Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
This is the BBC. This
0:03
podcast is supported by advertising
0:05
outside the UK.
0:11
The 29th of July 1981, Prince
0:13
Charles marries Lady Diana Spencer.
0:16
An eight-year-old boy watches the fairy
0:18
tale unfold. An hour later, he's
0:21
missing.
0:21
Then, one day in 2020, a
0:24
BBC reporter gets a call from
0:26
a mysterious source. Vishal,
0:29
the extraordinary true story of a boy
0:31
who went missing while the world looked the other
0:33
way.
0:34
All lives are not treated the same. Listen
0:37
to Vishal.
0:46
Welcome to Lady Killers with me, Lucy
0:49
Worsley, where true crime meets
0:51
history with a twist from BBC
0:53
Radio 4. This
1:01
time on Lady Killers, we look at women's
1:03
rights over their own bodies. We'll
1:06
dig a little deeper into the parallels between
1:08
19th century women and us today. There'll
1:11
be frustrated sexual desire, legal
1:14
prejudice, illegal abortion and slavery.
1:17
Christiana
1:19
Edmonds, a lady
1:21
obsessed, a stalker. The
1:24
poison that she put into chocolate
1:26
creams had deadly results. Margaret
1:36
Garner, an enslaved woman
1:38
who murdered one of her own children.
1:41
She wanted to free her daughter from
1:43
a life of servitude. Elizabeth Taylor, a
1:45
practical midwife who provided
1:47
women with illegal abortions, sometimes
1:49
with tragic crimes. consequences.
2:01
On arrival of Mrs. Taylor's I was shown
2:03
into a bedroom where she performed the operation.
2:05
And Mary McKinnon, a landlady
2:08
and likely bottle keeper, she
2:10
said that she was innocent but she was
2:13
hanged on the testimony
2:14
of a group of drunken men. I did
2:16
not have a knife in my hand at any time.
2:18
I do not know
2:21
who gave Mr. Howard the wound but it was not from
2:23
me. I'm joined by a
2:25
crack team of female detectives to take
2:27
a look, a feminist look actually,
2:30
at the wilds and unthinkable crimes
2:33
committed by murderers in Britain,
2:35
North America and Australia. We
2:37
hear their words, their voices
2:39
and we ask what
2:42
drove these ordinary women
2:44
to do these extraordinary things?
2:47
What do these lady
2:48
killers tell us about the world
2:50
they lived in, about women's lives
2:52
in the past and what might they
2:55
tell us about women's lives today?
3:00
I'm joined by Ayesha Hazarika,
3:03
broadcaster, political commentator and feminist.
3:06
Welcome Ayesha. Thank you so
3:08
much it's such a joy to be here. Ah
3:10
well you're very very welcome. Can you
3:13
tell us Ayesha a bit about
3:15
the work that you do? So I
3:17
worked in politics for a long
3:19
time and I was an advisor on women's
3:22
issues. I worked for the great feminist
3:25
politician Harriet Harmon and one of
3:27
the big pieces of legislation we got
3:29
in the statute book was the 2010
3:31
Equality Act. What was that like?
3:34
Tell us about it. It was a fascinating
3:36
process but it was really really hard
3:39
work because it feels like whenever
3:41
you are questing for more women's rights
3:44
particularly in legislation there is always
3:46
pushback and actually we got as much pushback
3:49
from men on the left as we did from
3:51
people on the right of politics
3:53
as well. You know we had arguments
3:55
for example about positive action saying this
3:58
will be the end of any senior
4:00
white man ever been able to get a job ever
4:03
again, for example. We put into
4:05
the legislation more transparency
4:08
on the gender pay gap and people were absolutely
4:10
up in arms saying, this is going to bring the
4:12
foundations of capitalism down. We
4:14
mustn't let women start having these conversations.
4:17
It's going to lead to no good. One
4:19
of the things that I feel is so interesting, particularly
4:21
looking at all the cases that we're about
4:23
to talk to, is that
4:25
it's so hard to make progress
4:28
on women's rights. So hard.
4:31
Every stage in history, any advancement
4:33
is contested and yet it's
4:36
so easy for the clock to go back. And
4:40
here to assess any progress we may have made or
4:42
not since the 19th century is our
4:44
own in-house historian at Lady
4:46
Killer's, Professor Rosalind Crone
4:49
from the Open University.
4:50
Hello, Lucy. Hello, Ayesha. Hello,
4:52
Rawls. Now,
4:56
we have selected the cases
4:58
we're here to discuss for the windows
5:00
that they open into women's lives
5:03
in the 19th century. And
5:05
what's particularly interesting to me about the four
5:07
we're looking at today is that they've all got
5:09
something to say about women's rights over
5:12
their own bodies, especially
5:14
their reproductive rights. Elizabeth
5:17
Taylor ran her business because
5:19
women couldn't access safe legal
5:22
abortions. Margaret Garner
5:25
chose to kill her own daughter rather than expose
5:27
her to the sexual abuse that she'd suffered herself.
5:30
Mary McKinnon was hanged for, or
5:32
so it seems to us, standing up for her fellow
5:35
sex workers. And people thought
5:37
that it was Poisoner Christiana Edmunds'
5:40
frustrated sexual passions
5:43
which led to her undoubted crimes.
5:45
She did actually poison people.
5:47
Now, Rawls, there's been progress
5:49
towards respecting women's rights over
5:51
their bodies, I hope. I'm
5:54
thinking access to contraception and safe
5:56
abortion since the 19th century. But
5:58
what was the situation?
5:59
for our forebears in
6:02
this Victorian period? Well, the reproductive
6:04
function of women's bodies, the
6:06
incubator, if you like, the deliverer of babies,
6:09
this has meant that the female body has been
6:11
a site of contention and
6:13
debate throughout history. And at times
6:15
it's been subjected to very strict controls,
6:18
including in the 19th century. The
6:20
19th century was a time when new understandings
6:23
or ideas about anatomy had
6:25
come to maturity. For example,
6:28
that women's bodies, their sexual organs,
6:30
meant that they were fundamentally different from
6:32
men and also predetermined
6:35
their social role as mothers. At the same
6:37
time, so much emphasis was placed
6:39
on the family. This was where children
6:42
were raised, where morals and
6:44
values were taught, and so substantial
6:46
effort was then put into controlling
6:49
women's bodies.
6:50
So there was the attempt to
6:52
shame women who had sexual intercourse
6:54
outside of marriage, to force
6:56
women into marriage through economic
6:59
or financial inequalities,
7:01
including legislation that dealt very harshly
7:03
with illegitimate children.
7:05
In marriage, in England or Wales at
7:07
least, for much of the century, not only
7:10
did women have to give their husbands their
7:12
property, but also their bodies.
7:14
There was no rape in marriage.
7:16
We know that many women had good
7:19
sexual relationships with their husbands
7:21
and partners. It wasn't
7:23
a case that sex was just a thing that
7:25
was done to them. The old idea of lie back
7:27
and think of England, they were active
7:29
participants. Are you saying that Victorian women
7:32
sometimes had fun in bed? Of course they did,
7:34
Lucy. You'd have thought it. That's not our popular
7:36
image of the Victorian age at all. I like it. You're
7:38
painting a mixed picture of life for Victorian
7:40
women, but the law, to my mind,
7:43
was pretty much not on their side.
7:45
When you were doing your work, I issue
7:46
on the Equality Act in 2010. What
7:49
remains of this attitude that men are
7:51
on top legally? So many things.
7:54
The default position is always, how is
7:56
this going to affect men?
7:59
think the thing that's so shocking for me is
8:02
when I look back on recent changes in
8:04
the law, Rose just mentioned about
8:06
rape within marriage,
8:08
the UK only changed
8:10
the law on that relatively recently.
8:13
It was not illegal for, or
8:16
it was not a criminal act for a man to rape
8:18
his wife until very, very recently.
8:22
We still have not decriminalised
8:24
abortion in this country. You can
8:26
get legal access to an abortion, but
8:29
with conditions. Yes,
8:32
we learnt that when we were learning about the case
8:34
of Elizabeth Taylor and we
8:36
learnt about some of the problems of backstreet
8:38
abortions, which that case exposed.
8:41
That was in Melbourne, Australia. But
8:43
this has once again become a heated topic of debate,
8:45
hasn't it, with the overturn of
8:47
Roe versus Wade in the
8:50
United States. Let me quickly recap
8:52
what that is. This is the ruling
8:55
that made abortion legal in the States
8:57
in 1973, but its overturn means that
8:59
individual States can now ban the procedure,
9:02
making abortion illegal for millions
9:05
in the US. It's a fiery debate
9:07
this is, with some people claiming the
9:09
rights of the unborn child should take
9:11
priority over those of the
9:14
woman. But Ayesha, how do you respond
9:16
to this overturn? It's so horrifying
9:19
to think that these really important
9:21
rights that we all sort of took for granted,
9:23
and I think this is the big
9:25
thing that has sent a shock through women
9:28
and of course men across the world, is that
9:31
you think these rights are established
9:33
and then they can be overturned. And
9:36
what I was really struck by, particularly
9:39
listening to the story about
9:42
Elizabeth Taylor, essentially,
9:45
you hear these stories from history about
9:47
the absolute dire streets
9:49
that women found themselves in. And
9:52
yet these are the stories that are
9:54
still happening today and will be happening
9:57
in States across America, where it's not
9:59
just about the world.
9:59
it will be illegal to administer
10:02
an abortion or help a woman
10:05
get an abortion. It really is an
10:07
absolutely horrendous situation.
10:09
I mean, these stories about women
10:11
having no agency over their bodies,
10:14
you think this is something from times
10:16
gone by and yet it is not. I
10:18
think it's really tempting to think, isn't it, that we've
10:20
moved on since the 19th century.
10:23
Everything has got better for women, but this is a reminder
10:25
that
10:26
history doesn't work like that. Some things
10:28
get better, some things get worse.
10:35
Now,
10:36
Rod, looking at the 19th century, we know,
10:38
don't we, that banning abortion doesn't make it go
10:40
away. What was the situation? The criminalisation
10:43
of abortion in the 19th century
10:45
didn't make it go away. It just made it riskier
10:48
and more dangerous for women's health
10:50
because it limited the options for getting
10:52
help when things went wrong. Banning
10:54
abortion without giving any thought
10:57
to the consequences of unwanted
10:59
pregnancies. So, for example, what support
11:02
mechanisms are in place for single mothers
11:04
and also large families? Is the state
11:07
willing to provide financial support, for
11:09
example, childcare? How do
11:11
we sustain a larger population
11:14
and bigger families? The thought process never
11:16
is there. That lack of state support
11:20
helps to sustain then an illegal
11:22
abortion industry. The industry basically
11:24
becomes this open secret.
11:27
And those working within the industry
11:29
illegally, they come to the
11:31
notice of the law, they are prosecuted
11:33
when things go terribly
11:35
wrong.
11:39
Now, our next lady killer, Christiana
11:42
Edmonds, was a woman who on the face
11:44
of it seems unlikely to have dealt with
11:46
an unwanted pregnancy. We're
11:48
talking here about a genteel spinster living
11:51
in Brighton who gets a huge crush
11:53
on a doctor, a married man, who
11:55
wants nothing to do with her. But
11:58
Christiana becomes fixated. becoming
12:00
what we would today call a stalker,
12:03
and a very dangerous one too, poisoning
12:05
people in pursuit of
12:07
the object of her desire. Now,
12:11
stalking may sound like a very modern phenomenon,
12:13
but no, this particular type of it, erotomania
12:17
was very real indeed in the
12:19
19th century, but female stalkers
12:22
are pretty rare. What do you
12:24
make of this whole phenomenon of stalking,
12:26
Ayesha? I hope you haven't had personal experience
12:28
of it, but I guess as a woman in the public
12:29
eye, you may well have done. Yeah,
12:32
I mean, I definitely had some quite
12:34
uncomfortable encounters with, again,
12:37
mainly men who have, you
12:39
know, constantly bombarded me with
12:41
messages. And when I was doing a stand-up tour, one
12:44
year there was a man who threatened to sort of turn
12:47
up at one of my gigs, and it was, you know, it was
12:49
really kind of quite frightening. But
12:51
what's so interesting about this story is that
12:53
it's about female stalking. Now, the
12:55
comedian kind of goes, haven't
12:58
we all been there, ladies,
12:59
after a couple of glasses of wine late
13:02
at night? Oh, before, before, in my case. Just let's
13:04
check up on what the ex is doing on Facebook
13:07
or Instagram, and then you have that horrible moment that you
13:09
might accidentally like, you know,
13:11
I sort of post. So I think there's definitely
13:13
something in the psyche, and
13:15
there's probably something in the female psyches, I
13:18
probably think everybody does it, that probably
13:20
is guilty of a bit of light
13:22
stalking, particularly in this age
13:25
of social media. So there's a kind
13:27
of funny side of this, because we all do
13:29
it. But of course, there is a very, very dark
13:32
side, and the Christiana story
13:35
goes there. But we also see it so
13:37
much in modern life because of
13:39
the phenomenon of social media.
13:43
And I think what that has done for
13:45
people is, you know, you might have had
13:48
a huge crush on a celebrity,
13:51
but they were very remote from you. But now,
13:53
with social media, you feel that you have
13:56
an accessibility to
13:57
them. You feel you can communicate with them.
13:59
them directly and that often happens.
14:02
I had a very good colleague
14:05
who he is a man. I mean he
14:08
has had a female stalker which went from oh
14:10
you know aren't you lucky you know to actually
14:13
very very very frightening
14:15
in terms of this sort of presence in
14:18
his life. So I think that sometimes
14:20
the idea of the female stalker
14:22
there can be a very ha ha old
14:25
fashioned slightly sexist trope you the
14:27
crazy stalking lady but
14:29
actually
14:29
it can get very dark as we
14:32
saw from this case.
14:36
So continuing our theme
14:38
of women's bodies and who gets to control
14:40
them let's move on to another
14:43
tragic encounter with the law experienced
14:46
by Mary McKinnon whose property in
14:48
Edinburgh was used as a drinking
14:50
den and also likely a bottle and
14:53
despite protesting her innocence when
14:55
one of her clients died in a fight Mary
14:58
was hanged. Now Roz
15:02
our
15:03
guest detective for this case Anastasia
15:06
Ryan when we talked about this challenged
15:08
the notion that sex workers have always been
15:10
victims. How much power
15:13
do you think that a 19th century sex worker
15:15
might or might not have had? So broadly
15:18
speaking in the 19th century there were two dominant
15:20
narratives about prostitution.
15:22
On the one hand prostitutes represented
15:25
a dangerous site of female sexuality.
15:28
This was sex outside of marriage this was
15:30
transactional sex. Some women they
15:33
believed went into
15:33
the trade because they had an insatiable
15:35
appetite for sex a licentious nature
15:38
they were fun loving and immoral and
15:40
this represented a kind of potential
15:43
danger of women being in control
15:45
of their bodies.
15:47
On the other hand prostitutes were viewed as
15:49
victims fallen women who
15:51
had been seduced trapped in the trade
15:54
and so not in control of their bodies.
15:57
These two narratives are reflected in the approach
15:59
of the author. authorities, social reformers
16:02
who made great strides to control
16:05
and restrict prostitution from
16:07
the criminalization of activities that surrounded
16:09
prostitution to the contagious diseases
16:11
acts, where women were targeted
16:14
in order to treat venereal disease, often
16:16
against their will, to the establishment of refuges,
16:19
homes for prostitutes where they would recover
16:21
their morality, become good citizens and go
16:24
back out into the world and not do it again. So
16:26
whilst 19th century prostitutes were
16:28
either bad or victims
16:32
in a sort of strange binary
16:34
way and sometimes they couldn't be both
16:37
at once it seems. Yes, according
16:39
to contemporaries, now over the last 20
16:42
or 30 years historians have done a very good
16:44
job of breaking through these narratives
16:46
to try to get a better understanding, especially
16:49
of who undertook sex
16:51
work and why. Prostitution
16:54
for the most part it was a choice,
16:57
it was about earning money, supplementing
17:00
low wages, basically
17:02
they had a poor set of options, limited
17:04
choice of employment and this looked like
17:06
the one to go for.
17:07
Best of a bad lot. Best of a bad lot.
17:10
And within the profession, it's important to
17:12
say,
17:13
women had some input, they
17:16
were part of the shaping of it. Which
17:18
wasn't the case in many other kinds of work
17:21
I suppose. Ayesha, what's your take
17:23
on sex work today? What do you think about
17:25
this whole issue?
17:27
It's very kind of fashionable at the moment to
17:29
sort of say that sex work is just the
17:31
same as other work. I
17:33
mean, I do have a different
17:35
view on that. I've
17:38
spent a bit of time talking with
17:40
prostitute groups and what's really interesting
17:43
is that they're campaigning very, very,
17:45
very hard for more rights and
17:47
I completely understand and respect that.
17:49
But what is interesting is to me
17:51
and what they have said to me is so
17:54
much sex work right now
17:56
and certainly over the last sort of 10 years has been
17:58
driven by poverty.
17:59
driven by austerity, it's
18:02
been driven by the cost of living crisis
18:04
that we're seeing at the moment. I
18:06
had a discussion with a prostitute
18:08
recently who was saying that actually the cost
18:11
of living crisis means that lots of young mothers
18:13
are turning to
18:16
sex work. So I'd
18:18
like to be pragmatic and
18:21
compassionate towards sex workers.
18:24
There may be things that the law does have
18:26
to revisit in terms of women's safety
18:29
and things like that. But fundamentally,
18:31
for me, I hate the idea
18:34
of commodifying women's bodies.
18:38
So interesting.
18:39
I want to start arguing with you, but we need to move on. Now,
18:43
Mary McKinnon was, until
18:45
it all went wrong for her, a businesswoman.
18:47
She was in charge of her own life.
18:51
And another of our lady killers,
18:53
who assesses her options and
18:56
who also strives for a better life,
18:58
actually, is Margaret Garner. Margaret
19:01
Garner was born enslaved and, the
19:03
evidence suggests, was cruelly sexually
19:06
exploited, bearing children that we think
19:08
were fathered by the man who claimed to own her. She
19:10
wanted freedom and control over
19:13
her own and her children's bodies. And
19:15
in her case, the free state of Ohio
19:17
lay only a tantalizing 16 miles
19:21
away. The danger of her
19:24
escape, the risks that she ran
19:26
to find freedom. Ayesha,
19:30
do you see any parallels for this experience
19:32
in the world today? I
19:34
just think this story is so
19:36
harrowing. And of course, it's
19:39
been immortalized in the book Beloved by
19:41
Toni Morrison. And
19:43
I think the thing that really
19:46
struck me is when you hear stories like
19:48
this, they didn't happen thousands
19:50
and thousands of years ago. They're
19:53
relatively recent in
19:55
our history. And slavery
19:58
has such a long tale,
20:01
and we're still not, I think, fully
20:03
understanding or as a
20:05
world fully processing
20:10
the legacy of the transatlantic slave industry. And there's
20:12
two elements to that. There is the entrenched
20:15
structural inequality that we still
20:17
see today in society, the
20:19
racism we see, the institutional
20:22
inequality. But there's also, I
20:24
think, one thing we don't talk about enough, and
20:26
that's the inherited trauma
20:29
of these stories and the slave
20:31
trade. We have not even, I think, scratched
20:34
the surface of the deep
20:36
psychological wounds that I think
20:38
is still inflicted by slavery
20:40
generations down the
20:43
track. So for me, this
20:45
story, it's horrible.
20:47
And you think, my goodness, this has happened in the de
20:50
Mendis and Pass. It's not actually.
20:52
And I think we're still seeing the long tail of that
20:55
horrible
20:56
barbaric trade. The transatlantic
20:58
slave trade may have come to an end, but slavery
21:01
certainly hasn't in the
21:03
form of modern day slavery and
21:05
people trafficking. Ayesha,
21:08
can you tell us, have you had any involvement with the women
21:10
affected by this today? At one point,
21:13
we did a bit of a study in about 2007, 2008, looking
21:15
at your local newspaper where
21:21
you would see adverts for a skip perhaps
21:23
or a lost cat. And in the midst of
21:26
it were
21:26
basically adverts for
21:28
brothels, which had trafficked
21:31
women in them all across the
21:33
country. And actually, you know, we
21:35
have trafficking and slavery
21:38
going on. I think sometimes in our
21:40
own communities, we turn a blind eye
21:43
to it. People don't realise that sometimes
21:45
in suburbia, leafy suburbia, there
21:47
are brothels where it isn't a
21:50
choice for many of those women.
21:54
Now in all of the four cases we've
21:56
looked at, the women get bad press
21:58
in some cases.
21:59
deserved, we'd argue, other cases less
22:02
so. And Ayesha,
22:04
this world of the press is one that
22:06
you know well as a journalist.
22:09
How do you treat women
22:12
that you have to cover as a journalist who you disagree
22:14
with? What happens when your feminism and your
22:16
other views come into conflict with each other? Well,
22:20
I actually wrote a stand-up show about
22:22
this a couple of years ago called Girl on Girl, the
22:24
fight for feminism. And my
22:26
premise was that actually, just
22:29
because you're a feminist,
22:29
it does not need to
22:32
be the case that you agree with every other
22:34
woman. Of course we shouldn't. And
22:36
there are many women who I profoundly
22:39
disagree with, but I respect their
22:42
agency and they're allowed to have that view.
22:44
What I think is so interesting is that we never think
22:47
that men should think the same. In
22:49
fact, men are allowed to
22:52
disagree gloriously with
22:55
verve and enthusiasm and
22:57
vigour and virility. And then they're
22:59
allowed to go for a pint afterwards and then
23:01
slap each other on the back and actually continue
23:03
the old boys network. Interestingly, the old boys network
23:06
goes across the political divides
23:08
and where men have disagreements. We
23:10
should be able to say, look, we don't agree on these
23:13
five things, but actually there's probably
23:15
quite a lot of things we do agree
23:18
on in terms of poverty and violence
23:20
against women and all of these things.
23:24
I was looking
23:27
at the lives of the women we've
23:29
covered, these 19th
23:31
century women. Is there anything about
23:34
their world that we can be jealous
23:36
of
23:37
as women living in the 21st century? Is there anything
23:39
that they got right?
23:41
Yeah, what you're touching on there is historians
23:43
do not like to think of the past
23:45
as this kind of story of progress, right?
23:47
The assumption that we're better than our forebears isn't
23:50
good, but historians are equally
23:53
distrustful of nostalgia.
23:55
Now there are times in my life,
23:58
I suppose I've had a little bit of sympathy.
23:59
for the idea of separate spheres
24:02
that you divide up your world, you know, men occupy
24:04
this bit, women occupy this bit. And especially
24:06
within a marriage, it's quite a neat division of
24:08
roles, isn't it, where you take on different tasks. But
24:11
immediately when you start to scratch, you see how
24:13
terrible that idea actually is in
24:16
practice, especially when women are given
24:18
the home, which generally means they don't
24:20
have any kind of authority. You
24:22
lose that when you don't get to earn the money. When you think
24:25
of 19th century society as being stratified,
24:27
the answer to this might depend on where
24:29
you fit in into that social structure.
24:32
That's exactly right. We could say that
24:34
19th century ideas around
24:37
sexual differentiation, femininity
24:39
and masculinity, there was some
24:42
certainty here. And that meant
24:44
that I think it was kind of easier at times
24:46
to identify the inequalities
24:49
in society, and then to work to
24:51
address them. You kind of knew where you had
24:53
to target things like the vote,
24:56
things like addressing abortion law,
24:58
education, work, marriage, political
25:00
rights, and women made good progress in these
25:02
things over the 19th century and into the 20th.
25:05
I think for better or worse, we
25:08
no longer have that certainty.
25:10
Legally speaking,
25:12
it feels like we've achieved most
25:15
if not all of the big battles for women's
25:17
rights, but equality for women still
25:20
feels, to me at least, very
25:22
elusive,
25:23
or that it hasn't somehow met
25:26
our expectations. More
25:28
women work alongside child
25:30
rearing, more men are kind of
25:32
involved in domestic life, but
25:35
gender stereotypes and expectations
25:37
continue to shape our lives in important
25:40
and profound ways.
25:47
Ayesha,
25:47
what would you like our listeners to
25:50
take away from the four stories
25:52
of these women that we've been looking at? I think
25:54
it would be to learn
25:56
the lessons of history and
25:59
time.
25:59
And these
26:02
four cases at their
26:05
core have actually got issues
26:07
that we are still battling for
26:10
today in terms of gender inequality.
26:13
Extreme poverty, lack
26:15
of agency, lack of opportunity,
26:18
women's health and reproductive
26:21
rights and violence against
26:24
women. And
26:26
it's just a reminder that
26:28
these things are never set in
26:31
stone and that the clock can go back.
26:33
The story's not over, is it? History
26:35
isn't over yet. No,
26:37
it's very much still in progress.
26:41
Now, it's comforting to think
26:44
that mainly as time goes by, things
26:46
get better for women. And broadly, I think
26:48
in terms of reproductive safety
26:51
and rights for women, that is probably true.
26:54
But I don't want to assume
26:56
that everything for Victorian women was dreadful.
26:59
We need a nuanced view of their lives. And that's
27:01
why we try on lady killers to examine
27:04
the sources, try to find out what the
27:06
sources biases might be and
27:08
to do our level best to listen
27:11
to those really elusive voices of women
27:13
from the past whose stories haven't traditionally
27:16
been told. And you know what? I
27:18
think that these skills of analysis
27:21
and judgment and questioning the evidence, they
27:23
aren't just skills for the historian
27:25
or for the journalist like you, Aisha, they're
27:27
skills for the citizen, they're skills for any
27:29
member of the human race. But
27:32
what I think mainly are lady killers of show
27:34
names is a world
27:36
in the 19th century for women in
27:38
terms of reproduction that was a bit dark and
27:40
dangerous, even if the courage shown
27:43
by Margaret Garner or even by Elizabeth Taylor
27:46
is humbling and inspiring. Sitting
27:48
here in my own body
27:50
in the year 2023, I'm
27:53
very glad that in terms of reproductive
27:56
rights, things have come on a
27:58
bit since the story we've told in this series.
27:59
series began 200 years
28:02
ago. Well, thank you for joining me, Roz,
28:04
and of course you too, Ayesha. Thank you so
28:07
much. Oh, it's been a pleasure.
28:15
Lady Killers is presented by me, Lucy
28:17
Worsley, and produced by Emily Hughes. Our
28:20
resident historian is Rosalind Crone, and our special
28:22
guest was Ayesha Hazarika. The
28:24
series producer is Julia Haebel. It's
28:27
a story hunter production for BBC Radio 4.
28:33
From the makers of The Battersea Poltergeist
28:35
and Uncanny, a new paranormal
28:38
podcast series from BBC Radio 4,
28:41
The Witch Farm.
28:42
People always say, oh, I'd love
28:45
to live in a haunted house. They bloody
28:47
well wouldn't. The Witch Farm
28:49
is the true story of an ordinary couple
28:52
in an extraordinary, terrifying situation.
28:54
I don't think I've ever come
28:57
across a case with this much phenomena.
29:00
I call it a grey lady. Like a black
29:02
and white image, there's no colour to her at all.
29:04
So you believe that the devil is
29:06
real? Definitely.
29:08
Leave us alone! Get
29:12
out of our house! The
29:17
Witch Farm. Subscribe on BBC Sounds.
29:20
Welcome to Britain's most haunted
29:22
house.
29:26
The 29th of July, 1981. Prince
29:29
Charles marries Lady Diana Spencer.
29:32
An eight-year-old boy watches the fairy
29:34
tale unfold. An hour later, he's
29:37
missing.
29:38
Then, one day in 2020, a
29:40
BBC reporter gets a call from
29:42
a mysterious source. Vishal,
29:45
the extraordinary true story of a boy
29:47
who went missing while the world looked the
29:50
other way.
29:50
All lives are not treated the same. Listen
29:53
to Vishal.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More