Podchaser Logo
Home
Have Smartphones Created an Anxious Generation? with Jonathan Haidt

Have Smartphones Created an Anxious Generation? with Jonathan Haidt

Released Sunday, 16th June 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Have Smartphones Created an Anxious Generation? with Jonathan Haidt

Have Smartphones Created an Anxious Generation? with Jonathan Haidt

Have Smartphones Created an Anxious Generation? with Jonathan Haidt

Have Smartphones Created an Anxious Generation? with Jonathan Haidt

Sunday, 16th June 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:00

At the UPS Store, we know being

0:02

a small business owner means holiday time

0:04

is still go time, still get those

0:07

orders shift time, and still

0:09

re-up on stamps and supplies time. That's

0:12

why this upcoming holiday, while others close

0:14

up shop, will be open. And

0:17

happy to help you keep being unstoppable.

0:19

Come into your local store today. Most

0:22

locations are independently owned. Product services, pricing, and

0:24

hours of operation may vary. See

0:26

Center for Details. The UPS Store.

0:28

Be unstoppable. Here

0:31

you are. BPMs high, sweat

0:33

dripping, body moving, tonk, panting,

0:36

you're working hard, real hard and

0:38

you're thirsty. You need vitamins, nutrients

0:41

for peak performance and energy. And

0:44

your plants do too. Aww, let

0:46

me just look at the little guy. Water-soluble

0:48

plant food from Miracle Grow is full of

0:50

essential nutrients. Just a little scoop into your

0:52

watering can and boom, instant feeding and bigger,

0:54

more beautiful plants. It's kind of like a

0:56

sports drink for your plants. You may have

0:58

to suffer from heat, but your plants do

1:00

not. Suppose

1:02

we suddenly changed the Earth's atmosphere from

1:04

20% oxygen to 80% oxygen. It's

1:08

like, oh, wouldn't that be great? Like you'd get so

1:10

much oxygen so easily we'd all feel good. Like, no,

1:13

everything would burn. Any little spark,

1:15

every electrical thing would explode. You know,

1:17

80% oxygen, everything is combustible. And similarly,

1:20

what if we give everyone an outrage

1:22

button where they can... The

1:24

slightest thing. Oh, something bothers you about what

1:26

you saw on the street? Tweet it. Somebody

1:28

did something obnoxious, take a photo, put it

1:30

up. Let people dox them. This

1:33

is what social media has done to

1:35

us. It's an open question whether liberal

1:37

democracy in the American form, it's an

1:40

open question whether we can survive, whether

1:42

our current institutions and structure is compatible

1:44

with an 80% oxygen world. I'm

1:48

Jon Favreau. Welcome to offline. Hey,

1:54

everyone. You just heard from today's

1:56

guest, social psychologist and NYU professor

1:58

Jonathan Haidt. So this is

2:01

a conversation I've wanted to have for a long time. Hite

2:03

is the author of numerous bestsellers like

2:05

The Happiness Hypothesis, The Coddling of the

2:07

American Mind, and the number one New

2:09

York Times bestseller that will join, seemingly

2:11

everyone else in talking about today, The

2:14

Anxious Generation. Hite's basic argument

2:16

is one we've made many times on this

2:19

show. The kids are not alright,

2:21

and the culprit is their phones. But

2:24

Hite takes it a step further. He

2:26

offers extensive research to support his contention

2:28

that smartphones, and especially social media, are

2:30

fueling a teen and adolescent mental health

2:33

epidemic here and in other countries. Hite

2:36

also offers a four-step plan to help us

2:38

build what he calls a healthier childhood in

2:40

the digital age. It's a

2:42

compelling book, and his recommendations make a lot of sense. But

2:45

The Anxious Generation has also touched off a

2:47

debate about whether Hite has overstated the case

2:49

against phones, and it raises

2:52

questions about whether his proposed reforms,

2:54

like banning phones in schools, have

2:56

the support necessary to become reality.

2:58

So I asked him. We talked about

3:00

the evidence he cites, the criticisms he's

3:03

received, how phones and social media have

3:05

changed our relationships and our attention spans,

3:07

and how they're making politics and democracy

3:09

much harder. As a quick note,

3:11

we had a lot to get through, so today's interview will

3:14

take up the full hour of the show. Here's

3:16

Jonathan Hite. Jonathan

3:20

Hite, welcome to Offline. Thank

3:22

you, Jon. Pleasure to be here. So

3:24

I've wanted to have you on for a

3:27

long time because even before The Anxious Generation,

3:29

a lot of your writing has focused on

3:31

the central thesis of this podcast, which is

3:34

that smartphones and social media are breaking our

3:36

brains, making us miserable, and making democracy much

3:38

more difficult. So you are talking

3:40

to a host, and I think most listeners,

3:43

who probably agree with your argument that smartphones

3:45

and especially social media are bad for kids.

3:48

But since I see people still debating

3:50

whether it's the phones that are causing the

3:52

increase in mental health challenges among kids, could

3:55

you start by talking about the most persuasive

3:57

evidence you found? So, there's a

3:59

lot of scientists. There's a lot of

4:01

correlational studies. There are a

4:03

lot of experiments. There are a lot of

4:05

time lag, longitudinal studies. One

4:08

thing I've learned by engaging in this debate

4:10

is that the scientific evidence is not nearly

4:12

as cut and dry or persuasive as you

4:14

would think. My critics will put out

4:16

a study and say, see, this proves that the height is

4:18

wrong. Then I look and say, wait a sec. No, actually,

4:20

this proves that I'm right. The scientific

4:23

evidence is really debatable. That's a whole

4:25

process that has to come out. To

4:28

my mind, the most powerful evidence

4:30

that I have seen on this is

4:32

the fact that I cannot find

4:35

anyone in Gen Z who

4:38

says or has written that

4:40

smartphones and social media were good for their generation.

4:44

There are thousands of essays and videos

4:46

by, especially Gen Z in their 20s,

4:48

saying, wow, this messed us up.

4:51

Wow, talking with naked men when I was

4:53

11 years old, this was terrible. If

4:55

there's been a crime and the crime victim keeps

4:57

saying, he did it, he did it, he's the

5:00

one. They all say that. I

5:02

actually think that's pretty persuasive. The

5:04

idea, the main criticism against me

5:06

is that I'm mistaken correlation for causation. That

5:09

sure, mental health plummeted all around the world.

5:13

Basically at the moment that kids moved their social lives onto

5:15

Instagram and a few other platforms around 2012. That

5:18

could just be coincidence. It might

5:20

have just been a big coincidence. It happened everywhere

5:22

at the same time, but just a coincidence. The

5:24

fact that the kids themselves see it, the fact

5:26

that the teachers see it, the principals see it,

5:28

the parents see it. I

5:31

actually take that as the most

5:33

persuasive. Of course,

5:36

I sometimes wonder, I'm going out on a

5:38

limb here, we don't have scientific consensus that

5:40

smartphones and social media are what's causing the

5:42

mental health crisis. Am

5:45

I fomenting a moral panic by saying, look,

5:48

we need to start acting now. We can't

5:50

wait five years for the scientists to reach

5:52

agreement. The

5:54

fact that I don't really find

5:57

anyone who disagrees with me other

5:59

than ... within the scientific other than a

6:01

few scientists who we argue over

6:03

the size of the correlations um i

6:05

was just talking yesterday with the commissioner of

6:08

uh the commissioner of schools of of

6:10

new york city and he said

6:12

he was asking a bunch of principles

6:15

what should we do with the phones and they all

6:17

said take them away take them away it's making our

6:19

jobs miserable so i think that's

6:21

pretty compelling yeah well i'll give you

6:24

a few of the like alternative

6:26

theories i've heard or some of the criticism

6:28

sure i love these alternatives yeah i figure

6:30

so and i see these floating around online

6:32

on social media uh but

6:35

you know one of them is what if more

6:38

young people are self-reporting anxiety

6:40

and depression because this is

6:42

less stigmatized than it used to be right

6:45

so that's perfectly plausible and if that

6:47

was the case then what we would

6:49

see is gradually rising rates from the

6:51

1980s through the present because

6:54

there used to be a stigma um

6:56

when i was a kid my mother sent me to

6:58

a psychiatrist when i was uh 10 or 11 years

7:00

old i had some nervous ticks that were kind of

7:02

strange and she sent me just that was very shameful

7:04

like i didn't want anybody to know but now

7:07

here you know it's 2024 and i'm perfectly happy to say

7:09

you know i i i see

7:11

a therapist every other week i have for a couple of

7:13

years so the stigma has been vanishing since the

7:15

80s um so if it was

7:17

the stigma that it was just you know it's

7:19

an illusion it's just like yeah it looks like

7:21

there's high rates but that's just because then what

7:23

we would see is a gradual rise from the

7:25

80s to the present but that's not what we

7:28

see what we see is

7:30

actually a slight fall from the

7:32

90s through 2010 2011 the millennials

7:35

their mental health was a little bit

7:38

better actually than gen x so we

7:40

see the numbers the actual rates uh

7:42

self-report rates of anxiety and depression going

7:45

slightly down during the 2000s

7:47

while stigma is dropping and dropping and

7:50

then all of a sudden 2020 2012

7:54

it goes way up way up in america

7:56

and it goes up all around certainly around

7:58

the english speaking world so you You want to

8:00

tell me that the stigma didn't

8:02

change at all from the 90s through 2011 and

8:06

then suddenly in 2012, 2013, suddenly

8:08

the whole world decided, hey, mental

8:10

illness is cool. I

8:12

don't mind saying that I'm anxious. It just,

8:14

it doesn't make any sense. The

8:16

other one I hear a lot, especially

8:18

on the left and from

8:21

some young people is, you know, what

8:23

if it's the impending climate disaster

8:25

and you know, massive inequality brought

8:27

about by late stage capitalism. Yeah.

8:30

So there's a thing called the pundit, um,

8:33

that was called the pundit illusion where whatever

8:35

happens, so it used to be like, you

8:37

know, right wing pundits, whatever happens, this shows

8:39

the need to lower taxes or whatever. And

8:42

so people were focused on climate change or

8:45

the, or who hate capitalism. Sure. Everything's

8:47

going to be evidence of that. But let's look at

8:49

the timing and let's look historically. So

8:52

what we see the sharpest increases are

8:54

for the preteen girls in 2012,

8:56

their rates double and

8:58

triple for self harmony triple. So did

9:01

something happen in 2012 that the young

9:03

girls were really clued into? Is

9:06

that when they got active about climate change?

9:08

Now Greta Thunberg, I think was about 2018

9:11

when she addressed the UN. Now

9:13

Greta was, you know, that would make sense. Greta

9:15

was incredibly inspiring, especially to young, to

9:18

girls and young women. So

9:20

if this whole thing, it was like, no

9:22

change, no change, no change. And then suddenly

9:24

Greta Thunberg, and then, you know, then

9:27

I would say, yeah, actually, maybe it was Greta. But

9:29

that's not what happened. What happened

9:31

was things, mental health was fine

9:34

during the Bush administration in the United States, George

9:37

W. Bush. And then it was fine during

9:39

Obama's first term, which means it was

9:41

fine during the global financial crisis,

9:44

because financial crises don't affect teenagers very much.

9:46

You don't see a national drop among

9:49

12 year old girls

9:51

and boys just because the economy is bad.

9:54

And then all of a sudden, in Obama's second

9:56

term, when, you know,

9:58

our first African American president is reelected, gay

10:02

marriages declared law of

10:04

the land a year or two later. This

10:08

was a progressive utopia, really, the early

10:10

2010s, and that's when girls, and

10:13

especially progressive girls, suddenly get so upset

10:15

about the state of the world. Because

10:17

I should point out that there are

10:19

three big demographic differences. The biggest one

10:21

is gender. So girls go up much

10:23

... well, not always. Girls

10:25

go up more than boys in absolute

10:28

terms, always, except for

10:30

suicide. Boys go up more. Boys

10:32

have high rates of suicide. But on

10:34

anxiety, depression, self-harm, girls start higher, and

10:36

then they go way, way up. So gender

10:38

is the biggest one. After

10:40

that comes politics and religion. So

10:43

it's girls on the left, especially, and

10:45

it's also kids in secular households. These

10:48

are the kids who had a lot of freedom.

10:50

They were not firmly anchored in binding communities. If

10:52

you're a religious conservative, your life is full of restrictions.

10:54

You have to go to church. You have to see

10:57

your grandmother. You have to say your prayers. You have

10:59

to do the dishes. I mean, religious

11:01

conservatives, they really hem their kids

11:04

in with obligations. Now,

11:06

according to many sociologists, or my favorite one,

11:08

Emile Durkheim, this is actually a good thing.

11:10

Like, many of us wouldn't choose it, but

11:12

it ends up actually being conducive to happiness.

11:15

And so what I think happened is

11:17

it's the kids who were least bound

11:19

in, which is especially secular

11:21

liberals, they're the ones who suddenly got

11:23

washed away in 2012, whereas the religious conservative

11:27

kids, their feet were firmly planted in real

11:29

communities. They didn't get washed away. They're worth

11:31

off, but it's only a little. So

11:33

again, the activism, the world is terrible,

11:35

and we didn't know it until 2013, but suddenly we

11:39

discovered that the world is terrible. Like, no,

11:41

that just doesn't fit. In all these

11:43

countries. Yeah. One thing I've wondered

11:45

is social media could be responsible in

11:47

a different way here, which is

11:50

social media is sort of like a

11:52

fire hose of bad news aimed directly

11:54

at our brains. And so that the

11:56

horrors of the world Become

11:58

more visible to kids. Through social

12:00

media probably an outsized ways that are not

12:03

you know they they might not actually match

12:05

the reality of the horrors but it like

12:07

already a like all news you're only going

12:09

to get the bad news in the worse

12:12

headlines. I was wondering if that had an

12:14

effect but yes but I would I would

12:16

for push the bit differently. So as a

12:18

social psychologists my job is to take whatever

12:21

you say and make it more social. Year

12:24

because he not. There's a

12:26

saying. And Social Psychology Cognitive

12:28

Psychology is Social Psychology. With

12:30

all of the interesting variables set to

12:33

zero so you propose a cognitive psychology

12:35

explanation may be a said social media

12:37

is bringing bad news and people are

12:39

thinking wow, the world is in bad

12:41

shape as very plausible but you know

12:43

it's much more influential especially on teenagers.

12:46

It's not. That there's a

12:48

war in Ukraine or somewhere

12:50

else is that. Sasser

12:53

the people in my seat or freaking out. Kids

12:56

are very subject to see emotional contagion especially

12:58

girls. girls are more open to social influences,

13:00

they feel other's emotions more or and so

13:02

this is one explanation for why said the

13:04

curves like everybody sort of flat and then

13:06

everybody goes up in their early twenties. His

13:09

girls is super sharp girls it really is

13:11

like a hockey sticks. The boys curves are

13:13

more gradual. It's not like you know is

13:15

they begin going up and two thousand nine

13:17

two thousand ten the the he put up.

13:20

but I'm so I think I think suddenly

13:22

especially when you look at middle school kids.

13:24

Middle school kids are not supposed. To be

13:26

worrying about the war in Ukraine or

13:28

inflation or anything else. They're supposed to

13:30

be playing that by the time your

13:32

senior in high school. Okay, you're reading

13:34

the newspaper. Maybe you're getting politically active,

13:37

but it's completely inappropriate for ten eleven,

13:39

twelve year old to have like thought

13:41

you know enough flog rise made in

13:43

Iraq or know exactly been reported to

13:45

Down a Goose's are you know about

13:47

throw it in stomach former Florida as

13:49

not pretty so that's what we're doomed.

13:51

Or middle school kids, they're suddenly immersed

13:53

and then there's posted. Go to these

13:55

protests. You know my my daughter's middle school they cancelled

13:57

school to go to a gun control. You know, gunfire?

14:00

I mean really middle school, please

14:02

just lay off the middle school kids.

14:04

Let them start puberty in a

14:06

normal healthy way Yeah, do

14:08

you got any more please? I love

14:10

well for people who haven't read the

14:12

book Could you explain a little bit

14:14

about why you think it rose so

14:16

sharply for girls and explain

14:18

the gender difference actually? Sure. Okay. So so

14:21

the basic story of the book is a

14:23

tragedy in in two acts Although there's a

14:25

third we can talk about which is community

14:28

In act one we take away the play based

14:30

childhood kids always used to

14:32

be out playing and Even

14:35

during the crime wave when I was growing up So

14:38

we take away begin in the 90s. We stopped letting kids

14:40

out. We're very afraid. They'll be kidnapped or hit by

14:42

a car So so

14:44

we block them from the kinds of

14:46

experiences that they need to be to

14:49

overcome their anxieties To

14:51

become more confident and capable. So that's that's act

14:53

one from like 1990 to 2010 But

14:58

in 2010 kids are still using their phones.

15:00

They have flip phones They're still using their

15:02

phones to communicate with other kids. They text

15:05

them. They call them they meet up to

15:07

you know, they meet up after school and

15:09

then everything changes act two of the tragedy

15:11

is this the in rushing of the phone

15:14

based childhood and That

15:16

means that kids go from having a flip phone

15:18

that they use to like painfully text each other

15:21

We know it's very hard to text on a

15:23

flip phone to suddenly having everyone's got an

15:26

iPhone with a front-facing camera They've got

15:28

Instagram. They've got high-speed internet at that

15:30

point. Everybody's on their phone now the

15:32

girls Choose so everyone's on

15:34

their phones, but they choose different things the girls

15:37

Actually think about it this way if you want

15:39

to trap an animal What you have to do

15:42

is find bait that the animal likes and

15:44

then the animals attract it And then you have to

15:46

find a way that once the animal takes the bait

15:48

they can't escape So if you

15:51

want to trap girls what you do is you say?

15:54

Hey, do you want to find out what everyone's

15:56

saying about everyone and

15:58

for girls? That's really? Appealing

16:00

especially do you want to find out what everyone's saying

16:02

about you? Now

16:04

that's more interesting to girls than it is to boys for

16:07

boys If you want to trap a boy you say hey

16:10

Do you want to look at pictures of naked women

16:12

or men whatever you're attracted to do you want to

16:14

look at high quality image? You know images of people

16:16

having sex. That's a lot more interesting to

16:18

boys than to girls or you say to boys

16:21

Hey, do you want to join teams and

16:23

fight war? You won't get physically hurt, but

16:25

really graphic amazing graphics It's very exciting. Yeah,

16:28

that sounds pretty good. Sign me up for

16:30

that three or four hours a day So

16:33

girls and boys go into they get very very deeply

16:35

immersed in different kinds of

16:37

activities all of which have quick dopamine

16:39

loops all of which are Very

16:42

rewarding on a variable ratio schedule, so

16:44

they're very addictive both ways But

16:47

the boys are actually having fun now over

16:49

time I think they're really harming themselves if

16:51

you if you keep giving yourself quick dopamine

16:53

for five or ten years every day You're

16:56

gonna change the reinforcement systems in your brain and

16:58

possibly permanently so the boys actually are getting quite

17:00

damaged I believe but if you look at kids

17:02

who are 14 the boys are actually having some

17:04

fun now. They're lonely as hell But

17:07

they are having fun when they're playing video games now

17:10

the girls on the other hand They're not

17:12

having fun when yours just swiping

17:14

on social media. You're looking at other photos

17:16

of beautiful girls, and they're perfect lives That's

17:19

not fun You're commenting on

17:21

what people said that's not fun. This is more

17:23

work So so this is

17:25

why I think we see there are both boys

17:27

and girls are addicted They

17:30

spend massive amounts of time about

17:32

five hours a day just on social media This

17:36

pushes out everything else, so they're not reading books. They're

17:38

not having hobbies. They're not seeing their friends This is

17:40

happening to both sexes But the

17:42

the video games and porn aren't they don't seem

17:44

as destructive to the boys at the age of

17:46

14 now if we look at These kids when

17:48

they're 30 and 40 I

17:50

think what we're going to find is that

17:52

the girls are somewhat functional They'll be more

17:54

anxious than average, but they'll have jobs, and

17:56

they finish college There's a lot of the

17:59

boys are going to still be dependent. They're

18:01

not gonna have developed skills to hold a job

18:03

or court a woman for the

18:05

heterosexual boys. So that's what I think is

18:07

the nature of the sex difference. The girls

18:09

went especially for Instagram, Pinterest, and Tumblr. Those

18:11

were three of the biggest platforms early on,

18:13

which the boys went much more for video

18:15

games than YouTube and that's why I think

18:18

one of the reasons they have very different

18:20

outcomes. Yeah, I mean it seems

18:22

for girls that there are

18:24

just like larger societal pressures that

18:26

have existed for decades, right, where

18:29

they're going to naturally feel the

18:32

pressure to compare

18:35

and look at other, and you know

18:37

there's sort of these unfair beauty standards

18:39

that girls feel pressure to

18:41

conform to that boys maybe do not

18:44

as much. That's right, absolutely. It's

18:46

always been clear to me that middle school is

18:48

harder for girls. I mean I hated middle school,

18:50

but it's harder for growth than it is for

18:52

boys, on average, harder for growth than boys. And

18:54

then social media says let's take the 10 worst parts

18:56

about middle school for a girl and let's crank them

18:59

up to 10. Let's just make it all a lot

19:01

worse. As

19:07

a chef and a restaurant owner, I'm as

19:09

meticulous about my cookware as I am about

19:11

my ingredients. That's why I love made-in cookware.

19:13

Each pan they make isn't just designed to

19:15

perform, it's crafted to last. As

19:17

a mom, I love that I can trust

19:19

made-in. It's made from the world's finest materials

19:21

so I can feel good about what I'm

19:23

feeding my family. I'm chef Rick Williamson and

19:25

I use made-in cookware. Shop chef quality pots

19:27

and pans at madeincookware.com. See

19:56

Center for Deakin, the UPS board. Be

19:59

Unstoppable. A

20:05

lot of debate out there on what to

20:07

put on your Johnsonville broad. No sauerkraut. No

20:09

sauerkraut. Peppers and onions, but no peppers and

20:11

onions. Or maybe peppers, but no onions. But

20:14

what kind of peppers? And then the mustard. What are

20:16

we doing brown? Spicy or are you going to go amateur hour? And

20:19

then catch up to its own situation. Which, by the

20:21

way, is absolute heresy. And here

20:23

is the beautiful truth. Johnsonville don't care.

20:25

If people are debating relish, bun, or no bun,

20:27

at least we're all talking and sharing again. And

20:29

yeah, the catch up is a personal choice. Keep

20:32

it juicy. The

20:39

thing that really drove home the problems for

20:41

me is sort of, you write about the

20:43

differences between relationships in the real world and

20:46

relationships in the virtual world. Can you talk

20:48

about the difference? Yeah, so

20:50

there's a huge difference between connecting and

20:52

performing. So Richard Reeves has this

20:54

great book called Of Boys and Men. He

20:56

points out, girls tend to interact face to face.

20:59

Boys tend to interact shoulder to shoulder. They like to

21:01

do things together. And that's even true for men. You

21:03

know, when I get together with my buddies, we're more

21:05

likely, we do talk. But we're more like, we want

21:08

to do something together. So when

21:10

technology helps us to

21:13

connect in the way that we want, the gender-specific

21:16

ways, when it helps boys to do things together,

21:18

when it helps girls to talk,

21:20

so of course girls would use the telephone

21:22

to talk for hours and hours. And

21:25

so is that bad? No, I

21:27

would say talking on the telephone with one person

21:29

is good. So that's connecting.

21:32

But what if it wasn't a one-way call? What if it was a

21:34

30-way call? What if

21:36

there's 30 people on the phone? Now, there's a

21:39

lot of performance. And

21:42

if you say something that other people

21:44

dislike or criticize, they might laugh at you and then they

21:46

build on that, and then they talk

21:48

about how stupid you are. Like, so it's high

21:51

stakes. And you get

21:53

30 people on a phone call, which you never did. But

21:56

if you had 30 people on a phone call, it would

21:58

be a high stakes. It's not really connecting. But

22:00

a lot of kids have these giant

22:02

group chats, and they're always chiming in,

22:04

and they're getting hundreds of notifications a

22:06

day. That's not connecting them. That

22:10

is performance. This

22:12

I think is one of the big reasons why as soon

22:15

as the boys move on to video games

22:17

and porn, even though they're

22:19

connecting on the video games, their level of

22:21

loneliness goes up. When the

22:24

girls move on to Instagram, even

22:26

though they're interacting, their level of

22:28

loneliness goes up. The more you

22:30

have virtual world interactions,

22:32

virtual interactions, many

22:35

of them are not intrinsically bad, some are. But

22:38

when you're having five or 10 hours a

22:40

day of virtual interactions, and you have to

22:42

sleep, and you have to go to school,

22:44

there really isn't any time to see your friends. And

22:47

that's what we see. It's so sad. I have grabs

22:49

in the book about time with friends. Before

22:51

2012, kids used to spend a lot

22:53

of time with their friends. Now they don't. They don't see them

22:55

very much. There's just no time in the day. Yeah,

22:58

and you talked about it in terms of

23:01

communities and how, I think you

23:03

said that virtual communities have sort

23:05

of a low bar for entry, and

23:08

that offline communities have a higher bar for entry.

23:10

Can you talk a little bit about the difference

23:12

there? Because I think that's pretty cool. Yeah,

23:15

childhood needs to be full of hard things. I

23:18

mean, I'd ask any parent here, if

23:20

you could remove all the obstacles from your child's

23:22

life, would you do so? Of course

23:24

not. You know, your kid needs to learn to

23:26

struggle. They need to learn to climb high walls.

23:29

They need to learn to overcome failure. And

23:31

so same thing in social life. If

23:34

you could set it, that whenever your kid made a

23:36

mistake or people were laughing at him, your kid could

23:39

just press a button and a jack. Like, that's it,

23:41

I'm done with them. Maybe go on to another community.

23:44

That would be a terrible way to raise a kid. What

23:48

has always happened for millions of years, certainly since

23:50

we've had language in the last million years, we've

23:53

always lived in relatively small

23:55

groups, a few dozen typically. And

23:57

fitting in with that community is

23:59

life. for death. You have to learn how to

24:01

fit in. And it can be painful. And

24:04

some kids are excluded. But

24:08

this is the gym,

24:10

the social, the gym where you work out how

24:12

to do this. You learn these skills. Whereas,

24:16

when everything moves into virtual communities, you know, a

24:18

huge number of apps and new apps every year,

24:20

you know, you can try out different communities. And

24:22

if you make a mistake, if you don't like

24:24

it, you don't have to fix yourself. You don't

24:27

have to make up with the people. You just

24:29

quit. And so when

24:31

everything becomes cheap, disposable and easy,

24:34

children don't have a chance to grow up. Kids

24:36

need to do hard things when they

24:38

have a phone. So let's just take awkward

24:41

silences. You know, as

24:43

soon as you get in an elevator, all the

24:45

phones come out, it's awkward to stand there for 30

24:47

seconds. My students at NYU

24:49

tell me that sometimes when they're at the lunch table,

24:51

they're sitting at lunch and

24:54

talking. But there's a moment of, you

24:56

know, there's a lull. Someone pulls out their phone because

24:59

most of them are addicted. They have to see what's

25:01

been coming in. And once one person pulls out their

25:03

phone, the others pull out their phones. So

25:05

I think what we're seeing is

25:08

our kids are so lonely. And what

25:10

they really need is each other. But as

25:12

long as they all have phones, they don't

25:14

get each other. Yeah, when you say

25:17

that, I think two things. One, which is we're

25:20

all like that now, right? Not just kids. And

25:24

two, have you seen any

25:26

evidence that sort of the

25:28

transients of these virtual world

25:30

relationships are actually affecting real

25:33

world relationships? The behaviors

25:35

that are encouraged and rewarded in these virtual

25:37

world relationships start spilling over now and this

25:39

is how people are with each other. Yes.

25:43

Now here, I don't know of any scientific

25:45

studies. This is a subtle question about behavior.

25:49

But so I teach in a business school, I speak with a

25:51

lot of people in the corporate world. And

25:53

they, you know, they almost uniformly see

25:56

real difficulties in incorporating their Gen Z

25:58

employees. It's just much harder. harder. And

26:00

again, there's no blame here. This generation,

26:03

we stuck them on social media

26:05

and smartphones at the beginning of puberty.

26:09

They went through COVID. My kids lost their first

26:13

year of middle school and high school to COVID. A

26:16

lot of kids lost their first years on

26:18

the job market. So there's

26:20

no blame here. But

26:23

what employers are noticing is

26:26

that members of

26:28

Gen Z are much more passive. If

26:31

something goes wrong, they don't take the initiative

26:33

to solve it. They might ask, what should

26:36

I do? But they just seem to

26:38

have less of a sort of internal locus of

26:40

control, a less of a sense of like, I can make

26:42

things happen. They

26:44

expect more accommodation. So in the work

26:47

world, if there's a deadline, if we

26:49

have a client who's expecting this report

26:51

on Monday morning, a lot of us are

26:53

going to be working over the weekend. I mean, that's just the way it's going

26:55

to be. But a lot

26:57

of Gen Z is like, I'm sorry, you know,

26:59

I have anxiety. And so I'm not going to

27:01

like they just expect accommodation because that's what we've

27:03

given them from the time they were little. And

27:07

another is the ghosting. It's

27:09

awkward to say you won't do something. It's awkward

27:12

to break up with someone. It's,

27:14

you know, it's so the idea that you

27:16

shouldn't have to experience anything uncomfortable. So if

27:18

someone's expecting something from you, and you don't

27:20

want to do it, just don't show up.

27:22

Just don't do it. So

27:24

I hear a lot about that. So again,

27:27

this is just these are more just from anecdotes

27:29

that I hear. Yeah, stands to

27:31

reason that if you didn't have a

27:33

normal childhood full of face to face

27:35

with millions of face to face interactions,

27:37

some of which were awkward, if

27:39

you take out, let's say 70% of

27:41

those, and you swap in these weird virtual

27:43

stuff, stands to reason that if you're a

27:46

24 year old, you're not going to be

27:48

behaving in the expected way in the

27:51

office. Yeah. And I was just

27:53

thinking about like, even just in my own life since

27:55

since doing this show. And you know, I was thinking

27:57

about it again, reading your book is like you're, you're

27:59

just around and a bunch of friends and if

28:01

you're all on your phone, or

28:03

if there is this moment of silence, you don't,

28:06

sometimes you just grab the phone and look at the phone

28:08

instead of just thinking of like, oh, what's the next thing

28:11

I'm gonna say? What's the next topic of conversation I'm gonna

28:13

have? And that's sort of all

28:15

generations really. That's right. So

28:17

people do talk about them having

28:19

poor conversational skills. And

28:22

for the boys especially, difficulty making eye

28:24

contact. I'd love to

28:26

see data on this, but I hear this a lot. In

28:29

fact, I'll just share a funny story. So

28:32

when The Calling of the American Mind came out in 2018, I

28:35

was on Billmore. And the first

28:37

guest was Stormy Daniels. And

28:39

so she went out, she had a book out and

28:41

Bill interviews her and then I come out and I

28:43

talk about what's happening to kids. And

28:45

afterwards, there's like a little party for

28:47

everybody who's involved, all the production crew

28:49

and the guests. So I'm talking with

28:51

her and she says, oh,

28:53

you know, I saw your segment and

28:55

wow, yeah, I really, I really seen

28:57

that, that Gen Z is just really

28:59

different. And she said, I've

29:02

worked with men of all ages, ever

29:04

since I was 17, she's been in strip clubs and dancing.

29:09

She said she's always worked with men of all ages and she

29:11

likes to flirt with them and talk with them. And

29:14

she's noticed in the last few years, the

29:16

young men can't look her in the eye.

29:18

So again, it's just an anecdote, but I'm

29:20

hearing this a lot about eye contact. Boys

29:22

have trouble making eye contact. So

29:25

you recommend four major reforms,

29:28

no smartphones before high school, no social

29:30

media before 16, phone-free schools

29:33

and more unsupervised play. Can you

29:35

talk about some of the obstacles

29:37

to getting these done and what

29:39

seemed to be some of the

29:41

more common sources of resistance? Sure,

29:44

so let's take the easiest one, the one that we

29:46

can do this year, the one that is happening this

29:48

year, which is phone-free schools. It

29:50

is terrible to have the greatest distraction

29:52

device ever made in your pocket. And

29:55

that's what we've allowed kids to do. If you

29:57

can imagine a teacher trying to teach a

29:59

class. where every kid has on

30:01

their desk, you know, a

30:03

TV set and a guitar and

30:06

a walkie-talkie and a phonograph,

30:08

you know, from back in the old days. Like

30:11

that's absurd, like why would we do that? But

30:13

that's what we do. Having phones

30:15

in school is completely insane. And

30:17

so most schools have a rule. You can't take

30:19

out your phone during class. You have to wait

30:21

until class is over, which does two

30:23

things. One, all the kids,

30:25

especially in the back row, they're just you hide it behind

30:27

a book and you're on your phone. I mean, you have

30:30

to be on your phone because everyone else's. If people are

30:32

texting, you have to check. Otherwise, you're left out. Some

30:35

teachers have told me kids go to the bathroom

30:37

a lot more often nowadays than they used to

30:39

because they have to they have to see their

30:41

phone. They can't go 40 minutes without checking it.

30:43

So anyway, phones in schools are complete, complete insanity.

30:46

This one is easy. This one is

30:48

happening. It's happened. If you're listening to

30:50

this conversation, and you have kids and

30:52

your kids go to a school where

30:54

they allow the kids to use their

30:56

phones between classes or lunch, please

30:59

talk to the principal and beg them

31:01

say please, I want my child to

31:03

listen to the teacher during class and to

31:05

talk with other kids between classes. But

31:08

if they have phones, they're not doing either of those. So

31:11

so phone free schools is easy. It's not

31:14

controversial. It's just there's some implementation questions. But

31:16

there's really no counter argument. I've not yet

31:18

seen a counter argument to taking the phones

31:20

in the morning and giving them back in

31:22

the evening. I guess it's I guess it's

31:25

you hear some parents say, well, I need to be

31:27

able to contact my kids, right? Like I

31:29

need to be able to if it but which which

31:31

is a very like recent

31:34

thing because I remember like, you know, when I was in

31:36

school, if your parents really needed you that someone would come

31:38

into the class and say, hey, your parents, that's right. If

31:41

it's an emergency, if it's an emergency, you can

31:43

still reach your kid. But if

31:45

every parent is texting their children multiple times during

31:47

the day to check up on things and oh,

31:50

I'm scheduling your dentist appointment. Are you free then?

31:52

Then? Or, oh, can you do this on your

31:54

way home? Like, you know, this

31:56

is during class. Like this never could have

31:58

been done until you know, 20. or

32:00

something and now it's routine. So

32:02

we have to stop, we have to stop it. So

32:04

phone free schools there's really no debate. I mean that's

32:06

just a no-brainer. The

32:09

first two are the ones where

32:11

there's not a lot of opposition

32:13

but there is some debate. So the first

32:15

rule is no smartphone till high school. Just give them

32:17

a flip phone or a phone watch. And

32:20

the second rule is no social media till 16. And

32:22

a lot

32:25

of the pushback is people think

32:28

no smartphone till high school. How will I get

32:30

in touch with my child? With

32:32

a flip phone or a brick phone or a

32:34

phone watch. That works fine. Do

32:36

you need your child to have complete

32:38

access to everything on the internet 24

32:40

hours a day? How about they just

32:42

can get it on their computer at

32:44

home? Do you need

32:47

everyone in the world to be able to reach your

32:49

child to try to sextort them, flirt with them, get

32:51

them to send photos of themselves? Like no you don't

32:53

need that. No child needs that. So

32:55

I'm not saying you

32:57

can't communicate with your child. You can text them. And

33:00

I'm not saying keep them off the internet. They can

33:02

go on the internet but it should be ideally on

33:04

a desktop computer. Especially if you're like, we're talking like

33:06

eight, nine, ten year old kids. Have

33:09

a desktop computer in your kitchen, in your

33:11

living room, family room. Have a computer that

33:13

the kids can use. If it's out

33:15

in a public place they're much less likely to get

33:17

into porn, to start talking with strange men.

33:19

It's just a lot of the bad stuff

33:21

happens when they have the phone in private

33:23

at night. So put that, you know, delay

33:25

that as long as you can. So

33:28

and then social media, no social media until 16. Social

33:32

media is so completely inappropriate for children.

33:35

We have a general consensus in

33:37

our society that we do pass

33:39

laws to restrict kids

33:42

with regard to sex, like

33:44

explicit hardcore sex, violence,

33:47

like really graphic violence, and

33:51

addiction. We think that a nine year

33:53

old can't be, you know, we don't let

33:55

nine year olds into casinos to gamble. They'll

33:57

be too easily taken advantage of. your

34:00

kid goes on social media and smartphones

34:02

in general. So you've got

34:04

huge amounts of really graphic sex, including

34:06

a lot of violent sex and choking

34:08

and things like that. And you

34:10

have a huge amount of violence. Depends

34:13

on whatever you click on on TikTok

34:15

or Instagram Reels. But

34:18

a lot of the boys end up

34:21

seeing car crashes, people getting punched in

34:23

the face, people falling to their death.

34:25

I mean, they end up seeing horrible

34:27

stuff. Drug

34:30

gangs, dismembering live people.

34:32

I mean, horrible things. And

34:36

there was addiction. Because

34:38

social media is addictive to about 10% of

34:41

kids have what's called problematic use,

34:43

which is essentially addiction. And

34:46

because especially for the boys, we then hook them

34:48

on gambling. Now that sometimes has to wait till

34:50

they're 18, but there's some gambling, there's some stuff

34:52

that they're able to get the kids on earlier.

34:55

My point is, we've worked for

34:57

100 years to make the real

34:59

world a place where we

35:01

can live with young people and young people

35:04

can walk around and we can buy liquor.

35:06

They can't. And we can buy cigarettes and

35:08

they can't. And we can go to strip

35:10

clubs and casinos and they can't. That's

35:13

the real world. And all of a sudden we develop

35:15

this virtual world. We say, how about

35:17

no restrictions? You know, it'll be too hard. Like,

35:19

are we going to ask everyone to identify themselves?

35:21

Are we going to ask everyone to show ID?

35:24

We can't do that. So how about no restrictions?

35:26

How about every child can have as much hardcore

35:28

porn as they want? That's what we've decided as

35:30

a kid. Yeah. I

35:33

mean, what, I'm sure you've seen this,

35:35

the National Academy of Sciences report that

35:37

found social media encourages a lot of

35:39

these harmful behaviors. They also found that,

35:42

you know, for some

35:44

kids in marginalized communities, especially

35:46

LGBTQ kids, you know,

35:48

the internet and social media especially can

35:50

be like a lifeline that, you

35:52

know, connects them to communities of

35:55

people like them that depending

35:57

on where they live, they may not come in

35:59

contact with. offline so one thing you

36:01

know i hear from people who are resistant to

36:03

this is like look obviously there's a lot of

36:05

trouble kids can get into but for some kids

36:08

who do feel excluded in real life this is

36:10

the way that they connect with other people this

36:12

is the way that they find these communities in

36:14

those communities are important to them. Yes

36:17

so that that makes it makes

36:19

some sense on its face

36:22

but there's a couple of problems with that. The

36:25

first is that it confuses social

36:27

media with the internet so

36:30

when the internet that came out in the

36:33

nineties was amazing and

36:35

suddenly you know lgbtq kids they

36:37

could find discussion groups that could

36:39

find other kids so the internet

36:42

largely solve that problem in the

36:44

nineties. I'm also information you

36:46

could find you couldn't find anything about

36:49

your interest you could find anything about

36:51

your group so the internet solve that

36:53

problem the nineteen nineties. Now

36:55

then in the twenty ten in the two thousands we

36:57

get facebook which originally was just

36:59

about connecting people but then once

37:01

it becomes more about the news feed curated by

37:03

algorithms so this is what really happened in the

37:05

twenty tens. So do lgbtq

37:08

people need a news

37:10

feed curated by algorithms that

37:13

are pushing them to interact with strangers all

37:15

over the world and feeding them content is

37:17

this good for them that were bad for

37:19

them. Yes the internet is

37:21

great i fully support

37:23

the benefits of the internet for

37:25

kids from especially sexual minorities

37:28

there so that's great

37:30

but they don't need instagram

37:32

or more tiktok or anything

37:34

like that. Second common sense

37:36

media they do a lot of surveys of families

37:38

and kids they found that

37:41

lgbtq adolescents were more likely

37:43

to their non lgbtq peers.

37:45

To believe that their lives will be

37:47

better without each platform that they use

37:50

and that lgbtq girls were more

37:53

than twice as likely as non

37:55

lgbtq girls to encounter harmful content

37:57

related to suicide and eating disorders.

38:00

So, you know, yes, that

38:02

argument makes sense on its face. And I know

38:04

it's one that Metta keeps pushing. Metta keeps trying

38:06

to say, oh, we can't regulate because that'll be

38:08

bad for LGBTQ kids. But it's just not true.

38:11

Metta does more harm to LGBTQ kids than to others.

38:13

And if you look at it this way, something's

38:16

really weird here. There

38:20

has never been a decade in

38:22

which LGBTQ was destigmatized

38:24

faster than the one we just went through.

38:27

You know, in 2010, you know, there

38:29

was still a big stigma and

38:31

Obama was opposed to gay marriage.

38:34

I mean, it was a different world in 2010. If

38:37

this was primarily a question about stigma,

38:39

then we would expect that this should

38:41

be the decade when LGBTQ kids got

38:43

the healthiest. We would expect them

38:46

to be happier. But they're the

38:48

least happy. So whatever this

38:50

world is, it's really, really harsh on

38:52

LGBTQ kids, more so than non-LGBT kids.

38:54

So I just I don't buy it.

38:56

That's my point. I don't buy this

38:58

idea that, oh, Instagram is so good

39:00

for LGBTQ kids. No, I mean, point

39:02

taken that if you're looking for

39:04

communities of like minded people, you can find them

39:06

without social media and you could in the 90s,

39:08

in the early 2000s as well. And

39:11

you can if you need mental health help, if you

39:13

need to research that you can do that as well

39:16

on the Internet. You said something else that was interesting,

39:18

though, that when that

39:20

in that survey from Common

39:22

Sense Media that LGBTQ kids said

39:25

they could do without these platforms, right? They'd be happy without

39:28

this. And I also saw these studies. I think you said

39:30

it in the past as well that like, even

39:32

if kids resist phone

39:35

free schools at first or resist getting off

39:37

social media, the kids where there are the

39:40

schools that have banned the phones, the kids

39:42

are happier afterwards. Within two or three

39:44

weeks. And we've seen these studies where kids

39:46

like, would you give up social media if

39:48

everyone else was still on it? No. Everyone

39:52

could give up social media and everyone could give up the

39:54

platforms. Would you do it? And then people want to do

39:56

it. So it really is the sort of fear of missing

39:58

out that's driving a lot of this as well. That's

40:00

right. That's the key to the whole

40:02

thing is to recognize that this is

40:04

a collective action problem and social media

40:07

is socially addictive So cigarettes

40:09

are biologically addictive and when I was

40:11

in high school You

40:13

know, there were some kids who smoked and you could buy

40:15

cigarettes from a vending machine back then in

40:18

the peak year of smoking was 1997 and

40:23

37% of American high school students smoked which

40:25

means that two-thirds didn't but social

40:27

media is much much more addictive Because

40:29

you can't have a school where only 37% of the kids are

40:31

on social media It's

40:34

it's gonna be either zero or 95 so or

40:36

you know, whatever but So

40:39

social media puts a lot of pressure on

40:41

other kids to join where smoking cigarettes didn't

40:43

do that So once you

40:45

understand that this is a trap Then

40:48

what we see is something very interesting the

40:50

young kids like 10 year olds They're

40:52

desperate to get a phone An

40:54

Instagram account tick-tock because that's what the older kids are

40:57

doing. They're desperate for it But I was

40:59

talking with a German a German interviewer

41:01

for a German newspaper and she said

41:03

she said some German TV Program

41:05

had done they did interviews with the kid, you know,

41:07

the 10 year olds and they were all I want

41:10

tick-tock I want Instagram. I wanna smart and I want

41:12

everything and then they Interviewed

41:14

either 18 year olds or 20 year olds and

41:17

they were all like wow, this really

41:19

messed us up I wish

41:21

we didn't have this so again what

41:23

we see is that is that Gen

41:26

Z themselves? Do not defend this

41:28

Gen Z is not saying don't take our phones.

41:30

We love our phones. They're saying we're trapped We're

41:32

trapped help us find a way out After

41:40

you can also we know being a

41:42

small business in a means holiday time is

41:45

still go through Still get

41:47

those orders shift and still

41:49

re up on stamps and supplies That's

41:52

why this upcoming holiday while others close

41:54

up shop will be open And

41:57

happy to help you keep being unstoppable

42:00

to your local store today. Most locations

42:02

are independently owned. Product services, pricing, and hours

42:04

of operation may vary. See Center for Detail.

42:06

The UPS Store. Be unstoppable.

42:11

Here you are. CPM, high, sweat,

42:13

chimp, and party mode. Talks, panting,

42:16

you're working hard, real hard, and

42:18

you're thirsty. You need vitamins, nutrients

42:21

for peak performance, and energy.

42:23

And your plants do too. Aww, let me

42:26

just look at the little guy. Water-soluble plant

42:28

food from Miracle Grow is full of essential

42:30

nutrients. Just a little scoop into your watering

42:32

can and boom, instant feeding and bigger, more

42:34

beautiful plants. It's kind of like a sports

42:36

drink for your plants. You may have to

42:39

suffer from heat, but your plants do not.

42:45

At the UPS Store, we know being

42:47

a small business owner means holiday time

42:49

is still goatee. Still get

42:51

those orders shipped home and

42:53

still re-up on stamps and supplies time. That's

42:56

why this will come in holiday while others

42:58

close up shop, will be open

43:01

and happy to help you keep being

43:03

unsusciable. Come into your local store today.

43:06

Most locations are independently owned. Product services, pricing,

43:08

and hours of operation may vary. See Center

43:10

for Detail. The UPS Store. Be

43:13

unstoppable. So,

43:20

first time I wanted to have you on was in April of 2022,

43:22

after you wrote a piece in the

43:24

Atlantic called, Why the Past 10 Years of American

43:27

Life Have Been Uniquely Stupid. And

43:29

you basically lay a lot of

43:31

the blame for political polarization and institutional

43:33

distrust on the rise of social media,

43:35

which really is the initial reason I

43:37

became interested in doing this podcast. I've

43:40

learned a lot about what being too online

43:43

is doing to our mental health. I've also

43:45

been worried though for a long time that

43:47

the behavior social media encourages and the way

43:49

it shapes our thinking about the world is

43:52

antithetical to what liberal democracy requires of us.

43:55

What have you discovered on that topic? research

44:00

has always been on moral psychology. I used

44:02

to look at how morality varies by culture. And

44:05

then in the late 90s early 2000s as

44:07

the culture was heating up I began looking

44:09

at liberal conservative as though they were different

44:12

cultures with different moralities. So I've been studying

44:14

this since the 90s and I

44:17

began to get very alarmed about political

44:19

polarization. And this is before social media.

44:21

This is just there so and

44:24

I was writing essays there's like 10 reasons

44:26

we're getting more polarized. You know the loss

44:28

of the greatest generation, the Cold War ending,

44:30

more education because more

44:32

educated people do more culture war stuff. Working

44:35

class people don't care as much about culture

44:37

war stuff. They want bread and butter

44:39

issues. So I don't want to

44:41

say that our polarization is just because of

44:43

social media. I can't even say that that's

44:45

the primary cause. But I think it is

44:47

a huge amplifier because what happens

44:50

is, so I have two Atlantic articles. The

44:52

one that you read is the one really

44:54

trying to lay out the whole story. But

44:56

my first one was my first pass at

44:58

this was in

45:00

2019 I was trying to say why

45:03

why did everything go crazy around 2014-2015.

45:05

It really felt like there was a

45:07

change in the fabric of the universe.

45:10

And we saw this on campus. You

45:12

know in 2013 things were normal and college students were

45:14

what you think of college students. And by 2015 they

45:17

were protesting against microaggressions and

45:19

asking for safe spaces. Again this

45:21

wasn't the majority of them but it was happening all over the

45:23

country especially especially at elite schools.

45:26

So something weird happened on college campuses and

45:28

then it turned out it wasn't just college

45:31

campuses. It was

45:33

spread much more widely in our society and

45:35

it just seemed like everything is now explosive.

45:37

If anyone says anything it can get blown

45:40

up into a whole big thing and they

45:42

can be fired within 24 hours. Like really?

45:44

This is the world we live in. We all have to walk on

45:46

eggshells. So I

45:48

think social media really changed the basic

45:51

fabric of everything. Now if

45:53

you go back to Federalist 10 and I think

45:55

I quote Madison

45:57

in Federalist 10 he talked

45:59

It talks about

46:02

how we are so prone to vex

46:04

and oppress each other that if no

46:06

substantive cause for disagreement can be found,

46:08

the most trivial little thing can become

46:10

a reason for outreach, something like that.

46:12

So the founding fathers were very aware

46:14

that people are argumentative and they easily

46:16

get in fights and they usually get

46:18

upset. And so the idea was, how

46:20

do we create a system that kind

46:22

of slows things down? How do we

46:24

have legislators, because remember, we

46:27

do not have a democracy. They

46:29

did not want direct democracy because

46:31

the people are passionate, the people are

46:33

prone to demagogues. They

46:35

wanted a system where the legislators

46:37

have sufficient independence to do what

46:39

they think is best, but

46:41

it's crucial that the people can kick them out

46:43

if they're not happy. That's the key. What

46:46

happens now? Most of

46:48

our congresspeople are on Twitter. There

46:52

was a famous scene where Ted

46:54

Cruz gave this big speech in

46:56

the Senate and then he sits

46:58

down and he pulls out his

47:00

phone and one of the journalists behind him takes a

47:02

photograph. He's checking what people are

47:05

saying on Twitter. This is

47:07

exactly the opposite of what the founding fathers

47:09

wanted. And this is one reason why Congress

47:11

is breaking down, our Congress is dysfunctional. Now,

47:13

there are many reasons for that, but if

47:15

it was an ailing institution in the 90s

47:17

and early 2000s, this is just like a

47:20

metaphor that I use is, suppose we suddenly

47:22

change the

47:27

Earth's atmosphere from 20% oxygen to 80%

47:30

oxygen. It's like,

47:32

oh, wouldn't that be great? Like you'd get so

47:34

much oxygen so easily we'd all feel good. No,

47:36

everything would burn. Any little spark,

47:39

every electrical thing would explode. 80%

47:42

oxygen, everything is combustible. And similarly, what

47:44

if we give everyone an outrage button

47:46

where they could, the slightest thing, oh,

47:48

something bothers you about what you saw

47:50

on the street, tweet it. Somebody

47:53

did something obnoxious, take a photo, put it up, let

47:55

people dox them. This

47:57

is what social media has done to us.

47:59

It's hypervirus. social media. Original Facebook wasn't like

48:02

this in 2004, but once

48:04

you get the newsfeed and algorithms

48:06

and outrage cycles, you

48:08

know, it's an open question whether liberal

48:10

democracy in the American form, it's an

48:12

open question whether we

48:14

can survive, whether our current institutions

48:17

and structures compatible with an 80%

48:20

oxygen world. Yeah, and not just here, but

48:22

you're seeing the stress on liberal democracies all

48:24

over the world. I also think to your

48:26

earlier point when we're talking about virtual relationships

48:29

versus sort of offline relationships,

48:32

there is something about virtual

48:34

relationships and if the more time we spend

48:36

online, the more difficult it is to disagree

48:39

in a way where

48:41

you need to disagree with in democracies, right?

48:43

And debate in that way because everything is

48:46

black and white, good or evil. And

48:48

I look at these polls of Gen

48:51

Z potentially shifting to the right or

48:53

at least disengaging from politics altogether and

48:55

I do wonder if it's driven by

48:57

some of the same social media dynamics

48:59

that are fueling some of these broader

49:01

mental health challenges. That's right. One of

49:03

the main things that my fellow professors

49:05

say about their students, so let's be

49:07

clear, most students are not radicals, most

49:09

students are not asking for trigger warnings,

49:11

most students want to learn, but

49:13

what my fellow professors say,

49:15

the most common thing I hear is

49:18

that I can't get them to disagree with

49:20

each other, I can't get a debate going.

49:22

They're so afraid of disagreeing with each other.

49:25

Now if you grew up your entire life

49:27

in a minefield and

49:29

any little thing you do can blow off

49:31

a finger or a toe, you'd be really

49:33

careful about where you walked. Now

49:35

when you grow up with small groups of friends,

49:37

you say something stupid, you make a joke that's

49:39

not funny, someone says that wasn't funny, that was

49:41

stupid, you say oh yeah sorry and then you

49:43

move on. But if you grow up in a world where

49:46

if you say something, it can get screenshotted

49:48

and passed around, it might even become a

49:50

national sensation. Sometimes things that kids say in

49:52

middle school or at high school become a

49:54

national, you know, Fox News will

49:56

pick it up or Left-wing Media will pick it up. If

50:00

we raise our kids in minefields, we shouldn't be

50:02

surprised that they're not really in

50:04

an exploratory frame of mind. Yeah,

50:06

no, that makes sense. Last question,

50:09

you gave an interview in 2020 about some

50:11

of these divisions where you said

50:13

that it was your understanding that the religious

50:16

wars ended in Europe, not because Europeans reached

50:18

some profoundly enlightened view. They just got exhausted

50:20

and realized we've got to stop this. Four

50:23

years after that interview, it's clear we have not

50:25

come to that realization yet. Have

50:28

you seen anything that gives you hope that might change?

50:32

Let me think hard about this because I don't want to give

50:34

my first answer, which is no. Let

50:36

me think about this. I

50:41

do think there's a greater recognition

50:43

of the problem, and that has

50:45

to come first. I

50:48

do think that we're

50:51

going to make huge progress on the

50:54

children's front. So far, there's

50:56

been zero regulation of social media, absolute

50:58

zero since 1998. Congress

51:00

had done nothing, nothing. I think we might

51:02

get ... There's a bill called COSA, the

51:05

Kids Online Safety Act. That actually could conceivably

51:07

pass this year. What

51:09

I'm saying is we went a long time where things got worse

51:11

and worse and worse, and there

51:13

was really no immune system. The

51:16

tech companies, these are some of the richest companies in the

51:18

world, they faced no

51:21

real opposition. They had their

51:23

way with our kids. They took over our kids' childhoods.

51:27

They took over our democratic discussion. They

51:29

took over the public square, and they

51:31

had no liability. We can't sue them

51:33

because of Section 230, the Communications Decency

51:35

Act. The

51:38

situation is untenable, and if left

51:40

unchecked, I think will lead to

51:42

the political collapse of the United

51:44

States. I think it will at least become

51:46

ungovernable. If we keep going the way we're

51:49

going, we will become ungovernable

51:51

within five or ten years. However,

51:55

things don't just keep going the way they're going.

51:58

I think we are beginning to see ... a

52:00

recognition that these companies are

52:03

messing us up and It's

52:05

going to start with the children It's going to

52:07

start with the recognition that our kids are in

52:09

horrible shape And if

52:11

we can get some legislation passed and

52:13

if we can get norms changed to

52:15

protect Gen Alpha the generation

52:18

after Gen Z That

52:20

would be an extremely hopeful sign

52:22

now What regulations

52:24

what laws would improve? Democratic

52:27

debate that's much harder I

52:30

don't want to get into content moderation because

52:32

content moderation always is going to be one

52:34

side Saying the other side speech

52:36

is harmful as we saw with the Twitter files But

52:40

there are many architectural features like things

52:42

that just enhance the the virality This

52:44

is this was one of Francis Huygens

52:46

main points the Facebook whistleblower Facebook

52:48

could have done all kinds of things

52:50

that were content neutral not about content

52:52

moderation This is changing parameters within the system.

52:55

It would make it much less explosive Let's

52:57

take the atmosphere from 80% oxygen down to 50% oxygen. That

52:59

would be a lot better So

53:03

I think we're going to face tremendous Challenges

53:05

in American democracy and as you say others

53:07

to other not not all I can't I

53:09

don't know about all but you know We're

53:11

not the only ones going through this but

53:13

but not all democracies are but the American

53:15

form which we don't have shared blood We

53:17

don't have shared enemies. We don't have shared

53:19

gods We

53:21

don't have a lot holding us together. I think

53:24

we are a large and diverse country

53:26

without a lot holding it together, so we are

53:29

at higher risk of Splitting

53:31

in some way then say Iceland or New Zealand I'm

53:34

very concerned about what's coming But

53:37

I do see hope in that people are

53:39

waking up to the dangers of social media

53:41

for society All right. Well, we will leave

53:44

it there Jonathan height the book is the

53:46

anxious generation. Thank you so much for joining

53:48

offline What a pleasure talking with you John.

53:50

I I hope your listeners will go to

53:53

anxious generation calm We have a lot of

53:55

resources there And my

53:57

sub stack after babble calm we put out

53:59

all kinds of research and supplements there.

54:02

So it's a pleasure talking with you. Thank you. Before

54:08

we go, some quick housekeeping. Our first ever

54:10

book, Democracy or Else? How to Save America

54:12

in 10 Easy Steps is out next week,

54:14

June 25th. At this point, we all know

54:17

what we're up against, American democracy is in

54:19

crisis, and that can feel daunting. That's why

54:21

in Democracy or Else, we broke everything down

54:23

into the 10 steps you need to follow

54:25

to get informed, get involved, and get off

54:28

the sidelines. Crooked's donating its profits

54:30

from Democracy or Else to Vote Save America

54:32

and 2024 campaigns, so you're already making a

54:34

difference when you purchase. Big

54:36

text, cool illustration, short chapters,

54:39

and love it's jokes are in there. What

54:41

more can you ask for? Did he write that line? Jesus.

54:46

Pre-order your copy now

54:49

at crooked.com/book. I

54:51

have some jokes in there too. So does Josh.

54:53

So does Tommy. Crooked

54:56

is going big because we were refused to

54:58

go home. Help us hit our $100,000 fundraising

55:00

goal in support of organizations fighting in states

55:03

where conservatives are banning gender affirming care and

55:05

targeting trans youth because they're nasty little freaks

55:07

who won't stop infringing on our most intimate

55:10

personal freedoms. Currently, we're only at

55:12

7%, so we have quite a ways to go.

55:14

Donate directly to the fund or pick up items

55:16

from our new Pride or Else collection and let

55:18

Crooked do it for you with a portion of

55:20

proceeds going directly to the fund. Learn

55:23

more at crooked.com/ pride.

55:37

Offline is a Crooked Media production. It's written

55:39

and hosted by me, Jon Favreau, along with

55:41

Max Fisher. It's produced by Austin Fisher. Emma

55:44

Illich-Frank is our associate producer. Mixed

55:46

and edited by Jordan Cantor. Audio support

55:48

from Kyle Seglin and Charlotte Landis. Jordan

55:50

Katz and Kenny Siegel take care of

55:52

our music. Thanks to Ari Schwartz, Madeline

55:54

Herringer, and Reed Cherlin for production support.

55:56

And to our digital team, Elijah Cohn

55:58

and Dilan Villanueva. who film and

56:00

share our episodes as videos every week. This

56:21

show is sponsored by BetterHelp. My

56:24

social battery gets drained so easily. You

56:26

guys know I am a sensitive Virgo

56:28

woman, okay? I need that time to

56:30

rest and relax. It can

56:32

be easy to ignore our social battery

56:34

and spread ourselves thin, especially with social

56:36

gatherings picking up after the winter. What's

56:38

the right amount of socializing for you?

56:40

And how do you recharge? Therapy can

56:42

give you the self-awareness to build a

56:44

social life that doesn't drain your battery.

56:46

You guys know that therapy is everything to

56:48

me. I have it. I

56:56

got the second kid at home. Procreation. Procreation.

56:59

We're both very proud of

57:01

our procreation. I'm proud

57:04

of... Uberbook. Oh, I'm proud of

57:06

the fact that we finished our book. That's right. Democracy

57:08

or else? How to Save America in 10 Easy Steps.

57:11

It's available for pre-order right now. We're trying to get

57:13

on the New York Times Best Seller list. That'll make

57:15

me proud. That'd be great. When

57:18

life goes fast, it's important to take a moment to

57:20

celebrate your wins and make adjustments for

57:22

the rest of the year. Therapy can help you

57:24

take stock of your progress and set achievable goals

57:26

for the next six months. If you're thinking of

57:28

starting therapy, give BetterHelp a try. It's entirely online

57:30

designed to be convenient, flexible, and suited to your

57:32

schedule. Just fill out a brief questionnaire

57:34

to get matched with a licensed therapist and switch

57:36

therapists anytime for no additional charge.

57:39

Take a moment. Visit betterhelp.com/offline today to get 10%

57:41

off your first month. That's

57:44

BetterHelp, help.com/ offline.

Rate

Join Podchaser to...

  • Rate podcasts and episodes
  • Follow podcasts and creators
  • Create podcast and episode lists
  • & much more

Episode Tags

Do you host or manage this podcast?
Claim and edit this page to your liking.
,

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features