
Germany. And he gave a speech called
35:37
the Coming Victory of Democracy. In
35:39
which he talked about how attacking the elite.
35:42
Is just a path to tyranny. And
35:45
He said. There. Exists a modern
35:47
anti intellectualism which is the contempt
35:49
of pure reason. The denial
35:51
and violation of troops in favor of
35:54
power and interests of the state. The.
35:56
Appeal to the lower and things to
35:58
the so called feeling. The. Release
36:00
of stupidity and evil from the
36:02
discipline or reason. Intelligence. The. Emancipation
36:05
of Black Art isn't. In
36:07
short, a barbaric mob movement.
36:09
Besides. Which was what we
36:11
call democracy. Certainly. Stands out
36:14
as aristocratic to the highest degree. So.
36:17
Good. Luck with a lotta so it's. Thank.
36:20
You Joe sign for next and closing
36:22
statement. Okay Basher, As per debate tradition,
36:25
you been arguing in favor of emotion.
36:27
Be a resolve. Elites have betrayed America
36:29
so we're going to give you the
36:31
last word. And
36:33
I knew that second class. how the
36:36
elites a trade Americans, working men and
36:38
women. I spent the are traveling the
36:40
country and interviewing working class Americans across
36:43
the spectrum of all races, political persuasions,
36:45
backgrounds, religions and regions. and I found
36:47
a deep, deep sense of betrayal. Whether
36:49
people were democrats or Republicans, they felt
36:52
that they had been left behind, abandoned
36:54
to fend for themselves in an economy
36:56
that no longer saw their hard work
36:58
as worthy of respect and the most
37:01
basic tenets of a middle class life.
37:03
The. Kinds of things that the elites
37:05
take for granted. And whether they were
37:08
democrats or republicans, they knew who was
37:10
to blame. politicians, the media, the so
37:12
called experts, the people who sneer at
37:14
them, exploit them and smear that was
37:17
selling out their futures. These people were
37:19
remarkably. I'm bitter there was still deeply
37:21
patriotic, but they knew that something had
37:24
gone wrong since their parents' generation when
37:26
people could achieve the American dream as
37:28
a janitor or a barber or trucker,
37:31
or a nurse's aid whether they were
37:33
white. black hispanic or jewish they knew
37:35
that things had been better for people
37:37
like them a generation ago and a
37:39
new that things would be even worse
37:41
for their children who's to blame the
37:43
people behind the offshoring of manufacturing and
37:45
the importing of millions and millions of
37:47
migrants the people behind free trade deals
37:50
and the ballooning administrative costs of healthcare
37:52
and education the people who defended vocational
37:54
training to give two hundred billion dollars
37:56
to institutions that meant gender studies majors
37:58
and then pay off their student loans
38:00
so they can become podcasters. None
38:03
of this was by accident. Someone
38:05
did these things. Someone
38:08
betrayed the people in my book, Second
38:10
Class. You can call them whatever you
38:12
want, but we know who it is. Be
38:15
it resolved, the elites have betrayed the
38:17
American people. Thank
38:19
you, Bacha Ungar Sargan. That was a
38:22
terrific closing statement too. You've given us
38:24
both so much to think about and
38:26
you've done it all with civility and
38:28
substance. We won't say that's either an
38:30
elite or a working class virtue, but
38:32
it's one that we really appreciate here
38:34
at the Month Debate community. So thank
38:37
you again both for coming
38:39
on the program today. Thank you so
38:41
much. Thank you. That
38:46
wraps up today's debate. I wanna thank our
38:48
participants, Bacha and Joel, for a terrific one-on-one
38:51
debate. They certainly gave us a lot to
38:53
think about. You have questions
38:55
or feedback on what you've just
38:58
heard, please send us an email
39:00
to podcast at monthdebates.com. That's M-U-N-K,
39:03
debates with an S, .com. Also
39:05
a friendly reminder for as little as
39:07
$25 a year, 50
39:11
cents an episode or less,
39:14
you can vote on each and
39:16
every month debate that you hear
39:18
on our podcast feed. We'll
39:21
register your votes and declare winners as we
39:23
go. Sign up now for
39:25
a Month Debate membership, www.munkdebates.com
39:28
for more information. Thank you
39:30
for lending your time and
39:32
attention to our efforts to
39:34
bring back the art
39:36
of civil and substantive debate,
39:39
one conversation at a time. I'm your
39:41
host and moderator, Rudyard Griffiths. The
39:48
Monk Debates are a project of the
39:50
Oria and Peter and Melanie Monk Charitable
39:52
Foundation. The Monk Debates
39:54
podcast is produced by Ricky Gerwitz
39:56
and Daniel Kitz. Karen
39:58
Lynch is the editor. Be
40:01
to download and subscribe wherever you
40:03
get your podcasts and if you're
40:05
like us feel free to leave
40:07
of star rating. Thank you again
40:09
for. Listen.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More