Podchaser Logo
Home
Trump Details His Dictatorial Plans

Trump Details His Dictatorial Plans

Released Wednesday, 1st May 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Trump Details His Dictatorial Plans

Trump Details His Dictatorial Plans

Trump Details His Dictatorial Plans

Trump Details His Dictatorial Plans

Wednesday, 1st May 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:00

Pod Save America is brought to you by Books. This

0:02

Mother's Day, give mom her flowers. She deserves

0:04

the best. That's why you should send her

0:06

farm fresh flowers from Books. That's

0:08

short for bouquets. And right now you can get 25%

0:10

off your entire Books purchase.

0:13

Here's why everyone likes the Books company. Books

0:15

is different. Their flowers are cut fresh and

0:18

sourced directly from the best flower farms. So

0:20

they can last way longer. They even have

0:22

flowers grown on the side of a volcano.

0:24

Wow. Books has modern designs and

0:26

unique flowers you can't find anywhere else. Books

0:28

is simple. You go online, pick the delivery date

0:30

and you're done. Mother's Day is

0:33

May 12th. Don't miss

0:35

the chance to thank your mom. Order your Books now.

0:37

And with 20% off, you can send

0:39

some to mom, wife, aunt, and even

0:41

grandma. I am very happy

0:44

that I'm reading this ad because now I'm

0:46

remembering when Mother's Day is and I'm gonna order

0:49

a whole bunch of Books because they're fantastic flowers.

0:51

Go to books.com and use promo code Cricut for 25% off. That's

0:55

b-o-u-q-s.com, promo code

0:57

Cricut. Books, promo

0:59

code Cricut. Hey y'all,

1:01

it's Tim Miller, Cricut Media's favorite Cuck-servative.

1:03

I'm now hosting the Daily Bulwark Podcast,

1:05

which comes out every weekday afternoon, rain

1:07

or shine, hangover or no hangover. Here's

1:10

what's special about this podcast and my

1:12

colleagues at the Bulwark. We

1:14

are all united in a mission to defend

1:16

democracy from the burnt sienna buffoon. And

1:18

as outcast Republicans, we have no future career

1:20

prospects. So we're free to tell you what

1:23

we really think. So check out my Daily

1:25

Bulwark Podcast. Or if once a week is

1:27

more your speed, there's Lovett's Guilty Pleasure, the

1:29

next level podcast, featuring me with my colleagues,

1:31

Sarah Longwell and JVL. Check it out, peace.

1:56

Welcome to Ponce of America. I'm Jon

1:58

Lovett and joining us. You

2:01

know him from the bulwark. You

2:03

know him from MSNBC. You

2:07

know him from being a little drunk alive with love

2:10

and eliteness. That's right. It's Tim Miller.

2:12

Thanks for being here. How you doing, brother? Thanks

2:14

for being here, Tim. I'm so excited. I think

2:16

this is official now. I just for listeners, you

2:18

know, you might have somebody in your life that

2:20

was maybe a friend of me at one stage

2:23

and maybe you have a little tension with at

2:25

one point over the years you

2:27

grow and you grow a

2:29

bond and appreciation for one another and it

2:31

blossoms into a real friendship.

2:34

I feel like that's officially happened right now

2:36

at this moment. And just so everybody knows,

2:38

his audio did break up for a second.

2:42

He said sexual tension. Yeah,

2:46

well that's what we had at one point. But

2:48

I'm just saying now it's blossomed. It's something deeper.

2:50

It is nice. It is nice. It's

2:52

something like, you don't know that this is coming. 20

2:54

year olds out there, this is happening for you in

2:56

your 40s. There's somebody in your life right now and

2:58

you're like, that guy? Never. But then

3:00

when you're 40, you're like, wow, we like each other a

3:02

lot. I never said never. But maybe

3:04

you did and that's fine. Yes, when you're 20, you don't

3:07

know what it's like to be an adult for 20 years.

3:10

I know. That's the beauty of it. Anyway,

3:12

let's talk about Gaza. But speaking of... Yeah,

3:16

and also people that have been adults for 50

3:19

years and don't seem to show it. We have

3:21

a packed show today. Donald Trump spent some of

3:23

his precious time outside of a courtroom to do

3:25

a good old fashioned sit down interview with Time

3:27

magazine, laying out his vision

3:29

for a second term. And it's worrying.

3:31

The Biden administration is reclassifying marijuana as

3:34

a less dangerous drug while student protests

3:36

envelop campus buildings and our national attention.

3:38

Marjorie Taylor Greene makes her

3:40

move. Plus the vice president sits down

3:42

with Drew Barrymore and it makes everyone

3:44

a little uncomfortable. Okay, first up. He

3:49

did something that feels like it's from another era. He

3:52

sat down for an interview with

3:54

Time magazine in Palm Beach, lasted

3:56

over an hour. All

3:59

the Palm Beach... and circumstance, the description of

4:01

the room, the transcript

4:04

has the aid coming in and saying,

4:06

Mr. Trump has to get to dinner.

4:08

We get some color about the playlist.

4:10

It's the same playlist, Sinead O'Connor, January

4:14

6th choir, the two genders. And

4:18

then they did a follow-up 20-minute conversation.

4:20

So we'll get to all

4:22

the details, but were

4:24

you surprised, Tim, to see

4:26

Donald Trump spend an hour doing this?

4:30

I was. I have to be honest. There

4:32

is a print time magazine, like a piers, that

4:35

you can get now. Is that, that still exists?

4:37

So that was, it

4:41

all made sense once I realized that still

4:43

existed. I personally did not know that. I

4:45

thought time had gone fully digital. And I

4:47

was like, Mr. Trump might be an idiot,

4:49

you know, and he might have the wool

4:51

pulled over his eyes a couple of times,

4:53

but he certainly would not do an interview

4:55

because he wanted a fake digital cover. And

4:57

this man would require a real physical cover.

5:00

And then he would do an interview where

5:02

he shames himself and really freaks everybody out

5:04

about what a Trump term would look like

5:06

and provides a political gift to Joe Biden.

5:08

So I do, it makes

5:11

sense for then, once I knew that, that

5:13

Trump could have the time cover that he

5:15

could frame, because that's what he really

5:17

values. And then once I interviewed

5:20

the reporter this morning, Eric

5:22

Cordalesa, and great reporter, tough

5:24

interview. So please don't take this

5:26

the wrong way, Eric, but he does give off like,

5:28

I got drunk with Madison Cawthorn at a

5:30

Duke lacrosse party vibes. And so

5:33

like once I spent more time talking to

5:35

him, I was like, Oh yeah, okay, this

5:37

makes sense. The Trump people felt like this

5:39

guy was one of them, you know, he's

5:41

going to get his cover and,

5:43

you know, consequences be damned. Yeah.

5:45

So, you know, the

5:49

1980s Trump brain is, Oh, Time Magazine. I want to be

5:51

on Time Magazine. I want to be on the cover of

5:53

Time Magazine. And it, yes, I

5:55

do. I also associate Time Magazine now with

5:57

the kind of downfall of Newsweek. And

6:01

us it's different but it's different but

6:03

there was the other piece of this too Which is I like

6:06

let's say you you were thinking about this in a more traditional

6:08

way The idea behind sitting

6:10

down for a long print interview like that. There's

6:12

no video. There's no audio. That's just a transcript

6:16

Was that there was some there was

6:18

some value to getting out to elite

6:20

news followers to

6:23

journalists to close Watchers

6:26

of politics the the vision

6:28

the kind of detailed Vision

6:31

that you wouldn't get on a stump speech

6:33

that you wouldn't won't get in shorter television

6:35

hits to give people the context of what

6:37

Trump's trying to do. I don't believe they

6:39

were doing anything as sophisticated as

6:41

that but if they were What

6:44

on earth were they hoping to accomplish? By

6:47

having the president the former

6:49

president walk through all this stuff Yeah,

6:53

they wanted to accomplish the physical

6:55

okay once the bridge I

6:58

just cannot emphasize what he wants the framed

7:00

magazine cover I know he's already been the

7:02

president feels like that seems like small ball

7:05

for him, but that's what he wanted Okay

7:07

granted that now moving on what was their

7:09

strategy beyond that? I really I do not

7:11

know I I do not know

7:13

I don't it doesn't seem like he went into

7:15

the interview I'm going back to my days You

7:17

know we certainly had some fails with my candidates

7:19

But if Jeb was gonna do a long sit-down

7:22

interview certainly sometimes he would get stumped or he'd

7:24

say something wrong or but But we would at

7:26

least have like a a proactive message

7:28

We were trying to get across right that you

7:30

would that if you looked at the transcript You

7:32

could see that he was coming back to this

7:34

whether it was an issue or whether it was

7:36

a argument So he's trying to put forth that

7:38

was not what this was I it is total

7:40

stream of consciousness Donald Trump It's

7:43

indistinguishable from his rallies Except

7:46

for the fact that the

7:48

reporter Eric got to kind of

7:50

direct him Into some

7:52

you know into like a briar

7:55

pet a little bit on abortion

7:57

in particular But also some

7:59

on some other issues and there was no sign

8:01

that they had like a proactive message that

8:04

they were trying to get across. Yeah. So

8:07

let's go through this. So it was wide ranging. He says

8:09

a lot. He also refuses to say a lot. For

8:12

example, he wouldn't say he'd veto a national

8:14

abortion ban. He wouldn't say defend Taiwan. He

8:16

wouldn't say he supports a two state solution

8:18

between Israel and Palestine. He wouldn't commit to

8:21

supporting Ukraine's defense. Almost immediately

8:23

the Biden campaign went on offense with the

8:25

interview, in particular on Trump's abortion comments, not

8:27

just refusing to say he'd veto a ban,

8:29

but when asked whether states should monitor women's

8:31

pregnancies to see if they violated an abortion

8:34

ban, Trump said, I think they might do

8:36

that. On abortion, what jumped

8:38

out at you? And then we can go beyond

8:40

that. Yeah. Well,

8:42

on abortion, that was like the

8:44

Chris Matthews moment. And Trump has struggled with this for

8:46

nine years because he is faking it, right? I mean,

8:49

that doesn't make the threat any more

8:51

real to vulnerable women about the laws that

8:53

would be put in place by the types

8:55

of people that Trump appoints, judgeships

8:57

in particular, but also into regulatory

9:00

positions. But he personally, obviously

9:02

doesn't care. And so he doesn't know how to

9:05

speak the language of pro-lifers. Somebody

9:07

who's a genuine pro-lifer, I think,

9:09

would at least be astute enough to be able to

9:13

move around the question of, are

9:16

you comfortable with states monitoring women's

9:18

pregnancies? And he feels

9:20

like just by saying, oh, well,

9:22

states get to decide, like that's some amulet that like

9:24

protects him from all criticism on this, right? That he's

9:27

like, oh, I don't know. I guess I'm comfortable if

9:29

the states decide to do it, the states decide to

9:31

do it. And that is a

9:33

crazy view, right, that is going to

9:35

be very useful to Biden, it adds,

9:37

where he says essentially, if during

9:40

a Trump presidency, states want to monitor

9:42

women's pregnancies so they can determine how

9:44

far along they are in the gestational

9:46

period in order to determine whether

9:49

or not they would have access to an

9:51

abortion. That

9:53

is deep state 1984 type

9:56

shit targeting women. And

9:59

he just walked right into it, I think in

10:01

large part because he hasn't thought about this stuff

10:03

deeply at all, never even occurred to him that

10:05

there might be a question about whether a woman

10:08

is at six weeks or nine weeks. None

10:10

of this stuff, he hasn't thought through any of this. He's just

10:12

like, yeah, I guess if the states want to monitor women, they're

10:14

going to monitor women. Yeah, he

10:16

also, I think, he views himself as

10:19

being very adept at these politics now.

10:21

At one point he says, did

10:23

you see everyone adopted my IVF position?

10:26

He was asked about what his policy position

10:28

is going to be on Mipha Pristone. His

10:30

only response, by the way, he didn't say

10:33

what it would be, but he says, it

10:35

won't be very surprising, which I took to

10:37

mean whatever he says, he really hopes people

10:39

don't pay too much attention to it. What

10:42

else jumped out at you? Yeah. The

10:44

Mipha Pristone thing was funny because he says

10:46

in the first interview, which is poolside with

10:49

the Cougars at Mar-a-Lago and

10:51

the well-done stakes during

10:53

that first interview, he's asked about

10:55

his position on Mipha Pristone and

10:57

he's like, I've got a great plan, won't be

10:59

that surprising, it'll be out in two weeks. Then

11:02

there's a follow-up phone interview two weeks later

11:04

and the first question is, are you ready

11:06

to share your Mipha Pristone? Another

11:08

two weeks, it's just like the Obamacare,

11:11

the healthcare plan. So he

11:13

still doesn't have that. But

11:15

again, I think part of that, I did wonder

11:17

if during the first interview he did, if he

11:19

knew what Mipha Pristone was, and he was buying

11:22

himself two weeks, but you'd think by the second

11:24

interview he would and maybe he's just trying to

11:26

dodge. By the time, because it's similar to the

11:28

IVF, this takes you out of into

11:31

even pro-life people,

11:33

right, like are

11:35

horrified by the idea that

11:37

women might not have access

11:39

to Mipha Pristone in like

11:41

the first days after having

11:44

sex. There are people that

11:46

would support a 15-week ban that think

11:48

it's crazy that the states want to

11:50

ban access to

11:52

Mipha Pristone, for example. And

11:54

so that gets him to a really dicey position

11:56

if he doesn't have a clear answer on that.

12:00

that and he did it over the course of two

12:02

interviews because again I think that he thinks that he's

12:04

got to get out of jail free card here

12:06

with this the states can decide thing but obviously once

12:08

you get, if you're going to sit down with time

12:11

for an hour and a half there are a

12:13

lot of holes and the states can decide. Yes and

12:15

his ignorance on this is a feature

12:17

for the kooks

12:20

around him who are already planning

12:23

to put in use

12:25

an old federal law to make it

12:27

impossible to mail abortion

12:30

drugs to people and to use and deploy

12:32

the federal government all kinds of ways to

12:35

make abortion inaccessible even if they

12:37

don't pass a national law even if it

12:39

still continues to be technically legal in

12:41

liberal states. So it's you know he can say I don't

12:44

want to see it too much from what Trump's perspective is

12:46

in a lot of ways it won't matter because will he

12:48

stand in the way of Congress passes a ban of course

12:50

not. Will he stop some schedule

12:53

efflunkie from doing something horrible

12:56

in an agency? Of course he won't. He won't have

12:58

the discipline or attention span to focus on it. This

13:01

is why just really quick on that this is why

13:03

I think that to me the most telling part of

13:05

the interview because of exactly what you're saying it's

13:07

kind of like who cares what Trump's like random

13:09

blurts out are on these various policies

13:12

in some ways and directionally we should care but

13:15

like on the details what

13:17

matters is going to be people around him and at one

13:19

point he was asked what he thinks

13:21

about this notion about hiring people who don't

13:24

believe in the 2020 election front like should

13:27

that be a litmus test for people that

13:29

would be hired into your administration and Trump

13:31

says essentially yes in kind of garbled Trump

13:33

words like yes I would only want I

13:35

would feel very you know he said something

13:38

like I'd feel very strongly against you know

13:40

somebody is too stupid to realize that the

13:42

election was stolen from me. Now to me

13:44

that just puts all this in a very

13:47

important perspective which is like they're going to

13:49

be much more judicious

13:51

is maybe the wrong word careful about hiring

13:53

the kookiest people possible right and like the

13:55

types yeah and so I thought that to me

13:58

was as revealing as any of the policies. stuff

14:00

in the interview and as concerned. Yes, I want to get to that in one

14:02

second. Before I want to get to the implementation because I do think that is,

14:04

I agree with you, it's just as important. Before

14:06

we get to that, were there any other policy points

14:08

that he made or that the piece makes that jumps out?

14:11

One, that his number one agenda item

14:13

when he comes in is going to be extending the Bush

14:15

tax cuts that some

14:17

of those tax cuts for the

14:20

wealthy expire, including the doubling of

14:22

the estate tax deduction, that those

14:24

things all expire in 2025. So

14:26

one of his first orders of business is going to be

14:28

tax cuts for the wealthy in addition to a border bill

14:31

because of course he killed the border bill. Were

14:33

there any other policy positions that jumped out

14:35

at you? Yeah, well

14:37

two. As a free market capitalist, the

14:39

thing that stood out to me was the 10% across

14:42

the board tariffs, which

14:44

is an absolutely insane policy that if

14:46

people are concerned about prices, will

14:48

be disastrous. And he has, just in general,

14:51

I think it's frustrating to get this across

14:53

to people, he

14:56

says that he's going to fight

14:58

the inflationary, the Biden-flation, right? His policies

15:00

are going to stop inflation, but every

15:02

policy he has is inflationary. Extending

15:05

the Bush tax cuts is inflationary, fewer immigrants

15:07

into the country is inflationary because

15:09

that affects the number of people

15:12

that we have in the workforce. Tariffs

15:14

are obviously inflationary. So is

15:17

there a way to make that message for

15:19

Biden? I think it's kind of a tough message

15:21

for Biden to actually implement in a

15:23

campaign setting but to me, maybe

15:25

that's something for Nikki Haley voters that we can

15:27

use. And then as someone

15:30

who has feelings and compassion, the

15:33

deportation plans are absolutely insane.

15:37

And he goes along every step the reporter asks

15:39

him, he's like, well, would you call in the

15:41

National Guard? Yes. Would you call

15:43

in the military? Yes. How are

15:45

you actually going to implement this? Local

15:47

police forces, we're going to have local

15:49

cops being our deportation troopers.

15:53

And if a local police force

15:55

doesn't want to be part of the Donald

15:57

Trump deportation effort,

16:00

where he specifically cites Operation Wetback, then

16:02

he's like, well, then we'll stop funding

16:04

them. Like, we're gonna not give funds

16:06

to police, you know, to local police,

16:08

you know, so we're gonna defund the

16:10

police that will not

16:13

do illegal deportations. So,

16:15

I mean, obviously, I think that is the most

16:17

alarming. And the thing that I

16:19

would be also the most scared about

16:21

being actually implemented if he were to

16:23

win, because he, it's the one area

16:25

where he already has a team of competent

16:27

sociopaths around him, led by Stephen Miller, who

16:29

would be able to execute on it. Yeah,

16:31

and they already, by the way, you know,

16:33

when they did family separation, it

16:35

was pushed

16:37

back from what you

16:39

could call the old guard inside the

16:42

administration, plus congressional Republicans, plus political pressure,

16:45

ordinary political pressure that caused them

16:47

to at least, you know, sort of second

16:49

guess what they were doing. I don't think

16:51

those guardrails exist in a second term.

16:54

No, I mean, and you could

16:56

see like that great, I forget who wrote

16:58

it, I feel like I should credit her,

17:01

but the great Atlantic profile that went in

17:03

so deep into the child separation and how

17:05

it actually happened, like the TikTok of it,

17:07

what it revealed was it really only took

17:10

Stephen Miller sessions and there was one

17:12

other person who were adamant about it

17:14

and who just kept pushing and pushing

17:16

it, every restraint in

17:18

the bureaucracy. And

17:21

so if you now just imagine a

17:23

situation where those bureaucratic restraints

17:26

are, you know, mostly excise to the schedule F

17:28

changes that they've talked about and they've, and they,

17:30

instead of just having two or three people who

17:32

are like really get off on child separation, you

17:34

have like three or four times more of that,

17:36

you know, to get brought in because

17:38

they've done a more thorough vetting job of

17:41

staff to ensure that they're fully on board

17:43

with these deportation plans. I

17:45

mean, I think that it's really, is really

17:47

scary and it's really kind of hard to calculate how

17:50

much more damage they could do to immigrants

17:52

and migrants. And

17:54

by the way, using schedule F to threaten people who

17:57

might otherwise have to go along. on

18:00

top of that, using the pardon power to

18:02

give cover to people who are worried that

18:04

they're doing something that's illegal. And I think

18:07

that's the most pernicious thing about his pardoning.

18:09

You know, about how I'm going to pardon

18:11

all the January 6 folks. Last time I

18:13

pardoned Bannon, I pardoned Manafort. Now he basically

18:16

would be sending a signal to, you know,

18:19

the shock troops, as Bannon calls them, that

18:21

like they can go ahead and not worry

18:23

if they're running afoul of

18:25

various immigration laws while they execute

18:28

these deportations, because if some, you

18:30

know, rogue liberal judge that Joe

18:32

Biden appointed or some prosecutor

18:34

goes after them, Trump will just pardon them.

18:36

So I think the combining of the pardon

18:38

with the Schedule F, I think like really

18:40

creates a very different environment for them in

18:42

a second term. So I'm

18:44

glad you pulled out the tariffs

18:46

and immigration. I think

18:48

the immigration policy is absolutely horrifying, but I do

18:51

want to get mercenary

18:54

about it. One

18:57

of the challenges, right, is you want to tell

18:59

people on imports, right? Hey, if

19:01

Trump puts a 10% tariff on all these

19:03

imports, it's actually going to cause the kind

19:05

of inflation that's been bothering you for years.

19:08

But I do think the problem is that a lot of people sort

19:11

this into a made

19:13

in America, American manufacturing

19:15

bucket, rightfully so. But

19:19

I worry a little bit that when we fight

19:21

back against that

19:24

kind of a policy, it's tough to do because you

19:26

end up sound, you don't want to sound like a

19:28

2000s era Democrat talking about

19:31

how good NAFTA is going to be. And

19:34

then you got Ross Perot talking about the sucking

19:37

sound of American jobs. How

19:39

do you talk about a policy that I have a

19:41

feeling, at the very least,

19:43

is one that like maybe

19:46

people have mixed feelings about because they

19:48

do worry about manufacturing and

19:50

they do want jobs to be in the U.S.? Yeah, and

19:52

Joe Biden kept it a lot of his tariffs, right? And

19:55

he doesn't have a clean message on that.

19:57

To me, I think it's a negative message.

20:00

That. Is specifically targeted towards my people. like

20:02

the Haley voters, the former republicans right? That's

20:04

like I don't know maybe this is mayor

20:06

running these ads just on breath air shower.

20:08

Something at us are in the Wall Street

20:10

Journal butts. I think if you combine that

20:12

that eight Trump was actually pretty. been to

20:14

Bb to an hour to get into that

20:16

stuff later but Trump was pretty harsh on

20:18

Israel I don't think can be seen as

20:20

reliable partner for Israel's They send his comments

20:22

this interview at the Terrorists you combine the

20:24

threats to take out of Nato. You know

20:26

this is Alice you'd segment of the population

20:28

but I think that you can micro target.

20:30

Some people in the Atlanta silly burbs you

20:32

know that have been traditional republican voters that

20:34

also responsive to the democracy message he could

20:36

layer on top of that disguise can do

20:38

a ten percent to they do. I go

20:40

back for that. Pro: like that the ten

20:42

percent tax on terror of their assigned to

20:44

it like I went like this is gonna

20:46

be harm others As you know anti market

20:48

is going to increase costs so I think

20:50

it's more useful for that group to use

20:53

it to say to like working class people

20:55

that are worried about prices a grocery store

20:57

other now it feels like a bank shot

20:59

and at the campaign. Pry of better arguments.

21:02

He was all over the place on.

21:04

His. Own house and hims all over the place. On

21:07

B B, it's actually very hard to figure out what

21:09

he's even saying that this is is always the problem

21:11

and anyone tries to kind of. I

21:13

don't know. mediate what Trump says into something

21:15

coherent that did the and about us on

21:17

a judgment of the of the journalists at

21:20

a Piece to the Peace like they're like

21:22

he is contradictory and I do things like.

21:24

That. The reporter really does follow ups

21:26

and push back and come back to Thanks Trump

21:29

is just. You. Know he's just it's

21:31

it's santa your fingers but he's but

21:33

just it. Here's what he said. About.

21:35

Whether or not there should be a two state solution. Most.

21:38

people thought it was going to be a two

21:40

state solution i'm not sure to it's a solution

21:43

anymore as gonna work everybody was talking about two

21:45

states even when i was there i was saying

21:47

what do you like year deal like to states

21:49

now people are going back to it depends where

21:52

you are everyday changes now if israel making progress

21:54

they don't want to states they want everything and

21:56

of israel's not making progress sometimes they talk about

21:58

two state solution to say solution seemed to be

22:00

the idea that people liked most, the policy or

22:03

the idea that people liked above. Do

22:05

you like it? Says the reporter. It depends

22:07

when. There was a time when I

22:09

thought two states could work. Now I think two states is

22:11

going to be very, very tough. I think it's going to

22:13

be much tougher to get. I also think you have fewer

22:15

people that like the idea. You had a lot of people

22:17

that liked the idea four years ago. Today you have far

22:19

fewer people that like the idea. He

22:22

goes on to mention that Sheldon Adelson was

22:24

against two states, I think, later on at

22:26

a different digression. We're not sending our best

22:28

here. You

22:31

mentioned this a few minutes ago. It's

22:33

not just about what he's promising. It's how he's promising to

22:36

implement it. Trump learned a lot

22:38

of bad lessons during

22:40

the first term, including

22:42

the danger of being surrounded by anyone

22:45

who has their own reputation to protect.

22:48

What jumped out at you in

22:50

terms of how differently he'd

22:53

go about a second term? He talks about

22:55

how he wouldn't wait for people to quit

22:57

now. He'd fire them. You

22:59

mentioned schedule F. What jumped out at you? To

23:06

me it's really that litmus test thing just

23:08

because it's so insane. We

23:14

say this. It's almost cliche to be like,

23:16

oh, it's a cult. It is

23:18

kind of a cult. In

23:21

order to join this administration,

23:23

you have to at least pay

23:25

lip service to denying reality. That

23:29

sets a tone. It sets

23:31

a tone with the pardons. It sets a tone for

23:33

the existing people that they know that they could be

23:35

fired, where it's like now you have to watch yourself.

23:38

I might have told this on this podcast before. I

23:40

forget, but I had a friend that was working at

23:42

the RNC that was one of the quote unquote good

23:44

ones who stuck around. He was a lifer at the

23:46

RNC. On a couple conference calls,

23:49

he's like, I don't know about this thing Mr. Trump

23:51

is saying. It's a little crazy. I

23:53

don't know that the RNC needs to echo this. He

23:55

did it like two or three times. Jared

23:57

Kushner was out on any of these calls. And

24:00

he gets a call from Jared Kushner out of the blue

24:02

one day. He's like, are you good? Are we all good?

24:04

Is everybody on the same page? And

24:06

that kind of mafioso attitude,

24:10

which they had in the first term,

24:13

but they didn't know how to implement.

24:15

I think if you just listen to him

24:17

now, that's the one thing where it's like,

24:20

they've got a handle on that now. They

24:22

might have people around who aren't true believers,

24:24

but they're going to be the types of

24:26

people who are sociopathic enough to not

24:29

ever reveal that they're not a true believer. Yeah.

24:32

I also think it does something else that's

24:34

also pernicious, which is

24:37

it makes signing on to

24:39

be part of this administration a door

24:42

that locks behind you. Ronna

24:44

McDaniel thought that she was clean

24:47

because everybody knew wink, wink, she

24:49

wasn't a real Trump person. She

24:51

just became one on television. Even

24:55

NBC higher up executives thought, oh, they

24:57

sorted her into the serious old

25:00

school Republican bucket, not the Magma

25:02

Maniac bucket. But because she had

25:04

done so much to defend the lie, there

25:07

was enough of an uproar that made it impossible

25:09

for her to be treated like a, be

25:12

part of polite society. And so

25:14

now you say to these people, if you want to

25:16

be part of Trump world, you've got to sign on

25:18

to this. He

25:22

takes away people's escape ramp. And I do think that

25:24

that makes people more beholden to him, which I also

25:26

think is part of this. Totally agree.

25:28

The other piece of this

25:30

is there are a lot of people thinking

25:32

very hard around Trump, not Trump, about

25:35

how he can better use federal power.

25:38

I saw a blast from the past

25:40

phrase, the unitary executive theory back

25:42

from the Bush administration. They also

25:45

talk about trying to get the president

25:47

more authority to not spend

25:49

money Congress has appropriated, right?

25:52

This would be for everything from not sending money

25:54

to the police to not funding social safety net

25:57

programs. Did any of that come

25:59

out to you? It's not been a good

26:01

quarter century for the Libertarians among us. I'm

26:04

actually an Exeteri Executive there. Look,

26:08

it did. And I think that, again, when I talk to...

26:14

My old friends don't talk to me anymore, because

26:17

there's the betrayal, obviously. Some

26:19

of the MAGA folks will

26:21

talk to me, though,

26:23

because they just, whatever, they always saw

26:25

me as an enemy. And the

26:28

one of them, as an enemy

26:30

within, and now I'm an enemy without, in some ways

26:33

I'm less threatening. And so when

26:35

I talk to them, this is what they talk

26:37

about all the time, like that

26:39

they've had to have learned from the

26:41

first term, right? That consolidating

26:44

power within the executive, that there was a

26:46

lot of deferring, Trump didn't know any better.

26:48

Trump was not really happy to kind of

26:50

let Paul Ryan do the legislating and Mitch

26:53

McConnell. He had Paul and Mitch. He got

26:55

to do the fun stuff. They did the

26:57

dirty work, right? And the mindset

26:59

is totally different now. A couple quick things before

27:01

we go to break. Are you ready to get

27:04

into the good, the ad, and the ugly? In

27:07

the latest episode of Political Experts

27:09

React, Dan is joined by MSNBC

27:11

host Alex Wagner to break down

27:13

viral political ads from Gavin Newsom,

27:15

the Biden campaign, and Republican voters

27:17

against Trump to watch this

27:19

hit series, Type Pod Save

27:21

America, into the nearest YouTube search bar. Also

27:23

from Trump's hush money trial to some pivotal

27:25

Supreme Court hearings, the last few weeks have

27:27

been a whirlwind. Want to keep up with

27:29

it all, but have a life? We can't

27:32

relate, but we've got you. Sign

27:34

up for the What a Day newsletter and get

27:36

a pithy, funny digest of the day's biggest headlines

27:38

straight to your inbox, everything you missed, and why

27:40

you should care five days a week. The

27:49

Pod Save America is brought to you

27:51

by ZipRecruiter. Look, as it's spring, summer's

27:53

coming up, now is the time when

27:55

you're thinking about that concert you want to

27:57

go to, maybe a baseball game you want to hit

27:59

up. Sports, theater, everything is

28:01

more fun in the summer. And

28:04

if you're gonna go to an event, you

28:06

wanna get the best seats. And when you

28:08

want the best, you have to act quickly

28:10

or else someone is gonna get them instead.

28:12

It's like if you're hiring for your business.

28:15

You wanna find the most talented people for

28:17

your open roles before the competition scoops them

28:19

up. So what's the best

28:21

way to do that? Zip Recruiter. Zip

28:23

Recruiter finds qualified candidates fast and right

28:25

now you can try it for free

28:27

at ziprecruiter.com/crooked. Got your eye on a rock

28:29

star candidate? Zip Recruiter's invite to apply feature

28:32

lets you cut the line. Once

28:34

you review Zip Recruiter's list of the most

28:36

qualified candidates for your job, you can easily

28:38

invite your top choices to apply to encourage

28:40

them to apply sooner. Amp up

28:42

your hiring performance with Zip Recruiter and

28:44

find the best fast. See why four

28:47

out of five employers who post on

28:49

Zip Recruiter get a quality candidate within

28:51

the first day. Just go to this

28:54

exclusive web address right now to try

28:56

Zip Recruiter for free. That's ziprecruiter.com/crooked. Again,

28:58

that's ziprecruiter.com/crooked. Zip Recruiter, the smartest way

29:01

to hire. Potsy of America is brought to

29:03

you by Aura Frames. Sweaters. Candles. The

29:05

dreaded bathrobe. Unfortunately, Mother's Day gifts

29:07

can be a little predictable and

29:10

boring. That's why Aura Frame

29:12

is the perfect gift to mix things up

29:14

this year. Named the best digital photo frame

29:16

by Wirecutter, Aura Frames are guaranteed to bring

29:18

joy to moms of all ages.

29:21

I have definitely accidentally given

29:23

my mom the same gift twice. I've

29:26

given her things that are boring. I've forgotten. You

29:28

know what I did last year? I gave her

29:30

an Aura Frame. Because we have a little daughter

29:33

and we are constantly taking pictures of her and there's

29:35

no one who wants to see them more than my

29:37

mom. And you know, it's great to get a photo

29:39

and print it out and put it in a frame

29:41

and send it to somebody that's really nice. That's a

29:44

snapshot in time. But with an Aura Frame, you feel

29:46

like you're connected to someone. You have a little window

29:48

into their world that's constantly updating and it's just really,

29:50

really nice. Aura Frames are WiFi

29:52

connected and come with unlimited storage so you can

29:54

share as many photos as you want from your phone

29:56

to your mom's frame. Not only

29:58

will she be grateful, Sweater she'll love

30:00

that in or a free means you

30:03

get to see more of you Adam

30:05

limited photos and videos and as many

30:07

people's you want to a frame there's

30:09

absolutely no hidden fees are subscriptions react

30:11

with cute and most used to show

30:13

you have a photo since graduations and

30:15

much much more right now or a

30:17

frame as a great deal from other

30:19

states. Listeners can save on a perfect

30:21

gift by visiting Aura frames.com and youth

30:23

promo code crooked to get thirty dollars

30:25

off plus free shipping on their best

30:27

selling frame that a you are a

30:29

frames.com. Use the code crooked a check out

30:32

the save. Terms and conditions apply. This

30:35

I was sponsored by. Better Help As or something you

30:37

need Get off your chest. What is your outlet for

30:40

working through the things that stress you out? You know

30:42

I I do the crossword. That. House

30:44

I am also dials go to therapy. You.

30:47

Know and I say I this week I don't

30:49

want to make any progress in Earth. As you

30:51

said last week, We. All care under

30:53

and stressors big and small. When. Keep them

30:55

bottled up. A concert to affect us negatively.

30:58

Therapy is a safe space to get things

31:00

after Chelsea to figure out how to work

31:02

through whatever is weighing you down. If you're

31:04

thinking of starting therapy, give Betterhelp a try.

31:06

It's entirely online design to be convenient, flexible,

31:08

and suited. You're scheduled to start a brief

31:11

crushed year to get matter the license therapist

31:13

and switch their best any time for no

31:15

additional charge. Get it off your chest with

31:17

better How Visit betterhelp.com/p S A today to

31:19

get ten percent off your first month that

31:21

betterhelp help.com/psn. Or

31:26

at while Trump was apparently dozing

31:28

off in courts President Biden is

31:30

ministration were having a big we'd

31:32

Yesterday the Associated Press reported that

31:34

the Da is taking steps towards

31:36

reclassifying marijuana. Anonymous sources said that

31:38

Attorney General Merrick Garland were formerly

31:40

recommend moving marijuana from a schedule

31:42

one drug to schedule three drugs

31:44

that puts alongside our testosterone and

31:46

tylenol and and Garland recommendations will

31:48

trigger the sort of a long

31:51

process. But ah, given at seventy

31:53

percent of Americans support legalization, Seems.

31:55

Like. A great step. Yeah.

31:58

Is mutai Tembere How. going to light

32:00

a, you know, do a blunt together

32:02

right now to celebrate. Yeah. Look, man,

32:05

this has felt like a no brainer from the

32:07

start and that Joe Biden has been resisting. I

32:10

don't have any internal, you know, Joe Biden's a

32:12

teetotaler. Joe Biden's from a different era. I don't know if

32:14

you notice that. And so I think

32:16

that he has been

32:18

somewhat resistant to this. But I

32:21

guess a political matter, it is

32:23

fucking obvious just based on what has been

32:25

like, look at what happens on ballot

32:27

initiatives anywhere. I mean, like

32:29

in Missouri, they passed a

32:32

kind of marijuana decriminalization or

32:34

maybe it was

32:36

medical. But like, Missouri has moved

32:39

like basically into Alabama territory when

32:41

it comes to like voting for

32:43

Republicans, you know, and voting

32:45

for far right Republicans in blowout elections

32:48

and like on the same ballot, they

32:50

are voting for liberalizing

32:52

marijuana laws. So

32:54

it seems like a no brainer from that perspective. As

32:57

a motivation tool, I do wonder, I guess maybe

32:59

I'd throw that question back on you. Like, is

33:01

it kind of too late? Like to you, like,

33:03

it was like a period like in 2015, it'd

33:06

be like, let's get the youth excited by

33:08

talking about legalizing marijuana. I don't know that

33:10

the youth really care about that anymore. Yes.

33:13

Well, I think part of the problem is that, well,

33:15

it depends on where the youth are. Right. And

33:18

also it depends on what this what act, what this actually

33:20

does. You know, we just live in this endless morass where

33:23

when President Biden does something, even something good, even

33:25

something that progresses, I've been calling on for a

33:27

while, it takes a long time and they don't

33:29

feel the effects right away. Like California. Kind of

33:31

like a weed gummy. Exactly like

33:33

a weed gummy. You don't know when it's going to hit. And then all of a

33:35

sudden you feel pretty good. But it's like

33:37

two hours after he ate us. You almost forget who,

33:40

you almost forget why. But the, because

33:43

right, like in a lot of places, weed

33:45

is pretend legal. Everyone pretends legal. Weed is

33:47

legal in California, even though it is still

33:49

a schedule one drug. And

33:52

then there will be a lot of places where even if it is reclassified,

33:55

there won't be recreational weed because

33:58

it's a state state question. I

34:00

remember that I was

34:02

reflecting on something, which is, I

34:04

think we owe certain

34:07

old school conservative pundits from

34:10

the 90s an apology, because I

34:12

vividly remember Robert Novak.

34:16

Robert Novak was a curmudgeonly conservative

34:21

television pundit. I remember there

34:23

was this debate about medical marijuana, and one

34:25

by one, everyone around the Meet the Press

34:27

table was talking about how it was a

34:29

good step, and it helps people who have

34:32

illnesses. Yes, weed isn't what

34:34

it was in the 1960s, and this is

34:36

supported, blah, blah, blah. Then they

34:38

get to Robert Novak, and he goes, this is the

34:40

hippies. This is what the

34:43

hippies are doing. This is the hippies' revenge. They've

34:45

been trying to get legal marijuana. This is

34:47

a gateway, and I don't support it. I

34:49

don't support legal marijuana. I don't support legal

34:51

drugs, and I don't support the hippies. I

34:54

just want to say that was what was

34:56

happening. Medical marijuana was a

35:00

gateway to getting to legal marijuana

35:02

recreationally. I think deep down we

35:04

all knew that at the time, and you were

35:06

being gaslit. You're dead now,

35:08

Robert Novak, but nevertheless. You

35:10

were right about that in dead. Well, you're wrong in the

35:12

merits of the policy, but you were right that it was

35:14

a gateway. There's a similar example to this. I was walking

35:16

into Jazfest last week, and there was some young progressives, kind

35:18

of multi-hair

35:22

colored, look at me and maybe

35:24

think, maybe I could be somebody that could win over

35:26

on the issue of gay rights. I don't know. I

35:28

guess I wasn't dressed gay enough that day.

35:30

We signed this petition to help

35:32

support the gay agenda. I

35:35

was like, my old instincts came back

35:37

out. I was like, wait a minute. There's no

35:39

gay agenda. In fact, conservatives are always

35:41

like, the gays have an agenda. We're always like,

35:43

no, what are you talking about? No, we just

35:45

want equal rights. There's no gay agenda. Turned out

35:47

there was a gay agenda, actually. Once we got

35:50

the rights, we were free to talk about it.

35:52

So, marijuana, it was a gateway. In

35:54

the gays, we did have an agenda. The

35:56

90s Republican pundits were right about that.

35:59

Yeah. They said what was coming. One

36:02

other note on this. This is from the AP

36:04

report, which is, once OMB,

36:06

the Office of Management and Budget, signs

36:09

off, the DEA will take public comment

36:11

on the plan to remove marijuana from

36:13

its current classification following a

36:15

recommendation from the Federal Health and Human

36:17

Services Department after the public comment period

36:19

and a review by a administrative judge,

36:21

the agency would eventually publish

36:23

the rule. Hey, Tim.

36:25

Make a marijuana bubble. Maybe

36:28

we do need a Trump's cleansing

36:30

bureaucratic fire. Yeah, I

36:33

mean, I do think we could probably get

36:35

rid of a few bureaucrats. I do. I

36:38

maintain that view. I do have to say it. All right.

36:40

I'm discussing. I'm talking with Josh Shapiro

36:42

here in a few hours. And one

36:45

thing I want to ask him, which I'm excited to hear,

36:47

is, like, you know, I-95 collapses.

36:49

I'm like, it's fixed in two days. It's fixed

36:51

in two days. And I'm like, over in California,

36:54

they've been trying to build a train for like

36:56

20 years now. Like, we

36:58

spent $800 million, and we haven't even put down

37:00

any tracks, you know, because we have CEQA.

37:02

And so, I don't know. Yeah. I

37:05

think we could get legalized pot and trains and

37:07

roads that work a little bit faster, just a little bit

37:09

faster. We can have a couple of bureaucrats still. I don't

37:11

want to fire too many people, but I don't know. Maybe

37:14

do less. How about do less bureaucrats? Well,

37:16

how about do more faster and cheaper? Or

37:18

do less. Yeah, do less review.

37:21

I want to do more faster. I want to

37:23

do more faster and cheaper. For the record. If

37:26

there is any place where we could move faster,

37:28

it was not to gut the government, 2010 era

37:33

Tim Miller style. All right? Okay.

37:36

I could be on board of either, I guess I'm saying. Do

37:38

less or do more faster. Well, for

37:40

those to be fine, then

37:42

doing more, much slower, slalier.

37:47

I do think Biden being out there

37:49

on marijuana ultimately. I

37:51

think that put aside

37:54

the policy taking time

37:56

and the fact that, to your

37:58

point, it does feel like weed

38:01

has legalized itself. I

38:04

do think that there is value to having, like I

38:06

think for people who know that this policy is just

38:10

completely indefensible, I would like to see President

38:12

Biden saying that I'm out there trying to

38:14

do this. And by the way, I've taken

38:16

steps on behalf of people that

38:18

have been locked up for nonviolent marijuana offenses. I

38:20

think that that's all really positive. Yeah, we've been

38:23

joking about this, but it is the criminal justice

38:25

side of this is serious. Weed

38:27

might be legal in our hearts as like

38:29

rich whites, but it is still a

38:31

problem for people

38:36

that have less advantages and there

38:38

are still people in jail for

38:40

weed crimes. And so on that side of things,

38:42

I think that is a good argument to make.

38:45

And maybe that can be more motivating also to

38:47

progressives when it's framed that way and less about

38:49

like smoking

38:51

spliffs or whatever. Yeah, I think that's right.

38:53

I also just, it is like the

38:56

fact that we have had this quasi

39:01

legal status for so long is

39:03

it is so morally

39:05

bankrupt that we have people in jail in

39:07

one place, in the same place that we

39:09

have people walking into a store like it's

39:11

an Apple store. And the fact that we

39:13

have tolerated that, it does to

39:15

me, it's outrageous and we could

39:18

talk about it at Nausea, but I do think it speaks to

39:20

like a

39:23

larger conversation, but like how does the society

39:25

become kind of soft enough that

39:27

Trump can sneak in? Well, I think part of

39:29

it is being the kind of place that

39:32

is willing to overlook those kinds of injustices. I'm snapping

39:34

at you, like I'm in the New York Times break

39:36

room. Please do, please

39:38

do. Speaking of the youth, overnight,

39:41

a lot of developments in

39:43

the campus protest movement in New York, NYPD

39:46

officers in riot gear and

39:48

riding an armored vehicle moved in on Hamilton

39:50

Hall. The Zionists

39:52

have taken back Hamilton Hall while

39:55

protesters that occupied it and barricaded it officers

39:58

also cleared an encampment at city Collins. Nearly

40:00

300 people were arrested according to a very

40:02

satisfied Eric Adams. A lot

40:04

is happening everywhere, Tulane, Yale, University of

40:07

Wisconsin, here in LA. There was an

40:09

ugly physical altercation between pro-Palestinian protesters at

40:11

UCLA who had fortified their encampment with

40:13

plywood barriers and a group of what

40:16

appeared to be pro-Israel counterprotesters trying to

40:18

tear down those barriers and throwing things

40:20

into the encampment. There's disturbing video out

40:22

there of the two sides

40:24

fighting. Eventually the police arrived and separated the

40:27

groups. Tim, you made a version of

40:29

this point last night. It is

40:31

what I think is probably a very popular

40:33

but quieter sentiment, which is basically the

40:36

fact that there is a lack of space in this

40:38

debate for people who are opposed to the war, believe

40:40

the Palestinians deserve freedom and self-determination,

40:42

opposed to perpetuating a famine, murdering

40:44

civilians, opposed to the anti-Semitism and

40:47

Islamophobia around these protests, and opposed,

40:49

and this is a quote of

40:51

yours, opposed to militarized police marching

40:53

on the Portlandia Quad like they're

40:55

invading Fallujah. I

41:01

was glad to see you had a back and forth with Mehdi Hassan, who

41:03

we had on Love or Leave It last week.

41:07

The fact that I think that there was so much

41:09

comedy between the two of you, I think, speaks to

41:11

the fact that there

41:14

really hasn't been that space during

41:16

this moment, in part because I think Republicans don't

41:18

want it to be. They want to talk about the

41:20

chaos. They want to exploit this. I also

41:22

think the media owns this. I think Democrats

41:25

own this, and the students themselves, by the

41:27

way, who have agency and are ought

41:29

to be held responsible for their words

41:31

and their actions. How

41:33

do we make space for that kind of a dialogue,

41:35

which is, I think, clearly what's needed?

41:38

Yeah, we're doing it right now. Here we are.

41:42

Look, I think that there are a lot of people

41:44

that are afraid to say that they really think about this. I

41:46

have to tell you, we just

41:48

did this talking about MAGA and talking about the Trump

41:50

administration, how they're trying to create a world. I came

41:53

from a world where a lot of my former friends

41:55

have real thoughts about Trump that they will tell me

41:57

after a couple of beers, or that they used to.

42:00

they won't say out loud, they won't say

42:02

on Twitter. And I feel

42:04

like there are a lot of people that have the views

42:06

about this conflict and these protests. And

42:09

I think that we need to make it

42:11

okay for people to express their views without

42:14

immediately going to ad hominem and saying, oh,

42:16

that means you're on BB's side, that means

42:18

you're on the terrorist side. Like, when it

42:20

comes to BB and when it comes to

42:22

Hamas, I think about it. Are you ever

42:24

on Reddit? You know the... From time

42:26

to time. You know the, am I the asshole Reddit

42:29

feed? Yeah. Right? So

42:31

am I the asshole? Somebody writes a story

42:33

about how they've been a jerk to their

42:35

colleague or something and then the responders can

42:38

say, you're an asshole or you're not an

42:40

asshole. But there are some situations where the

42:42

cometries respond, E-S-H, everybody sucks

42:44

here. And that's

42:46

how I feel about the Hamas

42:48

BB situation. Everybody sucks

42:50

here. Okay? Obviously not the

42:53

innocent people that have been killed or whether

42:56

they were in a kibbutz or whether they're in

42:58

Gaza. But when it comes to

43:00

the leadership of Israel, pretty

43:02

much everybody sucks here. When it

43:04

comes to Hamas who is still

43:06

holding hostages and still using

43:09

their own people as human shields, everybody

43:11

sucks here. And unfortunately, I feel that

43:13

way a little bit about the Columbia

43:15

situation where I think there

43:17

are many protesters who are very earnest in

43:20

their protest against the war. And

43:22

I think Mehdi, and this was part of

43:24

me and Mehdi's exchange yesterday where Mehdi's like,

43:26

well, Tim, the reason why they're not protesting

43:28

Hamas is because we're not giving weapons to

43:30

Hamas. And they're only

43:32

protesting Israel because that's where we

43:35

have some control in our

43:37

democratic government. I'm like, okay, I

43:39

guess that's fine. But it'd be nice to

43:41

have, if the protests also included some people

43:43

with signs that said, by the way, Hamas

43:45

sucks too. And unfortunately,

43:47

what I see in those protests are a

43:49

couple of people that have Hezbollah flags or

43:52

a couple of people that are like, Jews

43:54

should go back to Europe or America

43:56

where they came from, which is

43:58

just ahistorical or... glory

44:00

to our martyrs. All that

44:03

stuff makes me uncomfortable and that's

44:05

not to impugn everybody that has

44:07

very real earnest concerns about the

44:09

humanitarian crisis but I

44:11

would like to see a little

44:13

bit more, you know, if the goal

44:16

of these protests is, hey we need a ceasefire,

44:18

then we should also at least be expressing that

44:20

we're pretty upset about the main party that's preventing

44:22

us from a ceasefire right now which is Hamas.

44:26

And so anyway, that's why I'm kind of like

44:28

everybody sucks here when it comes to those protests

44:30

also and also the cops which

44:32

was and Eric Adams which is way

44:34

overkill and it's only in America and

44:37

third world countries. Like there's this is

44:39

not happening in Germany or in you

44:41

know Sweden if they're at their protest.

44:43

You know it's very nice officers with

44:45

little little batons like asking people to move

44:47

off the property. Like the idea they have

44:49

these fucking face masks like it's all it's

44:52

crazy. Yeah there's a there's somebody

44:54

this is not my observation but somebody

44:56

pointed out that you can track the

44:58

evolution of our militarization of police by

45:00

looking at the way the Lego policeman

45:03

has changed over the years from

45:05

like a smiling kind of almost in

45:08

a postal uniform to basically now like

45:10

a soldier. Yeah. No I agree with

45:12

what you're saying. I also I do

45:15

think that like one of the ways

45:17

our brains are all collectively pickled from

45:19

years of political coverage that

45:21

treats everyone like a pundit is we

45:23

kind of bounce back and

45:25

forth almost without

45:28

noticing between what is sort

45:30

of morally righteous versus what

45:32

what is effective and

45:34

I and now I have nothing in both

45:36

right like you are correct like it is

45:38

both I think less effective and I think

45:41

less I think morally

45:44

defensible to not make

45:46

denouncing Hamas's holding of

45:48

hostage a part of what you're what

45:51

you're trying to protest but then

45:53

sometimes I also think just okay I don't

45:56

agree with a lot of what these protesters are saying I'm

45:58

sure I would find them quite annoying. However,

46:01

they have successfully drawn attention to

46:03

what is the urgent moral

46:07

crisis, half a world away, where children

46:09

and civilians are being killed, where there

46:11

seems to be no end in sight

46:13

to this conflict even as a ceasefire

46:15

is being negotiated. And then

46:18

I think, well, you know what? It

46:20

doesn't really matter that I disagree with what

46:24

these protesters are saying on the

46:26

larger issue or the fact that

46:28

I find the ramifications of their

46:30

views abhorrent because what it

46:32

would actually mean to achieve what

46:34

they claim to be their goals.

46:36

I find it abhorrent because what

46:38

they are actually protesting right now

46:40

is something I completely agree

46:42

with, which is the inhumane and despicable conduct

46:45

of this war. And I don't want to

46:47

be a person who makes the

46:49

same mistake that a lot of people make when

46:51

they look at a protest, which is get

46:54

sucked into a debate over its

46:56

tactics and methods rather than putting

46:58

aside the longer term problems with the BDS

47:00

movement or the ways in which I disagree

47:03

with it, but rather what are they drawing

47:05

attention to and are they right to do

47:07

it? Yeah, I'm

47:09

with that. I get it. I think about that

47:11

for sure. And

47:13

maybe you could argue there's been some success there

47:15

and the fact that there's some more food

47:19

trucks are getting in, would that

47:21

have happened without the protest? I don't know. Would

47:23

that have happened without the protest? It's hard to do

47:25

that counterfactual. I will say this though. There's

47:27

just not another situation for a group

47:29

besides Jews where it would be acceptable

47:33

in polite liberal society to

47:36

hold a protest where people are

47:39

just, where there are

47:41

members of the protest that are

47:43

dehumanizing and personally attacking people from

47:46

a specific religious or ethnic group.

47:49

It's hard to imagine that being acceptable

47:51

in liberal society for targeting

47:53

any group except for Jews. And

47:55

so I just like, there feels like there

47:57

should be a way. protest,

48:00

right? There are going to be a lot of people out there, you

48:02

can not pick one sign. Sure.

48:06

There's no way to totally control every protestor's

48:08

sign or chant. And there have been some

48:10

gross chants from the pro-Jewish counterprotesters, by the

48:12

way. But at a broader enough

48:15

level, there's a certain group that doesn't feel safe

48:17

and they feel like they're being attacked. There

48:20

would be more widespread condemnation about that. I think

48:22

if that's other groups, and I think that's upset

48:25

a lot of Jewish people and a lot of

48:27

people that are allies of Jewish folks or just

48:29

observers of the situation. I agree

48:32

with that. And now the response is, well,

48:36

there are also Jewish students who are part of these protests.

48:38

But I think that

48:40

the issue is, why? Why

48:43

does this happen? Even if most of the

48:45

protesters, while saying things that I

48:47

think ultimately

48:51

would resort into a cataclysm

48:53

for millions of Jewish people

48:55

in Israel, they're

48:58

not shouting anti-Semitic statements. They're not

49:00

shouting slurs. But people

49:02

that do do that are drawn to the

49:04

outskirts or are inside of these protests. We

49:06

saw one of the leaders in Columbia, which

49:08

has also gotten an absurd amount of attention,

49:11

but nevertheless saying

49:14

horrible things came

49:16

to attention, shocking that that person

49:20

was walking around until

49:23

it drew national embarrassment for the school.

49:27

But I do think that that's a

49:29

question, right? Why does this draw this

49:31

kind of anti-Semitism? And I think it

49:33

is because this line between anti-Zionism and

49:36

anti-Semitism is a hard one to draw.

49:38

And I see it myself where you

49:41

see this word Zionist being thrown at

49:43

people in a way that it

49:45

does get my back up because it's so quick

49:48

to be thrown as a slur.

49:51

And so I just, in the end, it's just

49:53

like, this is really fucking hard. Yeah, it's a

49:55

liberal Zionist. Look, I have a lot of friends

49:57

like this that are in Israel that are Israel'sitis

50:00

that we're in the streets protesting Bibi that

50:02

believe Israel has a right to exist, that

50:04

love Tel Aviv as just a beautiful city.

50:06

That's a very gay city, by the way,

50:09

a really diverse city and have moved there

50:11

and love being there. And they

50:13

protested Bibi. They do not like the Lukud government, but

50:15

they believe Israel has a right to exist and

50:18

they dress visibly Jewish. And

50:21

they have the Star David necklace or whatever. And

50:25

they're being treated like shit by

50:28

their friends, like on social media and

50:30

by some of these protesters. They're being

50:32

treated terribly. And so yeah,

50:34

sure, they're anti-Zionist Jews that are part of

50:36

the protest, but like that

50:38

group, they didn't do anything wrong. They're

50:41

not bombing Hamas. Their friends

50:43

or relatives or acquaintances

50:45

got killed by Hamas. And

50:48

all they're trying to say is we have a right to exist

50:50

too. And we want

50:52

to have a right to exist peacefully. And

50:54

we want the Palestinians to be able

50:56

to get aid. Those

51:00

people aren't doing anything wrong. And

51:02

they're being treated very poorly by the protesters.

51:04

Is that the acute problem? Are

51:07

their feelings as important as the dead Palestinian

51:09

kids? Of course not. That's why you

51:11

always have to caveat. That's why you have this conversation. Every

51:14

time you say that, yeah, yeah, everyone sucks here. A lot

51:16

of people are getting screwed here, but it's worth saying though.

51:18

I think it's worth saying for another reason,

51:20

which forget the tone policing in addition to

51:23

the baton policing that's going on.

51:26

I think it matters not just because of

51:28

how it makes people feel, but

51:30

my sincere view, which I've expressed many

51:32

times in various forms on this and

51:35

other podcasts, is that the

51:37

most effective way that advocating,

51:41

chanting from the river to the sea, making

51:44

it this struggle

51:46

between colonialists and anticolonialists, none

51:48

of it puts actual peace

51:51

for actual human beings closer.

51:53

And actually I think if

51:55

it is effective, it puts those

51:57

things farther away because there's no

51:59

answer. to this problem that

52:02

involves ratifying those kinds of ideas. They are far

52:05

from it. And that to me I do think

52:07

is important. And not just because I don't like

52:09

what they're saying, I don't like how it makes

52:11

people feel, how Americans currently feel is not the

52:14

most important thing. I think it is because the

52:16

larger struggle, that peace

52:18

in this larger struggle requires rejecting those kinds

52:20

of ideas. Yeah. You

52:22

just have me on, you just wanna just peel

52:24

away the onion and just, you know, you're like,

52:26

I wanna bring up tariffs, I

52:29

wanna dunk on progressive protestors,

52:31

like let's talk about, dude, motor, you're just, every

52:33

time I'm on, Don't characterize it that way. You're

52:35

trying to do it. Don't fucking characterize it that

52:37

way. You're doing it for, you're intentional. I get

52:39

it, that's fine, I'm happy to do it. I'm

52:41

happy to be your little, I don't know, token.

52:44

Okay. Pods

52:52

of America is brought to you by Renewal by

52:54

Anderson. Is it time to replace

52:56

your home's windows? Are they rotting, rustling, or

52:58

warping? Is there fog between the glass? Then

53:00

it's time to replace them with Renewal by

53:02

Anderson. Renewal by Anderson is both

53:05

the manufacturer and installer of their windows and

53:07

doors, so there's no hassle. They have more

53:09

five-star reviews than other leading full-service window replacement

53:11

companies. Plus, their energy efficient windows and doors

53:14

could help you reduce the amount of energy

53:16

used in your home, lowering your energy bill.

53:19

And they offer limited, fully transferable

53:21

warranty coverage. Right now, Renewal

53:23

by Anderson is offering a free

53:25

in-home consultation and price quote on

53:27

quality, energy efficient, affordable windows or

53:30

patio doors with special financing options.

53:33

Text CROOKED to 200300 for

53:36

a free consultation to buy one window or door

53:39

and get one 40% off, plus save an extra $30 off every unit when

53:43

you buy four or more units. These savings are

53:45

only available for a limited time, so make sure

53:47

to check it out by texting CROOKED to

53:49

200300. That's

53:53

CROOKED to 200300. Testing

53:58

privacy policy in terms of conditions. Posted a text. textplan.us,

54:00

texting and roles for recurring automated text marketing

54:02

messages, message and data rates may apply, reply

54:04

stop to opt out, minimum purchase required, interest

54:07

accrues from data purchased but is waived if

54:09

paid within promotional period. Go to windowappointmentnow.com for

54:11

full offer details. Hey

54:13

everyone, it's Ted from Consumer Cellular, the guy in

54:15

the orange sweater, and this is your wakeup call.

54:17

If you're paying too much for wireless service, you

54:19

don't have to keep having that nightmare. Consumer Cellular

54:22

has the same fast, reliable coverage as the leading

54:24

carriers for less. And for a limited

54:26

time, new customers receive their second month free when they

54:28

sign up and use promo code monthfree by May

54:31

31st. So why keep

54:33

spending more than you have to?

54:35

Seriously, wake up and call 1-888-FREEDOM

54:37

or visit consumercellular.com. Texas needs another

54:39

third party charge as well apply. See website for additional

54:42

details. You

54:45

can start your day off right. You can start your day off

54:47

right when you find

54:49

a professional on Angie to get your plumbing

54:51

right first. Connect

54:54

with skilled professionals to get all your

54:56

home projects done well. Visit angie.com. You

54:58

can do this when you Angie that.

55:03

One last crass political question

55:05

about the situation, which is Republicans

55:08

like this. They like the chaos. They

55:11

like trying to drive a wedge between Democrats

55:14

and their Jewish constituency. How worried about it?

55:17

And what would you do about it? Many

55:19

constituencies, not just the Jewish constituency, youth, Arab.

55:25

Just broadly people of color, I think. There's a

55:27

lot of folks that have genuine unhappiness and concerns

55:29

in the situation. It's a wedge. And

55:31

so, yeah, look, I think that the Republicans

55:34

do see this as a political opportunity. They

55:36

did not see any, with maybe the exception

55:38

of like the one or two random libertarians

55:40

who are in there. Our friend

55:42

Justin Mosch is gone, so maybe there aren't any good

55:44

ones left. They

55:47

don't mind seeing the cops with their batons

55:49

going in there and knocking some heads. They

55:52

think that's a winner for them. Donald

55:55

Trump once, I think,

55:57

bleated in the protest now.

56:00

there is no nuance here. You

56:02

know, Jared Kushner is talking about, you

56:04

know, building, building Mar-a-Lago, you know, on

56:06

the strip in Gaza. So

56:09

I think it's a winner across

56:11

the board. They might be right. And

56:13

I think that it's concerning, you know, it's

56:15

like, it is concerning if there are, you

56:18

know, young voter like, like Joe

56:20

Biden has a very fragile coalition,

56:22

which includes people that are quite

56:25

Israel sympathetic in the democratic coalition,

56:27

but also kind of the swing

56:29

voters, you know,

56:31

who left the Republican Party over

56:34

Trump that are not happy

56:36

with him. The young voters are in

56:38

his coalition, Dear board voters are in

56:41

his coalition. I mean, so he has

56:43

to navigate a very broad

56:45

and wide coalition that has very different

56:47

views on this. Republicans are

56:49

happy to take advantage of it.

56:52

Meanwhile, Donald Trump's coalition is like

56:54

mostly either pro Israel or totally

56:56

anti-Semitic. So it's a little bit

56:58

less, it's like less of a tightrope. Yeah,

57:01

well, that's it is, but

57:03

it's interesting that it is less of a tightrope because of

57:05

what you just said. But I do think what I was

57:07

getting at, right, is that, yes, this

57:09

is an issue that what

57:11

is happening in Gaza is

57:15

potentially alienating key constituents by the

57:17

needs like our voters

57:19

and young voters,

57:21

while at the same time, the

57:24

Republicans are trying to exploit the

57:26

protests without really regard for the

57:28

views of those young people or those

57:30

our voters in Dearborn, they're trying to

57:32

go for, they're

57:35

trying to kind of use the chaos, they're trying

57:37

to say that Jews are unsafe, right? They're trying

57:39

to go after that constituency specifically. For sure. Yeah.

57:41

And I think it's working. It's

57:43

alarming to me, but anecdotally

57:46

speaking, you know, this is

57:48

this 1%, is this 2%? I

57:50

don't want to overstate how big of the audience this is.

57:52

It's a pretty small demographic. But it

57:55

could be important in Atlanta, could be

57:57

important in Philly, which is,

57:59

you know, Wall Street Journal reading

58:02

conservatives who are either Jewish or

58:04

kind of have strong foreign policy

58:06

hawks that were turned off by

58:08

Trump because of his

58:10

dabbling in anti-semitism and because of his isolationism,

58:14

that you hear them saying anecdotally,

58:17

like, I don't know, I don't like

58:19

what's happening, Trump will defend us, maybe

58:21

I have to go back to Trump.

58:23

The whole Dan Sinner who works

58:26

for Paul Singer, who used to be a Never Trumper,

58:28

who is a big donor who went back to Trump.

58:30

Paul Singer is already back at Trump. It seems like

58:32

Dan is sympathetic to that. You

58:34

see this and I was

58:36

actually just with someone today who

58:39

said that they're friends, who's Jewish, who said that they're

58:41

friends, they have

58:44

friends that feel this way. So is that going

58:46

to change by November? You know, will cooler heads

58:48

prevail? Hopefully. But I do

58:50

think that there is a small demo

58:52

of group voters that were traditionally Republican,

58:54

that were gettable for Biden, that

58:57

are, you

58:59

know, that are starting to lean back towards Trump over

59:01

this. I find that asinine, just to be, I'll be

59:04

very clear, I find that asinine and insane that you

59:06

would, that on the issue of anti-semitism, you would go

59:08

back to the person that had lunch with Nick Fuentes

59:10

and Kanye. I find it ludicrous and

59:12

the extreme, but that doesn't mean that it's not

59:15

happening. So

59:17

Biden, there are also people trying to

59:19

lay what's happening on a campus in New York, on

59:21

a private university campus at Biden's feet, I think, often

59:24

in bad faith, but nevertheless, Biden has

59:26

a difficult square to circle

59:28

here. He needs to assuage the

59:30

concerns of that part of

59:32

his coalition that is concerned about these

59:34

protests and where he had anti-semitism has

59:37

to assuage the concerns of people that

59:39

are deeply unhappy with his policy and

59:41

that requires a policy change that requires something to

59:43

actually shift on the ground for sure. But what

59:45

would you like to see Biden say if there's

59:47

anything he's not saying? And

59:50

this is going to be a very untimmed thing. This

59:52

is on the Podbro podcast. It should be you guys

59:55

saying this, but we could really use

59:57

Obama on this because it's so not he was

59:59

really good. at this stuff, like going out there

1:00:01

and talking. And this was this whole bit starting

1:00:03

in 04, like there are red

1:00:05

states and there are blue states. We can be,

1:00:08

we can think about the, we can be empathetic

1:00:10

towards the other side while also understanding the policy

1:00:12

ramifications. He was talented at this. Biden's like, that's

1:00:14

not his strength, man. Like he's got strengths, but

1:00:16

like, that's not it. And I think that right

1:00:19

now there are people that are like, where is

1:00:21

he on this? And, and, and

1:00:23

a lot of what they've been doing has

1:00:25

been relegated to written statements, which are usually

1:00:27

pretty good, by the way. If you read

1:00:29

the Biden administration, White House's written statements,

1:00:31

they usually are very empathetic, very

1:00:33

nuanced, very thoughtful. But,

1:00:37

but they're not letting him loose on it.

1:00:40

And maybe for, maybe for good reason. I don't,

1:00:42

I think that it's a really, it's

1:00:44

dicey. And, but I do think that he needs to

1:00:46

speak out more. And you could speak out from first

1:00:48

principles. And the nice thing about having a speech at

1:00:50

a press conference is he could speak more just about

1:00:53

the thing, like you can be, the inverse

1:00:55

of my original statement, where we started this,

1:00:57

everything's an asshole. You can, you can be

1:00:59

the positive version of that, which is I'm

1:01:02

worried about Gaza. We're trying to get

1:01:04

food in. I'm worried about antisemitism on

1:01:06

campuses in America. We should have that

1:01:09

stopped. I'm worried about free speech rights.

1:01:11

Kids shouldn't be getting knocked over by police

1:01:13

officers when they're at, you know, I saw,

1:01:16

he could do that, but it's

1:01:18

not, there's going to be people he doesn't please if he does

1:01:20

it, but it's probably, we'll

1:01:22

see. If it doesn't get any better, it's going to be

1:01:24

something he's going to have to figure out how to do.

1:01:26

Yeah. I think that's right. I do think that in moments

1:01:28

like this, when, when

1:01:30

the rhetoric is heated, when people are talking

1:01:33

past each other, and when

1:01:35

Republicans are trying to exploit it for the

1:01:37

chaos, I do think sometimes that does lower

1:01:39

the bar a little bit and turns just

1:01:41

stating first principles, sort of where we started

1:01:43

this conversation into something that

1:01:45

I think is calming and relieving and actually goes

1:01:48

a long way. Before we let you go, Tim,

1:01:51

Vice President Kamala Harris went

1:01:54

on Drew Barrymore show on Monday, talked about

1:01:56

a wide range of topics. But

1:02:00

at this moment, I don't think you've seen

1:02:02

it, and I think we'd like to get your live reaction. I

1:02:04

have not. I've been thinking that we

1:02:06

really all need a tremendous hug in the

1:02:08

world right now, but in our

1:02:10

country, we need

1:02:12

you to be mamala of the country. Oh.

1:02:27

They made me very uncomfortable. They made me very

1:02:29

uncomfortable. They made Kabbalah very uncomfortable. I know, I

1:02:31

like that. I like this thing. What is going on?

1:02:33

Like, isn't she about to touch me? It's,

1:02:37

everybody, we don't need any

1:02:39

politician to be mom. We don't need to

1:02:41

be mamala. We don't need to be dadala. We

1:02:44

don't need a national dad. We don't need

1:02:46

any of that shit. It's

1:02:48

a city where they go to

1:02:51

write laws and regulations and

1:02:53

to implement policies that

1:02:55

affect our lives. They're not dad.

1:02:58

They're not mom. I hate that

1:03:01

shit. Me too. We need a

1:03:03

head of government. By the way, this

1:03:05

was like, this is fundamentally American, love

1:03:07

it, that where you're gonna get. Like,

1:03:09

this is John Adams wanted to name

1:03:12

the president his excellency or some shit,

1:03:14

and George Washington was like, fuck that.

1:03:16

Mr. President. Mr. President, we

1:03:18

could have a Mrs. President, hopefully soon.

1:03:20

That's it. They're one of us. They're

1:03:23

of the people. We do not need a mom.

1:03:26

They're not like the royal family. They

1:03:28

don't need to be anything special. That

1:03:30

does bother, I'm with you on that.

1:03:32

Also the touching. Also

1:03:34

the touching. Because you had a moment

1:03:36

where Carrie Lake touched you. It was very similar. It

1:03:38

was kind of similar. It was kind of similar. I

1:03:41

don't mind if you touch me on the shoulders. I

1:03:43

don't know. Drew is kind of the good

1:03:45

angel version of Carrie. It's like the same

1:03:48

energy, but like the light versus the darkness

1:03:50

kind of with Carrie or Drew. But they

1:03:52

both did the double hand thing. Yeah,

1:03:55

too much. You can touch me on my

1:03:57

shoulder. We can hug, but there's something about

1:03:59

the full. like eight

1:04:01

fingers. Remember when George W. Bush

1:04:04

lost himself for a second and tried to give Angela

1:04:06

Merkel like a shoulder rub? He got got it. It

1:04:08

was just like he like mischaracterized this like he just

1:04:11

he just did something he might do like to a

1:04:13

relative or a loved one But he just he just

1:04:15

like kind of as he was passing gave her a

1:04:17

quick shivers Like I've

1:04:19

never seen a person shiver The other piece

1:04:21

of this too is like politics is emotional

1:04:24

because it's serious and the stakes are very

1:04:26

very high But we actually

1:04:28

don't need these figures to assuage It's

1:04:31

actually the mirror of the people people

1:04:33

who say like they don't find Joe Biden

1:04:36

inspiring. Okay It's funny. I

1:04:38

get wanting Joe Biden to inspire other people

1:04:40

because you want politics to have outcomes But

1:04:43

you don't need to be inspired because

1:04:45

if you say I want to be inspired It's

1:04:47

a little bit like I don't know like Louis

1:04:49

the 14th being like bring me a show I'd

1:04:51

like to see something bring me bring me a

1:04:54

lovely cake and a show It's like that's not

1:04:56

what this is about like if you're feeling worried

1:04:58

and anxious about politics It's not

1:05:00

Kamala Harris's job to assuage you it might be

1:05:02

valuable for others But if it's

1:05:05

for you sort of should be an

1:05:07

embarrassing thing to request Yeah, go volunteer

1:05:09

if you ought to be inspired, you

1:05:11

know, go out in society and find

1:05:13

somebody inspiring That's not what the let

1:05:15

you know the head legislator of the country.

1:05:18

That's it's nice It's a

1:05:20

nice bonus You know if you get all

1:05:22

tingle up your leg with the president talks

1:05:24

like that's not that should be a bonus

1:05:26

You know a little cherry on top. That's

1:05:28

not a median requirement Yeah, the idea that

1:05:30

like and I get where it's just a very like I don't

1:05:32

know just a very Hollywood Oh the

1:05:34

country needs a hug right now. The country

1:05:36

doesn't need a hug So that's one of

1:05:39

those people me hugs from their loved ones

1:05:41

in their own private lives. The country needs

1:05:43

effective governance and

1:05:45

and to defeat a Despicable

1:05:48

Authoritarian movement the country needs hugs after

1:05:50

go watch Finding Forrester. That's nice. You

1:05:53

know, go find a girl watch a

1:05:55

movie about Young

1:05:57

man overcoming challenges, you know

1:06:00

Whatever find go find something that's fine. You don't

1:06:02

need a mom From

1:06:04

Kamala. I know this is we're very aligned

1:06:06

on this job of it. We're we're look

1:06:08

you and I we began

1:06:11

by Tim

1:06:15

Miller you know him from

1:06:18

the bulwark Send all

1:06:20

your negative comments at him as

1:06:23

always great to see a Tim and And

1:06:26

if you're the one person out there that agreed with all

1:06:28

my takes today the board I

1:06:34

spent an hour for you. All right,

1:06:36

John. I miss you and if Tim is in

1:06:38

your cup of tea Don't worry Dan and John

1:06:40

back Friday morning If

1:06:45

you want to get ad-free episodes exclusive content

1:06:47

and more consider joining our friends of the

1:06:49

pod subscription community at crooked comm slash friends

1:06:52

And if you're already doom scrolling don't forget to

1:06:54

follow us at pods of America on Instagram Twitter

1:06:56

and YouTube For access to

1:06:58

full episodes bonus content and more plus

1:07:00

if you're as opinionated as we are

1:07:02

consider dropping us a review Pods

1:07:05

of America is a crooked media production. Our

1:07:07

show is produced by Olivia Martinez and

1:07:09

David Toledo Our associate producers are

1:07:11

solve Ruben and Farrah Safari Hero

1:07:14

Joaquin as our senior producer Reed Turlin

1:07:16

as our executive producer The show is

1:07:18

mixed and edited by Andrew Chadwick Jordan

1:07:20

Cantor is our sound engineer with audio

1:07:22

support from Kyle Seglen and Charlotte Landis

1:07:25

writing support by Holly Kiefer Madeline Herringer is

1:07:27

our head of news and programming Matt DeGroat

1:07:29

is our head of production Andy

1:07:32

Taft is our executive assistant thanks to

1:07:34

our digital team Elijah Cohn Haley Jones

1:07:36

Mia Kellman David tolls Kirill Pel Aviv

1:07:38

and Molly Lobel Angie's

1:07:47

list is now Angie and we've heard a

1:07:49

lot of theories about why I thought it

1:07:52

was an eco move your words less paper

1:07:55

It was so you could say it faster.

1:07:57

No, it's to be more iconic But

1:08:01

so dark to outright. It's because now

1:08:03

you can compare at some places, look

1:08:05

at service instantly and even get your

1:08:07

project handled from start to finish. How

1:08:09

do you be? It is. And it

1:08:11

makes us so much more than just

1:08:13

a list. Get started at angie.com. That's

1:08:15

A-N-G-I. Or download the app today. Because

1:08:22

NetSuite eliminates the expense of multiple

1:08:25

business systems by consolidating your operations

1:08:27

together into one. NetSuite

1:08:29

is the number one cloud financial

1:08:31

system, bringing accounting, financial management, inventory

1:08:33

and HR into one platform and

1:08:36

one source of truth. NetSuite reduces

1:08:38

IT costs because it lives in the

1:08:40

cloud with no hardware required so you

1:08:42

can access it from anywhere. You cut

1:08:44

the cost and headaches of maintaining multiple

1:08:46

systems because you've cut one unified business

1:08:48

management suite. Bringing all your major

1:08:51

business processes into one platform improves

1:08:53

efficiency, slashing manual tasks and errors.

1:08:59

So do the math. You'll see how you'll

1:09:01

profit with NetSuite too. And

1:09:03

now by popular demand, NetSuite

1:09:05

has extended its one-of-a-kind flexible

1:09:07

financing program for a few

1:09:10

more weeks. Just go to

1:09:12

netsuite.com/podcast25 for more information.

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features