Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
The future is a hefty responsibility and
0:02
not one that we take lightly. But then
0:04
taking things lightly has never been what
0:06
hefty is about. That's why we've created the
0:08
Hefty Renew program that turns hard to
0:10
recycle plastics into valuable resources like park benches
0:13
and building materials. To participate,
0:15
simply fill up an orange hefty renew bag
0:17
with accepted items, tie it up and drop
0:19
it in with your regular recycling. That's it.
0:21
It's that easy. It's time to
0:23
rethink recycling with Renew. Particular-valued
0:25
resources may vary by geography. More
0:28
info available at hestrerenew.com. Some
0:32
people just know the best rate for you
0:34
is a rate based on you with Allstate.
0:37
Not a rate based on Terry who keeps... It
0:40
makes the car behind them... Oh
0:43
no, they're about to... Save
0:47
with DriveWise and the Allstate app and only
0:49
pay a rate based on you. Not
0:52
available in every state. Subject to terms and
0:55
conditions, rating factors and savings vary and in
0:57
some states your rate could increase with high-risk
0:59
driving. Allstate Fire and Casualty Insurance Company and
1:01
affiliates Northbrook, Illinois. You know the old poem,
1:03
April Showers Bring May Birthdays. Okay, maybe that's
1:05
not how it goes, but it is time
1:08
for a Patreon May birthday shout outs. And
1:10
I want to send very
1:13
warm birthday greetings to Aria,
1:15
Carly, Ellie, Anne,
1:17
Rachel, Leah, Emily
1:19
Rose, Helen, Melissa,
1:22
Antoinette, Patty, Laura
1:24
and Kate. I
1:26
hope your day, your month,
1:28
your year is filled with
1:30
joy, laughter and wonderful memories.
1:33
Have a piece of cake for me and happy
1:35
birthday. Stephen
1:48
Watkins showed up to pick his daughter up
1:50
for court ordered visitation just two days before
1:53
Thanksgiving in 2008. The
1:55
following day was a court hearing where he
1:57
hoped to get more parenting time, but that
1:59
hearing... would not happen. What happened
2:01
instead is a matter of debate. I'm
2:04
Charlie and welcome to Crimelines. Welcome
2:14
to Crimelines Another Week, another
2:16
episode. Can you
2:18
believe it's been five years of
2:21
Crimelines? I launched Crimelines
2:23
on May 5th, 2019,
2:26
not sure how I was going to manage
2:28
a weekly show all by myself after
2:31
having a co-host for almost three
2:33
years. It is a
2:35
lot of work. And while I've
2:37
had help here and there and I've
2:39
taken occasional breaks, I'm back to producing
2:42
weekly shows plus bonus content
2:44
for Patreon and Apple subscriptions
2:46
completely by myself. I've
2:49
actually been making Crimelines by myself
2:51
longer than I made my other
2:53
show with a co-host. Now,
2:56
anyone who knows me knows that I'm
2:58
prone to hyperbole, but it's definitely not
3:01
hyperbole to say that this has been
3:03
life-changing. And I
3:05
know that Crimelines is nothing
3:07
without people listening, people
3:09
who are recommending the show to a
3:11
friend or on social media or supporting
3:13
me even directly through Patreon and Apple.
3:16
Plus, those who give me feedback.
3:19
Recently on Facebook, a listener named
3:21
Lee mentioned in a comment that
3:23
my delivery has really improved as
3:25
I've become more comfortable. And I
3:28
appreciate that because that's the thing
3:30
I've really been working on. And
3:32
I've been working on it because of the
3:34
feedback I have gotten about my delivery and
3:37
cadence, and so it's nice to know that
3:39
that work has been noticed. So
3:41
I just want to say thank you to
3:43
everyone because the show does not get to
3:45
five years just because the host didn't quit.
3:47
It's also a celebration for the listeners who
3:49
have shown up all of these weeks and
3:52
weeks and weeks I've been doing episodes and
3:54
allowed this to be my primary job,
3:57
which is why I can create so
3:59
much content. content. So
4:01
with that big thank you to
4:03
everyone, let's go ahead and get
4:05
into today's case. We are
4:07
starting with Stephen Watkins, who was born in
4:10
February of 1976 to Dale and Penny Watkins.
4:14
He grew up in Chandler,
4:16
Illinois, population 600. His upbringing in
4:19
this little town
4:22
was pretty idyllic. He had
4:24
great parents, he had a little sister he
4:26
adored, and lots of friends
4:28
and cousins everywhere. It's
4:31
the type of a life that some people
4:33
dream of, but like a lot of people
4:35
who grew up in a small town, Stephen
4:37
did want to see more of the world.
4:39
So he ended up enlisting in the Coast
4:42
Guard after high school. Around
4:44
the time Stephen was leaving for his service,
4:46
he found out that his girlfriend was pregnant.
4:49
She gave birth to a little girl who
4:51
we will call Emma. There are actually two
4:53
minor children involved in the story, and I'm
4:55
going to be changing both of their names
4:58
for their privacy. While
5:00
Stephen was stationed in Virginia, Emma's
5:02
mom would take her out to
5:04
see him pretty regularly until
5:07
she was about two years old. At
5:09
that point, she realized
5:11
that Stephen could provide Emma with
5:14
more stability than she could, so
5:16
she voluntarily gave him full
5:19
custody. Stephen loved
5:21
being a dad, it was his purpose in
5:23
life, and when he finished with
5:25
the Coast Guard, he moved back home
5:27
so he could raise Emma near family
5:29
in the same environment he grew up
5:31
in. He ended up moving
5:33
so close to his family that his
5:35
house was right behind his parents. As
5:38
a single dad, that was a
5:40
huge help to have them nearby.
5:43
Stephen got a job with the
5:45
state working for the Department of
5:47
Health Care and Family Services. He
5:49
was basically answering the phone,
5:51
advising people regarding their child
5:53
support. The job was
5:55
in Springfield, it was a bit of a
5:57
commute, so Stephen's life was basically going to
6:00
work and raising Emma. He
6:02
didn't have much time for anything else. One
6:06
day, several months into his new
6:08
job, Steven noticed a woman walking
6:10
through the parking lot at work.
6:13
She didn't work for the state, but
6:15
the company she did work for shared
6:18
the same parking lot. Steven
6:20
was interested in getting to know her, so
6:22
he started holding back a bit when he
6:24
would get to work to wait for her
6:27
so that he could strike up a conversation
6:29
as they made their way across the parking
6:31
lot. He learned her
6:33
name was Jennifer Webster, but what
6:36
he didn't know was that she
6:38
mentioned him to her family because
6:40
she knew he was interested in her.
6:43
Eventually Steven did ask Jennifer out
6:45
and she said yes. From
6:48
the first date, the relationship was
6:50
full on. There was no slow
6:52
build. Within two weeks of that
6:54
first date, Jennifer brought him to
6:56
church to meet her family. For
6:59
Jennifer's family, this was a big
7:02
deal. They were tight-knit, like Steven's
7:04
family, but according to the
7:06
reporting, they were close to
7:08
the point of almost being
7:10
insular. Jennifer, her parents,
7:12
and her grandparents all lived together,
7:14
and the extended family had
7:17
family dinner together almost every night,
7:19
and they all attended the same
7:21
church. It was
7:23
so hard for an outsider to
7:25
break into that family, according to
7:27
Dateline, that Jennifer's first
7:29
husband didn't last long. He
7:32
found it to be too much of an
7:34
us versus them mentality, and he was a
7:36
them, so the marriage ended. Steven
7:39
would also experience the us versus
7:41
them mentality, but not right away.
7:44
Jennifer seemed charmed by his daughter
7:46
Emma, who was around seven years
7:48
old, and her family was
7:50
very sweet with her. Steven had
7:53
such a wonderful childhood himself with two
7:55
parents and a sibling that he really
7:57
wanted that for Emma, so
7:59
Jennifer being ready to accept him and
8:01
Emma as a package deal really made
8:03
him fall head over heels. Things
8:07
moved quickly. They married within the
8:09
first two months of their relationship,
8:11
which worried both sides of the
8:13
family. Steven's mom thought things were moving
8:16
too fast, but she held her tongue. She
8:18
didn't want to put a cloud over Steven's
8:20
happiness. Jennifer's Uncle Ed, though,
8:22
disapproved enough that he didn't even go to
8:24
the wedding, which, from my
8:27
understanding, was a pretty bold statement in
8:29
this family since they did everything together.
8:33
After the wedding, the two moved into
8:35
a house in Ashland, Illinois. That's
8:37
about 30 minutes from where Steven grew up,
8:39
but it was just down the street from
8:41
where Jennifer had been living with her grandparents
8:43
and her parents. And
8:46
in line with everything in this
8:48
relationship moving fast, Jennifer
8:50
was soon pregnant. This
8:53
pregnancy marked a shift in the
8:55
relationship, according to Steven's family. Though
8:57
everything had moved so fast in
8:59
the relationship that it's hard to
9:01
say that if it was the
9:03
pregnancy that was the root of
9:05
the change or just the
9:07
fact that they were finally getting to know
9:09
each other, and maybe it just wasn't
9:11
working out. The first
9:14
thing Steven told his parents about
9:16
the shift in attitude was
9:18
towards Emma. It wasn't
9:21
necessarily Jennifer at first, but
9:23
her extended family. When
9:25
they had first gotten together, they all
9:28
treated Emma just like any other grandchild.
9:30
But after Jennifer got pregnant and
9:32
was having a biological grandchild, they
9:34
didn't see Emma quite the same
9:36
way. According to
9:38
what Steven's family told Dateline, Emma
9:41
was really upset when someone in
9:43
Jennifer's family told her she wasn't
9:45
really part of the family. Jennifer's
9:49
family was being, according
9:51
to Steven, outright exclusionary,
9:54
and Jennifer was doing the same
9:56
but in smaller ways. She
9:59
would prefer to to be around her family
10:01
rather than with Steven and Emma. And
10:03
Steven first thought that maybe it was
10:05
because of the pregnancy. It
10:08
was Jennifer's first baby and they had
10:10
only been married a few months after
10:13
even less time spent dating and getting
10:15
to know each other. So
10:18
it seemed natural that Jennifer would
10:20
lean heavily on her family for
10:22
support. And Steven
10:24
was pretty confident that they would be
10:26
able to get back on track as
10:28
their own family unit after the baby
10:31
was born. In
10:33
June of 2007, which was 10 months after
10:35
they got married and about a year after
10:37
they started dating, Jennifer and Steven
10:40
had a baby girl who we are gonna
10:42
call Lily. If
10:44
Steven really thought things were going to
10:46
change at this point, he was soon
10:48
proven wrong. More
10:50
than ever, Jennifer just wanted to be
10:52
around her family with her baby, of
10:55
course. Steven would get
10:57
home from work and Jennifer would pack Lily
10:59
up and go down to her parents' house
11:01
for the evening. They would
11:03
do all the normal routine things over there.
11:05
They'd have dinner, give Lily a bath, and
11:07
then Jennifer would come back pretty
11:10
much just in time to put her to bed. Steven
11:13
tried to work with Jennifer on this.
11:15
He would talk to her about prioritizing
11:17
their family over her family of origin,
11:20
but it became clear that just was not going
11:23
to happen. Steven
11:25
told his parents that he thought the
11:27
only way he and Emma would get
11:29
to be in Lily's life in any
11:31
meaningful way was if he divorced Jennifer
11:34
and the court gave him parenting time. Imagine
11:37
where Steven's mind is at this
11:40
point. He wanted more time
11:42
with his child to be a more involved
11:44
parent, and the only path forward that he
11:46
could see to accomplish that
11:49
was a divorce. The
11:51
couple separated with Steven consulting a divorce
11:54
attorney about custody in early 2008. Jennifer
11:57
moved with the baby back to the hospital.
12:00
with her family. In May of
12:02
2008, Steven filed for
12:04
divorce when Lily was 11 months
12:06
old. He could not get
12:08
Jennifer to agree to a regular visitation
12:10
schedule between the two of them, so
12:12
he needed the courts involved. And
12:15
when he filed, he asked for primary
12:17
custody. Jennifer then
12:19
called the Illinois Department of Children
12:22
and Family Services and reported that
12:24
Steven had been sexually abusing his
12:26
daughters. We don't
12:29
know all that was exactly in that
12:31
complaint, nor should we when we're talking
12:33
about a child, but Jennifer's family
12:35
later told the state journal
12:37
register what they witnessed and
12:39
what they were calling sexual
12:41
abuse. I would normally
12:43
never say what happened in any
12:46
detail when there's a surviving victim,
12:48
particularly when it's besides the point of the
12:50
case we're discussing, but I am
12:53
going to say this now because accusations
12:55
can linger even when someone is cleared
12:58
and what they described was not
13:00
abuse. The family
13:02
said that Steven, during diaper changes,
13:05
would tickle Lily above her
13:07
pubic bone, aka her stomach,
13:10
while saying the words, Naked
13:12
Baby Time. In
13:15
court, Steven admitted to doing this
13:17
because why wouldn't he? That's not
13:19
sexual abuse. And
13:22
eventually, the investigation would agree with
13:24
this, but in the meantime, Steven
13:26
was given supervised visits with Lily
13:28
so that they could investigate the claims.
13:32
During the supervised visits, Jennifer would generally
13:34
take the baby over to Steven's
13:36
house for an hour and a
13:38
half, two hours, and Steven complained
13:40
that at these visits, she would
13:42
largely try to keep him and
13:44
Emma from interacting or playing with
13:46
Lily. By the
13:48
end of the summer of 2008, Steven
13:51
had been cleared of the false
13:53
accusations against him and he
13:55
was given court ordered, unsupervised visits
13:57
with Lily. He showed
14:00
up to them as scheduled for every
14:02
single visit and in a show of
14:04
good faith, he would invite Jennifer
14:06
to come along if they were doing something
14:08
special, like when he took the girls to
14:10
the pumpkin patch. He didn't
14:13
want this to be a contentious
14:15
divorce or custody battle, he wanted
14:17
them to have a functional family
14:19
relationship, even if they weren't
14:21
together, because that's what would benefit Lily
14:23
in the long term. And
14:26
according to Steven's family, he may have
14:28
been holding out some hope that Jennifer
14:30
would see how good things could be
14:33
when they were together as a family.
14:36
But while Jennifer would take his olive
14:38
branch when it meant going along with
14:41
Lily on the visit, she never extended
14:43
one of her own. Her
14:45
own divorce attorney would later say that
14:47
Jennifer did not want Steven to see
14:50
Lily at all. She basically
14:52
wanted to move on with her daughter and
14:54
cut ties. Steven,
14:56
however, loved both of his daughters and
14:58
that was not going to happen. He
15:01
kept showing up to his court ordered
15:03
visits and after about a month of
15:05
this new schedule, Jennifer started cancelling. Sometimes
15:09
he would go over there to pick
15:11
Lily up and they wouldn't be home,
15:13
other times Lily was sick and couldn't
15:15
go. On
15:17
Thursday, October 30th, 2008, Steven went
15:19
to pick Lily up as scheduled.
15:21
He was supposed to have her
15:23
two evenings a week and then
15:25
he would have time with her
15:28
every other weekend. When he got
15:30
to the house, he was told that Lily was sick and
15:32
they were at the doctor. Steven
15:34
decided to call the police. An
15:37
officer came out to the house and
15:39
Steven showed him the court order for
15:41
visitation and explained that the family kept
15:43
denying him access to his daughter. So
15:46
the officer knocked on the door while he had
15:49
Steven stay on the other side of the street.
15:52
Jennifer's grandfather, Kenneth Skinner, and her
15:55
father Bob Webster, answered the door
15:57
together. The officer said he was called
15:59
to the house. out there because they
16:01
had denied visitation to the father,
16:03
and then both men started yelling.
16:06
Not at the officer, but they were
16:08
shouting across the street at Steven. The
16:11
officer noted that Steven did not
16:14
respond at all. The
16:16
men finally told the officer that Lily
16:18
had been sick and she was at
16:20
the doctor. And that meant there
16:22
really wasn't anything more the police could
16:24
do at that point, and I know
16:26
that's really frustrating for people. When
16:28
you have a court order, it should be
16:30
enforceable. The police will show up and
16:33
try to mediate the situation, but without
16:35
a warrant, they can't enter the home
16:37
and just get the child. And even
16:39
if they could, is that really in
16:41
the child's best interest to be removed
16:43
from the home by force? Basically,
16:46
Steven was told this was a matter for
16:49
the family court. And Steven's
16:51
plan was to continue to show up for
16:53
visits, document when the visit is
16:55
denied, and then bring all of that
16:57
before the judge at their next hearing,
16:59
which was scheduled for November 26th,
17:02
2008. The judge had
17:04
already indicated that he expected
17:07
to expand Steven's visitation to
17:09
include overnight visits, but
17:11
who knows what the judge would do when
17:13
he found out that Jennifer had been defying
17:15
the current court order. Not
17:17
following a court order isn't just seen
17:19
as something you're doing against the other
17:21
parent. You're doing it against the
17:23
judge. You're going against the court. And
17:26
judges don't like that. This
17:28
was really not going to look good
17:31
for Jennifer in court on top of
17:33
the unfounded abuse claims. The
17:36
evening before this hearing on November 25th,
17:38
Steven had a scheduled visit and as
17:40
always, he showed up to pick up
17:43
17 month old Lily. With
17:45
court the next day, I'm sure he thought Jennifer
17:48
would comply with the visitation schedule if only to
17:50
look good for the judge. Then
17:52
at around 5 30 that evening, a 911 call
17:56
came in. It was Jennifer
17:58
very upset. Saying that
18:00
her grandmother, 73-year-old Shirley Skinner,
18:03
needed help. She
18:05
said that her husband came in the house to
18:08
pick up their daughter and he went after Shirley.
18:11
Then he turned and went after her and
18:13
the baby and he was on the floor
18:15
shot. The 911
18:17
dispatcher repeated, you say she shot?
18:20
And Jennifer replied no. He
18:22
shot and she needed an ambulance
18:24
for her grandmother who had been
18:26
pushed and had heart trouble. This
18:29
was a confusing call. Jennifer was saying
18:32
that someone was shot but the help that
18:34
was needed was for someone with heart problems.
18:37
She was upset so the dispatcher took her
18:39
at face value and dispatched EMS to the
18:41
house on the report that
18:43
there was an elderly woman having heart
18:45
problems. The
18:47
first two people at the scene
18:50
were volunteer paramedics whose duty was
18:52
to render first aid until the
18:54
ambulance could get there. The
18:57
first one on the scene said that there were a
18:59
few people in the house who waved him inside. He
19:02
saw Shirley Skinner pacing in the
19:04
kitchen pretty frantically while
19:06
Jennifer and Shirley's husband Kenneth were
19:08
standing near her trying to calm
19:11
her down. Lily was
19:13
with Jennifer. When Shirley
19:15
saw the paramedics she said, I shot
19:18
him. Is he dead? Now
19:20
this guy stands there a little confused.
19:23
Shirley repeated it several times and then
19:26
pointed to the floor. Only
19:29
then did he see 32 year old
19:31
Steven Watkins lying face down. He
19:34
was dead having been shot once in the back
19:36
of the head and there was just nothing they
19:38
could do for him. I
19:46
don't know if you've heard about this
19:48
but the flavored air category is quickly
19:50
becoming the leading alternative to vaping and
19:52
smoking. It's really a whole
19:54
new movement towards better habits led by
19:57
the sponsor of today's episode Fume. you
20:00
perform a habit, good or bad,
20:02
your brain forms neural pathways associated
20:04
with that behavior. That means
20:06
breaking a habit requires you to
20:08
either rewire these pathways or substituting
20:11
the habit with something better. With
20:13
flavored air, you can satisfy your
20:15
oral fixation through a passive diffusion
20:18
system that utilizes no electronics, vapor,
20:20
or combustion. Fume is an
20:22
award-winning flavored air device, and if
20:25
you think of vapor as a
20:27
sticky soda, fume cores
20:29
are much closer to refreshing herbal teas.
20:31
And fume has a lot of delicious
20:33
flavors out there for every palate. Personally,
20:35
orange vanilla is my favorite. There is
20:37
no vapor so you can use it
20:39
anywhere, and the flavors are non-toxic. I
20:41
appreciate that fume continuously invests in third-party
20:43
studies to ensure the safety of their
20:46
products. I loved the look of the
20:48
fume, but I loved it even more
20:50
when I pulled it out of the
20:52
box and felt that weighted design that
20:54
makes it very comfortable to hold. They've
20:56
also made it with fidgeting in mind,
20:58
which I appreciate as a fidgeter. It
21:00
really does help keep my hands busy.
21:03
Fume has served over 300,000 customers,
21:05
and you can be the next success
21:07
story. For a limited time, use my
21:09
code CRIMELINES to get a free gift
21:11
with your journey pack. Head to tryfume.com,
21:14
that's tryfum.com, and use code CRIMELINES to
21:16
get a free gift with your order
21:18
today. The future is a hefty
21:20
responsibility and not one that we take lightly,
21:22
but then taking things lightly has never been
21:24
what hefty is about. That's why
21:26
we've created the Hasty Renew program that turns
21:29
hard to recycle plastics into valuable
21:31
resources, like suspension and building materials.
21:33
To participate, simply fill up an Orange Hasty
21:35
Renew bag with ducussed items, tie it up, and
21:38
drop it in with your regular recycling. That's
21:40
it. It's that easy. It's
21:42
time to rethink recycling with Renew. Particular
21:45
valued resources may vary by June if you
21:47
need more info available at Hasty renew.com. Thank
21:56
you. 911
22:00
call. Stephen had been
22:02
shot, so why did she
22:04
call an ambulance for Shirley
22:07
being in distress? Wouldn't
22:09
you call it for the person
22:11
who had a significantly more urgent
22:13
medical need? Since
22:15
there was nothing that could be
22:17
done for Stephen, the paramedic tried
22:19
to see if Shirley needed treatment,
22:22
and she first denied having any
22:24
medical issues. Her daughter, though, Jennifer's
22:26
mother Deborah, jumped in and said
22:28
she did have heart problems. The
22:31
only injuries the paramedic saw on
22:33
Shirley were two parallel scratches between
22:36
her thumb and forefinger. There was
22:38
some dried blood around them, but
22:40
no bruising. Shirley
22:43
was upset and just kept saying things like,
22:45
he shouldn't have come in here. At one
22:49
point, Shirley pointed to a broken sconce
22:51
on the wall and said that she
22:53
had been pushed into it. There
22:56
was another paramedic at the scene, and their
22:58
report is very similar to this one, so
23:00
I think we have a pretty good idea
23:02
of what the people in the house were
23:04
doing and saying in the aftermath of this.
23:07
All Jennifer said at the scene was basically what she
23:09
said on the 911 call. Stephen
23:12
forced his way in, he pushed Shirley,
23:14
and then he started to make his
23:16
way towards her and Lily. Then
23:19
Shirley grabbed a gun that was on a shelf
23:21
near the TV and shot him. At
23:24
some point in all of this, someone
23:27
in the house called an attorney and
23:29
Shirley was seen talking on the phone.
23:32
She then handed the phone to someone else and
23:34
simply said, I shouldn't have done this. The
23:37
ambulance arrived and Shirley was taken to
23:39
the hospital for observation since she was
23:41
agitated and short of breath. On
23:44
the ride to the hospital, her daughter Deborah
23:46
was with her and just kept telling Shirley
23:48
not to say anything else. And
23:52
that was the entire family's
23:54
decision going forward. Aside
23:57
from Jennifer's vague statement and Shirley's
23:59
attitude, agitated confession, they
24:02
were giving nothing. No one in the house
24:04
would say who shot Steven or why. They
24:06
wouldn't even clarify who was in the house
24:09
when it happened. So this
24:11
left the Ashland police to investigate
24:13
if this was murder or self-defense.
24:16
And when I say the Ashland police,
24:19
I mean that in the singular. Ashland,
24:22
with a population of around 11 or 1200
24:25
people, only had one
24:27
full-time police officer, the chief. And
24:30
he had never investigated a homicide
24:32
before. So there
24:34
were a lot of things that were
24:36
not done immediately, likely due to his
24:38
inexperience. He was never able
24:40
to fully ascertain how many people were in
24:42
the house at the time of the shooting.
24:45
He knew it was at least Jennifer, her
24:47
daughter, her grandmother, and her grandfather. Deborah
24:50
was there when the paramedics arrived, but that's
24:52
not to say she was there the whole
24:54
time. The chief also
24:56
did not do gunshot residue tests
24:58
on anyone, and that's probably because
25:00
Shirley admitted to having shot Steven.
25:03
But she was also agitated and in
25:06
distress, and a GSR test might have
25:08
helped definitively put the gun in her
25:10
hand. Now speaking of
25:13
her hand, no one took pictures of
25:15
Shirley's injury. Although
25:17
the chief was well-meaning, he
25:19
tried unsuccessfully to work the
25:22
case for months before he
25:24
called the state in to
25:26
help. He came
25:28
to believe through his investigation that
25:30
this was not a case of
25:32
self-defense or defense of another, and
25:35
the murder investigation needed more
25:37
experienced investigators from the state's
25:40
attorney's office. There
25:42
were reasons not to believe a
25:44
self-defense claim. For one, Steven
25:46
had the upper hand going into the
25:49
hearing the next day. The
25:51
judge had already indicated he would be giving
25:53
him more visitation, and Steven
25:55
had been following the orders to
25:57
the letter while Jennifer had not.
26:00
Why would he risk his pretty
26:02
easy court win by assaulting Shirley
26:05
and going after Jennifer? Why
26:07
didn't Steven do what he had done in the
26:10
past which was call the police and have it
26:12
documented? There was
26:14
also very little evidence of a physical
26:16
altercation at the scene. Shirley
26:19
said quote, he should not have come in
26:21
here, which indicated he
26:23
hadn't been invited in, but
26:25
there was no damage to the door and things
26:28
were not knocked over in the entry way like
26:30
he pushed open the door to barge in. All
26:33
they had was that broken wall sconce.
26:36
The sconce was still attached to
26:39
the wall, but three posts that
26:41
came out of it were all broken
26:43
and dangling by the wires. A
26:47
visual examination of the fixture
26:49
showed no blood on it
26:51
and Shirley also didn't have any
26:53
corresponding injuries. Had
26:55
she been pushed into the fixture hard
26:58
enough to break off three poles, wouldn't
27:00
she at least have a bruise from it? And
27:04
now to mention that the sconce appeared to be about
27:06
5 and a half feet up the wall, Shirley
27:08
stood just 5 feet tall. Now
27:12
maybe she got pushed and her
27:14
hands flailed up and her hand
27:16
hit the sconce, breaking all three
27:18
poles and giving her two scrapes.
27:21
To me that seems like something worth following
27:23
up on to rule it in or out,
27:26
but like I said the injury wasn't
27:28
photographed and they couldn't go back and
27:30
reconstruct it. To the
27:33
investigators, they believed that the sconce had
27:35
either already been broken or it was
27:38
broken in some attempt to stage
27:40
it. It seemed
27:42
much more likely that the injuries to
27:44
the webbing of Shirley's thumb and forefinger
27:46
were from the gun used to shoot
27:49
Steven. It was a
27:51
9mm Glock and the scrapes could
27:53
have been from the slide. It's
27:55
a common enough injury particularly for
27:57
people not used to handling a
28:00
gun like that, that it has
28:02
a name, Slide-Bite. And
28:04
Shirley was definitely not used to shooting
28:07
that gun or really any gun. That's
28:09
not to say she never shot a
28:11
gun before, but she wasn't an avid
28:14
shooter, and the gun was Jennifer's. She
28:16
had bought it many years before, and
28:19
the family kept it loaded on a shelf
28:21
near the television, which was why Shirley was
28:23
able to so easily and quickly grab it.
28:25
I have to
28:27
say for an inexperienced shooter, this was
28:29
quite the shot. Based on
28:32
the little information that Shirley and
28:34
Jennifer gave, it looks like Shirley
28:36
took the shot at 15 to 20 feet,
28:39
and she hit Steven right in the
28:42
back of his head, instantly killing him.
28:45
So it seemed to the investigators
28:47
that there were two possible scenarios
28:49
here. One was it
28:52
happened the way Shirley and Jennifer said.
28:54
Steven barged in, pushed Shirley into the
28:56
wall, and went for Jennifer when he
28:58
was killed. Or
29:00
he had been led into the house, and
29:02
when his back was turned, someone
29:05
in the house executed him to keep
29:07
him from getting custody of Lilly. With
29:10
the missteps in the early investigation, it
29:13
seemed like they would never be able
29:15
to prove which it was. But
29:18
then the investigators learned about something else
29:20
that happened that day, as Jennifer prepped
29:22
for the custody hearing. Jennifer's
29:25
mother, Deborah, hired a
29:27
private investigator to supervise
29:30
Steven picking Lilly up.
29:32
He said that he was told Steven
29:35
would be there around 4.45 in the
29:37
afternoon, and what they were looking for
29:39
from the PI was third-party documentation. Deborah
29:43
said that Lilly would really carry
29:45
on crying and wetting herself whenever
29:48
she was around Steven, and they
29:50
wanted that documented to bring to
29:52
court. But at 3.30 that day,
29:55
Deborah called the PI and
29:58
canceled. She told them not to come back. come
30:00
by and they didn't need a services. The
30:03
family was not talking to the police,
30:05
so they couldn't ask Deborah about this.
30:09
But down the road, in a bit of an
30:11
attempt to defend herself and her family in the
30:13
media, Deborah told the
30:15
state journal register that she canceled
30:17
because a child psychologist advised them
30:19
that evidence of a hired PI
30:22
observing a crying child wouldn't really
30:24
help in court. And
30:27
the fact that it wouldn't help in court
30:29
was true. Lily was 17 months
30:31
old at that point, and that's really the
30:33
peak of separation anxiety. It
30:35
would have been normal for her to cry
30:37
when she had to separate from her primary
30:40
caretaker, and a judge probably
30:42
wouldn't consider it. So maybe that was
30:44
the reason Deborah canceled the PI, and
30:46
maybe if she explained that to the
30:48
police early on, they would have found
30:51
it a reasonable enough explanation. But she
30:53
didn't. She didn't say it until two
30:55
years later. So to
30:57
the investigators, looking at this
31:00
case without that added explanation,
31:02
it looked like Deborah knew something was
31:05
going to happen that night, and she
31:07
didn't want a witness. The
31:09
initial plan may have been to go to
31:11
court with the PI's evidence to try to
31:13
keep Steven from getting custody, but at
31:16
some point that day, the plan
31:18
changed. And if
31:20
that was true, that the plan
31:22
changed to murder, this was
31:24
a conspiracy. It
31:27
seemed pretty clear at that point that if
31:29
Shirley was forced to defend herself, she
31:32
would mount a self-defense or a
31:34
defense of another claim. And
31:36
the investigators decided that she
31:39
could argue that in court. So
31:42
on October 5th, 2009, ten months after Steven's
31:44
death, 74-year-old Shirley Skinner was arrested. She
31:50
and her husband, along with Jennifer
31:52
and Lily, had moved down to
31:54
their Florida vacation home in
31:56
Lake Seminole, and that is where she was arrested.
32:00
At the time they took Shirley into custody
32:02
for the murder of Steven Watkins, the police
32:04
said that more arrests were possible. Shirley
32:07
waved extradition, so within days she
32:09
was back in Illinois, locked up
32:11
on a $5 million bond. Then,
32:16
in December of 2009, the
32:18
grand jury indicted her on
32:20
additional charges related to
32:22
attempting to hire two of her
32:24
employees in their family business to
32:26
commit the murder. She had told
32:29
both of them that she would pay $10,000 to have Steven
32:31
killed. Her
32:34
attorney said that this was just an off-handed joke
32:36
and that if either of the men thought she
32:38
was serious, they would have gone to
32:40
the police, which they didn't. But
32:43
the state countered that both men were
32:45
employees of Shirley's, which gave them a
32:47
financial incentive not to come forward.
32:51
While these criminal charges were
32:53
pending, Steven's family, who
32:55
were still dealing with having just
32:58
lost him, asked Jennifer
33:00
if they could visit with Lily, and
33:03
she refused. There
33:05
was an attempted offer that Shirley's bond
33:07
could be lowered in exchange for a
33:09
visit, and Jennifer still refused.
33:13
For the state, this just
33:16
confirmed the entire motive. They
33:18
believed that Jennifer and her family viewed
33:20
Lily as a piece of property that
33:22
belonged to them, and they would do
33:24
what they had to in order to
33:27
keep control. As
33:29
the trial approached, the state had a very clear
33:31
theory of the crime. Steven
33:34
showed up for his visit like usual, but
33:37
rather than refusing him to see
33:39
Lily, they invited him to step
33:41
inside. When he did that,
33:43
Shirley pulled the gun and shot him
33:45
from behind in a planned execution. The
33:48
issue here was going to
33:51
be that early investigation. How
33:53
could they prove this is what happened? Shirley
33:56
told multiple people at the scene that she was
33:58
the one who shot Steven. but what if
34:01
she denied that in court? What
34:03
independent proof other than her
34:05
excited utterances did they have?
34:08
They had injuries to her hand
34:10
that people saw but were not
34:12
documented. They didn't have GSR test
34:15
results. They didn't have fingerprints
34:17
on the gun which isn't unusual
34:19
given the materials in that particular
34:21
gun. So then they
34:24
DNA tested it and they found
34:26
female DNA but surely was excluded
34:28
as a possible contributor. Jennifer
34:31
was not excluded so it could have
34:33
been her DNA and since she owned
34:36
the gun I think it's probably safe
34:38
to say it was. But
34:40
they also found the police chief's DNA
34:42
even though he said he never handled
34:44
the gun without gloves which
34:47
then brings up a question of
34:49
contamination. So the
34:51
state was confident they knew what happened but
34:53
less confident they could prove it in court
34:56
so they offered Shirley a deal. If she
34:59
pleaded out on a lesser charge she
35:01
would be sentenced to around nine years
35:03
in prison. At 74 years
35:05
old she would have a chance of
35:07
a life of freedom afterwards but
35:10
if she went to trial and was convicted she
35:12
would spend the rest of her life behind bars.
35:15
Shirley turned down the deal. So
35:18
this case went to trial in May of
35:20
2010. Jennifer did not
35:22
attend any of the trial and
35:25
she remained living in Florida resisting
35:27
all of Stevens family's efforts to
35:30
see Lily. They ended up filing
35:32
a court case for grandparent visitation which
35:34
we'll get into later. At
35:37
Shirley's trial the state presented the
35:39
Skinner family as clannish closed off
35:41
to outsiders and possessive
35:43
of their family members. When
35:47
Stephen Watkins filed for custody he
35:49
was threatening their way of life.
35:52
When attempts to accuse him of truly disgusting
35:55
crimes failed they then tried
35:57
to block his access to his daughter. But
36:00
that wasn't getting him to go away, and
36:02
there was a hearing on the horizon, one
36:05
that was likely going to go in his
36:07
favor, so Shirley decided to put an end
36:09
to it. The
36:11
defense, they had a
36:14
strategy that I didn't anticipate. I
36:16
was 100% sure they were
36:18
going to present this as a clear-cut
36:20
defense of another case. They
36:23
were going to stick Shirley on the
36:25
stand and have her tearfully explain how
36:27
terrified she was when Steven barged through
36:29
the door, pushed her aside, and
36:32
then started to go after Jennifer and Lily.
36:35
She's a small woman who looks every
36:37
bit the part of a great-grandmother. Now
36:40
don't get me wrong, she's a strong
36:42
lady. She's the matriarch of the family,
36:44
she was running a family business years
36:46
past retirement age. But if
36:48
Jodi Arias' attorneys could make
36:51
her look mousy, Shirley's could
36:53
have made her look like a sympathetic, timid
36:55
old lady. But they didn't. They
36:58
decided instead to question if she was
37:00
the shooter. I
37:08
don't know if you've heard about this,
37:10
but the flavored air category is quickly
37:12
becoming the leading alternative to vaping and
37:14
smoking. It's really a whole new movement
37:17
towards better habits, led by the sponsor
37:19
of today's episode, Fume. When
37:21
you perform a habit, good or
37:23
bad, your brain forms neural pathways
37:25
associated with that behavior. That
37:27
means breaking a habit requires you
37:29
to either rewire these pathways or
37:31
substituting the habit with something better.
37:34
With flavored air, you can satisfy your
37:36
oral fixation through a passive-diffusion system
37:39
that utilizes no electronics, vapor,
37:41
or combustion. Fume is an
37:43
award-winning flavored air device, and
37:45
if you think of vapor
37:47
as a sticky soda, Fume
37:49
cores are much closer to
37:51
refreshing herbal teas. And
37:53
Fume has a lot of delicious
37:55
flavors out there for every palate.
37:57
Personally, orange vanilla is my favorite.
38:00
There is no vapor so you can use
38:02
it anywhere and the flavors are non-toxic. I
38:04
appreciate that Fume continuously invests in third-party studies
38:06
to ensure the safety of their products. I
38:09
love the look of the Fume, but I
38:11
loved it even more when I pulled it
38:13
out of the box and felt that weighted
38:15
design that makes it very comfortable to hold.
38:17
They've also made it with fidgeting in mind,
38:20
which I appreciate as a fidgeter. It really
38:22
does help keep my hands busy. Fume has
38:24
served over 300,000 customers
38:26
and you can be the next success story.
38:29
For a limited time, use my code
38:31
CRIMELINES to get a free gift with
38:33
your Journey Pack. Head to trifume.com, that's
38:35
tri-fum.com, and use code CRIMELINES to get
38:37
a free gift with your order today.
38:39
The future is a hefty responsibility and
38:41
not one that we take lightly, but
38:44
then taking things lightly has never been
38:46
what hefty is about. That's why we've
38:48
created the HECI Renew Program that turns
38:50
hard to recycle plastics into valuable
38:52
resources or sponges and building materials.
38:55
To participate, simply fill up an orange HECI
38:57
Renew bag with accepted items, tie it up, and
38:59
drop it in with your regular recycling. That's
39:02
it. It's that easy. It's time to
39:04
rethink recycling with Renew. Particular
39:06
valued resources may vary by June if you're
39:08
new and for available, head to renew.com. So
39:17
that's why I went through all those gaps
39:20
in the investigation. The only forensic
39:22
evidence we have, the DNA, made it
39:24
possible that it was Jennifer holding the
39:27
gun, and the defense really
39:29
used that. They
39:31
pointed out that there were multiple
39:33
photographs taken of the front door
39:35
but zero of Shirley's supposed injuries.
39:38
And if she had those injuries where the slide
39:40
scraped her skin to the point that she bled,
39:43
why was her DNA not on the gun? Additionally,
39:46
there was a ton of evidence
39:48
of Jennifer hating Steven, but
39:50
none of that applied directly to Shirley.
39:54
There were no communications between Shirley and
39:56
Steven, or really any evidence that she
39:58
was involved in the divorce process. proceedings
40:00
in any way. The
40:02
only thing that put the gun in Shirley's
40:04
hands were statements she made while
40:07
she was having a medical incident after
40:09
someone was shot in her home. According
40:12
to the defense, they could not be
40:14
relied on. The defense
40:16
chose to call no witnesses,
40:18
instead covering their case through
40:20
cross-examination and their closing arguments,
40:23
where they tried to drive home the
40:25
point that no one could put
40:27
the gun in Shirley's hand beyond
40:29
a reasonable doubt. There was
40:31
a reasonable alternative suspect, someone
40:34
whose DNA was likely on the gun and
40:36
who had all the motive in the world,
40:39
Jennifer. The
40:41
jury took the case, and we do
40:43
know a bit about their deliberations based
40:46
on interviews later done by students at
40:48
the Nepal University College of Law. It
40:51
seems the consensus of the jurors was
40:53
that they were surprised the defense did
40:55
not put on more of a case.
40:58
They were unaware that this initially
41:01
looked like a self-defense case because
41:03
Shirley didn't testify. No one else
41:06
in the family testified on her behalf
41:08
either, which seemed strange to the jury,
41:10
because certainly someone else in the family
41:12
knew whether Shirley pulled the trigger or
41:14
not. They
41:17
didn't have any character witnesses to let the
41:19
jury know how unlikely it was for Shirley
41:21
to have done something so violent, and
41:24
maybe they didn't put anyone on the
41:26
stand because it was something Shirley would
41:28
do, and in fact, did
41:31
do. After
41:33
15 minutes of discussion, they had their
41:35
first vote, which was 11 guilty,
41:37
1 not guilty. They
41:40
had about 15 more minutes of
41:42
discussion, followed by a second vote,
41:44
and this time it was unanimous,
41:47
guilty for first degree murder
41:49
and solicitation of murder. She
41:52
was sentenced to 55 years in prison. With
41:56
Shirley off to prison and Steven
41:58
dead, if Jennifer thought her days
42:01
of battling for custody were over,
42:03
she was very, very wrong because
42:05
Steven's family wanted visitation with
42:07
a lily and they were going to
42:09
push for it. Now, every state is
42:11
a bit different when it comes to grandparents' rights
42:13
to visitation. In Illinois, there are
42:16
limited circumstances where a grandparent even
42:18
has the legal standing to ask
42:20
the court for visitation. If
42:23
both of the parents of the grandchild
42:26
agree not to allow a visit, they
42:28
can't even petition. In
42:30
this case, though, the Watkins
42:32
could apply because Steven was
42:34
deceased. The
42:37
hardest step to overcome, though, is
42:39
that they had to prove that
42:41
Jennifer was unreasonable in not allowing
42:44
them to visit and that the
42:46
child had experienced harm due to
42:48
it. The reason this
42:50
is so difficult to prove is that
42:53
the baseline going into court is
42:55
that a parent who is fit enough to raise
42:57
their child would not choose
42:59
something that is harming them. But
43:02
the Watkins were able to prove to
43:05
this judge that it was harmful
43:07
for Lily not to visit with them.
43:10
It seems the main reason was that
43:12
she would otherwise grow up without learning
43:14
about her father or hearing positive things
43:17
about him if she didn't
43:19
have meaningful visits with his family.
43:22
This judge had very harsh
43:25
words for Jennifer. He
43:27
said he saw evil in
43:29
her and even said he felt
43:31
sorry for Lily because she had to
43:33
live with Jennifer. So
43:36
the Watkins were granted visits, but if
43:39
you think Jennifer followed this court order
43:41
any better than she followed the one
43:43
she had with Steven, you're sorely mistaken.
43:46
It wasn't long before Jennifer was
43:48
refusing visits. And
43:50
really around the same time she's
43:53
refusing these visits, the state had
43:55
decided they weren't entirely done with
43:57
the Skinner-Webster family. They did not
43:59
believe that it was Shirley and only
44:01
Shirley who planned Steven's murder. Another
44:04
grand jury was held in November of
44:06
2010 and this time members of the
44:08
family broke their silence. What
44:11
they told the grand jury is
44:13
sealed but they did speak with
44:15
the state journal register, not Jennifer
44:17
but Shirley's husband, her daughter Deborah,
44:19
her son Ed, and her son-in-law.
44:22
It seems the family realized that staying
44:24
quiet for two years really didn't help
44:27
them legally because Shirley was now in
44:29
prison and it certainly didn't help
44:31
them in the court of public opinion. They
44:34
said they didn't talk under the advice of
44:36
their attorneys which I can't say is the
44:38
wrong choice. It was clear the
44:40
state was looking at this as a conspiracy
44:43
case and if you're a suspect and a
44:45
murderer it's almost always in your best interest
44:47
to stop talking. The
44:49
family though was divided in what they
44:51
thought really happened. Shirley's
44:53
son Ed was and is as far
44:56
as I know convinced that Jennifer killed
44:58
Steven and Shirley took the rap for
45:00
her so that custody of Lily would
45:02
remain with the family. Ed
45:05
later told Dateline that Jennifer was the
45:07
golden child in the family, she was
45:09
the first granddaughter and she was spoiled
45:12
from day one. She could
45:14
be sweet when things went her way but
45:16
when she got upset it turned ugly fast.
45:19
He said she was entitled and
45:21
controlling with her behaviors which we
45:23
do see in the custody battle
45:25
over her daughter. Ed
45:28
absolutely could see Shirley taking the blame
45:30
for Jennifer because she would do anything
45:32
for her. Jennifer's
45:35
mother Deborah does not believe that and
45:37
neither does Kenneth, Shirley's husband. Deborah
45:40
said she would never let her mother go to
45:42
jail for her daughter but that Shirley shouldn't be
45:45
in prison either. She
45:47
was acting to defend the family. But
45:50
a big issue with what everyone thinks
45:52
happened is that they all claimed not
45:54
to have been there. Ed
45:56
wasn't at the house Kenneth said he
45:58
was in another room. when he heard Shirley
46:01
fall and then a gunshot so he didn't
46:03
see it. Jennifer
46:05
would also later claim to have been
46:07
in another room, apparently hiding
46:09
from Steven. And
46:11
Deborah also wasn't at home, she was
46:13
possibly at work, though she couldn't remember
46:16
the exact details two years later. Shirley's
46:19
family also said that contrary
46:22
to the prosecution's portrayal of
46:24
Steven as a kind man
46:26
who just wanted to be part of his daughter's
46:29
life, they knew
46:31
Steven as someone with a temper
46:33
and they repeated that they still believed
46:35
he had abused his daughter. Steven's
46:38
family said in that same article
46:40
that Steven was never aggressive towards
46:42
anyone in his life and what about
46:44
shooting someone in the back of the
46:46
head says self-defense. They
46:48
believed that Shirley pulled the trigger in
46:50
a planned murder and they only had
46:53
partial justice because only Shirley was in
46:55
prison. The new
46:57
grand jury did not lead to additional charges
46:59
in Steven's murder but this was not the
47:02
end of the legal woes for the family
47:04
because Jennifer was soon held in contempt for
47:06
not allowing those court ordered visits.
47:09
An arrest warrant was issued for her in March of
47:11
2011 and she
47:13
was jailed in Florida while she
47:16
fought extradition. Jennifer
47:18
sat in jail for around five
47:20
months before she was released because
47:23
Florida failed to extradite her. She
47:26
was so adamant that Steven's family not
47:28
be given a visit that she would
47:30
rather sit in jail while her family
47:32
took care of Lily than grant that
47:34
visit. Also
47:37
in 2011, Shirley's appeal was heard
47:39
and she was partially successful. She
47:42
did not get the first degree murder
47:44
charge overturned but she did get the
47:46
solicitation conviction tossed out. The
47:48
appellate court found that the evidence
47:50
there was really lacking. They
47:53
had one employee's testimony that was
47:55
called equivocal and vague and the
47:57
second employee who was there for
47:59
the conviction. conversation did not seem
48:01
to remember the details of it.
48:04
So Shirley got one conviction tossed out, but
48:06
because of the other one she stayed in
48:08
prison. The following year in 2012,
48:12
Stevens family helped pass a
48:14
state statute that allows judges
48:16
to suspend the driver's licenses
48:18
of parents who
48:20
refuse to allow court ordered
48:22
visitation between their children and
48:25
their non-custodial parents, and
48:27
they can also issue a fine. Now
48:29
this law makes sense if you think
48:31
about how Illinois has a similar law
48:34
for non-payment of child support. If
48:36
not paying your child support gets
48:39
you a license suspension, why shouldn't
48:41
refusing visitation do likewise? Now
48:45
this law did have opposition and there are similar
48:47
issues that come up with these types of laws
48:49
for not paying your child support. For
48:52
one, there are already punitive options
48:54
for judges which include jail time
48:56
and criminal charges. So
48:58
we should really focus on making the court use the
49:00
tools they have. The other
49:02
main argument against these types of
49:04
laws is that you shouldn't attach
49:07
driving privileges to something unrelated to
49:09
driving. In spite of
49:11
the opposition, the law did pass, but
49:14
nothing the Watkins did in
49:16
Illinois would force Florida to
49:19
successfully enforce the visitation schedule.
49:22
There was a second attempt to arrest Jennifer
49:24
in 2013, but at that point they couldn't
49:26
find her. Every time they
49:28
went to the house where she supposedly lived,
49:30
they said she didn't live there. The
49:33
Watkins managed maybe two phone
49:35
calls with Lily by calling
49:38
Deborah's phone, but then that
49:40
number was disconnected and they had
49:42
no contact. But
49:44
then in 2016, Jennifer left Florida. She
49:48
moved with Lily to Massachusetts to live with
49:50
a man that she had met at church.
49:53
Steven's parents had heard through a mutual friend
49:56
that Jennifer had moved, so they decided to
49:58
see if they could help her. Massachusetts
50:00
could do what Florida couldn't.
50:03
A warrant was issued for Jennifer's arrest,
50:06
and they not only arrested
50:08
her, they managed to successfully
50:10
extradite her to Illinois. Lily
50:13
was then put into state care and placed
50:15
in the home of Steven's sister in October
50:17
2016. Jennifer
50:20
then entered a custody battle, not
50:22
really with Steven's family, but with
50:24
the state. A hearing
50:27
was held to determine if keeping Lily
50:29
from her grandparents was
50:31
enough justification to remove Lily
50:33
from Jennifer's care. Jennifer
50:36
knew she had to fight to get
50:39
Lily back, so one of the things
50:41
she did was quickly break things off
50:43
with her fiancé, who was actually facing
50:45
fraud charges for something entirely unrelated, but
50:48
that was definitely not a good look, and
50:50
Jennifer's only focus at this point was getting
50:52
Lily back. Jennifer said
50:54
in court that she only left Illinois
50:56
because people blamed her for Steven's murder,
50:59
and she was being harassed. She
51:01
claimed she tried to arrange visits
51:03
with Steven's mother Penny both in
51:06
Florida and in Illinois, but Penny
51:08
denied that ever happened. She
51:10
didn't even know Jennifer was in Florida
51:12
initially. The only time she talked to
51:14
Jennifer about visits was when she had a scheduled visit
51:16
in 2010 with Lily
51:18
shortly after getting visitation rights.
51:21
She then received a text from Jennifer
51:24
that said, Gone out of state, you
51:26
can come visit if you want to. The
51:29
text did not say what state she was
51:31
in. Beyond that, Penny
51:33
never had Jennifer's new phone number. She
51:36
had her mother Deborah's number, which is
51:38
what she called, until that got disconnected.
51:41
Penny even hired a PI to find them, and
51:43
why in the world would she have done that
51:45
if Jennifer was allowing visits? Jennifer
51:48
set up a GoFundMe for her legal
51:50
expenses, and she actually put out some
51:52
of her story there. It's
51:55
the first time since Steven's murder that she
51:57
said what happened. She wrote that
51:59
she and Lily were in a bedroom and Steven
52:01
was coming after her. Writing about
52:03
what Shirley did, Jennifer said, quote, knowing
52:05
that he would come and kill me,
52:07
she grabbed a gun and fired one
52:10
warning shot, which happened to hit him
52:12
in the back of the head. This
52:14
was an act of self defense, end
52:16
quote. In
52:18
court and in the go fund me, Jennifer
52:21
said her former in laws were free to
52:23
see Lily in Florida. And in
52:25
an interview with the media, Jennifer said it
52:27
had been on her mind shortly before her
52:29
arrest to make sure a visit happened, but
52:32
she was arrested before she could get them
52:34
set up. After six years
52:36
of no visits, she was suddenly
52:38
ready to do it. But wouldn't
52:40
you know they arrested her before
52:42
she could. No
52:44
matter how this was twisted, it's
52:47
pretty clear that Jennifer was keeping
52:49
Lily from her grandparents. Now
52:51
the question was, was this
52:54
enough to rule that Lily
52:56
who was well cared for
52:58
otherwise had been neglected by
53:00
Jennifer and the judge
53:02
said she had been. Not
53:05
only was it neglect to prevent her
53:08
from knowing her father's family, Jennifer put
53:10
herself in a position to be
53:12
arrested for disobeying the court order
53:14
and that arrest would have a
53:16
negative impact on Lily. Now
53:19
this is not what we usually see
53:21
in a neglect case. When we
53:23
hear the reporting that says
53:26
simply that Lily was removed from
53:28
the home due to neglect, it
53:30
paints a picture in our minds that is
53:33
not entirely accurate. Aside
53:36
from the custody issue, Jennifer was
53:38
more or less taking good care
53:40
of her. Because
53:43
this case was not about outright
53:45
abuse and severe neglect, it seemed
53:47
to always be a case where
53:49
Jennifer would get Lily back once
53:51
she completed the things the court
53:53
asked of her like going to
53:55
counseling sessions and hopefully she learned
53:57
her lesson about following court rules.
54:00
orders. The judge told her
54:02
she was in the driver's seat with this. Once she
54:04
got her counseling and had a plan for how she
54:06
was going to not defy the court
54:08
order in the future, Lily would
54:10
be returned. And initially,
54:13
that is what Lily wanted as well.
54:15
She wanted to move back with her
54:17
mother. But then after
54:19
a few months in her aunt's care,
54:21
she changed her mind. She
54:23
expressed this to a number of people,
54:26
including her therapist and her
54:28
guardian ablietum. The
54:30
supervised visits she had with her
54:32
mom had not gone as smoothly
54:34
as everyone hoped for. Lily
54:37
told her therapist that Jennifer would
54:39
whisper things in her ear and
54:41
promise her things in her quote,
54:43
lying voice. There
54:45
were also notes from the visitation
54:47
supervisor who had to intervene with
54:49
both Jennifer and her mother
54:51
over things they said to Lily. With
54:54
Jennifer, it was mostly just bringing up what
54:56
would happen when Lily came home and how
54:58
she would decorate her room and things like
55:00
that. She was told by
55:03
the supervisor not to bring up reunification
55:05
at the visits. This is
55:07
such an uncertain time for kids and it's
55:09
best to just keep conversations in the present.
55:13
Jennifer's mother, Deborah, went a step further. She
55:15
did talk to Lily about coming home. But
55:18
then during an August 2017 visit,
55:20
Deborah told Lily to be careful
55:22
with what she told the judge
55:24
because it could hurt what happened
55:26
between her and her mom. The
55:29
visitation supervisor again had to intervene and
55:31
tell her to stop saying things like
55:33
that. Lily's
55:35
counselor told the court that the visits
55:38
were becoming a source of stress for
55:40
Lily because she was becoming aware of
55:42
the ongoing manipulation coming from
55:44
her mother. It was
55:47
causing her feelings of anger, sadness,
55:49
and distrust. The
55:51
counselor said Lily had been consistent since
55:53
February of 2017 after
55:56
four months with her aunt and uncle that she
55:58
wanted to stay with the them and that
56:00
she didn't feel safe with her mother. Lily
56:04
had also told the guardian ad litem that her
56:06
mom told her to say things like she was
56:08
forced to sleep on the floor and
56:11
to cry at night and
56:13
beg her aunt to go home. Now
56:16
when asked directly about this, Jennifer said she
56:18
didn't know why Lily had told him those
56:20
things. Jennifer said she
56:22
simply prayed with Lily that they would be
56:25
together again and she did everything the state
56:27
asked of her. She went to
56:29
counseling and according to her counselor she
56:31
was making progress. She was starting
56:33
to see things from another point of
56:35
view and understand how her
56:37
choices led her to where she was.
56:40
She said in court that she had hurt people
56:43
that were sitting there right then, her
56:45
daughter the most, and she was doing everything
56:47
she could to fix it. Jennifer
56:50
wanted custody back but the state
56:52
was looking to actually restrict her
56:55
visits more. The
56:57
judge decided to leave
56:59
Lily with her aunt for the
57:02
time being but not to restrict
57:04
Jennifer's visits and he suggested that
57:06
Jennifer consult with her attorney. The
57:09
custody battle would end in August
57:11
of 2017 when they reached an
57:13
agreement. Lily would stay where she
57:15
was but Jennifer would still retain
57:17
parental rights and have the
57:19
right to visitation. It turned
57:22
this from a kinship foster placement
57:24
to a private guardianship arrangement and
57:27
finally gave Lily the stability she
57:30
deserved. Now as
57:32
for Shirley Skinner, after her
57:34
appeals failed she started asking for clemency
57:37
with the first request coming in late
57:39
2014. She cited her poor health as
57:41
the primary
57:44
reason she should be shown mercy so she
57:46
could go home and be with her family.
57:48
Her new attorney
57:50
also said it should be considered that
57:53
her trial attorney had advised her poorly.
57:55
The self-defense argument
57:57
was the stronger of the two defenses.
57:59
but he went with a different
58:01
strategy. Now, a failed
58:04
trial strategy does not mean your
58:06
attorney was incompetent, and
58:08
it may not be enough for an
58:10
appeal. It could be considered in a
58:12
clemency argument. Steven's family
58:14
responded, recognizing Shirley's age and
58:16
poor health, but noted
58:19
that those things existed when
58:21
she killed Steven. So it's kind of hard
58:24
to argue she wasn't a risk to the
58:26
public. Not just that, she
58:28
wanted a mercy that she did not
58:30
give to their son. Clemency
58:33
in 2014 was denied, and
58:36
though she was sick at the time she
58:38
appealed, Shirley is, as of this recording, nine
58:41
and a half years later, still alive and
58:43
still incarcerated at the age of 89. Some
58:47
of Shirley's family still believe she should
58:49
be released because this was self-defense. Her
58:52
son still thinks she didn't do it. The
58:54
Watkins family, however, thinks she is
58:57
right where she belongs. Steven's
59:00
family did start an online petition
59:02
a few years ago to ask
59:05
the governor to deny Shirley's ongoing
59:07
clemency attempts. I don't
59:09
know how you, as a
59:11
listener, feel about geriatric inmates
59:13
and attempts at clemency under
59:15
those conditions, or really how
59:17
you feel about this case. I
59:19
like to mostly lay out
59:22
the case and let people make up their
59:24
own minds rather than inserting my opinion all
59:26
the time, because we all have our own
59:28
life experiences and value systems that we use
59:30
when we make our decisions on how we
59:32
feel about things. If
59:34
after hearing all of this, you do
59:37
object to clemency for Shirley Skinner, I
59:39
will leave a link to the Watkins
59:41
family petition in the show notes. Thank
59:49
you for listening. If you want more
59:51
content, check out my other show, Crime
59:53
Lines and Consequences, wherever you get your
59:55
podcasts. I also offer bonus content and
59:58
ad-free listening at patreon.com/crimely. the
1:00:00
Apple Talk to your staff. If you want to
1:00:02
buy me a copy of the official drink of
1:00:04
crime lines, you can give a one-time donation at
1:00:06
basementportproductions.com. Slash the... Some
1:00:30
people just know the best rate for you
1:00:32
is a rate based on you, with all
1:00:34
state. And
1:00:55
look at you! Is perfect be placed
1:00:57
on the wheel? Not like the drivers are riding
1:00:59
in the heat. They're
1:01:02
really going off of that drum stove. Save
1:01:06
with DriveWise and Allstate app and only pay
1:01:08
a rate based on you.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More