Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
From Lauren's office, it's
0:02
episode 81 of the Adam Ragusea podcast,
0:05
and if I played games as long
0:07
as Taylor Swift plays, I
0:09
would have worked this out so that it would be
0:11
episode 89, because
0:14
today my lovely wife Lauren and I are discussing...
0:18
1989 Taylor's version! Look
0:21
at that! Yep.
0:26
Doesn't she look so happy to own her music now?
0:30
You know, the kids were looking at that in front of our brand
0:32
new record player that was our impulse purchase
0:34
that occasioned this entire situation. But,
0:38
yeah, one of them said, oh, she looks
0:40
so happy, and the other one said, oh, she looks so
0:42
pretty. And I think we both know
0:44
which said which.
0:45
Yeah. Yeah,
0:50
aww. Bless. So...
0:55
You're driving this car, honey. I
0:57
am? You're the one that wants to talk about Taylor Swift
0:59
in front of a mass audience.
1:02
To be clear, we... I,
1:06
as I have said on this podcast before, and
1:08
just in general in our living life, that
1:11
talking with you about music is one of my
1:14
favorite things, and I wish
1:16
more often the people could hear you
1:18
talk about music, because I think you are
1:20
very smart and creative about it.
1:25
Very
1:25
politic way to handle this. So I
1:28
got the new 1989. I have
1:30
been listening to it. I
1:33
have turned some of our children, some of them,
1:35
both of them, into mini Swifties. So
1:38
then you had to listen to it in the car with
1:40
them, and you were kind
1:42
of into it a little bit, and you had some interesting
1:44
things to say. And
1:47
so I said, hey, what if we just did this for the podcast
1:50
instead of...
1:52
What if indeed? What if
1:55
indeed? So here we are. So
1:57
for the non-Swifties, 1989...
1:59
is a record that is about
2:02
the year of Taylor's birth
2:05
or the name is the year of Taylor's birth,
2:07
right? Mm-hmm. Is this going to be me correcting
2:09
all the Taylor Lords? Well, no, I
2:11
just want to make it clear so that you understand. She made
2:13
this kind of like 80s-y sounding
2:16
pop record in...when
2:19
did it originally come out? In 2014.
2:22
It also sort of marked her final
2:24
hard break with her country roots.
2:26
Yeah, this was like full pop.
2:28
She just was full pop. It
2:29
won Grammy for record of the year.
2:31
It's also when kind of like snooty
2:34
a-holes like me started
2:37
to kind of grudgingly acknowledge that
2:39
like, oh, this Taylor Swift girl, she
2:41
seems to like, she can write a catchy song. Yeah,
2:43
right. Respect Knuckles for that.
2:45
There
2:45
always had to be like big capital
2:48
B buts after that.
2:48
I know. Oh, it was horrible.
2:51
It's like...
2:51
Because girls loves Taylor Swift
2:54
and anything girls like...
2:56
Can't be real. Can't be legit. ...is
2:58
easily
2:58
made fun of. I
3:01
will also say this was like my entry. I listened
3:04
to a little bit of red and I kind of liked it. But 1989
3:08
was when I first started being like...I don't
3:11
know if we called ourselves Swifties back then. I was like, yeah, I
3:13
like Taylor Swift.
3:14
Well, also it was when you had our
3:16
first child and you had a lot
3:18
of...
3:19
A lot of sitting in a chair holding
3:20
a baby time. Downtime is not the right
3:23
word for it. But I
3:25
got a lot of podcast time and you
3:27
got a lot of Taylor Swift time. It was like prison time.
3:30
Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. And
3:32
so I
3:33
would sit in the chair.
3:34
They give it a time here like it's lunch.
3:36
I would sit in a chair with a baby
3:38
asleep on my chest and I would just like put
3:40
my phone on the arm of the chair and listen
3:42
to 1989. Okay. And yeah.
3:46
But I wasn't like a diehard Swiftie. It
3:48
wasn't like... It was
3:49
a flow process. Yeah. And the
3:51
reason we're talking about it now for the non-Swifties of
3:53
the audience is that, yes, so Taylor had
3:55
a business dispute
3:58
with the... the business
4:00
entities that own the masters
4:03
to her older records. And
4:05
so she has been embarking on a project of
4:07
re-recording all of her older albums
4:10
so that she, I assume she already
4:12
owns the songwriting rights, or at least those that
4:14
she does own for the songwriting that she did. Which
4:18
of course is most of it, but not all of it. But
4:21
she also owns, now
4:24
she owns the masters to the recordings
4:26
as well.
4:27
She's basically devaluing
4:29
the originals
4:30
by public. Flooding the market, yeah.
4:32
Yes, and famously
4:34
when she said she was gonna do this, the
4:37
owner of her masters, it was
4:40
like a private equity firm and
4:42
evil former people she worked with. And
4:45
they were like, she'll never do it, don't worry, your
4:47
investment is secure. And she was like, hmm,
4:49
watch me. And it has
4:51
seriously, there are some of the major
4:55
radio stations, including internet
4:57
radio, have vowed to only play the Taylor's versions.
5:00
I mean, Die Hard Swifties obviously will go in and
5:02
change all their playlists, so it's only the Taylor's
5:04
versions.
5:05
Probably the big ticket item here is that
5:07
it opens these songs up for
5:10
licensing in films and commercials.
5:12
She didn't
5:12
license anything of the old stuff.
5:16
And now she will license the Taylor's
5:18
version. So that's why you're seeing
5:20
it appear in movies and TV show
5:22
and commercials.
5:24
So basically like Taylor Swift,
5:26
among other things, is a savage
5:28
when it comes to matters of business.
5:30
She's
5:30
a business genius. And.
5:33
Which is why she, did you
5:35
hear her? She, in the estimation of some
5:37
publications. She's a billionaire now. She crossed the billionaire
5:39
mark this week, yeah. Yes,
5:42
and obviously that's not a billion in cash
5:44
dollars, that's a billion in her like,
5:47
owning of the masters,
5:49
owning of her real estate holdings and all that stuff,
5:51
so. Indeed. Congratulations to
5:54
Taylor on being a billionaire. Now
5:56
get started
5:56
giving it away. That's what,
5:59
exactly. That's right, we all know that's the true measure
6:01
of success in life, and we all know
6:03
how fondly we all think of billionaires. Yeah.
6:06
So, and so to me, my story with Taylor begins
6:09
with 89, in
6:14
part because of all the reasons discussed,
6:16
but also because it's one,
6:20
as I have tried to kind of critically examine my
6:22
own relationship to Tay Tay,
6:26
and how it started off as
6:28
that kind of, you know,
6:31
ignorant, arrogant sneering that
6:33
a guy like me would be expected to do early
6:36
in the Taylor phenomenon, right? Mm-hmm.
6:39
Then I went to the grudging acceptance,
6:42
then, oh yeah, yeah, yeah, she knows what she's doing in terms
6:44
of like, you know, commercial success
6:46
or whatever, not, you know, artistic success,
6:48
like the kind, you know, I pursue.
6:51
Oh, Jesus Christ.
6:54
I know, I know, I know, it's so bad.
6:57
When you look at it in the light of day, like the,
6:59
you know, it's so bad. But
7:02
you came around, you came around. Sure, yeah. So
7:05
anyway, to, you know, appreciating
7:08
a lot, you know, I'm subjected to the music all the time.
7:11
Because
7:11
let me be clear, I am the
7:15
kind of controlled freak that must always drive the car,
7:17
and Adam is always the passenger, I also get car sick.
7:20
And.
7:21
I do too, not that anyone cares.
7:23
And as
7:25
the driver of the car, I'm in charge of the radio.
7:28
And so Adam must often listen to
7:30
what I choose, which.
7:31
Must often?
7:34
Sometimes we come to,
7:36
usually what happens is you say,
7:38
please, I don't wanna listen to this anymore, please don't
7:40
make me listen to it again. And then, no,
7:42
they're fine, what do you wanna listen to? And
7:45
then you'll put on like, REM's most
7:47
obscure album.
7:48
Which is
7:50
fine. Which is fine. So
7:52
there are songs, individual songs
7:55
in individual, like passages or sections
7:57
or lines, that I do sincerely
7:59
like. you know,
8:02
there's much more of it that I like,
8:04
I respect for
8:07
its artistry. It's just not for me,
8:09
right? But
8:12
furthermore, but I, you know, my
8:14
interest in Taylor, I feel
8:16
like is
8:19
bigger than it should be for
8:22
an artist whose music doesn't really speak to me,
8:24
isn't for me, right? Like
8:27
I'm more interested in her than I'm more interested
8:29
in other, you know, beautiful girl
8:32
singers who grown ass women.
8:34
She's 33 or 34. Well,
8:37
I mean, you know, I can acknowledge that part
8:39
of the reason my interest in her has grown
8:42
is that it's like, I don't like... She
8:44
has become much more mature. I
8:46
like women. And like her
8:49
new phase of kind of womanly
8:51
power is very appealing,
8:53
I think. You know, in a way that your
8:56
present phase of womanly power is
8:59
quite appealing to me. Oh my God.
9:02
Thank you, I appreciate that.
9:04
Alright, I'm not making a joke, you know, that's
9:06
real, right? Yes, I do. Thank you. So...
9:10
Woo! It's lushing.
9:13
Getting hot in here. So...so...what
9:17
the hell are we talking about? Well, okay,
9:20
so
9:20
I'm going to start the first comments argument.
9:23
The
9:23
first time that people in the comments are going to start
9:26
typing and being like, no, you're wrong.
9:29
I think that Taylor has
9:31
reached the point of probably
9:34
most popular pop
9:37
star of all time. Like the
9:40
only people I think who could compete, and
9:43
this is not an endorsement of this person, but
9:45
like Michael Jackson. Yeah, yeah, yeah,
9:47
sure. But even like if you look at
9:49
the level of...and it's also, I mean, you
9:51
do have to calibrate for the level
9:53
of... Population growth
9:55
and... Population growth and also just like media
9:57
saturation because there was just so much fewer
9:59
media.
9:59
Exactly, and
10:00
now you, I mean, Taylor is
10:03
everywhere. And I
10:05
just, you know, the tours
10:07
and the concert film and the social
10:10
media.
10:10
And I think this is why I am
10:13
particular, one of the reasons why I am
10:15
more interested in her than my interest
10:18
in her music would indicate. And that
10:20
is that I am just amazed to
10:22
see like a level of human performance
10:26
at that height. Yes.
10:29
Like if you consider the full package. It's
10:31
a level of excellence that is shocking.
10:34
And everything she does, yes, it is a level
10:36
of excellence that is
10:38
almost unprecedented. Yeah.
10:41
Like,
10:43
and
10:45
that's incredible. Yeah. That
10:47
is, of course that would have to get
10:50
your attention. And I always feel
10:52
ridiculous when I say this it's
10:56
almost like a truism, but I have this
10:58
particular interest in things that
11:02
are successful things that managed
11:04
to be successful at the nexus of both
11:06
artistic and commercial success. Things
11:09
that managed to be really, really good
11:11
kind of any way you look at them.
11:12
So it's not like somebody sat in a lab
11:14
and designed something to become very
11:17
successful,
11:17
to be created or said.
11:19
So for example, like the Barbie movie, which
11:21
we talked about recently, the is
11:24
something that I think is like at this nexus of both commercial
11:27
and artistic success. And
11:29
in music, an example in my mind
11:31
would be Peter Gabriel's, so album,
11:35
an album of like enormous artistic
11:38
merit, really
11:40
sophisticated esoteric stuff like he
11:42
had been doing for a while. And
11:44
also like one of the greatest biggest
11:47
pit pop albums of the eighties, the biggest
11:49
decade for pop album. That has Sledgehammer
11:53
and all the ones you know. Helper Hill.
11:55
No, no, no, no. So that's an older one. No. So
11:58
is Sledgehammer and And don't give
12:00
up and big time, red
12:05
rain, in your eyes. Okay.
12:10
Yeah. Now I'm there. Now you're there. I
12:12
knew those other songs but like, In your
12:14
eyes, okay. Yeah,
12:17
right. And this 89 album,
12:20
I remember when it came out thinking, wow, this
12:22
might be one of those. Starting
12:27
with the opening track, Welcome
12:29
to New York, which is so trite in
12:31
some ways, but as is so often
12:34
the case with Taylor, if you just
12:37
get over yourself for two seconds.
12:39
Yeah, the initial
12:41
critique of that song, I think
12:43
that Lazy Hipsters do,
12:46
cause the chorus is Welcome to New York, it's been
12:48
waiting for you. And it's like, no, it fucking hasn't.
12:50
New York is not like that, but-
12:52
But in fact, it actually has
12:54
been in many ways for generations
12:56
of people. And it
12:59
has been the place-
13:00
I mean, it's the cliche of like, you
13:02
pack up your car or you pack up your bags
13:04
and you move to New York with a dream and-
13:06
I grew up five and a half hours away from New
13:08
York City. So I don't know if it was like this for you, but basically
13:11
I grew up far enough away from New York
13:13
City to where it was this like purely
13:15
theoretical, magical fairy land of perfectness,
13:18
where we would all be accepted and you know, right?
13:20
I'll see you that and raise you one further. I
13:23
grew up in Tennessee
13:24
in the conservative South, where
13:27
all the time I was like, God, if I could just get
13:29
myself to New York,
13:30
or
13:31
the North Sea.
13:32
And think of all of the kids in your high school who were
13:34
even more different than you were. Yeah,
13:35
who like wanted to get the fuck out of there. And
13:39
if I go to New York, all of these possibilities
13:41
that are not possibilities for me here, it
13:43
could be possibilities
13:44
for me. Right, right, right.
13:45
So instead I went to Indiana.
13:46
Indeed. It worked out. That's
13:48
okay, all the New York kids went to Indiana. All
13:51
those deuce bros. I got to
13:53
New
13:53
York eventually.
13:55
You did. A
13:58
lot of my friends got to New York. because it was close
14:00
enough that like most
14:03
of us who, it wasn't
14:05
super hard to reach the escape velocity
14:08
necessary to get yourself to New York from State
14:10
College, Pennsylvania. And there were like
14:12
a lot of misfits
14:14
and punk rockers and queer people and stuff
14:17
who all wanted to get there. Yeah, you
14:19
guys being close
14:19
enough could get there and know people there.
14:22
Whereas for like, growing
14:24
up in Tennessee, it was like, Yeah, it was like,
14:26
it really was a risk of either you had to get into
14:29
college there, which that was my original plan
14:31
was to go to college there, but then I couldn't bring
14:33
myself to spend the money. So.
14:36
If you're gonna move to New York, you need
14:38
good people. You need to partner with the
14:41
right kind of person, such as when you're hiring
14:43
for your business, you didn't even know
14:45
what happened. I thought you were
14:47
looking up Taylor Swift lyrics
14:48
there for a second. I was halfway
14:50
through the transition before
14:54
I got you. Well done, sir. And so like,
14:56
that's not a full got you, that's like a half got
14:58
you, but I got you.
15:00
And if you need to get somebody who has
15:02
a lot of talent and can help you in your business
15:05
the way that I tried to help Lauren and
15:07
her business in this room, where
15:09
I am officially your employee, I
15:11
believe. Technically, according
15:14
to the Articles of Corporation. Indeed, exactly.
15:16
You weren't for me. That's right, well, yeah.
15:19
Anyway, I'm not saying
15:22
that it's gonna work out as well for you as it has for us,
15:25
but it could work out really well for you
15:27
with Indeed, because Indeed is the hiring
15:30
platform where you can attract, interview,
15:32
hire, all in one place.
15:35
You don't wanna be spending hours on multiple
15:37
job sites looking for candidates
15:39
for your position with the right skills
15:41
when Indeed's powerful hiring platform can
15:44
help you do it all, all in the same place.
15:46
They streamline hiring with powerful tools
15:49
that find you matched
15:49
candidates. With Instant Match, that's
15:52
Indeed's, one of Indeed's most exciting
15:54
features, Instant Match, with that, over 80% of
15:57
employers get quality candidates. people
16:00
whose resume on Indeed matches their
16:02
job description the moment they sponsor
16:04
a job, according to Indeed's US
16:07
data. And even better, Indeed is the only
16:10
job site where you only pay for
16:12
applications that meet your must-have
16:14
requirements. This is where everybody
16:16
is. Something like 80% of US
16:19
online job seekers are looking for
16:21
jobs on Indeed every month.
16:24
This is the one place you need to be, and
16:26
you only pay for those matches that have
16:29
your must-have requirements. So start hiring
16:31
now with a $75 sponsored job
16:33
credit to upgrade your
16:35
job post at indeed.com slash
16:38
ragusea. That offer is good for a limited
16:40
time. Claim your $75 credit
16:42
right now at indeed.com slash ragusea.
16:46
Indeed.com slash ragusea. Terms
16:48
and conditions apply. Need to hire? You
16:50
need Indeed. And
16:54
we need to talk about how
16:57
Indeed, sorry, it
17:02
has been idealized. And I know
17:04
a lot of my friends from school who
17:07
went to New York got chewed
17:09
up and spit right back again. Just
17:12
spit right back Interstate 80, like
17:15
so much loogie down a straw. But
17:19
for a lot of people, and especially
17:22
for queer friends, and
17:24
people who were just different in some really
17:26
profound way, more than I felt different, and
17:30
I felt really different from other kids.
17:32
Related to that, first Taylor
17:34
Swift reference to, she
17:37
says, boys and boys and girls
17:39
and girls. Boys and boys and girls and girls. You can love who
17:41
you want in New York.
17:42
And then it's like, it is the tiniest toe
17:44
dipped into the pond of allyship.
17:46
But like,
17:47
she got grilled about it. She got grilled
17:49
about it. It seems very timid in retrospect,
17:51
but also especially remembering that she had come from Nashville.
17:55
That was like, that was her first
17:57
political statement. Yeah. So
18:00
everyone starts somewhere. You
18:02
know, it's funny. This was the same time
18:04
when,
18:06
oh, who's the really handsome country
18:08
singer who's a incredible guitar player
18:11
and does the insurance advertisements with
18:14
Peyton Manning? Oh, Brad Paisley?
18:16
Brad Paisley, yeah. Brad Paisley. So
18:18
like good guy, Brad Paisley, right? I don't know if you remember,
18:20
this is like right around the same time. He
18:23
had a song out called, Welcome to the Future.
18:26
That was like a minor, it was like a big
18:28
country hit and a minor pop crossover hit.
18:31
And it was a song about like kind
18:33
of New York, it was like, it was basically about, it was like
18:35
the, it was his version of the Welcome to New York
18:37
song. It was kind of about like growing
18:41
up and
18:43
it's not explicitly about people from
18:46
the South the way that they are. And
18:48
yes, Taylor is from Pennsylvania, but first
18:50
of all, Central Pennsylvania is the South. I thought
18:52
she was from Virginia. She's originally from Pennsylvania.
18:54
Central Pennsylvania is the South, ladies and gentlemen.
18:57
We call it Pencil Tonky for a reason. Secondly,
19:00
she like, that's where she started. And then she like kind of came
19:02
up around Nashville. Right? So anyway, okay. Anyway,
19:04
so like the subtext of those songs is
19:06
that yeah, these are people from the South and
19:08
from Southern culture who have
19:10
managed to through the power of their careers
19:13
and the power of their talents kind of break into
19:15
a bigger, more cosmopolitan world.
19:18
And they feel liberated by that. And
19:20
they wanted to sort of celebrate that, but
19:22
also celebrate that, but also kind of rather
19:24
than kind of sneer back at
19:27
everybody back home, both of these songs kind of
19:29
say, Hey, come on, it's great. You know, the water's
19:31
great. Come join us. Everybody
19:34
can be what they want to be. All kinds of
19:36
people are here getting along and it's fine.
19:39
Yeah.
19:41
And it's a very,
19:44
it is a naive sentiment, no
19:47
doubt. I'm surprised you know that song and I don't.
19:49
I'm so sorry. This
19:51
is back when I paid attention to things more than I do now.
19:54
But it's a naive sentiment, but like this is like
19:56
Taylor's talent is taking something
19:59
that like I feel. So any other songwriter
20:01
of her caliber would
20:04
dismiss as being trite. And
20:06
she thinks, no, no, no, no. This feeling
20:08
I'm having right now of being a young woman who's
20:11
living in New York for the first time and I'm really excited
20:13
about it. Yes, I know this is a super
20:15
basic feeling, but that means
20:18
a lot of people are having it or have fantasized
20:20
about having
20:21
it. Where other people see basic,
20:23
she sees
20:23
universal. Yes.
20:25
And so then, yeah,
20:27
like the sneering hipsters are like, but
20:29
everyone else is like, I know this.
20:32
I connect with this feeling. This feels real to me. Like
20:34
how many people after this song came out,
20:37
listen to it as they were heading into
20:39
the city to move into the dorms
20:41
at, you know, City College or NYU or Columbia
20:45
or wherever, you
20:47
know, and or moved
20:50
there for their first job out of college
20:52
and,
20:53
you know, legit. Or
20:56
if it wasn't New York, it was Chicago
20:59
or it was
21:01
LA or Atlanta or Houston
21:04
or, you know, or it was, you know,
21:06
it was London. And
21:11
and all you have to do to make
21:13
a really, I
21:17
think the reason the reason
21:20
you dismiss cliches is not because they're
21:22
bad or because they're used up. It's because they're too hard.
21:25
Interesting. Because in order to pull
21:27
off a cliche, you have to like stick
21:30
the landing. Yeah.
21:33
Or just see it in a
21:35
new way.
21:36
And she took a cliche and she put a
21:39
really catchy tune to
21:40
it. Yeah. And just said it
21:42
in a new way, in a slightly new way, but in a more
21:44
perfect way than anyone had said it before.
21:47
I can't believe we've spent so much time talking about Welcome
21:49
to New York, which is honestly like one of my
21:51
least
21:51
favorite things on the album. And I'm not even
21:53
I don't even think it's one of her most successful
21:56
songs, like artistically. I'm
21:58
not even sure it even actually.
22:00
succeeds in the way that we're saying that it
22:02
does. I think it almost does for sure. But
22:05
I also think that this is how she typically
22:07
succeeds, is that because
22:10
she is so damn good at
22:13
finding just the right line
22:15
to express a feeling that a lot
22:17
of people have, she
22:20
can pull off the cliche. And
22:24
people who think that she's not
22:27
good, people who still to this
22:29
day, write think pieces
22:31
in the national review or whatever about
22:33
how Taylor Swift's cultural
22:36
hegemony of the moment is an indication
22:38
of cultural decline and blah, blah, blah.
22:40
People are,
22:42
old white men are still writing that
22:45
think piece and getting paid
22:47
per word. And they're wrong,
22:50
wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong. Because, and
22:53
the thing that's ironic about it is that they just
22:55
can't, these guys who fancy themselves as
22:57
deep thinkers can't be bothered
22:59
to actually listen to the song and
23:02
pay attention to why millions of people
23:04
love it. It's not because it's
23:06
trite, it's because it's universal
23:09
and very good. Yes.
23:12
That said, there's things about her as
23:14
an artist that kind of frustrate me.
23:16
Sure. And, you know,
23:18
but the way
23:19
that I'm gonna
23:22
be like a better
23:25
version of masculinity than
23:27
I would have been in a prior generation
23:30
is that I'm gonna acknowledge that that's
23:32
not a problem with her, right? What
23:37
she's doing
23:38
is working. Like, if anybody was curious
23:40
what working looks like,
23:44
it's
23:47
like Taylor Swift's last nine months, you
23:50
know? Yeah. Like,
23:52
holy crap.
23:55
To think that she has been doing the areas to her,
23:58
all of that.
23:59
And at the same time that she has been doing
24:02
this rerecord project, which we haven't
24:04
even talked about
24:05
the enormous work involved
24:08
in rerecording an album as Technically
24:10
sophisticated as really any of her albums, but
24:12
this one You and I have talked about
24:14
how like the albums she's rerecorded
24:16
up to this point have been more country So
24:19
they have been more
24:20
easy to reproduce Yeah, because people play
24:22
the instruments. A mandolin is a mandolin is a mandolin
24:24
like you just get it in front of a microphone That's
24:27
you know, but
24:27
this was her most Electronic
24:30
like she did it with Jack Antonoff.
24:31
Yeah of bleachers and fun
24:33
and as someone who has spent a lot of time
24:37
at August institutions
24:40
in Labs sponsored
24:42
by people with fancy names as
24:44
someone who spent a lot of time making
24:47
bleep blorpy sounds in a
24:49
computer. Yeah, you know and trying
24:51
to find a new and interesting bleep or blorp,
24:53
right like The way that
24:55
you get the most interesting bleeps and blorps is
24:58
by just like You just
25:00
like fiddle fiddle and and the eye
25:03
Being able to the eye the notion of being able to recreate
25:06
that is ridiculous It's well
25:07
and especially when you consider hold
25:09
on. Hello. Yes
25:13
What time is it as
25:16
soon as we're done with this year we're gonna have dinner yeah,
25:18
then you can have a cookie, okay
25:21
All right
25:22
All right, we'll be done in a little bit. Okay All
25:25
right anyway Well,
25:29
especially like when you consider that
25:32
how much that this out the original is
25:34
nine years ago Yeah, the technology
25:36
the programs they're using the computers
25:38
are different indeed Yeah, so the settings that
25:40
they use to make the original 1989 might not even exist
25:42
anymore
25:44
and it's the kind of thing where they
25:46
can't
25:48
The Legality of using individual
25:51
Samples and such that a guy like Jack Antonoff
25:53
might fabricate for the purposes of producing
25:56
a Taylor Swift track I'm not quite
25:58
sure what the lawyers told them about what
26:00
they could use.
26:01
So, yeah, they may have started fresh trying
26:03
to recave. And it does sound, and as
26:05
a result, I think this is the album that sounds
26:07
the most different of all of the re-records.
26:10
Right. And there are hard
26:12
chords to, okay.
26:13
From,
26:15
on a scale of one to 10, one
26:18
being I like some Taylor songs, and 10 being
26:21
I decode all the Easter eggs professionally on the internet.
26:24
I'm probably like a four, four or five
26:26
on the safety scale.
26:28
Oh, the scale just goes so high.
26:30
The hardcore, there are hardcore Swifties
26:32
who are like, it's different, I don't
26:34
like it. I mean, her voice has
26:37
changed in nine years. She's definitely
26:39
embracing the Alto. It's
26:42
older. She always was an Alto, right? Yeah,
26:44
but she,
26:45
I saw somebody on the internet, and I wish I could
26:47
credit them for this, saying that because
26:49
this was her first pop record, and because
26:52
pop singers are often main
26:55
character sopranos, she was being
26:57
much more, she was going higher,
27:00
and while
27:00
she- And also sort of going
27:02
for these kind of self-consciously, I think
27:04
girlish
27:05
tones. Yeah, and I, well,
27:07
I think she hits the high notes better now, but also
27:09
when she goes into her low register, it's really
27:12
resonant now. Yeah. I
27:14
think it's nice. Womanly. And so,
27:16
yeah, it sounds different. I think there are people
27:18
who are mad about that. There
27:21
are people who are mad if you say it sounds different.
27:23
These are the kind of people who like, one
27:27
of my videos recently, somebody
27:29
commented on how I looked a little
27:31
older,
27:32
and someone said, yeah. Time marches
27:34
on, asshole. No, someone said, it's true, our
27:36
millennials are aging. And
27:39
then I said that to you, and you said, yeah, time marches
27:42
on, asshole. The bell
27:44
tolls.
27:44
Yeah. They're good for
27:46
the grace of God, people.
27:49
It's all happening at the exact
27:51
same rate. Old is the goal. For
27:54
all of us. Yeah. Same
27:56
night awaits us all, motherfucker.
27:58
Well, so do you think, are there any other? of the
28:00
original tracks you want to talk about or do you
28:02
want okay
28:03
here's well I wanted to sort of talk about her
28:06
her voice a little bit more okay I mean
28:08
she's someone who one
28:10
of the many reasons why she was unduly
28:14
dismissed by the intelligentsia
28:16
earlier on in her reign is
28:18
that she's not a
28:21
great singer she's not and she would
28:23
never call herself yeah like
28:24
well and she even references that in
28:27
one of the songs off of speak
28:30
now
28:30
mean yes about
28:32
how like her it's specifically
28:34
about a critic who often wrote about how she couldn't say
28:36
couldn't saying exactly and by the way
28:38
that's the mean that's the first song that I heard of
28:40
hers where I was like oh wow that's that's a very good
28:42
song that's whoever
28:43
no you're thinking of mine is that the one
28:46
made her a bowl of the careless man's careful daughter
28:49
I mean yeah someday
28:50
someday I'll be living in
28:52
a single city like yeah
28:55
yeah yeah no that's that's that's a
28:57
song classic I
29:00
was like I heard that that's the one that's yeah
29:03
I heard that I was like that's a that's a like a pop standard
29:05
going forward instantly you know yeah
29:08
but anyway so
29:10
she
29:11
she's not a great singer but the thing is
29:13
that it's like when we talk about male
29:16
great male songwriters when
29:18
do we ever demand that they be great singers
29:21
we only ever demand that they be competent singers
29:24
yeah and sometimes we let them get away
29:26
with being Leonard Cohen and Bob Dylan you
29:30
know oh god like
29:32
you know like
29:34
and like and the level of like
29:36
it's like and Taylor Taylor is only a bad
29:39
a bad singer in the sense that you compare her
29:41
to someone like or like
29:43
somebody voicey you know yeah
29:45
yeah who's big who's big right now with
29:47
a really great voice Ariana Grande
29:50
or who
29:54
the the Albanian Alto
29:59
What?
30:01
Dua Lipa, Dua Lipa, yeah. Oh,
30:04
right. Who isn't even a very acrobatic singer,
30:06
but just tambourine, wow, what a voice.
30:09
Or like Katy Perry, tambourine, wow,
30:11
what a voice, even if not the most acrobatic. And
30:14
then there's also incredibly acrobatic singers. Like
30:16
Christine Aguilera. Yeah, yeah. And she
30:18
is none of those, but as singer-songwriters
30:21
go, great songwriters go, as great
30:23
songwriters go, she's up there
30:26
with like John Lennon and like, and Paul
30:28
McCartney and like, you know, her voice
30:30
is that good. Yeah, yeah.
30:31
You know, it's just, you know, but
30:34
when John Lennon would sing,
30:36
you know, so basically, when there
30:38
was an incident when Taylor was on the, I
30:41
think it was the Grammys or something, and
30:43
she sang the
30:45
Stevie Nicks
30:48
song, Rhiannon, is that
30:51
how you say that name? Yeah. And
30:53
which has a really tricky vocal line in
30:55
it that, and
30:58
she sang it, she didn't do so
31:00
well, because maybe she was like a child
31:02
on live television in front of millions
31:05
of people, right? And also, that's a
31:07
hard song to sing, you know, as a lot
31:09
of karaoke people have found out, you
31:11
know, that is a surprisingly hard
31:13
song to sing, you know, and people made
31:15
like mincemeat out of her. And it's like
31:18
when John Lennon would sing flat,
31:20
it's like,
31:20
oh, the emotion, the
31:23
rawness. He's so taken away
31:25
by the melody. Yeah, exactly. You know,
31:28
he's a musician from the street, you know, he's
31:31
not schooled like you. You know
31:33
John
31:33
Lennon can't read music, right? Exactly,
31:35
that's right.
31:37
Jesus
31:39
Christ.
31:41
So can we talk about the singles? Sure. Okay,
31:44
so...
31:44
If you hold your microphone a little bit like more...
31:47
Sorry, sorry. There you go. It's
31:49
getting so heavy. It's so heavy. It's so heavy.
31:51
Adam wanted to go handheld, I'm like, these things weigh
31:53
a lot. Okay. Ooh,
31:56
this is actually kind of nice.
31:57
Is that what Taylor would say?
31:59
use a lighter fucking microphone.
32:01
She'd be like, you know what, this microphone is too heavy. Bring
32:04
to me a lighter microphone.
32:04
I know that. But I am not Taylor
32:07
Swift, so I have to use this heavy microphone.
32:10
An assistant on wings would descend.
32:13
Yes. They would be like, Madam,
32:15
here is your, and she would say thank you.
32:17
And then give them a giant bonus. She
32:19
would know exactly, she would know their names. She
32:22
would know the names of their kids. Because,
32:24
ugh. Okay, so I. She would have perfection.
32:27
I think Taylor has always been really terrible
32:29
at picking singles. As
32:32
evidenced by the fact that the lead single, Office,
32:35
I don't know if Welcome to New York was the lead.
32:36
It's the first one that I remember. But, Shake
32:38
It Off.
32:39
Shake It Off, yeah.
32:41
Which is a fine song. It's like, it's
32:43
a fun party song, but that
32:45
one
32:46
leans more towards the trite. Yes.
32:49
When You Had, When Out of the Woods was right
32:52
fucking there. When Wildest Dreams
32:54
was there. When Style was there. But
32:56
honestly, Wildest, or Out of the Woods should
32:59
have been the single. I think she picks, I
33:01
think she gets nervous and picks the song
33:03
that sounds most fun and
33:06
pleasing to the masses instead
33:08
of the song that obviously
33:10
everyone is gonna be scream singing with. Well,
33:14
I think that maybe you don't give her enough credit.
33:17
But, probably. In knowing, and, like
33:19
she writes, when she writes, when someone
33:21
like that writes a song, like Shake It Off, she
33:24
knows exactly what she is doing. And
33:26
when she puts it as a single, she knows exactly what
33:28
she is doing. And it had the exact desired effect.
33:31
Right, and everyone's like this. It was a gigantic smash. Right,
33:33
and it's
33:34
a smash and all of that because people think it's fun.
33:36
Permanent
33:36
weddings and dances and anywhere
33:39
gay people are for. But
33:41
even then, like,
33:42
if you,
33:45
nobody wants, when they see Taylor
33:47
Swift, nobody wants to hear Shake It Off.
33:49
Nope, no. No, nobody wants to hear her sing that.
33:51
Nobody, please.
33:53
That is at the bottom of the
33:55
list of songs they want to hear. Let's go on TikTok right
33:57
now. And look at videos
33:59
from the stand. where there's tween
34:01
girls.
34:02
No, I'm telling you, you are wrong about
34:04
this. You are absolutely wrong. I
34:06
accept that. They wanna hear, in
34:09
the eras set for 1989,
34:13
people are very mad that Out
34:15
of the Woods is not part of that. People
34:18
wanna hear Wildest Dreams, people wanna hear Style.
34:21
I think, you know, yeah. People
34:26
don't really like Bad Blood, but I do. Anyway.
34:30
Style, I, so
34:33
I,
34:35
I took the kids out of the house the other
34:38
day.
34:39
As you often do.
34:40
Don't make it sound like it. But I did it
34:42
specifically this time because I needed to
34:44
get away from Taylor Swift. So like we, we
34:47
bought this, you bought this record. Yes.
34:50
What's the, are the awesome local record store that you found?
34:52
Lost and Found Records. Lost and Found Records in Knoxville, Tennessee,
34:55
Rad Store. It's a great, great record
34:58
store. And so,
35:00
you noticed, is it on their social media? You
35:03
saw them unboxing this and you were like, I'm gonna go buy
35:05
that.
35:05
Yeah, they do a video on Instagram
35:07
of their new arrivals and it's just like they flip through
35:09
everything, either the new stuff or also stuff
35:12
they bought from somebody that's interesting.
35:14
And they showed the 1989 record and
35:17
I had been excited about this. So I obviously
35:19
fired up on Spotify, but like that's
35:21
not fun to celebrate a release day by just like
35:24
hitting a button on your phone. And I was like, you know what?
35:26
I wanna buy this thing. I want the object. Freaking
35:28
textbook case of how
35:30
you run a brick and mortar
35:33
media business today.
35:36
You know, if you can do it and these guys
35:38
are doing it, like it's by doing
35:40
stuff like that.
35:41
Yeah, and so I went and I bought the record and
35:44
so you had, oh, you were taking the kid to violin
35:47
and he was like, and as soon as you got in the car, he was like, can
35:49
we listen to Taylor Swift?
35:51
Yes, and I was like, Jesus. Please
35:54
no. But yes, so I put it on anything.
35:57
No, I mean, so especially with what.
36:01
We have one of them who
36:06
is really being,
36:08
in the way he is developing, is developing in
36:10
a very stereotypically boyish
36:12
way, right? In a way that like,
36:15
you know, is just sort of remarkable.
36:17
And it's like, and it's sort of, I think speaks
36:19
to, because that's
36:22
not, he's not getting that from us, you know?
36:24
It's like, if coming from somewhere powerful,
36:27
you know? And it's been interesting to watch. But
36:30
anyway, so when that one especially
36:32
wants to listen to a female
36:34
singer, or watch the Barbie movie, or
36:36
something like that, I say yes.
36:38
The little one, when I asked him what records he wanted
36:40
to get, he said Twisted Sister. But
36:42
he also...
36:43
Which is pretty awesome.
36:44
I love taking him into the record store and being like,
36:47
tell the man what you're looking for.
36:48
Do the voice, do the voice.
36:50
I want Twisted Sister.
36:54
My proudest moment is apparent.
36:55
But he also wants to listen to Taylor
36:58
Swift, because he enjoys it.
36:59
So that's why I grudgingly said, yes,
37:01
I'll put on 1989. He
37:04
asked for 1989. Yeah. Taylor's
37:07
version. So I put it on and I'm listening to
37:09
it, and it gets to Style, which
37:12
is a song that is about Harry Styles,
37:14
right? Well,
37:15
there's some debate, but probably
37:17
about Harry Styles.
37:19
And
37:21
I've never liked that song.
37:24
Ugh. You don't like it because she calls herself
37:27
pretty in it. I've
37:29
got the red, the magic
37:32
thing that you like. Anyway.
37:33
So here's the reason. I've actually interrogated
37:36
my feelings on this, and I think it's actually a little
37:38
bit different than what you would expect. Okay. Because
37:40
it's different than what I expected. But I actually think this is true. Okay,
37:43
let's hear it. I find that song
37:45
to be exclusionary of non-gorgeous
37:48
people. Oh, jeez. Maybe
37:53
that's what I like it. I thought you said
37:55
you love it and I as a mere mortal.
38:00
Like this song that's just
38:02
about two really hot people
38:05
celebrating how unbelievably
38:07
hot they are together. There
38:09
is someone in the comments right now unironically
38:11
typing, Lauren's not hot. And
38:13
you know what to
38:14
that person? Double deuces to you, sir. I say, get
38:16
fucked. I
38:17
like myself. You can't.
38:19
So we know. Anyway.
38:20
Anyways. I love the
38:22
imagery of
38:24
it. I think it's fantastic.
38:26
I think it's fun.
38:28
What caught my attention this time,
38:30
and that's a good dumb hang up for that's a
38:33
dumb reason for me to not like that song. Right.
38:36
That's not a problem. That's not a problem with the song. That's
38:38
not a Taylor problem. That's an Adam problem.
38:40
Okay. But what caught my attention. I was listening to the rerecord
38:43
was the first has
38:45
got the feel. You
38:47
know, it's a, it's very much like a full
38:49
live band and it's got
38:52
this like great 70s feel
38:54
to it. Oh yeah. It's
38:57
just wind in your hair and
38:59
it feels like driving your Camaro
39:02
and your aviators. It feels like
39:04
boys of summer. Oh hell yeah.
39:06
It really does. It's always a summer. Yeah.
39:09
Yeah. It doesn't sound like it. It
39:11
feels like it. It feels like it. I
39:13
love boys of summer. The same windbreaker and sunglasses
39:16
would be applied to either song. Yeah.
39:20
Right. And in her. And so anyway,
39:22
so I think I remembered that I always
39:24
liked that verse and that groove and
39:27
I'm ashamed that I first noticed it
39:29
when what's his name? Hipster Mccountry
39:32
abuser covered it. Oh,
39:35
Ryan Adams. Ryan Adams. Yeah. For
39:38
reasons that pass understand. I know, but I remember he was
39:41
on like a late night television show that was on in the
39:43
background and he played style.
39:45
Yeah. And I remember that whoa, that versus
39:48
that group is hot. Like, but
39:50
he didn't do anything new to it. And he just played it as,
39:53
as, as written, you know? But
39:55
anyway, and I heard that now with her older
39:58
womanly voice.
39:59
Yeah, and she's like putting a little
40:02
like
40:03
almost kind of stereotypically
40:05
kind of male 60s
40:08
70s soul singer kind of sex
40:10
on that performance and
40:13
that got my attention Adam
40:15
that got my attention. I
40:18
will admit to you
40:19
He to the point where he texted me and
40:21
said I think I like style now
40:24
and I said Welcome
40:28
to the circus. We're all clowns here She
40:32
talked about the vault tracks sure. Okay.
40:34
So for anyone who's Unversed
40:37
how could you be but all the
40:39
rerecords come with what are called
40:41
vault tracks? Which are songs
40:44
that she wrote to some
40:46
degree or another? At
40:48
the time of the recording of the original album
40:50
that he
40:50
sketched out Biss some of them
40:53
you got
40:53
further than others but for whatever
40:56
reason they did not make the album
40:58
and so she has Produced them
41:00
to completion obviously as
41:02
part of the rerecords. This
41:05
one has one two three
41:07
four five Fault
41:09
tracks if you get the deluxe
41:12
version. It also has an extra version of bad
41:14
blood with
41:18
Yeah So
41:22
Do you do you have any interest in any
41:24
of the vault tracks? I? Mean
41:27
the most famous of all the vault tracks is obviously
41:29
shoulda woulda coulda wrong coulda woulda
41:31
shoulda wrong Shoulda woulda coulda woulda shoulda
41:33
wrong. That's not a vault track coulda woulda shoulda wrong
41:35
That's that is a bonus
41:37
track on bone. We just not a rerecord.
41:40
Okay, it doesn't count It's
41:41
just noteworthy because it's like maybe her
41:43
best song ever and the notice that the notion
41:45
that it was a bonus track is kind Of is
41:48
just yes interesting thing But the
41:50
most famous of all vault tracks is obviously the
41:52
10-minute version of all too well
41:55
right That she
41:57
performs at the arrows to her
41:59
song about John Mayer? Jake
42:01
Gyllenhaal. Jake Gyllenhaal, yes. Okay.
42:04
Allegedly. Allegedly. Alma,
42:10
I believe the supposition
42:12
is that all of these vault tracks are about Harry Styles,
42:15
which is especially interesting
42:17
for the last one, Is It Over Now, where
42:20
she calls him a heartless
42:23
traitor, I think.
42:24
Dang. And
42:26
Patil- You had a microphone in front of your face. Is
42:29
it- No, no, no. Here. You gotta get more in
42:31
front of your face. I thought you wanted over here so
42:33
they could see my face. No, no, no. I
42:36
do want them to see your face, but this is an audio
42:38
program. Sorry. I'm
42:39
sorry. This is why handheld is bad. My
42:41
hand hurts and I'm not even holding it correctly. I
42:45
don't know if you've listened to enough of the vault
42:47
tracks to have opinions on them.
42:49
I would like- I have thoughts on her
42:52
vault tracks in general. Yeah.
42:55
Which is, you know, they are in general
42:57
pretty extraordinary. Yeah.
43:00
Now that is in part because, I mean,
43:03
maybe it's a self-protection
43:05
mechanism for me to believe
43:07
that it's a more mature, skilled
43:10
adult version of her that's really sprucing
43:12
up and finishing these songs and not
43:15
that the younger version of her was really so
43:17
genius as to write a song like that and then to
43:19
leave it on the cutting room floor. As a self-protection
43:22
mechanism, I like to believe that it's- Yeah, you're
43:24
wrong. Oh, shit.
43:25
Well, it's interesting because the chatter
43:27
online amongst people who don't like the vault tracks, they're
43:29
like, oh, they don't sound like 1989. They sound like midnights.
43:32
And I'm like, well, yeah, she finished them as an adult.
43:35
Right. Yeah, sure. And you and I were talking about how they're
43:38
relics of her younger self, but
43:41
with her adult present
43:43
self authorial
43:45
voice. Voice, yeah.
43:46
And I just think that must be kind
43:48
of a mindfuck. I mean, I am
43:50
not- I
43:52
know you are not strong enough to
43:54
go into your personal archives
43:57
and journals or whatever and pull
43:59
out stuff that- you wrote 20
44:01
years ago and be like, hmm, this
44:03
is good. Let's share it
44:05
with the world. I
44:07
don't even want to look at my old journals,
44:10
much less publish them. So
44:12
yeah, that's pretty
44:15
daring. That
44:18
shows a very strong sense of self.
44:19
Yes, it does.
44:22
And forgive me for bringing it back to this, but
44:25
maybe this is a good place to sort of wrap it
44:27
up. Sure.
44:28
Because I think it's how I engage with Taylor
44:30
and it's how I imagine these
44:32
seven people who are still listening.
44:35
Most of them probably engage with Taylor because my audience
44:38
is overwhelmingly young and male
44:40
and because they're like mine, they're
44:43
probably like a bunch of know-it-alls, right? Well,
44:45
hopefully we have convinced
44:47
them to go sit down with their internet
44:49
machine and listen to some tracks.
44:51
So one reason why, like,
44:54
you know, A-holes like
44:56
us boys, one reason why
44:58
a lot of us still tend to dismiss Taylor
45:00
Swift is that they'll say like, oh, well,
45:03
she's not like
45:06
a sole proprietor.
45:09
There's a lot of sort of in dude
45:11
music, there's a lot of stock
45:16
put in the value of an artist being
45:20
like Dave Grohl doing it entirely.
45:22
Like a one-man band. In his basement, yeah. Right.
45:25
Recording all the tracks. That's the thing
45:27
that John Mayer does now and talks about
45:29
like going off into the studio by himself.
45:31
By himself and blah, blah, blah,
45:33
blah, blah, blah. And I say this
45:35
as by the way, like someone who.
45:37
Does not collaborate.
45:39
Does not collaborate. And
45:41
by the way, like, you know, and anyone,
45:44
you know, like there's a reason I'm not
45:46
a famous musician.
45:47
I had game, okay, I
45:50
have some game left. I'm
45:52
someone who can walk into like a
45:55
studio and like lay down all the tracks
45:57
and like, you know, produce a song that's like, okay.
46:00
And
46:01
I'm
46:02
over that as being a thing
46:04
that we value.
46:06
And also,
46:07
think of all of the
46:10
male auteurs, male musical
46:12
auteurs who we
46:14
just revere
46:17
as gods
46:18
who collaborated with session
46:21
musicians and producers and blah,
46:23
blah, blah, blah. Everyone from
46:26
people who really were auteurs like
46:28
Brian Wilson who would go in there and really
46:30
be the director of the film.
46:34
But still, he didn't play a single
46:36
note on Pet Sounds. He
46:38
sang, but he didn't play a note.
46:44
The Beatles were collaborating with
46:46
all kinds of people at the end. Exactly, all kinds of
46:49
great. Say nothing of George Martin.
46:50
Sure, or just
46:54
to make it circular, we're talking of Boys of Summer. Yeah.
46:58
Don Henley, a song that, that's
47:00
a song that was written, the entire
47:02
music for that song was written by Mike Campbell
47:04
from The Heartbreakers, offered
47:07
to Tom Petty who for
47:09
some reason, maybe he got stabbed
47:11
in the ear that day, turned
47:13
it down and was just like, and
47:15
then like, Don Henley heard it and was like, okay,
47:18
well, that's gonna be a hit if I
47:20
can do my job right today. And he did. And
47:23
his contributions to that song should not be minimized.
47:26
Don Henley wrote the melody and the words and,
47:29
and sang it and that belty, high tenor,
47:32
seventies tenor, Jesus. He
47:35
showed up to work that day. He did, okay.
47:38
But like,
47:39
he had a lot of help on that, okay. And
47:41
no one like doesn't, no one questions
47:43
Don Henley being like a real musician.
47:45
I would also stipulate, and you and I have talked
47:47
about this, I like John Mayer,
47:50
you don't. True. But
47:52
you have argued that you would like John
47:55
Mayer more if he collaborated
47:57
and had people editing him. Yeah.
48:01
So. Hold on, I'm just checking the time. Oh,
48:03
we're good. Yeah,
48:06
truth. So I think there's
48:06
plenty of musicians out there who had
48:08
they collaborated, there could have been even better.
48:10
Right, right. So she's
48:12
someone who like has, she
48:15
could absolutely run in there and just track
48:17
the whole thing herself, okay? She could.
48:20
She chooses not to, because that's not a good use of her
48:22
time. She can, she's much better
48:24
off being a pop star, you know,
48:27
in her spare time. And letting Jack Antonoff
48:30
fiddle with the computer, you know? Who
48:32
wants to see Jack Antonoff at a
48:34
football game? Love
48:38
you, Jack, but I feel
48:40
like
48:40
you'd agree with me. Well, I
48:42
think you're
48:44
discounting the amount of time she
48:46
spends in the studio
48:47
working on the songs with him. No
48:49
doubt, absolutely. She's a studio
48:51
rat too, no doubt, okay?
48:54
But I also think, I can't imagine that
48:56
she has been there for
49:00
every minute of the production
49:02
necessary of reassembling these albums
49:05
while she's been also doing the areas tour.
49:08
She has to be delegating. And this
49:10
is not someone who does that out of weakness. This
49:13
is someone who does that because she's a strong manager,
49:15
right? And she chooses, and
49:17
she like collaborates, she chooses good employees.
49:20
And like, you know, everything she
49:22
does, she does correctly. So there's that
49:25
thing that I think is one reason why
49:27
I think idiots,
49:29
idiot boys like us, discount her and we shouldn't.
49:32
Here's one where I kind of feel like
49:36
maybe us idiot asshole arrogant
49:38
boys have
49:40
not a point,
49:41
but a function, a
49:43
legitimate function. All right, let's hear
49:45
it. It's like when there's like animals
49:48
in the ecosystem and you're just like, oh God,
49:50
fuck mosquitoes. Like they just fuck
49:53
them. But you know what, bats are hungry,
49:55
okay? And so mosquitoes have
49:57
to exist, right? So there's like a thing
49:59
that like.
49:59
the
50:01
asshole smarty pants dude. Okay.
50:05
You know, visible a character
50:07
as he may be. As much as we'd love to exterminate
50:10
him. Noted. Let's hear the argument.
50:12
Okay, so I think that I feel
50:15
like Taylor Swift
50:18
actually has stalled a bit
50:20
artistically. I
50:23
think that someone of her ability, I
50:29
think if she, let
50:30
me put it this way. I think a male artist
50:32
of her ability
50:34
would have felt the social pressure
50:37
to be more
50:40
musically and intellectually
50:43
adventurous and ambitious than
50:45
she has been.
50:47
Are you ready for me to tell you why I think that you're
50:49
wrong? Yeah. Okay.
50:52
So the common knock on Taylor
50:54
Swift for years was she just
50:56
dates guys and then writes songs about
50:58
them. She writes 90 songs about them. She writes
51:01
tea spilling songs about her. It's all
51:03
just about the guys, right? Yeah, for
51:05
sure. That was, that was,
51:08
you know. And even if it was true, like
51:10
how many,
51:12
every Leonard Cohen song is about
51:15
a girl.
51:15
Yes. Jesus. And
51:18
then, you know, then she wrote Reputation,
51:20
which was about all of that.
51:23
And then everyone was like, well, she's just complaining. And
51:25
we don't like the new style. Anyway, then
51:28
she did Lover, which was very pop.
51:31
And then the pandemic happened and
51:33
she was locked in her house as
51:36
we all were. And she produced what I
51:38
think are the two best Taylor Swift albums,
51:40
Folklore and Evermore, mostly because I
51:43
am a folkie and they speak to me. I
51:45
love acoustic shit. But
51:48
those are songs where I think she really went
51:50
in new directions with her songwriting. She did
51:53
a bunch of story songs, which were new for her.
51:55
She did a bunch of interconnecting
51:57
where she created characters and then wrote songs
51:59
from
51:59
different perspectives. She wrote
52:02
a song based on history. I think she
52:04
wrote Epiphany, which I think
52:07
blends like history and
52:09
the modern in a way that is so emotional.
52:11
I still can't listen to that song without crying.
52:14
I think she, and you know, she has really
52:16
reinvented herself in different ways than Midnight's came
52:18
along and she kind of latched
52:21
on to sort of the Kate Bush nostalgia,
52:24
I think, and did a lot of that sort
52:26
of 80s interesting thing. Do
52:28
you think that maybe she,
52:30
because Kate Bush
52:32
is sort of an early example
52:35
of a female
52:36
artist who
52:39
was kind of like a beautiful pop
52:42
star who danced around and looked beautiful in
52:44
her videos, but also fully
52:46
produced her own songs with her own keyboards
52:49
in her own studio and was
52:51
her studio rat, you know,
52:53
made all of herself soup to nuts
52:55
and was she sort of trying to
52:59
try to get everyone
53:01
to see her as the Kate Bush that she is? No.
53:03
I mean, she's honestly far more talented
53:05
than Kate Bush. I think she's just very good at trying
53:07
new things and reinventing
53:09
herself and, you know, Madonna reinvented
53:12
herself in ways that were really visually dramatic.
53:15
And I think Taylor just keeps
53:17
kind of putting new things on her plate.
53:20
And so she's always eating some of the same
53:22
things, but she's trying new foods at the same time.
53:24
No
53:25
doubt. The artistic
53:27
growth that you describe over the course of those albums
53:30
happened a hundred percent. And
53:32
I like it. And there's lots of songs there that I really
53:35
like. And a song like Snow
53:37
on the Beach on Midnight
53:39
is a song where she
53:41
actually pushed herself into some
53:43
new musical territory using some interesting
53:45
chords that are not so stock.
53:48
Yeah. This is where I wish we could play stuff because
53:50
I would love to hear you explain the chords. Yeah.
53:52
Well, that's that's good. Go watch Rick. Rick
53:55
Beato. You know, hey, Rick,
53:56
I'm going to text you after this. You
53:58
should do a wide
53:59
the song is great about snow on the beach. Cool
54:02
harmonies in that one. Anywho, so one
54:05
of the things that a guy like Rick
54:07
talks a lot about and an asshole like me
54:09
thinks a lot about, smarmily to myself
54:12
as I listen to the radio,
54:15
is how music
54:17
has in many ways gotten more complex
54:20
in this era, but in several
54:22
dimensions it has actually gotten much simpler. The
54:25
biggest one being harmonically, the chords.
54:29
Even sort of pop songs, top 40 pop
54:31
songs just a couple of decades ago just
54:33
used to have a much broader harmonic vocabulary.
54:37
And I
54:39
think, and Rick just bemoans this
54:41
all the time, and I think one thing that I would
54:43
love, that I have said to you Rick privately,
54:45
and maybe we'll have this debate out publicly
54:48
one day, is that I
54:50
think that's sort of a falsely
54:52
declinist attitude. I think that
54:54
part of what's happened is that just great
54:56
songwriters, people who are very good
54:59
at writing songs that lots and lots of people
55:01
will like, have simply learned
55:04
through experimentation and empiricism
55:06
and all of that, that there are certain
55:08
chord progressions
55:09
that work. Like
55:11
the axis progression, which Google that
55:13
one, if you, that's the one that's
55:16
with or without you and 80 million other songs
55:18
you've heard is the same. Max
55:22
Martin, that producer in Sweden,
55:25
80 million songs that you'll know and love, he
55:28
calls it sort of melodic math. He's worked out
55:30
sort of basically very simple little algorithms
55:32
for these are the chord progressions
55:35
that make hits. And I
55:37
think to a great extent, Taylor,
55:41
at least on some level, probably
55:44
on every level just knows
55:46
that. On the other
55:48
hand, I feel that someone of
55:51
her ability should
55:53
be writing songs where the chords
55:55
don't always change on the one.
55:57
So, you know what I think?
55:58
Every single time the chord.
55:59
just changes on the one, the last, the whole bar,
56:02
and you're gonna have four changes like that, and
56:04
it's just like, well, someone of
56:07
her ability should just,
56:09
should feel, it would,
56:12
I, as a listener,
56:14
would like it if she felt more pressure
56:18
to explore
56:20
more difficult
56:22
territory, both musically and
56:24
to a certain extent lyrically too.
56:26
I think, I mean, or I think, maybe,
56:29
I think topically, maybe. Okay. Because
56:32
I think as a lyricist, you can't, she's unimpeachable,
56:34
like, she, what she does, she does perfectly.
56:36
I think what's interesting,
56:38
and so the
56:40
songs that you have listened to that you think are
56:42
more interesting of hers, I think a lot of
56:44
them are the ones that are with Aaron Desner
56:47
of the National, who,
56:50
his music is more like that, and also
56:52
some of the songs were orchestrated by his brother, who is
56:56
a classical dude. Oh, dude,
56:57
doing all the string stuff. Oh, yeah. Yeah,
57:00
Bryce Desner, and so, again,
57:01
she, I think it's one of those
57:04
things where she's like, I'm gonna bring in these other people who do
57:06
that well.
57:06
Right, yeah.
57:07
And he also produced
57:10
Koda Wooda Shida, I think that's the title. Wooda
57:12
Koda, some permutation thereof. Which
57:14
is
57:14
one of the bonus tracks on Midnight, and,
57:17
I mean, he's even said,
57:20
when he performed it with her there, I think this
57:22
is the best song we've ever done. And
57:25
that's a song that has many phases
57:28
and builds in interesting ways. It's not just
57:30
verse, chorus, verse, chorus, bridge, it's got multiple,
57:34
it's got a beginning chorus, I don't know what you call
57:36
that, multiple choruses.
57:38
Pre-chorus. Pre-chorus, yeah, it's
57:40
got the pre-chorus of the chorus, it's got like-
57:42
A very lengthy bridge.
57:44
Yeah, that has multiple phases to
57:46
it. I'm not saying it's
57:48
progra- I'm saying it's sort
57:50
of as the shape of progra- No,
57:53
no, no, it's progressive
57:56
in the sense that it
57:58
uses structure. to create
58:01
forward momentum in the song. Which
58:03
is what a lot of bad or
58:06
mediocre pop songs struggle with where
58:08
they sound circular. Where it's just
58:10
kind of like, oh the verse to the chorus and then
58:12
I've heard the whole song. It's just gonna like loop,
58:15
right? Whereas like a
58:17
song like Koda woulda whatever, uses
58:21
sections to create an overall
58:23
forward momentum, an overall
58:26
arc to the song that keeps
58:28
you listening as you go through the whole thing.
58:32
It is a little bit more what they might call
58:34
through composed in the classical music
58:36
world. Where instead of writing a loop,
58:38
you're writing a line. You know,
58:40
a thing that
58:43
got something that meanders and trails around and goes
58:45
somewhere instead of marching around in a circle,
58:47
you know. But
58:51
so I guess on the one hand there, I'm embarrassed
58:53
that like
58:56
I am on some level proud of myself
59:00
to be such a feminist that I can see
59:02
the genius in Taylor Swift, right? I
59:04
know that on some level. Yes, you've got your cookies. It's self
59:06
congratulatory for me to even have this conversation,
59:09
right? And that's kind of nauseating, right? So
59:11
on one level, I know that's what's
59:13
going on here and so therefore I am injured
59:16
when you tell me that this thing that I thought I liked
59:19
that was Taylor's might've been by some fucking
59:21
hipster dude. Like he, that
59:23
was his contribution is what's like really speaking
59:25
to this other hipster dude. Yeah, because
59:27
she wrote that song. Of course she did. And so here's
59:29
this one, but like I came up with a counter argument
59:32
to my own argument and I feel like this
59:34
is maybe like a good thing to end on, right? Sure. Because
59:36
like you want to talk about like male
59:39
songwriters who are worshiped by other
59:42
men, okay, by smart men, white
59:45
men who fancy themselves the smartest
59:48
men of all worship this
59:50
fucking songwriter, okay, as being
59:52
the best of the best, right? Talking
59:54
about Paul Simon, okay? You
59:56
and I both love Paul Simon. We
59:59
love, like. Paul Simon is a deeply
1:00:02
meaningful artist to both of us. Yes. Okay.
1:00:04
We both hate him in many ways. We
1:00:07
think
1:00:07
he is in many ways an objectionable human,
1:00:09
but a genius.
1:00:10
And an objectionable artist. There's lots of things about his
1:00:12
art that I think- Yeah,
1:00:13
all that Rhythm of the Saint stuff.
1:00:15
My favorite album, but there's
1:00:17
lots of things I hate about it. But anyways, you know,
1:00:21
anyways, okay. So this is not a knock on
1:00:23
Paul Simon, okay?
1:00:26
Paul Simon is like someone who
1:00:28
dudes like me would sort of describe
1:00:31
under the kind of auteur theory of musicians,
1:00:33
right? Yeah. Okay. That's a man who's
1:00:36
in control, right? Mm-hmm. Um,
1:00:40
you want to talk about a guy who
1:00:42
relied on his collaborators.
1:00:45
Yes. Okay. And the
1:00:47
reason you don't think of his collaborators is one of the
1:00:49
reasons why he's an objectionable
1:00:50
human. Okay, so the most obvious example
1:00:53
of this is the Graceland
1:00:56
incident where Paul
1:00:59
took a trip to South Africa because he heard some South
1:01:01
African music
1:01:03
and was understandably excited
1:01:05
by it because it was amazing. And
1:01:08
he like, you know, invited a bunch
1:01:10
of just like all- he had some fixer
1:01:13
in South Africa. Like a murderers
1:01:15
row of music. Yeah, a murderers row, all of
1:01:17
the hottest players in Johannesburg or whatever, like
1:01:19
in the theme studio. And
1:01:21
Paul- and they just, you know, Paul said, hey,
1:01:23
let's jam. And
1:01:26
which is like code for- You
1:01:28
play your best lick. You play your best lick and
1:01:30
I will record you as though
1:01:32
I
1:01:33
am an-
1:01:34
as though I am an ethnomusicologist
1:01:37
pointing a microphone at a primitive
1:01:39
tribe.
1:01:39
That's really
1:01:41
what I am is every guy in the 1950s and 60s
1:01:43
who went down to the Delta and
1:01:45
fucking stole all the
1:01:47
blues musicians. Yeah, exactly. I
1:01:49
know. As though I am-
1:01:51
as though I am
1:01:53
Methian transcribing birdsong.
1:01:56
Yeah. Right? I
1:01:58
will record these bits and then I will- a
1:02:01
civilized man will take it back to the
1:02:03
civilized world and I will cut and paste
1:02:05
these loops of tape and Turn them
1:02:07
into song let
1:02:08
me just say at least the racists
1:02:10
who went down to the Delta and Conned
1:02:13
those people into signing bad contracts paid
1:02:15
them five dollars. I'm in originally
1:02:17
paid those guys nothing
1:02:19
No, I'm sure they got paid to show up on
1:02:21
the day, right? I'm sure they got paid a day rate,
1:02:24
but they didn't get songwriting credit, which is
1:02:26
publishing royalties, right? Which
1:02:28
is the ongoing money that's you know, that's
1:02:30
that's really the real money So anyways, yes
1:02:32
when you know, whatever it's kind
1:02:35
of objectionable But in fact the matters Graceland
1:02:37
is still one of the best albums of all time
1:02:39
Like in part because of the contributions
1:02:42
of these genius fucking South African musicians,
1:02:44
okay But also because of the
1:02:46
genius of Paul Simon everyone involved was
1:02:48
a genius and that is a genius album, right?
1:02:51
There's a great or great record But
1:02:53
of course what is tremendously objectionable about is
1:02:55
that when it came out it said music and lyrics
1:02:57
by Paul Simon
1:02:59
Period
1:03:03
And that my friends is what we call
1:03:05
a lie that's what we call You know when
1:03:07
if you think erasure isn't a real
1:03:09
thing Tell me tell me tell
1:03:12
me how that's not erasure. Okay, right
1:03:15
now. Luckily there was an uproar
1:03:18
and Whatever I don't know
1:03:20
how it happened, but they ended up getting
1:03:22
all of those musicians ended up getting their songwriting
1:03:24
credits Yeah, and therefore
1:03:26
their ongoing royalties which for a song
1:03:29
like, you know Call me out or whatever has got to
1:03:31
be a lot of money, especially in South
1:03:33
Africa,
1:03:33
right? so
1:03:36
So that's objectionable
1:03:38
That's an example of possible working
1:03:40
with collaborators, but also just like things like, you
1:03:43
know
1:03:45
All of the just hot flight jazz
1:03:47
guys that he worked with in the 70s On
1:03:50
all on you know for my favorite Paul
1:03:52
Simon album, which is hearts and bones Which
1:03:55
is like in many ways what
1:03:57
I'll just never forget the very first time you ever
1:03:59
played guitar for me You sat down,
1:04:01
we had been dating for like a minute.
1:04:03
And
1:04:04
you played Hearts and Bones, which is a
1:04:06
song about divorce. I know,
1:04:09
but it was the most impressive acoustic
1:04:11
guitar song I could play.
1:04:12
It was very impressive. You did not match
1:04:15
box 20 me,
1:04:16
a la Ken. I was genuinely
1:04:19
impressed. Thank you, thank you.
1:04:23
That's like his least successful album. It's like,
1:04:25
you know, but it's my favorite. But he was
1:04:27
just working with top flight jazz guys,
1:04:29
right? Who like brought
1:04:32
so much, a lot of what, you know, who
1:04:34
really should have gotten composition credit.
1:04:38
You know, they ended up just getting player credit and
1:04:40
that's really a shame, but like nobody
1:04:42
questions whether or not Paul
1:04:44
Simon is an auteur, okay? And
1:04:48
I'm not questioning, I do think he's the master
1:04:51
because I think one of the many things he
1:04:53
does well is recognize
1:04:56
talent, get
1:04:59
it in the room with him,
1:05:01
be a casting director and be like, oh,
1:05:03
you know, that drummer with that bass player, that
1:05:05
would be something really special. Like
1:05:09
she does that. And then
1:05:11
what's also amazing, okay. Okay,
1:05:13
and she does that on a Paul Simon level with
1:05:16
her music, okay? Now, how
1:05:18
well does Paul Simon dance? Okay.
1:05:22
How does Paul Simon look in his sparkly
1:05:24
gown? I
1:05:25
will tell you there's a long
1:05:27
going knock about how Taylor Swift is not a good dancer.
1:05:29
She has improved significantly.
1:05:32
Much
1:05:34
better than. If she was a male
1:05:36
artist. I will
1:05:37
tell you Paul Simon could not perform
1:05:39
the era store.
1:05:39
Okay, and I'm sorry, if she was
1:05:41
a male artist, no one would doubt.
1:05:44
They'd be like, oh my, if she was a dude in
1:05:47
a really masculine coded dude, if
1:05:49
she was like a rapper, like a really masculine coded
1:05:52
rapper who could dance that well, that
1:05:55
they would be like, oh, you're a genius. And you're so
1:05:57
bold with your gender performance.
1:06:00
You know? No. The
1:06:03
only reason. Yeah. And
1:06:06
now I'm thinking about Paul Simon performing the Aristotle,
1:06:09
and if so,
1:06:11
it's so like da-da in his past.
1:06:14
You know, I don't like AI. But
1:06:17
I would like to see Paul
1:06:19
Simon doing vigilante shit.
1:06:21
Yeah, like in contemporary,
1:06:23
like bald Paul Simon, you
1:06:25
know? Oh, dear.
1:06:26
With his facelift.
1:06:27
With his facelift, yeah. Ooh.
1:06:30
How?
1:06:33
It's such a, it's,
1:06:35
I'm only doing this to balance the scales
1:06:37
for all of the years that female artists
1:06:39
have been critiqued for their appearance. But
1:06:42
it's just like Paul Simon. Just age. You're
1:06:45
just, you're waking up across
1:06:47
the breakfast table from Edie
1:06:49
Brackel every morning. This woman who is
1:06:52
aging like the finest cheese
1:06:54
at the
1:06:56
shop. Okay, like because
1:06:58
she's just doing nothing.
1:07:01
She's just getting up and she's doing yoga and
1:07:03
she's just, and singing. And
1:07:05
she
1:07:06
likes you the way you are.
1:07:07
And she's like, she's like,
1:07:09
look at how she's aging. A and
1:07:12
B, she likes you the way you are. So
1:07:14
just age, dude. Just age.
1:07:19
I don't know how we land this plane now
1:07:21
that we've talked about. I'll,
1:07:24
Paul Simon's facelift.
1:07:26
You know what? This is
1:07:28
how this is how we see who our
1:07:31
real friends are.
1:07:32
Yeah. Yeah. If you comment
1:07:34
the secret, if anyone comments about
1:07:37
Paul Simon performing the Aeros
1:07:39
tour, we know, oh, did it die?
1:07:41
Oh, oh, right on battery. Yeah.
1:07:43
Okay. That's okay. So that's that's telling us that
1:07:45
we should wrap up this episode. That's okay. Cause
1:07:48
the audio is still running. So
1:07:49
we can still land the plane. Okay. So on the video,
1:07:51
then will you just have a blank? Yeah,
1:07:53
it's gonna be, it's black right now. They're looking at black
1:07:55
screen.
1:07:56
Wow. Now we'll really know who's still here.
1:07:58
Oh, don't who's coming in.
1:07:59
through the other, through the window.
1:08:01
This is like when they turn the lights out
1:08:04
of the bar. They're like, get out,
1:08:06
you horrible drunk.
1:08:08
You don't have to go home, but you can't
1:08:10
stay here. Go home
1:08:12
and listen to your Taylor Swift record. When I used to work at Petit
1:08:15
Library at Penn State, which was one of my favorite
1:08:17
jobs I've ever had, I had like worked night shift there,
1:08:19
which works with the black screen people are seeing right
1:08:21
now on YouTube. Yeah. I
1:08:25
loved that job for a million
1:08:27
reasons, but I used to love going and closing
1:08:29
up the main reading room, the big grand
1:08:31
main reading room, which I believe was
1:08:34
the paternal room. I imagine it's been renamed,
1:08:36
but I... Anyway.
1:08:38
But anyways, but I used to love going
1:08:40
and closing up that room, because
1:08:42
it was just fun. And I had to like yell
1:08:44
and bellow, the library's closing, but the
1:08:46
best part of that was during finals week when
1:08:49
everyone was cramming and it would be just chock
1:08:51
full of just desperate, scared looking
1:08:54
people. And I would go in there at 11,
1:08:56
55 and say, the
1:08:59
library is closing and they'd all just go,
1:09:02
oh, and I... That's what's happening
1:09:04
right now. And I would yell, you don't have
1:09:07
to go home, but you can't stay here. Well,
1:09:09
our children who... And every time it got a big, big
1:09:11
laugh.
1:09:11
Well, our children who would like their dinner are
1:09:14
saying,
1:09:15
bar's closed, mom, dad. So
1:09:19
if this podcast is gonna continue with me
1:09:23
trying to prioritize my mental health in the way that
1:09:25
I should, it's gonna need to be a lighter lift
1:09:27
a lot of the time. So listeners,
1:09:31
if you're still here, that's good. That
1:09:33
speaks well for the future of this program.
1:09:36
If there's nobody left, then that speaks ill for
1:09:38
the future of this program. Whatever. And
1:09:40
either way is fine. We like you either
1:09:42
way. We like, love you just the way you are.
1:09:45
It's you I like. It's
1:09:48
you yourself.
1:09:50
I like you.
1:09:52
I like you too.
1:09:54
Thank you. All right.
1:09:55
Make good choices. Talk to you next time.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More