Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:01
In 2007, TV network CBS
0:03
dropped 40 kids
0:05
in the middle of the New Mexico desert as
0:07
part of a brand new reality show. These kids
0:09
would have to build their own society from scratch.
0:11
And if this sounds like Lord of the Flies
0:14
to you, well, it was meant to. We
0:16
were on this mission together. We were going to prove
0:18
to the world that we could make a better society
0:21
than adults could. I'm Josh
0:23
Gwynn, and I want to know
0:25
what this wild TV experiment was
0:27
really about. Splitscreen Kid
0:30
Nation, a six part podcast
0:32
from CBC, available now.
0:37
Frequency Podcast Network, stories
0:39
that matter, podcasts that resonate. I
0:43
often say that I love this job.
0:46
It's the best job I've ever had, and I
0:48
would have no problem doing it
0:50
until I die. Which
0:53
I might have to. And
0:55
you might have to do yours till you die, too.
0:59
The concept of retiring at 65 to
1:01
live out our years in
1:03
leisure and relaxation, that's
1:05
an option afforded to fewer and fewer
1:08
people. And among those just
1:10
starting out in their working lives, people
1:12
who are taking on debt to afford
1:14
everything or barely keeping their heads above
1:16
water, saving anything for
1:18
retirement can feel like
1:21
a total impossibility. So
1:24
is it? It's this week
1:27
on In This Economy. Freedom
1:45
55. There are
1:47
a lot of things about that classic
1:49
80s commercial that did not age well.
1:53
Primarily, the fact that for
1:55
most of the kids who happened to watch it
1:57
on TV back in the day, it's turned
2:00
out to be a big lie.
2:06
Many of us who are now
2:08
approaching that apocryphal age of 55
2:11
would grow up to worry that
2:13
not only would they not be
2:15
able to retire by 55 but,
2:18
in this economy, are
2:20
worried we might not be able
2:22
to retire at all. I'm
2:30
Jordan Heath-Rollings and you are listening
2:32
to In This Economy, where
2:34
we help you understand the
2:36
systems that create your money problems, from
2:39
grocery bills to pension plans
2:42
to never stopping working until
2:44
you die and everything in
2:46
between. In
2:48
each episode, we hear from a
2:50
listener who is facing a financial
2:52
challenge and then I talk to
2:55
an expert who can explain the
2:57
factors causing that problem and offer,
2:59
if not perfect, solutions than
3:01
pivots or options, things you can
3:04
do even in
3:06
this economy. A
3:10
listener named Brian recently wrote in with
3:12
a question that is probably on a
3:14
lot of people's minds. Here's
3:17
what he said. Hello!
3:21
Love the podcast. At 44
3:23
and as either the youngest Gen X
3:25
or the oldest Millennial, depending on the
3:28
source, I've been almost
3:30
subconsciously paying more attention to
3:33
the doom and gloom articles
3:35
regarding retirement in Canada. Is
3:38
it even possible to retire and what
3:40
does an alternative retirement even look like?
3:47
Brian's email included a link to a
3:49
Daily Hive article that cites a Reddit
3:51
thread where someone posed
3:53
the question... 65.
4:01
A lot of folks on that thread wade
4:04
in with what I would
4:06
call bleak responses. 65.
4:10
I'll be lucky if I can retire at 95. I'm
4:13
42. At my current
4:15
trajectory, I can expect to retire comfortably at
4:17
age 275. I
4:21
swear, I'm gonna work until 12 p.m.
4:23
on the date of my funeral. Retirement
4:25
is now only a thing for the rich. So,
4:29
we wanted to find out more about
4:32
how attitudes towards retirement have been changing
4:34
over the years. And
4:36
if, rather than either
4:39
retire or not
4:41
ever retire, there might
4:43
be a better way. So
4:46
we reached out to Alyssa Briarly.
4:49
She is the executive director of
4:52
the National Institute on Aging at
4:54
Toronto Metropolitan University. She
4:56
co-authored their annual report, Perspectives
4:59
on Growing Older in Canada.
5:03
Alyssa, I will be blunt off the top.
5:06
Are millennial Canadians gonna be able to
5:08
retire, like most of them even? I
5:12
think so. I mean, it's something that
5:14
I think about myself because I fall
5:16
into that age cohort as
5:18
well. I think your listener question identified themselves
5:21
as a 44-year-old, and that's
5:23
the age that I am at right now. So I'm thinking
5:25
about these things myself. But yes,
5:27
I think retirement is absolutely in the
5:29
cards for people. They just need to
5:31
be thoughtful and plan for it. It's
5:34
a major financial undertaking and a shift
5:36
into a different phase of life. So
5:38
it just requires careful planning. What
5:40
will that retirement look like maybe
5:42
compared to what our
5:44
parents or their parents were used to since
5:47
the rise of the unions, I guess, when
5:49
it seemed to be like 65 and you're
5:51
good and maybe even if you work hard
5:53
55 and you're off to the golf
5:55
course? I think certainly the
5:57
concept of retirement has evolved.
6:00
and is continuing to
6:02
evolve significantly. The
6:04
traditional concept of retirement, where you get
6:06
to age 65 and go sip cocktails
6:08
on the beach is not
6:11
really realistic for people. We live
6:13
too long for that, frankly. The average life expectancy
6:15
is 79 for men and
6:18
close to 84 for women. So
6:20
it's not terribly surprising, given
6:22
the major changes to longevity that
6:25
we've seen over the last century
6:27
that our views on retirement are
6:29
evolving. I think at
6:31
a high level, it doesn't look like
6:33
what it looked like for our parents necessarily,
6:36
but it's also the case that that's
6:38
not necessarily what people want anymore. A
6:40
lot of people, according to Stats Canada,
6:42
want to continue doing some kind of
6:45
work well beyond the traditional retirement age.
6:47
And the majority of people planning to
6:50
retire would continue working longer if they
6:52
could reduce their hours and their stress.
6:55
So when you talk to Canadians, what
6:57
are the concerns they have as they
6:59
age and look towards retirement? Just saying
7:02
I can't afford it is a very
7:04
broad statement. What are they really worried
7:06
about? So the major concerns that Canadians
7:08
have as they age and they look to
7:10
retirement, they are primarily financial in nature. So
7:13
in particular, we heard that Canadians
7:16
are concerned about the impact of
7:18
inflation, the fear of running
7:20
out of money in retirement, as
7:22
well as the cost of care that they might
7:24
need as they age, including long-term care. And I
7:26
can break all that down a little bit if
7:29
it's helpful. Sure. In our survey,
7:31
we asked Canadians over 50 who
7:33
haven't yet retired if they felt financially
7:35
prepared to retire when they want to.
7:38
And only 35% of working Canadians
7:40
50 and over who intend to retire
7:42
said that they could afford to do so at
7:44
their desired time. 39%
7:47
said that they're not in the financial position to do so.
7:50
And 26% said that they were unsure of
7:52
whether they could afford to retire at their
7:54
desired time. So I'll caveat
7:56
all of that by saying that we
7:58
don't know why. people feel that way. It could
8:01
be that they have money, but they're not sure if
8:03
they have enough. It could be
8:06
that they have money, but they're more aware
8:08
of and concerned about the cost of aging.
8:10
It could be that they aren't
8:12
sure how to manage their money when they do
8:14
retire. So just on that note, for
8:17
people who have defined benefit pension plans,
8:19
they don't have to worry about managing
8:21
their money in retirement because the pension plan
8:23
does that for them and guarantees
8:26
an income for life. But that's
8:28
not the case for people with
8:30
retirement savings in other types of
8:32
vehicles like defined contribution pension plans
8:34
or RSPs or TFSAs. So it's
8:37
a little bit more precarious for those folks in
8:39
terms of managing their money. But
8:41
in addition to asking that
8:43
sort of broad question, we also
8:45
identified nine future financial
8:48
concerns and asked Canadians 50 and
8:51
over to identify which ones were
8:53
of concern to them when they thought about their future.
8:56
And not surprisingly, given the economic trends
8:58
in recent years, inflation is a top
9:00
concern for people with the rising cost
9:03
of living named as the top concern,
9:05
followed by running out of money. And
9:08
then other issues that were identified include possible
9:11
reduction in government benefits and
9:14
not being able to afford major medical
9:16
or long-term care expenses. One
9:18
of the things you mentioned was their
9:21
money not lasting. This is a question
9:23
that I've got myself, which is given
9:25
the volatility that we've seen in the
9:28
economy the past few years, how do
9:30
you look at how much you'll need
9:32
to save for retirement and
9:34
trust it when we see the
9:37
cost of everything, especially housing,
9:39
can skyrocket so quickly? Yeah,
9:41
that's a great question. And I think
9:44
just at a high level when people
9:46
are planning for retirement, they need to
9:48
keep in mind that they're
9:50
living longer lives. They're in
9:52
an environment of less secure
9:55
retirement income from workplace
9:57
pension plans. They're lower
9:59
anticipated. financial market returns
10:01
and higher projected costs for things
10:04
like health care and caregiving support.
10:06
So there really is a lot to
10:08
think about. We're often asked if
10:10
there's sort of a number or a target
10:12
or a sort of a magic number. I
10:15
was going to ask you that myself. Yes, it's a very
10:17
common question that people need to
10:20
retire comfortably and unfortunately, you
10:22
know, there really isn't a magic number. People
10:24
need to understand what their expenses are and prepare
10:27
for those costs. So maybe I'll talk a little
10:29
bit about that if it's helpful. Yeah. So
10:32
just off the top, only about a
10:34
third of working Canadians have some form
10:36
of workplace pension coverage. And we
10:39
do have Canada's retirement income system,
10:41
which provides all older Canadians with
10:43
a base level of retirement income.
10:46
But for most people, it doesn't provide
10:48
enough money to fully cover living expenses
10:51
and unexpected costs. So that's something that's
10:53
really important for people to keep in
10:55
mind. Mm-hmm. What your expenses
10:57
will look like really depends
10:59
on a number of different factors that
11:01
are all really quite personal to the
11:03
individual. So, you know, what
11:05
do you want your life to be like when you retire?
11:07
What does comfortable mean to you? Where do
11:09
you live? What is your health status?
11:12
Do you have a solid network of friends and
11:14
family who can help you out if you need
11:16
help? You know, what assets do you
11:18
have? Do you own a home? So
11:21
it's really important for people to understand what
11:23
their expenses might look like when they retire. And
11:25
in addition, there's a couple of other things to
11:27
keep in mind. First of
11:30
all, your expenses today may not
11:32
necessarily be your expenses tomorrow. Right.
11:35
And there's also a common misperception out
11:37
there that when you're looking at financing
11:39
your retirement, you'll spend most of your
11:41
money upfront on things like traveling and
11:43
living your best life. But
11:45
the reality is that the cost of
11:47
aging can be significant and those costs
11:49
tend to increase as we age as
11:51
people need more care and support. So,
11:55
you Know, many people think that their expenses will
11:57
go down when they retire because they don't. A
12:00
mortgage which is is one thing to
12:03
think about but as people a health
12:05
care expenses and to increase this can
12:07
include a no health insurance premium that
12:09
people will third to have to pay
12:12
out of pocket after they retire because
12:14
they don't have an employer paying for
12:16
that are deductible copayments for health expenses,
12:19
prescription drugs, central vision, long term care,
12:21
etc. Mind. When. It comes
12:23
to care traditionally and have seen
12:25
today is adult children who are
12:27
providing the majority of chair at
12:29
home for Canadian. The three out
12:31
of every four hours of care
12:33
is being done by people that
12:35
all children. So if you
12:38
don't have children, are you have a smaller family
12:40
or your family doesn't live close to you? you
12:42
may not be able to rely on that anti
12:44
terror and have to pay for that out of
12:46
pocket. And. The average cost
12:49
of private and home care services can
12:51
range anywhere from a thousand dollars to
12:53
thirty five hundred dollars per month. But.
12:56
Forty nine percent of Canadians who are forty
12:58
five years and older believe that the in
13:00
home care for themselves or a loved one
13:03
would cost less than eleven hundred dollars a
13:05
month has a huge disconnect between what people
13:07
to actual care costs are and what they
13:10
think they will be. In addition
13:12
to the care needs as people age. They
13:14
might need assistance and support with
13:16
what we call activities of daily
13:18
living. So things like snow removal,
13:20
gardening, and cleaning. The author needs
13:23
to think about how maintenance and
13:25
renovation. Because we know that
13:27
virtually all Canadians want to eat in
13:29
their homes as opposed to move into
13:32
institutional care settings. But in order for
13:34
that to be a reality, people need
13:36
a plan for expenses, serenity, their homes
13:39
and and make modifications for accessibility and
13:41
to a comedy eating in place. And.
13:44
then going back to housing which is where
13:46
i started people think expenses go down when
13:48
you retire because they sort of assume that
13:50
many people no longer have a mortgage but
13:52
if you're a renter that assumption go at
13:54
the window was entirely if you're a renter
13:57
housing will be one of your biggest costs
13:59
and i imagine your listeners are likely quite
14:01
attuned to the high cost of rental housing
14:03
in Canada with our record low
14:05
vacancy rates and record high rents. So
14:08
let me ask you this then because, and
14:10
I swear I'm not trying to be dour
14:12
here, but you've not made retirement sound like
14:15
living my best life traveling the world. Is
14:18
how we think about retirement changing?
14:20
You kind of touched on this
14:22
a little bit off the top,
14:24
but if we're looking at saving
14:27
for retirement and I'm listening
14:29
to you and taking into consideration all
14:31
of those things, I'm not actually
14:33
thinking that I'm going to be lying on
14:35
a beach somewhere sipping a margarita. I'm going
14:37
to be worried about affording my house, affording
14:39
my medical care. Why would
14:41
I want to retire? That's
14:45
a great question. I
14:47
certainly don't mean to paint an
14:50
impossible picture of retirement for
14:52
people, but I do think it
14:55
is important that people understand and
14:57
are realistic about what
14:59
the cost of getting older entails so
15:01
that they can plan for them and
15:04
enable the kind of retirement that they
15:06
want to have. A lot of people
15:09
find themselves thinking about these
15:11
things later than they should be. So
15:13
it's really important that people start thinking about
15:15
and planning for retirement sooner
15:17
rather than later if that's what they want
15:19
to do. So doing things like
15:21
taking steps to improve their financial
15:24
literacy and educate themselves, learn
15:26
and read and think about what their expenses
15:29
will be while they're older and not
15:31
make assumptions about what that looks like.
15:33
But as I was saying earlier,
15:36
to your point, our concept of retirement
15:38
has changed over the years. There are a lot
15:41
of folks who want to
15:43
continue doing some kind of work
15:45
well beyond the traditional retirement age
15:48
if they could reduce their hours
15:50
and their stress. Some
15:52
of the reasons why they're working
15:54
longer are due to financial need,
15:56
unfortunately. And also some people don't
15:58
have adequate retirement. The Bank or
16:00
they probably want to supplement their retirement
16:03
income and we think you know under
16:05
the circumstances that this trend it is
16:07
likely to increase given what we've seen
16:09
in the results of our annual survey.
16:11
But there is also. A segment of
16:13
the population of older adults who wants
16:16
to continue working because they're healthier and.
16:18
More. Active and me into a contributing
16:20
and the enjoy the social interaction and
16:22
the routine of working and we've also
16:24
from new phone or the biggest structural
16:26
barriers to working later in life which
16:29
is the elimination of mandatory retirement ages
16:31
back in the nineties. So I think
16:33
it really depends on you know if
16:35
it's a very personal decision, what do
16:38
you want your life to be like
16:40
when you're when you're answering you know
16:42
your later years and and for many
16:44
people they want to traditional retirement from
16:47
any full they want. To continue working.
16:58
Not a sudden Tv network Cbs dropped
17:00
forty kids in the middle of the
17:03
New Mexico desert part of a brand
17:05
new reality show. Beautiful. have to do
17:07
their own society from scratch and if
17:09
this sounds good, lord of the Five
17:11
to you. Well, it was meant. You
17:14
were on this mission Together, we were going and
17:16
free to the world that we could make a
17:18
better society than adults turn. I'm just
17:20
going and I want to
17:22
know what does Wilde Keys
17:25
dammit was really about split
17:27
screen kid and a six
17:29
pack part as from Cbc
17:31
available now. I
17:37
know you probably won't have a concrete answer for
17:39
this. I think he even a personal financial advisor
17:41
may not have much to say to somebody in
17:43
this predicament, but. There. Are probably
17:45
people listening to this right now
17:47
and thinking I would love to
17:49
invest in my future self? but
17:52
my present cells has to eat
17:54
and. how should i think
17:56
about retirement in that context when we're in
17:58
the middle of an afford it crisis
18:00
and people are worried about next
18:03
month's rent or what happens when
18:05
the lease runs out and can't
18:07
really afford to spare that
18:09
much money for an RRSP or something else.
18:13
Yeah it's a great question. I'm
18:15
not sure that I have a good answer for that
18:17
to be honest. I can say that what you've described
18:19
is reflected in the results of our
18:21
annual survey as well. We did see
18:23
clearly that Canadians are facing challenges when
18:26
it comes to saving for their retirement
18:28
and one of the things that has
18:30
a major impact on that is income
18:32
adequacy. So we had three-quarters
18:34
of Canadians over 50 who took our survey
18:36
reported that their income is enough for them
18:39
in 2023 but only one-third reported that their
18:43
income is enough and at a level that they could
18:45
save from it and 39% said that
18:48
it is just enough to avoid major problems
18:51
and one in four Canadians over 50 said that
18:53
their income is not enough for them so that
18:55
they're either financially stretched or they're having a hard
18:57
time. So income adequacy
19:00
is a real challenge to your point in
19:02
the here and now needing to make ends
19:04
meet but also wanting to save for retirement.
19:06
So when we hear that only
19:08
you know a third of Canadians can save
19:10
with their current income it is understandable that
19:12
people are worried about financing their retirement and
19:15
we also know that this is particularly acute
19:17
and there's more financial vulnerability
19:19
among certain population groups in
19:21
particular those who have fair
19:23
or poor health. What are some
19:25
other ways people could think about this or could
19:27
be doing this? What are differing
19:30
takes on what retirement might look like
19:32
in the future of presuming to
19:35
your point that life expectancy continues to
19:37
go up? Like 65 is not
19:40
that old now. Yeah
19:42
absolutely it is not that old as I
19:45
get closer to it every year. I
19:47
have the same reaction myself. I
19:49
mean I think that there is you know the
19:52
sort of traditional pathway of
19:54
learning, earning
19:56
and retiring I think in
20:00
the future, again, just what
20:02
I was saying earlier about people's interests
20:05
in wanting to stay
20:07
attached to the workforce in many cases out
20:09
of out of interest and a desire to
20:11
contribute and in some cases out of financial
20:13
need. I think what this
20:15
looks like is really disrupting
20:18
the traditional sort of linear
20:20
pathway for our later years,
20:23
moving away from like I said, learning,
20:25
earning, retiring to, you know,
20:27
learning, earning, learning some more,
20:30
earning some more, maybe taking a break,
20:32
go back to work, so long
20:35
as your health allows you to do that. So
20:37
certainly, you know, more flexibility
20:39
and just a real openness
20:41
to a much
20:43
more nonlinear career path. There
20:46
are certainly some challenges to this, of course,
20:49
workplaces aren't necessarily providing older
20:51
Canadians with the opportunities that
20:53
they're looking for.
20:56
Many workplaces default to
20:58
full-time employment and don't
21:00
make part-time opportunities available.
21:02
Workplaces don't often sort of accommodate
21:04
people downshifting in their career, so moving
21:06
from a more sort of senior management
21:08
role to something less senior
21:11
and part-time. But it's
21:13
really important that workplaces start to
21:15
think about how to accommodate this
21:17
new reality because people want it and
21:19
older Canadians are looking for those opportunities.
21:22
And one thing that a lot of
21:24
people forget often is that older adults
21:26
are one of the biggest cohorts of
21:28
caregivers in the country. Many older adults
21:30
are caregivers for aging parents, spouses,
21:33
siblings, or friends, so they need the kind
21:35
of flexibility that many employers aren't willing to
21:37
offer in order to stay in the labor
21:40
force for very practical reasons as well as
21:42
sort of aligning with their interests. Last
21:45
question then, is this something that we
21:47
should expect to see a policy shift
21:49
on in the coming years as the
21:51
demographics kind of make this impossible to
21:53
ignore for politicians? I
21:56
think so. I certainly think that
21:58
there is room for policy. I
22:00
think there's also an opportunity for
22:03
employers themselves to step up here.
22:05
So, you know, certainly adapting for
22:07
greater age inclusion, thinking about
22:09
age in the same way that they
22:11
think about other areas of discrimination and
22:14
take it seriously as a protected ground
22:16
of discrimination. It really does seem to
22:18
be kind of the last socially acceptable
22:20
form of discrimination. Employers
22:23
need to promote opportunities for older workers to
22:25
return to the workforce if and
22:27
when they want to do that. So
22:29
again, that's flexibility in work arrangements, whether
22:32
it's part-time or remote or
22:34
creating sort of phased retirement
22:36
programs. But the good news is,
22:38
you know, some of the things that are
22:41
required to enable this for older adults are things
22:43
that are good for a variety of people in
22:45
the workforce. Everyone wants
22:47
flexible work arrangements these days. But
22:49
we also know that there are groups who
22:51
fare particularly better with flexible and part-time opportunities.
22:54
So, you know, parents of young children, women,
22:57
persons with disabilities, people with care responsibilities,
23:00
it's a great way to make our
23:02
workplaces more inclusive generally. And I think
23:04
that's something we can all recognize the
23:06
value of in 2024. And
23:10
I think as well, you know,
23:12
there's a role for government as
23:14
well, you know, to your point
23:16
in eliminating some of the structural
23:18
barriers to ongoing labor force participation.
23:20
So looking at things like pension
23:22
eligibility criteria and the sort of
23:24
incentives that those create in terms
23:26
of moving people out of the
23:28
workforce entirely, can we look at
23:31
ways of facilitating, you know, people
23:33
to take a part-time pension while
23:35
working part-time or doing more of
23:37
a phased retirement? So
23:39
I certainly think, you know, there's lots of opportunities
23:41
there. And I'm hopeful
23:43
that given sort of the
23:45
demand and the need for rethinking some
23:47
of our traditional notions of retirement that
23:49
we'll see some movement on this front.
23:54
Alyssa, thank you so much for this. My pleasure.
24:00
Alyssa Briarly is the Executive
24:02
Director of the National Institute
24:04
on Aging at Toronto Metropolitan
24:07
University. Thank you so
24:09
much to Alyssa for sharing her expert knowledge
24:11
with us. You can
24:13
find out more about the
24:15
NIA at niaaging.ca. And
24:19
thanks to Brian for writing in with a
24:21
question that sparked this episode. If
24:24
you have a money problem or just a
24:26
question about navigating this economy, we want to
24:28
hear from you. Many
24:30
of you already know this, but for those
24:32
who don't, the show relies on you
24:35
emailing us at
24:37
hello at itepod.ca
24:40
or calling us to talk about
24:42
your problem. You can
24:44
do that by leaving a voicemail at 416-935-5935. You
24:51
don't have to give us your real name, but
24:54
you do have to give us real numbers,
24:56
either the numbers you're working with on a
24:58
spreadsheet or the number where
25:00
we can actually reach you to call you
25:02
back and talk about it. Now
25:12
before we go, I have a
25:14
quick housekeeping note. We received some
25:16
feedback about our recent episode about
25:18
RRSPs that some of the information
25:20
presented was confusing and inconsistent. So
25:23
we've updated those show notes for
25:25
that episode to include a clarification
25:27
as well as a link to
25:29
more information. Thank
25:34
you so much for listening. Thank you to the
25:36
listeners who wrote in about that episode. And if
25:38
you liked this show and want us to keep
25:40
making more of it, please
25:43
share it with your friends and your enemies and
25:45
people you are indifferent to. You
25:47
can also rate and review and
25:49
follow whatever your favorite podcast
25:51
app allows you to do. I'm
25:55
your host and your executive producer, Jordan
25:57
Heath Rawlings. This episode was
25:59
written and produced by Alison Groverman and
26:01
Stephanie Phillips. The sound design was done
26:03
by Kristy Chan. Mary Juebrin
26:05
is our digital editor. Diana Kay is
26:08
our manager of business development and together
26:11
we make up the frequency podcast
26:13
network which is indeed a division
26:15
of Rogers. Thanks again for
26:17
listening and we will talk to you next
26:19
week on In This Economy. In
26:36
2007, TV network CBS dropped 40 kids in
26:38
the middle of the New Mexico desert as
26:41
part of a brand new reality show. These
26:43
kids would have to build their own society
26:45
from scratch and if this sounds like Lord
26:47
of the Flies to you, well it was
26:50
meant to. We were on this mission
26:52
together. We were gonna prove to the world
26:54
that we could make a better society than
26:56
adults could. I'm Josh Gwynne and I
26:58
want to know what this wild
27:01
TV experiment was really about. Split
27:04
Screen, Kid Nation, a six-part
27:06
podcast from CBC. Available
27:08
now.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More