0:00

According to the numbers from a newly

0:02

released study, a growing trend of younger

0:04

people who are being diagnosed with late

0:06

stage cancer. Researchers predict over

0:08

the next two decades there will be 15 million

0:11

more cancer cases. By the

0:14

year 2050, the number of cancer cases is

0:16

predicted to jump to 35 million. We're

0:18

seeing a rise in younger adults being

0:21

diagnosed with cancer, including people who are

0:23

seemingly healthy like Princess Kate. Researchers

0:25

say they're finding more people, some as young

0:28

as 30, with late

0:30

stage colon cancer. A new

0:32

study finds that late stage cervical cancer cases

0:34

are on the rise in the United States.

0:37

Kyle Limper was seemingly a healthy 16-year-old. He

0:40

complained that his back was hurting. When

0:42

the pain didn't go away, they took him to urgent

0:44

care and then over to Jefferson Hospital. That's

0:47

where doctors broke the news to Kyle's parents

0:49

that his organs were shutting down due

0:51

to leukemia and within 24

0:54

hours of diagnosis, Kyle

0:56

passed away. Just a month

0:58

ago, Macy and her family found out

1:00

she was diagnosed with grade 3 anaplastic

1:03

meningioma, an aggressive brain tumor. My

1:05

life was normal and then a month ago, they found

1:07

the mass. Colon cancer at 40.

1:10

It turns out Jones' cancer was

1:13

bigger and had spread farther than

1:15

doctors first thought. His story is

1:17

becoming more common. It's the faster

1:19

rise, especially in these colorectal cancers

1:22

and bile duct cancers and breast

1:24

cancers. Colon, esophagus, kidney, liver and

1:26

pancreas, along with others. The scariest

1:29

thing about that is that we

1:31

actually don't know what is driving

1:33

this uptick. All in the healthcare

1:36

community going, what's going on

1:38

here? So

1:43

what's going on here? It's

1:45

a really interesting way to end that because a lot

1:48

of people know and a lot of people won't

1:50

report on it. This is the American Cancer Society.

1:52

A headline just came out. American Cancer Society warns

1:55

that a tidal wave of tumors is coming with

1:57

cases set to rise 80% by 2020. Remember,

2:01

we've had a war on cancer since right

2:03

around Nixon's time, so this is a shocking

2:06

headline. And what's confusing for a lot of

2:08

people is just a couple weeks ago, an

2:10

outlet ran the paper, the headline that looks

2:12

like this, how America's winning the war on

2:14

cancer, deaths dropped 10% in

2:16

five years despite diagnoses staying steady. Inside

2:18

country is getting better at treating disease.

2:21

So you look at that headline and

2:23

people say, oh, that sounds hopeful. But

2:25

then you start reading into it, and this is where you really

2:27

got to pay attention to the details because it shows a graph

2:30

here from the American Cancer Society, US rate

2:32

of cancer cases and deaths by year. And

2:34

you can see obviously all those lines for

2:36

the most part are trending down. The female

2:39

incidence is kind of just staying, going

2:41

sideways across all time. But what do you notice about the year?

2:44

That's from 2021 to 2019. Conveniently

2:47

they- 2001 to 2019. Yep. Okay.

2:50

Yep. So 2001 to 2019. And

2:53

so that was the year of diagnosis.

2:55

And so they left out some key

2:58

years, namely the years that the COVID

3:00

vaccine was being- We introduced a product

3:02

that's going to shut down your immune

3:04

system that fights cancer. And so- Right.

3:07

And so now since that's happened, we got a new headline, 80% increase

3:11

in cancers. Amazing. Amazing.

3:14

And so we've been on this show for some

3:16

time. We've had Edward Dowd on and Edward

3:18

Dowd has a consulting firm who's been really

3:20

tracking this in the disability numbers, the cancer

3:22

numbers. So let's look at some of his

3:24

more recent charts. This

3:27

is the CDC's underlying cause. He looked at

3:29

the ICD codes for neoplasms. Now neoplasms are

3:31

just tumors. So remember tumors are supposed to

3:33

go up 80% in the next

3:36

whatever couple of decades, since in 2050.

3:39

So this is age group 75 to 84. And

3:42

you look at this and you can see just

3:44

like that American Cancer Society chart we just showed,

3:46

it's trending downwards. And then around 2021,

3:49

whoops, up it goes. Now it's

3:51

just that that line is where

3:53

it was supposed to go by

3:56

from the track that was going on, but something made it

3:58

go up. What was that? at

4:00

it from a little different chart, the underlying cause

4:02

of death. You can see 2021, 2022, it jumps

4:06

up. This was compared to the 2010 to 2019 trend. You

4:08

can see it bucks the trend in

4:13

2021 big and 2022. People may say, well, that's only 75 to

4:15

84-year-olds, but Dowd's group

4:21

also looked at 15 to

4:23

44-year-olds. Same chart,

4:25

same numbers, basically, same colored lines.

4:27

You're seeing the same trend there.

4:30

What's going on? This is ...

4:32

It looks like it's across most age groups.

4:35

There's some Japanese researchers that have had

4:37

the courage to put this on paper

4:39

instead of looking at just raw numbers.

4:41

They're actually pointing ... Instead

4:43

of having to be embarrassed, scratching their heads like

4:45

a bunch of mons, we just can't figure out.

4:48

We wouldn't even know where to start looking where

4:50

this is coming from. We

4:52

kind of think we know where to start looking. It's

4:55

not like it's not an important

4:57

disease or it's not devastating or

4:59

anything. The Japanese researchers have this

5:02

paper that was just put out,

5:04

it's peer reviewed. It increased age-adjusted

5:06

cancer mortality after the third mRNA

5:08

lipid nanoparticle vaccine dose during the

5:10

COVID-19 pandemic in Japan. They conclude,

5:12

statistically significant increases in age-adjusted mortality

5:14

rates of all cancers and some

5:17

specific types of cancers, namely ovarian

5:19

cancer, leukemia, prostate, lipo, oral, pharyngeal,

5:21

pancreatic, and breast cancers were observed

5:23

in 2022 after two-thirds

5:25

of the Japanese population had received the

5:27

third or later dose of SARS-CoV-2 as

5:31

the COVID vaccine. These particularly

5:33

marked increases in mortality rates of

5:35

these ER alpha, that's estrogen

5:37

receptive alpha, the sensitive cancers, may

5:40

be attributable to several mechanisms

5:42

of the mRNA lipid nanoparticle

5:44

vaccination rather than COVID-19 infection itself

5:46

or reduced cancer care due to

5:49

the lockdown. So finally we're

5:51

getting some traction here and I really

5:53

applaud them for doing this and I hope other

5:55

researchers step up because this is not something you

5:59

want to sit back and try to keep. your job or worry

6:01

about your pension on. This is global

6:03

changing demographics with these numbers. This is

6:05

very scary stuff. Very scary.

6:07

And once again, one

6:10

of the things that we predicted here

6:12

on the high wire very early on,

6:14

I'd probably go back and do

6:16

an I told you so from 2020, because

6:19

this is what we're studying. When

6:21

they created this vaccine, when

6:23

they took the spike protein, which

6:25

is the known bioweapon of this

6:27

so-called virus and stuck it into

6:29

a syringe, the problem was the

6:32

spike protein or the mRNA that

6:34

would have your cells create this

6:36

bioweapon would die. The

6:38

mRNA didn't know how to

6:40

live long enough to get

6:42

your immune system react. And

6:44

so the geniuses that decided,

6:46

well, how about we do this? We

6:49

mess with the tool like receptors, we

6:51

insert uridine and change the, you know,

6:53

sort of the genetic structure of the

6:55

spike protein or the mRNA so that

6:57

it goes all the way in and

6:59

stays in stays alive and keeps going

7:02

long enough so that your body can

7:04

have an immune system reaction. Of course,

7:06

Dr. Robert Malone, who was one of

7:08

the inventors of this technology said this,

7:10

I, this was never my intention. I

7:12

invented it. This has turned this into

7:14

the most dangerous way to vaccinate. He

7:17

said the whole idea was that it

7:19

would quickly disappear in the body and

7:21

leave your body mRNA, but instead they

7:24

made it this mutant Frankenstein that lives

7:26

on forever. Now we've done reports, you're

7:28

seeing it persisting for six months, years,

7:30

really as long as the study lasts,

7:33

they tend to still keep finding our

7:35

bodies, you know, creating this mRNA and

7:37

creating this spike protein. And we're going

7:39

to get into that in just a

7:42

minute about like, you know, is this

7:44

a bioweapon? Have we all been given

7:46

a bioweapon? Has the military been

7:49

forced to take a bioweapon

7:52

into their bodies? And what did it do?

7:54

We have had multiple doctors says it's shutting

7:56

down your immune system. It's shutting off your

7:58

toll-like receptors through your body. body

8:00

doesn't have the ability

8:02

to fight cancer any longer and thus,

8:05

bing, turbo cancers.

8:07

Jeffrey and now the science is backing

8:09

up once again, backing up the highway.