0:00

From January through the end. Of April,

0:02

the military administered two point eight

0:05

million doses of the vaccines from

0:07

Pfizer and Moderne. A. More than ninety

0:09

eight percent of all of the active

0:11

duty force got at least one of

0:13

the shots and the Army has released

0:15

a memo say any soldier active duty

0:18

or national guard who refuses to get

0:20

vaccinated will be forced out of the

0:22

service. A new study on the

0:24

cob and vaccines found more cases of

0:26

heart inflammation that expected among members of

0:28

our Us. military strokes. And fertility

0:31

breast cancer, heart disease. dramatic spikes

0:33

and all of these ailments and

0:35

more been reported among military members

0:38

during the Kobe nineteen vaccine era.

0:40

healthy pilots, Twenties, thirties. some things

0:42

that suddenly get strokes a marker

0:44

date is on in all sorts

0:47

of ailments and they're going untreated.

0:49

undiagnosed. A fighter pilot who got

0:51

pericarditis as me grounded for seven

0:53

months. There was one enlisted service

0:56

member the had four strokes after

0:58

getting the vaccine is so these

1:00

are these are serious injuries I

1:02

witnessed. Firsthand, The numbers of

1:04

cases of young soldiers between the ages of

1:06

twenty seven and thirty five. With

1:09

neurologic. Events: Cardiac events.

1:12

A. Thirty something year old who I had explained his

1:14

family while he was on a ventilator. Why?

1:16

Had a stroke. When.

1:19

He just got his vaccine have their say and to

1:22

be what happened. He was five

1:24

yesterday. We have in the military

1:26

the single best dataset we add

1:28

that exists because we have baselines

1:30

in there and acute disease across

1:32

all categories. In the preceding years,

1:35

five years leading up to the

1:37

vaccination year was one point seven

1:39

million. They introduced and mandated a

1:41

coven nineteen vaccine for I Us

1:43

military when they had only last

1:45

twelve service members total to the

1:48

disease and in the ten months

1:50

of twenty twenty one after that

1:52

it jumped from one point seven.

1:54

Million All diseases to darn near

1:57

twenty Two million. That was a

1:59

Twenty. Million increase.

2:01

In unfortunately I think that the Department of

2:04

Defense is not being open. About

2:06

the of the number of service members

2:08

that have potentially been injured by the

2:10

shots, we here in United States need

2:12

to ask the question. Did we

2:14

mandate a. Toxic Exposure When he mandated

2:17

this objection to our entire armed

2:19

forces. Will.

2:22

Read the and there was Doc Dirks

2:24

a Sauna Shackelford and thirty two years

2:27

he was in the Navy and Department

2:29

of Defense and is my honor pleasure

2:31

be joined by her now. It's.

2:34

Great Actor Awesome Awesome! The have you

2:37

here Doctor Sack is over. The people

2:39

call you Sachs Doctor Shacks. Or.

2:42

Let me to stateless the start

2:44

with your personal story. Coven vaccine

2:46

comes along. How. Does that?

2:48

I mean you've been working for part

2:51

of the Federal government or the navy?

2:53

But the part of you know. Our.

2:55

Readiness our national Security

2:58

your whole career, Certainly.

3:00

Someone like you just opt out of that

3:03

vaccine. Wear me out and we always say

3:05

look the heads of it. never take it

3:07

assists all the people have no control over

3:09

their own lives around careers. Did you actually

3:12

face? Oh Mama Were good You are being

3:14

forced to take the covered vaccine. Safer

3:16

Those miss it when that Barbara Defense for

3:18

Federal Employees is moses aware of our service

3:21

members. They came down and they said. Seems.

3:24

A very else been Lose your job. For

3:27

your employment. For. Those of us that

3:29

held a security clearance. They. Came back

3:31

and they said not only that but within

3:33

a flag clearance for failure. To ah

3:35

of a a direct order. So.

3:38

Personal medical decision. Ah,

3:41

It's. Created to. Cook

3:44

disobeying and order right? right?

3:46

So at that point I decided, you know what? I

3:48

think, I'm done. I think that's my red

3:50

line in the sands. It now actually basically

3:53

said to me, you know you're not trustworthy

3:55

Her: they don't leave, were trustworthy and so

3:57

that was time to get out. Why

4:01

did you personally have an issue with this

4:03

vaccine? I'm assuming you've gotten other vaccines throughout

4:05

your career. I did actually as a result

4:07

of my multiple deployments to Iraq and

4:09

Afghanistan, the anthrax series, all

4:11

the exotic vaccines, you

4:13

name it, we've had to take them for every single deployment. Like

4:15

I said, I had five to Iraq, one Afghanistan, two to Crestwood,

4:18

one to Boston. And this

4:21

particular injection was

4:23

different. So, I mean, this is one of the things that

4:25

we talk about. When I run into people

4:27

out in the street, we hear, oh, well, the

4:30

people that are in charge, they're doing it

4:32

to everybody else, or they're the ones not

4:34

getting it. Certainly, those high up in rank

4:38

have some power over their lives, or

4:40

that our federal government knows. Did President Biden get

4:43

it? Did Bill Gates get the vaccine?

4:45

I mean, all of these questions are

4:47

sort of what we're dealing with. And

4:49

what you realize is that they seem

4:51

to believe in this thing. I mean,

4:53

they seem to think that

4:55

it really makes a difference. And so even

4:58

beyond being a cadet, you should have been

5:00

able, or beyond, I mean,

5:02

you're someone that has security clearance, and you're

5:04

someone that actually understands science. You've been around

5:06

this long enough, and

5:08

you can't, I mean, that must have been a

5:11

shocking moment. You can't find anyone

5:13

to listen to you say this is ridiculous. No,

5:16

not only that, we were actually actively, I

5:18

personally was actively engaged, documenting the

5:20

known and both unknown risks at that

5:22

time. I mean, we documented the known

5:24

risks, sending out the data on

5:27

the fact that the clinical trial said, up front

5:29

we knew from day one it wasn't gonna prevent

5:31

transmission, it wasn't gonna prevent infection. Literally

5:34

sending these out to the department,

5:36

to the service secretary, to the secretary of defense, saying,

5:38

hey, pay attention. This

5:41

does not make sense. Let's take a look at

5:43

the mechanisms of injury. Let's take a look at

5:45

the fact that it says it's going to cause

5:47

disease in the body. Then you'll have an antibody

5:49

response. Are we really going to do this to

5:51

our entire armed forces? Right. I

5:54

mean, in experimenting on our armed forces,

5:57

which is what this was, we warped

5:59

speed of the... vaccine. We're never going to

6:01

know the long-term safety

6:03

effects. This was a brand

6:05

new technology. And we're

6:07

talking about being military ready.

6:09

What was morale like around

6:12

that? Because it sure seemed

6:14

like, from my vantage point,

6:16

you had this huge

6:18

dip in, I mean, I forget

6:20

what the number was. I want to feel like, I feel like the

6:22

headline was something like 800,000 military

6:25

about to be laid off. Was that accurate?

6:27

Was it that high? We've got numbers

6:29

of those that we actually end up forcing out. So

6:32

that number was around 8,000 or 9,000 of

6:34

known. They were actually forced out. Those

6:37

that self-voluntarily, if you will, resigned,

6:41

that's an even greater number. So we

6:43

have a combination of folks

6:46

that basically critically thought about the problem

6:48

set and said, hmm, can't continue

6:50

to do this. Those that were forced out,

6:52

because they critically thought about the problem set

6:55

and said no, and their religious

6:57

exemptions were denied. Then what

6:59

you end up with is basically

7:03

you have a compliant armed forces that

7:06

were left, didn't rock the boat.

7:08

A lot of them just, and they were told

7:10

this is just what you've signed up for. You

7:12

don't have control over your body. You're basically owned

7:14

by the US government, and

7:16

you just do what you're told. Yeah,

7:19

and DOD has to do what the CDC says.

7:22

We were beholden to CDC guidance. We

7:24

were not allowed to go over to

7:26

another organization to say, what have you

7:28

got? What is

7:31

this other set of data over here that we

7:33

really, really need to bring into the Department of

7:35

Defense to say, hey, it's not just the CDC

7:37

guidance that we need to start looking at and

7:39

listening to. We need to listen to this other

7:41

data set over here that talks about the toxics

7:43

mic protein, that talks about some of the

7:45

other issues, because then you bring

7:47

us back into a question. Number

7:49

one, you bring us back into a defense readiness question,

7:51

but you also have to ask the question, did the

7:54

Secretary of Defense mandate a toxic

7:56

exposure? Well, I Mean, that's the question I

7:58

have, right? I Mean, it seems to me. The I

8:00

noted is a lot of conversations you

8:02

know lately about taking care of military

8:05

right? taking care of military that you

8:07

know, where round bunker buster bombs that

8:09

like are you gonna breathing in you

8:12

know, you know, radioactive fragments, things like

8:14

that. Certainly if you are in the

8:16

line of fire it's been put in

8:18

harm's way to have a permanent injury.

8:21

You. Know there's been some, you know,

8:23

awareness. It seems to say you

8:25

should be taken care of them

8:27

for all of the health issues

8:29

in this case. As I just

8:31

said before, you know the segment.

8:34

Despite. Protein is a known him in

8:36

his the known sort of bio weapon and

8:38

and I can say that's because most science

8:41

now even the F B I believe is

8:43

this came from a lab so whether or

8:45

not they what were they make you for

8:47

making a tooth, make a vaccine or figure

8:50

out how developer they were making the most

8:52

dangerous form of a Corona buyers the figure

8:54

out how do you know deal with it

8:56

so let's say it is escaped on accident

8:59

some people got sick this are spreading around

9:01

but the most didn't have Had this conversation

9:03

with the York. Times I was I was talking

9:05

to one believes New York Times, a kiss and was

9:07

is no wasn't but one of those times reporters and

9:09

the and I was where I got them. They.

9:12

Said oh, the virus is much more dangerous than

9:14

the vaccine As a. While. How with

9:16

less as follow that up for a second

9:18

I said let's just say that let's say

9:20

all things being equal or we agreeing that

9:22

despite protein is the most dangerous part of

9:25

the viruses what causes my or or die

9:27

this is what causes pair of could I

9:29

this blood clotting all of those things Rumble

9:31

site a pain yes is this by produce

9:33

and and the reporter said yea I would

9:36

agree with that as a okay so all

9:38

things being equal if I'm walking around and

9:40

nature is a chance I don't catch it

9:42

Does a chance I'm not around someone that

9:45

you. Know I get the spike protein, it

9:47

starts attacking myself. but if I take their

9:49

spike protein and I put it the vaccines

9:51

and I make it so that my body

9:53

makes that bio weapon over and over and

9:55

over again. Let's just say it's the same

9:58

amount of effect in back since and. put

10:00

aside the fact that they bragged that the

10:02

vaccine is going to create far more spike

10:04

protein and I'm going to come in contact

10:06

with breathing it in or however, then could

10:09

we agree all things being equal that if

10:11

you make everybody get the vaccine, more people

10:13

are going to come in contact with this

10:15

bioweapon than they would have naturally with

10:17

random selection. And I swear it's one of the only

10:20

times the lightbulbs going off. I just, I heard a

10:22

gas on the phone. They were like,

10:24

oh my God, I've never thought

10:26

about it like that. And this is the

10:28

point. If this

10:30

spike protein is a weapon, if

10:33

it causes long-term injury just in

10:35

nature, the version that came from

10:37

Wuhan lab, certainly injecting it, we

10:39

now know for a fact that

10:42

it causes myocarditis in some people.

10:44

We can discuss rare after you've

10:46

tracked every single, every person and

10:48

said, we know that happens, pericarditis,

10:51

long-term effects, heart damage that never

10:53

goes away. Is

10:55

that in fact then the same

10:58

as being put in harm's

11:00

way of a bioweapon or

11:02

some chemical exposure

11:05

only we made you inject it? We mandated

11:07

it. We mandated

11:09

that you take this injection, that

11:12

your body creates trillions of copies

11:14

of this synthetic toxic spike protein

11:17

with both known as you just described and

11:19

unknown and yet to be

11:21

learned, harms and injuries

11:23

to the individual. But it gets worse

11:25

than that. We've actually now said

11:28

to our complete armed forces, as

11:30

you transition out with your injuries, you show

11:32

up at the VA. The

11:35

VA should in theory based on the 2020 PAC

11:38

Act, which is I think something that we should talk

11:40

about. Let's talk about the start of the PAC Act. Sure. What

11:43

is PAC? Right. So PACT

11:45

is PAC Act. It was PACT in 2022. With

11:50

that, the administration said, we're going to take

11:52

care of our veterans. We're going to

11:54

take care of the veterans that have been harmed by

11:57

those toxic exposures. Have you been exposed

11:59

to Agent Orange? Have you been exposed to

12:01

the burn pits in Iraq? Have

12:03

you been exposed to the oil wells that

12:05

created all this toxicity? The

12:07

IEDs, all the toxicity that a service member would

12:09

have been exposed to. When

12:11

you transition out, you go over

12:13

to the VA, you get something

12:15

called a toxic exposure risk activity

12:17

screening. It's a mouthful, I appreciate

12:19

that. T-E-R-A. That is the

12:22

provision that the PACAC allows for you

12:24

as a veteran now to go in

12:26

and say, we're gonna give you a screening

12:28

based on all of the

12:30

different things that you may have come encounter with when you

12:33

were in the service. That's

12:35

fantastic. I'm a vet, I think that's

12:38

fantastic. Do you feel like you've been

12:40

exposed to things like that? I know for a fact I

12:42

have, but again, I'm completely aware

12:44

of where I was during

12:46

my time in the Navy and so on

12:48

and so forth. The issue then becomes,

12:51

I think, important for us to ask

12:53

the question, how

12:55

is the VA going to handle that disability

12:57

claim? The problem is

12:59

we actually know through whistleblower, we

13:01

actually know that for the VA,

13:05

for the purpose of a Terra screening, the

13:07

VA has come back and they have said there's

13:09

no such thing as a long-term side effect of

13:12

a vaccine. And in fact,

13:14

you've got that right there. Colonel, VA,

13:16

SOP, vaccines and medications in general are

13:19

not considered participation in a toxic

13:22

exposure risk activity, Terra, because there's

13:24

no scientific or medical evidence that

13:26

supports the conclusion that vaccines

13:29

and medications administered to service members

13:31

have resulted in long-term adverse health

13:34

effects. So just look at

13:36

that again. There is no long-term

13:39

evidence. Right. No

13:41

scientific or medical evidence that supports

13:43

the conclusion that

13:46

there's a long-term adverse effect from a vaccination.

13:48

Right. How about the, and

13:50

I say this when I argue in

13:52

layman's terms with anyone, every

13:55

vaccine, including COVID, comes with a list

13:57

of side effects that are on it.

13:59

And we're, And we now know for

14:01

a fact increased risk, especially in young

14:03

men, which is a big part of

14:06

the military, of myocarditis, pericarditis,

14:08

I mean, all these lists of

14:10

injuries. And

14:12

this is the problem. I mean, maybe the military

14:14

is the same. One of the things

14:17

I try to explain to doctors and people that are just

14:19

trying to figure out how would this happen, why are they

14:21

saying to me that there's no studies? Because

14:24

they don't do the studies. They never do

14:26

a comparative study. They never do the studies.

14:28

They say, we can't find a study that

14:30

backs up that claim because you were refusing

14:33

to do that study. Many

14:36

years ago when Donald Trump first took office,

14:38

Robert Kennedy Jr. asked me to

14:40

join him to go to the NIH. Donald

14:42

Trump sent him there and we presented exactly that.

14:45

Show us any double blind study ever

14:48

done of any childhood vaccine that has

14:50

never happened. Then show us the

14:52

comparative study that shows taking all these vaccines

14:55

makes you healthier. Never been done, never

14:57

been done. We're never going

14:59

to do it, is what they said. We refuse to do that. And

15:02

so this is what they're getting away with. Well, there's no

15:04

science that shows that, but you're not

15:06

doing the science. It's the same truth for

15:08

the military because you have the best records

15:10

in the world. You literally are tracking, nobody

15:13

has a more thorough background check on their

15:15

health than people going to the military. We

15:17

track them every day. Somebody

15:20

must be seeing a dramatic change in the

15:22

health outcomes of the military. They're all forth to

15:24

the back. And we have now a VA

15:27

that will disenfranchise every single veteran

15:29

if they show up and they have been harmed by

15:32

this injection. We have an

15:34

SOP that will disenfranchise all of our

15:36

veterans because they've just blanket decided

15:38

that there's no evidence of harm for

15:40

the purpose of a toxic exposure, which

15:43

is why it's important to talk about

15:45

the toxicity of the injection and why

15:47

it's important to link it back to

15:49

whether or not the Secretary of Defense

15:51

actually mandated a toxic exposure, which is

15:53

shocking in and of itself. If

15:56

you think about it, what has

15:58

he done to the totality of our own forces? forces. And

16:01

all of our allies and all of our partner

16:03

nations, they did the same thing. Do

16:08

we know whether or not all the militaries of

16:10

the world forced their military

16:12

to take this vaccine? It's a great question. I think

16:15

it's a great question that we need to ask and just

16:17

ask the question, which

16:20

militaries out there did not? Did

16:22

China line up all their military to

16:24

get the vaccine? Did Russia

16:26

line up all their military? Iran,

16:29

China, Russia. Those

16:31

are great questions to ask. And

16:34

so then when we think about military readiness,

16:36

this is one of the arguments that our

16:38

let Aaron Siri did make. We fought for

16:41

the military for many people that donate to

16:43

this show. They were a part of winning

16:45

cases for Air Force and others like them.

16:47

But we talked about we've got the V-safe

16:49

data. The V-safe was sort of the tracking

16:51

data for people that got the vaccine that

16:54

has certain things about their health records. And

16:56

we have a dashboard on our website. Here

16:58

it is, folks, if you haven't seen the

17:00

V-safe COVID vaccine, average health impacts, go to

17:02

ikendecide.org and just type in V-safe and you'll

17:04

get this. And you can look at all of

17:06

the different. It was over 10 million

17:09

individuals put in their data. But one of the

17:11

things that popped up right away is if you

17:14

see that bar at the top, 1.2 million,

17:17

1.3 million, the yellow, pink and red, that

17:19

means about 33.2% of the people that

17:23

got that vaccine reported that in

17:26

the yellow, they were unable to

17:28

perform normal activities. In the pink,

17:30

they couldn't go to work.

17:32

They weren't able to go to work or school. And

17:34

in the red, nearly 1 million

17:36

people required medical care. So 33.2% right

17:39

there would be defined

17:42

as not military ready.

17:45

For every fact, if this matches

17:47

the military, we wiped out one

17:49

third of them who certainly in

17:51

the days and weeks following couldn't

17:53

perform their duties. So

17:56

when we think of readiness, when we think

17:58

of readiness, When we think of where

18:01

our military is at, are

18:03

we ready? Are we ready for, I mean, as

18:05

I said earlier, if we're going into World War

18:07

III and everyone's going to jump into a NATO

18:09

war, where are we at from

18:11

your perspective? So if I put a warfare perspective

18:14

on, if I put a warfare spin on this

18:16

conversation, then I would probably have to step back and

18:18

say, at what point is

18:21

our adversary, adversary's plural,

18:23

looking at us and

18:25

thinking we're softening the battlefield. The battlefield has

18:27

been softened, to put it into warfare

18:29

language. Arguably the answer is yes.

18:32

We've softened our battlefield. We've softened our battlefield. Yeah.

18:35

I mean, that transgender story, I don't know if

18:37

you caught that early on, is just, I mean,

18:39

that's, and again, I want to be careful

18:42

not saying everyone should be allowed in the

18:44

military, but if you're going there to get

18:46

a sex change operation, I think we're,

18:49

what is it when you're on the wrong mission? Might

18:51

be on the wrong mission. Right.

18:55

Yeah. Yeah. So

18:57

now when I look at things like this,

18:59

you look at the secretary of defense has

19:03

mandated a known bioweapon

19:05

in this spike protein that

19:08

attacks the body in so many

19:10

different ways and

19:12

has done it to our military and

19:15

now won't even take care of those that are

19:17

injured, probably is continuing,

19:19

I'm sure they're continuing vaccine programs,

19:21

all of that. And

19:25

I look at a military that is now saying, come

19:27

on in if you want a sex change operation, all

19:30

things that clearly are, I mean, obviously

19:32

soften your military, making it so, as we

19:35

pointed out, I don't know how anybody after

19:37

sex change operation is going to be able

19:39

to rush into battle. So they're not ready.

19:42

They're obviously having, you

19:44

know, as Tracy beans

19:46

pointed out, having psychological

19:48

that require more than

19:50

the acceptable amount of

19:53

counseling. And

19:55

so my question then becomes from just

19:57

an outsider looking at it. It

20:00

does not feel like the

20:03

leadership of our country is acting

20:05

in the best interest of our

20:07

country. So I have written in

20:09

the past and proposed that what

20:11

the Secretary of Defense needs to

20:13

do is actually take a different

20:15

look at how to think about our defense

20:17

readiness posture. I was talking to

20:19

you earlier about the fact that I wrote an article asking the

20:22

question, what does the autism epidemic have

20:24

to do with now-security and defense readiness?

20:26

Right. We have to

20:28

add to all of these

20:30

discussions to get to the totality of

20:32

defense readiness. We have to add, there's

20:35

an additional layer. If we have an

20:37

autism rate today, let's say it's one in 36, I think

20:39

the stats are roughly one in 36 with

20:41

the diagnosis. If you project that out, I believe

20:43

it's to the year 2030, we're looking

20:46

at a number somewhere between one and two. Of

20:49

that population, they'll largely be

20:51

boys and they'll be nonverbal. That's just the

20:54

data. That's the trend that we're taking right

20:56

now. So we're saying by the year 2030,

20:59

we're going to have one in two

21:01

that will potentially have a diagnosis of autism.

21:04

Then we have to step back and ask

21:06

questions. Secretary of Defense, by the year

21:08

2030, how many people will be enlistment

21:10

eligible? Yeah. So that's just

21:12

a- I just want to, just so I can protect

21:14

it. I think that there's ways to

21:16

look at the science. I don't want someone

21:18

to report. Delby from the High Wire said

21:21

by 2030, one in two are going to

21:23

have autism. Certainly, stats like that are in

21:25

the movie Vax that I made. Anything

21:27

can change that. There's a lot of variables, but

21:29

you are right. When we see a trajectory that

21:31

started at one in 10,000 and

21:33

we now find ourselves at one in

21:36

36, I think there's even stats

21:38

showing more like one in 28, certainly

21:41

boys, one in 18 to one in

21:43

20 are now

21:45

suffering from autism. So already, already you've

21:47

reduced the amount of population that are

21:49

going to be eligible to be able

21:51

to join the military and nothing is

21:54

stopping this. Let's just say very generally,

21:56

this is what's happening with autism as

21:58

we speak. slowing it

22:00

down, we still, you know, and so to

22:02

your point, and let me add this, that

22:05

I'm pretty sure if you have asthma,

22:07

you're not really ready to rush into

22:09

battle either. If you have, you know,

22:11

if your body's all covered with eczema

22:13

and you need a shower every day

22:16

in order to handle all the scales

22:18

and things that are in your body,

22:20

all of these things, lupus, we have

22:22

a population now of children that more

22:24

than one in two already have a

22:26

chronic illness, a chronic disease, either a

22:28

neurological disorder or an autoimmune disease.

22:31

They're not military ready, so we're already there.

22:33

I mean, there's the stat, it just came

22:35

up right there. We're already there where

22:38

one in two Americans is

22:41

too sick to go

22:43

into battle. We can't have people pop in a bunch

22:45

of drugs and I need another asthma inhaler out in

22:47

the middle of the battlefield. And so

22:50

that is a question. Is the military

22:52

addressing it? I mean, are they looking

22:54

at it? If you're sitting there and you're the Secretary of Defense,

22:57

I think it would be very

22:59

smart to look right and to look left

23:01

and say, I need to bring in some folks that

23:03

are gonna bring me some alternative data. We

23:06

need to consider that data that is

23:08

considered quote unquote alternative in order for

23:10

us to have a comprehensive picture of

23:12

what our defense posture looks like in

23:14

the future, going into the future, especially when

23:16

we're going into dramatic changes around the world

23:18

that are becoming much more integrated. When we

23:20

talk about the nation state, we talk about the

23:23

supper state, we talk about all of these

23:25

issues that we've covered, the World Health

23:27

Organization, the IHR amendments. You talk

23:29

about fundamental changes in global power

23:31

structures. These are the challenges that

23:33

our defense department is going to have to go

23:35

into. Those are the environments. When we talk about-

23:37

If they see them as challenges, which is back my

23:39

question. If we're being led

23:42

by a nation's like, yeah, let's follow WAF,

23:44

globalism rocks. Let's tear

23:46

down our border. Let's just make sure

23:48

everybody that wants to come in, criminal

23:50

or not, come on in. And let's

23:52

force our military to take back seeds

23:54

and get sex, change operations. It sure

23:56

does it look like anyone is saying

23:58

that the goal is- to protect us, to

24:01

protect our interests. You

24:04

were in there, Department of Defense, is it

24:06

still sitting around going, how do we make

24:08

America stronger? Well, I think that to be

24:10

fair, to be fair,

24:12

we have a Defense Department that will look at

24:14

our big, big China, big Russia, big Iran,

24:17

and we'll sit there and we will have

24:19

a concerted defense

24:21

strategy that says, I need to think about how

24:23

I'm going to potentially go to war

24:26

with a big, big adversary. But

24:29

I think at the same time,

24:31

it's important to understand how these

24:34

conflicts are changing, how we think

24:36

about global interdependencies in terms of

24:38

global fights, and from the local

24:40

to the global, what does it look like in

24:42

terms of our ability to go step into that

24:44

new space, develop that foresight

24:46

picture. Our adversaries think about warfare

24:48

much differently. When I think about

24:50

nonlinear warfare, our adversaries think

24:52

about how do you look for the potential

24:54

that's going to unfold in the future environment.

24:56

Sounds very zen, doesn't it? It's

24:58

kind of like how do you watch water flow? But

25:01

our adversaries think about warfare that way. The Russians

25:03

think about warfare that way. In fact,

25:05

they have a doctrine called nonlinear warfare. If

25:08

we're busy talking about, and again, I

25:10

would talk about the fact that it's

25:12

not fifth generation warfare, this is not

25:14

an evolutionary linear process of how we're

25:16

going to transition and develop

25:19

change in the future or be a part of

25:21

that change in the future. We have to stop

25:23

and consider how adversaries also think about the future

25:25

that they want to shape because

25:27

that's what we have to be able to step into. It'd

25:29

be almost like a really good way

25:31

to attack America would be to accidentally

25:33

release a manmade bioweapon into the world,

25:35

then have the government of your enemy

25:38

call you and say, could you give

25:40

us the genetic code of what that

25:42

bioweapon was? Yeah, here you

25:44

go. Put that in a vaccine and give

25:46

it to everyone that didn't come in contact

25:48

with our bioweapon. Would that

25:51

be nonlinear? So if I wanted to

25:53

be an evil mastermind and plan

25:56

my own war game on how to go

25:58

about defeating my adversary. And

26:00

I would want to soften that battlefield. And

26:03

I want to create chaos. And

26:05

I want to have people that are

26:07

totally focused on things that, quite frankly,

26:10

I'm not concerned about at this point because I'm

26:12

going to be able to put this apparatus in over

26:14

here while they're looking left. I'm doing something on the

26:16

right. I think

26:18

if our adversary thinks that way, then we probably

26:21

need to say to, oh, by the way, our

26:23

Department of Defense, make sure we get

26:25

in that, how do we think the same way? How

26:28

do we make sure that we're actually

26:30

focused on the non-linearity of warfare as a

26:32

set of

26:35

behaviors, as things that adapt, they

26:37

co-evolve, they have emergent characteristics. I

26:40

recall Brett

26:42

Weinstein made an observation about his

26:45

observations in the Darien Gap. He was talking about

26:47

the illegal immigration issue.

26:49

The Shamps and Darien Gap. I've

26:52

had Michael Yahn on the show. So this idea

26:54

that we're building these, we're

26:56

funding, Americans are funding these giant

26:59

camps to help these immigrants fly

27:01

into Panama and accelerate their trip,

27:03

their free ride right across our

27:05

border. And it was a comment

27:07

that Brett Weinstein made. He made too.

27:09

Number one, he too observed something about

27:12

our military, which now has a very,

27:14

very interesting dynamic, which is we forced him

27:16

to become compliant, but it didn't have

27:18

anything to do with his observations about

27:20

how did he think about the problem?

27:23

And as an evolutionary biologist, he

27:25

actually makes a very, very interesting

27:27

statement, which is we need to

27:29

think about all of these adaptations

27:32

in the environment, how they change,

27:34

how we think about the problem set, because

27:36

it's not just the issue of illegal immigration

27:38

coming up to the border. It's

27:41

all of this tacit support, both

27:43

from all those UN organizations,

27:46

NGOs that are being funded. So now you've got

27:48

people that are thinking about, if you wanted

27:50

to say, again, in my language, how do

27:52

you soften the battlefield? You have

27:54

to understand where these threats are coming from as well.

27:58

It's just, it's a different way. of looking

28:00

at warfare and then it folds

28:02

all the way back into, bring it all the way

28:04

back into a defense readiness

28:06

posture. Are we ready? Right.

28:09

And then just go ahead and unfold into the

28:11

middle of that. Are we ready? Will

28:13

we be ready from a health perspective? What

28:16

do we do to our own armed forces with

28:18

regard to the toxicity that we know is

28:21

in the shot? So all of this

28:23

comes into play and will

28:25

impact our defense readiness posture in

28:28

ways that we just haven't even began to have conversation about.

28:30

What are the mechanisms by which we

28:32

can out this? Secretary of Defense has

28:34

been, went and poisoned the

28:36

troops from my perspective. Now it's obvious.

28:39

I'm not standing, I'm not like stepping

28:41

out on some third rail here. All

28:43

science is adding up to show increased

28:45

rates of myocarditis by CDC's own numbers.

28:48

I mean, just that alone, God

28:50

knows the turbo cancers and everything else we're

28:52

talking about on this show. What

28:54

is the mechanism by which we either demand

28:56

an apology, but certainly a shift? What would

28:59

have to happen? Because the military seems out

29:02

of touch. I don't even know

29:04

that, I mean, I can't, I don't have

29:06

standing to sue. Do the military cadets have

29:08

a standing to sue or did they, it

29:10

seems like to me they've signed away their

29:12

life enough that it's like, hey man,

29:15

you know. I

29:17

think there's two things at play. Actually

29:19

there's three. When you think about

29:22

demanding military accountability, you've had

29:24

Brad Miller on the show. He's talked about

29:26

the effort that a group, a very, very

29:28

prominent group of folks have stepped up

29:30

and said, we are publicly going

29:32

to ask the public for accountability.

29:35

Go to military accountability.net or.com and

29:37

actually pledge and sign that

29:39

petition. But at the same

29:42

time, we've also got to say, what

29:44

were those violations? Let's have a really,

29:46

really concerted look at the violations that

29:49

have occurred. The Secretary of Defense is actually

29:51

prohibited in law from actually harming service members

29:54

through the use of a biological agent that

29:56

can cause disease. Let's take a look at

29:58

some of the violations. those other violations

30:01

that we know are known within

30:03

the Department of Defense, tie them

30:05

to regular statutes, deceptive medical practices

30:07

is an example. I think for

30:09

those of us that were in the military and

30:11

those of us that were paying attention early on,

30:13

it was hashtag kill the virus, get

30:17

your vaccine, hurry up, get your shot, hashtag

30:19

kill the virus, protect the force. Hashtag

30:23

kill the virus. There was no way that if you got the

30:25

shot, you're going to kill the virus. That's

30:27

a deceptive medical practice. There

30:29

are a number of things that I think

30:31

are in play that there are

30:33

a group of folks that have sat down

30:35

and itemized and said these are the alleged

30:38

crimes, these are the alleged violations of law

30:41

and that effort is ongoing. Then

30:43

just to have some public awareness

30:46

on the fact that the Veterans

30:48

Administration is disenfranchising every single one

30:50

of our service members that

30:52

will have potentially been harmed when they

30:54

show up at the VA and

30:56

they need that disability compensation, which we

30:59

know the programs are broken. Where

31:02

do we have, how are we going to help our vets,

31:04

how are we going to help the vaccine injured? When

31:08

nonprofits have to stand up, in

31:11

their stead, when a service member

31:13

doesn't get what they need and they have

31:15

to go and say, please, can you help

31:17

me because CICP is broken. When

31:21

the disability compensation programs are so broken that

31:25

service members have nowhere to go, I think

31:27

that's also important. To raise awareness on the

31:30

VA secretary, Dennis

31:32

McDonough, and then to raise awareness of

31:34

the fact that the SECDEF in

31:37

tandem has potentially harmed

31:40

our entire armed forces. It's a

31:42

very bold statement. It's a very

31:44

bold statement to say, did you

31:46

mandate a toxic exposure and

31:49

what were the effects of that? I

31:51

got to ask that question, which is why on that

31:53

clip I said, start bringing in

31:55

the issue of national security and

31:57

defense readiness into the issue of

31:59

the mandate, the toxicity of the mandate,

32:02

bring all those other issues at play and bring

32:05

this into a much different

32:07

conversation. It takes it out of the vaccine

32:09

safety discussion, brings it

32:11

into the Defense Department discussion. So

32:14

the Defense Department listens to

32:16

this conversation and they're going

32:18

to have some concern perhaps

32:21

about, what do you mean? What are

32:23

they talking about? The toxic spike protein. What

32:25

is that? And hope, by

32:27

the way, what happens if all of

32:30

a sudden the Department of Defense is

32:32

compelled or the VA is compelled to

32:34

acknowledge that they're going to have to

32:37

compensate the service members for that

32:39

toxicity? Certainly would have a totally

32:41

different response. I mean, certainly once

32:43

the government had to pay,

32:45

once you started realizing this was going on, then

32:48

you would think you would have a huge

32:50

knowledge growth, which is maybe we should have

32:52

the whole vaccine program. Maybe we should look

32:54

at what readiness is. Someone that

32:57

spends their life in the

32:59

military, Department of Defense, obviously

33:02

you must really be into national security

33:04

on some level. Do you miss it?

33:06

Is it hard to walk away from? You

33:11

know, it's interesting. You're kind of stumping there. I

33:14

don't miss it. I

33:16

enjoy what I'm doing now. I had

33:18

an opportunity to step into this space in a

33:21

way that I was already passionate about the topic,

33:23

but it gives me a chance to speak about

33:25

it in a way that I would have never

33:27

had from the inside. I mean, I

33:29

was very active in war gaming. I was very active in

33:33

actually playing through defense scenarios,

33:35

whether I went down to SOCOM and sat there and worked

33:38

with the guys to think about how do you think about

33:40

warfare and how do you bring resources

33:44

to the fight. I'm very much involved

33:47

in that, but

33:50

being able to speak about it on

33:52

this side, I think is much

33:54

more important at this point. We've got too much at stake.

34:00

the work you were doing and get involved. So there's

34:02

been a couple things that I've done since I've been

34:04

out. The primary one, of course, is follow

34:07

me in terms of my work, making

34:09

sure that our veterans get

34:12

taken care of, raising awareness on that.

34:14

I'm on X and then

34:16

I started a nonprofit, some

34:19

Wider Act 19, said, hey, you

34:21

guys have been injured, come

34:24

to it. Here it is, realreactions.org. realreactions.org.

34:26

Yep, right there. And what is the

34:28

work you're doing there? What is it

34:30

doing with your work? What I wanted

34:32

to do was raise awareness for the fact

34:34

that it wasn't only the COVID

34:37

shot that we were trying

34:39

to help people with. If you've been

34:41

injured by the shingles vaccine, if you've been injured

34:43

by the MMR vaccine, as

34:46

we both know, the disability compensation programs are

34:48

broken. So we're able to provide basically what

34:50

we call a grant. React

34:52

19 calls it a care fund. We're

34:54

able to go ahead and help that

34:56

individual that is financially harmed, medically harmed

34:59

severely. If there are donations there, we will

35:01

be able to support them. So I started

35:03

that after I got out

35:06

and then just went straight into the work

35:09

over at Children's Health Defense as their military fellow.

35:11

So I did that. And then we're able

35:14

to get the Children's Health Defense military chapter

35:16

up and running. So

35:18

I've done a lot of work on the

35:20

military side with regard to the vaccine safety

35:22

issue and all of those discussions. So we've

35:25

really, really got a tight network of folks

35:27

that are focused on this discussion. But it's

35:29

the national security piece. It's the most interesting.

35:31

Is national security, military readiness, is that something

35:34

that like as we, you know,

35:36

I'm not going to tell people who to vote

35:38

for, but when we think of it, is this

35:40

responsibility of civilians, you know, of those of us

35:42

that are voting, is this something we

35:44

should be thinking about? Like who's actually going to

35:47

make sure that our military

35:49

is ready? Who's going to

35:51

like really ask the right questions about what happened

35:53

here? Because if we were injuring

35:55

our, you know, our military, are they going to

35:57

have, you know, are they going to be protected?

36:00

and taking care of and given the right way

36:02

forward. Is that

36:04

something that we can even figure

36:06

out as a voting population? I

36:09

think every single American needs to ask that question.

36:12

I think they absolutely need to ask the

36:14

question again going back to the very first

36:16

shot, what's the nexus between national security defense

36:18

readiness and the harms that we've committed potentially

36:21

committed on our armed forces. And

36:24

it's not just, oh by the way, it's not

36:26

just the US forces. It's all of

36:28

our partner nations who did the same thing. Yeah. All of

36:31

them. Right. I mean so this is this is

36:33

very much a global concern in terms

36:35

of the partnerships that we

36:37

have, the allies that we have, if we're

36:39

all in the same boat. So

36:42

I think for US, the average

36:44

US American, this should be

36:46

in my humble opinion our

36:48

number one concern. Are we soft? I

36:51

think we're way too soft. Way

36:53

too soft right now. Seems

36:56

that way to me too. Yeah. Dr.

36:58

Kristana Shachkofford, thank you for joining us today. Thank

37:00

you. Appreciate it. Thank you.