Podchaser Logo
Home
64. Is Facebook Bad for Your Mental Health?

64. Is Facebook Bad for Your Mental Health?

Released Friday, 9th December 2022
Good episode? Give it some love!
64. Is Facebook Bad for Your Mental Health?

64. Is Facebook Bad for Your Mental Health?

64. Is Facebook Bad for Your Mental Health?

64. Is Facebook Bad for Your Mental Health?

Friday, 9th December 2022
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:00

Introducing

0:00

the first TV brand streaming

0:02

Xbox games, Samsung Neo QLED

0:04

and OLED with gaming hub. With Samsung

0:06

Neo QLED and OLED TV, you

0:08

can stream your favorite game straight to your TV.

0:10

No console required. All you need is compatible

0:13

controller and Internet. Play hundreds of games

0:15

from the biggest streaming services including NVIDIA,

0:17

GeForce NOW, Luna, Nutomix, and Xbox

0:19

app. There's always something to play in something

0:21

fresh to discover with thousands of new and classic

0:23

game titles. Gain access to games in seconds

0:26

without worrying about purchasing new hardware, downloads,

0:28

storage limits, all you need is an Internet connection

0:30

and a compatible controller. There is a special promotion

0:33

going through the end of the year. Purchase a twenty twenty

0:35

two Samsung Neo QLED or OLED,

0:37

and you get your first months of Xbox Game

0:39

Pass Ultimate and an Xbox controller on

0:41

Samsung. Disclosure through twelve thirty one

0:43

while supplies last purchased a twenty twenty two new QLEDQNE5B

0:47

or above. OLED S95 via participating retailers.

0:49

For terms and conditions, including redemption instructions,

0:51

see controller redemption dot com or see retailer. Control

0:53

color may vary. After the game pass trial, you will automatically

0:55

be charged unless limit one. Terms, xbox

0:58

dot com slash description terms.

1:04

Mark Zuckerberg was my college classmate, And

1:07

so I think I'm the one thousand one

1:09

hundredth person on Facebook. That's

1:11

doctor Nina Vassen.

1:12

So I've been on since two thousand and four and

1:15

looking at this research Actually, I'm realizing that

1:17

my classmates and I were in that user group.

1:19

Nina is now a psychiatrist and professor

1:22

at Stanford. Long ago though,

1:24

she was a very early Facebook user,

1:26

which made her an inadvertent participant

1:29

in a recent study published by my

1:31

other guest today. My name

1:32

is Alexey McCarran. I'm an assistant professor

1:35

in Applied Economics at MIT Sloan

1:37

School of Management. Some

1:38

of Alexey's research focused is

1:40

on the economics of media, specifically

1:43

social media. In twenty twenty,

1:46

he published study that looked at whether

1:48

the Russian social media platform, VK,

1:51

fomented anti government protests

1:54

around the country in twenty eleven.

1:57

Participation

1:57

in persons was associated strongly

1:59

with your

1:59

social media use, but the cause of impact

2:02

was unclear, and that's where we

2:04

came in. In that, study, Alexey

2:06

and his coauthors, relied on the

2:08

introduction of VK at its

2:10

founders university as a randomizing

2:13

device. What we noticed

2:15

is that VK was created in two thousand

2:18

six by a student of

2:20

Saint Petersburg State University, and

2:22

the first users of VK War,

2:24

students of that university at that particular time.

2:27

Saint Petersburg State University attracts

2:29

students from all over Russia. more

2:31

from some cities than others. And

2:34

that suggested a natural experiment to

2:36

Alexei and his colleagues. So

2:39

I'm from a very small town in Russia. If

2:41

I go from that particular hometown

2:44

to study at that particular university in my hometown,

2:46

the penetration that social media platform is gonna

2:48

be higher. Why? potentially, I

2:51

can send the link to my friends

2:53

and family who remained in

2:55

my hometown and they will be the second

2:57

layer of adoption across Russia.

3:03

If

3:03

you want figure out the impact that social

3:05

media has on political activity, you

3:08

can't just compare protest rates

3:10

in areas with high versus low

3:12

social media because that

3:14

isn't random. But

3:16

you could compare protests, rates, and

3:18

cities that just happened to

3:20

be exposed to more social media

3:23

by chance. Because people

3:25

there were connected to students who

3:27

knew the founder of VK. In

3:30

that case, uptake could

3:32

actually be random. Alexey

3:34

and his colleagues were right. The

3:36

more people in a given city used

3:38

VK, the more likely it

3:40

was there would be protests in the city,

3:43

and the larger those protests

3:45

were. Social media

3:47

was fueling political behavior.

3:50

That study got alexey thinking. else

3:53

could social media change human

3:55

behavior.

3:58

From

3:58

the Freakonomics Radio Network,

3:59

this is FreakonomicsMD. I'm

4:02

Bob Bujena. Today on the show,

4:05

since its inception, people

4:07

have speculated that social media

4:09

could have psychological effects

4:11

on its users. But

4:13

does it cause mental health problems?

4:15

Immediately after Facebook comes

4:18

to a particular college, a terrific

4:20

bump, in the medical health problems

4:22

among students at that college. And

4:24

if Facebook and other social media

4:26

platforms are causing mental health

4:28

problems, Can we do anything

4:30

about it? In medicine, we take

4:32

this oath to do no harm, and that

4:34

was really the idea that we had around

4:36

how do we change the user experience?

4:56

When

4:56

I was in medical school, I myself experienced

4:58

depression and I think that that

5:01

personal experience is the very

5:03

first thing that drew me to mental health.

5:05

That's the psychiatrist doctor Nina

5:07

Dawson again from Stanford. She

5:09

runs the brainstorm lab for mental

5:12

health innovation, and she's also

5:14

chief medical officer of a mental

5:16

health startup called Real.

5:18

She says the COVID nineteen pandemic

5:21

has been a challenge, but

5:23

has also made people pay more

5:25

attention to mental health.

5:27

Where mental health is today is

5:29

actually what I thought it would look like maybe

5:31

a decade from now. A lot of my

5:33

colleagues in the field talk about this silver

5:35

lining that we've experienced because

5:37

of how so many people

5:40

struggled with their mental health during the pandemic,

5:42

people who never had before. it really

5:44

brought to the forefront the importance of

5:47

addressing mental health as a society.

5:49

During the first year of the pandemic, Rates

5:51

of anxiety and depression around the

5:53

world grew by twenty

5:55

five percent according to the World

5:57

Health Organization. One

5:59

major reason for this massive increase

6:01

was stress from social isolation. The

6:05

pandemic shown a spotlight on

6:07

mental health, but it also

6:09

made it harder for people to get

6:11

help. Data from the centers for

6:13

Medicare and Medicaid services indicated

6:15

that on average, Adults and

6:17

children with public insurance experienced

6:20

around a twenty five percent decline

6:22

in mental health care utilization

6:25

between March and October of

6:27

twenty twenty compared to that

6:29

same period in twenty nineteen. And

6:32

even as medical care normalized during

6:34

the pandemic, use of mental

6:36

health services rebounded more

6:39

slowly than other specialties.

6:45

When

6:45

people first start experiencing the symptoms of

6:47

mental illness to when they actually

6:50

start officially seeking help

6:52

within that healthcare system, that

6:54

amount of time is

6:56

eleven years. That's

6:58

a huge delay. And what it shows is that

7:00

people are really only seeking help when they're in

7:02

crisis. Nina

7:03

has thought a lot about how to intervene

7:06

long before someone is

7:08

in crisis. Telehealth services

7:10

are part of the answer, but

7:13

it's also about meeting people

7:15

where they are. which

7:17

these days tends to be on

7:19

social media. We

7:20

have this idealistic sense of like the

7:22

old school doctor who would go knocking on

7:24

doors with their bag and treating people

7:26

in the community, and then we think where are

7:28

people living their lives? Literally

7:31

billions of people are living their

7:33

lives online. Right now,

7:35

worldwide, the average

7:37

number of hours that we are spending

7:40

on social media is

7:42

two point five hours a day.

7:44

What do

7:45

we know about how these platforms can

7:47

affect psychological health?

7:50

time

7:50

spent on social media has

7:52

been shown to really have, I would

7:54

say, dire impact on mental

7:56

health correlations to

7:58

increases in depression, anxiety,

8:02

substance use, suicidal

8:04

thoughts, self harm thoughts,

8:07

and even body image issues and

8:09

body image pathology. What we're

8:11

also seeing is that the

8:13

more time people spend on social

8:15

media the more likely these different

8:17

things are to increase. We don't yet have

8:19

the exact relationship.

8:23

I started my economics

8:25

journey back in the day when I was in

8:27

Russia. I started working on this

8:29

project on the impact of social media on

8:31

anti authority in projects. So

8:34

ever since I started working on, that

8:36

project I was very curious about

8:38

social media, how can

8:40

we study the cause of impact of social media

8:42

and various aspects of our lives? And

8:45

it's very difficult and that's why only

8:47

wrote two papers and not more. That,

8:51

again, is the economist Alexei

8:53

Materin. from MIT. We

8:55

already

8:55

talked about his first paper on social

8:58

media and protests in Russia in

9:00

twenty eleven. It was

9:02

a fascinating study with a clever

9:04

design and a clear

9:06

predecessor to his second bit of work.

9:09

Facebook or the Facebook as it was

9:11

initially called was launched

9:12

in two thousand four for Harvard

9:15

students, by Harvard students. Among

9:17

them, Mark Zuckerberg. About

9:19

a month later, they opened the

9:22

platform up to students at Gail,

9:24

Columbia, and Stanford. As

9:26

we all know, it didn't stop

9:28

there. Now nearly two decades

9:30

later, Facebook has around

9:32

three billion active monthly

9:34

users.

9:36

There are

9:39

other platforms of course, but

9:41

Facebook changed the game.

9:43

Some of its effects have been very

9:45

visible. Facebook is

9:47

widely credited as being one force

9:49

behind the Arab spring uprisings

9:51

Indonesia and Egypt in twenty

9:54

eleven. A few years later in

9:56

twenty seventeen, around

9:58

seventy percent of people who attended the

9:59

women's march in Washington

10:02

DC told researchers

10:04

they heard about it on Facebook.

10:06

What it's

10:06

been doing to our health, however, has

10:09

been a little less clear.

10:10

There are a lot of papers

10:13

that document a significant

10:15

association between mental

10:17

health problems and social media

10:19

use. most of the results

10:21

show that people who use

10:23

Facebook a lot or other social media

10:25

platforms, they seem to be experienced

10:27

in worse mental health. But of course, we know

10:29

that this is correlation and there are some

10:31

issues with that. Maybe when I'm

10:33

depressed, I use social media

10:35

more, or it could be that, for

10:37

instance, if I break up with my

10:39

girlfriend, then maybe the next day I'm gonna be

10:41

depressed and at the same time I'm gonna have

10:43

more free time to use to spend on

10:45

social media

10:49

These

10:49

correlation issues make it hard

10:51

to prove that Facebook or any

10:53

social media platform is

10:55

causing poor mental health.

10:57

What we do know is that nearly

10:59

one in five adults in the

11:01

US and half of all adolescents

11:04

live with mental illness. These

11:07

conditions range in severity, but

11:09

most often include major

11:11

depressive episodes and anxiety

11:13

disorders. A lot of factors can

11:15

contribute to someone developing a

11:17

mental health problem, things like

11:19

family history, living with chronic

11:21

illness, or coping

11:23

with traumatic experience. Often,

11:26

it can be hard to prevent or

11:28

mitigate these conditions.

11:30

but But what

11:31

if for some people, it was as

11:33

simple as deactivating Facebook.

11:36

A few years ago, Some researchers at

11:38

Stanford and NYU conducted

11:41

an experiment where they paid a

11:43

group of people randomly to

11:45

do just that.

11:48

And what

11:51

they show is that if you pay

11:53

people to deactivate their Facebook accounts one

11:55

week or four weeks after those

11:58

people, they

11:59

report

11:59

that they feel better. about

12:02

themselves, their general will be in is

12:04

better so they report less

12:06

anxiety, they report less depression. Alexey

12:08

and his coauthors wanted to take

12:10

a different approach, but

12:12

they weren't sure how to tackle this

12:14

thorny question surrounding social

12:16

media and mental health.

12:18

They debated a few different strategies

12:21

until one of them suggested an

12:23

approach that was familiar to

12:25

Alexey. So

12:26

we followed a very similar logic

12:28

to the paper that I just described

12:30

before. We looked at the staggered

12:32

adoption of Facebook across college

12:34

campuses. from two thousand four

12:36

to two thousand six. So when

12:38

Facebook was just created, Facebook did not

12:40

immediately become available

12:42

to all students across

12:44

the US. they slowly

12:46

started being available at Harvard,

12:48

Stanford, and so forth, and then slowly

12:50

they became available to other colleges.

12:52

And that process took about one and a half

12:54

years, up to two years. So

12:57

we compare students at colleges

12:59

that just receive Facebook versus

13:01

students that were at

13:03

colleges at the same time, but

13:05

without Facebook. How

13:06

are you measuring mental health

13:08

in these universities?

13:10

We got access to this

13:12

survey, it's called the National College Health

13:14

Assessment, and it is one of

13:16

the most comprehensive surveys and

13:18

one US car issuance related to their

13:20

health and behavior, and they

13:22

have a lot of variables related to

13:24

mental health. You have questions

13:26

about depression. You have questions about the take up

13:28

of anti depression therapy. You have

13:30

questions about anxiety, you believe me,

13:32

eating disorders. That survey is collected

13:34

every semester across

13:36

many, many colleges. And moreover, it

13:38

exists from two thousand to two

13:40

thousand eight, so that allows us to

13:42

get a sense of student mental health

13:44

at different colleges before and after

13:47

Facebook was created. immediately

13:49

after Facebook comes to a

13:51

particular college, a geographic bump

13:53

in the medical health problems amongst

13:55

students at that college. So you look at

13:57

universities that have similar trends of

13:59

mental health issues

14:00

prior to the introduction of Facebook

14:02

and show that in those sets of

14:04

colleges in which Facebook is introduced.

14:07

There's an increase in mental health issues

14:09

compared to universities that looked very

14:11

similar before in

14:13

terms of mental health issues. they don't

14:15

experience that increase.

14:17

Yes,

14:17

we observed that after the

14:20

introduction of Facebook, the

14:22

student mental health ecorages with Facebook

14:24

persons relative to students

14:26

at colleges that did not get Facebook.

14:28

When you

14:29

say that mental health worsened

14:31

What specifically did you

14:33

see? The most

14:34

effective conditions are depression and

14:36

anxiety. Most students report that

14:38

they were depressed severely actually,

14:40

the question was stated the following way.

14:43

Have you felt so severely that this

14:45

was difficult for you to function? And how many

14:47

times you felt so in the past year?

14:49

that question, we observed the biggest

14:51

effects, but we also observed some other effects

14:53

for other conditions.

14:57

After the break, What

14:59

else was in the data? I

15:00

didn't actually realize how bad the

15:03

situation is in the United States in terms

15:05

of mental health. We'll also

15:07

look at how social media platforms

15:09

are trying not only to

15:11

mitigate harm, but to

15:13

actually improve users' mental

15:15

health. We created a whole platform

15:18

of little mini tools,

15:20

little activities that people can

15:22

do on the platform in

15:24

real time. I'm Bob Pujena, and this

15:26

is FreakonomicsMD.

15:40

EconomicsMD is

15:42

sponsored by JustWorks. If

15:44

you're a small business leader

15:46

looking for an easier way to onboard

15:48

and manage remote employees, then

15:51

you need to learn about just works.

15:54

Just works makes it easier for you

15:56

to start run and grow a

15:58

business. Let me tell you how.

15:59

Just Works gives you the peace of

16:02

mind and knowing that payroll will

16:04

run smoothly. Your team has

16:06

access to high quality benefits, and

16:08

your business is getting the support it

16:10

needs. Just works makes

16:12

it simple to hire and manage

16:15

remote employees across all

16:17

fifty states. Just works helps

16:19

you comply with state payroll tax

16:21

requirements, keep up with state

16:23

labor laws and access health

16:25

insurance plans in any

16:27

state. You have

16:27

access to a cloud based platform,

16:30

that enables managers and employees

16:32

alike to quickly and securely

16:35

access benefits, payroll, and

16:37

other HR functionality from

16:39

anywhere, anytime. Plus,

16:41

there are no hidden costs. Take

16:43

a look at just works transparent pricing

16:46

by visiting just works dot com

16:48

slash pricing. That's just

16:50

works dot com slash pricing

16:53

or details. Introducing

16:55

the first TV brand streaming

16:57

Xbox games, Samsung Neo QLED

16:59

and OLED with gaming hub. With

17:01

Samsung Neo QLED and OLED TV,

17:03

you can stream your favorite game straight to your

17:05

TV. No console required. All you need

17:07

is a compatible controller and Internet. Play hundreds

17:09

of games from the biggest streaming services including

17:12

NVIDIA, GeForce NOW, Luna,

17:14

Nutomix, and box app. There's always something

17:16

to play in something fresh to discover with

17:18

thousands of new and classic game titles. Gain

17:20

access to games in seconds without worrying about

17:22

purchasing new hardware, down loads or storage limits, all you

17:24

need is an Internet connection and a compatible

17:26

controller. There is a special promotion going

17:28

through the end of the year. Purchase a twenty twenty

17:30

two Samsung Neo QLED or

17:32

OLED you get your first three months of Xbox

17:34

Game Pass Ultimate and an Xbox controller

17:36

on Samsung. Disclosure through twelve thirty

17:38

one while supplies last purchase a twenty twenty two

17:40

new LED QNEB or above or OLED

17:42

S95B you participate in retailers. For terms

17:44

and conditions, including redemption instructions, see controller

17:47

redemption dot com or see retailer. Control color may

17:49

vary. After getting passed trial, you will automatically be

17:51

charged and let's cancel. The mid one terms, x box

17:53

dot com

17:53

slash the friction terms.

18:00

Alexey Macarin's new study is

18:03

called simply social media, and

18:05

mental health, and it was published

18:07

in November of this year in the

18:09

American Economic Review.

18:11

Before the break, he told us

18:12

that their findings suggest a

18:14

bump in mental health problems

18:16

among students at a college

18:18

after Facebook is introduced

18:21

there. What that bump translates

18:23

to is a worsening

18:23

of what Alexey and his coauthors

18:26

called their index of poor mental

18:28

health by about eight

18:30

percent. Facebook access also

18:32

led to a nine percent increase

18:34

in depression among students

18:36

on college campuses. and a twelve

18:39

percent increase in generalized

18:41

anxiety disorders. Alexey

18:43

says the mental health effect of using

18:46

Facebook is about one fifth the size

18:48

of how it feels when you lose

18:50

your job. So

18:52

how does this new work which

18:54

suggests Facebook causes mental

18:56

health problems compared

18:57

to prior work, which only showed an

18:59

association between the two. Is

19:01

actually strikingly similar?

19:03

Why

19:06

is it that

19:07

social media has

19:10

this causal effect on mental health

19:12

issues? What's the mechanism?

19:13

we believe that Facebook users

19:16

engage in unfavorable social comparisons, and

19:18

that's what's driving the negative impact of

19:20

Facebook and mental health. And the

19:22

fact that we started Facebook at

19:24

its inception, it automatically rules out

19:26

a lot of stories that you might have about,

19:28

for instance, the like button, the news feeds,

19:30

the political news on social media.

19:33

All of that is nonexistent. Right?

19:35

So the fact that we observed that

19:37

Facebook had a negative impact all the

19:39

way in two thousand four, two thousand five, two thousand

19:41

six that suggests that sudden

19:43

in the nature of social media

19:46

leads to worse mental health

19:48

outcomes. And in our case, we believe that

19:50

it's due to unfavorable social

19:52

comparison? I mean, that's an interesting point to me because

19:54

you're looking at a period when Facebook was

19:56

really in its early stages. So

19:58

some of the features

19:59

are different now. It was really all

20:02

about

20:02

peer networks and social

20:05

comparisons back then. If you find

20:07

that on average, there's an x percent increase in

20:09

mental health problems in a

20:11

university that adopted Facebook.

20:13

Do you then scale that up by the fact that it

20:15

could be only two percent of people?

20:17

that

20:17

use Facebook or

20:19

not. Because that would tell us something about what

20:21

is the effect of a single

20:23

individual using Facebook who otherwise

20:25

wouldn't have used it. Yeah. That's

20:26

a great question. We don't scale up. We

20:28

believe that actually the use of

20:31

Facebook and college campus at the time was

20:33

almost universal and the adoption was

20:35

very fast. the common estimate that we

20:37

found is that about eighty five

20:39

percent of college

20:41

students had a Facebook account and we're using

20:43

it on a database. Wow.

20:45

Okay. So it's quite high. When

20:47

you set out to do the study, were

20:49

you expecting to find

20:51

an

20:51

adverse impact of Facebook introduction

20:54

on mental health. So what definitely surprised

20:55

me is how clean in the end this natural

20:58

experiment was. I did not expect it to

21:00

be as clean. because

21:02

when you work with the substation of

21:04

status, it's not like you're operating in the

21:06

control environment. When I started writing

21:08

the background, Section four or

21:10

paper, I didn't actually realize how bad

21:12

the situation is in the United States in

21:14

terms of mental health trends among

21:16

the the pictures that

21:18

you see in the data are

21:20

stark. So for instance, the percentage

21:22

of individuals from eighteen to twenty

21:24

three for report of experience in

21:26

a major Depressive episode in the

21:28

past year increased by eighty three percent

21:30

so almost doubled between twenty

21:32

eighteen and the fact

21:34

that this trend is sort of

21:36

coinciding with the spread of social media

21:38

is really begging the question whether

21:40

social media is to blame. It strikes me that

21:42

what you're doing, it does fit

21:44

into a broader important economic

21:46

question. Is this societal question of

21:48

what is

21:48

it that drives people's happiness or

21:51

economics we talk about utility? in

21:53

very standard economic

21:55

models of utility. We

21:57

don't typically factor in the

22:00

idea that our well-being may be a

22:02

function of what we perceive

22:04

the well-being or accomplishments of

22:07

others to be. And there is economic

22:09

literature out there, which would suggest that

22:11

in some cases, our own utility

22:13

is lower when the utility of others

22:16

is higher. one of the things that's coming out of social comparison is

22:18

that you're comparing accomplishments

22:21

relative to that of what you observe from

22:23

your peers. And

22:25

if you benchmark yourself in

22:27

that way, it's maybe not a surprise that

22:29

something like Facebook could actually lead

22:32

to declines in well-being. But what's even

22:34

more striking is that we're talking about

22:37

a situation where these individuals might actually

22:39

experience a clinical manifestation that

22:41

we call depression. So that's much more severe just

22:43

saying, okay, I'm unhappy because

22:45

Alex say just, you know, put on Twitter

22:47

that he published a paper in the American economic

22:50

review. one of the ways in which we

22:52

document that indeed

22:53

social comparison seems to be a channel

22:55

is that after the introduction of Facebook,

22:58

students suddenly believe

23:00

that the other students consume

23:02

much more alcohol than they did before.

23:04

But the actual usage of alcohol did

23:06

not increase at all. So students have

23:08

some needed there about how to

23:11

interpret the Facebook posts of

23:13

others, and they believe that everybody is having a

23:15

fantastic time, while in fact,

23:17

nothing changed. the sphere of these

23:19

alternatives to be a big component.

23:21

We also find that in the short to medium

23:23

run, the negative effects of Facebook

23:25

on mental health increase with the length

23:27

of exposure to the platform. And

23:30

actually, students reported

23:32

that their academic performance worsened

23:34

as a result of their mental health

23:36

issues. So

23:36

it's not just a time allocation issue. It's

23:38

that the time you spend on Facebook means

23:40

you're not spending a time studying, but it

23:42

also creates mental health problems

23:45

that make it harder to

23:47

perform academically as well as you were prior

23:49

to the introduction. We got

23:51

very lucky because in the survey

23:54

that we have, there is a specific

23:56

question that asks whether

23:58

your academic performance worsened as a

24:00

result of mental health such as

24:02

anxiety, depression. so far, when we analyzed

24:04

that question, we found that indeed

24:06

Facebook had this downstream impact

24:08

on Acadian

24:09

performance. If

24:11

you

24:12

were to say, you know,

24:15

here's why this study is important.

24:17

Here's what you should make of

24:19

it. and here's what you should with this information.

24:21

How would you articulate

24:22

that? This study is important because

24:24

we think that it's the most comprehensive

24:27

causal evidence on the impact of Facebook on mental

24:30

health. It's also important because we are able

24:32

to zero in on a

24:34

subset of people

24:36

who are particularly vulnerable and who

24:38

experience the most significant deterioration

24:40

of mental health in the past.

24:42

Fifteen years for college students

24:44

and young adults, and what can people do with this information

24:46

is that, first of all, they can be aware of it. So

24:48

they could potentially alter their

24:51

own usage of social

24:53

media and the usage of

24:55

social media by their kids or

24:57

friends. And second, we hope that social

24:59

media platforms sort of figure out a way find

25:01

a balance between maximizing their

25:03

ad revenue and potentially mitigating

25:05

the harms that social

25:07

media does.

25:10

We talk

25:12

about

25:12

why social media has made

25:14

mental health worse. THAT'S SOMETHING THAT

25:16

WE'RE ACTIVELY WORKING WITH SOCIAL MEDIA

25:19

COMPANIES AROUND HOW TO ADDRESS

25:21

THAT. THAT'S

25:21

THE SCIENTISTS DR. NINA

25:24

VASSON AGAIN. In

25:24

twenty eighteen, her lab at

25:27

Stanford called Brainstorm

25:28

started working with the social

25:31

media platform Pinterest.

25:32

they were

25:33

looking to understand different

25:35

patterns and what was driving people to their

25:38

platform. And what they actually saw was

25:40

that the fourth most common

25:43

category of search terms was

25:45

related to mental health, and it was things

25:47

like depression, stress,

25:49

anxiety. When people think of

25:51

Pinterest, they think about things like wedding

25:53

planning or interior

25:55

design or recipes. Pinterest

25:57

has not been a place that historically

25:59

people really

25:59

talked about I wanna go address my mental

26:02

health on this platform. What Pinterest

26:04

realized was, this is

26:06

something that people are coming to

26:08

us for. how can we

26:10

create a space for people to

26:12

be able to feel safe

26:14

and understood?

26:15

Around that same time, a fourteen year old girl

26:17

in England named Molly Russell

26:20

died

26:20

by suicide. Afterward,

26:22

it was discovered viewed more

26:24

than two thousand posts related

26:26

to suicide and self harm

26:29

on social media platforms, one

26:31

of which was Pinterest. This

26:33

was alarming and led to a lot

26:35

of questions around what are

26:37

kids engaging in, how do we keep them

26:40

safe, what are the interventions that can then be done? And

26:42

also, what is the role of social media

26:44

companies to keep users safe when things

26:46

like this happen? There are three big

26:48

things that we did.

26:50

The first

26:53

was what we call micro therapeutics.

26:56

We created a whole platform

26:58

of little mini tools little

27:00

activities that people can do anywhere from

27:02

one to five minutes that

27:04

take the same types of therapies

27:07

that we might do with our patients in

27:09

clinic. but instead that they can

27:11

do on the platform in real

27:13

time, not only things like mindfulness

27:15

and gratitude, but even leveraging

27:18

cognitive behavioral therapy and helping

27:20

people understand their thoughts and

27:22

thought patterns where they

27:24

can start thinking in a more positive

27:27

way. Now, when people go on the

27:29

Pinterest platform and they type in

27:31

depression or stress or anxiety,

27:33

they get an entire pop up

27:35

box. that's separate from their Pinterest

27:37

page, and it's very private.

27:40

The second thing that we did is

27:42

called compassionate search. if you

27:44

go into Pinterest and you start to type

27:46

in something related to suicide,

27:48

you're not now gonna get pushed

27:50

additional content into your inbox like

27:52

you did before. Some things will auto

27:55

fill, but things that we have been able

27:57

to flag as potentially

27:59

dangerous will not auto

28:01

fill So we're not further making things potentially

28:03

harmful for people. And then the third

28:05

thing was working with the algorithm

28:08

engineers specifically around

28:10

how to decrease the amount of self harm

28:12

content on the platform and

28:14

by educating the engineers around

28:17

what is self harm, what is self harm

28:20

content. After six months or so, there

28:22

was a

28:22

significant decrease in self

28:25

harm on

28:27

the platform.

28:33

in

28:33

medicine, we take this oath to do no harm.

28:35

And

28:35

that was really the idea that we

28:37

had around how do we change the user

28:40

experience everything from the way people

28:42

searched, the way that results get popped up

28:44

to them so that

28:45

the platforms are doing no harm to their

28:47

users.

28:50

Not long after Pinterest implemented

28:53

these changes, they noted

28:55

an eighty eight percent drop in

28:57

reports of self harm content by

28:59

users users. The company

29:00

said it was able to remove

29:02

this kind of content three

29:04

times faster than before. But

29:06

is it actually improving users

29:09

mental health? We don't know.

29:12

other

29:12

platforms have also tried to be proactive

29:14

about mental health. Meta,

29:16

the company that owns both Instagram

29:19

and Facebook, allows

29:21

users to flag worrisome posts

29:23

they've seen from friends.

29:25

In twenty seventeen,

29:28

Facebook develop its own algorithms to

29:30

identify users at risk of self

29:32

harm. And they have an

29:34

emotional health page containing

29:36

resources on conditions like

29:39

anxiety and depression. And

29:41

yet just last year, The

29:43

Wall Street Journal published

29:45

a series in which they claim

29:47

that Facebook has long studied and

29:49

known about the harm it

29:51

causes, particularly to mental

29:53

health. And that it has

29:55

continued to publicly deny and downplay

29:57

this information. In twenty

29:59

twenty

29:59

one, more than four billion

30:02

people people around the world

30:04

used some form of social

30:06

media. That's half of the entire population

30:08

of the planet. We've had

30:10

clues about its effects on our

30:12

mental health, but now we're starting

30:14

to get some definitive answers. What

30:16

we do

30:17

with that information is a

30:19

looming question. Nina Vassen thinks a

30:22

good place to start is with

30:23

data. When we look at

30:25

an area like mental health,

30:27

We have enormous data that we

30:29

use in order to do everything

30:31

from assessing someone's symptoms,

30:34

how depressed are they? How anxious are

30:36

they? But we don't really share this

30:38

information with patients. And I always

30:40

try to give an analogy to

30:42

something like diabetes. Where someone

30:44

with diabetes they are very aware

30:46

most often of their blood sugar. They're

30:48

measuring that regularly. They're

30:50

making food choices based on what their blood

30:52

sugar levels are. In mental health, we have

30:54

similar metrics around things like

30:56

depression anxiety scores, sleep

30:58

scores, but patients aren't actively

31:00

using these numbers. And metrics

31:02

What has not historically been a part of the conversation

31:04

with patients is for them

31:06

to understand what these

31:08

numbers are and to engage in

31:10

these numbers themselves. That's

31:12

it for today's

31:14

show. If you or

31:16

someone you know is struggling with

31:18

a mental health problem, It's

31:20

really important to seek help.

31:22

Talk to your primary care doctor

31:24

about finding appropriate services

31:27

or you can call the national suicide and

31:29

crisis lifeline. The number

31:31

to dial is 988

31:33

Trained workers are available

31:36

talk twenty four hours a day,

31:38

seven days a week, and all calls

31:40

are toll free and confidential.

31:42

I want to thank my guests, Alexia

31:45

Macquarie, and doctor Nina Boston. And thanks to

31:47

you, of course, for listening. Let

31:49

us know what you

31:49

thought about today's episode. How does

31:52

social media make you feel

31:54

good? bad or a little of both. Have

31:57

you ever tried to cut back on it to

31:59

improve how you feel? feel Send us

32:01

an email or a voice memo

32:03

We are at babu at freakonomix dot

32:06

com. That's

32:06

BAPU at

32:08

freakonomix dot com. Here's

32:10

an idea to leave you with about a

32:13

different way social platforms can affect our

32:15

health. Sexual

32:16

transmitted diseases or STD's are

32:20

a huge public health problem, particularly

32:22

among adolescents and young adults.

32:25

Over the last decade, a number

32:27

of new apps have

32:29

made it easier for people to

32:31

meet other people.

32:32

Could the staggered uptake of these apps

32:35

across cities tell us something

32:37

about their effect on STD rates?

32:39

Think about

32:39

it. And in the meantime, coming up

32:42

next week, they say

32:43

what's passed is prologue.

32:46

So what can the past tell us about

32:48

the present and maybe even the

32:50

future of our healthcare system?

32:52

It really shows

32:53

us how a significant

32:55

shock can play out even decades later.

32:58

And what

32:58

could the lasting effects be

33:00

of another more recent

33:03

shock. We've

33:03

seen a lot more people applying

33:05

and matriculating into healthcare programs.

33:07

More people applying to medical school, nursing

33:10

school. that's coming up next week

33:12

on FreakonomicsMD. Thanks again

33:14

for

33:15

listening.

33:16

FreakonomicsMD is part

33:18

of the Freakonomics Radio Network, which

33:21

also includes Freakonomics Radio,

33:23

no stupid questions, and

33:25

people I mostly admire.

33:27

All our shows are produced by Stitcher

33:29

and Renbud Radio. You can

33:31

find us on Twitter at doctor

33:34

BahooPod. This episode

33:36

was produced by Julie Canfor and

33:38

mixed by Eleanor Osbourne with

33:40

help from Jasmine Klinger.

33:42

Learick Boudic is our production associate.

33:44

Our executive team is

33:46

Neil Karuth, Gabriel Roth, and

33:48

Steven Dubner, original music

33:51

composed by Louise Gara. If you

33:53

like this show or any

33:55

other show in the Freakonomics Radio

33:57

Network, please recommend it to your

33:59

family and

33:59

friends. That's the best

34:02

way to

34:02

support the podcasts you love.

34:04

As always, thanks for listening.

34:08

Because I'm not a

34:11

native

34:11

speaker, I'm always kind of very self conscious

34:14

that I'm phrasing things not in a

34:16

fantastic manner.

34:18

Sometimes, Alexay. If they can make me sound good, they can make

34:20

anybody

34:20

sound good, so don't worry.

34:25

The Freakonomics

34:27

Radio Network, the hidden

34:29

side of everything.

34:32

Stitcher.

34:38

Introducing

34:40

the first TV brand streaming Xbox

34:42

games. Samsung NIO QLED

34:44

and OLED with Gaming Hub. With a

34:46

Samsung NIO QLED and OLED TV,

34:48

you can stream your favorite games straight to your

34:50

TV. No console required. All you need is compatible controller

34:52

and Internet. Play hundreds of games from

34:55

the biggest streaming services including Nvidia, GeForce

34:57

NOW, Luna, Nutomix, and

34:59

Xbox app. There's always something to play in something fresh to

35:01

discover with thousands of new and classic game

35:03

titles. Gain access to games in seconds without

35:05

worrying about purchasing new hardware, downloads,

35:07

or storage limits All you need is

35:09

an Internet connection and a compatible controller. There is a special promotion going through the end of the

35:12

year. Purchase a twenty twenty two Samsung

35:14

deal QLED or OLED, and you get

35:16

your first three

35:18

months of box game pass ultimate and an Xbox controller on

35:20

Samsung. Disclosure through twelve thirty one while

35:22

supplies last purchased a twenty twenty two new QLEDQNE

35:26

be or above or OLED S95 be your participating retailers. For terms and

35:28

conditions, including redemption instructions, see control redemptions dot

35:30

com or see retailer. Control the color

35:32

may vary after game pass you

35:35

will automatically be charged and let's cancel. The mid one terms, x

35:37

box dot com slash subscription terms.

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features