Podchaser Logo
Home
Sexual Integrity & Men's Leadership - with Mischa Byruck

Sexual Integrity & Men's Leadership - with Mischa Byruck

Released Thursday, 16th May 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Sexual Integrity & Men's Leadership - with Mischa Byruck

Sexual Integrity & Men's Leadership - with Mischa Byruck

Sexual Integrity & Men's Leadership - with Mischa Byruck

Sexual Integrity & Men's Leadership - with Mischa Byruck

Thursday, 16th May 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:00

Hello , friend , and welcome to this episode . That

0:02

deserves its own special

0:04

, unique introduction , because

0:06

the conversation can get a little intense

0:08

at times , it can be confronting , it

0:10

can feel sometimes challenging to listen to as

0:12

a man , and I wanted to just give this

0:14

preface up front . It's

0:16

about sex , yes , but it's not about

0:18

how to be the best technically skilled

0:20

lover . It's not about how to boost your performance

0:23

in bed , technically

0:25

skilled lover . It's not about how to boost your performance in bed . It's about another

0:27

really important aspect of sex that is crucial to dive into

0:29

if we want to be truly strong

0:32

, powerful , integrated and positively

0:34

impactful sexual men

0:36

. Today I'm interviewing a man

0:38

named Misha , who I found

0:40

because I was looking up information

0:43

about ISTA , which is the International School

0:45

of Temple Arts . They're an organization that has

0:47

come under scrutiny and criticism

0:49

over the past bunch of years because of some of the behavior

0:52

of some of their instructors , and I found

0:54

Misha because he was

0:56

somebody who was directly involved

0:58

with creating repair processes for

1:00

the organization and the individuals involved

1:03

, and I thought , wow , this guy looks really

1:05

interesting and this is his profession to

1:07

help people learn from and integrate and

1:10

acknowledge and heal the harm

1:12

that they've caused in the world . And I thought , wow

1:14

, this needs to be a conversation

1:16

, this needs to be on the podcast

1:18

, because this is a crucial missing

1:21

piece for so many of us . I

1:23

just want to be clear that I am not up here

1:25

on some pedestal saying you need

1:27

to heal your sexual harm , and I've

1:29

never caused sexual harm . I've definitely

1:31

caused harm to people , even in my current

1:34

relationship with my current partner . And

1:36

it's a journey , it's a process of

1:38

navigating it and learning to create

1:40

repair . I learned a ton

1:42

from this episode . I

1:44

learned a ton , lots of really useful

1:47

, practical , actionable things in

1:49

this episode that you can take into your life , into

1:51

your current relationships , into your past relationships

1:54

, and create healing

1:56

and navigate them with much

1:58

more ease and clarity and create

2:00

really positive outcomes . And that

2:02

, again , is so crucially

2:05

important if we want to be strong

2:07

, powerful , positively impactful

2:10

, sexual , integrated men . So

2:12

thank you , thank you again for

2:14

being here . Let's

2:18

get into today's episode . My

2:24

basic understanding is that you're somebody who's come

2:26

from a unique background , who started a lot

2:28

of different big projects in the world and and

2:30

non-profits and had a big impact

2:32

, and then at a certain point , you realize , oh

2:34

, somehow I'll speak

2:37

as if I'm you , somehow I've been hurting certain

2:39

people in the process and my

2:41

impact therefore isn't as positive

2:43

or powerful as it could be . Ooh

2:46

, I need to examine this . I went

2:48

through your own process and came out the

2:50

other side and realized just how important it

2:52

is to do integrity work and

2:54

then eventually got to the position

2:56

where you are now , which is a man who supports other

2:59

men , deepening into their

3:01

integrity so that they can be better community

3:03

leaders and people , etc

3:06

. Is that accurate and welcome

3:08

?

3:09

thank you , yeah , oh yeah , let's start it

3:11

. I feel like it's the perfect way to start a leadership

3:14

and integrity podcast . There's just so like such such

3:16

lofty and ambitious

3:18

topics is to is to talk about like , okay

3:20

, like , how did I come to this ? It's what most people's

3:22

first questions are curiosity , um

3:25

, I it what

3:27

? I didn't have a big call out , I didn't have

3:29

like someone who was like , or or like

3:31

a group of people calling me out or do the big

3:33

cancellation thing . That was never . That was never my

3:35

truth . I did have moments , moments

3:39

of realizing that that the way

3:41

that I was conducting myself , especially around sex

3:43

, um , uh , were

3:45

, were out of my integrity and

3:48

yet very , very much

3:50

like ingrained in me . Um

3:52

. Moments

3:54

when I realized that my , I I'd placed my

3:57

agenda over attunement in

3:59

in in sexual relations . Moments where I

4:01

realized , oh , my God , like I have been willfully

4:05

ignoring the realities of

4:07

um , of what it would

4:09

mean to be an ethical human in the , in

4:11

this interaction , in this dynamic , like kind

4:14

of letting myself get away with fuck

4:16

boy dynamics . Excuse me if I'm going to say that .

4:18

You can say fuck , you can say pussy

4:20

, yeah .

4:20

I mean , I try not to curse , but anyway

4:23

, whatever , but like , but yeah , like fuck

4:25

boy . Dynamics in the sense of just kind of saying

4:28

whatever I

4:30

felt like , without thinking about the repercussions

4:32

. Engaging in

4:35

inadvertent

4:37

love bombing , inadvertent breadcrumbing dynamics

4:40

with women Of course

4:42

never maliciously , but that's not the point with

4:46

women , of course never maliciously , but that's not the point . And just having these moments

4:48

of realizing , you know , again and again , I am

4:50

someone who everybody says I'm a good man , everybody

4:52

experiences me as a good man . I get a

4:55

lot of that feedback and yet I'm still capable

4:57

of immense harm . I'll also just name

4:59

that I had an

5:01

episode many years ago

5:03

, over a decade ago , in

5:05

which I was , in the context

5:07

of a very bad breakup , hurt

5:12

a woman like , actually hit her in

5:14

the course of a big breakup fight and

5:19

we both got physical . Only time that I've gotten

5:21

physical , but it was it was a huge wake

5:23

up call for me to like , talk about

5:25

, to , to like , to realize how

5:28

capable , sweet

5:31

, conscientious feminist

5:34

men

5:36

, men who like , like , have always been

5:38

getting this like feedback from women of like , oh , you're

5:40

so different , it's so wonderful , you're so involved , how

5:43

capable we are of harm . And in fact , as

5:47

I've gone through my career , I've

5:49

really ended up focusing mostly

5:51

on men who have a

5:53

feminist bent , who want to be good men in the

5:55

world , who want to be men of integrity , who want to be progressive

5:57

, and not just how

6:00

capable they are of harm , but how much

6:02

more capable , interestingly , their

6:04

feminism or their progressive stances

6:06

make them of doing harm . Yeah

6:08

, because

6:13

we receive so much trust , such that when from this particular woman

6:15

, such that when we

6:17

do do harm , it feels like betrayal .

6:19

Yeah , thank you , yeah , so much for sharing

6:22

that intro and that that personal piece

6:24

from over 10 years ago . And , yeah , thank you , yeah , so much for sharing that intro and that that personal piece from over 10 years ago . And

6:26

I

6:28

want to normalize also that , like

6:30

all of us , I'll

6:33

just go ahead and say pretty much 99%

6:35

of men at some point have hurt people

6:37

on intentionally , you know , like

6:39

that's just what happens , and

6:42

we're not bad because of it . If you're

6:44

listening and you've done this , you're not bad because

6:46

of it . You're not a bad person , you're not worthless

6:48

, et cetera . But

6:53

it's an opportunity to grow and to evolve and then to come into better relationships with

6:55

people in general . So I'd like to name that

6:58

up front and I also want to just say

7:00

, because you mentioned it and I'm sure

7:02

some people are thinking it right now Like you said , oh

7:04

, in the heat of the moment , over 10 years ago

7:06

you actually hit your partner or

7:08

ex-partner . Some

7:14

people will probably think like , oh well , this means this guy has no room to talk on the realm

7:16

of accountability or something like that too . So I'd love it if you could just like

7:18

speak to that for a little bit . Like what

7:21

sort of systems have you set in place , how

7:24

have you worked to to address

7:27

that within yourself , so

7:29

that you can then help other people ?

7:32

Oh sure , yeah , Thanks

7:34

, and I mean , yeah , this is a there's

7:37

, there's unresolved like

7:40

. It's given me like a

7:43

lot of a lot to grow on

7:45

, the

7:48

biggest , or there's many things

7:50

. That

7:53

night alcohol was involved and I'm now three years

7:55

sober . I don't do drugs or alcohol at

7:57

all , but

7:59

there's

8:02

, that's a big

8:04

one , that's a real big one . Yeah , um

8:06

, there's also a lot of like personal

8:08

growth , learning , work that I've done to

8:10

like evolve myself to the point where , like

8:12

, I can recognize the signs of

8:14

rage or anger , where I can

8:16

um mitigate that

8:19

, where I can catch myself way earlier in any

8:21

kind of like trigger process , where

8:23

I can , um , and have very

8:25

successfully avoided the

8:28

kinds of , uh the

8:31

kinds of dynamics that were present in the relationship

8:33

that she and I had , which was in

8:35

many ways a really unhealthy relationship where

8:37

we were egging each other on in a really

8:40

really unhealthy ways . Um , and

8:43

yeah , I've come to like

8:45

, through therapy , through coaching , through men's work

8:47

, I've come to recognize those dynamics

8:49

and avoid them and make sure I'm not

8:52

having any kinds of giant incoherences

8:54

in my life , right

8:57

, where there are these kind of like , like , just don't

8:59

look at that part of my life Like everything else

9:01

looks good right Like that the life is

9:03

genuinely , genuinely coherent

9:05

, even even under a microscope

9:07

, and I could hold my head up about that . Um

9:09

, I've gotten psychologically

9:13

okay with um , my own

9:15

sexuality and my own shortcomings in a way

9:17

that , like , I'm much less easily triggerable

9:19

. Um , I

9:21

think part of part of that episode

9:23

and and um a lot of my own insecurities was

9:26

was about um , yeah

9:29

, anyway , without getting too much into

9:31

my own psychology , psychodrama like

9:33

see , like , what , like triggered

9:36

a lot of my own insecurities around being a

9:38

uh um from

9:41

being a failure um and

9:43

being uh uh

9:45

being ultimately

9:47

deeply callous . I was

9:49

really , really

9:52

, really resistant against the idea that I didn't care

9:54

, and

9:59

I've reconciled

10:01

a lot of that . I'm 42 now . I

10:03

was in my 20s . I've

10:06

been on my own personal growth journey , but one of

10:08

the big takeaways and I really want to name this First

10:10

of all , I want to hold the space for anybody

10:12

hearing about this and

10:16

feeling their own pain , either having

10:18

caused it or having been hurt . You've

10:24

heard the expression that hurt people , cause hurt people , cause

10:26

hurt . Right , um

10:29

, hurt people , hurt people . I

10:32

mean that's , that's true , but

10:34

I think we all hurt people . I

10:36

don't think you need to like be able to like isolate

10:39

a like I was really

10:41

well loved I I

10:43

come from a really loving background . I come from a

10:46

financially abundant background

10:48

. There

10:51

is a trauma

10:53

of alienation in privileged

10:55

people where that

10:58

, where , where there is there is some sort of a , a

11:01

pain of being divorced

11:03

from the collective human experience

11:05

. But ultimately

11:08

, like I don't , I don't carry a lot of trauma in my

11:10

body . Like I've taken trauma certification

11:12

courses as part of my work with men , like I've

11:15

taken abuse courses , like you don't have

11:17

to be someone who has experienced

11:19

a lot of pain to be capable of

11:21

causing a lot of pain . Yeah

11:23

, you know , like we're all part

11:26

of the human drama , regardless of how much trauma we

11:28

carry in our body , how much like whether or not we

11:30

had nice parents . I don't think that , like , the

11:32

fact that you had nice parents in immunizes

11:35

you from from

11:37

being capable of causing pain or from having

11:39

all sorts of weird insecurities that need to get worked

11:41

out . And

11:43

that was actually a big lesson for me and it's something I've

11:46

carried through of helping otherwise

11:48

very good men see their capacity

11:50

to do harm .

11:51

Yeah , awesome , yeah . Thank you so

11:53

much . And also for context , I noticed on

11:55

your website you referenced that you have also

11:58

like proactive accountability options

12:01

for people and we can go into that

12:03

and like should anybody ? you know , I'd

12:06

like to start a different in a different place first

12:08

, but I just want to mention like it seems like you have

12:10

systems in place that are set up to

12:12

where , if there are problems that arise , people can

12:14

address them , and you want to be addressed , like

12:17

you . You are , you're an open door

12:19

and reaching for this sort of a thing

12:21

.

12:21

Right and for mean and I mean and

12:23

like . Okay , so like , let's just talk about that briefly , all

12:25

right , just briefly . Yeah right , redundant

12:28

systems of support , men's group , coach

12:30

, therapist , psychiatrist , um

12:32

sobriety , uh temple

12:35

, uh rabbi , like I have

12:37

multiple overlapping and redundant

12:39

systems of support , I have cultivated

12:42

community that like speaks to me and that , like

12:44

I can , um be in relationship

12:46

with in a way that , like , I don't have to hide , um

12:49

, that's critical

12:51

. Yeah , and yes , I have um

12:53

supervisory structure that I've created for

12:55

myself proactively . It was not like

12:57

demanded of me by my community , but it was definitely

12:59

something that I saw looking around like needed to

13:01

happen . So you can , I

13:03

welcome feedback , even

13:06

the saltiest , angriest feedback . I

13:08

welcome people telling me that I've hurt them , and I

13:10

promise not to greet it with defensiveness or minimization

13:12

. And I've proactively

13:15

set up a system for when people , like don't think

13:17

that I'm safe . If people don't think I'm safe , they

13:20

can go to two external supervisors

13:22

, who I trust but who are not

13:24

beholden to me , who

13:27

have their own independent jobs and incomes , and

13:31

you can tell them hey

13:33

, we think , I think Misha's dangerous or I think Misha's

13:35

like , I don't think Misha should be doing his work

13:37

, and I never , I'm never

13:39

, I'm never immune to that . I

13:42

never think I'm above that . I'm never immune to

13:45

that . I never think I'm above that . And those people Marsha Bojinski wrote

13:47

the book Creating Consent Culture and

13:49

Angel Adioja has been a transformative justice

13:51

facilitator for 20 years and they

13:53

now run Folsom Street Fair , which is the largest

13:55

leather and kink event in the world . And

13:58

those two people have , you know , have agreed to , like you

14:00

know , effectively be supervisory

14:02

in that right , and I also have regular check-ins with them

14:04

. I go over , like ethical

14:07

questions that are coming up . You know , how did I handle

14:09

this kind of client , like what , you know what ? How

14:11

should I handle this issue or this , uh , this

14:14

opportunity , et cetera ? Yeah , um , yeah

14:16

.

14:17

Awesome , cool . Yeah , thanks for that context

14:19

. That's awesome , and I think it's really important to frame

14:21

the conversation , you know , like

14:23

this is . We're

14:25

looking at , ultimately , how to be a

14:27

better man , right , how to be a man

14:30

who has ? positive impact in the world . So some people will be

14:32

listening to this and thinking like , oh

14:34

well , cool , that's cool for him

14:36

. Like

14:39

, how does that apply to me ? Right , and really

14:41

like , really I want to . I want to go into

14:44

the realm of specifically

14:46

talking about people who are in some kind

14:49

of position of leadership or

14:51

power or something like that . And so

14:54

, for example , like if you're somebody out there who

14:56

leads a class on something , if

14:58

you're leading a workshop

15:00

, if you're leading an experience , if you've written a book

15:02

, if you're like hosting a show , if you're like

15:04

X , y and Z , what

15:09

else , you know what , what a ? What

15:11

is power ? You know ? Oh

15:22

, this is the person that does this thing . Like

15:24

this episode is is really

15:27

for you , you know , to become better at that

15:29

, to become more effective , and I

15:31

think it starts with a question

15:34

of what is power . You know

15:36

what is power ? Because all of those positions

15:39

come with a certain amount of power , whether or not we

15:41

want them . Me , like , there I come

15:43

, I have a certain amount of power . Now , too , I have a very

15:45

large social media following . Like I'm a sexologist

15:48

, I'm an established sex educator . Like there

15:51

are certain projections and weights and powers

15:53

that people give me some that I'm probably

15:55

not even aware of still and like

15:57

that impacts how I relate relate

15:59

with people and interact with people . So

16:01

I'll just pause

16:04

and ask you , like , in your mind

16:06

, what is , what is power in those

16:08

contexts ?

16:11

I use a really general , broad

16:13

definition because I found that the most effective

16:15

way of thinking about power um

16:17

is is broad and

16:20

um malleable . Um

16:22

, I think power is the ability

16:25

to impact and influence others . Right

16:28

in terms of , if we're

16:30

talking about interpersonal power , which I think we are , yeah

16:32

, um , you can also talk about intrinsic power

16:34

within . You can talk about , like , oh , the power

16:36

that we can achieve together if we all unite , but I

16:39

think right now we're talking about interpersonal power dynamics

16:41

and mostly power over yeah um

16:43

, what does it mean for us to hold

16:45

power or someone to project power

16:47

onto us ? um , the

16:50

other thing I'll say just right up front

16:52

about dynamic power is that power

16:54

is dynamic . It's

16:57

really easy in a um

17:00

, politically progressive context

17:03

to think of power as static , as

17:06

as like this is , you know , like

17:08

there's , he's the white guy in the room , so he's got

17:10

to hold all the power , and that's just what it is . It's

17:13

really important , I think , to think about power

17:15

as dynamic and flowing that there's

17:18

. That power shifts even as

17:20

the conversation goes along . That power shifts as we

17:22

all get older or younger . There's

17:24

a great example that one of my consent educator mentors

17:26

shared of like , uh

17:29

, they they're , uh , they they

17:31

work in , um , in , uh , intimacy

17:34

coordination for hollywood movies , and

17:36

um , they told a story of of

17:38

a of a movie set in which a very

17:40

established actress , a very famous

17:42

, established actress , was on the set , but she was older

17:45

. And then there was a much younger

17:47

, ingenue actress

17:49

who were both on the set and

17:52

they hadn't met , and they both were like avoiding each

17:54

other for the first day because both of them had this

17:56

intimidation right . Both of them had projected that

17:58

the other person held more power . Right

18:00

, the young woman was like this is like she

18:02

won an Oscar , and

18:05

the old woman was like this is like she won an oscar . And the old woman was like this woman's about

18:07

to replace me . You know , this is where this woman is , is where all

18:09

the male gaze is going , all the attention

18:11

is going , and she represents everything , I fear

18:13

. And so both of them had this

18:15

right . So , like , power is also

18:17

both dynamic and also perceived

18:20

. Right like perception , it plays a role

18:22

. You were talking about the projections that people might

18:24

be putting on you that you might not be aware of . Um

18:27

, I think it's really important to recognize

18:29

, if you're you , how

18:31

much power that confers on you , whether or not you

18:34

hold a specific formal position

18:36

of authority over anybody . Right like um

18:39

, informal power is often

18:41

far more relevant than

18:45

formal power . Formal power is almost easier

18:47

to spot . Right Like , I

18:49

know that my boss has power over me . Right

18:52

Like got it . That's

18:55

pretty basic , right , informal

18:58

power , like this person knows

19:00

everybody at this event and I don't know anybody . This

19:02

person is a consent educator and

19:04

I am automatically , without even consciously

19:07

acknowledging it , giving them the benefit of the doubt

19:09

for this kind of sketchy shit that's happening right now sexually

19:12

between us . That's

19:14

the stuff that where , where , where

19:16

. I see a lot of clients , especially

19:19

my male clients , um , messing

19:22

up because in the

19:25

minds of maybe this resonates with you , taylor , or

19:27

in the in the minds

19:29

of a lot of men that I've spoken with when I'm , when I talk

19:31

about power , they're like well , I'm not Elon Musk , I'm

19:33

not Donald Trump , I'm not the head

19:35

of a fortune 500 , whatever . I'm not looking

19:37

like these guys on Instagram on private jets , so I

19:40

don't have any power . What are you talking about ? I was unpopular

19:42

in high school , you know . What

19:46

are you talking about ? You know , like I still have to work for a living

19:48

. How could I help ? How could I ? How could I hold any power

19:50

? Right

19:53

? So our self-conceptions can betray us

19:55

and this is where I see a huge amount of harm

19:57

occurring generally is , yeah

20:00

, it's the failure to acknowledge our own power .

20:01

Yeah , can you speak a little bit more to that . Like I

20:04

think that's super juicy . Like , yeah

20:07

, like , say more like the , the

20:09

failure to acknowledge our own power , like so

20:11

, so okay , there's consent consent

20:14

educator who here it is ? Here it is

20:16

Like like people don't know .

20:17

Okay . So , like what I do professionally is

20:20

I support men who

20:22

generally are either

20:24

trying to prevent themselves from causing harm from their

20:26

position of power or who have caused harm in

20:28

their position of power and want

20:30

to use it as a source of growth

20:33

and evolution , which

20:36

involves really engaging in

20:38

the work of understanding , impact and conducting like deep

20:41

, deep

20:51

seated behavior change transfer and like psychological transformation

20:53

. One of the biggest sources of psychological

20:56

transformation that I help my clients to see is the degree to which

20:58

they hold power , because universally not

21:00

universally , but like 90% of the time in

21:02

my , in my work with clients , it

21:05

isn't actually the

21:07

actions that they've done right , it's not

21:10

like this person assaulted

21:12

in

21:15

it , right and that , and that's the problem , it's usually

21:17

this person was just a little pushy , but

21:20

from a position of power that they fail to recognize

21:22

. And then when I , when I , when we all brought

21:24

it to their attention , they got defensive and

21:26

when we talked about the way that , like the person

21:28

that they were being pushy to was like

21:30

intimidated by them , they denied that that was possible

21:33

. And it's

21:37

in the denial , it's in

21:39

the defensiveness , it's in the

21:41

abdication of power that

21:44

the real harm tends to occur

21:46

and that , okay , I'm

21:48

going to say that again . So it's not in the original

21:50

act , it's in how they were

21:52

, with realizing the act

21:54

it's

21:56

. And so , specifically around

21:58

power , around not being able to see . Oh

22:00

, like I I

22:03

talked to , I talked to a client

22:05

yesterday who was , you

22:07

know , has gone through his journey

22:09

and

22:12

the issues that

22:15

were raised about him had everything to do with

22:17

he doesn't get the

22:20

influence that he has and the responsibilities

22:23

that come with that . That

22:25

it's even if all the people

22:27

that he and this is , you know , this particular

22:29

client was in sex positive communities , there was a lot

22:31

of like hooking up with lots of people . Even

22:38

if all those people feel good about it , even if no

22:40

one feels bad about it afterwards , he's still

22:43

impacting the broader field . It , even if no one

22:45

feels bad about it afterwards , he's still impacting the broader field in

22:47

the indiscriminate and

22:49

power ignorant ways

22:51

that he's conducting his own sex life . I

22:54

want , I want . I'm actually going to put this , this point , up

22:56

front , because I always save it to the end , but I think

22:58

it's so important , taylor , like

23:00

most of us are operating right

23:04

from a very , very

23:06

ingrained position

23:10

around sex and power , which is you

23:13

with me . Yeah , all's fair

23:16

in love and war . And

23:19

so long as it's two consenting adults , no

23:21

one should be able to say anything . Consenting

23:26

adults , no one should be able to say anything . In fact , it's actually

23:28

sex negative and shamey right to to critique someone's sexual

23:30

choices so long as it was two

23:32

consenting adults . So a 55

23:35

year old man in a position of power sleeping

23:37

with his 25 year old secretary so long as they're consenting

23:40

, right . So long , well , right , let's just not

23:42

even make it her secretary . Maybe it's just like a 25

23:44

year old ingenue who comes into his community , right

23:46

, let's just say it like that , right

23:48

, there's no technical position

23:51

of power . Even let's say that he's not even

23:53

a teacher . Let's just say he's a community leader , you

23:55

know , and he's just . Let's not even say he's the organizer

23:57

of the space , let's just say that he's really well established

23:59

, right , 25

24:03

, 50 , just the age difference alone

24:05

and the experiential difference will create

24:07

a ripple effect around him

24:09

. And now let's say that he is

24:11

in charge of big communities . Maybe

24:13

that she is in or out of , but it doesn't really

24:16

matter , because everybody in his community

24:18

now doubts his judgment and

24:23

he , she , this woman , doesn't have

24:25

to be harmed by

24:27

him for people to doubt his judgment , and

24:31

this is this , is this runs against so much

24:33

of what we've believed about , like being sex positive

24:35

and being open and like saying , oh look , it's

24:38

all good so long as everybody's consenting , the whole consent

24:40

framework . This is one of the things about going beyond consent

24:42

like we have . Like consent

24:45

can't be our only barometer of harm . If

24:51

it is , we're lost because

24:54

we will ascribe harms that aren't

24:56

actually consent violations using

24:58

the language of consent violation , which confuses everybody

25:00

. Right , I'm sure we've all seen that , right where

25:02

guys are . I didn't consent violate

25:04

and three years later , like trying to make

25:06

sense of it , she's putting it

25:08

into the language of consent violation . You

25:13

know we're trying to make consent do too much of the work , like . The point is

25:16

that oftentimes things are consensual but also

25:18

really harmful , and

25:22

I think what most of us want is to prevent harm . I think when we're , when we talk

25:24

about consent , what we're really talking about is let's

25:27

prevent harm .

25:28

Yeah .

25:29

And if we're going to do that , that's a . That's a deeper

25:32

question and a and

25:34

, frankly , almost a different question , because there's plenty of

25:36

things that are consensual that can still be harmful . And

25:40

this is not just my point . I'm going to cite some really

25:42

beautiful influences right now . Amiya Srinivasan

25:44

, an Oxford philosophy professor , who wrote a very

25:47

controversial and amazing book called the Right to Sex

25:49

. She makes this point about

25:51

teachers and students often that like , yeah

25:53

, the teacher and student might be having consensual sex

25:55

, but it's impacting the ability of everybody else

25:57

to learn . Everybody

26:04

else in the classroom can't learn as well from a teacher who's sleeping with their

26:06

colleague , with their , with their fellow student , right , um ? Katherine angel um just came up

26:08

with an amazing book called uh , quoting

26:11

michelle foucault called tomorrow , sex will be good

26:13

again . She's also a british

26:15

academic . For some reason . They're just . That's where

26:17

the some of the most amazing thought thinking is coming

26:19

out of for consent theory . Uh

26:22

, she makes the point of uh

26:24

, why ? Why would we believe ? Like ? Why

26:26

, why would we think

26:28

that we can always know what we're

26:30

what we want ? Like ? Consent

26:33

orients towards everybody

26:35

being these rational actors and

26:37

say and being able to know exactly what we are

26:39

all gonna like , what we all want and what we are

26:41

gonna want which is the true

26:44

like ? That's not how human sexuality works

26:46

, right , you , you work in sexuality . That's not how

26:48

things are . So , like um

26:50

. Also , uh , clementine morgan

26:52

from canada , she ? Uh has

26:55

come up with the attunement model of consent , which

26:57

is amazing , right , and it talks about , like

26:59

um , it contrasts itself with

27:01

the contractual model . It says like um

27:04

, the contractual model is problematic for its lack

27:06

of eros right of like , agreeing to

27:08

every step , but it's also problematic for

27:10

its inability to

27:12

prevent harm . Right

27:14

, like . Again and again , let's come back to this . Let's as

27:17

a place to orient yeah right like

27:19

, yes , we should aim for pleasure , but

27:21

I think we should also aim to prevent harm , and I

27:23

don't think consent as a , as it's currently

27:26

construed , gets us there

27:28

. It's important , god knows , yeah , but

27:30

I don't think that we should limit our conversation

27:32

exclusively to it . We should , we should talk about harm

27:34

.

27:34

I can what . I'm thinking of a number of scenarios

27:37

right now , uh , in my own

27:39

community , and examples that I've seen where

27:41

consensual sexual interactions

27:44

have happened and technically it's within the

27:46

realm of consent , but massive

27:48

harm happened from it , and then there was

27:50

massive fallout . But then

27:53

, because it was technically consensual

27:55

, it's like I don't have responsibility

27:57

for that . And then , and then

27:59

I can see , like I can

28:01

see how that right there , like

28:03

that's the , that's the trigger point , you know , like that's the incendiary , how that right there , like that's the , that's

28:05

the trigger point , you know , like that's the incendiary , like that right

28:07

there is the shit that will blow it up and actually

28:09

create more harm and actually

28:11

create more harm . And so , yes , the defensiveness

28:14

, the blaming , the reversing

28:17

of like , oh no , actually no , I'm the victim

28:19

because you're accusing me of something when

28:21

it actually was consensual you said yes to

28:23

, you know , like it's a total head

28:25

fuck and yeah , and and

28:27

we don't have language , we don't have right , like so

28:30

we don't .

28:30

So there is , in

28:33

many ways , like a legit there's

28:35

, there's a deep legitimacy in in

28:37

the harm . Let's

28:40

just like , let's start there in the experience

28:42

of harm , of like this this wasn't okay . Like

28:44

yeah , technically I said yes , but he was totally

28:46

unattuned and he can teach his consent

28:48

. And yeah , he's totally unattuned , like he rushed

28:51

the consent conversation and that made me feel pressure

28:53

, like yeah , I technically said yes

28:55

, but like surely we're beyond that , and yet I

28:57

don't have the language to articulate

29:00

anything beyond like I felt violated

29:02

, right , so like I don't

29:04

. Like I see , and that's , let's just assume

29:06

that that's authentic and valid and real and

29:09

let's like not diminish it or patronize

29:11

it in any way . In fact , let's orient our

29:13

entire communities around validating the reality

29:16

of that pain and

29:22

right . And if

29:24

we haven't made that jump

29:26

as a community yet and we're still

29:28

using collectively the language of

29:31

assault and crimes , and

29:33

you know , and like rape is this

29:35

kind of crime and comes with this kind of punishment and this

29:37

kind of social approbation and salt is this , and

29:39

you know , then , using the language

29:42

of he assaulted me , right , which , which

29:44

, which is about a crime , will

29:47

and I'm not I hate

29:49

to even come close to even just touching

29:51

on validating defensiveness because

29:54

it's so destructive and it's like the defensiveness

29:56

really is the problem . But I do

29:58

understand the sense of like being like , well

30:00

, no , I did not assault , I

30:03

wasn't attuned , I abdicated my responsibility

30:05

as a leader . I caused harm . I

30:08

didn't assault , right

30:11

, and we don't really like , think about

30:13

it . Like we don't even have this in our lexicon

30:15

, even in super progressive communities , right

30:18

, we don't have a language which is bananas

30:21

to talk about consensual sex that was

30:23

harmful and

30:30

I kind of . And I think we need to , like , I think we need to have that language , yeah , that we can say

30:32

this was really hard and we can treat it seriously , like right . This

30:34

is the other thing like let's not diminish the harm

30:36

because it didn't elevate to the

30:38

level of a crime . Let's

30:40

, in fact , take the harm incredibly

30:43

seriously , even using a

30:45

subjective scale of

30:47

severity . Yeah , right , saying

30:49

like calm is in the eye of the harm to doer , can

30:51

we be present with the fact that this impacted

30:53

this person ? And the fact that it was

30:55

quote , consensual doesn't matter

30:58

. What matters is the harm

31:00

.

31:00

Yeah .

31:02

It's a harder way to live .

31:04

It is , it requires it requires

31:06

more . It requires more presence

31:08

it requires more effort , more labor and

31:11

, as somebody myself

31:14

or anybody else , you who's in a position

31:16

of leadership like it seems like that's a necessary

31:19

part of it . You know , like right now there's

31:21

there's all these different like sex

31:23

workshops people can go to for sexual liberation

31:26

, sexual expansion I'm thinking ISTA

31:28

is one of the main ones that comes to mind and

31:31

I've done ISTA . I've had great experiences

31:33

there . I know other people have had not as good experiences

31:35

there , but I've gone to play parties

31:37

, I've hosted play parties . There's all this stuff

31:39

around sexual liberation and openness

31:41

and also

31:43

this

31:46

conversation I feel like needs to be more

31:49

a part of it . And I look back on some of my previous

31:51

experiences in these spaces and , yes , there was talk

31:53

about consent , but there wasn't as much talk about

31:55

all these different nuances . And I think like , if

31:57

we're really trying to actually advance as

32:00

a sexual society

32:02

, like , this kind of framework needs

32:04

to be in there as well , in addition to the like

32:06

having your wild experiences at the play parties , sure

32:09

, like D shame , all the like puritanical stuff

32:11

that we've been programmed with . And then , how

32:14

do you navigate the reality

32:17

that maybe maybe three of your past partners

32:19

actually felt really shitty after

32:22

they had consensual sex with you .

32:24

You know , like , then , what you

32:26

know yeah

32:28

, and it gets to like are the values

32:30

in this community or in this space that we're holding in this

32:32

play party ? You

32:34

know we are here to avoid legalistic

32:38

crimes against each other . Is

32:40

that our standard , right ? Yeah

32:43

, or is our standard that we're here to um

32:45

, engage in high risk activity ? That

32:48

, right , where all

32:50

of our traumas and triggers are evident and we're literally

32:52

getting naked and doing sexual things with each

32:54

other ? Incredibly

32:57

high risk , right ? High risk , physically sti

32:59

related . High risk around pregnancy

33:02

. High risk around emotional harm , even

33:05

physical harm , and

33:08

like what ? I really honestly

33:10

this is . Again , this is not my original idea . I'm simply

33:13

borrowing the philosophy of

33:15

the drug community , which is harm

33:17

reduction . Right , the progressives in the drug

33:19

community are like this is a high risk activity . We

33:21

aren't going to pretend that we're doing drugs without

33:23

risk . We're going to say this is a high risk activity

33:26

, like rock climbing that we all like to do , and

33:28

and we are going

33:30

to orient ourselves towards preventing

33:33

harm , being hyper educated , right

33:35

, being responsible in our engagement and

33:38

um and acknowledging

33:40

the potential of harm um

33:42

in ways that we might not have been

33:45

able to predict or been able to , you know , easily

33:48

, easily predict um right now , I

33:50

think a lot of what's happening in sex positive

33:52

communities is that it's just like it's

33:54

a . It's a greedy little gold

33:56

rush and we're all in our little trauma responses

33:59

coming from scarcity and trauma and

34:01

insecurity and we're rushing

34:03

at play parties and we're rushing it to ISTA

34:05

and uh other

34:07

neo-chantra experiences , seeking

34:10

peak experiences . And I , I hold myself at this

34:12

too right . Like I , I definitely have been

34:14

consumptive and habitual

34:16

and almost compulsive

34:19

in my in my experiences of sex

34:21

in the past . It's one of the reasons I took a giant step

34:23

back recently . I'm six months celibate as well

34:25

as sober . You know like

34:27

I really do right , because I was going to a sex

34:29

party a week you know what I mean and it was delightful

34:31

and wonderful and cool and like very consensual , but it was

34:33

also like , hmm , kind of too much

34:35

, but like we're

34:38

not . Yeah

34:50

, so we need to actually be in a space of harm reduction and centering the potential

34:52

of harms that we can't predict and getting good at it . And so I think one of

34:54

the ways to be Formula One drivers with a modicum of seatbelts and

34:57

helmets is to be

34:59

really not just consent , educated , which

35:01

still to this day , enthusiastic

35:04

, verbal , non-verbal , everything most

35:07

people when they hear consent is like right , don't be rapey

35:09

, are we good now , totally

35:11

right , or

35:14

most people really , what they hear is don't , don't rate , yeah

35:16

, frankly , yeah , yeah , for sure you don't violently rape

35:18

, and like , no matter of language

35:21

around , consent has , I think , really effectively prevented

35:23

that from still being the thing . This is just the

35:25

obstacle , and the obstacle is like I guess I'm supposed

35:27

to ask , but no one around here is actually asking for

35:29

every step . So there's immediately oh , that's the other thing there's

35:31

immediately hypocrisy , right away

35:34

. Like you know , if you want to come into , like a sex

35:36

positive community right now , yeah , you know what's

35:39

going to happen is you're going to hear a lot of people talking

35:41

about how you need to have explicit consent for

35:43

every step , and then you're going to look around

35:45

and see nobody doing that and you're going to

35:47

immediately have this experience , this embodied experience

35:49

of incoherence , which is traumatizing . Frankly , right

35:51

and and right of like these people don't do

35:53

what they say you're going to do , which is bad . Right

35:56

, trauma , education , one-on-one , you don't want your words

35:58

not to match your actions , right , so

36:00

like , not good , right

36:02

, like we're , we're preaching something that nobody does

36:05

. Right , because you see people like , oh , like

36:07

this person feels comfortable with him , like

36:11

he's a tune right , and then people

36:13

will come in to that community and be like , oh , like

36:15

, is it okay for

36:18

me to do ? Is it not ? Like ? What is what are these rules

36:20

? Nobody gets it .

36:21

Yeah , um yeah , there's

36:23

a couple of different directions we could go from this point . It's

36:25

super rich conversation . There's , there's . I

36:27

was listening to a different podcast of yours earlier

36:29

. Uh , in preparation for this conversation and

36:32

because I think this material is so interesting and you said

36:34

something that that resonated with me

36:36

, at least , I'll just bring it personally

36:38

for a moment . My own experience in community

36:40

. I think you said , um , when

36:43

, or maybe it was a mentor of yours that

36:45

said something to the effect of as a

36:47

leader , you know , when this person

36:50

lets their guard down , other

36:52

people have to put their guard up

36:55

in a certain way , and so like

36:57

.

36:57

So I'm thinking , I'm thinking so last night

36:59

.

36:59

right , I'll just use my life as an example . Last

37:01

night I went to an ecstatic dance in Asheville

37:04

. I love ecstatic dance . I play in a live

37:06

music ecstatic dance band . Like it's a great way for me

37:08

to feel free , emotionally free

37:10

, physically free in my body . I also love dancing

37:12

with different people . I love dancing with men , with women

37:15

. I love sometimes exploring flirtatious

37:17

, uh , sensual energy

37:19

in the space as well . And

37:21

also , like last night , the

37:23

, the I was just I was thinking

37:25

more like what is my impact in this space

37:27

? You know , like what do I want to have happen here

37:29

? While I was dancing and I was like man , I really

37:32

just want to feel like free in my body

37:34

and I would like shake around and do all this stuff

37:36

. And I'm aware , like I'm a relatively bigger guy

37:38

, I'm tall , like I'm strong , I have status

37:41

in this particular community and I'm like I'm

37:43

sure I'm having impact on people that I can't even

37:45

imagine right now . And

37:48

like I'm there was this like real

37:50

big desire internally to just totally

37:53

let fucking go , you know , and like go

37:55

nuts , and but

37:57

then , like I was realizing , well , if

38:00

I do that to that extreme , like

38:02

it's certainly going to make other people kind of shrink

38:04

down a little bit or feel something . You

38:07

know , there's gotta be some balance

38:09

point there , or is there ? And I did figure

38:11

out there are ways I could get that experience in my

38:13

body . Uh , that felt good

38:15

in the space , at least for me , and I think

38:17

had a , you know , net positive impact on the space

38:19

. But it's something that I was just like , yeah

38:22

, I was just aware of . So when I heard you say that

38:24

this morning , I'm like , oh yeah , like

38:26

I recognize the desire to be wild and

38:28

free and liberated and also , as

38:31

this particular person , like what is the net impact

38:34

of that on space ? And then what

38:36

will the ripple effect of that be

38:38

? You know , yeah , yeah

38:40

.

38:41

Yeah , I love that you brought that up and I'm

38:43

grateful for you for using

38:45

your own life right Like , yeah

38:47

. So that was very much Angel

38:50

Adioja , my one

38:52

of my mentors and supervisors . They

38:55

, they , they say yeah . When

38:58

people in power and traditionally kind

39:00

of centered people let their guard

39:02

down , it's often the case that others have to put

39:04

theirs up . Well

39:06

, let's take the shame out of this . Everybody , right , just

39:08

because you're a white guy , listen , this doesn't mean that you have

39:10

to like now , like , be ashamed or like just

39:13

none of that right ? The

39:16

point is , as another one of my mentors

39:18

said one time , that the

39:21

idea of a space in which you

39:23

don't have to think about your own power

39:25

and the responsibility that comes with it is

39:27

a I think

39:30

they put it , they said it's a white supremacist wet

39:32

dream . You

39:34

know it's , it's . It's a conceit . It's

39:36

a conceit that we could ever set down

39:38

our influence and our power . It's

39:41

a conceit and it's a very , very

39:43

conveniently self-serving one . Right

39:45

, where right , in fact , I , I know

39:47

that for myself . Right , I had to get checked on this right

39:49

because I would go to these private , intimate

39:52

play parties , mostly with people that I knew and trusted

39:54

and that I knew , knew me , you know , and

39:56

my story was oh no , these are the places where

39:58

I can let my hair down , these are the places where I can

40:00

be like loud and obnoxious and

40:02

exhibitionistic and really take up all

40:04

the space in the room and be you know , and

40:07

not have to think about power . And in fact

40:09

it's actually healthy . It's

40:11

good for everybody around me for me to have

40:13

those spaces so I can let off that steam and there I

40:15

can bring my power , aware self to my professional

40:18

life , right , right . So I told myself

40:20

a narrative that it was actually good for the world for

40:22

me to have those spaces , and

40:24

I think it's wonderful for

40:27

people to have spaces in which they can be themselves

40:29

. But I don't think

40:31

that that necessarily translates that now you don't

40:33

have to . Now you get to . Now

40:36

you get to be free of thinking about power . Now

40:38

you get free of thinking about consent . I've seen this in

40:40

my clients too . They're like , well , I thought we'd establish

40:42

consent , I thought I could just be myself . Now , you

40:45

know , I thought like , since she kind of indicated

40:47

that she was cool , like I thought I could just , you know , gonna

40:50

, you know , maybe smoke my joint

40:52

and like not have to think about attunement

40:54

anymore , because it's kind of a burden Totally

40:56

To

40:59

constantly be attuning to other people . It's so much

41:01

nicer to just kind of say whatever the hell I feel , like

41:03

, and wait , you know , really , you know , make sure that

41:06

I'm with people who trust me , but , like , just say whatever I

41:08

feel . And I found that that's not true . I've

41:10

just found that there is no place where , like

41:12

, people won't be affected by

41:14

you . Even your deepest friends will be affected by

41:16

shit . You say , even the people that you love the

41:19

most and maybe who share identity

41:21

, privilege identities with you , right , other cis , straight

41:24

white guys with you , know you can still hurt them

41:26

. You know , like , totally , you

41:28

know you can say really , cutting , undermining things

41:30

and , um , yeah

41:33

, like there is , there is no space and

41:35

there shouldn't be right and we shouldn't be waiting to find

41:37

it in which we don't have to think about

41:40

our influence and our power . But doesn't mean that you

41:42

can't dance , or even dance cool

41:44

and crazy , right , but like , even as you're dancing crazy

41:46

in the ecstatic space , like , be

41:49

aware of your surroundings , right , like , oh

41:51

, like , am I making everybody around me

41:53

stand way back ? And if I

41:56

am , am , like , am I occupying

41:58

that kind of center , right , this is . I used to be in the

42:00

house dance world , right , and it's like , if you're going to be

42:02

the guy who's like moving your body and

42:04

creating space and almost like creating the cipher

42:06

around you , then like , okay

42:09

, but own that space , do

42:11

your dance , be expressed , and

42:13

then be attuned to the collective

42:16

and move out of it so that other people can

42:18

win . In fact , you can even use your loudness

42:20

to empower other people and

42:22

people will have this overall impression of you as

42:25

not like unattuned mr guy

42:27

who needs all the attention on him all the time , which turns

42:29

everybody off , but like , oh , this guy like

42:31

created the cypher , like instigated some

42:33

cool vibes , energies , and then knew , right

42:36

, he could attune to the collective and

42:38

knew when to pass the mic right

42:41

and you went like , yeah , yeah , so

42:43

this is so .

42:44

I think I want to sort of riff on this dance thing

42:46

for a little bit , because it's such a , it's such an interesting

42:48

microcosm of society , right

42:51

like in non-verbal space where people are interacting

42:53

with movement . You can clearly

42:55

see , just to preface , also

42:57

in the dances around here there's the agreement

42:59

you're not going to stare , you're not going to watch people , but

43:02

people still witness the space . People

43:05

still see the impact that different people have

43:07

on each other , and you can see that some

43:09

people have very clear patterns of impact

43:11

in the space , like

43:14

some people

43:16

move around the space and try to interact

43:18

with people in a way that , like , doesn't

43:20

necessarily feel the greatest for other

43:22

people . So there's kind of like this bubble

43:24

that expands around them wherever they go

43:26

and people like , oh , I'm just going to slowly move away from this

43:29

person , but they're not actually violating

43:31

consent . You know they're not doing something

43:33

wrong , but the vibe is

43:35

a little bit iffy , whereas

43:58

there are other people and this is part of where my curiosity goes there are other people who seem like they can embody this sort of almost like a generative seeding

44:00

the space with positivity and connection

44:03

, and they leave a positive impact with whoever they dance with . Even if they're dancing what somebody would label as sexually , somehow they're doing it in a way

44:05

that that feels like

44:07

it has integrity , you know , and it doesn't

44:09

seem to negatively impact the space as much

44:11

.

44:11

It's just super , super interesting

44:14

but you're talking about energy , yeah , and

44:16

to me , like a conversation about power

44:18

, harm and consent , that ends

44:20

up in the conversation around energy

44:22

and attunement is a good one right , like , so I'm really

44:24

happy that we , that we arrive here , like I always try

44:26

to , it's

44:29

important to acknowledge the degree to

44:31

which the esoteric energies , the kind of

44:33

the ineffable , the difficult to describe

44:35

energies that we carry with us , impact the

44:37

people around us . And again and

44:39

again , I've read , I've read like restorative justice

44:41

reports and like accounts that

44:43

are all very like , formal , when , like

44:45

the , what the reports consist of is like , his

44:48

energy was so creepy , I

44:51

can't point to it exactly and technically I did

44:53

consent , but god , it just made me feel

44:55

so gross the next day . Yeah

44:57

, you know , and like , oh , you

45:00

know , so , like , and people . So we're trying

45:02

, we're in good faith , we're trying to put to

45:04

words what is like the

45:06

ineffable right , the , the , that which cannot really

45:09

fully be named , and so there

45:11

are , um , there's science

45:14

to attunement . There is , you know , there's , there's

45:16

uh , proprioception

45:19

, like an awareness of our body in space and kinesthetic

45:21

awareness , awareness of what your body is doing . There's

45:23

um , uh , there's

45:27

the ability , without getting into too many other terms

45:29

, there's the ability for us to like attune to

45:31

, uh , where

45:33

my energy is really being welcomed

45:36

and invited , based on your body language and

45:38

the body language around me , and like really tuning in , like

45:40

, oh , this person , this person had like a little

45:42

bit of an uncomfortable vibe , so I'm going to give them a little bit

45:44

more space and maybe not look at them and

45:46

maybe like move away , or I'm going to like

45:48

slow my movements down to be less like energetically

45:52

and unattuned to the people around me . And

46:03

, at its best , ecstatic dance is an incredible petri dish laboratory for witnessing , not just like like

46:05

I think a lot of people come to it originally for like radical self-expression , but where it really is

46:07

is like this is an attunement lab . You

46:09

know , and like , if you're

46:12

not already incredibly good at this , and I

46:14

hold myself very , very gently

46:16

as someone who is still learning- yeah

46:18

you know , like I like to think I'm attuned , but

46:20

like I'm still always in the process

46:22

of inquiry and very much in the process

46:25

of observing people who are really

46:27

good at it , sometimes naturally , sometimes

46:29

as a result of a lot of practice and skill , of

46:31

like sensing into the people around them and

46:34

like raising the vibes or

46:36

doing their own thing in a way that feels like generative

46:38

. Yeah

46:41

, so like yeah

46:43

, yes to that . And if you're confused about

46:45

this , go go to ecstatic dance or go

46:47

to some dance and notice , like

46:49

start observing what is that , what is

46:51

that ? And really you start with yourself , like , how do

46:53

I feel in this person's presence ? How

46:55

do I feel in this person's presence ? How do I feel in that person's

46:58

presence ? Like , how did that person make ? Like , did they make me feel

47:00

comfortable ? Did they make me feel excited to dance more

47:02

? Did I ? Did I feel turned off ?

47:06

Totally yeah . And also , just to be clear , like I'm not sitting here saying

47:08

that you listener

47:11

or viewer on YouTube shouldn't

47:13

go dance sensually or sexually

47:15

or powerfully with people . I just like

47:17

wanting to bring awareness to all the

47:19

all the layers of everything

47:21

and I'd like to like shift into

47:23

a possibly a practical

47:26

lens . Let's say , for example

47:28

, there's a guy , he

47:30

comes to you , he says , hey

47:32

, I've gotten these . There's

47:35

, like you know , five or six reports

47:37

from these different women who've said

47:40

you know , like you

47:44

didn't violate my consent , but like

47:46

I feel awkward

47:49

and uncomfortable around you and I feel like I've been harmed

47:51

from our experience somehow

47:53

. And then this

47:55

guy says , well , it's

47:57

not my fault , like I didn't violate your consent , etc

48:00

. Like what do you

48:02

? What do you ? What would you say in that

48:05

space ?

48:06

yeah , I mean the the part

48:09

of the inquiry right , and

48:12

I'll just I'll just name first of all that , like when I work

48:14

with men , this is important , this is I'm gonna , I'm I'm

48:16

going to be tangential and go on a

48:18

slight divergent tangent

48:20

here , but only because it's important to

48:22

answer the full question . I promise I will get back to it , cool . The

48:26

first thing I want to say is that I am

48:28

not a proto-feminist

48:31

wrist slap for white dudes

48:33

. What does that

48:35

mean ? I come from a place of love

48:37

, like my work in the world is

48:40

to support mostly

48:42

cis , straight white guys to be their full

48:44

, loving selves and make the contribution they're

48:47

here to make . I am not here to punish . I'm

48:49

not here to condemn . I'm not here to even

48:51

inadvertently , kind of use the language

48:54

of restorative justice to punish or condemn . I

48:56

am here because I love

48:58

men , because I'm honored to

49:00

play this role , and so , like , the first

49:02

thing I would do is is

49:05

is create the trust energy

49:07

with this man that I see him right

49:11

and that

49:13

I accept that he isn't

49:15

trying to cause harm . I

49:18

accept even that part

49:20

right and

49:28

I might inquire with him about his relationship to harm and about his relationship

49:30

to his ability to cause harm and we might , in that process , start

49:33

to uncover some of the maybe we'll call them structures of knowing

49:35

right , might

49:42

maybe we'll call them structures of knowing right . That right , such as , so long as

49:44

I didn't violate consent , there is no viable valid claim

49:46

of harm possible

49:48

. It's a big one , right , which

49:52

is a very understandable

49:54

structure of knowing to receive from the society

49:56

because our legal system

49:58

asserts it . Yep

50:00

, right , our legal system

50:02

does not have a crime for

50:04

creepy vibes . Right

50:07

, our legal system

50:09

does not have a crime for sex

50:11

. That is regretted . Both

50:14

of those things can cause a lot of harm , right

50:17

, both of those things can cause a lot

50:19

of harm , right , um , so I I start with an inquiry around

50:22

his relationship to harm . Well

50:24

, and yes , like , sometimes , like that you know , childhood

50:26

stuff comes up , his relationship to you know and

50:29

um , defensiveness whenever

50:31

they come up . But , like , ultimately

50:34

, what we try to get to in this kind of first , first

50:36

wave of work will be a

50:38

sense of his own standards of integrity

50:40

, his own values and , specifically

50:43

, how it's important to him to

50:45

conduct himself in the world . Is

50:47

it important to me that

50:50

the women I interact with feel

50:52

good about my interactions with them . You

50:55

know , or is it important to me simply

50:57

just to avoid raping ? You

51:00

know , it's like all's fair in love and war

51:02

. I , you know

51:05

, I'm a rational actor in a capitalist

51:07

, cutthroat society and so long as I don't violate

51:09

the law I'm good . And

51:12

you might think that there's a lot of guys like that . But

51:16

I have been happily surprised

51:18

to see that they're like and maybe

51:20

this is a obviously there's a filtration bias

51:22

here of like the only kind of guys who would come to me but

51:24

like most guys don't come to me of their

51:26

own volition . Most guys come to me because they're

51:28

pressured to frankly , but

51:31

when I really investigate with them , they want to be contributions

51:33

in the world . They don't want to cause harm . They don't want women to regret their interactions with

51:35

them . They want to be contributions in the world . They don't want

51:37

to cause harm . They don't want women to regret their

51:39

interactions with them . They don't want to create those waves

51:42

, even if it's only because

51:44

they realize that that's going to negatively impact their

51:46

prospects in their various communities

51:48

and their professional lives etc . But

51:51

generally also because they , you

51:54

know , I know they're men , but boy do we have empathy

51:56

, boy do we have compassion . We just don't know how to wield

51:58

our power yeah and it's hard

52:00

because we also have raging hormones

52:03

and testosterone and we have a deep-seated

52:05

psychological or sociological , uh

52:07

, imperative to

52:10

initiate and you know there's there's all kinds

52:12

of masculine , feminine polarity stuff

52:14

and , like the , the fear of being a cuck

52:16

or beta or whatever you know . You know

52:18

, um , maybe

52:21

gen z can tell you on their comments if those terms

52:23

are still relevant . But

52:25

uh , but yeah , I start with , I start with compassion

52:27

, I start and end with compassion and I start and end

52:29

with the inquiry into harm

52:31

. But generally the path is to , like

52:33

, get to the place where

52:36

the man can see that he was violating

52:38

his own standards of integrity in those behaviors . Right

52:41

, get him to see

52:43

that this isn't the woke police

52:45

, this isn't the woke

52:48

mob or the cancel mobs coming after him

52:50

, this isn't feminism run amok , this

52:52

is him acting

52:54

out of his own integrity . But oftentimes

52:56

it takes some time to see that . But

52:58

once you do , it's a lot stronger

53:01

a foundation than just

53:03

slapping him into

53:05

conformity with a set

53:07

of standards that he still , that at his core

53:09

he still believes are externally imposed

53:12

by

53:14

the woke police . Right

53:16

, and I use that term with

53:20

a lot of intention , that's how a lot of people think . That's

53:22

how a lot of them especially think . For sure . So

53:24

I have to be cognizant

53:26

of that dynamic . But yeah , does

53:29

that answer the question ?

53:31

No , I think it does and I think it's really important . I like

53:33

how you humanize it , because I see

53:35

something in the field and

53:38

noticed myself like having certain

53:40

judgmental qualities , characteristics sometimes

53:43

, where it's like , oh , this person did this thing

53:45

, they're bad , you know , or

53:47

or cancel , even if I don't want to cancel

53:49

them , I'm like cut them out , you know , danger

53:51

, dehumanize , like that sort of

53:53

a thing , and I think for

53:56

some people , especially people

53:58

who have experienced the harm , perhaps that's a useful strategy

54:00

for them to create safety , you know , in their

54:02

life .

54:03

And also like in the context

54:05

of being somebody who's helping somebody to

54:08

sort of right the wrongs

54:10

or like heal the harm , like it's

54:12

gotta , there's gotta be a meeting

54:14

on a human level , you know , and yeah , and

54:17

I mean I , I , I think it's gotta , there's gotta be a meeting on a human level

54:19

, you know , and yeah , and I mean I , I I think it's huh

54:21

, I

54:23

think what you're , what you're saying , is really important and

54:26

I I really like that you're naming it , um

54:29

, from both the perspective

54:31

of someone who's a directly experienced harm , like

54:33

, say , a survivor , but also from the perspective

54:36

of someone who's maybe a third party observer

54:38

, like what you're talking about you being right

54:40

I'm a guy's friend , I'm in

54:43

the same dance community as him or

54:45

right , like , I am her friend , right

54:48

, and that's the majority of us right . The

54:50

majority of the roles that we play are not harm

54:53

doer or victim . They're observer , they're

54:56

person impacted by what these other

54:58

two people did , and

55:00

it's really easy to judge . So

55:03

here's a framing that I think

55:05

is really useful . If all

55:07

of us are especially your audience , I

55:09

imagine are really on board with

55:11

a collective social

55:15

or or societal project

55:17

of sexual liberation , yeah

55:20

, let's go there Then I

55:23

invite us to also simultaneously

55:26

embark on a project of

55:28

decolonizing

55:31

our minds around justice . What

55:33

does that mean ? It means

55:35

not thinking in terms

55:37

of there are objective

55:40

standards of harm that correspond

55:42

to the objective standards of crime . It

55:45

means understanding that harm is subjective . Right

55:47

, it means not insisting on

55:50

every harm being

55:52

something that needs a right to a fair trial . We've

55:54

seen that that does not work for sexual assault right

55:57

. Right that , like

55:59

it , will never result

56:01

in any kind of justice or healing for our

56:03

community . Right that we can't

56:05

be cops with each other . Right

56:08

that we are not equipped to

56:10

investigate each other , that

56:13

demanding an investigation

56:16

be done in the context of quote

56:18

accusations itself is

56:20

harmful . Right that

56:23

approaching interpersonal

56:25

uh disputes

56:28

or interpersonal harm , especially

56:31

within the context of community , of intentional community , through

56:33

the lens of a judicial mindset , of a

56:35

litigious mindset of well , I should have the right to face my accuser . I should have the lens of a judicial mindset , of a litigious mindset of well

56:38

, I should have the right to face my accuser . I should have the right

56:40

to a fair and speedy trial . I should have the right to have

56:42

evidence presented against me . You

56:44

know I should have the right to a lawyer and an advocate

56:47

. You know , and this person should be . You know

56:49

I should know exactly who

56:51

they are . None of that applies . None

56:53

of that is safe . None of that is how

56:55

a good community can

56:57

function . Why ? Because all

56:59

of those systems might be

57:02

a decent way to run a country , but they're not a

57:04

good way to run community , and we tend to

57:06

recreate judicial systems

57:08

within community and we run tribunals

57:11

and we exert judgment on each other and

57:15

, frankly , none of it works . So when I talk about decolonizing

57:18

our sense of justice , I'm talking about all

57:20

what I just said , right , and and

57:22

also what you mentioned of not

57:25

of training ourselves , literally training

57:27

ourselves . This is the process of decolonization . We have to train ourselves

57:29

not to jump to conclusions when we hear someone did

57:31

harm , right . I mean , how many of your listeners

57:34

dismissed me when I said that I'd done this harmful

57:36

thing 15 years ago ? Right , yeah

57:39

, I mean and you know , god bless , like I'm not going to insist

57:41

that you accept me , but like , what

57:44

does it mean ? Like to or like ? I

57:46

hate it when people try to answer questions with questions . So

57:49

I'll try to be more specific . Um

57:51

, we

57:54

have to train ourselves not to assume

57:56

that someone's bad when we hear that they did harm . And

58:01

that often starts with us , with training

58:03

ourselves not to think that we are bad when

58:05

we've done harm Right

58:08

. We have to train ourselves to be like I

58:10

did a harmful thing and

58:14

I'm still a good person . Right

58:16

, I did a harmful thing and

58:19

all you know , and I can

58:21

and I have the ability to , to be with it

58:23

, to be present to it , to be present to the consequences

58:25

of it . You know it's incredibly

58:28

brave and in , and we all have

58:30

to still exist in our hyper litigious

58:32

, cutthroat capitalistic

58:34

society too . So , like we can't pretend

58:37

that that's not around us or pretend that that's

58:39

not the soup we're all swimming in and what

58:41

we're bringing into our little

58:44

ecstatic dance enclaves . You know

58:46

we are , we are bringing that world in . So

58:48

we have to consciously be um

58:50

, in the process constantly of , of

58:53

, of , uh , kind

58:55

of liberating our minds from

58:57

that perspective . And it doesn't . And what's

58:59

great about that is that when we do

59:01

as we do , we find space

59:03

for compassion for people who have done harm

59:05

, space for nuance , deep

59:08

space for healing for the people who

59:10

have experienced harm but might not have experienced

59:12

a crime . Right , I think it's really

59:14

important . This is a survivor centric model , like

59:16

, like

59:20

, just because he didn't commit a crime doesn't mean that you're not harmed , doesn't mean

59:22

that you're not traumatized , doesn't mean that there aren't

59:24

consequences that need to happen in order to make you safe

59:26

, in order to support your healing . Crimes

59:30

don't have to be a present for

59:32

us to really take things seriously Anyway

59:35

.

59:36

Yeah , I really like how you just spoke to that , because

59:38

I imagine there are a lot of people out there who

59:40

have experienced harmful scenarios

59:42

with somebody and

59:44

they can't really pinpoint

59:47

the specific thing and

59:49

so they feel maybe isolated

59:51

or scared or frustrated and shut

59:53

down and unsure how

59:55

to proceed . And it's almost this

59:57

form of possibly possibly even self

1:00:00

gaslighting that can happen , where

1:00:02

, like , maybe there's just something wrong with me or

1:00:04

I don't know what . Something's just weird about it

1:00:07

. But like , I like how you're .

1:00:09

Well , and gaslighting from the community , right . Like

1:00:11

like a lot of a lot of I've seen

1:00:13

survivors friends will like kind of try to like

1:00:15

ask questions that get to whether

1:00:17

or not assault was committed , and

1:00:19

they'll either convince the person that assault

1:00:22

was committed when it wasn't , which

1:00:24

is also destructive , right , or

1:00:28

they'll be like , well , it

1:00:31

sounds like it wasn't that big a deal

1:00:33

, or rather , it sounds like it technically wasn't

1:00:35

assault , so like , like you know

1:00:37

, so deal with it

1:00:39

, that'll happen . Well , yeah , we'll deal with it , right . Like

1:00:42

both of which are really really destructive . It's really important

1:00:44

with anybody just to be present to their

1:00:46

experience yeah you know , um

1:00:49

, and especially if they're , if they're feeling really harmed

1:00:51

, to be present , to present to their

1:00:54

experience and the and the work especially

1:00:56

like , because a lot of people who have done harm then

1:00:58

themselves get called out and feel harmed . So

1:01:01

I it's tricky

1:01:04

, tricky , tricky industry . I

1:01:07

think it's also important , like there's such

1:01:09

nuance in helping someone who is

1:01:11

feeling really indignant and defensive

1:01:13

at the nature of their call out to like

1:01:16

relax into what , what

1:01:19

accountability there is there for them to

1:01:21

take , um

1:01:23

, and that's why I mean

1:01:25

I've dedicated my , my career to doing

1:01:27

that well and to doing that effectively , and it's super

1:01:30

, super hard .

1:01:31

That's super , super hard , Like I've

1:01:33

witnessed a number of folks over the years

1:01:35

uh , get sort of publicly called out

1:01:38

on Facebook or something , and

1:01:40

I have seen

1:01:42

their nervous systems just go

1:01:44

totally into fight or flight , you know

1:01:46

, and like get completely overwhelmed

1:01:48

. And I guess I will

1:01:51

just empathize for a moment in the sense

1:01:53

of like I imagine hundreds

1:01:55

of years ago or even prior to

1:01:57

Facebook , like you would never

1:01:59

have a situation where , all of a sudden , there's 500

1:02:02

people saying like horrible things

1:02:04

about you all at once . Like you would probably be in

1:02:06

a community with maybe 20 people or

1:02:09

some smaller amount of people around you , ideally

1:02:11

in person , talking to you about this

1:02:13

thing . So , like the reality of the online call

1:02:15

out who knows right ? I guess I'm just

1:02:17

thinking .

1:02:18

I'm not , I'm not , not sure . Actually , public public shaming

1:02:20

is a tried and true technique and it's been

1:02:22

destructive for thousands of years . Fair

1:02:25

fair .

1:02:26

I just yeah . So I just I guess I'm just sort

1:02:28

of thinking out loud about this , like the

1:02:30

I guess you said

1:02:32

somebody causes harm and

1:02:35

then they get accused or

1:02:37

they it's , it's brought to light that they've caused

1:02:40

harm and then they feel harmed in the process

1:02:42

, right , like and and

1:02:44

so that , like

1:02:46

I just I guess I question

1:02:49

, like is empathy for

1:02:51

them feeling harmed , a useful step

1:02:53

in them getting to the point where they can realize

1:02:56

that they've harmed somebody else ? Do

1:02:58

you know what I mean by ?

1:02:58

that . I mean , I think that's a very legitimate question

1:03:01

. Um , I I think I think I'll start

1:03:03

with by saying , huh , uh

1:03:06

, you know , I am

1:03:09

generally a believer in public

1:03:12

. Like adjudicating this kind of stuff in public

1:03:14

as a not

1:03:17

last resort sounds too judgy , but

1:03:20

like as a a

1:03:22

step that really needs to be taken with a lot

1:03:24

of uh , a

1:03:27

lot of careful awareness and especially

1:03:30

, usually not as a first

1:03:32

step , like if you've , if you haven't , tried

1:03:34

talking to someone , if you've never literally tried

1:03:36

saying to someone um , um , hey

1:03:39

, this hurt me and it's safe for you

1:03:41

to do so , and that you've got support to

1:03:43

do so , then that's something that I

1:03:45

think it's important to to name

1:03:47

is is

1:03:50

ideal , and I'll say that

1:03:52

like a lot of times that men who get called out

1:03:54

, it's not because the

1:03:57

person calling them out like

1:03:59

was so callous as to not consider

1:04:01

talking to them directly . It's usually because there

1:04:03

was some degree to which

1:04:05

the man getting

1:04:08

called out created a

1:04:10

very clear impression that he was not

1:04:13

going to be receptive to Right

1:04:15

. So oftentimes when I work with a man who's been called

1:04:17

out , I say , oh well , I can see two harms

1:04:20

right away . There's whatever you're accused of doing and

1:04:22

there is the way that you've been such

1:04:25

that nobody in your community felt like you would take

1:04:27

it well when they told you directly .

1:04:31

Yeah .

1:04:32

Right , which is that you've been projecting defensiveness

1:04:34

. You've been projecting defensiveness . You've

1:04:36

been projecting a , an opposition or

1:04:39

or a high potential

1:04:41

likelihood of gaslighting If

1:04:43

you were to receive feedback . You have maybe received

1:04:45

feedback and dismissed it . You have maybe received

1:04:47

feedback and been callous

1:04:49

about it , especially

1:04:52

feedback that's come as like a , a consistent pattern , especially

1:04:55

feedback that's common , so

1:04:57

like a consistent pattern , and I mean

1:04:59

and there's nuance here . You know , like , especially if you're

1:05:01

a leader , like

1:05:04

I'm sure you lead classes , like you might get some feedback . That's

1:05:06

kind of like you know what . I'm taking this feedback

1:05:08

and I'm going to not listen to it . Like I

1:05:10

think that I teach fine and like 90% people

1:05:12

love it . One person out of a hundred

1:05:14

was like I

1:05:21

don't like your teaching style .

1:05:21

okay , well , okay , but that doesn't mean I'm gonna like radically shift my teaching style because you know it's like

1:05:23

you have to be . There's nuance here , right , yeah , but if 10 people said the same thing independently

1:05:26

, like that's worth looking at exactly

1:05:28

there's right .

1:05:29

So the the energy here is

1:05:31

not one side

1:05:33

or another , it's it's discerning right . There's

1:05:35

just skill and discernment . It's part of the leadership , it's

1:05:38

part of being a good leader is being able to discern . Oh

1:05:40

shit , what is there for me to see ? And

1:05:43

um , I

1:05:45

think that I think and

1:05:47

this , this needs to be mentioned being

1:05:52

publicly canceled is a trauma . It

1:05:56

is no-transcript

1:06:16

Ostracization is akin to death psychologically

1:06:19

. You know , like um

1:06:21

, and not for nothing . But I've had three

1:06:24

past clients , um , kill themselves or

1:06:26

overdose . I've had four past

1:06:28

clients , um , x , like , exile

1:06:30

themselves from their communities and completely start over

1:06:32

um because they couldn't

1:06:34

deal with the

1:06:37

um , with the intensity

1:06:39

of their ostracization . And so , like I

1:06:41

don't like part oh , here's another part

1:06:43

part of decolonizing ourselves around

1:06:45

. Justice is not believing in punishment , and

1:06:49

this is a really tough one , right like , yeah , if

1:06:52

you right , if you're a prison abolitionist , you got to really embrace

1:06:54

some really tough stuff . Right , because

1:06:56

your instinct will be like he hurt her , punish

1:06:59

him . Right and be justified . Right

1:07:01

, I'm righteous in my quest for punishment for

1:07:03

him . Right and

1:07:05

right . So , like is the call-out a

1:07:07

natural consequence of him ignoring every

1:07:10

single like ? Is there a group of his friends

1:07:12

who have come to him and been like dude , you really need to change , you need

1:07:14

to look at this . And he's been like fuck you guys

1:07:16

. You know , it's like the call out is the last resort

1:07:19

. We're going to call them out . They haven't changed

1:07:21

. Like is to just got a big call out , like I get it . You

1:07:23

know , like this organization was not shifting

1:07:25

right and this is I'm saying this is someone , it is

1:07:27

a client , right then , just full disclosure

1:07:29

, um , and that's uh public

1:07:31

knowledge .

1:07:32

Uh , like I

1:07:35

let me just like riff on that for a moment , cause I think

1:07:37

that is , that is such that is

1:07:39

one of the most important pieces . I remember

1:07:41

a conversation previous podcast I had

1:07:43

with puppy on a therapist who works with

1:07:45

sexual assault survivors . We

1:07:47

didn't go into as many nuances around

1:07:50

the harm piece , but what he

1:07:52

said was that in talking with all of the

1:07:54

victims , the people who've experienced

1:07:56

harm , none

1:08:06

of them wanted to go public Like , none of them wanted to really like call out or that sort of a thing

1:08:09

. And if people did something like that , it was basically a last resort

1:08:11

because the feedback that they

1:08:13

had given or the harm that they had expressed wasn't

1:08:16

received well and it was met with a wall or

1:08:18

defensiveness or gaslighting or something

1:08:20

like that . And I think that's so , so , so

1:08:22

fucking important .

1:08:23

It's so important and even if

1:08:26

I won't say anybody deserves

1:08:28

it , but even if it was the logical

1:08:30

consequence of

1:08:32

a woman who had both felt harmed , didn't

1:08:34

feel like , didn't like , saw that the

1:08:36

guy wasn't going to take the feedback , saw

1:08:38

that there was , that there was , there

1:08:40

was ongoing danger , which

1:08:43

tends to be like the real rationale , like the person's

1:08:45

going to rape another person , he's going to do this

1:08:47

again . I'm calling him out publicly and

1:08:49

warning other people about him because I think that he's going

1:08:51

to do it again . Yeah , even

1:08:54

then it's

1:08:57

still harmful and

1:09:00

I don't mean , oh , this is real . I don't

1:09:02

mean that it's not valid , but let's

1:09:04

be . Can we just all take a deep

1:09:06

breath and be with that nuance ?

1:09:11

Yeah , it makes me think

1:09:13

and question , is

1:09:16

it ? It

1:09:18

is so nuanced in my mind

1:09:21

I'm like , yeah it , maybe it is harmful and

1:09:23

also , is it a net

1:09:25

positive in terms of overall

1:09:28

harm reduced ? You know , Sure .

1:09:29

And it and it may be and like , people

1:09:32

can do that calculation and people will debate it and

1:09:34

know , and there will never be a full agreement

1:09:36

within the community . There'll be his

1:09:38

friends who are like fuck you guys for calling him out . There'll be

1:09:40

, like everybody else who's like , yeah , kind of felt like it was

1:09:42

necessary , I'm glad he did his growth work . And there'll be people

1:09:44

who are like he's never done enough . He

1:09:46

should just chop off his cock and never

1:09:48

come back . You know , and like shit

1:09:51

gets real right and like . And

1:09:53

I also don't think that , like , I think it's a dangerous

1:09:55

naivete to think that people aren't motivated

1:09:58

in part by vengeance , in part by the desire to punish

1:10:00

and by the desire to um

1:10:03

equalize the playing field , in part by the

1:10:05

desire to um very

1:10:07

reasonably like correct for

1:10:09

millennia of

1:10:11

gender-based uh , inequality

1:10:14

and gender-based harm , um

1:10:16

to radically

1:10:18

distrust men in power , myself included , um

1:10:21

to and and very reasonably

1:10:23

so . So , like I don't think that anything

1:10:25

is simple of these things are simple . I don't

1:10:27

come down into a can't like

1:10:29

anti-cancel culture camp

1:10:32

or a pro-cancel culture camp . Um

1:10:34

, I invite nuance , I invite the

1:10:36

, the you know and like , and

1:10:38

I like this is this is coming from and I think , feel

1:10:40

very confident saying this like , even

1:10:42

like and I am friends

1:10:45

and in community with a lot of victims advocates , like

1:10:47

people

1:10:51

do harm in the process of surviving , harm

1:10:53

all the time , the

1:11:01

time , and if you've ever been friends with someone who has experienced

1:11:03

a rape trauma , then you might have also experienced them being them lashing

1:11:05

out at you and

1:11:07

that's real . Um , it

1:11:10

doesn't . I like I'm

1:11:12

not making that point . To make a point besides

1:11:15

inviting us to sit with the nuance

1:11:18

and complexity of harm and of the

1:11:20

ripple effects . I'm not saying anybody's

1:11:22

good or bad or righteous or not .

1:11:24

Yeah , or they should or shouldn't do that thing

1:11:26

, it's just , thank you .

1:11:27

Yes , no , I'm not saying that Like I'm

1:11:29

God , I really try to avoid normatives

1:11:31

, you know , like I've tried to avoid

1:11:34

shoulds . I invite us , I

1:11:40

invite us , I invite us to consider the harm of all of our actions , including going to a sex

1:11:42

party when you , like , are noticing yourself

1:11:44

in a compulsive pattern of hunting . Including

1:11:48

going to an ecstatic dance when you notice yourself as

1:11:50

like hunting for the hot women and

1:11:52

then like going directly beeline into them

1:11:54

and then going to the next one . Like I

1:11:56

invite us to consider and

1:11:58

notice , you know . So

1:12:01

yeah , yeah . No judgment

1:12:03

.

1:12:04

No , really no judgment . This

1:12:06

is . This is such an interesting conversation

1:12:08

, Um , I want to keep going just for a little

1:12:10

bit longer , cause there's some pieces I want to bring in

1:12:12

.

1:12:13

Uh rock and roll . Thank you , thank you for this

1:12:15

.

1:12:15

So the it seems like

1:12:17

one of the prerequisites for

1:12:20

growth and actual healing and

1:12:22

change and and repair is

1:12:25

that we'll just use

1:12:27

like , like the man

1:12:29

, like you work with men , like the man needs

1:12:31

to want to

1:12:33

understand right

1:12:35

. Ultimately , it seems like the man will

1:12:37

need to be able to hear

1:12:40

and receive feedback without getting defensive

1:12:42

, like ultimately maybe

1:12:45

.

1:12:45

I don't know what would you say to that Like ideally

1:12:47

, but like one of one of one of

1:12:49

the parts of doing my work , is

1:12:51

being satisfied and indeed thrilled

1:12:54

with incremental change . You know , like a lot of people are

1:12:56

, like great Misha , you can crawl , create the transformation

1:12:58

that we all want to see in our male leader who's really problematic

1:13:00

, and then like , if he just works with you after

1:13:03

10 or 20 sessions , like he'll just never be defensive

1:13:05

and never be problematic and never have like an politically

1:13:07

incorrect thought , and that

1:13:09

will be the indicator that he's now safe and

1:13:12

we can bring him back . But

1:13:14

, my friends , I'm here to tell you that that's not

1:13:16

how it works . I wish it were . That would be

1:13:18

cool if I had the magic wand , but

1:13:22

it's not right . Like people are complicated , they'll take two

1:13:24

steps forward , one step back . They'll get re-triggered

1:13:26

by something and then go back into their defensive

1:13:28

patterns . Yes

1:13:31

, I'd say the skills , yeah

1:13:33

, the skills to build that . We're all human

1:13:35

, fallible people building the skills . But the

1:13:37

skills to take very seriously in building are

1:13:39

the skills of proactively

1:13:41

seeking feedback , of being

1:13:43

energetically attuned to the

1:13:46

invitation in your body to

1:13:48

feedback , so that people feel energetically oh

1:13:50

, misha will take it really well and people around

1:13:53

you will vouch right

1:13:55

. So one of my big kind of like successes in this

1:13:57

is when , like , a woman had a problem with me from , like , a play

1:13:59

party three years ago where I

1:14:01

was just a little clingy with one of her partners

1:14:04

and she noticed it and felt like , really energetically

1:14:06

misattuned , and felt like , oh , me , she were trying to get in on the

1:14:08

group thing and like , and she was right , and

1:14:10

she held on to that for three years , you

1:14:12

know , and in recalling it I was like , oh yeah

1:14:14

, I was cling . I was clingy that night , like , and I will own

1:14:17

that and I've done work on that since then , like , but

1:14:19

like , the victory was her friend , her

1:14:21

going to people about me and

1:14:23

then being like you should go straight to Misha . I

1:14:25

am confident that he'll be able to take it well

1:14:28

and I've done this for some of mine Like

1:14:34

, and this is like really honestly . One of mine

1:14:36

is can I , if a woman came to me

1:14:38

to complain about you , would I feel

1:14:40

confident saying , oh

1:14:42

, you can go directly to bob like

1:14:44

. I am confident that bob will take your

1:14:46

feedback well and he'll take it seriously . He won't gaslight

1:14:49

you , he won't minimize , he won't deflect , he won't

1:14:51

get defensive . That's

1:14:54

a standard for me , for

1:14:56

friendship , but I it's a skill

1:14:58

that I invite any man to work on , frankly

1:15:00

, I invite any human to work on it . Defensiveness is

1:15:03

beyond gender , but especially

1:15:06

men , especially men in positions of leadership

1:15:08

or power or authority or rank , even

1:15:10

if they're not formally in authority . Where do

1:15:12

you hold influence and power ?

1:15:13

Yeah , that's

1:15:17

such a big thing . Um

1:15:22

, yeah , that's that's such a big thing . Yeah , I would , and I would like to think that my friends would

1:15:24

say that to people if somebody went to them , because that's super fucking

1:15:26

important to me . Like , integrity is very , very , very

1:15:29

important to me , especially as a sex educator

1:15:31

, as somebody who is in explorative

1:15:34

spaces on occasion . You know , like

1:15:36

, yeah , I really want to be that guy

1:15:38

, like yeah , you know , yeah

1:15:40

, and I think , and I think it's a way it landed and

1:15:42

maybe , and right and like , but like , will

1:15:45

taylor be able to hold it ?

1:15:47

totally , hold , hold maybe , and maybe

1:15:49

hold my projection without flipping

1:15:51

it back on me , like doing that weird fucked

1:15:53

up neo-tantra guru thing of being like , oh , this is your

1:15:55

stuff , totally , I hear you like

1:15:57

, just like , put like putting the mirror right up

1:15:59

in their face and be you know which is super

1:16:01

fucked up and like not Okay , Right , you have to

1:16:03

be able to say oh , thank you for sharing

1:16:05

Like let me look at what is here for me .

1:16:07

And if people are looking for metrics , you know

1:16:09

, like measurable things , like I think what you

1:16:11

just said , like that is a metric right there . Like

1:16:14

that it should be a standard that , like anybody

1:16:16

in a leadership position ideally all people

1:16:18

, but like especially if you're any in any

1:16:20

sort of leadership position , like that should be something

1:16:22

you should be striving for , I think .

1:16:25

Yes , I went on 100% Like . I mean

1:16:27

I I hesitate to use like kind of like table

1:16:30

stakes language because I feel it's too

1:16:32

extreme or ultimatum me , and

1:16:34

I think it doesn't take into account our us as like

1:16:37

, if I had to say I'd say table stakes

1:16:39

, is that like table stakes for leadership is

1:16:41

like a proactive

1:16:44

approach to feedback and a

1:16:46

ability to genuinely

1:16:48

commit to welcoming it with curiosity

1:16:51

and gratitude rather than defensiveness . And

1:16:54

if you're not able to , genuine right

1:16:56

genuine right because no matter what the words are

1:16:59

right , like have you ever , have you ever heard that Right ? There's like

1:17:01

a great episode of the office where where

1:17:03

Michael Scott gets some feedback about his coffee breath

1:17:05

and he's like , well , I'll work on that Right

1:17:08

, saying the right thing in to make it be over

1:17:10

with more quickly , you know , but then and that's

1:17:12

worse , and

1:17:24

then that will have an impact that people will feel

1:17:26

, and then it'll create the ripple

1:17:28

effect , et cetera et cetera , and at the risk

1:17:30

of being reviewy

1:17:32

or redundant , like it's worse because

1:17:34

it creates incoherence . People like it

1:17:37

is a very destructive thing

1:17:39

for the people around you for your words not to match

1:17:41

your energy right

1:17:43

it is . It creates incoherence

1:17:46

. It's one of the core trauma triggers . He's

1:17:49

saying it's okay , but I can feel in my body it's

1:17:51

not no

1:17:53

good .

1:17:54

Yeah , so this is one of the pieces you

1:17:56

said in the other interview , something to the effect of

1:17:58

like if if I'm a leader , then I

1:18:01

have to match my behavior

1:18:03

with the projections that I'm putting

1:18:05

out into the world .

1:18:06

Oh yeah , let's talk about projections for sure . You mentioned

1:18:09

this at the outset too .

1:18:10

Yeah , yeah , like

1:18:12

whatever I'm presenting myself as my

1:18:14

behavior has to match that .

1:18:16

it it's problems

1:18:19

, problems yeah you know , yeah

1:18:21

, yeah , I think that's so right . I think

1:18:23

that's so right and like , so , like

1:18:25

you know how I was saying earlier that the prop that

1:18:27

the harm of being

1:18:29

a progressive and feminist

1:18:31

man and then doing some sketchy stuff

1:18:34

around sex is like

1:18:36

exacerbated , like by an order of

1:18:38

magnitude . The harm of doing

1:18:40

some sketchy stuff around sex when you're a fucking

1:18:42

consent educator is exacerbated

1:18:44

by multiple quarters of magnitude . The

1:18:47

level of betrayal that

1:18:49

people will feel is

1:18:51

intense . Right , people come to

1:18:53

alternative communities ecstatic dance , yoga

1:18:55

, burning man , uh

1:18:57

, intentional communities , co-ops

1:19:00

, you name it right , churches because

1:19:02

they want to escape , in part

1:19:04

, the kind

1:19:06

of moral depravity of our capitalist

1:19:08

, legalistic

1:19:11

world . Right , they want

1:19:13

to be in community where we can relax

1:19:15

into our trust of each other . So

1:19:17

when the person that they've placed trust

1:19:19

in to be progressive

1:19:22

, to share their values , does

1:19:24

the same fucked up shit as the default world , guys

1:19:26

, it causes more

1:19:28

harm . And I needed to emphasize this because

1:19:31

, like , I've had a lot of clients who are super confused . They're

1:19:33

like well , wait a second , I'm a feminist , I've done all

1:19:35

this feminist stuff , I've like elevated women to

1:19:37

like positions of leadership , right , and

1:19:39

why don't I get the benefit of the doubt ? Like

1:19:41

, why don't I get like , I'm not going

1:19:43

out there and aggressively violating people

1:19:46

. But it turns out that , like when when

1:19:48

a man that you trust and love right

1:19:51

takes advantage , or

1:19:53

maybe let's just say when a man that you trust and love like

1:19:56

does a like cops a feel it's

1:20:00

actually often more psychologically

1:20:02

detrimental than when that

1:20:04

man that you didn't know at

1:20:06

a nightclub in Miami tried

1:20:08

to assault you Because there was no

1:20:10

trust in Miami . You didn't expect that guy

1:20:13

to be ethical . There's no betrayal . It's

1:20:15

like oh , that was just a scary , scary guy . That was scary

1:20:17

, but this was betrayal . I trusted

1:20:20

him . I let my guard down energetically

1:20:22

. This is also true for a lot of microaggressions

1:20:24

and racism . Right , like a lot of racist

1:20:26

statements . Right , like

1:20:38

when your friends right say something racist , it's way worse than like when some rando says something

1:20:40

racist , right , like so , so , yeah , so like the . The

1:20:42

the more progressive you are , especially that

1:20:44

you can proclaim yourself to be , the more dangerous

1:20:47

you are .

1:20:49

And the more responsibility you have .

1:20:50

Yeah , I mean I'm phrasing it in a little bit more of

1:20:52

an aggressive way , but yes , the more responsibility you have

1:20:55

. Yeah , I do that intentionally

1:20:57

, like to draw our attention . You can't proclaim

1:20:59

values and then not live up to them without

1:21:01

causing a lot of harm .

1:21:04

Yeah .

1:21:05

So be careful about the values that you proclaim .

1:21:07

Totally yeah . And to me , like . To

1:21:10

me , this , like what we're talking about right

1:21:13

here , like some people if you're still

1:21:15

listening like you're not in this camp , but some people

1:21:17

will dismiss it and say like , oh well , that's just

1:21:19

like there's a bug flying around me . That's

1:21:21

just sort of like woke new age , like people trying

1:21:24

to like figure out the best things to do or like

1:21:26

how to judge people , etc . And also

1:21:28

, but I really feel

1:21:30

like , if I feel like , to me this is

1:21:32

a spiritual practice , like it's , because it's really

1:21:34

. What is the impact that

1:21:36

I am having on the world

1:21:39

? What's the impact I'm having on

1:21:41

my community ? What is it

1:21:43

positive ? Am I causing harm , more

1:21:46

so than any state of consciousness I can achieve

1:21:48

? What is the ripple effect that I'm doing

1:21:50

and creating ? And that

1:21:53

, to me , is the practice . If

1:21:55

I could make a spiritual practice for everyone

1:21:57

and prescribe it like , that would be it , you

1:21:59

know .

1:22:00

Well , I mean , and I for for , for my

1:22:02

clients who veer towards spirituality

1:22:05

, I talk about this as a spiritual practice

1:22:07

. I talk about this as a way of connecting , like

1:22:09

you know , to being a channel

1:22:11

for divine light and for grace

1:22:13

. And , you know , for my Jewish

1:22:15

clients , I talk about Tikkun Olam and the

1:22:18

idea of healing the world through our actions . For

1:22:21

my clients from

1:22:23

a more political liberationary bent , or

1:22:25

liberatory bent , I talk about this as being

1:22:27

praxis , as being liberational

1:22:31

praxis , especially for white men , that this is actually

1:22:33

a form of revolutionary action , to

1:22:35

like accountability as revolutionary action

1:22:38

, accountability as liberation . For

1:22:41

my more , uh , executive clients

1:22:43

, I talk about this as leadership skills . I talk about this as

1:22:45

a way of demonstrating

1:22:48

evolved 21st century masculine

1:22:50

leadership , um , of

1:22:52

being a position , in a position of power that

1:22:54

recognizes it . I use um examples

1:22:56

of other leaders that I that that are

1:22:59

deeply respected , and I talk about how this um

1:23:01

creates stronger teams , like , sends

1:23:03

messages downstream , um to

1:23:06

others that , like this , is the kind of place

1:23:08

where it's actually not just safe

1:23:11

but encouraged to call out your

1:23:13

leaders , you know , and that tends

1:23:15

to create a lot more trust , especially if you're trying to build a

1:23:17

team with um people from a diverse

1:23:19

variety of backgrounds . Yeah

1:23:21

, um , that trust each other with a white guy in

1:23:23

charge . You really have to be thinking about this . Yeah

1:23:26

, so I think it applies across across

1:23:28

. Yeah , I think thinking about harm

1:23:31

and impact applies across , um

1:23:33

, across worlds yeah

1:23:36

.

1:23:37

So I want

1:23:39

to move towards closure here and talk about

1:23:41

one last sort of thematic thing while we're

1:23:43

doing that , which is some amount

1:23:45

of going into repair and apology

1:23:48

and how to how to do that . I

1:23:50

think that's a super important piece

1:23:52

. You said something uh , it's maybe

1:23:55

a quote I think you said something I

1:23:57

don't think it's actually possible to be accountable

1:23:59

without a whole lot of dignity , and

1:24:02

I I love that

1:24:04

. And then you also said I don't trust the apology

1:24:06

from someone who hates themselves .

1:24:09

Yeah , I did say that .

1:24:12

Yeah , which , which which is interesting , but

1:24:14

also like what I think it points to

1:24:16

what I , what I heard in that is

1:24:18

that there's , like

1:24:21

there's this sort of generative

1:24:23

place you could get to . If you're somebody who's been

1:24:25

called out or you've been said that , it's been

1:24:27

said that you've caused harm , there's a place

1:24:30

where you can , you could go into

1:24:32

a shame spiral and maybe you do that , maybe you have

1:24:34

your emotional release , but at some point you

1:24:36

can transmute that or change that

1:24:38

into actually you know what . Like I want to be

1:24:41

a really , I want to be a really integral

1:24:43

person in the world . Like my integrity

1:24:45

is important to me , my impact is important

1:24:47

to me . So then there's this dignity that comes

1:24:49

from that and rather than saying , oh

1:24:52

, I'm so bad , I'm so sorry

1:24:54

, I'm horrible , you say , wow , like I

1:24:56

messed up , I

1:24:59

am sorry , like I own that , et

1:25:01

cetera .

1:25:01

You know , like different , different , different

1:25:03

flavor , right , yeah , well

1:25:06

, I think , actually , the dignity comes

1:25:08

from being committed to your own integrity , but

1:25:10

I think the dignity actually comes from

1:25:12

a place of . There's

1:25:15

this great , great quote , and I'm going to I forget

1:25:17

the the name of the Seth

1:25:20

Godin no

1:25:24

matter what you've done , it's still

1:25:26

your responsibility to contribute

1:25:28

your gifts to the world . That's

1:25:34

the dignity . No

1:25:36

matter what you've done , it's

1:25:39

still your responsibility to contribute your gifts to

1:25:41

the world . You

1:25:44

have a gift to give . I guarantee

1:25:46

you , every man listening knows that they have a gift

1:25:48

to give to this world and

1:25:51

make a contribution in their lives

1:25:53

, and that they want to .

1:25:54

Yeah , and I imagine sorry , go

1:25:56

ahead . No , well , no , please . And

1:25:59

I imagine like the fear of getting called

1:26:01

out or said that you've caused harm is

1:26:03

ultimately translated into the fear that

1:26:05

you won't be able to give the gift and have

1:26:07

the impact on the world . Therefore

1:26:10

, better to shove away and keep giving the

1:26:12

gift than actually deal with it and

1:26:14

be able to yeah .

1:26:15

Yeah , yeah , that's exactly right . So I think part

1:26:17

of the part of this , the fear that a

1:26:19

call out creates is oh my god

1:26:22

, I had this gift to give . I know

1:26:24

that . I'm sure for you and me , right , if we were to get

1:26:26

called out , like part of the fear that we would experience would

1:26:28

be well , I'm right

1:26:30

, we've got these podcasts and these classes that you run

1:26:32

. Like what if I don't get to do that ? Like that was my dharma

1:26:34

, that was like my , the thing that was meant to do ? Yeah

1:26:37

, it's deep , sorry , without projecting onto you

1:26:39

, like it would be deeply hard

1:26:41

for me to like consider not being able to

1:26:43

speak on podcasts and like , do the writing

1:26:46

and the teaching and the coaching and the consulting that I , that

1:26:48

I do ? I mean , it's like I finally

1:26:50

found my purpose in life . You know , yeah , um , so

1:26:52

I hold that with , with delicacy , um

1:26:54

, but yeah , there's a deep dignity

1:26:56

in in , in

1:26:58

knowing that , like it's still my responsibility

1:27:01

to , to , to

1:27:03

, to contribute those gifts and and and to do so in

1:27:05

a way that's an integrity . So I

1:27:09

think part of part of approaching repair , I

1:27:11

think I really want to emphasize what you said is

1:27:13

doing your emotional

1:27:16

processing separately . I don't have

1:27:18

better like with

1:27:20

your therapist , with your coach , with your best friends , you

1:27:22

know , like screaming

1:27:24

, calling them names

1:27:26

, like I really am a deep

1:27:28

believer in , like politically

1:27:31

incorrect emotional processing done

1:27:33

in safe contexts and containers

1:27:35

.

1:27:35

Yeah .

1:27:36

Like I really think that that's important . Like

1:27:39

none of the successes I've experienced with my clients or my clients

1:27:41

have experienced through me would come

1:27:44

if they hadn't gotten some pretty toxic

1:27:46

shit out at some point . Yeah

1:27:48

, you know what I mean . And this

1:27:50

like let it emerge from their system without it being

1:27:52

like a logical thing of like oh , like this is like evidence

1:27:54

that you're bad or that you have you have wrong , think

1:27:56

, you know . But like , no , just like

1:27:58

, and and then show

1:28:01

up for the repair from a place

1:28:03

of having already expressed that and

1:28:05

had it witnessed , ideally maybe

1:28:08

by your journal or by your , your , your God

1:28:10

or by your community , in

1:28:13

a healthy way , and then show up for

1:28:15

the repair . I mean

1:28:17

, I could talk about repair for so long

1:28:19

, but like one of the big things is to show

1:28:22

up for repair without the agenda of

1:28:24

um , it's

1:28:27

like show up for

1:28:30

repair in the same way that we show up for sex right without

1:28:32

agenda . Like I think it's actually

1:28:34

can be detrimental to assign

1:28:36

, you know , it's like okay , well

1:28:38

, here's what I'm trying to get out of this . It's like , okay

1:28:40

, you can sort of go there , but like I

1:28:43

think showing up a repair with the right energy is more

1:28:45

important than showing up with the right agenda , because

1:28:48

sometimes you know , like and I see this happen all the time

1:28:50

and that's that's one of the reasons that it fucks up um

1:28:53

, like mediations that happen

1:28:55

too soon after the event People

1:28:57

are like what's my agenda ? My agenda is

1:28:59

to get resolution . My agenda is to get out of trouble . My agenda

1:29:01

is to be cool again . I don't want

1:29:03

this to be a thing anymore . I'd like this to stop being

1:29:06

a thing . I'd like you to be okay with me and

1:29:09

even having that as your agenda going

1:29:11

in , if you've done a harm could be the

1:29:13

kind of energy that will do more harm . Right

1:29:19

, the energy that will do more harm , yeah , right . So I see this happen all

1:29:21

the time where , like , they go into the mediation and she's like oh , he'll finally

1:29:23

get me , he'll finally receive me , and he's like I just want

1:29:26

to say whatever I need to say to get out of trouble

1:29:28

totally . And

1:29:31

then the energies are mismatched and he hasn't

1:29:33

done enough processing , and you know

1:29:35

and like , and then

1:29:37

it ends up being worse , right ? So this

1:29:39

is like number one most preventable mistakes

1:29:41

apologizing too quickly until

1:29:43

you've taken the time to grok it and

1:29:46

you know , and really I , I advise

1:29:48

, um , doing as much preemptive

1:29:50

emotional labor as you can , like really putting yourself

1:29:53

in the shoe , like , yes , like if

1:29:55

someone wants to share their pain with you , great

1:29:57

, like you know , you should be able to

1:29:59

hold that pain . Um , and do what

1:30:01

danielle surred the um , who

1:30:04

I quote all the time she's the founder of common justice

1:30:06

, which is a brooklyn-based restorative justice organization

1:30:09

. She calls standing in the fire of

1:30:11

accountability , which is sitting

1:30:13

with someone telling you the pain that you cause them and

1:30:16

just fucking standing in that fire , yeah

1:30:19

, which is so hard . It's a fire

1:30:21

, totally no defensiveness , no

1:30:24

, oh , but you also hurt me . Or oh , like

1:30:26

it's not that big deal , but oh , but like my

1:30:29

, I didn't have this good experience

1:30:31

in childhood , one time where kids beat me up like , just

1:30:33

thank you , what

1:30:36

else ? Right

1:30:38

? Um , yeah

1:30:41

, um . I think it's really important to engage

1:30:43

in that , uh , what I call pre-empt

1:30:45

, uh speculative empathy . I

1:30:48

imagine this person might have experienced this

1:30:50

. I imagine this person

1:30:52

might have experiences . I'm not going to assume that I know their

1:30:54

experience , but , given everything I know about them , I imagine

1:30:57

, imagine that , like when I did that , they probably experienced

1:30:59

maybe some betrayal , some sense of like , distrust

1:31:01

, like , oh , like . If Misha did this and like

1:31:03

, how can I trust him to be a consent educator ? God

1:31:05

, like . And then how can I trust this organization that's endorsed

1:31:08

him as a consent educator ? I imagine you experienced

1:31:10

all those thoughts and that must have sucked

1:31:12

for you . Oh

1:31:15

, I can go so much Like

1:31:17

we're not even we . We don't . I don't know if we

1:31:19

have the time to go into like , but apology practice

1:31:21

and restoration practice is like a huge part of my work

1:31:24

.

1:31:24

Yeah , I'd say you know what I'd say

1:31:26

? Like , if you have the time , people can . People

1:31:28

can break this episode up into chunks

1:31:30

, so

1:31:35

I think it could be useful , Like if you could . You know , possibly there's somebody listening right now

1:31:37

who's like man , I'm really taking notes , I really want to get this stuff . Like

1:31:39

let's . I'd say let's , let's

1:31:42

round . Like if we can do that in 15

1:31:44

minutes , whatever we

1:31:46

can round out to provide some actionable , something

1:31:48

like I , yeah , I'd say let's do

1:31:50

it .

1:31:51

Yeah , so okay , if

1:31:53

you've done harm and you know it and you want to make it better

1:31:56

, right , the first thing

1:31:58

is to be with your

1:32:00

own body , be with yourself

1:32:02

, like , be with the

1:32:04

experience of doing harm and make sure that you're not coming

1:32:06

from the place of like I'm a shit , shit

1:32:08

, piece of shit , you know

1:32:10

. So , not self-flagellating

1:32:13

, you know that that expression like self-hitting

1:32:15

and also

1:32:17

right , well , like

1:32:21

, welcome and acknowledge the degree , like the , the various politically

1:32:23

incorrect feelings that you'll inevitably

1:32:25

get like . One of the first things that happens after

1:32:28

I do harm to someone is

1:32:30

I look at them through a red lens and I'm like

1:32:32

what a what a over

1:32:34

sensitive judgy

1:32:36

piece . You know , you know , like , that's

1:32:39

my internal process . I think most people's internal process

1:32:41

is that we start hating

1:32:43

the person we harmed . It's a defense

1:32:45

mechanism . It's quite common Accept

1:32:47

it , recognize it , notice it , let it pass

1:32:50

through you , right , let it come through you Some

1:32:53

level of like hitting a pillow or some sort

1:32:55

of like expression going to someone , having

1:32:57

a big cry , being really self-centered in your

1:32:59

cry . All of this should be done privately , not with the person you

1:33:01

harmed . Right , lots of pre-work , restorative

1:33:04

justice . People call this prep . Yeah

1:33:07

, you prep . You prep before you go into the circle

1:33:09

. You

1:33:12

really look not just at like , where , like

1:33:14

. The inquiry is where you were out of integrity

1:33:17

. That's usually the best , most fruitful

1:33:19

place to start . A lot of people

1:33:21

call this what did I do wrong , but

1:33:24

wrong tends to like apply to like a

1:33:26

, an objective set of standards

1:33:28

. Did I break a law ? Did I violate a

1:33:30

norm within the community ? That's

1:33:33

that can be useful as an inquiry , but like it's also

1:33:35

, I find it much more useful to be like what

1:33:37

did I do that was out of my own standards , you

1:33:40

know , and usually for this inquiry

1:33:42

it's useful to assume that there was something right

1:33:44

. Like part of my practice . You talk about preventative practices

1:33:47

. We asked at the early set . One of my preventative practices

1:33:49

is when any at , whenever anybody

1:33:52

gives me feedback , I assume

1:33:54

that it's all true , all

1:33:56

of it , and

1:33:59

I just sit with that . It

1:34:03

takes me anywhere between an hour and a week to just ugh that stage and it's the

1:34:05

worst . It's the worst because I'm consciously

1:34:08

tearing down my own internal

1:34:11

defenses , all of my armor

1:34:13

that I've naturally created , for myself to be

1:34:15

like dismiss that one . That's not real and just

1:34:18

allow it in , and for myself to be like , dismiss that one , that's not real and just like , allow it in and allow

1:34:20

it to be true . Like , what if this were ? Like what

1:34:23

, if they're seeing a side of me that I'm not even ? Oh

1:34:25

God , it's the worst , especially if you don't trust

1:34:27

them , if you're like this person's like not a good

1:34:29

judge of character and I don't trust their judgment

1:34:31

. They're just seeing a side of me , you

1:34:34

know , is just a facet

1:34:36

, you know , and it's not really me . Ooh

1:34:38

, okay , you've done that work . Now

1:34:41

let's say you've seen it and you've seen where you were

1:34:43

out of integrity . You've

1:34:46

seen where , like , oh , it's important to me to be compassionate and I wasn't . It's important

1:34:48

to me to be thoughtful and to like , really be like attuned and I wasn't

1:34:51

attuned . Okay

1:34:53

, when you

1:34:55

like , I advise people to write out the restoration

1:34:57

, even

1:35:00

if they end up delivering it verbally . I advise people to take the time

1:35:02

to write it out , um , and

1:35:04

then , in terms of like , venue for delivery

1:35:07

or or or vehicle for delivery , written

1:35:09

, oral , in person , et cetera , is

1:35:11

, um , I think , really a context

1:35:14

based . Some people hate written , some people hate to

1:35:16

receive written . They're like this is dispassionate

1:35:18

or cold , um , some people would

1:35:20

really appreciate it , because it's like , oh , this is complicated

1:35:22

and I have complicated feelings and I want to be able to sit with your

1:35:24

words . Yeah , and I know that if we talk

1:35:27

like all my instinct will be to like

1:35:29

, immediately tell

1:35:31

you it's okay when

1:35:35

you engage in the repair . Um

1:35:37

, I have a whole practice on this , but

1:35:39

it's name

1:35:44

the action . Don't apologize for impact

1:35:46

. Name the action

1:35:49

and then , when you apologize , apologize for what you did , not

1:35:51

for how they felt , not

1:35:54

for what happened , but what

1:35:56

you did . I am sorry that I hit you , not

1:35:58

I'm sorry that you were hurt , I'm

1:36:00

sorry that you felt bad .

1:36:03

We use this in .

1:36:03

English all the time we say I'm sorry that you're feeling

1:36:05

that bad , I'm sorry your father died , and an apology

1:36:08

letter really with me

1:36:10

.

1:36:10

Yeah , except the one piece , just to clarify

1:36:12

. Like that I see

1:36:15

in some people is like , like

1:36:17

we talked to earlier , just want to name it like oh

1:36:22

, maybe they didn't hit the person , maybe it's not , like they have a hard time clearly identifying

1:36:24

it , In which case , I think , go back and possibly listen to the earlier part of this episode

1:36:27

again .

1:36:28

Yeah , yeah , well , well , like , how about

1:36:30

? How about ? Like , I'm sorry that I disrespected

1:36:32

you , right , I ? Generally one of my more advanced

1:36:35

techniques is to like name the action that happened

1:36:37

and then , when you apologize

1:36:39

, apologize for the more

1:36:41

overarching theme of the thing that you

1:36:43

did . That was most impactful . Like , um

1:36:46

, I workshopped one recently where it was a man with

1:36:48

his partner and he took

1:36:51

off the toll like

1:36:53

sticker thing that like allowed the you know

1:36:55

and without telling them , and then the person like

1:36:57

got a ticket because , right

1:37:00

, and it was like I'm , yes

1:37:02

, like , what I happened was I took off the toll sticker

1:37:05

thing on the car without telling you . That's what happened . But

1:37:08

what I'm sorry for is that I'm sorry that

1:37:10

I took away your sovereignty , because it's

1:37:12

something that we've talked about a lot got

1:37:15

it yeah you see what I mean ? totally , that's

1:37:17

where the juice is , that's where the resonance

1:37:19

is . Yeah , right , that's

1:37:21

what the person wants to hear , not I'm sorry for this

1:37:23

incidental little thing , because the incidental thing of

1:37:25

the thing it's right in the context of our marriage is

1:37:28

representative of all the other shit right and so like

1:37:30

do you get the impact right

1:37:32

? Do you get the , the gestalt , the

1:37:34

holistic thing and that's that's

1:37:37

the advanced technique is to apologize for that . Name

1:37:40

the impact right , engage

1:37:42

in the speculative empathy , engage in like

1:37:44

reflection of right . This is where your non-violent

1:37:46

communication skills can come in . Of like I

1:37:49

heard you say that you were hurt in this specific way

1:37:51

, betrayed , felt

1:37:53

, violated , whatever it was , and then you can say

1:37:55

like this is how you felt , this is what what your experience was . It's

1:37:57

better generally to take away phrases Like you

1:38:00

felt this , better to use direct

1:38:02

language of like this was violating to you , or you

1:38:04

were violated , or I violated you . People

1:38:07

are pretty resilient when you say I violated

1:38:09

you . People tend to really tend to , especially

1:38:11

in relationship , tend

1:38:14

to respect that and and tends to

1:38:16

land pretty easily . So

1:38:20

we've done the apology

1:38:22

, we've done naming the action , we've done naming the incoherence

1:38:24

, we've talked about naming the impact

1:38:26

, and

1:38:30

then the final two steps are repair

1:38:32

and prevention . What am I doing to repair

1:38:34

it right ? What am I doing to make it better

1:38:37

? I'm going to pay the toll . I'm

1:38:39

going to pay for your therapy . I'm taking

1:38:42

classes from an accountability

1:38:44

coach . I'm , you know , I'm

1:38:46

taking classes with Taylor . You know , maybe it's indirect

1:38:48

, maybe I was pushy , in part because I don't have good control

1:38:51

of my sexual urges , and so it's not

1:38:53

about , like , learning to apologize better . It's about like

1:38:55

, actually that's the reparative act , right

1:38:57

? Or rather , that's more of a preventative

1:38:59

action , right , the preventative action is

1:39:01

gaining better control of my own sexuality . That's a

1:39:03

journey that I have seen now from this incident , that

1:39:05

I need to go on .

1:39:07

Yeah , just to say , also with

1:39:09

a number of the women that I've talked to over the years

1:39:11

who've experienced some sort of harm from somebody , like

1:39:13

, one of the biggest important

1:39:15

things that they really desire is

1:39:17

evidence that

1:39:19

the man is changing

1:39:22

the behavior , going forward like

1:39:24

, and that inherently is part of the

1:39:26

repair process right .

1:39:27

Totally oftentimes prevention can feel

1:39:30

reparative , totally right . Um

1:39:32

, so I I I say

1:39:34

that by saying and sometimes there's actual

1:39:37

reparative steps . For sure , it depends

1:39:39

on depending on the context , depending on the harm , depending on

1:39:41

the . But yes , oftentimes

1:39:43

everything in prevention functions as

1:39:45

repair , but you don't get to skip

1:39:47

over the repair as well . You

1:39:51

have to think about

1:39:54

the actual incident as well . Yeah , but

1:39:57

then prevention can look really , really creative . A lot of people get stuck

1:39:59

on these last two steps . A

1:40:01

lot of people like feel like , oh

1:40:03

, I won't do it again . The promise not to do it again

1:40:05

works once , and then you kind

1:40:07

of have to get a little bit more creative and a little bit more

1:40:09

serious . You have to really take it seriously . And

1:40:13

it's tough and we're all going to fuck up and we all leave dishes

1:40:15

in the sink . Still , you know what I mean People

1:40:23

tough and we're all gonna fuck up and like we all leave dishes in the sink . Still , you know what I mean

1:40:25

. Like people are . People are fallible and you can , you can take the stuff as seriously as as it's possible

1:40:27

. You know , you can , you know , and it can be a giant vehicle for growth to really

1:40:30

use these things as a , as a vehicle

1:40:32

to push yourselves forward . Um , some

1:40:34

more advanced techniques . Briefly , make

1:40:36

sure that your apologies are consensual . Don't assault

1:40:38

people with your apologies . Don't like attack

1:40:40

with your apology . Don't

1:40:42

apologize at someone . Don't

1:40:45

assume that your apology is enough . Don't

1:40:47

assume you get it . Don't assume that you've like encapsulated

1:40:49

everything . I advise a double

1:40:52

down technique of like saying , now

1:40:54

that I've apologized , like what else is present for you , right

1:40:56

? Which is like people are like

1:40:58

oh my God , whoa , really , I get to like cause , yeah

1:41:01

, like I'm really interested , like

1:41:04

is there something that I might've missed or something

1:41:06

that I didn't really speak to ? Like take your time , oh , that's great . Don't

1:41:09

make , don't , don't ask for forgiveness

1:41:12

Please . This is a weird thing . Don't

1:41:14

, don't say oh , please forgive me . I really don't say oh , please

1:41:16

forgive me . I

1:41:18

really don't like that . I don't think anybody

1:41:20

really does Like

1:41:23

they'll make it okay when they're

1:41:25

good and ready . And I think pressuring someone

1:41:28

to like forgive you , first of all

1:41:30

, is pressure , which sucks to feel pressured about

1:41:32

anything , right , especially

1:41:35

if your original harm had to do with pressure and sex , right ? Second

1:41:38

of all , it it makes it about

1:41:40

you , right . Asking for forgiveness

1:41:42

fundamentally makes the apology a transaction . It

1:41:44

says now that I have given you gold , you

1:41:47

will now give me a horse

1:41:49

, right , yeah ? And

1:41:51

the forget right and the forgiveness is almost like legalistic

1:41:53

. It's like now you've forgiven me , you can't bring this

1:41:55

up again . Fuck all that . I offer this

1:41:57

to you without expectations . I offer this to you without strings

1:41:59

. It's important for me , this

1:42:02

is the framing and this I got from my anti-racism mentor

1:42:04

, the reverend bridge feltus , at the intersection

1:42:07

for mankind , if you're curious , is

1:42:09

the idea of restoring integrity . Rather than apologizing

1:42:11

, it was important to me to

1:42:13

restore my integrity and part of that was , was

1:42:16

, was making the corrective actions and the reparative

1:42:18

actions and the preventative actions , and part of it is also

1:42:20

offering you this

1:42:22

, this restoration , this , this , these

1:42:24

words , but like I

1:42:27

needed to restore my integrity . Thank you for

1:42:29

witnessing me like you

1:42:32

don't like . This isn't just to pacify

1:42:35

you . This isn't right

1:42:37

. And if you come at it with that angle , it

1:42:39

tends to land a lot better , because

1:42:41

people are like oh , this is about him

1:42:44

wanting to do better rather than him just trying to make me not

1:42:46

mad at him and get out of trouble . Yeah

1:42:48

, there it is , quick

1:42:51

and dirty .

1:42:53

Man , thank you so much . Such a rich , in-depth , interesting

1:42:56

conversation . I really hope this has provided like a rich , in-depth , interesting

1:42:58

conversation . I really hope this has provided

1:43:00

a resource for you

1:43:02

, listener , watcher , for people out

1:43:04

there . I'm going to go through and put

1:43:07

different timestamps throughout the episode so people

1:43:09

can go to different sections . There's

1:43:13

this one last piece that I'm like oh

1:43:15

, if I didn't say this I would be kicking myself . It's

1:43:18

happened in a friend circle within

1:43:20

the last couple of years . There was a scenario

1:43:23

between two partners and

1:43:25

one partner did something . The

1:43:27

other partner felt hurt by

1:43:29

it and the partner

1:43:31

who did the action that hurt the other

1:43:34

partner didn't want to apologize

1:43:36

. They didn't . They didn't want to say I'm sorry't

1:43:38

. They didn't want to say I'm sorry because they , their

1:43:41

thought was well , if I say I'm

1:43:43

sorry , then I'm admitting that

1:43:45

I'm bad or fault

1:43:47

or something , and that I can grieve the

1:43:49

action and impact , but

1:43:52

without wanting to admit or

1:43:54

say that I did something wrong

1:43:57

, cause I don't think I did something wrong

1:43:59

. I'm curious what happens for

1:44:01

you when you hear that .

1:44:02

Yeah , oh , it's really common . Yeah

1:44:06

, I mean I don't know the context or the

1:44:08

Totally . I didn't give you enough really to go on

1:44:10

, but but like , it's okay , I'll

1:44:13

take it a couple of places . One is , you know , like

1:44:15

, to the degree possible we have , like , I invite

1:44:17

us to remove the , the , the

1:44:19

words and the concepts of , of

1:44:21

allegation , accusation

1:44:23

, guilt , innocence

1:44:26

, right and wrong , right

1:44:31

, yeah , I

1:44:33

right . If , if , if part of

1:44:35

the resistance is apologizing , because that

1:44:38

makes me wrong , that's already

1:44:40

the big inquiry , that's the big thing

1:44:42

of . You can do harm without being bad

1:44:44

, which is what I'm hearing in

1:44:46

that . But

1:44:48

there's also the whole idea of admitting

1:44:51

fault or admitting wrong , um

1:45:16

, or right . So I would put it into the language of like what was the action in in the context of your own

1:45:18

integrity , you know ? And like maybe the action itself that they're pointing to wasn't out of your integrity

1:45:20

, but maybe there was something in the way that you did it or in the context surrounding it that was out of your integrity . Like it wasn't out of my integrity

1:45:22

not to call you , because I don't feel an obligation to call you , but it was . It was important to me

1:45:24

to set better expectations about what kinds of phone communication

1:45:26

you could expect from me , and I didn't do that or something

1:45:28

totally I , without

1:45:31

knowing anything about what you're talking about . I really don't

1:45:33

um , but like yeah , no

1:45:35

, the make it the inquiry about their

1:45:37

own integrity and their own values

1:45:40

as much as possible in general

1:45:42

is a good approach , taking

1:45:45

out the context of right and wrong .

1:45:47

I like that yeah .

1:45:49

And let's end on that . I really want to mention that , Like

1:45:53

it's so important not to not

1:45:56

to think you're bad by

1:45:58

looking at harm . I

1:46:00

hope to be an embodiment of that

1:46:02

. I say with

1:46:04

deep humility , to be an embodiment of

1:46:06

loving yourself while

1:46:09

also recognizing your capacity to do harm and the

1:46:11

reality of the harm that you have caused in the past

1:46:14

. I invite other

1:46:16

men to step into

1:46:18

that form of leadership and

1:46:20

I , I I invite you . If

1:46:23

the water is warm , it's

1:46:26

, it's okay .

1:46:30

Beautiful . Thank you , misha

1:46:33

. We'll put all the links and methods

1:46:36

for people to get in touch with you in

1:46:39

the description of this episode as well , as you

1:46:41

have a really awesome resource around how

1:46:43

to apologize that outlines a lot of the things

1:46:45

you just spoke to in a really beautifully written way

1:46:47

. It's on your website . Well , you

1:46:50

can find that on your website . Anything else you want to share about

1:46:52

how to find you , I'll

1:46:54

have some in-depth Zoom courses coming

1:46:56

up in the fall .

1:46:58

I'll have some in-depth Zoom courses coming up In

1:47:01

the fall . I'm designing one that's just for leaders that really delves

1:47:03

into the topics that we talked about today . I'm

1:47:06

really excited to launch that . It's not yet launched

1:47:08

, but please follow me on Instagram at

1:47:10

Misha Byrick , and

1:47:12

that's by far the best ways to stay

1:47:14

in touch with me . You can also sign up for my mailing list , which

1:47:17

is um , on my website evolved

1:47:19

up men , and so go

1:47:21

to evolvemen and um

1:47:24

. Yeah , there's

1:47:26

a , there's a beautiful world waiting for you and

1:47:28

I'll see you there .

1:47:29

Awesome . Thank you so much , thank

1:47:31

you for being here . Yeah , thank

1:47:33

you Listener , thank you Watcher , thank you

1:47:35

Human . I'll see you

1:47:37

next time .

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features