Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
Pod Save America is brought to you by Books. This
0:02
Mother's Day, give mom her flowers. She deserves
0:04
the best. That's why you should send her
0:06
farm fresh flowers from Books. That's
0:08
short for bouquets. And right now you can get 25%
0:10
off your entire Books purchase.
0:13
Here's why everyone likes the Books company. Books
0:15
is different. Their flowers are cut fresh and
0:18
sourced directly from the best flower farms. So
0:20
they can last way longer. They even have
0:22
flowers grown on the side of a volcano.
0:24
Wow. Books has modern designs and
0:26
unique flowers you can't find anywhere else. Books
0:28
is simple. You go online, pick the delivery date
0:30
and you're done. Mother's Day is
0:33
May 12th. Don't miss
0:35
the chance to thank your mom. Order your Books now.
0:37
And with 20% off, you can send
0:39
some to mom, wife, aunt, and even
0:41
grandma. I am very happy
0:44
that I'm reading this ad because now I'm
0:46
remembering when Mother's Day is and I'm gonna order
0:49
a whole bunch of Books because they're fantastic flowers.
0:51
Go to books.com and use promo code Cricut for 25% off. That's
0:55
b-o-u-q-s.com, promo code
0:57
Cricut. Books, promo
0:59
code Cricut. Hey y'all,
1:01
it's Tim Miller, Cricut Media's favorite Cuck-servative.
1:03
I'm now hosting the Daily Bulwark Podcast,
1:05
which comes out every weekday afternoon, rain
1:07
or shine, hangover or no hangover. Here's
1:10
what's special about this podcast and my
1:12
colleagues at the Bulwark. We
1:14
are all united in a mission to defend
1:16
democracy from the burnt sienna buffoon. And
1:18
as outcast Republicans, we have no future career
1:20
prospects. So we're free to tell you what
1:23
we really think. So check out my Daily
1:25
Bulwark Podcast. Or if once a week is
1:27
more your speed, there's Lovett's Guilty Pleasure, the
1:29
next level podcast, featuring me with my colleagues,
1:31
Sarah Longwell and JVL. Check it out, peace.
1:56
Welcome to Ponce of America. I'm Jon
1:58
Lovett and joining us. You
2:01
know him from the bulwark. You
2:03
know him from MSNBC. You
2:07
know him from being a little drunk alive with love
2:10
and eliteness. That's right. It's Tim Miller.
2:12
Thanks for being here. How you doing, brother? Thanks
2:14
for being here, Tim. I'm so excited. I think
2:16
this is official now. I just for listeners, you
2:18
know, you might have somebody in your life that
2:20
was maybe a friend of me at one stage
2:23
and maybe you have a little tension with at
2:25
one point over the years you
2:27
grow and you grow a
2:29
bond and appreciation for one another and it
2:31
blossoms into a real friendship.
2:34
I feel like that's officially happened right now
2:36
at this moment. And just so everybody knows,
2:38
his audio did break up for a second.
2:42
He said sexual tension. Yeah,
2:46
well that's what we had at one point. But
2:48
I'm just saying now it's blossomed. It's something deeper.
2:50
It is nice. It is nice. It's
2:52
something like, you don't know that this is coming. 20
2:54
year olds out there, this is happening for you in
2:56
your 40s. There's somebody in your life right now and
2:58
you're like, that guy? Never. But then
3:00
when you're 40, you're like, wow, we like each other a
3:02
lot. I never said never. But maybe
3:04
you did and that's fine. Yes, when you're 20, you don't
3:07
know what it's like to be an adult for 20 years.
3:10
I know. That's the beauty of it. Anyway,
3:12
let's talk about Gaza. But speaking of... Yeah,
3:16
and also people that have been adults for 50
3:19
years and don't seem to show it. We have
3:21
a packed show today. Donald Trump spent some of
3:23
his precious time outside of a courtroom to do
3:25
a good old fashioned sit down interview with Time
3:27
magazine, laying out his vision
3:29
for a second term. And it's worrying.
3:31
The Biden administration is reclassifying marijuana as
3:34
a less dangerous drug while student protests
3:36
envelop campus buildings and our national attention.
3:38
Marjorie Taylor Greene makes her
3:40
move. Plus the vice president sits down
3:42
with Drew Barrymore and it makes everyone
3:44
a little uncomfortable. Okay, first up. He
3:49
did something that feels like it's from another era. He
3:52
sat down for an interview with
3:54
Time magazine in Palm Beach, lasted
3:56
over an hour. All
3:59
the Palm Beach... and circumstance, the description of
4:01
the room, the transcript
4:04
has the aid coming in and saying,
4:06
Mr. Trump has to get to dinner.
4:08
We get some color about the playlist.
4:10
It's the same playlist, Sinead O'Connor, January
4:14
6th choir, the two genders. And
4:18
then they did a follow-up 20-minute conversation.
4:20
So we'll get to all
4:22
the details, but were
4:24
you surprised, Tim, to see
4:26
Donald Trump spend an hour doing this?
4:30
I was. I have to be honest. There
4:32
is a print time magazine, like a piers, that
4:35
you can get now. Is that, that still exists?
4:37
So that was, it
4:41
all made sense once I realized that still
4:43
existed. I personally did not know that. I
4:45
thought time had gone fully digital. And I
4:47
was like, Mr. Trump might be an idiot,
4:49
you know, and he might have the wool
4:51
pulled over his eyes a couple of times,
4:53
but he certainly would not do an interview
4:55
because he wanted a fake digital cover. And
4:57
this man would require a real physical cover.
5:00
And then he would do an interview where
5:02
he shames himself and really freaks everybody out
5:04
about what a Trump term would look like
5:06
and provides a political gift to Joe Biden.
5:08
So I do, it makes
5:11
sense for then, once I knew that, that
5:13
Trump could have the time cover that he
5:15
could frame, because that's what he really
5:17
values. And then once I interviewed
5:20
the reporter this morning, Eric
5:22
Cordalesa, and great reporter, tough
5:24
interview. So please don't take this
5:26
the wrong way, Eric, but he does give off like,
5:28
I got drunk with Madison Cawthorn at a
5:30
Duke lacrosse party vibes. And so
5:33
like once I spent more time talking to
5:35
him, I was like, Oh yeah, okay, this
5:37
makes sense. The Trump people felt like this
5:39
guy was one of them, you know, he's
5:41
going to get his cover and,
5:43
you know, consequences be damned. Yeah.
5:45
So, you know, the
5:49
1980s Trump brain is, Oh, Time Magazine. I want to be
5:51
on Time Magazine. I want to be on the cover of
5:53
Time Magazine. And it, yes, I
5:55
do. I also associate Time Magazine now with
5:57
the kind of downfall of Newsweek. And
6:01
us it's different but it's different but
6:03
there was the other piece of this too Which is I like
6:06
let's say you you were thinking about this in a more traditional
6:08
way The idea behind sitting
6:10
down for a long print interview like that. There's
6:12
no video. There's no audio. That's just a transcript
6:16
Was that there was some there was
6:18
some value to getting out to elite
6:20
news followers to
6:23
journalists to close Watchers
6:26
of politics the the vision
6:28
the kind of detailed Vision
6:31
that you wouldn't get on a stump speech
6:33
that you wouldn't won't get in shorter television
6:35
hits to give people the context of what
6:37
Trump's trying to do. I don't believe they
6:39
were doing anything as sophisticated as
6:41
that but if they were What
6:44
on earth were they hoping to accomplish? By
6:47
having the president the former
6:49
president walk through all this stuff Yeah,
6:53
they wanted to accomplish the physical
6:55
okay once the bridge I
6:58
just cannot emphasize what he wants the framed
7:00
magazine cover I know he's already been the
7:02
president feels like that seems like small ball
7:05
for him, but that's what he wanted Okay
7:07
granted that now moving on what was their
7:09
strategy beyond that? I really I do not
7:11
know I I do not know
7:13
I don't it doesn't seem like he went into
7:15
the interview I'm going back to my days You
7:17
know we certainly had some fails with my candidates
7:19
But if Jeb was gonna do a long sit-down
7:22
interview certainly sometimes he would get stumped or he'd
7:24
say something wrong or but But we would at
7:26
least have like a a proactive message
7:28
We were trying to get across right that you
7:30
would that if you looked at the transcript You
7:32
could see that he was coming back to this
7:34
whether it was an issue or whether it was
7:36
a argument So he's trying to put forth that
7:38
was not what this was I it is total
7:40
stream of consciousness Donald Trump It's
7:43
indistinguishable from his rallies Except
7:46
for the fact that the
7:48
reporter Eric got to kind of
7:50
direct him Into some
7:52
you know into like a briar
7:55
pet a little bit on abortion
7:57
in particular But also some
7:59
on some other issues and there was no sign
8:01
that they had like a proactive message that
8:04
they were trying to get across. Yeah. So
8:07
let's go through this. So it was wide ranging. He says
8:09
a lot. He also refuses to say a lot. For
8:12
example, he wouldn't say he'd veto a national
8:14
abortion ban. He wouldn't say defend Taiwan. He
8:16
wouldn't say he supports a two state solution
8:18
between Israel and Palestine. He wouldn't commit to
8:21
supporting Ukraine's defense. Almost immediately
8:23
the Biden campaign went on offense with the
8:25
interview, in particular on Trump's abortion comments, not
8:27
just refusing to say he'd veto a ban,
8:29
but when asked whether states should monitor women's
8:31
pregnancies to see if they violated an abortion
8:34
ban, Trump said, I think they might do
8:36
that. On abortion, what jumped
8:38
out at you? And then we can go beyond
8:40
that. Yeah. Well,
8:42
on abortion, that was like the
8:44
Chris Matthews moment. And Trump has struggled with this for
8:46
nine years because he is faking it, right? I mean,
8:49
that doesn't make the threat any more
8:51
real to vulnerable women about the laws that
8:53
would be put in place by the types
8:55
of people that Trump appoints, judgeships
8:57
in particular, but also into regulatory
9:00
positions. But he personally, obviously
9:02
doesn't care. And so he doesn't know how to
9:05
speak the language of pro-lifers. Somebody
9:07
who's a genuine pro-lifer, I think,
9:09
would at least be astute enough to be able to
9:13
move around the question of, are
9:16
you comfortable with states monitoring women's
9:18
pregnancies? And he feels
9:20
like just by saying, oh, well,
9:22
states get to decide, like that's some amulet that like
9:24
protects him from all criticism on this, right? That he's
9:27
like, oh, I don't know. I guess I'm comfortable if
9:29
the states decide to do it, the states decide to
9:31
do it. And that is a
9:33
crazy view, right, that is going to
9:35
be very useful to Biden, it adds,
9:37
where he says essentially, if during
9:40
a Trump presidency, states want to monitor
9:42
women's pregnancies so they can determine how
9:44
far along they are in the gestational
9:46
period in order to determine whether
9:49
or not they would have access to an
9:51
abortion. That
9:53
is deep state 1984 type
9:56
shit targeting women. And
9:59
he just walked right into it, I think in
10:01
large part because he hasn't thought about this stuff
10:03
deeply at all, never even occurred to him that
10:05
there might be a question about whether a woman
10:08
is at six weeks or nine weeks. None
10:10
of this stuff, he hasn't thought through any of this. He's just
10:12
like, yeah, I guess if the states want to monitor women, they're
10:14
going to monitor women. Yeah, he
10:16
also, I think, he views himself as
10:19
being very adept at these politics now.
10:21
At one point he says, did
10:23
you see everyone adopted my IVF position?
10:26
He was asked about what his policy position
10:28
is going to be on Mipha Pristone. His
10:30
only response, by the way, he didn't say
10:33
what it would be, but he says, it
10:35
won't be very surprising, which I took to
10:37
mean whatever he says, he really hopes people
10:39
don't pay too much attention to it. What
10:42
else jumped out at you? Yeah. The
10:44
Mipha Pristone thing was funny because he says
10:46
in the first interview, which is poolside with
10:49
the Cougars at Mar-a-Lago and
10:51
the well-done stakes during
10:53
that first interview, he's asked about
10:55
his position on Mipha Pristone and
10:57
he's like, I've got a great plan, won't be
10:59
that surprising, it'll be out in two weeks. Then
11:02
there's a follow-up phone interview two weeks later
11:04
and the first question is, are you ready
11:06
to share your Mipha Pristone? Another
11:08
two weeks, it's just like the Obamacare,
11:11
the healthcare plan. So he
11:13
still doesn't have that. But
11:15
again, I think part of that, I did wonder
11:17
if during the first interview he did, if he
11:19
knew what Mipha Pristone was, and he was buying
11:22
himself two weeks, but you'd think by the second
11:24
interview he would and maybe he's just trying to
11:26
dodge. By the time, because it's similar to the
11:28
IVF, this takes you out of into
11:31
even pro-life people,
11:33
right, like are
11:35
horrified by the idea that
11:37
women might not have access
11:39
to Mipha Pristone in like
11:41
the first days after having
11:44
sex. There are people that
11:46
would support a 15-week ban that think
11:48
it's crazy that the states want to
11:50
ban access to
11:52
Mipha Pristone, for example. And
11:54
so that gets him to a really dicey position
11:56
if he doesn't have a clear answer on that.
12:00
that and he did it over the course of two
12:02
interviews because again I think that he thinks that he's
12:04
got to get out of jail free card here
12:06
with this the states can decide thing but obviously once
12:08
you get, if you're going to sit down with time
12:11
for an hour and a half there are a
12:13
lot of holes and the states can decide. Yes and
12:15
his ignorance on this is a feature
12:17
for the kooks
12:20
around him who are already planning
12:23
to put in use
12:25
an old federal law to make it
12:27
impossible to mail abortion
12:30
drugs to people and to use and deploy
12:32
the federal government all kinds of ways to
12:35
make abortion inaccessible even if they
12:37
don't pass a national law even if it
12:39
still continues to be technically legal in
12:41
liberal states. So it's you know he can say I don't
12:44
want to see it too much from what Trump's perspective is
12:46
in a lot of ways it won't matter because will he
12:48
stand in the way of Congress passes a ban of course
12:50
not. Will he stop some schedule
12:53
efflunkie from doing something horrible
12:56
in an agency? Of course he won't. He won't have
12:58
the discipline or attention span to focus on it. This
13:01
is why just really quick on that this is why
13:03
I think that to me the most telling part of
13:05
the interview because of exactly what you're saying it's
13:07
kind of like who cares what Trump's like random
13:09
blurts out are on these various policies
13:12
in some ways and directionally we should care but
13:15
like on the details what
13:17
matters is going to be people around him and at one
13:19
point he was asked what he thinks
13:21
about this notion about hiring people who don't
13:24
believe in the 2020 election front like should
13:27
that be a litmus test for people that
13:29
would be hired into your administration and Trump
13:31
says essentially yes in kind of garbled Trump
13:33
words like yes I would only want I
13:35
would feel very you know he said something
13:38
like I'd feel very strongly against you know
13:40
somebody is too stupid to realize that the
13:42
election was stolen from me. Now to me
13:44
that just puts all this in a very
13:47
important perspective which is like they're going to
13:49
be much more judicious
13:51
is maybe the wrong word careful about hiring
13:53
the kookiest people possible right and like the
13:55
types yeah and so I thought that to me
13:58
was as revealing as any of the policies. stuff
14:00
in the interview and as concerned. Yes, I want to get to that in one
14:02
second. Before I want to get to the implementation because I do think that is,
14:04
I agree with you, it's just as important. Before
14:06
we get to that, were there any other policy points
14:08
that he made or that the piece makes that jumps out?
14:11
One, that his number one agenda item
14:13
when he comes in is going to be extending the Bush
14:15
tax cuts that some
14:17
of those tax cuts for the
14:20
wealthy expire, including the doubling of
14:22
the estate tax deduction, that those
14:24
things all expire in 2025. So
14:26
one of his first orders of business is going to be
14:28
tax cuts for the wealthy in addition to a border bill
14:31
because of course he killed the border bill. Were
14:33
there any other policy positions that jumped out
14:35
at you? Yeah, well
14:37
two. As a free market capitalist, the
14:39
thing that stood out to me was the 10% across
14:42
the board tariffs, which
14:44
is an absolutely insane policy that if
14:46
people are concerned about prices, will
14:48
be disastrous. And he has, just in general,
14:51
I think it's frustrating to get this across
14:53
to people, he
14:56
says that he's going to fight
14:58
the inflationary, the Biden-flation, right? His policies
15:00
are going to stop inflation, but every
15:02
policy he has is inflationary. Extending
15:05
the Bush tax cuts is inflationary, fewer immigrants
15:07
into the country is inflationary because
15:09
that affects the number of people
15:12
that we have in the workforce. Tariffs
15:14
are obviously inflationary. So is
15:17
there a way to make that message for
15:19
Biden? I think it's kind of a tough message
15:21
for Biden to actually implement in a
15:23
campaign setting but to me, maybe
15:25
that's something for Nikki Haley voters that we can
15:27
use. And then as someone
15:30
who has feelings and compassion, the
15:33
deportation plans are absolutely insane.
15:37
And he goes along every step the reporter asks
15:39
him, he's like, well, would you call in the
15:41
National Guard? Yes. Would you call
15:43
in the military? Yes. How are
15:45
you actually going to implement this? Local
15:47
police forces, we're going to have local
15:49
cops being our deportation troopers.
15:53
And if a local police force
15:55
doesn't want to be part of the Donald
15:57
Trump deportation effort,
16:00
where he specifically cites Operation Wetback, then
16:02
he's like, well, then we'll stop funding
16:04
them. Like, we're gonna not give funds
16:06
to police, you know, to local police,
16:08
you know, so we're gonna defund the
16:10
police that will not
16:13
do illegal deportations. So,
16:15
I mean, obviously, I think that is the most
16:17
alarming. And the thing that I
16:19
would be also the most scared about
16:21
being actually implemented if he were to
16:23
win, because he, it's the one area
16:25
where he already has a team of competent
16:27
sociopaths around him, led by Stephen Miller, who
16:29
would be able to execute on it. Yeah,
16:31
and they already, by the way, you know,
16:33
when they did family separation, it
16:35
was pushed
16:37
back from what you
16:39
could call the old guard inside the
16:42
administration, plus congressional Republicans, plus political pressure,
16:45
ordinary political pressure that caused them
16:47
to at least, you know, sort of second
16:49
guess what they were doing. I don't think
16:51
those guardrails exist in a second term.
16:54
No, I mean, and you could
16:56
see like that great, I forget who wrote
16:58
it, I feel like I should credit her,
17:01
but the great Atlantic profile that went in
17:03
so deep into the child separation and how
17:05
it actually happened, like the TikTok of it,
17:07
what it revealed was it really only took
17:10
Stephen Miller sessions and there was one
17:12
other person who were adamant about it
17:14
and who just kept pushing and pushing
17:16
it, every restraint in
17:18
the bureaucracy. And
17:21
so if you now just imagine a
17:23
situation where those bureaucratic restraints
17:26
are, you know, mostly excise to the schedule F
17:28
changes that they've talked about and they've, and they,
17:30
instead of just having two or three people who
17:32
are like really get off on child separation, you
17:34
have like three or four times more of that,
17:36
you know, to get brought in because
17:38
they've done a more thorough vetting job of
17:41
staff to ensure that they're fully on board
17:43
with these deportation plans. I
17:45
mean, I think that it's really, is really
17:47
scary and it's really kind of hard to calculate how
17:50
much more damage they could do to immigrants
17:52
and migrants. And
17:54
by the way, using schedule F to threaten people who
17:57
might otherwise have to go along. on
18:00
top of that, using the pardon power to
18:02
give cover to people who are worried that
18:04
they're doing something that's illegal. And I think
18:07
that's the most pernicious thing about his pardoning.
18:09
You know, about how I'm going to pardon
18:11
all the January 6 folks. Last time I
18:13
pardoned Bannon, I pardoned Manafort. Now he basically
18:16
would be sending a signal to, you know,
18:19
the shock troops, as Bannon calls them, that
18:21
like they can go ahead and not worry
18:23
if they're running afoul of
18:25
various immigration laws while they execute
18:28
these deportations, because if some, you
18:30
know, rogue liberal judge that Joe
18:32
Biden appointed or some prosecutor
18:34
goes after them, Trump will just pardon them.
18:36
So I think the combining of the pardon
18:38
with the Schedule F, I think like really
18:40
creates a very different environment for them in
18:42
a second term. So I'm
18:44
glad you pulled out the tariffs
18:46
and immigration. I think
18:48
the immigration policy is absolutely horrifying, but I do
18:51
want to get mercenary
18:54
about it. One
18:57
of the challenges, right, is you want to tell
18:59
people on imports, right? Hey, if
19:01
Trump puts a 10% tariff on all these
19:03
imports, it's actually going to cause the kind
19:05
of inflation that's been bothering you for years.
19:08
But I do think the problem is that a lot of people sort
19:11
this into a made
19:13
in America, American manufacturing
19:15
bucket, rightfully so. But
19:19
I worry a little bit that when we fight
19:21
back against that
19:24
kind of a policy, it's tough to do because you
19:26
end up sound, you don't want to sound like a
19:28
2000s era Democrat talking about
19:31
how good NAFTA is going to be. And
19:34
then you got Ross Perot talking about the sucking
19:37
sound of American jobs. How
19:39
do you talk about a policy that I have a
19:41
feeling, at the very least,
19:43
is one that like maybe
19:46
people have mixed feelings about because they
19:48
do worry about manufacturing and
19:50
they do want jobs to be in the U.S.? Yeah, and
19:52
Joe Biden kept it a lot of his tariffs, right? And
19:55
he doesn't have a clean message on that.
19:57
To me, I think it's a negative message.
20:00
That. Is specifically targeted towards my people. like
20:02
the Haley voters, the former republicans right? That's
20:04
like I don't know maybe this is mayor
20:06
running these ads just on breath air shower.
20:08
Something at us are in the Wall Street
20:10
Journal butts. I think if you combine that
20:12
that eight Trump was actually pretty. been to
20:14
Bb to an hour to get into that
20:16
stuff later but Trump was pretty harsh on
20:18
Israel I don't think can be seen as
20:20
reliable partner for Israel's They send his comments
20:22
this interview at the Terrorists you combine the
20:24
threats to take out of Nato. You know
20:26
this is Alice you'd segment of the population
20:28
but I think that you can micro target.
20:30
Some people in the Atlanta silly burbs you
20:32
know that have been traditional republican voters that
20:34
also responsive to the democracy message he could
20:36
layer on top of that disguise can do
20:38
a ten percent to they do. I go
20:40
back for that. Pro: like that the ten
20:42
percent tax on terror of their assigned to
20:44
it like I went like this is gonna
20:46
be harm others As you know anti market
20:48
is going to increase costs so I think
20:50
it's more useful for that group to use
20:53
it to say to like working class people
20:55
that are worried about prices a grocery store
20:57
other now it feels like a bank shot
20:59
and at the campaign. Pry of better arguments.
21:02
He was all over the place on.
21:04
His. Own house and hims all over the place. On
21:07
B B, it's actually very hard to figure out what
21:09
he's even saying that this is is always the problem
21:11
and anyone tries to kind of. I
21:13
don't know. mediate what Trump says into something
21:15
coherent that did the and about us on
21:17
a judgment of the of the journalists at
21:20
a Piece to the Peace like they're like
21:22
he is contradictory and I do things like.
21:24
That. The reporter really does follow ups
21:26
and push back and come back to Thanks Trump
21:29
is just. You. Know he's just it's
21:31
it's santa your fingers but he's but
21:33
just it. Here's what he said. About.
21:35
Whether or not there should be a two state solution. Most.
21:38
people thought it was going to be a two
21:40
state solution i'm not sure to it's a solution
21:43
anymore as gonna work everybody was talking about two
21:45
states even when i was there i was saying
21:47
what do you like year deal like to states
21:49
now people are going back to it depends where
21:52
you are everyday changes now if israel making progress
21:54
they don't want to states they want everything and
21:56
of israel's not making progress sometimes they talk about
21:58
two state solution to say solution seemed to be
22:00
the idea that people liked most, the policy or
22:03
the idea that people liked above. Do
22:05
you like it? Says the reporter. It depends
22:07
when. There was a time when I
22:09
thought two states could work. Now I think two states is
22:11
going to be very, very tough. I think it's going to
22:13
be much tougher to get. I also think you have fewer
22:15
people that like the idea. You had a lot of people
22:17
that liked the idea four years ago. Today you have far
22:19
fewer people that like the idea. He
22:22
goes on to mention that Sheldon Adelson was
22:24
against two states, I think, later on at
22:26
a different digression. We're not sending our best
22:28
here. You
22:31
mentioned this a few minutes ago. It's
22:33
not just about what he's promising. It's how he's promising to
22:36
implement it. Trump learned a lot
22:38
of bad lessons during
22:40
the first term, including
22:42
the danger of being surrounded by anyone
22:45
who has their own reputation to protect.
22:48
What jumped out at you in
22:50
terms of how differently he'd
22:53
go about a second term? He talks about
22:55
how he wouldn't wait for people to quit
22:57
now. He'd fire them. You
22:59
mentioned schedule F. What jumped out at you? To
23:06
me it's really that litmus test thing just
23:08
because it's so insane. We
23:14
say this. It's almost cliche to be like,
23:16
oh, it's a cult. It is
23:18
kind of a cult. In
23:21
order to join this administration,
23:23
you have to at least pay
23:25
lip service to denying reality. That
23:29
sets a tone. It sets
23:31
a tone with the pardons. It sets a tone for
23:33
the existing people that they know that they could be
23:35
fired, where it's like now you have to watch yourself.
23:38
I might have told this on this podcast before. I
23:40
forget, but I had a friend that was working at
23:42
the RNC that was one of the quote unquote good
23:44
ones who stuck around. He was a lifer at the
23:46
RNC. On a couple conference calls,
23:49
he's like, I don't know about this thing Mr. Trump
23:51
is saying. It's a little crazy. I
23:53
don't know that the RNC needs to echo this. He
23:55
did it like two or three times. Jared
23:57
Kushner was out on any of these calls. And
24:00
he gets a call from Jared Kushner out of the blue
24:02
one day. He's like, are you good? Are we all good?
24:04
Is everybody on the same page? And
24:06
that kind of mafioso attitude,
24:10
which they had in the first term,
24:13
but they didn't know how to implement.
24:15
I think if you just listen to him
24:17
now, that's the one thing where it's like,
24:20
they've got a handle on that now. They
24:22
might have people around who aren't true believers,
24:24
but they're going to be the types of
24:26
people who are sociopathic enough to not
24:29
ever reveal that they're not a true believer. Yeah.
24:32
I also think it does something else that's
24:34
also pernicious, which is
24:37
it makes signing on to
24:39
be part of this administration a door
24:42
that locks behind you. Ronna
24:44
McDaniel thought that she was clean
24:47
because everybody knew wink, wink, she
24:49
wasn't a real Trump person. She
24:51
just became one on television. Even
24:55
NBC higher up executives thought, oh, they
24:57
sorted her into the serious old
25:00
school Republican bucket, not the Magma
25:02
Maniac bucket. But because she had
25:04
done so much to defend the lie, there
25:07
was enough of an uproar that made it impossible
25:09
for her to be treated like a, be
25:12
part of polite society. And so
25:14
now you say to these people, if you want to
25:16
be part of Trump world, you've got to sign on
25:18
to this. He
25:22
takes away people's escape ramp. And I do think that
25:24
that makes people more beholden to him, which I also
25:26
think is part of this. Totally agree.
25:28
The other piece of this
25:30
is there are a lot of people thinking
25:32
very hard around Trump, not Trump, about
25:35
how he can better use federal power.
25:38
I saw a blast from the past
25:40
phrase, the unitary executive theory back
25:42
from the Bush administration. They also
25:45
talk about trying to get the president
25:47
more authority to not spend
25:49
money Congress has appropriated, right?
25:52
This would be for everything from not sending money
25:54
to the police to not funding social safety net
25:57
programs. Did any of that come
25:59
out to you? It's not been a good
26:01
quarter century for the Libertarians among us. I'm
26:04
actually an Exeteri Executive there. Look,
26:08
it did. And I think that, again, when I talk to...
26:14
My old friends don't talk to me anymore, because
26:17
there's the betrayal, obviously. Some
26:19
of the MAGA folks will
26:21
talk to me, though,
26:23
because they just, whatever, they always saw
26:25
me as an enemy. And the
26:28
one of them, as an enemy
26:30
within, and now I'm an enemy without, in some ways
26:33
I'm less threatening. And so when
26:35
I talk to them, this is what they talk
26:37
about all the time, like that
26:39
they've had to have learned from the
26:41
first term, right? That consolidating
26:44
power within the executive, that there was a
26:46
lot of deferring, Trump didn't know any better.
26:48
Trump was not really happy to kind of
26:50
let Paul Ryan do the legislating and Mitch
26:53
McConnell. He had Paul and Mitch. He got
26:55
to do the fun stuff. They did the
26:57
dirty work, right? And the mindset
26:59
is totally different now. A couple quick things before
27:01
we go to break. Are you ready to get
27:04
into the good, the ad, and the ugly? In
27:07
the latest episode of Political Experts
27:09
React, Dan is joined by MSNBC
27:11
host Alex Wagner to break down
27:13
viral political ads from Gavin Newsom,
27:15
the Biden campaign, and Republican voters
27:17
against Trump to watch this
27:19
hit series, Type Pod Save
27:21
America, into the nearest YouTube search bar. Also
27:23
from Trump's hush money trial to some pivotal
27:25
Supreme Court hearings, the last few weeks have
27:27
been a whirlwind. Want to keep up with
27:29
it all, but have a life? We can't
27:32
relate, but we've got you. Sign
27:34
up for the What a Day newsletter and get
27:36
a pithy, funny digest of the day's biggest headlines
27:38
straight to your inbox, everything you missed, and why
27:40
you should care five days a week. The
27:49
Pod Save America is brought to you
27:51
by ZipRecruiter. Look, as it's spring, summer's
27:53
coming up, now is the time when
27:55
you're thinking about that concert you want to
27:57
go to, maybe a baseball game you want to hit
27:59
up. Sports, theater, everything is
28:01
more fun in the summer. And
28:04
if you're gonna go to an event, you
28:06
wanna get the best seats. And when you
28:08
want the best, you have to act quickly
28:10
or else someone is gonna get them instead.
28:12
It's like if you're hiring for your business.
28:15
You wanna find the most talented people for
28:17
your open roles before the competition scoops them
28:19
up. So what's the best
28:21
way to do that? Zip Recruiter. Zip
28:23
Recruiter finds qualified candidates fast and right
28:25
now you can try it for free
28:27
at ziprecruiter.com/crooked. Got your eye on a rock
28:29
star candidate? Zip Recruiter's invite to apply feature
28:32
lets you cut the line. Once
28:34
you review Zip Recruiter's list of the most
28:36
qualified candidates for your job, you can easily
28:38
invite your top choices to apply to encourage
28:40
them to apply sooner. Amp up
28:42
your hiring performance with Zip Recruiter and
28:44
find the best fast. See why four
28:47
out of five employers who post on
28:49
Zip Recruiter get a quality candidate within
28:51
the first day. Just go to this
28:54
exclusive web address right now to try
28:56
Zip Recruiter for free. That's ziprecruiter.com/crooked. Again,
28:58
that's ziprecruiter.com/crooked. Zip Recruiter, the smartest way
29:01
to hire. Potsy of America is brought to
29:03
you by Aura Frames. Sweaters. Candles. The
29:05
dreaded bathrobe. Unfortunately, Mother's Day gifts
29:07
can be a little predictable and
29:10
boring. That's why Aura Frame
29:12
is the perfect gift to mix things up
29:14
this year. Named the best digital photo frame
29:16
by Wirecutter, Aura Frames are guaranteed to bring
29:18
joy to moms of all ages.
29:21
I have definitely accidentally given
29:23
my mom the same gift twice. I've
29:26
given her things that are boring. I've forgotten. You
29:28
know what I did last year? I gave her
29:30
an Aura Frame. Because we have a little daughter
29:33
and we are constantly taking pictures of her and there's
29:35
no one who wants to see them more than my
29:37
mom. And you know, it's great to get a photo
29:39
and print it out and put it in a frame
29:41
and send it to somebody that's really nice. That's a
29:44
snapshot in time. But with an Aura Frame, you feel
29:46
like you're connected to someone. You have a little window
29:48
into their world that's constantly updating and it's just really,
29:50
really nice. Aura Frames are WiFi
29:52
connected and come with unlimited storage so you can
29:54
share as many photos as you want from your phone
29:56
to your mom's frame. Not only
29:58
will she be grateful, Sweater she'll love
30:00
that in or a free means you
30:03
get to see more of you Adam
30:05
limited photos and videos and as many
30:07
people's you want to a frame there's
30:09
absolutely no hidden fees are subscriptions react
30:11
with cute and most used to show
30:13
you have a photo since graduations and
30:15
much much more right now or a
30:17
frame as a great deal from other
30:19
states. Listeners can save on a perfect
30:21
gift by visiting Aura frames.com and youth
30:23
promo code crooked to get thirty dollars
30:25
off plus free shipping on their best
30:27
selling frame that a you are a
30:29
frames.com. Use the code crooked a check out
30:32
the save. Terms and conditions apply. This
30:35
I was sponsored by. Better Help As or something you
30:37
need Get off your chest. What is your outlet for
30:40
working through the things that stress you out? You know
30:42
I I do the crossword. That. House
30:44
I am also dials go to therapy. You.
30:47
Know and I say I this week I don't
30:49
want to make any progress in Earth. As you
30:51
said last week, We. All care under
30:53
and stressors big and small. When. Keep them
30:55
bottled up. A concert to affect us negatively.
30:58
Therapy is a safe space to get things
31:00
after Chelsea to figure out how to work
31:02
through whatever is weighing you down. If you're
31:04
thinking of starting therapy, give Betterhelp a try.
31:06
It's entirely online design to be convenient, flexible,
31:08
and suited. You're scheduled to start a brief
31:11
crushed year to get matter the license therapist
31:13
and switch their best any time for no
31:15
additional charge. Get it off your chest with
31:17
better How Visit betterhelp.com/p S A today to
31:19
get ten percent off your first month that
31:21
betterhelp help.com/psn. Or
31:26
at while Trump was apparently dozing
31:28
off in courts President Biden is
31:30
ministration were having a big we'd
31:32
Yesterday the Associated Press reported that
31:34
the Da is taking steps towards
31:36
reclassifying marijuana. Anonymous sources said that
31:38
Attorney General Merrick Garland were formerly
31:40
recommend moving marijuana from a schedule
31:42
one drug to schedule three drugs
31:44
that puts alongside our testosterone and
31:46
tylenol and and Garland recommendations will
31:48
trigger the sort of a long
31:51
process. But ah, given at seventy
31:53
percent of Americans support legalization, Seems.
31:55
Like. A great step. Yeah.
31:58
Is mutai Tembere How. going to light
32:00
a, you know, do a blunt together
32:02
right now to celebrate. Yeah. Look, man,
32:05
this has felt like a no brainer from the
32:07
start and that Joe Biden has been resisting. I
32:10
don't have any internal, you know, Joe Biden's a
32:12
teetotaler. Joe Biden's from a different era. I don't know if
32:14
you notice that. And so I think
32:16
that he has been
32:18
somewhat resistant to this. But I
32:21
guess a political matter, it is
32:23
fucking obvious just based on what has been
32:25
like, look at what happens on ballot
32:27
initiatives anywhere. I mean, like
32:29
in Missouri, they passed a
32:32
kind of marijuana decriminalization or
32:34
maybe it was
32:36
medical. But like, Missouri has moved
32:39
like basically into Alabama territory when
32:41
it comes to like voting for
32:43
Republicans, you know, and voting
32:45
for far right Republicans in blowout elections
32:48
and like on the same ballot, they
32:50
are voting for liberalizing
32:52
marijuana laws. So
32:54
it seems like a no brainer from that perspective. As
32:57
a motivation tool, I do wonder, I guess maybe
32:59
I'd throw that question back on you. Like, is
33:01
it kind of too late? Like to you, like,
33:03
it was like a period like in 2015, it'd
33:06
be like, let's get the youth excited by
33:08
talking about legalizing marijuana. I don't know that
33:10
the youth really care about that anymore. Yes.
33:13
Well, I think part of the problem is that, well,
33:15
it depends on where the youth are. Right. And
33:18
also it depends on what this what act, what this actually
33:20
does. You know, we just live in this endless morass where
33:23
when President Biden does something, even something good, even
33:25
something that progresses, I've been calling on for a
33:27
while, it takes a long time and they don't
33:29
feel the effects right away. Like California. Kind of
33:31
like a weed gummy. Exactly like
33:33
a weed gummy. You don't know when it's going to hit. And then all of a
33:35
sudden you feel pretty good. But it's like
33:37
two hours after he ate us. You almost forget who,
33:40
you almost forget why. But the, because
33:43
right, like in a lot of places, weed
33:45
is pretend legal. Everyone pretends legal. Weed is
33:47
legal in California, even though it is still
33:49
a schedule one drug. And
33:52
then there will be a lot of places where even if it is reclassified,
33:55
there won't be recreational weed because
33:58
it's a state state question. I
34:00
remember that I was
34:02
reflecting on something, which is, I
34:04
think we owe certain
34:07
old school conservative pundits from
34:10
the 90s an apology, because I
34:12
vividly remember Robert Novak.
34:16
Robert Novak was a curmudgeonly conservative
34:21
television pundit. I remember there
34:23
was this debate about medical marijuana, and one
34:25
by one, everyone around the Meet the Press
34:27
table was talking about how it was a
34:29
good step, and it helps people who have
34:32
illnesses. Yes, weed isn't what
34:34
it was in the 1960s, and this is
34:36
supported, blah, blah, blah. Then they
34:38
get to Robert Novak, and he goes, this is the
34:40
hippies. This is what the
34:43
hippies are doing. This is the hippies' revenge. They've
34:45
been trying to get legal marijuana. This is
34:47
a gateway, and I don't support it. I
34:49
don't support legal marijuana. I don't support legal
34:51
drugs, and I don't support the hippies. I
34:54
just want to say that was what was
34:56
happening. Medical marijuana was a
35:00
gateway to getting to legal marijuana
35:02
recreationally. I think deep down we
35:04
all knew that at the time, and you were
35:06
being gaslit. You're dead now,
35:08
Robert Novak, but nevertheless. You
35:10
were right about that in dead. Well, you're wrong in the
35:12
merits of the policy, but you were right that it was
35:14
a gateway. There's a similar example to this. I was walking
35:16
into Jazfest last week, and there was some young progressives, kind
35:18
of multi-hair
35:22
colored, look at me and maybe
35:24
think, maybe I could be somebody that could win over
35:26
on the issue of gay rights. I don't know. I
35:28
guess I wasn't dressed gay enough that day.
35:30
We signed this petition to help
35:32
support the gay agenda. I
35:35
was like, my old instincts came back
35:37
out. I was like, wait a minute. There's no
35:39
gay agenda. In fact, conservatives are always
35:41
like, the gays have an agenda. We're always like,
35:43
no, what are you talking about? No, we just
35:45
want equal rights. There's no gay agenda. Turned out
35:47
there was a gay agenda, actually. Once we got
35:50
the rights, we were free to talk about it.
35:52
So, marijuana, it was a gateway. In
35:54
the gays, we did have an agenda. The
35:56
90s Republican pundits were right about that.
35:59
Yeah. They said what was coming. One
36:02
other note on this. This is from the AP
36:04
report, which is, once OMB,
36:06
the Office of Management and Budget, signs
36:09
off, the DEA will take public comment
36:11
on the plan to remove marijuana from
36:13
its current classification following a
36:15
recommendation from the Federal Health and Human
36:17
Services Department after the public comment period
36:19
and a review by a administrative judge,
36:21
the agency would eventually publish
36:23
the rule. Hey, Tim.
36:25
Make a marijuana bubble. Maybe
36:28
we do need a Trump's cleansing
36:30
bureaucratic fire. Yeah, I
36:33
mean, I do think we could probably get
36:35
rid of a few bureaucrats. I do. I
36:38
maintain that view. I do have to say it. All right.
36:40
I'm discussing. I'm talking with Josh Shapiro
36:42
here in a few hours. And one
36:45
thing I want to ask him, which I'm excited to hear,
36:47
is, like, you know, I-95 collapses.
36:49
I'm like, it's fixed in two days. It's fixed
36:51
in two days. And I'm like, over in California,
36:54
they've been trying to build a train for like
36:56
20 years now. Like, we
36:58
spent $800 million, and we haven't even put down
37:00
any tracks, you know, because we have CEQA.
37:02
And so, I don't know. Yeah. I
37:05
think we could get legalized pot and trains and
37:07
roads that work a little bit faster, just a little bit
37:09
faster. We can have a couple of bureaucrats still. I don't
37:11
want to fire too many people, but I don't know. Maybe
37:14
do less. How about do less bureaucrats? Well,
37:16
how about do more faster and cheaper? Or
37:18
do less. Yeah, do less review.
37:21
I want to do more faster. I want to
37:23
do more faster and cheaper. For the record. If
37:26
there is any place where we could move faster,
37:28
it was not to gut the government, 2010 era
37:33
Tim Miller style. All right? Okay.
37:36
I could be on board of either, I guess I'm saying. Do
37:38
less or do more faster. Well, for
37:40
those to be fine, then
37:42
doing more, much slower, slalier.
37:47
I do think Biden being out there
37:49
on marijuana ultimately. I
37:51
think that put aside
37:54
the policy taking time
37:56
and the fact that, to your
37:58
point, it does feel like weed
38:01
has legalized itself. I
38:04
do think that there is value to having, like I
38:06
think for people who know that this policy is just
38:10
completely indefensible, I would like to see President
38:12
Biden saying that I'm out there trying to
38:14
do this. And by the way, I've taken
38:16
steps on behalf of people that
38:18
have been locked up for nonviolent marijuana offenses. I
38:20
think that that's all really positive. Yeah, we've been
38:23
joking about this, but it is the criminal justice
38:25
side of this is serious. Weed
38:27
might be legal in our hearts as like
38:29
rich whites, but it is still a
38:31
problem for people
38:36
that have less advantages and there
38:38
are still people in jail for
38:40
weed crimes. And so on that side of things,
38:42
I think that is a good argument to make.
38:45
And maybe that can be more motivating also to
38:47
progressives when it's framed that way and less about
38:49
like smoking
38:51
spliffs or whatever. Yeah, I think that's right.
38:53
I also just, it is like the
38:56
fact that we have had this quasi
39:01
legal status for so long is
39:03
it is so morally
39:05
bankrupt that we have people in jail in
39:07
one place, in the same place that we
39:09
have people walking into a store like it's
39:11
an Apple store. And the fact that we
39:13
have tolerated that, it does to
39:15
me, it's outrageous and we could
39:18
talk about it at Nausea, but I do think it speaks to
39:20
like a
39:23
larger conversation, but like how does the society
39:25
become kind of soft enough that
39:27
Trump can sneak in? Well, I think part of
39:29
it is being the kind of place that
39:32
is willing to overlook those kinds of injustices. I'm snapping
39:34
at you, like I'm in the New York Times break
39:36
room. Please do, please
39:38
do. Speaking of the youth, overnight,
39:41
a lot of developments in
39:43
the campus protest movement in New York, NYPD
39:46
officers in riot gear and
39:48
riding an armored vehicle moved in on Hamilton
39:50
Hall. The Zionists
39:52
have taken back Hamilton Hall while
39:55
protesters that occupied it and barricaded it officers
39:58
also cleared an encampment at city Collins. Nearly
40:00
300 people were arrested according to a very
40:02
satisfied Eric Adams. A lot
40:04
is happening everywhere, Tulane, Yale, University of
40:07
Wisconsin, here in LA. There was an
40:09
ugly physical altercation between pro-Palestinian protesters at
40:11
UCLA who had fortified their encampment with
40:13
plywood barriers and a group of what
40:16
appeared to be pro-Israel counterprotesters trying to
40:18
tear down those barriers and throwing things
40:20
into the encampment. There's disturbing video out
40:22
there of the two sides
40:24
fighting. Eventually the police arrived and separated the
40:27
groups. Tim, you made a version of
40:29
this point last night. It is
40:31
what I think is probably a very popular
40:33
but quieter sentiment, which is basically the
40:36
fact that there is a lack of space in this
40:38
debate for people who are opposed to the war, believe
40:40
the Palestinians deserve freedom and self-determination,
40:42
opposed to perpetuating a famine, murdering
40:44
civilians, opposed to the anti-Semitism and
40:47
Islamophobia around these protests, and opposed,
40:49
and this is a quote of
40:51
yours, opposed to militarized police marching
40:53
on the Portlandia Quad like they're
40:55
invading Fallujah. I
41:01
was glad to see you had a back and forth with Mehdi Hassan, who
41:03
we had on Love or Leave It last week.
41:07
The fact that I think that there was so much
41:09
comedy between the two of you, I think, speaks to
41:11
the fact that there
41:14
really hasn't been that space during
41:16
this moment, in part because I think Republicans don't
41:18
want it to be. They want to talk about the
41:20
chaos. They want to exploit this. I also
41:22
think the media owns this. I think Democrats
41:25
own this, and the students themselves, by the
41:27
way, who have agency and are ought
41:29
to be held responsible for their words
41:31
and their actions. How
41:33
do we make space for that kind of a dialogue,
41:35
which is, I think, clearly what's needed?
41:38
Yeah, we're doing it right now. Here we are.
41:42
Look, I think that there are a lot of people
41:44
that are afraid to say that they really think about this. I
41:46
have to tell you, we just
41:48
did this talking about MAGA and talking about the Trump
41:50
administration, how they're trying to create a world. I came
41:53
from a world where a lot of my former friends
41:55
have real thoughts about Trump that they will tell me
41:57
after a couple of beers, or that they used to.
42:00
they won't say out loud, they won't say
42:02
on Twitter. And I feel
42:04
like there are a lot of people that have the views
42:06
about this conflict and these protests. And
42:09
I think that we need to make it
42:11
okay for people to express their views without
42:14
immediately going to ad hominem and saying, oh,
42:16
that means you're on BB's side, that means
42:18
you're on the terrorist side. Like, when it
42:20
comes to BB and when it comes to
42:22
Hamas, I think about it. Are you ever
42:24
on Reddit? You know the... From time
42:26
to time. You know the, am I the asshole Reddit
42:29
feed? Yeah. Right? So
42:31
am I the asshole? Somebody writes a story
42:33
about how they've been a jerk to their
42:35
colleague or something and then the responders can
42:38
say, you're an asshole or you're not an
42:40
asshole. But there are some situations where the
42:42
cometries respond, E-S-H, everybody sucks
42:44
here. And that's
42:46
how I feel about the Hamas
42:48
BB situation. Everybody sucks
42:50
here. Okay? Obviously not the
42:53
innocent people that have been killed or whether
42:56
they were in a kibbutz or whether they're in
42:58
Gaza. But when it comes to
43:00
the leadership of Israel, pretty
43:02
much everybody sucks here. When it
43:04
comes to Hamas who is still
43:06
holding hostages and still using
43:09
their own people as human shields, everybody
43:11
sucks here. And unfortunately, I feel that
43:13
way a little bit about the Columbia
43:15
situation where I think there
43:17
are many protesters who are very earnest in
43:20
their protest against the war. And
43:22
I think Mehdi, and this was part of
43:24
me and Mehdi's exchange yesterday where Mehdi's like,
43:26
well, Tim, the reason why they're not protesting
43:28
Hamas is because we're not giving weapons to
43:30
Hamas. And they're only
43:32
protesting Israel because that's where we
43:35
have some control in our
43:37
democratic government. I'm like, okay, I
43:39
guess that's fine. But it'd be nice to
43:41
have, if the protests also included some people
43:43
with signs that said, by the way, Hamas
43:45
sucks too. And unfortunately,
43:47
what I see in those protests are a
43:49
couple of people that have Hezbollah flags or
43:52
a couple of people that are like, Jews
43:54
should go back to Europe or America
43:56
where they came from, which is
43:58
just ahistorical or... glory
44:00
to our martyrs. All that
44:03
stuff makes me uncomfortable and that's
44:05
not to impugn everybody that has
44:07
very real earnest concerns about the
44:09
humanitarian crisis but I
44:11
would like to see a little
44:13
bit more, you know, if the goal
44:16
of these protests is, hey we need a ceasefire,
44:18
then we should also at least be expressing that
44:20
we're pretty upset about the main party that's preventing
44:22
us from a ceasefire right now which is Hamas.
44:26
And so anyway, that's why I'm kind of like
44:28
everybody sucks here when it comes to those protests
44:30
also and also the cops which
44:32
was and Eric Adams which is way
44:34
overkill and it's only in America and
44:37
third world countries. Like there's this is
44:39
not happening in Germany or in you
44:41
know Sweden if they're at their protest.
44:43
You know it's very nice officers with
44:45
little little batons like asking people to move
44:47
off the property. Like the idea they have
44:49
these fucking face masks like it's all it's
44:52
crazy. Yeah there's a there's somebody
44:54
this is not my observation but somebody
44:56
pointed out that you can track the
44:58
evolution of our militarization of police by
45:00
looking at the way the Lego policeman
45:03
has changed over the years from
45:05
like a smiling kind of almost in
45:08
a postal uniform to basically now like
45:10
a soldier. Yeah. No I agree with
45:12
what you're saying. I also I do
45:15
think that like one of the ways
45:17
our brains are all collectively pickled from
45:19
years of political coverage that
45:21
treats everyone like a pundit is we
45:23
kind of bounce back and
45:25
forth almost without
45:28
noticing between what is sort
45:30
of morally righteous versus what
45:32
what is effective and
45:34
I and now I have nothing in both
45:36
right like you are correct like it is
45:38
both I think less effective and I think
45:41
less I think morally
45:44
defensible to not make
45:46
denouncing Hamas's holding of
45:48
hostage a part of what you're what
45:51
you're trying to protest but then
45:53
sometimes I also think just okay I don't
45:56
agree with a lot of what these protesters are saying I'm
45:58
sure I would find them quite annoying. However,
46:01
they have successfully drawn attention to
46:03
what is the urgent moral
46:07
crisis, half a world away, where children
46:09
and civilians are being killed, where there
46:11
seems to be no end in sight
46:13
to this conflict even as a ceasefire
46:15
is being negotiated. And then
46:18
I think, well, you know what? It
46:20
doesn't really matter that I disagree with what
46:24
these protesters are saying on the
46:26
larger issue or the fact that
46:28
I find the ramifications of their
46:30
views abhorrent because what it
46:32
would actually mean to achieve what
46:34
they claim to be their goals.
46:36
I find it abhorrent because what
46:38
they are actually protesting right now
46:40
is something I completely agree
46:42
with, which is the inhumane and despicable conduct
46:45
of this war. And I don't want to
46:47
be a person who makes the
46:49
same mistake that a lot of people make when
46:51
they look at a protest, which is get
46:54
sucked into a debate over its
46:56
tactics and methods rather than putting
46:58
aside the longer term problems with the BDS
47:00
movement or the ways in which I disagree
47:03
with it, but rather what are they drawing
47:05
attention to and are they right to do
47:07
it? Yeah, I'm
47:09
with that. I get it. I think about that
47:11
for sure. And
47:13
maybe you could argue there's been some success there
47:15
and the fact that there's some more food
47:19
trucks are getting in, would that
47:21
have happened without the protest? I don't know. Would
47:23
that have happened without the protest? It's hard to do
47:25
that counterfactual. I will say this though. There's
47:27
just not another situation for a group
47:29
besides Jews where it would be acceptable
47:33
in polite liberal society to
47:36
hold a protest where people are
47:39
just, where there are
47:41
members of the protest that are
47:43
dehumanizing and personally attacking people from
47:46
a specific religious or ethnic group.
47:49
It's hard to imagine that being acceptable
47:51
in liberal society for targeting
47:53
any group except for Jews. And
47:55
so I just like, there feels like there
47:57
should be a way. protest,
48:00
right? There are going to be a lot of people out there, you
48:02
can not pick one sign. Sure.
48:06
There's no way to totally control every protestor's
48:08
sign or chant. And there have been some
48:10
gross chants from the pro-Jewish counterprotesters, by the
48:12
way. But at a broader enough
48:15
level, there's a certain group that doesn't feel safe
48:17
and they feel like they're being attacked. There
48:20
would be more widespread condemnation about that. I think
48:22
if that's other groups, and I think that's upset
48:25
a lot of Jewish people and a lot of
48:27
people that are allies of Jewish folks or just
48:29
observers of the situation. I agree
48:32
with that. And now the response is, well,
48:36
there are also Jewish students who are part of these protests.
48:38
But I think that
48:40
the issue is, why? Why
48:43
does this happen? Even if most of the
48:45
protesters, while saying things that I
48:47
think ultimately
48:51
would resort into a cataclysm
48:53
for millions of Jewish people
48:55
in Israel, they're
48:58
not shouting anti-Semitic statements. They're not
49:00
shouting slurs. But people
49:02
that do do that are drawn to the
49:04
outskirts or are inside of these protests. We
49:06
saw one of the leaders in Columbia, which
49:08
has also gotten an absurd amount of attention,
49:11
but nevertheless saying
49:14
horrible things came
49:16
to attention, shocking that that person
49:20
was walking around until
49:23
it drew national embarrassment for the school.
49:27
But I do think that that's a
49:29
question, right? Why does this draw this
49:31
kind of anti-Semitism? And I think it
49:33
is because this line between anti-Zionism and
49:36
anti-Semitism is a hard one to draw.
49:38
And I see it myself where you
49:41
see this word Zionist being thrown at
49:43
people in a way that it
49:45
does get my back up because it's so quick
49:48
to be thrown as a slur.
49:51
And so I just, in the end, it's just
49:53
like, this is really fucking hard. Yeah, it's a
49:55
liberal Zionist. Look, I have a lot of friends
49:57
like this that are in Israel that are Israel'sitis
50:00
that we're in the streets protesting Bibi that
50:02
believe Israel has a right to exist, that
50:04
love Tel Aviv as just a beautiful city.
50:06
That's a very gay city, by the way,
50:09
a really diverse city and have moved there
50:11
and love being there. And they
50:13
protested Bibi. They do not like the Lukud government, but
50:15
they believe Israel has a right to exist and
50:18
they dress visibly Jewish. And
50:21
they have the Star David necklace or whatever. And
50:25
they're being treated like shit by
50:28
their friends, like on social media and
50:30
by some of these protesters. They're being
50:32
treated terribly. And so yeah,
50:34
sure, they're anti-Zionist Jews that are part of
50:36
the protest, but like that
50:38
group, they didn't do anything wrong. They're
50:41
not bombing Hamas. Their friends
50:43
or relatives or acquaintances
50:45
got killed by Hamas. And
50:48
all they're trying to say is we have a right to exist
50:50
too. And we want
50:52
to have a right to exist peacefully. And
50:54
we want the Palestinians to be able
50:56
to get aid. Those
51:00
people aren't doing anything wrong. And
51:02
they're being treated very poorly by the protesters.
51:04
Is that the acute problem? Are
51:07
their feelings as important as the dead Palestinian
51:09
kids? Of course not. That's why you
51:11
always have to caveat. That's why you have this conversation. Every
51:14
time you say that, yeah, yeah, everyone sucks here. A lot
51:16
of people are getting screwed here, but it's worth saying though.
51:18
I think it's worth saying for another reason,
51:20
which forget the tone policing in addition to
51:23
the baton policing that's going on.
51:26
I think it matters not just because of
51:28
how it makes people feel, but
51:30
my sincere view, which I've expressed many
51:32
times in various forms on this and
51:35
other podcasts, is that the
51:37
most effective way that advocating,
51:41
chanting from the river to the sea, making
51:44
it this struggle
51:46
between colonialists and anticolonialists, none
51:48
of it puts actual peace
51:51
for actual human beings closer.
51:53
And actually I think if
51:55
it is effective, it puts those
51:57
things farther away because there's no
51:59
answer. to this problem that
52:02
involves ratifying those kinds of ideas. They are far
52:05
from it. And that to me I do think
52:07
is important. And not just because I don't like
52:09
what they're saying, I don't like how it makes
52:11
people feel, how Americans currently feel is not the
52:14
most important thing. I think it is because the
52:16
larger struggle, that peace
52:18
in this larger struggle requires rejecting those kinds
52:20
of ideas. Yeah. You
52:22
just have me on, you just wanna just peel
52:24
away the onion and just, you know, you're like,
52:26
I wanna bring up tariffs, I
52:29
wanna dunk on progressive protestors,
52:31
like let's talk about, dude, motor, you're just, every
52:33
time I'm on, Don't characterize it that way. You're
52:35
trying to do it. Don't fucking characterize it that
52:37
way. You're doing it for, you're intentional. I get
52:39
it, that's fine, I'm happy to do it. I'm
52:41
happy to be your little, I don't know, token.
52:44
Okay. Pods
52:52
of America is brought to you by Renewal by
52:54
Anderson. Is it time to replace
52:56
your home's windows? Are they rotting, rustling, or
52:58
warping? Is there fog between the glass? Then
53:00
it's time to replace them with Renewal by
53:02
Anderson. Renewal by Anderson is both
53:05
the manufacturer and installer of their windows and
53:07
doors, so there's no hassle. They have more
53:09
five-star reviews than other leading full-service window replacement
53:11
companies. Plus, their energy efficient windows and doors
53:14
could help you reduce the amount of energy
53:16
used in your home, lowering your energy bill.
53:19
And they offer limited, fully transferable
53:21
warranty coverage. Right now, Renewal
53:23
by Anderson is offering a free
53:25
in-home consultation and price quote on
53:27
quality, energy efficient, affordable windows or
53:30
patio doors with special financing options.
53:33
Text CROOKED to 200300 for
53:36
a free consultation to buy one window or door
53:39
and get one 40% off, plus save an extra $30 off every unit when
53:43
you buy four or more units. These savings are
53:45
only available for a limited time, so make sure
53:47
to check it out by texting CROOKED to
53:49
200300. That's
53:53
CROOKED to 200300. Testing
53:58
privacy policy in terms of conditions. Posted a text. textplan.us,
54:00
texting and roles for recurring automated text marketing
54:02
messages, message and data rates may apply, reply
54:04
stop to opt out, minimum purchase required, interest
54:07
accrues from data purchased but is waived if
54:09
paid within promotional period. Go to windowappointmentnow.com for
54:11
full offer details. Hey
54:13
everyone, it's Ted from Consumer Cellular, the guy in
54:15
the orange sweater, and this is your wakeup call.
54:17
If you're paying too much for wireless service, you
54:19
don't have to keep having that nightmare. Consumer Cellular
54:22
has the same fast, reliable coverage as the leading
54:24
carriers for less. And for a limited
54:26
time, new customers receive their second month free when they
54:28
sign up and use promo code monthfree by May
54:31
31st. So why keep
54:33
spending more than you have to?
54:35
Seriously, wake up and call 1-888-FREEDOM
54:37
or visit consumercellular.com. Texas needs another
54:39
third party charge as well apply. See website for additional
54:42
details. You
54:45
can start your day off right. You can start your day off
54:47
right when you find
54:49
a professional on Angie to get your plumbing
54:51
right first. Connect
54:54
with skilled professionals to get all your
54:56
home projects done well. Visit angie.com. You
54:58
can do this when you Angie that.
55:03
One last crass political question
55:05
about the situation, which is Republicans
55:08
like this. They like the chaos. They
55:11
like trying to drive a wedge between Democrats
55:14
and their Jewish constituency. How worried about it?
55:17
And what would you do about it? Many
55:19
constituencies, not just the Jewish constituency, youth, Arab.
55:25
Just broadly people of color, I think. There's a
55:27
lot of folks that have genuine unhappiness and concerns
55:29
in the situation. It's a wedge. And
55:31
so, yeah, look, I think that the Republicans
55:34
do see this as a political opportunity. They
55:36
did not see any, with maybe the exception
55:38
of like the one or two random libertarians
55:40
who are in there. Our friend
55:42
Justin Mosch is gone, so maybe there aren't any good
55:44
ones left. They
55:47
don't mind seeing the cops with their batons
55:49
going in there and knocking some heads. They
55:52
think that's a winner for them. Donald
55:55
Trump once, I think,
55:57
bleated in the protest now.
56:00
there is no nuance here. You
56:02
know, Jared Kushner is talking about, you
56:04
know, building, building Mar-a-Lago, you know, on
56:06
the strip in Gaza. So
56:09
I think it's a winner across
56:11
the board. They might be right. And
56:13
I think that it's concerning, you know, it's
56:15
like, it is concerning if there are, you
56:18
know, young voter like, like Joe
56:20
Biden has a very fragile coalition,
56:22
which includes people that are quite
56:25
Israel sympathetic in the democratic coalition,
56:27
but also kind of the swing
56:29
voters, you know,
56:31
who left the Republican Party over
56:34
Trump that are not happy
56:36
with him. The young voters are in
56:38
his coalition, Dear board voters are in
56:41
his coalition. I mean, so he has
56:43
to navigate a very broad
56:45
and wide coalition that has very different
56:47
views on this. Republicans are
56:49
happy to take advantage of it.
56:52
Meanwhile, Donald Trump's coalition is like
56:54
mostly either pro Israel or totally
56:56
anti-Semitic. So it's a little bit
56:58
less, it's like less of a tightrope. Yeah,
57:01
well, that's it is, but
57:03
it's interesting that it is less of a tightrope because of
57:05
what you just said. But I do think what I was
57:07
getting at, right, is that, yes, this
57:09
is an issue that what
57:11
is happening in Gaza is
57:15
potentially alienating key constituents by the
57:17
needs like our voters
57:19
and young voters,
57:21
while at the same time, the
57:24
Republicans are trying to exploit the
57:26
protests without really regard for the
57:28
views of those young people or those
57:30
our voters in Dearborn, they're trying to
57:32
go for, they're
57:35
trying to kind of use the chaos, they're trying
57:37
to say that Jews are unsafe, right? They're trying
57:39
to go after that constituency specifically. For sure. Yeah.
57:41
And I think it's working. It's
57:43
alarming to me, but anecdotally
57:46
speaking, you know, this is
57:48
this 1%, is this 2%? I
57:50
don't want to overstate how big of the audience this is.
57:52
It's a pretty small demographic. But it
57:55
could be important in Atlanta, could be
57:57
important in Philly, which is,
57:59
you know, Wall Street Journal reading
58:02
conservatives who are either Jewish or
58:04
kind of have strong foreign policy
58:06
hawks that were turned off by
58:08
Trump because of his
58:10
dabbling in anti-semitism and because of his isolationism,
58:14
that you hear them saying anecdotally,
58:17
like, I don't know, I don't like
58:19
what's happening, Trump will defend us, maybe
58:21
I have to go back to Trump.
58:23
The whole Dan Sinner who works
58:26
for Paul Singer, who used to be a Never Trumper,
58:28
who is a big donor who went back to Trump.
58:30
Paul Singer is already back at Trump. It seems like
58:32
Dan is sympathetic to that. You
58:34
see this and I was
58:36
actually just with someone today who
58:39
said that they're friends, who's Jewish, who said that they're
58:41
friends, they have
58:44
friends that feel this way. So is that going
58:46
to change by November? You know, will cooler heads
58:48
prevail? Hopefully. But I do
58:50
think that there is a small demo
58:52
of group voters that were traditionally Republican,
58:54
that were gettable for Biden, that
58:57
are, you
58:59
know, that are starting to lean back towards Trump over
59:01
this. I find that asinine, just to be, I'll be
59:04
very clear, I find that asinine and insane that you
59:06
would, that on the issue of anti-semitism, you would go
59:08
back to the person that had lunch with Nick Fuentes
59:10
and Kanye. I find it ludicrous and
59:12
the extreme, but that doesn't mean that it's not
59:15
happening. So
59:17
Biden, there are also people trying to
59:19
lay what's happening on a campus in New York, on
59:21
a private university campus at Biden's feet, I think, often
59:24
in bad faith, but nevertheless, Biden has
59:26
a difficult square to circle
59:28
here. He needs to assuage the
59:30
concerns of that part of
59:32
his coalition that is concerned about these
59:34
protests and where he had anti-semitism has
59:37
to assuage the concerns of people that
59:39
are deeply unhappy with his policy and
59:41
that requires a policy change that requires something to
59:43
actually shift on the ground for sure. But what
59:45
would you like to see Biden say if there's
59:47
anything he's not saying? And
59:50
this is going to be a very untimmed thing. This
59:52
is on the Podbro podcast. It should be you guys
59:55
saying this, but we could really use
59:57
Obama on this because it's so not he was
59:59
really good. at this stuff, like going out there
1:00:01
and talking. And this was this whole bit starting
1:00:03
in 04, like there are red
1:00:05
states and there are blue states. We can be,
1:00:08
we can think about the, we can be empathetic
1:00:10
towards the other side while also understanding the policy
1:00:12
ramifications. He was talented at this. Biden's like, that's
1:00:14
not his strength, man. Like he's got strengths, but
1:00:16
like, that's not it. And I think that right
1:00:19
now there are people that are like, where is
1:00:21
he on this? And, and, and
1:00:23
a lot of what they've been doing has
1:00:25
been relegated to written statements, which are usually
1:00:27
pretty good, by the way. If you read
1:00:29
the Biden administration, White House's written statements,
1:00:31
they usually are very empathetic, very
1:00:33
nuanced, very thoughtful. But,
1:00:37
but they're not letting him loose on it.
1:00:40
And maybe for, maybe for good reason. I don't,
1:00:42
I think that it's a really, it's
1:00:44
dicey. And, but I do think that he needs to
1:00:46
speak out more. And you could speak out from first
1:00:48
principles. And the nice thing about having a speech at
1:00:50
a press conference is he could speak more just about
1:00:53
the thing, like you can be, the inverse
1:00:55
of my original statement, where we started this,
1:00:57
everything's an asshole. You can, you can be
1:00:59
the positive version of that, which is I'm
1:01:02
worried about Gaza. We're trying to get
1:01:04
food in. I'm worried about antisemitism on
1:01:06
campuses in America. We should have that
1:01:09
stopped. I'm worried about free speech rights.
1:01:11
Kids shouldn't be getting knocked over by police
1:01:13
officers when they're at, you know, I saw,
1:01:16
he could do that, but it's
1:01:18
not, there's going to be people he doesn't please if he does
1:01:20
it, but it's probably, we'll
1:01:22
see. If it doesn't get any better, it's going to be
1:01:24
something he's going to have to figure out how to do.
1:01:26
Yeah. I think that's right. I do think that in moments
1:01:28
like this, when, when
1:01:30
the rhetoric is heated, when people are talking
1:01:33
past each other, and when
1:01:35
Republicans are trying to exploit it for the
1:01:37
chaos, I do think sometimes that does lower
1:01:39
the bar a little bit and turns just
1:01:41
stating first principles, sort of where we started
1:01:43
this conversation into something that
1:01:45
I think is calming and relieving and actually goes
1:01:48
a long way. Before we let you go, Tim,
1:01:51
Vice President Kamala Harris went
1:01:54
on Drew Barrymore show on Monday, talked about
1:01:56
a wide range of topics. But
1:02:00
at this moment, I don't think you've seen
1:02:02
it, and I think we'd like to get your live reaction. I
1:02:04
have not. I've been thinking that we
1:02:06
really all need a tremendous hug in the
1:02:08
world right now, but in our
1:02:10
country, we need
1:02:12
you to be mamala of the country. Oh.
1:02:27
They made me very uncomfortable. They made me very
1:02:29
uncomfortable. They made Kabbalah very uncomfortable. I know, I
1:02:31
like that. I like this thing. What is going on?
1:02:33
Like, isn't she about to touch me? It's,
1:02:37
everybody, we don't need any
1:02:39
politician to be mom. We don't need to
1:02:41
be mamala. We don't need to be dadala. We
1:02:44
don't need a national dad. We don't need
1:02:46
any of that shit. It's
1:02:48
a city where they go to
1:02:51
write laws and regulations and
1:02:53
to implement policies that
1:02:55
affect our lives. They're not dad.
1:02:58
They're not mom. I hate that
1:03:01
shit. Me too. We need a
1:03:03
head of government. By the way, this
1:03:05
was like, this is fundamentally American, love
1:03:07
it, that where you're gonna get. Like,
1:03:09
this is John Adams wanted to name
1:03:12
the president his excellency or some shit,
1:03:14
and George Washington was like, fuck that.
1:03:16
Mr. President. Mr. President, we
1:03:18
could have a Mrs. President, hopefully soon.
1:03:20
That's it. They're one of us. They're
1:03:23
of the people. We do not need a mom.
1:03:26
They're not like the royal family. They
1:03:28
don't need to be anything special. That
1:03:30
does bother, I'm with you on that.
1:03:32
Also the touching. Also
1:03:34
the touching. Because you had a moment
1:03:36
where Carrie Lake touched you. It was very similar. It
1:03:38
was kind of similar. It was kind of similar. I
1:03:41
don't mind if you touch me on the shoulders. I
1:03:43
don't know. Drew is kind of the good
1:03:45
angel version of Carrie. It's like the same
1:03:48
energy, but like the light versus the darkness
1:03:50
kind of with Carrie or Drew. But they
1:03:52
both did the double hand thing. Yeah,
1:03:55
too much. You can touch me on my
1:03:57
shoulder. We can hug, but there's something about
1:03:59
the full. like eight
1:04:01
fingers. Remember when George W. Bush
1:04:04
lost himself for a second and tried to give Angela
1:04:06
Merkel like a shoulder rub? He got got it. It
1:04:08
was just like he like mischaracterized this like he just
1:04:11
he just did something he might do like to a
1:04:13
relative or a loved one But he just he just
1:04:15
like kind of as he was passing gave her a
1:04:17
quick shivers Like I've
1:04:19
never seen a person shiver The other piece
1:04:21
of this too is like politics is emotional
1:04:24
because it's serious and the stakes are very
1:04:26
very high But we actually
1:04:28
don't need these figures to assuage It's
1:04:31
actually the mirror of the people people
1:04:33
who say like they don't find Joe Biden
1:04:36
inspiring. Okay It's funny. I
1:04:38
get wanting Joe Biden to inspire other people
1:04:40
because you want politics to have outcomes But
1:04:43
you don't need to be inspired because
1:04:45
if you say I want to be inspired It's
1:04:47
a little bit like I don't know like Louis
1:04:49
the 14th being like bring me a show I'd
1:04:51
like to see something bring me bring me a
1:04:54
lovely cake and a show It's like that's not
1:04:56
what this is about like if you're feeling worried
1:04:58
and anxious about politics It's not
1:05:00
Kamala Harris's job to assuage you it might be
1:05:02
valuable for others But if it's
1:05:05
for you sort of should be an
1:05:07
embarrassing thing to request Yeah, go volunteer
1:05:09
if you ought to be inspired, you
1:05:11
know, go out in society and find
1:05:13
somebody inspiring That's not what the let
1:05:15
you know the head legislator of the country.
1:05:18
That's it's nice It's a
1:05:20
nice bonus You know if you get all
1:05:22
tingle up your leg with the president talks
1:05:24
like that's not that should be a bonus
1:05:26
You know a little cherry on top. That's
1:05:28
not a median requirement Yeah, the idea that
1:05:30
like and I get where it's just a very like I don't
1:05:32
know just a very Hollywood Oh the
1:05:34
country needs a hug right now. The country
1:05:36
doesn't need a hug So that's one of
1:05:39
those people me hugs from their loved ones
1:05:41
in their own private lives. The country needs
1:05:43
effective governance and
1:05:45
and to defeat a Despicable
1:05:48
Authoritarian movement the country needs hugs after
1:05:50
go watch Finding Forrester. That's nice. You
1:05:53
know, go find a girl watch a
1:05:55
movie about Young
1:05:57
man overcoming challenges, you know
1:06:00
Whatever find go find something that's fine. You don't
1:06:02
need a mom From
1:06:04
Kamala. I know this is we're very aligned
1:06:06
on this job of it. We're we're look
1:06:08
you and I we began
1:06:11
by Tim
1:06:15
Miller you know him from
1:06:18
the bulwark Send all
1:06:20
your negative comments at him as
1:06:23
always great to see a Tim and And
1:06:26
if you're the one person out there that agreed with all
1:06:28
my takes today the board I
1:06:34
spent an hour for you. All right,
1:06:36
John. I miss you and if Tim is in
1:06:38
your cup of tea Don't worry Dan and John
1:06:40
back Friday morning If
1:06:45
you want to get ad-free episodes exclusive content
1:06:47
and more consider joining our friends of the
1:06:49
pod subscription community at crooked comm slash friends
1:06:52
And if you're already doom scrolling don't forget to
1:06:54
follow us at pods of America on Instagram Twitter
1:06:56
and YouTube For access to
1:06:58
full episodes bonus content and more plus
1:07:00
if you're as opinionated as we are
1:07:02
consider dropping us a review Pods
1:07:05
of America is a crooked media production. Our
1:07:07
show is produced by Olivia Martinez and
1:07:09
David Toledo Our associate producers are
1:07:11
solve Ruben and Farrah Safari Hero
1:07:14
Joaquin as our senior producer Reed Turlin
1:07:16
as our executive producer The show is
1:07:18
mixed and edited by Andrew Chadwick Jordan
1:07:20
Cantor is our sound engineer with audio
1:07:22
support from Kyle Seglen and Charlotte Landis
1:07:25
writing support by Holly Kiefer Madeline Herringer is
1:07:27
our head of news and programming Matt DeGroat
1:07:29
is our head of production Andy
1:07:32
Taft is our executive assistant thanks to
1:07:34
our digital team Elijah Cohn Haley Jones
1:07:36
Mia Kellman David tolls Kirill Pel Aviv
1:07:38
and Molly Lobel Angie's
1:07:47
list is now Angie and we've heard a
1:07:49
lot of theories about why I thought it
1:07:52
was an eco move your words less paper
1:07:55
It was so you could say it faster.
1:07:57
No, it's to be more iconic But
1:08:01
so dark to outright. It's because now
1:08:03
you can compare at some places, look
1:08:05
at service instantly and even get your
1:08:07
project handled from start to finish. How
1:08:09
do you be? It is. And it
1:08:11
makes us so much more than just
1:08:13
a list. Get started at angie.com. That's
1:08:15
A-N-G-I. Or download the app today. Because
1:08:22
NetSuite eliminates the expense of multiple
1:08:25
business systems by consolidating your operations
1:08:27
together into one. NetSuite
1:08:29
is the number one cloud financial
1:08:31
system, bringing accounting, financial management, inventory
1:08:33
and HR into one platform and
1:08:36
one source of truth. NetSuite reduces
1:08:38
IT costs because it lives in the
1:08:40
cloud with no hardware required so you
1:08:42
can access it from anywhere. You cut
1:08:44
the cost and headaches of maintaining multiple
1:08:46
systems because you've cut one unified business
1:08:48
management suite. Bringing all your major
1:08:51
business processes into one platform improves
1:08:53
efficiency, slashing manual tasks and errors.
1:08:59
So do the math. You'll see how you'll
1:09:01
profit with NetSuite too. And
1:09:03
now by popular demand, NetSuite
1:09:05
has extended its one-of-a-kind flexible
1:09:07
financing program for a few
1:09:10
more weeks. Just go to
1:09:12
netsuite.com/podcast25 for more information.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More