Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:01
Today's rewind of Stochastic City is presented
0:03
by Radio Lab. Sponsor better Help with
0:05
so many New Years resolution to this
0:08
time of year, the emphasis on transformation
0:10
can get a little tiring. Therapy can
0:12
help you find your strength. so if
0:15
you're thinking of starting therapy, give Better
0:17
Help a try. It's entirely online and
0:19
suited your schedule. Celebrate the
0:21
progress you have already made with
0:23
a health.com/radio Lab. Today to get
0:26
ten percent of your first month
0:28
that's better Help help.com flash really
0:30
allow. Hey,
0:34
it's like if happy New Year
0:36
luigi. You feel fresh. It's a
0:38
new you at a new me
0:41
and a new page and a
0:43
new lease on life for all
0:45
of us. And as we start
0:47
to chart out our new year.
0:50
I. Want to play an episode from
0:53
the Archives that asks an important
0:55
question that I think is helpful
0:57
to consider? You know, as we
1:00
make plans and goals and set
1:02
expectations, The here's the question. Here's
1:04
the question: How much can we
1:07
control what happens in our lives?
1:10
And how much Is it? Just
1:12
Whatever you want to call it luck
1:14
or fate, or just a random and
1:16
fickle universe having his way with
1:18
us. This. Is an episode
1:21
about that? How that applies to
1:23
he cool I bacteria how it
1:25
applies to dimes and corridors, how
1:27
it applies to blades of grass
1:29
on a golf course. And of
1:31
course how it applies. To.
1:34
You. I. Hope you enjoy. This.
1:37
Is. Still, Cast a city
1:39
of you know you were you with. Your
1:47
than listening to radio Lab. Radio
1:49
from W and Weiss
1:52
A. Lie.
1:58
Again, When start to show today with. Truly
2:00
remarkable story. Which
2:03
least initially involved this girl right
2:05
here. I'm hello. I'm nervous than
2:07
Laura Buxton surname. remember their names
2:09
and Laurel, Let's do this like
2:11
a movie. Okay, I can. Movies
2:13
I say. That
2:16
it's June. Two thousand and one. Yeah,
2:18
where we were in a little town
2:20
in Northern England called Safe and Tren
2:22
Stoke on Trent. You. Imagine.
2:25
A little English health in this
2:27
town. and the camera zooms in
2:29
and they're standing. The front lawn
2:31
is Laura Buxton. She's ten years
2:33
old. He wow, almost ten. She's
2:35
a tall girl, pretty tall flags
2:37
exhale and in her hand she's
2:39
holding. A. Balloon. Or
2:42
read to. You. Release
2:45
Of Our Pockets Or earlier that day Laura had
2:47
taken a little card and stuff into the balloon
2:49
and on one side written. My name's personal
2:51
message is a sudden m please return to
2:53
Lower Bucks Then and then on the other
2:55
side had my address. Okay so cut back
2:58
to the outdoor scene There she is standing on
3:00
lawn. Is very windy. To
3:02
get this red balloons are name on it and she
3:04
holds it up to the sky. To.
3:07
The heavens. And
3:09
at just let it go. In
3:12
the winter. Came. Through
3:16
the last. In intensive as it is thought to get stuck
3:18
in a tree. That further down the road somewhere.
3:20
That's not what happened. The balloon kept doing.
3:23
Or it Now I'm looking at a
3:26
map here of England and stuff and
3:28
has com boom want to do so
3:30
selfless. Pound down down pass Stratford past
3:33
while so he has to Wolverhampton than
3:35
pass Birmingham as Kidderminster has worked. Sister
3:37
yes has millions of people has setting
3:39
him. They ask people with different lives
3:42
differently as glove sister lost a cluster
3:44
and all in all the red balloon
3:46
goes about one hundred forty miles. South
3:49
exactly against the prevailing wind. Really
3:51
to the Southwest. with
3:55
his of finally when this blue to the all the way
3:57
on the other side of the country. It
3:59
begins to dissent. Down
4:01
Down Down. And of all the place the
4:03
good: A Landed. In a in a river
4:05
in a factory parking lot in the
4:07
see. Instead the balloon touches down. In
4:10
the yard. Of this girl. I.
4:13
Live. I. Live in the
4:15
countryside and a little funded
4:17
schools. Nelson Lowborn. Just Your Next uses
4:19
a different girl than the first one. They do sound
4:21
the same. But. They live on opposite ends of
4:24
the country. The blame got. Stuck in our heads for
4:26
our next door neighbor. found it and he thought
4:28
has disappeared of rubbish and he collected it up
4:30
say the cows wouldn't eat it because he didn't.
4:35
And he was about to that in the been
4:37
I literally. And then he saw the label saying
4:39
please send back to Nor Buxton and he was
4:41
like. Oh. My. God. Why
4:45
we resume Riga. Okay, so check this out. Rimmer,
4:47
I tell ya. The first girl who sent the
4:49
balloon with ten. The. Second girl who
4:52
received it and ten years old. She's ten. A
4:54
game. Or current winner is more
4:56
than one bit of remember. I told
4:58
the first girl's name was Laura Buxton.
5:01
Well girl number Two Country, introduce yourself.
5:04
Hi I'm love. And was
5:07
they both were of of
5:09
suggests now guess oath named
5:11
Laura Buxton. Yes, You
5:14
heard me? write. A ten year old girl
5:16
named Laura bucks and let's go over balloon.
5:19
The balloon float a hundred and forty miles
5:21
and lands. In
5:23
the yard of a ten year old girl named
5:25
Laura Buxton is is for real. I think I
5:27
might be the strange thing have ever heard in
5:29
my life. It's pretty with. Been. About eight
5:31
years since the balloon incident dolores each other a
5:33
lot. We managed to get them both and a
5:35
studio. So
5:37
like who can hear Americans through these? Okay,
5:40
back to the story. Yeah, I got the
5:42
Berlin. that's lore number two on I would
5:44
seek at that point. On
5:47
well I. I
5:49
was quite young. I didn't really know what to think.
5:51
I'll just let I'd better write the letter because he
5:53
does is someone else out local lore box and I
5:55
must see them. to learn and but you
5:57
wrote a letter to learn about one thing
6:00
Laura, I think I put, I'm 10 years old
6:02
and I live in Woodton and I found your
6:04
balloon and the thing is that my
6:06
name is Laura Buxton as well. So lots
6:08
of love from Laura Buxton. Laura
6:11
number one. Yep. You get the note. Got
6:14
it through the post. Do you remember reading it? I remember reading it
6:16
because I sort of opened it up while I was in the kitchen
6:18
and it was really quite confusing actually
6:20
because it was like to Laura Buxton from Laura
6:22
Buxton. I took it up to my mum and
6:24
we stood there arguing about it for quite a
6:26
while. What did you argue about? Well, she was
6:29
trying to tell me that it had come to
6:31
Laura Buxton and it wasn't from Laura Buxton. She
6:33
just thought I was confused. Okay,
6:36
fast forward a short while later, the two
6:38
Laura's meet. It was at one of England's
6:40
most popular TV shows, Richard and Judy. They'd
6:42
found out about the Laura Laura coincidence, invited
6:45
them on and here the story gets even
6:47
stranger because there's Laura number two standing backstage.
6:49
And down the corridor I saw this girl who looked
6:51
pretty similar to me. First thing she noticed
6:54
is, wow, with the same height. Guinea and tall. She
6:56
got the same colour hair. Brownish hair. And
6:58
we're even wearing the exact same clothes. Pink jumpers
7:00
and jeans. Yeah. Both
7:02
had on pink jumpers and jeans. Yeah. And as
7:04
they started to talk, it just kept getting weirder. Well,
7:07
we both got a three year old black Labrador. We
7:09
both got a grey rabbit. We both got guinea pigs.
7:11
Really? Yeah, and they both brought their
7:13
guinea pigs with them that day. I remember Laura took
7:15
hers out of its cage and I had mine on
7:17
my lap and we were like, oh
7:19
my God. They were identical. They
7:23
were both brown with a sort of
7:25
beigey orange patch on their bum. Like
7:28
completely the same. I was
7:32
just like, oh my gosh, how is this happening? Do
7:36
you believe in miracles? Either of you? I
7:39
don't know. Would you call this miracle? I'm not sure. I
7:41
mean, I guess it could be, but I think
7:43
it's more of a case of fate. Yeah,
7:45
I'd say it's more fate than a miracle. So
7:47
you don't think that wind that blew the balloon
7:50
was just wind? Well, if it was
7:52
just wind, it was a very, very lucky
7:55
wind. The
7:57
chances just so likely there must be some.
8:00
What kind of reason? Maybe
8:03
we were meant to meet, I don't know.
8:05
But meant by whom? Or what? I don't
8:08
really. Every time we'll tell
8:10
it could actually be like, preparedness
8:12
for something else later in life. Maybe
8:16
when we're old grannies, we'll find out. No,
8:18
I'm just young and I'm just
8:20
enjoying life. Oh,
8:24
Jed, I mean, what do you look like? You know what you
8:26
are. What? You're a
8:28
destiny bully. What are you doing?
8:30
A destiny bully? Yes, because you... Something like a pop band
8:33
or something. No, it's what you're doing to those girls. No,
8:35
I wasn't trying to force God on them, if that's what
8:37
you mean. Yes, you're the one who says, oh... No,
8:40
no, I was trying to get to the
8:42
question of how should we think about
8:44
that story? Is our world
8:46
full of magic and meaning and coolness,
8:49
or is it all just chance? In
8:51
fact, that's what we're going to do with this whole
8:53
hour of Radio Library, when you discuss the role that
8:56
chance plays in so many things. In
8:58
the lottery, in the flipping of coins, and
9:00
deep as a ball. In us. Yes.
9:04
On Radio Library. I'm Jad Abumrod. I'm Robert Krowich. We're
9:06
about to get random, so stay with us. So
9:14
let's start with a very basic question. Let's.
9:17
Random sounds like it means
9:19
random. That is, anything can
9:21
happen at the next turn of the wheel.
9:23
Like your phone ringing, for example. Oh, sorry.
9:26
Random. Sorry. Although
9:28
it happened so many times, it is no longer random.
9:30
It's completely predictable. But it does have
9:32
a very nice kind of lilt to it, don't you
9:34
think? I'm going to sing with it now. And
9:38
now back to our
9:40
regularly scheduled program. So
9:54
let's say that something remarkable
9:56
happened. Like Dolores. Like
9:58
Dolores. Can you tell? Whether
10:00
this is just the random act
10:02
of an indifferent universe, or is
10:05
there something truly miraculous and wonderful about
10:07
it? Excellent question. Thank you very much.
10:09
Hi, we found you. So
10:12
this is Chad. Hi, this is Robert.
10:14
Hi, I'm Debra Nolan. I'm a professor
10:16
of statistics at the University of California, Berkeley.
10:19
The reason we'd come to see Deb Nolan at Berkeley
10:21
is because we'd heard that she plays this game. I
10:23
like to incorporate lots of classroom
10:25
activities and demos. One in particular has
10:28
to do with randomness. It's a game that helps
10:30
her students understand what real randomness
10:32
actually looks like. I don't know anything about
10:34
that. And it doesn't look like what you
10:36
would think. They called it a...
10:38
In any case, she takes us into her
10:40
classroom. That's a nice student. And
10:43
she sits us down. We all sit down.
10:45
We sit in a semi-circle. That sounds good.
10:48
And then she explains. Okay, I'm gonna divide the
10:50
group up into two. I'm gonna divide it
10:52
right here. She splits us up so that group one is
10:54
three of her students. I'm Joe Cheng. Richard
10:56
Liang. Margaret Taub. Group two, Chad
10:59
Abumrod. Robert Krollwich. It's us. And
11:01
the group here... She's pointing at us.
11:03
I'm gonna give you a penny. And I'm
11:05
gonna ask you to flip the coin a hundred
11:08
times. And the three
11:10
of you... She points to her students. Your
11:12
job is to pretend to flip a coin.
11:15
Meaning they just have to flip the coin in their heads. How do
11:17
you think that coin might land? Produce
11:20
a hundred fake coin flips. And
11:22
then, Deb leaves
11:24
the room. So
11:30
her students start whipping through their imaginary
11:33
fake flip... Tails. Tails. Tails. Echocorp,
11:36
hallelujah. While we...
11:44
Actually flip the coin. A hundred times. Head.
11:46
Head. Tail.
11:48
Tail. Tail.
11:50
Tail. Tail.
11:53
Head. Tail. Head. Tail.
11:57
Tail. and
12:00
put our strings of H's and T's on
12:02
point zero. Point zero. Yes. Well,
12:05
and then, Deb came back. Hello.
12:09
Here they are, huh? Let's see
12:11
what you look. Okay,
12:15
so on the board, you've got two sets of H's
12:17
and T's, which look pretty much the same to
12:20
us. But she looked at their list, the fakers,
12:22
and then she looked at our list, and
12:25
right away, she says, pointing at our list? This
12:27
is the real world. We
12:29
were like, how
12:32
did she do that? Well,
12:34
amazingly, the way she knew had to
12:36
do with one particular moment. Right.
12:39
Roll the tape back, and pipe it to a
12:41
moment right at the beginning of Power Coin. Nails
12:43
in here.
12:48
Nails. Nails.
12:51
Nails. They're in a room.
12:54
What a name. Another
12:57
nail. Nails. We
13:02
have way too many nails. Seven
13:14
tails in a row. It
13:17
was really spooky. Completely. Like
13:19
at any moment, a unicorn was going to come galloping in. That's
13:22
how weird it was. But as magical and unrandom
13:24
as it felt to us, that's
13:27
how she knew that we were the real flippers. As
13:29
soon as I saw the seven tails, and
13:31
then I looked over to the other board, and
13:34
there weren't any longer than four,
13:36
I think. That's how she knew. When
13:38
we asked one of the guys on the other team, why
13:40
didn't you put more streaks in your flips?
13:42
Well, he said, what do I think we don't think?
13:45
I was thinking if we did that too much, maybe
13:47
she would recognize that we were actually doing that on
13:49
purpose. In other words, those
13:51
streaks just feel wrong. And
13:53
that's the thing about randomness. Real randomness when
13:56
you see it, just doesn't
13:58
feel random enough. Ah,
14:02
it says that the truth is strange
14:04
things do happen by chance. Well,
14:13
it is hard for us to emotionally accept this.
14:15
Well, it finally made sense to us when we
14:18
spoke to this guy. Hi, Jed. Hi, Robert. That's
14:20
Jay Kohler. I'm a professor
14:22
of finance and professor of law at Arizona State University.
14:24
So here's how the epiphany happened. We were explaining to
14:26
Jay the unicorn experience in Debs classroom. We got one
14:28
tail, then we got a second, then we got a
14:31
third, then we got a seventh. And
14:33
somewhere in the conversation we started to do the
14:35
math. Okay, what actually are the
14:37
odds? Let me see. Was it heads in a row,
14:40
tails in a row? Tails. Seven tails in a row,
14:42
that's one half raised to the seventh power.
14:44
So we started to do the calculations and at
14:46
first... It looked
14:48
pretty good. 0.00,
14:51
a little more than one percent. Just over one percent chance. Yeah.
14:54
So it seemed at first that what
14:56
had happened in Debs class was super
14:58
unlikely. Right. But
15:00
then, Soren, our producer. Yeah, Soren. Had
15:03
to go and say this. You know, to be fair,
15:05
you should tell him that you actually flipped the coin
15:07
a hundred times. Oh, now you...
15:10
Wait, wait, you were holding back on me. We're
15:13
too stupid to know that. That's why we have
15:15
Soren here. Are you saying that somewhere in the
15:17
hundred flips you got a run of seven? That's
15:19
what we're saying. That's not a particularly good coincidence.
15:21
I'm sorry to burst the voice. What did you
15:23
mean? And then Jay explained it to us. Uh,
15:27
seven... If you're just doing seven flips,
15:30
then yeah, getting seven in a row
15:32
is really unlikely. But if you're doing multiple
15:34
sets of seven, 14 of those sets of
15:36
seven, which we were doing a hundred, then
15:38
the probabilities start to add up. It starts
15:41
small, like one percent. But then that one
15:43
becomes two, which becomes four, which becomes eight,
15:45
until when it's all said and done, the
15:47
chances of getting seven tails in a row
15:49
somewhere in a set of a hundred is...
15:54
Don't hold your breath. About one
15:56
in six chance. One in six. That's it. would
16:00
have gotten a string of seven. So
16:03
what felt spooky and almost twilight zonish
16:05
in the moment is actually- Not that
16:07
improbable. Oh. See, that's
16:09
why you don't want to know it. It doesn't
16:11
confirm your goosebumps. No, I think the goosebumps are
16:14
dead now. Oh, I'm sorry to
16:16
do that. I still enjoy life. The
16:20
problem, says Jay, is that we were so
16:22
focused on those seven flips in a row that
16:24
we'd forgotten about the other 93 that
16:27
weren't seven in a row. We'd
16:29
forgotten about what he calls the
16:31
background. We were too zoomed in.
16:33
So you've got to back the camera up and
16:35
pan around and look at the complete sample space.
16:37
And when you do that, he says, what you
16:40
will realize is the thing that felt
16:42
so special. Suddenly you see that it's not so odd
16:44
in its real context. And this
16:46
sad lesson goes way beyond
16:48
coins. You gave us this
16:51
example. 1985 and 1986, Evelyn Adams of New Jersey wins
16:55
the lottery twice. Back to back years.
16:58
Crazy improbable, right? So if you zoom
17:00
in all the way in, there
17:03
she is. Evelyn Adams standing outside of a
17:05
convenience store somewhere in New Jersey. She
17:11
is completely blown away for good reason. The
17:13
odds is that those two particular tickets would
17:15
become winning lottery tickets. They're 1 in 17.3
17:17
trillion. Wow. But
17:21
Jay would say if you pan the camera back, away
17:23
from Evelyn. Bye, Evelyn. If you
17:25
look at the whole world of
17:28
people buying lottery tickets, at this
17:30
vantage point, you can begin
17:32
to ask a different question. What are the odds that
17:34
somebody somewhere would win the lottery twice?
17:38
And in fact, the answer to that is it would
17:41
be very surprising if it didn't happen repeatedly. And
17:43
it has happened repeatedly. Really? For instance,
17:45
in Connecticut. Employees
17:48
of a place called the Shuttle Meadow Country
17:50
Club, they won twice. The man in Pennsylvania,
17:52
he won twice a few years later. In
17:54
California, retirees won a Fantasy
17:56
Five and the Super Lotto in the
17:59
same day. To
20:00
be totally honest, he's right. What?
20:02
What do you mean? Well, when I was
20:05
interviewing Dolores, I asked him a bunch of
20:07
questions, kind of scouting for similarities. What's your
20:09
favorite color, both of you? Blue, pink. Scrap
20:11
that. And what do you guys study in
20:13
school? Biology, chemistry, and geography. Whereas I'm
20:15
doing English and history and classical
20:17
civilization. Scrap that. What people do
20:19
is they try to make the story better by
20:22
showing more similarities. So you're saying that
20:24
somebody, I couldn't imagine who, doctored
20:27
the story? By
20:29
the way, I don't want to spoil anything. This is a trivial comment.
20:31
But I believe that one of the girls is actually nine. Well, almost
20:33
ten. And the other one was ten. Oh,
20:41
well, that's the story through it. Never mind. Yeah, I'm sorry
20:43
to be your most depressing guest. Nonetheless,
20:45
I will continue to tell the Laura
20:48
story every chance I get on the
20:50
air at parties, wherever. Because, you know,
20:53
damn, the statistics just makes me feel good. I think
20:56
Jay would agree with you. Well, first
20:58
of all, we love stories. It
21:00
connects us. It gives us insight into our
21:02
own lives. And I think it
21:05
also gives us a feeling that life is magical.
21:09
And maybe we don't have to call it
21:11
magic to enjoy the experience. In
21:13
fact, I was talking to the Laura's and I
21:15
asked them, what if a statistician were to walk
21:17
in the room right now and say to you,
21:19
this was bound to happen. Statistically, this was going
21:21
to happen sometime to
21:23
someone. Fair enough, really, because
21:25
it just happens to be us and
21:27
those statistics. Yeah, I mean, if that's
21:30
what the statistician thinks, I mean, yeah, I gave
21:32
him to him. They don't really care. The way
21:35
they see it, whatever was in that wind, whether it was
21:37
fate or just wind, doesn't
21:39
matter. We brought them together.
21:41
And now, they're friends. Radio Lab
21:52
will continue in a moment. Fact-Check
22:00
News, making science fun and
22:03
approachable. Audiences trust our
22:05
show and our fellow WNYC
22:07
studio podcasts, because they know
22:09
we're driven by a mission
22:11
to inform and serve listeners
22:13
first and foremost, and
22:15
our sponsors benefit from that
22:17
halo effect. For more information
22:19
on becoming a sponsor, visit
22:21
sponsorship.wnyc.org. Hey,
22:24
it's Lotsof
22:27
again. Just a quick note before we get back to
22:29
the episode. The story you're about to hear was reported
22:32
back in 2009 by journalist Jonah Lehrer, who years after
22:36
that got in trouble for fabricating quotes in
22:39
one of his books. We
22:41
have fact-checked this story, everything in it
22:43
held up, just so you know that
22:45
we know and now you know, you
22:48
know. Okay, back to Jad and Robert.
22:51
Hey, I'm Chad Abumrad. And I'm Robert
22:53
Krulwich. And we are talking on Radiolab
22:55
about things stochastic. Like coin flips and
22:57
lottery tickets. But let's just push this
22:59
whole argument another step forward if we
23:02
may. Which mean? Let's talk
23:04
about human beings. Pattern
23:08
rules the brain. This one
23:10
is about a woman, I believe her
23:12
name is Anne. I'm Anne
23:14
Keinsniper. I live
23:16
in a small country town where most
23:19
people know other people. Anne was
23:21
a high school English teacher. I taught
23:23
for 31 years. She now lives in
23:26
West Virginia. Wait, can you wait just a minute,
23:28
there's someone at my door. I'm sorry. No,
23:30
no, of course. Of course. Anne was
23:32
an upstanding citizen, went to church every
23:35
Sunday. Was just one of
23:37
those people who... Makes
23:39
the world go round. Makes the world
23:41
go round. I'm sorry. Not at all.
23:43
Anyway, in 1991, I would go
23:45
to the grocery store. And on
23:48
the occasions I wrote a check
23:50
for my groceries, the
23:52
woman would say, gosh, you're shaky.
23:55
And she says she began to notice that her hands
23:57
would start to tremble. Are you alright? thought
24:00
maybe it was because of working
24:03
that hard and trying
24:05
to get everything done. And
24:07
it got particularly bad when she said she
24:09
was just walking in the mall doing some
24:11
shopping. And I was
24:13
by myself walking and
24:16
it was like I stepped off a
24:18
step that wasn't there. It
24:21
was the first full-body tremor. She
24:24
fell. And then my husband
24:26
was a doctor and he
24:28
sent me to a neurologist who
24:31
diagnosed me with Parkinson's.
24:35
How old is she, by the way? She was
24:37
at that point in her early 50s. What is
24:39
Parkinson's? Parkinson's is the death of dopamine neurons
24:41
in the back of your brain, in the
24:43
part of your brain that controls bodily movement.
24:45
And so when these neurons die, the
24:48
end result is first
24:50
the shaking hand and the loss of feeling and
24:52
the loss of movement. And
24:54
of course the tremors get worse and
24:56
worse. But anyway... Well, the doctor diagnosed
24:58
with Parkinson's and he gives her a
25:01
drug called Requip. Requip was a new
25:04
medicine in 1992. It's
25:07
a pseudo dopamine. It basically mimics dopamine
25:09
in the synapse of the cells. And
25:12
it was like a
25:14
miracle drug for me. Her
25:19
tremors disappear, her symptoms disappear.
25:23
So she's cured her? If
25:25
you looked at her on Requip, years after she
25:27
had Parkinson's, you wouldn't notice anything. She would seem
25:29
symptom free. So
25:36
about seven or eight years go by, all the while
25:38
they're upping the doses to compensate for the cell loss
25:40
that's still taking place. And in the early years of
25:42
2000, something sort of unusual happened
25:44
to Anne. The friends of mine had
25:47
gone to Las Vegas every
25:50
year for the
25:53
basketball tournament, the
25:55
Final Four type thing. Yes,
26:00
but I like to go with them. And
26:03
I said, yes, I would. So
26:05
she went to watch basketball, but as often
26:07
happens in Vegas, one afternoon she and her
26:09
friends found themselves in a casino. Had you
26:11
ever gambled before this trip to Las Vegas?
26:14
No, I was raised in a
26:16
household that was fairly
26:18
religious, and we considered
26:20
gambling a sin. But as
26:23
she stood there in the casino in Vegas, she
26:25
had this inexplicable urge to go to the
26:27
slot machines. They had frogs
26:29
and princes and cars
26:31
and cherries and lemons. We'll
26:35
sit and see what the pictures
26:37
did. I've never taken
26:39
any drags. I don't know anything to
26:42
compare it to, but it was like
26:44
a high. That
26:47
was sort of the beginning of it. And
26:50
then when she comes back to West Virginia... I couldn't
26:52
wait to get to a machine I really
26:54
wanted to play. She discovers the dog
26:57
racing track, about
26:59
15 miles away from her house. I'd go to
27:01
the 730 video when they opened. And
27:04
that's where she would go, and they had a
27:07
white sort of slot machine. Hi,
27:11
how are you? If I had
27:13
the money, I'd play all day. From
27:15
7 to 3.30 in the morning. Whoa.
27:19
And then she would go home and
27:21
play slots... On the computer. On her
27:23
computer. Not even for money. Just
27:26
for the sheer visceral thrill. I
27:29
would play that the rest of the
27:31
night. 730 the next morning,
27:34
I'd be back at the joint. Hi,
27:36
how are you? Without
27:38
any sleep at all? No sleep, and she could keep that up
27:40
for several days in a row. At
27:43
the beginning of my gambling, I'd wake up
27:45
in the night and just scream out, oh,
27:47
God, what am I doing? Help
27:49
me, save me. But
27:52
eventually, I became too
27:54
hard-hearted, I guess, to even pay
27:56
attention to that. Her credit cards
27:58
are all maxed out. I sold my
28:01
mother's silver, I sold my silverware.
28:03
Things that should have been my
28:05
son's heirlooms. Stole from the safety
28:08
deposit box. She steals quarters from
28:10
her grandkids. Steals quarters from her
28:12
grandkids. Yeah. Anything I looked
28:14
at around the house, I thought I could
28:16
get money out of. Everyone
28:19
who knows her is watching her life fall apart. My
28:21
house was filthy dirty
28:23
and mess. I would take time
28:26
to eat in wash dishes. She
28:28
lives on peanut butter. I didn't have any
28:30
crackers or bread or anything. I just
28:32
had peanut butter. Because that's all she
28:34
can afford and still leave as much money as possible for
28:36
the slots. Even when I'd be at
28:38
church, I'd think, well, so many more
28:40
minutes or so many more hours I
28:42
can get a gamble. Her husband eventually
28:45
leaves her. I mean, I loved my husband,
28:47
but. They got divorced. There's just
28:50
no decision. Everything is gambling.
28:55
One of the neat things about gambling is
28:57
that you can do it by yourself. How
29:03
much money did you lose during those years, if
29:06
you don't mind me asking? I lost at
29:08
least $300,000. Which
29:13
to her is? Is all your life savings. And
29:15
it's one quarter at a time. Yeah,
29:17
that's the surreal part. I
29:21
tried several things. I
29:24
went to a rehab facility. My
29:28
father, I told you, I was racing
29:30
and really religious home. Sometimes
29:33
I would say my dad's watching me
29:36
for a therapy. He
29:39
wouldn't approve of this. He
29:41
wouldn't be so disappointed in me.
29:46
But seemingly, I
29:49
just couldn't stop. Let
29:54
me pause here for a second, Jed. I
29:56
want to just take a moment to try to figure
29:59
out what exactly is happening. happening to Anne. Yeah,
30:01
why can't she stop? Yeah. It
30:03
turns out there may be an explanation if you look into
30:05
her brain. Remember
30:07
earlier we talked about a little chemical called dopamine
30:09
and how she didn't have enough dopamine in her
30:12
brain so that was giving her some kind of
30:14
movement trouble, the Parkinson's. Right. It
30:16
also turns out to be the case that
30:18
any time you do something that
30:20
makes you feel good, your brain
30:23
spurts out dopamine. For years that's
30:25
how scientists saw dopamine as
30:27
the neurotransmitter of pleasure, the neurotransmitter of sex,
30:29
drugs, and rock and roll. But you
30:31
said earlier that dopamine has to do with movement. What
30:34
is the ultimate purpose of movement from the
30:36
perspective of evolution? It's to get you to
30:38
food, it's to get you to sex, it's
30:40
to get you to a reward. So that's
30:43
why the same circuits, the same chemical that
30:45
controls motivation, that controls what you want also
30:47
controls movement. But that
30:49
turned out it was a little more complicated than that.
30:53
In the mid 1970s a guy named Wolfram
30:55
Schultz decided to take a much closer look
30:57
and his subject was a monkey.
31:00
So he would put these very thin needles
31:02
that can record the activity of individual dopamine
31:04
neurons in the monkey brain. And
31:07
they'd put the monkey in a room
31:09
and then every day they would walk
31:11
down the hall to the room where
31:14
the monkey was, they'd open the door,
31:16
hello monkey. They'd flip on the light,
31:18
they'd give the monkey some juice, here
31:20
you go monkey. And then when the
31:23
monkey sipped the juice, dopamine. Happy
31:25
monkey. Right. He
31:27
soon discovered something very odd about these
31:30
neurons. As they
31:32
juiced this monkey gay, hello monkey. The
31:39
squirt of dopamine, which they were always measuring
31:41
in the monkey's brain, seemed to move forward
31:43
in time. What do you mean?
31:45
Well at first the dopamine hit when the monkey took
31:47
the sip of juice. But
31:50
after a while the monkey got the dopamine hit
31:52
when they entered the room and switched on the
31:55
light. Hello monkey.
31:57
After a few more times the dopamine hit when the monkey took the sip of
31:59
juice. When the researchers peeked, it
32:02
could be heard walking down the hall. You
32:06
see what's happening here? Hello monkey. Um,
32:08
not really? You have to bring it home
32:11
for me. A little bit. I'll do it again then.
32:14
What the monkey is trying to do
32:16
is piece together the sequence of events
32:19
that inevitably lead to juice. Exactly. That's
32:21
what these cells do. They try to
32:23
predict rewards. Oh,
32:26
so this isn't just about movement or
32:28
about feeling good. It's about finding the
32:30
pattern of the thing that makes you feel
32:32
good. Yeah. It's pattern finding. Oh,
32:34
this is pure pattern recognition. This
32:36
is essentially how your brain makes sense
32:38
of reality in some very primitive sense.
32:40
It parses reality in terms of rewards.
32:43
This is how you get more food in the wild. You
32:46
can see the reward before anyone else can. So
32:49
we're talking about like basic survival stuff here. There's
32:52
one other wrinkle though, methadopamine system
32:54
that makes casinos and slot machines
32:56
so tantalizing, which is that these
32:58
cells are all also programmed to
33:00
be very sensitive to surprising rewards.
33:02
So this seems to be, most scientists speculate that
33:05
this seems to be your brain's way of telling
33:07
you, pay attention. You just got something for free.
33:09
This must be good. Sit here in this nice,
33:11
comfy velvet chair and try to figure out this
33:13
reward. So now imagine Anne sitting
33:15
there at the slot machine. She
33:18
pushes the button on the machine. And
33:25
sirens and bells go off, coins
33:27
clang. And inside her head, her
33:31
dopamine, they're saying, this
33:34
is wonderful. But
33:36
now how did this happen? Where did this big
33:38
reward come from? What did you do this time?
33:40
Why are you so happy all of a sudden?
33:42
And start searching for something. Dead frogs and
33:44
fences and cherries. Was it the
33:46
number of cherries that she had just
33:48
before? Was it that this machine had
33:50
13 hits and this was the 14th?
33:53
I thought I could tell. It has
33:55
all kinds of pattern like things. It
33:57
has bells. It has lights. But
34:00
the problem is, is that there is
34:02
no pattern to find. There is no pattern.
34:04
It's inherently random. It's inherently unpredictable. And while
34:06
the rest of us might just, you know,
34:08
give up and walk away. God, I just
34:10
wasted a hundred bucks on this stupid machine.
34:13
I should go get lunch. Ann can't
34:15
go to lunch. Her dopamine system is
34:18
too powerful, too potent. Oh,
34:20
because of that drug she's taking.
34:22
Right. It keeps surging and surging,
34:24
forcing her neurons to fight, fight
34:26
hard, to find a pattern. That's
34:28
what's gripping her. Her brain is
34:30
intoxicated at the possibility that it
34:32
will learn how to succeed. That
34:35
it will crack an uncrackable code. She
34:41
told me a story about she would go
34:43
to buy milk and then spend
34:45
the next 12 hours with
34:48
the milk rotting next to her as
34:50
she puts quarter after quarter after quarter
34:52
into this machine. Were you surprised when
34:54
you learned that the medication might be
34:56
responsible for your gambling addiction? I mean,
34:59
someone said to me, this
35:02
medicine will cause compulsive gambling.
35:05
I thought they were crazy. It's
35:07
just at that time where the first studies
35:09
come out showing that this is actually a
35:11
common side effect of rec-rip. Really? So there
35:13
were other Anns appearing in other places? Same
35:16
deal? Absolutely. Basically,
35:19
after my neurologist sent me off
35:21
the recrip. Her compulsion
35:23
disappeared instantaneously. Almost immediately. That
35:26
fast. Well, it was been a
35:28
week I'd say. Wow. It was
35:30
gone. I haven't gambled for nearly
35:32
three years. Did her Parkinson's
35:35
return? Yeah. I have
35:37
a dreamers of that worth. I've
35:39
recently gotten a cane after walking.
35:42
I use a wall. So the price
35:44
of not being a gambling addict
35:46
is living with debilitating Parkinsonian symptoms.
35:48
About my son. Let me finish
35:50
about my son. When I told
35:52
him after the quick gambling I
35:54
said, son, I just sold
35:57
things that belong to you. that
36:00
you should have happen he said mom
36:05
that's just things that's
36:08
just really great to have you back
36:33
radio lab will continue in a moment hello
36:39
I'm jana boom rod and i'm robert krolwick
36:41
radio lab and our topic today is you
36:44
want to say the word
36:46
stochasticity stochasticity which is a
36:48
wonderful and fancy word that
36:50
essentially means randomness chance like
36:52
the kind built into flipping
36:55
a coin or playing lottery
36:57
or to take things deeper when
36:59
you breathe crow
37:02
which thing about the air that's flowing around your head right now
37:05
full of atoms and molecules they're
37:07
flying about smashing to each other
37:09
and colliding and shooting off different
37:12
trajectories can't be predicted it's totally
37:14
chaotic right mm-hmm until
37:17
you breathe it all in when
37:22
you do things get predictable the
37:31
point is when you breathe in all
37:34
of those chaotic fluxing molecules come in
37:36
and become a part of
37:38
the machinery that is you they
37:41
go into your blood they go into your cells
37:43
which are themselves these little factories full of even
37:46
tinier factories of mitochondria what are mitochondria
37:49
I'm not really sure but
37:51
I do know that's Jonah lara again himself
37:53
a factory of insight after he's full of
37:56
intricate things which which
37:58
work you can understand You know
38:00
this gene makes this protein which makes this
38:03
organ out which does this
38:05
thing for the cell This
38:10
process is Jonah taking in Flux
38:15
and giving it a shape Giving
38:19
it order that is what
38:21
life Does in fact you might
38:23
say it is the definition of life
38:25
the closer you get the more you kind of
38:27
stand in awe at the exquisite engineering
38:35
There is a sense of life is simply
38:37
the world's most elegant Now
38:50
if life is a machine you would
38:52
think that the most Clock
38:55
like most machining part of life would be
38:58
all the way down at the bottom I
39:00
would think so which for our purposes is
39:02
when a gene makes a protein gene This
39:07
is the basis of life so you would
39:09
think it's got to be orderly. It's got to
39:11
be predictable otherwise none
39:13
of us would be alive
39:17
It is a very predictable orderly
39:20
system, so we all
39:22
believe pretty amazing
39:26
But then we spoke to that guy am I talking
39:28
have I been have I been talking yeah, okay, and
39:30
he Mucked
39:32
things up. I'll be looking this way. Well.
39:34
What's your name? My name is Carl Zimmer He's
39:37
a science writer like Jonah I relit for the
39:39
New York Times and Scientific American and discover
39:41
I blog and he told
39:43
us that this whole genes making
39:45
protein situation As
39:48
tick tocky and affairs we've always assumed it to be in
39:51
fact Scientists have never actually
39:54
seen it. I mean it's very small,
39:56
but finally scientists have figured out a
39:58
way to turn on a
40:00
light when it happens so they now can see
40:02
a gene turning on a
40:05
protein. Literally say it with their own
40:07
eyes. Yeah. And what they saw was
40:10
astonishingly un-clock-like. At
40:13
the fundamental level, it's just sloppy.
40:16
Sloppy. And that's the best word for
40:19
it. In fact, in our interview, he
40:21
used that word like 42 times. Sloppy,
40:24
sloppy, sloppiness. Sloppiness.
40:26
Sometimes he uses this word. Random, fluctuating,
40:29
noise, chaos, noise. Definitely
40:32
use that one a lot.
40:34
No, no, noise, noisy, accident,
40:37
noisy, noise, noise, noise, noisy,
40:40
sloppy, chaotic noise, sloppiness, sloppy
40:42
and fluctuating. It fluctuates. It's
40:44
really crazy in there. He
40:48
started by telling us about this experiment that happened
40:50
in California at Caltech, involving a
40:52
little tiny bacteria called E. coli,
40:54
which is Carl's favorite. Indeed.
40:57
Yeah, so these are E. coli. These
41:00
are harmless residents of our gut.
41:03
And they're also- Would you call them creatures?
41:05
They're creatures, sure. They sense their world.
41:07
They make decisions. They feed. They reproduce.
41:10
They have genes like us. They've got
41:12
4,000 genes. I think they earn the
41:14
title creature. And these creatures are actually
41:16
very similar to our own cells. Their
41:18
genes make proteins just like ours. So
41:20
what these scientists did was they took
41:22
some E. coli that were exactly the
41:24
same. Clones. In every single
41:26
way. They're identical. And then they put the whole batch in
41:29
a dish. And they said, okay, everyone, we're
41:31
going to turn on your genes. Start making
41:33
proteins. Now. And
41:36
they watched. Because like you said
41:38
earlier, they had found this new way of getting the E. coli
41:40
to flow. Every
41:45
time it's genes, they made
41:47
a protein. It
41:49
seems like it ought to be like just flicking
41:51
a switch. Yeah, you turn on the genes. Click.
41:54
Protein, protein, protein, protein, protein, protein. Turn it off. Turn
41:57
it on. Protein, protein, protein, protein, protein, protein.
41:59
Turn it on. Couldn't get simpler. This is
42:01
like a basic function of biology. Yeah, this
42:03
is biology 101 and again These
42:05
are genetically identical E. coli meaning they've
42:08
got the same genes. They're making the same
42:10
protein So they should go the same
42:12
right? You just expect a steady glow And
42:17
all of them nice and steady And
42:21
that's not what happened You
42:24
could start with like an individual E. coli and
42:26
say okay. Well what happened with that one? It
42:29
didn't start to glow it started to
42:36
There'd be a little bit of light No
42:38
light a little bit more light Then
42:41
maybe a sudden flash Then
42:44
dark again and a little
42:46
bit of light Hmm and
42:49
they were expecting What
42:52
they got thing was Oh
42:55
It was completely defective like a
42:58
car with no muffler going More
43:02
troubling still when they looked at the cola number
43:04
two two was defective
43:08
except in its own unique way Two
43:12
had his own thing going same
43:14
with number three He
43:17
had his own thing going. I mean
43:19
they're genetically identical Same in
43:21
number four. This is essentially
43:23
the same creature in many different
43:25
copies and five Six
43:28
two five and seven each
43:30
one with click rings in its own
43:32
break Hey
44:03
Now this noise would not
44:05
be a problem if it's just bacteria we're talking about.
44:09
But according to Carl, it's everywhere. Everywhere
44:12
in us. We are built,
44:14
he says, on a foundation of
44:17
chaos. This is very puzzling to me because
44:20
if down at a deep
44:22
level of our DNA, there's
44:24
just this random mayhem. How
44:27
do you go from bedlam up
44:29
to the organization that I think I represent?
44:32
I wake up in the morning, I go
44:34
to sleep at night, I get hungry, I
44:36
eat, I breathe in, I breathe out. Listen
44:38
to my heart. I
44:43
am very, very orderly. I
44:48
don't know how you get from this to this.
44:56
That's right. I mean, so somehow,
44:59
all of this sloppiness has
45:01
got to be somehow tamed
45:04
because we're alive. I
45:06
mean, it's not total chaos in our bodies. But
45:09
you keep the sentence, never seems to quite fit it. But
45:12
we don't know how that happens? We
45:14
have some ideas of how it happens. As
45:16
scientists start to understand how genes
45:19
work with other genes, they can
45:21
see ways in which you can
45:25
filter out the noise
45:27
and keep the good signal, keep
45:29
the music. Okay, so do you want to sit
45:31
for a minute? Anywhere
45:35
really. Now, this I find really cool. The
45:37
research on this stuff is really
45:40
new, but Carl says one of
45:42
the ways that the body may
45:44
do this testing, hello, hello, may
45:46
go from like, to, is by
45:49
doing something that I actually do on the show all the time,
45:51
which is use a noise filter.
45:53
The body may have engineered some noise filters. I'll just
45:55
give you an example from my
45:57
world. This is the honest to God's truth. named
46:01
Little Wing Lee. Hello, Dad. In
46:04
my hands, I have two audio tapes. Little
46:06
Wing just recently called me up. She
46:08
said, I've got these two cassette tapes. They're really old. I
46:10
think they were made in the 70s. My
46:13
mom found them in her attic, and they're of my grandmother. One's
46:16
labeled Mima Singing. Singing? Singing
46:22
old slave songs, an old hymn. Now,
46:24
Little Wing's grandmother died last year. She
46:26
was 99 years old. Wow.
46:29
And they were really close. Yeah, very close. They
46:31
used to call me Little Mima when I was
46:34
a kid. So she's got these tapes. She wants to
46:36
hear them. The problem is, if you put it on for more than three
46:38
minutes, you get annoyed. And there's that weird,
46:40
like... It's too
46:42
noisy. She
46:45
wanted to know if I could do something about it. So,
46:47
real quick, here's what I did. I
46:49
put it into a computer, launched an
46:51
EQ program, found the bass noisiness, which
46:54
was around 600 hertz, dialed that down,
46:57
like so. Then I found the high frequencies,
47:00
which are around 2,000 hertz, dialed
47:03
that down. Now,
47:05
as a final step, I just kind of located the voice around
47:07
1,000 hertz and dialed
47:09
it up. Singing old slave
47:12
songs, yeah. Okay,
47:16
so it's not a flawless process. I mean, now she sounds like
47:18
she's coming out of a well. But for
47:20
the first time, you can hear her voice. I
47:22
don't know. This is the first time I'm
47:24
hearing this song. But it
47:26
seems like she's describing the night
47:30
that my grandfather passed away, talking
47:33
about the doctors telling
47:36
her that my grandfather has passed. And
47:39
then she's describing putting a fern in
47:41
his hand, and she said it should
47:44
be a rose. Singing
47:51
old slave songs, yeah. The
47:55
thing that's applicable here is that we started with this.
47:58
And Then just by bringing certain frequencies in,
48:00
the down and others up, we ended up
48:02
with this. This.
48:08
Might be how it is in the body. That. You've
48:11
got this noise all the way in the
48:13
bottom these genetic circus which were spitting out
48:15
messiness but some are just some top of
48:17
that are other of genetic circuits. Which.
48:19
Are cleaning it all up? Giving. It a
48:21
sat. Way what is
48:23
it? is an hour. I'm
48:25
not quite carrot cyan success.
48:29
And what was wrong with that?
48:31
Well in ourselves, there's no Grandma.
48:33
When you mean there's no grandma
48:35
who don't start off with some
48:37
very clear signal that gets masked
48:39
by noise. The. Noises Their from
48:41
the start. It's noise. And.
48:43
There would have a sudden you have this
48:45
beautiful song. Carl went on to explain it
48:48
to killing an hour for us to finally
48:50
get. This does nothing but noise down there
48:52
at the bottom and yet somehow the song
48:54
emerges like a phantom. Is. It
48:56
seems like the noise is somehow
48:59
filtering itself. Into music so
49:01
if to your gets eat algae right
49:03
little we would he job a tape
49:05
with just fragmented sound, little bit some
49:08
little bits of me my and all
49:10
kinds random ways maybe she gave you
49:12
eight or nine teeth. And
49:15
somehow he says it all starts. the gonna get
49:18
into a network with this one filters that one
49:20
and about one for the the other one. Young
49:22
ones will does that. Ninety one out of all
49:24
of that. Hum
49:27
grammar. Com
49:29
The song. To
49:31
Song of a Living
49:34
Regular Organism Nema literally
49:36
I mean grandma's are
49:38
made from chaos. Ah
49:40
a love that. Movie
49:43
like this one was like it's seems like
49:45
a miracle that like that stands up and
49:47
walks see. The thing is you've hit. I
49:49
mean we are talking about something that scientists
49:52
don't understand so I don't have so there's
49:54
none of. if if
49:56
you want to have a part of the show you
49:58
say has this be both is hop It
50:00
all works can't do that. No, but
50:02
here's the thing if you want to get
50:04
fruity about this You could say
50:06
and I put this to Carl that if all
50:09
the way down at the bottom of us There
50:11
is this fuzz it cannot be predicted then
50:14
in some sense We're free
50:17
to be whatever we want. Hmm. Well,
50:19
I Mean
50:22
look I can sit here and concentrate and I can
50:24
think any thought I want to
50:26
right Now
50:28
and you know sure but you can't think
50:31
about a poem from second century China Do
50:33
you do you think that do you think
50:35
could you make an equivalence between? loose
50:38
mechanics and sense of freedom
50:41
well You
50:44
know, I mean does the sloppiness and
50:46
the floppiness of a protein
50:49
clamping onto your DNA scale
50:52
up to What you're
50:54
gonna be when you grow up on radio love.
50:56
Yes Okay Hello,
51:17
this is Carl Zimmer The stochastic theme
51:19
song was created by Josh Kurtz and
51:21
Shane winter special. Thanks to little
51:23
wingly and me mom Visit
51:26
radio lab online at radio lab org
51:29
where you can comment on this show
51:31
ask random questions and hear the entire
51:34
Stochastic theme song. Anyways, this is
51:36
little wing Hi,
51:42
I'm Hazel and I'm from Silver Springs
51:45
Radio lab was created by Chad a bone map
51:47
is edited by Soren Wheeler Lulu
51:49
Miller and Latiff Nasser are co-hosts
51:52
Dylan Keith is our director of sound design Our
51:54
staff includes Simon Adler
51:57
Jeremy bloom Becca Bressler it
51:59
can Eddie Foster Keese, W. Harry
52:02
Fortuna, David Gable, Maria Paz
52:04
Catieres, Sindhu Nainesam
52:06
Badan, Matt Keelty, Annie
52:08
McEwen, Alex Neeson, Sara
52:11
Khari, Alyssa Strong-Harry,
52:13
Sarah Sandbach, Arianne Wack, Pat
52:15
Walters, and Molly Webster. Our
52:17
fact checkers are Diane Kelly,
52:20
Emily Krueger, and Natalie Middleton.
52:23
Thank you. Hi,
52:26
this is Tamara from Pasadena,
52:28
California. Leadership support for
52:31
Radiolab science programming is provided
52:33
by the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation,
52:36
Science Sandbox, a Simons Foundation
52:38
initiative, and the
52:40
John Templeton Foundation. Foundational
52:43
support for Radiolab was provided
52:45
by the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More