Podchaser Logo
Home
Ep. 1951 - Israel STRIKES BACK Against Iran

Ep. 1951 - Israel STRIKES BACK Against Iran

Released Friday, 19th April 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Ep. 1951 - Israel STRIKES BACK Against Iran

Ep. 1951 - Israel STRIKES BACK Against Iran

Ep. 1951 - Israel STRIKES BACK Against Iran

Ep. 1951 - Israel STRIKES BACK Against Iran

Friday, 19th April 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:00

Last night, Israel finally struck back against

0:02

Iran. Of course, earlier this week, over

0:04

the weekend, Iran had struck Israel with

0:06

some 350 drones, missiles, and

0:10

Israel was expecting that it was going

0:12

to have to fire back against Iran

0:14

in some form or fashion. There were

0:16

a few different options that had been

0:18

tabled, that had been considered. One was

0:20

a full-scale attack on Iran's nuclear facilities,

0:22

for example, completely degrading their nuclear program.

0:24

Another option would have been to do

0:26

virtually nothing, which is what Joe Biden

0:28

wanted to do. Israel last night decided

0:30

on a third option. That would be

0:32

a targeted strike, limited in nature, inside

0:34

Iran, mainly to show the Iranians as

0:36

a warning. Okay, guys, if you decide

0:38

that you're going to escalate this thing, we

0:41

are going to get to you much more

0:43

than you are going to get to us.

0:45

And that is what Israel pursued last night,

0:47

which is, in fact, a useful means of

0:49

deterrence. It is probably the best available scenario

0:51

for both America and for America's allies in

0:53

the region. If Israel had gone really heavy,

0:55

there was always the possibility of serious escalation

0:57

via Hezbollah in Israel's north that could have

0:59

turned into a larger, full-blown war. Now,

1:02

would it have been more in Israel's interest

1:04

to completely destroy Iran's nuclear facility? Sure, it

1:06

also would have been a lot riskier. Right

1:08

now, the United States and Israel have been

1:10

in this very fraught negotiation over what the

1:13

United States will allow Israel to do. And

1:15

so, the Israeli government took a sort of

1:17

conciliatory middle road by

1:20

issuing this targeted strike against Iran. And

1:22

the goal, of course, was deterrence of

1:24

Iran itself directly, saying, listen, you guys

1:27

fired 350 drones, missiles, we

1:29

knocked nearly all of that down. We

1:31

basically can hit you anytime, anywhere we want.

1:33

So you guys better stand down. That

1:36

was the goal of the Israelis. And it also

1:38

offered, because it was so limited in nature, the

1:40

Iranians in off-ramp. The Iranian off-ramp would be to

1:42

deny that any of this ever happened, which, of

1:44

course, is exactly what Iran did. Iran had been

1:46

mouthing off a lot about the idea that if

1:49

Israel launched a serious strike into Iranian territory, then

1:51

Iran would up the ante with a broader retaliatory

1:53

strike, and then you would have an escalating conflict.

1:55

Israel issued a strike limited in

1:57

nature so as to allow the Iranian

1:59

government The possibility of basically denying

2:01

that anything had ever happened, and that's basically what

2:03

happened last night. Again, Israel is playing a different

2:06

game than Joe Biden is used to. Israel is

2:08

playing in an area, the Middle East, where what

2:10

you do matters a hell of a lot more

2:12

than what you say. Joe Biden has spent his

2:14

entire career in places where what you say matters

2:16

a hell of a lot more than what you

2:18

do. And he is completely unfamiliar with

2:21

the foreign policy realm where what you

2:23

do matters an awful, awful lot, which

2:25

is why reality keeps clocking Joe Biden

2:27

directly in the face. Forget

2:29

about Israel and Iran for a second. Think about the

2:31

Saudi Arabian government. When Joe Biden was a candidate for

2:33

presidency of the United States, Joe

2:36

Biden was extraordinarily critical of Mohammed bin Salman,

2:38

who was the heir apparent over in Saudi

2:40

Arabia and the de facto ruler of the

2:42

country. He was suggesting that he was

2:44

a mass human rights violator, that he had

2:46

killed Hashagi, Jamal Hashagi, who

2:48

was a pseudojournalist member of the Muslim

2:51

Brotherhood who had written for various American

2:53

outlets. And this meant that the

2:55

United States has to take a very harsh tactical

2:57

look at our alliance with Saudi Arabia up to

2:59

and including giving the green light to the Houthis

3:01

in Yemen and Iranian proxy group by delisting them

3:04

as a terror group. And then

3:06

it turns out that reality intervenes. And

3:08

the Houthis, as it turns out, hate the United States more than they

3:10

hate the Saudis. It turns out

3:12

that the Saudis have control over oil supply, and

3:14

Joe Biden had to go on bended need to

3:17

Mohammed bin Salman and do the thing because what

3:19

you say in the Middle East does not matter

3:21

nearly as much as what you do. And so

3:23

Israel, without making a big statement, we are going

3:25

to knock you guys back to the Stone Age.

3:27

Israel simply did the thing, and they let Iran

3:30

know that if, in fact, Iran decides to escalate,

3:32

it will do significantly more damage to

3:34

the Islamic Republic of Iran than it

3:36

will do to Israel. All of this,

3:38

again, was prefaced by the UN Security

3:40

Council being a completely useless and garbage

3:42

institution. So of course, Israel did what

3:44

it had to do because the UN Security

3:46

Council could not even bring itself to condemn

3:48

Iran for a full-scale attack on another nation.

3:52

Remember, it's an act of war definitionally when you fire

3:54

350 drones and missiles at another sovereign country. The

3:57

UN Security Council not only did not even take the time to do that, but also

3:59

took the time to do that. a resolution condemning Iran

4:01

for that attack last weekend. They

4:03

allowed Iran to then lecture Israel,

4:05

suggesting that, quote, Israel must

4:08

be compelled to stop any further military adventurism against

4:10

our interests. That is what Iran told the UN

4:12

Security Council. The absolute

4:14

unmitigated sheer gall of that is astonishing,

4:16

considering that it's Iranian military adventurism that

4:18

has led to the entire conflagration in

4:21

the Middle East, from Iraq to Syria

4:23

to Lebanon to the Gaza Strip to

4:25

the West Bank to Yemen. That

4:27

is Iranian military adventurism that has led to all that,

4:30

and the UN Security Council, because again, the

4:32

United Nations is effectively the most wisely of

4:34

international politics, so Richard Hyve of Scum and

4:36

Villany, because of that, the

4:39

UN Security Council was

4:41

never even going to take up the

4:44

possibility of condemning Iran. They did, however,

4:46

take up the possibility in the last

4:48

48 hours of a resolution to unilaterally

4:50

declare Palestinian statehood, which would be an

4:52

incredibly audacious and stupid move considering there

4:54

is no actual government for a

4:56

Palestinian state. The Gaza Strip is

4:58

currently governed by Hamas, a terror group that

5:00

is in an existential war with the state

5:03

of Israel. The Palestinian Authority has so little

5:05

control over the West Bank that there is

5:07

open warfare between Hamas, Palestinian Islamic Jihad, and

5:09

the Palestinian Authority. You

5:11

may as well simply declare a state of

5:14

unicorn land in a random part of the

5:16

earth that has no government as

5:19

declared a Palestinian state, and if unicorn land presumably

5:21

would not necessarily turn into a terror state, whereas

5:23

a Palestinian state already has turned into a terror

5:25

state and remains as such. In any case, Israel

5:27

decided that it was going to do what it

5:29

had to do and restore the status quo ante

5:31

before October 7, and that is really what we

5:33

are headed toward. We'll get

5:35

to more on this in a moment. First, using the

5:37

internet without ExpressVPN is like walking your dog in public

5:39

without securing the dog on a leash. Most of the

5:42

time, probably fine, then one time the dog runs into

5:44

the street, God forbid. Well, it's better to be careful,

5:46

especially when we're talking about something as simple as using

5:48

ExpressVPN. Every time you connect to an unencrypted

5:50

network in cafes, hotels, or airports, your online data is not

5:52

secure. Any hacker on

5:54

that same network can gain access to and

5:57

steal your personal data. What I love about

5:59

ExpressVPN is how they create a secure, encrypted

6:01

network. tunnel between your device and the internet

6:04

to keep your data secure. It also has

6:06

a built-in password manager to ensure protection goes

6:08

beyond passwords. You can safely store notes, passwords,

6:10

and credit card information. ExpressVPN works on all

6:13

your devices, including your phone, laptop, tablet, even

6:15

your smart TV. To get protected, fire up

6:17

the app and click one button. ExpressVPN has

6:20

changed the game for internet security. If you

6:22

haven't downloaded the app, you're allowing your data

6:24

to be targeted. Right now, you'll get an

6:26

extra three months of ExpressVPN for free at

6:29

expressvpn.com/ben. That's expressvpn.com/ben. Once more, expressvpn.com/ben.

6:31

I've been using ExpressVPN myself

6:33

for years. You should too.

6:35

expressvpn.com/ben. Remember, October 7th

6:37

was launched specifically with the

6:39

green light of Iran in order to

6:42

scuttle the burgeoning Israeli-Saudi peace deal. That

6:44

is what was happening. Israel

6:46

and Saudi Arabia were establishing a regional

6:49

alliance in terms of defense to deter

6:51

Iran and its proxies in the region.

6:54

And that alliance to facto included Egypt, it

6:56

included Jordan, it also included a bunch of

6:59

the Saudi sponsored states like UAE and Bahrain.

7:01

A variety of these

7:03

states had basically formed up an alliance and

7:05

it was just really

7:07

a matter of toppling that last domino in Saudi Arabia

7:09

for the alliance to go full scale. And if Donald

7:11

Trump had been elected, there's no doubt in my mind,

7:13

and by the way, in the mind of the Israelis

7:15

or the Saudis, that that deal would have gotten done.

7:17

Even with Joe Biden as president though, it appeared as

7:19

though that deal was very close on the horizon. Not

7:22

because Joe Biden is great at this, but because

7:24

he sucks at this. And because Joe Biden had

7:26

been so conciliatory toward the Iranians, the Saudis had

7:28

basically gone to the Israelis and said, listen, we

7:30

need to make a deal with you now because

7:33

you don't trust the Americans. We don't trust that

7:35

Joe Biden is going to come to our defense

7:37

if in fact Iran attacks us. So let's form

7:39

up a regional alliance against Iran. And that was

7:41

really, really close to happening. In fact,

7:43

Benjamin Netanyahu, the prime minister of Israel, had spoken

7:45

openly about it at the United Nations. Iran

7:48

saw that. Iran activated Hamas to

7:50

go into Israel and kill 1,200 people and take 250 hostages

7:53

back to the Gaza Strip. And

7:55

the hope is that this would start a conflagration

7:57

that would burn down the possibility of a Sunni-Israeli

8:01

Well, it appears that the status quo ante is

8:03

now being reinforced.

8:05

Why? Because Israel has actually preserved

8:07

its own ability to deter and

8:09

militarily destroy its enemies. The whole

8:11

reason for a Saudi peace deal

8:13

with the Israelis is not because

8:16

Israel and Saudi Arabia see eye to eye on

8:18

matters of religion. Obviously, they do not. The

8:20

reason for that is because Saudi looks at Israel

8:22

and they say Israel is capable of deterring Iran.

8:26

Israel is capable of destroying its enemies

8:28

on the battlefront. Israel is an extraordinarily

8:30

powerful and innovative military machine. And

8:32

we want to be allied with that. And so

8:34

what Hamas did by striking at Israel was to

8:36

dent that perception in the Saudis. Israel

8:39

has reinforced the perception, the

8:41

prior perception, in the aftermath

8:44

by its successful military action in the Gaza Strip, which is

8:46

why they are now going to go in and finish off

8:48

Rafa in the south of the Gaza Strip. And

8:51

the last two weeks have shown that Israel

8:53

not only is capable with the allies of

8:55

repelling a mass Iranian attack, but also

8:57

that Israel can strike pretty much where it

8:59

wants to in Iran. And

9:02

so Iran had better not escalate because it will be worse

9:04

for Iran than it will be for Israel. And Saudi, of

9:06

course, wants to sign on to that. That

9:08

is the math. In other words, what

9:11

Israel just did in Iran is actually

9:13

de-escalatory. If Israel wanted to escalate

9:15

with Iran, certainly they could have. They

9:17

could have done that mass attack on their nuclear

9:19

facilities, for example. Or they could

9:21

have tried to kill members of the regime in Tehran

9:23

because they can hit anywhere in Iran,

9:25

apparently. They didn't do that,

9:28

which is why it's so amazing to watch as the

9:30

media continue to know nothing about the Middle East

9:32

and yet report on it as though they do. So,

9:34

for example, NBC News reporter Matt Bradley

9:37

suggested Israel's strike against Iran may have

9:39

been destabilizing. It's the opposite. If Israel

9:41

had not actually retaliated against a mass

9:43

missile and drone attack against its own

9:45

territory, that would have been radically destabilizing

9:48

because then Iran would have sensed weakness

9:50

and would have gone forward with, for example,

9:52

activating Hezbollah in Israel's north. But

9:55

here are your typical journalistic

9:57

idiots completely missing the point. This

10:01

could be a deeply, deeply destabilizing move

10:03

by the Israelis, and again, not just

10:05

for the Iranians, but for the entire

10:07

region. And it could even draw in

10:09

the United States. The United States has

10:11

said that they are committed to defending

10:13

Israel's security. Well, I spoke with the

10:15

deputy chief of Hezbollah just today. He

10:18

said that they are committed to

10:20

defending against Israeli attacks against Hamas

10:23

and the Gaza Strip and against

10:25

civilians there. So they are ready

10:28

and willing to fight. We're hearing a

10:30

lot of bellicose language from a lot of different

10:32

groups. So this is a very,

10:34

very dangerous situation. Wait,

10:36

you mean everybody is bellicose in their language in the Middle East?

10:38

This goes back to my point. Everyone

10:40

is always bellicose in their language in the Middle East. If

10:43

you ever go to a shuk, like a

10:45

market, any market in the Middle East, Arab

10:47

country, Jewish country, doesn't matter. The shuk is

10:50

what the Middle East is. And there's

10:52

people yelling at each other very loudly in

10:54

order to quietly negotiate a price on a

10:56

pack of dates. That's

10:59

effectively what the Middle East is in a

11:01

nutshell. And when it comes

11:03

to what they are willing to do, it's a very different

11:05

story. There's a reason Hezbollah has not gone all out against

11:07

the state of Israel. They could at any time. And they

11:09

have 200,000 rockets pointed at Israel, including 50,000 rockets

11:12

sophisticated enough to hit actual targets. The

11:15

reason they're not going all out is because the

11:17

minute they do, Israel will unleash its F-16s as

11:19

well as its F-35s, and there will be no

11:21

Hezbollah in southern Lebanon anymore because

11:24

that actually will be an existential battle

11:26

for Israel involving the possibility of tens of thousands

11:28

of Israeli deaths. And Israel is not going to

11:30

go quite as nice as they have in the

11:32

Gaza Strip. And yes, they've been going

11:35

pretty nice in the Gaza Strip considering that they've sent

11:37

about 300 of their own soldiers into position to

11:39

die going house to house to preserve civilian life in

11:41

the Gaza Strip. That will not be the case when

11:44

you're talking about the necessity

11:46

for a fast takeout of vast

11:48

rocket capacity in southern Lebanon. In

11:51

any case, the United States is

11:53

starting to get the picture. Tony Blinken, of course, is

11:55

a smarter person than Joe Biden, but who isn't? Tony

11:57

Blinken at least has three functioning neurons as opposed to...

12:00

Joe Biden, who has two. He is declining

12:02

to say whether the United States had received advance warning of

12:04

Israel's strike. Clearly the United States did. There's

12:06

good information that the United States knew 24 to 48 hours in advance of

12:08

this attack. In

12:10

fact, there's pretty good evidence that the Iranians

12:12

knew something was coming because they had pulled

12:15

apparently some of their IRGC activists out of

12:17

Syria and out of Lebanon in anticipation of

12:19

Israeli attacks. Also, they had shelved a

12:21

few of their naval assets because they were afraid that

12:23

Israel was going to hit their navy, their

12:26

rinky dink navy. Anthony Belingin said, I'm

12:28

not going to speak to that except to say the United States has

12:30

not been involved in any offensive operations. He

12:33

said, all I can say is that for our part

12:35

and for the entire G7, our focus has been on

12:37

de-escalation and avoiding the larger conflict. Okay, well

12:39

now, because reality is setting in, even

12:42

the United States is starting to act under Joe Biden

12:44

like a more rational actor because

12:47

here is what has actually happened here. Israel

12:50

will, in the next six weeks, take out

12:52

the last vestiges of Hamas's military organization in

12:54

Rafah. It's not going to end Hamas's threat

12:56

in the Gaza Strip. Obviously, the biggest problem

12:58

in the Gaza Strip is

13:00

that any sort of de-notification policy that takes

13:02

place in the Gaza Strip is going to

13:05

have some pretty steep obstacles

13:07

to it considering the level

13:09

of love of the

13:11

population for Hamas. And this is not

13:13

an ISIS situation in which you have a terror group that simply

13:16

sees the control of the territory. This was an elected group. Hamas

13:19

is, by polling it, is still the most popular group of all

13:21

the groups in the Gaza Strip as well as in the West

13:23

Bank. With that said,

13:25

Israel will establish effective military control

13:28

of the Gaza Strip, which means there will

13:30

be no more offensive threat to the state of Israel from the Gaza

13:32

Strip. Israel will

13:35

have negated Iran's direct attack willingness,

13:38

which is what last night was all about. And

13:41

eventually, after Israel signed some sort of deal with

13:43

the Saudis, then there will be a move on

13:45

Hezbollah in the north unless Hezbollah pulls back. We'll

13:48

get to more on this in a moment. First, with

13:50

the NBA playoffs starting next week, there's no better time to

13:52

get in on the action than with PrizePix, America's number one

13:54

fantasy sports app, where you can turn your hoops knowledge into

13:56

some serious cash. You can now win up to 100 times

13:58

the number of times that you win. your money on prize

14:00

picks with as little as four correct picks. You can

14:02

turn 10 bucks into a thousand bucks. If you want

14:05

to play alongside some of prize picks favorite players like

14:07

Meek Mill or Sugar Sean O'Malley, you can now find

14:09

community plays under the Pro Moes tab of the app

14:11

to view entries from some of the biggest names in

14:13

the prize picks community every week. Prize picks

14:15

even offers injury insurance, so your entries stay in

14:17

play even if one of your players gets injured.

14:19

For basketball games, if you've got a player who exits

14:22

the game in the first half and doesn't come back

14:24

in the second, that player projection will not count against

14:26

you. The rest of your entry stays live. Producer Jake

14:28

loves prize picks. He likes the easy to use interface.

14:30

He's super excited to get in on the NBA playoff

14:33

action. Download the prize picks app today. Use Code Ben

14:35

for a first deposit match up to 100 bucks. Put

14:37

more pick less. It's that easy. Use Code Ben on

14:39

the prize picks app for a first deposit match up

14:41

to 100. That's a lot of good stuff to do

14:44

with prize picks right now. NBA playoffs just beginning is

14:46

going to be an exciting year. Use Code Ben at

14:48

the prize picks app. Get a first deposit match up

14:50

to 100 bucks. Joe Biden is

14:52

finally signing into the chat on this. Now

14:54

again, all of this could have happened literally the day after he took

14:56

office. All Joe Biden had to do. This is why he's such a

14:59

fool. All the presidents of the United States

15:01

had to do when he took office was this. Go to

15:03

the Saudis. Say, listen, we want you

15:05

to enter the Abraham Accords. All

15:07

that requires of you is to make a

15:09

mutual defense pact in some form or fashion

15:11

with the state of Israel and normalize it,

15:13

and we will help subsidize that and sponsor

15:15

that, and it will create a really solid

15:17

ring of fire around Iran. That

15:20

could have been done day one. That's what Donald

15:22

Trump would have done. He's openly said that. Joe

15:25

Biden didn't do that. Instead, he decided to

15:27

orient himself against the Saudis and orient himself

15:29

like Barack Obama before him in favor of

15:31

Iran as a regional power, which

15:33

is totally insane. Well now again,

15:35

reality is setting in. So according to the Wall

15:38

Street Journal, the Biden administration is considering more than

15:40

a billion dollars in new weapons deals for Israel,

15:42

including tank, ammo, military vehicles, and mortar rounds at

15:44

a time of heightened scrutiny of the use of

15:46

American-made weapons in the war in Gaza. But let's

15:48

be real about this. If you want less death

15:51

in this particular region of the world, Israel needs

15:53

to win and win quickly. Prolonged wars in the Middle

15:55

East cost hundreds of thousands of lives.

15:58

Short wars in the Middle East kill fewer people. And

16:00

usually the right side ends up winning in quick wars in the Middle East.

16:04

The proposed weapons transfers would be among the

16:06

largest to Israel since it invaded Gaza in

16:08

response to the Hamas October 7 attack. The

16:10

sales would also be the first since Iran launched an

16:12

unprecedented direct missile and drone attack on Israel just last

16:15

weekend in retaliation for the killing of a top Iranian

16:17

general in Syria. That top Iranian general

16:19

in Syria, of course, was the organizer, one

16:21

of them, of the October 7 attack in Israel.

16:25

So what is happening here? The United

16:27

States is recognizing reality, which

16:29

is that Iran is the head of the octopus

16:32

in the Middle East, that their terror proxies have been

16:34

spreading violence and

16:36

evil throughout the region, and

16:39

that Israel and Sunni allies should team up together. So

16:41

Joe Biden is facilitating that now, which is what he

16:43

should have been doing all along. It just took him

16:45

too long to get here, which

16:47

is why – like, this is an amazing story. So

16:50

according to The Wall Street Journal, the White House is making

16:53

a fresh push for a historic deal to forge Saudi-Israeli ties. Now,

16:55

the part about this that is truly amazing

16:57

is that, again, this should not be a

16:59

hard push. The Saudis want to make a peace deal.

17:02

How bad do the Saudis want to make a peace deal? They

17:04

want a deal with Israel worse than

17:06

the Biden administration does. How

17:09

do I know? The Biden administration, because they

17:11

cannot let go of the

17:13

absolutely asinine, imbecilic idea that

17:15

the central conflict in the

17:17

Middle East is Israel versus

17:19

the Palestinians. They cannot let go of

17:22

it. And because they can't let go

17:24

of it, the United States is trying

17:26

to cram down on the Saudis a demand for

17:28

a Palestinian state. You know what

17:30

the Saudis don't give two good gosh darns about?

17:32

That. They don't care about it at

17:34

all, like zero. In

17:37

fact, the Saudis don't want a Palestinian state. You know why

17:39

they don't want it? Because it will be a terrorist state,

17:41

as everyone with half a brain knows. You know

17:43

who else doesn't want a Palestinian state, by the way? The

17:45

Hashemite dynasty of Jordan. They

17:47

try out Queen Rania, who is ethnically Palestinian,

17:50

to talk about the horrors that the

17:52

Israelis are unleashing upon the Palestinians. There's

17:55

only one problem. She's a member of the

17:57

Hashemite dynasty, 70 percent of the world. of

18:00

the population of Jordan is Palestinian. You know, it

18:02

doesn't want a Palestinian state, the Jordanian government. Because

18:05

were there to be a Palestinian state, you

18:07

know what would happen next? It would turn into a

18:09

giant terror state. And Queen Rania's head, as

18:11

well as those of the rest of her families, would be on the top

18:14

of pikes. Everyone knows this in

18:16

the Middle East. This is not some sort

18:18

of speculative game. In

18:20

any case, this is – it's so incredible. The Saudis

18:22

are more willing to make a deal with the Israelis

18:25

than the Biden administration is. Here's

18:27

the Wall Street Journal. Quote, the Biden administration is pushing

18:29

for a long-shot diplomatic deal in coming months. It's

18:31

not a long-shot diplomatic deal. I know the press

18:33

is going to try and play this up so

18:35

if it occurs, then it'll be like, wow, Biden

18:37

pulled the rabbit out of the hat. This rabbit

18:39

was in the hat from day one of the administration.

18:41

Donald Trump would have pulled it out the first day. The

18:44

Biden administration is pushing for a long-shot diplomatic

18:46

deal in coming months that presses Israeli Prime

18:48

Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to accept a new commitment

18:50

to Palestinian statehood in exchange for diplomatic recognition

18:52

by Riyadh, U.S. and Saudi officials said. As

18:56

inducements to recognize Israel, the White House is

18:58

offering Riyadh a more formal defense relationship with

19:00

Washington, assistance in acquiring civil nuclear power, and

19:02

a renewed push for a Palestinian state, a

19:05

package the U.S. officials say they are in the final stages of

19:07

negotiating. U.S.

19:10

officials say the successful multi-country effort to shoot down

19:12

Iranian missiles and drones on Saturday should make it

19:14

clear to Israel its security against threats from Tehran

19:16

can be enhanced through closer integration with Saudi Arabia.

19:20

So first of all, Israel mows that, which is why they've been

19:22

covertly working with the Saudis for legitimately probably a couple of

19:24

decades at this point. For

19:26

President Biden, the gambit offers the chance of

19:28

a significant diplomatic breakthrough in the middle of

19:31

a presidential campaign year, one that would

19:33

expand the Abraham Accords, his Republican opponent Donald Trump sealed

19:35

when he was in office. Now, here's

19:37

the best part of this article. So you notice those

19:39

conditions, right? The conditions were that the United

19:41

States would help subsidize more of a defense

19:43

relationship with the Saudis. They

19:46

would push for civil nuclear power, which again

19:48

is the predicate to a Saudi nuclear program

19:50

in all likelihood, and

19:53

Palestinian statehood. And Palestinian statehood is the sort

19:55

of breaking point for the Israeli government. Why?

19:57

Because no one in Israel wants a president.

20:00

But here's the thing, neither do the Saudis.

20:02

The only people in this entire equation pushing

20:04

a Palestinian state are, wait for it, Joe

20:06

Biden and his dollars. How

20:09

do I know that? Because buried deep

20:11

in this article, buried

20:13

deep in this article is the following paragraph. It's

20:15

an amazing paragraph. Ready? Here we go. Saudi

20:17

Arabia's leaders have said for decades that a Palestinian

20:20

state is a priority. And its top

20:22

diplomats have said creating a path to a two-state solution is part

20:24

of their price for normalization. Now,

20:26

Saudi officials have privately indicated to the

20:28

US they might accept verbal assurances from

20:30

Israel that it would engage in new

20:33

talks on Palestinian statehood to secure the

20:35

other parts of the deal of more

20:37

interest to Riyadh, Saudi officials said. Okay,

20:39

so that's diplomatic speak for we don't give too sh**

20:41

about the Palestinian state. That

20:45

is what that means. You know how

20:47

I know that? Let me read that sentence again

20:49

because it's amazing. They say,

20:51

oh man, this is such an important priority

20:53

that we need a Palestinian state. Quote, Saudi

20:55

officials have privately indicated they might accept verbal

20:57

assurances from Israel that it would engage in

20:59

new talks on Palestinian statehood to

21:01

secure the other parts of the deal they care

21:03

about. Okay, that is what would be a

21:06

contingency upon a contingency. Introducing two

21:08

new and improved Jeremy's razors. Fighting the left

21:10

and building the future means constantly bringing your

21:12

best and that's exactly what Jeremy's razors is

21:14

doing. Choose between the

21:16

new and improved precision five razor for an

21:18

exceptionally smooth and close shave or the brand

21:20

new Sprint three razor for a quick clean

21:23

shave. The new razors feature

21:25

top to bottom redesign, enjoying ergonomic handle

21:27

designed for superior durability. The new coated

21:29

stainless steel blades are sharper so they

21:31

last longer. Increased

21:33

flexibility allows the razor to better contour

21:35

to your face to reduce nicks and cuts. Plus

21:38

the lubricating strip is now equipped with argan

21:40

oil and aloe. It's time

21:42

to toss out that woke razor and get yourself a precision

21:44

five or Sprint three trial kit today. Pledge

21:47

the fight the left and build a future

21:49

with Jeremy's razors. Go to jeremysraisors.com and order

21:51

yours today. Funding

22:00

of the Saudis until nuclear power know breast.

22:03

That they will accept. A. Handshake,

22:05

verbal deal, To. Have

22:07

a future discussion. About

22:09

a Palestinian state. In

22:12

return for that, Now

22:14

I have a question. At.

22:16

You've signed contracts. We've all sign contract.

22:18

When. You sign a really important contract

22:21

with a super important contract. Have

22:24

you ever said the most important part of the seal?

22:27

Is. The stuff to be on couldn't agreement. Hundred.

22:29

On that. Is. So you'd better lawyer.

22:32

Because. That's not how this stuff works. If

22:34

our negotiate an agreement with you. And

22:37

that agreement where to include an incredibly important term

22:39

like the most important from something I'm in talking

22:41

about for decades. And then the last minute our

22:43

said you listen. Honey we need you already

22:45

have actually do to. Say. Out Loud.

22:48

The. You want to engage in discussions about

22:50

this thing two years from now? I'm

22:53

a very serious about that particular term. The.

22:56

Answer is no. As. Always the

22:58

Saudis do not care about of house in his eighty don't

23:00

want palestinian set by the way you know well as one

23:03

housing estate. The. Egyptians. Literally, no one

23:05

wants a Palestinian state in this region

23:07

except for Iran and the. Absolute.

23:10

Again, I'm running out of synonyms for for more

23:12

on, but. Anyone who is low I q

23:14

enough to believe. That. A Palestinian state

23:16

solve the problems in the Middle East

23:18

rather than creating a vast new Problems in.

23:20

the Middle East knows literally nothing about the

23:23

Palestinian population, the history of the region.

23:25

what else any of those Literally every state

23:27

they have moved to including Lebanon would used

23:29

to be a christian marinate state. Beirut

23:31

was the. Was. The paris of the

23:33

Middle East when christians were running. it's. And

23:36

then it turns out the Palestinian Liberation

23:38

Organization moved there after Black September and

23:40

completely wrecked the place. Know

23:43

what? You wanna? know? why his hips is now

23:45

allowing in Palestinian refugees from the Gaza Strip as

23:47

they don't want them there? I

23:50

know everybody pretend that the Palestinians are it's it's

23:52

only the Israelis all my guys. Only three. In.

23:55

The aftermath of the Gulf War. And I can anyone

23:57

who wait. And. something like two hundred to

23:59

three The United States has a very good deal with the

24:01

United States. They've been in the

24:04

United States for over 300,000 Palestinians living in Kuwait. They

24:07

all sided with Saddam Hussein, and you know what Kuwait did? They

24:10

forced them out. You

24:12

know who doesn't want a Palestinian state? Anyone with half a brain

24:15

in the region because a Palestinian state will be an Iranian

24:17

terror proxy. Everyone

24:20

knows this, except for the Biden administration apparently. They're going

24:22

to be from the Gaza Strip, according to the Saudis.

24:26

Several potential Arab contributors said they wouldn't consider

24:28

participating without public moves by Israel toward establishment

24:30

of a Palestinian state. Okay, that's nonsense.

24:32

Israel is going to say some words, and

24:35

then everybody is going to shake hands, and that's how it's going to go.

24:38

All this requires is for the Biden administration to get

24:41

out of the way. That is all. And

24:44

then you could have strong allies like the

24:46

Saudis and the Egyptians and the

24:48

Israelis as a bulwark against Iranian

24:52

revanchism. That would be

24:54

a very, very good thing. In

24:56

fact, foreign policy is

24:58

turning out to be – the alignment

25:01

of interest in foreign policy right now is

25:03

actually quite fortuitous for the United States, not

25:05

just because Iranian aggression in the Middle East

25:07

has created the possibility of a Middle East

25:09

peaceful breakout, but also because all

25:12

over the world, America's enemies who are on

25:14

the march are forcing other countries into making

25:16

a decision between whether they wish to march

25:18

with America's enemies or march with America, which

25:20

is why over the last 48 hours,

25:23

my favorite world leader and

25:25

recent interview subject Javier Mille has

25:27

repeatedly said that he now wants to become

25:30

a global partner in NATO, which

25:32

is good. Having more

25:35

open, overt Western-aligned powers in

25:37

the world like Argentina would

25:40

be a very good thing. Latin America used to

25:42

be a bulwark of Westernism. That's

25:44

what the Monroe Doctrine was. It was basically the European

25:46

powers don't get to be involved in South America. That

25:48

obviously has not been true for a while. The Russians

25:50

are very much involved in sort of the Chinese in

25:52

South America. And so now South

25:54

Latin America is split between

25:57

a group of libertarian minorities.

26:00

They blinded fixers like

26:02

Javier Mille in Argentina or

26:06

Bukele in El Salvador and

26:09

between actual radical Marxists

26:12

like Maduro in Venezuela. And

26:14

the question is which way Latin America is going to go. The

26:17

more allies the United States has, the better. That

26:20

would be a very good thing. People are seeking

26:22

American leadership. People want to align with America and

26:24

not with Russia and not with China, both fading

26:26

powers. All that

26:28

requires is a little bit of American leadership

26:30

and a little bit of American strength. We'll

26:32

get to more on this in just one moment. First, 20

26:34

bucks barely gets you anything these days. You can't even fill

26:37

your gas tank or get a burger and fries for less

26:39

than 20 bucks. But you know what, $20 will get you?

26:41

From the cell phone company I use, Pure Talk, you can

26:43

get unlimited talk, text, and plenty of 5G data for just

26:45

20 bucks a month. Pure Talk

26:47

gives you the same quality of service as your

26:49

current cell phone provider but for half the cost.

26:51

The average family saves almost $1,000 a year, all

26:53

with no contracts and no activation fees. You

26:56

can switch to Pure Talk and keep the phone and

26:58

phone number you currently use, or you can take advantage of

27:00

their great deals on the latest iPhones and Androids. Making

27:02

the switch incredibly easy. Their US customer service team can

27:04

help you join Pure Talk in as little as 10

27:06

minutes. Choose to spend your

27:08

hard-earned money with a wireless company that shares

27:10

your values, supports our military and veterans, creates American

27:13

jobs, and refuses to advertise on those fake news

27:15

networks. So stop spending a ridiculous amount of

27:17

money on your phone plan. Go to puretalk.com/Appuro right

27:19

now. My listeners can get an additional 50%

27:22

off their very first month of

27:24

coverage. That's puretalk.com/Shapiro. Again, start saving

27:26

money on your phone plan today

27:28

with people who actually like you.

27:30

Go to puretalk.com/Shapiro and start saving.

27:33

So with all of this happening, you got

27:35

the Biden administration, which is totally incapable of

27:37

world leadership. And meanwhile, you have a Congress

27:39

that is busy farting around. I mean that

27:41

absolutely literally. Let me explain.

27:45

There is a thing that has now been declared.

27:47

I am not kidding you about this. The

27:51

Freedom Caucus, which is

27:53

sort of the more extreme right-wing

27:55

caucus in the Republican Party, includes a bunch of

27:58

people I like and some people I like. who

28:00

I think are frankly clowns, the

28:03

Freedom Caucus is trying to uphold the stupid

28:05

rule that I've been wailing against for weeks

28:07

at this point that

28:09

requires that the Speaker of the House

28:12

be allowed to be essentially

28:14

ousted after the call of

28:16

a vote by a single member of the Republican

28:18

Party. So there

28:20

can be a motion to vacate the chair

28:22

by any member of the Republican Party. This is

28:25

the game that Marjorie Taylor Greene is playing. It's

28:27

the game that Matt Gaetz played against Kevin

28:29

McCarthy and all the rest. Well,

28:32

now Mike Johnson is looking at the possibility of

28:34

fixing that so that you can't have three members

28:36

of the Republican Caucus who oust the Speaker of

28:38

the House as opposed to the

28:40

other 215 Republicans who don't want to do it.

28:44

So the Freedom Caucus has decided that they

28:46

are going to stand up for their right,

28:48

apparently, to continue to hold the

28:50

Speaker of the House hostage in some

28:52

form or fashion. They

28:55

have now created what they call the

28:57

Freedom Caucus Floor Action Response Team. The

29:01

shorthand is FART. I'm

29:03

not kidding you. I mean, genius

29:06

level stuff here, guys, like just branding

29:08

genius. So I'm

29:10

glad that you created the Freedom Caucus FART.

29:16

Their job is to guard against an unannounced request

29:18

to pass resolutions that would stealthily limit their leverage

29:20

against leadership according to two Republicans with direct knowledge

29:22

who are granted anonymity to speak candidly. Members

29:25

don't want to be caught flat-footed if a

29:27

GOP college tries to seek unanimous consent or

29:29

a voice vote for resolution that would change

29:31

the House's structure. So

29:34

if Mike Johnson tries to call a vote that

29:37

gets rid of this dumb motion to vacate

29:39

rule, then the FART team will jump into

29:41

action. The

29:44

FART team will explode into action.

29:48

The FART team will let loose with the stink

29:50

of truth. This is all so deeply stupid, and all of this is

29:52

because, again, there's a group of Republicans who actually want to be who

30:00

want to prevent governance, who have

30:02

an interest apparently in a Republican minority. Some

30:05

of this battle broke out into

30:07

the open yesterday during a

30:09

apparently rather colorful

30:11

conversation between a Wisconsin

30:13

freshman named Representative Derek Van Orton,

30:16

who confronted Florida Republican

30:18

Matt Gaetz and called him Tubby. Things

30:22

are going great. The confrontation occurred

30:24

as a group of GOP hardliners, according to the

30:26

Journal Sentinel, including Gaetz, Representative Lauren Boebert, and the

30:28

Republican Senator. Representative Lauren Boebert, who loves

30:30

Beetlejuice and getting felt up at

30:32

Beetlejuice, and Tennessee Representative Tim Burkhart

30:35

huddled around Mike Johnson, who voiced their displeasure with

30:37

his plans to put a $95 billion package of

30:39

foreign aid bills to a vote this weekend. Now

30:42

remember, what Mike Johnson is doing is he's putting up

30:44

each of these bills as a separate piece of legislation.

30:47

If they garner majority support, they will then be packaged

30:49

back together and sent on to the Senate. A

30:52

majority of Republicans will likely vote in favor of each one

30:54

of these bills, but this makes Matt

30:56

Gaetz very, very mad. And

30:59

so he apparently was going

31:01

after Mike Johnson on the floor, and

31:03

Van Orton said, fine, you want to ask the speaker to do it? Like,

31:05

you keep threatening to do it, do it. He

31:08

said they've been trying to blackmail the Republican conference now for a

31:10

long time. Just do it. Show the American people who you

31:12

really are. The American people can't see

31:14

really what takes place all the time. What

31:16

they can see is a motion to vacate. It'll show their

31:18

true colors. They're not here to legislate. They're not serious legislators. Gaetz

31:22

then called Van Orton a squish, so

31:24

Van Orton called Matt Gaetz a tubby. Things

31:28

are going well. Van

31:32

Orton, who's the retired Navy SEAL, said, I said people have not

31:34

been to combat and been shot at. We're not holding one of

31:36

their friends' hands if they die. They probably shouldn't be calling other

31:38

people squishes. And then he did it again, and I

31:41

said something along the lines of, stow it, tubby. Okay,

31:46

and here is Matt Gaetz then, sounding off to the

31:48

media as he loves to do Lauren Boebert in his

31:50

wake. I think a

31:52

motion to vacate is something

31:55

that could put the conference in peril,

31:57

and Ms. Boebert and I were working

31:59

to avoid that. our goal is to

32:01

avoid emotion of a case but we're

32:03

not going to surrender that accountability tool

32:05

particularly in a time when we're seeing

32:08

america's interest subjugated to foreign interests abroad

32:10

explain what was going on with mister van order he

32:13

kept demanding that we file a motion of a

32:15

key and demanding that we do it a privileged

32:17

way and what does that mean i mean that

32:19

is it doesn't surprise you in this climate that

32:21

people might be saying that we heard this from

32:23

mister massie we've heard this from this room i'd

32:26

be working i gleaned from it is that mister van

32:28

orton is not a particularly intelligent individual what did

32:31

you spoke to the speaker what was that

32:33

conversation like since because

32:36

we don't want to pass this bill we do not

32:38

look the only way that with the only way and

32:40

we've gotten house representatives blocking the senate supplemental and so

32:43

if he's ready to throw in the towel on that

32:46

what we do in here what

32:48

are you doing here i mean the answer is the challenge

32:50

one speaker for no apparent reason kevin mccarthy and

32:52

now you're holding the motion to vacate over

32:54

johnson's head so as to what

32:57

hold up a vote that a majority of republicans are going to

32:59

vote for and i'm

33:01

a point out of the yesterday when it comes

33:03

to this foreign aid package it's

33:05

too big a bunch of i don't like it also

33:08

it is worth noting at this point that

33:10

that foreign aid package is

33:12

in fact necessary israel is in

33:14

the middle of an existential war with a variety of

33:17

opponents in the middle east all sponsored by iran

33:19

ukraine is in the middle of an existential war

33:21

with russia and

33:23

donald trump put out a statement yesterday suggesting that european allies

33:26

need to give more money to help you claim to why

33:28

isn't europe giving more money to help you claim why

33:30

is it the united states over a hundred billion dollars

33:32

into the Ukraine war more than europe we have an

33:34

ocean between us as separation i can't

33:36

europe equalizer national money put in by the united

33:38

states in order to help a country in desperate

33:40

need now as i pointed

33:42

out i'm supporting president trump this happens to be factually wrong

33:45

the fact is that european union and

33:47

their twenty seven member states have

33:49

agreed to commit at least fifty four

33:51

billion more dollars on one february twenty

33:53

twenty four as part of

33:56

their new Ukraine facility their commitments to date are

33:58

over a hundred and fifty five $155

34:00

billion. The United States has not

34:02

given $155 billion. This

34:08

includes, by the way, over

34:10

$51 billion in financial and budgetary support

34:12

and in humanitarian and emergency assistance. It

34:14

includes $36 billion in military assistance and increasing,

34:17

ranging from ammo to air defense systems. That

34:21

includes $11.5 billion from the European

34:23

Peace Facility in addition to $25 billion in

34:25

bilateral contributions from member states. It

34:29

also includes $18 billion from the EU budget to

34:32

support Ukrainian refugees who have fled into Europe. So

34:36

again, the basic idea, which is that the EU has not been

34:38

stepping up, that's not true. Donald

34:40

Trump successfully forced the EU countries to step

34:42

up with regard to their defense commitments with

34:44

regards to NATO. And the EU has, in

34:46

fact, been stepping up with regard to the

34:48

amount of aid provided to Ukraine. The

34:52

real question, as I keep asking for Mac Eights

34:54

and for Lauren Boebert and for Thomas

34:56

Massey and for everyone else, is how is

34:59

it in America's interest for Russia to stroll

35:01

into Kiev? And if it is not,

35:03

what level of support do you think would be necessary in

35:05

order to prevent that? Because the answer is not

35:07

zero. The same thing

35:09

holds true in the Middle East. How is it in America's

35:11

interest for Iran to continue to gain regional power? This

35:15

is the point that Mike Johnson, the speaker of the House, was making yesterday.

35:17

Here he goes. Why

35:19

are you willing to risk losing

35:21

your job over the supreme

35:23

funding? Listen, my

35:25

philosophy is you do the right thing and you let

35:28

the chips fall where they may. Look, history judges us

35:30

for what we do. This is a critical time right

35:32

now, a critical time in the world state. He

35:34

is not wrong about all of that. And

35:37

again, posturing ain't going to do it, guys. It ain't

35:39

going to do it. If you want to do what,

35:41

for example, Chip Roy has done in the past and

35:43

issue a list of specific debts that you want from

35:46

Mike Johnson, and then we can see why those are

35:48

debts that are debtable. That's something

35:50

that's useful. But if you're just going to rail against the

35:52

wind and then just randomly shout motion to

35:54

vacate, those rules need to change,

35:56

and they need to change forthwith. Okay, in just a

35:58

moment, we'll get to… The daughter of Ilhan Omar,

36:01

who turns out Apple not far from three. First,

36:03

it's been two years of fighting the left and

36:05

building the future with great products we are only

36:07

getting better. Jeremy's second generation razors are here. Same

36:09

mission, better razors. For

36:11

example, here is one of them

36:13

now. Shocker. You'll immediately

36:15

notice the totally reconstructed ergonomic handle for

36:18

superior durability and improved coated stainless steel

36:20

blades that last longer plus. Enjoy

36:22

more flexibility for a close shave without

36:24

those nicks or cuts. For those who

36:26

meticulously craft their masculine look, introducing Jeremy's

36:28

new precision 5 razor completely transformed with

36:30

precision trimmer and enhanced comfort thanks to

36:32

the improved lubrication strip. Experience

36:34

an exceptionally smooth and close shave with added durability

36:36

to withstand those accidental drops. And if shaving feels

36:39

more like a chore, meet the brand new Sprint

36:41

3 with open blade geometry for a swift clean

36:43

shave allowing you to get time to your

36:45

manly pursuits. Razors not

36:47

made in China, razors made right, progress

36:49

that is not progressive. Head on over

36:51

to jeremysrazors.com. Upgrade to your second generation

36:53

razor today. Okay, also

36:56

this Sunday, brand new episode of the

36:58

Sunday special with Sage Steele, former Sports

37:00

Center reporter on ESPN. She's fantastic.

37:02

I've known Sage for quite a while. She's

37:05

entertaining and she is courageous. Here's

37:08

a bit of the trailer. How

37:10

was it working as a woman in this world?

37:12

Because obviously there's a lot of controversy, especially at

37:14

this time in the 80s, early 90s

37:18

about women being in sort of the sporting world.

37:20

I remember there were a lot of conferences about

37:22

women's locker room and this sort of stuff. How

37:25

did any of that impact you? What

37:27

it did for me was

37:29

it made me better. Because

37:32

when you're in the media scrum,

37:34

and it's an NFL media Wednesday and

37:36

you've got 20

37:39

reporters gathering around Shannon

37:41

Sharp or Ray Lewis or whoever it

37:43

was and Warren Sapp,

37:45

difficult people like Warren Sapp and you have to

37:47

like, you're in there, you try

37:49

to get your mic in and it's all these

37:52

big fat smelly male reporters. And I was like,

37:54

okay, that's helpful. Number one, but

37:56

number two, because it was all male voices,

37:59

I knew that when I... folks, it would fall into front

38:01

and it would maybe stop some people. And so what

38:03

came out of my mouth better be damn good. Remember

38:12

that episode drops this Sunday. You're not going

38:14

to want to miss it. Meanwhile, it turns

38:16

out that the apple does not fall far

38:19

from the anti-American, anti-Jewish tree. Ilhan Omar's daughter

38:21

has apparently now been suspended from Barnard

38:23

College for her involvement in Prokamos protests,

38:26

according to the New York Post. Her

38:28

daughter, Isra Hersey, revealed Thursday she has

38:30

been suspended from Barnard College over her

38:32

involvement in disruptive anti-Israel protests on Columbia

38:34

University's Morningside campus, at which scores of

38:37

demonstrators were arrested. They had set

38:39

up a bunch of tents basically in the

38:41

middle of the Columbia campus, sort of like

38:43

Occupy Columbia, in order to say

38:45

that they hate Israel. The

38:47

21-year-old wrote, I just received notice. I am

38:49

one of three students suspended for standing in

38:51

solidarity with Palestinians facing a genocide. Well,

38:55

I doubt that that's really what it was about since

38:57

most Columbia students are fired to the left on this.

38:59

Hersey was one of more than 100 protesters all the

39:01

way in cuffs by the NYPD Thursday afternoon after they

39:03

erected a tent city on the campus of the $90,000

39:05

per year Ivy League school. By

39:09

late Thursday afternoon, the protests had dispersed. Cleaning

39:11

crews were brought in to disassemble and remove

39:13

dozens of tents that littered the campus. Hersey

39:16

has spent much of her life attending demonstrations. Apparently,

39:18

she attended her first protest at the age of

39:21

six. At 12, she joined a

39:23

Black Lives Matter protest forcing the Mall of America to

39:25

shut down. And then

39:27

they received she and two other students,

39:29

notice of their suspension, from the Barnard

39:31

Dean. Apparently,

39:33

the Dean's statement said the decision is

39:36

based on information related to the Columbia

39:38

University public safety. You've been involved in

39:40

an unauthorized encampment on the Columbia University

39:42

campus. You've not seized participation in this

39:44

unauthorized encampment. Well, that

39:46

of course is correct. She

39:50

is just as anti-American

39:53

and anti-Israel as her mom is.

39:56

But it's good to see campuses actually starting to demonstrate at

39:58

least a little bit of fealty to you. That

40:02

would be good. A shout-out to

40:04

actual – a rare shout-out to a legacy media

40:06

figure today. Jake Tapper over at CNN actually did

40:08

something good on his show a couple of days

40:10

ago. So there's

40:13

been a lot of coverage of a

40:16

terrorist named Walid Daka who had died in Israeli prison.

40:20

And he was portrayed by the media as some sort of a victim of

40:23

Israeli aggression. Jake Tapper fully

40:25

dismissed that and that of course is good

40:27

for him. The

40:30

International had called for Daka who was in

40:32

his 60s to be released on humanitarian grounds

40:34

after he was diagnosed with bone marrow cancer

40:37

in 2022. Amnesty issued

40:39

a statement saying, quote, death in

40:41

custody of Walid Daka is

40:43

a cruel reminder of Israel's disregard

40:46

for Palestinians' right to life. It's

40:49

an interesting term – turn

40:51

a phrase there – a disregard for Palestinians' right

40:53

to life. Much of the

40:55

news media coverage of Walid

40:57

Daka's death after his 38 years in

41:00

prison was along these lines. Many

41:02

stories barely, if at all, even

41:04

mentioned why Walid Daka

41:06

was in the Israeli prison to

41:09

begin with. He was in prison

41:11

because he was part of a

41:14

militant group that killed this 19-year-old,

41:17

Moshe Tamam. It

41:19

is heart-wrenching that Walid Daka

41:21

has died in Israeli custody,

41:23

said Amnesty International. Heart-wrenching? I

41:27

ask this sincerely. Does it wrench

41:29

the heart of anyone at Amnesty

41:31

International that 19-year-old Moshe

41:33

Tamam was murdered? Anyone?

41:37

By the way, Moshe Tamam wasn't just murdered. He

41:39

was mutilated before his murder by Walid Daka. But

41:41

that again is how the media have treated the

41:43

Middle East historically, good for Jake Tapper for disabusing

41:46

people of that notion. Meanwhile, Joe Biden

41:48

continues to stumble around aimlessly. So

41:50

we played yesterday a clip of Joe Biden explaining that

41:52

his uncle was once eaten by cannibals, which

41:55

was a thing he actually said because

41:57

our president is no longer with us and has not

41:59

been murdered. Yesterday the

42:01

White House was forced to admit that actually,

42:03

in fact, Joe Biden's uncle was

42:05

not eaten by cannibals. It

42:08

was a little bit awkward. We

42:10

just had a cannibal tab in your

42:12

book. There's a cannibal tab? What are

42:14

you talking about? Is

42:18

that what you're asking me about?

42:20

Can you finish it? Yes.

42:22

Look, I'll just, and I think we shared

42:25

this with some of you, so I'm just going

42:27

to kind of repeat. Look, you saw the president,

42:29

he was incredibly proud of his uncle's service in

42:31

uniform. He saw him at the war memorial. It

42:33

was incredibly emotional and important to him. He

42:36

saw him respond to all of you when

42:38

asked about the moment yesterday, and

42:41

his uncle lost his life when the military

42:43

aircraft he was on crashed in

42:45

the Pacific after taking off near New Guinea.

42:48

The president highlighted his uncle's story as

42:50

he made the case for honoring our

42:52

sacred commitment to equip those

42:54

we send to war and to take care of

42:57

them and their families when they come home. And

43:00

as he reiterated that the last thing American veterans

43:02

are suckers or losers, and he

43:04

wanted to make that clear. He wanted to make a strange

43:07

story. I mean, look, I don't have anything

43:09

beyond about what I just laid out, but it

43:11

was a really proud moment for him. It

43:14

was a proud moment when his uncle was

43:16

eaten by cannibals. That was

43:19

a proud moment that didn't happen. I

43:22

just love that Joe Biden's stories are, as I've

43:24

said before, one of my favorite things. That's when

43:26

my uncle, Uncle, he was

43:28

either we used to call him Uncle when he was in

43:30

the fly in World War II, and

43:34

his plane went down. And suddenly a

43:36

bunch of native savages jumped out of

43:38

the bushes, and he started

43:40

chomping on his legs. And he

43:42

said, whoa, whoa there, bucko.

43:48

You know, things are going well when the Biden campaign has

43:50

to run an ad. They literally did this. They ran an

43:52

ad saying that he is not mentally unfit. Joe

43:55

Biden, not mentally unfit 2024. Even

43:59

CNN was like, Like, guys, this is not

44:01

good. I just

44:03

want you and our viewers to see a

44:05

brand new ad from the Biden campaign, and

44:08

the name of the ad is Sharp. Love

44:12

to tell the story about meeting President Biden

44:14

because when you meet him, this guy is

44:16

as sharp as the knife. They have nothing

44:18

else to attack because they can't attack the

44:21

things that he's doing that are so good

44:23

for this country. Joe Biden gets things done.

44:26

That's just who he is. I

44:29

mean, that says it all again. That is

44:31

from the Biden campaign, and the name of

44:34

the ad is Sharp. Yeah,

44:37

man. This campaign

44:39

is not going well for Joseph

44:41

Robinette Biden. Things are bad.

44:44

Well, meanwhile, when Joe Biden isn't telling weird

44:46

stories about how his uncle was eaten by

44:48

cannibals or weird stories about how his dad

44:51

once informed him about homosexual

44:53

rights on the streets of Scranton,

44:55

Pennsylvania, in like 1956 while watching

44:57

Two Men Kissing, when Joe Biden

45:00

isn't telling weird stories like that, he's now

45:02

attacking RFK Jr. So when

45:04

you are the candidate who's issuing ads

45:06

saying, I'm not senile, Biden 2024. When

45:09

you are the candidate who's attacking the third-party candidate,

45:11

you got a problem. If you're so

45:13

weak that your campaign is now dependent

45:15

on people not voting for the third-party candidate, this

45:18

is not a good sign for your campaign, which

45:20

right now Joe Biden's campaign is in a lot

45:22

of trouble. New Fox News poll has Donald Trump

45:24

leading Joe Biden in Michigan. So

45:27

despite Joe Biden's best attempts to

45:29

appease the Pro-Kamos crowd in Michigan, it

45:31

isn't working, unfortunately, for him. Well,

45:34

now Joe Biden in an attempt to,

45:36

again, cudgel Robert

45:39

F. Kennedy Jr. supporters into supporting

45:41

him has dragged out the entire

45:43

Kennedy family to endorse him. Here's the

45:45

problem. No one knows who any of these people are. I'm

45:48

sorry, unless you are like deeply, deeply ensconced

45:50

in politics and Democratic

45:52

Party politics in specific, name

45:55

three members of the Kennedy family. Seriously,

45:58

like three, go. Ain't

46:00

got nobody? That's what I thought. So Joe

46:02

Biden brings forth, he's like, and here

46:04

are random people named Kennedy, who

46:06

are related to JFK and RFK, but

46:08

are not RFK Jr. They support me,

46:11

shouldn't you? Here is

46:13

Kathleen Kennedy, the maker of

46:15

the new Star Wars series. She

46:18

supports me, shouldn't you? Okay,

46:20

so here was Kerry Kennedy, who was

46:22

RFK Jr.'s sister. Who

46:24

cares what Kerry Kennedy has to say? Like, what? Who

46:26

are the voters who are like, well, now that Kerry Kennedy

46:28

has endorsed Joe Biden, I guess I'm back on the Biden

46:30

frame here. Here's Kerry Kennedy. What

46:34

we need in the United States is

46:36

not division. What we

46:38

need in the United States is not

46:40

hatred. What we need

46:43

in the United States is not

46:45

violence or lawlessness, but

46:47

love and wisdom and

46:50

compassion toward one another

46:52

and a feeling of justice towards

46:54

those who still suffer

46:56

in this country, whether they be

46:58

black or they be white. Joe

47:02

Biden's every decision is

47:05

informed by his love, his

47:09

wisdom, and his compassion

47:11

towards those who suffer. That

47:14

is why we are so

47:17

happy today to pledge our

47:19

unwavering support to President Joe

47:21

Biden and President Kamala Harris.

47:24

God bless all of you.

47:26

God bless America, and please

47:28

welcome President Joe Biden. Okay,

47:32

if you are deeply dependent on Kerry Kennedy

47:34

to save your campaign, you got a problem,

47:37

and Joe Biden has himself a

47:39

very, very large-scale problem for certain.

47:42

And meanwhile, Alejandro Mayorkas was led off the hook by

47:44

the Senate of the United States. Democrats in the Senate

47:46

decided they weren't even going to hear the impeachment charges

47:48

against him. They just dismissed them right away. However,

47:52

according to Breitbart, President Biden's

47:54

Department of Homeland Security approved a work permit

47:57

for Jose Antonio Ibarra of Venezuela, who's accused

47:59

of being a criminal. He was murdering 22-year-old

48:01

Lake and Riley even after discovering he had

48:03

a prior criminal history, according to federal documents

48:06

detailed by Senator Josh Howley. America

48:08

was thrilled about that yesterday by Howley on

48:11

the Hill. Here is the exchange. Senator,

48:14

I will not speak to the particulars of the

48:16

case given the pending criminal

48:18

prosecution. I'm sure. Well, you certainly, of

48:20

course you don't want to because it

48:22

is an absolutely damning indictment of

48:25

your policies. Let's just review Jose Barrera and

48:27

how Ibarra rather and how he came to

48:29

be here on September the 8th, 2022. He

48:32

was encountered by United States Border Patrol

48:34

in El Paso, Texas and was paroled

48:37

into the United States due to lack

48:39

of detention capacity. A

48:41

provision, a proviso, a rule that is not permitted

48:43

under the statute. You and I both know you

48:45

know this. You knew it

48:47

when you were talking to Congressman Bishop. You knew

48:49

it when you were testifying to Senator Britt and

48:51

you know it today. You just

48:54

never wanted to cop to it because

48:56

the statute doesn't permit it. And so you lied to

48:58

Congressman Bishop and you lied to Senator Britt. And

49:00

now you are hiding behind the ongoing

49:03

prosecution excuse because it's the last one

49:05

left to you because you

49:07

testified falsely under oath. Well,

49:11

Josh Howley hasn't been dead to rise on that one. I mean, the fact

49:13

of the matter remains. It is Joe

49:15

Biden's immigration policy that has in fact gotten

49:17

American citizens killed. Meanwhile, Alhans and Marrakis continues

49:19

to claim that the Southern border is as

49:21

secure as we can make it. Here he

49:23

was yesterday. Why

49:25

did you say the border was secure? Was that a lie? What

49:27

do you mean by that? Senator

49:29

Romney, allow me to assure you that

49:33

I have honored the oath of

49:35

office that I have taken more

49:37

than five times in my 22-plus

49:39

years of federal service. Let

49:41

me go back to the question. That's as

49:43

accurate as it is irrelevant, which is

49:47

my question is, you said that the border

49:49

was secure. What did you mean when you

49:51

said the border was secure? Is that not

49:53

a lie? Senator, you've

49:56

asked me now if that is a lie and

49:58

I have assured you. that I have

50:00

honored the oath of office. In

50:03

what way was it not a lie then,

50:05

Senator? With the resources and authorities that we have,

50:07

it is as secure as it can be.

50:10

Sure, sure. It's just as secure as it can be. There's only

50:12

one problem as Rand Paul points out. You already have the powers

50:15

you need to shut down the border. What

50:17

exactly are you waiting for? All

50:19

of the laws that existed under the Trump

50:21

administration still exist under the Biden administration. You

50:24

have all the powers that you need. The

50:26

laws on accepting migrants to

50:29

this country say the

50:31

executive may admit migrants.

50:34

Doesn't say the executive branch shall admit migrants.

50:36

You could simply say we're full up. We've

50:38

got too many criminals and we've got the

50:40

horrendous thing that happened to Lake and Raleigh

50:43

and to others. And we're just

50:45

full and we're just, we're going to stop taking migrants

50:47

for a while until we can sort out the mess

50:49

we have at the border. You have every power to

50:51

do that now. You don't utilize

50:53

those powers. But it isn't about

50:55

really being good at utilizing the power. We just think you're

50:57

not obeying the law. He

51:00

happens to be correct about all of that.

51:02

Meanwhile folks, we've been discussing the chaos in

51:04

the Republican House. We are joined online by

51:06

Speaker of the House Mike Johnson. So on

51:08

Friday morning, the House voted on debate rules

51:10

that advance a series of foreign aid bills

51:12

to the full House for final passage on

51:15

Saturday. Broad bipartisan support for these bills 316

51:17

to 94. But

51:19

there are people as usual screaming and crying about it. Speaker

51:21

Johnson, thanks so much for joining the show. Great to talk

51:24

to you. Ben, great to be

51:26

with you. Thanks for all you do. So

51:28

why don't we start by talking about what's actually in these

51:30

bills. These bills, as always, are not perfect. It turns out

51:32

there are these things and they're called Democrats and they exist

51:34

in the House and they also exist in the majority in

51:36

the Senate. And also one of them is sitting in the

51:39

White House able to veto things. So what is in these

51:41

bills that is good? What is in them that's bad? Why

51:43

are you advancing these bills to the floor? Well,

51:45

we're at a point of pivotal

51:47

decision. I mean, this is a dangerous time on

51:50

the world stage, as you and I know, when

51:52

Israel is in great jeopardy fighting for their existence.

51:55

Ukraine is close to being overrun and they're estimated to

51:57

be out of ammo by the end of literally,

52:01

which would allow Vladimir Putin to roll through the

52:03

country, take Kiev and set up on the borders

52:05

of NATO countries. Of course,

52:07

Iran and its aggression of Israel

52:09

has continued, and Xi is watching

52:11

this from China and all of the

52:13

Axis of Evil is empowered. So what are we to

52:15

do? We're in the midst of this dynamic

52:18

where we have divided government. And as you

52:20

noted, the Democrats control the White House and

52:22

the Senate. So we in the House here,

52:24

with the smallest majority for the Republican

52:26

Party, smallest majority in U.S. history, one to

52:28

two vote margin on any given day, we

52:31

have to address these matters. We have to

52:33

meet the moment. And so the House is

52:36

fixing the Senate supplemental bill, the foreign aid

52:38

bill that was sent to us a few

52:40

months ago, with better policy and

52:42

better process. And so what we've done is

52:44

we've taken, for example, the Ukraine funding elements

52:46

that are controversial, of course, on

52:49

our side. We've added a lone

52:51

instrument. We have added the repo act,

52:53

which is the use of corrupt Russian

52:55

oligarchs seized assets to support the

52:57

effort there. We've added oversight, accountability, and a

53:00

strategy shift to force the White House to

53:02

give us the information and the endgame and

53:04

all the rest. We have an

53:06

amendment process so we can address each of

53:08

these measures on their own merit and four

53:11

separate bills instead of having them sandwiched together.

53:13

And everybody can vote their own will and their own

53:15

conscience and their own constituents. That's the way this place

53:17

is supposed to work. And we

53:20

included tough measures on Russia, China, and Iran,

53:22

including sanctions and some other

53:24

innovations. So a very important change

53:26

in both the process and the

53:29

policy. And if we had not done

53:31

this, Ben, and this is very important, we would

53:33

have had to eat the Senate supplemental. If

53:36

we had not taken this step, there would have

53:38

been a discharge petition. And that means that a

53:40

handful of Republicans would have crossed over and gotten

53:43

on board with the Democrats to force it out

53:45

of my hands and make us take the Senate

53:47

supplemental as is. That was

53:49

not an acceptable outcome. And this is the best possible outcome that

53:51

we can achieve. You know, Speaker, that

53:53

last phrase, the best possible outcome that we can

53:55

achieve, that's the one that so many members

53:57

of sort of the House Freedom Caucus is right,

53:59

have been. have been focusing in on, they suggest

54:02

that there is a better deal that can be

54:04

made. If only there was the will, then suddenly

54:06

Democrats would collapse on a bunch of these issues,

54:08

or suddenly there would be an Israel-only aid bill

54:11

that would go forward without any sort of humanitarian

54:13

aid to Gaza, or maybe the Ukraine bill could

54:15

be pared down much smaller than it currently

54:17

is. But you're the one who's actually in the

54:19

negotiating room. Is there a

54:22

lot of wiggle room here with Democrats that's been left?

54:26

There's not. And part of the reason for

54:28

that, Ben, is that they know that our

54:30

House Republican Conference is not sticking

54:32

together right now. There's a lot of division

54:35

and difference of opinion. And that's part of

54:37

the process. Democracy is messy. But when you're

54:39

in a negotiation and you literally have the

54:42

smallest margin in the history of the United

54:44

States Congress, the other side obviously

54:46

knows that. And they're watching the dissension

54:48

among our ranks, and that takes away

54:50

our negotiation ability. Look, on

54:52

the Ukraine piece, this is really important to point

54:55

out. There's a lot of angst about, quote

54:57

unquote, sending more money to Ukraine. But 80%

55:01

of the funds that are in this package for Ukraine

55:03

are literally to replenish American weapons

55:05

and stocks and facilities. This is

55:07

America's defense industrial base. This is

55:09

building weapons here at home and

55:12

refilling our stockpiles. Really, really important

55:14

thing for us to do. Ukraine

55:16

is in a position where

55:18

they very likely would fall.

55:20

And so this is going to allow

55:22

them to at least hold the line.

55:25

And I believe, Ben, that President Donald Trump

55:27

is going to have another term. And early

55:29

next year, if this is continuing to that

55:31

point, I think he's the one that has

55:33

the strength to go in and negotiate a

55:35

peace in this. But

55:38

not if Russia rolls through the country. I

55:40

mean, this is really important. As I said

55:42

in a press gaggle here the other day,

55:44

to be blunt, I would rather send bullets

55:46

to Ukraine than boys, American soldiers. We don't

55:48

want boots on the ground. We're not the

55:50

world's policemen. If we can invest this small

55:52

amount right now and achieve a desired outcome,

55:54

that is better for us in the long

55:56

run. And it saves us a lot of

55:58

money and, of course, blood and blood. And

56:01

Speaker Johnson, it sounds to bewildering to me

56:03

why there are so many people in the

56:05

Republican Party who don't seem to understand or

56:07

want to understand that strong American allies forestalls

56:10

direct American action. That's the history of America's

56:12

foreign policy. When we have weak allies who

56:14

are unable to take care of themselves, very

56:16

often we end up sending our own troops,

56:18

sending our own resources in much greater numbers

56:20

than would have been the case if we

56:22

had simply supported our allies from the outset

56:25

so that they were strong enough to actually

56:27

withhold America's enemies. But I'm hearing

56:29

– I've yet to hear any Republican

56:31

actually explain what the alternative to, for example,

56:33

aid to Ukraine would be. I've heard

56:35

some people in the Republican caucus call them principled libertarians

56:38

who just say that we should spend no money

56:40

at all. Okay, that's consistent, although I think that it

56:42

does not have the virtue of wisdom. But

56:44

that's not a lot of members of the Republican

56:46

caucus. Many of the people who are sounding out

56:49

in the Republican caucus and in the commentary about

56:51

aid to Ukraine can't seem to express why exactly

56:53

it would be in America's interest for Russia to

56:55

actually overrun Kiev, which would

56:57

be the predictable result if in fact no

56:59

aid gets moved to Ukraine in the middle of this. I

57:03

think you stated that very well, and you're

57:05

right. They don't have an answer because there

57:07

isn't one. And I'll point out,

57:09

too, to my real frustration. I mean,

57:11

some of my colleagues who are the most adamantly

57:13

opposed to this and who have

57:15

in some sense mocked the arguments of

57:18

why this is so important have

57:20

not availed themselves of the defense briefings that

57:23

are available here. They've not gone to talk

57:25

to the generals. They've not gone into the

57:28

confidential classified briefing on exactly what

57:30

the status is on the ground.

57:32

And they're making monumental decisions with

57:34

global implications not completely

57:37

informed about the facts. And I think that's a

57:39

dereliction of duty. And I've said it as much,

57:41

and I'm not naming anyone, but there are some

57:44

people that have just refused to go on this

57:46

gift. And

57:48

I think it's a dangerous thing. Look,

57:50

you and I are children of the

57:53

Reagan era. I was. I grew up. I'm older

57:55

than you. But look, I believe in peace through

57:58

strength. I believe in what Ronald Reagan did. said,

58:00

it does not mean that we're the world's policemen.

58:02

It does not mean that American troops should have

58:04

boots on the ground everywhere. That's not what we're

58:06

for. But to your point, Ben, and you've said

58:08

it well, a strong America is

58:10

good for stability around the globe. What does

58:12

that mean? It means the perception of

58:15

a strong America. We're the last great

58:17

superpower. We're the greatest nation in the

58:19

history of the world. It's not even

58:21

close. We're the most free, most benevolent,

58:23

the strongest, the most powerful. And if

58:25

we don't act like it, then terrorist

58:27

and tyrants take over. The reason that

58:29

Iran and China and North Korea and

58:31

Russia right now are acting so provocatively

58:33

is because we're projecting weakness on the

58:35

world stage. Joe Biden's foreign policy has

58:38

been an absolute disaster, and that's what's

58:40

got us in this situation. And if

58:42

we do this little bit of investment

58:44

here, we can stem the tide,

58:46

hold them off, hopefully, until we get a

58:48

new president. And that day cannot happen soon enough. Speaker

58:51

Johnson, one of the things that has come

58:54

up in this context, obviously, is the ridiculous

58:56

motion to vacate. Obviously, you inherited a set

58:58

of rules that were originally negotiated by Speaker

59:00

Kevin McCarthy, who then had his speakership vacated

59:02

by some members of the Republican caucus, who

59:05

never really specified why McCarthy was doing such

59:07

a terrible job, but they just decided that

59:09

he had to go. And then he couldn't

59:11

actually get enough Democrats to

59:13

vote with him to preserve his speakership, or he

59:16

couldn't get enough Republicans to vote with him to

59:18

preserve his speakership, and he ended up ousted and

59:20

then leaving Congress. Now you have a similar group

59:22

of people, smaller, it seems, who are

59:24

attempting to challenge your speakership. They keep threatening a motion

59:26

to vacate. I noticed they haven't actually brought one formally

59:28

yet, because I think that they are afraid they're not

59:31

going to get nearly as many votes as they keep

59:33

trumpeting with regard to the media. These

59:35

are unworkable rules. I mean, right now, the situation,

59:37

as you mentioned, in the House of Representatives, is

59:39

that you are presiding over the slimmest majority for

59:42

the Republicans in modern history, and

59:44

that majority could theoretically be thrown

59:46

into complete chaos by a couple

59:48

of attention seekers at any time.

59:51

Those rules I've been pushing for you to try

59:53

to change those rules, is that coming?

59:55

Is there going to be a move to go back

59:57

to what was a sense of normalcy, You

1:00:00

needed a significant percentage of the caucus to

1:00:02

actually challenge a speaker in order to oust

1:00:04

a speaker and then go back to what

1:00:06

is the way the Republicans used to govern,

1:00:08

which was the Hastert rule, which says that

1:00:10

you don't bring forward a bill unless a

1:00:12

majority of the caucus supports it. By the

1:00:15

way, again, worth noting, a majority of the

1:00:17

Republican caucus supports these foreign aid bills. They

1:00:19

do. The rules package that just went forth

1:00:21

was voted by Republicans 151 to 55, the

1:00:23

notion that a minority of Republicans ought to

1:00:25

run the House of Representatives seems

1:00:27

bizarre to me. It

1:00:30

is bizarre, and it's not workable. It

1:00:32

really undermines the way the institution is designed to

1:00:35

work by the founders, and it's

1:00:37

become a problem. Look, we're in the age

1:00:39

of the modern Congress. Newt Gingrich famously said

1:00:41

a few days ago that being speaker is

1:00:43

now impossible. I challenged

1:00:45

him on it. He's a prim, but what

1:00:47

Newt was suggesting there is that we

1:00:49

now live in the age of the

1:00:52

24-hour news cycle and social media, and

1:00:54

so every member of Congress has their

1:00:56

own media outlet and platform. And

1:00:59

they can go online and tell the American public every

1:01:01

five minutes what they're disgruntled about and why they don't

1:01:03

get 100 percent of what they want. It makes a

1:01:05

real challenge to get things done when the

1:01:07

margin is as small as ours is. But

1:01:10

look, on the motion to vacate, it's

1:01:12

not something I walk around being concerned about.

1:01:14

I can't. We need to unify this

1:01:16

conference, and we have to do our jobs. And

1:01:18

we cannot send the House in the chaos in

1:01:21

the middle of an election season. I mean,

1:01:23

obviously, these are commonsensical notions. You

1:01:25

can't show to the country that we

1:01:27

can't keep ourselves together and then expect

1:01:30

them to vote for us

1:01:32

to keep and grow this majority. And let

1:01:34

me point out why that's so important for

1:01:36

the obvious that anyone has a question about

1:01:38

that. If we don't have a majority in

1:01:40

January in the next Congress and Donald Trump

1:01:43

wins for president, which I believe he will,

1:01:46

the Democrats will impeach him in the first week of

1:01:48

his office. They will try

1:01:50

to investigate everyone who even thinks about serving

1:01:52

in the Cabinet. Bill subpoena, every visitor to the

1:01:54

White House. Everybody in the president's

1:01:56

orbit will need their own army of

1:01:58

lawyers. That's where we are in the

1:02:00

country. And we can't allow that to

1:02:02

turn this disastrous policy around, foreign policy,

1:02:05

domestic policy, every metric that's a disaster

1:02:07

under Joe Biden. We

1:02:09

have to have the majority in both chambers, the Senate and the

1:02:11

House, and we have to have the White House. Then

1:02:13

I think we're on track to do that, but we can

1:02:15

shoot ourselves in the foot and take

1:02:18

the victory away from ourselves if we're not careful here. Yeah,

1:02:21

Speaker Johnson, that is, I think, the main point, is

1:02:23

that if Republicans wish to govern and actually make the

1:02:25

sort of major changes that are necessary, they are going

1:02:28

to have to run all three elected branches of government.

1:02:30

They're going to have to run the Senate. Republicans have

1:02:32

a good shot of winning back the Senate, given the

1:02:34

map this year. They're going to have to have a

1:02:36

much larger majority in the House. Right now, frankly, none

1:02:38

of this would be a problem if Republicans had additional

1:02:40

15 seats in the House. The

1:02:43

truth is that the entire House would have been run differently if

1:02:45

Republicans had additional 15 seats in the House. And

1:02:48

if Donald Trump is the President, the reality is that

1:02:50

in a presidential race, you know what he's not going

1:02:52

to want to have to deal with? A completely dysfunctional

1:02:54

Congress that Democrats are going to be running against, including

1:02:56

President Joe Biden. So the idea

1:02:58

that the Republican conference should actually do

1:03:01

their jobs, as opposed to grandstanding for the

1:03:03

cameras, in the name of a purity that

1:03:05

they never seem to achieve, that

1:03:07

is absolute foolishness. So, Speaker Johnson, I'm

1:03:10

glad that you're doing what you're doing. I appreciate

1:03:12

it. I think it's good

1:03:14

for the country, and thanks so much for standing strong in

1:03:16

favor of an actual strong America on the foreign policy stage.

1:03:19

Thank you, Ben. Appreciate it. Great to hear your voice,

1:03:21

and glad for all your work. Appreciate you. Thanks,

1:03:24

Speaker Johnson. Really appreciate it. Alrighty, guys. The

1:03:26

rest of the show is continuing right now. You're not going to want

1:03:28

to miss it. We will deconstruct some culture. If you're not a member,

1:03:30

become a member. Use Code Shapiro. Check out for two months free on

1:03:32

all annual plans. Click that link in the description and join us.

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features