Podchaser Logo
Home
Reddit Goes Public, Microsoft’s Big AI Move, and the DOJ Sues Apple

Reddit Goes Public, Microsoft’s Big AI Move, and the DOJ Sues Apple

Released Friday, 22nd March 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Reddit Goes Public, Microsoft’s Big AI Move, and the DOJ Sues Apple

Reddit Goes Public, Microsoft’s Big AI Move, and the DOJ Sues Apple

Reddit Goes Public, Microsoft’s Big AI Move, and the DOJ Sues Apple

Reddit Goes Public, Microsoft’s Big AI Move, and the DOJ Sues Apple

Friday, 22nd March 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:01

Support for the show comes from Schwab. With

0:03

Schwab investing themes, you can invest

0:05

in what's trending in artificial intelligence,

0:07

big data, robotic revolution, and more.

0:09

It's an easy way to invest

0:11

in ideas you believe in. Schwab's

0:14

research process uncovers emerging trends, then

0:16

their technology curates relevant stocks into

0:18

themes. Choose from over 40 themes

0:20

by all the stocks in a

0:22

theme as is, or customize

0:25

to better fit your investing goals, all in

0:27

a few clicks. Schwab investing

0:29

themes is not intended to be investment

0:31

advice or a recommendation of

0:33

any stock or investment strategy. Learn

0:37

more at schwab.com/thematicinvesting.

0:41

Support for the show comes from Indeed. If

0:44

you need to hire, you may need Indeed. Indeed

0:47

is a matching and hiring platform

0:49

with over 350 million global

0:51

monthly visitors, according to Indeed data.

0:54

And a matching engine that helps you

0:56

find quality candidates fast. Listeners

0:58

of this show can get a $75 sponsored job

1:00

credit to get

1:03

your jobs more visibility at

1:05

indeed.com/podcast. Just go to

1:07

indeed.com/podcast right now and say you

1:10

heard about Indeed on this

1:12

podcast. indeed.com/podcast. Terms and

1:15

conditions apply. Need

1:17

to hire? You need Indeed.

1:24

Hi, everyone. This is Pivot from New York

1:26

Magazine and the Vox Media Podcast Network. I'm

1:29

Kara Swisher. And I'm Scott Galloway. Guess where

1:31

I am today, Scott? You're on the West Coast,

1:33

no? No. I'm in the city

1:35

of Big Shoulders. I'm in Chicago. Really?

1:37

Okay. What are you doing in Chi-town?

1:40

Well, from Ann Arbor, after seeing giant

1:42

Alex speaking of Big Shoulders and

1:44

doing an event there with the CEO of

1:47

GM, I went to

1:50

Minneapolis where I had the loveliest time.

1:52

They are truly nicer people in Minneapolis

1:54

than anywhere else. Yeah. It's a great city, a

1:56

great music city. Anyways, what were you doing in

1:58

Minneapolis? another event that is sold

2:00

out of that there for the book. We had a lot

2:02

of discussions about George Floyd, which is interesting.

2:05

So the repercussions and everything. That's kind

2:07

of interesting. Now I'm at Chicago for

2:10

two events today. Two events,

2:12

one with Brene Brown, our friend from

2:14

Vox Media, and one

2:16

with Mark Leavovich, who is an

2:18

old friend of mine, works for

2:20

the Atlantic now. That sounds good. Sounds

2:22

very white, but it sounds good. It

2:24

does. It's very white. I had a

2:27

hot dog, a Chicago dog. They're

2:29

practically one of them now. I

2:32

love Chicago. Do you like Chicago? I

2:34

think Chicago is the old Navy of cities. It's 80% of New York

2:36

for 50% of the price, which I

2:38

say that positively. It's a great trade. I

2:41

love this city. It's freezing, but I

2:43

love this city, I have to say. I would

2:46

live here. My best friend, Adam, was there. Yeah.

2:50

And it's close to everything. I think its geography

2:52

is really powerful. I went on a bit of

2:54

a bender and started to watch Chicago movies,

2:57

like about last night, and

3:00

the one with Kevin, where he plays

3:02

the FBI agent, Ketching

3:04

Al Capone. Oh, The Untouchables

3:06

with Kevin Costner. Yes, The Untouchables.

3:09

I watched Blue's Brothers, a little bit of

3:11

the Tom Cruise movie, Risky Business. Anyway, a

3:13

lot of movies set here. It has a

3:15

lot of visuals. Ferris Bueller's Day Off. And

3:17

all the John Hughes movies. Anyway, I'm headed

3:19

to LA tomorrow to be on Bill Maher,

3:22

but you were also going to be on They Tell Me. So

3:24

that was nice. Do you know who your

3:26

co-panelist is? I'm not a panelist on the interview. Oh,

3:28

you got the big chair. You're right up front. That's

3:31

very exciting. I think I do know who yours are,

3:33

but you're not supposed to talk about it. You're going

3:35

to have some fun. Anyway,

3:38

we've got a lot to get to today,

3:40

including Reddit's IPO finally happening,

3:42

and Microsoft making a big

3:44

AI higher. But first,

3:47

Elon Musk's Neuralink has released a video showing

3:49

the first human patient playing chess using nothing

3:51

but his thoughts. The patient at

3:53

Quadra-Pagetic moves a cursor on a laptop to play

3:55

a game and turn off music. Neuralink

3:58

is the third competitive release video ever. of

4:00

brain implants after neurotech and synchron.

4:02

What's different here is he can

4:04

do other things, but he can

4:06

multitask and also

4:10

it's closer so it has a – some

4:13

of them are on the outside, I guess, and

4:15

this one is implanted. But

4:18

this whole area is really, really

4:20

interesting. Are you ready to let

4:22

Elon have access to your thoughts, Scott? Scott,

4:24

I'm trying to come up with something snarky. It's

4:27

cool. There's no getting around it. It's really

4:29

hopeful and exciting. I have someone very close

4:32

to my – close

4:35

to me in my life who suffers from

4:37

multiple sclerosis. There's all sorts of – I

4:39

mean, this could be very exciting on a number of

4:41

dimensions. So I'm distinct

4:44

of how I feel about his personal behavior off Mike.

4:46

I'm rooting for him and the company. Yeah,

4:48

and there's other companies too. It's a really

4:50

interesting area. I think we

4:53

know so little about our brains. We really

4:55

do about how they work and everything else.

4:57

And so all these neural

5:00

issues and what you can do with them are interesting. And

5:04

we'll see where this guy goes. I think he was

5:06

in a diving accident, this guy. I'd

5:08

like to – it just got me interested

5:10

in more of the whole area, all these companies,

5:13

and how we're going to do this. And I

5:15

just – I remember seeing Dean Kamen, if you remember,

5:17

he did the segue. But he also

5:19

did this chair, this special wheelchair that you

5:21

got up in. We had it once at

5:24

a code. Someday they're going to print your liver,

5:26

Scott, so you'll be okay. Oh, you're not going to want

5:28

to see that movie. That's

5:30

basically – that's basically the Hollywood

5:32

stars of bars in downtown as

5:35

my liver. Oh, I see. Well, it's

5:37

going to be able to be printed and made from

5:39

synthetics. I think it's just – I think all this

5:41

stuff is really cool. And these are the Elon we

5:43

like. And not just – again, not just Elon, but

5:45

lots of companies like this. I love this part of

5:47

– Wait, do you remember the segue? Yeah, I do. I

5:49

remember Jeff Bezos on a segue at

5:51

Ted's. I didn't put that in the book,

5:53

but yeah, I remember it. They were always

5:56

around. They rode him around a lot. It goes

5:58

to the idolatry of innovators in this. this

6:00

kind of marks the time, but coming

6:02

into my professional years, the Jesus Christ

6:05

of my world was

6:07

a guy named John Doar, Kleiner Perkins. Yeah,

6:09

I know. You know John. Okay, anyways. Yes.

6:11

And he announced that one, the segue was

6:13

going to change the world. So

6:16

we're all waiting for the segue. It literally

6:18

was the headset of before headsets. But

6:21

everyone, these folks spent a ton

6:23

of money on it and it was supposedly going to change

6:25

mobility and do away with cars.

6:27

And also, I remember my biggest moment, I

6:29

was just so excited as an entrepreneur, we

6:31

were doing work for Kleiner Perkins, my firm

6:33

profit. We were doing branch energy. And so

6:35

they let us invest in this

6:38

online wedding registry. I forgot the name.

6:40

So I convinced my partner, I'm like, John Doar

6:42

is letting us into a deal. And we literally

6:44

gathered every cent we had, it was a quarter

6:47

of a million bucks. And we put it into

6:49

this thing and we're waiting. I was literally thought,

6:51

okay, that's it. I'm done. I'm going to be

6:53

a billionaire. I got to co-invest with Kleiner Perkins.

6:55

And they can six months the business is

6:57

out of business. He's been a lot

6:59

of good things, you know, Google, Amazon,

7:02

you know. Well, yeah,

7:04

he had a very, very strong career. But

7:06

and actually, a lovely fellow, I have to

7:08

say. Really nice man. Smart. I mean,

7:10

obviously, this stuff around Ellen Tau was

7:12

problematic at Kleiner, but that was the

7:15

largest. It's good we got that. It's good we got

7:17

that. I just gotta say that everyone has a

7:19

mixed record, just like you just insulted him

7:22

for the segue. But all the digital people

7:24

rode around on them. And I just remember

7:26

Jeff Bezos riding around like a lunatic on

7:28

it, into restaurants and things like that. But

7:30

it's being used all over cities across America

7:33

for tourists. You've seen them. Little segue tours,

7:35

haven't you? Yeah, they have them in Paris.

7:37

But I mean, it's literally, it's like, how

7:39

can I look like the worst

7:42

cliche of a tourist? Yeah. Mall cop.

7:44

Mall cop. If I could take a segue

7:46

into a marine park and start harassing and

7:48

petting dolphins while, you know,

7:50

while eating fried Snickers. It's just, it

7:53

is the cliche of cliche. Let me just say,

7:55

having written it, it's a cool thing. Secondly, if

7:57

it brought us, Paul Blart, Mall Cop.

8:00

cop, I think it's worth everything.

8:03

That's the best movie ever. Have you ever seen

8:05

it? It's just because nobody has any goddamn idea.

8:07

I mean, who would have thought,

8:09

oh, but, you know, a handheld

8:12

phone, I guess we would have thought

8:14

that, or this little blank page with

8:16

a query box was going to be...

8:18

I mean, it's just so interesting what works

8:20

and what doesn't. Yeah. Blah blah. He lives

8:22

down the street from Delaware Beach. No, he's

8:24

made a lot of money doing what I

8:27

would call fairly unimportant work, but good for

8:29

him. King of Queens. King of Queens is

8:31

pretty cute, isn't it? Good for him. He's

8:33

a... I like him. I don't care. He's great. That movie

8:35

is... Go watch that movie if you want to be happy.

8:37

I like any movie where a mediocre

8:39

overweight guy with a minimum wage job

8:41

gets to date hot women. Gates the

8:43

girl and rides a segue. That's right.

8:46

Yeah, it's very realistic. Anybody watch it

8:48

if you want to be happy. Anyway, former

8:50

President Trump won't be able to secure the

8:52

$464 million bond to appeal his

8:54

fraud case in New York according to his

8:56

lawyers right now. We'll see. Trump's legal team

8:58

has called the amount impossible. He's making a

9:00

big deal of that and said they had

9:02

contacted around 30 companies that provide appeal bonds

9:04

with no success. The bond is due to

9:06

be posted next week, but Trump's lawyers have

9:08

asked the court to either pause the judgment

9:10

or accept only $100 million, try to do

9:12

a deal, deal or no deal. I'd

9:15

love you to talk about this because that lunatic

9:17

from Shark Tank, Kevin O'Leran, I think is

9:19

such a pompous ass, was screaming at the

9:22

very lovely Laura Coates the other day on

9:24

shows. Everyone feels like, look, this guy did

9:26

the crime. Don't do the crime if you

9:28

don't want to pay the bill or put

9:30

through the time, essentially. He

9:32

shouldn't get it now because he's rich, etc., etc.

9:34

Thoughts? Well, the

9:37

whole bond thing is pretty interesting, right? Because there's

9:39

probably some people that just shouldn't be allowed

9:41

bond. Then on the other

9:44

hand, if people are granted bond and

9:46

not seen as immediate threat to society,

9:48

kind of nonviolent crime, I think

9:51

bond prices should come down because this is

9:54

yet another example of how the justice

9:56

system right away is just entirely

9:58

not blind based on how much money they're paying. money you

10:00

have. The issue here is whether

10:02

or not, and I don't know the answer to this,

10:04

I'd love to ask Preet if this is kind of

10:06

what I call an extraordinary

10:08

demand that to ask for a

10:11

half a billion dollar bond, my

10:14

understanding is this is a fairly unprecedented

10:16

size and that this is... It's

10:18

not. I've searched it, but

10:20

go ahead. Well, half a billion dollars. Are there a

10:22

lot of half a billion dollar bonds? It is. It's

10:24

a lot of money. Yes, it is. But

10:27

it's not unprecedented. There have been other ones. Is

10:29

that right? Okay. Yes. From what I

10:31

understand, this is... The way

10:33

they're handling this is the way they handle

10:36

everyone's bonds. This was the judgment. You

10:39

can't make changes. Maybe you should. Maybe

10:41

it should be... As the price goes up, the

10:45

bond goes down. I don't know. But

10:47

it seems like that favors rich people, right? So I

10:49

don't know. It'll be interesting. So she could seize. It'll

10:51

take forever from what I've been reading a lot about

10:53

this. It'll take forever

10:56

for her to seize something. And a lot of

10:58

his properties have other

11:01

obligations on them, loans or whatever. So

11:04

the worry is that he has to

11:06

go to Saudi Arabia or some

11:08

single rich guy or... A donor.

11:10

A donor. And all the republicans,

11:12

all the MAGA people, not the republicans,

11:14

are another person who was

11:17

it, was screaming about

11:19

why isn't a rich person, maybe

11:21

that was Kevin O'Leary again, about

11:23

giving... Why isn't a rich person pony up?

11:26

Why doesn't Sean Hannity pony up on everybody else?

11:28

No one wants to give this guy money, but

11:30

he may get some money with True Social, which

11:32

may go public and give him several billion dollars

11:34

because he owns a

11:37

whole bunch of it. So that could happen. It's

11:39

now maybe if they decide to, the shareholders decide

11:41

it will go public, he'll get the money, but

11:43

he can't sell it for six

11:46

months. Maybe that he

11:49

could borrow against it. I wouldn't take that

11:51

bet. But there's that. He

11:53

doesn't have a half a billion dollars in cash, so he needs

11:55

to get a bond and he's having trouble finding

11:57

someone to scare the assets. In my opinion...

12:00

it's fairly likely to speculate

12:02

that his reason with Elon Musk was,

12:04

hey, Elon, would you like a

12:06

cabinet position? Can you give me half a

12:08

billion dollars? And the scary thing here is

12:10

everything becomes financialized and we've normalized how, what

12:13

just a whorehouse Washington is, I would imagine

12:15

we're about to find the second VP pick

12:17

is based on how much money this person

12:19

has and how much they're willing to give

12:22

to the campaign. I would imagine that Donald Trump's

12:25

running around and saying, hey, hey, how'd

12:27

you like to potentially be president? No, I'm old

12:29

and I'm obese. Do you want

12:31

to be VP? How

12:33

committed are you to the campaign? Wink, wink, are

12:35

you $500 million committed to the campaign? Because

12:38

this just happened and I think the media

12:41

isn't- He can shove money over there. He

12:43

shoves his legal money. He

12:45

uses the campaign. That's why he's so far down. He's

12:47

really not. Now, everyone says he'll

12:49

get money once it gets going, but

12:52

there's a lot of worry about how

12:54

much money Biden has versus Trump

12:56

in this campaign because these campaigns

12:58

are made of money and that's how

13:00

things work. But where I was going

13:02

with this, Kara, is that I do think the media

13:04

is remiss or at least takes

13:06

a beat before they ... I'm

13:12

trying to be polite around saying, RFK

13:14

Junior's supposed VP

13:16

pick- Nicole Shanahan. Yeah. Who

13:19

seems like a nice young woman. If

13:22

she was a he, the

13:25

media's hair would be on fire because the only reason

13:27

she's, in my opinion, has

13:29

been vetted and potentially is supposedly

13:31

now, his VP pick to be announced in

13:34

Oakland, is because he needs 15

13:36

million bucks to get on different state ballots and she

13:38

has it. If it was

13:40

a young tech bro with absolutely no

13:42

experience in elected office who had gotten

13:44

a settlement from someone he was

13:46

married to for two years, the media would have their

13:48

hair on fire. The

13:52

VP, the VP stakes have entered a new

13:54

level of just how inane they are and

13:57

that is this individual who, by the way,

13:59

my- I don't doubt she's

14:01

a lovely person and even an impressive person.

14:04

They should do some reporting on her. Like you and I, like

14:07

I said, mixed bag, mixed bag. Well, there is no, no,

14:09

it's not a mixed bag. There is no bag. She

14:11

has no business near the White House. That's

14:13

correct. That's correct. Neither does he.

14:15

But my point is, the Veeb's stakes are now

14:17

about who's willing to give me money to bail

14:19

me out of jail or get me on ballots

14:21

in different states. I mean, we really have... Is

14:24

this a fucking simulation? It is.

14:27

Elon's right. Elon and all these people are right.

14:29

It's a simulation. What's going to happen next? You're

14:31

going to be asked to be... Would

14:33

you take the job? Do you have $444 million? Yeah.

14:39

No, we're going to need a lot more downloads. We're going

14:41

to need Elon. Who would you pick then? Who

14:43

would... Elon can't do it. By the

14:45

way, FYI, Elon said he was not asked for money

14:47

when asked at that interview with Tom L But

14:53

he may have been asked by someone else, which is... You have

14:55

to ask a question very carefully around Elon Musk. I

14:58

think he probably, in some fashion, was asked

15:00

for the money. Who

15:03

could do that then? Who could he

15:05

pick as we pay Trump to get $500 million? Oh,

15:08

there are a lot of billionaires. They will take... I

15:10

think that they doesn't have that money. There are a

15:13

lot of billionaires that would figure out a way, and

15:15

I don't think he'd care. I think he'd violate

15:17

campaign financials. I'm like, once I'm president, it doesn't

15:19

matter what laws I've broken. That's why I'm running,

15:21

quite frankly. But

15:24

if you think about it, the vice president is the

15:26

least important job in the world until it's the most

15:28

important potentially. They all say

15:30

the right thing. They all say, well, obviously the qualification

15:32

or the only consideration is who would be a good

15:34

president. But that is just such bullshit. The only reason

15:37

Veebs are picked is who will

15:39

increase the likelihood that I will

15:41

be president. In other words, they bring a state, they

15:43

bring money, they check some boxes, whatever

15:45

it might be. That's

15:47

why they're picked. Unfortunately, what I think happens

15:50

is people forget these two

15:52

really should have a good relationship. Supposedly,

15:54

Biden and Harris don't like each other.

15:57

And I think vice president Harris is a very...

16:00

impressive woman. I think he wanted to pick

16:02

a woman of color and she was the most qualified. She

16:04

checks a lot of boxes. She's a very impressive

16:06

woman. She would have had a greater chance of

16:08

being president had she never been vice president for

16:10

whatever reason she has lost her voice.

16:12

And a lot of it people say is that the

16:14

West Wing does not like her. I

16:17

don't, I have interviewed people in the West Wing

16:19

and including on the record, lots of people saying

16:21

this is just not true. It's not, I don't

16:23

think vice presidents have a very good job.

16:25

She's been especially bad at that not good

16:28

job. I mean, she just hasn't. I

16:30

don't know about that. Dan Quayle, come on. We

16:32

could list lots of vice presidents. I'm going

16:34

to know. Okay. Okay. She's

16:37

right up there with Dan Quayle. No, she is

16:39

not. Are you kidding me? Oh, she's awful, Kara.

16:41

No, you're wrong. She's awful. Again, speaking

16:43

without knowing, I actually do know a thing or two

16:45

about this and it's not true. I

16:47

think she has problems politically and I think it

16:49

has a little to do with being a woman, a

16:51

little, not insignificant amount

16:53

to being a woman of color. I think she

16:55

has the, she can feel like a prosecutor. There's

16:57

all kinds of things like that. And I think

16:59

she suffers from being a vice president. I don't

17:01

know. I think you're correct.

17:04

I think that she had a ton

17:06

of opportunities around Roe, around Black Lives Matter to

17:08

be a powerful voice. She is doing that right

17:10

now. Well, she hasn't been affected. I don't know.

17:13

It's a long road. We'll see where she comes out. We'll see

17:15

where she comes out in the end. In

17:17

any case, she's certainly qualified.

17:19

How about that? Oh, out of

17:21

central casting. And by the way, was an

17:23

outstanding senator. Yeah, very much so. Very

17:26

good attorney general of California. So we'll see where

17:28

she zeros out in the end. But

17:31

you're incorrect about some of those things. Good to know. You

17:34

are. You are. You're just saying

17:36

that's the top of your head. Yeah, it's called a podcast. I understand.

17:39

The Vek Ramaswamy is worth apparently $950

17:41

million, although he says he's a billionaire.

17:45

Well, he's right in there. He's right at the edge of that. Maybe

17:47

he could give. What people don't

17:49

realize is when you're worth $900 million, you can't find $450

17:51

million in cash. Right.

17:55

That's what I mean. Yeah. That's

17:57

$900 million. But he says he

17:59

is. but others do

18:01

not. In general, the more dudes talk

18:03

about their wealth, i.e. like Trump, the

18:06

less they have relative to

18:09

what they're saying. I found the wealthiest people in

18:11

the world do not talk about their money. He's

18:13

right at the edge of a billion, supposedly. Go

18:15

ahead. Is that right? But Trump used to call

18:17

Forbes and complain that they weren't saying he was

18:19

wealthy enough. I think we're going to

18:22

find out that actually Donald Trump's net worth is a lot

18:24

less than we thought or he claimed. Yeah,

18:26

that's what this is going to show. We'll see where it comes

18:28

up with the money, regardless. He

18:31

has to pay like everybody else. Bonds

18:33

are hard for poor people, too. In

18:36

any case, the Justice Department is

18:38

suing Apple, accusing the company of

18:40

violating antitrust laws by blocking rivals

18:42

from accessing hardware and software features

18:44

on its phone. The suit

18:46

escalates the Biden administration's antitrust fights

18:48

against the biggest U.S. tech companies,

18:50

including Alphabet, Meta, and Amazon. This

18:52

is happening as Apple is coming

18:54

under increasing scrutiny in Europe over

18:56

alleged anti-competitive behavior. As you know,

18:59

Margaret Vestiger, her group in

19:01

Europe in the EU, fined them over $2

19:03

billion. So,

19:05

Scott, what do you think of this? Finally,

19:07

the penny is dropping for Apple. We've been

19:09

waiting for this one. Look,

19:12

I think that it is shocking

19:14

how much likability

19:16

plays into this because – and I'm guilty

19:18

of this, and I think a little bit

19:21

used sometimes – Tim Cook

19:23

and Apple are just so likable that

19:25

we don't apply the same unbiased

19:28

scrutiny of their role

19:30

in addiction to devices, their role

19:33

in privacy, even though they claim

19:35

privacy is – they

19:38

use kind of the virtue signaling of

19:40

privacy, quite frankly, around certain – to

19:43

let themselves to not, in my opinion, not

19:46

live up to the standards of what

19:48

would be best for America or the

19:50

consumer. And, Margaret Vestiger, there seems

19:52

to be a group of regulators who are

19:55

not impressed or not really

19:57

concerned with how likable Apple is. So

20:00

I'm here for it. I think it's a good thing. Yeah,

20:03

we'll see where it goes. They definitely

20:05

are facing a lot of things, again,

20:07

in the EU under, and

20:10

so are tech companies, especially in the EU.

20:12

But this is the US finally stepping up.

20:14

The thing is outmatched by all these companies,

20:16

every one of them. And this Apple case

20:19

was a long time coming, and

20:21

as are the others, the Google ones coming,

20:23

Alphabet ones coming. That's

20:26

further advanced. So we'll see

20:28

what happens with all of these. But there's a wide-ranging

20:31

group of cases. And by

20:33

the way, there were also cases that

20:35

began in the Trump administration. So this

20:38

is a little bit of a bipartisan thing.

20:40

I don't know if it's anti-tech, but it's

20:42

anti-powered. It's something I've been talking about all

20:44

the time, that there is no governor. And

20:46

I happen to like Apple, but I don't

20:48

care. They shouldn't be controlling the

20:50

app store the way they are. And it's

20:53

just this is about bigness. And whether you

20:55

like the company or not, it

20:57

doesn't matter. Bigness begets at

20:59

a competition. That's it. I'm one of those

21:02

people. Power corrupts. No, I don't know about

21:04

that. I don't know. Oh, we

21:06

all know about that. Power corrupts, Cara.

21:08

The bigger they are, the less innovation there

21:10

is, Scott. That's it. I'm sorry. I think

21:12

about Standard Oil or

21:14

AT&T, et cetera, et cetera. I

21:16

just think, and by

21:18

the way, there's going to be lawsuits in the AI

21:21

area too. And there should be. I

21:23

think lawsuits are the only way

21:25

to handle this stuff, given that we have no

21:28

federal legislation protecting us from tech

21:30

companies. That is any kind of

21:32

teeth. No privacy bill, no new

21:35

updated antitrust bill, no

21:37

algorithmic transparency. And I

21:39

will stand on this. I've been screaming this on

21:41

this book tour. This has to happen because there

21:43

are no other options. And as great

21:45

as these companies are and as much money as they

21:47

make and how valuable they are, that's all great. And

21:50

it says a lot about America. You

21:53

can't have all these big companies if you want to be

21:55

what we are in 10 years

21:57

from now. That's my feeling. Anyway.

22:00

Let's get to the first big story. Microsoft

22:05

just made a big move in the AI

22:07

race, hiring former Google exec and DeepMind

22:10

founder, Mustafa Suleiman, to oversee its

22:12

consumer AI unit. Suleiman had, until

22:14

recently, been running his own AI

22:16

startup, Inflection, which he co-founded with

22:18

Reed Hoffman. Among others, Inflection has

22:21

raised over $1.5 billion

22:23

from a number of investors, including Microsoft, and

22:25

Reed Hoffman's on the board of Microsoft. There's

22:27

a lot. I really want to see the

22:30

big story about this. I chatted with Suleiman

22:32

last year, actually, and he asked him about

22:34

his startup and its place in the AI world.

22:37

You know, Inflection, Anthropic,

22:39

DeepMind, OpenAI, we're a

22:41

group of, you know, friends and colleagues

22:44

that have been working together for the best part of 10, 15

22:46

years, and I think we have slightly different, you

22:49

know, a different flavor. I mean, we're still fundamentally

22:51

working in big tech. I'm not, you know, going

22:54

to sort of, you know, that's important to say.

22:56

But, you know, I think there's a different flavor to the

22:58

kind of approach that we're trying to take now, and it

23:00

represents the next step forward in the evolution

23:03

of companies and how we run

23:05

big tech. So, this is

23:07

interesting because there's so many interactions

23:09

here. In addition to

23:12

Suleiman, Microsoft hired a number of

23:14

Inflection employees, including its chief scientist,

23:16

who is another co-founder. Inflection is

23:18

staying operational, but will stop running

23:20

its chatbot, Pi, and will instead

23:22

sell its software to businesses.

23:24

I don't know what happened here.

23:26

I just haven't read anything. Go

23:29

to any thoughts on things like

23:31

this happening, given all the various

23:33

interconnections, including Hoffman being on the

23:35

board of Microsoft.

23:37

He said he'd accused himself, by the way, of

23:39

this thing, but he doesn't seem angry about it.

23:42

I pinged him. We're

23:45

missing something here because essentially, from

23:47

what's been reported, Microsoft has taken the heart

23:50

and lungs of this company. It's taken Mstafa,

23:52

and my understanding is every important person at

23:54

this company that all the company is left

23:56

with is its IP. an

24:00

individual like Mustafa, and I

24:03

also had him on a podcast, you

24:08

can't raise a billion and a half

24:10

dollars and look at people and ask

24:12

them for money and then take your

24:14

entire team over to another company. So

24:16

they've clearly, someone at a high level

24:18

between two companies has come to some

24:21

sort of accommodation. Otherwise, lawsuits would have

24:23

been announced yesterday. This

24:25

is very strange. Basically,

24:27

the whole firm is getting their

24:29

mouse pad or whatever and they're

24:31

walking across, they're going to Microsoft.

24:33

It's just very strange what's going

24:35

on here. Yeah, a little like when

24:37

they tried to hire Sam Altman, when

24:40

that whole thing was happening, if you

24:42

remember, when

24:44

Sam was going to go over there and

24:46

run the AI division after Microsoft had

24:48

a big stake in open AI. It's

24:51

really interesting. He's

24:54

going to lead CoPilot, which is their consumer,

24:56

he's running the consumer unit.

24:59

I have searched for a

25:01

very good, I probably should do the reporting myself,

25:03

but I haven't. Who's

25:08

going to pay back the people? One

25:10

of its co-founders, I think it's

25:12

Karan Simonyan, he was

25:14

also a leading researcher at DeepMind. I

25:17

don't get it. Do you have any idea? It

25:21

has to be Microsoft has said

25:23

to the shareholders of

25:26

Inflection, we're going to make you whole or

25:28

we're going to ... There's just no way

25:30

Inflection and Inflection's

25:32

investors would just get an

25:35

email saying, oh, hi, it's

25:37

Mustafa and me and 60 of the

25:40

75 employees or whatever it is are

25:42

going to Microsoft. You just- Well,

25:45

it's moving out of the consumer space with this pie, which was kind

25:47

of cool. I liked it. It will work with

25:49

commercial customers to create tests and tune AI systems. This

25:51

is from the New York Times. Microsoft

25:53

is also licensing Inflection AI's latest underlying

25:56

technology to make it available to business

25:58

customers of its cloud computing. products.

26:00

And this guy's working on the consumer stuff.

26:02

But the reason why I'm this stuff, in

26:04

addition to obviously being very, very talented, I

26:06

believe that he was hired and that they

26:08

are probably paying inflection or figuring out something

26:10

to make inflection whole and spending this much

26:13

money, is that you

26:15

said, we are not going through that bullshit again that

26:17

we went through three months ago. And

26:19

what's strange about AI, true or

26:22

not, they've decided that there are three or

26:24

four kind of key athletes.

26:26

There's Messi, there's Ronaldo in this world.

26:30

I would bet that Satya said, I don't

26:32

like how vulnerable we are to something along

26:34

the lines of what happened a few

26:36

months ago with Sam, I need Steve

26:39

Young to his Joe Montana. And

26:41

that's what this is. It's basically saying that

26:43

the most ... Satya

26:46

probably believes and aspires to be the

26:48

most important AI company in the

26:50

world. And he doesn't want it too

26:53

dependent from a reality or a perception

26:55

standpoint on one person. No

26:58

matter how lovely or how smart Sam Altman is,

27:00

he needs ... I mean the 49ers, this is

27:02

the limit of my sports knowledge, and whenever ...

27:04

Bill Walsh, the coach, slept really well at night

27:06

because he had the best quarterback in the world

27:08

and the second best quarterback on the bench in

27:10

case one guy got injured. There

27:12

just appeared to be too much shareholder

27:14

value riding on one person and this

27:17

is diversification from that. Yeah,

27:19

I see why he's doing it. But interestingly,

27:21

Suleiman, and you probably know this from interviewing

27:23

him, he was the one that has been

27:25

much more out front with this technology is

27:28

very dangerous, could be very dangerous, it could

27:30

be great. But I mean he's

27:32

sort of more in the middle, but he's ... In

27:35

his book especially, I think that you talked to him about

27:37

too, he talked about the

27:39

transformative nature, but he also talked about the

27:41

destruction of humanity part. The

27:44

other part, they didn't do open

27:46

sourcing although he said, Suleiman has

27:48

said that these technologies shouldn't

27:50

be controlled by one company. There's all

27:52

kinds of really shifting sands here in

27:54

a really interesting

27:57

way because they're not open the way meta

27:59

and ... XAI are open

28:01

sourcing to make it safe. But

28:04

he's sort of a proponent for that a

28:06

little bit too. It's really, lots

28:09

is going on here. And

28:11

nobody's actually making money from a business yet.

28:13

That's the other thing we need to underscore. Well,

28:15

this Game of Thrones here is the ultimate Game

28:17

of Thrones. I don't know if you saw, I

28:20

mean, just speaking of which, we're waiting to

28:22

see what the first trade is on

28:25

Reddit. A company yesterday, Astera Labs, went

28:27

public and it had a 72% pop

28:29

in on its first trade. I

28:34

mean, we may be off to the races

28:36

again, because this company, Astera Labs, they

28:38

sell hardware and software products that improve the

28:41

efficiency and reliability of enterprise AI systems. So

28:43

it's legitimately an AI company. Right,

28:45

but do they make money yet? Oh, none of these

28:47

things make money yet. None of these. Let's

28:50

just underscore that for people. They have revenue. They

28:53

went from 85 million to, I think, 120, so they had

28:55

about 40% revenue growth. The

28:58

company, as of yesterday, Post-a-Pop, has

29:01

a $9 billion market cap. It's

29:04

trading at 70 times revenue. Yeah,

29:06

and that was crazy. Revenues.

29:09

Revenues, not earnings, revenues. Revenues.

29:12

If Reddit comes out and gets

29:14

a pop, the markets, baby, are back

29:16

and we are off to the races. Well, Reddit

29:18

is just an ad business and it loses money

29:20

just like the rest of media. In the old-fashioned

29:22

way. Just for a couple

29:25

of things, you're talking about things

29:27

going on right now. Google and Apple's

29:29

potential partnership is a big blockbuster. Microsoft

29:31

also invested $16 million in Mistral AI.

29:35

It's a French rival to OpenAI. It's

29:37

all over the place. It'll be interesting

29:39

to see what it does to its

29:41

relationship with OpenAI, because he was going

29:44

to bring Sam and Sam Altman if he didn't

29:46

get that job back at OpenAI. Nadella

29:49

apparently told, according to Bloomberg,

29:52

Altman about the new role on

29:54

Monday, just a day before everyone else. I'm

29:57

sure he swallowed his tongue a little

29:59

bit. But he also said

30:01

they're very committed to its partnership with OpenAI.

30:03

I mean, Satya looks

30:06

like the head of Westeros

30:08

right now. And of

30:10

course, they're also facing copyright

30:12

lawsuits all over the globe.

30:16

Google was just fined $270

30:18

million by French regulators for training

30:20

its model in news articles without notifying

30:22

publishers. The New York

30:24

Times is obviously in a lawsuit with

30:26

OpenAI. There's all

30:28

kinds of things happening here, all kinds

30:30

of things. It's really interesting. From

30:33

an economic standpoint, this

30:35

is arguably the most important or intense chess

30:37

game ever played. The amount of money on

30:39

the line here for whoever

30:42

outwits the other finds the human

30:44

capital, the positioning, the marketing, and

30:47

the government

30:49

regulation pretends to give a flying fuck about the Commonwealth so that

30:51

they have AI operating committees that never do anything. That

30:55

firm will probably mint their first trillionaire. I

30:58

mean, you talked about Reddit. Reddit's pricing at eight

31:00

times revenues. I mean, there's all the companies in

31:02

the world, and then there is the

31:04

companies in the center of AI, and

31:07

they are treated by an entirely different standard in

31:09

terms of the market. I

31:12

want to share this story on what happened

31:14

here, because especially around Reed, they're all in

31:16

everybody's grill. So

31:19

it's really interesting. Actually, you know what? I'm going to start making calls this

31:21

afternoon. I'll find out for us. This is

31:23

a really weird story. There is definitely some reporting that needs

31:25

to be done here because we're missing something. You

31:28

can't cash someone's check

31:30

for a billion and a half dollars, which Mustafa

31:32

did, then walk across the street. Yeah, there's no

31:35

shareholder lawsuits. Absolutely.

31:38

Somebody has come to an agreement here that

31:41

is the controlling shareholders at Inflection and with

31:43

Microsoft. Yeah, and again, just to be clear,

31:45

Reed Hoffman is on the board of Microsoft.

31:49

There's OpenAI. He used to be on

31:51

the board of OpenAI. I mean, they're

31:53

all the connections are so interesting. Reed

31:55

used to be on the board of OpenAI. Sam

31:57

is close with Satya. and

32:00

Sue and Mom was at Google. I

32:03

mean, it is, it's game of friggin' Thrones, game

32:05

of AI Thrones, and we'll see where it goes.

32:07

Anyway, let's take a quick break. When we come

32:09

back, we'll talk about Reddit's big IPO now and take

32:11

a listen to a mail question about pop

32:13

culture tearjerkers. Support

32:21

for Pivot comes from Atlassian. Atlassian

32:23

software, including Jira, Confluence, and Trello,

32:25

help power the collaboration for teams

32:27

to accomplish what would otherwise be

32:29

impossible alone, because individually we're great,

32:31

but together we're so much better.

32:33

That's why millions of teams around

32:36

the world, including 75% of the

32:38

Fortune 500, trust

32:40

Atlassian software for everything from space

32:42

exploration and green energy to delivering

32:45

pizzas and podcasts. Whether you're a

32:47

team of two, 200, or two million, or

32:49

whether your team is around the corner or on

32:51

another continent altogether, Atlassian software is built to

32:54

help keep you all on the same page

32:56

from start to finish. That way, every one

32:58

of your teams from engineering and IT to

33:00

marketing HR and legal can stay connected and

33:02

moving together as one towards

33:05

shared company-wide goals. Learn

33:07

how to unleash the

33:10

potential of your team

33:12

at atlassian.com. That's a-t-l-a-s-s-i-a-n.com,

33:14

Atlassian. Support

33:23

for this show comes from Thorne. Your health isn't

33:25

determined by how many hours you

33:28

spend in the gym or the miles you

33:30

run or the combos you have in the

33:32

sauna post-workout. No, if you want to be

33:34

in charge of your health, it starts with

33:36

what you put in your body from hoots

33:38

to supplements. I'm always trying to find the

33:40

best options out there, which is why I

33:42

am excited to tell you about Thorne. Thorne

33:44

takes a personalized, innovative, and scientific approach to

33:46

health and wellness and manufacture all their supplements

33:48

in the U.S. using top-notch ingredients sourced globally.

33:50

Plus, they team up with leading medical professionals

33:53

to bring you highly effective nutritional supplements

33:55

and with thorough testing and a super

33:57

clean manufacturing process, they've earned some of

33:59

the highest certification. in the industry. I've

34:01

used Thorne. I have someone in my

34:03

life that I'd like to think cares

34:05

a great deal about me and puts all

34:07

of this stuff in front of me

34:09

every morning. Whether it's their B-complex, creatine,

34:11

or magnesium citramate, Thorne's got a wide

34:13

array of supplements to help promote and

34:15

maintain your health goals and keep them on

34:17

track. Give your body what it really

34:19

needs with Thorne. Go to thorne.fit slash

34:21

pivot and use code pivot for 10%

34:23

off your first order. That's T-H-O-R-N-E dot

34:26

F-I-T slash pivot

34:28

code pivot for 10%

34:30

off your first order. Thorne dot fit

34:33

slash pivot code pivot. These statements have

34:35

not been evaluated by the Food and

34:37

Drug Administration. This product is not intended

34:39

to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any

34:41

disease. Support

34:44

for this show comes from Fiverr, the

34:46

world's largest marketplace for freelance services. In

34:49

the fast-paced world of business, every decision

34:51

counts. And when it comes to hiring,

34:53

there's no room for guesswork. That's why

34:56

Fiverr has developed solutions for business to

34:58

make outsourcing projects simple, quick, and compliant.

35:00

You can gain access to curated talent

35:03

through Fiverr Pro's catalog of top freelancers

35:05

organized by skills and experience plus. You

35:07

can streamline your projects with a user

35:10

friendly dashboard where you can track progress

35:12

and collaborate with your team. Fiverr Pro

35:14

is perfect for businesses that want

35:16

to work with top talent for

35:19

immediate or long-term needs. And for

35:21

anyone needing the highest level of

35:23

Y-Glove service, Fiverr Pro's project partners

35:25

can manage multiple freelancer engagements for

35:27

you. Project partners will outline requirements,

35:29

assemble a roster of freelancers, and

35:32

manage a schedule to ensure your

35:34

deliverables are completed on time, allowing

35:36

you to flex your budget without

35:38

any headcount constraints. Ready to scale

35:40

smarter? Visit pro.fiverr.com to sign up

35:42

and use code PIVOT

35:45

for 15% off

35:47

any service. That's

35:50

pro.fiverr.com and use

35:52

code PIVOT. Scott,

36:00

we're back for our second big

36:03

story. Reddit has officially gone public.

36:05

The social media company made its debut on the New

36:08

York Stock Exchange on Thursday with a share price of

36:10

$34, the high end of

36:12

the targeted range. Its share price puts

36:14

Reddit's value at around $6.4 billion,

36:16

which seems teeny tiny these days, which is

36:19

what they were aiming for, but below

36:21

the $10 billion valuation from a private

36:23

fundraising round in 2021. I

36:27

chatted with Reddit CEO Steve Huffman yesterday prior

36:29

to the IPO and asked him about

36:31

how he was feeling about all of this.

36:34

When somebody asked me what keeps me up at night, my

36:37

answer has been the same for a long time,

36:39

which is one, just practically,

36:42

actually sleep very well at night.

36:46

And then two, I think

36:48

for Reddit, we've been around

36:50

20 years. So

36:52

we've seen the rise of social media. We've seen

36:54

the internet totally evolve.

36:58

And by and large, these things

37:00

haven't affected Reddit. What

37:02

affects Reddit is how

37:04

we work. Are we

37:06

executing effectively? Are we shipping the right stuff?

37:09

And so it's always kind of felt like

37:11

we're in control of

37:14

our destiny, for

37:16

better or for worse. Well, I mean,

37:18

for better. So I think sometimes

37:20

we've been better or worse at being in

37:22

control of our destiny. Right.

37:25

He also told me he thought that two years of

37:27

not IPO-ing was one of the best things that ever

37:29

happened to the company, gave it discipline. We're

37:32

recording this as trading is getting underway. How do

37:35

you think it'll go? Well, I

37:37

voted with my wallet. I'm trying to get

37:39

shares here. So if JP Morgan and Goldman

37:42

Sachs and

37:44

Morgan Stanley could do this, this is what they would do.

37:47

They themselves would find $100

37:49

million each and buy into the first trades and

37:51

try and send

37:55

the stock soaring. Because

37:57

the IPO market has been in a deep

37:59

thaw for... It's been some of

38:01

the slowest two-year period, 24-month period in

38:03

several decades. Yesterday, the

38:06

landing lights got lit by this

38:09

company, this company, Astera. Is that

38:11

what it's called, Astera? I forgot

38:13

the name right. Yeah,

38:16

Astera Labs. If a popular or

38:18

not a popular, but a well-known

38:20

consumer internet brand, Reddit gets a

38:23

big pop, we're

38:25

back in business, baby. And the amount of

38:27

money that flows from the IPO market in

38:29

terms of downstream, secondary, green shoe follow-on, wealth

38:31

management, all this shit, they create so much

38:34

fees. Let me push back here. This is

38:36

an advertising company. This is not an AI company,

38:38

first of all, which is a little different. Just

38:40

for people to be aware, Reddit sold, I

38:43

mean, it's almost fully an advertising company, completely.

38:45

$800 million in advertising. It's very small. It's like a

38:47

Snapchat kind of situation. I think Snapchat's

38:50

a lot bigger, actually. I think double,

38:52

for sure. It sold just for people

38:54

to be aware, just about 15 million

38:56

shares in the offering, and existing shareholders

38:59

sold another close to 7 million

39:01

shares, taking some money off the

39:03

table, I think, right away. And

39:07

you were talking about Astera, A-S-T-E-R-A,

39:09

for people who don't know. But

39:12

it's a dry spell, just so people aware. Reddit's

39:15

revenue was $804 million last year. It

39:19

rose from $667 million, but it lost $90 million in almost

39:21

$91 million, and the year before

39:29

lost $159 million. It's

39:33

trying to get into other businesses, like data

39:35

licensing. It

39:37

got just around $66 million

39:40

from Google in a data licensing

39:42

deals. It's trying to train

39:44

these AI models. It

39:47

got a query from the Federal

39:49

Trade Commission for this. It's also, Steve told

39:51

me, he was, you know,

39:53

they're looking at commerce and other businesses

39:55

besides advertising, and they think they have

39:57

a good advertising story because it's safer.

40:00

because of contextual advertising and

40:02

also because you can reach

40:04

individuals. This is decentralized content

40:06

moderation, decentralized groups. I

40:08

don't know. I think it's an advertising business. So

40:10

I think, and also the last

40:13

thing is they're famous for Wall Street

40:15

Bets, which, and in Wall Street Bets,

40:18

they were betting, they were going to short

40:20

the stock. So there's a meme possibility here

40:22

too that they will, that there's, that the

40:25

people that are on the site will try

40:27

to work against it. And

40:29

then last thing, moderators, some of the

40:32

mods are getting shares and

40:34

not all of them liked it

40:36

necessarily because this is a very

40:39

noisy company among the people who

40:41

run it. It's run by people

40:43

who are volunteers and stuff. Anyway, it's a lot

40:45

happening here. I mean, you still think because it's

40:47

an ad business, I mean, and you know the

40:49

ad business, that it'll mean as much. So

40:53

there's Reddit, the specific company, its performance

40:55

and how it performs in the market.

40:57

And then there's a larger question about

41:01

what it means, the IPO this morning of Reddit

41:03

to the larger market. So let's talk about Reddit.

41:05

You're right. It's an ad business. They

41:07

basically have a series of boards and Redditors that manage

41:09

those boards. They have unbelievable

41:11

traffic, but they haven't really figured out. They

41:13

don't have the ad stack and the business

41:15

model to really monetize it the way other

41:18

companies have run it. It's an $800 million

41:20

business, not a big business. They grew 20%

41:22

last year. It's still losing

41:24

money. It's going out or it's priced

41:26

at about eight times revenues, which draws

41:28

sharp relief between, as you pointed out,

41:30

an ad-based business and an

41:33

AI business. The question surrounding Reddit is

41:35

the following. They

41:37

have the worst monetization of any

41:40

platform that gets this kind of traffic.

41:42

I think Meta gets something like 30

41:45

to 50 times the monetization per

41:47

person on the platform as Reddit. Now,

41:50

it's like my dad told me, I remember my dad telling me

41:52

this when he was trying to test whether I'd be a good

41:54

salesman. He's like, a salesman goes over to Africa.

41:56

This marks the time. This is the 70s. And

41:59

he comes back. And one salesman goes, he's

42:01

a shoe salesman. One salesman comes back and

42:03

says, terrible market force, nobody wears

42:05

shoes here. Another salesman goes

42:08

over and comes back and says, this is amazing,

42:10

nobody has shoes. So the

42:12

question is, is Reddit, is the fact

42:14

that they have the worst monetization given

42:17

the traffic an incredible opportunity

42:19

if they figure that out? Or is it a

42:21

company that's never been able to figure it out

42:23

and it's going to go nowhere? That's the question.

42:25

Six and a half billion dollars, a

42:28

lot of people are about to take, I believe, that

42:30

bet. Now, the bigger issue here

42:32

is what it means for the market. Would

42:35

you buy Reddit? I don't buy into these things. So

42:37

would you buy Reddit? Oh, I'm trying to. Because

42:39

you think that it's undervalued in that regard. Yeah.

42:42

Because I don't think people think that the data stuff is

42:44

going to be the big moneymaker at

42:47

all, the data stuff. And

42:49

the commerce stuff is absolutely nascent.

42:52

Like I sell more t-shirts than that

42:54

kind of thing. I'm buying for two

42:57

reasons. The

43:00

first is, this could be, I think

43:02

there is a ton of pent up demand. In 2021, there

43:04

were 397 IPOs. And

43:10

of those 397 IPOs, because a ton of them were

43:12

SPACs and shit and caught up in the mania, eight

43:14

out of 10 of them, 82% of them, are

43:16

trading below their IPO price. And the market

43:19

feels burned and jilted. So as a result,

43:22

in 2023, there were only 108 IPOs. The

43:28

reason I'm investing in this is

43:30

two reasons. One, I think that

43:32

essentially it's a global brand. And

43:34

two, it's the most trafficked

43:36

side in America that is known by

43:38

Alphabet. And it's trading all of this

43:40

set against a valuation of six

43:43

and a half billion dollars. There

43:45

are real issues, as you pointed out with this company.

43:48

They have not yet figured out a way

43:50

to monetize anything resembling the firehose of traffic

43:52

they have. It's not that big.

43:55

500 million users, 76. He was

43:57

focused in on the daily users, 76 million. And

44:00

it's not ugly. They really cleaned it up quite a

44:02

bit compared to a Twitter where

44:04

everyone's in the same pile of crap. Everybody's

44:08

in the same feed or whatever. There's a

44:10

lot to not like about this company. They

44:12

haven't figured out monetization. When I go on

44:15

the site, it feels like Lycosk or Altavista

44:17

called and wants their UI back. I don't

44:19

think it's very elegantly done. But

44:22

for $6.5 billion, a company that is...

44:24

If you type in most traffic sites

44:26

in the US, it goes Google,

44:29

it goes YouTube, and then it's Reddit. And

44:33

also, I think there's so much money on

44:35

the sidelines hoping to get back into the

44:37

IPO market. But if Reddit comes

44:40

out at a healthy pop, we're off to

44:42

the races again, Kara. You're going to see a

44:44

ton of companies file in the greed glands

44:46

or in the animal spirits are going to

44:48

get going again. So Reddit is actually... Reddit

44:51

is more important to investment banks and the

44:53

IPO ecosystem and the broader market. I would

44:55

argue that almost any company

44:57

in a while, this IPO has much

44:59

bigger meaning and ramifications than just what

45:01

shareholders of Reddit are going to garner. In

45:04

the midst of this, of all these things that

45:06

are happening, two things interesting. One

45:09

of the big winners could be Conde Nast's parent,

45:11

company Advance, whose stake in Reddit will be worth

45:13

around $1.4 billion. I don't think they

45:15

can sell though. Maybe they're selling a little bit

45:17

of shares in the... They might be

45:19

among those sellers. They

45:22

made a $10 million investment for Conde Nast to

45:24

buy Reddit in 2006 and then they spun

45:28

it out again. So this company

45:30

got bought in and then spun out.

45:33

It's been through a lot in the many

45:35

years. Second thing, Reddit had to reveal the

45:38

FTC is conducting an inquiry tied to the

45:40

company's deals to license data,

45:42

as we said. And then also

45:44

Reddit, along with YouTube and Meta, also

45:46

has been ordered by New York State

45:48

judge to face a lawsuit tied to

45:51

that 2022 racially motivated shooting in Buffalo.

45:53

The lawsuit claims the platforms helped radicalize the shooter

45:56

and prepare him for an attack. Of course, the

45:58

Supreme Court found differently when it was a... Google

46:00

case so I'm not sure this will go anywhere. So

46:03

there's all those things hanging around. Will

46:06

this set it off or will something else

46:08

set off? The IPO market is Instacart didn't

46:10

do very well, others didn't do very well. Like

46:12

I said the tables been set with the Stair

46:15

Labs up 72%. If a big consumer internet

46:18

brand Reddit comes out at

46:21

a healthy pop, the IPO

46:23

market is back in business. Alright, okay.

46:25

We'll see Scott. We'll see what it is. Hey Scott

46:28

Galloway here coming in with an update. Since

46:30

we've taped, Reddit has become trading. The stock

46:32

opened at 47 buck and at

46:34

its peak the company had a market cap of get

46:36

this 11 billion and also ended up closing

46:38

up I think around 45 or 50%. I

46:41

would argue that essentially this

46:44

is enormous for the markets. That this

46:46

has turned the IPO market from sort

46:48

of like blinking yellow to the aluminum

46:51

green. The IPO market, the animal spirits I

46:53

think are back. In some

46:55

Stair Labs kind of illuminated the runway

46:58

yesterday and this big consumer internet brand

47:00

Reddit landed the plane with a huge

47:02

pop today. This is big for the

47:04

markets. It's actually the bigger part of

47:06

the news here isn't a consumer

47:09

media company up whatever

47:11

it was 45 or 50%. The

47:14

bigger story here is the IPO market I believe

47:16

is back. The animal spirits are back. John Travolta

47:18

is on the dance floor. Okay, now back to

47:20

the show. Let's pivot

47:23

to a listener question. The

47:31

question comes from Justin. Let's listen.

47:33

Hey Scott and Tara. Justin here

47:35

calling in from New York's ugly

47:37

older cousin Philadelphia. I took your

47:39

advice and watched the show one day. My wife

47:41

and I just finished the finale last

47:43

night and I gotta say I haven't

47:46

cried that hard since I rewatched Titanic,

47:48

stoned in my parents basement back in

47:50

high school. Great recommendation, Scott.

47:52

My question for both of you, what show

47:55

or movie has made you cry the hardest in

47:57

your life? Thanks. Actually

47:59

we of messages about Scott's TV recommendation,

48:01

including one from Lou in Brooklyn, please

48:03

tell Prost G to fuck off about

48:06

his win, that one day show on

48:08

Netflix. I cried like a little bitch,

48:10

but that's neither here nor there. Fuck that

48:13

guy. I

48:15

met this really

48:17

impressive woman, Miriam Vogel, who is

48:19

doing this great startup or

48:22

nonprofit around AI and trying to manage

48:24

responsible AI. And it's just like out

48:26

of central casting for the person who

48:28

would want to lead this organization. And

48:30

as I was walking in, like immediately someone

48:32

yelled at me and they're like, one day, and

48:34

they give me a thumbs up sign. I mean,

48:36

people are literally, because we tell people that

48:39

we like hearing from people, which we do,

48:41

people just feel totally emboldened to like yell

48:43

across a restaurant and be a reference from

48:45

the pod or something. But I told you,

48:47

ketamine trip was a big topic on my

48:49

bookstore right now, Scott's ketamine. Oh, wait, I

48:51

got it. Before we come back to what made you,

48:53

I want you to answer what

48:55

made you cry. But before we come back to that, just a couple

48:58

of things. I've heard from a

49:00

lot of psychiatrists and a lot of people very

49:02

involved in ketamine saying that I didn't spend enough

49:04

time talking about the very important benefits

49:06

here. And there's a lot of studies, and I

49:08

just want to highlight a lot of studies showing

49:11

that it has real, that is really effective

49:13

and a wonderful drug for people, veterans and

49:15

others who have suffered trauma or really struggle

49:17

with depression. So I want to put that

49:19

out there. The other thing, just as

49:21

a follow up that I think is kind of interesting, I'm now

49:23

two weeks in. And for the first time

49:25

in 35 years, over a two week period,

49:28

I haven't had a drink. And

49:31

that is very unusual for me. And it's

49:33

not because I had some sort of, you

49:35

know, revelation that I was drinking too

49:37

much, something has happened where the taste

49:39

I've lost the taste of alcohol, you

49:41

know how they say when you're not taking

49:43

a zemphick? Is that those are two? That's

49:45

exactly the right question. Because my feeling

49:47

is whatever it was supposedly a zemphick

49:49

just sort of turns tells your brain

49:51

to be kind of a little turned

49:54

off and nauseated by food. I

49:56

feel like the same thing I walked in I went last night

49:58

at dinner. downtown

50:00

and then I went to Zero Bond

50:02

and just the smell of alcohol. I

50:04

had grapefruit spritzers the whole

50:06

night and I didn't drink which was so

50:08

unusual for me. By the way, am I

50:10

nearly as charming or nice to be around?

50:13

You're literally becoming Kara Swisher. Let

50:16

me say I had dinner the other night

50:18

with the third Emmanuel brother. I know

50:21

Rahm and Ari very well but I didn't know Zeke

50:23

Emmanuel. He's a doctor. He's a very well-known doctor and

50:26

a scientist and he

50:28

was telling me about the effects he's

50:30

studying of mushrooms on cancer

50:32

patients and all these psychedelics and he

50:35

was very much like this is important.

50:37

This is important stuff. So yes, good

50:39

thing for saying that. One

50:42

thing that I'd like to know is

50:44

what's your movie? What's your movie that made you...well you said one day

50:46

but is there another one and then I'll tell you mine. But

50:49

I'm an easy cry. Remains of the

50:51

day with Anthony Hopkins, The Black Stallion

50:54

with Terry Gar and Mickey

50:56

Rooney. You cried everything though,

50:58

like right? Literally. Yeah, pretty

51:00

much any episode of Modern

51:02

Family. Yeah, how about you? What have you cried

51:04

in? I don't cry at movies. It's a

51:06

very big joke between Amanda and I. She cries

51:08

at literally everything. It's fascinating. Like

51:10

I look over and she's tearing up over

51:13

something like True Detective or something. Like it

51:15

wasn't True Detective but it was something like

51:17

that and I was like, are you kidding

51:19

me? So she she cries at everything. I

51:21

cry at nothing. I'm

51:23

trying to think what movie got me. I

51:25

cried in Barbie. Like what the fuck am I doing here?

51:28

How did I end up here? No,

51:30

stop it. Stop attacking Barbie. You're not

51:32

allowed. You've used up all your anti-Barbie

51:35

remarks for your life. I

51:37

do love what you said. The Margot Robbie, had

51:39

she not been in pink, would have been nominated.

51:41

I thought that was a super interesting frame. She's

51:43

an astonishing actress. I'm sorry. Her whole face is

51:46

so expressive. What

51:48

did I cry in?

51:50

Let me think. Oh

51:52

my god. Roadhouse with Patrick

51:55

Swayze. Roadhouse with Patrick Swayze because it

51:57

was so beautiful. the

52:01

champ with Ricky Schroeder and John Doit.

52:03

You didn't cry in that? No, I

52:06

don't cry in movies. I really

52:08

don't. Really? Roadhouse, Gladiator, when

52:10

he died, I didn't cry but

52:12

I was sad. The English patient, my favorite movie. The

52:15

English patient, you didn't cry in that. You didn't? That

52:17

didn't grab you and like really move you? No. Old

52:20

yeller? Nope. Nope. Oh my god,

52:22

I'm dead inside. Roadhouse!

52:27

Patrick Swayze! His beauty!

52:31

Oh. Yeah, my favorite line in Roadhouse is this

52:33

guy when he's fighting me. Not the new one.

52:35

No, no, no. The old Roadhouse. My favorite scene

52:37

is when they're fighting and the guy goes, I

52:39

used to fuck guys like you in prison. And

52:42

I'm like, well then. Well then.

52:44

Okay. So

52:46

every Patrick Swayze movie is spectacular. Maybe

52:48

I turned up a tiny bit in

52:51

Dirty Dancing when she goes, nobody puts

52:53

baby in the corner. But that wasn't

52:55

really sad. That was the happy part.

52:57

I'm like, yes, yes Patrick Swayze. Pulled

52:59

baby out of the corner. But that

53:01

was, I still didn't cry. I'm sorry.

53:05

Dead Poets Society? Dead movie? Dead

53:07

Poets Society? No. Oh god.

53:09

Oh my god, no. Oh god,

53:11

it was so saccharine. Maybe

53:13

Ghost? The end of Ghost a

53:15

little bit? Brokeback Mountain? That didn't make you

53:18

cry? No. You're not gonna get one. No.

53:20

Beaches? Hold on, hold on, hold on,

53:22

hold on. Terms of Endowment? Really? Sophie's

53:25

Choice? Philadelphia?

53:29

No. Schindler's List? Oh, don't

53:31

do that to me. Keep going. I

53:34

know I'm gonna find one here. Hold on. I would

53:36

cry more at a Bugs Bunny. I mean,

53:39

there's some very moving Scooby Doos that really

53:41

get to my heart. Because you know, if it

53:44

wasn't for those kids, I would have gotten away

53:46

with it. Oh my god, so

53:48

many movies I've cried in. Hold on. The Elephant Man?

53:51

No. The Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless

53:53

Mind? No. I mean, I like them. You're in

53:55

aiming movies I like very much. Little Miss

53:57

Sunshine on Golden Pond when Henry and

54:00

Jane and Brace. I'm literally getting welled

54:02

up right now just thinking about these

54:04

movies. You cry at everything. You and

54:06

Amanda are like waterworks as far as I'm

54:08

concerned. The Shawshank Redemption when

54:10

he's talking about his wife? No.

54:13

Oh my God. You

54:15

are dead inside. These

54:18

are incredible movies. Notting

54:20

Hill when she made that little speech about

54:22

like I'm just a girl, you know,

54:26

looking for a guy. That speech made him

54:28

really cry. No. I do like Julia

54:30

Roberts, so I'm a big admirer of hers. I'm

54:32

going to try and reverse engineer this to a

54:34

lesson here for young men. I

54:36

didn't cry from the age of 29 to 44. For 15 years, I didn't cry. I

54:38

lost the capability. I

54:42

just didn't know how to cry any longer. I didn't cry when my

54:44

mom died. I didn't cry when I got divorced. What

54:47

I would say to anyone, especially men,

54:49

if you discover the ability to cry, it's

54:51

a gift because it helps inform what's

54:53

meaningful to you. I

54:58

think it makes a much more meaningful life because the problem

55:00

is when you shove down your

55:02

emotions, and that's including learning how

55:04

to laugh really hard when something inspires you,

55:06

take time to try and understand why it

55:09

inspires you, but lean into

55:11

the crying because it really helps

55:14

inform like what's important to you, what

55:16

really moves you. That's a wonderful thing

55:18

as opposed to just sleepwalking

55:20

a little bit through life. I'd say lean

55:23

into it. I agree. Louie and Alex

55:25

cry. All my kids cry. Amanda is

55:27

like, as I said, like you, waterworks.

55:29

I can't explain it. I laugh a

55:31

lot. I can't explain it. I

55:33

will say in Steel Magnolia's, I was kind of

55:36

glad when Julia Roberts died. Is that wrong? Is

55:38

that wrong? The way we were?

55:40

The way we were? Look

55:43

at you. You're not going to find a movie.

55:45

Let's move on. Thank you, Justin.

55:48

Justin, we're having a big moment in our relationship

55:50

here. I don't know what to say. Anyway, if

55:55

you've got a quest of your own you'd like

55:58

answered, send it our way. Go to nymag.com. to

56:00

submit a question for the show or call 855-51-Pivot.

56:04

All right, Scott, one more quick break.

56:06

We'll be back for predictions. The

56:12

report for Pivot comes from Hidden Layer.

56:14

It seems like everywhere you look, industries

56:16

are turning to generative AI. We talk

56:19

about it a lot on this show.

56:21

Businesses can generate more ideas, answers, connection,

56:23

solutions, and momentum. But at the same

56:25

time, security teams are forced to slow

56:27

down that progress so they can make

56:30

sure AI adoption is safe and responsible.

56:32

Hidden Layer's AI detection and response platform

56:34

secures generative AI and large language models

56:36

from malicious attacks, leaking of confidential information

56:38

and intellectual property theft. Hidden Layer helps

56:41

you generate more by enabling seamless, secure

56:43

generative AI. Here's how it works.

56:45

AI detection and response protects businesses

56:48

from potential attacks by monitoring and

56:50

analyzing the inputs and outputs of

56:52

their generative AI applications, blocking harmful

56:55

transactions and alerting security teams in

56:57

real time, allowing organizations to accelerate

56:59

their AI adoption with speed. Customers

57:02

in finance, technology, healthcare, and even

57:04

the US Department of Defense trust

57:06

Hidden Layer to protect their AI

57:08

today. Plus, Hidden Layer was named

57:11

most innovative startup at RSA, the

57:13

most significant cybersecurity conference in

57:15

the nation. With Hidden Layer,

57:17

go from pause to possibilities.

57:19

Generate more with Hidden Layer.

57:21

Visit hiddenlayer.com/Pivot to learn more

57:23

about Hidden Layer's AI detection

57:26

and response solution. Support

57:30

for this podcast and the following message is

57:32

brought to you by E-Trade from Morgan

57:34

Stanley. Take control of your financial

57:37

future with E-Trade. No matter what kind of

57:39

investor you are, our tools and resources can

57:41

help you be ready for what's next. Now,

57:43

when you open an account, you can get

57:45

up to $1,000 with a qualifying deposit. Terms

57:49

apply. Learn more at

57:52

etrade.com/Fox. Investing involves risks.

57:54

Morgan Stanley Smith, Barney LLC, Member

57:57

Sipek. E-Trade is a business of

57:59

Morgan Stanley. Support

58:01

for this show comes from Indeed. Imagine

58:04

the perfect employee. Let's

58:06

go hear Jackie. Jackie

58:08

is professional yet relaxed, punctual,

58:10

friendly, meets deadlines, and just makes

58:12

your job easier overall. But the

58:15

search for Jackie can be long and

58:17

tedious, especially when you have so many other

58:19

things on your plate. Indeed wants

58:21

to help you find your next Jackie.

58:23

Indeed is your matching and hiring platform

58:26

with over 350 million global monthly visitors,

58:29

according to Indeed data, and a

58:31

matching engine that helps you find

58:33

quality candidates fast. They

58:35

leverage over 140 million

58:37

qualifications and preferences every day,

58:40

so their matching engine is constantly

58:42

learning from your preferences. That means they

58:45

can better connect to you with your

58:47

Jackie. And the listeners of this show can get

58:49

a $75 dollar skims or

58:51

job credit to get your job

58:53

more visibility at indeed.com/podcast. Just

58:56

go to indeed.com/podcast right now

58:58

and say you heard about Indeed on this podcast.

59:01

indeed.com/podcast. Terms

59:04

and conditions to keep. Need to hire?

59:06

You need Indeed. Okay,

59:12

Scott, let's hear a prediction. My

59:14

prediction is I think someone

59:16

who's going to go down in history as

59:19

just an incredibly powerful role model

59:21

for young people and a

59:23

really fantastic American is

59:26

the co-founder of Amazon, Mackenzie

59:28

Scott. I agree. Explain what

59:30

you just did. She just announced she's giving

59:32

another $650 million away. So

59:35

she's doubling the amount of money she's allocating

59:37

to charities. And I have some personal experience

59:39

with Mackenzie Scott. I'm a huge

59:42

fan and a big supporter of something called

59:44

the Jed Foundation that leverages the infrastructure of

59:46

high schools to help give them the tools

59:48

to identify or discern between kind of normal

59:50

but strange teen behavior and actual teen behavior

59:52

you need to be cautious

59:54

of and intervene around depression and suicidal

59:56

ideation. And it is an amazing organization

59:58

run by a man who ran

1:00:00

a pharmaceutical company whose son Jed

1:00:02

killed himself and he has this amazing staff,

1:00:06

this guy John McPhee, they do an

1:00:08

amazing job, amazing job. And

1:00:11

out of the blue, somebody called them

1:00:13

and said, we need your wiring information, we want to make a

1:00:15

donation. They got that all the time, $1,000, $5,000, $50, and they

1:00:18

got a wire for $15 million. And

1:00:23

it was Mackenzie Scott saying, I've been following you,

1:00:25

you're wonderful. I don't want anything. I don't need

1:00:27

anything. It's yours. I've

1:00:30

been following you. Don't call me. Don't put my name

1:00:32

in the papers. And

1:00:35

A, it was so moving, but B, it really

1:00:37

is a great lesson around giving because I give

1:00:40

a lot of money away, but here's the thing. For

1:00:43

me, it's a transaction and it feeds my

1:00:45

ego and I want recognition for it. And

1:00:48

it really taught me that that's not giving.

1:00:51

That's consumption. What she's doing

1:00:53

is giving. She's

1:00:56

just giving. I love it. What's

1:00:58

the ROI on the investment of the charity?

1:01:00

She's just like, here's the fucking money. Go

1:01:03

for it. She's not starting a

1:01:05

rocket company or going to Cannes or

1:01:07

having- Or naming things after herself. Or

1:01:09

having three kids by two different people

1:01:11

in one week. She's just

1:01:13

like, I'm blessed. I

1:01:16

hate anyone framing her as solely

1:01:19

like a rich wife. She was very involved

1:01:21

in Amazon in the beginning. She was. I

1:01:24

was there. And frankly, the V candidate

1:01:26

that I brought up before, you could accuse

1:01:28

her of being a wealthy housewife if that's

1:01:30

an accusation or a wealthy spouse. This

1:01:33

is an individual who deserves the billions she

1:01:35

has and she's not trying to

1:01:37

figure out a way to have a

1:01:39

midlife crisis explode. She's trying

1:01:41

to figure out a way to be helpful and

1:01:43

lean into her blessings and she does not want

1:01:46

or even desire recognition.

1:01:49

I think we're- I mean, there's some problems.

1:01:51

A non-geared at us correctly points out that

1:01:53

rich people shouldn't be dictating our social priorities

1:01:55

but distinct. She is all over

1:01:57

the map. That's why she's not dictating. She's the wide

1:01:59

range. And she gets just social justice. You

1:02:01

know, Elon Musk attacked her,

1:02:04

of course, as usual, an ungenerous person, by

1:02:06

the way. And if you read the New

1:02:08

York Times piece about him giving money to

1:02:10

things that help him, that's exactly

1:02:12

what he's like. And she,

1:02:14

you know, she doubled the donations. Such

1:02:17

an impressive person. It was going to

1:02:19

be 250 million and she upped it to 640. And

1:02:22

Musk called her a super rich ex-wife

1:02:25

who's destroying Western civilization. Let me just

1:02:27

say, in this regard, fuck you, Elon.

1:02:29

You're an ungenerous person of charity. This

1:02:31

woman's giving away, I think, $16 billion

1:02:34

at this point. So fuck you. Get back

1:02:36

off of Mackenzie Scott. She's not going to.

1:02:39

But in total, I think she's given $16 billion. I

1:02:42

don't know if it's $16 billion, but

1:02:44

she's given an enormous one. But

1:02:49

she announced $2.15 billion in

1:02:51

donations over the last year. I

1:02:53

mean, geez, a Louisa. Like, think

1:02:55

about that. Think about that. And

1:02:57

all over the place. I

1:03:00

told my kids about her. I think she's

1:03:02

just, I think she's incredibly impressive. And unlike

1:03:04

these individuals who are like, how do I

1:03:06

buy a dildo into space or... Yeah.

1:03:09

My burrito bar needs money. That's the kind

1:03:11

of giving Elon Musk in my town that

1:03:14

I'm building because I'm an egomaniac. You

1:03:16

know, I just, I

1:03:18

can't even with these people. The contrast I kept

1:03:20

thinking of was Oprah sort of marks the age

1:03:22

in the sense that, you know, you get a

1:03:24

car, you get shit. You get more shit. I

1:03:27

mean, she's given away a lot of money. You

1:03:29

get a toaster oven. And she's just, her attitude

1:03:31

is, you need money and I'm giving

1:03:33

you money. You need money and I'm giving you

1:03:35

money. You're doing good work and you need money.

1:03:37

I'm giving you money. And anyways, I just love...

1:03:40

They have a woman bent. They have a social

1:03:42

justice bent. It doesn't matter. It's her

1:03:44

business, you fuckers. I'm sorry. Just

1:03:47

like, go read the New York Times story.

1:03:49

But let's frame this in a positive. No, I'm

1:03:51

not going to because read the David Farrenhold story.

1:03:53

That is about greed and giving. She

1:03:56

is about generosity and giving. And

1:03:58

it couldn't be a... darker contrast

1:04:00

between two people couldn't be. Anyway,

1:04:02

go ahead, sorry. But she's a great American

1:04:04

and the key word here is American because for

1:04:07

all the shitposting of

1:04:09

America and the fact that we're raising

1:04:11

a generation of young people that don't

1:04:13

like America, Americans at their core, at

1:04:15

their core, and this is different than

1:04:18

Europe or other nations. When it comes to

1:04:20

philanthropy, we are the most generous people in

1:04:22

the world and she embodies that. She's

1:04:25

a great American, she embodies our values.

1:04:27

And it's something, she

1:04:29

is an example of a reason to

1:04:31

love America. Americans are very generous. I

1:04:33

agree. Mackenzie, fantastic

1:04:36

work. Anyway, we love

1:04:38

Mackenzie Scott. Scott, that's the

1:04:40

show. We'll be back on Tuesday with

1:04:42

more Pivot. Read us out. Today's

1:04:45

show is produced by Larry Naaman, Billy Marcus, and

1:04:47

Taylor Griffin. We're an intertide engineer at the CEPSA.

1:04:49

Thanks to officer Drew Burrows and Neil Savario. Nishak

1:04:51

Kerouac is Fox Media's executive producer of audio. Make

1:04:54

sure you subscribe and show wherever you listen to

1:04:56

podcasts. Thanks for listening to Pivot from New York

1:04:58

Magazine and Fox Media. You can

1:05:00

subscribe to the magazine at nymag.com/pod. We'll

1:05:02

be back next week for another breakdown

1:05:04

of all things tech and business at

1:05:06

the I Heart Podcast

1:05:09

Awards where we won best news

1:05:11

podcasts. I forgot to mention two

1:05:13

people. One was a huge oversight and that

1:05:15

is Zoe Marcus, who is a fantastic producer.

1:05:18

I apologize, Zoe. Also, I forgot to mention

1:05:20

Carol Swisher. Not as a big a deal.

1:05:22

I just wanted to say thank you to

1:05:24

both of those people. I was just off

1:05:27

Academy and I was not at my best.

1:05:29

So I apologize for forgetting both of you.

1:05:31

Thank you, Scott.

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features