Podchaser Logo
Home
Pride Month Rewind 1 • Michael Cashman • Distraction Pieces Podcast with Scroobius Pip

Pride Month Rewind 1 • Michael Cashman • Distraction Pieces Podcast with Scroobius Pip

BonusReleased Thursday, 6th June 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Pride Month Rewind 1 • Michael Cashman • Distraction Pieces Podcast with Scroobius Pip

Pride Month Rewind 1 • Michael Cashman • Distraction Pieces Podcast with Scroobius Pip

Pride Month Rewind 1 • Michael Cashman • Distraction Pieces Podcast with Scroobius Pip

Pride Month Rewind 1 • Michael Cashman • Distraction Pieces Podcast with Scroobius Pip

BonusThursday, 6th June 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:00

Hello, holy bonus episode Batman.

0:03

From the start of Distraction Pieces we have been

0:06

big supporters and lovers and friends

0:08

of the LGBTQ community. So for

0:10

Pride Month we're doing a few

0:13

rewind episodes so every Friday there

0:15

will be a rewind of a

0:17

classic episode that discusses

0:20

topics that fall in that realm.

0:22

I mean we had a great

0:24

recent episode with Pickleby, trans activist

0:26

Pickleby. So go in and listen

0:28

to that if you haven't before but we're

0:31

kicking things off and now I know I've done a

0:33

rewind of this before but it's such a

0:35

special episode to me. In 2020 I sat

0:38

down with Michael Cashman

0:41

who was one of the

0:43

founders of Stonewall. He had

0:45

the first gay kiss on

0:48

British TV. Just had an amazing life

0:50

and has been an amazing activist and

0:52

spokesperson and this was originally a two-parter

0:55

if I remember rightly so we'll put

0:57

it all into one. It'll

0:59

be one big bumper thing. He's a

1:01

beautiful man, his story is beautiful, he

1:03

speaks beautifully. So I really

1:05

hope you enjoy this. Love to

1:08

everyone this Pride Month. This

1:25

piece of fiction is the intro to

1:27

distraction pieces. This piece of fiction is

1:29

the intro to distraction pieces. The

1:32

very beginning. At the very beginning indeed. I'm

1:35

joined today by Michael Cashman. How are you sir? I'm

1:38

really good in the middle of promoting

1:41

and talking about my lovely

1:43

book and just tells you

1:45

how good I am. Yeah. So the other day

1:47

I went in and they said

1:50

the final books here and I went

1:52

into Bloomsbury, collected it and I got

1:54

a little bit emotional. Came home

1:56

along this street where I grew up and

1:59

where I'm back in the city. living and it

2:01

was raining and I had the book tucked

2:03

inside my coat and as

2:05

I passed the streets, the

2:07

actual street we lived on, I saw

2:09

the five-year-old me and I

2:11

looked at the book and

2:14

I just thought I've written this

2:17

book and all of the

2:19

amazing things I've done and I'm

2:22

here and I cried and I cried and

2:24

I cried. Beautiful.

2:27

And so I'm good, I'm really good. I just

2:29

have a big hole in my life but I've

2:31

just got to get used to

2:33

that. Yes of course and I've just started

2:37

getting into the book. I've read extensive

2:39

notes on it in preparation for this

2:41

podcast but it's a hell of a

2:44

life that you've had and a hell of

2:46

a story and a journey and we'll go

2:48

all over the place in it. There's loads

2:50

I want to ask you about but the

2:53

day after we confirmed this interview

2:56

my Twitter feed was a light with

2:58

your name as the story resurfaced so

3:01

I figured that was a good

3:03

place to start and it was it's

3:06

from a while ago from the

3:08

80s when an article from a

3:10

yet to be shamed journalist called

3:12

Piers Morgan and it

3:15

was a review of an EastEnders storyline that saw

3:18

your character have the first gay kiss as

3:20

described by Piers as a homosexual

3:23

love scene between Yuppie

3:25

Puffs, Colin and Guido which even

3:29

at the time

3:31

feels incredibly insensitive.

3:33

Incensitive, yeah, or horrific. Well we've got

3:36

and you see there's a lot

3:38

of stuff particularly in this day and age where we have

3:40

to look back and go well of the time so on

3:42

and so forth but this was imprint again

3:44

I saw a few people trying to

3:46

defend it saying he was quoting different

3:49

lords or whoever that rang you but that

3:51

sentence he was not quoting that was his

3:53

homosexual love scene a kiss

3:55

between two men is not a

3:58

love scene if it was people will

4:00

be arrested the length and breadth of the country.

4:03

It was the second gay kiss actually. The

4:05

first gay kiss was in 1987 and

4:08

that called outrage.

4:10

I mean if we look at what

4:13

was written then in a way it

4:15

was a it

4:17

wasn't as bad as some of the awful

4:20

stuff. I'm not excusing it but what I

4:22

would say about that was it was it

4:24

was pandering to prejudice. Yuppie

4:28

puffs. There's no need to use puffs.

4:32

Somebody lovely tweeted said what's a yuppie

4:34

poof. That made

4:36

me chuckle. But we

4:39

have to remember and again this is

4:41

no excuse for it. This

4:43

was all part of the courage of

4:46

the BBC of bringing a non stereotypical

4:49

gay man into the family into

4:51

this family show. At

4:53

a time when AIDS and HIV was depicted

4:55

as I quote the gay plague people read

4:58

in these newspapers that Piers Morgan was writing

5:00

in like The Sun, The Mail, The News

5:02

of the World, all of the others that

5:04

you could catch AIDS by sitting next to

5:06

a gay person or from a glass that

5:08

hadn't been properly washed or a cup and

5:12

people were stigmatized and

5:14

stereotyped and people faced

5:16

appalling discrimination. Some people

5:19

were hounded out of their homes, bricks

5:21

through their window. I had, Paul and

5:23

I had bricks through our window and

5:26

for me you have to look

5:28

back and you have to say we have

5:31

moved on but we must never

5:33

forget how people treated

5:35

us and how people fueled

5:37

prejudice because going to

5:40

my experience and the experience of many

5:42

when a brick comes through your window

5:44

it doesn't just happen because somebody says

5:46

picks up that brick. They

5:48

are motivated by what they read day

5:50

after day what they hear day

5:53

after day whether it's in their church or

5:55

at work or in the pub and

5:57

we have to know the value of

5:59

words. and that words

6:01

can liberate, but actually words

6:03

can actually empower someone to

6:06

take those actions that

6:08

can remove somebody's life or

6:11

inflict damage. So

6:14

the journalist, Chris Godfrey,

6:17

from The Guardian, who

6:19

did the interview about me, was right to throw that

6:21

up into the Twitter ether and say,

6:23

do you still stand by this, Piers?

6:27

I'm told, Piers Morgan apologized and

6:29

said it was language of

6:31

the time. But again, I

6:34

say, OK, we move on. But

6:36

we must never forget because it's part

6:38

of the history of liberation. Do

6:40

we say 75 years

6:42

since the liberation of Auschwitz and

6:44

we shouldn't remember that anymore? Of

6:47

course not. And I'm not making direct comparisons.

6:50

What I am saying is if we forget

6:52

our history, we allow the

6:54

next generation to forget it. And it's

6:57

very easy, therefore, to repeat it. Yeah,

6:59

I think that's the key part of

7:01

that story resurfacing now and what you

7:03

said there of

7:05

the enforcement

7:07

of what is reported in the media

7:09

and things like that. And

7:11

we have a lot of arguments now when politicians

7:14

or journalists or whomever else will

7:17

say things that you can argue

7:19

isn't explicitly racist or isn't explicitly

7:21

homophobic, as Piers was. But

7:25

it still adds to that strengthening of those who

7:27

will pick up a brick and throw it through

7:29

a window if they're feeling more and more acceptance,

7:31

even if it's subtler

7:33

or more cloaked. It's still adding

7:35

to that societal suggestion

7:38

that that kind of thing is acceptable and is

7:40

the norm, which it really is. I

7:42

know. Well, let's exactly let's jump forward now

7:45

because I say the enemies of equality,

7:48

whether it's gender

7:50

equality, whether it's LGBT equality, race

7:52

equality, whatever. They never give

7:54

up. They never go away. They're

7:57

brilliantly funded, often funded from. from

8:00

America and the evangelical far

8:02

right, not only

8:04

from America, their

8:06

language becomes much more subtle. Their attacks

8:08

much more subtle. Up

8:11

in Birmingham, the two schools, Anderton

8:13

Park School in particular, the head

8:15

teacher, Sarah Hewitt Clarkson,

8:18

asked the local authority to get an

8:20

injunction because there were protests outside the

8:22

school against the inclusion

8:25

of LGBT relations in

8:27

relationship education. It's called

8:29

inclusive relationship education.

8:32

There were protests outside

8:34

the school and it went on. Now,

8:37

they gained an injunction and I went up

8:39

for one day of the hearing where

8:42

the school and the council were seeking a

8:45

permanent injunction. And

8:48

to hear lawyers, senior lawyers,

8:50

QCs, refer to LGBT as if

8:52

it was a danger,

8:56

a threat to children,

8:58

to pupils. To hear

9:01

a teacher, head teacher, have to

9:03

explain why she bought LGBT books

9:05

and brought them into the school.

9:07

It reminded me of 32 years

9:09

ago, when

9:11

they brought forward the first anti-gay law in 100

9:14

years called clause 28, section 28. And

9:19

when they brought that law in, they brought it in and they said, we're

9:22

protecting children from the promotion

9:24

of homosexuality. A

9:27

terrible argument because first of all,

9:29

there was no promotion of homosexuality. You

9:31

can't promote the sexuality. I live in

9:34

a predominantly heterosexual world. I'm 69 years

9:36

old. If heterosexuality

9:38

throughout my life, with advertising

9:40

books, everything around me, promoting

9:43

homosexuality according to them, can't win

9:46

me, then a tiny minority is

9:48

going to have absolutely no impact.

9:50

But the argument, throw that away.

9:53

But it suggests that there's something negative

9:56

and dirty and threatening about

9:58

LGBT. And there is. inclusive

12:01

religious education, but not certain other

12:03

religions, would we tolerate

12:05

that? Of course not, because the

12:07

concept of equality means that we

12:10

deal, we include, and we talk

12:12

about the multiplicity of choices that

12:14

there are. But more importantly, when

12:16

you're educating, you're empowering

12:19

children and pupils so

12:22

that the world in which they live in, they

12:25

are protected, they are not

12:27

abused. Like children

12:29

like me, like I

12:31

was abused, and

12:33

I had to suffer that abuse and couldn't

12:38

find the words to

12:41

say to my parents or people around me what

12:44

that young doctor had done to me when

12:46

I was seven years old, and then what

12:48

subsequently occurred to me, as

12:50

I detail in the book

12:52

during my teens. I want

12:55

every child to be able to find the

12:58

vocabulary, to find the confidence to say

13:00

what happens to them, and

13:03

for them to be believed. And I came

13:05

from that period where we were told kids

13:07

should be seen and not heard. So

13:10

empower young people, don't

13:13

hobble them through life so that they

13:16

can never fully defend themselves and no

13:19

other child can do what their rights are.

13:21

100%. You kind of spoke of the strength

13:24

of your sexuality in that growing

13:26

up in a largely heterosexual

13:30

climate, that wasn't enough to hamper you, to

13:32

hold you back, therefore it can't be influenced

13:36

in such a way. To look

13:38

back to when you grew up

13:41

in this area, houses away from where

13:44

you were, and we can hear the

13:46

boats in the background. Now, on

13:48

the river, and I'm just looking out

13:50

of my window and there's two

13:53

river boats going up, the sun

13:55

has just sat over to the left and it will,

13:57

a little later it will be a wonderful sunset just over

13:59

to the right. But when I was a kid, the

14:02

noise and the sound on this river

14:04

with boats and ships all hooting and

14:07

tooting because they wanted to get over

14:09

onto the docks so that they could

14:11

unload and get back out to sea,

14:14

the barges being shipped up and

14:17

down, the dockers, the stevedores, the

14:19

cranes, it was incredible. And when

14:21

I stand here, that's

14:24

what I see. That

14:26

amazing community and the community

14:28

of the docks and

14:31

the fun. And you have to remember the

14:33

fun because otherwise you can't cope with

14:37

the dark things that were done to

14:39

you. And that was the interesting thing

14:42

for me, Pip, that I, because

14:44

I knew at an early age, very early age, that

14:46

I was different, that I was attracted to other boys.

14:50

And before that man abused

14:52

me. And at one point I thought, is

14:54

it on my forehead? Can people see it

14:56

on my forehead so that they know they

14:58

can come and just use

15:01

me and I won't tell anyone. And

15:05

so it was

15:07

strange in this hugely predominantly

15:10

heterosexual area, the docks.

15:13

But then there was always a kind

15:16

of faint attraction

15:19

of what was going on in the pubs.

15:21

There were always little drag pubs around the

15:23

East End. And Luke Lynch's

15:25

shop that I worked in as a kid,

15:27

she used to call me Nobby. I never

15:29

knew why she called me Nobby. And she'd

15:31

say, Nobby, now when you cycle, it

15:34

was on the paper round, when you cycle

15:36

past that city arms, you go past there

15:38

fast. And of course, immediately as a kid,

15:40

you think, oh, what goes on in the

15:42

city arms? And I can remember I

15:44

parked the bicycle against the pub wall, stood

15:47

up on the saddle, looked into the pub

15:49

window. And I just thought, oh, it's just

15:51

people who look like my aunt Eileen. And

15:53

what I didn't know was it was mainly

15:56

drag queens in there. Beautiful. Yeah. Again, that

15:58

must have been a beautifully reassured. as

16:00

those realizations came about, because

16:03

it's easy for someone of my generation,

16:06

for example, to sit here in these continually

16:09

progressively liberal times for

16:11

such things. Again, still fights

16:13

to be fought, but huge progression,

16:16

particularly in recent years. And

16:19

think, oh, it must have been tough, Catholic

16:22

upbringing in the 50s and 60s, not

16:25

really any public homosexual role

16:28

models or figures, but what

16:30

is easy to overlook and forget is those

16:33

exact years you're probably speaking about there,

16:36

the paper round years, it

16:38

wasn't only frowned upon or looked at on,

16:40

it was literally illegal, which is so hard

16:42

to get your head round in this, like

16:44

having been born into a world

16:46

where that was never the case. It's such a

16:48

hard thing to think that something that is intrinsic

16:50

to your complete nature, your

16:53

first, not only is it frowned upon or

16:56

not talked about, it's actively illegal. How was

16:58

that and how do you kind of battle

17:01

that as you're coming to terms with it? First

17:04

of all, you're right to say that there were no

17:07

role models. The only models you were

17:09

given were in the darker pages of

17:11

the news of the world, invariably, vicars

17:14

or priests caught

17:16

generally abusing boys. There

17:20

were some sensational

17:22

cases like Peter Wildblood. So

17:25

you only read about it in a negative way

17:28

and in films and television,

17:30

we would depict it as camp,

17:32

a feminine, weak little people. But

17:36

I think when you're

17:38

surrounded by people telling you that

17:40

your attraction to someone is criminal,

17:42

that you will go to prison,

17:44

that you could be blackmailed, you

17:46

could be arrested, has a deep

17:48

psychological impact. You

17:50

carry it like a bit of, if

17:53

you can imagine in your gut, there's all

17:55

this silt deep, deep

17:57

down there. And if you're not careful over that, the

18:00

years it builds up and it

18:03

stops you functioning. Even

18:05

though in the 60s

18:08

when it was still illegal, it was

18:10

illegal, only partially decriminalised in 1967, I

18:12

remember a young actor, I was a

18:17

young actor, and people

18:19

were saying to me, you should not let

18:22

people know what you are because it will

18:25

affect your career and you will go to prison. We

18:28

went out on tour when I

18:30

was 15 and a half and I

18:32

had my first experience of these smoky

18:35

little back rooms in pubs where

18:37

it was all men and it was exciting. You

18:40

then ended up late at night in

18:43

places like the bus stations sat

18:45

there stirring your coffee and listening to

18:47

the tales, the horrific tales and the

18:49

more naive you were the more they

18:51

wanted your eyes to pop open about

18:53

the arrests and the beatings and

18:55

the queens and the

18:58

prostitutes would battle with one another for the

19:00

most outrageous stories. And

19:03

so you took comfort in being in a

19:05

small space like those bars in places like

19:08

Blackpool and Manchester and Leeds, but

19:10

you knew that once you stepped outside that door you

19:13

were at risk. You might

19:16

be blackmailed, you could be

19:18

blackmailed into sex, you could

19:20

be beaten up and equally

19:22

you could be arrested if you said to

19:24

someone, you know, I really like you because

19:27

they arrested you for, it was called soliciting

19:30

procuring or soliciting for an

19:32

immoral purpose. There

19:34

was an amazing film about it, was it

19:37

called The Victim? It was the first that

19:39

painted the homosexual character

19:43

as the victim, as the one attacked rather than

19:45

as the villain and it was

19:47

hugely important in cinema and in entertainment at

19:49

that point to have that

19:51

because it's, I talk

19:53

about it all the time on the podcast, but I'm a big

19:56

believer that there's a certain area of society who will listen to

19:58

a progressive lecture. or

20:00

a speech being given or read an article.

20:02

But there's a whole different area that will

20:04

ignore that. Whereas if you can tell those

20:06

stories through entertainment, that's when you can get

20:09

through to those people. And that, it felt

20:11

like just, I saw it a

20:13

while back at the

20:15

Dalige Gallery or museum. And

20:18

yeah, it felt hugely important to begin telling that

20:21

story. Cause it was, it was exactly that of

20:23

the fear of blackmail, the fact that you will

20:25

be blackmailed and that can be just

20:28

crippling mentally and physically

20:31

and financially, obviously. And

20:34

you saw people because these cases were

20:36

reported. They were given huge space. And

20:41

so even when they partially decriminalized

20:43

in 1967 and

20:45

I was 16, by that time

20:47

I'd set up a relationship with a

20:50

boy who was, I say a boy because we were

20:53

young boys. I was 16, he was 24. And

20:57

we ended up being together for nine years. But he

20:59

said to me, he said, we

21:02

have to have two separate rooms or

21:04

wherever we share two separate beds.

21:07

You have to tell people you're my cousin. That's why

21:09

we're sharing. Because the

21:11

police could knock on your door at

21:13

any time because I was 16 and

21:15

he was 24 and the age of consent

21:17

was 21. And

21:19

people will now hear that helicopter going

21:22

above and that's often the troop carriers.

21:24

They come all the way up here along the

21:26

river up towards Hyde Park. And

21:29

so the discrimination

21:32

didn't really change after 1967. That's

21:35

one of the things again, with history and

21:37

with dates, it's easy to look at 1967

21:39

and go, oh, it all changed then. It

21:42

was the breakthrough and it's important of course,

21:44

but purely the fact that the

21:46

first gay kiss came 20 years later on

21:48

TV. That's an illustration of

21:50

how slower process it was. It's

21:54

now decriminalised therefore everyone's okay

21:56

and everyone's safe because it

21:58

was still generating. And

34:00

we came back from this wonderful holiday, and I

34:02

read that there was going to be a march

34:05

against this section 28. And

34:09

I didn't even ask him. I didn't ask anyone. I

34:11

just knew I had to be on this march. I

34:13

knew, I thought, you can't be

34:16

on screen playing this important gay

34:18

character, and people know

34:20

that you're openly gay and

34:22

not be on that march. And I knew

34:24

if I didn't go on that march, I

34:27

would never be able to look myself in

34:29

the face again. So I

34:31

went on that. It was a lovely story

34:33

about how June Brown, who plays Doc, managed

34:35

to get me time off

34:37

so I could go. But

34:40

often I would think, why is it me that

34:42

I've got to do it again? And then the

34:44

other voice in your head says, come on, do

34:47

it. And

34:51

so it became a lot

34:53

easier working around with

34:55

people like Ian McKellen and the

34:57

wonderful activist, Lisa

35:00

Power, Jenny Wilson, Duncan Campbell,

35:03

even Matthew Parris, the Times

35:06

writer, joined us when

35:08

we were setting up Stonewall. And

35:11

it became a bit easier because

35:14

you had that sense of solidarity. But

35:18

if I'm honest, even

35:21

now, when there's an issue, something

35:24

might be happening in this country, there

35:27

might be still, well, there is still the reluctance

35:30

to roll out PrEP as it should be

35:33

rolled out. And you

35:36

know you're working with THT

35:38

and AIDS frontliners and

35:40

all of that, you've got to get up there

35:42

in parliament and raise the issue. And

35:44

every so often you think, oh,

35:47

I wish I could sit back and watch somebody else

35:49

do it. And then you think, no, come on. That's

35:52

why you have a voice. And if you don't use it,

35:55

you lose it. But

35:59

it was different. I

40:00

did a documentary about discrimination against lesbians and

40:02

gay men and where it came from. I

40:04

called it A Kiss Is Just A Kiss.

40:09

And it went out. And here my mum, as they

40:11

always used to do, whether I had a tiny part

40:13

or fronting a documentary, phoned up and they said, proud

40:15

of you, son, proud of you. And

40:17

then the next day he rang in the morning and

40:19

he said about how he was proud

40:21

and he'd been to his pub and they'd given him a

40:23

pint. And he said, so I'm

40:25

proud of you. I said, yeah, you told me that last night.

40:28

And then he said, he said, no, I want to tell you.

40:32

And his voice started to quake.

40:34

He said, I love

40:36

you. I love you, son. And

40:40

I nearly nearly broke down. I said, yeah, I love you

40:42

too, dad. And he said, right, I'm

40:44

going back. Get that pint that

40:46

the governor put on the bar before he takes

40:48

it back. And I

40:51

knew actually that that was

40:53

the moment I became my father's son, that he

40:56

realised that if he'd been gay and

40:59

he'd had exactly the same opportunities and

41:01

the same chances, he would have

41:03

done exactly the same. And

41:07

I'm so proud of that. I'm proud that it happened.

41:11

I learned about my father as

41:13

a real man because of

41:15

his friendship and his relationship

41:18

with Paul. Because if you think

41:21

about it, my dad had four sons, so he never

41:23

thought he was going to get a son-in-law. Yeah. And

41:26

I gave him the perfect son-in-law who loved

41:28

football, loved sport, loved

41:30

politics, and they could talk about

41:32

football until the cows came home,

41:34

whereas it bored me silly. But

41:38

that's what I mean about the

41:40

complexity of life

41:42

and how, for me, you

41:46

can so often find that

41:48

tender part of you that you've shut

41:50

away and denied. Only

41:52

when you have the courage to love and

41:55

the courage to own up to the fact

41:57

that you can be loved, that you deserve

41:59

it. to be loved and

42:02

that you don't deserve, as you think,

42:04

to be abused. Yeah, I mean,

42:06

it's a beautiful story because again,

42:08

it's that moment of... And

42:12

it relates to Paul as well

42:14

there. Your

42:16

dad, as much

42:18

as I'm sure he revelled in it, but he

42:20

has to love his sons. That's

42:22

his fatherly duty. He didn't have to

42:25

love Paul. So that's the beautiful thing

42:27

there, to choose that. And again, that

42:29

moment of that phone call

42:31

from the pub, that's

42:33

that moment of that recognition for

42:35

you that this isn't simply that I

42:37

have to love my sons. This is

42:39

the real look, I love you. You

42:41

know, it feels so powerful on both

42:43

of those counts there. It's

42:45

not just the responsibility to

42:47

love. No. It's the

42:50

choice to love. He came from that

42:52

generation. You know,

42:54

a tough working class man, twice

42:57

a prisoner of war, released by the

42:59

Italians, captured by the Germans, where

43:02

men didn't express love to

43:04

one another unless they were drunk. And

43:06

you certainly didn't to your sons because

43:09

your sons had to be tough like

43:11

you. When I was born,

43:14

like my other brothers, our names were put down

43:16

at the port labour board so that we would

43:18

follow him into the docks. So

43:21

that declaration of love, I'd

43:23

never heard him say

43:26

that before. And

43:28

the fact that it came through that relationship with Paul

43:30

was incredible. Yeah, I love that. So

43:33

can we go back to the founding

43:35

of Stonewall? You co-founded

43:37

it with Ian McKellen and it was

43:40

in response to section 28 of

43:42

the Local Government Act. And

43:47

how did that feel to say that we have to, essentially

43:50

we have to organise? It's not enough to

43:52

be vocal. We

43:54

have to organise because, I

43:56

mean, it sounds dramatic, but I don't

43:59

think it is our enemy is organised.

44:01

Our enemy is incredibly organised. So we

44:03

can't simply protest or speak. We

44:06

need to have that further level of

44:08

unity and organisation to battle this.

44:10

That was exactly what it was,

44:12

unity and organisation. And we certainly

44:14

didn't have unity. When we set

44:16

up Stonewall, we

44:18

were attacked from other activists. We

44:22

were attacked from sections of the lesbian and gay

44:24

media as to who did we think we were,

44:27

who did we represent? And my arrogant

44:29

answer was we represent ourselves

44:32

and we're going to try and achieve equality. And

44:34

if other people want to opt into it, great.

44:37

If they don't, fine. Organising

44:40

was difficult. It took us nearly

44:43

a year to get the right people

44:45

together. Some people said no, because

44:49

our remit was you had to be openly

44:51

lesbian, gay or bisexual. You

44:53

couldn't be in the closet because

44:56

we would present ourselves

44:58

as representing the issues. And what

45:00

we'd learnt during the

45:03

campaign against Section 28 was that

45:05

there were politicians who were willing to

45:07

listen and willing to listen to an

45:09

argument. So we knew that there were

45:11

arguments to be won. But

45:15

the attacks came because they said, you should

45:17

be a membership organisation. And

45:20

what we did know, because we'd seen it

45:22

with other membership organisations, was

45:24

how they'd imploded by serving the

45:26

different wings of their membership rather

45:29

than serving and servicing

45:31

the arguments for change and

45:33

equality. And we launched it here in 1989, a

45:37

year after Section 28 became law, on

45:41

Ian's Terrace overlooking the Thames.

45:44

And then we had to raise money because

45:47

we knew we couldn't get any public money

45:49

for it. Section 28 forbid

45:52

that. So

45:54

we had to do what we did best,

45:56

which was to put on a show. And

45:58

we put on an amazing. list

50:00

of people was just, it

50:02

was endless and it was

50:04

wonderful. And again, as you

50:06

say, it's amazing,

50:08

but it made it unavoidable. And that's the beauty

50:10

of it. It made it something that people couldn't

50:13

just turn away from and ignore. Cause it was

50:15

people in every area of their

50:18

lives. If you're a fan of theater, there

50:20

would be your favorite people from theater. If

50:22

you're a fan of TV, TV, radio, radio,

50:24

everywhere, it would say, no, we

50:26

are adding to the

50:28

richness of your life. Directly. And

50:32

Pip, the great

50:34

thing was a lot

50:36

of these people weren't lesbian, gay or bisexual.

50:39

But they made a connection with

50:41

you cannot deny equality to these

50:43

people because it affects me.

50:46

Yeah. And that is the power

50:49

of standing up for the rights

50:52

of others. Because you know that if

50:54

you want to look at it selfishly, if

50:56

you allow somebody else's rights to go or

50:59

you barter them away, eventually we

51:01

need to look back no further than the 1930s,

51:04

eventually your rights will go. And

51:07

the ability to imagine what if that were me,

51:09

what if that were my child? What

51:12

if that were my mother, my father, whatever.

51:14

If it was not right for them, how

51:17

can it be right for anybody else? And

51:19

that was the powerful signal. And

51:21

one show we did, everything

51:23

had to be written or performed. It

51:25

was written or everything

51:28

that was performed had to be written or

51:30

composed by a lesbian, gay man or bisexual.

51:32

Because we were making a statement that if

51:34

you had this section 28, you could potentially

51:37

lose all of this in a local

51:40

authority concert hall theater. So

51:42

we had to write and get permission. Again,

51:45

there's some lovely stories that I use in the

51:47

book. But one I remember fondly was Leonard Bernstein.

51:49

We wanted to do a number from West

51:52

Side Story. And Leonard Bernstein wrote back

51:54

and said, yeah, I'm proud

51:56

of that bisexual period of my life.

51:59

By that time. He was

52:01

married and doing other

52:04

things, but the association

52:06

was absolutely glorious.

52:10

Sadly, we couldn't do the number because

52:12

of the response from the lyricist, and I'll

52:14

have to let people read about that. Yeah.

52:17

Yeah. So can we talk about your

52:19

choice to become an MEP,

52:23

to continue fighting? Again,

52:26

to fight, as we said, the thing

52:29

with Stonewall was it was the realisation that we

52:31

need more than just the people at the front.

52:34

We need the organisation, we need the people in

52:36

those rooms. It's great to have these events that

52:38

have the Pet Shop Boys and George Michael, and

52:40

all the glamour, but it needs more than that.

52:42

You needed to raise that 30,000 to have an

52:45

employee. Yeah. And

52:47

was that kind of the realisation? It was like,

52:49

right, we don't just need

52:52

the front line, we need the back line as

52:54

well. We need people in parliament, in

52:57

these meetings, in these rooms, representing

52:59

us. That wasn't a

53:02

conscious thought because

53:06

Stonewall's approach was we

53:09

consider LGBT rights high

53:13

profile, high agenda rights.

53:16

They're human rights. And

53:18

so therefore, if a party considers

53:20

itself a serious political party, it

53:22

has to address those rights. And

53:25

there weren't many, but hardly anyone

53:27

out in politics. And

53:30

Stonewall's other way was not only through the

53:32

political process, but taking cases through the courts

53:34

to get to the European Court of Human

53:36

Rights in Strasbourg, and

53:38

working with some amazing individuals.

53:41

But for me, I never

53:43

thought I'd go into politics. I

53:45

left, my education really finished at the age

53:47

of 12. When I left school, I learned

53:50

I knew how to tap

53:52

dance, sing, act, impersonate.

53:55

I want to be key

53:57

skills for a politician. Absolutely. Especially the

53:59

impersonates. Paul

1:02:00

organised it, he was a brilliant organiser. Little

1:02:03

did I know when Barbara Windsor introduced us

1:02:05

all those years before, that this

1:02:07

man would organise my life and turn

1:02:10

me around, make me another person

1:02:13

and I think a better person.

1:02:16

And so we decided we were

1:02:18

going to have our civil partnership and

1:02:21

we put all the things into play. As

1:02:25

people read in the book, there was a time when I thought,

1:02:28

this isn't going to happen, this isn't going to

1:02:30

happen. All our guests were assembled, I

1:02:32

thought, it's not going to happen. But

1:02:34

I can say to people,

1:02:37

never underestimate the

1:02:39

power, the absolute power

1:02:43

of being able to say in public, this is the

1:02:45

person I love and this is the person I'm

1:02:47

committing my life to. And

1:02:50

we did that in public and my only

1:02:52

sadness was that my

1:02:54

parents weren't around to see it. If

1:02:56

my dad had been, he probably would have got drunk

1:02:58

and appeared as an old lady at the drink

1:03:02

celebration afterwards. He was always fond

1:03:04

of doing that. And

1:03:06

our families were there, our friends were there, and

1:03:09

it was such a powerful

1:03:12

day. And later on during

1:03:14

his battle with cancer, in

1:03:16

this room I was stood just behind

1:03:18

him doing the ironing. He was sat

1:03:21

on the sofa, couldn't keep his head up because

1:03:23

it was a bad day with the chemotherapy. And

1:03:27

I loved to do ironing because as Mo Mollum always

1:03:29

says, she used to love filling

1:03:32

the dishwasher and then emptying it. She

1:03:34

said, because in politics you never get

1:03:36

to see if you finished anything. She

1:03:38

said, whereas on a Sunday afternoon that

1:03:40

was hers, well, mine was ironing. I

1:03:42

loved doing it. And I looked down

1:03:44

at this beautiful man, 13 years

1:03:46

younger than me, sat on the sofa

1:03:49

and I said, Paul, because

1:03:51

by then same-sex marriage would

1:03:53

come in. And I said, Paul, will

1:03:56

you marry me? And he said, no,

1:03:58

today's not a good day. So

1:04:01

I continued ironing and they went, hang

1:04:03

on. I said, I'd just ask you if

1:04:06

you'd marry me. And he said,

1:04:08

and I said, today is not a good day.

1:04:10

So that was it. We had our civil

1:04:13

partnership and I think probably he was

1:04:15

sat there battling with this chemotherapy, battling

1:04:17

with this most aggressive of cancers, a

1:04:20

cancer that they only saw one in

1:04:22

every 3 million. And he probably thought,

1:04:24

and on top of this, he thinks

1:04:26

I'm going to organize our wedding. You

1:04:29

must be joking. You're not

1:04:31

happy with the last party I threw for

1:04:33

our relationship. Exactly. I

1:04:35

love that. So I mean, it

1:04:38

seems fair to discuss and talk

1:04:41

about your choice to walk

1:04:43

away from Stonewall and

1:04:46

to move on from that. What was the

1:04:48

reasoning behind that? And how

1:04:50

hard a decision was that to come to, I guess?

1:04:54

The reasoning was quite complex.

1:04:57

I've got an addictive personality and I

1:04:59

now control it. But with

1:05:01

an addictive personality, you become obsessive.

1:05:04

And so all of my free time, I was

1:05:07

giving to Stonewall. And Paul

1:05:10

at one point, because he was at that time an

1:05:13

actor, he was out on tour with

1:05:15

The Rocky Horror Show. And he used to say, I wonder

1:05:17

why I bother to come home. You're not

1:05:19

here. And it

1:05:22

was affecting the relationship. And I also

1:05:24

knew that I was holding

1:05:26

the organization back, that

1:05:29

it could develop in a different way. And

1:05:32

I was holding on to the old ways. And

1:05:34

I made my mind up. I

1:05:37

had to let go. And even at

1:05:39

the meeting where I announced

1:05:41

my resignation, I

1:05:44

was still backling with the other half of my

1:05:46

ego that was saying, you can't go. Because if

1:05:48

you go, look, there's no one here who can

1:05:50

take over. And

1:05:52

when I announced it and I came home and

1:05:55

I told Paul, I didn't even tell him. Because

1:05:57

I didn't want anyone to reason me out of

1:05:59

it. because I knew it

1:06:01

needed a new chair, it needed

1:06:03

a new leader. Angela Mason, a

1:06:05

brilliant executive director, wanted to develop

1:06:08

the organization in a different way.

1:06:12

And so Elaine,

1:06:15

my deputy, she was

1:06:17

then elected as the

1:06:19

chair, and it

1:06:21

was absolutely the right thing to do. It freed me

1:06:23

up. I could get on with other things. I

1:06:26

could commit to Paul, commit to the plays

1:06:29

that I was doing, and then into politics, and

1:06:32

be a part of Stonewall without

1:06:34

having to strangle it. Yeah.

1:06:37

And to stand back and watch

1:06:39

it grow in a way that

1:06:42

I never imagined, in a brilliant

1:06:44

way, was an

1:06:46

amazing gift to receive. Yeah.

1:06:49

I love that. So, I mean, we

1:06:51

started the podcast talking of, if

1:06:54

you stand on the street you grew

1:06:56

up in, and seeing your five-year-old self,

1:06:58

and having your book in your hand,

1:07:00

and having that pride, how

1:07:03

was it in 2014 to

1:07:05

be made Baron Cashman of Limehouse,

1:07:08

in the London Borough of Tower

1:07:10

Hamlets, to be, and again, particularly

1:07:12

somewhere that you

1:07:14

loved, but again, I'd imagine for a good period

1:07:16

of your life, felt you would maybe never be

1:07:19

accepted, because of what you had to hide, because

1:07:21

of who you were and what you were. So,

1:07:23

to be able to have not only

1:07:26

come out as that, not only be accepted

1:07:28

as that, but to be celebrated and honoured

1:07:30

in such a way, that must have been

1:07:32

the ultimate kind of cap to

1:07:36

put on all of that, on that part

1:07:38

of the journey. Well, first

1:07:40

of all, there's a song from, talk

1:07:42

song trilogy, not from talk song trilogy,

1:07:46

I can't remember what, but it's I Am

1:07:48

What I Am. Yeah. And I started singing,

1:07:51

I was what I was. And

1:07:53

what I was needs no excuse. I never

1:07:56

thought it would happen to me. Yeah. It

1:07:58

happened to others.

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features