Podchaser Logo
Home
Fouling Caitlin Clark; plus, a shoplifting panic!

Fouling Caitlin Clark; plus, a shoplifting panic!

Released Friday, 21st June 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Fouling Caitlin Clark; plus, a shoplifting panic!

Fouling Caitlin Clark; plus, a shoplifting panic!

Fouling Caitlin Clark; plus, a shoplifting panic!

Fouling Caitlin Clark; plus, a shoplifting panic!

Friday, 21st June 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:00

Support for NPR and the following message

0:03

come from our sponsor Whole Foods Market.

0:05

Enjoy the hot grill summer event through

0:07

July 16th with sizzling sales

0:09

on steaks and sustainable salmon or choose

0:11

favorites like picnic salads and cooler friendly

0:13

beverages. Make it a hot grill summer

0:16

at Whole Foods Market. Hello,

0:21

hello. I'm Brittany Luce and

0:23

you're listening to It's Been a Minute from

0:25

NPR, a show about what's going on in

0:27

culture and why it doesn't happen by

0:30

accident. This

0:38

week we're connecting the dots between culture

0:41

wars, hot takes, and basketball.

0:43

I know, I know. How are

0:45

all these things connected? Well, we're

0:47

gonna find out with Gene Denby, co-host of

0:50

NPR's Code Switch and my three Anantharaman, who

0:52

covers the WNBA for defector. Gene, my three,

0:54

welcome to It's Been a Minute. What's good

0:56

with you, Brittany? So good to be here.

0:59

Thanks for having me, Brittany. Oh, it's so good

1:01

to have you both. Okay, so you're

1:03

both WNBA fans, right?

1:06

Well, a lot has been happening in

1:08

the league lately, so I want to

1:10

know in one word, how do you

1:12

feel about the WNBA's seemingly sudden popularity?

1:15

Overwhelmed. Gene, what about you?

1:17

Salty, probably. Salty.

1:19

Well, those are two very good

1:22

words, overwhelmed and salty. We'll get

1:24

into why you chose those words,

1:26

but I'm gonna throw another word

1:28

into the mix, dismayed. Okay. And

1:30

not for the reason you think,

1:32

okay? I'm thrilled the WNBA is

1:34

getting more and more popular. I

1:36

am one of those recent

1:38

converts, and I'm not alone. More than 400,000

1:40

people attended women's basketball

1:43

games in May, as I

1:46

did, and half of them were sellouts.

1:48

That makes this past May the

1:50

highest turnout for the league

1:52

in over two decades. Wow. I mean,

1:54

the WNBA is officially having

1:56

a moment, but with

1:59

that, great viewership, apparently comes some growing

2:01

pain. Indeed. Let's take a look at the

2:03

player of the moment right now. Indiana

2:06

fever rookie and number one draft pick,

2:09

Kaitlyn Clark. After finishing her

2:11

college run as the highest scoring college

2:13

basketball player ever, Kaitlyn, like

2:15

many rookies, is adjusting to life in the

2:18

big leagues and has been on the receiving

2:20

end of some intense fouls. The

2:22

latest incident that had everyone clutching

2:24

their pearls was between Kaitlyn and

2:26

Chicago Sky player, Kennedy Carter. Carter

2:29

fouled Kaitlyn and the media frenzy

2:31

that ensued afterwards has been just

2:33

wild to watch. I've

2:35

seen WNBA players get called

2:37

Caddy. Women are Caddy, even the ones

2:39

on her own team. Jealous. She's getting knocked down

2:41

for just no, I mean, this is just

2:43

a form of jealousy that looks like. Bullies. She's

2:46

a bullier, right? No one feels sorry for the

2:48

bully. And even a congressman

2:50

weighed in, saying there was, quote,

2:52

excessive physical targeting. My three, Jean,

2:55

what do you think of these

2:57

reactions? Again, overwhelming to sort of

2:59

consume this. And I don't blame

3:02

anyone who's come to women's basketball

3:04

lately, like welcome, join the

3:06

club, it's fun here. But I think when

3:08

you're in that position, you do need

3:11

some of that context. Kennedy Carter's also

3:13

a player with this really specific history

3:15

in the WNBA, who has, I think,

3:18

struggled to get along with teammates, who's

3:20

kind of a known, like fiery player.

3:22

Does that mean every player in the

3:25

WNBA is like that? No, I don't

3:27

think so. So I think it

3:29

helps to have that grounding in the league's

3:31

history in some of the stories and some

3:34

of the people who have been playing in

3:36

this league for a while. And so

3:38

I hesitate as

3:40

someone who's in the WNBA

3:42

media to come across

3:45

like a gatekeeper, right? To say, no, you

3:47

have to go to the library and read

3:49

all these books before you can join. But

3:51

when it gets to the point that we

3:54

have congressmen sending letters to

3:56

the commissioner, asking her to

3:58

investigate this. I think maybe

4:01

we need to all calm down, take a little

4:03

bit of a breather. Mm-hmm, mm-hmm. And just to piggyback

4:05

on, my three said, you have this player in Kaitlyn

4:07

Clark who went to the University of Iowa, she's a

4:09

white woman, and she played on a, you know, we

4:11

gotta say, like a mostly white team. She

4:14

can hoop. I want to make that absolutely clear.

4:16

She is cold. Yeah, she's a great player. She's

4:18

a fantastic player, but she brought this giant fan

4:20

base of people who rock with

4:23

her and weren't necessarily WNBA

4:25

fans. And now they're

4:27

in the league, and I think there are fans

4:29

who like her for a bunch of reasons, you

4:31

know, fandoms are always really complex, who are suddenly

4:34

creating friction for a bunch of other

4:36

reasons that are not just about basketball

4:38

with this sort of established WNBA fan

4:41

base. I think there's several layers of

4:43

ideological and social dynamics that are playing

4:45

out in the Kaitlyn Clark

4:48

discourse. So if you look at

4:50

the partisan lean of different

4:52

fan bases for different major sports, to the

4:54

right, you have the PGA, you

4:56

have NASCAR, you have college football. And

4:59

somewhere in the middle is like baseball,

5:01

the NFL, and college basketball, right? But

5:04

to the left, the most democratic

5:06

leaning, interestingly enough, was the

5:08

WWE. But

5:11

the most democratic leaning sports fan base

5:14

was the WNBA, like by a comfortable distance.

5:16

Yeah, I mean, Jean, you touched on some of

5:18

the ideological touch points there, but I'd love to hear

5:20

more, especially from you, my three,

5:23

about some of these social

5:25

dynamics that are cropping up. I mean,

5:27

Kaitlyn Clark is a good player,

5:29

for sure. We all agree on this, but it

5:32

just seems like people are handling

5:34

her with caution. My

5:37

three, why do you think people are

5:39

trying to handle or handling Kaitlyn Clark

5:41

with kid gloves? What do you think

5:43

that's about? It's funny because if you've

5:46

watched Kaitlyn Clark in college or even

5:48

in the professionals, like, you know she's

5:50

like a real competitor. You know that

5:53

she's a hooper. She likes this. She likes

5:55

trash talking. I think she likes when

5:58

people guard her tough. Because if... Message

13:13

comes from and he our sponsor Mint

13:16

Mobile. from the gas pump to the

13:18

grocery store, Inflation is everywhere. So Mint

13:20

Mobile is offering premium wireless starting a

13:22

just fifteen dollars. A month to

13:25

get your newfound planned for

13:27

just fifteen dollars? Go to

13:29

mintmobile.com/switch. Support

20:01

for NPR and the following message

20:03

come from the American Cancer Society.

20:05

Dr. Alpa Patel leads a team

20:07

that researches cancer risk factors, and

20:10

she shares how her team makes

20:12

an impact. We always

20:14

do what we like to think of

20:16

as actionable science. So the

20:18

work that we do makes its way

20:20

to things like nutrition and physical activity

20:22

guidelines for cancer.org, where millions of people

20:25

come each year to learn

20:27

about how they can

20:29

better prevent cancer. pistachios

22:00

have been locked up. That's

22:02

Vox policy correspondent, Abdullah Fayyad, and

22:05

The Marshall Project's engagement editor, Nicole

22:07

Lewis. And they're here to answer

22:09

my big questions this week. Why

22:12

is all the deodorant locked up?

22:14

And what's the shoplifting panic really

22:16

about? As you heard,

22:18

there's a new trend at drugstores. Thick

22:20

plastic barriers between you and a

22:23

lot of everyday products. By

22:25

deodorant, toothpaste, detergent, these necessities

22:27

are basically behind bars. And

22:30

I need an employee to free them. I

22:33

don't know about you, but I find

22:35

these deodorant jails incredibly annoying. But

22:38

it's not just an inconvenience to

22:40

everyday shoppers. It's actually tied

22:42

to a much bigger panic about

22:44

shoplifting. And while shoplifting is

22:47

very much a real thing, some

22:49

of the fears that led to these locked up products

22:51

are built on very shaky ground. And

22:54

it's also connected to a broader

22:56

movement to roll back more progressive

22:58

policies around minor crimes. So

23:00

to separate panic from fact and illuminate

23:03

the systems behind them all, I'm

23:05

joined by Nicole and Abdullah. Nicole,

23:10

Abdullah, welcome to It's Been A Minute. Thanks, good

23:12

to be here. Thanks for having us. Oh

23:15

my gosh, my pleasure. Okay, so the

23:17

deodorant is locked up, but is

23:19

that something people are actually worried about? Like,

23:21

would you say they're freaked out about shoplifting

23:24

right now? Nicole, let's start with you. Yeah,

23:27

I mean, I would. I would say

23:29

that there has been a retail theft

23:31

panic. There has been this concerted media

23:34

focus, I think, on putting

23:37

chief executives on air and

23:39

them really sounding the alarm to say, hey,

23:41

this is a huge problem for us. We're

23:44

losing money left and right. Theft is

23:46

an issue. It's higher than what it's historically

23:48

been. If that's not corrected over time, prices

23:50

will be higher and or store to

23:52

close. And by

23:54

and large, those statements go completely

23:56

unchallenged. Did the former CEO of

23:58

Home Depot compare? shoplifting

24:01

to COVID? Yes.

24:04

But today this thing is an epidemic.

24:06

It's spreading faster than COVID, Steve. The

24:09

other thing to say is that there

24:11

are a handful of viral videos of

24:13

what we call like a smash and grab. So

24:15

when several people come into

24:18

a store and it's pure chaos and they

24:20

steal a bunch of stuff, right? And so

24:22

those videos also circulate and they're

24:24

really enough to generate this sense of

24:26

like, oh my god, this problem is

24:28

out of hand with no

24:30

more underlying information behind it. Hmm.

24:33

Hmm. Abdallah, how does this match up with

24:35

what you've learned? I mean, I think there's

24:37

been a huge overreaction. I think a

24:39

big part of it is a result

24:41

of the virality of these videos of

24:43

people shoplifting. But what I would add

24:46

to that is statistics numbers by the

24:48

National Retail Federation way inflating

24:50

the inventory losses of businesses

24:52

due to shoplifting by billions

24:54

of dollars. Eventually the record

24:56

was corrected, but you

24:58

know, a lot of these arguments

25:01

were fueling this idea that there

25:03

are deeper societal problems and the

25:05

shoplifting pandemic as some people called it was

25:07

kind of a window into that cultural decay if

25:09

you want to see it that way. Hmm.

25:12

Hmm. So what do we actually

25:14

know about shoplifting rates? So we

25:17

know a couple of things. I'd say the

25:19

most recent data comes from the Council on

25:21

Criminal Justice and they took

25:23

a look at what we call NIBRS data.

25:25

So that's incident report data, right? And so

25:27

that self-reported and when we look at that

25:29

data over the last several years starting with

25:32

2020, if you take New York

25:35

City out of the 24

25:37

metropolitan areas that they looked at, if you take

25:39

this big city and you just put it to

25:42

the side, that actually incidences of

25:44

shoplifting decreased by about 7%.

25:47

Wow. Wow. That's a huge

25:49

difference. Correct. Direct contradiction to the notion

25:51

that this is a pandemic. If you

25:54

keep New York in, the picture looks

25:56

slightly different. It did go up. So

25:58

really what we could say. is New

26:01

York seems to have an issue

26:03

with shoplifting, right? The

26:05

other thing though that I want to

26:08

say is that, and this can really

26:10

get into the data weeds of things,

26:12

this is NIBRS data. This is not

26:15

actually FBI crime data. Actually,

26:17

most police departments are

26:20

not really categorizing or tracking

26:22

shoplifting as its own segment

26:24

of retail crime. Oh. The

26:27

FBI's database is actually deeply, deeply

26:29

flawed. Not all police departments have

26:31

to report to it. Some of

26:33

the largest departments in the country,

26:35

including the LAPD, do not report

26:37

their crime statistics to the FBI.

26:40

That's one lesson out of all of this,

26:42

is that we can get a sense from

26:44

all this data if there's an increase, if

26:47

there's a decrease, but as to the extent

26:49

of those increases or decreases, there's really a

26:51

lot we don't know in real time. It's

26:54

really interesting that there's this panic, but we don't have

26:56

the data to show it on a wider scale or

26:58

the data presented is just wrong.

27:01

As we said, the National Retail Federation, which

27:03

is a lobbying group that represents the interest

27:05

of retailers, they had to retract some of

27:07

the massive numbers it was coming up with

27:09

for how much organized retail

27:11

theft was actually happening. And

27:14

that makes me think of another situation

27:16

with Walgreens. They said they were closing

27:18

a bunch of stores in San Francisco

27:20

because of rampant shoplifting. Back

27:23

here in San Francisco, where five

27:25

Walgreens stores around the city will

27:27

be soon closing their doors for

27:29

good. Brazen robberies

27:31

like this one have become

27:33

an epidemic. But

27:36

later it was reported in the

27:38

San Francisco Chronicle that the data

27:40

didn't really support that. Those stores

27:42

all had less than two reported

27:44

shoplifting incidents per month on average.

27:47

But then also, Walgreens coincidentally

27:49

said in an SEC filing that

27:52

they were looking to close 200

27:54

stores anyway to save money. In

27:56

a statement to the San Francisco Chronicle, Walgreens

27:59

maintained. that shoplifting in their

28:01

San Francisco stores is

28:04

higher than the national average, but on

28:06

an earnings call last year, a

28:09

Walgreens exec said to quote,

28:12

maybe we cried too much about

28:15

shoplifting. So intentional or

28:17

not, how might it

28:20

benefit retailers to use inflated

28:22

claims about shoplifting? Yeah, I

28:24

think this is really the

28:26

question to be asking, truly.

28:28

If you can make stuff

28:30

flying off your shelves a

28:33

public problem, a problem

28:35

that needs to be solved and can only

28:37

be solved in their estimation by law enforcement,

28:40

then the money that actually gets spent on

28:42

dealing with that is

28:44

taxpayer money. So I

28:47

think part of the logic around

28:49

a panic like this, intentional or

28:52

not, is that if you

28:54

can get the public to pay for

28:56

it, like why wouldn't you, right? It's

28:58

such a confounding question right now why

29:00

a lot of these businesses

29:02

are interested in making it seem

29:04

like their stores are less safe.

29:07

It's also confounding why they would spend so much

29:09

money on locking up their

29:11

products and making it harder for customers

29:13

to buy them. I think they're just

29:15

creating more friction and making people less

29:17

likely to buy things. I

29:20

can't lie, it's also confounding to me

29:22

too, but talking more about public

29:24

solutions to shoplifting problems, how about

29:27

politicians responded to this panic about

29:29

shoplifting? Yeah, not well. I mean,

29:32

politicians here, oh my goodness, shoplifting,

29:34

organized crime is out of control.

29:36

We've got to crack down, right?

29:39

The NRF actually has model legislation.

29:41

Like they have thought about what

29:44

they want to see happen here. And

29:46

it's two things. They're really campaigning

29:48

and arguing for states to

29:50

basically lower the threshold by

29:53

which stealing becomes a felony. The

29:56

other big thing that they want is

29:58

to actually make organized reasons. retail theft

30:00

a crime category. Lawmakers

30:02

have to decide what's a crime. Like, we don't just

30:04

all wake up and the book of crimes is like

30:06

written for us, right? That's

30:09

not how it works. So the

30:11

NRF really wants lawmakers to add

30:13

a statute that designates organized retail

30:16

theft, and that is when you're

30:18

shoplifting for personal gain and not

30:20

personal need. So if I

30:22

steal the deodorant and I use it because I'm

30:25

stinky and sweaty, that's something different. But if I

30:27

give it to you or sell it to you

30:29

because you're stinky and sweaty, I could potentially be

30:31

charged with this other crime category.

30:34

Right. So what makes it organized crime

30:36

is the intent to sell it. It

30:38

doesn't have to be boosting it off

30:40

the back of a truck, Tony Soprano

30:42

style. You know,

30:44

organized crime rings. I don't know how

30:46

broad of a problem that is, but

30:48

I do know that the first reaction

30:50

to the shoplifting

30:52

panic came during COVID when

30:54

we saw a lot of crimes of need.

30:57

People stealing diapers, people stealing

31:00

baby formula. These were crimes

31:02

of desperation. Hmm. Hmm.

31:05

So I know for a few years in major

31:08

cities, there were pushes for more progressive policies supported

31:10

by left-leaning DAs and politicians

31:12

like Chasa Boudin in San Francisco.

31:14

It sounds like some of those

31:16

efforts have sort of rolled back.

31:19

Why do you think that is? Abdallah, I'd love to hear from

31:21

you about that. I think that's

31:24

kind of one of the casualties

31:26

of this era that we're in.

31:28

And you saw this, like you

31:30

mentioned in San Francisco, you saw

31:32

this in Boston with prosecutors kind

31:34

of declining to prosecute certain crimes

31:36

that included petty theft because there

31:38

were such disparate outcomes as to

31:40

who was getting arrested and who

31:42

was getting sent to prison over

31:44

some low-level crimes. And the

31:46

results of those policies were very

31:48

promising, actually. And they seemed to

31:50

have been working very well. But

31:53

they were also deeply unpopular in some

31:55

parts of the right. And so when

31:57

the pandemic hit... more

40:00

fear-mongering than solutions-oriented.

40:03

And could I say one other thing? Sure. This

40:05

is more of a thought that I always have

40:07

about it. So I grew up in DC,

40:10

and my family has lived there for many,

40:12

many years. And so

40:15

I remember a feature of my childhood

40:17

being my grandmother and my mom

40:20

and uncle all telling

40:22

me stories about times that they were

40:24

mugged on their doorstep in DC in

40:26

the 80s and early 90s

40:29

when there was a crime problem. And so

40:31

this was something that they all experienced. Now,

40:33

fast forward to me living and growing

40:36

up in the city. I never had

40:38

an experience like that. I have actually never

40:40

been victimized by any kind of crime. I've lived

40:42

in New York for 15 years. I've

40:45

just not had that experience. But

40:48

now think about what that does, what

40:50

that actually means, in terms of how

40:52

they're going to respond versus how I'm

40:54

going to respond or even understand your

40:56

baseline level of safety in public places.

40:59

So I do think there is a

41:02

little bit of a generational nerve that

41:04

is easily touched on because there is

41:06

a whole segment of people who did

41:08

live through high crime eras of the 70s, 80s, and 90s

41:10

because fear is not necessarily

41:14

a super rational response that

41:16

can hijack your ability to

41:18

really make decisions. I

41:21

keep thinking like there's a whole segment

41:23

of voters out there who have never

41:25

actually moved on from

41:28

the narrative that Abdullah is talking about.

41:30

When we thought about cities as high

41:32

crime and very segregated, every

41:34

city I've lived in is

41:36

extremely expensive and really

41:39

nice and full of coffee shops. But

41:42

we have not been able to shake,

41:44

I think, that deep embodied notion of

41:47

discomfort or lack of safety. And

41:49

I don't say this to gloss

41:52

over the way that racism really

41:54

does function. It's embedded in all of this.

41:56

But I really think about my parents, the

41:58

fact that they have fundamentally had. a completely

42:01

different experience of public space and public

42:03

safety than I have because

42:05

we are different generations. And

42:07

so I wonder if again, we could step

42:09

back and have a better conversation, one

42:12

that attends to some of the social

42:14

issues, lived experience, that we actually might

42:16

be able to get to better solutions.

42:20

Well, Nicole, Abdallah, this has been an incredible

42:23

conversation. Thank you both so much. I really

42:25

appreciate it. Thanks for having us. Thank you.

42:28

Thanks again to Nicole Lewis from The

42:30

Marshall Project and Abdallah Fayyad from Fox.

42:38

This episode of It's Been a Minute

42:40

was produced by Barton Girdwood. Alexis Williams.

42:42

Liam McBain. Corey Antonio Rose.

42:45

This episode was edited by Jessica

42:48

Placek. Engineering support came from Tiffany

42:50

Vera Castro. We have fact-checking help

42:52

from Will Chase. Our

42:54

executive producer is Veralyn Williams.

42:57

Our VP of programming is

42:59

Yolanda Sanguini. All right, that's

43:01

all for this episode of It's Been a

43:03

Minute from NPR. I'm Brittany Luce.

43:05

Talk soon. This

43:13

message comes from NPR sponsor, Acorn

43:15

TV. Stream stories from around

43:18

the world, from sinister suspense to

43:20

charming comedies and clever crime dramas

43:22

like My Life is Murder, starring

43:24

Lucy Lawless. Visit Acorn.tv for a

43:26

30-day free trial with promo code

43:29

NPR. This message

43:31

comes from NPR sponsor, REI Co-op. For

43:33

the next 15 seconds, REI

43:35

wants to remind you that your

43:37

time is precious and that getting

43:39

outside to soak up summer is

43:42

a precious way to spend it.

43:44

Visit your local REI Co-op or

43:46

rei.com/opt outside. All

43:48

that sitting and swiping. Your

43:50

body is adapting to your

43:52

technology. Learn how and what

43:54

you can do about it. I really

43:56

felt like the cloud in my brain

43:58

kind of dissipated. Once I

44:00

started realizing what a difference these little

44:03

bricks were making, there's no turning back

44:05

for me. Take NPR's

44:07

Body Electric Challenge. Listen

44:10

to the series wherever you get your podcasts.

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features