In this final episode on whether John Frame is a Van Tillian, we discuss Frame’s views on traditional evidential arguments and how he understands the circularity of Van Til’s apologetic.
This is the second episode of a two-part series on refuting evidential apologetics. Today, we prove that all evidential arguments fail in their demonstration.
This is the first episode of a two-part series on refuting evidential apologetics. Today, we work through how to refute some of the more popular evidential arguments.
In this episode we begin some clean up work related to Van Til’s apologetic, starting with the two distinct ways Van Til’s proof can be presented (direct and Indirect).
In this episode we complete Van Til’s apologetic by proving that ‘Christianity is true’. We then end by presenting the proof at different levels of complexity (to a child, to a teenager, to a college student).
In this episode we work through our next three inferences, culminating in the demonstration that ‘Christianity is the only sufficient foundation for knowledge’.
In this episode we go through the final three aspects of Van Til’s apologetic and discuss the difficulty in assuming the truth of Christianity at the start of the apologetic yet not as an assumption within the argument.
In this episode we continue our series on defending young earth creation by showing that the Bible plainly teaches that the ‘flood covered the entire earth’.
In this episode we continue our series on defending young earth creation by critiquing Dembski’s “time theory” interpretation of Genesis 1-3 and showing that the Bible plainly teaches that the ‘universe is 6,000-10,000 years old’.