0:00

Welcome one and all as

0:02

we close out the week here

0:04

on the day with me

0:06

John Arola and trashy. My co

0:08

host my co pilot

0:10

on every Friday show going

0:13

to be feeding trashy later

0:15

on. Also bread is here. Hey Brett,

0:17

how's it going? I'm going to be

0:19

feeding trashy later on. I'm

0:21

going to be feeding trashy later on.

0:23

I'm going to be feeding trashy later

0:26

on. Also bread is here. Hey

0:28

Brett, how's it going? Brett are like in the house. What's

0:30

up? I didn't make me feel good about

0:34

myself. Well, I'm here

0:36

with my friend bubbly. I'm

0:41

trying to get some revenge because when I joined

0:43

our call, I did a little bit

0:45

and Brett apparently had

0:47

done a better version of it before I was on the call

0:50

and he made me feel inadequate. So now

0:53

this is the cycle of trauma. But Brett, how you doing?

0:55

Good to have you here. I'm all right, John. I

0:59

thought that was going to lead elsewhere anyway. Well

1:02

then I'm glad to have you here. We have a

1:04

lot to talk about very briefly. We're not

1:06

going to be doing like a full thing on it or anything, but we

1:08

did see the breaking news that documentarian

1:11

Morgan Spurlock tragically passed of

1:13

cancer. And want to

1:15

be clear, the reports are

1:17

that it was cancer, not and I'm sorry, you anti Vaxxers or whatever,

1:21

not whatever will confirm your

1:23

insane ideas about the world. But

1:25

I'm going to be doing a little bit more on

1:27

that. But I'm going to be talking about the insane

1:29

ideas about the world. So that is

1:31

distressing. But yes, I know he hit it very big a

1:34

number of years ago and obviously very sad. So

1:37

we just wanted to briefly mention that. I also

1:39

wanted to mention something I talked about earlier today

1:41

in the pre port, which is that apparently as

1:44

a result of the BS legal challenges

1:46

that people like Elon Musk have lodged

1:48

against them. Media Matters is

1:50

under a lot of financial strain and has

1:52

apparently fired 12 of their workers,

1:54

including a number of who

1:57

we have had on the damage report and on

1:59

other. shows on the network. Many

2:01

times, Midi Matters does great work.

2:03

They do what I consider critical work, and

2:07

that is why right-wing billionaires like Elon

2:09

Musk want to destroy them. And

2:11

so if you value the work of

2:13

those individuals of Media Matters, Pat

2:16

Abigazale, who's been on the show, has

2:18

set up a mutual aid fund to

2:20

help people during their transition period of

2:22

finding other employment. So we've got that

2:24

graphic there. If you want to pause,

2:27

you can scan that QR code and then you can contribute

2:29

to that if you'd like to. It's

2:31

good people, they're great work, and it's

2:34

unfortunate that this is the way the

2:36

industry works. Yeah, laid off.

2:38

They do good work and they get

2:40

laid off. Elon Musk does terrible damage

2:42

to the reputation of Tesla and

2:45

gets like a $58 billion bonus

2:47

package. System doesn't make

2:49

any sense, except from the point of view

2:51

of if you're already wealthy and you've rigged it to make yourself wealthier.

2:54

That didn't make sense actually. Yeah. Okay,

2:57

everyone, so let's turn to happier

2:59

news, which is that the Dragonathon

3:02

has gone absolutely insane. Not only

3:04

did we pass our highest stretch

3:06

goal, we smashed it. And so

3:09

Brett, bad news for you. We're

3:11

gonna need you to get some purple hair, okay?

3:14

Because we're at nearly 2400 gifted

3:16

memberships, which is just like, I don't even know what

3:19

to say. Like I barely knew what to say when

3:21

we hit 1000. I don't know what to say when

3:23

we hit 2400. It's a lot, thank you. I

3:27

really can't believe it. Then

3:29

Gabby Mathis alone donated our

3:32

original goals worth. Yeah, more

3:34

than the original and is now

3:36

gifting more, just gifted 50 more

3:38

memberships. That's 10% more than

3:41

Gabby already had. That's a lot.

3:43

Again, that's more than the whole community goal

3:45

that we had set. Or not even goal,

3:47

just like lofty like, wouldn't it be cool

3:49

if we did this? So

3:51

look, Gabby is in first place on the

3:53

leaderboard now, according to my math, at 570

3:55

gifted memberships,

3:58

which is just a lot. Thank you, that's a

4:01

lot, that's so much thank you. The

4:03

Poeticate in second place at 400, thank

4:05

you Poeticate. In third place, Lady Efantuya 370, also

4:07

a ton, thank you. In fourth place, in

4:12

fifth place now, it's high. Joe Gutierrez and Bronco

4:14

at 100 gifted memberships,

4:17

thank you so much to both of you. Keide

4:19

at sixth place with 95, just narrowly behind

4:22

that. In seventh place, Waddane

4:24

Dragon at 81, thank you so much.

4:26

Eighth place, Jen Welch with 73, ninth

4:30

place, Moon Dragon with 55, thank you.

4:32

And we still have that three-way tie

4:34

for tenth place with Vauxella, Sam Hurley,

4:36

Anthony McClendon at 50, thank you to

4:39

all of you. Thank you to everybody that's

4:41

been participating. There has never before

4:43

been anything like this on our channel,

4:45

there's never been anything even

4:48

similar in any way, it's crazy and I

4:50

really appreciate it, thank you so much. Many

4:53

of the hostages that you're waiting for and

4:55

everybody's waiting for, those hostages, many of them

4:57

are dead, many of them are dead and

5:00

it's a horrible thing, it's a horrible

5:02

thing but many of those hostages are

5:04

dead. There's no way that those hostages

5:06

and some will be alive but many

5:09

of those hostages are dead, it's a

5:11

very, it's a very serious, horrible thing.

5:13

It would have never happened if the

5:15

election weren't rigged, it would have never

5:17

happened if

5:19

I could be president. Yeah,

5:22

so that's about as gross as I

5:24

can imagine a public figure ever saying,

5:26

not just repeatedly saying the hostages are

5:28

dead, the hostages are dead, the hostages

5:30

are dead. But then linking

5:32

it as he links literally everything in

5:34

the world as being tied to his

5:36

own political fortunes. If he gets what

5:38

he wants, people won't die,

5:40

if he doesn't, you just

5:42

might die. That is a

5:44

message that he is crazy

5:46

enough to deliver and unfortunately

5:48

millions of Americans are diluted

5:51

enough, desperate enough, insert a word

5:53

to accept and to think that that

5:55

makes sense. So that's just a taste of the madness,

5:58

there was a lot of madness at the end. the Memphis rally in

6:00

the Bronx. That sort of

6:02

stood out, it was unique. We also had some of the

6:04

more typical sorts of madness, which is he

6:07

was repeatedly lying about the crowd size. There

6:09

are overhead shots showing that it is,

6:11

as you can see, a good crowd. That's

6:14

a good crowd, just like Wildwood, perfectly

6:16

good crowd. And you know what? You could

6:19

describe the actual crowd that's there, and that

6:21

would be good. You could accurately talk about how many

6:23

people are there. You could talk about the fact

6:25

that it's more diverse than most

6:28

Republican crowds. It's nowhere near as diverse as

6:30

they imply it to be. And the vast

6:32

majority of those people there, at least

6:34

according to reporters talking to people there,

6:37

are not actually from the Bronx. No, that's fine. They're

6:39

still humans. They're still people. But

6:42

when you have to pitch it as this

6:44

overwhelmingly black and brown Bronx crowd that broke

6:46

all records, well, then it doesn't seem like

6:48

you care about the crowds there. You're more

6:50

focused on the fictional crowd you've

6:53

invented in your mind that makes you feel warm

6:55

and fuzzy. I want to go to just a little

6:57

bit more from the rally. And then

6:59

we will discuss. Take a look at this. A lot

7:01

of people say to me today the toughest business people,

7:04

people that you know about, could I ask you

7:06

a question? How do you do it? I

7:09

say, do what? How do you get up in the morning and

7:11

put your pants on? Why do you put the pants

7:14

on? I'll explain it to you someday. How do

7:16

you do it? How do you get up? How

7:18

do you do it? I

7:23

get a deranged old man

7:25

ranting like this. I

7:27

get it. He's in the twilight of his

7:29

life. He's a very desperate,

7:32

needy person. I get him ranting. I

7:34

don't understand why people so readily line

7:36

up to hear his utter nonsense. But

7:39

Brett, you're better at putting yourself in

7:41

the point of view of someone who might do that.

7:43

What's your explanation for this? What's the appeal? I

7:46

want to see it. Show me, don't tell me. Donald,

7:49

put your pants on. I

7:52

don't believe that Donald Trump can put

7:54

his own pants on just due to

7:56

the physics as someone who's getting

8:00

a bit of a gut myself was driving

8:02

home and there's like this ridge

8:04

of sweat. When you're

8:06

in the car, I don't know if anyone

8:08

gets that where you're like, am I sweating between

8:11

my belly button and my mani boobies? And

8:13

the answer is yes. But I can

8:15

still put my pants on. How does

8:18

he put his pants? And also, no one

8:20

asked you that. No one.

8:22

Nobody asked you how do you put your

8:24

pants on. And after

8:26

you said it, Donald, you

8:28

weren't smart enough and aware

8:31

enough and whatever

8:33

he is, a genius and a very

8:35

stable genius enough not to say it.

8:38

But you were smart enough to realize it didn't

8:40

make any sense. And you knew

8:42

you couldn't say, excuse me, that was weird.

8:45

And you knew that all the people in

8:47

the audience would just cheer no matter what

8:50

you said. So why not push it? It's

8:54

insane. About this,

8:56

go ahead. Yeah, I just,

9:00

the point of that and the effect of it is, isn't

9:03

it so hard to be a

9:05

billionaire former president? They're all coming

9:08

for you. They're so mean. Everyone's

9:10

mean to you. And they buy

9:12

it. Tons of people who

9:14

are desperately living paycheck to paycheck

9:17

can barely, like there's inflation, grocery prices. Well, actually, grocery

9:19

prices are apparently going down a little bit, but there's

9:21

still everything so expensive and the rent is so high

9:23

and the odds of owning a home are so hard.

9:26

And these people work themselves in a frenzy

9:28

to feel bad for a guy with billions

9:30

of dollars. That's not

9:33

just a thing that's happening. That is arguably

9:35

the point of right wing media is

9:38

to make you sympathetic to people who

9:40

have a million times more than you

9:42

will ever have in your life. And

9:45

it works. They feel bad

9:47

for the billionaire. Also,

9:50

nothing is difficult for

9:52

Trump except what he made

9:54

difficult. The guy was

9:57

born very rich. He was

9:59

given. hundreds of millions of

10:01

dollars, which he squandered many times

10:03

due to his own business

10:06

dealings. In

10:08

terms of winning the Republican nomination, all

10:10

he had to do was be a

10:12

guy who knew how to be on

10:14

TV in front of other people who

10:16

didn't know how to be on

10:18

TV. It was difficult to

10:20

realize that you just needed to treat the race

10:22

like a reality show, but

10:25

his expertise was reality shows because the one

10:28

thing that he's good at, but it isn't

10:30

hard is just being brash. Yeah,

10:34

that's it. And all the things he

10:36

did along the way to get himself in legal trouble, that's

10:38

his fault. And

10:41

then the first thing you started off with, those

10:43

hostages would be alive if it

10:45

wasn't for him. What are you

10:47

talking about? In terms of escalating

10:49

tensions in the region, you were

10:51

the bellicose schmuck boy who endorsed

10:53

the moving of the American embassy

10:55

to places it shouldn't be. If

10:58

you want to do diplomacy and you

11:00

want peace. He also said

11:03

that Russia never would have invaded Ukraine. So

11:07

again, can you imagine if

11:09

Bernie Sanders came out and said if

11:11

the DNC hadn't screwed

11:13

me, all these people wouldn't

11:15

have died. Can you imagine how he'd

11:17

be pilloried for claiming that all of

11:19

his lives hinged on him getting what

11:21

he wants? But elections do matter, just

11:23

not in the way that he says.

11:27

Exactly, no, no, no, they're very

11:29

consequential. But there has

11:31

to be a logical through line, some sort

11:34

of common

11:36

sense connection, not just

11:39

whatever is bad, 140 million people would have still

11:42

been instituted there. If

11:44

I hadn't been screwed, Rise of Skywalker

11:46

would have been great. You

11:48

can't just claim that everything would be better, that's

11:51

not how it works. I

12:00

was hotter than I am now and I became president,

12:02

okay? I

12:05

don't know. I said to somebody,

12:07

was I hotter before or hotter now? I

12:09

don't know. Who the hell knows? Who

12:12

the hell knows? Who the hell cares,

12:14

right? Okay,

12:17

the crowd wasn't cheering for that, but they did

12:20

not do what I would have done, which is

12:22

will not be there in the first place or

12:24

leave if I happen to be there. And

12:26

that's the sort of vamping that he does, how hot he

12:29

was and how great he was. He definitely thinks this, or

12:31

at least he wants you to think that he thinks this.

12:33

We know that deep down inside he's a black hole of

12:35

need and ego and all that. But

12:37

what I find interesting about that, Brett, is they

12:40

present him as being hot. Like

12:43

he presents himself as being hot, even

12:45

though he is not, and I would argue never

12:47

was. I don't think he was hot back

12:49

before he was what he is. And

12:52

when they depict him in art, he

12:54

is hot, they make him hot. And

12:57

what I don't understand is, if this

12:59

is very important to them, and they're

13:01

telegraphing that it is, being

13:04

strong, being alpha, being hot,

13:06

all this stuff, why

13:09

don't you choose someone who actually

13:11

is those things? Because

13:13

they say it's what they want, and yet they

13:15

choose Trump. So that's not what they want. They

13:18

want something else, which he apparently does have. Now

13:20

you earlier in the show said he's brash, and

13:22

maybe it's that they don't have a hot, jacked

13:26

billionaire who is brash

13:28

enough or who is offensive enough. I don't know

13:30

what it is. Why do they choose the

13:33

people that they choose? I'm not even just talking about Trump. I'm

13:35

talking about virtually every one of their media figures as well. Most

13:37

of their politicians, they are pathetic little

13:39

weenies masquerading as alphas, and

13:42

every one of them says that's what's

13:44

important, and yet none of them are

13:46

it. What do you think? Listen,

13:49

guys don't have to be hot to

13:52

be hot. That's

13:54

one of the great things about our

13:56

society. People can be like,

13:59

you know who's super. hot like Michael

14:01

Keaton. And you're like,

14:04

he's not know I was a track

14:06

is like a Blake Shelton. I don't

14:08

know why I picked that he was

14:10

the sexiest man alive, like Patrick Dempsey,

14:12

like people with perfect beautiful hair like

14:14

to be considered hot. Women

14:17

have to traditionally in society

14:19

is that level

14:21

of television need to like Eddie, you

14:24

know, thread a certain needle. But

14:27

the first time I played music

14:29

in front of a live audience, I

14:32

like what I was considered a hotter

14:34

for no reason.

14:37

That's what he's talking about. I

14:39

was a pistol. It is

14:42

not fair. It's

14:45

not is but he

14:47

but I've watched many

14:49

television shows that referred before he

14:51

was president there for Donald Trump

14:53

as a sex symbol. Because

14:57

of other things other needles guys

14:59

have to thread a much bigger

15:02

needle. It's like a base

15:05

needle size needle. The

15:07

guy can thread to compensate

15:09

for not being conventionally considered

15:12

male models. I

15:14

think that sex symbol is generally thought

15:16

to mean one thing but the symbol

15:19

can symbolize many things the mark

15:21

of the beast perhaps not every symbol has

15:23

to be good. Also,

15:26

Blake Shelton is no Patrick Dempsey is

15:28

what I will say. Good for you. I look I

15:30

agree for you John. I had to Google them. But

15:33

anyway, um, yeah, look, I get

15:35

that Brad really fast really. Well,

15:39

I think we all have made Michael

15:41

Keaton is the perfectly Oh my God,

15:43

don't even do they

15:46

think okay, if you were to pull no

15:49

not poll because poll is say if

15:51

you could get into the mind if you

15:53

could use Elon Musk's neural link to

15:56

tap into their mind before the

15:58

threads all came out. shredded the

16:00

neural tissue. Do

16:03

they think he's hot? Do

16:06

who think he's hot? His followers. I

16:09

think that people think the president

16:12

of the United States is

16:14

hot, no matter what.

16:17

I think weird buggy

16:19

bulge eyes Kennedy was not

16:21

really a hot guy. But

16:24

okay, everyone wanted to bling a ring JFK.

16:30

Should we do a poll? Who is

16:32

hotter? Floopy hair. Former Biden, because they're

16:35

both president or they both were president.

16:37

And if it's just that, well, then that

16:39

cancels out and then we can just compare everything else.

16:42

Again, why

16:45

don't they have like a

16:47

former Marine who's

16:50

straight out of central casting, jacked,

16:53

a fascist, hates

16:55

women, wants to strip away all of their

16:57

rights and is the thing they say they

17:00

want. I don't think they want

17:02

it because maybe it's not achievable. Maybe they like looking

17:04

at Trump and thinking like, that could have

17:06

been me if I just been born into a rich

17:08

family or whatever. Maybe that's what they like. I

17:11

don't know. Yeah, maybe they'd like Dwayne

17:13

Johnson. I don't know. Maybe he could be their

17:15

person or something. They're trying to say Trump's racist.

17:18

And they have to go all the way back into the 80s

17:20

to say he's racist. I

17:23

remember in the 80s blacks love Trump. In the

17:25

90s, they loved him in the 2000s.

17:28

Blacks wanted to be Trump. Everybody wanted

17:30

to be Trump no matter what color

17:32

you are. That changed when he ran

17:35

for president. And I don't

17:37

think black Americans even really knew who Joe

17:39

Biden was until Barack Obama tapped him for

17:41

VP. He had

17:43

been a senator for literally decades. How little

17:46

respect do you have for a group of

17:48

people to think that they have no idea

17:50

of one of the most senior Democrats setting

17:53

aside, it's the least terrible of the things he said.

17:55

First of all, if I had a lamp

17:58

and if there were a genie in

18:00

it. My first wish, and maybe my

18:02

second and third just to make sure,

18:04

would be to never again have to

18:06

hear Jesse Waters say the word blacks.

18:10

I don't even like when I say it.

18:12

I damn sure don't like when that sentient

18:14

boat shoe says it. Anyway,

18:17

and then what I

18:19

love is he'll say something and he

18:21

has no idea what it

18:24

means that he said it. So

18:26

he said 80s, 90s, 2000s,

18:29

everybody loved him. Everybody wanted

18:32

to be him. And then he ran

18:34

for president. So

18:38

why do you think it is that they don't

18:40

like him anymore? Is it because he started talking

18:42

about what he believes supposedly and he started opining

18:45

on politics and all? Is it possible that maybe

18:47

they don't like him because of the things that he's

18:49

said and done? Like people don't understand why you would

18:52

turn on someone after you all of a sudden know

18:54

way more about who they are as a person. Same

18:56

thing happened with Elon Musk. Like, yeah,

18:58

people thought he was cool 15 years

19:01

ago when the only thing they knew is

19:03

they thought he'd made an electric car. Then

19:06

he started talking and now we know who he is. What

19:09

do you think? Like, I like

19:11

John Iadarola. I think he's great.

19:15

Until he's like, no, I'll fly the plane

19:17

we're gonna be in. I

19:20

could learn. Like, I like Donald

19:23

Trump too. So did Samantha from Sex

19:25

and the City. She references

19:27

how cool it would be. He

19:31

has a cameo. Like, yeah,

19:34

when he was nowhere near the

19:36

nuclear button. You know who didn't

19:39

like Donald Trump? Ever.

19:42

So Sesame Street had a character

19:44

named Donald Grump in the 80s

19:47

because he was gentrifying Sesame Streets

19:49

all over New York. He

19:51

was kicking people out making unaffordable housing.

19:54

He was doing that stuff. People just

19:56

didn't know about it because he and

19:58

they're all kinds of people. people like

20:00

things they don't know that much about. I

20:05

really like Coca-Cola until I turn

20:07

around and look at the ingredients.

20:09

I'm like, my God, I know

20:12

too much. I now

20:14

know too much about Donald Trump and

20:17

worse, he's flying. He

20:20

flew the plane once. I hated it.

20:22

It was very turbulent. And

20:24

now he's like, no, I'll be better this time.

20:26

Did you go to school? Did you go to

20:28

flight school? No, but I flew the plane once.

20:30

Yeah, we barely made it out alive. Next

20:34

time I'll be way better now. Why

20:37

did you go to flight school? No, but

20:40

I'm way angrier than I was the last time

20:42

I flew the plane. That's not

20:44

reassuring at all. I knew getting out

20:46

of the plane was the worst feeling

20:48

ever. So I

20:50

just plan on keeping the controls of

20:52

the plane as long as possible. Yeah, last time

20:55

when you tried to get me out of the

20:57

plane. I just held on to it and I

20:59

was literally a lost in the air being pulled

21:01

out of the cockpit. But give another try. You

21:03

crashed the plane while I just won't land it.

21:07

Tessie Waters there is very,

21:09

very hot, I guess, on the prospects

21:12

of Donald Trump and black

21:14

and brown voters. So just to give you the

21:16

actual polling, here is the party

21:19

ID of black voters, 83% Democratic

21:22

or leaning 12% Republican. And

21:24

Donald Trump does indeed outperform other

21:26

Republicans, at least in this Pew

21:28

poll. It's still

21:30

only 18%, but that is outperforming.

21:34

See we can talk about what is true.

21:37

We can just say that it's true. It's not

21:39

as impressive as they're making out to be, but

21:41

it's certainly something. And when you

21:43

look at in terms of the actual vote, depending

21:46

on which age group you're looking

21:48

at, it's similar. Republicans polling

21:50

about 77% of the vote to 18% for Donald Trump. Donald

21:55

Trump is doing better amongst black males and

21:57

black females and amongst.

21:59

younger voters rather than other voters, that's what's

22:02

actually going on. We'll

22:04

see if that has an effect. I'm just saying

22:06

this both to correct the record on the right,

22:08

but also like, hey, Joe Biden. Jesse

22:11

Waters and Fox News, they're

22:14

not news, they're YouTubers. Like

22:16

that's it, they're just YouTubers like the rest

22:18

of us. They're pretending, that's

22:21

not news, that's not reporting what

22:23

he's doing, he's just trying

22:25

to convince you of stuff. Yeah,

22:28

and that is the art. We

22:31

need to understand what's happening there. They're

22:35

trying to leverage Donald Trump's former

22:37

reputation. And then doing the thing

22:39

he always does, which is just

22:41

saying things are a certain way, even

22:43

though they're not. Those two things together happen

22:46

over and over again, in an

22:48

attempt to convince people that of

22:51

a different perception so that it becomes

22:53

reality. So they're like, all right, it's

22:56

not that bad. Meanwhile, if I don't know what

22:58

the hell the Democrats are doing just

23:00

to win elections and market

23:02

themselves to people. But

23:05

I know what the Republicans are

23:07

doing and they do it over and over

23:09

again maniacally. And it may push

23:11

the needle a little bit. Worst

23:14

case, it's a dominant strategy, worst case

23:16

scenario is what, people who hated them

23:18

still hate them? Maybe someone

23:20

else will be like, I don't know. Yeah,

23:24

well, everyone stay tuned. Consequential election, as always,

23:26

we're gonna take a short break, and we'll

23:28

be right back. Who's in and who's out of the Trump veep

23:31

stakes? The answer might surprise

23:33

you or more likely just cause you

23:35

to lose whatever remaining faith in humanity you have, because

23:38

we have updates. This comes from

23:40

Donald Trump talking to a reporter outside of

23:42

his Bronx rally. He was asked by Tara

23:45

Rosenblum, share with me your top three candidates

23:48

for your running mate, to which he said, well,

23:50

we have so many, I don't want to do that,

23:52

but we have so

23:54

many, you can take people out of the Trump's rally,

23:58

take people like Ben Carson. You could

24:00

take people like Marco Rubio, J.D. Vance,

24:02

Elise is doing a fantastic job. I

24:05

could go on for a very

24:07

long time, but I'm not going to.

24:10

So look, a lot of those names have appeared on the

24:12

list before. What is more interesting is the

24:14

names that are not on the list. Now the

24:17

first few I'm gonna say are not the most surprising. I'm

24:19

just gonna say it because I like in case they're

24:21

watching or reminding them that after all they did for Trump,

24:23

they're not on the list. Marjorie Greene,

24:25

no, Terry Lake, get the hell out of

24:27

here. It's not gonna happen. More

24:30

importantly, while Ben Carson was on the list and

24:32

some of the other senators that he's talked about

24:34

before, no Byron Donalds.

24:37

And more importantly, no Tim Scott.

24:40

And interestingly, Tim Scott has been in the news recently.

24:42

You might have seen this. He has an ad to

24:45

raise money for Donald Trump to help save Donald Trump,

24:47

get him elected. But there was a bit of a

24:49

problem with it. When you

24:51

went to actually donate, you

24:53

weren't necessarily giving to what you thought you were.

24:56

But as tweeted, it's Tim Scott, which yeah, it's

24:58

your Twitter account and there's a video view. We

25:01

know it's you, Tim. Anyway, he says,

25:03

can you chip in 5, 10 or

25:05

$25 to President Trump's campaign before his

25:07

critical end of month fundraising deadline? Thank

25:10

you. But as I alluded to, when

25:12

you go and do that, there's an

25:14

automatic split that happens that gives

25:16

Donald Trump 5% of

25:20

what you give and gives Tim Scott 95%.

25:23

Now you can change that obviously, you give 100% to Tim

25:25

Scott. You give 100% to Donald

25:27

Trump if you want. But notably,

25:30

he could have easily put a

25:32

link to Trump's fundraising there. He

25:34

didn't. He did the one

25:36

that benefits him almost entirely. Now look,

25:38

obviously he needs money. He wants to

25:40

be considered a credible candidate. He wants

25:42

to be considered a good fundraiser. So

25:44

I guess strategically, you might wanna do

25:47

that. But if I was Donald

25:49

Trump and I saw that, I'd think, you're

25:51

using me to raise money, 95%

25:54

of which goes to you. That

25:56

would peeve me a little bit, Brett. What do you think? I

25:59

think it's- Fantastic, I think

26:01

it's so hilarious. I love

26:03

every story about when you

26:06

actually look at what happens

26:09

when you donate, they're fleecing

26:11

you. All of

26:13

it, Donald Trump famously had

26:15

an auto renew option that

26:17

was microscopic at the bottom

26:19

of the original donation page

26:21

that he had, and it

26:23

was revealed that people who would make a

26:25

one time donation actually were

26:27

signing up a

26:30

donation, and they just didn't know

26:32

it until the next week, month, year,

26:35

who knows? I think this is

26:37

great. I think Tim Scott is

26:39

just doing what every politician in the Republican

26:42

Party is doing, using the

26:44

popularity of Donald Trump among

26:47

Republicans to benefit themselves.

26:50

And if they don't use Donald Trump right,

26:54

they are committing political

26:56

action. They

26:58

are committing political suicide. I

27:01

have a question, so what's good for

27:03

the Tim Scott? Hi, it's Tim Scott. Would

27:06

it be good for, I guess, the gander in this case? Should

27:09

I just tweet out like, help Donald

27:11

Trump save MAGA, third world

27:13

something? And then it just takes you to

27:15

my Patreon or something, signs you up. As

27:18

long as you gave a dollar to Donald

27:20

for everyone, then you're not really not helping

27:22

Donald. New reports from inside of the

27:26

Donald Trump camp say that Senator Tom

27:28

Cotton of Arkansas is unexpectedly sort of shooting back

27:31

up to the top of consideration to

27:33

be Donald Trump's running mate. If you

27:36

don't remember who Tom Cotton is, I

27:38

will take literally any opportunity

27:40

I can find to remind you that this is who he is. If

27:43

something like this happened in Arkansas on a bridge

27:45

there, let's just say I think there'd be a

27:47

lot of very wet criminals that have

27:49

been tossed over by the Democrats. Criminals

27:52

that have been tossed overboard, not by

27:54

law enforcement, but by the people whose

27:56

road they're blocking. If they

27:58

glued their hands to a car or a- the

28:00

pavement, well, probably pretty painful

28:02

to have their skin ripped off. But I think that's

28:04

the way we'd handle in Arkansas. And I've encouraged most

28:07

people anywhere that get stuck behind

28:09

criminals like this who are trying to block traffic

28:11

to take matters in their own hands. There's only

28:13

usually a few of them and there's a lot

28:15

of people being inconvenienced. It's time to put an

28:17

end to this nonsense. Again,

28:20

that is a sitting senator telling

28:23

people to literally take matters into

28:25

their own hands and throw

28:28

protesters off a bridge into

28:30

the ocean. He

28:32

said that weeks ago, nobody

28:35

cared. He literally

28:37

said take matters in your own hands,

28:39

rip the skin off their body and

28:42

nobody cared. Brad, what do you think? He

28:44

could be a BBC. Of course, he's a

28:46

sitting senator because he couldn't stand up with

28:48

the boner he got from the thought of

28:51

just killing people. Tom

28:54

Cotton is the most disgusting

28:58

senator, I think. It goes back and forth and

29:00

maybe we should have some kind of bracket where

29:02

we decide who's the most disgusting senator. But

29:05

Tom Cotton is a 40 pound psycho

29:09

killer who very obviously,

29:13

if he has this, when he says there's

29:15

more than one way to skin a cat, he's

29:17

done it. I

29:20

was already thinking about, yeah, child animal

29:23

violence. It's very

29:25

obvious to me that this guy has

29:27

other people's skin that he

29:30

has worn as a mask before. Like

29:32

he's a psycho and what is he doing? Yeah,

29:34

he's saying you should kill your

29:36

political enemies is one thing, but really he's

29:38

saying he hates America. He

29:41

hates when people use their

29:44

free speech, First Amendment rights

29:46

to get their point across.

29:48

Yeah, they're gonna get arrested.

29:51

They're gonna get arrested, they're blocking

29:53

traffic. They're gonna get at least

29:55

a jay walking ticket. They're gonna

29:57

get cited. We all know what's

29:59

happening. There's people

30:01

standing out front of Disneyland

30:03

with swastikas and the ACLU

30:05

is like, yeah, that's

30:08

their right to protest. The

30:10

demon ACLU is more consistent

30:12

in their defense of the

30:14

First Amendment than Nazi cows

30:17

like Tom Cotton. Yeah.

30:19

Whose name isn't racist, but feels

30:21

racist. It does feel deeply in

30:24

the same way that it feels

30:26

like he probably bought some of

30:28

Blake Masters skin collection

30:31

on eBay to add to his zone.

30:33

It does feel that way. I'm not

30:35

saying it happened, like feels that way.

30:37

My guy isn't even like cancel them.

30:40

Don't not even cancel the protesters. He's

30:42

saying kill the protesters. Drown the protesters.

30:45

He told people on live

30:47

TV to kill protesters and

30:50

nobody aired. And here's

30:53

why I think it matters. Look, if

30:55

I wanted to, every day we could talk about

30:58

the possible VPs or whatever. I'm trying not to

31:00

do that. Although I think that it is a

31:02

deeply important choice. Donald Trump totally

31:05

could just pick someone like a Tim Scott who

31:07

it won't matter that he's the VP or whatever. I mean,

31:09

it maybe has an effect on the election, but then he'll

31:11

just go off to his office and you literally won't hear

31:14

from him for four years. And

31:16

if Donald Trump does the horrible things that

31:18

he plans to do, Tim Scott will just,

31:20

yeah, whatever. Okay. Tom

31:25

Cotton would potentially be different. He would

31:27

not just be a rubber stamp on

31:29

the worst excesses of the Trump administration.

31:32

He would be gasoline on the

31:34

fire. This guy wants violence against

31:36

protesters. This is the guy that back in 2020,

31:38

when there were the social

31:40

justice protests, wrote an op-ed saying

31:42

send in the troops, deploy the

31:45

military. He wants to

31:47

crush dissent. He's not willing to

31:49

crush dissent. He wants to crush

31:51

dissent. Again, he can't stand up

31:53

without putting his trapper keeper in

31:55

front of him when he thinks

31:57

about crushing people exercising their First

31:59

Amendment rights. Right. Thank you

32:01

for revealing yours. You're just supposed to tuck it

32:03

up. You're a waste man. Anyways, but like, I

32:07

wish I could focus on other words. Oh, Lindsey

32:10

Graham's of the world, the Tom Cotton of the

32:12

world. And weird that like, I mean, I just kind

32:14

of watched too many teen movies growing up, but like

32:16

you guys, you're the dorks. They're

32:19

the dorks. You're the nerds. Like, unfortunately,

32:22

you guys, it's like, but

32:24

they're really the school shooter. Like

32:26

that's Tom Cotton. He just

32:28

feels it's more efficient to

32:31

become a senator so he

32:33

can sanction thousands of shootings.

32:36

If, you know, rather than

32:38

doing it like, I mean, he was

32:40

a soldier, but Jesus, he's like, he's

32:42

like the scariest kind. He's

32:44

like the secret, like, I don't forget

32:46

that. Like there was a movie, like

32:49

he's like the guy that you realize

32:51

is in like some terrible secret society

32:53

that is hell bent on like establishing

32:55

the fourth Reich. Like that is Tom

32:57

Cotton. Yeah, he's just hiding

32:59

in the Ozarks. And it

33:01

means he's honestly the perfect choice. He's

33:03

a Stephen Miller type. He's

33:06

not just like there's tons of Republicans

33:08

that will not make a peak peep

33:10

when he Trump violates people's rights and

33:12

all that stuff. But these are people

33:14

that they have some sort of childhood

33:16

trauma where a girl laughed at them

33:18

or something. They had just gotten out

33:20

of the pool and they got their

33:22

we we got laughed at. And they

33:25

have just wanted people to burn ever

33:27

since they have that as you alluded

33:29

to that energy of like the school

33:31

shooter. And

33:33

unfortunately, they might have a lot of

33:35

power very soon. Okay, let's jump to

33:37

one more story to close out this

33:39

section. Clarence Thomas did what he did

33:42

best other than being utterly

33:44

corrupt. No, he gave a horrible

33:46

reasoning on an absurd opinion on

33:49

a terrible ruling by the Supreme Court.

33:51

So the Supreme Court ruled yesterday that

33:53

South Carolina Republicans did not in fact

33:55

engage in racial gerrymandering when they redrew

33:57

the map of the state's first congestion

34:00

district. Basically, they said there was

34:02

no evidence that they were

34:04

motivated by racial bias when they took

34:06

30,000 predominantly black residents

34:09

from the first district, the

34:11

district that represented Nancy Mace

34:13

represents and then just threw them into another

34:15

district. So that they would

34:17

have a better chance of winning in that race.

34:20

Averantly arguing that's not racial bias,

34:23

that's just political bias. And

34:25

thus, honestly, obviously that should be allowed. It

34:27

seems crazy to me, but here

34:29

is what Clarence Thomas had to say

34:31

about this. He doesn't just think that they were

34:34

fine to do this here. He

34:36

doesn't think this is something the

34:38

court should ever consider. So

34:40

in my view, the court has no power

34:42

to decide these types of claims. The

34:45

Supreme is literally in their name. Does

34:47

he know where he works? Drawing

34:49

political districts is a task for

34:51

politicians, not federal judges. There are

34:53

no judicially manageable standards for resolving

34:55

claims about districting. And regardless, the

34:58

Constitution commits those claims exclusively

35:00

to the political branches. The court's insistence

35:02

on adjudicating these claims has led it

35:04

to develop doctrines that indulge

35:06

in race-based reasoning inimical to

35:08

the Constitution. So the

35:11

fact that the Republicans were using race-based

35:13

thinking to give themselves the white electorate

35:16

that they want to protect and incumbent, that's

35:19

okay, that's fine. It should be

35:21

the people whose jobs depend on

35:23

the maps that decide on the maps, not

35:25

the court. And that is what he believes.

35:27

By the way, he goes on to effectively

35:30

demonize Brown v. Board of Education, which perhaps we

35:33

will turn to. But Brett, what do you make of this?

35:36

I mean, yeah, we all know, Clarence,

35:38

that, sorry, your

35:41

eminence, that, yeah, the Supreme Court,

35:43

I disagree with John's characterization, just because

35:48

it has the term supreme in the

35:51

title, that it gets to make any

35:53

decision it wants and weigh in

35:55

on all kinds of things. It is only the top,

35:58

and that's just what the Supreme Court. before

36:00

they make their decision, they decide whether they're

36:02

allowed to decide that decision based

36:04

on whether the other people have standing

36:07

or whether this is a constitutional question

36:09

at all. But what my key

36:12

thing is, is who's going to do

36:14

it? It

36:17

seems wildly insane to

36:20

assert that it makes

36:23

sense for the politicians to decide

36:25

their districts,

36:28

it doesn't make any sense,

36:30

none of it makes sense. And

36:34

the effect of it is detrimental

36:36

to democracy as the founders themselves,

36:38

they had a lot on their

36:41

plate when they were deciding how to

36:43

set up the way things work. And

36:46

some forms of corruption were

36:48

basically the seeds were

36:50

there, but they hadn't been invented yet.

36:54

This is one of those things

36:56

that got invented later that we

36:58

need to fix gerrymandering, it's the

37:00

way around it. Now, I understand

37:02

generally the somatic concerns of should

37:05

race factor into a form of discrimination

37:07

or an action by the state? And

37:10

the answer in many cases is no,

37:12

it should not. But

37:14

as we're going to get into with Brown versus

37:16

Board, that was a unanimous decision where

37:19

they said you are creating a

37:21

situation where people are being discriminated

37:23

against based on who they are.

37:26

And the lone dissenter in even

37:28

the separate but equal decision, knew

37:31

what it was, we can't have these

37:34

kinds of discriminations in America. Yeah,

37:37

look, the reason that he has

37:40

taken this position is because while both parties

37:43

engage in opportunistic

37:46

gerrymandering on a

37:48

macro level, it is not equal.

37:51

And when you log the states and you look

37:53

at the percentage of congressional

37:56

districts or state house districts

37:58

or whatever that go to. to the

38:00

Republicans and what their share of the actual vote

38:03

is. It is so wildly out of step.

38:05

It mirrors, in effect, how they don't

38:07

need to be that popular across America

38:09

and still regularly could win the Electoral College.

38:12

Because those things serve to

38:14

protect Republican interests, Clarence Thomas,

38:17

who is not truly a legal being, he's

38:19

a political being, is okay with it. If

38:22

that flipped, then they would be against it

38:24

and maybe we would have reform. And

38:26

I would like to think that if it flipped, the

38:28

Democrats would still be willing to

38:30

be consistent on it. And if

38:32

not, then the Supreme Court again

38:34

should step in. You should have people

38:37

whose future employment, their money, their

38:39

access to power is not based

38:41

on manipulating the electorate. And

38:44

it's just super convenient that that's the

38:46

position that Clarence Thomas takes. Right, the

38:48

specific, there's final point for you. Yeah,

38:50

there's things we can't have in America.

38:53

We can't have situations that happen all the

38:55

time. We can't have a situation where Mary

38:58

Mandarin is so bad that even though

39:01

more people vote for,

39:03

say, Democrats in a state, there

39:05

end up being more Republican representatives

39:07

to the point of a supermajority.

39:09

That has happened in America. That

39:12

happens all the time and it

39:14

flips vice versa. But no one's

39:16

going to unilaterally disarm

39:18

in this system, except Andrew Cuomo,

39:20

when it's going to hurt

39:22

them in the long run and potentially it's

39:25

going to be the Democrats who do it. And

39:28

the Republicans aren't going to do it because they

39:30

did the Mitch McConnell thing with the Supreme Court

39:33

nominations. It's just really bad.

39:35

And these guys are going to take advantage of it

39:37

until it ends up ruining

39:39

everything. And

39:41

again, Brown vs. Board was unanimous. It

39:43

just wasn't enough people on the Supreme Court.

39:46

Everybody said that that was the right

39:48

decision to make. We're

39:51

going to take a short break. More to come after this. OK,

39:59

I don't know what. And I wanna get

40:01

to both of these, so let's jump

40:03

into this. Lauren Boebert isn't quite clever

40:05

enough to make the point she wants

40:07

on social media without opening herself up

40:09

to obvious, predictable, and accurate mockery. She's

40:12

also not clever enough to know when

40:14

to just accept the mockery and let

40:16

it lie. And so she's doubling

40:18

down in a way that I think makes her look

40:20

even worse. So we'd already reported

40:22

yesterday that she's taking credit for an

40:24

infrastructure project that was funded by a

40:26

bill that she voted against. She's one

40:28

of those Republicans, you know the type.

40:31

So that tweet was responded to

40:33

by Secretary Pete Buttigieg, who said,

40:35

Congresswoman, in what way do you believe

40:37

that your support helped this project? We

40:39

chose it because it's a good project

40:41

and funded it using President Biden's infrastructure

40:44

package, which you voted against. Which, look, I

40:46

don't even really like Pete Buttigieg, I'm not

40:49

the biggest supporter of him, but there's nothing

40:51

he said that is wrong there. And

40:54

so she needs to respond, but because

40:56

there's no factual inaccuracy, she has

40:58

to go low. Really, really

41:00

low and really, really gross and

41:02

really, really classless. She says this,

41:05

Mayor Pete, maybe you were out chest

41:08

feeding and missed my letter, but I

41:10

personally wrote you about this in June

41:12

2022. Only

41:14

13 rhinos in the house voted for

41:17

your Green New Deal non-infrastructure bill you're

41:19

touting that wastes hundreds of millions on

41:21

climate change instead of roads and bridges.

41:24

On climate change means like energy infrastructure and

41:26

charging infrastructure and all this stuff that produces

41:28

jobs, gets us ready for. Infrastructure grants

41:31

have been doled out by administrations on

41:33

both sides for decades who don't act

41:35

like you're the sole provider of this

41:37

funding. Well, first of all, in

41:40

Pete Buttigieg's defense or Joe Biden's defense,

41:43

Infrastructure Week became a joke

41:45

during the Trump administration because they kept saying they

41:47

were gonna have it, but they refused to. So

41:49

maybe technically they've been doled out by administrations for

41:51

decades. There was a bit of a gap there

41:54

for four years. Should bother you

41:56

more since you love infrastructure so much,

41:58

Congresswoman. 13 rhinos voted

42:00

for it, yeah, and more than 13 are

42:03

now claiming credit because they're liars who want

42:05

the cred but don't wanna actually provide the

42:07

funding. And saying that it wastes

42:09

hundreds of millions on climate change, first of all, identify

42:11

what the funding is actually going to. And if you

42:13

think that the whole thing is a big waste of

42:15

money, that's fine, but don't try to

42:17

claim credit for it because again, you tried

42:19

to stop it. But I wanna focus briefly

42:21

and get your thoughts on this. Maybe you

42:24

were out test feeding. That's just the deeply

42:26

homophobic sort of stuff that a petty little

42:28

mean girl like Lauren Bovard is gonna do.

42:30

He had a kid, people

42:33

are judged it. Him and his partner

42:35

had a kid, and he took time off

42:38

to be with this kid. So

42:40

screw him for the rest of time.

42:42

It actually gets worse when you learn

42:44

another detail and we'll get to that,

42:46

but what do you make of it?

42:48

Didn't she go to Trump's trial instead

42:51

of her kid's graduation? I know rather

42:53

than her kid's trial. Her kid's

42:55

trial, that's what it was. Her

42:57

kid was on trial. Rather than

42:59

be there to defend her flesh

43:01

and blood as she gave a

43:03

pound of flesh to Donald Trump.

43:06

Come on, you're not a family woman.

43:08

You're not a good person. What

43:11

do you expect Pete Buttigieg to do? Be like,

43:14

wow, she's an idiot, but that's

43:17

right, I'm gay. I'll

43:20

see myself out. Yeah,

43:23

I forgot. He can't choose

43:25

to not be gay, but you can

43:27

choose not to be stupid. Figure it

43:29

out and not tweet that thing. Here's

43:32

the detail that makes it even worse. Pete

43:35

Buttigieg's partner says, our two month old son

43:37

was on a ventilator at the Children's Hospital

43:39

when you attacked my husband for being with

43:41

his family. I watched him take calls and

43:43

zooms from our hospital room all day managing

43:46

crisis after crisis while our son's heart monitor

43:48

beeped in the background. As

43:52

someone with a young child who thankfully has never experienced

43:54

any sort of medical crisis like that, you're

43:57

mocking them in your

43:59

homophobic. classless way, you little

44:02

piece of congressional trash. Literally

44:04

with a crisis like that. You

44:06

know, multiple kids. She pretends

44:08

to care about families and she mocks

44:11

him for loving his. She

44:13

is garbage. She should have been my garbage

44:15

first of the day I messed up. Yeah,

44:17

your family is totally all about

44:19

family values when your ex husband got

44:21

arrested and convicted for

44:23

sure. He basically whipped out as we

44:26

were in front of a teen. And

44:28

then you're not at home taking care of your

44:30

kids. You're out at the theater getting your beetle

44:33

juiced. Yeah,

44:39

I will quickly say I don't have a conversation about

44:41

it. I will quickly say I'm

44:43

not necessarily as critical of her for not going

44:45

to the court thing. He's

44:47

now of age. If

44:49

they've had a big falling out, it is possible

44:52

that she has. There are families that have tried

44:54

to get through to a person many, many times

44:56

at a certain point. I'm just

44:58

saying I don't know the family dynamics there. That's not

45:00

the part I'm going to criticize. I'm going to criticize.

45:02

Neither does she. Okay, yeah,

45:04

yeah, that's true. She's opening herself up to it because

45:06

she's talking about other people's families. I get that. You're

45:09

not. That's just the context. I'm just pointing out the hypocrisy.

45:11

I don't even like, I don't

45:14

think I'm making an awesome killer point about

45:16

her. I'm just like revealing how ridiculous her

45:18

points are. Do you think

45:20

that the upcoming Beetlejuice sequel loves that

45:22

she put Beetlejuice back in the national

45:24

conversation so much? I wonder. Anyway,

45:27

I'm very excited for it. The trailer came out yesterday and

45:29

it looks good. Okay, let's jump into this. You're

45:31

the boy, Dennis. I'm killing all you

45:33

guys about that. Jilla.

45:36

Jilla, you're on the whole community. You

45:38

want to know? I have you on

45:41

camera. I have you on camera. You're

45:43

a beauty girl. You're

45:45

a beauty girl. You're a beauty girl. You're a

45:47

beauty girl. You're a beauty girl. That's

45:49

a charm. You expect at a protest or

45:52

in this case a walk out from a

45:55

graduation that there might be harsh words

45:58

being thrown around. expect

46:00

the public safety officer to tell a

46:02

group of protesters, I

46:04

want to kill all of you while a

46:06

camera is rolling in his face. But

46:10

that is indeed what happened. This

46:12

was at the College of Staten Island, there was a walk

46:14

out from the graduation to show solidarity for

46:17

Palestinians. Sergeant Donald Gerard,

46:19

the guy in the video, sees that he

46:22

is being filmed and tells them

46:24

he wants them all to be,

46:26

he's literally there to keep the peace and

46:28

to stop violence, keep everyone safe. And

46:31

he tells one group of people, I

46:33

support all of you dying. It's

46:35

not the direction I would go in, I know that

46:37

these situations get heated. I've never

46:39

served as a public safety officer, but I

46:41

like to think that we should have higher

46:44

expectations for them than that. And

46:46

by the way, the Students for Justice in Palestine,

46:48

the organization, by the way, I want to give

46:50

credit to journalists have the Jamal for doing the

46:52

filming and providing the video tapes that we get

46:54

this. Just having the quote would not be nearly

46:56

as strong as seeing the video, I appreciate when

46:58

people do that. But the organization

47:01

demanded an apology from the school and

47:03

the sergeant's termination and said that they'll

47:05

be exploring all legal options available to

47:07

hold Gerard accountable for the violence against

47:09

CSI students and their families. A spokesperson

47:11

for the school did say that they

47:13

condemn the offensive language that was given

47:15

during an otherwise wonderful commencement. His

47:17

words don't reflect the values of the College

47:19

of Staten Island. And

47:22

he has been suspended following a review, what do

47:24

you think? What that guy said is one of

47:26

the most polite things anyone has said to anyone

47:28

in Staten Island. Like

47:32

stories like this. These

47:36

stories are so stupid. These

47:38

stories are so stupid. People who are

47:40

yelling at each other said mean things

47:42

to each other. It's not people. It's

47:44

the public safety officers. I'm not killing

47:47

all of you. Listen, you're

47:49

a goddamn ball. Like this

47:52

is so stupid. What do you know? Get out

47:54

of the story like this. What

47:57

do you get out of it? Expectations for people. in

48:00

positions of authority who have like the

48:02

state- You just told no violence. This

48:05

person told this guy that he supports

48:07

a genocide because he's out there

48:09

being like kick okay if you're walking out while you

48:11

go. Are you saying that we should not expect

48:14

to have higher standards for the two

48:16

sides of that conversation? We should, I've

48:18

never done this and I've never done

48:20

that. Let me solve everything then. Don't

48:23

tell him he supports genocide there and also he

48:25

should not say that he supports all of you

48:27

dying. Yeah, obviously. But I'm

48:30

not gonna be like, this is

48:32

the straw that broke the camel's back. Listen,

48:35

stop killing children

48:37

in Gaza and

48:40

anywhere. Gaza, West Bank, stop doing

48:42

it. It needs to stop now.

48:45

Everybody out there is supporting that. Oh,

48:47

let's cover this Staten Island

48:49

police officer. Oh, they're all real peaches and

48:51

gems. Oh my God, can you believe one

48:53

was rude? Like get your eye back on

48:55

the ball. Okay, there's

48:58

not one eye and there's not one ball. If

49:02

that's the standard keep your eye on the ball,

49:05

then the vast majority of the news is utterly

49:07

irrelevant because we can identify the one most important

49:09

thing and only ever talk about that, but not

49:11

how it works. You have to like, let's make

49:13

it, this is the

49:15

best thing. And you saying that we're

49:17

not allowed to have standards for an

49:19

entire region because they're generally thought of

49:22

as rude, I don't agree with. I

49:24

was telling a joke. Were

49:26

you covered of this one or were you

49:29

being a job? You got that out before

49:31

me. That's damn it. He's

49:33

got that comic timing. Anyway, somebody identified that it

49:35

must have been Mike that produced this because apparently

49:37

according to your wife, he produces blocks that make

49:39

you angry. I don't mind any game.

49:43

I don't I'm angry.