Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
We love hearing people's viewpoints on
0:02
Bitcoin and what they believe are the most important
0:04
aspects of crypto. Jameson Lopp
0:06
is helping as many people as possible understand
0:09
the importance of self-custody and providing
0:11
a way for them to make their Bitcoin as
0:13
secure as it can be. He's an old-school
0:16
Bitcoiner and a technologist with an epic
0:19
beard. It's been a long time since he's rocked
0:21
the mic here in the Republic of Bad Cryptopia,
0:24
so we've got him back today. It's all Lopp,
0:26
and you can't stop listening to episode
0:28
number 699 of the Bad Crypto Podcast.
0:29
5, 4, 3, 2, 1, 0, Ignition.
0:41
Who's there? All
1:02
Lopp, and you can't stop, so you don't
1:04
drop unless you gotta plop.
1:08
Sometimes if you gotta plop, you gotta drop. Sometimes
1:10
you gotta plop, and then we need to hurry up this
1:12
episode here real quick. Stop, drop, and plop.
1:17
Sounds good to me. Now, this is a great episode,
1:20
man, with Jameson Lopp. I
1:22
think you guys are really going to appreciate this one.
1:24
I don't know who has better resources
1:26
in crypto than this guy does. Like, his website
1:28
is a full-on… Oh, my gosh.
1:31
He has the best resources. You wouldn't
1:33
believe the resources this guy has. It's
1:35
a bit of media over there. Amazing.
1:37
You know what? Less of us, more
1:40
of Lopp. Here we go with Jameson.
1:46
We set the Wayback Machine to January 2018,
1:48
episode number 72. Mr. Jameson Lopp graced us with his presence and his epic
1:51
beard, which is still just as epic today. He's
1:56
got a lot of great stuff. He's
1:58
got a lot of great stuff. a lot
2:00
of entrepreneurial spirit in the
2:02
crypto space and helping to
2:04
bring people into the self custody
2:07
world for their Bitcoin wallets.
2:09
And he's got a lot to say. We're going to find
2:11
out what his latest thoughts are today. Jameson,
2:13
welcome back to the Republic of Bad Cryptopia.
2:16
Good, sir.
2:18
Long time no see.
2:19
Yeah, I feel like the beard
2:21
that you're getting those white strips now,
2:23
right? Yes, no, you can definitely go
2:25
back and check. I think back then I only had like one
2:28
street, but it's growing out further.
2:31
It's great. It's like bear market for you.
2:33
It's like you
2:35
have beard fangs.
2:37
That's that they're like, keep
2:40
your own Bitcoin. That's nice. That's
2:42
good. Hey, we appreciate you coming
2:44
back on the show. You know, it's been a long time
2:47
since January of 2018, dude. That's
2:50
almost six years ago. You've been on. You
2:53
know, you've kept
2:55
your finger on the pulse. You've been building a lot
2:58
of amazing things. And so we
3:00
want to talk, touch base on some of those things. But
3:02
you know, really, let's kind of give a refresher.
3:04
Some people might not know you. So maybe
3:06
what initially drew you to the
3:09
whole crypto world and maybe
3:11
what were some of your first projects
3:12
in the space so people can
3:14
get reacquainted with you? Yeah.
3:19
Well, it's been about 11 years now. I
3:24
think I came across Bitcoin
3:26
on a slash.post back
3:28
in 2012. I'm sure I had come
3:30
across it before, probably also on nerdy
3:32
sites like that. And I had dismissed
3:35
it as many do as, you know,
3:37
nerd money that everybody was
3:39
going to lose and,
3:42
you know, would end horribly. But
3:45
for some reason, when
3:47
I saw that particular post,
3:50
I ended up reading the white paper and kind
3:54
of tickled the computer science parts
3:56
of my brain, along with some of the libertarian.
4:00
of beliefs and thought
4:02
it was a really interesting project.
4:05
And unlike most white papers, I could
4:07
actually understand it. And
4:10
from there, I just really kicked off exploration
4:13
down the rabbit hole as you and many other
4:16
people have
4:18
also gotten sucked into over the years.
4:21
So- That's actually coincidentally where
4:24
I saw Bitcoin the first time. And
4:26
then I talked to a bunch of friends about it and they all
4:28
said that I was stupid and that was a dumb thing. But
4:30
I mined some
4:32
and then it crashed my computer. So instead
4:34
of going, oh my God, I need to get stronger
4:36
computers and build a warehouse these computers.
4:39
I said, what the hell dude, you screwed
4:41
on my computer. Oh man, this sucks. And
4:43
so I had to get a new computer and then I
4:45
lost those Bitcoins. So that was
4:48
awesome. You know, Hal Finney actually
4:50
said something similar of I think
4:52
he mined on his laptop
4:54
for a couple of days but then he got annoyed because
4:56
it was making the fans too much. So
4:59
he turned it off.
5:00
Destroyed my computer. I mean, it destroyed the fan,
5:02
which then the fan was dead and then the rest of the computer died.
5:04
But ob la di, ob la da.
5:07
Well, here we are, you know, five
5:09
and a half years further down the road from
5:11
whence we last spoke and the
5:14
world economy is just
5:16
a hot mess, right? Governments are printing
5:18
more worthless paper money than ever
5:20
before. We've got politicians allegedly
5:24
in control that don't necessarily
5:26
have the best interest of citizens
5:28
at heart. How important do you think
5:30
Bitcoin is now and how has your thinking
5:33
evolved onto its relevancy
5:35
to our day and age?
5:39
Oh boy. You know, when I started
5:41
off with all of this, it was an interesting
5:45
thought experiment and I sort
5:47
of saw it as a type of project that,
5:50
you know, maybe on a generational time
5:52
scale it could be interesting. You know, if
5:54
you basically have this deflationary
5:57
currency that nobody can screw with, then...
6:00
Inevitably, over decades,
6:03
other nation states are going to continue to devalue
6:05
their currencies. So I think very
6:07
few of us expected
6:09
Bitcoin to grow as quickly as
6:11
it did. Though once it started
6:14
doing that in various growth
6:16
spurts now, I think some people may have
6:18
overcorrected on those expectations and
6:20
expected to go mainstream any day. But
6:23
from many different metrics,
6:27
it has gone mainstream, at least
6:29
mainstream in terms of
6:32
a non-trivial portion
6:34
of the population knows what it is,
6:36
or they've heard of it. But of course, they probably
6:39
have very little fundamental understanding
6:41
of why it's interesting and why
6:43
they should probably be using it. But
6:47
it has been interesting,
6:50
I think, to see who
6:53
has got it, per
6:55
se, who amongst
6:59
the global population has
7:01
seen value in Bitcoin. Obviously,
7:03
a lot of people don't see value in it, and
7:06
that's because of their own perspectives
7:09
and things that they think are good
7:11
and bad. But Bitcoin doesn't care. What
7:15
really matters is those of us that do find
7:17
it valuable, and especially those of us
7:20
who find it valuable enough that we spend
7:22
our time, energy resources, working
7:25
on the system, maintaining it, trying to better
7:27
understand it. And in
7:29
your case, like trying to convey that understanding
7:31
to a wider audience. Yep,
7:34
people got to figure it out. And
7:36
I think that we've gone through
7:38
a couple of bull runs now, right, since 2017.
7:41
We started doing the show in 2017, and then we personally
7:44
experienced a couple of bull runs and bear runs
7:46
now, bear markets. And
7:50
people who, you know, it's so wild. It's like,
7:52
oh, crypto goes up. Everybody's interested in crypto.
7:54
Crypto goes down. People stop being
7:56
interested in it. Oh, it goes back up again, the
7:59
big hype cycle. And it seems to us
8:01
that the halving's happening right around the corner,
8:04
not too long from now. I mean, we're about six
8:06
months away from it, maybe a little bit longer.
8:08
But it seems like we're at about that time
8:11
where that bull market starts getting
8:13
a little itchy, starts rolling a little
8:15
bit, and now the interest is going to go back
8:18
into crypto. So maybe what would
8:20
you suggest to the new people who are just going
8:23
to start figuring out about crypto? They're
8:25
going to come in again because they always do. And this
8:27
is this next big hype cycle. What
8:29
advice would you have for them?
8:32
It's very simple. I tell people
8:34
I don't give financial
8:36
advice, but I do give investment advice.
8:39
And that basically is you
8:41
should invest in education. So
8:44
go to my website, bitcoin.page.
8:47
There's like 2000 links on there in dozens of
8:51
different categories. And it's never
8:54
too late to start learning
8:56
about this space. The main
8:59
thing that you need to avoid is getting
9:01
too much FOMO,
9:04
too hyped up and over eager
9:06
and basically jumping in and getting over your head,
9:09
because you need to understand that this
9:11
is a very unforgiving
9:13
space. On one
9:15
hand, there's some great properties
9:19
and utility that you can get from this technology.
9:21
And that basically is a result
9:24
of the fact that you can take
9:26
custody of your keys and you can
9:28
interact with these protocols and networks
9:31
without having to ask permission,
9:33
without having gatekeepers that can
9:35
screw with you and
9:37
decide how you can use your own money. But
9:39
the flip side of that is you take on
9:42
a lot of responsibility. And if
9:44
you make a mistake and you don't know what you're doing,
9:46
it can be catastrophic.
9:48
Your hard drive with 50 Bitcoin could
9:50
end up in the garbage dump somewhere in Kansas
9:52
City. Yeah, there's no crypto Karen
9:54
out there. There's nobody that Karen can complain
9:56
to. My debt coins. I
10:00
need to know. And I gotta tell you, dude, your resources
10:02
have grown tremendously. I know it's LOPP.net,
10:06
and I think you got it mirrored
10:08
out at the other, what'd you say, bitcoin.page? Yeah,
10:10
bitcoin.page goes to the same place. It's just
10:13
easier for people to remember, I think. Dude, those
10:15
resources are spectacular, folks. If you
10:17
wanna learn more about this, you definitely wanna go
10:19
to there. All those resources are tapped
10:21
out. And actually, if you go and look under podcast,
10:24
you might see a few podcasts that you
10:26
know. Yeah, there we are, that's good. So,
10:28
as
10:29
we're looking forward, of course, nobody
10:32
can actually predict squat. What
10:34
we can do is we can look at trends,
10:36
we can look at past history, and we do
10:38
know that a halving is coming. And
10:41
those of us who have slogged our way through this
10:43
bear market are quite optimistic that
10:46
next year, 2024 and 2025, are
10:49
going to see all-time highs again.
10:51
Are you of that same mindset?
10:54
Well, I certainly hope
10:56
so. It
10:59
would be not only good for me personally,
11:02
but it would be good for all of the businesses in the space.
11:05
You've surely seen over the
11:07
past year or so, the bear market is
11:09
rough. A lot of people have
11:11
had to kind of downsize, lay
11:14
people off, really
11:16
trim the fat so that we can hibernate
11:19
through the winter and hopefully emerge
11:22
in the spring and be ready
11:24
for the bull. This
11:26
is, I've
11:29
done this three or four times and
11:31
the bear markets are good for
11:34
the builders and the technologists like myself because
11:36
there tends to be fewer distractions. Though
11:39
this time around, there's still a lot of drama and
11:41
distractions of all the mess that is still being cleaned
11:43
up from a year ago, all the court cases and
11:45
stuff. But we
11:48
can get our heads down and build
11:50
more and basically prepare
11:52
for the next onslaught because once
11:55
the bull market does come, those of us
11:57
who are running companies in this space, we
11:59
tend.
11:59
to have the opposite problem where we are basically
12:02
struggling to keep our heads above water. Let
12:05
me do a quick follow-up on that. Bitcoin
12:08
in general, we always say is
12:10
unstoppable money. Under
12:12
what circumstances do you
12:15
think it would take? How big of a
12:17
black swan, how swan-y
12:20
must it be in order for
12:22
Bitcoin to fail? What is like
12:24
if you were going to write a piece of fiction and go,
12:26
this is how it ends, what would
12:28
it look like? Well,
12:31
I can certainly think of plenty of apocalyptic
12:34
events. Other
12:37
than hey, we're all screwed and the zombies are here.
12:40
Those are less interesting because the TLDR
12:44
of most of those is you've got bigger
12:46
problems to deal with. We've already seen that even huge nation
12:48
states can ban it and it
12:51
only makes a small
13:00
dent in it. So I'm not concerned
13:03
so much about governments,
13:06
at least as a cataclysmic
13:08
event, because for
13:11
better or for worse, I would say probably for
13:13
better, there is no one world government.
13:16
So governments around the world are
13:18
not going to all coordinate with each other and agree
13:20
on the same thing. So we have some
13:23
jurisdictional arbitrage that
13:25
can keep Bitcoin going even
13:27
if major nation states decide
13:30
to push against it. But
13:33
really the thing that has stuck with me
13:36
through multiple cycles
13:38
is that Bitcoin's
13:41
biggest enemy is apathy. And so it's tough
13:43
for me to
13:46
come up with specific scenarios.
13:50
But for example,
13:55
if I think the price stayed
13:58
flat or went down for many, many
14:00
years, that would push a lot of people
14:02
out, that would cause a lot of the businesses
14:05
to have to close. And
14:07
that could be a kind of
14:09
downward spiral that results in a lot
14:11
of apathy. We already get,
14:13
a lot of the tourists get pushed out, shaken
14:16
out through the bear markets already, but a
14:18
bear market where those normal cycles
14:21
got broken, I think, would
14:23
potentially cause even more people to become
14:25
apathetic. It's
14:27
hard to imagine a situation
14:30
where we actually get to the point that
14:32
the Bitcoin stops working,
14:34
because that basically means
14:37
that almost
14:39
everybody in the world has decided
14:42
that it is no longer worth trying
14:44
to keep it on life support. And so
14:47
one thing that we've seen with
14:49
a lot of these like blockchain decentralized
14:52
networks is they are extremely hard to
14:54
kill. I mean, you look at the what, 50,000
14:57
plus networks
15:00
that are out there and there's a ton of them
15:02
out there that I mean, for all intents and purposes,
15:04
they're dead. But technically, you
15:06
can still use them, you can still interact
15:08
with them. There's still a handful of people running
15:11
machines around the world that
15:14
are speaking those protocols. And
15:16
while they're not nearly as robust
15:19
or well maintained, they are technically
15:21
still usable. So I
15:24
think that Bitcoin
15:27
is not going to die unless literally everything else
15:29
dies. And the fact that these networks
15:31
can be sustained by just a handful
15:34
of people makes them very, very difficult
15:36
to completely
15:38
kill. You know, they are the cockroaches of the
15:40
sort of Internet.
15:43
Yeah, I watched a couple of interviews of you recently.
15:46
And one of the things that you were talking about was, you
15:48
know, you're not completely
15:50
opposed to a theory. And because people
15:52
are going on a theory and they're trying new
15:54
things, they're it's innovative, and
15:57
sometimes they're doing some silly things. But what
15:59
you. said was I would rather than be able
16:01
to do those silly things on Bitcoin to
16:04
explore on Bitcoin. So now
16:06
we have things like noster and Bitcoin ordinals
16:09
and some other stuff that's being built on top of that.
16:11
Where do you see that ecosystem
16:14
going? And can you you foresee
16:16
a time where maybe there's so many
16:18
ordinals that it's clogged up the network
16:20
or it's spiking the rest of the Satoshi's
16:22
that are not connected to to
16:25
those ordinals and maybe explain a little bit about
16:27
what all that means because I'm sure some
16:29
people just heard that and go this is bad crypto. I don't know
16:31
what the hell any of that is. Yeah
16:34
I mean I think the short version is that
16:36
I'm a technologist and I am
16:39
always in favor of permissionless
16:41
innovation.
16:41
Now of course there's
16:44
always going to be bad aspects that come along with that
16:47
when someone can can basically
16:49
build an entire new ecosystem
16:52
and economy with whatever economic rules
16:54
they want there are going to be a lot of questionable
16:57
or scammy ones out there. But
17:00
I think that that is kind of the price that you pay
17:02
for innovation is that there will be some
17:04
bad actors that do stupid things and
17:07
play stupid games when stupid prizes. We can
17:10
we don't have to participate but we can certainly
17:12
watch from the sidelines and we can learn
17:14
and we can learn from the failures
17:17
we can learn from the successes. There
17:20
in the early days of Bitcoin there was a fairly
17:23
strongly held thesis that any altcoin
17:26
that found product market fit and was
17:28
highly successful with some bit
17:30
of new functionality would
17:32
find that functionality eventually gets subsumed
17:35
by the Bitcoin network. Now that
17:37
thesis has not really played out. It's
17:40
hard to think of many things where that has happened
17:43
other than you know one good case what's
17:46
not quite the same thing though is that you know SegWit
17:48
got activated on Litecoin before
17:50
Bitcoin.
17:50
I mean
17:52
the plan was to have it on Bitcoin but
17:54
it ended up being an interesting sort of
17:56
test case and proof of economic
17:58
security I think. that made it easier
18:01
for it to get activated on
18:03
Bitcoin. Other than that, you know,
18:05
it's sort of novel functionality. We
18:07
haven't really seen that getting subsumed.
18:11
And so
18:13
I'm still somewhat
18:15
hopeful that we'll see more
18:17
and better
18:20
layer twos. And this actually
18:23
kind of segues into some of the side
18:25
chains and drive chains and now
18:27
spider chains discussions
18:30
that have been having over the past month
18:32
or two. And if that
18:34
was another thesis back from like 2014-2015 that
18:40
the Bitcoin ecosystem
18:43
would grow and would add more
18:45
functionality via having
18:48
a sort of blossoming ecosystem
18:51
of many side chains that are pegged
18:53
to each other. And what that basically means is
18:55
you have many different blockchains, but
18:58
under the hood they're all still effectively
19:00
using Bitcoin tokens.
19:03
You just be able to move your Bitcoin tokens
19:05
from one blockchain to another, preferably
19:08
without having to ask permission. And that sort
19:11
of that permissionless two-way pecking mechanism
19:13
unfortunately has yet to be
19:16
developed. Yeah, that's not what happened
19:18
at all. Instead we have all of these other chains
19:21
and L2s. And by the way, you get five
19:23
points for use of the word subsumed.
19:26
I think that may be the first time that has been used
19:28
on the show. So you get points. You can spend those
19:31
on nothing, but they're yours. Congratulations.
19:34
You are a technologist and as one
19:36
you are building technology. And you know, we've
19:39
all spoken for quite some time and
19:41
written about the fact that if you don't have your keys,
19:43
it's not really your crypto. You can easily
19:47
get hacked, lose it, so forth.
19:49
And you are a huge evangelist for
19:52
holding your own keys, so much so that you
19:54
have developed the software product at Keys.Casa.
19:58
Tell us what this is all about.
20:01
Yeah, so I guess I
20:03
switched over to Kaathe
20:06
just a few months after we last spoke. The
20:09
short version is that for
20:11
the first three years that
20:13
I was working full time in the space, I was working
20:15
for a company called BitGo, and
20:18
they were one of the first multi-signature wallets
20:20
out there, but they were specifically targeting
20:22
enterprises. So BitGo basically
20:25
was kind of the security product that
20:27
was used by a lot of exchange and payment processors.
20:30
And we learned a lot over the few years
20:32
when I was there, and I felt
20:34
like there was still a hole
20:37
in the market, and that was basically
20:40
a highly secure but user-friendly
20:43
for individuals type of product. So
20:45
Kaathe is
20:48
really what I believe is
20:50
the best self-custody
20:53
product that we can architect with the
20:55
current technology. Now
20:58
there are some nice improvements
21:00
on the technology that are coming down
21:02
the pipeline, and we're definitely doing research
21:04
and development on. But the short version
21:06
is that I saw many
21:10
catastrophes over the years, and I
21:12
started building this sort
21:15
of mental checklist of
21:17
best practices of how to do self-custody.
21:21
And as you know, if you look at my
21:23
website, there is a huge amount of resources,
21:26
really an overwhelming amount of resources,
21:29
even if you just go to the security section
21:31
and you try to learn how to do self-custody,
21:33
right? So the goal of Kaathe
21:36
is to put forward
21:39
a user-friendly wallet
21:42
that as long as you just follow
21:44
the instructions that are presented to you
21:47
in the mobile app, you get yourself
21:50
into this architecture that
21:52
is highly robust and
21:55
it eliminates single points of failure.
21:57
So that's the number one thing that we keep
21:59
in mind. whenever we're doing anything
22:02
at CASA is that we're developing
22:05
products that don't have single points
22:07
of failure and the reason for that is
22:09
that we could we understand that people are
22:11
human people make mistakes people
22:14
aren't security experts and
22:16
we want to remove a lot of the rough
22:18
edges a lot of the foot guns from
22:21
self-custody that result in people
22:24
you know losing their money in many
22:27
cases just locking themselves out
22:29
of their money and so having
22:32
multiple keys on multiple
22:34
different hardware devices in multiple
22:36
different geographic locations we
22:39
found gives you a level of resilience
22:42
so that you can have failures and
22:44
you can gracefully recover from those failures.
22:47
So my question would be around this then
22:49
so is is it because it looks like it's just
22:51
a mobile app or it's a desktop app does it have
22:53
a hardware component to it? I'm not
22:56
seeing one of those.
22:57
Yeah absolutely and yeah
22:59
it's a it's not possible
23:02
with CASA like we don't
23:04
let you have a multi-sig setup
23:06
where all of the keys are on internet connected
23:08
devices that would be a huge potential
23:10
point of failure so we offer both
23:13
two of three multi-sig and three of
23:15
five multi-sig and you
23:18
know different levels of support plans
23:20
I think that's one of our big differentiators is
23:22
really that at our premium tiers what you're
23:25
really paying for sure you're getting
23:27
a nice you know software user experience
23:29
but what you're really paying for is white
23:32
glove your consultation so you can
23:34
literally get on the phone with us basically
23:38
think of it as a bunch of many
23:40
Jamesons who have been trained you know gotten
23:42
all the the knowledge dumped from me on
23:44
the best practices and we help
23:47
people navigate the
23:49
decisions that need to be made you know
23:51
everyone has a different
23:55
set of variables in their life
23:57
different threats to
23:59
incorporate into their security model
24:02
different levels of convenience versus
24:05
security that they're going to be interested
24:07
in making those tradeoffs. And
24:09
we help you make those decisions while
24:12
not actually taking control of your money. Though
24:15
we do hold one key as an
24:18
emergency recovery mechanism that
24:21
you can set different authentication
24:24
protocols with us of how that
24:26
key can be requested to be used. And
24:29
that can help you get out of certain sticky situations.
24:32
I think of a bunch of many Jamesons running
24:34
around. Do they all have the beard?
24:36
That's what I want to know.
24:38
Very few. Let
24:41
me ask this then. So
24:44
say as more people get involved with crypto
24:46
and then populations get older, people
24:48
die. Is there something built
24:51
in for retirement or
24:54
even to inheritance
24:56
kind of thing if somebody passes along?
24:59
Yeah, you know, inheritance is kind of
25:01
like the
25:04
final solution, right?
25:06
So like a lot of people get into self custody
25:09
and there's a million different ways that you can do self
25:11
custody.
25:13
But
25:15
getting an inheritance setup is this really
25:17
interesting balancing act. Because
25:20
on one hand, you want to put
25:23
yourself into an architecture where
25:25
only you are able to
25:27
spend your money. But then you magically
25:30
want this switch to flip if
25:32
you cease to live. And
25:34
then you want some predetermined
25:37
person or set of people to
25:39
be able to spend your money after
25:41
that. So yeah, we do have an inheritance
25:44
product. And that is at our highest
25:47
level tier because that requires even more
25:49
consultation, more planning,
25:51
more
25:52
thinking about all
25:54
of the different situations. It's
25:57
a perplexing problem because some people would
25:59
mean... what's going to happen is you have this expert
26:02
who knows in their own world, all right,
26:04
I set up Kasa, I got it up, I'm pretty proficient
26:06
with how it all works. And then now they're
26:08
dead. And then, oh, no. And
26:11
then the people who are probably going to come in are way
26:13
less sophisticated to try to figure out how to grab
26:16
whatever crypto is in that account. So it can
26:18
definitely create an issue.
26:20
Yeah, yeah. And that's, I think, another
26:22
reason you might want a service like Kasa
26:24
to be able to facilitate recovery
26:27
and inheritance situations. So you still
26:29
have the experts available and we can
26:31
help the heirs, the beneficiaries
26:34
to get through that process. And
26:37
there's a lot of decisions to be made. For example,
26:40
it may not just be a question
26:43
of, OK, what happens if I get hit by a
26:45
truck? Some people,
26:47
of course, they start thinking about
26:49
inheritance more when they have kids. And
26:54
if you want to take it to the extreme, you may also
26:56
want to be assured that if both you and
27:01
your spouse get hit by a truck at
27:03
the same time, but your kids survive, you want
27:06
to be able to get out of that situation
27:08
as well. So it's a very complicated
27:11
problem with a number of different moving parts,
27:13
but we do have experience.
27:16
It's part of the situation,
27:18
right? We're all going there. So I didn't even
27:20
know that .kasa was a domain,
27:23
a top level domain extension, of course, Kasa Espanol
27:26
for house and keys.kasa.
27:28
It's like you own
27:31
all the Kasa now because you named your brand
27:33
after the TLD, which I think is super
27:35
smart. So you guys can
27:37
check out Kasa. This episode, not
27:40
brought to you by Kasa. This is not a paid
27:43
advertisement here. We do want you to check out what
27:45
Jameson is doing, though. So
27:47
I'm curious
27:50
to know when you are explaining
27:52
Bitcoin to a lay person
27:54
for the first time, let's assume that they
27:57
really don't know, what is the
27:59
simplest route that you take
28:02
to explain it to somebody so they immediately
28:04
get it and it doesn't take well it's
28:06
kind of like well let me explain decentralization
28:09
to you and and self custody
28:11
and how do you do it?
28:15
Well you know there's no one size fits all
28:17
thing for it what I found over the years
28:19
is that if you if you just sort
28:21
of start blabbering you know based
28:24
on your own perspectives there is a very high
28:26
likelihood that your audience will
28:28
not be interested or not get it so
28:31
you know to do it right you need to know
28:33
your audience you need to understand what what
28:36
things will be interesting to
28:38
them so I made a lot of...
28:40
Explain it to mom explain it to mom
28:42
okay let like you know somebody who's
28:45
like
28:45
I've heard of this thing you crazy
28:47
kids with your magical internet
28:49
money why should I care?
28:51
Yeah There
28:56
are plenty of metaphors out
28:58
there you know I think the the digital
29:00
gold metaphor is one of the simplest
29:03
for people to understand
29:06
because it encapsulates a
29:08
number of aspects of the system
29:11
mainly that you know it's really
29:13
it's more like a natural phenomenon than
29:15
it is a system that is run by any specific
29:19
entity a lot of the properties
29:21
of the system while theoretically
29:24
they could be changed the you know the game
29:26
theory the dynamics of the system
29:28
make them basically inviolable
29:32
so you know the idea that
29:35
we're essentially creating an alternative
29:38
financial system that
29:41
it has no knowledge of the existing
29:43
financial system and you can
29:46
use it without having to ask
29:48
anyone for permission all you have to do is
29:50
you follow the rules of the system the system
29:53
will allow you to manipulate it
29:56
beyond that of course the
29:59
exactly mechanics of this
30:02
basically magical system
30:05
can get really tricky to understand. It
30:08
is, I
30:10
think, it's pretty fascinating that
30:12
the whole thing worked. And if you
30:14
look at the people early on who were
30:16
trying to understand it, probably like
30:20
98% of even the early cypherpunks scoffed
30:23
and said, no, this will never work because of X, Y,
30:25
or Z. But just so happens
30:27
that Satoshi managed to figure out the game
30:29
theory and it's been working for 14
30:31
years now. Yeah,
30:34
that's great. I want to ask about
30:37
this. One thing I've always thought about is that, you know,
30:39
with Ethereum, they have those stable coins,
30:41
right? USDC, USDT,
30:44
there's a lot of debate on how those are good or not,
30:47
or if they're backed by real money or
30:49
how it goes. Do we think
30:51
we might ever see a Bitcoin stable
30:53
coin? Because it's weird, right? Because Bitcoin's
30:56
always pegged to the US dollar. The
30:58
US dollars could potentially be doing
31:00
some weird stuff here as we reach
31:03
the end of life cycle for the old financial
31:05
system. Right. And it's
31:07
like one of those things, it's like, OK, we know crypto
31:09
is going to go up, crypto doesn't go down. Sometimes it's good.
31:12
If you're a trader, you want to get out and
31:14
maybe put it in a stable coin because you
31:16
know the volatility of it. But there's
31:19
not a Bitcoin stable coin yet. Is that something
31:21
that we could foresee in the future?
31:26
Well, you know, there is something
31:28
called stable SATs, which
31:31
is a way of representing
31:33
dollars over lightning networks.
31:37
And I think that it's basically
31:40
like a type of derivative. So
31:43
depending on how you classify it, that might count
31:45
as a Bitcoin stable coin. I'm
31:48
sure that over the next year
31:50
or two, we are going to see some
31:53
of the existing stable coins start
31:56
to issue their tokens on
31:59
lightning networks. as Taproot Assets
32:01
becomes a thing and works its
32:04
way into production. I
32:06
think RGB is another project
32:08
that can also let you do similar tokenization.
32:12
And going back
32:14
to some of your early questions about ordinals
32:16
and stuff, I'm not bullish. While
32:20
I'm interested in seeing people do
32:22
the permissionless innovation, I'm not particularly
32:25
bullish about any of it that
32:27
is working on the main
32:29
chain, especially if you're using a lot of data
32:31
in block space, because we already know that's
32:34
not going to scale long term. So
32:37
even if those on chain or on
32:39
the base chain products
32:43
and pieces of functionality do
32:45
become
32:48
a sort of long term used thing,
32:50
I think they're going to be very niche markets, simply
32:52
because it's going to crowd out anything
32:54
except the very highest value use
32:57
cases.
32:58
So when do you think that we
33:01
make that move on the technology
33:03
adoption curve from early adopter
33:05
to the beginning of mainstream
33:07
adoption? Is it these ETFs
33:10
for BlackRock and Vanguard and whoever
33:12
else? Or does that not
33:14
even put us there yet?
33:17
Yeah, I mean, I feel like
33:19
we're already somewhat
33:21
there. I
33:23
believe Coinbase has
33:26
said that there's something like 20 or 30
33:28
million crypto
33:31
owners in America. I'm assuming that's
33:33
based off their own internal metrics. Yeah,
33:37
they put that on that can that they distributed
33:39
recently. Yeah, that's not
33:41
nothing. That is definitely
33:44
very solidly in the early adoption. 15%, yeah,
33:46
that's pretty good. Maybe
33:48
we are.
33:50
It is fascinating watching
33:52
this stuff go. And in this new life cycle,
33:55
it looks like, wow. Wow,
34:01
you know as the having happens again, what
34:03
it's going to go down to what 3.125 or
34:06
something much smaller and
34:09
then so each subsequent having
34:11
are going to seem to have less of an impact
34:13
on the overall volume because you know
34:15
really 90 plus percent of Bitcoin
34:17
has been mined almost right. So it's
34:19
like most of it's already out there. A lot
34:21
of people are holding it. They're not selling it. They're
34:24
keeping it in there. They're keeping it in their own place. This
34:27
is maybe kind of a dual question. Do
34:30
you think we'll get to a time where Bitcoin
34:32
no longer has 8 decimal
34:34
points but maybe they say hey there's only 21
34:36
million of them so let's move this
34:39
to 10 decimal points or 12 decimal points. That
34:41
way that Satoshi can get broke down in the smaller
34:44
amount because it seems like if there's
34:46
only a finite amount and the only way to go
34:48
is to divide that way. That's super-eflationary
34:51
potentially.
34:52
Yeah,
34:54
well so
34:56
I don't think that'll happen anytime
34:59
soon at the base layer
35:01
and that's primarily a function
35:04
of the way that the fees work. I
35:08
think we would need like much larger block sizes
35:10
and lower fees in order to justify
35:12
further subdivision because you know the fees
35:14
you're I think in best case scenario
35:17
you're paying at least a few hundred Satoshis
35:19
for an on-chain transaction fee at the very
35:22
lowest fee rate that is currently
35:24
allowed and relayed. However,
35:26
it is already possible
35:28
to send millis Satoshi
35:31
increments on Lightning Network. This
35:35
gets into some interesting philosophical
35:38
quandaries because technically if
35:40
you send less than one Satoshi on
35:42
the Lightning Network, you're not necessarily guaranteed
35:45
that you would be able to close that out on the main
35:47
chain once again because of the
35:50
fee situation. But I
35:52
think it is interesting. That
35:56
facilitates things like machine
35:58
payments.
35:59
you know,
36:00
really paying for resources on
36:03
demand, you can start to
36:05
have these meaningful economic
36:08
interactions that are simply not
36:10
possible at any scale
36:13
with the traditional financial system because
36:15
they have so much more overhead.
36:17
Hmm. Now, maybe if Bitcoin gets up to a million dollars,
36:20
then Satoshi's worth like a penny for something,
36:22
right? And then it's like, okay,
36:24
maybe we need to do it. But man, for Bitcoin to
36:26
get up to a million dollars, we got a way, we
36:29
got a ways to go. What do you think, Joel? What
36:31
do you think? Was that James Jameson? What do you think about
36:33
this next cycle not being a financial
36:35
advisor, being just guessing? Do we
36:37
hit 250,000 this cycle or 150,000? What do you think? Any ballpark?
36:40
Any guess?
36:44
And you don't have to eat your dick if you
36:46
don't get it right. Yeah,
36:48
you know, another
36:50
reason why I think that price predictions
36:53
aren't necessarily interesting is
36:56
because it's actually a two variable
36:58
equation. Bitcoin going
37:01
to $250,000 doesn't necessarily
37:03
mean that you're going to be able to buy
37:05
a house with one Bitcoin. It could
37:08
be that if fiat has collapsed
37:10
so much, it goes to $250,000. That's
37:13
why I've always thought when Bitcoin hits
37:14
a million, it's because the dollar has tanked,
37:16
right? Something crazy has happened.
37:19
Yeah.
37:20
Bitcoin millionaire, but it doesn't
37:22
matter because it costs me half a million
37:24
for a roll of toilet paper. So well,
37:27
let's close out with this, then. You know, hindsight
37:30
is the best vision of all. And
37:33
if you're going to look back, let's
37:35
say, to when you first discovered Bitcoin,
37:37
what does Jameson today want,
37:40
you know, younger Jameson who just discovered
37:42
Bitcoin to know?
37:47
Hmm. Mainly
37:49
that
37:50
I should care about privacy more. Unfortunately,
37:52
I had to learn my privacy lesson the hard
37:54
way of getting swatted and
37:57
having to spend a lot of time and money.
38:00
basically burning down my old life
38:02
and starting over again. Those
38:05
are really the two things, especially
38:08
in this space, but really in general, working
38:10
in cybersecurity is,
38:15
this is why I'm somewhat bearish on
38:18
humanity in terms of privacy
38:20
and security, because humans
38:24
are so, you could say lazy,
38:28
but the human- That's a nice
38:31
way of putting it. The human condition
38:33
is to take the path of least resistance
38:35
to achieve whatever you think your goal is,
38:38
and that combined with the fact
38:40
that we have now thousands
38:43
and thousands of years of human civilization
38:45
where we have created more economically
38:48
productive and
38:51
viable systems by
38:53
ceding our power
38:54
and
38:58
our skills to other people,
39:01
to basically be specialists in one or
39:03
two things, it's
39:05
this really weird trade-off
39:07
where now it is considered
39:11
normal to have other
39:13
trusted third parties facilitate
39:16
things that literally keep you alive.
39:19
I mean, most of us would die
39:21
within a few weeks if
39:23
the supply chains broke down, if
39:26
critical parts of our civilization
39:28
infrastructure stopped working. And
39:31
the kind of the scary
39:33
thing is how fragile a lot of these systems
39:35
are, but on the flip side, they're also antifragile
39:38
because we have all of these people
39:40
around the world who are constantly fixing
39:43
various aspects of civilization.
39:46
So in general, I would
39:49
want to be more privacy and security
39:52
conscious upfront, because if
39:54
you don't do that, you might
39:56
be able to go your whole life without a problem happening,
39:58
but there's always... the possibility.
40:01
And if you have a major security or
40:04
privacy event, it can be
40:06
catastrophic if you're not prepared for it. So
40:09
suffice to say, I'm a fan of prepping,
40:12
prepping in every possible way. We
40:15
talk a lot about financial sovereignty,
40:19
being a sort of sovereign individual,
40:21
at least in the context of Bitcoin. But
40:23
I think that people should take that perspective
40:26
and try to apply it to as many different aspects
40:28
of their lives as possible.
40:30
I would tell my younger Joel,
40:33
buy, you know, mine, a thousand Bitcoin
40:35
or so and sock it away and don't touch it. Then
40:38
mine was a lot simpler than yours. Anyway,
40:41
Jameson. I love that. Barris on humanity.
40:44
Yeah. Thanks for coming on, man. The
40:47
website for all things Jameson, lopp.net,
40:50
L-O-P-P dot net. And as
40:52
Travis mentioned, the resources that
40:55
he has here, this is definitely worthy
40:57
of a bookmark. So much
40:59
content right here on Bitcoin resources,
41:02
everything that you could ever want.
41:04
This might be the most definitive resource
41:06
site that I have seen
41:09
yet. So Jameson, thanks again, dude, for
41:11
coming on. I guess we'll see in five and a half years.
41:14
Hopefully less than that. Okay.
41:20
See how we just we got right into that interview,
41:22
Trav. We were like, boom, you just got to hear what
41:24
Jameson's got to say. Hope you guys check
41:26
out the show notes with the links to all his
41:28
resources at badco.in
41:31
forward slash 699.
41:34
Get secure with your Bitcoins. That's
41:37
right
41:37
in the Casa. So yeah, not
41:39
a sponsored, you know, podcast
41:42
at all, but just wanted to chat with him because he's been a true
41:44
thought leader, man. He got a Bitcoin at
41:47
the same time as me, but he looked at it in a little
41:49
different way. Like I was like, damn, it ruined my computer.
41:51
He's like, oh my God, screw
41:55
you Bitcoin, you piece of shit
41:57
scam. He's like, oh damn, this is
42:00
going to be great. You know, I look
42:02
at that and I go, I always laugh because I
42:04
don't laugh. I silently cry. But
42:06
I look at it and I go, man, I was buying so
42:08
much gold and silver in 2011. And
42:12
then my gold and silver now is worth about half
42:15
of what I paid for it. If I had only taken
42:17
a quarter of that and put it in Bitcoin,
42:21
I would be somewhere in
42:23
the most ridiculous house you've ever seen and
42:26
live in large. But it's like I didn't do
42:28
that. And it's like, wow, man.
42:31
It's like seeing gold and silver, what
42:33
it was doing then, it was almost like
42:35
the 1980s whenever the Hunt Brothers were
42:37
manipulating the silver market. Because
42:40
like silver hit almost 45 or something then
42:43
I remember. But
42:44
I do have some cool, amazing, epic coins
42:47
still, Joel. So I got that going for me.
42:49
So there's something, it's not a complete wash.
42:52
Yeah. Yeah. So you guys are going to
42:54
want to tune into our next episode because
42:56
it's number 700-700 and we're going to be talking a lot
43:02
about our thoughts of what's happened so
43:04
far. The story so far,
43:07
especially thoughts from being in
43:09
the midst of this bear market and perhaps
43:12
getting ready to come out the other side. The
43:15
bear market birth canal, if you
43:17
will. Is
43:19
that a really good? Yeah. Well, that's what it
43:21
is. It's like during the bear market, everybody gets
43:23
nice and fat. And then during the bear
43:26
market, we're all in the bull market, everybody's getting
43:28
nice and fat in the bear market. We're all getting
43:30
skinny because we're burning that fat. And
43:32
we're like, come on bull market, let's go again.
43:34
We're ready to go. I'm about 20 pounds
43:37
lighter. Speaking of burning
43:39
right now,
43:40
I've been burning. Well, that's all calories that
43:42
you gained when you went on that cruise. You're
43:46
not too far from the truth, dude. You're
43:48
back to normal now. You're
43:51
telling me I'm just here on this cruise eating every
43:53
buffet possible. And when I come back, I'm
43:55
going to lose some weight. So basically you lost some weight,
43:57
but it was all the weight you gained on the cruise. Shut up.
44:00
Shut up. Why you gotta be mean to
44:02
me? I'm
44:03
not gonna want to do episode 700 if you mean to me. Okay,
44:06
it's great, guys. Let's just say it's $6.99. That's a good number.
44:09
Nikola Tesla will approve of this number.
44:13
No, the $6.99. $3.69, where
44:16
Nikola Tesla's energy
44:18
frequency vibrations of the universe, it's
44:20
all tied together. And so he loved it. Every
44:22
time he would stay in a hotel, it always had to add
44:25
up to the number three in some way. He
44:27
was very, very focused around
44:29
the numbers three, six and nine. So this is episode
44:31
six, nine, nine. So this is one
44:33
of the most powerful episodes in all
44:35
of bad crypto so far. Oh my gosh, you
44:37
guys need to make sure... Maybe
44:39
number 693 or number 369.
44:42
Guys, make sure you're subscribed. Tell
44:45
a friend. We'll see you on episode number 700. Until
44:48
then, please of bad
44:50
staying, shall you be. If
44:52
I'm gonna do that, I should feel like Yoda. Bad
44:54
you must stay. Mmm. That
44:58
sounded more like Fuzzy Bear. Fuzzy
45:02
Bear needs to go pop now. Who's
45:05
bad?
45:25
The Bad Crypto Podcast is a production of
45:27
Bad Crypto LLC. The content
45:29
of the show, the videos and the website
45:31
is provided for educational, informational
45:34
and entertainment purposes only. It's not
45:36
intended to be and does not constitute
45:38
financial, investment or trading
45:40
advice of any kind. You shouldn't make
45:42
any decisions as to finances, investing,
45:45
trading or anything else based on this information
45:47
without undertaking independent due diligence
45:50
and consultation with a professional financial
45:52
advisor. Please understand that the trading
45:54
of Bitcoins and alternative cryptocurrencies
45:57
have potential risks involved. Anyone
45:59
wishing to...
45:59
invest in any of the currencies or tokens
46:02
mentioned on this podcast should first
46:04
seek their own independent professional financial
46:06
advisor.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More