0:00

Hello Friend! Thank you so much for downloading

0:02

this podcast and I hope you hear something

0:04

truly. I mean this from the bottom of

0:06

my heart. Something that edifies, equips, enlightens, encourages

0:09

and then gently but firmly get you out

0:11

there into the marketplace of ideas. I so

0:13

appreciate your taking the time to listen. But

0:15

before you start the broadcast on me to

0:17

stake a moment and explained that this month's

0:20

Truth Tools called Seek S E E K

0:22

written by my friend David Roberts in my

0:24

favorite Scottish apologist who's currently serving the Lord

0:26

in Australia he comes in, visits with us

0:29

once a month. And he wrote

0:31

a book called Ask and now he's

0:33

written a foul a book called seek

0:35

Real Word answers to real world questions

0:37

And so he literally go through a

0:39

whole series of questions like is there

0:41

ever a good lie or does the

0:43

Bible have mistakes? or what does the

0:45

Bible say about climate change or what's

0:47

the difference between capitalism and Communism And

0:49

the list goes on and on and

0:51

out. So it is a fabulous reference

0:53

book that I know you're going to

0:55

want to put in your legacy library.

0:57

So if you'd like a copy of

0:59

Seek. And we are listener supported radio.

1:01

I'd love to send one to you when

1:04

you give a gift of any amount to

1:06

support in the Market With Janet Partial, Simply

1:08

call Eight Seven Seven Janet Fifty Eight. That's

1:10

Eight Seven Seven Janet Fifty Eight and offer

1:12

gift of any amount will send you a

1:14

copy of David's book Seek Or if you'd

1:16

rather do it online, go to in the

1:19

Market with Janet Partial.o R G scolded the

1:21

bottom of the page. there's the cover. It

1:23

has a brain on the. Cover. So you

1:25

can't miss. It click on the cover of the

1:27

book, make your gift right through the website, and

1:29

will send you a copy of Seek by David

1:31

Roberts and Great Tool to have one of those

1:34

important little volumes. A You're Ready Reference Library and

1:36

I know you're going to be blessed. By the

1:38

way, when you're on the website, you might want

1:40

to consider being a partial partner. Those are people

1:43

give every single month at a level of their

1:45

own choosing. They always get whatever the Truth Tool

1:47

is that particular month and in addition to that

1:49

they get a newsletter that contains an audio piece

1:52

for me as well. So Partial Partner or just

1:54

this month Truth Tool either. Way It helps

1:56

us financially to keep moving forward. Eight

1:58

Seven Seven Janet For the Eight Eight

2:00

Seven seven she added Fifty Eight or

2:03

online in the market with Janet partial.o.

2:05

R G L Please enjoy the broadcast.

2:08

Had for the nana. Friends

2:16

welcome the in the Market with Janet partial

2:18

it's hard to hurt Freddie Were Craig and

2:21

I share some of the stories making headlines

2:23

this week's end and will offer are inside

2:25

and analysis. If you'd like to join in

2:27

the conversation and what we're talking about, please

2:29

call Eight Seven Seven Five Four Eight Three

2:32

Six Seven Five. That's Eight Seven Seven Five

2:34

Four Eight Three Six seven Five. Now let's

2:36

take a quick look back at some of

2:38

the other topics we discuss. This. Week. Maybe

2:47

this was gonna somewhere job I renew

2:49

the but I have watched over the

2:51

years are usually the people that are

2:53

want him to walk course with God.

2:56

Usually the people that have been on

2:58

our high with God. Are you know

3:00

of the really wonderful as happens can

3:02

expect somebody sooner or later lobbying grenades

3:04

at them Sambo? I don't watch you

3:06

excited about Jesus and I certainly don't.

3:09

You think about walking with him So

3:11

and people say when I get bothroyd

3:13

give out evil am I I see.

3:15

Will also did some. Sort of border

3:17

guards of your now media with

3:20

miss the mark of all of

3:22

us but if you're say and

3:24

must I be one who is

3:26

is you know the most horrible

3:28

person you know, etc etc. Book

3:30

of i had thoughts a beer

3:32

see ago if it's from demons

3:34

usually bother the ones that they

3:36

think represent rice. We live in

3:38

a culture that loves to pride

3:41

itself on tolerance and love of

3:43

but in my lifetime this is

3:45

the most rigid cancel culture. that

3:47

i've ever lived or this is

3:49

indices it's it's crazy and so

3:51

we have to be careful that

3:53

we listen carefully to the narratives

3:55

it's be in prison i think

3:57

we're being love shamed as chris

4:00

And I think it's the perfect tool

4:02

for Satan to get at us. And

4:04

it's sort of the Achilles heel because

4:06

the world will know that we're his

4:09

disciples by our love. Well, if

4:11

you're Satan, what are you going to do? Well,

4:13

I'm going to give a twisted definition of love,

4:16

and then I'm going to paralyze the church

4:18

to do what is true. When

4:21

he came to earth and made

4:23

his home among us, he was

4:25

full of unfailing love and faithfulness.

4:27

See, that is the image now.

4:29

That is the full picture of

4:31

who God is thanks to what Jesus did

4:33

on the cross. He is 100% unfailing love.

4:37

The Greek word there is charis. It means

4:39

pure grace. So we don't have to be

4:41

afraid anymore of him zapping us

4:43

dead for our every sin. We don't have to

4:45

be afraid or looking over our back or like

4:47

I used to grow up hearing from my school

4:49

teachers and even some of my family, watch out

4:52

or God's going to get you back. No,

4:54

no, no. God dealt with the sin

4:56

issue on the cross with Jesus. Now we get

4:58

to live in his love.

5:01

I would tell you that

5:03

I'm a recovering perfectionist, meaning

5:05

that I'm constantly battling perfectionism

5:08

or the longing of perfectionism

5:10

in my life. I

5:12

overachieve or over-took the goal most of

5:15

the time, at least in my mind,

5:17

even before I've kicked it, right? I'm

5:19

just constantly putting some kind of standard

5:21

up there that I want to achieve

5:23

and notice my language. It's usually

5:25

something I want to do or something that

5:27

I think is best rather than relying upon

5:30

the strength of Christ that's in me and

5:33

relying upon who Christ

5:35

wants me to be. So one of the things

5:37

I wrote about in my book is remember who

5:39

you are and who you are not. And I

5:41

think at times our battle with

5:43

perfectionism is remembering who we are

5:45

not. We are not our own

5:47

perfect savior. It's

5:50

Heart to Heart Friday. Here are some of the

5:52

other stories making headlines This week. Sweeping.

6:02

For a packet easily. Pass the

6:04

Senate. Is

6:07

expected to santa legislation stay at once. The

6:09

President signed. It it will start.

6:12

The process is sending weapons

6:14

to Ukraine this weekend to

6:16

promise to boot. Good seafood

6:18

means in the mood to

6:20

military prove. To pretend to North

6:22

Korea and peace in the region since

6:24

it's hard to hard. Friday on in

6:26

the Market with Janet. Partial Reagan, I have

6:28

lots to share and will put the first

6:30

story on the table when we return to

6:32

join the conversation. On the topics discussed:

6:35

Eight Seven seven five four Eight

6:37

Three Six Seven Five Eight Seven

6:39

Seven Five Four Eight three Six

6:41

seven. Will

6:55

find. Them is if you're looking for

6:58

biblical answers to questions the world is asking,

7:00

you will find them And it's web tools

7:02

and seek. Is this monstrous to get biblical

7:04

answers to multiple questions and dad society, theology

7:06

and more. Ask for your copy of Sick

7:09

when you give a gift of any him

7:11

up in the markets. Police Seven Seven Jetta,

7:13

Fifty Eight that seat Seven Seven Janet Fifty

7:15

Fourth. Putting in the market within a partial

7:18

not a large he. Every

7:21

Friday to you friends make partial is

7:23

with me Friday's We take a look

7:25

at the stories making news and we

7:28

look at them through the lens of

7:30

scriptures. always a different kind of a

7:32

prospective by the way. we spent the

7:34

entire last hour doing some analysis of

7:36

the mounting anti semitism in this country

7:38

and discovering that it wasn't happening organically

7:41

As many this thought that exact folks

7:43

like George Soros or backdoor funding to

7:45

the tunes of a whole lot of

7:47

money to train these next generation Marxists

7:49

how to rise up and cause. Revolution.

7:51

If you want to get their conversation in

7:53

it's depth, just go to in the Market

7:56

with Janet partial.o R G in the right

7:58

hand side bunch of words. Look for these

8:00

two city right next to each other. Past

8:02

programs click and and download last hour or

8:04

any our we do going back a full

8:06

year. we do two hours every and then

8:08

it's at your convenience and the your perusal

8:10

that you can find something you want to

8:13

listen to. But if you do want to

8:15

hear our analysis of what's been going on

8:17

all across the country from California to New

8:19

York on these these revolts, these ignorant revolts,

8:21

people who just had the most obscure understanding

8:23

of what's going on in the Middle East.

8:25

and it really doesn't have anything to do

8:27

with the Middle East. It has everything to.

8:30

Do with Marxists Revolution, you're gonna want

8:32

to listen to what we said. An

8:34

hour program that nominate A turned to

8:36

another topic in this kind of P:

8:38

Tails Off of Pig Tails Off of

8:40

the conversation I had yesterday with Doctors

8:42

Killed by a Sinner and David Lee

8:44

Gates They wrote a brand New both

8:46

associated with the Cornwall Alliance had deals

8:48

with looking at the clients at the

8:50

climate rather and understanding that we have

8:52

a biblical. Imperative to practice stewardship.

8:54

That that we never trampled underfoot our

8:56

fellow man under the guise of trying

8:58

to protect the planet. That's an alienation

9:00

of affection. Romans speaks to this and

9:03

of whatever proposal you have up. There

9:05

is going to hurt the least among. Us.

9:07

and it's a bad proposal, right? Added the

9:09

game. but it's also a religion tilted for

9:11

one minute. It isn't an ideology steeped in

9:13

a religious. World view it as worshipping the

9:16

creation ness rather than the creator and

9:18

this is a bizarre new angle. I

9:20

wish I had this yesterday to be

9:22

able to share when I was happy

9:24

to David and to Cal. There's a

9:26

new study from the University of California

9:28

Law School that's you, Cla their school

9:30

of law that. I don't know why

9:32

this would come out of the School

9:34

of Law because it has to do

9:36

with sexuality and the environment. But stick

9:38

me. Apparently they are claiming that Lgbt

9:40

couples are at greater risk. Of.

9:42

Being impacted adversely by climate

9:44

change? You heard me. I'll say

9:46

it again. A law school at

9:49

U C L A is saying

9:51

that Lgbt couples are at greater

9:53

risk of being impacted adversely by

9:55

climate change. And so here's

9:57

what they sound. They said that

9:59

those. Being an Lgbt relationships

10:01

are quote this proportionally located

10:03

in coastal areas and cities

10:05

such as Washington that the

10:07

scene which they roads is

10:09

at an increased risk. Sorry

10:11

but I live here so

10:13

it's hard to read. This of

10:15

the straight face is at an increased

10:17

risk of he. Waves, sledding, and

10:20

dangerously strong winds Apparently same

10:22

sex couples also tend to

10:24

reside in areas and poor.

10:26

Infrastructure researchers have noted so I

10:28

went to the major findings of

10:30

this report. And. I'm literally U

10:32

C L A School of Law Williams

10:34

Institute What this has to do with

10:36

law I don't get. And by the

10:38

way, I'll give him my Dc observations

10:40

in a minute. They're saying that dates

10:42

Hubble's are is that good. Greater risk

10:44

of exposure to the negative impacts of

10:46

climate change compared to straight couples. Okay,

10:49

So and those will blow yourself?

10:51

What's come in Washington, Dc? When

10:54

it gets thought, it's a fairly.

10:56

It's glows around the heterosexual couple.

10:58

It does not flooded the monogamous

11:01

heterosexual couple that are married. It

11:03

only gets. Spirit: They are

11:05

impervious hundred. It's.

11:07

I'm trying desperately to see where they're coming

11:09

from. A mess and it's so vacuous it

11:12

is ridiculous. Well would call this new

11:14

so oh my goodness. Apparently, homosexual

11:16

couples are disproportionately located in coastal

11:18

cities and areas. Great Can I

11:20

say something? Washington D C is

11:22

one of the most expensive cities

11:25

in the world to live. not

11:27

just the State Senate. the country's

11:29

the world to live and as

11:32

his San Francisco and New York's

11:34

coastal cities by the way. So

11:36

again, what you're hearing is critical

11:39

theory: Oppressor oppressed because you're a

11:41

homosexual. Somehow the climate impacts you

11:43

more because he are disproportionately choosing

11:45

to live in expensive cities. And.

11:48

If you find lousy gonna send me an email. Because I'm

11:50

struggling for both to until I just

11:52

become a provision is the he says

11:54

i'm not that great at math. But.

11:56

I do know what the top for. The.

11:59

Highest park. calculations in states are

12:01

among our 50 states. California

12:04

is the first. That's why they get 55 electoral votes,

12:06

by the way, more than any other state. Next

12:10

comes Texas, also coastal.

12:14

Then comes New York and Florida states,

12:16

both coastal. Well,

12:19

that means that most

12:22

people live in coastal states,

12:25

whether they're heterosexual or

12:27

homosexual. Back to your

12:29

point, so as human beings tend to

12:31

go to coastal states apparently. You talked

12:33

about George Orwell. I remember

12:36

most of us when we were taught

12:38

like this, it was part of our required

12:40

reading. Most of our English classes would

12:42

have us in high school, junior or senior year,

12:45

had to read this book because we had this

12:47

idea of what a utopian world would look like.

12:49

It was anything but utopianistic. It was exactly the

12:51

antithesis of that. The only utopia will be when

12:54

we are in the new earth, not until then.

12:56

We can't do this because the book of Jeremiah

12:58

says, we got a heart problem. What

13:01

I find ridiculous is that with a

13:03

straight face, these lawyers, okay, that's why

13:05

Shakespeare says- How dare you?

13:08

How very dare you? It's like Shakespeare penned

13:10

the words, first thing we do, let's kill the lawyers.

13:13

By the way, that was spoken in

13:15

that play by Shakespeare by a villain.

13:19

Doesn't mean a villain can't be right. One

13:23

of the few times that the villains are right is when

13:25

they disown lawyers. Let me go

13:27

back to this, Craig. Because we're

13:29

in D.C. I guess that story is very personal. Because

13:33

you're in D.C., you have an increased risk

13:36

of heat waves, flooding, and dangerously strong

13:38

winds. The paradox of that is, so

13:40

when you're walking down K Street, where

13:42

all the lobbyists are, you're going down

13:44

Ambassador Rowell, or you're on Constitution or

13:47

Independence, and the wind blows. When

13:49

the iceberg melts, look out, honey.

13:52

Okay? Run to the mountains. How

13:54

does the iceberg know to go more after the gay

13:56

people than the straight people? So let me tell you

13:58

what the recommendations are. this is going

14:01

somewhere, right? To combat responders

14:05

quote be inclusive

14:07

when to

14:10

quote address the specific needs and

15:10

experts now and again I fail

15:12

to see the contingency, the connection

15:14

between UCLA School of Law and

15:16

homosexuals and climate change. You know,

15:19

read Blackstone's law, see if you can really

15:21

understand the Constitution and apply it appropriately. What

15:24

that has to do with the climate and

15:26

homosexuals I don't know but this is

15:28

a laughable report to say that

15:30

somehow winds and heat and floods

15:34

are more impactful for people because

15:36

they're homosexual than they're people

15:38

who are heterosexual. I think the idea behind

15:41

some of this if not a

15:43

lot of it is the fact

15:45

that certain groups or political movements

15:47

or social movements

15:51

have they've

15:53

increased to the point where they have a

15:55

certain amount of media bulletproof

15:57

protection that if

16:00

you say, well, wait a minute,

16:02

are you against protecting gays in

16:04

the event that New York City

16:06

gets submerged by the icebergs that

16:08

have melted? And you say, well, wait

16:10

a minute, no, I want all humans

16:12

to be protected. But that

16:15

you're assuming that the flood's going to

16:17

happen, let's, number one, but even hypothetical.

16:20

Hypothetical, let's say it happens. All humans

16:22

should be protected. Let me take their

16:24

argument and turn it right back on again.

16:26

And it's sexist to say that a certain

16:28

group of people predicated on their sexual activities

16:30

should have better protection than peoples who engage

16:32

in a different kind of sexual activity.

16:35

Well, look, here it goes back

16:37

to an argument that the Supreme

16:39

Court dealt with when Colorado said

16:41

the state of Colorado passed a

16:43

referendum and they said the majority

16:45

of citizens at that time, we

16:48

don't believe that special protections in

16:50

terms of non-discrimination protections should be

16:52

given to a group based on

16:54

their sexual preference. So

16:58

we believe in maintaining the

17:00

historic protections in civil rights

17:02

groups for things like sex,

17:04

meaning man or woman, race,

17:07

national origin, religion. But

17:10

those are the fundamental and

17:12

foundational categories of protection in

17:15

civil rights history. But

17:17

when they did, they said we don't think

17:19

special protection should be afforded in non-discrimination

17:22

laws to people based on

17:25

their sexual preferences. The

17:27

Supreme Court in a

17:29

divided court decided that was

17:31

unconstitutional. You were targeting that

17:34

particular group for mistreatment. Well, now we

17:36

can, now you and I have seen

17:38

targeting on this show, we've just talked

17:40

about people being targeted

17:42

for their beliefs. People,

17:45

Jews being targeted because they're Jews.

17:48

So this is the great time of targeting,

17:50

apparently. And if you're

17:52

viewed as someone who's targeting the wrong group,

17:55

then you're verboten. seeing

18:00

the pimp of reason and common sense back

18:02

after this. This

18:09

is in the market with Janet Parshall. Craig Parshall is

18:12

with me. Again, this really follows on the

18:14

heels of the conversation we had yesterday. The

18:16

doctors, Cal Beisner and Dr. David

18:19

LeGates. They've written

18:21

a brand new book about the environment. And

18:23

they really talk about looking at climate and

18:25

energy with a realistic approach that doesn't put

18:28

a terrible burden on the

18:30

least among us. It's a very important book

18:32

to read. But now this ridiculous report coming

18:34

out of UCLA Law School. To this moment,

18:36

I still don't understand what they have to

18:38

do with either sexual proclivities or the climate.

18:41

Either way, they've got this report that says,

18:43

because homosexuals have a propensity to

18:45

live in coastal cities, which tend to

18:48

be, by the way, very expensive

18:50

cities, that somehow they're disproportionately at risk

18:52

from climate change, which is ludicrous,

18:54

because they use Washington DC, our town,

18:56

as an example, saying, because there

18:58

are dangerously strong winds, waves,

19:01

and flooding, winds

19:03

and floods and rain,

19:05

don't stop and ask what your sexual

19:07

productivity is before it hits. So this is

19:09

an argument that falls flat under its own

19:11

weight. Just to put a capstone on this,

19:14

the issue is one, apparently, according to the

19:16

researchers, that NASA is

19:18

concerned about. Because the recommendation is

19:20

being made that the space agency

19:23

include homosexuals in its climate risk

19:25

assessment and assign them

19:27

higher social vulnerability

19:29

scores. That's prejudicial, Counselor.

19:32

Would you like to address that? All right.

19:34

Now, if I were arguing their case, I

19:37

would say, oh, no, no, no, no. And

19:39

by the way, I'm not sure what I'm about to

19:41

say is true. That would be a shock for a

19:44

trial lawyer. But let's fantasize. And I'm

19:46

going to make an argument to the jury. I'm

19:48

going to say, ladies and gentlemen of the jury,

19:50

really what the study is saying is that

19:53

let's not discriminate against gay

19:56

people in these areas

19:58

that may be facing. climate

20:01

catastrophe. Make sure

20:03

that we provide comfort,

20:05

acceptance, and the same level

20:08

of protection for them as heterosexuals.

20:13

That's what we're saying. Now my

20:16

argument falls flat because that's not what

20:18

the study says. The headline

20:21

was designed I think to

20:24

again remind our culture

20:27

that there are certain categories

20:31

that are untouchable, certain issues

20:33

that can't be debated, certain

20:35

unreasonable illogical premises that should

20:37

not be challenged. Determined by

20:39

the liberal elites by the

20:42

way. Exactly. So the elite

20:44

ideas may not be touched.

20:46

It is the sacred cow among several and

20:48

there are a lot of them right now.

20:50

Not just dealing with sexual preference but all

20:53

kinds of sacred cows that

20:55

if you wade into a debate about

20:57

those issues, I think

21:00

back to the statement by Samuel Adams who

21:03

during the founding year in the Revolutionary War used

21:06

to say look I don't know any issue that

21:10

isn't worth a public fierce

21:12

debate between people who don't agree with each

21:14

other. Well those days are gone because

21:17

we are more and more now living

21:19

in a silenced culture

21:22

and society where certain things

21:24

can't be brought up for

21:27

fear that there's going to

21:29

be retribution, cancellation, retaliation, and

21:31

you know being penalized of

21:33

losing your job and so

21:35

forth. Exactly. So let's go from one

21:37

flawed report to another flawed report. First one

21:39

coming out of UCLA law. This one coming

21:42

out of the journal Science. Apparently

21:44

they did a study and they decided that

21:46

they would analyze the six most widely used

21:48

high school biology textbooks in the US and

21:51

what they found is that most

21:53

of them conflate sex and gender.

21:55

How dare they? They

21:57

believe those are two separate concepts. according

22:00

to scientists. Instead, these

22:02

textbooks focus on more essentialist

22:05

view of sex and gender, the idea that

22:08

sex and gender are interchangeable and

22:10

men and women are fundamentally different,

22:12

which the researchers note may lead

22:14

to discrimination toward women and gender,

22:16

non-conforming people. The whole world is

22:18

bowing at the altar of transgenderism

22:20

now, by the way, making up

22:22

less than 2% of the population.

22:25

But now what they're saying is you can't say

22:27

that sex is deterred. These are scientists. This

22:29

should scare you. This is your

22:32

tax dollars at work buying these textbooks, or

22:34

at least the ones that the science journal wants

22:36

you to buy. They're saying now

22:38

that sex and gender need to have

22:41

greater interplay. We're saying there are two

22:43

separate and distinct things. Gender is a made up

22:45

idea. Your gender could be

22:47

a two-spirit furry,

22:49

if you wanted to, based on the 96

22:51

and counting opportunities to

22:54

define your gender. Sex, sorry, God's

22:56

in charge. You come into the

22:58

world with a certain number of

23:01

chromosomes. It's non-negotiable, non-debatable. Now,

23:03

I read this article, same one that you're talking

23:05

about that you read. And

23:07

something jumped out at me, though. They

23:11

made the statement, this study, that

23:13

according to the consensus

23:16

of science, they use that word consensus. There's

23:18

a consensus of science. Sure. There was a

23:20

consensus at one point that there were no

23:22

such things as germs, too. But

23:25

again, this is the scientific elite. They

23:28

are bulletproof. The cult of the expert. Yes, got it.

23:31

So the

23:33

consensus they said in this report is that

23:35

the word sex means the

23:37

biological makeup of male or female.

23:40

Gender, and I'm quoting from them,

23:42

is the social and cultural construct.

23:45

And you should be free to pick

23:47

a gender that's different from your sex.

23:50

But what's interesting is science

23:52

according to them. According

23:55

to them, the word science

23:57

means biology of maleness or

23:59

femaleness. Now if you follow

24:01

that logic, that that's what

24:03

sex means, then what was

24:05

the majority of the court doing in the

24:07

Bostock case when they took

24:09

Title VII, which used the word sex,

24:12

and they said we're going to give it the

24:14

common understanding. It means gender

24:16

as well. But don't you know,

24:18

Counselor, that's the quote essentialist view.

24:20

We need to move beyond the

24:22

essentialist view to a more fluid understanding.

24:24

And gender is bulletproof,

24:26

you can't touch that. That's

24:30

a little scary. So again, what's happening is

24:32

you've got to propagandize the kids. So if

24:34

you change the textbooks, you've got enough teachers

24:36

out there that are being advocates for this

24:39

craziness. Now we're going to change the textbooks.

24:41

And we're going to lie to kids about

24:43

scientific... Remember, science... This is biology

24:45

by the way. These are biology textbooks. That's exactly right.

24:47

So why are you worried about cultural norms in a

24:49

biology textbook? Right. Shouldn't it just be this is the

24:51

way a cell works, this is what a gene is,

24:54

this is the DNA helix. Almost here's a bigger agenda

24:56

at play. That wouldn't be happening, would it? No.

25:00

How could that be? Take a break. Be

25:02

right back after this. If

25:11

what you hear on In the Market with Janet

25:13

Partial encourages you, enlightens you, engages you, and equips

25:15

you, I want to ask you to become a

25:17

partial partner today. This program depends

25:19

on the faithful and ongoing supportive listeners just

25:21

like you. Supporting this program

25:23

on a regular ongoing monthly basis, you'll

25:26

receive several benefits that only my

25:28

partners receive. So please

25:30

call today, 877-JANIC58 or go

25:32

online to In the Market

25:34

with janetpartial.org. So

25:39

we were just talking about the S.R.I.D.I.E.S

25:41

that are out there. So I'm going

25:43

to take you to Germany now because

25:46

Germany has passed something called the Gender

25:48

Self-Identification Law. And

25:50

it allows infants

25:52

to transition. The

25:54

new law will enable parents to transition their

25:57

babies starting from the moment they're born. So

25:59

I guess... Craig, if you

26:01

don't want to kill the child in utero because

26:03

it's not the sex of the baby that you

26:05

wanted, you can have that baby regardless but then

26:07

just transition that baby the minute he or she

26:09

draws their first breath. And not only

26:12

that, they put a little fine attached to this, by the

26:14

way. There's

26:17

a 10,000-year-old that translates to about $10,800 fine

26:19

for exposing a transgender person's

26:23

biological sex or saying their

26:25

dead name. In other words,

26:27

the name they were given

26:29

by their parents. So it

26:32

establishes gender identity. And remember,

26:34

96 Plus last time

26:36

I looked, including literally, I'm not making

26:38

this up, two-spirit furries,

26:40

whatever that is. That's

26:42

why it's LGBTQ Plus because they keep adding

26:44

stuff all the time, which is why I'm

26:47

not buying it anymore. The Plus

26:49

is like pie. It's a number

26:51

with no ending. Exactly right.

26:53

It apparently establishes gender identity

26:55

as protected characteristic, allows parents

26:57

to change the sex marker,

26:59

those would be called chromosomes,

27:01

on their child's document from

27:03

birth. It's supported by

27:06

the leading party there. It

27:09

puts forth this penalty for revealing a

27:11

person's given name and birth sex without

27:14

that person's permission, arguably

27:16

the most troubling aspect of the law relates to

27:18

a portion of the bill which permits parents

27:20

to alter the recorded sex of children beginning

27:22

for a birth. You know

27:24

that your biological birth, your birth, remember assigned

27:27

at birth, these are the people going off

27:29

the cliff. Now we're going

27:31

to literally, forget what makes itself

27:33

self-evident the moment baby is born,

27:36

forget what the genetics coded by

27:38

God say, mom and dad shall

27:40

be like God's and they're going to say

27:42

abracadabra boom, that boy is now a baby

27:44

girl, congratulations. $10,800 for misgendering or dead

27:46

naming, Greg Ludacris. Now

27:52

here's the deal, it doesn't go into

27:55

effect until October. You

27:57

see I actually kind of wondered whether it was written

27:59

in a. October and at a part

28:01

of a lower fest they just too

28:03

much guzzling of the beer over there

28:05

when they wrote this thing But no

28:07

no it becomes in effect I'll tell

28:10

you that from a serious standpoint one

28:12

of the really really sin there's so many

28:14

flaws in this bizarre law But

28:17

one of the most troubling ones is the fact

28:19

that if you don't change the

28:23

the gender of this child from

28:25

zero to four and a half

28:28

but at five Yes, you want to change

28:30

it and also begin

28:32

a physical transformation Into

28:35

a boy from a girl a girl from boy You

28:38

need the quote mutual consent of

28:40

the five five-year-old now our rape

28:42

laws as an example our criminal

28:45

laws require the

28:48

ability of a person to give consent

28:51

and under Not just you

28:53

know hundreds of law of years of English

28:55

common law But also American common law that

28:57

was built on English common law The

29:00

idea is minors those under the age

29:02

of adulthood however you the planet, but

29:04

generally you know 18 to 21 Are

29:09

incapable they may think

29:11

they have the ability to intelligently

29:13

and maturely consent to something important

29:15

But they're deemed in Unable

29:19

to give consent to a number

29:21

of important decisions in life this now

29:23

says a five-year-old has ludicrous one of

29:25

the most important things you can do

29:28

to it to to against a

29:30

child is to Really

29:32

damage their ability to identify who they

29:34

are at the age five, but now

29:36

we're gonna say well Do you consent

29:38

to this little Johnny Craig and

29:40

the country right when they get through playing with

29:42

their play-doh? Then you bring them over and ask him for

29:44

it said we're not doing this anymore. We now

29:46

know there's mental illness We need to be taking

29:48

care of a child a puberty blocker. They're called

29:51

irreparable Exactly their practice so

29:53

another part about this is that apparently

29:55

the child like you said Has

29:58

to give consent the

30:00

age of five, at the age of

30:02

14, minors can do it all by

30:04

themselves. But they would require the consent

30:07

of their guardians. This is where it

30:09

also gets pernicious. Parents who don't want to go

30:11

along with this crazy game, they

30:13

say through the law that a family

30:15

court would decide the best interests of

30:18

the child and therefore overrule the wishes

30:20

of the parents. This is draconian.

30:22

This is one of the worst. I thought

30:24

Scotland was bad. I think Germany now has

30:26

just bumped up to first place. But let

30:29

me contextualize it again in the European continent.

30:31

Finland, Sweden, the UK, France, all

30:33

of these, the CAS report that just came out,

30:35

388 pages longitudinal study, 2400

30:38

patients. Now they're talking definitively

30:40

about there's mental illness. Yeah, you think

30:43

the DSM to this day still calls gender

30:45

dysphoria a mental illness? Although they'll be assaulted

30:47

and attacked like the APA was in 72

30:49

of the gay issue. But

30:51

for the time being, it's still categorized

30:53

as a mental illness. And this is

30:55

just an outward manifestation of the inward

30:58

confusion of mental illness. And so the

31:00

compassionate approach is to deal with the

31:02

child's mental illness issues. And by the

31:04

way, the longitudinal studies show that the

31:06

adolescents outgrow this, the majority, less than

31:09

2% still struggle with

31:11

the idea that they're in the wrong body. So

31:14

you know, it's amazing. I don't see laws

31:16

in Germany, by the way, that says when

31:18

your baby is born, just follow through the

31:20

logic. It sounds crazy, but the same logic

31:22

would have to apply. And if it applies

31:24

here, it would apply there. So mom and

31:26

dad can say we have determined that we

31:29

are going to decide what the sex of

31:31

our child is, not biology, not God, far

31:33

more importantly, but we let's decide that your

31:35

proclivity as a parent is you're into body

31:37

mutilate mutilation. And we know that body dysphoria

31:39

is another manifestation of gender dysphoria. Only this

31:41

time you believe that you're supposed to be in

31:44

a wheelchair or you're supposed to be blind.

31:46

I remember Dr. Phil

31:48

interviewing somebody who blinded herself because she felt

31:50

that she should be blind. What if the

31:52

parents at the time of birth decided that

31:54

they want their child not to be sighted,

31:56

but to be blind and they have the

31:58

right to be blind. right to say I

32:01

want that child blinded. Or at the age

32:03

of five, taking the same guidelines from the

32:05

new law, Germany says that the five-year-old, with

32:07

the consent of the parents, says I want

32:09

to be blind. Or the 14-year-old says I

32:11

want to be blind and has to be,

32:14

the guardians have to be told. And if

32:16

the guardians won't go along with the blinding

32:19

of the child, then the court

32:21

will step in and make the best interest

32:23

of the child. We don't do this with

32:25

any other part of the human body or

32:28

any other form of this mental illness. Why

32:30

are we doing this? Again, I hate to sound

32:32

redundant, but if you walk through life with the

32:34

Bible in one hand and the newspaper in the

32:36

other at its core, this is

32:38

a spiritual issue. It is about your

32:40

identity. And all of the mutilation on

32:43

the outside and the pills you swallow

32:45

on the inside cannot fill the hole

32:47

in the human heart. It

32:49

was never designed to be filled with those things.

32:51

Blaise Pascal, 17th century

32:53

French mathematician, God-shaped void designed

32:56

to be filled by a relationship with

32:58

God. Well, and opposite to that, which

33:00

I believe to be the truth, is

33:02

the delusion of

33:04

self-determination. That if

33:07

I wanted society,

33:09

law, government, or

33:12

logic, and appropriate

33:14

reasoning should not come

33:17

into play to stop me from self-determining

33:19

what I want to do

33:21

with my body, my face. A newborn doesn't

33:23

have any self-determination. Well, let's put it this

33:25

way. The self-determination that

33:27

I remember among

33:30

our children until they

33:32

became adult, even after that, you're

33:35

born. And basically, you have to

33:37

be taught manners. You have to be taught not to

33:39

be selfish. You have to be taught

33:41

to be obedient. You have to be

33:44

taught to do the tough things in

33:46

life that are necessary

33:48

to be a member of a productive

33:50

society and show respect for others. Those

33:52

are things that need to be taught.

33:55

They don't come full-born into those kinds

33:57

of values. They need to be shared.

34:00

be taught, which is why the

34:02

Hippocratic Oath supposedly used to apply

34:04

to doctors, first do no harm.

34:07

Apparently that has been, they've retreated from that

34:09

in a number of different areas. But

34:12

there's a kind of Hippocratic Oath there should

34:14

be for parents as well. First

34:17

don't harm. And as

34:19

a matter of fact, the common law

34:21

for centuries said unless the parent has

34:25

committed harm or risk of harm

34:27

to the child in

34:29

terms of neglect or abuse, the

34:31

government should not interfere with the

34:34

parent's determination of best interest. The

34:36

problem is we have social movements, we

34:39

have entertainment world, we have

34:42

music artists and celebrities and internet

34:44

influencers who have created the delusion

34:47

that self-determination should mean you can

34:49

change your sex if you want

34:51

to. If you feel uncomfortable as

34:54

a 10-year-old in your body as

34:56

a boy, then you want to

34:59

join the gang that's saying it's

35:01

great to turn into a girl.

35:04

That's the kind of self-determination argument that they're

35:06

making. And unfortunately, those that push

35:08

back and say, no wait a minute,

35:11

if you look at the medical science

35:13

in this, in the biology, the studies

35:15

have shown that hasty decisions

35:17

or pressure on the part of

35:19

parents or children to undergo

35:22

these kind of mutilations in terms

35:24

of surgical changes are met with

35:27

huge regret in later

35:29

years, high percentages. So

35:32

all the science seems to be against it,

35:35

but all the politics and the social

35:37

pressure seems to be for this very

35:39

bizarre movement. And don't forget the money.

35:41

This is a very profitable business right

35:43

now. You've got doctors and hospitals

35:45

and clinics that are handing these things out like

35:47

M&Ms and it's profitable

35:49

and money doesn't talk. It shouts under these

35:51

circumstances, it is requiring us to give more

35:53

and more scrutiny. By the way, the new

35:56

report out of Finland, and I've cited this

35:58

report on several times, I do believe that. there's

36:00

a pushback and I praise God for this.

36:02

That pendulum seems to be sweeping the other

36:04

way now and now we've got the transitioners

36:06

who are speaking out and clearly. I

36:09

think Kira Bell in the UK

36:11

who sued the UK health

36:13

system there and as a result I think brought

36:16

about this pause because of the damage that she

36:18

went under. Irreversible damage by the way that she

36:20

will suffer the rest of her life. So

36:23

when you start seeing what happened in

36:25

Finland that lie that is perpetuated to

36:27

parents all the time you better transition

36:29

this child. What would you rather have

36:31

a dead son or a live daughter?

36:33

The Finland study said exactly the opposite

36:35

that in fact very often jumping into

36:37

these mutilations the surgery these

36:39

pharmaceuticals that radically change the

36:41

body and its natural function

36:44

actually causes an uptick in suicidal ideation.

36:46

Doesn't mitigate actually becomes causal. That's something

36:48

worth considering. When we come back what

36:50

about those new title 9 rules and

36:52

what some states are saying now that

36:54

the administration has rewritten the rules again

36:56

around this issue that Africa dab a

36:58

boom boys or girls girls or boys

37:00

and they can play in each other's

37:02

team back after this. So

37:08

we talked to Sarah not too long ago about

37:10

the rewrite of title 9 and

37:12

it went exactly as we thought it would go

37:15

which is basically adulterating the definition of

37:17

the word sex leaving wide open the

37:19

idea now that boys can use a

37:21

girls locker room and that boys

37:23

can cheat and they can compete against

37:25

girls and it's interesting because

37:27

it's going to be challenged legally sooner or

37:30

later because there are all kinds of constitutional

37:32

flaws Sarah and other legal minds have pointed

37:34

out that this is just saturated with legal

37:36

landmines and so they're going to be taking

37:38

it to court soon. Well I want to

37:40

tell you how one state in fact there's several states that are

37:42

reacting and I'm going to give you a short list

37:44

in a minute but Oklahoma in particular their superintendent of

37:47

public instruction is directing all the

37:49

local school districts in that state not

37:51

to comply with the administration's rewrite of

37:53

title 9 because in his perspective and

37:55

he's spot-on it puts women in danger

37:57

in a letter just this week to all the

38:00

local superintendents in the state, apparently

38:02

this superintendent of public instruction

38:05

called on districts not to

38:07

make policy changes based on

38:09

the controversial timeline overhaul which

38:11

redefines sex to include claimed

38:13

gender identities. In other words, this

38:15

is self-defined, not scientifically substantiated,

38:18

not objective truth, self-identified,

38:22

calling the rewrite illegal and outside

38:24

compliance with Oklahoma law. This

38:26

is what I mean when I said it's rife with legal challenges. In

38:28

fact, here's what he said. He said, in Oklahoma,

38:31

we don't bend to the senseless will of Biden

38:33

and his posse eradicating women's rights and putting women

38:35

in danger. That's why I've

38:37

instructed every superintendent in my state

38:39

to completely ignore Biden's new Title

38:41

IX changes that allows males to

38:43

roam in female locker rooms, dorms,

38:46

and bathrooms, places where women should

38:48

feel safe. He

38:50

is urging other states to follow in

38:52

fighting the changes and it's

38:54

interesting because, again, this new finalization

38:57

is out there but this is

38:59

not the only state that's responding.

39:01

Louisiana has now penned a letter

39:03

to the state boards saying

39:06

that the changes are, quote, recklessly

39:09

endangering students and seeks to dismantle

39:11

opportunities for females. I've

39:14

already told you about Oklahoma and

39:16

then it is not the only state. South

39:19

Carolina is weighing in as well. Another

39:22

state superintendent is concerned

39:24

about women's rights, sent

39:26

out a letter to the district. She asserted

39:28

the regulations are contrary to the,

39:30

quote, undisputed original understanding of the

39:32

law. In fact, went on

39:35

to say, Worshader turns the statute on his head

39:37

and would rescind 50 years of

39:39

progress and equality of opportunity by

39:41

putting girls and women at a

39:43

disadvantage in the educational arena. Florida,

39:46

first governor to sign against this, Ron

39:48

DeSantis, announced that his state is not

39:50

going to comply with the Title IX

39:53

regulations and said we are

39:55

not going to let Joe Biden try to inject men

39:57

into women's activities. We're not going to let Joe

39:59

Biden undermine the rights of parents. Now I

40:01

do believe of

40:34

a child at Watertown Middle School said

40:37

that students now fear for their lives

40:39

wearing each day that they will be

40:41

going home in a body bag. Worse

40:44

still, school officials have silenced criticism of

40:46

the trans student, a seventh-grader. Parents say

40:48

they can't talk about school safety without

40:50

being accused of being transphobic. So

40:53

apparently this kid has a 40-plus

40:55

person hit list who has faced

40:58

minimal consequences and then favored at every

41:00

turn obviously has a lot

41:02

of anger, doesn't know what they will do, said

41:04

one parent. I saw the testimony of a young

41:07

girl whose name was on that list. She warned

41:09

a teacher. The teacher said, I'm paraphrasing

41:11

what she said in her very powerful

41:13

video, she said the teacher

41:15

told don't worry about it it's all been taken

41:18

care of. The next thing you know she was

41:20

being battered and bloodied. Even though she told a

41:22

teacher I'm afraid for my safety, the teacher basically

41:24

said go away kid you bother me. Not a

41:27

problem, not a problem whatsoever. So they know the

41:29

hit list is out there. They know students have

41:31

been hurt and the school won't do anything. Students

41:33

on the hit list have prepared to fight for

41:35

their lives according to the parents. They know that

41:38

the school is not protecting them. Craig your

41:40

thoughts on this. Yeah you know

41:42

when you target people generally

41:44

speaking and I just had

41:48

recently researched this for a

41:50

legal case. I

41:52

went through the number of Supreme Court cases

41:55

where the court denounced rightfully so

41:58

as a violation of the First Amendment. whenever

42:00

government targets anybody

42:04

based on their fundamental rights. So

42:07

if you write a free speech as an

42:09

example and you say, well, I don't agree

42:11

with this or I believe in that, and

42:14

then the government targets you, that's

42:16

a very egregious violation of the

42:18

First Amendment targeting by government because

42:21

government has more power than the

42:23

individuals do. I can tell

42:25

you right now that school districts have massive

42:27

budgets. They have a large

42:29

number of faculty, they have a board

42:31

behind them, and they have the federal

42:34

government behind them because federal dollars find

42:36

their way into public education. And

42:38

then you have these parents of 45

42:40

students or 40 students, whatever the number is,

42:43

facing that onslaught of

42:46

targeting. So what's

42:48

really disheartening is the response of the

42:50

school was to take the list from

42:53

this, apparently the student

42:55

who said he was or she was a

42:57

trans and said, these are my

42:59

enemies. And then they

43:01

said, okay, what are we going to do about this? Well

43:04

we're going to, I know we'll build what

43:06

they called an affinity group to

43:09

confirm and support that

43:12

trans's report that these

43:14

40 to 45 students should be targeted

43:16

because they're the enemy. They're the enemy

43:18

of the state, they're the enemy of

43:20

the school district, they're the enemy of

43:23

good order and peace in

43:25

the community. Now that is

43:27

nasty stuff, that's troublesome stuff. I

43:29

think it's unconstitutional if there were

43:31

a lawsuit brought. I think they

43:33

might have a grievance

43:37

to bring to a court's attention, not sure how it

43:39

would play out because we don't know all the facts,

43:41

but I do know this. These

43:43

students were targeted for their

43:45

disagreement with the idea of

43:48

a person transitioning in terms

43:51

of their gender. Once again,

43:53

gender becomes the special, protected,

43:56

we can't discuss or debate or

43:58

disagree with category. and that's

44:00

dangerous in a constitutional republic, I

44:02

think. Well, that's my point. I think what

44:04

happens to the child that's not trans, what if the

44:07

child says, I'm not gonna use that pronoun because

44:09

you're not, you're a boy, you're not a girl,

44:11

and that's enough to get on this trans hit list. I'll tell you

44:13

the other thing that hits me, and I live

44:16

in a world of pragmatics. Again, I argue

44:18

there is mental illness in this

44:20

issue. So if this

44:22

person creates a hit list, if this person is

44:24

physically acting out and they are, all

44:27

of a sudden the issue of

44:29

that person self-identified gender, all very

44:31

fluid and wrong-headed terms, apparently

44:34

has a transcendence that's sucking another fuse

44:36

in the head that doesn't

44:38

carry. So in other words, forget the

44:40

basic deportment and assault and battery. Your

44:42

pronouns are far more important. In other

44:44

words, as the heckler's veto, one

44:46

heckler can silence thousands of people if it's

44:48

the right heckler with the right worldview, or

44:50

the wrong one, I should say. And

44:53

it's a popular worldview. Now, wow, go through

44:55

the book, keep it in your heart,

44:57

keep it in your mind, use it as your guide as you

44:59

get out there in the marketplace, I'll meet you there. Have a

45:01

great weekend, friends.