Podchaser Logo
Home
Episode 689: Family Unfriendly

Episode 689: Family Unfriendly

Released Saturday, 27th April 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Episode 689: Family Unfriendly

Episode 689: Family Unfriendly

Episode 689: Family Unfriendly

Episode 689: Family Unfriendly

Saturday, 27th April 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:04

On this episode of News World, the high

0:07

standards set for modern American parenting

0:10

are unrealistic and setting

0:12

parents and our kids up to

0:14

fail. Our culture tells

0:16

parents there's one best way to raise kids.

0:19

Enroll them in a dozen activities, protect

0:21

them from trauma, get them into the most expensive

0:24

college you can. If you can't

0:26

do that, don't bother. And

0:28

we now see record rates of anxiety,

0:31

depression, medication, debts,

0:35

loneliness, and more in America's

0:37

children. In his new book

0:39

Family on Friendly, how our

0:42

culture made raising kids much harder

0:44

than it needs to be, best selling author

0:46

Timothy Karney says it's time to

0:48

end this failed experiment in overparenting.

0:52

I'm really pleased to welcome my guest, Timothy

0:55

Karney. He is the father of six children,

0:57

a senior fellow at the American unerpresence'

1:00

An, a columnist at the Washington Examiner.

1:14

Tim welcome and thank you for joining.

1:16

Me on news World. Thank you for

1:19

having me.

1:20

You and your wife, Katie have six children. In

1:23

your book, you wrote the quote childhood

1:25

anxiety is a result of helicopter

1:28

parenting. What does that mean?

1:31

So with helicopter parenting you can

1:34

mean a couple things, but just the image of

1:36

the parent hovering literally or figuratively

1:39

over the child. When I

1:42

was a kid, we played little league.

1:44

I rode my bike to the fields. My parents

1:46

came to a couple of games if the weather was nice, and

1:48

they thought that that was the nicest thing to do on a Friday

1:50

night. That's out the window

1:53

now. It's intensive, expensive travel

1:55

sports where you're in Delaware for a field

1:57

hockey tournament every other weekend. It's

2:00

cracking the whip on homework every

2:02

night and hiring tutors. It's

2:04

also when they're little, a constant

2:06

fear that there's some kidnapper,

2:09

well trained kidnapper with a getaway car

2:12

around every corner. And so

2:14

it's a safetyism. It's an over

2:16

ambition, a parental anxiety

2:19

that trickles down into a childhood

2:21

anxiety, and it involves forgetting that

2:23

childhood is supposed to involve freedom and

2:26

fun. And it really

2:28

started in the upper middle class, this overparenting,

2:31

but it's trickled down to the middle class and the

2:33

working class, and so it's driving down birth rates.

2:35

You know, new we have record low birth rates now

2:37

less than one point seven babies per woman.

2:40

And also this epidemic of childhood

2:42

anxiety. There are economists

2:44

who like this. Belsaw Hill, who's a friend

2:47

of mine at the Workings Institution, she praised

2:50

quality over quantity parenting.

2:52

But my argument is that it's actually low quality

2:54

parenting to make childhood

2:57

into this sort of constant audition

2:59

for getting into Princeton. That

3:01

high pressure is not good for anyone.

3:04

So how do you think this evolved.

3:07

It's got a lot of roots. One

3:09

of them really has to do with

3:11

the secularization of our country. Frankly,

3:14

so in this book, I talked to all sorts of fates.

3:16

I went out to Mormon Utah and Idaho.

3:18

I went to Jewish neighborhoods

3:20

in Maryland, and I went to Tel Aviv and Jerusalem.

3:24

I write it from a Catholic perspective. All

3:27

of these parenting pathologies show

3:29

up in all of these communities, but a lot less because

3:32

I think if you view humans as

3:34

sort of naturally good, then

3:37

you not as worried about

3:40

their outcomes. But in a more secular,

3:42

more materialistic world, I think

3:44

we'd say, okay, well a I'm

3:46

going to plan a family super

3:49

planned postpone it agonized,

3:51

get married in your thirties, have your kid, in your

3:53

late thirties know that it's just the

3:56

right moment. Once you've done that, it

3:58

becomes so much more pressure to get it

4:00

exactly right, rather

4:02

than you grow up, you have kids and

4:05

you try to teach them well. So

4:07

that's part of it. But also just the idea that

4:09

the humans value is in their worldly accomplishments.

4:12

I think that leads to this added pressure.

4:15

So I really do think our culture's values

4:17

have driven this.

4:18

And you make the point that this

4:21

is also a real problem

4:23

because we have this false

4:25

sense of how dangerous the

4:27

world is.

4:29

Oh yeah, I mean people really

4:31

do think that kidnappings

4:34

happen around every corner

4:36

every day, and so kids aren't free

4:39

to wander the neighborhood.

4:41

There are neighborhoods that are unsafe, and

4:43

we had a crime wave in twenty twenty. In most

4:45

of the country it's gone down, but in a lot of places it

4:47

hasn't. My wife and I we moved out of

4:49

Montgomery County, Maryland into Fairfax

4:51

County, Virginia, in part because the government there

4:54

wasn't taking the crime wave seriously.

4:56

But in any event, America is much safer

4:58

today than it was when I was a kid.

5:00

In the eighties and nineties, just by any measure

5:03

of crime is way down from them.

5:04

And you make a void, which I think is startling

5:07

that while there are these very

5:11

high value and

5:14

greatly paid attention to events with young

5:16

kids, the fact is to

5:18

something like one hundred

5:21

abductions a year in which

5:23

a stranger grabs a child.

5:25

Out of a population of three hundred and thirty

5:28

million, So that is it

5:30

seems to happen every day.

5:32

That's a staggering number. Unlike

5:34

everybody else, when one of these things does occur,

5:36

they can be two weeks of news and

5:39

it makes you feel like it's around the

5:41

corner and everyone's at risk, and

5:43

based on your data, in fact,

5:46

it's so unlikely that

5:49

to warp your life around it is

5:51

almost a psychological problem.

5:54

Yeah, your child is as likely

5:57

to be killed by a lightning strike as

6:00

is to be abducted. And

6:03

when something is that rare, you can't really

6:05

protect so well against it. I mean, at least with a lightning

6:08

storm you can see the clouds coming, I guess,

6:10

but it's incredibly rare. It's less than one

6:12

in a million occurrence, and

6:14

so you shape your life around

6:17

that. Now, there are real risks to children,

6:19

you know, drowning, car accidents, these are

6:21

the things that the actual accidental,

6:23

horrible things that happen to children. And

6:26

I'm hyper aware and on guard

6:28

around a swimming pool or at the beach with the

6:30

kids. But the fact is that we

6:32

were much more likely to get on the beltway and drive

6:34

with our kids, which is much more dangerous than to let

6:37

them walk to the park that's three blocks away.

6:39

And so what that does then is

6:41

it sets a cultural norm, and the parents who want

6:43

to let their kids go to the park, some of

6:46

them feel like they're being judged. And

6:48

I tell the story from Montgomery County of parents

6:50

who did let their kids go to the park and the police

6:52

busted the parents for it, took the kids away

6:54

for a little bit because they thought it was unsafe,

6:57

and the parents said, show me one point where

6:59

they were in day. The only danger was

7:02

the Child Protective Service is taking the

7:04

kids away for a few hours. So those

7:06

threats that parents worry about are

7:08

based on how a national

7:10

media, even before social media,

7:12

just they're being a national media. If it happens,

7:16

you know, once a week somewhere

7:18

in America and you hear about it every week,

7:20

it sounds like it's happening around you all

7:22

the time. But it's again a

7:24

one in a million.

7:26

So in a sense, you have a kind

7:28

of fearful parenting. My

7:31

child won't get into the right college, my

7:33

child might will be in danger physically,

7:36

my child won't have the right skills. I

7:38

need to keep them so busy that they can't do drugs.

7:41

It's almost like the paranoid parent,

7:43

if you will.

7:45

Yeah, I call it a mantle of fear that we

7:47

feel we're supposed to wear like. And again,

7:49

I talk to parents who feel that they should be

7:51

afraid that when they let go and

7:54

let their kids wander the neighborhood, they feel

7:56

guilty about it, and so

7:59

that it really is a cultural

8:01

issue. And I try not to make it be an individual

8:03

thing, but I do. It takes effort to overcome

8:05

it. It takes community saying, you know,

8:07

we are going to let our kids wander.

8:09

I know dads who have done that, who gathered the other dads in

8:11

the neighborhood and said, Okay, can we all agree

8:14

our kids can run around the neighborhood. And

8:16

if somebody else's kids run into your

8:18

house like kids are allowed to come into my house,

8:20

I might kick them out, but you know, we're going to let

8:22

the kids run the neighborhood, and that

8:25

takes an actual effort these days, when the norm

8:27

is the paranoid parenting you're talking about.

8:29

I think back to my own childhood. There

8:32

was a very relaxed attitude about

8:35

my wandering off. I

8:37

lived in a small town till I was eleven, so that

8:39

may have been part of it, but there

8:41

really was no sense. You could just go out and wander

8:44

around and as long as you got home for

8:46

dinner, they didn't care.

8:48

And so this stuff that we didn't really

8:50

think about that was kind of the wisdom of our

8:52

parents. Social science and

8:54

psychology are actually showing

8:57

the value of it. In the American Journal of

8:59

Pediatrics recently, they said there is

9:01

an epidemic of childhood anxiety, and

9:03

a primary cause of it is the

9:05

lack of independent play by children

9:08

unsupervised by adults. One

9:10

writer who was this sort of upper

9:13

middle class liberal writer

9:15

realize her husband said to her when

9:17

she was working on a book about parenting, and says,

9:20

oldest is ten years old. How

9:23

much time do you think she's spent unsupervised?

9:27

And the mom said, in her ten years,

9:30

probably less than an hour in

9:32

ten years, and that's what they realized that they

9:34

had because that's what they had absorbed

9:37

from other parents, and so they had to

9:39

deliberately intentionally

9:41

unschedule their kids. My

9:44

wife and I were similar, where we put our daughter

9:46

in a valet program that was close by because

9:48

people said, oh, it's the best, the Maryland

9:50

Youth Ballet. They produce prima ballerinas.

9:52

We thought, oh, of course, we want to give our kid the best,

9:55

and then we realized she was doing three

9:57

hours a week at age eleven

10:00

of the best valet and that this is horrible

10:02

for everybody. And when we pulled there, we

10:04

were all so much happier. So we had sort of backed

10:06

in thoughtlessly to this hyper

10:09

intensive parenting.

10:10

How much of that relates also to a

10:12

underlying fear and if

10:14

I don't keep you scheduled, you'll end up either

10:17

doing drugs or in some way

10:19

getting into trouble.

10:20

Well, I will say that the valid thing

10:23

that parents fear is too much

10:25

time on social media, the internet and

10:27

smartphones. So this is a new

10:29

and Jonathan Hate just came out with a book

10:32

on this too, called The Anxious Generation. But

10:34

in Family and Friendly I talk about that's

10:37

one reason that some parents overschedule

10:39

their kids, as they say, oh, well, the only other alternative

10:42

is that they're going to be on Instagram or

10:44

TikTok for many hours, and I do think

10:46

that that's harmful for kids.

10:48

So I read somewhere that, particularly for

10:51

teenage females, that social

10:53

media is a major source of bullying and

10:56

a major source of anxiety.

10:58

Anxiety, so social compare Who's

11:00

the term I learned while working on my book that

11:02

you look at it, you see the party that

11:05

you miss. You look at this filtered

11:07

and perfectly posed picture, and you're envious

11:09

of the other girls. For boys,

11:12

the danger is porn. It's

11:14

like an unending supply of it. And

11:17

when I talk to young women now, they say,

11:19

you're writing a book about how people are getting married and having

11:21

kids. Well, half the men my age

11:23

are addicted to porn. And

11:25

so these are real dangers. And the

11:28

answer to both overscheduling and

11:31

to the online dangers,

11:33

a lot of it is let

11:35

your kids be bored, let them roam,

11:38

let them play pick up basketball. And

11:41

obviously it's not possible to protect your kids

11:43

from every harm. One of the middle chapters

11:45

in the book, though, is about the tech and about

11:47

how the dating apps delay marriage

11:50

and they don't actually

11:53

accelerate it, but how social media

11:55

sort of rewires our mind and it uproots

11:57

us from community who

12:00

are on social media all day what they're

12:02

doing. If you think about it, you

12:04

were wandering your small town, you were in some

12:06

ways becoming more rooted in where you were

12:08

from. In social media, you're

12:10

becoming uprooted, uprooted from your family,

12:13

from your community, from your faith. And that ends

12:15

up being really bad for kids. And

12:17

so this is another problem, is

12:19

that we have weaker communities

12:21

in weaker extended families. That's

12:23

bad. That again contributes to childhood anxiety,

12:26

and it contributes to lower birth rates. I think.

12:44

You talk about the baby bust, and

12:46

you trace it all the way back to two thousand

12:48

and eight. What is it and why did

12:50

it start.

12:52

So in two thousand and six. In two thousand

12:54

and seven, my wife and I we had our first kid. In two thousand

12:56

and six. There was a lot of babies born.

12:59

Four point three million babies in two thousand and

13:01

seven. There were more babies born than even at the peak of

13:03

the baby boom. The total fertility

13:05

rate, which is the most common birth rate you hear

13:07

was at two point one, which

13:10

is the replacement level, that's

13:12

what would keep a population stable over time.

13:15

Since then, it's dropped every year, down

13:17

from four point three million babies down to

13:19

three point six million babies, from

13:21

two point one birth rate down to below

13:24

one point seven birth rate, basically

13:26

every single year. When it first started,

13:28

people said, oh, it's a great reception. People can't

13:30

afford to have kids. But then the economy started

13:33

to improve and the birth rate kept falling.

13:35

In twenty nineteen, before the pandemic, we had the best

13:37

economy in my life and

13:40

the lowest birth rate in my life. And

13:43

so it's hard to pinatus on the economy.

13:45

We talked about tech. The iPhone came out in

13:47

two thousand and seven and the baby bus started

13:49

the next year. That might be a

13:51

coincidence, it might not. Obviously

13:54

it's a problem too. Not everybody believes

13:56

it's the problem. And in my book I talk about the

13:58

economic problems the socials,

14:00

and how it reflects the sort of failure

14:02

of our society to support

14:05

families. We sort of think, okay, have kids,

14:08

but they're all your own, you know, don't

14:10

bug the rest of us. Don't let them make noise at

14:12

the restaurant and don't bring them on the airplane, and

14:14

don't expect us to accommodate parents.

14:17

I think there's a lot of reasons to be upset about

14:19

the baby busts.

14:20

And do you think it's likely to continue?

14:23

Yes, because it's all self reinforcing.

14:25

When people have fewer kids, that results in people

14:27

having fewer kids. This is true for a lot of reasons.

14:30

One you look in a place

14:32

like South Korea, which has the lowest

14:34

birth rate in the world. A lot of recent

14:36

articles in major newspapers

14:38

here talked about how there's

14:41

an increasing push to ban children

14:43

from more places in South Korea.

14:45

Once you're not used to kids, then

14:48

the world gets less built for kids and

14:50

less built for families. Just think about

14:52

neighborhoods that have a lot of kids. Once there's a lot

14:54

of kids, they're like, Okay, let's put up a new playground, Let's

14:56

make sure the sidewalks are a little wider. There's

14:59

family restaurants and that sort of thing.

15:01

Those don't happen in places where they're

15:04

fewer kids. And then you think about Capitol

15:06

Hill. You remember the Capitol

15:09

Hill staff. These are mostly young

15:11

childless people these days, they're

15:14

the people making our policies, some of

15:16

them never see a kid all day long,

15:19

and so they're shaping our world

15:22

without children in mind. So I do

15:24

think that the baby bus causes

15:26

more baby bus and so

15:28

right now we've fallen from two point one to one point

15:31

sixty five in about fifteen years.

15:33

I expect that to keep going down less of course,

15:36

everybody reads my book and we get a baby boom

15:38

starting in nine months.

15:40

You cite what I think is one

15:42

of the most fascinating examples

15:45

of this change, and that's South Korea.

15:47

I mean, despite all the talk about

15:49

China's one child policy, it's

15:51

actually South Korea, which

15:54

as a free country, suddenly shifted

15:56

years and became the lowest birth

15:58

rate in the world. How do you analyze

16:01

them.

16:01

It's tricky, but I've been reading everything

16:04

i can on this and comparing

16:07

it to other cultures. They

16:09

have always had a

16:12

very workest careerist

16:15

policy for the

16:17

men there, and

16:20

it was just sort of established that working career

16:24

are the highest callings. I don't think

16:26

there was a lot of respect given to

16:30

mothers, who were largely expected

16:32

to stay at home. I argue

16:34

one of the chapters of my book that we need more stay

16:36

at home moms, but they need to be celebrated

16:38

and vaunted and recognized and accommodated.

16:42

And so in a culture that set its

16:44

ideals as about career success,

16:47

well, once there was more equality,

16:50

the women wanted that career success.

16:52

And then once a lot of the men were competing against a

16:54

lot of the women, it became harder and a lot

16:56

of men dropped out of the labor force. So now

16:58

what you have is is women who

17:01

want more career success, men who

17:03

don't necessarily want to bother the

17:05

hustle in the workforce, so they

17:07

are not attractive as husbands, obviously,

17:10

especially to women who can make their own money. And

17:12

so a lot of those cultural shifts

17:14

happened. Again, it's also rapidly secularized.

17:17

It's a very secular country, and

17:20

so we can talk about values,

17:22

but I think a lot of it has to do with mood.

17:24

It's an increasingly sad place where

17:27

if you're just focused on your career,

17:30

if you are a man who doesn't think you have

17:32

high career prospects, if you're a woman

17:34

who thinks, well, i'd like to marry but there's not that many

17:36

men out there, And now you're

17:38

shrinking because of the baby bus theres

17:40

and that exacerbates the sense of sadness.

17:43

It seems like a dying culture that's

17:45

just about putting your nose to the grindstone.

17:48

The last chapter of my book is called civilizational

17:50

sadness, because I think that's what ties

17:53

South Korea, Northern Europe, Southern Europe,

17:55

the United States all together.

17:58

It's in different ways. We do

18:00

not see sort of the human

18:02

race as a good thing.

18:04

It's not just a

18:06

Western civilization plus Japan and career.

18:08

I mean, you make the point. Mexico

18:11

has collapsed in birth rates,

18:14

Brazil, Malaysia, Vietnam now

18:16

now below replacement fertility

18:18

race, and even Nigeria is

18:21

rapidly declining in number

18:23

of children. There's something going on worldwide

18:27

in the civilization that is sending

18:29

a signal that having children

18:31

is less important and maybe for

18:34

women, having a career is more important. I don't know what

18:36

it is, but it is apparently a worldwide

18:38

phenomenon.

18:39

Yep. I think that again, the idea is the

18:42

modern idea of the individual, disconnected

18:46

from the community and from

18:48

past generations. In future generations,

18:50

it's a very modern, overly

18:53

individualistic mindset

18:56

and the places that have the most babies

18:59

are place which is not just a well,

19:01

yes at our religious but also that

19:03

have robust religious

19:06

communities. And I think a

19:08

robust, sort of less religious community

19:11

could play some of this role. But the more

19:13

that we are just sort of floating about

19:15

as individuals, or if you get married it's

19:17

just a couple and you're alone, the less

19:20

you're going to think about the past and the future, the

19:22

less support you're going to think that you have. And

19:25

I think that that, again is sort of part of

19:27

modernity. Some of it is technology, some of

19:29

it is just again the sort of Tookville

19:31

talks about this in democracy in America, like the spirit

19:34

of equality and democracy, two

19:36

great things. If they become all consuming,

19:39

well, then it does disconnect us

19:42

from one another. A wise woman

19:44

once said, it takes a village to raise a child.

19:47

Now Hillary might have meant the Department of Health

19:49

and Human Services, but historically

19:52

it was the extended family, the neighborhood,

19:54

the church, the school.

19:56

Well, and you made a boy, which I frankly not thought

19:59

about that. It's not a function of

20:01

cost, because a lot of people think, gee, if

20:03

we could change the income equation, but

20:05

in fact, wealthier people are

20:07

less likely to have children than poorer

20:09

people.

20:11

And it's not really more expensive to

20:13

raise kids. So I cite lots of economists

20:16

and actually the cost of raising kids hasn't really gone

20:18

up unless you insist on doing all

20:20

the travel, sports and the private tutoring. The

20:23

exception to that, though, is housing. Housing

20:25

costs in the last three years have gone up, and

20:28

more expensive housing does deter family

20:30

formation. That doesn't explain the baby

20:32

bus because that's been going on for fifteen years.

20:35

That's where I would focus policy, because

20:37

we have the discussion about the child tax credits,

20:39

the Biden administration monts to subsidized

20:42

childcare. What I

20:44

would focus on at the governmental level, are

20:46

there obstacles to building

20:48

more housing, more family friendly housing.

20:51

Are there federal policies

20:53

regulations that make it totally

20:55

unprofitable to build a starter

20:58

home? Where our

21:00

part of Northern Virginia, New McLain,

21:03

Virginia, every house that's less than

21:05

four thousand square feet gets torn down

21:07

and replaced by this massive mansion

21:10

where people have two kids and I don't know what they

21:12

do with all their six thousand square feet. But

21:14

those smaller houses,

21:17

that was what a family could afford and buy

21:19

and you ask a builder now, they say it

21:21

would make no sense, and not just in McLain where

21:23

the land's really expensive, but almost anywhere. It make no sense

21:26

for me to build a house that somebody could buy for two

21:28

hundred and fifty thousand dollars because

21:30

just the permits are going to cost me two hundred

21:33

thousand dollars. So housing is a one

21:35

place where I really say policy ought to

21:37

say what can we do to make it more affordable

21:40

for families? But outside of housing, you're.

21:41

Right, does that almost become a

21:44

big fight over localism.

21:46

A lot of these regulations and a lot of these

21:48

fees are deliberate.

21:51

Yes, there are people who want to keep

21:53

down the housing suck. And

21:56

then an unhelpful kind

21:58

of yimbie response is that we should build

22:00

massive apartment buildings in every neighborhood. I

22:02

think the next thing I want to study

22:04

at AI with housing people

22:07

with family folks is what

22:09

is the actual pro family housing

22:12

policy because it's not big apartment buildings, so those

22:14

are not family friendly, but it's certainly

22:16

not no new development because high

22:19

housing prices. One of the most valuable

22:21

things you can do as

22:23

a parent is live close to your

22:25

own parents. Now I say, the

22:27

optimal distance is just far enough that they

22:30

can't hear you screaming at your own kids. A

22:32

block away from Grandma is

22:34

one of the best things to do. And this is one of the things that

22:36

makes Israel unique. Most parents live

22:38

within twenty minutes of their own parents, and

22:42

that's really hard in sort

22:44

of the large metropolitan areas in

22:47

the United States because of the costs of

22:49

housing and so anything that

22:51

can increase density but in

22:53

a family friendly way. That's a really complicated

22:56

thing. But it's not being studied right

22:58

now because Americas just

23:00

started to pay attention to the baby

23:02

bus. Europe has been paying attention

23:04

to it for fifteen years. But here, my agent

23:06

was surprised to learn that birthrate through low and

23:09

falling three years ago. It's just

23:11

really hitting our radar screen.

23:29

You know. It's interesting. When I was Speaker of the House,

23:31

we did a lot of work with Jimmy Carter

23:34

and Habitat for Humanity, And

23:36

when the Republicans decided to have their convention

23:39

in nineteen ninety six in San Diego, we

23:42

thought, that's terrific. We will go out and we

23:44

will build a Habitat for Humanity house.

23:47

Well, the cost of the permits

23:49

in San Diego was

23:51

greater than the total cost of the house

23:53

in Georgia, and that was

23:56

for a habitat for humanity house. There

23:58

was no one like charitable exams or

24:00

poor people exemption. It was unbelievable

24:04

how much they charged and have never gotten

24:06

over two other things that are fascinating

24:08

that you bring up one and I did not

24:10

know this. Will you make the assertion that

24:13

there's been a gap in child bearing

24:15

between conservatives and liberals, at

24:17

least since the early nineteen eighties.

24:20

Yeah, so some of that gap

24:22

is due to the fact that

24:24

conservatives are more religious, but even

24:26

controlling for religion, I'd

24:29

say most of it is due to religion, but

24:31

there's even some leftover. Even if you control

24:33

for religion, there's even some conservatives

24:36

outbreeding the Libs, as you could

24:39

say, And some of

24:41

the baby bus is suited the fact that young

24:43

women are more likely to be liberal today than they were

24:45

fifteen years ago and thirty years

24:48

ago. Why would that be

24:50

one. I think that conservative

24:52

people are just more likely to be rooted

24:55

in a place to live near

24:57

grandma, to be raising their kids in a small town.

25:00

Liberal Americans are often more

25:02

likely to be trying to get

25:04

above their backwards upbringing or

25:06

whatever they think. Also, a lot of

25:08

liberalism in the last thirty years has been

25:11

sort of dark and brooding

25:13

about the future, whether it's climate change

25:16

or the racial settler colonial

25:18

guilt of an American. But I don't

25:20

want you to think that this means that the future everybody's

25:22

going to be conservative, because

25:25

we have the public schools out there whose job it

25:27

is to turn conservative kids

25:29

into liberals.

25:30

I used to teach environmental studies and

25:32

taught in the Second Earth Day back in

25:35

nineteen seventy one, and in

25:37

that period, the catastrophism

25:40

which still exists, for example, in climate was

25:42

in part focused on population.

25:46

And you had Paul Erlick, who has

25:48

been amazingly wrong

25:51

about every single thing he's written, but

25:53

remains a tenured professor of Stanford

25:56

with great prestige on the left. And

25:58

he wrote a book called The Population Bomb, and

26:00

what she said basically that

26:02

by the year two thousand, Britain would

26:04

be starving to death. It's the last

26:06

great stand of Malthusian economics.

26:09

And yet everything they said about

26:11

the population boom, it's very

26:13

hard for them to switch gears and realize we're

26:15

now worldwide seeing a

26:18

declining rate of population,

26:20

not a rising rate. And I assume

26:22

that the next generation Paul Early will

26:24

write a best selling book called the

26:27

Population Bust and how it threatens us

26:29

or something. But are you surprised

26:32

at how totally Aerlic was wrong?

26:35

Yes? What's the first line of the book. The

26:37

race to feed humanity is over and we've

26:39

lost. Humans are better nourished

26:41

now by a million miles

26:44

than they were when Erlick wrote that book,

26:46

and the population is much larger.

26:48

So to me, that's the most telling

26:50

detail. In fact, we've

26:53

reached about twenty years ago peak

26:55

agricultural land. The human

26:58

species uses up less land every

27:00

year because again farming

27:02

efficiency, grazing efficiency, that

27:05

sort of thing. So we're taking up less of the planet,

27:07

and the rural population will in

27:09

the life span of my children start

27:12

to shrink unless something changes. What

27:15

was interesting and telling about Erlich and

27:17

so I use his quotes in the last

27:19

two chapters, isn't my book? Because

27:21

he said, tell a woman she can have as many kids

27:23

as she wants is like telling someone that

27:26

they can throw as much trash in their neighbor's y

27:28

ared as they want. And that to

27:30

me was so telling. That idea that children

27:32

are an externality, a

27:34

negative externality, and that children are kind of

27:37

like trash. That was reflective.

27:39

And he tells the moment that he came to fear

27:41

over population was in a cab ride

27:44

through Delhi in

27:47

India and just

27:49

the filth he saw, all the people.

27:51

He said, the people talking, people, visiting,

27:54

people, eating, people, people, people.

27:57

He actually says people, people, people,

27:59

people as like his image of Hell,

28:02

and I just thought that is so telling.

28:05

There's that saying Hell is other people. And I think

28:07

that's what Erlik believes. And

28:09

that's why again I come back to the civilizational

28:12

sadness. I think that it's

28:14

trickled into the spirit

28:16

of our age, especially among a lot of our elites,

28:19

that people, people, people

28:21

are the problem, that what we need is sort

28:24

of a more sterile, clean life,

28:27

and that misanthropy of

28:30

Erlick. I think, even though he was wrong

28:32

on everything, I think that has sunk

28:34

into the spirit of the day.

28:36

There's a certain sense on the left that Gaya,

28:39

Mother Earth is offended

28:42

by all of these human beings, and

28:45

instead of seeing us as part of nature, they

28:47

see us as a parasite, risking the destruction

28:49

of nature. It's a very interesting

28:52

phenomena. I think your work is

28:54

fascinating. I wish you well

28:56

at looking at housing policy next and

28:59

we want you to come back and educate

29:01

us when you're ready to on that topic.

29:04

I'm really delighted that you

29:06

wrote Family on Friendly How

29:09

our culture made raising kids much harder

29:11

than it needs to be. It's available on

29:13

Amazon and bookstores everywhere, and

29:15

I think folks ought to read it and understand

29:18

that we really have gone down a cultural

29:21

road that is ultimately destructive

29:23

and we need to rethink where we are and how we're

29:25

dealing with it. And Tim, I want

29:27

to thank you for joining me. This is a

29:30

very very interesting conversation.

29:31

Thank you, my pleasure.

29:38

Thank you to my guest, Timothy Carney. You

29:40

can get a link to buy his new book Family

29:42

on Friendly on our show page

29:45

at newtsworld dot com. Newtsworld

29:47

is produced by Game of three sixty and iHeartMedia.

29:50

Our executive producers Guarnsey Sloan.

29:53

Our researcher is Rachel Peterson.

29:55

The artwork for the show was created

29:57

by Steve Penley Special

29:59

Things. Thanks to the team at GINGRIDGH three sixty.

30:02

If you've been enjoying Newtsworld. I hope you'll

30:04

go to Apple Podcast and both rate

30:07

us with five stars and give us

30:09

a review so others can learn

30:11

what it's all about. Right now,

30:13

listeners of news World can sign up

30:15

for my three freeweekly columns

30:18

at gangwischthree sixty dot com slash

30:20

newsletter. I'm new Gingrich. This

30:23

is newts World

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features