Podchaser Logo
Home
Why accused killer mushroom cook doesn't want case heard in Melbourne

Why accused killer mushroom cook doesn't want case heard in Melbourne

Released Tuesday, 23rd April 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Why accused killer mushroom cook doesn't want case heard in Melbourne

Why accused killer mushroom cook doesn't want case heard in Melbourne

Why accused killer mushroom cook doesn't want case heard in Melbourne

Why accused killer mushroom cook doesn't want case heard in Melbourne

Tuesday, 23rd April 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:01

From the newsrooms of the Sydney Morning

0:04

Herald and the Age, this is the

0:06

Morning Edition. I'm Chris Payne, filling in

0:08

for Samantha Selinger Morris. It's

0:11

Wednesday, April 24th. Earlier

0:14

this week, the woman at the centre

0:16

of the mushroom deaths case attended court

0:18

for the second time. Erin

0:20

Patterson was arrested and charged in

0:23

November last year with three counts

0:25

of murder and five counts of

0:27

attempted murder in the small-town Victorian

0:29

case tracked around the world. Legal

0:33

teams are now focusing their efforts on

0:36

the timing and location for a committal

0:38

hearing which could be impacted

0:40

by requests from Patterson's legal team to

0:42

have the case tested in front of

0:44

her peers in a local court. Patterson

0:48

has already spent five months in custody

0:50

and may spend many more waiting for

0:52

a hearing that could be pushed out

0:54

to 2025. Today,

0:57

Crime and Justice reporter Erin Pearson

1:00

on everything we know so far and

1:02

what we can expect next. So

1:08

Erin, it's been months since the

1:10

alleged mushroom cook killer Erin Patterson

1:12

was arrested and later charged with

1:14

three counts of murder and five

1:17

counts of attempted murder. Now

1:19

Patterson attended court for the second time this week

1:21

but before we get to proceedings, could you just

1:23

lay out the facts of the case? It's been

1:25

some time since we've spoken about this. Absolutely.

1:28

So mid last year, there was

1:31

a lunch held at Erin Patterson's

1:33

family home. She invited

1:35

members of her former extended

1:37

family. There was

1:39

served a dish that contained mushrooms

1:42

and the police alleged those mushrooms

1:44

of what led to the poisoning

1:46

of those family members. Now

1:49

we know three of those family

1:51

members died, one recovered after a

1:53

significant stint in hospital, but we

1:55

also know from the police charges

1:58

that Patterson is also accused of of attempting

2:00

to kill her former husband as well. 96

2:05

days after Erin Paterson hosted the deadly

2:07

Beef Wellington lunch, the Homicide Squad made

2:09

its move, arresting 49 year old Erin

2:11

Paterson as part of their investigation into

2:14

the deaths of three people. In

2:16

what has been a complex and

2:18

thorough investigation by Homicide Squad

2:20

detectives and one that

2:22

is not yet over. And Erin and

2:25

Heather, they are some of the best

2:27

people I've ever been. They never did anything wrong

2:29

to me. I've never stayed in a better place.

2:36

Now Paterson appeared in court in

2:38

November last year where the court

2:40

heard that police needed extra time

2:42

to analyse evidences from her home.

2:45

What type of evidence are we talking about there?

2:47

Yes, the police had visited her home

2:50

multiple times. On her

2:52

arrest, they also searched further taking

2:54

in specialist search dogs to help

2:56

them with their investigation. There

2:58

was electronic material seized during that search

3:00

and that electronic material, while we don't

3:03

know the finer details of what that

3:05

is just yet, police said required 20

3:08

weeks to analyse. Looking

3:10

at the time frame that's been spoken about

3:12

in court, they should have

3:15

had all of that material analysed,

3:17

compiled whatever they needed to

3:19

form their case and supplied to the

3:21

defence team for Ms Paterson at the

3:24

end of March. Which brings

3:26

us to a court hearing earlier this

3:28

week. We heard about possible dates and

3:30

locations for a committal hearing. Now

3:33

that's a hearing to decide whether Paterson

3:35

will face trial or not. Can

3:37

you tell me about that? Yes, what we're seeing

3:39

now is it's been six months since

3:41

Ms Paterson has been in custody.

3:43

So we're looking at that time now thinking,

3:46

you know, when is this committal proceeding going

3:48

to happen? A

3:51

committal is also the first time that

3:53

the defence team

3:56

publicly analyse the

3:58

evidence that's been put before. the courts

4:00

in relation to their client. It's

4:03

where we hear from witnesses, we hear

4:05

cross-examination of witnesses and at the

4:07

end of a committal a magistrate will decide

4:09

if there is sufficient evidence that

4:11

has been presented that could go to a

4:13

future jury and if that is the

4:15

case he will commit Patterson to stand

4:18

trial. Patterson

4:20

remains in custody so she was beamed

4:22

in by a video link from the

4:24

Dame Phyllis Frost Centre which is Victoria's

4:26

Women's Prison. She's being housed

4:28

there in a special section called the

4:31

Murray Unit for Protected Prisoners. So

4:33

she appeared from a rather bleak room, looked

4:35

like a grey towel over a window and

4:38

there was a single chair in the background.

4:41

She appeared quite emotionless but seemed to follow

4:43

the proceedings the whole way through. She

4:46

was in a blue jumper, glasses, hair

4:48

pulled back tight into a bun. Could

4:50

you just talk us through a little

4:52

bit about the argument that Patterson's legal

4:55

team made with regards to where

4:57

they wanted this hearing to

4:59

take place? So the

5:01

judicial system usually likes to see

5:04

committal proceedings run within six

5:06

months of a person being charged with

5:08

a criminal offence. At the

5:10

end of the day everybody is

5:12

and should be presumed innocent and

5:14

therefore nobody should be languishing in

5:16

prison unnecessarily while proceedings

5:19

are dragging on. Now

5:21

there's really a couple of options that can happen.

5:24

Typically with a complex and long committal

5:26

which we're looking at about three or

5:28

four weeks, those hearings will

5:30

run in Melbourne where there's more staff,

5:32

there's more courtrooms available in regional areas

5:34

that can be quite difficult, very in

5:37

demand regional areas, they're not staffed as

5:39

well and it's very difficult to pencil

5:41

in a room, a court room for an entire month

5:43

and have no other cases in there. So

5:46

what was discussed was whether or not

5:48

the case will get moved to Melbourne

5:51

or if it will stay at the La Trobe

5:53

Valley courthouse. What that means

5:55

though is because it's a regional court

5:57

that's booked out for months in advance.

6:00

The magistrate raised the issue that it's unlikely a

6:02

committal could be held until 2025. That

6:05

could mean that Patterson would be in custody for

6:08

sort of 14 months or more

6:10

before a committal even happens. And then

6:12

what would have to follow is more

6:14

court proceedings, a possible trial, quite a

6:16

lengthy delay. So concerns were

6:18

raised about that. The prosecution were very supportive

6:21

of the case being moved to Melbourne, but

6:23

Patterson's defense team said

6:25

they'd been instructed by her that she

6:27

wanted the hearing to happen in her

6:29

local community. She wanted that evidence tested

6:31

publicly in front of her

6:34

local community and there is a presumption

6:36

in the judicial system that that is

6:38

what happens. So why

6:40

exactly is it that Patterson's team

6:42

is arguing so adamantly to have

6:44

this case tested in regional Victoria?

6:46

Yeah, well there is a presumption that

6:49

charges are heard and ventilated in the

6:51

local community where those offenses are said

6:53

to have occurred. It's

6:55

really important, I guess, on a

6:57

bigger scale for local communities to

7:00

also stay engaged with the judicial

7:02

system, develop trust and understanding of

7:04

the judicial system when everything is

7:06

centralized into Melbourne, which

7:08

might be convenient for many reasons,

7:10

but you lose that connection to

7:13

the local community. We've also

7:15

got in cases like this, if we've got a

7:17

committal running for three, four

7:19

weeks, there could be dozens of

7:21

witnesses, many of which will

7:23

live locally in the Leingatha, Gippsland area.

7:26

So having them travel as well, considerable

7:28

distance in into Melbourne to give

7:31

evidence is also a really big

7:33

consideration. Okay, so it looks like there

7:35

could be some more delays potentially extending

7:37

into 2025 and

7:39

beyond. What's likely to happen or

7:41

what could we expect in the next few months?

7:43

What are the next steps here? So we are

7:46

scheduled to go back to court next month

7:48

where the magistrate will decide officially whether

7:51

or not it's going to stay in

7:53

Morwell or move to Melbourne, which is

7:55

about 150 kilometres away,

7:58

and he will set down a date for the...

8:00

that committal. So in

8:03

the next couple of weeks, there'll be

8:05

a lot of looking at diaries and

8:07

trying to move things around, figure out

8:09

who's available and get staff in more

8:11

well, which can be quite difficult. But

8:13

our judicial system says it's really important

8:16

that cases are heard where offences are

8:18

alleged to have been committed. So

8:20

it's not unusual for them to be moved, but

8:22

it's certainly the preference usually of lawyers

8:25

for it to stay there. Erin,

8:28

thank you so much for coming on and we'll definitely

8:30

check in with you again as we move through this

8:32

process. Thanks, Chris. Today's

8:40

episode of The Morning Edition was

8:43

produced by Julia Karkatzel. The Morning

8:45

Edition is a production of The

8:47

Age and The Sydney Morning Herald.

8:49

If you enjoy the show and want

8:52

more of our journalism, subscribe to our

8:54

newspapers today. It's the best way

8:56

to support what we do. Search

8:59

the age

9:01

or smh.com.au/subscribe

9:04

and sign up for our Morning Edition

9:06

newsletter to receive a comprehensive summary of

9:09

the day's most important news, analysis

9:11

and insights in your

9:14

inbox every day. Links are

9:16

in the show notes. I'm

9:18

Chris Payne. This is The Morning Edition.

9:21

Thanks for listening.

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features