Podchaser Logo
Home
Adam talks about "1989," New York, and his Swifty status

Adam talks about "1989," New York, and his Swifty status

Released Monday, 30th October 2023
Good episode? Give it some love!
Adam talks about "1989," New York, and his Swifty status

Adam talks about "1989," New York, and his Swifty status

Adam talks about "1989," New York, and his Swifty status

Adam talks about "1989," New York, and his Swifty status

Monday, 30th October 2023
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:00

From Lauren's office, it's

0:02

episode 81 of the Adam Ragusea podcast,

0:05

and if I played games as long

0:07

as Taylor Swift plays, I

0:09

would have worked this out so that it would be

0:11

episode 89, because

0:14

today my lovely wife Lauren and I are discussing...

0:18

1989 Taylor's version! Look

0:21

at that! Yep.

0:26

Doesn't she look so happy to own her music now?

0:30

You know, the kids were looking at that in front of our brand

0:32

new record player that was our impulse purchase

0:34

that occasioned this entire situation. But,

0:38

yeah, one of them said, oh, she looks

0:40

so happy, and the other one said, oh, she looks so

0:42

pretty. And I think we both know

0:44

which said which.

0:45

Yeah. Yeah,

0:50

aww. Bless. So...

0:55

You're driving this car, honey. I

0:57

am? You're the one that wants to talk about Taylor Swift

0:59

in front of a mass audience.

1:02

To be clear, we... I,

1:06

as I have said on this podcast before, and

1:08

just in general in our living life, that

1:11

talking with you about music is one of my

1:14

favorite things, and I wish

1:16

more often the people could hear you

1:18

talk about music, because I think you are

1:20

very smart and creative about it.

1:25

Very

1:25

politic way to handle this. So I

1:28

got the new 1989. I have

1:30

been listening to it. I

1:33

have turned some of our children, some of them,

1:35

both of them, into mini Swifties. So

1:38

then you had to listen to it in the car with

1:40

them, and you were kind

1:42

of into it a little bit, and you had some interesting

1:44

things to say. And

1:47

so I said, hey, what if we just did this for the podcast

1:50

instead of...

1:52

What if indeed? What if

1:55

indeed? So here we are. So

1:57

for the non-Swifties, 1989...

1:59

is a record that is about

2:02

the year of Taylor's birth

2:05

or the name is the year of Taylor's birth,

2:07

right? Mm-hmm. Is this going to be me correcting

2:09

all the Taylor Lords? Well, no, I

2:11

just want to make it clear so that you understand. She made

2:13

this kind of like 80s-y sounding

2:16

pop record in...when

2:19

did it originally come out? In 2014.

2:22

It also sort of marked her final

2:24

hard break with her country roots.

2:26

Yeah, this was like full pop.

2:28

She just was full pop. It

2:29

won Grammy for record of the year.

2:31

It's also when kind of like snooty

2:34

a-holes like me started

2:37

to kind of grudgingly acknowledge that

2:39

like, oh, this Taylor Swift girl, she

2:41

seems to like, she can write a catchy song. Yeah,

2:43

right. Respect Knuckles for that.

2:45

There

2:45

always had to be like big capital

2:48

B buts after that.

2:48

I know. Oh, it was horrible.

2:51

It's like...

2:51

Because girls loves Taylor Swift

2:54

and anything girls like...

2:56

Can't be real. Can't be legit. ...is

2:58

easily

2:58

made fun of. I

3:01

will also say this was like my entry. I listened

3:04

to a little bit of red and I kind of liked it. But 1989

3:08

was when I first started being like...I don't

3:11

know if we called ourselves Swifties back then. I was like, yeah, I

3:13

like Taylor Swift.

3:14

Well, also it was when you had our

3:16

first child and you had a lot

3:18

of...

3:19

A lot of sitting in a chair holding

3:20

a baby time. Downtime is not the right

3:23

word for it. But I

3:25

got a lot of podcast time and you

3:27

got a lot of Taylor Swift time. It was like prison time.

3:30

Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. And

3:32

so I

3:33

would sit in the chair.

3:34

They give it a time here like it's lunch.

3:36

I would sit in a chair with a baby

3:38

asleep on my chest and I would just like put

3:40

my phone on the arm of the chair and listen

3:42

to 1989. Okay. And yeah.

3:46

But I wasn't like a diehard Swiftie. It

3:48

wasn't like... It was

3:49

a flow process. Yeah. And the

3:51

reason we're talking about it now for the non-Swifties of

3:53

the audience is that, yes, so Taylor had

3:55

a business dispute

3:58

with the... the business

4:00

entities that own the masters

4:03

to her older records. And

4:05

so she has been embarking on a project of

4:07

re-recording all of her older albums

4:10

so that she, I assume she already

4:12

owns the songwriting rights, or at least those that

4:14

she does own for the songwriting that she did. Which

4:18

of course is most of it, but not all of it. But

4:21

she also owns, now

4:24

she owns the masters to the recordings

4:26

as well.

4:27

She's basically devaluing

4:29

the originals

4:30

by public. Flooding the market, yeah.

4:32

Yes, and famously

4:34

when she said she was gonna do this, the

4:37

owner of her masters, it was

4:40

like a private equity firm and

4:42

evil former people she worked with. And

4:45

they were like, she'll never do it, don't worry, your

4:47

investment is secure. And she was like, hmm,

4:49

watch me. And it has

4:51

seriously, there are some of the major

4:55

radio stations, including internet

4:57

radio, have vowed to only play the Taylor's versions.

5:00

I mean, Die Hard Swifties obviously will go in and

5:02

change all their playlists, so it's only the Taylor's

5:04

versions.

5:05

Probably the big ticket item here is that

5:07

it opens these songs up for

5:10

licensing in films and commercials.

5:12

She didn't

5:12

license anything of the old stuff.

5:16

And now she will license the Taylor's

5:18

version. So that's why you're seeing

5:20

it appear in movies and TV show

5:22

and commercials.

5:24

So basically like Taylor Swift,

5:26

among other things, is a savage

5:28

when it comes to matters of business.

5:30

She's

5:30

a business genius. And.

5:33

Which is why she, did you

5:35

hear her? She, in the estimation of some

5:37

publications. She's a billionaire now. She crossed the billionaire

5:39

mark this week, yeah. Yes,

5:42

and obviously that's not a billion in cash

5:44

dollars, that's a billion in her like,

5:47

owning of the masters,

5:49

owning of her real estate holdings and all that stuff,

5:51

so. Indeed. Congratulations to

5:54

Taylor on being a billionaire. Now

5:56

get started

5:56

giving it away. That's what,

5:59

exactly. That's right, we all know that's the true measure

6:01

of success in life, and we all know

6:03

how fondly we all think of billionaires. Yeah.

6:06

So, and so to me, my story with Taylor begins

6:09

with 89, in

6:14

part because of all the reasons discussed,

6:16

but also because it's one,

6:20

as I have tried to kind of critically examine my

6:22

own relationship to Tay Tay,

6:26

and how it started off as

6:28

that kind of, you know,

6:31

ignorant, arrogant sneering that

6:33

a guy like me would be expected to do early

6:36

in the Taylor phenomenon, right? Mm-hmm.

6:39

Then I went to the grudging acceptance,

6:42

then, oh yeah, yeah, yeah, she knows what she's doing in terms

6:44

of like, you know, commercial success

6:46

or whatever, not, you know, artistic success,

6:48

like the kind, you know, I pursue.

6:51

Oh, Jesus Christ.

6:54

I know, I know, I know, it's so bad.

6:57

When you look at it in the light of day, like the,

6:59

you know, it's so bad. But

7:02

you came around, you came around. Sure, yeah. So

7:05

anyway, to, you know, appreciating

7:08

a lot, you know, I'm subjected to the music all the time.

7:11

Because

7:11

let me be clear, I am the

7:15

kind of controlled freak that must always drive the car,

7:17

and Adam is always the passenger, I also get car sick.

7:20

And.

7:21

I do too, not that anyone cares.

7:23

And as

7:25

the driver of the car, I'm in charge of the radio.

7:28

And so Adam must often listen to

7:30

what I choose, which.

7:31

Must often?

7:34

Sometimes we come to,

7:36

usually what happens is you say,

7:38

please, I don't wanna listen to this anymore, please don't

7:40

make me listen to it again. And then, no,

7:42

they're fine, what do you wanna listen to? And

7:45

then you'll put on like, REM's most

7:47

obscure album.

7:48

Which is

7:50

fine. Which is fine. So

7:52

there are songs, individual songs

7:55

in individual, like passages or sections

7:57

or lines, that I do sincerely

7:59

like. you know,

8:02

there's much more of it that I like,

8:04

I respect for

8:07

its artistry. It's just not for me,

8:09

right? But

8:12

furthermore, but I, you know, my

8:14

interest in Taylor, I feel

8:16

like is

8:19

bigger than it should be for

8:22

an artist whose music doesn't really speak to me,

8:24

isn't for me, right? Like

8:27

I'm more interested in her than I'm more interested

8:29

in other, you know, beautiful girl

8:32

singers who grown ass women.

8:34

She's 33 or 34. Well,

8:37

I mean, you know, I can acknowledge that part

8:39

of the reason my interest in her has grown

8:42

is that it's like, I don't like... She

8:44

has become much more mature. I

8:46

like women. And like her

8:49

new phase of kind of womanly

8:51

power is very appealing,

8:53

I think. You know, in a way that your

8:56

present phase of womanly power is

8:59

quite appealing to me. Oh my God.

9:02

Thank you, I appreciate that.

9:04

Alright, I'm not making a joke, you know, that's

9:06

real, right? Yes, I do. Thank you. So...

9:10

Woo! It's lushing.

9:13

Getting hot in here. So...so...what

9:17

the hell are we talking about? Well, okay,

9:20

so

9:20

I'm going to start the first comments argument.

9:23

The

9:23

first time that people in the comments are going to start

9:26

typing and being like, no, you're wrong.

9:29

I think that Taylor has

9:31

reached the point of probably

9:34

most popular pop

9:37

star of all time. Like the

9:40

only people I think who could compete, and

9:43

this is not an endorsement of this person, but

9:45

like Michael Jackson. Yeah, yeah, yeah,

9:47

sure. But even like if you look at

9:49

the level of...and it's also, I mean, you

9:51

do have to calibrate for the level

9:53

of... Population growth

9:55

and... Population growth and also just like media

9:57

saturation because there was just so much fewer

9:59

media.

9:59

Exactly, and

10:00

now you, I mean, Taylor is

10:03

everywhere. And I

10:05

just, you know, the tours

10:07

and the concert film and the social

10:10

media.

10:10

And I think this is why I am

10:13

particular, one of the reasons why I am

10:15

more interested in her than my interest

10:18

in her music would indicate. And that

10:20

is that I am just amazed to

10:22

see like a level of human performance

10:26

at that height. Yes.

10:29

Like if you consider the full package. It's

10:31

a level of excellence that is shocking.

10:34

And everything she does, yes, it is a level

10:36

of excellence that is

10:38

almost unprecedented. Yeah.

10:41

Like,

10:43

and

10:45

that's incredible. Yeah. That

10:47

is, of course that would have to get

10:50

your attention. And I always feel

10:52

ridiculous when I say this it's

10:56

almost like a truism, but I have this

10:58

particular interest in things that

11:02

are successful things that managed

11:04

to be successful at the nexus of both

11:06

artistic and commercial success. Things

11:09

that managed to be really, really good

11:11

kind of any way you look at them.

11:12

So it's not like somebody sat in a lab

11:14

and designed something to become very

11:17

successful,

11:17

to be created or said.

11:19

So for example, like the Barbie movie, which

11:21

we talked about recently, the is

11:24

something that I think is like at this nexus of both commercial

11:27

and artistic success. And

11:29

in music, an example in my mind

11:31

would be Peter Gabriel's, so album,

11:35

an album of like enormous artistic

11:38

merit, really

11:40

sophisticated esoteric stuff like he

11:42

had been doing for a while. And

11:44

also like one of the greatest biggest

11:47

pit pop albums of the eighties, the biggest

11:49

decade for pop album. That has Sledgehammer

11:53

and all the ones you know. Helper Hill.

11:55

No, no, no, no. So that's an older one. No. So

11:58

is Sledgehammer and And don't give

12:00

up and big time, red

12:05

rain, in your eyes. Okay.

12:10

Yeah. Now I'm there. Now you're there. I

12:12

knew those other songs but like, In your

12:14

eyes, okay. Yeah,

12:17

right. And this 89 album,

12:20

I remember when it came out thinking, wow, this

12:22

might be one of those. Starting

12:27

with the opening track, Welcome

12:29

to New York, which is so trite in

12:31

some ways, but as is so often

12:34

the case with Taylor, if you just

12:37

get over yourself for two seconds.

12:39

Yeah, the initial

12:41

critique of that song, I think

12:43

that Lazy Hipsters do,

12:46

cause the chorus is Welcome to New York, it's been

12:48

waiting for you. And it's like, no, it fucking hasn't.

12:50

New York is not like that, but-

12:52

But in fact, it actually has

12:54

been in many ways for generations

12:56

of people. And it

12:59

has been the place-

13:00

I mean, it's the cliche of like, you

13:02

pack up your car or you pack up your bags

13:04

and you move to New York with a dream and-

13:06

I grew up five and a half hours away from New

13:08

York City. So I don't know if it was like this for you, but basically

13:11

I grew up far enough away from New York

13:13

City to where it was this like purely

13:15

theoretical, magical fairy land of perfectness,

13:18

where we would all be accepted and you know, right?

13:20

I'll see you that and raise you one further. I

13:23

grew up in Tennessee

13:24

in the conservative South, where

13:27

all the time I was like, God, if I could just get

13:29

myself to New York,

13:30

or

13:31

the North Sea.

13:32

And think of all of the kids in your high school who were

13:34

even more different than you were. Yeah,

13:35

who like wanted to get the fuck out of there. And

13:39

if I go to New York, all of these possibilities

13:41

that are not possibilities for me here, it

13:43

could be possibilities

13:44

for me. Right, right, right.

13:45

So instead I went to Indiana.

13:46

Indeed. It worked out. That's

13:48

okay, all the New York kids went to Indiana. All

13:51

those deuce bros. I got to

13:53

New

13:53

York eventually.

13:55

You did. A

13:58

lot of my friends got to New York. because it was close

14:00

enough that like most

14:03

of us who, it wasn't

14:05

super hard to reach the escape velocity

14:08

necessary to get yourself to New York from State

14:10

College, Pennsylvania. And there were like

14:12

a lot of misfits

14:14

and punk rockers and queer people and stuff

14:17

who all wanted to get there. Yeah, you

14:19

guys being close

14:19

enough could get there and know people there.

14:22

Whereas for like, growing

14:24

up in Tennessee, it was like, Yeah, it was like,

14:26

it really was a risk of either you had to get into

14:29

college there, which that was my original plan

14:31

was to go to college there, but then I couldn't bring

14:33

myself to spend the money. So.

14:36

If you're gonna move to New York, you need

14:38

good people. You need to partner with the

14:41

right kind of person, such as when you're hiring

14:43

for your business, you didn't even know

14:45

what happened. I thought you were

14:47

looking up Taylor Swift lyrics

14:48

there for a second. I was halfway

14:50

through the transition before

14:54

I got you. Well done, sir. And so like,

14:56

that's not a full got you, that's like a half got

14:58

you, but I got you.

15:00

And if you need to get somebody who has

15:02

a lot of talent and can help you in your business

15:05

the way that I tried to help Lauren and

15:07

her business in this room, where

15:09

I am officially your employee, I

15:11

believe. Technically, according

15:14

to the Articles of Corporation. Indeed, exactly.

15:16

You weren't for me. That's right, well, yeah.

15:19

Anyway, I'm not saying

15:22

that it's gonna work out as well for you as it has for us,

15:25

but it could work out really well for you

15:27

with Indeed, because Indeed is the hiring

15:30

platform where you can attract, interview,

15:32

hire, all in one place.

15:35

You don't wanna be spending hours on multiple

15:37

job sites looking for candidates

15:39

for your position with the right skills

15:41

when Indeed's powerful hiring platform can

15:44

help you do it all, all in the same place.

15:46

They streamline hiring with powerful tools

15:49

that find you matched

15:49

candidates. With Instant Match, that's

15:52

Indeed's, one of Indeed's most exciting

15:54

features, Instant Match, with that, over 80% of

15:57

employers get quality candidates. people

16:00

whose resume on Indeed matches their

16:02

job description the moment they sponsor

16:04

a job, according to Indeed's US

16:07

data. And even better, Indeed is the only

16:10

job site where you only pay for

16:12

applications that meet your must-have

16:14

requirements. This is where everybody

16:16

is. Something like 80% of US

16:19

online job seekers are looking for

16:21

jobs on Indeed every month.

16:24

This is the one place you need to be, and

16:26

you only pay for those matches that have

16:29

your must-have requirements. So start hiring

16:31

now with a $75 sponsored job

16:33

credit to upgrade your

16:35

job post at indeed.com slash

16:38

ragusea. That offer is good for a limited

16:40

time. Claim your $75 credit

16:42

right now at indeed.com slash ragusea.

16:46

Indeed.com slash ragusea. Terms

16:48

and conditions apply. Need to hire? You

16:50

need Indeed. And

16:54

we need to talk about how

16:57

Indeed, sorry, it

17:02

has been idealized. And I know

17:04

a lot of my friends from school who

17:07

went to New York got chewed

17:09

up and spit right back again. Just

17:12

spit right back Interstate 80, like

17:15

so much loogie down a straw. But

17:19

for a lot of people, and especially

17:22

for queer friends, and

17:24

people who were just different in some really

17:26

profound way, more than I felt different, and

17:30

I felt really different from other kids.

17:32

Related to that, first Taylor

17:34

Swift reference to, she

17:37

says, boys and boys and girls

17:39

and girls. Boys and boys and girls and girls. You can love who

17:41

you want in New York.

17:42

And then it's like, it is the tiniest toe

17:44

dipped into the pond of allyship.

17:46

But like,

17:47

she got grilled about it. She got grilled

17:49

about it. It seems very timid in retrospect,

17:51

but also especially remembering that she had come from Nashville.

17:55

That was like, that was her first

17:57

political statement. Yeah. So

18:00

everyone starts somewhere. You

18:02

know, it's funny. This was the same time

18:04

when,

18:06

oh, who's the really handsome country

18:08

singer who's a incredible guitar player

18:11

and does the insurance advertisements with

18:14

Peyton Manning? Oh, Brad Paisley?

18:16

Brad Paisley, yeah. Brad Paisley. So

18:18

like good guy, Brad Paisley, right? I don't know if you remember,

18:20

this is like right around the same time. He

18:23

had a song out called, Welcome to the Future.

18:26

That was like a minor, it was like a big

18:28

country hit and a minor pop crossover hit.

18:31

And it was a song about like kind

18:33

of New York, it was like, it was basically about, it was like

18:35

the, it was his version of the Welcome to New York

18:37

song. It was kind of about like growing

18:41

up and

18:43

it's not explicitly about people from

18:46

the South the way that they are. And

18:48

yes, Taylor is from Pennsylvania, but first

18:50

of all, Central Pennsylvania is the South. I thought

18:52

she was from Virginia. She's originally from Pennsylvania.

18:54

Central Pennsylvania is the South, ladies and gentlemen.

18:57

We call it Pencil Tonky for a reason. Secondly,

19:00

she like, that's where she started. And then she like kind of came

19:02

up around Nashville. Right? So anyway, okay. Anyway,

19:04

so like the subtext of those songs is

19:06

that yeah, these are people from the South and

19:08

from Southern culture who have

19:10

managed to through the power of their careers

19:13

and the power of their talents kind of break into

19:15

a bigger, more cosmopolitan world.

19:18

And they feel liberated by that. And

19:20

they wanted to sort of celebrate that, but

19:22

also celebrate that, but also kind of rather

19:24

than kind of sneer back at

19:27

everybody back home, both of these songs kind of

19:29

say, Hey, come on, it's great. You know, the water's

19:31

great. Come join us. Everybody

19:34

can be what they want to be. All kinds of

19:36

people are here getting along and it's fine.

19:39

Yeah.

19:41

And it's a very,

19:44

it is a naive sentiment, no

19:47

doubt. I'm surprised you know that song and I don't.

19:49

I'm so sorry. This

19:51

is back when I paid attention to things more than I do now.

19:54

But it's a naive sentiment, but like this is like

19:56

Taylor's talent is taking something

19:59

that like I feel. So any other songwriter

20:01

of her caliber would

20:04

dismiss as being trite. And

20:06

she thinks, no, no, no, no. This feeling

20:08

I'm having right now of being a young woman who's

20:11

living in New York for the first time and I'm really excited

20:13

about it. Yes, I know this is a super

20:15

basic feeling, but that means

20:18

a lot of people are having it or have fantasized

20:20

about having

20:21

it. Where other people see basic,

20:23

she sees

20:23

universal. Yes.

20:25

And so then, yeah,

20:27

like the sneering hipsters are like, but

20:29

everyone else is like, I know this.

20:32

I connect with this feeling. This feels real to me. Like

20:34

how many people after this song came out,

20:37

listen to it as they were heading into

20:39

the city to move into the dorms

20:41

at, you know, City College or NYU or Columbia

20:45

or wherever, you

20:47

know, and or moved

20:50

there for their first job out of college

20:52

and,

20:53

you know, legit. Or

20:56

if it wasn't New York, it was Chicago

20:59

or it was

21:01

LA or Atlanta or Houston

21:04

or, you know, or it was, you know,

21:06

it was London. And

21:11

and all you have to do to make

21:13

a really, I

21:17

think the reason the reason

21:20

you dismiss cliches is not because they're

21:22

bad or because they're used up. It's because they're too hard.

21:25

Interesting. Because in order to pull

21:27

off a cliche, you have to like stick

21:30

the landing. Yeah.

21:33

Or just see it in a

21:35

new way.

21:36

And she took a cliche and she put a

21:39

really catchy tune to

21:40

it. Yeah. And just said it

21:42

in a new way, in a slightly new way, but in a more

21:44

perfect way than anyone had said it before.

21:47

I can't believe we've spent so much time talking about Welcome

21:49

to New York, which is honestly like one of my

21:51

least

21:51

favorite things on the album. And I'm not even

21:53

I don't even think it's one of her most successful

21:56

songs, like artistically. I'm

21:58

not even sure it even actually.

22:00

succeeds in the way that we're saying that it

22:02

does. I think it almost does for sure. But

22:05

I also think that this is how she typically

22:07

succeeds, is that because

22:10

she is so damn good at

22:13

finding just the right line

22:15

to express a feeling that a lot

22:17

of people have, she

22:20

can pull off the cliche. And

22:24

people who think that she's not

22:27

good, people who still to this

22:29

day, write think pieces

22:31

in the national review or whatever about

22:33

how Taylor Swift's cultural

22:36

hegemony of the moment is an indication

22:38

of cultural decline and blah, blah, blah.

22:40

People are,

22:42

old white men are still writing that

22:45

think piece and getting paid

22:47

per word. And they're wrong,

22:50

wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong. Because, and

22:53

the thing that's ironic about it is that they just

22:55

can't, these guys who fancy themselves as

22:57

deep thinkers can't be bothered

22:59

to actually listen to the song and

23:02

pay attention to why millions of people

23:04

love it. It's not because it's

23:06

trite, it's because it's universal

23:09

and very good. Yes.

23:12

That said, there's things about her as

23:14

an artist that kind of frustrate me.

23:16

Sure. And, you know,

23:18

but the way

23:19

that I'm gonna

23:22

be like a better

23:25

version of masculinity than

23:27

I would have been in a prior generation

23:30

is that I'm gonna acknowledge that that's

23:32

not a problem with her, right? What

23:37

she's doing

23:38

is working. Like, if anybody was curious

23:40

what working looks like,

23:44

it's

23:47

like Taylor Swift's last nine months, you

23:50

know? Yeah. Like,

23:52

holy crap.

23:55

To think that she has been doing the areas to her,

23:58

all of that.

23:59

And at the same time that she has been doing

24:02

this rerecord project, which we haven't

24:04

even talked about

24:05

the enormous work involved

24:08

in rerecording an album as Technically

24:10

sophisticated as really any of her albums, but

24:12

this one You and I have talked about

24:14

how like the albums she's rerecorded

24:16

up to this point have been more country So

24:19

they have been more

24:20

easy to reproduce Yeah, because people play

24:22

the instruments. A mandolin is a mandolin is a mandolin

24:24

like you just get it in front of a microphone That's

24:27

you know, but

24:27

this was her most Electronic

24:30

like she did it with Jack Antonoff.

24:31

Yeah of bleachers and fun

24:33

and as someone who has spent a lot of time

24:37

at August institutions

24:40

in Labs sponsored

24:42

by people with fancy names as

24:44

someone who spent a lot of time making

24:47

bleep blorpy sounds in a

24:49

computer. Yeah, you know and trying

24:51

to find a new and interesting bleep or blorp,

24:53

right like The way that

24:55

you get the most interesting bleeps and blorps is

24:58

by just like You just

25:00

like fiddle fiddle and and the eye

25:03

Being able to the eye the notion of being able to recreate

25:06

that is ridiculous It's well

25:07

and especially when you consider hold

25:09

on. Hello. Yes

25:13

What time is it as

25:16

soon as we're done with this year we're gonna have dinner yeah,

25:18

then you can have a cookie, okay

25:21

All right

25:22

All right, we'll be done in a little bit. Okay All

25:25

right anyway Well,

25:29

especially like when you consider that

25:32

how much that this out the original is

25:34

nine years ago Yeah, the technology

25:36

the programs they're using the computers

25:38

are different indeed Yeah, so the settings that

25:40

they use to make the original 1989 might not even exist

25:42

anymore

25:44

and it's the kind of thing where they

25:46

can't

25:48

The Legality of using individual

25:51

Samples and such that a guy like Jack Antonoff

25:53

might fabricate for the purposes of producing

25:56

a Taylor Swift track I'm not quite

25:58

sure what the lawyers told them about what

26:00

they could use.

26:01

So, yeah, they may have started fresh trying

26:03

to recave. And it does sound, and as

26:05

a result, I think this is the album that sounds

26:07

the most different of all of the re-records.

26:10

Right. And there are hard

26:12

chords to, okay.

26:13

From,

26:15

on a scale of one to 10, one

26:18

being I like some Taylor songs, and 10 being

26:21

I decode all the Easter eggs professionally on the internet.

26:24

I'm probably like a four, four or five

26:26

on the safety scale.

26:28

Oh, the scale just goes so high.

26:30

The hardcore, there are hardcore Swifties

26:32

who are like, it's different, I don't

26:34

like it. I mean, her voice has

26:37

changed in nine years. She's definitely

26:39

embracing the Alto. It's

26:42

older. She always was an Alto, right? Yeah,

26:44

but she,

26:45

I saw somebody on the internet, and I wish I could

26:47

credit them for this, saying that because

26:49

this was her first pop record, and because

26:52

pop singers are often main

26:55

character sopranos, she was being

26:57

much more, she was going higher,

27:00

and while

27:00

she- And also sort of going

27:02

for these kind of self-consciously, I think

27:04

girlish

27:05

tones. Yeah, and I, well,

27:07

I think she hits the high notes better now, but also

27:09

when she goes into her low register, it's really

27:12

resonant now. Yeah. I

27:14

think it's nice. Womanly. And so,

27:16

yeah, it sounds different. I think there are people

27:18

who are mad about that. There

27:21

are people who are mad if you say it sounds different.

27:23

These are the kind of people who like, one

27:27

of my videos recently, somebody

27:29

commented on how I looked a little

27:31

older,

27:32

and someone said, yeah. Time marches

27:34

on, asshole. No, someone said, it's true, our

27:36

millennials are aging. And

27:39

then I said that to you, and you said, yeah, time marches

27:42

on, asshole. The bell

27:44

tolls.

27:44

Yeah. They're good for

27:46

the grace of God, people.

27:49

It's all happening at the exact

27:51

same rate. Old is the goal. For

27:54

all of us. Yeah. Same

27:56

night awaits us all, motherfucker.

27:58

Well, so do you think, are there any other? of the

28:00

original tracks you want to talk about or do you

28:02

want okay

28:03

here's well I wanted to sort of talk about her

28:06

her voice a little bit more okay I mean

28:08

she's someone who one

28:10

of the many reasons why she was unduly

28:14

dismissed by the intelligentsia

28:16

earlier on in her reign is

28:18

that she's not a

28:21

great singer she's not and she would

28:23

never call herself yeah like

28:24

well and she even references that in

28:27

one of the songs off of speak

28:30

now

28:30

mean yes about

28:32

how like her it's specifically

28:34

about a critic who often wrote about how she couldn't say

28:36

couldn't saying exactly and by the way

28:38

that's the mean that's the first song that I heard of

28:40

hers where I was like oh wow that's that's a very good

28:42

song that's whoever

28:43

no you're thinking of mine is that the one

28:46

made her a bowl of the careless man's careful daughter

28:49

I mean yeah someday

28:50

someday I'll be living in

28:52

a single city like yeah

28:55

yeah yeah no that's that's that's a

28:57

song classic I

29:00

was like I heard that that's the one that's yeah

29:03

I heard that I was like that's a that's a like a pop standard

29:05

going forward instantly you know yeah

29:08

but anyway so

29:10

she

29:11

she's not a great singer but the thing is

29:13

that it's like when we talk about male

29:16

great male songwriters when

29:18

do we ever demand that they be great singers

29:21

we only ever demand that they be competent singers

29:24

yeah and sometimes we let them get away

29:26

with being Leonard Cohen and Bob Dylan you

29:30

know oh god like

29:32

you know like

29:34

and like and the level of like

29:36

it's like and Taylor Taylor is only a bad

29:39

a bad singer in the sense that you compare her

29:41

to someone like or like

29:43

somebody voicey you know yeah

29:45

yeah who's big who's big right now with

29:47

a really great voice Ariana Grande

29:50

or who

29:54

the the Albanian Alto

29:59

What?

30:01

Dua Lipa, Dua Lipa, yeah. Oh,

30:04

right. Who isn't even a very acrobatic singer,

30:06

but just tambourine, wow, what a voice.

30:09

Or like Katy Perry, tambourine, wow,

30:11

what a voice, even if not the most acrobatic. And

30:14

then there's also incredibly acrobatic singers. Like

30:16

Christine Aguilera. Yeah, yeah. And she

30:18

is none of those, but as singer-songwriters

30:21

go, great songwriters go, as great

30:23

songwriters go, she's up there

30:26

with like John Lennon and like, and Paul

30:28

McCartney and like, you know, her voice

30:30

is that good. Yeah, yeah.

30:31

You know, it's just, you know, but

30:34

when John Lennon would sing,

30:36

you know, so basically, when there

30:38

was an incident when Taylor was on the, I

30:41

think it was the Grammys or something, and

30:43

she sang the

30:45

Stevie Nicks

30:48

song, Rhiannon, is that

30:51

how you say that name? Yeah. And

30:53

which has a really tricky vocal line in

30:55

it that, and

30:58

she sang it, she didn't do so

31:00

well, because maybe she was like a child

31:02

on live television in front of millions

31:05

of people, right? And also, that's a

31:07

hard song to sing, you know, as a lot

31:09

of karaoke people have found out, you

31:11

know, that is a surprisingly hard

31:13

song to sing, you know, and people made

31:15

like mincemeat out of her. And it's like

31:18

when John Lennon would sing flat,

31:20

it's like,

31:20

oh, the emotion, the

31:23

rawness. He's so taken away

31:25

by the melody. Yeah, exactly. You know,

31:28

he's a musician from the street, you know, he's

31:31

not schooled like you. You know

31:33

John

31:33

Lennon can't read music, right? Exactly,

31:35

that's right.

31:37

Jesus

31:39

Christ.

31:41

So can we talk about the singles? Sure. Okay,

31:44

so...

31:44

If you hold your microphone a little bit like more...

31:47

Sorry, sorry. There you go. It's

31:49

getting so heavy. It's so heavy. It's so heavy.

31:51

Adam wanted to go handheld, I'm like, these things weigh

31:53

a lot. Okay. Ooh,

31:56

this is actually kind of nice.

31:57

Is that what Taylor would say?

31:59

use a lighter fucking microphone.

32:01

She'd be like, you know what, this microphone is too heavy. Bring

32:04

to me a lighter microphone.

32:04

I know that. But I am not Taylor

32:07

Swift, so I have to use this heavy microphone.

32:10

An assistant on wings would descend.

32:13

Yes. They would be like, Madam,

32:15

here is your, and she would say thank you.

32:17

And then give them a giant bonus. She

32:19

would know exactly, she would know their names. She

32:22

would know the names of their kids. Because,

32:24

ugh. Okay, so I. She would have perfection.

32:27

I think Taylor has always been really terrible

32:29

at picking singles. As

32:32

evidenced by the fact that the lead single, Office,

32:35

I don't know if Welcome to New York was the lead.

32:36

It's the first one that I remember. But, Shake

32:38

It Off.

32:39

Shake It Off, yeah.

32:41

Which is a fine song. It's like, it's

32:43

a fun party song, but that

32:45

one

32:46

leans more towards the trite. Yes.

32:49

When You Had, When Out of the Woods was right

32:52

fucking there. When Wildest Dreams

32:54

was there. When Style was there. But

32:56

honestly, Wildest, or Out of the Woods should

32:59

have been the single. I think she picks, I

33:01

think she gets nervous and picks the song

33:03

that sounds most fun and

33:06

pleasing to the masses instead

33:08

of the song that obviously

33:10

everyone is gonna be scream singing with. Well,

33:14

I think that maybe you don't give her enough credit.

33:17

But, probably. In knowing, and, like

33:19

she writes, when she writes, when someone

33:21

like that writes a song, like Shake It Off, she

33:24

knows exactly what she is doing. And

33:26

when she puts it as a single, she knows exactly what

33:28

she is doing. And it had the exact desired effect.

33:31

Right, and everyone's like this. It was a gigantic smash. Right,

33:33

and it's

33:34

a smash and all of that because people think it's fun.

33:36

Permanent

33:36

weddings and dances and anywhere

33:39

gay people are for. But

33:41

even then, like,

33:42

if you,

33:45

nobody wants, when they see Taylor

33:47

Swift, nobody wants to hear Shake It Off.

33:49

Nope, no. No, nobody wants to hear her sing that.

33:51

Nobody, please.

33:53

That is at the bottom of the

33:55

list of songs they want to hear. Let's go on TikTok right

33:57

now. And look at videos

33:59

from the stand. where there's tween

34:01

girls.

34:02

No, I'm telling you, you are wrong about

34:04

this. You are absolutely wrong. I

34:06

accept that. They wanna hear, in

34:09

the eras set for 1989,

34:13

people are very mad that Out

34:15

of the Woods is not part of that. People

34:18

wanna hear Wildest Dreams, people wanna hear Style.

34:21

I think, you know, yeah. People

34:26

don't really like Bad Blood, but I do. Anyway.

34:30

Style, I, so

34:33

I,

34:35

I took the kids out of the house the other

34:38

day.

34:39

As you often do.

34:40

Don't make it sound like it. But I did it

34:42

specifically this time because I needed to

34:44

get away from Taylor Swift. So like we, we

34:47

bought this, you bought this record. Yes.

34:50

What's the, are the awesome local record store that you found?

34:52

Lost and Found Records. Lost and Found Records in Knoxville, Tennessee,

34:55

Rad Store. It's a great, great record

34:58

store. And so,

35:00

you noticed, is it on their social media? You

35:03

saw them unboxing this and you were like, I'm gonna go buy

35:05

that.

35:05

Yeah, they do a video on Instagram

35:07

of their new arrivals and it's just like they flip through

35:09

everything, either the new stuff or also stuff

35:12

they bought from somebody that's interesting.

35:14

And they showed the 1989 record and

35:17

I had been excited about this. So I obviously

35:19

fired up on Spotify, but like that's

35:21

not fun to celebrate a release day by just like

35:24

hitting a button on your phone. And I was like, you know what?

35:26

I wanna buy this thing. I want the object. Freaking

35:28

textbook case of how

35:30

you run a brick and mortar

35:33

media business today.

35:36

You know, if you can do it and these guys

35:38

are doing it, like it's by doing

35:40

stuff like that.

35:41

Yeah, and so I went and I bought the record and

35:44

so you had, oh, you were taking the kid to violin

35:47

and he was like, and as soon as you got in the car, he was like, can

35:49

we listen to Taylor Swift?

35:51

Yes, and I was like, Jesus. Please

35:54

no. But yes, so I put it on anything.

35:57

No, I mean, so especially with what.

36:01

We have one of them who

36:06

is really being,

36:08

in the way he is developing, is developing in

36:10

a very stereotypically boyish

36:12

way, right? In a way that like,

36:15

you know, is just sort of remarkable.

36:17

And it's like, and it's sort of, I think speaks

36:19

to, because that's

36:22

not, he's not getting that from us, you know?

36:24

It's like, if coming from somewhere powerful,

36:27

you know? And it's been interesting to watch. But

36:30

anyway, so when that one especially

36:32

wants to listen to a female

36:34

singer, or watch the Barbie movie, or

36:36

something like that, I say yes.

36:38

The little one, when I asked him what records he wanted

36:40

to get, he said Twisted Sister. But

36:42

he also...

36:43

Which is pretty awesome.

36:44

I love taking him into the record store and being like,

36:47

tell the man what you're looking for.

36:48

Do the voice, do the voice.

36:50

I want Twisted Sister.

36:54

My proudest moment is apparent.

36:55

But he also wants to listen to Taylor

36:58

Swift, because he enjoys it.

36:59

So that's why I grudgingly said, yes,

37:01

I'll put on 1989. He

37:04

asked for 1989. Yeah. Taylor's

37:07

version. So I put it on and I'm listening to

37:09

it, and it gets to Style, which

37:12

is a song that is about Harry Styles,

37:14

right? Well,

37:15

there's some debate, but probably

37:17

about Harry Styles.

37:19

And

37:21

I've never liked that song.

37:24

Ugh. You don't like it because she calls herself

37:27

pretty in it. I've

37:29

got the red, the magic

37:32

thing that you like. Anyway.

37:33

So here's the reason. I've actually interrogated

37:36

my feelings on this, and I think it's actually a little

37:38

bit different than what you would expect. Okay. Because

37:40

it's different than what I expected. But I actually think this is true. Okay,

37:43

let's hear it. I find that song

37:45

to be exclusionary of non-gorgeous

37:48

people. Oh, jeez. Maybe

37:53

that's what I like it. I thought you said

37:55

you love it and I as a mere mortal.

38:00

Like this song that's just

38:02

about two really hot people

38:05

celebrating how unbelievably

38:07

hot they are together. There

38:09

is someone in the comments right now unironically

38:11

typing, Lauren's not hot. And

38:13

you know what to

38:14

that person? Double deuces to you, sir. I say, get

38:16

fucked. I

38:17

like myself. You can't.

38:19

So we know. Anyway.

38:20

Anyways. I love the

38:22

imagery of

38:24

it. I think it's fantastic.

38:26

I think it's fun.

38:28

What caught my attention this time,

38:30

and that's a good dumb hang up for that's a

38:33

dumb reason for me to not like that song. Right.

38:36

That's not a problem. That's not a problem with the song. That's

38:38

not a Taylor problem. That's an Adam problem.

38:40

Okay. But what caught my attention. I was listening to the rerecord

38:43

was the first has

38:45

got the feel. You

38:47

know, it's a, it's very much like a full

38:49

live band and it's got

38:52

this like great 70s feel

38:54

to it. Oh yeah. It's

38:57

just wind in your hair and

38:59

it feels like driving your Camaro

39:02

and your aviators. It feels like

39:04

boys of summer. Oh hell yeah.

39:06

It really does. It's always a summer. Yeah.

39:09

Yeah. It doesn't sound like it. It

39:11

feels like it. It feels like it. I

39:13

love boys of summer. The same windbreaker and sunglasses

39:16

would be applied to either song. Yeah.

39:20

Right. And in her. And so anyway,

39:22

so I think I remembered that I always

39:24

liked that verse and that groove and

39:27

I'm ashamed that I first noticed it

39:29

when what's his name? Hipster Mccountry

39:32

abuser covered it. Oh,

39:35

Ryan Adams. Ryan Adams. Yeah. For

39:38

reasons that pass understand. I know, but I remember he was

39:41

on like a late night television show that was on in the

39:43

background and he played style.

39:45

Yeah. And I remember that whoa, that versus

39:48

that group is hot. Like, but

39:50

he didn't do anything new to it. And he just played it as,

39:53

as, as written, you know? But

39:55

anyway, and I heard that now with her older

39:58

womanly voice.

39:59

Yeah, and she's like putting a little

40:02

like

40:03

almost kind of stereotypically

40:05

kind of male 60s

40:08

70s soul singer kind of sex

40:10

on that performance and

40:13

that got my attention Adam

40:15

that got my attention. I

40:18

will admit to you

40:19

He to the point where he texted me and

40:21

said I think I like style now

40:24

and I said Welcome

40:28

to the circus. We're all clowns here She

40:32

talked about the vault tracks sure. Okay.

40:34

So for anyone who's Unversed

40:37

how could you be but all the

40:39

rerecords come with what are called

40:41

vault tracks? Which are songs

40:44

that she wrote to some

40:46

degree or another? At

40:48

the time of the recording of the original album

40:50

that he

40:50

sketched out Biss some of them

40:53

you got

40:53

further than others but for whatever

40:56

reason they did not make the album

40:58

and so she has Produced them

41:00

to completion obviously as

41:02

part of the rerecords. This

41:05

one has one two three

41:07

four five Fault

41:09

tracks if you get the deluxe

41:12

version. It also has an extra version of bad

41:14

blood with

41:18

Yeah So

41:22

Do you do you have any interest in any

41:24

of the vault tracks? I? Mean

41:27

the most famous of all the vault tracks is obviously

41:29

shoulda woulda coulda wrong coulda woulda

41:31

shoulda wrong Shoulda woulda coulda woulda shoulda

41:33

wrong. That's not a vault track coulda woulda shoulda wrong

41:35

That's that is a bonus

41:37

track on bone. We just not a rerecord.

41:40

Okay, it doesn't count It's

41:41

just noteworthy because it's like maybe her

41:43

best song ever and the notice that the notion

41:45

that it was a bonus track is kind Of is

41:48

just yes interesting thing But the

41:50

most famous of all vault tracks is obviously the

41:52

10-minute version of all too well

41:55

right That she

41:57

performs at the arrows to her

41:59

song about John Mayer? Jake

42:01

Gyllenhaal. Jake Gyllenhaal, yes. Okay.

42:04

Allegedly. Allegedly. Alma,

42:10

I believe the supposition

42:12

is that all of these vault tracks are about Harry Styles,

42:15

which is especially interesting

42:17

for the last one, Is It Over Now, where

42:20

she calls him a heartless

42:23

traitor, I think.

42:24

Dang. And

42:26

Patil- You had a microphone in front of your face. Is

42:29

it- No, no, no. Here. You gotta get more in

42:31

front of your face. I thought you wanted over here so

42:33

they could see my face. No, no, no. I

42:36

do want them to see your face, but this is an audio

42:38

program. Sorry. I'm

42:39

sorry. This is why handheld is bad. My

42:41

hand hurts and I'm not even holding it correctly. I

42:45

don't know if you've listened to enough of the vault

42:47

tracks to have opinions on them.

42:49

I would like- I have thoughts on her

42:52

vault tracks in general. Yeah.

42:55

Which is, you know, they are in general

42:57

pretty extraordinary. Yeah.

43:00

Now that is in part because, I mean,

43:03

maybe it's a self-protection

43:05

mechanism for me to believe

43:07

that it's a more mature, skilled

43:10

adult version of her that's really sprucing

43:12

up and finishing these songs and not

43:15

that the younger version of her was really so

43:17

genius as to write a song like that and then to

43:19

leave it on the cutting room floor. As a self-protection

43:22

mechanism, I like to believe that it's- Yeah, you're

43:24

wrong. Oh, shit.

43:25

Well, it's interesting because the chatter

43:27

online amongst people who don't like the vault tracks, they're

43:29

like, oh, they don't sound like 1989. They sound like midnights.

43:32

And I'm like, well, yeah, she finished them as an adult.

43:35

Right. Yeah, sure. And you and I were talking about how they're

43:38

relics of her younger self, but

43:41

with her adult present

43:43

self authorial

43:45

voice. Voice, yeah.

43:46

And I just think that must be kind

43:48

of a mindfuck. I mean, I am

43:50

not- I

43:52

know you are not strong enough to

43:54

go into your personal archives

43:57

and journals or whatever and pull

43:59

out stuff that- you wrote 20

44:01

years ago and be like, hmm, this

44:03

is good. Let's share it

44:05

with the world. I

44:07

don't even want to look at my old journals,

44:10

much less publish them. So

44:12

yeah, that's pretty

44:15

daring. That

44:18

shows a very strong sense of self.

44:19

Yes, it does.

44:22

And forgive me for bringing it back to this, but

44:25

maybe this is a good place to sort of wrap it

44:27

up. Sure.

44:28

Because I think it's how I engage with Taylor

44:30

and it's how I imagine these

44:32

seven people who are still listening.

44:35

Most of them probably engage with Taylor because my audience

44:38

is overwhelmingly young and male

44:40

and because they're like mine, they're

44:43

probably like a bunch of know-it-alls, right? Well,

44:45

hopefully we have convinced

44:47

them to go sit down with their internet

44:49

machine and listen to some tracks.

44:51

So one reason why, like,

44:54

you know, A-holes like

44:56

us boys, one reason why

44:58

a lot of us still tend to dismiss Taylor

45:00

Swift is that they'll say like, oh, well,

45:03

she's not like

45:06

a sole proprietor.

45:09

There's a lot of sort of in dude

45:11

music, there's a lot of stock

45:16

put in the value of an artist being

45:20

like Dave Grohl doing it entirely.

45:22

Like a one-man band. In his basement, yeah. Right.

45:25

Recording all the tracks. That's the thing

45:27

that John Mayer does now and talks about

45:29

like going off into the studio by himself.

45:31

By himself and blah, blah, blah,

45:33

blah, blah, blah. And I say this

45:35

as by the way, like someone who.

45:37

Does not collaborate.

45:39

Does not collaborate. And

45:41

by the way, like, you know, and anyone,

45:44

you know, like there's a reason I'm not

45:46

a famous musician.

45:47

I had game, okay, I

45:50

have some game left. I'm

45:52

someone who can walk into like a

45:55

studio and like lay down all the tracks

45:57

and like, you know, produce a song that's like, okay.

46:00

And

46:01

I'm

46:02

over that as being a thing

46:04

that we value.

46:06

And also,

46:07

think of all of the

46:10

male auteurs, male musical

46:12

auteurs who we

46:14

just revere

46:17

as gods

46:18

who collaborated with session

46:21

musicians and producers and blah,

46:23

blah, blah, blah. Everyone from

46:26

people who really were auteurs like

46:28

Brian Wilson who would go in there and really

46:30

be the director of the film.

46:34

But still, he didn't play a single

46:36

note on Pet Sounds. He

46:38

sang, but he didn't play a note.

46:44

The Beatles were collaborating with

46:46

all kinds of people at the end. Exactly, all kinds of

46:49

great. Say nothing of George Martin.

46:50

Sure, or just

46:54

to make it circular, we're talking of Boys of Summer. Yeah.

46:58

Don Henley, a song that, that's

47:00

a song that was written, the entire

47:02

music for that song was written by Mike Campbell

47:04

from The Heartbreakers, offered

47:07

to Tom Petty who for

47:09

some reason, maybe he got stabbed

47:11

in the ear that day, turned

47:13

it down and was just like, and

47:15

then like, Don Henley heard it and was like, okay,

47:18

well, that's gonna be a hit if I

47:20

can do my job right today. And he did. And

47:23

his contributions to that song should not be minimized.

47:26

Don Henley wrote the melody and the words and,

47:29

and sang it and that belty, high tenor,

47:32

seventies tenor, Jesus. He

47:35

showed up to work that day. He did, okay.

47:38

But like,

47:39

he had a lot of help on that, okay. And

47:41

no one like doesn't, no one questions

47:43

Don Henley being like a real musician.

47:45

I would also stipulate, and you and I have talked

47:47

about this, I like John Mayer,

47:50

you don't. True. But

47:52

you have argued that you would like John

47:55

Mayer more if he collaborated

47:57

and had people editing him. Yeah.

48:01

So. Hold on, I'm just checking the time. Oh,

48:03

we're good. Yeah,

48:06

truth. So I think there's

48:06

plenty of musicians out there who had

48:08

they collaborated, there could have been even better.

48:10

Right, right. So she's

48:12

someone who like has, she

48:15

could absolutely run in there and just track

48:17

the whole thing herself, okay? She could.

48:20

She chooses not to, because that's not a good use of her

48:22

time. She can, she's much better

48:24

off being a pop star, you know,

48:27

in her spare time. And letting Jack Antonoff

48:30

fiddle with the computer, you know? Who

48:32

wants to see Jack Antonoff at a

48:34

football game? Love

48:38

you, Jack, but I feel

48:40

like

48:40

you'd agree with me. Well, I

48:42

think you're

48:44

discounting the amount of time she

48:46

spends in the studio

48:47

working on the songs with him. No

48:49

doubt, absolutely. She's a studio

48:51

rat too, no doubt, okay?

48:54

But I also think, I can't imagine that

48:56

she has been there for

49:00

every minute of the production

49:02

necessary of reassembling these albums

49:05

while she's been also doing the areas tour.

49:08

She has to be delegating. And this

49:10

is not someone who does that out of weakness. This

49:13

is someone who does that because she's a strong manager,

49:15

right? And she chooses, and

49:17

she like collaborates, she chooses good employees.

49:20

And like, you know, everything she

49:22

does, she does correctly. So there's that

49:25

thing that I think is one reason why

49:27

I think idiots,

49:29

idiot boys like us, discount her and we shouldn't.

49:32

Here's one where I kind of feel like

49:36

maybe us idiot asshole arrogant

49:38

boys have

49:40

not a point,

49:41

but a function, a

49:43

legitimate function. All right, let's hear

49:45

it. It's like when there's like animals

49:48

in the ecosystem and you're just like, oh God,

49:50

fuck mosquitoes. Like they just fuck

49:53

them. But you know what, bats are hungry,

49:55

okay? And so mosquitoes have

49:57

to exist, right? So there's like a thing

49:59

that like.

49:59

the

50:01

asshole smarty pants dude. Okay.

50:05

You know, visible a character

50:07

as he may be. As much as we'd love to exterminate

50:10

him. Noted. Let's hear the argument.

50:12

Okay, so I think that I feel

50:15

like Taylor Swift

50:18

actually has stalled a bit

50:20

artistically. I

50:23

think that someone of her ability, I

50:29

think if she, let

50:30

me put it this way. I think a male artist

50:32

of her ability

50:34

would have felt the social pressure

50:37

to be more

50:40

musically and intellectually

50:43

adventurous and ambitious than

50:45

she has been.

50:47

Are you ready for me to tell you why I think that you're

50:49

wrong? Yeah. Okay.

50:52

So the common knock on Taylor

50:54

Swift for years was she just

50:56

dates guys and then writes songs about

50:58

them. She writes 90 songs about them. She writes

51:01

tea spilling songs about her. It's all

51:03

just about the guys, right? Yeah, for

51:05

sure. That was, that was,

51:08

you know. And even if it was true, like

51:10

how many,

51:12

every Leonard Cohen song is about

51:15

a girl.

51:15

Yes. Jesus. And

51:18

then, you know, then she wrote Reputation,

51:20

which was about all of that.

51:23

And then everyone was like, well, she's just complaining. And

51:25

we don't like the new style. Anyway, then

51:28

she did Lover, which was very pop.

51:31

And then the pandemic happened and

51:33

she was locked in her house as

51:36

we all were. And she produced what I

51:38

think are the two best Taylor Swift albums,

51:40

Folklore and Evermore, mostly because I

51:43

am a folkie and they speak to me. I

51:45

love acoustic shit. But

51:48

those are songs where I think she really went

51:50

in new directions with her songwriting. She did

51:53

a bunch of story songs, which were new for her.

51:55

She did a bunch of interconnecting

51:57

where she created characters and then wrote songs

51:59

from

51:59

different perspectives. She wrote

52:02

a song based on history. I think she

52:04

wrote Epiphany, which I think

52:07

blends like history and

52:09

the modern in a way that is so emotional.

52:11

I still can't listen to that song without crying.

52:14

I think she, and you know, she has really

52:16

reinvented herself in different ways than Midnight's came

52:18

along and she kind of latched

52:21

on to sort of the Kate Bush nostalgia,

52:24

I think, and did a lot of that sort

52:26

of 80s interesting thing. Do

52:28

you think that maybe she,

52:30

because Kate Bush

52:32

is sort of an early example

52:35

of a female

52:36

artist who

52:39

was kind of like a beautiful pop

52:42

star who danced around and looked beautiful in

52:44

her videos, but also fully

52:46

produced her own songs with her own keyboards

52:49

in her own studio and was

52:51

her studio rat, you know,

52:53

made all of herself soup to nuts

52:55

and was she sort of trying to

52:59

try to get everyone

53:01

to see her as the Kate Bush that she is? No.

53:03

I mean, she's honestly far more talented

53:05

than Kate Bush. I think she's just very good at trying

53:07

new things and reinventing

53:09

herself and, you know, Madonna reinvented

53:12

herself in ways that were really visually dramatic.

53:15

And I think Taylor just keeps

53:17

kind of putting new things on her plate.

53:20

And so she's always eating some of the same

53:22

things, but she's trying new foods at the same time.

53:24

No

53:25

doubt. The artistic

53:27

growth that you describe over the course of those albums

53:30

happened a hundred percent. And

53:32

I like it. And there's lots of songs there that I really

53:35

like. And a song like Snow

53:37

on the Beach on Midnight

53:39

is a song where she

53:41

actually pushed herself into some

53:43

new musical territory using some interesting

53:45

chords that are not so stock.

53:48

Yeah. This is where I wish we could play stuff because

53:50

I would love to hear you explain the chords. Yeah.

53:52

Well, that's that's good. Go watch Rick. Rick

53:55

Beato. You know, hey, Rick,

53:56

I'm going to text you after this. You

53:58

should do a wide

53:59

the song is great about snow on the beach. Cool

54:02

harmonies in that one. Anywho, so one

54:05

of the things that a guy like Rick

54:07

talks a lot about and an asshole like me

54:09

thinks a lot about, smarmily to myself

54:12

as I listen to the radio,

54:15

is how music

54:17

has in many ways gotten more complex

54:20

in this era, but in several

54:22

dimensions it has actually gotten much simpler. The

54:25

biggest one being harmonically, the chords.

54:29

Even sort of pop songs, top 40 pop

54:31

songs just a couple of decades ago just

54:33

used to have a much broader harmonic vocabulary.

54:37

And I

54:39

think, and Rick just bemoans this

54:41

all the time, and I think one thing that I would

54:43

love, that I have said to you Rick privately,

54:45

and maybe we'll have this debate out publicly

54:48

one day, is that I

54:50

think that's sort of a falsely

54:52

declinist attitude. I think that

54:54

part of what's happened is that just great

54:56

songwriters, people who are very good

54:59

at writing songs that lots and lots of people

55:01

will like, have simply learned

55:04

through experimentation and empiricism

55:06

and all of that, that there are certain

55:08

chord progressions

55:09

that work. Like

55:11

the axis progression, which Google that

55:13

one, if you, that's the one that's

55:16

with or without you and 80 million other songs

55:18

you've heard is the same. Max

55:22

Martin, that producer in Sweden,

55:25

80 million songs that you'll know and love, he

55:28

calls it sort of melodic math. He's worked out

55:30

sort of basically very simple little algorithms

55:32

for these are the chord progressions

55:35

that make hits. And I

55:37

think to a great extent, Taylor,

55:41

at least on some level, probably

55:44

on every level just knows

55:46

that. On the other

55:48

hand, I feel that someone of

55:51

her ability should

55:53

be writing songs where the chords

55:55

don't always change on the one.

55:57

So, you know what I think?

55:58

Every single time the chord.

55:59

just changes on the one, the last, the whole bar,

56:02

and you're gonna have four changes like that, and

56:04

it's just like, well, someone of

56:07

her ability should just,

56:09

should feel, it would,

56:12

I, as a listener,

56:14

would like it if she felt more pressure

56:18

to explore

56:20

more difficult

56:22

territory, both musically and

56:24

to a certain extent lyrically too.

56:26

I think, I mean, or I think, maybe,

56:29

I think topically, maybe. Okay. Because

56:32

I think as a lyricist, you can't, she's unimpeachable,

56:34

like, she, what she does, she does perfectly.

56:36

I think what's interesting,

56:38

and so the

56:40

songs that you have listened to that you think are

56:42

more interesting of hers, I think a lot of

56:44

them are the ones that are with Aaron Desner

56:47

of the National, who,

56:50

his music is more like that, and also

56:52

some of the songs were orchestrated by his brother, who is

56:56

a classical dude. Oh, dude,

56:57

doing all the string stuff. Oh, yeah. Yeah,

57:00

Bryce Desner, and so, again,

57:01

she, I think it's one of those

57:04

things where she's like, I'm gonna bring in these other people who do

57:06

that well.

57:06

Right, yeah.

57:07

And he also produced

57:10

Koda Wooda Shida, I think that's the title. Wooda

57:12

Koda, some permutation thereof. Which

57:14

is

57:14

one of the bonus tracks on Midnight, and,

57:17

I mean, he's even said,

57:20

when he performed it with her there, I think this

57:22

is the best song we've ever done. And

57:25

that's a song that has many phases

57:28

and builds in interesting ways. It's not just

57:30

verse, chorus, verse, chorus, bridge, it's got multiple,

57:34

it's got a beginning chorus, I don't know what you call

57:36

that, multiple choruses.

57:38

Pre-chorus. Pre-chorus, yeah, it's

57:40

got the pre-chorus of the chorus, it's got like-

57:42

A very lengthy bridge.

57:44

Yeah, that has multiple phases to

57:46

it. I'm not saying it's

57:48

progra- I'm saying it's sort

57:50

of as the shape of progra- No,

57:53

no, no, it's progressive

57:56

in the sense that it

57:58

uses structure. to create

58:01

forward momentum in the song. Which

58:03

is what a lot of bad or

58:06

mediocre pop songs struggle with where

58:08

they sound circular. Where it's just

58:10

kind of like, oh the verse to the chorus and then

58:12

I've heard the whole song. It's just gonna like loop,

58:15

right? Whereas like a

58:17

song like Koda woulda whatever, uses

58:21

sections to create an overall

58:23

forward momentum, an overall

58:26

arc to the song that keeps

58:28

you listening as you go through the whole thing.

58:32

It is a little bit more what they might call

58:34

through composed in the classical music

58:36

world. Where instead of writing a loop,

58:38

you're writing a line. You know,

58:40

a thing that

58:43

got something that meanders and trails around and goes

58:45

somewhere instead of marching around in a circle,

58:47

you know. But

58:51

so I guess on the one hand there, I'm embarrassed

58:53

that like

58:56

I am on some level proud of myself

59:00

to be such a feminist that I can see

59:02

the genius in Taylor Swift, right? I

59:04

know that on some level. Yes, you've got your cookies. It's self

59:06

congratulatory for me to even have this conversation,

59:09

right? And that's kind of nauseating, right? So

59:11

on one level, I know that's what's

59:13

going on here and so therefore I am injured

59:16

when you tell me that this thing that I thought I liked

59:19

that was Taylor's might've been by some fucking

59:21

hipster dude. Like he, that

59:23

was his contribution is what's like really speaking

59:25

to this other hipster dude. Yeah, because

59:27

she wrote that song. Of course she did. And so here's

59:29

this one, but like I came up with a counter argument

59:32

to my own argument and I feel like this

59:34

is maybe like a good thing to end on, right? Sure. Because

59:36

like you want to talk about like male

59:39

songwriters who are worshiped by other

59:42

men, okay, by smart men, white

59:45

men who fancy themselves the smartest

59:48

men of all worship this

59:50

fucking songwriter, okay, as being

59:52

the best of the best, right? Talking

59:54

about Paul Simon, okay? You

59:56

and I both love Paul Simon. We

59:59

love, like. Paul Simon is a deeply

1:00:02

meaningful artist to both of us. Yes. Okay.

1:00:04

We both hate him in many ways. We

1:00:07

think

1:00:07

he is in many ways an objectionable human,

1:00:09

but a genius.

1:00:10

And an objectionable artist. There's lots of things about his

1:00:12

art that I think- Yeah,

1:00:13

all that Rhythm of the Saint stuff.

1:00:15

My favorite album, but there's

1:00:17

lots of things I hate about it. But anyways, you know,

1:00:21

anyways, okay. So this is not a knock on

1:00:23

Paul Simon, okay?

1:00:26

Paul Simon is like someone who

1:00:28

dudes like me would sort of describe

1:00:31

under the kind of auteur theory of musicians,

1:00:33

right? Yeah. Okay. That's a man who's

1:00:36

in control, right? Mm-hmm. Um,

1:00:40

you want to talk about a guy who

1:00:42

relied on his collaborators.

1:00:45

Yes. Okay. And the

1:00:47

reason you don't think of his collaborators is one of the

1:00:49

reasons why he's an objectionable

1:00:50

human. Okay, so the most obvious example

1:00:53

of this is the Graceland

1:00:56

incident where Paul

1:00:59

took a trip to South Africa because he heard some South

1:01:01

African music

1:01:03

and was understandably excited

1:01:05

by it because it was amazing. And

1:01:08

he like, you know, invited a bunch

1:01:10

of just like all- he had some fixer

1:01:13

in South Africa. Like a murderers

1:01:15

row of music. Yeah, a murderers row, all of

1:01:17

the hottest players in Johannesburg or whatever, like

1:01:19

in the theme studio. And

1:01:21

Paul- and they just, you know, Paul said, hey,

1:01:23

let's jam. And

1:01:26

which is like code for- You

1:01:28

play your best lick. You play your best lick and

1:01:30

I will record you as though

1:01:32

I

1:01:33

am an-

1:01:34

as though I am an ethnomusicologist

1:01:37

pointing a microphone at a primitive

1:01:39

tribe.

1:01:39

That's really

1:01:41

what I am is every guy in the 1950s and 60s

1:01:43

who went down to the Delta and

1:01:45

fucking stole all the

1:01:47

blues musicians. Yeah, exactly. I

1:01:49

know. As though I am-

1:01:51

as though I am

1:01:53

Methian transcribing birdsong.

1:01:56

Yeah. Right? I

1:01:58

will record these bits and then I will- a

1:02:01

civilized man will take it back to the

1:02:03

civilized world and I will cut and paste

1:02:05

these loops of tape and Turn them

1:02:07

into song let

1:02:08

me just say at least the racists

1:02:10

who went down to the Delta and Conned

1:02:13

those people into signing bad contracts paid

1:02:15

them five dollars. I'm in originally

1:02:17

paid those guys nothing

1:02:19

No, I'm sure they got paid to show up on

1:02:21

the day, right? I'm sure they got paid a day rate,

1:02:24

but they didn't get songwriting credit, which is

1:02:26

publishing royalties, right? Which

1:02:28

is the ongoing money that's you know, that's

1:02:30

that's really the real money So anyways, yes

1:02:32

when you know, whatever it's kind

1:02:35

of objectionable But in fact the matters Graceland

1:02:37

is still one of the best albums of all time

1:02:39

Like in part because of the contributions

1:02:42

of these genius fucking South African musicians,

1:02:44

okay But also because of the

1:02:46

genius of Paul Simon everyone involved was

1:02:48

a genius and that is a genius album, right?

1:02:51

There's a great or great record But

1:02:53

of course what is tremendously objectionable about is

1:02:55

that when it came out it said music and lyrics

1:02:57

by Paul Simon

1:02:59

Period

1:03:03

And that my friends is what we call

1:03:05

a lie that's what we call You know when

1:03:07

if you think erasure isn't a real

1:03:09

thing Tell me tell me tell

1:03:12

me how that's not erasure. Okay, right

1:03:15

now. Luckily there was an uproar

1:03:18

and Whatever I don't know

1:03:20

how it happened, but they ended up getting

1:03:22

all of those musicians ended up getting their songwriting

1:03:24

credits Yeah, and therefore

1:03:26

their ongoing royalties which for a song

1:03:29

like, you know Call me out or whatever has got to

1:03:31

be a lot of money, especially in South

1:03:33

Africa,

1:03:33

right? so

1:03:36

So that's objectionable

1:03:38

That's an example of possible working

1:03:40

with collaborators, but also just like things like, you

1:03:43

know

1:03:45

All of the just hot flight jazz

1:03:47

guys that he worked with in the 70s On

1:03:50

all on you know for my favorite Paul

1:03:52

Simon album, which is hearts and bones Which

1:03:55

is like in many ways what

1:03:57

I'll just never forget the very first time you ever

1:03:59

played guitar for me You sat down,

1:04:01

we had been dating for like a minute.

1:04:03

And

1:04:04

you played Hearts and Bones, which is a

1:04:06

song about divorce. I know,

1:04:09

but it was the most impressive acoustic

1:04:11

guitar song I could play.

1:04:12

It was very impressive. You did not match

1:04:15

box 20 me,

1:04:16

a la Ken. I was genuinely

1:04:19

impressed. Thank you, thank you.

1:04:23

That's like his least successful album. It's like,

1:04:25

you know, but it's my favorite. But he was

1:04:27

just working with top flight jazz guys,

1:04:29

right? Who like brought

1:04:32

so much, a lot of what, you know, who

1:04:34

really should have gotten composition credit.

1:04:38

You know, they ended up just getting player credit and

1:04:40

that's really a shame, but like nobody

1:04:42

questions whether or not Paul

1:04:44

Simon is an auteur, okay? And

1:04:48

I'm not questioning, I do think he's the master

1:04:51

because I think one of the many things he

1:04:53

does well is recognize

1:04:56

talent, get

1:04:59

it in the room with him,

1:05:01

be a casting director and be like, oh,

1:05:03

you know, that drummer with that bass player, that

1:05:05

would be something really special. Like

1:05:09

she does that. And then

1:05:11

what's also amazing, okay. Okay,

1:05:13

and she does that on a Paul Simon level with

1:05:16

her music, okay? Now, how

1:05:18

well does Paul Simon dance? Okay.

1:05:22

How does Paul Simon look in his sparkly

1:05:24

gown? I

1:05:25

will tell you there's a long

1:05:27

going knock about how Taylor Swift is not a good dancer.

1:05:29

She has improved significantly.

1:05:32

Much

1:05:34

better than. If she was a male

1:05:36

artist. I will

1:05:37

tell you Paul Simon could not perform

1:05:39

the era store.

1:05:39

Okay, and I'm sorry, if she was

1:05:41

a male artist, no one would doubt.

1:05:44

They'd be like, oh my, if she was a dude in

1:05:47

a really masculine coded dude, if

1:05:49

she was like a rapper, like a really masculine coded

1:05:52

rapper who could dance that well, that

1:05:55

they would be like, oh, you're a genius. And you're so

1:05:57

bold with your gender performance.

1:06:00

You know? No. The

1:06:03

only reason. Yeah. And

1:06:06

now I'm thinking about Paul Simon performing the Aristotle,

1:06:09

and if so,

1:06:11

it's so like da-da in his past.

1:06:14

You know, I don't like AI. But

1:06:17

I would like to see Paul

1:06:19

Simon doing vigilante shit.

1:06:21

Yeah, like in contemporary,

1:06:23

like bald Paul Simon, you

1:06:25

know? Oh, dear.

1:06:26

With his facelift.

1:06:27

With his facelift, yeah. Ooh.

1:06:30

How?

1:06:33

It's such a, it's,

1:06:35

I'm only doing this to balance the scales

1:06:37

for all of the years that female artists

1:06:39

have been critiqued for their appearance. But

1:06:42

it's just like Paul Simon. Just age. You're

1:06:45

just, you're waking up across

1:06:47

the breakfast table from Edie

1:06:49

Brackel every morning. This woman who is

1:06:52

aging like the finest cheese

1:06:54

at the

1:06:56

shop. Okay, like because

1:06:58

she's just doing nothing.

1:07:01

She's just getting up and she's doing yoga and

1:07:03

she's just, and singing. And

1:07:05

she

1:07:06

likes you the way you are.

1:07:07

And she's like, she's like,

1:07:09

look at how she's aging. A and

1:07:12

B, she likes you the way you are. So

1:07:14

just age, dude. Just age.

1:07:19

I don't know how we land this plane now

1:07:21

that we've talked about. I'll,

1:07:24

Paul Simon's facelift.

1:07:26

You know what? This is

1:07:28

how this is how we see who our

1:07:31

real friends are.

1:07:32

Yeah. Yeah. If you comment

1:07:34

the secret, if anyone comments about

1:07:37

Paul Simon performing the Aeros

1:07:39

tour, we know, oh, did it die?

1:07:41

Oh, oh, right on battery. Yeah.

1:07:43

Okay. That's okay. So that's that's telling us that

1:07:45

we should wrap up this episode. That's okay. Cause

1:07:48

the audio is still running. So

1:07:49

we can still land the plane. Okay. So on the video,

1:07:51

then will you just have a blank? Yeah,

1:07:53

it's gonna be, it's black right now. They're looking at black

1:07:55

screen.

1:07:56

Wow. Now we'll really know who's still here.

1:07:58

Oh, don't who's coming in.

1:07:59

through the other, through the window.

1:08:01

This is like when they turn the lights out

1:08:04

of the bar. They're like, get out,

1:08:06

you horrible drunk.

1:08:08

You don't have to go home, but you can't

1:08:10

stay here. Go home

1:08:12

and listen to your Taylor Swift record. When I used to work at Petit

1:08:15

Library at Penn State, which was one of my favorite

1:08:17

jobs I've ever had, I had like worked night shift there,

1:08:19

which works with the black screen people are seeing right

1:08:21

now on YouTube. Yeah. I

1:08:25

loved that job for a million

1:08:27

reasons, but I used to love going and closing

1:08:29

up the main reading room, the big grand

1:08:31

main reading room, which I believe was

1:08:34

the paternal room. I imagine it's been renamed,

1:08:36

but I... Anyway.

1:08:38

But anyways, but I used to love going

1:08:40

and closing up that room, because

1:08:42

it was just fun. And I had to like yell

1:08:44

and bellow, the library's closing, but the

1:08:46

best part of that was during finals week when

1:08:49

everyone was cramming and it would be just chock

1:08:51

full of just desperate, scared looking

1:08:54

people. And I would go in there at 11,

1:08:56

55 and say, the

1:08:59

library is closing and they'd all just go,

1:09:02

oh, and I... That's what's happening

1:09:04

right now. And I would yell, you don't have

1:09:07

to go home, but you can't stay here. Well,

1:09:09

our children who... And every time it got a big, big

1:09:11

laugh.

1:09:11

Well, our children who would like their dinner are

1:09:14

saying,

1:09:15

bar's closed, mom, dad. So

1:09:19

if this podcast is gonna continue with me

1:09:23

trying to prioritize my mental health in the way that

1:09:25

I should, it's gonna need to be a lighter lift

1:09:27

a lot of the time. So listeners,

1:09:31

if you're still here, that's good. That

1:09:33

speaks well for the future of this program.

1:09:36

If there's nobody left, then that speaks ill for

1:09:38

the future of this program. Whatever. And

1:09:40

either way is fine. We like you either

1:09:42

way. We like, love you just the way you are.

1:09:45

It's you I like. It's

1:09:48

you yourself.

1:09:50

I like you.

1:09:52

I like you too.

1:09:54

Thank you. All right.

1:09:55

Make good choices. Talk to you next time.

Rate

Join Podchaser to...

  • Rate podcasts and episodes
  • Follow podcasts and creators
  • Create podcast and episode lists
  • & much more

Episode Tags

Do you host or manage this podcast?
Claim and edit this page to your liking.
,

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features