Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
Quality. Quality. Sleep is essential. That's
0:02
why the sleep number Smart Bad is designed
0:04
for your ever evolving sleep needs so you
0:06
can choose what's right for you whenever you
0:08
like me. to Bad: that's firmer, softer on
0:11
either side, and helps you sleep. But. A
0:13
comfortable temperature sleep number does that. Number
0:31
stores or sleep number.com. Prompts,
0:34
Defense team is now cross examining the
0:36
prosecution's first witness, former tabloid Executive David
0:39
Hacker. This is backwards third day on
0:41
the stand and today for the very
0:43
first time. he described the deal that
0:45
he helped broker with adult film star
0:47
Director Stormy Daniels Of a deal that
0:50
is at the center of this kit
0:52
is the prosecution has used Packer to
0:54
set the scene for the jury, introducing
0:56
them to key players in the case,
0:59
how they all fit together in the
1:01
story. Right now, the defense tactic in
1:03
it's early questioning. His part of
1:05
a strategy. the strategy to argue the
1:07
David Packers work helping Trump during the
1:10
Twenty Sixteen election was nothing new, nothing
1:12
unusual. Also, notably today, judge One Marshawn
1:14
so far still has declined to issue
1:17
a ruling from Tuesday's hearing on whether
1:19
Trump has violated. His. Gag Order
1:21
Despite the prosecution arguing that this
1:24
morning that Trump continues to violate
1:26
this order against disparaging members of
1:28
the jury and the witnesses of
1:31
course this is four times over
1:33
the last three days the prosecution
1:35
says let's discuss with our panel
1:38
and let me start with you,
1:40
David Chalian because the trials going
1:42
on right now Vivid packers shrugging.
1:45
says. He is testifying to the best best
1:47
of his knowledge to be truthful because a
1:49
meal both. Trump's lawyers say one
1:51
I'm getting at is these things happen long time
1:53
ago. Even. When you're doing your best
1:55
hard to remember things is he saying, like, maybe you
1:58
don't remember this all that well, this is yours. Years
2:00
ago, ah, Packers in his seventies,
2:02
etc. Trump has his arms folded
2:04
across his body watching Packer answer
2:06
his attorneys questions specifically he was
2:08
were poking holes in the memories
2:10
of where Trump was in August?
2:12
Twenty Cassini Remember that that consequential
2:14
meetings between Pecker and Cohen in
2:16
Trump's setting up the whole schemes
2:18
and the defense here is clearly
2:20
trying to say you're not fight
2:22
remembering of Trump was in town
2:24
or not in town or just
2:26
trying to bring in this cloud
2:29
of suspicion around. What he presented
2:31
during the prosecution's time record
2:33
said earlier. Of: when presented
2:35
with the fact that Stormy Daniels ah,
2:38
had the story out there, this adult
2:40
film starring director of them alleging that
2:42
you had an encounter with Mister Trump
2:45
a Packer Testify quote I said I
2:47
don't want the National Enquirer to be
2:49
associated with with a porn star. He.
2:52
Added that Walmart was I'm a distributor of
2:54
the magazine and would be very bad for
2:56
am I the the publishing company that produces
2:59
the The National Enquirer. Pecker also said if
3:01
anyone was going to buy it. In.
3:03
Terms of buying the story I thought
3:05
Michael Cohen and Donald Trump. Or
3:08
said by. The significance of as you
3:10
think the idea that a packers saying that he
3:12
was reluctant to get involved in the Stormy Daniels
3:14
case when we know at the end of the
3:16
day. He. Didn't actually get involved. it
3:18
was Michael Cohen who got involved right? So
3:21
I mean it look look like I guess
3:23
the the argument to be made as that
3:25
I'm. That. This was unusual
3:27
might wasn't standard fare for him to be wouldn't
3:29
necessarily bit it with his fit. It consists of
3:32
with his business objectives to be engaged to kill
3:34
sore to kill stories right handed it for trump.
3:36
right? And in fact, telling us particular story
3:39
or fine a story when a made me
3:41
much business sense for himself for trying to
3:43
sort of build this ah of. Narrative.
3:46
Around and a sort of working susie pro Trump
3:48
and exclusively for the purposes of the election, right?
3:50
One of the things he testified about I believe
3:52
on direct earlier today was he said that you
3:54
know in a meeting with Trump was no reference
3:56
to Trump's family. right? No references Trump's
3:58
family that meeting with. The What You're Doing This
4:01
death. He wasn't wanting to suppress the Stormy Daniel
4:03
story where the current with story. Be.
4:05
On behalf of his wife, protecting his wife or
4:07
it's kids. it was in in just about his
4:09
campaign that that is what the Da's office again
4:11
be saying. Ano Trump has suggested or as lawyers
4:13
have suggested that it may have been had something
4:15
new this family but this is now a trial
4:17
or evidence has to be a deuce and I
4:19
don't know who is going to put that into
4:21
evidence unless it's Donald Trump himself and he's not
4:23
credible. So the prosecutor right now ah this is
4:25
as Assistant District Attorney. Our stained glass. Is
4:27
objecting to Trump's attorney and mister both.
4:30
Characterizing David Packers meetings with the Da's
4:32
office as a walk as Packers. Suggested.
4:35
Something like that. The judge ah, sustained
4:37
of the objects and or will what's
4:39
what's the point. Of that objects
4:41
in these the idea that they cooked the
4:43
story up with the prosecutors. yeah look this
4:45
is kind of textbook defense lawyer one on
4:48
one. One of the things to defense is
4:50
going to try to show is that Packer
4:52
and probably the other witnesses really did sit
4:54
down the prosecutors and laid out the narrative
4:56
and on what to say. it's us concocted
4:58
story but the idea is that they're basically
5:00
spelling out the story that the prosecutors one
5:02
of the told stealth I think we've seen
5:05
so far here just today in the early
5:07
stages of the cross examination is that the
5:09
Trump defense team is going to follow a
5:11
strategy. Of really trying to read frame the
5:13
whole significance of Packers testimony, the prosecutors want
5:15
to educate the jury on the cats until
5:17
process and six, This is how Trump and
5:19
people he worked with typically would try to
5:22
suppress these kinds of source. What the defense
5:24
is going to be trying to show today
5:26
through the cross examination is at this was
5:28
done all the time they didn't for all
5:30
sorts of other celebrities, all sorts of other
5:32
politicians. so don't drawing conclusions that this was
5:35
a special deal to protect Donald Trump. The
5:37
David Baker to said he remembers meeting with
5:39
prosecutors five to six times during the summer.
5:41
Of two thousand. Eighteen.
5:43
At themselves or it in your experiences at work
5:45
as the out of the idea of try this.
5:48
Depicts. A witness that has
5:50
damaging testimony is having kind of been coast
5:52
or or nudged in a certain way by
5:54
prosecutors. Does that work with was a contract
5:57
so that he was incentivize, right? Did he
5:59
did? He's. These now a witness he
6:01
was not a subject that the investigation work
6:03
or involved in it and had immunity it
6:05
all the of things that come along with
6:08
that. And. I think they're also trying
6:10
to show looked at. this is the keep
6:12
using the word standard operating procedure in order
6:14
for them and one thing in the questioning
6:16
and I think that's the key to this.
6:18
The same looks they've done this whole time.
6:20
They're protecting the dirty secrets of that business.
6:22
same thing leveraged of other celebrities right? That's
6:24
the key that they've leverage other celebrities that
6:26
they do this all the time. The and
6:28
they keep using word stated operating procedure and
6:30
attacking it from that angle. Did this is
6:32
a dirty business. That's what they're going to
6:34
try and show that this is a dirty
6:36
business and that when they get caught. In it.
6:39
They. Went to the prosecutors and just follow
6:41
the prosecutors narrow so the jury right now
6:43
we're told and side doesn't have been allow
6:45
cameras in the courtroom so we're trying to
6:48
bring your window are through narrative from our
6:50
reporters in the room. The jurors are closely
6:52
watching. prompts, attorney Mr. Both and the witness
6:54
Mr. Packer sums are seated closer to the
6:57
gallery or occasionally looking out into the gallery.
6:59
Ah, as a reporter. same again girl. Says
7:01
to follow up on. my team said
7:04
the reality is David Pecker is getting
7:06
immunity and you know that's going to
7:08
come out as an incentive. I would
7:10
say just going back to direct Today
7:13
I was looking through. All. Of
7:15
our slack channel for everything that
7:17
was sad. that's that's what we're
7:19
putting on Tv. The number of
7:21
times David Pecker was ass and
7:24
answers that this had to do
7:26
with the campaign. If you just
7:28
go through the trans. Quite a bit,
7:30
right? Over and over and
7:32
over again I see says.
7:35
If he didn't wanna do it
7:37
because it with embarrass Mister Trump
7:39
or embarrassed or hurt the campaign
7:41
the campaign the campaign's. The campaign
7:43
which is different I guess than saying yes.
7:46
We did this with. I'm
7:48
just going to name a dead actor so
7:50
I don't get in trouble. Pyro Power Dry
7:52
we had. We had all of that Tyrone
7:54
Powers dirt. Just. To help him because we
7:56
had a good relationship with him. This is
7:59
different as it's helping. Get somebody elected,
8:01
Theoretical and. Clearly the prosecution is
8:03
underscoring this over and over.
8:05
They wanna make the case
8:07
to other things. One is
8:09
that dated pecker and they
8:11
did this yesterday. They're doing
8:13
it today. They're making the
8:15
connection that David Pepper and
8:17
Donald Trump were friends David
8:19
Pekearo one point said. Defense attorneys
8:21
or maybe ah yes no no no no
8:23
the bras agree with you are going to
8:26
browse. Is because they want to say he the
8:28
Packers. Wouldn't. Be doing this
8:30
to tear her towel trump. He
8:32
he liked it and he said
8:34
at one point I felt the
8:36
Donald Trump was my mentor. He
8:38
helped me throughout my career. I
8:40
still consider I'm close. Even though
8:42
we haven't spoken, I still. Consider.
8:44
Him a friend. So Trump's attorney or
8:47
the defence attorney or Emile Bove is
8:49
asking series of questions right now. David
8:51
Packer that witness about how prosecutors. In
8:54
fact, prepared Packer to give quote
8:56
consistence. Testimony or every time
8:58
he testified David Chalian Some
9:01
very interesting testimony. Not long
9:03
ago this afternoon were David
9:05
Packer recalled a phone conversation.
9:07
He. Had with Trump's White House team.
9:10
At the time. According to Mr.
9:12
Packer, A Hope Hicks and
9:15
Sarah Huckabee Sanders said Sarah was
9:17
Communications Director or the Press Secretary
9:19
and and hope it's was a
9:21
special assistant to the President's He
9:24
talks Packer says with Hicks and
9:26
Sanders about whether Karen make do
9:28
bulls contract. Should. Be extended so
9:30
just to remind people carrying Mcdougall is the Ninety
9:32
Ninety, a playmate of year who alleges she had
9:35
a long term affair and part of the catch
9:37
and kill was to give her hundred fifty thousand
9:39
dollars. A woodpecker did. To. Have
9:41
are not tell her story publicly. It was
9:43
not a script Packer said going on to
9:45
confirm. he wasn't surprised. Many questions from the
9:47
prosecutor. That's what the separate issue about whether
9:50
or not the defense or the rather the
9:52
prosecution has coached him. In any case, karma
9:54
Google had this contract. She was good. Got
9:56
one hundred fifty thousand dollars. They bought the
9:58
rights to her story. Including
10:00
her alleged. Affair. With
10:02
down trump. Ah, and then
10:04
David Pecker calls the White House and so
10:06
should we should we extend her contracts. Pecker
10:09
said both of them hope aches and Sarah
10:11
Sanders. Said. That they thought it was a
10:13
good idea. Know. Those.
10:15
Are taxpayer funded employees?
10:18
Have a hours of the White House
10:20
at the time giving a recommendation the
10:23
chemicals contract to be extended. That's. That's.
10:25
Pretty interesting. I don't think either of
10:27
them were thinking also about Trump's family
10:29
or embarrassment it's efforts of is it
10:31
inside the White House about what not
10:33
wanting more stories are to help out
10:36
here you know. This. Hearing.
10:39
Packers telling of how Donald
10:41
Trump. Checked. In On Terror.
10:43
And Mcdougall with hims I thought was really interesting
10:45
to damage. Starting with the initial before the deal
10:47
was done before he signed a Am, I signed
10:50
the deal with Mcdougall, but when it was in
10:52
the works apparently there was a phone call between
10:54
Pecker and Trump's Packers out New Jersey. Get me,
10:56
let me interrupt you. I'm going to bring up
10:58
cause I got a graphic and them and everybody.
11:01
Okay so this has to do with A When
11:03
I got on the phone this is David Back
11:05
are talking. When. I got on the phone.
11:07
Mister Trump said to me. I. Spiked I spoke
11:09
to Michael Cohen. Karen is a nice girl
11:11
by the way just to interrupt your David
11:13
Zucker confirming. Them. In two thousand and
11:15
fifteen and two thousand six thing, Michael Cohen was
11:17
always clear that he was Trump Personal attorney. He
11:19
was not working for the campaign. Will. See
11:22
how significant that is? anyway? So.
11:24
Parker as. Trump gets on
11:26
the phone with them says I spoke to Michael Currents
11:28
a nice girl. Pecker testifies. I believe that when Mister
11:30
Trump said that she was a nice girl, I believe
11:32
that he knew who she was. The. Prosecutor
11:34
as Packer why he told prompt they should
11:36
by the story. To. Suppress It Hacker
11:38
says. I believe the story was true. Becca.
11:41
Recalls Cohen told them about paying for the story,
11:43
saying the boss will take care of it. Pecker
11:46
clarifies the boss. Was. Donald Trump was
11:48
just down core Trump's attorney aspect. To
11:50
confirm is far Testimony The Cohen was
11:52
always angling for something. For. Himself. And
11:54
in any case, that's what you're talking about. the com xactly
11:56
around or say that comes I didn't know you have the
11:58
graphic. I'm glad. You didn't have that conversation the up
12:00
of Donald. Trump saying she's a nice
12:03
girl now. Fast forward. And
12:05
now you're in love, Saint you! Dinner!
12:07
At the White House and we. Learn again that
12:09
Donald Trump is. Checking in on how
12:11
Terrence doing. So when you see Donald
12:14
Trump publicly and say things like i
12:16
don't even know who this person. Is
12:18
up the heat of this? Clear up? This.
12:20
Clearly phrase somebody that he actually had
12:23
on his mind that I thought pecker
12:25
revealing that of was quite informative. To
12:27
and Crisis have one thing. I
12:29
can hear Donald Trump saying these
12:31
words because I've actually heard him
12:33
say these words about somebody else.
12:35
This is the way he speaks.
12:37
I was interviewing him at the
12:39
time he was married to Marla
12:41
Maples and we were waiting for
12:43
her to com and he said
12:45
she's a nice girl. She shows
12:47
up on. Time about marla. maples?
12:49
Yes please! Just. The way he speaks
12:52
when when I heard those words that you
12:54
just jumped out. At me interesting arm
12:56
we are with the it is
12:58
not of. On. Heard of. Of
13:01
for courts to throw out a conviction. In
13:03
fact, we just happen though in New York
13:05
today with Harvey Weinstein. I'm not comparing these
13:07
cases, but it just happened to days where
13:09
they are and a higher court ruled that.
13:13
Evidence should not have been introduced in
13:15
a case against Harvey. Wants to know
13:17
he's he's still in prison for stuff
13:19
he did, los Angeles, etc. They might
13:21
retry the case, but I wonder jam
13:23
if you think introducing this karma Google
13:25
and of Information and the other catch
13:27
and kill story information could later be
13:29
used to. Call into
13:31
question this this case the it's that balancing test
13:34
between what is prob it is and what is
13:36
prejudicial right and those are things that the appellate
13:38
courts are going to look at. I think they're
13:40
going to be a lot of a pellet issues
13:42
in this case including to kind of underlying primes
13:44
that make it a felony. I think this case
13:46
is gonna have a there's a lot of fodder
13:49
for up of for appeals on this case is
13:51
gonna go for some time after afterwards if there's
13:53
a conviction. So. Trump's Attorney just as
13:55
Packer whether he told agents isomers F
13:57
B I, Agents of July Twenty eighteen.
14:00
Interview that Hope Hicks had been at that.
14:02
M I'm Important meeting in August.
14:04
Two thousand and fifteen at Trump
14:07
Tower were supposedly the scheme ah
14:09
has been hashed. Ah, The prosecutor
14:11
objects to Trump's attorney asking that
14:14
question. Marshawn Sixteen sustains the objection:
14:16
why would. Marshawn, Why
14:18
would the prosecutor object? And
14:20
why would Marshawn sustain the objection? Yeah.
14:23
I'm quite sure I'm in a good one of you have an
14:25
idea. Wealth. And he might. My
14:27
guess is that what they're trying to do
14:29
that the defense team is trying to suggest
14:31
that the the political and personal we're kind
14:33
of kept segregated. The prosecutors are trying to
14:36
show that kind of and from world. Everything
14:38
was all blended together and self. I think
14:40
that that's what that line of questioning was
14:42
aimed to get at, but I think what
14:44
the judge said he was actually very interesting
14:46
and that you know to the point about
14:48
not creating a pellet. Issues: The judges pay
14:50
attention listening to the questioning and making these
14:52
on the spot. Judgment calls about questions that
14:55
are permissible and questions that are impermissible. Precisely.
14:57
To ensure that you don't have that. Kind of harvey
14:59
one scene problem where the judge allows the
15:01
prosecutors or the defense to start opening doors
15:03
that son of be opened before the jury
15:05
am in the written a thing as customizers
15:07
anytime. New you have a defense
15:10
lawyer asking a cooperating witness. Did.
15:12
You tell the agents x, y or z. Usually.
15:15
Suggests that there may have been some omission
15:17
during the debriefing process and that maybe that
15:19
fact and come out during some exactly right
15:21
Trump's attorney from France attorney trying to get
15:23
back or to confirmed that he did not
15:25
mention Hicks when he first told the story
15:27
from were told it is sitting there with
15:29
his arms crossed, the end of his other
15:31
defense attorney toddler insulating over or whispering to
15:33
each other. Stand by one and all much
15:35
more to discuss The breaking new Trump's defense
15:38
team is cross examining former tabloid magnate David
15:40
Packer. He said the updates coming in on
15:42
the side of your screen will see how
15:44
much ground is covered. In these final minutes of the
15:46
trial today, we're going to take a quick break. Will be
15:48
right back. This
15:52
podcast is supported by sleep number.
15:55
Quality. Sleep is essential. That's why the
15:57
sleep number smart bed is designed for your
15:59
ever evolving like needs so you can choose
16:01
what's right for each of you whenever you
16:03
like. Need a bad that's farmer or softer
16:06
any other side of Cc but a comfortable
16:08
temperature quiet their snores sleep number does that.
16:10
Only. Sleep Number: Smart Beds let you
16:13
each choose your ideal comfort and support
16:15
your sleep. number. Setting: Sleep. Number
16:17
Smart Beds learn how you sleep and
16:19
provide personalised insights to help. You sleep
16:21
better. All sleep number Smart beds Future
16:23
cooling pressure Live in comfort. Layers. Sleep
16:34
Better Together Jd Power ranked Sleep number
16:37
number one in customer satisfaction with mattresses
16:39
purchased and store and now see forty
16:41
percent on sleep number. Limited edition smart
16:43
bed. For a limited time for
16:46
Jdpower Twenty Twenty Three Award
16:48
information, visit jdpower.com/awards. I'm
16:54
Doctor Sanjay Gupta, Cnn's teeth medical Correspondent
16:56
this week. Unceasing Life. I'm sorry that
16:58
the Great Barrier Reef is no longer
17:00
great, that we value Amazon much more
17:02
than V Amazon, and that the waterfront
17:05
neighborhood where you were growing up can
17:07
be condemned by Rising Seas before you're
17:09
old enough to apply for a mortgage.
17:11
That's my friend, Bill. We're Scene and
17:13
Cheap Climate correspondent. He's optimistic about the
17:15
planet, and he's optimistic about our ability
17:18
to take care of it. listened,
17:20
To tasting wine revenue to
17:22
podcasts. However
17:25
with are breaking news a three of
17:27
testimony continues in the Donald Trump has
17:29
want to up for former tabloid executive.
17:31
David. Pecker is on the stand.
17:34
He's been cross examined by Trump's defense
17:36
team or let's every backer panel discuss
17:38
was happening quite right this minute because
17:40
a Packer is confirming as the a
17:42
defense attorney has been pressing him to
17:45
do that and you amy all about
17:47
that. He did not mention Hope Hicks
17:49
being at that August two thousand and
17:51
fifteen from Tower meeting in his initial
17:53
two thousand and eighteen government interview Just
17:56
to bring you up to speed. if
17:58
you don't know, in August. The Thousand
18:00
and Fifteen. That is when. I.
18:02
Donald Trump and Michael Cohen his attorney
18:04
at the time and David Packer, the
18:07
publisher of The National Enquirer sat down
18:09
according to Packer and Cohen and came
18:11
up with this meeting. In this idea
18:13
where the National Enquirer would help Trump?
18:16
That's according to the testimony of to
18:18
of these individuals. What is the significance?
18:20
Do you think of the fact. That
18:23
the defense attorneys have now gotten
18:25
David Becker to agree that he
18:27
didn't mention Trump's campaign aide and
18:30
White House Aide Hope Hicks being
18:32
at that a original August twenty
18:34
Two Thousand Fifty meeting When he
18:36
first recounted this. To. Prosecutors two
18:38
reasons. One for Absalom in pieces credibility, right
18:40
to take a shot at his credibility and
18:42
maybe his memory right to the could be
18:44
a resubmit. Hope it's been part of other
18:46
meetings going forwards. This was kind of the
18:48
course of conduct having run it as they
18:51
got further into the campaign at my feet
18:53
and might have been back in two thousand
18:55
and fifteen. they were doing it and then
18:57
perhaps me. she was sort of other meetings
18:59
The happened further down the road and I'm
19:01
trying to establish that she was part of
19:03
that as part of a courses. And
19:05
course of conduct for those types of issues. Attorneys
19:07
are at the band's right now because the prosecution
19:09
has to approach. Overt. Objection:
19:12
To. Emile Bove the defence attorney
19:14
his series of questions about Packers past
19:16
testimony. So so this is again this
19:19
is the prosecution object thing or two
19:21
was a gym was just explaining the
19:23
defense attorneys trying to do trying to
19:26
undermine David Packer in some way. perhaps?
19:28
Yeah, I think what's going on here
19:30
is that the dissenters tried to show
19:33
that Packers story has evolved. A classic
19:35
defense Cross examination techniques is to confront
19:37
the witness with the story as the
19:40
first told at when approached by the
19:42
government. And said here's the story unfolds.
19:44
Then today in this courtroom you're a
19:46
different story suggesting it's change. Maybe the
19:48
government was coaching and maybe they were
19:50
planting nuggets. Maybe they want to frame
19:52
the case that a different way as
19:54
new details begin to emerge so it
19:56
looks like what's going on here. Object
19:58
is the prosecutors are getting wise to
20:00
this and the here going to try
20:02
shut down this line of questioning and
20:04
hopefully gets his defense to move onto
20:06
a different topic with with so hope
20:08
Hicks Ah we're told Will will possibly
20:10
testify in this case of former campaign
20:12
aides, a former or White House aide,
20:14
a close to our President Trump and
20:16
add the Trump family and the Trump
20:18
team. What is the purpose do you
20:20
think. Of all of this
20:23
question about whether or not she was
20:25
as the two thousand and fifteen meeting
20:27
as a to establish that this was
20:29
in fact a campaign purpose mean and
20:31
yes. Them guess I don't think
20:33
she was there to help out Donald
20:35
Trump's family. Yeah. Because.
20:38
Well I mean I'm sure. see. Ab America see
20:40
that I should be So so she is about
20:42
as she does Obe Hampshire. She has relationships with
20:44
Ivanka and Milan yeah I mean but it's an
20:46
honor of ah but other times he used to
20:48
work for Ivanka and at the top Yep guys
20:50
which is no Judge Marshawn as dismiss the that
20:52
the jury for the day I wasn't there but
20:54
at that time with on August twenty fifth t
20:56
I read all know the political calendar and what
20:58
is happening at that point in time in terms
21:00
of gearing up for present right Trump is just
21:02
announced his presidential campaign the month before that month
21:04
or two before. If somebody can also go to
21:06
the fact that are trying to look at this
21:08
and say look this was all about. Also,
21:10
Donald Trump's brand right that this is something
21:12
he's been a celebrity forever long before he
21:15
was a schemes a candidate for president. That
21:17
there's as course of conduct that they are
21:19
going to that there were constantly working to
21:21
try to protect the brand. A few will
21:24
and part of that is protect the family
21:26
to family's all part of the brands. That
21:28
could be part of their defense theory at
21:30
the end of the day that this is
21:32
that this is all commonplace because the constantly
21:35
protecting Trump's brand. Like I can I
21:37
say Trump's brand was all cel marla
21:39
maples that he left to. I mean
21:41
it's not as if he had not
21:43
been. In. The Tabloid. You
21:45
have to one way to Marla Maples it's not
21:48
have already have their watches when I met watching
21:50
knows I'm Marla Maples. I know Marla Maples is.
21:52
Backset. Best sex of her life
21:54
she has said although this. Reason.
21:57
The question that I target. You. Remember
21:59
that idea. Remember that what I
22:01
remember is she was Weiss number two
22:03
and that she was having an affair
22:05
with Donald Trump of he was still
22:07
married to Ivana Trump wife my wife
22:09
number one and it was all over.
22:11
Didn't have. So they've joined, the jury has
22:14
left the courtroom, but Jamie brings up an
22:16
interesting idea. which is the idea you know
22:18
First of all, for any presidential. Candidate.
22:20
Or or any President. Separating
22:23
campaign from official government business
22:25
is always difficult, right? And
22:28
Neo Barack Obama candidates Rock Obama
22:31
President it's the same person. Donald.
22:33
Trump had thirty versions of that
22:36
right. a societal property for office
22:38
Donald Trump, The The the Game
22:40
show host Donald Trump, the the
22:42
real estate tycoon Donald Trump the
22:44
state manufacturer and on and on
22:46
and on. So the Trump brand
22:48
is like a legitimately have a
22:50
legitimate that subject for a defense
22:53
it is. And the Trump Brand
22:55
ah was totally. Part. And
22:57
parcel of the campaign in that way
22:59
that are, There's no doubt about that.
23:01
That's why he was immediately recognizable the
23:04
American public unable to be a player
23:06
in this campaign. But remember, This
23:08
is Candidate Trump prior to president. Select
23:10
this when you're running a presidential campaign.
23:13
As you know, There's. Almost
23:15
nothing. You were doing said is
23:17
not in the context of that presidential
23:19
campaign. Yeah Tapa, John Edwards and factors
23:21
Canal was in New York. she's been
23:24
falling every detail from outside the courthouse.
23:26
I care a significant day in court.
23:29
Or as the judges now dismissing the
23:31
jury, Those poor jurors. I get to
23:33
go home and have some time to
23:35
themselves get us up to speed on
23:37
where the defense team left matters in
23:40
it's cross examination of this first witness,
23:42
David Packer. For
23:45
that offense has only been going outdated
23:47
tech or for less than an hour
23:49
about their of the getting a focus
23:52
on t mean been here trying to
23:54
get at these has many deals and
23:56
then magazines and politicians often worked together
23:58
asking is it's hacker if that the
24:00
center the operating procedure and he said
24:02
that it was. He also said that
24:05
he'd been warning Trump's for seventeen years
24:07
about any negative stories unassisted not just
24:09
beginning. Twenty six Pm says one main
24:11
focus on the cross examination has to
24:13
tried to and tell the jury that
24:16
Ahmadis was normal. It's not necessarily a
24:18
legal and that is one of the
24:20
theme that we knew. The Plaza the
24:22
defense with going to be pushing us
24:24
that are also trying to chip away
24:26
at David Packers credibility and they're doing
24:29
advice asking him some. Questions about interview
24:31
he has given with prosecutor saying you
24:33
know he is going back to the
24:35
August Twenty Six Team meeting that this
24:37
is the meeting where the Prosecutor city
24:39
alleged conspiracy between Donald Trump, Michael Collins
24:41
and Betas hacker with had sewage. They
24:43
agreed to catching Sylvie Seal to help
24:45
the campaign for their ask any The
24:47
Packer about his initial interview with prosecutors
24:49
when he said that the meeting was
24:51
at a different state than though data
24:53
it actually was and that he didn't
24:55
remember Hope Hicks being there and which
24:57
he later said that she was so
24:59
trying. To suggest that maybe he has
25:02
altered his story is a common tactic
25:04
that the Templars used to protests cast
25:06
doubt on the credibility of the witness
25:08
and try to make it is though
25:10
that they've been rehearsed pointing out how
25:12
many times he the Packers know if
25:14
prosecutors he said is that with them
25:16
up for five times this year which
25:18
Trump's attorney and doing that her immobile
25:20
they said oh that seems like a
25:22
lot of time to just trying to
25:24
have some doubt in the credibility of
25:26
the the Packers testimonies and on the
25:28
sand. Now for and three. Days he's
25:30
given more than five hours of testimony
25:33
for the prosecution where where he has
25:35
laid out a story and telling them
25:37
the narrative of these tests until deals
25:39
repeating how he had done three of
25:41
them up. buying a story is a
25:43
doorman who said that he had a
25:45
knowledge of Up and that Trump had
25:48
fathered an illegitimate child which is a
25:50
false story spine a caring and Dougal
25:52
story and then bringing the Stormy Daniel
25:54
story to Michael Cohen and repeatedly same
25:56
and he'd done that for the campaign
25:58
and self defense attorneys. I'm getting their
26:00
first chance to try to towns that
26:02
cross examination is expected to go for
26:04
several hours unfold feel as if a
26:07
federal the bath on the sand from
26:09
our morning where they will likely get
26:11
into some of the more specific of
26:13
this case. but right now today and
26:15
their first sampling at him there are
26:17
focusing on just says the deaths of
26:19
this is normal that having sex until
26:21
deals is not illegal and it was.
26:23
He put it standard operating procedure for
26:25
magazines and media to work with politician.
26:27
And Sake and Kara our rewards. A
26:29
real Beauvais is beauvais years ago as
26:31
they must renounce. Yeah.
26:34
Anal those A. Culture of good Enough from
26:36
portrays his handling of your nose or as
26:38
I ask myself how to pronounce a meal
26:41
and they tell me a meal were there
26:43
but I forgot to ask about go back
26:45
or it and any case to see You
26:47
know what's going on right now So the
26:49
assistant District attorney just stained glass is objecting
26:51
or and getting into the objects in they
26:53
had about are both ways. line of questioning
26:55
when it came to they've attacker sunglasses right
26:57
now arguing that Bobby's questions about the F
26:59
B I interview were quote. Improper.
27:02
And left the jury with
27:04
a miss him fashion styling
27:07
glass objecting to Beauvais are
27:09
trying to. Seemingly.
27:11
Or undermine the memory at the
27:13
very least, if not the credibility.
27:16
of David Hacker which is what you would
27:19
expect. A defense attorney on a
27:21
to do I suppose Carrasquillo. Re
27:25
any new you see as all the
27:27
time and cross examination. They try to
27:29
bring up notes on the next the
27:31
I interview or from grand jury testimony
27:33
and then try to and challenge the
27:35
memory as you say other the witness
27:37
and so then what are inconsistent statements
27:39
and then have them try to explain
27:42
why they're inconsistent before the jury's sell
27:44
a sign glass now that the jury
27:46
has left for the day is challenging
27:48
how much sense to trees and do
27:50
best selling swords. Advocacy of pecker is
27:52
the first witness so the question here
27:54
will. Be are trying to set the
27:56
tone of how this can be used
27:58
to tell us census him the other
28:00
witnesses. As his trial plays out or I
28:03
thank you so much. Carousel Gym. So it's
28:05
funny you mentioned dismissive uber. That's what John
28:07
Edwards case, right? So there are a lot
28:09
of parallels here with the John Edwards case.
28:11
Interestingly enough, that was a campaign finance case
28:13
right brought against them, and in this particular
28:15
and in that case he was acquitted. And
28:18
didn't it? And I think that has
28:20
a lot to do with why federal
28:22
charges were brought in connection with this.
28:24
Because those parallels because they more spec
28:26
tastes which really goes the underlying case
28:28
here. Rights they're bringing in these it
28:30
it's a campaign far as a campaign
28:33
issue. New York State law. But. Also
28:35
there are some federal undertones there and then
28:37
ordered. guess that felony. You have to show
28:39
that there was a crime being covered up
28:41
in this case he wasn't swords probably not
28:44
charged because they lost that case against said
28:46
what so I'd without because of United States
28:48
of scandal. Nutter views are know that show
28:50
that we've done on here and seen a
28:53
because of that I knew I remember a
28:55
little bit about or that case. We're waiting
28:57
for a Donald Trump to come out in
28:59
the soon as he speaks. We will bring
29:02
the to live and it was dug out.
29:04
There are clear similarities. In terms of
29:06
what you're spending money on, in
29:08
terms of an extra marital relationship,
29:10
And. How much about is done for
29:13
campaign and how much of them
29:15
that is done to protect your
29:17
family? Without question the key difference
29:19
I would say is in that
29:21
case. Or it was people.
29:23
It. Was it was contributors and supporters of
29:25
John Edwards who are spending the money or
29:27
Bunny Melon and another individual in Texas i
29:30
forget his name. Ah, but those two individuals
29:32
were spending money to keep Rielle Hunter. Are.
29:35
Out of the limelight. Are. But yeah,
29:37
I mean the basic point you're making up
29:39
the money was spent. On. To
29:41
protect the brand of John Edwards and the jury had
29:43
to decide what how much of that was for politics
29:45
and how much of that was for as. His.
29:48
The personal life and they couldn't really decide
29:50
at the end of the day. at least
29:52
not with a unanimous juri that was relevant,
29:54
although they weren't the candidate themselves. individuals yeah,
29:56
no, I the gym is exactly right and
29:59
in the Edwards. There I'm has no doubt
30:01
of you can keep talking. Always makes you
30:03
know. The Edwards case I'm sure loomed large
30:05
when federal prosecutors were engaging with the spat
30:08
pattern. I'm sand are you know in that
30:10
case and that expensive and lead them to
30:12
be cautious in this area. Yeah, let's listen
30:14
in to the defendants. Today
30:19
reserved for authority says
30:21
Russo or went on
30:23
was breathtaking An. Amazing
30:27
system or this is a round.
30:29
It's. Never happened this
30:31
case is ever been filed.
30:34
Anniversaries. An incredible. Incredible.
30:38
Open your eyes they would you let
30:40
this continue to happen to have ventured.
30:44
For another matter you know and account
30:46
of, insisted reported to be doing very
30:48
badly the stock markets way down. As
30:51
horrible numbers came out, it's
30:53
very high numbers on inflation
30:56
particular gasoline. And
30:58
seventy F zones in California is
31:00
usually leads the way. That happened
31:02
to. Very
31:05
important, various. Various
31:08
colleges over the country is the
31:10
I services because putting in other
31:12
areas. You see
31:15
what's on the fruits. Happy
31:17
to do with. Israel
31:20
and fruitiness and. Sending.
31:25
A message. Horrible horrible messages. Noisy
31:27
inner city kids. Be secure for
31:29
two sentences together. you know what
31:31
to do. This is Not a
31:34
President. Is somebody that should
31:36
be doing what he's doing because he can. Talk
31:42
about Charlottesville shows a little.
31:45
And was nothing compared to he
31:48
was a dissenting Iraqis. This tremendous
31:50
A to we have a manager
31:52
talk about understand that he doesn't
31:54
understand what's going on with our
31:57
country. He has enough. The
32:00
world with the last and his
32:02
expenses because the him and his
32:04
administration and today we had idea
32:06
of because I was forced to
32:08
the yes I'm glad I wasn't
32:11
as was a very interesting day
32:13
and certain way for us. Supreme
32:15
court had a. Monumental
32:18
hearing on immunity have the
32:20
ability to do with president
32:23
so. I
32:25
think it was made warehouses made Players
32:28
as a president has thousand. Prisoners
32:30
for of course you could say what.
32:37
They're talking about ceremony one president
32:39
sets in, get things done and
32:41
for people together. So I heard
32:43
the meaningless. For.
32:47
An amazing Justices work on a
32:49
game so long as he other
32:52
himself and again I say presidential
32:54
of is a very powerful person.
32:56
In Soviet it is imperative or
32:59
you practically would have a country
33:01
anymore. Thank you very much Sex.
33:05
Offender: Donald Trump. After the
33:07
third day of testimony, a
33:09
former. Tabloid magnates
33:12
add David Packer are
33:14
coming out on not
33:16
attacking witnesses, not attacking
33:18
jurors. So. His. Lawyers
33:20
can be happy about that. Are.
33:23
Going into campaign issues
33:25
legitimate campaign issues, but.
33:27
Ah, As always. Worth.
33:30
A fact check. So let's bring and soon and samuel day
33:32
I'll. I'll daniel We heard
33:34
of. Talk of the stock
33:36
market down, which is true. And
33:38
place and up. Gas. In California.
33:41
Charlottesville. Being a piano. Give.
33:43
Us what you got as so that
33:45
Sarlis fell I mean, from present from
33:47
said the Charlottesville of Protests and Twenty
33:49
seventeenth with a little peanuts compared to
33:51
what we're seeing now on college campuses.
33:53
Pro Palestinian protesters. I guess that's a
33:55
matter of opinion on which I can't
33:57
render a decision of such acts, but.
34:00
Remember the fact that a woman or
34:02
a counter protester was murdered their in
34:04
Charlottesville? We've had at no reports of
34:06
anything like that happening on any college
34:08
campus today than his pro Palestinian protests.
34:10
He said the heat in Charlottesville paled
34:13
in comparison to the hate. We're seeing
34:15
their again a matter of opinion, but
34:17
let's remember there was neo nazi and
34:19
other white nationalist hate in Charlottesville, so
34:21
know those points on gas prices are
34:23
for President Trump again said it just
34:26
been announced. California a gas seven and
34:28
a half dollars per gallon. There. Always
34:30
are Jake some outlying in a rural a
34:32
deserted stations in California that have high prices.
34:34
but today's average according to Aaa or is
34:36
five dollars and forty one cents per gallon
34:39
and then on the stock market. Yeah it
34:41
has fallen that today in the wake of
34:43
a D Gdp report. But if you look
34:45
I have the Snp numbers are right in
34:48
front of me. If you look at one
34:50
year is up twenty five percent. Year to
34:52
date is that more than six percent. A
34:54
six month it's up twenty two percent. So
34:56
we have had a bit of a decline,
34:59
but let's not suggested. The stock market has
35:01
plummeted under President Biden or in the last year
35:03
in general Daniel just to a point of clarification
35:05
on want to be accused of fact checking or
35:08
fact checker by. Five. Dollars and
35:10
Forty One sense you need you noted as
35:12
the average gas or is that the average
35:14
gas price in California In California California didn't
35:16
specify because in the United States as a
35:19
whole three Dollars and Sixty Five. so that's
35:21
right. Always appreciated the fact that with of
35:23
our i doubt I will. Years ago I
35:25
was a fact checker those how I got
35:28
into this business Thank you. So mercenary, always
35:30
good stared at the have you in here
35:32
bet M in the gym You gotta be
35:34
happy that he's at least a generally speaking
35:37
sticking to ah things he's allowed. It's about.
35:39
And not violating the gag order. His lawyers
35:41
have to be happy about that, right? That's
35:43
it. No doubt about that. I mean, getting
35:45
it. Just the fact that he's mentioning Charlottesville
35:48
has to make his campaign cringe at this
35:50
point. Rights like that just brings back all
35:52
those bad memories about that issue that was,
35:54
or it was a really bad issue for
35:56
him at the time I was in the
35:59
White House when all that was what when
36:01
all that was unfolding And to bring that
36:03
back now was a big mistake on his
36:05
part politically to raise last. but the rest
36:07
of it is campaign rhetoric, right? And he
36:09
also saw him. He. Was. A little
36:12
tired was a long day for me. you know
36:14
I don't think was a good idea that kind
36:16
of go out and do that. Do
36:18
that press press avail in any way shape or
36:20
form if he's not going wow be sharper, make
36:22
us forces or gym raises. Really interesting point out
36:24
David and and Jamie which is. Why?
36:26
Bring of Charlottesville like that is one
36:29
of the ugliest moments of his presidency.
36:31
And yes, we are seeing protests all
36:33
over the country. Most. Of
36:35
them, peaceful, most of them and support
36:37
a Palestinian rights. There has been some
36:39
anti Israel sentiment and there has been
36:42
some anti semitic sentiments without question. But
36:44
that's not with the Neo Nazis in
36:46
the Unite the Right Rally were doing.
36:48
That was not a. Peaceful.
36:50
March that turned into something ugly. It
36:53
was ugly From the word go right.
36:55
And and is actually see started this
36:57
at least this morning. I just quickly
36:59
was looking through This is a new
37:02
seen. That. He's He's.
37:04
Playing on see things and perhaps rightly
37:06
that people are very upset about what's
37:09
going on on college campuses. Just like
37:11
the border he sees it as an
37:13
issue to bring up a just to
37:16
go back to. When he came out
37:18
of the courtroom the first thing he
37:20
said and I think this didn't know
37:22
bagel with a group with actually true
37:25
He said today's testimony in court with.
37:29
Through it was it. It was ransacked. Nine
37:31
aware that the but out of the what
37:33
was. Your most fascinating thing for you are
37:35
today in court. I was personally surprised to
37:37
hear David Zucker. Calling. White
37:39
House aides, Hope X
37:41
and Sarah Huckabee Sanders now
37:44
Gov Sarah Huckabee Sanders ah
37:46
and asking them their opinion
37:48
of whether Karen we could
37:50
do goals hush money untracked
37:52
should be extended and them
37:54
saying. Yes, That
37:56
that is breathtaking. Right? And
37:58
and actually from. There are what
38:00
we've talked about Hope Hicks maybe being
38:03
a witness and he turned to David
38:05
nice and see a thing Gov Sanders
38:07
may be called as as a witness.
38:09
in this case there are. There is
38:11
one thing that wasn't said of is
38:14
shocking is that. But I wonder from
38:16
the jury's point of view whether it
38:18
speaks to David packers credibility. There are
38:20
sometimes things that people just saying a
38:22
certain way and it cuts through. And
38:24
this was about when David Pecker says
38:27
Sir Michael Cohen why should I pay
38:29
I just paid. Thirty thousand dollars for
38:31
the storm and story. Now you're asking
38:33
me to pay a hundred and Fifty
38:35
thousand dollars for the Karen Story. I.
38:38
Said I'm not a bank. In.
38:40
Other words and this place to truth. From.
38:43
Pleasant hangs back for these
38:45
things. I just think. Little.
38:48
Anecdotes like that. Yes, the defense
38:50
is going saying you didn't remember
38:52
that Hope Hicks has had a
38:54
meeting. I. Think. That
38:56
that. Weighed. Against something like
38:58
this. You actually helps the
39:01
prosecutors Woodpeckers credibility. And
39:03
I would you say back to the
39:05
former President for me out, there has
39:07
been a shift in strategy in the
39:09
last couple of days. Like all of
39:12
he's outside, court appearances had been solely
39:14
focused on railing against money go on
39:16
and prosecutions of witnesses and look So
39:18
I don't know that the waiting for
39:20
the gag order ruling or the threat
39:22
of that or she's gotten the advice
39:24
that just as you have this opportunity
39:27
in front of a microphone every day
39:29
with so much attention on its, use
39:31
it for the purpose of your. Campaign
39:33
but it's. This is now
39:35
the second day imports. Were when we
39:38
see him he is on and anti buys
39:40
and more political message that he is on
39:42
his legal message. Yeah I completely agree that
39:44
that possibly the threat of a gag orders
39:46
for of hanging over this right and the
39:48
judge may be looking at this and wondering
39:51
wealth and this man really reform his behavior
39:53
for how serious to the sanctions need to
39:55
be on. He. Struck me as quite
39:57
low energy. Or to coin a phrase
39:59
more aware. If. We
40:01
really know how to hurt Ago has
40:04
that? the Us: I'm. But
40:06
it's a step in the right direction as
40:08
I think The thing that you know, his
40:10
boys must be happy about this. I completely
40:12
agree with him, but you know all of
40:14
these comments has been making. Our. On
40:16
video and choosing or whatever it's a
40:18
currently the subject of this contempt hearing
40:20
by the prosecutors. Also may have the
40:23
option of introducing those comments in trial.
40:25
On because these are typically these statements from the
40:27
defendant, our emissions that can be entered into evidence
40:29
by the prosecution. So it's the government may be
40:32
able to save the end of the day like
40:34
just to play a series of clips from the
40:36
last week or two saying this is what this
40:38
man was doing. Love you. He was on trial,
40:40
He was railing against you, his attacking witnesses, He
40:43
was disobeying the judge's orders. Yeah, there was a
40:45
critical detail of this case. It was not handled
40:47
before quarter join for the day. I and that
40:49
you just heard of an allusion to at our
40:51
special live coverage for ten years as if the
40:53
moments. Just
40:58
before the judge would call former
41:00
tabloid magnate a Woodpecker back the
41:02
witness stand today, prosecutors stopped him.
41:04
they wanted the flag yet for
41:07
additional examples of what prosecutors allege
41:09
were instances. Of Donald Trump
41:11
violating. His. Gag Order to
41:13
not disparage witnesses, jurors, or staffers
41:15
or family of the judge and
41:18
prosecutor. Here's one of them. Describing.
41:20
Court. From. Donald Trump in a
41:23
radio interview Monday. With. Real America's
41:25
Voice. That's.
41:27
Your he was picked so fast.
41:29
Ninety five percent democrats. The
41:32
areas are mostly old democrat. You think
41:34
of it, is it just a purely
41:37
democrat area? It's a very unfair situation
41:39
that I can tell you. The.
41:41
Panel is back and David
41:43
Chalian judge Percent has still
41:45
not. Ah or have issued
41:48
a ruling in whether not Donald Trump
41:50
violated the gag order in the ten
41:52
previous instances and now the prosecutor has
41:55
for new ones. Do. You
41:57
think that he can
41:59
be. Card from that's in
42:01
words like the last to meet post
42:03
court appearances. He adhere to the gag
42:05
order right? Do you think that that's
42:07
working at all? Do you think a
42:10
penalty might have an effect? Was we
42:12
were discussing I do wonder if it's
42:14
some kind of demonstration. says he can
42:16
alter his behavior prior to this ruling
42:18
coming and I don't know if that
42:21
is part of the strategic easily since
42:23
up but what? I. Also, it seems
42:25
to me how much longer we wait for
42:27
this judge to have this ruling. Because or
42:29
the prosecutor if he does indeed by the the
42:31
gag order against in a few hours untrue, social
42:33
or some every day of the prosecutors going to
42:35
start court with us. now we have a few
42:37
more and know a few more and a few
42:39
more and to each of those need to be
42:41
adjudicated. It just seems to me if you're gonna. Have
42:44
a. Game. Plan and
42:46
ground rules which I guess the gag
42:48
orders already supposed to be the brambles
42:50
but of whether or not as being
42:52
violated at him and therefore enforced or
42:54
don't you tell me that in the
42:56
course here before the trial gets too
42:58
much deeper into a we should know
43:00
Jamie game. Go! It's not just he's
43:02
not only gag from saying bad things
43:04
about witnesses, he's by gags. I'm saying
43:06
anything. About witnesses and the reason
43:08
I bring that up is because here's another
43:10
example of him allegedly breaking the gag order.
43:13
Or this is from this morning when he
43:15
made a stop on the way to court
43:17
to talk about David Packer, the key witness
43:19
so far in a positive way. Take a
43:22
listen. I
43:27
wouldn't last a nice Very
43:30
nice as a response. Burners.
43:33
Now it sounds innocent enough to
43:35
maybe some people. but the prosecutor
43:37
said today quote. This is
43:39
a message to Packer. Be nice,
43:41
it's a message to others. What am?
43:44
I can't. Wait, we've heard that before.
43:46
I mean, this is it that said
43:48
about Donald from. Ah,
43:51
And mouth, as you don't I
43:53
thinking at first maybe Judge Marshawn.
43:55
Is waiting be kinds just
43:57
having this hanging over Donald?
44:00
Current head might cause it.
44:02
But. It's not nothing. Is. Going
44:04
to to restrain. Trump
44:07
either either one of the tricky things
44:09
here for for judge where someone the
44:11
lawyers can talk about this his other
44:14
than a thousand dollar fine. Each for
44:16
each By where each. One which is
44:18
not going to bother. Donald.
44:20
Trump too much. When you
44:23
step it up it, it's incarceration and I
44:25
think we've all pretty much who reads as
44:27
not gonna happen. There are a couple
44:29
of intermediate options to that of our the
44:31
Da's office. I'd be considering I'm again. It's
44:34
very possible the stuff uncommon evidence but seconds
44:36
or and eluded this last week. if he
44:38
keeps it up I think they're gonna stop
44:40
giving his lawyers advance notice of which witnesses
44:42
are being called on which days. On.
44:44
An edited actual significant tactical disadvantage in the
44:46
trial because if you don't know which witnesses
44:48
are going on which days you don't know,
44:50
you can't Runners need to be ready who
44:52
don't, Bosses who need to be ready to
44:54
cross examined which evidentiary she's You need to
44:56
be prepared to dress would documents you'd have
44:58
to put an evidence repeat someone's that's way
45:00
more significant than Fifty Thousand Oaks as interesting
45:02
gym. I say this one for you because
45:04
it's from of your hometown and minor Philadelphia
45:06
Channel Six or Donald Trump. I gave an
45:08
interview to Channel six weeks and he brought
45:10
up Mister Cohen or he was aswell Mr.
45:12
Cohen either way Mexico and was discussed. Here.
45:15
It is. Vital
45:18
Town is a convicted liar and he's
45:20
got no credibility whatsoever. He was a
45:22
lawyer and you rely on your lawyers.
45:26
Third, Child sex acts news exclusive it
45:28
says. There is also. And. The
45:30
lawyer but it's specs pretty cut and dry
45:32
Case of a violation of the gag order
45:35
or I don't think that's can stop at
45:37
all I reached yeah Michael Cohen is going
45:39
to be front and center and Donald Trump's
45:41
mind. He had a day to day where
45:43
it came out tried to talk about campaign
45:45
seems a little uncomfortable about wanted to press
45:47
away but didn't I did You just see
45:49
time and time again and Cohen's go to
45:51
do everything he can to try to drawn
45:53
out. Early and often so the
45:56
Donald Trump is going out making comments
45:58
like this about Michael Cohen. He's. The
46:00
Me number one for Donald Trump and he's
46:02
not going to be on help himself. They're
46:04
So now there's going to be an additional
46:06
hearing next Wednesday afternoon. A Lot. in all
46:08
likelihood. with these new instances, you think. It's.
46:12
Hard to say. I mean I'm a little
46:14
curious that unite. I understand the logic of
46:16
like maybe holding us over Trump's head and
46:18
seeing if he can reform his behavior. but
46:20
I do. Also, after completely ago with David
46:22
said he earlier there's an order and place.
46:24
It's very strange for trial the Beagle ongoing
46:26
with prosecutor saying this dissenters violating the sport
46:28
or over and over again and the judges
46:30
in resolving the issue. It sounds like you're
46:32
calling it a two tiered system of justice.
46:34
Perhaps there's a list of we are not
46:36
thousands of to be in that Wednesday hearing.
46:38
Does he on this issue? Because he's supposed
46:40
to campaign of Michigan and Wisconsin. Next Wednesday
46:42
as I write up. So one other thing
46:44
just because we're not are that New York.
46:46
I'm courts and all their wisdom which I
46:48
don't mean sincerely is not allow got cameras
46:51
in the courtroom or despite the obvious public
46:53
interest in this. So here is the best
46:55
we can do which is reporting on some
46:57
of Trump's body language and court. He smirked
46:59
just once when Packer I recounted Trump telling
47:01
room full of people that Pecker knows more
47:03
stories about him than anyone else in the
47:05
rooms and when prosecutors ass about the Access
47:08
Hollywood tape. From. Had his eyes closed
47:10
with a scowl on his face? No, I don't
47:12
know if this courtroom sketch. From. The
47:14
artist Christine Cornell is from that exact
47:16
moment although his eyes are closed. At.
47:19
Get that Kira on off their a dumpster
47:21
their thanks so much as Donald Trump us
47:23
now lane and frowning. But.
47:26
I but it does seem to you know that faced
47:28
him as a recognizable that we've all seen. The
47:33
but I'm very good. What? What Is Amy? What's going
47:35
through his mind Their: this is it. If this is
47:37
the moment where he thought about the Access Hollywood tape
47:39
that is one of his lowest. Moments.
47:41
Politically or that tape coming out everybody thought
47:43
although it wasn't true or that that was
47:45
the end of his political career and he
47:47
wasn't gonna be elected president. In I
47:49
was going to say that you
47:52
never want to ask anyone what's
47:54
going to Donald Trump's mind. on
47:56
the other hand, one or things
47:58
as sure that in this is
48:01
actually pretty transparent, he tells you
48:03
what he's thinking. Let's just remember
48:05
the timing: October before the election.
48:08
Access Hollywood October Seventh. These things
48:10
happen. The Stormy Daniels is two
48:12
weeks before election day. October Twenty
48:15
Seven Twenty Eight. The timing is.
48:17
Critic? Yeah, and I did. I will say
48:19
however much I was, there are cameras in
48:21
the courtroom. I do enjoy the work of
48:24
Christine Cornell's in Rosenberg, the courtroom artisan or
48:26
they're doing exemplary works thanks to one and
48:28
all appreciated. In addition to this critical day
48:30
in the hush money cover up case, there
48:33
was also a major hearing before the Us
48:35
Supreme Court where another Trump defense team force
48:37
for Presidential immunity in a different criminal case.
48:39
We're gonna talk about that next Quests a
48:41
brand new criminal case in Arizona involving several
48:44
Trump allies, but not Mister Trump himself, the
48:46
Arizona Secretary of State. Is going to join me.
48:48
We need to get into all of that. Here on
48:50
the lead, stay with us. I'm.
48:56
On a carton. Welcome to be my
48:58
guest. The Protest. One of the best
49:01
gift you can get friends spending time together.
49:03
But what's even better than that cooking with
49:05
them and be my guess is hard cast.
49:07
New friends and all stuff on
49:09
my bars for some conversation and
49:11
great cooking. We talk about food,
49:14
Life and everything in between. Listen
49:16
to be my guess the podcast
49:18
with me I know, garden and
49:20
join us for ever you that
49:22
you podcasts. C.
49:29
C C and. I
49:33
will go back to the lead. All
49:35
in this our in the law and
49:37
justice lead and this big day for
49:39
gowns a trump Two have his criminal
49:41
cases one courtroom at the same time
49:43
series. Of course a Manhattan has want
49:45
to cover a pile of in Manhattan
49:47
has been on a just wrapped up
49:49
with as a former have more publicity.
49:51
The sectors such as the Back on
49:53
sense for a fourth day Tomorrow the
49:55
defense's having their chances Him You began
49:57
by explain why you believe that. Immunity
50:01
from from little prostitution is
50:03
essential for is a proper
50:06
functioning of the presidency. But
50:08
my question is whether the
50:11
very robust worms immunity that
50:13
you're advocating is really necessary
50:16
in order to. In. Central
50:19
for criminal liability. Is taken
50:21
off the poop? Wouldn't there
50:24
be a significant risk that
50:26
future presidents would be emboldened
50:28
to commit crimes with abandoned
50:30
while they're in office? In
50:33
addition to these two cases, there's also
50:35
a brand new criminal indictment from Arizona
50:37
in an alleged to empty attempt to
50:39
overturn the Twenty Twenty election in that
50:41
state. This one charges. Eighteen.
50:43
Different individuals eight Trump allies.
50:46
From. His inner circle and
50:48
eleven Republican electors in Arizona.
50:51
Arizona Secretary of State is going to join
50:53
me this our to discuss the let's start
50:55
this our with that immunity case before the
50:57
Us Supreme Court today and will bring and
50:59
seen as Evan Paris and Paula Read and
51:01
and policy it appears the Supreme court. Might.
51:04
End up with some sort of middle
51:06
ground here because many justices seems. Skeptical.
51:09
Of Trump's absolute immunity claim that
51:12
anything he did. In
51:14
office or that was impersonal. like
51:16
falls into official duties at Mother
51:18
and his attorney. Kind of Granted
51:20
the mad at seems, but they
51:22
also seems unwilling to greenlight the
51:24
January Six trial together. Yeah, did
51:26
not news that these for Trump? First
51:29
of all, it's clear majority of justices
51:31
are not willing to just toss the
51:33
special counsel's case questions about these official
51:35
as versus private acts and we heard
51:37
as you know, it's time zone and
51:40
thirty's conceded that some other details in
51:42
the indictment aren't that not of Islam.
51:44
So. How do you assess out. With. Or
51:46
official and which are pie that? Well, that's
51:49
the problem because she's just as Robert, for
51:51
example, clearly doesn't think that the lower courts
51:53
prefer The court of Appeal did enough analysis
51:55
to soft that out. What sick? listen to
51:57
what he said. Why
52:00
shouldn't we saw in the send it back to
52:02
the court of appeals? Or. Issue
52:05
and opinion Making clear that that's
52:07
not the law via I am
52:10
defending the court of Appeals judge
52:12
then and I do think that
52:14
there are layered safeguards of the
52:16
court can take into account that
52:19
will ameliorate concerns about unduly chilling
52:21
presidential candidates that concerns us. We
52:23
are not endorsing a regime that
52:25
we think would expose former presidents
52:28
to criminal prosecutions in bad. Safe
52:30
for political animals without
52:32
adequate evidence. Is.
52:36
Doesn't appear that the justices completely by that
52:38
thought It appears they are poised to do
52:40
is set up some kind of past and
52:42
then kicked the entire case of back down
52:44
to the lower courts to analyze again which
52:46
are fish lox with our private off the
52:48
bat additional with a decent would take time
52:50
we don't know how long it's gonna take
52:52
the supreme court for this decision we are
52:54
a how long that litigation Athena takes but
52:56
again every delay benefits Trump because if he's
52:58
reelected he can make both of us federal
53:00
cases go. Way we have in this case
53:03
is very much about Donald Trump wrote
53:05
it's called in the Supreme Court. Battles.
53:07
Are Trump petitioner vs United States
53:10
but. Many. Of the justices,
53:12
if not, most of them seemed very,
53:14
very focused. On. The precedence this
53:16
case could set for future presidents right?
53:19
and and it just big just because
53:21
they they they kept going back to
53:23
that point or I think it's a
53:25
it's a big win frankly for the
53:28
former president of this one of the
53:30
things his his are lawyers kept arguing
53:32
They kept saying that if you allow
53:35
this to go forward this way that
53:37
other presidents could face prosecution or for
53:39
any acts of they commit an office
53:41
and so are you here here's a
53:44
dog Just Gore said describing. What He
53:46
says, What he sees at play here. Listen.
53:50
I'm not concerned about this
53:52
case, but I am concerned
53:54
about future he of the
53:56
criminal law to target political
53:58
opponents based on accusations of
54:00
their motives whether it's reelection
54:03
or who knows what for
54:05
up means And Fifteen Twelve
54:07
right with we don't know
54:09
what that means, maybe we'll
54:11
find out sometime soon, but
54:13
is a dangerous of accusing
54:15
your political opponent of having
54:17
bad motives and and if
54:19
that's enough to overcome your
54:22
poor powers or any other
54:24
limits. And. Listen,
54:26
I'm a world where the most bizarre
54:28
parts of the today I sort of
54:30
was wet weather getting one of the
54:32
justices a raised, the prospect that a
54:34
president might want to commit acts. Illegal.
54:37
Acts in order to remain in power.
54:39
What does that remind you of Bread
54:41
and Apple's like they're talking about the
54:44
Twenty Twenty election and this case that
54:46
we're talking about rights. So it's clear
54:48
that they're very much focused on this
54:50
idea that there be a cycle of
54:52
retribution and again, that's something that that
54:55
that Donald Trump and his team of
54:57
has repeatedly race. Interesting. Thanks so
54:59
much to both you. Let's bring in. Joshua
55:01
A Mass is a former Flair for Justice
55:03
Kennedy and a former Attorney for Eating Carol.
55:05
Also still with a stem cells the served
55:07
as White House Counsel for Donald Trump. Suggests
55:09
Honey up start by playing the argument
55:12
that Trump Attorney. The. John Sour made
55:14
before the court. Take a listen. The
55:17
implications of the court's decision here
55:20
extend far beyond the facts of
55:22
this case. Good
55:25
President George W. Bush and
55:27
then sent to prison for
55:29
obstructing an official proceedings are
55:31
allegedly lying to Congress to
55:33
induce war in Iraq. To
55:37
President Obama be charged with murder for
55:39
killing Us citizens abroad by drone strike.
55:43
Good President Biden someday be
55:45
charged with unlawfully inducing immigrants
55:47
enter the country illegally for
55:50
his border policies. The
55:53
answer to all these questions is
55:55
no. Prosecuting the president for his
55:57
official acts is an innovation. No
56:00
foothold in history or tradition and
56:02
incompatible with our constitutional structure. So
56:05
Joshua, what's your reaction to that
56:07
argument? My. Reaction
56:09
is that it's unsurprising that the for
56:11
Trump's lawyer wants to talk about anything
56:13
other than the facts of his own
56:15
case. And. That he's really
56:18
trying to paint the picture of some
56:20
kind of dystopian future where former presidents
56:22
are prosecuted with abandoned for all sorts
56:24
of partisan reasons. I mean the
56:26
problem with his example is that and I kind
56:28
of agree with him and know the those president's
56:30
could not be prosecuted on any of those grounds.
56:32
The. Not because of absolute immunity, but instead
56:34
because of other protections within our legal system
56:36
which has a point that the lawyer representing
56:39
the Justice Department I thought made very effectively.
56:41
And. In I think coming off of
56:43
this argument, the big question is whether the court
56:46
can find a way between the the fairly extreme
56:48
view. That everything the President does
56:50
is covered with absolute immunity. With.
56:52
The view on the other side that nothing
56:54
the President does is covered with immunity and
56:56
presidents can be prosecuted for any crime after
56:58
they leave office. In. Address clearly disagreed
57:00
about how to strike that balance and and I
57:03
think it's It'll be tough to see whether they
57:05
can arrive at a resolution that allows the case
57:07
to move forward in a timely manner. But.
57:09
But think the position that Mr. Sarah was taking
57:11
in that class is just wildly overbroad. So.
57:13
The newest Justice Clancy Brown Jackson had
57:15
this warning. If the court ultimately finds
57:18
the President's do have absolute immunity, take
57:20
a listen. If.
57:22
Someone with those kinds of
57:25
powers, the most powerful person
57:27
in the world, with the
57:29
greatest amount of authority and
57:31
could go into office knowing
57:33
sat there would be no
57:35
potential penalties for committing crimes.
57:37
I'm trying to understand what
57:39
a disincentive is some turning
57:41
the Oval Office into. Ah,
57:44
you know that that the
57:46
seeds of criminal activity in
57:48
this. Country so gym If
57:50
a president does have absolute
57:53
immunity, What incentive? Might.
57:55
The president, half or following the law
57:57
other than. The. Honor system and is
57:59
good. Grace are and wouldn't essentially
58:01
just state that the President is above.
58:04
The. Law. Yes, Vs with
58:06
that. But I do agree with the points that
58:08
were made earlier and I and I think it's
58:10
important to note that the core powers of the
58:13
presidency and there or perceptions there for the poor
58:15
powers of the presidency and I think that's an
58:17
important. Of the important. Point that
58:19
was just mates. I also think it's important
58:21
to note that the Office of Legal Counsel
58:23
they referred back the offs legal counsel that
58:25
for all. All all administration's that
58:28
there was this idea that the president
58:30
you know could be held criminally liable
58:32
for certain types of criminal conduct. So
58:34
that isn't something new. You know this
58:36
isn't that narrative that this is something
58:39
new, just isn't the case. And I
58:41
think what what could happen here if
58:43
they decide to go down the road
58:45
of say what's official, what's not and
58:47
it gets remanded back. The draft boards.
58:50
And what's the trough what do it through
58:52
with it will What they'll do was hold
58:54
an evidentiary hearing which if if they hold
58:56
an evidentiary hearing spree and witnesses and making
58:59
that determination you can have many trial within
59:01
the trial of the end of the day
59:03
that relates to all of this conduct which
59:06
would be a public forum again bringing our
59:08
old these things that happened or January six
59:10
so if they get a remained yes it
59:12
makes the can down the road. but all
59:15
of these issues that came out of January
59:17
sixth will be read lived in that evidence
59:19
or here. Interesting There was a
59:21
lightning rod of questions are in
59:24
which justice Our Amy Coney Barrett
59:26
a Trump appointee I got prompts
59:28
attorney to concede ah that the
59:30
indictment and lists acts by Donald
59:32
Trump. Allegations. Of behavior
59:35
that would not be covered by president
59:37
will immunity because they were private acts.
59:39
Take a listen. It
59:42
is or turns on private attorney. Was willing to
59:44
spend knowingly false claims and election fraud
59:46
to spearhead sounds of see Elections. Enough
59:48
silent as am I sending me to speak?
59:51
The allegation by the sounds kind of Japan's.
59:53
Time it isn't Arkansas is another private
59:55
attorney to cause the filing in court
59:57
as as assocation signed by citizens can.
1:00:00
For validation to support. Of homes
1:00:02
that for ah, small three. Private
1:00:04
actors to attorneys and sitting as mentioned
1:00:06
above and a political consultant how to
1:00:09
implement a plan to submit fraudulent place
1:00:11
of presidential electors said stop the certification
1:00:13
preceding and petitioner and co concert or
1:00:16
tourney directed that efforts. Are
1:00:18
you a prickly? I believe? Joshua.
1:00:22
What do you make of that concessions?
1:00:24
Is that me a minute to sounds
1:00:26
like own. He's. Great thing that
1:00:28
this stuff isn't covered by immunity.
1:00:31
Therefore, That we some of the
1:00:33
stuff can go forward or in court but I
1:00:35
think I'm wrong about that. but that's what it
1:00:37
sounded like to me. this non lawyer. I.
1:00:40
Don't think you're wrong about it. I thought
1:00:42
it was an extraordinarily important concession, and I
1:00:44
thought it was telling that Justice Parrot was
1:00:46
the conservative justice who was by far the
1:00:48
most skeptical of of Donald Trump's position. I
1:00:50
think those concessions open up a really significant
1:00:52
question. With. Everybody seems to
1:00:55
agree that the indictment against Trump alleges a
1:00:57
number of acts that we're we're private in
1:00:59
the sense that there's no real claim that
1:01:01
they're covered by absolute immunity and Justice Berets
1:01:04
loaded this. this compromise, if you want to
1:01:06
call it that of the argument. Or.
1:01:08
She said, well, look what what if you just drop
1:01:10
all of the stuff that's official Or that maybe official.
1:01:13
Could. You just go to trial with the or
1:01:15
acts that everybody agrees are private. And
1:01:17
you know that seems to be away a potentially a
1:01:19
getting around some of the big issues here. You.
1:01:22
Know that in turn opens up this
1:01:24
big debate about even if they did
1:01:26
that. Could. All of the official
1:01:28
acts which provide a central context and
1:01:30
color. For. The entire conspiracy that's
1:01:33
alleged. Could those be brought in as
1:01:35
evidence? And. Justice Department said
1:01:37
yes and Trump said know if the Supreme
1:01:39
Court wants to think about equip path for
1:01:41
this case to move forward and one that
1:01:44
avoid some of the really thorny questions about
1:01:46
what acts or official and what acts aren't.
1:01:49
It could potentially be man for consideration,
1:01:51
at least. Have. An expedited trial
1:01:53
focused on the private acts. Although.
1:01:55
I think it would really need to give
1:01:57
some guidance. There are about whether the the.
1:02:00
On private acts can still be heard by
1:02:02
the jury as evidence even if they can't
1:02:04
be a separate pieces from liability. Person.
1:02:06
Amia a quick final phone. So I
1:02:08
really think it in the context. in
1:02:10
the use the example of switching out
1:02:12
the Attorney General's the It's Thirty General
1:02:15
can issue these letters that there was
1:02:17
some type of widespread voter fraud, right?
1:02:19
I think that's that that that would
1:02:21
have stopped seem would argue that that's
1:02:23
an official act, right? But it it's
1:02:25
like anything else when you're talking about
1:02:27
an appointment. right? The core power. But
1:02:29
if you're taking a bribe for that
1:02:31
appointments, it's the bride's It's the cloth,
1:02:33
right? So when you're talking about switching
1:02:35
out, the Attorney. General to do something that
1:02:37
another Attorney General General wouldn't do because it's
1:02:40
unlawful. That's when you get into the crux
1:02:42
of the crime. So I do think that
1:02:44
that's there is some exposure there. which is
1:02:46
why I don't think they're just gonna. Blow.
1:02:49
Past kind of the that idea
1:02:51
of what's official what's products. Will.
1:02:53
Say thanks to both. He really appreciated the underlying
1:02:55
case before the Us supreme court has got on
1:02:57
the from Zoc actions on the day of the
1:02:59
capital attack while he was president. The. Now
1:03:01
defunct house January Six committee also investigated his
1:03:03
actions as they were going to a reaction
1:03:05
to these arguments from a former member of
1:03:08
that committees. They were a. Lot
1:03:13
of focus of much of this
1:03:16
day has been in court rooms
1:03:18
in New York and here in
1:03:20
Washington Dc moments ago at Emory
1:03:22
University in Atlanta, Georgia seen such
1:03:24
as this one and protests from
1:03:26
college campus of War in the
1:03:28
Middle East continues to spread. When
1:03:30
the phone is right now would
1:03:32
you W University? George Washington University
1:03:34
here in Washington gave out what's
1:03:36
going on where you are. He
1:03:41
has a Jake were right in the middle
1:03:43
of this exam and on Gw campus or
1:03:45
take a look we're going to give you
1:03:47
like a three four three sixty view here.
1:03:49
There's a really large crowd occupying this part
1:03:51
of his squad. Here on the campus it's
1:03:54
private property. be university sent campus police the
1:03:56
earlier try to clear out students are the
1:03:58
suit is refusing. Now we understand. The school
1:04:00
has called in Dc Police Department Metropolitan
1:04:02
Police for going to be arriving here.
1:04:05
We expect around seven and may have
1:04:07
said they are going to clear the
1:04:09
students out. I've spoken with organizers who
1:04:11
have said they're prepared to stay there
1:04:14
are do not want to leave even
1:04:16
if police tell them they're going to
1:04:18
and that they are prepared to potentially
1:04:20
get arrested and come back if they're
1:04:22
innocent. We cleared out. Interesting,
1:04:25
These protests are spreading Got to
1:04:27
campuses. All. Over the country it
1:04:29
seems. The
1:04:32
as regimented emery we've seen in a Columbia
1:04:35
Us see it is happening all over North
1:04:37
West or just to name a few. and
1:04:39
speaking with organizers and students the Earth there's
1:04:41
clearly that inspiration other has been This organization
1:04:44
here are and to be cleared his or
1:04:46
student success from Cw. This is Visas student
1:04:48
from Georgetown a big group that came over
1:04:50
this afternoon as well as other schools around
1:04:52
the Dc area and they said they were
1:04:55
inspired by what they saw. Us at Columbia
1:04:57
had some of these other schools and so
1:04:59
we're seeing this major seen here. we may
1:05:01
see it. A continued even after their
1:05:04
cleared to the students are saying they're
1:05:06
prepared to come back to have you
1:05:08
thought any the students what what are
1:05:10
they exactly call an hour and has
1:05:12
it been a a peaceful demonstration. Up
1:05:17
again I apologize. We do have a
1:05:19
really loud speaker by does go. Yes
1:05:21
it has been peaceful up to this
1:05:23
point of but again of police have
1:05:26
been sort of standing by on the
1:05:28
side and will use a secret service
1:05:30
police Metropolitan Police. We don't know what
1:05:32
will happen around seven o'clock when a
1:05:34
much larger group of Dc police officers
1:05:36
are expected to come here with the
1:05:38
purpose of getting be sued in South.
1:05:42
So are you talk to some
1:05:44
of the students about what are
1:05:46
they gonna do if the police
1:05:48
the man ah that they leave
1:05:50
the where they are right now
1:05:53
I tell us about that. Will
1:05:58
take if we have it. I did speak with him. Either
1:06:00
a little while ago with ah, who talked about
1:06:02
that A you know I asked directly what are
1:06:04
you going to deal with when police arrived If
1:06:07
they tell students you need to leave now where
1:06:09
be arrested, take a listen. This is what she
1:06:11
told me. Are
1:06:14
you prepared to stay here? even if police demand
1:06:16
that you leave or be arrested? I'm. Prepared to
1:06:19
say hands high, demands are met. Yeah
1:06:23
and so we heard that repeatedly
1:06:25
and from other students as well,
1:06:27
people saying they're ready them for
1:06:29
themselves on the line essentially. And
1:06:32
look, we have seen those romantic
1:06:34
scenes shake or videos that you
1:06:36
have played as other Cnn shows
1:06:38
a blade showing students protesters on
1:06:40
these campuses clashing with police officers
1:06:43
away. I have been at various
1:06:45
pro Palestinian or protests across the
1:06:47
Dc area here in recent months.
1:06:49
Metropolitan Police, the Dc Police Department
1:06:51
There are No strangers. To this have
1:06:53
seen a lot of arrests. The question is
1:06:55
what is going to be that response from
1:06:58
both sides when the officers come in when
1:07:00
they give those warnings a to soon as
1:07:02
we may see a lot of students least
1:07:04
in that moment. But the question is what
1:07:06
will that look like and I believe litter
1:07:08
are ways of the photos we're just showing
1:07:10
their with of police with the with the
1:07:12
guns was at Emory University not a T
1:07:14
W I get going. Thanks so much for
1:07:16
her Second in appreciated our going to go
1:07:18
back to the big A, the Supreme court
1:07:20
and the decision on Donald from pushing for
1:07:22
Presidential immunity. We're going to have reaction from a
1:07:24
former member the January Six mini plus. Donald.
1:07:26
Trump's former Secretary of Defense. That's next day
1:07:28
with Us. Our
1:07:34
presidents immune from prosecution for
1:07:36
official acts. That is a
1:07:39
t question that the Us
1:07:41
Supreme Court. Wrangled. With
1:07:43
today diving into all sorts, a
1:07:45
hypothetical such as can a President
1:07:47
order. The. Military to assassinate
1:07:49
a political rival. Can.
1:07:52
He or she order the military to
1:07:54
stage a coup. While. Those
1:07:56
situations might seem farfetched. It's
1:07:58
worth remembering what. Handed and
1:08:00
com said in a two thousand and
1:08:03
sixteen presidential debate. Gen.
1:08:06
Michael Hayden, former Cia Director, and
1:08:09
I say Director and other experts
1:08:11
have said that when you ask
1:08:13
the Us military to carry out
1:08:15
some of your campaign promises specifically
1:08:17
targeting terrorist families and also the
1:08:20
use of interrogation methods more stream
1:08:22
and waterboarding, the military will refuse
1:08:24
because they've been trained to turn
1:08:26
down and refuse illegal orders. So.
1:08:29
What would you do as Commander in
1:08:31
Chief of the Us Military? Refuse to
1:08:33
carry out those orders though over issues
1:08:35
that are going to reviews from. A.
1:08:39
Day later the Trump campaign walk that back
1:08:41
in a statement saying quoted is clear that
1:08:43
as President I will be. Bound.
1:08:45
By laws just like all Americans and
1:08:47
I will meet those responsibilities unquote. Journalist.
1:08:50
Now the Secretary of Defense for Donald
1:08:52
Trump had marked Asper, who serves on
1:08:54
the border as a strategic advisor to
1:08:57
a handful of aerospace and defence related
1:08:59
company secretary Us for as a former
1:09:01
Trump senior official. On. What was
1:09:03
it like? listening to
1:09:05
the supreme court as they debated
1:09:08
as these hypothetical today that maybe.
1:09:10
Didn't. Seem all that hypothetical. Are
1:09:15
good actor Jake Ethic. First and foremost it was
1:09:17
a of for a very serious debate and discussion
1:09:19
from the small parts of our heard about it
1:09:22
and why I read about it. As.
1:09:24
I like the save. I hate these
1:09:26
examples being brought up about some how
1:09:28
the military be one or two, a
1:09:30
junior, a true, or the use of
1:09:32
the military to kill political opponent. It's
1:09:34
just so outlandish. it's it's it's utterly
1:09:36
ridiculous. And I wish we would say
1:09:39
wait, most examples, maybe look at more serious ones.
1:09:41
But. It was clear that the court
1:09:43
has teased out that there is a
1:09:45
difference between immunity for official conduct. And.
1:09:48
Then no immunity for personal conduct and
1:09:50
and justice. Any cody, a bird or
1:09:52
really put that trump's difference turning on
1:09:55
a spot in, he conceded that and
1:09:57
in a series of up. Of.
1:09:59
Charges that she raised and he conceded the
1:10:01
private points of itself. I think there is
1:10:04
obviously the station. On the suppose
1:10:06
it is not above the law know American
1:10:08
is about the lawn. I think that is
1:10:10
important principle it's you gotta support for So
1:10:13
in response to these questions before the Us
1:10:15
Supreme Court right now, three groups of former
1:10:17
military National Security officials filed. A
1:10:19
friends of the Court a brief which
1:10:21
reads in part quote any military officers.
1:10:24
Who. Knowingly issued are carried out Such an
1:10:26
on lawful order would themselves be. Criminally.
1:10:29
Liable unquote in your decades of
1:10:31
experience in the military Under Secretary
1:10:33
of Defense? Do you think. A.
1:10:36
Situation could ever arise. Where.
1:10:39
A soldier or a general was commanded
1:10:41
to do something. They. Know is
1:10:43
illegal, but they do it anyway because
1:10:45
they were given direct orders. What?
1:10:50
Gun. Nothing's ever impossible, but I find it
1:10:52
very hard to believe that eight a senior
1:10:54
officer in the United States military or even
1:10:56
As and a junior officer for that matter
1:10:58
would obey and a legal order it. I
1:11:01
went to West Point at said so many
1:11:03
years on active duty and than on reserve
1:11:05
duty as well and it is drilled into
1:11:07
our our heads into the ethics of a
1:11:09
profession. That. You don't have a on
1:11:11
the a lawful i'm awful orders and that
1:11:14
you have a duty to resist to oppose
1:11:16
them. And. So I believe that's ground
1:11:18
into our it's our military across all
1:11:20
the services. It's part the culture. It's.
1:11:22
Also for the fundamental principles or survey control
1:11:24
The military but there's there's a limit when
1:11:26
it comes to unlawful order so I just
1:11:29
don't believe that be the case I think.
1:11:31
The. Fact is professional military ethic. The
1:11:33
understanding of the duties of the military
1:11:35
ah to not follow a lawful orders
1:11:38
would prevail a look at face that
1:11:40
in some ways you might recall. And
1:11:42
January twenty or twenty twenty or so.
1:11:46
President. Trump made a statement about the
1:11:48
United States will attack Iran historical and cultural
1:11:50
sites and I went on T V and
1:11:52
said no or we will not do that.
1:11:55
We're. Gonna follow the laws of why I'm warfare
1:11:57
and I felt it important that time. To.
1:11:59
Make us. A Statement. They're not just to
1:12:01
the American public, but really to the
1:12:03
United States military or professional armed forces.
1:12:06
That. We will continue to follow the
1:12:08
laws of when warfare and an
1:12:10
honor the obligations and legal obligations
1:12:12
of our profession. Before you got
1:12:14
want to get your reaction to
1:12:16
some news are out of Gaza
1:12:18
today and Israel says that quote
1:12:20
terrorists. Shot. Mortars at a
1:12:23
humanitarian work side in northern Gaza
1:12:25
towards this peer that the Us
1:12:27
is trying to construct. This peer
1:12:29
would be there to get more
1:12:31
humanitarian aid. Into Gaza
1:12:33
by see. The Un
1:12:36
is characterizing this is a minor incidents if
1:12:38
he were Secretary Defense right now how much
1:12:40
you respond. I'd
1:12:43
be very concerned and look I was
1:12:45
concerned from day one. are speaking about
1:12:47
this on Cnn that us a major
1:12:49
factor years the vulnerability of our of
1:12:51
forces you're talking about. Thousand service members
1:12:53
or so are constructing this peer. This
1:12:55
peers going to be relatively narrow but
1:12:57
for the stretch of the eighteen hundred
1:12:59
feet. Onto the Mediterranean in order
1:13:01
to up and connect the floating peer
1:13:04
to other vessels that would be offered
1:13:06
a cargo a little bit farther away
1:13:08
and so the quite open to both
1:13:10
direct fire. Think about rifles, machine guns,
1:13:12
but indirect fire which are mortars and
1:13:14
artillery And that's what we saw today.
1:13:17
And of course you could shoot worse
1:13:19
artillery for miles miles away without attribution
1:13:21
and cause harm to Us forces. Kill
1:13:23
Service members admit that you could destroy
1:13:25
the pier quite easily and certainly disrupt
1:13:27
operations. I think it is a very
1:13:30
big vulnerability. A much for. We worked
1:13:32
out all the issues and keep in mind
1:13:34
yourself to do that. A threat to see
1:13:36
now to So these are big issues of
1:13:38
it. Very concerned I want to talk on
1:13:41
see what the Israelis about security phone as
1:13:43
appear at the site and on the pier
1:13:45
during operations. Secretary. As her good
1:13:47
to see! Thanks so much. Supreme. Court
1:13:49
Justice Clarence Thomas chose to not recuse himself in
1:13:51
this case, despite the fact that his wife. Jenny.
1:13:54
Had communications with the White House after
1:13:56
the twenties when he likes and about
1:13:59
undermining the election. I'm going to
1:14:01
have my next guest about. That was
1:14:03
another big case with ties to Donald
1:14:05
Trump. The new charges against eighteen individuals
1:14:08
from Arizona including Trump allies such as
1:14:10
Mark Meadows and Rudy Giuliani, and eleven
1:14:12
fake aleck tours will be right back.
1:14:19
Where. Back today, the Us Supreme court
1:14:21
dissected former President Trump's claim that he
1:14:24
has. Absolute immunity, get out
1:14:26
of free, get out of jail,
1:14:28
free card, or for any official
1:14:30
action that would completely dismantled the
1:14:32
Federal Action subversion case against him.
1:14:35
Listen. To how the you Attorney representing
1:14:37
the Us Government and Special Counsel Jack
1:14:39
Smith laid it out. His
1:14:43
normal theory which immunized former
1:14:45
presidents for criminal liability from
1:14:47
Barbary Trees and sedition murder
1:14:50
and see are conspiring to
1:14:52
use fraud to overturn the
1:14:54
results of an election and
1:14:56
perpetuate himself in power. Such
1:15:00
presidential immunity has no foundation and
1:15:02
the institution of framers new to
1:15:04
well the dangers of a kings
1:15:06
who could do no wrong. Congresswoman.
1:15:09
Zola going a democrat from California, joins
1:15:12
me now. She was a key member
1:15:14
of the January Six Committee congresswoman locker
1:15:16
injustices as signal today that they were
1:15:18
skeptical of of Trump's claim. That.
1:15:21
He had complete immunity for anything he did that was
1:15:23
an official app. But. They also pushed
1:15:25
back on how would the
1:15:27
special counsel frames the case.
1:15:30
How much we do you think it is that the court's
1:15:32
gonna. Try. To reach a middle ground
1:15:34
ruling that might push this trial beyond November's
1:15:36
election or that they might kick back to
1:15:38
the a lower court. That
1:15:41
will also. Pro. Long. All of
1:15:43
this. Want
1:15:46
to say take a the court is
1:15:48
not looking. Impartial or nonpartisan at
1:15:50
this point, or they didn't need to
1:15:53
take this case at all. The appellate
1:15:55
court decision was tightly drawn and correct,
1:15:57
or they didn't take it early on
1:16:00
once they gave an indication are they
1:16:02
dragged it out. And. Really
1:16:04
the debate. Today. So.
1:16:07
To a very serious problem which is
1:16:09
they are not deciding the case before
1:16:11
them are. In instead engaging
1:16:13
and flights of fancy you that
1:16:15
would involve further delay. Honestly,
1:16:18
You know, All. Of us more
1:16:20
years are also called. Officers of the
1:16:23
courts were trained to believe in the
1:16:25
impartiality of the court said, especially the
1:16:27
supreme court. but it's tough to do
1:16:30
today. It doesn't look like
1:16:32
they look like partisan hacks. I'm
1:16:34
sorry and it's a it's a
1:16:36
great concern to me, a great
1:16:38
concern to the preservation of our
1:16:40
democracy that we couldn't actually get
1:16:43
it's file. Of someone who
1:16:45
tried to overturn the election
1:16:47
before the next election. Is.
1:16:49
Preposterous. So I'm in the sense
1:16:52
of Justice Amy Coney Barrett. I
1:16:54
will say I mean she did
1:16:56
get Trump's attorney to concede that
1:16:59
several. Of. The accusations
1:17:01
against happen the Special counsel's
1:17:03
indictment. Ah did not
1:17:05
constitute. Or official conduct in
1:17:07
in fact, we're person all acts. Does
1:17:10
that Not At least exempt Amy Coney
1:17:12
Barrett from. Your charges
1:17:14
have partisan hack henri. Well.
1:17:18
Here's my home. My hope is on wrong.
1:17:21
My. Hope is that they dismiss
1:17:23
the stay. That. They
1:17:25
decide the case before
1:17:27
them. Bad. Overturning the
1:17:29
constitution cannot be an official act
1:17:32
and let the trials to proceed.
1:17:34
I would love to be wrong
1:17:36
on this. But I'm
1:17:38
I'm very concerned about what it looks like
1:17:40
they're going to do. Just.
1:17:42
As Gore such as said something
1:17:44
along the lines of that he's
1:17:47
less concerned with this case before
1:17:49
them specifically as it pertains to
1:17:51
Trump and more concerned about how
1:17:53
what they roll on presidential Immunity
1:17:55
a will impact future presidents. I'm.
1:17:57
You. Do not see his argument that
1:18:00
all I mean this will be a precedent.
1:18:04
Want you know, these guys think
1:18:06
they're conservatives? And. What conservatives
1:18:08
do is decide the case
1:18:10
that is before them. That's.
1:18:13
Not what of that justice
1:18:15
seem to imply. They should decide
1:18:17
to case. It is before them not
1:18:20
go off on tangents. a for potential
1:18:22
cases that are not the for them.
1:18:24
Tommy Someone So Lofgren democratic California Thank
1:18:26
you so much! Always good to see
1:18:28
you. Bake.
1:18:31
You. Can. We up Mark Meadows
1:18:33
and Rudy Giuliani are just so
1:18:35
of the boldface name's included in
1:18:37
a brand new indictment in Arizona
1:18:39
about the alleged attempt to overturn
1:18:41
the Twenty Twenty election in that
1:18:43
state. The Arizona Secretary of State.
1:18:46
Will. Be here next. As
1:18:51
the Us. Supreme Court decides whether
1:18:53
former President Trump will go to
1:18:55
trial for charges that he plotted
1:18:57
to overturn the Twenty Thousand election,
1:18:59
a Grand jury in Arizona just
1:19:01
indicted several key Trump allies including
1:19:03
Rudy Giuliani and Mark Meadows and
1:19:05
Boris Epstein in their efforts. To. Overturn
1:19:08
from twenty thousand election loss in
1:19:10
that state. The indictment also includes
1:19:12
charges against so called faith aleck
1:19:14
tours in Arizona. Which. Reads
1:19:16
quote In Arizona and the United States
1:19:19
the people elected President Biden is presidents.
1:19:21
On. November Third, Twenty Twenty. Unwilling
1:19:23
to accept this fact. Defendants.
1:19:26
An unindicted coconspirators
1:19:28
schemes. To. Prevent the lawful
1:19:30
transfer of the presidency. To. Keep
1:19:33
unindicted coconspirators And number One.
1:19:36
In office against the will.
1:19:38
Of. Arizona's voters. The. Details
1:19:40
in the indictment suggest Trump
1:19:42
is one of those unindicted
1:19:45
coconspirators. Sound. Like he's coconspirators number
1:19:47
one. Here. To explain the cases,
1:19:49
Arizona Secretary said Adrian Font is
1:19:51
our. First. All the me to
1:19:53
start with: Why is Arizona pursuing
1:19:55
this case And Why. So.
1:19:58
Late. Well
1:20:01
for thanks for having the on Jake
1:20:03
And second the question of lateness really.
1:20:06
Ah, I don't think is that relevant
1:20:08
to the Attorney General's office was very
1:20:10
thorough and it's investigation. They followed the
1:20:12
facts where the facts let them. Out
1:20:15
original Chris Maze and her team
1:20:17
have been working with his Secretary
1:20:19
of State's office and other agencies
1:20:21
to make sure that they could
1:20:23
cross the T's and.all of the
1:20:25
eyes and they found enough facts
1:20:27
to take to a grand jury.
1:20:29
The grand jury then figured the
1:20:31
there was probable cause to bring
1:20:33
these charges and the grand jury
1:20:35
decided to indict. And so we
1:20:37
find ourselves here today with the
1:20:39
eleven accused. Ah, quote unquote
1:20:41
fake electors and several coconspirators who by
1:20:44
the way are all innocence until they
1:20:46
are proven guilty in a court of
1:20:48
law. Why he
1:20:51
down Trump is obviously Coconspirators
1:20:53
unindicted Coconspirator number One. Oh,
1:20:55
why not indict him? I certainly
1:20:58
wouldn't be the first time. Well,
1:21:03
having been a prosecutor in the past, I
1:21:05
can tell you there's gotta be some good
1:21:07
reason you'd have to ask the Attorney General
1:21:09
however, on the Secretary of State and as
1:21:11
the Chief Collection Officer. My. Job
1:21:14
is to make sure that we ensure the integrity
1:21:16
of the elections which we have done or for
1:21:18
quite some time and we will continue to do.
1:21:21
This is a criminal matter who belongs
1:21:23
to the criminal courts and the criminal
1:21:26
prosecutors. Ah, they've made their determinations but
1:21:28
release both of those things Are election
1:21:30
systems and our criminal justice systems are
1:21:33
pillars of our democracy. Operating under this
1:21:35
general concept of the rule of law
1:21:37
and where the laws broken. Very glad
1:21:39
to have this guaranteed. Or
1:21:41
that the accused kinda face their accusers. They
1:21:44
can have the guarantees of council and et
1:21:46
cetera. And that's the important thing
1:21:48
in the rule of law. Law will prevail and
1:21:50
hopefully just as will be done at the end.
1:21:53
Regardless, Of what The alchemist. One.
1:21:55
All this was going on during before
1:21:57
and after the twenty thousand he laughs.
1:22:00
Then you were the recorder. Are.
1:22:02
For Maricopa County, that most
1:22:04
populous county in Arizona, Out
1:22:07
what did you witness and do you
1:22:09
think you'll be called to testify? Well
1:22:14
as the Maricopa County Recorder. At the time of
1:22:16
the twenty two thousand election, I was actually on
1:22:18
the ballot as well, and my race didn't turn
1:22:20
out the way I wanted to. Ah,
1:22:23
And as all good Americans and good
1:22:25
American spirits, Ah, I conceded my
1:22:27
race or my own two feet. Or
1:22:29
to my successor, Recorder, Stephen Richer and we
1:22:32
moved along. That's what we're supposed to do
1:22:34
in the United States of America. The peaceful
1:22:36
transfer of power is one of the pillars
1:22:38
under the rule of law that keeps us
1:22:41
ah in the fourth of human development in
1:22:43
the world. Now I saw a Lot. I
1:22:45
saw a lot of great people doing a
1:22:47
lot of great work. And then
1:22:50
as time move forward I saw lot of
1:22:52
them fall under false accusations, conspiracy theories and
1:22:54
lies. And that is why we are where
1:22:56
we are today. Not because there was anything
1:22:59
wrong with the elections that we ran. Not
1:23:01
because anybody did anything wrong about, because
1:23:04
there were certain individuals who just didn't
1:23:06
like the outcome. and now they are
1:23:08
moving to destroy our democracy simply because
1:23:11
of that thought that is untenable. At.
1:23:13
This criminal prosecution is only one
1:23:15
facet. Of the fight that
1:23:17
we have against those who advance
1:23:19
against our democracy and we've got
1:23:21
be vigilant to protect every institution,
1:23:23
the free press or courts or
1:23:25
judiciary and etc. This is ah
1:23:28
part of what makes us who
1:23:30
we are. As Americans, we need
1:23:32
to preserve and protect that democracy
1:23:34
or through the rule of law
1:23:36
and these important processes. Talk if
1:23:38
he would about the individuals who
1:23:40
were indicted who were part of
1:23:42
this a fake Elect Tours scheme.
1:23:44
Or one of the defense's you hear from
1:23:47
Trump attorneys are is this was just an
1:23:49
alternate slate of elect or as in case
1:23:51
it went to Congress it wasn't meant to
1:23:53
be a pulling the wool over a one's
1:23:55
eyes of tell us what you saw when
1:23:58
it came to the fake elect or. Well,
1:24:03
what I saw were signed documents making
1:24:05
specific claims. But let's be honest here,
1:24:07
it isn't my opinion that matters is
1:24:09
the opinion of the Grand jury. those
1:24:11
citizens who are impaneled to enforce the
1:24:14
law and to bring an indictment. If
1:24:16
there was sufficient evidence to make these
1:24:18
charges, I believe those citizens who operated
1:24:20
under oath or did their job I
1:24:22
believe these incitements are at this time
1:24:25
We'll give as a criminal defendants their
1:24:27
opportunity to tell their side of the
1:24:29
story or in a court of law
1:24:31
if they so. Choose they might and
1:24:33
with a plea agreement with this is
1:24:35
just the beginning. Now, as this story
1:24:38
unfolds, know it's not as we know,
1:24:40
dissimilar to the story we saw across
1:24:42
the United States of America. I can
1:24:44
imagine as a former prosecutor that the
1:24:46
Attorney General will try to bring a
1:24:48
lot of that other evidence to show
1:24:50
a pattern and practice or the pattern
1:24:52
of behavior from that period of time.
1:24:54
But again, ah, our job right now
1:24:56
is to preserve the rule of law
1:24:58
to make sure that we don't lose
1:25:01
these institutions to rumors as. Windows and
1:25:03
gases which is what has been eroding.
1:25:05
Our faith in. Other As Americans
1:25:07
itself is a lot of speculation that the
1:25:09
I won't be engaged in, but I do
1:25:11
appreciate the opportunity to talk about the great
1:25:13
work that election workers have done and continue
1:25:15
to do across the United States of America.
1:25:18
Arizona Secretary of State Adrian Contests think you
1:25:20
so much for your time with bringing recast
1:25:22
and is a professor at U C L
1:25:24
A Law School. He's also the author of
1:25:26
the book A Real Right To Vote How
1:25:28
A Constitutional Amendment. And. Safeguard American
1:25:30
democracy. I'm Rick. Why
1:25:32
do you think I'd Trump is
1:25:35
unindicted coconspirator number One not indicted.
1:25:37
And what are you think of
1:25:39
the fact that it almost to
1:25:41
four years to get this indictment
1:25:43
going? Thanks.
1:25:46
For having the and of the first thing I'd say is
1:25:48
that. Our justice system tends
1:25:50
to move slowly and deliberately, which generally
1:25:53
is pretty good thing in terms of
1:25:55
protecting criminal defendants, right? It's just not
1:25:57
well equipped to deal with attempts. To.
1:26:00
Subvert. The outcome of a presidential election?
1:26:03
We don't have a lot of experience with
1:26:05
their such a Merrick Garland. A long time
1:26:07
to bring a special prosecutor on for the
1:26:09
federal case. The. State cases proceeded
1:26:11
state by state. I think some
1:26:13
of the evidence that came out
1:26:15
from Kenneth Chesbrough in Wisconsin ended
1:26:17
up providing more information that led
1:26:19
to yesterday's indictments in Arizona. Ah,
1:26:21
so if for Trump's he may
1:26:23
be able to run off the
1:26:25
clock. but for these other defendants,
1:26:28
I think these things are going
1:26:30
to go on for the next
1:26:32
few years and they might actually
1:26:34
see some trials. And some
1:26:36
criminal convictions. Prosecutors in Michigan, Georgia, Nevada
1:26:38
have also brought criminal charges against some
1:26:40
of the people who signed on his
1:26:43
Sake Aleck tours. In. Those states
1:26:45
explain why the state cases might
1:26:47
be more successful than the federal
1:26:49
case. Ultimately, Well,
1:26:53
you know, the Federal case against
1:26:55
Trump for election interference. That's the
1:26:57
one that's on hold as this
1:26:59
immunity issue is being put out.
1:27:01
that's only against Trump. Ah
1:27:04
Trump is one of many in Georgia
1:27:06
and sense as you mentioned is not
1:27:08
part of this. In Arizona they're different
1:27:11
state laws that apply so are in
1:27:13
Arizona and some moves other states. They're
1:27:15
safe. Fraud laws that apply here. You're
1:27:18
signing fraud, some documents saying this is
1:27:20
an official documents. That
1:27:22
is providing who the states slate of electors
1:27:24
is. That might be easier to prove than
1:27:26
some of the claims that would come on
1:27:28
the federal level. And I think
1:27:31
probably different calculations are being made on
1:27:33
the Federal level. Just go after Trump
1:27:35
and try and be laser focused on
1:27:37
that. Whereas. On the state level,
1:27:39
if you go after Trump then you face
1:27:41
potential new the arguments there and you make
1:27:44
the case more complicated. So I have prosecutors
1:27:46
have discretion, but they also has to be
1:27:48
realistic about getting these cases trial and actually
1:27:50
getting some juri to make a determination about
1:27:52
them less certain to the major arguments in
1:27:54
the Us supreme Court today. How likely they
1:27:57
think it is that the supreme court will
1:27:59
end up delay. This trial.
1:28:01
Beyond. The November Election Based
1:28:04
on what you heard today from
1:28:06
the justices. What
1:28:08
they are regulated a lot I don't know.
1:28:10
If you're member Project Smith, the Special Counsel
1:28:12
try to get the courts to intervene before
1:28:14
the Dc circuit back in December. the court
1:28:17
said no them. With the fourth set it's
1:28:19
for argument. They gave us to month window
1:28:21
for it, now a private another two months.
1:28:23
For. A decision the justices seems
1:28:25
somewhat divided today. I think it's really
1:28:28
unlikely we would see a decision before
1:28:30
the end of June the beginning of
1:28:32
July, and that decision is likely going
1:28:35
to split the baby. It's going to
1:28:37
result in a remains where there's gonna
1:28:39
be more work for the lower courts
1:28:41
to do. I would be very surprised
1:28:44
to see Donald Trump or go to
1:28:46
trial before the November elections. Despite. Our.
1:28:49
I U C L a law professor Chaos and thank you
1:28:51
so much! Good to see A will be right back. Sauce
1:28:55
Money cover up for our picks up again
1:28:57
first thing tomorrow. Morning's in and will of
1:29:00
course have special coverage. Former. Tabloid
1:29:02
magnate David Pecker is expected to
1:29:04
be back on the stand from
1:29:06
defense teams will continue their cross
1:29:08
examination Roth. I'm still waiting on
1:29:10
the judge's decision for a potential
1:29:12
punishment for Trump. For. Allegedly violating
1:29:14
the gag order that has been issued
1:29:16
telling him to not bad mouth or
1:29:18
even discuss jurors, witnesses and others soon
1:29:20
as a nice to get to speed
1:29:22
on what played out in the case
1:29:24
today. especially easy for sixty and which
1:29:26
Ac Anderson Cooper will go through the
1:29:28
major moments in the Has Money cover
1:29:31
up for our that's Tonight at Eight.
1:29:33
Only. Here on seen him. When.
1:29:47
Sleep Next Level J.D. Power ranks
1:29:49
Sleep Number Number One in customer
1:29:51
satisfaction with mattresses purchased in store.
1:29:53
And now during Sleep Number's President's
1:29:55
Day sale, save 50% on the
1:29:57
Sleep Number Limited Edition Smart Bed
1:29:59
plus Special Financing for a limited time. Quality.
1:30:06
Quality. Sleep is essential. That's why the
1:30:08
sleep number Smart Bad is designed for your
1:30:10
ever evolving sleep needs so you can choose
1:30:13
what's right for you whenever you like me.
1:30:15
to Bad: that's firmer, softer on either side,
1:30:17
and helps you sleep. But. A comfortable temperature
1:30:19
sleep number does that. Number
1:30:36
stores are sleep. number.com.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More