Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:03
Matt Gaetz, the biggest fire brand inside
0:06
of the House of Representatives. You're not
0:08
taking Matt Gaetz off the board, okay?
0:10
Because Matt Gaetz is an American patriot
0:12
and Matt Gaetz is an American hero.
0:15
We will not continue to allow
0:17
the Uniparty to run this town
0:19
without a fight. I want to
0:21
thank you, Matt Gaetz, for holding
0:23
the line. Matt Gaetz
0:25
is a courageous man. If we had
0:27
hundreds of Matt Gaetz in D.C., the
0:30
country turns around. It's that simple. He's
0:32
so tough. He's so strong. He's
0:34
smart and he loves this country. Matt
0:37
Gaetz. It
0:39
is the honor of my life to
0:41
fight alongside each and every one
0:43
of you. We will save America.
0:45
It's choose your fighter time. Send
0:47
in the fire brains. Welcome
0:55
to a very special edition of Firebrand.
0:57
We are broadcasting now from the Spotify
0:59
studios in Los Angeles, California. As you
1:02
know, this is a time when Congress
1:04
is out of Washington, D.C. We're moving
1:06
around the country. Some are doing investigative
1:08
work. Some are doing communications work and
1:11
political work. We're incredibly grateful that the
1:13
Spotify team has invited us here to
1:15
this sound stage. They actually make them
1:18
available to all of their creators to
1:20
be able to come in. We're very
1:22
proud that Firebrand is hosted on
1:24
Spotify in addition to the other
1:26
platforms that we're able to use.
1:28
We're grateful for all of our
1:31
Spotify listeners and certainly grateful for
1:33
this tremendous opportunity. So the goal
1:35
for this discussion is not going
1:37
to be to review breaking news
1:39
or news of the day, but
1:41
to have an in-depth discussion with
1:43
Tony Bobolinsky. You know Tony Bobolinsky
1:45
as the most credible narrator of
1:47
this entire experience of the Biden
1:49
investigations. When the Chinese Communist
1:51
Party wanted to have influence around the
1:54
world and in the United States,
1:56
Tony Bobolinsky was there among the
1:58
Bidens and other Biden associates. associates,
2:00
as he believed a business deal
2:02
was being created to deploy capital
2:04
within the United States. But
2:06
what Mr. Bobolinsky thought was a business
2:09
deal started to look more and more
2:11
like a bribe to him. Now
2:13
we've gone over a lot of the facts.
2:16
We've gone over a lot of
2:18
the documents, text messages that have
2:20
really corroborated Mr. Bobolinsky. And you
2:22
may have seen folks in the
2:24
media or even Democrats on the
2:26
House Judiciary Committee attack this man.
2:29
But what they never attacked, what
2:31
they never challenged was any fact
2:33
he laid out, any meeting he
2:35
had, any place he was, any
2:37
document that he provided. Instead,
2:41
there was a critique of his goals, a
2:43
critique of his motives, a critique of his person.
2:46
And that is something that as we
2:48
saw in the House Judiciary Committee, as
2:50
America saw, Mr. Bobolinsky was well, well
2:52
adapted to handle and handled
2:55
them. Indeed, he did. We
2:57
keep hearing from certain corners that our democracy is
2:59
at risk and democracy is on the ballot in
3:01
24. Yet the same
3:03
people preaching this mantra know better. They
3:06
continue to lie directly to the
3:08
American people without hesitation and remorse.
3:12
Rep. Dan Goldman and Jamie Raskin,
3:14
both lawyers and Mr.
3:16
Goldman, a former prosecutor with the SDNY
3:18
from New York, will continue to lie
3:20
today in this hearing and then go
3:22
straight to the media to tell more
3:25
lies. My biggest appeal to everyone in
3:27
this room is I wish you would
3:29
spend the time focusing on the fact
3:31
that the Chinese Communist Party infiltrated the
3:33
White House of the United States of
3:35
America through the Biden family. I don't
3:37
say that lightly. It's not a joke.
3:39
I was willing to die for this
3:41
country, as was my father and both
3:43
my grandfathers and my brother. It's the
3:45
serious, serious stuff. We
3:47
should be asking how that happened. Take
3:49
the Biden name and the Biden family
3:51
completely out of it. How did the
3:53
Chinese Communist Party infiltrate the White House
3:55
of the United States of America? Let's
3:57
start there, focus on those facts. what
4:00
they did, how they did it,
4:02
why they used money, why they
4:04
used private enterprises instead of military
4:06
stuff and other stuff. That is
4:08
huge for national security. But
4:11
I don't want this discussion to
4:13
just be about what we're learning
4:15
from the Bidens and the documents
4:17
that relate to their business activities
4:19
and their activities with China. My
4:22
hope is that this discussion will teach us
4:24
a little bit more about how the power
4:26
centers in the world work. I
4:29
am concerned that increasingly the
4:31
institutions that we have often
4:33
admired and looked to as
4:35
Americans, institutions like the United
4:37
Nations, like our judicial system,
4:39
are increasingly being compromised by
4:41
China through bribes. And
4:43
this is not some conspiracy theory I
4:45
have. It's not just a viewpoint from
4:48
Mr. Bobolinsky. As we're going to prove
4:50
to you, this has been the position
4:52
of the United States government in very
4:55
specific and in very
4:57
meaningful criminal litigation in the Southern
4:59
District of New York. Now you'll
5:01
hear from Mr. Bobolinsky about a
5:03
company called CEFC. And
5:05
CEFC was really the investment wing
5:07
of China's energy business and a
5:10
big part of their One Belt,
5:12
One Road initiative. CEFC
5:16
has one of their major executives,
5:18
major players, put on trial in
5:20
New York for corruption. Corruption
5:22
that involved countries in Africa,
5:25
banks in New York, people
5:27
in our own government. And
5:30
in those circumstances, I think we
5:32
can learn a lot about how
5:34
bribes, how global institutions are driving
5:36
the decisions that affect the
5:39
lives of people here and all around
5:41
the world. So with that, I welcome
5:43
Tony Bobolinsky. Tony, you have
5:45
been through an experience that not a lot
5:48
of people have. Testifying before Congress, having
5:50
your story scrutinized by every
5:53
opposition research entity, every media
5:55
entity, every congressman. And
5:58
without question, every... person I've talked to
6:01
in town halls around my district, around the
6:03
country, they say you were credible, that you
6:05
stood on the facts and that no one
6:07
really challenged you on those facts. But
6:09
just talk a little bit about like as a human being
6:11
who didn't have a lot of
6:13
notoriety before all of this, going through
6:16
this process, what's your reflection on
6:18
it as we sit here today in the Spotify
6:20
studios in Los Angeles? Yeah, good morning, Matt. And
6:22
obviously I'd like to thank Spotify as well for
6:24
hosting us and Joel and Matt, you and your
6:27
team for having me down here. So
6:31
stating that I had no notoriety before all
6:33
this is probably an understatement because I had
6:36
spent the prior 10 plus
6:38
years working for one of the wealthiest families in the
6:40
world. And through my
6:43
time doing that, most people actually didn't know
6:45
what I did for a living because I
6:47
didn't really talk about it. I didn't have
6:49
any social media accounts. I didn't have a,
6:51
you know, profiles. We didn't have a website.
6:53
The family was a very low key, very,
6:55
very wealthy family. And we invested all over
6:57
the world and I could care
7:00
less if anybody knew my name. So
7:02
I was the, you know, the stark
7:05
contrast of this environment we live in
7:07
today where, you know, people are building
7:09
huge social media following. So it's,
7:13
it has been an education
7:16
of just how the media works. If
7:18
you had asked me, I actually lived in a
7:20
place for almost 15 years that didn't have a
7:22
TV in it. Um, if I wanted entertainment, I'd
7:25
go to the movie theater and during, you know,
7:27
I was working 80 to a hundred hour weeks
7:29
and I had four Bloomberg's on my desk. So
7:31
if I needed information on any company I was
7:34
invested in, I could get it instantly and, and
7:36
stuff like that. And so if
7:38
you had asked me six years ago, if
7:40
the media, um, lied,
7:43
misrepresented, told half stories,
7:45
I would have said, no, that's, that
7:47
doesn't happen. Um, there's laws that protect that
7:50
from happening and hold them accountable and stuff
7:52
like that. I was ignorant on the subject.
7:54
Um, you know, our companies that we're invested
7:56
in had comms people and I really didn't
7:58
get involved at that. level if I sat
8:01
on a board and stuff like that. So
8:03
to say that this was just a crazy,
8:05
rude awakening of what I've gone through the
8:07
last five years, it's been astonishing. And most
8:09
people will never go through that. Most
8:11
people will not go from being
8:13
a consumer of information to being
8:16
kind of the subject of that
8:18
entire ecosystem. Now you talk about
8:20
commspeople in our operation, our
8:22
communications director is Joel Valdez. He is the
8:24
executive director of Firebrand. Joel is
8:27
joining us to help us today, also
8:29
to give the everyman perspective. But
8:32
it's certainly something to
8:35
go from a world in which
8:38
you're judged by these high-intensity
8:41
economic decisions to being peppered
8:43
with five-minute rounds of questions.
8:47
Before we get into any of the specifics
8:49
here, if you were to meet someone and
8:51
they were about to reveal information
8:54
about a powerful person that disrupted
8:56
the power dynamics and shifted the
8:58
tectonic plates of politics in our
9:00
country, what advice would
9:02
you give them about being the
9:04
subject of media scrutiny, having a
9:06
story to tell, and then emerging
9:09
as a critical congressional witness? It's
9:12
funny because actually the parallel in
9:14
the investing business, I spent my
9:16
whole career post the Navy in
9:18
the investment business and you'd
9:20
always talk to early stage and venture
9:22
companies and tell them to fine-tune their
9:25
elevator pitch, their 60-second elevator pitch. This
9:28
story about the Biden corruption and
9:30
the involvement of
9:32
China, Russia, Ukraine, Romania,
9:35
and the list continues on to try
9:37
to package that in two-minute
9:39
or five-minute sound bites as nearly
9:42
impossible. To prepare for
9:44
congressional testimony, it was just an interesting
9:46
dynamic because I'm fighting to get the
9:48
facts out to the American people. I
9:52
had this interchange with AOC where she was
9:54
looking for a sound bite or something short
9:56
and quick and sweet. This is not a
9:58
short, quick and sweet. Sweet story. I believe
10:01
the fact that he was sitting with me while
10:03
I was putting together a beat. Us President
10:05
committed a crime. Isn't your
10:08
testimony today? Yes, And
10:10
What crime? Do. You have
10:12
you written? How. Much time do I have to go
10:14
through it is. Simple You name the
10:16
crime, did you watch him spill
10:19
something or corruption statues Rico and
10:21
can what? Let's see what they
10:23
a lot is the crime sir.
10:26
You. With specific issue is that the you
10:28
keep up you ask me the answer the
10:30
question I answered the question Know go. You're
10:32
obviously not familiar with drugs. Instead of
10:34
me sir x you are say
10:37
excuse me Sir Rico is not
10:39
a crime, It is a category.
10:42
What about China? Gory of crimes
10:44
that your then charge. You have
10:46
scars on long one hundred. You
10:48
have charges. Sir. Please
10:50
The name that statute that Riga
10:52
was. well it's funny in this
10:54
committee room. Everyone's not here. There's over right.
10:56
Click my lawyers the right the last one.
10:58
I really like time. you guys are they
11:00
find the sir. I regret my time. I
11:03
don't have a picture of Joe
11:05
Biden picking up a duffel bag
11:07
of twenty million dollars of cash.
11:09
This is a very complicated involving
11:11
the most powerful countries in the
11:13
world and how they operate to
11:15
infiltrate powerful. Business. Powerful
11:18
political people in the United States,
11:20
and I'm simply fighting to get
11:22
the facts out to the American
11:24
people. That's all I ever wanted
11:26
to do. And that sort of
11:28
plays into your question about his,
11:30
you know, rude awakening And twenty
11:32
twenty. I simply wanted to. Deliver.
11:35
The facts to Congressional on Parties Senators
11:37
and let them go. Take these facts
11:39
and educate the American people. But unfortunately
11:41
that wasn't done as efficiently as it
11:43
could be. So here I sit with
11:45
you today, still fighting to get the
11:47
facts out to the American people. For.
11:51
A lot of folks I think it's
11:53
It's not familiar to think about. Kind.
11:56
Of who you are in the world and in
11:58
the grand scheme of the economy because. People
12:00
don't know attorney bible and ski in their
12:02
life. so. If. If you
12:04
were to drawn an archetype for you,
12:06
you know you're not like you're not
12:08
Bobby Axelrod right? Because you don't run
12:11
a hedge fund but at the same
12:13
time a lot of the people who
12:15
are are running family funds or making
12:17
big investment decisions kind of seek you
12:19
out as someone to hunt deals. mind
12:22
deal. So like who is a Tony
12:24
bubble in seats the archetype that people
12:26
could associate with. I struggled with this.
12:28
Yeah, it's interesting because I had numerous
12:30
offers to my career to young become
12:33
a Bobby. Axelrod to launch my own
12:35
hedge fund private equity fund. I chose
12:37
not to. I chose to work for
12:39
specific family, which is an interesting dynamic
12:42
because you're you're intertwined yeah, with their
12:44
children, with their grandchildren, all the personal
12:46
aspects of their family business. Oh, trust
12:48
is even at a much much higher
12:50
level than it would be if I
12:53
went to war for a Goldman Sachs
12:55
or ran my own hedge fund. Amen
12:57
when I say try familiar to you
12:59
and working with a family. An.
13:02
Inner inner. Twining.
13:04
A family dynamic which I would cure
13:06
for your every family dynamic is as
13:08
controversy is. With business.
13:12
Were you able to draw on that at
13:14
all? as you kind of saw the Bidens
13:16
interacting? And as you were there having a
13:18
meeting with Joe Biden he's telling you to
13:20
take care of his son lived there Must
13:22
have been some sort of are. Merging
13:25
of kind of family and business that you
13:27
were able to identify and see based on
13:29
your back. Again I'm sure the binds picked
13:31
up on it because I had spent my
13:33
time working for one the wealthiest the is
13:36
the world's that had multiple generations involved in
13:38
the business. so I would be training large
13:40
amounts of start on a daily basis and
13:42
the grandchildren would walk in my office and
13:44
ask hey how you doing, what are you
13:46
doing can we say and your step in
13:48
to learn what I was doing or talk
13:51
about it And so I developed a relationship
13:53
and just a mutual trust of the dynamics.
13:55
Between your the grandchild and
13:57
the patriarch and they're different
13:59
prospect. There's on live in the and
14:01
the kids as well because they all have
14:03
their own families, their own interests, their own
14:06
wealth. Each one of these families were you
14:08
hugely wealthy and their own right. And then
14:10
and aggregates you don't want the most powerful
14:12
wealthy families in the world. So it was.
14:14
I'm going with a powerful family that that
14:17
is producing a lot of cash with investments
14:19
everybody wants to get their big wet and
14:21
sometimes that challenging and how it's presented and
14:23
talked about in disgust. And it seemed as
14:25
though. In. This china deal where
14:27
they would bring in you and decreed
14:30
the vieira veneer of a business arrangement.
14:32
But really it was. it was the
14:34
facilitation of of payment to family members
14:36
of it seemed as though. You.
14:38
Might have been drawn into that because
14:40
they knew. You were familiar with
14:43
the interplay. A family business? Yeah, no
14:45
question. I'm in. James Gil Your who
14:47
was the individual former British military British
14:49
Intelligence and didn't really talk much about
14:51
what he did outside of sort of
14:54
relationships and sauce I'm I'd known him
14:56
for approximate ten years from gills I
14:58
was doing around the world. And just
15:00
to give your listeners a snapshots, I'm
15:03
not just talking about China. I've been
15:05
to mainland China ten plus times. I'd
15:07
a business there that employed hundreds of
15:09
people that work for me. It
15:12
was in a business very similar to
15:14
Groupon so as a daily deal kind
15:16
of business at restaurants and spas and
15:18
of right thing and I'm all over
15:21
that Asian region Hong Kong, Taiwan, Singapore,
15:23
Malaysia, South Korea. So I spent a
15:25
lotta time there in two thousand and
15:27
ten, Two Thousand and Eleven and two
15:30
Thousand and twelve And I personally was
15:32
highly, highly concerned and skeptical. About
15:34
China. And so when James Kill your initially
15:36
brought this up to me in two thousand
15:39
and fifteen. I. Was encouraging
15:41
him to. You know. I'm.
15:44
Be. intense on your due diligence don't believe
15:46
anything till this it's signed a the money's
15:48
in the bank ask a lot of questions
15:50
out of a out of a position of
15:52
concern so this wasn't you know this this
15:55
deal with the bidens wasn't the first time
15:57
you are familiar with how the chinese do
15:59
business Correct. You had
16:01
done other deals in China with
16:03
China with Chinese interests or assets,
16:05
deals in the tens of millions.
16:08
Yeah, yeah, yeah. So you were, okay, so you
16:10
got that. Had you also ever
16:12
done business in Africa? I've
16:14
been to Africa. I've looked at a couple
16:16
of deals there. I personally have not deployed
16:18
any capital in Africa. I'm interested with
16:21
China working on modern day
16:23
colonialism in Africa. It's
16:26
an interesting interplay. So getting
16:29
back to kind of how America got to
16:31
know you, this testimony against the Bidens, one
16:34
thing that struck me is that you're the
16:36
one guy who emerges out of Biden world
16:38
who's not a criminal, telling the truth about
16:41
them. I mean, you've got Devin Archer, who
16:43
was indicted. I guess he's
16:46
subject to his trial. You
16:48
got the Bulger family, Whitey
16:51
Bulger son, I guess. I
16:54
mean, I don't know that he's a criminal,
16:56
but the Bulger name certainly evokes a sensible
16:58
kind of business they're at least tied
17:00
to. Then you got
17:04
Galatas sitting in a prison
17:06
cell, and you're the one guy who emerges out of it. You've
17:09
never been accused of a crime, to my knowledge. I have not. Never
17:11
been arrested. I have not. Never
17:13
gone to prison. And so you're a business guy that comes
17:16
out of this, and you become the central narrator. The
17:19
way they chose to attack you was interesting. They
17:22
didn't really go after any of the claims you
17:24
made, because it was all documented. Instead,
17:27
they went after your goals. They started
17:29
by saying you were some sort of
17:31
political operative. Mr. Bobolinsky
17:33
made his hazy allegations against
17:35
the Bidens public for the
17:37
first time at a press
17:39
conference choreographed by the Trump
17:42
for President campaign, which provided him a
17:44
venue, a gaggle of journalists, and even
17:46
a dress shirt that they went out
17:48
and bought for him to wear
17:51
to the event. Hours later, Mr. Bobolinsky
17:53
joined the second 2020 presidential
17:55
debate as Donald Trump's
17:58
personal guest, where he was seated
18:00
with Kid Rock and Mark Meadows. Address
18:03
that directly. Yeah, it's interesting because
18:06
the American people pray. Hopefully they're
18:08
not tired because I bleed red,
18:10
white, and blue first, then blue
18:12
and white for Penn State second.
18:15
But I don't say
18:17
this lightly. I grew up the grandson
18:20
of a 37-year Army
18:23
intelligence officer that spoke, I
18:26
think, eight languages. So effectively he
18:28
was a military spy. My
18:30
mom, my aunt was born in Cuba.
18:32
That family had to be extracted from
18:34
Cuba back in the day. My father
18:36
spent his whole career as a naval
18:38
officer traveling the world as I did
18:40
as a kid. My brother, a 28-year
18:42
Navy flight officer who
18:44
served in combat. My other grandfather
18:47
served in the Air Force and
18:49
I was lucky enough to be
18:51
invited, I think they picked 25 instructors
18:53
a year, to go teach at
18:55
nuclear power school, probably the most
18:57
elite academic intense environment founded by
19:00
Admiral Rickover. And I
19:02
only reiterate that each
19:04
time did the American people to sort of set a
19:06
tone of, I am not political.
19:09
I was willing to dive for this country
19:11
and fight for this country, as was every
19:13
immediate male in my family. We
19:16
love this country. I've been simply trying to
19:18
get the facts out to the American people
19:20
and you bring up a good point. They don't
19:22
attack the facts. I've yet to see Hunter
19:25
Biden or Abby Lowell come out and
19:27
say, hey that text, you know, they're
19:29
causing concerns it's a screenshot of a
19:31
blackberry. That text has been doctored. They
19:34
never say that because every document, every
19:36
email, every text I produced is factual,
19:38
has metadata. Unfortunately, forensic people couldn't pull
19:40
it off the blackberry so I had
19:42
to take pictures of it. Well it's
19:45
not even, it's not even challenged. That's
19:47
what's so ridiculous about the criticisms of
19:49
you showing screenshots from a blackberry. There's
19:51
not a single person who says that
19:54
these messages were not sent and received.
19:56
Right. Not one. They Just they
19:58
just want to nitpick at the. Yeah,
20:00
at the origin, but they don't. They don't
20:03
in any way challenge the contents. And.
20:05
The content is then. Reinforced
20:07
with the actual meetings that occurred, mates and
20:09
and your own testimony about those experiences. But
20:11
but I want I want to draw finer
20:13
point in the question that it would you
20:16
say your goals are to get. Get
20:18
the information out when. One thing I
20:20
noticed is that during the congressional testimony.
20:23
People. Try debates you into saying that
20:25
you believed Joe Biden should be impeached.
20:28
Do you saying Chairman Calmer has
20:30
proven that Joe Biden has committed
20:32
a high crime and misdemeanor. I.
20:35
Believe with all the evidence is gathered. Yes,
20:37
he's proven that Joe Biden is committed i
20:40
crimes and misdemeanors. Okay, and so I soon
20:42
you believe Joe Biden should be impeached. Well.
20:45
That's up to you guys. Are you
20:47
said luck? That's not for me, That's for
20:49
the Congress to decide on land the facts
20:52
out. But when this is all over Tony
20:54
What what? What do you want to have
20:56
happened like choosing to buy this blog and
20:58
jailed you believe Joe Biden to be impeached?
21:01
Do believe that this you just flavor our
21:03
understanding of the broader corruption problems we have.
21:05
shouldn't we to Legislation I've had I've had
21:08
your republicans and Democrats even say you know
21:10
watching all this stuff. if it's not a
21:12
crime maybe it should be at and it
21:14
you want to see like a Bobby Alinsky
21:17
build come out of this. What's your when
21:19
this is all over. What makes it worth
21:21
it to you that you put your name
21:24
on the line, You've put your credibility on
21:26
the line and and really you know now
21:28
you go from being. A finance
21:30
guy in a deal guy to being seen
21:32
as the guy bringing down the bidens. Or.
21:36
There's a lot in that question so
21:38
how they're gonna have kids. So a
21:40
I look forward to sort of off
21:42
into the sunset and going back to
21:44
my private life is I'm enjoying my
21:46
family willing to fight for this country
21:48
Ill at however I'm asked to on,
21:50
but I look forward to that and
21:52
people such as yourself. Who
21:55
are you know driving change in and
21:57
make waves in Congress or there's a
21:59
couple different. Is it is. I've
22:01
always been shocked. I
22:04
think we discuss this in the hearing
22:06
in the spring of two thousand and
22:08
seventeen. When I started to take meetings
22:10
and and get up to speed on
22:12
this and had lawyer setting up the
22:14
business I was shocked. Would be an
22:17
understatement that the binds were even. Able
22:20
to be anywhere near these discussions.
22:22
Remember. I held a queue security clearance which
22:25
is granted by the Deo he and than an
22:27
essay and I to fill a form out every
22:29
year under oath that I had receive gifts are
22:31
out of I could be wrong on the dollar
22:34
man as he was somewhere between fifty nine hundred
22:36
dollars. No immediate member of my family had receive
22:38
gifts or was interacting sort of like F B
22:40
I agents have to do every year. And
22:43
so with that purview seen what these guys
22:45
were doing in the spring of two thousand
22:47
seventeenth I asked my lawyers as i just
22:49
doesn't make sense or like you know I
22:51
have a great reputation as spent time all
22:54
of the what I were for one the
22:56
most private but wealth is famous in the
22:58
world I can't be. On. The have
23:00
zero interest in stepping out the box and
23:02
so they looked into it from my vantage
23:04
point and under a C P A and
23:06
dotted lines across seas. That. Doesn't
23:08
mean they looked at it from the
23:10
binds vantage point, what they were able
23:12
to do as a political family and
23:15
their relationships and all that stuff and
23:17
so I believe there needs to be.
23:19
I'm a legislation to require if it's
23:21
not already in place because I'm not
23:23
an expert on it's for the President's
23:25
family and the vice President's family because
23:28
of my lawyers are frustrated when the
23:30
asking this question I it early has
23:32
it's a criminal law firm and a
23:34
lawyer do a bunch of work not
23:36
for me I don't need. it but
23:38
what the vice president and their
23:40
immediate family members are allowed to do
23:43
under the current legislation know sort
23:45
of shocking to me that's why many
23:47
lcs me the question i could
23:49
quickly talk about rico and conspiracy and
23:51
stuff like that's because i've spent
23:53
a large amount of my own personal
23:56
funds having noise dig into that
23:58
to understand it because currently My
24:00
understanding is the vice president the president live under sort of
24:02
a slightly different umbrella than
24:05
if you're an FBI agent or a Naval
24:07
officer or a member of Congress or a
24:09
member of Congress and I don't understand how
24:11
I as a lieutenant With a Q security
24:14
clearance had to disclose every year if I
24:16
even had a lunch with a foreign national
24:18
Yet the vice president the president United States
24:21
Possibly can have their immediate family members
24:23
their son their brothers flying
24:25
all over the world meeting with you know effectively
24:31
Foreign nationals with close close so that would be
24:33
a goal of yours. So I mean you laid
24:35
out a nation Yeah, the Biden
24:37
family is gonna also write
24:39
off into the sunset can't tell you exactly
24:41
when but the threat of China to
24:44
the United States of America is More
24:46
real and has been real for
24:48
decades and if your listeners
24:50
want to read a great book There's a book
24:53
out there called spies and lies That
24:55
walks through the MSS the Ministry of
24:57
State Security Which is the Intel agencies
25:00
for the Chinese Communist Party and they
25:02
give a PhD Dissertation
25:05
on how little might
25:07
be as simple as a cab driver in New
25:09
York gathering information of what they see to
25:12
you know the highest kind of operations
25:14
of Information exchange and stuff like that. So I
25:16
believe there's well, let me tell you there Let
25:18
me step you there because I think this is
25:21
this is getting somewhere really good If
25:24
if because of your testimony and what you've
25:26
illuminated We end
25:28
up with stronger Anti-corruption laws.
25:30
Let's just make that a basket and Katie Porter
25:32
laid out some great ideas. I thought she did
25:34
a great job Oh, yeah hearing we should
25:37
have a policy discussion about how
25:39
to stop government officials from using
25:41
their positions to get money or
25:44
favors Now that is a real
25:46
hearing one that nearly every American
25:48
regardless of party wants us to
25:51
hold We could start
25:53
by talking about how senior executive
25:55
branch officials can leave public service
25:58
Wait Just one year. I'm
26:00
legally become lobbyists for
26:03
big corporations, scoring their
26:05
new employers profitable government
26:07
contracts and favorable regulations.
26:09
They can even be
26:11
paid. By. The big
26:13
corporations. During. that sort
26:15
of when you while we're waiting
26:17
to become lobbyists as a down
26:19
payment for their future ability to
26:22
peddle influence. That's. Wrong. For.
26:25
The Panel of Witnesses. By. Show
26:27
of Hands as them as Americans
26:29
would are witnesses Support extending this
26:32
one year waiting period to at
26:34
least two years. Know.
26:38
I would have a so do it
26:41
All Republicans. Democrats even
26:43
convicted criminals. everybody.
26:45
Supports. That. We should
26:47
do more to stop influence peddling. And.
26:50
Then, it also resulted in the
26:52
American people becoming more resilient against
26:55
this thread of Chinese bribery and
26:57
Chinese aggression and malign influence. But.
27:00
It never resulted in an impeachment
27:02
of Joe Biden, nor a prosecution
27:04
or criminal if just resulted in
27:07
legislation and then stronger American resilience
27:09
against China. Will. Will Will
27:11
All of it have been worth it
27:14
to a thousand percent of thousand presents
27:16
I said. I bleed red, white and
27:18
blue. I don't say that lightly. We
27:21
have to protect our country or people
27:23
are intellectual property. All these people in
27:25
this country working sixty sixty hour weeks
27:28
to produce things that are being stolen
27:30
by the Chinese Communist Party. We need
27:32
to protect him and wake up to
27:35
how they are in full training or
27:37
countries and notice they are using capital
27:39
to do it. Obvious see one
27:41
the largest economies in the world
27:44
back and forces the United States
27:46
they deploy People are like all
27:48
the binds. Millions of dollars that
27:50
the Chinese Communist Party deploys, pride,
27:52
Tens of billions of not hundreds
27:54
of billions of dollars around the
27:56
world in full training. Africa, South
27:58
America, Europe, Eastern Europe
28:00
and stuff like that and we need
28:02
to wake up. So if thats addressed
28:05
legislation, I think the American people are
28:07
going to hold a bind family accountable.
28:09
I don't need to do that, but
28:11
what's interesting about that is there's there's
28:13
no resentment. In you
28:16
toward the binds. It's toward China. Crap. It's
28:18
It's toward the people offering the bribes considerably
28:20
more than it is the people taking them.
28:23
And I think they have been on who's
28:25
unfairly treated. In end, the truth is Joe
28:27
Biden. And Hunter Biden and
28:29
the buying family came out. In. Twenty
28:32
Twenty. Or. Twenty nineteen when I
28:34
started seeing. you know, I'm a President
28:36
Trump, didn't you know? impeach for a
28:38
phone call on all that stuff? Really
28:40
don't want to weigh in on that.
28:43
But. I understood the corruption in
28:45
Ukraine of in Ukraine numerous times have
28:47
seen business transacted there and and since
28:49
I'm an interesting stuff to say the
28:52
least. If. They had just simply
28:54
come out with told the truth. Yes,
28:57
I've met with my son's business partners.
28:59
Maybe I crossed the line I didn't
29:01
understand, I was crossing it or I
29:03
did cross. It's out the and stuff
29:05
like that they told American people the
29:08
truth and twenty twenty I would simply
29:10
getting this information to the property people,
29:12
senators, congressmen, the deal jets and I
29:14
would have people would never heard my
29:16
name nor would they have needed to.
29:18
But when they were willing to lie
29:20
about all these facts that are insane
29:22
me Well documented not only by mean
29:24
by numerous business partners across large spans
29:26
of times. By. Own Department of Justice
29:28
and if somebody really wants exhaustive something
29:31
can sit down across connect all these
29:33
different data points and seats, Will that
29:35
text messages valid Because it stopped about
29:37
three different times and other communications and
29:39
so on? My i don't have animosity
29:42
towards the binds and yes they defrauded
29:44
me. Yes they stepped out the box.
29:46
This is about our country. we have
29:48
to protect ourselves against the Chinese com
29:51
is podium with the a woman to
29:53
do to become the global power. Ah
29:55
in supersede the United States of America.
29:57
You really become a China hawk. You've got.
30:00
From some but I didn't shine hog since
30:02
I left there in two thousand and twelve
30:04
hour based on the stuff I saw go
30:06
on there. I mean I would always where
30:08
there's different views on his own You? there's
30:10
there's like the in the Steve Bannon view
30:12
that China's trying to dominate all of us.
30:14
We asked they're they're engaged in irregular warfare
30:16
against us, we have to go full throttle
30:18
against them and the and and kind of
30:20
on the other and the continuum there's the
30:22
you on Musk view that to people of
30:25
China are wonderful, that he's bullish on China's
30:27
opportunities. and really if we draw China closer
30:29
to us than. They. Will be more like us.
30:32
I. Bought myself far closer
30:34
to the Steve Bannon ah, perspective
30:36
than the you on perspective because
30:39
as we've drawn China closer to
30:41
us, we've just become more like
30:43
them. We'll just see differentiate this.
30:46
Yes, there is a material difference
30:48
between the Chinese Communist Party in
30:50
the leadership and the Chinese people.
30:52
I had hundreds of Chinese people
30:55
working for me in mainland China,
30:57
Hong Kong and they were wonderful,
30:59
smart, hard working, caring people. But.
31:02
They were different than the Power
31:04
Center of the Chinese Communist Party.
31:07
Daves themselves complained about the Chinese
31:09
Communist Party in the power Centers
31:11
and that Ccp uses their power
31:14
of leverage over Chinese nationals on
31:16
our own soil and around the
31:19
world to gather information and stuff
31:21
like that. So, Elon Musk. What?
31:24
An amazing entrepreneur increases my guys.
31:26
I think he is differentiating between
31:28
effect of the the Chinese people
31:30
in the Chinese Communist Party, but
31:32
unfortunately the Chinese Communist Party gets
31:34
said Chinese people to do things
31:36
many of them probably don't wanna
31:38
do. but the power they hold
31:40
over their family, their jobs, their
31:42
livelihood is something that we're not
31:44
familiar with in this country. China's.
31:48
A colonial power right there. A modern
31:50
colonial power. They want to extract resources
31:52
from other places for their benefit. Another
31:54
going to get into this trial that
31:56
I'm I'm dying to get into. but
31:58
but I really enjoy the top. Analysis
32:00
of of what's going on in the world. I
32:02
think it educates people great deal and I think
32:04
a lot of American say okay will. China.
32:07
Seeks this bipolarity. You're right now.
32:09
arguably we live in a unipolar
32:11
world. China seeks bipolarity. And ah,
32:14
the oh, they. They.
32:17
Are going to try to crowd out
32:19
us influence in the world with the
32:21
One Belt One Road Initiative. Get people
32:23
more tied into their economic system, smelter
32:25
systems. Whatever. I see it differently. I
32:28
actually don't believe China's simply trying to
32:30
crowd out the United States. I think
32:32
they are trying to include the United
32:34
States in the Belt One Road Initiative
32:37
as a subservience power. That It's not
32:39
just they want deals elsewhere to feed
32:41
China's, they actually want deals in the
32:43
United States hundred percent seeding China and
32:46
and I. Think that's a misconception with
32:48
a lot of people, but you are
32:50
a frontline witness to China's efforts. Forget
32:52
the bags for a moment, China's efforts
32:55
to try to get deals inside the
32:57
United States. not for our benefit, but
32:59
for their benefit. And in does that's
33:02
just kind of shape how you think
33:04
about him. A: what would you add?
33:06
The just a regular person's understanding of
33:08
what China's real goals or what the
33:11
American people need to understand that. The
33:13
Chinese Communist Party, the Mss, the rental
33:15
agencies and stuff. Like that are
33:18
using capital. To. Infiltrate
33:20
our countries where a capitalistic
33:22
country. We. Feel sounded on
33:24
Free enterprise and trust and ability go out
33:26
make your dreams true and they're feeding into
33:28
that by using large amounts of capital. So
33:31
it's important that the here to resolve this
33:33
discussion and twenty twenty about ten million dollars
33:35
for sign on to ten million dollars was
33:37
insignificant That ten million dollars was to get
33:39
off the space other one hunter wanted to
33:42
take it all out and put in as
33:44
pigment day one which of pie the reason
33:46
why we went back and forth but. It's.
33:49
Directors and Sherman you were talking
33:51
about the point billions to potentially
33:54
tens of billions of Us dollars
33:56
in the United States in on
33:58
infrastructure projects, finance. Institutions I'm
34:00
if your readers are familiar, there's
34:03
a very successful investment bank called
34:05
Molson Company ten most The founder
34:07
that business is a multibillion dollar
34:09
enterprise. I sat down with him.
34:12
At. The roof top of the Peninsula Hotel And
34:14
Twenty twenty. In
34:16
a very serious discussion talking about
34:18
buying. Molson. Company A multibillion
34:21
dollar enterprise can most would have taken the time
34:23
to sit down with me if he didn't think
34:25
it was real. Fight. And
34:28
we were having those discussions because Csc
34:30
was looking at the pool. Large amounts
34:32
of money on her own shoes or
34:34
yes, it is scaled Really important here.
34:36
The ten million at that is like
34:38
a little sprinkle fun area that is
34:40
not the Bloody Miller equal. It's like
34:42
a new a dry and yeah drops
34:44
but but but do this orient the
34:46
listeners right now. What? Is
34:48
Cfc. Who. Is chairman you.
34:51
Who. Is directors egg in who is
34:53
Patrick? How only those for Cfc Zang
34:55
He holocaust So C S C at
34:58
It's Peak was a top five private
35:00
enterprise in mainland China, arm in the
35:02
energy business, but also in the financial
35:05
institution business and a variety of other
35:07
texts military stuff that they were doing.
35:09
but the primary core of it was
35:12
energy business around the world. And at
35:14
It's Peak as he was doing in
35:16
the forties, forty plus billion dollars of
35:18
revenue or on an annual basis, Germany
35:21
was. The chairman of that company and if
35:23
you look him up you'll notice that he's
35:25
a very stealth individual. People say it's does
35:28
not much known about him. Where did he
35:30
come from Worded Csc come from all the
35:32
sender on the global stage and you have
35:34
this Forbes forty under forty individual flying around
35:36
on an Airbus three hundred I believe and
35:39
when he touched down in a city he
35:41
would roll with an entourage Lake. City.
35:43
Twenty people deep of executive. So
35:46
Germany was executive or the chairman
35:48
of it who in march of
35:50
two thousand and eighteen disappeared. Hasn't.
35:53
Been seen since. People. Speculate whether
35:55
is dead or in a mud hole in mainland
35:57
China. so that's part of our story later. So
35:59
that's. Their money. Then. You have
36:01
Director Zang! There was a debate whether
36:03
is the number two and number three.
36:05
I believe based on my interaction and
36:07
knowledge that he was the senior most Chinese
36:10
Communist Party member. At Csc. I.
36:12
Was told he was sort of put in place
36:15
to keep an eye on chairman he a couple
36:17
of different times by people I would trust. And
36:20
he was the one flying around the
36:22
world striking deals on. There's a famous
36:25
picture of him with Put Them in
36:27
Budapest, Hungary in August Two Thousand and
36:29
Seventeen when they were in the middle
36:31
of the Rosneft deal. He's individual I
36:34
interacted with extensively up until the end
36:36
of July Two Thousand and Seventeen when
36:38
the biden stepped in and decided they
36:40
wanted to young take all the money
36:43
directly themselves. But Director saying interesting enough
36:45
was able to leave the United States
36:47
was never named in that trial that
36:49
we're. Going to talk about in the
36:51
Sd and why is named by witnesses
36:53
but he was never charged and is
36:55
visas were revoked in the summer of
36:57
two thousand and seventeen. So he's a
37:00
high level executive. He was the you
37:02
know, on the ground deal guy doing
37:04
business in your Africa, South America, all
37:06
over the world. And
37:08
then Patrick. Though I never met,
37:10
I've actually never heard of Patrick
37:12
Low until she was indicted. In.
37:15
November of twenty seventeen and this
37:17
House of Cards built by the
37:19
Chinese Communist Party called Cfc came
37:21
crumbling down on between Patrick Pose
37:24
indictments and chairman you disappearing and
37:26
or mud hole or jail in
37:28
college so very early may have
37:30
been laid cyber but early March
37:33
two thousand and eighteen so.yahoo that
37:35
tigers are very helpful Carsick! So
37:37
Cfc, this is the big Chinese
37:39
energy business investment conglomerates that is
37:41
gonna plowing the cash in theory.
37:44
Yes you. Ought to oneida this
37:46
business entity the one where we'd originally
37:48
contemplated I present for the head Idina
37:50
in our I you've done that extensively
37:53
on it at all on a lot
37:55
of things, but but just for for
37:57
those, Catch enough. Yeah, we get Oneida.
38:00
That up see of sees going to
38:02
plow the money and zang. Gets.
38:04
That shakedown text message cry from Hunter Biden
38:06
will throw that on the screen. say and
38:08
I'm sitting here with my father. You know
38:10
the start making the payments and then Patrick
38:13
House and when you haven't met but we're
38:15
gonna learn about him. How
38:17
is one of these executives whose
38:19
job it is to consummate the
38:21
bride? Or to make. The
38:24
government's official compromised and do
38:26
what's necessary and he ends
38:28
up running a foundation that
38:31
is funded entirely by Cfc.
38:33
Cracked. And this is not
38:35
unusual. By the way to Shell has
38:37
a foundation that they run. Exxon has
38:40
a foundation they run. Any foundations largely
38:42
exists to build good and to achieve
38:44
the goals of the company. But.
38:47
Here with China. Based on everything
38:49
we've been discussing leading up to
38:51
this point, you have described a
38:53
China that is trying to get
38:55
senior government officials, former government officials,
38:57
upcoming government officials compromised. And so
39:00
there is this trial that occurs
39:02
that you just referenced in New
39:04
York where Patrick Co. is accused
39:06
by the United States government of
39:08
facilitating these bribes And I wanna
39:10
read the opening statement in this
39:12
trial. So Dead. Too Much like
39:14
just to do you want peace.
39:16
I could. You just is a lot
39:19
for the American people. Listen you. I'd
39:21
encourage you to look at the What
39:23
Sap messages that matches referenced on July
39:26
Thirtieth, Two Thousand and Seventeen In July
39:28
Thirty first, Two Thousand and Seventeen. But
39:30
even more important, look at the one
39:33
on July Twenty Fifth, Two Thousand and
39:35
Seventeen It's a group discussions Aldo Night
39:37
A Holdings It was myself James Gill
39:40
your Rob Walker Hunter by New Gym
39:42
Biden And in that message Hunter says
39:44
I haven't spoken to either of. Them
39:47
meaning he hasn't spoken to director
39:49
saying or chairman me because he
39:51
was yielding to me to focus
39:53
on getting the ten million dollars
39:55
of capital into sign off holdings.
39:58
the capitalized the business. That's
40:00
July twenty Fifth where he says I hadn't spoken
40:02
any of them. Then. Five days. Later
40:05
on July thirtieth, he invokes his
40:07
father sitting next to him because
40:09
he knows he's broke. He
40:11
has all these payments due for his
40:14
alimony a variety of things on the
40:16
first of August and see and at
40:18
that time remember I didn't know he
40:20
was a drug addict or had these
40:22
issues. I'd no idea is to the
40:25
extent of the problems that he was
40:27
personally dealing with. ah and stuff like
40:29
that. But on the thirtieth he says
40:31
why I'm you Fulfilled the commitment. That.
40:34
Commit mean he's talking about his
40:36
Sino Hawk holdings. Day
40:38
then on the thirty first. All
40:40
the sudden his tone changes after
40:43
he had a discussion with Director
40:45
Zang. And. Arm
40:47
and Zao who was the interpreter for
40:49
Director Sang and of a sudden he's
40:51
now reshaping yet. Where. The
40:54
commitment to sign or holding isn't what
40:56
he's focused on. He's focusing on reshaping
40:58
the partnership to remove Oneida and put
41:00
his law firm a wasp go in.
41:02
As a fifty percent owner. Why was
41:05
he able to do that? It plays
41:07
into your focus. Matt: He was able
41:09
to do that because all Csc cared
41:11
about. Was. The Biden Family. In the
41:13
Biden name I was irrelevance. I was in
41:15
significance. I'd look Director saying in the face
41:18
numerous times. The first time I met him,
41:20
I told him listen, I believe you're going
41:22
to lie, cheat, steal, And he
41:24
laughed and said listen, we're very westernized.
41:26
We say we're going to do something,
41:28
we will do it nice and will.
41:30
That's not been my my arm track
41:33
record in my interaction being in China
41:35
and all that stuff. And so they
41:37
knew they had fully executed operating agreement
41:39
since I How holdings and they knew
41:41
they had liability to circumvent those agreements.
41:43
but they were willing to do that
41:45
at the end of July two thousand
41:47
seventeenth because all they wanted was the
41:49
buying family and the power in the
41:51
access information and why at that moment.
41:54
In time. Because. This is important to
41:56
this to the the trial you're gonna talk
41:58
about because it's it plays into. The acted
42:00
they meet they had me chase them for
42:02
two months. For this money we're getting to
42:04
it. We're getting to it, We're getting to
42:06
of while the send. Did. It
42:09
slow within ten days. While.
42:11
Hunter invokes his father. But more importantly,
42:14
the Chinese needed something. See.
42:16
I see was under the impression
42:18
there were sealed indictments. Of.
42:20
Didn't know who they thought. Possibly Patrick?
42:22
Whoa. possibly the chairman, possibly Director Sang
42:25
at the end of July. two thousand
42:27
and seventeen and they needed information and
42:29
access. and so they were wounded. Do
42:31
whatever the binds ask them to do.
42:34
I. Was in significant change Skill You was
42:37
insignificant. Rob walkers and that's what happens
42:39
and those what's that messages spell it
42:41
out in intimate details and are cross.
42:43
Could you can cross check on with
42:45
of right of information and so my
42:47
hat's off to I'm he owns Shapley
42:49
and Ziegler for it's be emboldened, proud
42:51
and fighting for the truth of the
42:54
American people coming out producing that information.
42:56
So sorry I just know it's very
42:58
helpful. Will get area import all that
43:00
on the screen and all that is
43:02
concepts because the fundamental essence of the
43:04
Biden defense. Here. Is. That this
43:06
wasn't a bribe with Cf seats. This
43:08
was legitimate business and they cast you
43:11
as just kind of a disgruntled business
43:13
guy who didn't get the right part
43:15
of the deal that you wanted when
43:17
reality. You were the
43:20
one being duped to be brought in
43:22
to look like this was legitimate business
43:24
because you're a legitimate businessman. But then
43:26
up the been around the legitimate business
43:28
and it's entity Oneida Holdings there were
43:30
getting the payments. It's it's so correct
43:32
or you describe it's the only reason
43:35
they were able to go around you.
43:37
The legitimate businessman is because this wasn't
43:39
legitimate business. So if the if the
43:41
core tenet of the by defenses this
43:43
is all legitimate business. That's what you
43:45
made the point at the hearings. People
43:47
need to know the truth. about c
43:49
e f c and what they're doing and
43:51
so what i'm and how come no deal
43:54
was ever done how come with sign on
43:56
there wasn't a deal done i don't mean
43:58
the ten million dollars i mean actual
44:00
transaction where we invested hundreds of millions or
44:02
billions of dollars. I had a detailed deal
44:04
where we were going to invest $300 to
44:06
$500 million in Romania. It
44:09
didn't happen. Biden's claimed they
44:11
worked for two years to present all these deals.
44:13
How come none of the deals happened? You're
44:16
going to get to it because you're going
44:18
to focus on this trial. And that's the
44:20
same way they operated in Chad and Uganda
44:22
because they needed things. So they came with
44:24
their capital. They claimed they were going to
44:26
do things. When they got what they needed,
44:28
they sort of then just rode
44:31
off and moved on to the next
44:33
thing. And what they needed at the
44:35
end of July 2017 is they needed
44:37
intel and details about those sealed indictments
44:39
of CFC executives and what it meant
44:41
to their companies. So key on that.
44:43
And we also want to put up
44:46
on the screen here the Devin Archer
44:48
messages with Hunter Biden, where he's saying,
44:50
well, gee, Hunter, we're, in
44:52
essence, we're telling the Chinese we
44:54
can protect them from indictments. And
44:56
here I am, Devin Archer, getting
44:58
indicted. It sort of limits
45:01
our ability to be able to sell that protection.
45:04
But here is the opening statement in
45:07
the government's allegations against CEFC.
45:10
This is a case about greed and corruption, about
45:13
more than $2 million in bribes,
45:16
cash hidden in gift boxes,
45:18
international wire transfers, and
45:20
promises of future riches. Profits
45:23
offered and paid by the defendant, that
45:25
man, Patrick Ho, offered and paid to
45:27
the leaders of two African nations, all
45:30
done in an effort to corruptly obtain
45:32
business for a multi-billion dollar Chinese oil
45:34
company. During this trial, you will hear
45:37
about two bribery schemes that were global,
45:39
but each began right here in New York. The
45:42
first scheme involved the Republic of Chad,
45:44
a country in Africa. The defendant and
45:46
his business associates offered $2 million in
45:48
cash to the top public official in
45:50
Chad, the president. They
45:53
concealed the cash in gift boxes,
45:55
and they offered this bribe in an effort
45:58
to obtain valuable oil rights. The
46:00
second scheme was similar but involved the Republic
46:02
of Uganda, another country in Africa. The
46:05
defendant and his associates sought to bribe
46:07
two of the top officials in Uganda,
46:10
the president and the foreign minister. The
46:12
defendant schemes to pay them millions of
46:14
dollars in cash and wire transfers, along
46:17
with offering them a cut of future
46:19
profits. Again, all in an
46:21
effort to obtain business for the Chinese
46:23
oil company. How was the
46:25
defendant able to get access to such high-ranking
46:27
officials? In both of these schemes, he took
46:29
advantage of the fact that he ran a
46:31
nonprofit organization, which was fully funded by
46:34
the oil company. This position gave
46:36
him access to some of the most
46:38
powerful leaders around the globe, including at
46:41
the United Nations right here in
46:43
Manhattan. He also held meetings here in New
46:45
York and he wired money through banks
46:47
here in New York. But
46:49
you'll learn that while the defendant led
46:52
a nonprofit, what drove him to Chad
46:54
and Uganda was money, business.
46:56
You see, the oil company already had
46:58
operations in Asia and Europe, but they
47:00
were looking to expand into the African
47:02
market. But the defendant and his associates
47:04
didn't want to take time to win
47:06
business the right way, in a competitive
47:08
role. After all, someone else might
47:10
get that deal. So they
47:12
cheated. They decided to offer bribes
47:15
to gain an unfair advantage, and
47:17
the defendant used his nonprofit organization
47:20
to make it look like those
47:22
bribes were something else, something
47:24
legitimate. But as the evidence
47:27
will show, those payments weren't charitable
47:29
donations. They weren't political contributions. They
47:31
were bribes, money offered to the
47:33
top officials in Chad and Uganda
47:35
in exchange for business. What
47:38
the defendant did wasn't just wrong. It
47:41
wasn't business as usual. It was
47:43
corrupt and it was criminal, and that is why we
47:45
are here today. Ladies and gentlemen, this opening statement is
47:48
the government's opportunity to give you an overview of the
47:50
evidence we're going to show you in this case. First,
47:53
I'm going to talk about what the evidence
47:55
is going to show. Second, I'm going to
47:58
talk about the different types of evidence that
48:00
you're going to see in this case. Third,
48:02
I'll give you a brief overview of the
48:04
charges. So what will the evidence show? You'll
48:06
learn that the defendant is a citizen of
48:08
China, and during this scheme, he was working
48:11
on behalf of a multi-billion dollar Chinese company
48:13
called CEFC China Energy, or just CEFC for
48:15
short. The company is headquartered
48:17
in Shanghai, China, with operations and offices
48:19
around the world. It's a massive company
48:21
engaged in primarily the oil business and
48:23
banking, as well as many other things.
48:26
Now, while the defendant worked on behalf
48:28
of this massive company, he did so
48:30
carefully, indirectly. You'll learn that the defendant
48:32
wasn't at least on paper an employee
48:34
of the oil company. Instead, he was
48:36
the secretary general of a not-profit organization,
48:39
or NGO, that the oil company funded.
48:41
In fact, a nonprofit NGO also went
48:43
by the same abbreviation as the energy
48:45
company CEFC. Running
48:47
an NGO allowed the defendant
48:49
to pass himself off as a humanitarian,
48:51
a man solely interested in promoting causes
48:54
like sustainable development, energy security, and clean
48:56
water. In those positions
48:58
at the NGO existed, the defendant
49:00
gained access to powerful leaders across
49:02
the globe, and that access was
49:04
brokered in many cases right here
49:06
in Manhattan. His NGO participated
49:09
in official United Nations events. It
49:11
looked impressive. But behind
49:13
closed doors, the defendant was focused
49:15
on business. Business for CEFC, the
49:17
multi-billion dollar oil company that funded
49:20
his NGO. He used his
49:22
NGO to gain access to world leaders who
49:24
could benefit the oil company's business, and he
49:26
used the cover of the NGO to
49:29
pay bribes, where it felt necessary
49:31
to get the job done. Bribes
49:34
for business, this for that.
49:37
You'll see he carried out the same plan in
49:39
both Chad and Uganda. The defendant wanted to break
49:41
into the African market, so he threw money at
49:43
top leaders in both countries and
49:46
Uganda. The scheme resulted in business
49:48
being directed to the defendant and
49:50
CEFC. In Chad, however, the scheme
49:52
backfired. The president rejected the
49:54
bribe and was furious about it. But as you'll
49:56
learn, The law makes it a
49:58
crime to offer. Or a bride
50:01
whether or not before an official accepts
50:03
it, and whether or not the bribe
50:05
successfully leads to any business or profits.
50:08
And. You'll see overwhelming evidence that the
50:10
defendant did exactly that he schemes and
50:13
conspired to corrupt officials decision making in
50:15
Chat and Uganda. He offered millions of
50:17
dollars in bribes and he did so
50:20
in an effort to gain business. Now.
50:23
I'd like to talk about the scheme in
50:25
greater detail. The scheme began in the fall
50:27
twenty fourteen when the defendant is businesses you
50:30
saw oil projects in Chat at the time
50:32
Cfc at operations in Asia and Europe but
50:34
had not yet established themselves in Africa. To
50:36
change this to defend it wanted to go
50:39
straight to the top to engage directly with
50:41
the President of Chat, but the defended didn't
50:43
know the President so he sought out someone
50:45
who did. A man named.
50:48
She's. Geico, Geico,
50:51
Was a former foreign minister in Senegal.
50:53
A country in West Africa. Geico,
50:56
Was connected summers powerful officials in Africa, including
50:58
the present of chats. The senate paid guide
51:00
oh to introduce him to the president. You'll.
51:03
Learn the defendant first met with Guy though
51:05
right here in Manhattan steps from United Nations
51:07
falling as being the defendant reported back to
51:09
his boss, the chairman of the multi billion
51:11
dollar oil companies that she had set in
51:14
motion. A plants receive special attention and support
51:16
from the present of Chat. A
51:18
couple of weeks later, november twenty fourteenth, the
51:20
defendant flew to chat with other representatives from
51:23
the Cfc oil Company on was Geico. They
51:25
met with the President and the president was
51:27
receptive. He presented the defendant
51:30
and Cfc with an opportunity to
51:32
access to obtain extremely valuable oil
51:34
fields. But the first meeting. They.
51:36
Didn't go into details like how much
51:39
Cfc would pay to achieve those rights.
51:41
All. The defendant new is it the President
51:44
would make the final decision on whether or
51:46
not Cfc. Would. Sell those rights and
51:48
at what price? That. A
51:50
senate was eager to seal the
51:52
deal. So through Geico, He.
51:54
Represented. That. they would set up
51:56
a second meeting and chat almost immediately on the heels
51:58
of the first meeting Guido thought this
52:01
was a bad idea. It was too soon. CFC
52:03
had not done the work yet to figure out
52:05
the price it would offer for the oil, but
52:08
the defendant insisted on the second meeting right away.
52:10
Why? The defendant wanted the second meeting so badly
52:12
they wanted to get in front of the president
52:14
in person before any negotiation on the price had
52:17
taken place because the plan was
52:19
to bribe the president to throw money at
52:21
him to make sure the negotiation went the
52:23
way the defendant wanted it to go. You
52:26
see during the second meeting with the president
52:28
of Chad, the defendant and his associate presented
52:30
the president with several gift
52:32
boxes, but they didn't just
52:35
contain gifts. Hidden inside
52:37
was two million dollars in
52:39
cash. Money for
52:41
an oil deal, this for
52:43
that. You'll learn
52:45
however the defendant had their corrupt plan backfire.
52:47
The president of Chad saw this as a
52:50
blatant attempt to bribe him. He was furious.
52:52
He confronted the defendant and the other oil
52:54
company representatives. He demanded to know
52:57
why they had tried to bribe him and pay him off. After
53:00
the president spoke to first person to respond to
53:02
the defendant, replied and said, no
53:05
denial. Instead they said
53:07
the president was mistaken or misunderstood.
53:09
The defendant was simply, the defendant
53:11
was impressed by the president's reaction.
53:15
The defendant and his associates then spoke quickly
53:17
and privately. They came up with a
53:19
solution. They convinced the president to keep
53:21
the money and they would
53:24
wire him a letter saying that the two million
53:26
dollars in cash was really just a charitable donation
53:28
and they did just that. You'll learn that after
53:30
leaving Chad, the defendant did a draft short letter
53:32
to the president saying the oil company wished to
53:35
make the two million dollar donation for
53:37
which the president would use something
53:39
at his personal disposal. But
53:41
along with that letter, the defendant worked on a
53:44
second document that was included in the letter, an
53:46
agreement between the oil company and the government of
53:48
Chad that said the Chadian government would support the
53:50
oil company in obtaining the oil rights in Chad.
53:53
Because Call it a donation or not,
53:55
the defendant was focused on business. If
53:58
he could get the business. By
54:00
labeling secret cash in a box as
54:02
a donation. That was just fine. Let's
54:06
talk about how the defense second
54:08
bribery scheme worked. This involves Uganda.
54:10
He played much the same game. Just.
54:13
Was different players. This.
54:15
Time He didn't offer just one bride.
54:18
He. Offered multiple bribes to to high level
54:20
officials in Uganda. the Foreign minister in the
54:22
President still hundred and twenty fourteen and twenty
54:24
fifteen to defend using his status as the
54:26
head of a nonprofit and jokes. Met multiple
54:29
times in New York with the former Foreign
54:31
Minister of Uganda at the time. the for
54:33
Mr was serving. A. One year
54:35
term as one of the highest ranking officials
54:38
at the United Nations, the President of the
54:40
General Assembly, and during these private meetings they
54:42
discussed ways to connect the defendant and his
54:44
associates with the oil companies to the President
54:46
of Uganda. As. It happened to present
54:48
have you got it was the for Ministers brother in law.
54:51
And the foreign minister promised that could
54:53
easily bring the two sides together To
54:55
the descended developed a relationship with the
54:57
foreign minister. And. Public that said
54:59
it appeared with him at you and
55:01
events gave speeches, talked about losses, humanitarian
55:03
goals, but in private the defendant was
55:05
focused on how the Foreign minister could
55:07
open doors for Cf seats to pursue
55:09
all sorts of business in Uganda. And
55:11
late twenty fifteen the foreign ministers term
55:14
as United Nations ended he returned was
55:16
powerful position in Uganda. And.
55:18
At that point all the groundwork had been laid. The
55:21
for Mr was right out. The defendant
55:23
and the does that send it was
55:25
more than willing to pay up the
55:27
for miss or reached out to the
55:30
senate. He requested a contribution or donations
55:32
for a so called foundation the foreign
55:34
minister wanted to launch and he provided
55:36
the account information for international wire transfer.
55:38
The defendant eagerly responded that he was
55:40
ready to renew their commitment and agreement.
55:43
But. You'll see that this talk about of
55:45
the nation was all winks and nods. The
55:47
defendant didn't ask anything about what the foundation
55:49
or would do, They didn't talk about that.
55:51
As far as the to fit it was
55:54
concerned all that mattered. Was. At
55:56
the foreign minister wanted to get paid but
55:58
before he paid up. The defend
56:00
it made crystal clear that he wanted
56:02
something In exchange the defendant demanded an
56:04
invitation to the inauguration. The president of
56:06
Uganda who had just been reelected an
56:08
email after email to defend it demanded
56:10
meetings with the president and other top
56:13
you gotta and officials insisted that before
56:15
traveling to Uganda the foreign minister provide
56:17
him with a list of specific projects
56:19
that C E F C could participate
56:21
in and when he got the invitation
56:23
to the inauguration and received assurances that
56:25
he would get access is needed he
56:27
got and officials who had steer business.
56:29
the Cfc. The defendant was ready to
56:31
pay up. He wired half a million dollars the
56:34
counter The foreign minister. But. Crop
56:36
scheme didn't stop with the for Mr
56:38
to defend it. Also scheme to bribe
56:40
the President of Uganda, the foreign ministers
56:42
brother in law. The. Defended suggested to
56:44
his boss the Chairman's the oil company. That
56:47
the money be provided in cash. As.
56:50
A suppose donation to the President's reelection
56:52
campaigns. Of course, the President just been
56:54
reelected dismayed. No sense. But. It
56:56
didn't matter to the defendant business mattered.
56:59
So. Is about to board the Plane de
57:01
Cada. The defend told the foreign minister that
57:03
he needed special assistance with customs in Uganda.
57:06
Because. They were bringing some quote very
57:08
nice gifts for your president. What?
57:11
Did the defendant and Cfc wanted exchange
57:13
for the money? As I said, it
57:15
was simple business business for Ctf seats.
57:17
After wired half a million dollars and
57:19
landing in Uganda with those very gives,
57:21
the defended and his associates met with
57:23
the President, the Ford minister and other
57:25
you gotta officials. They got the inside
57:27
track on a variety of profitable business
57:29
opportunities. The defendant reported back to his
57:31
boss had C E F c that
57:33
the visit and the discussions were successful.
57:35
That the President was likely to be
57:37
a highly supportive of cooperating with See
57:39
of seats and fields. Like energy infrastructure
57:41
fight as agriculture and tourism. The president
57:43
even agree to carve out a large
57:46
piece near of land your leg victoria
57:48
for the oil companies to develop a
57:50
high end tourist resort. Shortly.
57:52
After the trip to Uganda that it's in
57:54
a got back in touch with the For
57:56
mister he said that Cfc had decided that
57:58
their first priority. Would be. Require you
58:00
got it Bank But event a promise
58:02
to Foreign minister the present to be
58:04
partners an adventure so that C E
58:06
F C profited, those officials would be
58:08
able to line their pockets to. And.
58:11
Sure enough, a few months later the for
58:13
Mr. Learned of you Gotta Bags that was
58:15
looking to be acquired. And. Who
58:17
did he bring this opportunity to
58:19
the descendants and Cfc? This.
58:22
For that. That. Is a
58:24
summary. Of what happened. This.
58:27
Is the partial opening statement of
58:29
not. Republicans. In
58:31
Congress. But. The actual United
58:33
States Government. So we're supposed to believe
58:36
that that Cf seats which by the
58:38
way, Patrick Cote gets convicted on six
58:40
of seven counts, get sentenced to three
58:42
years in prison based on those allegations
58:44
and those charges. Joel Valdez executive producer
58:47
Firebrand, your take on the government's opening
58:49
statement. I can't wait to watch the
58:51
Netflix series on this if they even
58:53
come forward with this, but that was
58:55
insane it. usually. you know some of
58:58
these. I'm. Silly. That if
59:00
elected democrats in Congress wants you to believe that
59:02
this is you know all the this hunters. just
59:04
such a great business man. but. These. Deals
59:06
that he's doing with these people seem to
59:08
just be clearly corrupt. And. I
59:11
think they laid it out for you on
59:13
the skin will and what's interesting is the
59:15
pattern recognition. If you heard me going through
59:17
that you can actually start to think about
59:19
who plays what role here. And so as
59:21
this trial goes on, attorney and and you're
59:23
the one who was pounding the table on
59:25
this in the congressional testimony we learn of
59:28
the Serbian Die. The Serbian guy tell us
59:30
about his would just real comfort or his
59:32
jaw hits is. So you just did a
59:34
phenomenal job reading what our own Department of
59:36
Justice. Opened. A seven
59:38
day I think that each day
59:40
was you know that finalizing was
59:42
a jury trial in the S
59:45
D N Y and notice because
59:47
other love you didn't have used
59:49
the prosecutors. Why didn't they named
59:51
Chairman Me? Why didn't they named
59:53
Director Zang And why were they
59:55
so shy about naming Csc and
59:57
the indictments and their trial. Patrick.
1:00:00
How was working At behest of all
1:00:02
of them Director same of the plane
1:00:05
that left Hong Kong to fly with
1:00:07
the two million dollars a gift that
1:00:09
of boxes. Director.
1:00:11
Zang was the C or C of see
1:00:13
Official net, the same director saying that one
1:00:16
Hunter Biden was shaking down on July thirtieth,
1:00:18
two thousand and seventeen demanding that they flynn
1:00:20
ten million dollars and then ultimately on the
1:00:23
Thirty first as a bind families. So there's
1:00:25
a saying. Walks. Like a duck
1:00:27
talks like a duck. It's. Probably.
1:00:30
A.get this is clacking a lot like a
1:00:32
bra and the evolution of you. Look at
1:00:34
the fact pattern with the bidens. It's.
1:00:37
Exactly the same sacked pattern as Uganda
1:00:39
in Chad and those are just with
1:00:41
the Sd. A wide talked about. See.
1:00:43
A was doing this all over the world.
1:00:45
Yeah well this is just where they a
1:00:48
sufficient enter A Sticks Your next is as
1:00:50
a New York backyards as a New York
1:00:52
Meetings But what's interesting is the you've gotta
1:00:54
look at the common threads you're into our
1:00:56
listeners. This will repeated. Again, In
1:00:58
some other Chinese enterprise. certain to repeat. But
1:01:00
first you have what what has to look
1:01:02
like a legitimate seeing them and so that's
1:01:04
where hose there to see all this is
1:01:06
just our international sustainable development work and clean
1:01:09
water. But don't you see you words a
1:01:11
legitimate thing. they need somebody to be out
1:01:13
there to make the bride payment. It's really
1:01:15
going on under the table look legitimate soon
1:01:17
a lot of ways. how does this for
1:01:19
the company but he couldn't have whole run
1:01:22
around anywhere in the attic the kind of
1:01:24
knew he was in trouble for this Africa
1:01:26
stuff. so they go get. Him a Bob
1:01:28
Alinsky to say Okay, we got something to make
1:01:30
this look legitimate and that's when the real dirty
1:01:32
stuff starts. So there's a psycho hear that that
1:01:35
I was able to track. First.
1:01:38
Cfc. Needs the connectors. Then.
1:01:40
They need the introductions. Than. They
1:01:43
need the bribes then they need to deal.
1:01:45
So in this trial we we get introduced
1:01:47
to the first can and and by the
1:01:49
way Hunter right. Connect. Gilly are
1:01:51
connector right Then they get to the
1:01:53
infant the or that the government people
1:01:55
the bidens than the bribes than than
1:01:57
the payoff. Jeremy.
1:02:00
Who's Jeremic? So what your make
1:02:02
is a Serbian national who was
1:02:04
the a President of the General
1:02:06
Assembly The Un General Assembly I
1:02:08
believe he was there. Two.
1:02:10
Thousand and Twelve you serve in a
1:02:12
one year capacity and that's where he
1:02:14
met Patrick Cove To that relationships and
1:02:17
they developed and then when he lasts,
1:02:19
when full Germek left or he was
1:02:21
actually a paid adviser to see a
1:02:23
seat for multiple years, he was good.
1:02:25
I think only of those, I wait
1:02:27
a second, a major make might have
1:02:29
gotten paid millions of dollars across his
1:02:31
total cost of the so rude. Jeremic
1:02:33
is the President of the Un General
1:02:35
Assembly, and in that role you got
1:02:37
a lot of relationships with all the
1:02:39
foreign ministers. The. Key powerful players on
1:02:41
all over the world and he rolls
1:02:43
out of that job and he actually
1:02:45
weaves the job because his government's in
1:02:48
Serbia gets thrown out of power so
1:02:50
you can't be the representative of your
1:02:52
government would your government gets Sarah power?
1:02:54
He loses that and what what immediately
1:02:56
happens. Powerful, Man powerful position,
1:02:58
right out of power. The Chinese see
1:03:00
the opportunity. They scoop him up. He
1:03:02
starts getting hundreds of thousands, maybe millions
1:03:04
of dollars from China immediately as a
1:03:06
connector upon that role. And then who
1:03:09
does what what Cfc saying at this
1:03:11
time? Patrick? Oh since we gotta get
1:03:13
these African deals and chat in Uganda
1:03:15
so they go to the zoo or
1:03:17
Jeremic and they say well you're a
1:03:19
Serbian guys We have this position as
1:03:21
the President of Un General Assembly to
1:03:23
who can you connect us with in
1:03:26
Africa. And. That's where we meet.
1:03:28
Gaudio. Am I saying that right?
1:03:30
Yeah, I think it's gaudio in the interesting
1:03:32
thing here in which is powerful for the
1:03:34
American people is yet to understand the way.
1:03:37
Intel. Or sort of operations
1:03:39
work. Because Book Germek was witness number
1:03:41
one for the United States government A
1:03:43
D O J, they didn't accuse him
1:03:45
of any wrongdoing he showed up in,
1:03:47
was happy to testify. It's I seen.
1:03:50
At his peak, he might have been getting
1:03:52
paid a million dollars years under a Csc
1:03:54
contract. I'd have to go back and check
1:03:56
that, but notice that because ever was like, well,
1:03:58
why wouldn't Patrick hold know. what
1:04:00
Chairman Yee's agenda was. Well Chairman Yee
1:04:03
didn't tell Patrick Hoe probably all of
1:04:05
his agenda, nor did Director Zang, nor
1:04:07
so Vook Jeremy was simply a connector
1:04:10
and obviously leaving the you know president of the
1:04:12
UN General Assembly he knew the leaders of all
1:04:14
the countries around the world and could get to
1:04:16
any of them and so they
1:04:18
were happy CFC they were happy to
1:04:20
engage him and pay him large sums
1:04:22
of money to just simply make introductions
1:04:24
and then Vook would you know leave
1:04:26
the room and go on with his
1:04:28
other stuff. I think a lot of
1:04:31
people don't know that that that is
1:04:33
a cottage industry that exists people that
1:04:35
get paid millions of dollars just to
1:04:37
make these connections. So Vook Jeremy creates
1:04:39
this meeting with Gadio. Gadio is the
1:04:41
former foreign minister of Senegal oh
1:04:43
and by the way former president
1:04:45
of the UN General Assembly how
1:04:47
interesting how that works right and
1:04:50
then how does Gadio then become an asset
1:04:53
essentially of the Chinese in this deal.
1:04:55
Well so he had
1:04:57
the relationship originally with the
1:05:00
president of Chad not just a
1:05:02
relationship but close friendship apparently and
1:05:04
so Vook engaged them to set
1:05:06
up that meeting originally with Patrick
1:05:08
Hoe. My understanding is the original
1:05:10
meetings were in New York around
1:05:12
the UN stuff and then ultimately
1:05:14
they did on-site meetings in Chad where
1:05:17
you know those gift boxes were exchanged
1:05:19
and stuff like that but it's just
1:05:21
a serial of leveraging powerful
1:05:23
political people using capital to do that
1:05:25
getting in the room with the bright
1:05:27
people and then you know CFC remember CFC
1:05:29
in the first meeting wouldn't tell you
1:05:31
their agenda because if they actually told
1:05:33
you their true agenda you would get
1:05:35
up and walk out of the room right.
1:05:39
Vook Jeremy cuz simply oh I can get you a
1:05:41
meeting with him you're paying. So he
1:05:43
sets him up he helps the government
1:05:45
but he's getting a meeting with another
1:05:47
guy getting a meeting this Gadio guy.
1:05:50
So he's an African from Senegal I
1:05:52
think he knew Jeremy they'd both gone
1:05:54
to Harvard together and so Gadio shows
1:05:56
up and says okay I will I
1:05:58
will connect CEFC. with people
1:06:00
in government. Doesn't it
1:06:03
doesn't Gaddio essentially play the role of the
1:06:05
Biden president in the country? Yeah, but isn't
1:06:07
he the archetype? Yeah, and
1:06:09
what we haven't talked about is
1:06:11
Vuk Jermak had a very, very
1:06:13
close relationship with Hunter Biden and
1:06:15
the Biden family. And that's actually
1:06:18
talked about in the fall of
1:06:20
2015 when CFC started making their
1:06:22
approach to the Biden family, which
1:06:24
started in October 2015. So Vuk
1:06:26
Jermak's not only involved in that,
1:06:28
but also a very close relationship.
1:06:30
Going back to those WhatsApp messages,
1:06:32
your listeners can go and see
1:06:34
that on July 31st, in
1:06:37
between shaking down Director Zhang for
1:06:39
the money, and then a phone call,
1:06:41
Vuk Jermak reaches out to Hunter Biden
1:06:43
and Hunter responds saying, Hey, I'm on
1:06:45
with the director, I'll call you after.
1:06:48
So all these people are intertwined.
1:06:50
And I believe under national security,
1:06:52
there's something much bigger out there
1:06:54
that we haven't been fully educated
1:06:56
on on what was going on.
1:06:58
And you can see it. Why
1:07:00
didn't the SDNY name CFC Chairman
1:07:02
Ian Director Zhang? Why was Charles
1:07:05
McGonagall, the head of counter intelligence
1:07:07
of the FBI, a 25 career
1:07:09
veteran of the FBI, was right in the middle
1:07:11
of all of this in July of 2017 and
1:07:14
2018. So I believe there's
1:07:16
a lot more that our
1:07:18
intel agencies and the Department of Justice know
1:07:21
about all these parts, as well as the
1:07:23
Biden family's involvement that the American people haven't
1:07:25
quite yet been educated on. The
1:07:27
UN doesn't come out smelling like
1:07:30
a rose on this, do they? And when
1:07:32
it looks like someone from one of these
1:07:34
third world countries gets a major position of
1:07:36
power, which is kind of the last thing
1:07:38
that happens before you get some major consultant
1:07:40
contract from the Chinese. And as
1:07:42
Gadio describes it, he says, well, you know,
1:07:44
I said, I'd get them with the president
1:07:46
of Chad, I show up, I don't know
1:07:48
that this $2 million in cash in a
1:07:50
box is going to be presented. It gets
1:07:53
presented. Gadio says, I should have
1:07:55
known better. I should have walked away. I
1:07:57
knew it was a bribe. I stayed involved In
1:07:59
The Conspiracy. C He gets a non
1:08:01
prosecution agreements in order to testify against
1:08:03
Patch or Co. who's who's the target
1:08:05
here. But but what it's important for
1:08:08
people to see is when the Chinese
1:08:10
are trying to do one of these
1:08:12
corrupt deals. They. They
1:08:14
absolutely have to have the
1:08:16
folks to have to really
1:08:19
lubricate that bribe and in
1:08:21
in this trial. You. See
1:08:23
exactly what Hunter Biden was doing
1:08:25
in the United States reflected in
1:08:27
the conduct of people who are
1:08:29
getting charged with crimes. Correct, correct
1:08:31
and go back And looked. It
1:08:33
wasn't just Book Jeremic, it was
1:08:35
the subsequent to Presidents of the
1:08:38
you know General Assembly after vulgar
1:08:40
Make it was John Ash. Who.
1:08:42
Was also charged and a Chinese national
1:08:44
went to jail for corruption and stuff
1:08:47
like that. Then when John Ash last
1:08:49
there was an individual named Sam to
1:08:51
Tessa which had to do as the
1:08:53
you done to stars armed so they
1:08:56
just three consecutive. I don't know if
1:08:58
they did pre or post that but
1:09:00
it's publicly well documented. Three Presidents of
1:09:02
the Un General Assembly were intertwined with
1:09:05
Css business around the world and acting
1:09:07
as connectors are being on the receiving
1:09:09
end of millions of dollars of from
1:09:11
Cfc. So. Chinese Communist Party. It is
1:09:14
laid bare what the true business model
1:09:16
of Cfcs threatened and and by extension
1:09:18
China really, that the true business model
1:09:21
is to get these deals by not
1:09:23
playing fair and so And that marionette
1:09:25
that's not you saying it. Has
1:09:27
taught me. So it's it's not
1:09:29
the Republican Party or Chairman Comber
1:09:32
German Jordan that is the Department
1:09:34
of Justice and the Prosecutors in
1:09:36
the Sdn. Why? Some. Would
1:09:38
say that sought the toughest, the most
1:09:40
renowned you know district in the whole
1:09:42
country. I'd love to see them interviewed
1:09:45
on Csc and weighing in in front
1:09:47
of Congress. And to some I'd say
1:09:49
okay it's one thing if it's Africa
1:09:51
exotic place, maybe you gotta pay bribes
1:09:53
as but we actually saw this reflected
1:09:56
in North America as well with Pemex
1:09:58
and Mexico. That. Comes out. The
1:10:00
trial as well as we see
1:10:02
in the transcripts some of the
1:10:04
very players involved in these bribes
1:10:06
and Africa are are wadden up
1:10:08
with people around Biden world or
1:10:10
with people around Cfc world. They
1:10:12
wanted to acquire Pemex which is
1:10:14
the major Mexican a producer of
1:10:16
petrol. What does that tell us
1:10:18
about Cfc will that their tentacles
1:10:21
were everywhere. Remember in Romania that
1:10:23
I was heavily involved in Csc
1:10:25
was willing are looking at the
1:10:27
point three to five hundred million
1:10:29
dollars of capital. Into buying
1:10:31
down the majority ownership of Gabriel
1:10:33
Popovich in his company in Romania
1:10:35
to help pretend see with would
1:10:38
he was doing with in Pemex.
1:10:40
there was discussions book Jeremic I
1:10:42
believe. Went to Harvard with the
1:10:44
Ceo of Pemex. And. The
1:10:46
Vote: Germek set up a meeting we're not
1:10:49
only see a C was part of the
1:10:51
discussions but Burris Ma. The. Ukrainian energy
1:10:53
company that advices become world famous that
1:10:55
Hunter and Devon said on the board
1:10:57
on was sitting at the table as
1:11:00
well. So these chemicals this one belt
1:11:02
one road as see a C had
1:11:04
all over the world at your extensive
1:11:06
negotiating tables data and I want to
1:11:09
for a moment zero in on Chad
1:11:11
and how it played out in this
1:11:13
trial and or there's there's a part
1:11:15
of the of the testimony of gotta
1:11:18
go with are talking about why Chad
1:11:20
mattered and and how the business. Business
1:11:23
works So so here's the government's question
1:11:25
and what Vuk Jeremic say to you.
1:11:28
With respect to the defendant in here they're talking
1:11:30
about as Chad and the question as to Geico.
1:11:32
He. Told me about one of his friends
1:11:34
in China who's doing a lot of work
1:11:36
with the United Nations, the United Nations Economic
1:11:39
and Social Organizations. He also told me that
1:11:41
it works with an oil company called Cf
1:11:43
Seat. China. Energy. Fund
1:11:45
Company. He said you should
1:11:47
meet him because he's a good friend of
1:11:50
ours. Number one, Number two, you know very
1:11:52
powerful company in China. They're interested in oil
1:11:54
and Africa and he himself is interested in
1:11:56
helping to be introduced. To. Chat
1:11:58
the Central Africa. We can republic whole
1:12:01
chat. Okay and did Mr.
1:12:03
German say anything to you with respect
1:12:05
to with the defendant or companies interests
1:12:07
were in Chad? I think the main
1:12:09
introduction had to be made First and
1:12:11
later we discuss the fact that Cfc
1:12:13
could also provide a Chad. You know.
1:12:16
With. Other areas of interest
1:12:18
such as infrastructure. Banking.
1:12:20
System. Military. Equipment.
1:12:23
And. Other things like that. So I wanted a
1:12:25
point to this in the trial because if you're
1:12:28
watching all this and the full, some of it
1:12:30
is. Which. Billionaires and what
1:12:32
part of the world's are gonna read
1:12:34
some extra benefit. It goes a lot
1:12:37
cheaper than that because once these bribes
1:12:39
are made and once the hook to
1:12:41
the Chinese com his party or in
1:12:43
these countries it's not just the energy,
1:12:45
it's the financial systems. it is the
1:12:48
military system and all the sudden this
1:12:50
becomes a pretty pretty broad reaching will.
1:12:52
A key point in that is Remember
1:12:54
and of the prosecutors outline this in
1:12:57
there was the state owned. Chinese.
1:12:59
Energy company that had been penalised
1:13:02
with a one point two billion
1:13:04
dollars penalty by the government of
1:13:06
Chad it was existing When see
1:13:08
a see all the Sudden has
1:13:11
an interest in Chad and their
1:13:13
energy. Case. That was
1:13:15
done before see A was going to
1:13:17
be the masthead. That yes. Then all
1:13:19
of a sudden. Vote
1:13:22
makes an introduction, Gaudio makes an
1:13:24
introduction with the President's and then
1:13:26
weirdly enough that one point two
1:13:28
billion dollar penalty becomes a four
1:13:30
hundred million dollar penalty and then
1:13:33
some equity ownership of that they
1:13:35
structured while they were doing this.
1:13:37
I believe if you read between
1:13:39
the lines and you axes could
1:13:41
interview more people see a season
1:13:43
Gender in going in the Chad
1:13:46
was the actually helps the Chinese
1:13:48
state owned energy company either removed
1:13:50
that penalty. or get it reduced like i
1:13:52
said it went from one point two billion four
1:13:54
hundred million and then a slice of equity in
1:13:57
it's and then all of a sudden see a
1:13:59
c wasn't really that
1:14:01
interested in doing a lot of deals.
1:14:03
They never did a deal in Chad, but
1:14:06
when they reached out, they were hot
1:14:08
and heavy. They brought $2 million. Now,
1:14:11
remember, Patrick Cole was not on the
1:14:13
private jet that flew to Chad, is
1:14:15
my understanding. It was Director Zang with
1:14:17
those two million, those gift boxes with
1:14:19
$2 million of cash. The
1:14:21
same Director Zang that I met
1:14:24
face-to-face with around the world, that
1:14:26
the Hunter Biden family shook down
1:14:28
at the end of July 2017,
1:14:30
and that ultimately sent that $5-plus
1:14:32
million to Hudson
1:14:34
West 3 and then funded
1:14:36
a Wasco Holdings-Hunters company. There's
1:14:39
a lot more here than even we know, and we
1:14:41
spent a lot of time looking at all these facts
1:14:43
and diving into it. I love
1:14:45
how the SDNY is making a better case
1:14:47
to defund the United Nations than most Republicans
1:14:49
in Congress. They are
1:14:52
showing the UN as really
1:14:55
an influence-pedaling operation that allows the Chinese to
1:14:57
go and engage in capture right here in
1:14:59
our country. In a lot of ways, we
1:15:01
ought to be utilizing that jurisdiction more if
1:15:04
those things are happening in New York. Well,
1:15:06
no question. People are like, well,
1:15:09
that American in the middle of
1:15:12
Nebraska, listening to the Firebrand podcast is going to
1:15:14
be like, Tony Boblinski was a military man. He's
1:15:16
proud of all of his military. What was he
1:15:18
even doing in business with CFC? If
1:15:20
I read, if the government had
1:15:22
come to me and given me one paragraph of
1:15:24
their opening statement in that, I would have ran
1:15:26
as fast as I could out the door, and
1:15:28
I would have told James Gillier, you guys are
1:15:30
out of your mind. You want nothing to do
1:15:32
with this company, and the Bidens at that time,
1:15:34
you guys are clearly out of your mind. You
1:15:36
shouldn't be anywhere near this, and you should be
1:15:38
running. Okay, well, let me push back. I didn't
1:15:40
know any of this information at that time. I
1:15:42
wish I had. The crazy thing is the SDNY
1:15:45
started issuing FISA warrants, so they
1:15:48
were listening to recorded conversations, email
1:15:50
exchanges, real time, all the way
1:15:52
back to 2014 and 15 with
1:15:55
Patrick Oh.
1:15:58
So they had to have known, or are... FBI
1:16:00
or CIA, the DOJ had to know
1:16:02
every aspect of what I was
1:16:04
doing with CFC, what the Biden's
1:16:06
were doing. And those are questions
1:16:08
that we have yet to see
1:16:11
answered on why this wasn't forestalled
1:16:14
or somebody didn't step in, right? Why didn't
1:16:16
I get a knock on my door one
1:16:18
day and say, hey, listen, we don't go
1:16:20
and do a lot of detail. We understand
1:16:22
that you're working on this deal. You should
1:16:24
just stop taking calls, stop responding to emails
1:16:26
and stay as far away from this as
1:16:28
possible. Yeah, it's the
1:16:30
case of Sam Katusa, who
1:16:33
gets a lot of
1:16:35
attention from the FBI reviewing emails,
1:16:37
phone calls, and that
1:16:39
emerges in this allegation of a
1:16:41
big bribery. Sam Katusa was the
1:16:44
president of the United General Assembly.
1:16:46
Two people after, the guy between
1:16:48
them was John Ash, who they
1:16:51
also were monitoring, who they
1:16:53
also charged, and they sent another
1:16:55
Chinese national to jail for corruption
1:16:57
that was associated with Patrick Dell. Do
1:16:59
you think there's a single president of the UN General
1:17:02
Assembly from a third world country who doesn't at least
1:17:04
have some bribery outreach from CEFC or the Chinese? I
1:17:06
don't know. It seems crazy
1:17:08
to me. It just all seems crazy.
1:17:10
Well, and this is an ongoing concern.
1:17:12
I mean, let's, so we've now kind
1:17:14
of, we've gone over the CEFC business
1:17:16
model. Get the connectors, get the decision,
1:17:18
the government decision makers, get the bribes,
1:17:21
get the deals. And you've pointed out
1:17:23
it doesn't always emerge in a
1:17:25
deal, but as our own government stated,
1:17:28
if you offer the bribe, even if
1:17:30
the deal doesn't emerge on the back
1:17:32
end, you are guilty of violating these
1:17:35
laws. And unfortunately,
1:17:37
we don't view foreign corrupt practices the
1:17:39
way we view domestic corrupt practices. We're
1:17:41
harder on what you can do to
1:17:43
bribe foreigners than on what foreigners can
1:17:45
do to bribe people in
1:17:48
the United States. But we've been over that
1:17:50
business model. We've been over how these various
1:17:52
connectors are
1:17:54
playing the role of the Bidens abroad,
1:17:56
but then the Bidens get brought in to sort
1:17:59
of do that in the United States. States. And
1:18:01
now I think a listener would be left
1:18:03
sort of wondering, so where do we go
1:18:05
from here? I mean, is CEFC still
1:18:08
on the march in their
1:18:10
bribery and colonialism and
1:18:12
are worried, even forget about
1:18:14
the Bidens, that there are other
1:18:16
US policymakers and decision makers who
1:18:18
are going to be confronted with
1:18:20
these corrupt opportunities? Well, crazy
1:18:24
enough, when Patrick Coe was, you know,
1:18:26
indicted, arrested, and thrown in jail in
1:18:28
November 2017, and
1:18:31
then shortly after that, we could spend
1:18:33
a whole other show talking about what
1:18:35
Hunter and Jim Biden did to, you
1:18:37
know, alter documents in Hudson West 3,
1:18:39
remove Chairman E so they could continue.
1:18:41
Imagine this, Patrick Coe gets indicted.
1:18:45
Hunter Biden in a recording
1:18:47
talks about his belief that Patrick Coe is
1:18:49
the spy chief of China. And
1:18:51
are the Bidens running as fast as they can
1:18:53
out the door? No, they're running
1:18:56
in the door. Hunter
1:18:58
Biden wants to represent Patrick Coe so he
1:19:00
can get a million dollars simply for finding
1:19:02
a lawyer. Apparently, Patrick Coe now
1:19:04
potentially might sue Hunter Biden for that
1:19:07
million dollars because it was never returned.
1:19:09
I saw that in a press release.
1:19:11
And then Chairman E is detained in
1:19:13
mainland China. Are the Bidens running out of
1:19:15
the room? No, they're digging in. They're
1:19:17
altering Hudson West 3's operating agreement
1:19:19
so they can keep paying themselves
1:19:22
millions of dollars, and they have
1:19:24
no authority or approval from Chairman
1:19:26
E, the partner of CFC, to
1:19:28
do it. It is crazy, but
1:19:31
CFC collapsed, was taken over by
1:19:33
who? The Chinese government. And
1:19:36
I'm sure there's a next version
1:19:38
of CFC out there. I've stayed
1:19:40
away from it. I'm happy to
1:19:42
be done with it, but I'm
1:19:44
sure there's small versions of CFC
1:19:46
and large versions that are using
1:19:48
capital around the world. They call
1:19:51
it loan to own, one belt,
1:19:53
one road in seaports, military installations,
1:19:55
buying up farmland, all kinds
1:19:57
of stuff that the Chinese Communist Party is doing
1:19:59
right now. Now as you and
1:20:01
I sit here for this amazing podcast
1:20:03
and they're doing it at At At
1:20:06
at every level. Whether it's send and
1:20:08
Sang saying to Chase after Eric Small,
1:20:10
well when he was on the City
1:20:12
government in the city of Dublin, California,
1:20:15
or whether it's offering these massive connector
1:20:17
consulting contracts to people in the Un
1:20:19
to go and do their bidding, it's
1:20:21
everywhere. All along. That straight is an
1:20:24
important point. One of the things that
1:20:26
the I'm To democrats want to argue
1:20:28
is well Joe Biden announced. In
1:20:30
October twenty sitting that he wasn't
1:20:33
running for president, why would see
1:20:35
a seat care about it? The
1:20:37
Chinese or Hundred Years seekers. And
1:20:40
in that announcement Joe implied that.
1:20:42
Stay. Tuned something could be coming
1:20:44
on that running in this election but
1:20:47
potentially could run and further elections. Csc
1:20:49
approach the by in family in the
1:20:51
beginning of October and then the. Young.
1:20:54
Increased it started doing deals. While Jos in
1:20:56
the White House's all these communications that have
1:20:59
been made public by Chairman Com or Chairman
1:21:01
Jordan and Soaks they are long term sinkers.
1:21:03
They could plant seeds as small as a
1:21:06
you know taxi driver or a Yahoo Bird
1:21:08
drivers, some business men or women that are
1:21:10
simply just gathering intel. We want to
1:21:12
know you're you're driving a new Bern D
1:21:14
seats. We just want to know every when
1:21:17
you pick up and and and the Chinese
1:21:19
national might just have to cooperate because the
1:21:21
Chinese Com his party of power over
1:21:23
them based. On their family being in mainland
1:21:25
sense of like that. So yes we have
1:21:27
to wait up. To not
1:21:29
make it you know I'm the boogie man
1:21:32
in the corner. The Sig knowledge of what
1:21:34
they are willing to do, how they are
1:21:36
doing it and how we as a country
1:21:38
lock arms and protect ourselves from that and
1:21:41
not fault. Brady is a capitalistic side of
1:21:43
it or as a different tools they're using
1:21:45
infiltrate us and set rules and stuff like
1:21:47
that and hold them accountable. and it was
1:21:49
part of hundred by the defense in his
1:21:52
deposition. Would get that that part on the
1:21:54
screen where says we'll my Dad Now you
1:21:56
know we were out of power, Dad was
1:21:58
out of office, So what if we
1:22:00
wanted to do a business with China? If
1:22:03
you're just looking at CEFC and the
1:22:05
Bidens, you might think, well, maybe that
1:22:07
looks more like legitimate business. But then
1:22:09
if you look at the fact that
1:22:11
they went and hired Gadio after
1:22:14
he had just left, all
1:22:16
of them, look, all of them, what they
1:22:18
do is they wait till you're just out, they get your hooks
1:22:20
in you, but you see with a number of these other people,
1:22:23
there is a revolving door in government. They're
1:22:25
willing to buy people off on their way
1:22:27
out with the prospect and the hope that
1:22:29
when those people get back in, they'll be
1:22:32
compromised. Yeah, looks like a duck, walks like
1:22:34
a duck, quacks like a duck. I'm willing
1:22:36
to bet it's a duck. You
1:22:39
have to be disappointed that when you voluntarily
1:22:42
provided all this information that you've
1:22:44
given Congress to the FBI, that
1:22:46
it didn't seem to be treated
1:22:49
with the same seriousness of
1:22:51
the Patrick Ho prosecution that we've
1:22:54
been going through. Do
1:22:56
you think that's just because it was
1:22:58
Hunter Biden playing the role of
1:23:01
the bribe solicitor and the bribe
1:23:03
facilitator as opposed to some random
1:23:05
Chinese national or some lower notoriety
1:23:08
person? As
1:23:10
I said, there is much
1:23:12
more here than the American people, even
1:23:14
you as a congressman are aware of.
1:23:17
Charles McGonigal, the head of
1:23:19
counter intelligence with a specialty
1:23:21
in Russia, was based
1:23:23
in New York City from 2016 through 2018. In
1:23:28
his indictment, they name a person
1:23:31
B. That person B
1:23:33
is Dorian Duka, an Albanian
1:23:35
national that also had
1:23:38
close ties to James Gilear and Hunter
1:23:40
Biden. So much so, there's an email
1:23:42
off the infamous laptop where Hunter Biden
1:23:45
says, his first name was Dorian, that
1:23:47
if Tony doesn't want to pay, I
1:23:49
never met Dorian, I never interacted with
1:23:51
Dorian, but James Gilear is talking in
1:23:54
this email exchange that I'm not on
1:23:56
how valuable Dorian Duka was in their
1:23:58
initial introduction. Hims was C
1:24:00
F C. Hunter.
1:24:03
Who wasn't willing to give anybody a
1:24:05
penny was saying if Tony isn't okay
1:24:07
with that all paid during to get
1:24:09
out of my own salary think about
1:24:12
the power. That statement that doing yoga
1:24:14
is person be. In. One of
1:24:16
trolls Mcgonigal to indictments and
1:24:18
during duper was being paid
1:24:20
by Csc. So are the
1:24:22
American people. Supposed. To
1:24:24
believe that the head of Counterintelligence.
1:24:27
In the summer of Two Thousand and
1:24:30
Seventeen wasn't fully aware of everything the
1:24:32
Pine family was doing, everything the Cfc
1:24:34
was doing. And oh, for reminder era
1:24:36
in the process of buying and nine
1:24:39
billion dollar fourteen percent stake and Rosneft,
1:24:41
the Russian owned put and controlled Us
1:24:43
sanctions, energy companies All that was going
1:24:46
on in the summer of Two Thousand
1:24:48
and Seventeen. By the way, shortly after
1:24:50
Joe Biden walked into a private dining
1:24:52
room at the Four Seasons. In
1:24:55
Washington, Dc to shake Germany's
1:24:57
hand Director Sayings Hand and
1:24:59
an entourage for fifteen to
1:25:02
twenty minutes According to Rob
1:25:04
Walkers sworn testimony, that Hunter.
1:25:06
Couldn't remember when he was under oath.
1:25:08
All of that going on and to
1:25:11
South Thousand and Seventeen. Csc was an
1:25:13
extension of the Chinese Communist Party deploying
1:25:15
billions and tens of billions of dollars
1:25:17
run the world's to represent the capitalistic
1:25:20
arm of getting their meet the hawks
1:25:22
in different countries and we need to
1:25:24
wake up in this country to protect
1:25:26
ourselves and protect his American people. And
1:25:29
I appreciate everything you're doing, focused on
1:25:31
that and getting your spears and other
1:25:33
people to focus on that point. What
1:25:35
I really enjoyed. About this discussion is
1:25:38
that the focus is an exclusively
1:25:40
on one administration, one family, one
1:25:42
president. This is really about a
1:25:44
global scheme to hurt America to
1:25:46
hurt our interest driven by the
1:25:48
Chinese and and really you've played
1:25:50
a key part in in giving
1:25:52
us visibility into that scheme through
1:25:54
the most a high profile alleged
1:25:56
bribes that you could possibly imagine
1:25:58
a to the for. who are now
1:26:01
behind the Resolute Desk in
1:26:03
the Oval Office. Final question, Tony,
1:26:06
with all you've exposed and talked about,
1:26:08
do you fear retaliation? Is that something
1:26:11
that you went into this knowing would
1:26:13
be potentially a part of your life
1:26:15
going forward? In 2020, as I told
1:26:17
you, I was a very private,
1:26:22
no social media, low-key.
1:26:24
I could hear
1:26:26
my two grandfathers and my father saying,
1:26:29
you can't sit on the sideline, you know too
1:26:31
much, you have to come forward and tell the
1:26:33
American people the truth. I didn't know how to
1:26:36
do it. I didn't know the right people to
1:26:38
talk to. This was all out of water, out
1:26:40
of element for me. I was willing to do
1:26:42
it then. We live in the greatest country in
1:26:44
the world based on truth, based on the freedom
1:26:46
that our people have fought
1:26:49
and died for before us. I was happy
1:26:51
to do it. I didn't think much about
1:26:53
retaliation. I expected it. I've been warned of
1:26:55
it as recently
1:26:57
as, you know, in our congressional hearing where
1:27:00
Lev Parnas is threatening me, sitting next to
1:27:02
me, warning, they're coming for you. I think
1:27:05
it's laughable that the
1:27:07
Democrats are asking Lev Parnas to
1:27:10
weigh in on my credibility, a
1:27:12
convicted felon that served jail time.
1:27:14
I have an impeccable record. Now
1:27:17
he warned me earlier in this hearing that they're coming
1:27:19
for me. I look forward to that. I look forward
1:27:21
to that, Mr. Parnas. Keep lying. You'll
1:27:24
be there soon. Well, and is that
1:27:26
a threat, Mr. Parnas? No, it's just the truth. No,
1:27:28
did you say they were coming for me? No, I
1:27:30
said if you keep lying, you will end up in
1:27:33
prison. I'm not lying. You're the one who was lying.
1:27:35
You're the one who went to prison for lying. Well,
1:27:37
let him come. The truth will win out and our
1:27:39
country is worth fighting for and I'm more than happy
1:27:41
to do it. A Truth
1:27:43
Teller, an international businessman and a patriot, Tony
1:27:46
Boblinski. Thanks for being here. Thank you very
1:27:48
much.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More