Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
This is Paige, the co-host of GigglySquad,
0:02
and I want to tell you about a
0:04
company that I've been loving, Olive & June.
0:06
Olive & June gives you everything that you
0:09
need for a salon-quality manicure in one box.
0:11
And if you break it down, it
0:13
really comes out to $2 a manicure, which
0:15
is absolutely insane. It's also so easy to
0:17
get salon-worthy nails at home with Olive &
0:20
June. The difference between how your nails
0:22
used to look when you did them yourself
0:24
and now with the manny system is a
0:26
complete game changer. The best thing about Olive
0:29
& June 2 is it's a quick
0:31
dry. It dries in about one minute, lasts
0:33
for five days, and full coverage in up
0:35
to one to two coats. Visit oliveandjune.com/perfect manny
0:38
20 for 20% off your
0:40
first system. That's oliveandjune.com/perfect manny
0:42
20 for 20% off your
0:44
first system. Hello,
0:54
Gabby Logan here. Welcome to The Midpoint. Today,
0:56
my guest is an expert on a topic
0:59
I think is of particular interest to those
1:01
of us in midlife. Our
1:03
special subject today is ultra-processed
1:05
food, aka UPF. Sexy, I
1:07
know. But UPFs are being talked
1:09
about more and more. And when you
1:11
start to look around in the supermarket,
1:14
you realise they are absolutely everywhere. So
1:16
what are they? What are they doing
1:18
to our bodies? And why are they
1:20
so prevalent in modern diets? These are
1:22
all questions I'm hoping that Dr. Chris
1:24
Van Tulliken will answer for us. Chris's
1:26
latest book, Ultra-Processed People, Why Do We
1:28
All Eat Stuff That Isn't Food and
1:30
Why Can't We Stop, is already a
1:33
bestseller. As well as an author, Chris
1:35
is an infectious diseases doctor, has a
1:37
PhD in molecular virology from University
1:39
College London, where he's also an associate
1:41
professor, and is one of
1:43
the BBC's leading science presenters, having
1:46
made countless programmes for children and
1:48
adults, including The Doctor Who Gave
1:50
Up Drugs and Operation Ouch. Alongside
1:52
his twin brother, Zand, he also
1:54
presents a thorough examination for BBC
1:56
Radio 4. Today, we're going to find
1:59
out what prompted him to explore this particular
2:01
element of food science, what he learned
2:03
and how we can avoid UPS in
2:05
our busy everyday lives. I'll also be
2:07
asking him some of the questions you
2:09
very kindly sent in via Instagram. We've
2:11
got a lot to get through. So let's get going. Chris
2:19
thank you so much for coming on
2:21
The Midpoint. Such a pleasure. In
2:23
your introduction I've kind of done a
2:25
little description of UPS but what
2:28
I want you to talk about is why you
2:30
became interested in them and the moment with the
2:32
ice cream. If you could just tell us
2:34
about with your daughter when you started to work
2:36
out that the ice cream wasn't melting. It's a
2:38
bit of a journey from infection to nutrition
2:40
but when I was a young doctor I worked
2:43
in very low income settings in Central African Republic
2:45
in South Asia and Pakistan and I
2:47
saw a lot of kids very ill or
2:50
dying because of the aggressive marketing of baby
2:52
food that their parents had to make up
2:54
with dirty water. Their parents couldn't afford it
2:56
so they would dilute it and
2:58
it didn't matter how many antibiotics we had you
3:00
can't save a child that's just drinking you know
3:02
sewage water mixed with baby food and
3:05
the same companies that were doing that I said the
3:07
same companies that are selling baby food in the UK
3:09
they sell us our grown-up food they sell food all
3:11
around the world they're very large transnational companies. So
3:13
I suppose my research moved from
3:15
infectious diseases and virology into studying
3:17
how what we call the commercial
3:19
determinants about how big
3:22
corporations food alcohol tobacco farmer tech
3:24
how they affect you and
3:27
then one day so I was
3:29
in the park with Lyra who's my eldest
3:31
and I guess at the time she was
3:33
about three and we got her this very
3:36
fancy artisanal pistachio ice cream
3:39
and so in your brain you think this is
3:41
like three pounds of scoop or something and so she had it in a
3:43
little cardboard tub and she was just chatting
3:50
with her friends and handed it to me to go on the
3:52
swings and the ball was still there she'd had a few scoops
3:54
but it was still a perfect ball and it was a hot
3:56
day it was quite early in the year but still hot
3:58
and it just hadn't melted And it was
4:00
a warm foam. And so that
4:03
sparked really me to start
4:05
looking into why does ice cream not melt?
4:07
And I spoke to an incredible guy, Paul Hart, who's a
4:09
big character in the book. And he died a few
4:12
months ago, but he became a good friend. And
4:14
he'd been an ice cream scientist at Unilever. He was
4:16
a biochemist. And he said the project
4:18
for ice cream companies all over the world is to
4:20
get ice cream. They don't need to freeze at all,
4:23
just to have foams that can be cooled
4:25
down at home or in a shop at the last minute.
4:27
Cause that would save them huge amounts of money. And they
4:29
haven't quite got there yet. But what we have
4:31
is these ice creams. And this is almost
4:33
all the ice cream you buy. We'll have
4:35
stabilizers, gums, and emulsifiers in it that
4:37
mean that in the drive home from
4:40
freezer in the supermarket
4:42
to sell for the transporters all over the country,
4:44
it stays exactly the same.
4:46
The ice crystals don't form. And when
4:49
you first read that, the kind of immediate alarm bell goes,
4:51
well, I'm never gonna be ice cream again. And I'm gonna,
4:53
yeah, exactly. But you got kicked. I'm
4:55
only gonna have it when it's kind of from
4:57
somebody that's made it locally and after that ice
4:59
cream. But of course all these
5:01
things become very practical, don't they? And a
5:04
lot of UPS history, I guess, is down
5:06
to practicality. A hundred percent. So
5:08
industrialized food was a big part
5:10
of helping women enter the workplace.
5:12
So one of the critiques that's
5:14
leveled at me by food industry
5:17
commentators is I want everyone
5:19
to start home cooking and that's gonna shove
5:21
a burden onto, you know, it's typically shoved
5:23
onto mums and women to do that. Of
5:25
course I don't want that. There's no opinion
5:27
about what anyone should eat at all. I
5:29
think in the whole book there is no advice. What
5:32
there is is information. How people use that is
5:34
very specific to them. The reality
5:36
of the food system in the UK is that
5:38
ultra-precious food is the only affordable, available food for
5:40
many people. If you, you know,
5:42
my colleagues in the hospital, many of them are
5:45
on night shifts. They're not on big incomes and
5:47
they've seen a real-time deflation in their wages. And
5:50
they need to eat ultra-precious food. It's all that's available
5:52
in the hospital. They don't have any time to cook.
5:54
They're not batch cooking at home. So this
5:56
is the reality of the food system. We need to be
5:58
thinking in terms of... big system changes.
6:01
But what in everything I say, and I
6:03
hope everything I write, at the
6:05
core of it is not making life more
6:07
expensive and trying to reduce some of the
6:09
shame and stigma that people feel around food.
6:12
Let's get to why that's important because you
6:14
do talk a lot and you go into the science
6:16
and the various papers that have been done although it
6:18
seems like there's loads more to do in this area,
6:20
you know, from what you talk about that okay,
6:23
might not all be bad and we'll get onto that as well,
6:25
but why we shouldn't have a
6:27
diet that is dominated by ultra
6:30
processed foods and what you've learned
6:32
about how that's affecting us as a
6:34
human race. So
6:37
the science is pretty clear, you know in
6:39
the UK we're dragging our heels and saying
6:41
there's more work to be done. I'll tell you
6:43
what UNICEF, you have the best nutrition team of
6:45
any institution in the world virtually, they
6:48
believe the science. We've got research
6:50
groups at Harvard, Yale, Princeton, Cambridge,
6:52
my group at UCL, you know,
6:54
they all believe the science. We've
6:56
got governments like France, Belgium, Canada,
6:59
Israel, almost all the governments in
7:01
South and Central America, they believe the science and
7:03
are issuing warnings. The reason we don't change
7:06
the environment here is because the food
7:08
industry has very very complete control over
7:10
nutritional messaging. Now this sounds
7:12
a bit tinfoil hat, a bit conspiracy,
7:14
but let's look at the picture. So
7:16
we have our biggest food charities like
7:19
the British Nutrition Foundation. Their healthy eating
7:21
week last year was sponsored by Coca-Cola.
7:24
Now whether you believe all the evidence on ultra
7:26
processed food or not, we can all agree that
7:28
the Coca-Cola Corporation doesn't have a healthy product portfolio.
7:30
Okay, they're also sponsored by McDonald's, they have corporate
7:32
members including all the major supermarkets. So that's our
7:34
leading food charity, they advise government, they advise the
7:36
public. We've then got
7:38
the government scientific advisory committee on nutrition.
7:41
Now this is an august body that
7:43
issues very sort of robust advice. About
7:46
half of its members have declared
7:48
relationships with companies like and including
7:50
Coca-Cola. So you can't, if
7:52
you have the government nutrition committee being partly
7:54
funded by the food industry, that creates a
7:56
real risk. Then we have university departments funded
7:58
by Pepsi and Mars. So
8:01
we have an environment and then we have the
8:03
Science Media Centre who sort of helps sort out
8:05
all the science stories that go into UK Press.
8:07
They're funded by Nestle, Procter & Gamble and Food
8:09
Drink Europe. So industry has a
8:11
lot of control of the messaging and then we
8:13
have the influencers and lots
8:15
of the doctors that you see
8:18
on social media partner with companies
8:20
that make ultra-processed food. I
8:22
won't name any names but you know it's pretty easy
8:24
to find out who they are. So ultra-processed foods as
8:27
a simple definition, anything that
8:29
is removed from its natural
8:31
state or added to buy a product
8:33
that is not. It's a
8:35
formal definition. It's
8:38
not like junk food. It's not a casual word.
8:41
It's a definition housed by the United
8:43
Nations Food and Agriculture Organization. It's about
8:45
nine paragraphs long but it boils down
8:47
to this. If you look on your
8:50
packet and you see an ingredient that
8:52
you don't normally find in a domestic
8:54
kitchen like Zentum gum or a stabilizer
8:56
or an emulsifier or flavourings or extracts,
8:59
it's probably an ultra-processed food. If you're reading
9:01
an ingredients list at all, it's probably ultra-processed.
9:03
If it's a food product made by
9:06
a very big transnational corporation, it's
9:08
probably ultra-processed because whether you
9:10
look at Kellogg's or Nestle or Danone or
9:12
any of the big food companies, almost all
9:15
of them, the majority of their products will
9:17
be ultra-processed because this is how you make
9:19
money. And the
9:21
reason why ultra-processed foods
9:23
are causing so many health issues?
9:26
Well, we have, first of
9:28
all, let's say, well, what's the evidence they do
9:30
cause harm? We've got very
9:33
good big epidemiological studies. So the kind
9:36
of studies that we use to link
9:38
cigarettes with lung cancer, we
9:40
now have really a very, very
9:42
large number, probably more than a
9:44
hundred of those kind of studies
9:46
linking ultra-processed foods to inflammatory bowel
9:48
disease, dementia, anxiety, depression, cancers, metabolic
9:51
disease, weight gain and obesity, and early
9:53
death from all causes. So according
9:56
to World Health Organization data
9:58
and Lancet data... poor diet
10:01
has overtaken tobacco as the world's leading cause of
10:03
early death. So we're in a real crisis and
10:05
the UK has some of the worst rates in
10:07
the world. So that
10:09
kind of big population data is very robust. We're
10:11
sure this food is causing harm and we've got
10:14
studies on animals and small studies on humans where
10:17
we can point at emulsifiers or softness or
10:19
calorie density or high levels
10:21
of sugar, fat and salt. I mean we've got really
10:23
good evidence around them and almost all UPF has high
10:25
levels of sugar, fat and salt. So
10:28
we've got very, very good evidence it's harmful. How
10:30
does it harm us? Well it does it in a few
10:32
different ways and it depends what the thing
10:34
you're interested in is. Let's look at obesity because
10:37
that is probably responsible for more suffering
10:39
in this country at the moment than
10:41
almost any other health problem because it
10:43
leads to so many other problems. And
10:45
because people who live in larger bodies
10:47
are discriminated against by their doctors, by
10:49
their workplaces, by everyone. And now we've
10:51
got 60% of people living
10:53
with excess weight. So the
10:55
reason it drives weight gain is partly because
10:57
it's very soft. The
10:59
best example might be supermarket bread. You go
11:01
and buy a big loaf. You can squash
11:03
that loaf down to nothing. You can eat a
11:06
slice of supermarket bread really
11:08
quickly. Go and buy a loaf of
11:10
real bread. It will cost you perhaps 10 times more.
11:12
You know my local fancy bakery, a loaf of bread
11:14
is 6 pounds. But
11:17
it will take you twice as long to eat it. It will
11:19
also go stale very quickly. So
11:21
the speed with which we
11:23
consume the food means that it bypasses
11:25
all the hormones and nerve signals inside
11:28
our body that tell us when to
11:30
stop eating. So we can look
11:32
at levels of sugar and levels of salt
11:34
and flavourings and all the other ways the
11:36
food is engineered to drive excess consumption. But
11:39
the truth is any one product, whether it's
11:41
a chew bar or breakfast cereal, it's got
11:43
thousands of properties. It's got all the
11:45
nutrients and the texture and the taste. It's also got the
11:47
cartoon character on the box and the ad. Every
11:50
single property has been dialed up
11:53
to 11 by brilliant scientists working very
11:55
hard in labs over many decades so
11:57
that every single property drives out. excess
11:59
consumption. So we know that the marketing
12:01
makes kids eat more of the food.
12:03
We know that the flavouring does. We
12:05
know that the colouring of the box
12:07
changes the way the food tastes. So
12:10
you can try and deconstruct
12:12
it and we've got good evidence. But the big
12:14
picture is when I go and speak to food
12:16
company scientists and the book is full of testimony
12:19
essentially from whistleblowers, they all agree. They're
12:21
all like, no, we make
12:23
the food to drive you to eat all of
12:25
it because that's the only way we can make
12:27
money. We've got enough calories in this country. You
12:30
just have to get inside the head of being a
12:32
food company executive. If you manufactured
12:34
a product that really filled people
12:36
up and they didn't eat too much of,
12:39
would that product survive in the marketplace? Of course
12:41
it wouldn't. You have to make a product that
12:43
people want to eat for breakfast, lunch and dinner seven
12:45
days a week and it has to have a nearly
12:48
infinite shelf life so that if it's a Christmas thing
12:50
you can make it all in January. You don't have
12:52
to make it all in the week before Christmas. The
12:55
other thing you said there in the list
12:57
of things that are going wrong with us
12:59
as a society in terms of what food
13:01
is doing to us, mental health issues and
13:04
gut health is increasingly, thankfully becoming
13:06
a more talked about and real
13:08
subject for people to understand the
13:10
gut microbiome but also how that links
13:12
to mental health. So are UPFs directly
13:15
related to that as well? Yes,
13:18
so this is food that is generally very
13:20
low in fiber and we know there's a
13:23
lot of nonsense around gut health.
13:25
What we are absolutely sure about is
13:27
eating beans, pulses, fruit and vegetables is
13:29
really good for your gut and
13:32
eating ultra processed food or even very processed
13:34
food, processed meats is pretty bad for your
13:36
gut. Beyond that what we're then
13:38
seeing in the middle is that the food
13:40
industry has very skillfully taken that knowledge about
13:42
fruit and veg and they've gone, well maybe
13:45
we could make branded products with fiber
13:47
extract in them and also add lots of
13:49
sugar but not mention that too much and make
13:51
like little shots that would be really good
13:53
for your gut. There's no
13:56
evidence at all that probiotics,
13:58
prebiotics, postbiotics, fiber extract any
14:00
of that is good for your gut. If you want to look after your
14:02
gut, eat real normal food,
14:05
cook it at home, and that's
14:07
kind of the state of the evidence. And you do
14:10
not need supplements and pills and
14:12
potions. But why? I mean, you know,
14:15
totally understand how they, how, how
14:17
is it affecting your mental health if you don't do that? So
14:20
how this food affects your mental health,
14:22
you know, we could probably talk for two hours
14:24
about all the different possible mechanisms. One of the
14:27
most important things is this microbiome that lives inside
14:29
our gut. So in terms of the cells in
14:31
your body, you probably have as many bacterial cells
14:33
as human cells. They're the biggest organ in your
14:35
immune system. And when you put
14:37
real food in your mouth and you swallow
14:39
it, the bits you can't digest get to
14:41
your colon. And the fiber, the stuff you
14:43
can't digest is eaten by the bugs there.
14:45
And they ferment it. And they turn it
14:47
into little molecules that are really important for
14:49
your brain and for controlling information and for
14:52
controlling your immune system. And for,
14:54
for generally improving the heart of almost
14:56
every organ in your body. And when
14:58
you start feeding these bugs molecules
15:00
that they don't like, or
15:02
when you start feeding them, when you start
15:04
eating a diet that promotes bugs flourishing that
15:06
shouldn't be there, do we
15:08
understand all the effects? No. Do we think it's
15:10
pretty bad for you? Yes. And we can show
15:12
with some of the additives and probably
15:15
it's also to do with the high levels of
15:17
fat, sugar, and salt, but some of the additives
15:19
we know have significant effects on the microbiome. So
15:21
the emulsifiers, emulsifiers occur in real food, like egg,
15:24
egg yolk is an emulsifier or mustard in a
15:26
salad dressing, it mixes water and oil. But
15:28
they also, is also an emulsifier. And
15:31
we think that some of the synthetic emulsifiers
15:33
in food act a bit like detergent. So
15:35
in a simple way, when you consume lots
15:37
of them, they scrub out your gut, they
15:39
thin the protective mucus, they change the bacteria.
15:41
We know that the non-nutritive sweeteners, the even
15:43
the natural artificial sweeteners, you know, the things
15:46
that taste sweet, but don't have many calories,
15:48
they seem to have very significant effects on
15:50
the microbiome as well. So effectively
15:53
good food, the pulses, the
15:55
seeds, the nuts, all the vegetables,
15:57
the legumes, they are helping
15:59
to feed the gut. You're putting good soil
16:01
in for the right plants to grow. That's
16:03
how I'd think about it. And you don't
16:05
need to be fancy about it. You don't
16:07
need to go and buy capsules and
16:10
special fibers and things. It's all in real
16:12
food. And in fact, there's some evidence that
16:14
eating fiber in the context of real food,
16:17
we know that's extremely good for you. We're
16:19
not sure that if you strip the fiber
16:21
out, you'll often see corn fiber or citrus
16:24
fiber as an additive. And it
16:26
makes a health claim. We're not really sure that
16:28
kind of fiber is particularly good for you. We
16:30
know that eating a banana, an apple, a head of
16:32
broccoli, or a can of beans is good. It'll
16:35
come up in some of the questions that we've been sent in. But
16:37
you focus a lot in the book
16:39
on diet products, or products that claim
16:41
lots of different health properties, which
16:44
I think overall, basically, your take is that
16:46
anything that says it's a diet product or
16:48
it's low in sugar or it's low in
16:50
fat is generally not a good thing. And
16:52
almost any pack with a health claim is
16:54
likely to be ultra-processed. And it's often likely
16:56
to be very high in sugar and salt
16:58
and often high in fat. I've
17:01
got a pack of Cocoa Pops at home that I
17:03
use as a prop. It has 12 health claims. Now,
17:06
it also has, above the UK
17:08
dietary recommended levels of sugar and salt,
17:10
and it is ultra-processed. And I
17:12
don't think there's anyone... How can you be allowed to
17:14
have both of those in one place? It
17:16
seems entirely illogical. So one of
17:19
the strategies that the South American
17:21
public health experts are using is they say, well, if
17:24
the food has a warning label for salt, you can't make
17:26
a health claim. I mean, that's just blindingly obvious. You can't
17:28
have food that's good and bad for you. There's
17:31
just food. Yeah, which bit am I eating of it then? Right.
17:34
And we also know that if you cook at home
17:36
that those kind of ingredients seem to be much less
17:38
harmful probably because we use much less of them. So,
17:40
yeah, a good rule is if you're eating like a
17:42
nutri bar, a
17:44
supplement, anything that's saying it's good for
17:46
you, you know, broccoli, eggs, milk, they
17:48
don't have health claims on the pack,
17:50
they're just food. Can I say
17:52
one... Because I know you're particularly interested in mental
17:55
health. There's one aspect to this food. Because
17:57
it's engineered to drive access...
18:00
much of it has become quite addictive for many people.
18:02
So there'll be lots of people listening to this who
18:04
feel a little bit out of control with this food.
18:06
And I'm certainly one of those people. And
18:09
the idea of addiction has been controversial, but
18:11
addiction is quite simple. It's can you stop
18:13
using a substance or a product even
18:16
when you try and quit it and
18:18
you know it's doing you harm, physical,
18:20
social, mental harm. And so
18:22
the addictive property of the food is really
18:24
kind of taking away people's agency and being
18:26
addicted to anything is incredibly damaging to mental
18:28
health. It's very distracting, it's a big burden.
18:30
And then we know the food is also
18:32
driving weight gain, which causes mental health problems.
18:35
So there are these very direct effects of
18:37
the food, the inflammation, the microbiome on the
18:39
body, but the very
18:41
fact of us not feeling like we can
18:43
stop. Yeah, all undermining mental health. Yeah,
18:46
of course. And then your inability
18:48
to move how you want and not
18:50
exercise and not... Exactly. You just have
18:52
those positive hormones. So those hormones are really
18:54
good. And then you get constipated, you get
18:56
sleep deprived. The physical problems, they also
18:59
erode your mental health and often drive you to consume
19:01
more of the food. And in the way that smokers,
19:03
the stress of trying to quit often drives
19:06
them to smoke more cigarettes. So as the
19:08
food causes health problems, you
19:10
seek the short term solutions of the
19:12
food, of tobacco, of alcohol, of social
19:15
media, of all these other things that interact with our bodies
19:17
in the same way. The
19:28
The The
19:38
The What
19:40
was that? Boring. No
19:42
flavor. That was as bad as
19:44
those leftovers you ate all week.
19:46
Kiki Palmer here. And it's time
19:48
to say hello to something fresh
19:50
and guilt-free. Hello, fresh. Jazz up
19:52
dinner with pecan-crusted chicken or garlic
19:55
butter shrimps can't be. Now that's
19:57
music to my mouth. Hello, fresh.
19:59
Let's Let's get this dinner party started.
20:02
Discover all the delicious possibilities at
20:04
hellofresh.com. Okay, let's
20:15
crack
20:25
on with some questions. And
20:28
this has occurred in a few different guys'
20:30
questions. Angie says, how do I
20:32
convince my family that eating ultra-processed food
20:34
is not good for them? I
20:38
have 18-year-old twins. I know you love a
20:40
human experiment. And you talk about my
20:42
twins. I want
20:44
to get your belly. Because they
20:46
have such totally different attitudes
20:49
towards food, right? And I totally appreciate
20:51
this. It doesn't matter what I say. The
20:53
messages seem to go into my daughter, and she kind
20:55
of buys it, and she eats what we all
20:58
eat. But away from home,
21:00
my son is not buying into what I'm
21:02
saying, right? So I'm not able to influence
21:04
the fact that ultra-processed food is definitely still
21:06
a big part of his life. And
21:09
a lot of people are talking about teenagers in the
21:11
questions that have come in. And it's so frustrating when
21:13
you want to help them, and you know life will
21:15
be better for you. I
21:20
would love some advice from your
21:22
listeners, because I have a six-year-old, a
21:24
three-year-old, and a two-month-old. So
21:27
I still have some control over what
21:29
they eat. My approach is
21:32
– there are two things. First of all,
21:34
even with a six-year-old, I don't control everything. I
21:36
don't control these. Well, when they go to parties
21:39
and things, you can't. And what's very important, I
21:41
think, is food binds us to
21:43
the people around us. I don't want them being weird. I
21:45
want them to have normal friendships, and sharing food is
21:47
important. So they can eat whatever they want when they go
21:49
to a party. At home, I
21:51
try and make sure – we know
21:54
that part of all of
21:56
these kind of behaviours that are harmful is opportunity.
21:58
Cigarettes, right? If you're small, you're small. smoking, they'll
22:00
probably have one too. If you're having a glass
22:02
of booze, I might join in. So making
22:05
these things unavailable helps a lot. And it actually
22:07
makes kids feel better if the food isn't around.
22:09
So in my household, look, I have not cracked
22:11
this code. We really have got rid of most
22:14
of the junk. We used to have a big
22:16
bowl of it that was kind of a way
22:18
I'd prove to journalists that I was like hip
22:20
and normal. And increasingly, just the kids
22:22
were eating chocolate bars, you know, a couple of times
22:24
a day. And there was always pudding was always from
22:26
this big blue bowl of stuff from
22:29
grandparents from parties. So we've we've got rid
22:31
of that. And actually, the kids are much
22:33
happier not endlessly talking about the big blue
22:35
bowl. We only have water and milk
22:37
for them to drink. And that's, that's kind of the
22:39
one thing is maybe the one hard line I have
22:41
is we don't have any soft drinks. That
22:44
comes from colleagues at the World Health
22:46
Organization, who just have that
22:48
as their as their form of religion
22:50
is just kids should just drink milk
22:52
and water. Other drinks are so harmful
22:55
for them completely unnecessary, completely unnecessary. So
22:57
that's the one hard line. But part
22:59
of it also is like, don't try
23:01
and persuade your kids because one
23:04
of the journeys in the book is my my
23:06
twin, I've got an identical twin. He
23:08
went and lived in the States. He was very stressed there,
23:10
he put on a huge amount of weight. And for a
23:12
decade, I nagged him, I tried to control him. And
23:15
my family, you know, I'm from a wonderfully loving family,
23:17
but we do love to get up in each other's
23:19
grills. And it was we speak to
23:21
a therapist in the book who says you have to
23:23
just let this go. And in the
23:25
end, my project as a physician
23:28
and as a broadcaster as a scientist is I
23:30
want to change the environment for everyone. I want
23:32
warning labels on the food. I want to reduce
23:34
the influence of industry. But I will
23:36
not tell people what to eat. And my
23:38
advice to any listener dealing with a teenager
23:40
is they, they're essentially a grown up and
23:42
just, you got to find their own way.
23:44
You can't be the bar and they will
23:47
kids are smart. Actually, we know from from
23:49
evidence from Chile, where they've put these warning
23:51
labels, these big black stop signs on the
23:54
food, kids ask their parents not to buy
23:56
it just as you and I probably remember
23:58
telling our parents. not to smoke.
24:00
I remember saying to my dad, you know that
24:02
isn't good for you. You know, I'd have some
24:05
lesson at school and kids, you
24:07
know, I do a kitchen on the BBC
24:09
operation ouch and the kids we speak to,
24:11
they want to be strong and well and
24:13
smart and successful and be good at sport.
24:16
But as you say, the environment, it's so
24:19
depressing when I'm driving in the morning and I see kids
24:22
13, 14 drinking huge energy cans of
24:24
energy drinks and big chocolate bars as
24:26
their breakfast. And there's no warning on
24:28
any of that. Even the environment, that's what
24:30
they're picking up at shops, right? That's just
24:33
there in front of them. It's what everybody's
24:35
doing. Those harmful products, you
24:37
don't have to believe any of the evidence
24:39
on ultra processing to agree on
24:41
fat, salt and sugar. That evidence is the
24:44
jury's in. Everyone agrees on it. Why is
24:46
there not a warning about the amount of
24:48
sugar on a can of cola? There's
24:50
a little tiny red traffic light, but there are
24:52
three green traffic lights. So that according to our
24:55
current labeling, a can of cola is
24:57
three quarters healthy. A can of
24:59
diet cola is four green traffic lights,
25:01
the healthiest thing you can buy. It's
25:03
really, what it should have is a
25:05
big light. And yes, South America is doing
25:08
this. They're doing it incredibly well. They
25:10
are pushing rocks uphill because the food,
25:12
I mean, the food industry has any
25:15
one of the big companies that make
25:17
our food. They have revenues roughly equivalent
25:20
to the GDP of a medium sized
25:22
South American country. Okay. That's how powerful
25:24
one of these companies are. So you
25:28
cannot understand their sort of political power,
25:30
but because the tragedy
25:32
there was so sudden, they had an
25:34
influx of American food and within a
25:36
generation, there was this
25:39
explosion of obesity and type 2 diabetes. And
25:41
so there was great population desire. It was
25:43
very great clarity of like, oh, it's those
25:45
products we have to put warning levels on.
25:48
UK has crept up on us. You know, we've
25:50
gradually been since the 70s. It's been 50 years
25:52
of trickling into our diet. And suddenly it's most
25:54
of what we eat. But a lot of the
25:56
products in the UK are dressed up as healthy.
25:58
And that's why on the cover. of the
26:00
book, there's a loaf of brown bread. Because
26:02
that brown bread is soft, it's incredibly energy
26:05
dense, it's got emulsifiers in it, it's got
26:07
very high levels of sugar, very high levels
26:09
of salt, and yet brown bread is
26:11
the sort of... It pretends to be good. ...bread is the
26:13
thing we all lean on as being healthy is what we
26:15
serve our kids in the morning. And New Zealand, I've just
26:17
seen, as an example, my husband was there not so long
26:19
ago, and he said it was so much that he'd go
26:21
into a store and all he could see was good stuff
26:24
because... So interesting. Yeah, the other stuff
26:26
was pushed up very, very high or very, very low. And
26:29
he said he felt like there were... And he felt he
26:31
was in, I'll say, Whole Foods, you know, which
26:33
is the kind of like, I'd say
26:35
the shop in this country that probably
26:37
has more natural products than maybe... No?
26:40
No? Okay. Well... He felt like
26:42
he was in a health store. Yeah. You
26:44
know, maybe... I mean, I go around Whole
26:47
Foods with a slightly different eyeball, but supermarkets
26:49
are more or less all the same because
26:51
they're all, with the exception of Waitrose, is
26:53
unusual because it's not owned by institutional investors,
26:55
it's employee owned. So it's a slightly... And
26:58
that, when you go in not to promote
27:00
Waitrose, you know, I have no relationships with any of
27:03
these people, but it does feel a bit different. They're
27:05
less interested in driving this kind of incredible rate of
27:07
growth that all the other supermarkets... Yeah, and let's not
27:09
even get on for like three for ones and all
27:11
that kind of stuff. Well, we know the bog offs don't
27:14
save money. No. No. So let's move to another question because
27:16
I'm going to run out of time with you, which is
27:18
annoying because there's so much more to talk to you
27:20
about. This is another one we had quite a few
27:22
questions about as well, which is to do with oils. Claire
27:25
wonders, what is your opinion on vegetable oil
27:27
and rapeseed oil? The minute you walked in,
27:29
I talked to you about oils and, you
27:31
know, should we be cooking with them? Should
27:34
we be avoiding certain oils
27:36
in certain foods? So I
27:38
would say that the best evidence shows that
27:41
the reason we're thinking the seed oils are
27:43
harmful is because they're almost all being used
27:45
in ultra processed foods. So it's very hard
27:47
to sort of disentangle that evidence statistically. What
27:50
we're very clear about, in fact, one
27:53
of the reasons the definition of ultra
27:55
processed food was created is because the
27:57
Brazilian team noticed this paradox where families
27:59
that were buying lots of oil and
28:02
sugar were healthier than families that weren't.
28:05
Now the families that weren't were still eating
28:07
the oil and sugar but they were eating
28:09
it in these new ultra-processed products. So buying
28:12
sugar, salt and oil ingredients
28:15
is a sign of good health. Now
28:17
we could go toe to toe on is it
28:20
better to have cold pressed rapeseed oil and extra
28:22
virgin olive oil and are they better than just
28:24
plain old vegetable oil? I'd
28:26
say that's that's some killed in
28:28
the lily if you like. If you
28:30
are home cooking using ingredients it
28:33
doesn't matter really if your butter is grass-fed
28:35
and your oil is cold pressed you're cooking
28:37
food at home and you won't when
28:39
you cook at home you're not doing it
28:41
to drive excess consumption and to drive increased
28:44
purchasing and to make money for yourself. You're
28:46
doing it because you love your kids and
28:48
and you won't add loads of salt and
28:50
you'll we know when people cook at
28:53
home they're moderate with oil. So the levels
28:55
of salt in ultra-processed food
28:57
are so much higher than you cook with
28:59
at home and then you eat
29:01
way more of that food because of the
29:03
way it's engineered because its logic is
29:06
to make money. So if anyone here
29:08
is... But you're not going to split hairs about oil. I really
29:10
am not going to split hairs. Just cook
29:12
at home butter, oil, you know make tasty
29:14
food. The slight exception is there is now
29:16
this this growth of recipes that are like
29:19
take a pack of cheesy puffs and
29:21
pour cheese spread over it and you
29:24
know mix it with crisps and you know you
29:27
have you'd have to be cooking with ingredients
29:29
and not if you're cooking with a load
29:31
of ultra-processed stuff then you know. I
29:34
think I know what you're gonna say to this. Steffi
29:36
says what are your thoughts on vegan or vegetarian alternatives
29:38
like corn? So these
29:40
are this is really tricky and
29:43
I kind of deliberately avoided this a bit in the
29:45
book but I have put I've put in two new
29:47
chapters in the paperback and I do cover a bit
29:49
of this. What I'd say is
29:52
without getting specifically into corn
29:54
they have much lower carbon footprints in
29:56
general and some of them are pretty
29:58
unprocessed so they are just... There's
30:00
things like tofu and lots of
30:02
East Asian cultures and South Asian
30:05
cultures have had meat substitutes for
30:07
a long time and they're really
30:09
good. But the
30:11
new meat substitute burgers, their
30:14
purpose is to make you buy more.
30:17
They're owned by investors usually in Silicon
30:19
Valley and they're extremely delicious.
30:21
They're very high in salt and fat and
30:23
often high in sugar and so they're not
30:25
really healthy. If you're
30:27
being ethical about carbon, definitely
30:29
switching away from meat to them is
30:31
probably a good idea. There's
30:34
a whole load of nuance to that that I don't want to get into.
30:37
But they're not healthier really than eating real
30:39
vegetables and their purpose is not health. I'd
30:41
also say many of them are made by
30:44
the same companies that also make the
30:46
meat. So when you go to a fast food chain and
30:48
you eat the vegan burger or the vegan sausage roll, you're
30:51
still paying into the same corporation that's
30:53
flogging loads and loads of meat. And
30:56
fat and ill health. So
30:58
if you're trying to be ethical, I'm
31:00
not sure it's really an ethical decision a lot of
31:02
the time to buy some of these vegan products. Sarah
31:06
says I'm fully behind you. But
31:08
everything before the but is rubbish,
31:10
isn't it? This
31:14
is an interesting point because a few people kind of sent
31:16
me messages a little bit like this. What
31:18
do you say when people say that
31:21
you're demonising some foods? So
31:23
that's a very
31:25
important critique. I
31:27
think it is nearly impossible when we talk
31:29
about harmful food. And when
31:32
we criticise the food, it's hard not to criticise
31:34
those that eat it. I have tried very, very
31:36
hard to take the shame that people feel and
31:38
heap it onto the companies and the policymakers and
31:40
the people who I can hear that. But
31:43
there will be people who are living
31:46
on low incomes that this food is marketed
31:48
to who cannot afford to buy anything
31:50
else. Nothing else is available to them. And it's
31:52
really hard to talk about this food without them
31:54
feeling enormous discomfort. And I
31:56
have tried to populate the book
31:58
with people with... very different backgrounds
32:00
to me with very different expertise is so
32:03
I want the
32:05
book to reduce shame and stigma.
32:07
In terms of demonizing food there
32:09
is another important thing which is
32:11
the anxiety around eating disorders and
32:13
so I was very careful I've been speaking
32:16
a lot with the eating disorders faculty at
32:18
the Royal College of Psychiatrists and they have
32:20
early data that shows that some eating disorders
32:22
seem to be very strongly linked to consumption
32:24
of ultra-processed food and that maybe shouldn't surprise
32:27
us that binge eating disorders for example. The
32:30
ultra-processed food might be contributing to them
32:32
because it is food that's been processed
32:34
in a way that interferes with our
32:36
ability to control appetite and so
32:38
I think it's really important to
32:40
talk about the harms of the food you
32:42
know this is a significant form of death
32:44
and suffering. Now the British Nutrition Foundation have
32:46
been and the food industry been very skillful
32:48
at sort of going oh this is this
32:51
is snobbery and by criticizing
32:53
the food you're marginalizing people who depend on
32:55
it. I would say that the real shame
32:57
and stigma comes from the fact that people
33:00
in this country with even medium incomes can't
33:02
afford to eat real food and that makes
33:04
them ill and that's where the shame comes
33:06
from and just being ill is bad for
33:09
you and so trying to change the system
33:11
I think a critique of me from the
33:13
industry that's causing the problem saying that in
33:15
trying to solve the problem I'm contributing to
33:18
it it's one of the cruelest and most
33:20
cynical of their ploys. So these are valid
33:22
critiques I'm very aware of who I am and
33:24
this is why I hope
33:26
I never say this is what people should
33:28
eat I never make that kind of normative
33:31
statement and I sincerely don't
33:33
care what people eat I want people to have
33:35
choice so I want real food to be affordable
33:37
available I want harmful
33:40
food to have clear warnings but I'm not
33:42
even proposing taxing most of it
33:44
I think we probably should tax the worst confectionery
33:46
the energy drinks we do need taxes on them
33:49
but for the most part I want I want to
33:51
increase choice not limit choice and
33:53
this really needs support of
33:55
government To be able to change
33:57
this system. So my research I published a paper last.
34:00
Last year not with doctors, nutritional scientists but
34:02
with a group of economists and we off
34:04
the simple question if if you go on
34:06
the website of any big they come again
34:09
coke or less like a look at the
34:11
home page a new think these are charities
34:13
dedicated to reducing carbon, cleaning up, plastic, protecting
34:15
public health you know preventing children in the
34:18
workplace being exploited you have so we just
34:20
said com He has their own financial data
34:22
to test these sessions and it turns out
34:24
of course when these companies make money what
34:27
they spend it on these not a rewarding
34:29
women and. Children is not reducing carbon
34:31
emissions and limiting plastic pollution. What they
34:33
spend it on is doing share buybacks
34:35
and hang out dividends. You know they
34:37
buy that their own shares to drive
34:39
up the equity value. And when public
34:41
health proposals are put to the board
34:43
by some investors, it's the big institutional
34:45
investors, the pension funds, the hedge funds
34:47
to vote those proposals down so the
34:50
companies cannot control themselves. they are part
34:52
of a system that is just the
34:54
economic system. I'm not trying to criticize
34:56
that bought the place. We know capitalism
34:58
works brilliantly well is when it's well
35:00
regulated. The pharmaceutical industry specs enormous
35:02
profits for well regulated the aviation industry
35:04
in the automotive industry with trying to
35:07
regulate carbon. So saying that government should
35:09
regulate the food industry should not be
35:11
controversial. By the way, behind closed doors
35:13
when you go and speak to. What?
35:16
Could see sweet. You know the chief executive
35:18
bullying at board level of the of the
35:20
company's the hula desperate to be regulated they
35:23
know they're selling bad food. You.
35:25
Speak to supermarkets mean I said to one
35:27
Big supermarkets. Could you Not switch to being
35:29
a fruit and veggie business? Know like. Will.
35:31
Know people don't overeat pairs, you know
35:33
apple spoil lettuce? You know we don't
35:35
have any. I peace will just sold.
35:37
It is on the market prices. We
35:40
may com money from the chocolate tray
35:42
bake which we make from you know
35:44
palm. Fast and cheap flights directly and
35:46
I think it is entering the but
35:48
was there a point in history. In. The
35:50
last fifty sixty years where we can
35:52
have reached a and a nice balance
35:54
in terms of because I think that's
35:56
like my mom's childhood where everything would
35:58
have been an ingredient. that you know that
36:01
she that her family cooked her mum or who
36:03
you know whoever was cooking and then
36:05
obviously through my my childhood when my
36:07
mum got her microwave things
36:09
changing a bit and things started to make things
36:11
started being brought in that we could put in
36:14
the microwave the whole meal could come out was
36:16
there a point in history where our health was
36:18
at an almost the optimum because we had that
36:20
it's really the balance I think it's
36:22
really hard looking backwards because
36:26
partly there were so many historical problems if we go
36:28
back to the 50s I mean there were a lot
36:30
of bad things about the 50s I mean there was
36:32
a lot of fancy you couldn't buy a mango you
36:34
know yeah it was bananas were in short supply so
36:37
and a lot of people who want to want us
36:39
to protect the environment more would say we shouldn't be
36:41
buying mangoes because they don't grow here that's very valid
36:43
I think for me it's perfectly possible
36:45
to look at the current system and go it could
36:47
be so much better we live in a food apartheid
36:50
right people with enough money can eat better than they
36:52
have at any point in history we can buy any
36:54
food we want from anywhere in the world we can
36:56
cook the most amazing food we've got recipes
36:59
cookbooks but that is not the
37:01
food that's marketed to us and it isn't the food
37:03
that most of us eat most of the time and
37:05
so I think looking backwards ago life was wonderful in
37:08
the 50s it wasn't life was terrible for loads of
37:10
people and people living in poverty ate terrible diets then
37:12
and they smoke more and they drink more you know
37:14
that but I guess in the 70s we didn't have
37:16
the levels of obesity we have now well that that is
37:18
that we smoked that's it I mean in 1990 so one of my
37:20
one of the
37:22
goals I think we should have in 1995 percent
37:24
of children left primary school living with obesity
37:27
now it is 25% okay so
37:30
that is a tragedy you
37:32
know and that's not as you said
37:34
before that's not a statement of kind of
37:37
no it's just that we've allowed that to
37:39
happen to our food failure of government and it's
37:41
a failure of successive governments you know it's a
37:43
failure going back to conservatives
37:45
and labor then back to conservatives it
37:48
causes enormous suffering it has nothing to do with
37:50
willpower we know it has nothing to do with
37:52
inactivity it is all to do with the food
37:54
environment and it's about the failure of government to
37:57
regulate corporations but it's also
37:59
economic stupid So I
38:01
hate the economic arguments because the moral arguments are
38:03
so much more powerful You know this we just
38:05
shouldn't have 25% of kids
38:07
suffering with this because it will cause them physical and mental
38:09
and social harm But you can
38:12
if you are a right-wing hawkish economist
38:14
and you want a strong military right
38:16
and you know A powerful nation great
38:18
sports team to make Britain great again,
38:20
you know, bring your kids healthy British
38:23
children at the age of five
38:25
are this much shorter than nine
38:28
centimeters Okay, then their counterparts in
38:30
Eastern Europe or in Northern Europe in Scandinavia If
38:32
you take a class of you know I've got
38:34
a six-year-old if you take her class and you
38:37
move it to Norway and you put them in
38:39
a football match against The class of Norwegian kids
38:41
Norwegian kids will look like they're two years older.
38:43
Okay, you've got if you travel I mean if
38:46
you if I try and you know about
38:48
six foot tall if I travel to Northern
38:50
Europe I'm very average, you know, we see
38:52
and this is all because of diet. So
38:54
it's Economically very stupid
38:57
and we see there
38:59
is an anxiety about the companies. We don't want
39:01
we don't want to damage the economy We don't
39:03
know regulate these companies. It's just fantastically well when
39:05
you regulate them We've never seen you know The
39:07
banks loved being regulated because the banks collapse when
39:10
they're allowed to do what they want because they
39:12
sort of have to take these risks So
39:14
yeah, it's we we cannot afford not
39:16
to regulate this industry Keep doing what you do
39:19
because I think it's so important and I think
39:21
you know You're obviously very much the David in
39:23
this Goliath fight and I hope that there are
39:25
plenty more who want to join your fight Well,
39:28
I think that I mean, I'm a very small
39:30
part of this and I should say I'm riding
39:32
the crest of a wave to other people built
39:34
I mean there have been people saying this since
39:37
the 1970s my mum was saying this in the
39:39
1970s all the way through the 1890s
39:41
when I was a kid, so I am I'm
39:43
piggybacking on the lot of people who totally
39:46
believe and do what you're saying But
39:48
they're fighting against a system those that
39:51
can't get that food on their plates
39:53
Very quick personal one. My really
39:55
good friends Claudia. She Instagramed in when I
39:58
put this shout out She said Can
40:00
you ask Dr. Chris, why am I
40:02
addicted to Mark suspense's Florentine chocolates? Why
40:05
is she addicted to Mark suspense's Florentine chocolates? Is
40:07
it for all the reasons you've just said?
40:09
So you like the personal shout outs and
40:11
the answer. Claudia, I mean, you
40:13
are not the only one. Okay. We
40:16
can look at very specific aspects of those
40:18
chocolates. So they're incredibly soft. They're very, very
40:20
energy dense. And one of the things we
40:22
know about almost all addictive substances, whether we
40:24
look at nicotine or alcohol is
40:26
the speed of delivery is very important. So
40:29
sugar in a bowl on the table, not
40:31
very addictive. But if we mix the sugar
40:33
with fat and we put it in a
40:35
form that gets into your gut very quickly, whether it's
40:37
a soft drink or a chocolate, we know that can
40:39
drive this addictive relationship. But the main reason is some
40:41
very, very smart people in M&S have put that chocolate.
40:44
They've tested it on hundreds of people. And this is
40:46
the way, I mean, this is just the way food
40:48
testing works in general. So I don't know about M&S,
40:50
but this is the way all the other companies do
40:52
it. They test it on a few hundred people. How
40:54
many can you eat in 10 minutes? How many can
40:56
you eat in 10 minutes? And if there's
40:58
one formulation, people eat nine in 10 minutes and there's another
41:01
formulation and people eat 12 in 10 minutes, that's the one
41:03
that goes on the shelf. So it's designed
41:05
to make you more is to
41:07
make money for the owners of
41:09
the supermarket. And that is where
41:11
your pension is. So M&S
41:14
cannot regulate, they can't do
41:16
anything other than make chocolate in that way. And that
41:18
is why the government needs to come in and put
41:20
some big black octacons on that chocolate and take away
41:22
the advertising from the chocolate. It might make them a
41:24
bit less attractive to you, Kale. Thank
41:27
you so much for coming in. I feel like we
41:29
need a second go at this
41:31
at some point. I would absolutely love to. It's
41:33
been brilliant having you here. And we've, you know,
41:35
we've only gone through kind of a quarter of
41:37
the questions. But I think you get
41:39
the general sense of what people are wanting to hear.
41:41
They're brilliant questions. I'd love another bite if you're up
41:43
for it in the next few months. It would be
41:46
absolutely delicious. Brilliant. I love that. Thank you. Well,
41:51
thank you so much to Dr. Chris for coming
41:53
in and for being so generous with his time
41:55
and his knowledge. It's a subject you feel that
41:57
is just going to grow and grow in the.
42:00
interest that we all have in society in
42:02
terms of what we're putting in our bodies
42:04
and the effect it's having on us. And
42:06
if there are other topics you'd like us
42:08
to cover on the podcast, please do get
42:11
in touch. You can either leave us a
42:13
review on Apple Podcasts, message or comment on
42:15
my Instagram, which is at gabbylogan, or follow
42:17
me on Facebook and submit your suggestions there.
42:20
You might also want to scroll back through
42:22
our archives for similar expert episodes. We've got
42:24
Megan Rossi or Gerontology Professor Rose Ann Kenny.
42:26
Thanks again to Dr Chris for his time
42:29
to Spiritland Creative and to you for keeping
42:31
me company. I'll catch you next time. Hi,
42:44
I'm Daniel, founder of Pretty Litter. Cats
42:46
and cat owners deserve better than any
42:48
old fashioned litter. That's why I teamed
42:50
up with scientist and veterinarians to create
42:52
Pretty Litter. It's innovative. Crystal Formula has
42:54
superior order control and ways up to
42:56
eighty percent less than clay litter. Pretty
42:58
Litter even monitors health by changing colors
43:01
to help detect early signs of potential
43:03
illness. It's the world's smartest kitty litter.
43:05
so of. litter.com and use Code A
43:07
cast for twenty percent off your first order
43:09
and a free cat toy. Terms and conditions
43:11
apply see site. For details. Hold
43:17
up. What was that? Boring. No flavor.
43:19
That was as bad as those leftovers
43:21
you ate all week. Kiki Palmer here
43:23
and it's time to say hello to
43:26
something fresh and guilt-free. Hello Fresh. Jazz
43:28
up dinner with pecan-crusted chicken or garlic
43:30
butter shrimps can be. Now that's music
43:33
to my mouth. Hello Fresh.
43:35
Let's get this dinner party
43:37
started. Discover all the delicious
43:39
possibilities at hellofresh.com.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More