Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
Welcome
0:00
back to State of the Apps. State of the
0:02
Apps! 2024 edition! Every year on State
0:04
of the Apps
0:06
we talk about the tools and services that we
0:08
use to manage our work and our lives. We've
0:12
been doing this for many years now. I'm
0:14
absolutely horrified because I was like, wait
0:16
a minute, and I just googled myself,
0:19
right, CGP Grey State of the Apps.
0:21
When did I do this? And I wrote that
0:23
article in 2014. Yeah, I
0:27
didn't want to mention it. I did
0:29
look this up that
0:30
it has been a decade since you wrote
0:32
the article on your blog that became
0:34
like the reason that we do this episode.
0:38
10 years of State of the Apps for me. Oh my
0:40
god. Well, I think there was a gap
0:42
of like two or three years where there wasn't
0:44
another one. And then I was like, that's
0:47
a good idea. Let's do an episode of Cortex about
0:49
it. And then here we are.
0:51
I'm doing a quick scroll down the list of
0:53
like how many of these apps have still survived.
0:55
And the answer is not zero. That's surprising.
0:58
You know what? It might be fun actually throughout
1:00
this episode, considering we are
1:02
on like the decade of State of
1:05
the Apps. If there's any that
1:07
you pick today that are on that original list, I
1:09
think it would be fun if you mentioned that. One that's definitely
1:11
not
1:12
Evernote. Were
1:14
you positive in 2014 about Evernote? Okay,
1:18
here's what I wrote in 2014. Evernote is my dumping
1:21
ground for lots of random video related
1:24
pre-research. I use it,
1:26
but reluctantly. The
1:29
real shock of today's episode is if Evernote's
1:31
found its way back. Anything could
1:33
happen. Hold on to your seats, everyone. The
1:36
traditional way of starting State of the Apps
1:39
is with home screens. Home screens.
1:41
Although now it's home screens and
1:44
lock screens. Yeah. And focus
1:46
modes. And I think also standby?
1:49
See, there's a lot in this now.
1:51
I mean, Mike,
1:52
what even is a home screen anymore?
1:55
Honestly, that is becoming a harder and harder
1:57
question. It totally is becoming a strange
1:59
kind of question.
1:59
about what is the home screen, what do we
2:02
mean by this? Yeah, like as well,
2:04
from this year, with Interactive Widgets, home
2:07
screens aren't even just a static
2:09
thing anymore, they're not just a launcher anymore,
2:12
they are actually a place to perform
2:15
actions. Yeah, I haven't a ton
2:17
of apps that are doing Interactive Widgets
2:19
yet, but it is suddenly realizing
2:21
like the home screen is
2:24
an app now, kind of? Like
2:26
that's clearly the direction it's
2:28
going into, so what even is
2:30
a home screen? How is it connected to focus
2:32
modes and your watch and everything else? It's
2:35
like it's all kind of getting muddled together
2:38
and also partly being apps
2:40
at the same time. So what do
2:42
your home screens look like, Mike? Right, well
2:45
let's start with my regular home screen.
2:48
This is like the default home screen, I also use
2:50
these set of home screens for Do Not Disturb,
2:53
and I've also included the corresponding
2:56
lock screens for these home
2:58
screens in the image, so you can kind of get the whole
3:00
view. Yes, that's always so
3:03
overwhelming when I click on one of these links to
3:05
see all of Mike's things. It's
3:07
a visual treat, it's a little experience.
3:10
It is visual, that is true, yeah.
3:12
Visual treat. I've
3:14
gone way more widget focused
3:17
this year. For a long time, I had
3:20
like big widget on the top and
3:23
I had a little widget in the corner and then I
3:25
had like 12 apps. This year, I've
3:28
actually reduced my apps to eight
3:30
and I have two square widgets and
3:33
the large widget on the top and this
3:35
is because of interactive widgets. So
3:38
the widget I wanted to kind of like blow up
3:40
everything for was the Do widget.
3:43
Tell me about your use case of Do because Do
3:45
is one of these apps that for me has
3:48
disappeared over the years because
3:51
mainly for me, like I was looking for an app years ago
3:53
that related to timers that also had really
3:55
good shortcut support. So previous
3:58
lightning round pick for me. an
4:00
app called Just Timers, which I'm still using
4:02
to this day. Fantastic timer, shortcut
4:04
support, really good. And that
4:06
just blew due out of the water
4:08
for me. It's like, oh, I just never used it again.
4:11
So it looks like you're actually using it as a task
4:14
manager here. Like what's your use case for this? Okay,
4:17
so the types of tasks that go into
4:19
due are always personal
4:22
focused. So
4:25
I use Todoist as my to-do app, which I'll talk
4:27
about a little bit later on in the show. And
4:29
I have a personal project
4:32
in Todoist, but they're for like quite
4:34
large things. The stuff
4:36
that goes into due are very simple,
4:39
often recurring tasks. So
4:41
for example, I have take out the
4:43
trash, do the dishes, do
4:46
my evening stretches, take my
4:48
pills, text my mum,
4:50
like these little things that happen
4:53
on a daily basis, on
4:55
a weekly basis, go in here.
4:58
Remember to set my time tracker
5:00
when I go to the gym. Remember
5:02
to get cash out for my barber when I
5:04
see him next week. Do my exercises,
5:07
like these little things that are just,
5:10
I don't want all of these tasks messing
5:13
up my Todoist to-do list. And
5:16
then also all of these types of
5:19
tasks benefit from
5:21
due's nagging, right? That
5:23
you can set in due if I do
5:25
not mark this complete, keep
5:27
reminding, keep reminding. And
5:30
a lot of these things, they're like, it has
5:32
to be done today. So like, I want the phone
5:35
to keep asking me to do this stuff
5:38
until it's done. Like if I don't
5:40
remember to take the trash out, that's
5:42
going to be a problem. I have to take out
5:44
the trash, right? So like it's going to keep
5:46
telling me every 10 minutes,
5:49
have you done this? Have you done this? Have
5:51
you done this? These are the kind of things. And it
5:53
can also be like a very simple
5:55
task that might be a one-off that
5:58
will go in here. Like for example. I
6:00
had to disable the automation
6:03
of our Roomba
6:04
for a few days
6:05
because we were having a like a treatment to the floor
6:08
and so I disabled it and then I've put it back in
6:10
there to Enable it in like a week's time and
6:13
so that kind of thing. It's just like it's
6:15
just like a very simple thing I want to make sure
6:17
I remember to do it on that exact day so I can
6:19
have it actually go out and do the cleaning So that's the
6:21
kind of thing I'll just throw it into do and it
6:23
will remind me every 10 minutes
6:25
until I've done it on the day that I've asked for and
6:29
One of the things about these due tasks is that
6:31
because they are frequent things often
6:34
I just do them because I remember so
6:36
having them as a little widget They're
6:39
just there and I can very quickly check them off
6:41
from the interactive widget And I don't need
6:43
to open that app do you right
6:45
so to me this felt like a really good
6:48
Thing to just have there on my home screen
6:51
all the time. They're not work tasks
6:53
So I don't feel like the impending not
6:55
having done work And it's very easy
6:58
for me to just check these off and get them done and
7:00
so I like this widget a lot actually Hmm.
7:02
I feel like I've underappreciated
7:04
the role that do used to play in
7:06
my life and I
7:09
might borrow this from you. I think do
7:11
deserve the second view I need to take a look at
7:14
that again the other little square
7:16
widgets time Aree and now the
7:18
iOS 17 shortcuts widget
7:20
underneath has two actions
7:23
rather than one action, which is awesome and Underneath
7:26
that little timer which it is like the stack
7:29
and I've got two Timer-related
7:31
shortcuts one is a shortcut
7:34
I have where I can just add an
7:36
increment of time to my
7:38
time tracker So I can tap it and be like
7:41
I just did 15 minutes of this kind of work
7:43
But I forgot to press the button so
7:45
I like that. Oh, huh, okay.
7:47
I didn't realize that was a feature That's nice. You can build
7:49
a shortcut like I built the shortcut years ago.
7:51
It just like looks at the current time
7:54
Subtracts it by the amount of time not ever asked
7:57
and then adds it as an entry to timer e And
8:00
then I also have one more which is my recording
8:03
or editing shows timer where if
8:06
I hit it it says you're recording or editing if hit
8:08
recording it looks on my calendar and Creates
8:10
a new time entry with that as the tag
8:12
that set the naming up correctly if
8:15
I'm editing It just gives me a list of
8:17
shows to choose from and I'll choose that show and it'll
8:19
start a timer based on that Those are just
8:21
like my two most often Time
8:24
tracking shortcuts and now they just live on that little
8:26
stack underneath the time re widget, which
8:28
I'm really happy about And now the
8:30
time re widget has a nice stop button on it too, which is
8:32
great. Oh, you can stop it from that widget Okay, great
8:34
I would look up on a bunch of the widgets
8:36
have an option in the configuration
8:39
settings to add a stop button to them
8:42
This is a request that I gave to the developer
8:44
Joe that like I felt like the stop
8:47
button should be available everywhere That a timer
8:49
was incrementing. Yeah, that's
8:51
a good feature outside of that There's no
8:53
other app changes here from year
8:55
to year and I've ended up with these eight
8:58
as the ones that I'm using most from My home
9:00
screen so it's no discord Google Maps
9:02
city mapper the camera and Instagram
9:05
Messages and slack and then my talk is to do
9:07
ist spark safari and overcast
9:09
so that's all remain very similar
9:12
to previous years Yeah, I think I'm always surprised
9:14
that discord is ranked so high on your
9:16
home screen here But like I know we have different
9:18
use cases for that like every year we do this. I'm
9:20
like discord really It's
9:22
work and social for me Like the fact
9:24
that I have slack there says I should have discord
9:27
there the fact that I have Instagram says
9:29
I should have discord Cuz it like it's
9:31
almost all of those kinds of things It's like
9:33
a social network in a way But it's also work
9:36
and it's also like it's an interesting
9:38
like straddling of all of this stuff I
9:40
spent a lot of time in discord now I think the
9:43
only one I would question is do
9:45
you really need the camera on this
9:47
home screen people always say this? What
9:50
I use camera as both
9:53
the camera and how I get to my photos
9:55
Okay, so you're using it for the recently taken photos
9:58
thing where you can get it up and click on the corner Yeah, it's
10:00
like a double duty. Can't you get to the recent
10:03
photos from your lock screen? You can but if
10:05
I'm using my phone and I want to take a picture. Well,
10:07
I lock the phone. Yes That's what I always
10:09
do. Yeah. See I that doesn't make any sense to me.
10:12
Hmm Like I'm using my phone or
10:14
I want to get a picture press the Glock button
10:16
now press the camera button. No,
10:18
you here we go Plus
10:21
as well when you look when you lock the phone
10:24
it turns the display off into always-on display
10:26
So you have to tap the phone to wake the phone
10:29
then press the camera bond. That is inefficient
10:31
I guess you're right I was like this is one of
10:33
these like when you have shortcuts that you just
10:36
Your fingers know how to do and your brain doesn't
10:38
I was like Mike I don't need to tap the screen Oh,
10:40
I do need to tap the screen in order to wake it up and then
10:43
swipe over I didn't even realize I was doing just like tripled
10:45
my taps, you know, yeah. No, that's
10:47
true camera on the lock screen man Steve
10:50
Jobs was right He
10:53
was right the whole time get it on there, okay.
10:55
All right, I'll let you keep the camera I will probably once
10:57
again next year be like do you really need that? Everyone
11:01
always says it to me but I think it's a
11:03
good thing to have and right in the top I
11:05
have my long fantastic in a widget underneath it
11:07
is the carrot weather widget The perfect
11:09
pairing carrot weather widget is like it's you
11:11
always got to find a way to sneak it on there somewhere
11:13
or another On my second screen.
11:16
I've got a bunch of widgets. So I have notion widgets.
11:18
I'll talk about notion later I have a
11:20
bunch of widgets Smith widgets for photos
11:23
as well as Apple's photos I
11:25
have peak which is another
11:27
app I'll talk about later on which shows me some health
11:29
stuff then I have the best widget
11:32
as part of iOS 17 the home Widget,
11:35
which is just like the best thing.
11:38
Are you for real? Are you for real suggesting that the home
11:40
app is the best widget? It's so good Really?
11:43
Let me tell you what makes it good It's like sell me on
11:45
the home widget because I've tried
11:47
it and it only ever just shows me things
11:49
I never want It doesn't seem like I have
11:51
any way to grow it which things I use Cg
11:54
be gray. I'm gonna change your life
11:56
man. You ready? Please please do long
11:58
press on the widget Press
12:01
edit widget, untick recommended,
12:03
and choose what you want. Oh
12:05
my god! This
12:09
is why State of the Apps exists. It's
12:11
for these nuggets of wisdom. You
12:14
have changed my life. That's why I love
12:16
it. So now I have the
12:18
four lights that I always want to
12:20
be turning off most. The two in the bedroom, the two in
12:22
the lounge. I have the TV and the
12:24
most active scene that I use. It's fantastic. Oh,
12:28
okay. All right. This is definitely
12:30
going to change some things then. It's so good.
12:32
I love it because I hate the way
12:34
it works in Control Center. Because
12:37
especially what's complicated for me is I have
12:39
a home at the studio and
12:42
a home at home. And quite
12:45
often, even though it's supposed to change
12:47
based on location, it doesn't. So I'm at home
12:49
and I want to turn on the light and I pull it down
12:52
and it's showing my lights at the studio. This is not helpful
12:54
to me. There's no reason why this should
12:56
be happening. They're not even remotely close to each other. But
12:59
then also just like the phone deciding
13:01
what it wants to show you are fine,
13:04
I suppose, but it's not what I want. The
13:06
only downside with the widget is you can only
13:08
toggle things on and off, right? You can't
13:11
adjust the amount of brightness,
13:14
but I guess you could set up a scene to do that. I
13:16
run everything through scenes.
13:18
My home philosophy is you should basically
13:21
never be controlling an accessory directly.
13:24
Everything should be a part of a scene. I
13:26
have a ton of scenes, but
13:29
maybe that's also why I've tried that at the home
13:31
widget. And it's like something about my brain didn't
13:33
even process that I could tell it, don't
13:35
recommend. It never occurred to me
13:37
to untick that box. I
13:40
was just disappointed that it was constantly
13:42
like, hey, do you want to hard turn
13:44
off your Apple TV with the smart plug that
13:46
you put behind it? No. How about
13:49
these scenes that you know that I'm
13:51
telling you to set every day at this
13:53
time? Do you want to suggest me one of them? No,
13:55
no, it never wants to suggest one of them. That's
13:58
funny thing as well for that smart plug controller. on
14:00
your Apple TV. Your Apple TV is probably
14:02
the dominant HomeKit
14:05
hub in your house? Yeah, the
14:07
reason it's extra funny to me is because this is
14:09
a holdover from when, I don't know
14:11
if it was tvOS or what, but like when
14:14
we first got the Apple TV, it would
14:16
just freeze quite a lot and the
14:18
only way to fix it was to unplug
14:20
it and I plug it back in. I got so
14:23
tired of this, I bought a smart plug
14:25
just so from the couch, right? I could press
14:28
the button to like physically
14:30
cut the power to this Apple TV to then force
14:32
it to turn back on. But if that switch
14:34
was in HomeKit, if you turn it off,
14:37
you probably can't turn it back on again via
14:39
HomeKit. We have HomePods though, right? Like
14:41
so the HomePods will take the right place. Ah, there hubs
14:43
as well? Yeah, there hubs as well. Okay. We've got
14:45
like a million things in the house that are acting as hubs.
14:48
Yeah. But my wife and I joked that like buying
14:51
that smart plug, eventually
14:53
the Apple TV learns. We have like a
14:55
hard threat here, Apple TV.
14:57
You better just freaking work. Yeah. And
15:00
it slowly was like, okay, like I guess I'll
15:02
be a good Apple TV and not just completely
15:04
freeze audio all the time. So the threatening plug.
15:07
That's why it's extra funny to me that HomeKit was
15:09
like really aggressive about recommending
15:11
maybe my least used accessory
15:14
currently that like I forgot even existed
15:16
was always like front and center. Do you
15:18
want to hard cut the power to the Apple TV? No, HomeKit.
15:21
I don't. I then have a Bode,
15:24
which is my home security system. That's
15:27
a camera widget. They also have an interactive widget
15:29
for setting the state of the alarm system, which
15:31
is pretty cool. Then I have
15:33
one of the new Widgetsmith widgets, which
15:35
I love. So with the interactive widgets,
15:38
when I tap that photo of the pool, it
15:41
slides up and shows me a countdown to my
15:43
next vacation. Oh, huh.
15:45
Cause you can have these widgets stacked on
15:47
top of each other now. So like you
15:50
can take what were two widget types that were
15:52
in Widgetsmith and you can like put
15:54
them one on top of the other. So you can like
15:56
have a photo hiding time zones.
15:58
I have a photo hiding. countdown and stuff
16:00
like that. This is like one of the things that Underscore
16:03
put in is the interactive stuff. And
16:05
I really love that. Because I like having the countdown,
16:07
but sometimes the image I wanted to use,
16:10
text didn't look good on it. But now I can
16:12
have it hidden there. And we did this for
16:14
the podcast-a-thon. So I had an image of the podcast-a-thon,
16:17
and I would tap it, and it would slide up and show me the
16:19
time, which is also good for an event like that, so
16:22
I don't see how many days it is all the time. Just
16:25
what I want to see. I didn't realize David
16:27
had put that in Widget Smith. I
16:29
mean, again, as far as I could tell, he's built an entire
16:31
operating system inside of Widget Smith.
16:34
The number of things he's done is insane. So
16:36
is that an inspirational photo for you for your next
16:38
vacation, this pool photo? Yeah, it's like, here's
16:40
where you're going. Ah, OK. And
16:42
then you tap it, and it will show you. It's nice. That
16:46
is my regular home screen.
16:49
So when you say your regular home screen,
16:51
does this not exist within a focus
16:53
mode? Correct. So this is just the default state
16:55
of the phone. Yes, I also use these
16:57
home screens in do not disturb and
17:00
in my recording focus mode. Ah,
17:02
OK. I have recording as one of
17:04
the options in here, so you can look at that. And
17:07
my recording one is exactly the same
17:09
home screens. I just have a different lock
17:11
screen. So
17:14
my regular home screen, lock screen, that's confusing.
17:17
I just have an image of Adena, and I have
17:20
the very top lock screen widget
17:22
is Fantastic Al. And then I have weather.
17:25
I have widgets from a step counter, and I have a timer
17:27
timer, like it's the little circle one. And
17:29
then on my recording lock screen, I
17:32
use the photo shuffle thing,
17:35
which is the same as last time. And I just have a widgets
17:37
with time zone thing and a larger
17:39
timer time tracker on
17:41
my recording one. OK, huh. So it's
17:43
basically the same there. And I don't
17:46
have anything special for do not
17:48
disturb. It's just all
17:50
the same stuff as my regular lock screen.
17:52
Oh, OK. You mean like this is just, it
17:54
looks like this for do not disturb as well. Yeah, nothing
17:57
changes. Travel.
18:00
My travel lock screen, which is one of my
18:02
favorite lock screens. I think
18:04
this is exactly the same as before. So
18:06
I have like the globe lock
18:08
screen because I think that's really cool. Show you where you are in
18:10
the world. Oh, I added the batteries
18:13
lock screen widget, which was your recommendation
18:16
from last time. This is funny to me
18:18
because my travel focus
18:20
mode, literally exactly the same, right?
18:22
It's like clock, weather, battery,
18:25
flighty, and the zoomed in
18:27
thing for the earth. It's a little bit like
18:30
the correct travel setup
18:32
just manifested itself into
18:35
the universe. Like this is the correct answer
18:37
for if you need a lock screen while
18:40
you are traveling, this is what you should just
18:42
do. This is the one that looks the best. Those are the
18:44
most obvious options for what to have. Well, I think
18:46
the two of us who just perfected it, you cannot
18:49
argue with the arrangement. It's unarguable. Yep.
18:52
And then the home screen itself, I use way more
18:54
widgets here. I have four widgets
18:56
and they're just like weather and calendar.
18:59
I have the fine mind, just like a stack of the
19:02
things that I might have. And I can change those around
19:04
depending on what I'm taking with me, like
19:06
what suitcase I have, what bag I have. I
19:10
used to have a notes note
19:12
for both my scan and my passport
19:14
and also my packing list. This
19:17
is now in things, which
19:19
I'll talk about later. So I have a things widget
19:22
underneath the notes widget, which is where my packing list
19:24
lives. And then, you know,
19:27
for apps, they're very similar to my usual
19:29
apps, but I add wallet on there because you
19:31
use a bunch of wallet passes when you're in travel
19:33
and also like airline apps. And I change those
19:36
out depending on which airline I'm flying. Right
19:38
now, listening to you, I'm just I'm totally
19:41
stealing the find
19:43
my widget for my own travel setup. I
19:45
didn't think about that one for bags and things or
19:48
like you can even set it for people. Like if you're meeting someone,
19:50
I think like I didn't consider
19:52
that. And that's great. I'm going to add
19:55
that one straight away. You know, we've
19:57
spoken about having air tags on the
19:59
luggage and how. helpful that can be. Yeah air
20:01
tags on everything. It's super good and then just
20:03
having them right there it's just like a very quick and easy
20:06
way to get to that thing that I'm gonna need and
20:08
that's what my travel lock screen is
20:10
really. It's like a lot of widgets
20:13
because it will give me information at a glance but
20:15
also very quickly allows me to get to the apps
20:17
that have the corresponding information if I need to
20:19
dig into them. You know so I've got like these are all in
20:21
stacks but I have flighty in there
20:24
and I have Tripsy in there like so these are apps
20:26
that have got that information in them. And I
20:28
can just get to them as quickly as possible.
20:29
Alright
20:30
well when you're traveling you're traveling
20:33
to go on vacation. Yes. Do you
20:35
have a vacation set up? I do now because
20:37
last year you showed me your vacation home
20:40
screen and lock screen I was like oh that's a good idea so
20:42
I do that. And I would
20:44
say that this builds on the
20:47
travel one so I still have
20:49
like a lock screen which has now
20:52
has like an image and this will be some kind of like
20:54
image taken whilst on vacation somewhere. This
20:56
is a perfor overdina taken on a trip we took a
20:58
couple of years ago and I've got weather
21:01
there which is very important and I also brought batteries
21:03
in because that's also very important when you're on your vacation.
21:07
And then on the home screen again I have
21:09
the batteries widget very helpful
21:11
I have the Tripsy widget very helpful so
21:13
I have Find My there and I have the
21:16
basic apps that I'm going to need while I'm traveling
21:18
with two spots that are spare
21:21
and that will be related to the trip
21:23
that I'm on. Like when I was at WWDC
21:26
I still use the vacation one and I would add the Apple
21:28
Developer app there and the wallet app
21:30
because I was gonna need those. And so depending
21:32
on the trip that I'm on I will add apps
21:35
that are relevant to this vacation
21:37
lock screen which I find to be like a very
21:39
helpful thing to do. You know like if
21:41
you go into a theme park and they have an app and
21:43
put it on your home screen and it's there whenever you need
21:45
it you know. Yeah yeah for any of that kind of like
21:48
holiday stuff you need that spare space for
21:50
whatever it is. Like I'm a big believer
21:52
in spare space on your home
21:54
screens or lock screens. I've just got to say
21:57
though like you're killing me
21:59
here with with the wallpaper
22:01
being the same for all of these
22:03
modes. You change your lock screen wallpaper,
22:06
but you don't want to change the background wallpaper.
22:08
I know you love that literal wallpaper that
22:11
is your wallpaper, but doesn't
22:14
it like mess with your brain, right? That you're
22:16
on vacation and the wallpaper
22:18
is still exactly the same? Not at all.
22:21
Because the apps are different. It grabs your attention,
22:23
that wallpaper, right? It really dominates
22:26
the scene. So I feel like it
22:28
has such an impact that you
22:30
might want to change it for different, but you
22:32
just don't. I can tell you just don't. Okay. It's
22:35
like if you change all the furniture inside of your house,
22:37
you know it's different. If you leave the paint or
22:39
the wallpaper on the walls, it's not like, you know? I
22:43
don't approve of this analogy. I know you don't. I
22:45
also, if I got halfway through it, realized I didn't know
22:48
how I was going to finish it. But the
22:50
point still stands. I
22:52
changed the lock screens. I don't know why
22:54
I do that. I just do that. Like it's fun
22:56
to mess around with them. No, you change the lock
22:58
screens because you do it to mentally
23:01
reinforce that you're in a different mode. That's why you change
23:03
the lock screens. Yeah, but my app layout does that on
23:06
my home screen. I guess I'll just have to believe you. But
23:08
it's like, I can't believe it's like, oh
23:10
my God, you've shown me four focus modes in
23:12
a row and the wallpaper is the same on all
23:15
four focus modes. Oh buddy, you got another two. Don't
23:17
you worry. We're going to go for
23:19
a perfect 10 here, you know? No, we're not,
23:21
it can't possibly be a perfect 10. We'll find out. I
23:24
have a weekend focus mode now. This is new,
23:26
year of the weekend, weekend focus mode. Okay,
23:28
right. So this is different thing that you're focusing
23:31
on related to your theme. I'm sure I'm going to click on
23:33
this and I'm going to see a different wallpaper. You're going to see the
23:35
same wallpaper. Oh God, God. You're going to see
23:37
the same wallpaper. Mostly the same app. But
23:40
it's also a photo of Adina in front of that
23:42
wallpaper. That's my average, like
23:44
that's a regular lock screen. This is the
23:46
regular lock screen. Really
23:49
the main difference here is I
23:51
do actually need to change this. I've just looked at this now
23:53
and realised I have not updated this lock
23:55
screen because I still have dew there
23:57
and I want to remove that and put the little dew. widget
24:01
in instead so I need to change that around. I'm going
24:03
to do that today actually. It's kind of funny
24:05
in preparing for this episode
24:07
I have made multiple changes to multiple lock
24:10
screens and this is one that has
24:12
not been done so I would do that. So the due app
24:14
will be gone and I'll put where I've got Widget
24:16
Smith right now I'll put the due widget there as well in
24:18
a little stack. And then on the second
24:21
screen here it's just kind of a simplified
24:23
version showing me the home thing my widget thing
24:25
and also box box which is a Formula
24:28
One app. So it has the times of
24:30
the next races which always happen on the weekends so
24:32
I want to know and then also have the Sonos app. Is
24:35
that a little picture of the racetrack? Is that what that is?
24:37
That's a visual layout of the racetrack
24:39
yeah. Cool right? Yeah that is
24:41
cool. Very Mario Kart. This app is really
24:44
nice like I like it. It also has a live
24:46
activity in there which I enjoy so like there's
24:48
a live activity for the
24:51
race if you are not
24:53
watching or whatever you can enable live activity
24:55
into you's winning. I'm only laughing because like
24:57
oh someone I know who actually uses
25:00
the pitched use case of live activities
25:02
which was like you can follow the sports game. Yeah. Because
25:05
it just sewn not into sports. My brain filed
25:07
that away as like ah yes what a lovely
25:09
developer example of like how to make a test
25:12
case. It's like no no people actually do that right this
25:14
is very important to them. One of those people. Nice.
25:17
Sports. Okay so when you're going
25:19
to sleep sleep's got to look different.
25:21
Nope. Yep it does. It's different widgets.
25:26
So everything's
25:28
different. I only have one page for my sleep
25:31
home screens and basically
25:33
what we're seeing here is YouTube and Audible
25:35
are being added. It's like YouTube I watch
25:38
videos at night to wind down same as audiobooks
25:40
at night to wind down and then I also have
25:42
a little home little square home one and these
25:44
are the lights I need at night right make sure the lounge
25:47
lights are off downstairs and maybe
25:49
the bedroom lights are on while we're getting
25:51
ready to sleep and then turn them off and it's just like an easy way
25:53
to get that done. It's really fine that YouTube winds
25:55
you down at night that feels like a bad choice for
25:58
I'm gonna go to bed so I'm gonna watch some
26:00
YouTube videos. Yeah. If
26:02
that works for you? I mean, it's not all
26:04
like, hey guys,
26:06
you know, it's not all, you know, sometimes it's like,
26:09
oh, watch me make these knives. If
26:11
that works, I just feel like the related videos are
26:13
always there trying to just like keep you focused
26:15
on the app forever as opposed to something like Audible.
26:18
Great, you're talking to somebody who
26:20
doesn't pay attention to related videos. Oh,
26:23
okay. I'm very good with YouTube. Like,
26:25
I don't watch things that are on the front page. I
26:27
just watch stuff from my watch later queue.
26:29
That's my world subscription.
26:32
And then I only watch things from the watch later queue. So
26:35
it's very easy for me to ignore most
26:37
of what YouTube is trying to give me. It's
26:40
like, good try, YouTube. Do
26:43
you want to watch shorts? We've got shorts for you, please. None
26:45
of that stuff finds its way to me. Please watch
26:47
the shorts. Okay, good. I still feel like, I don't know,
26:50
for a sleep focus,
26:52
you might want to have a, like a dimmer wallpaper,
26:55
you know, something that's just a bit more, okay,
26:58
can I negotiate with you here? Would you consider
27:01
taking your current wallpaper, which
27:03
you obviously love, but just
27:05
like, why? In, I
27:07
would even said it. I'm
27:10
not interested in what you're telling me. I was just gonna
27:12
say, like, put a little vignette on it. Why? You
27:15
know, pull the saturation down or, so
27:17
it feels more like bedtime, that's why. I don't
27:19
need it. Oh, God. I don't know why
27:21
this really bothers me. I don't know why it bothers you
27:23
either. It's fine, like, it's
27:26
not a problem. Okay. I
27:29
also have some watch faces for you. I'm
27:31
glad you can't put wallpaper on watch faces. All right,
27:33
let's take a look at your watch faces. I'm unhappy. Oh,
27:37
yeah, really? I think like you and everyone else
27:39
on Earth. Because I have a new watch now, right?
27:41
I have the Apple Watch Ultra. And the
27:43
watches, faces I've used before, don't look
27:45
good on the Apple Watch Ultra. I used to like a lot of
27:47
the round watch faces. The round watch faces
27:50
do not translate very well to the Apple Watch Ultra. So
27:53
I've decided that the best thing for me to do is
27:55
just do what the Apple Watch Ultra wants me to do,
27:57
and I use the modular Ultra watch
27:59
face. And what I will say is
28:02
while I do not like the look of this watch face,
28:04
it is very utilitarian.
28:07
It is helpful because
28:10
I have like a billion complications on this
28:12
watch face, right? So I have
28:15
top left, carrot, then dew, then
28:17
a fantastic cow showing me the date, then
28:19
I have the big fantastic cow in the middle showing me my next appointment,
28:22
then I can see my activity rings, I can get to my medications
28:25
app, and timer-y. Ton
28:27
of information, which is good, and I can access
28:29
the things that I am doing most often right
28:31
there. And I just don't like the way it looks,
28:34
but this watch is so huge,
28:36
I figure I have just got to lean into it. I cannot try
28:39
and fancy it up anymore. This is just what it is. That is
28:42
a rewind back in time. The Apple
28:44
Watch has just been released, and someone
28:46
shows you and they go, someday
28:49
here will be all
28:52
of the watch faces that you can use. And then I
28:54
was able to see the current slate of
28:56
watch faces. I go, wow,
29:00
I cannot believe how many they are going
29:02
to have by next year. And then
29:04
the time traveler would say, oh no, no,
29:07
this is going to be ten years
29:09
later. We
29:12
have mentioned it a million times, but it
29:14
is just mind-blowing to me,
29:17
still, how limited and locked
29:19
in time these Apple Watch
29:21
faces are. What you have just said
29:23
is the truth of trying
29:26
to make it look good is this
29:28
endless battle. And it always
29:31
feels like they find a way to
29:35
force you to decide between two different things. But
29:38
no, I would like this watch face to do these two
29:40
things and it would look much better. So it is like, no,
29:43
no, no, no, no. You can have this
29:45
part be colored, but not that part be
29:47
colored, or whatever it is. It is just incredibly
29:50
frustrating. This new Apple Watch Ultra
29:52
face, yep, we have
29:55
got a new one, but it is still the same. It
29:57
is still the same as all of them. Yes,
30:00
it was just very frustrating. What I do
30:02
like about this new one compared to some of the other ones
30:04
It's like it has that ring around the outside
30:07
and there's a few things you can do with it Mm-hmm, and
30:09
I have it set to ticking seconds, which I do
30:11
find to be helpful Yeah, you
30:13
know a decade in the future,
30:16
but we can put a ring on it that shows you the
30:18
seconds Thanks guys. I
30:20
also have a travel watch face. These
30:22
are the only two watch faces. I have only two
30:24
interesting What I'll say is I've this is the first time
30:27
I've ever set another watch face So maybe I'll
30:29
do more in the future Hmm because before
30:31
I really was just trying to make it look the best it could
30:33
be when now I'm trying to lean into The utility
30:36
right, but this is my like traveling
30:38
watch face And I'll probably
30:40
set one up for maybe for vacations too
30:43
But it's the first one I've done and the
30:45
reason I did it was because there was a flighty watch
30:48
app now And that's what the middle
30:50
complication is but it's blacked out But
30:52
that's the I put the flighty one there so
30:55
that shows me my next flight information Then
30:58
I also have removed due
31:00
and added a quick access to my find items,
31:03
right? So like I can find my air tags
31:06
and then in the bottom right instead of timer
31:08
II I have Time zone in
31:10
London like the time in London or I might set it to
31:12
where I'm going to for example to have
31:15
arrived there So that is my
31:17
travel watch face This
31:20
episode of cortex is brought to you
31:22
by member fall Monetizing
31:24
your passion takes work you have
31:26
to have the right platform in place to build
31:28
a membership business That's best for your
31:31
audience, but it's hard when you're already
31:33
busy working with other projects That's
31:35
why member fall makes it simple to build
31:38
and run a membership business And it's why
31:40
we chose them when we wanted
31:42
to build a membership program of our
31:44
own with more text The longer
31:46
ad free version of the show this is powered
31:49
by member fall They have everything
31:51
that we needed and everything that you
31:53
need to run a membership program of your own
31:56
including a streamlined and powerful Checkout
31:58
process an easy to use Memberful
32:00
portal, we have a member management
32:02
dashboard as well, and transactional
32:05
emails. Memberful also
32:07
allows us and will allow you to tailor
32:10
a program that is best suited to your audience,
32:12
with custom branding, options for newsletters,
32:15
podcast feeds, gift subscriptions,
32:18
Apple Pay support, free and paid trials,
32:21
automatic referral discounts, and so much
32:23
more. They have analytics as well to
32:25
give you an easy to use in-depth view of what's
32:28
working, what's not, and where to double down.
32:30
Memberful seamlessly integrates with the tools that
32:33
you're already using, like MailChimp, WordPress,
32:36
and Stripe, and also very important
32:38
to us is Discord. So when you become
32:40
a Modtech subscriber or a RelayFM member,
32:42
you get access to the RelayFM membership Discord,
32:45
which is a great community of people who
32:47
have a lot of fun talking about things that they care
32:49
about. And this is all very easily
32:51
managed with no work from us by
32:54
Memberful. If you ever need them,
32:56
you can contact Memberful's world-class support
32:58
team that are ready to help you simplify
33:00
your membership and grow your revenue. They
33:03
act as support for you if you need it, if you have any
33:05
questions, but they're also a support in
33:07
making your membership program the best that it
33:10
can be. They're passionate about your success
33:12
and you'll always have access to a real human.
33:15
Go and check it out for yourself right now and see
33:17
how Memberful can work for you. You
33:19
can get started with no credit card required
33:21
by going to Memberful.com slash
33:24
Cortex. It could be the next
33:26
great move for your business. That's
33:28
M-E-M-B-E-R-F-U-L Memberful.com
33:32
slash Cortex. Our thanks to Memberful
33:34
for their support of this show and RelayFM.
33:38
Alright, so the number one rule that everyone
33:41
would know is if you're
33:43
going to have different focus
33:45
modes and different setups
33:48
for doing different kinds of things in life, you
33:51
want them to look different. You want them
33:53
to be visually, immediately,
33:57
obviously different. Interesting. You
33:59
can do that with... app arrangement
34:01
is one tool, but it's not a sufficient
34:03
tool. You want to also try to use color,
34:06
and you want to try to use imagery, so
34:09
that it's just immediately obvious
34:12
that you are in a different mode. Communicate
34:15
that instantly. Mm-hmm. Mm-hmm.
34:18
That's for sure. So I've
34:20
pulled out the main focus
34:23
modes. I've sent you a copy of all
34:25
the different things that I have. So on
34:27
a high level, I have a lot of the similar
34:30
modes that you do. So I've got like
34:32
weekend, I've got travel, I've got sleep, a
34:35
do not disturb mode, and then I've
34:37
got a mode for health, a
34:39
mode that I call core for
34:42
what I think of as core work, like the most important
34:44
stuff that usually means writing. And
34:47
then I have a mode called open, which
34:49
is basically like my default mode for the phone.
34:52
Now, a bunch of modes. How do you distinguish
34:55
them? Well, Apple this
34:57
year added these absolutely
34:59
lovely planetary image backgrounds.
35:02
And so I've decided to go through
35:05
all of my focus modes and pick one
35:07
of the planets, with a slight exception,
35:10
to represent each of these modes.
35:12
Oh, a planet? How
35:14
on earth can you discern between the different shapes?
35:17
Because the planets look different. If it's all the same shape
35:19
and a black background, surely these
35:21
planets don't look that different. I've never bumped
35:24
into a square planet before, have you? No,
35:27
I have not bumped into a square planet before. But
35:30
I will say, if you decide
35:32
to go with this mode, you will realize we
35:34
don't actually have a lot of different colors for
35:37
the different planets. There's obviously the standout
35:39
of Saturn, right? We have the rings that makes it
35:41
more visually different. Earth looks quite
35:43
different. But then if you're like, oh, right,
35:46
Neptune and Uranus look like basically like
35:48
the exact same planet. Mercury
35:50
and the moon are quite difficult to tell
35:53
the difference, like at a glance. So I've
35:55
eliminated the similar ones. But
35:58
it did make me feel like... Ah,
36:00
we could use more colors in these planets, right?
36:03
We could use more differentiation for different ones.
36:05
Why do they all have to be planets? Why can't you just use
36:07
completely different images or like things
36:10
that all relate to the thing that is? Here's
36:13
the problem, Mike. If you're trying to
36:15
pick, like in my case here,
36:18
six, seven different wallpapers
36:21
to represent these different modes,
36:24
I would want them to be distinct,
36:28
but also related. And
36:31
that's actually quite a difficult task
36:33
to find wallpapers that go together
36:36
nicely,
36:37
but
36:38
also are visually distinct
36:40
in their colors. And so this was the
36:42
kind of task where I
36:44
was driving myself crazy because I would find
36:47
like, Ooh, I've got four good
36:49
wallpapers that work together, but these
36:51
two just don't quite fit and it's
36:53
like, well, let me try to fix this problem
36:56
by finding a new set of six wallpapers
36:58
that can work perfectly well. And so
37:01
when Apple came out with those planets, I made the
37:03
decision for my own mental sanity.
37:05
I was like, you know what? I'm just going to work
37:08
with what Apple gave me. There's enough choices
37:10
here. So I'm just going to stick with the planets for
37:12
each of the different focus modes. And I think
37:15
it looks really nice. And there's enough of them that are
37:17
enough different with the colors that
37:20
it can be just immediately obvious,
37:22
which thing are you doing? Sure. So yes,
37:25
this is what I do for me. As
37:27
you can see, many of these focus
37:30
modes are quite bare. So
37:33
like if we take a look at do not disturb,
37:36
which I've used as the moon, leave
37:38
me alone, right? Nobody come here. I
37:40
just don't have anything on
37:42
my phone for the do not disturb mode because
37:45
the only circumstances in which
37:47
I use that are circumstances basically,
37:49
which I shouldn't be using my phone
37:52
anyway. So like we're recording the podcast
37:54
right now, but the phone and do not disturb mode.
37:57
I'm not going to do anything with the phone because we're
37:59
recording. a show. I don't need anything here,
38:02
so I'm just going to not have
38:04
anything on the screen at all. And I
38:06
really like having it like that. It's good
38:08
to know where you're going to serve when the sun's going to go
38:10
down. Just have a little lock screen,
38:12
cut out the old sun
38:15
down there. Why are you making fun
38:17
of me for that? Because you started
38:19
it. We're a perfect recorder, and then
38:21
you're like, oh, look at your wallpaper. The
38:25
doc here, we have three shortcuts,
38:27
I'm assuming. Oh, yes,
38:30
right. Okay, yes. The only thing that I can do in any
38:32
of these modes that have nothing on them
38:34
is, yes. The doc, I've got three shortcuts.
38:37
Years ago, I used to have a launcher down here,
38:39
which brought up a list of a bunch of different
38:41
things that I could use, and I decided, you
38:44
know what? I can easily 80, 20, or 90, 10, which of
38:46
these am I actually using
38:49
basically all of the time, and just search for the rest
38:51
and get rid of this launcher. I've
38:53
gone down now to three things. They're
38:56
all input shortcuts. One
38:58
is for OmniFocus, one is
39:00
for a new note, and one is
39:03
for Cortex, for something to talk about on
39:05
the show. Those are the three that I leave on the bottom
39:07
as just like input. I have a thought.
39:09
It needs to go somewhere. Basically,
39:13
all of the time, it's going into one of
39:15
these three things. I
39:17
mean, there's a little problem that we'll get to
39:19
later, which is stuff should also
39:21
be going into Obsidian, but we
39:23
can get to that at a later point. This is like
39:26
most of my use case for just
39:28
about absolutely everything. So those are my items in
39:30
the doc. So I guess later on, we'll find out where they're
39:32
actually going. Because
39:35
that didn't sound too good. I also like
39:37
that you've had what I consider as
39:39
the very typical shortcuts experience,
39:41
which is like, I'll start one shortcut.
39:44
Now I'll make a shortcuts menu. Yeah,
39:46
yeah, yeah. So I'll make my shortcuts, and then I'll realize
39:49
I don't use them all. And so I'm just
39:51
going to go back to the ones that I really need, rather
39:53
than like my multi
39:55
shortcut, the Omni shortcut,
39:58
every shortcut possible. You know and people
40:01
end up like pairing that back over time This
40:03
is the exact same experience that people have when they
40:06
get into time tracking right is the
40:08
like oh, I'll just track Work
40:11
and it's like oh, just how many work hours I do
40:13
and then it grows into like incredibly
40:15
fine Distinctions for absolutely everything
40:18
and then you get paired back to like no wait
40:20
a minute. It's really only four things I care
40:22
about I don't care about Everything
40:24
in my life. I don't need to time track these
40:27
really subtle differences. So yeah hang
40:29
on Don't you track everything?
40:32
I'm always running a tracker But there's a
40:34
distinction here of like how fine grained
40:37
are the differences between the trackers? And
40:39
I just see this with everybody and I also
40:41
went through with time tracking Yeah, like you wildly
40:44
expand to like I'm gonna time
40:46
track the individual books that
40:48
I'm reading It's like really you
40:50
don't need to do that That doesn't make any sense and
40:53
people then pair it back and go like just reading
40:55
is fine, right? Yeah, it's the same
40:57
thing with shortcuts. Like you said you sort of explode into a
41:00
billion number of shortcuts and then you go Yeah,
41:03
but 90% of the time
41:05
I'm using these three and that's fine And
41:07
then you also have a corresponding empty
41:10
watch face what we call this watch face empty.
41:12
We have the weather on it Well, I'm assuming that the other
41:14
ones maybe have more complications on them Well,
41:16
I just wanted something that was non distracting.
41:18
Okay, like I've just gone with
41:21
a you know No numbers watch face just
41:23
the weather Basically black and white
41:25
matching the moon. It's actually a slight subtle
41:28
gray there naturally but yes once
41:30
again trying to pair watch
41:32
faces with modes is Exercise
41:36
in disappointment. Yeah, this is probably one
41:38
of the better ones and we're going to get to like
41:40
sad ugly ones later Well, I look forward to it.
41:43
So where next on the tour? Which
41:45
planet are we going to now if we're on
41:47
the moon, then I guess we'll go to earth
41:50
next Slightly disappointing because I
41:52
could see that I have travel set up exactly
41:54
the same way that you have travel
41:56
set up So that's completely uninteresting, but I
41:58
do cheat and I use Earth
42:01
twice, which I'm just like a little
42:03
bit upset at having to use the same planet
42:05
twice. But Apple does provide
42:08
this thing where you have two options, like the
42:10
zoomed in Earth and the zoomed
42:12
out Earth. Yeah, because the zoomed in one is good for
42:14
travel because it is showing you where you are. Yeah,
42:17
so the zoomed out Earth is what
42:19
I use for my open
42:21
mode. And this is
42:24
basically like the default
42:26
mode on the phone almost
42:28
all of the time. Basically, the way my day works
42:31
is like I start out in the core
42:34
for like doing my actual work or it's
42:36
the weekend. And then in the afternoon,
42:38
this rolls over into open
42:41
mode. And I call it open and
42:43
I use the Earth because this is the
42:45
period of time in which notifications
42:48
will actually reach me. This is
42:50
when you will communicate with people on Earth.
42:52
That's exactly why it's shown here. Well,
42:54
I like it because then in the other ones, look, if
42:57
you are from Mars, I'll speak to you. If you're not,
42:59
I want to know. I get it. Yeah,
43:02
so the open mode is the only time I'm having
43:04
anything to do with other Earthlings,
43:07
hence the Earth mode. And I guess it also works for
43:09
travel, too, right? It's like I'm having to like get
43:11
through all of these other Earthlings around me to get
43:13
wherever I'm going. So this
43:15
is the time where notifications
43:18
can come through, apps can have
43:20
like badges and things. This
43:22
is the one that's the afternoon one. I
43:24
don't have anything wildly interesting here.
43:27
Again, I like to try to keep things relatively simple.
43:30
So I would like to ask on the lock
43:32
screen, what is the complication with the little
43:34
flame? OK, yeah. So on the lock screen, I've
43:36
got batteries, activity, the weather.
43:39
The flame one is zero,
43:42
which is that fasting application that I've
43:44
mentioned in previous years. So with a little
43:46
timer and it just shows a little icon,
43:49
which tells you like which phase
43:51
of the fast are you in. So that's
43:53
just something that I want to do. What does a flame have to do with it?
43:56
Are you burning calories now? What's
43:59
going on? That's basically. Basically what they mean is
44:01
like, yeah, you're in the fat burning zone
44:03
of your fast. That's
44:06
basically what it means. If I was doing that
44:08
and I was hungry, I would not appreciate that little countdown.
44:11
Yeah. I mean, this is like a whole other thing, but
44:14
yeah, I've just been sort of keeping track of this. This
44:17
is part of my, people know, like I've always skipped breakfast
44:19
for forever. I guess this falls
44:21
in the same category of I'm always
44:23
running a time tracker. And so this
44:26
little timer of like, when
44:28
are you done eating for the evening?
44:31
Just start it with like slipped right
44:33
into my routine super easily. Yeah.
44:36
This to me is actually the primary benefit because I
44:38
feel like the danger is always
44:41
evening time. Like you're snacking for the whole
44:43
evening. So this is also more about
44:45
like, it's not really so much for me about when
44:48
the timer runs down. Like I don't care and I will
44:50
blow past this at all times, right? It's
44:52
like, oh, you've got two
44:54
hours left to hit your whatever goal.
44:56
It's like, I don't care, right? I don't care a timer. It's
44:59
much more about making a little
45:01
decision of like, okay, it's 8 PM.
45:05
I'm like done eating for the day. And
45:07
I know that because I press the button to start the
45:09
little fasting timer. So that's what that thing is.
45:12
And then on the home screen itself, I
45:14
just have the weather and
45:16
I have an OmniFocus
45:19
widget, which is showing me
45:21
a list that I call now, which
45:23
is basically most of the
45:25
things that are available to me just
45:28
sorted in the kind of project
45:30
slash priority order. You've got
45:32
a lot left to do today. Yeah.
45:35
23 tasks. That's like three days
45:37
for me. That's rough stuff.
45:40
Good luck. It's why I was intrigued
45:42
by the do thing that you were mentioning
45:44
before is because I think
45:47
I should experiment with pulling
45:49
out some of the more smaller personal
45:52
tasks that might fit into
45:54
this category of like, it needs
45:57
to be done today. It doesn't really
45:59
make sense. major project
46:01
and it helps to be nagged. So
46:04
I have a ridiculous number of things
46:07
in my OmniFocus and so
46:09
it always looks like, oh, Gray has a crazy
46:12
number of things, but I
46:15
rarely ever think that, oh, I'm going
46:17
to get to the end of this list today. It's just not
46:19
how I use the system and it's more like
46:21
they're ranked in priority and you just
46:23
work your way down the list and
46:26
a bunch of huge numbers of very
46:28
small things like take
46:30
out the trash, take your vitamins
46:32
or whatever, a bunch of things like that are in
46:34
there as well. So it's just a different
46:37
use for a task manager. Yeah,
46:38
okay.
46:40
So I guess we're going to go to Mars
46:42
next, which
46:45
is obviously, Mars is
46:47
for sleep. Why wouldn't the moon be for sleep?
46:50
Okay, so I'm glad you
46:52
asked, Mike, why isn't the moon for sleep?
46:54
Because it does seem like the moon should be
46:57
for sleep, but it's not
46:59
for sleep because in the actual real
47:01
world, when you're using your phone,
47:04
the moon's color is basically
47:07
bright white, like in the evening time,
47:09
right? It's the end of the day or like you're
47:11
getting ready for bed and you look at your phone and there's
47:14
like a circle of a flashlight just
47:16
shining into your eyes that is your
47:18
phone drawing the moon. So
47:21
I basically chose Mars because it is
47:24
the reddest planet. It is the darkest,
47:27
sleepiest color of all of the planets
47:29
to choose from. So that is why Mars is
47:32
the sleep focus. Okay, because it's
47:34
a sleep focus, you don't have the image of Mars on the
47:36
lock screen to send the home screen. It is very
47:39
faintly on the lock screen. Really? Oh
47:41
yeah, I can kind of see that. Right, it's
47:44
barely there. It's like
47:46
doing the sleep thing and the always on, I get that. They've
47:49
really, really dims the wallpaper in sleep
47:51
mode. Yeah, so you could easily miss it, but
47:53
you won't miss it if you're actually in like a completely
47:55
black room. Then you're like, oh, you can't actually see that
47:57
it's there. But yeah, the sleep mode, I have that setting
47:59
where It dims the wallpaper, which, so
48:02
here's the thing. I do like that for the wallpaper,
48:04
for dimming the wallpaper, but, okay.
48:07
Apple Watch frustrations. I have an Apple
48:09
Watch face for sleep
48:12
mode. So this is the
48:14
same face that you were talking about, like
48:16
the modular ultra face. Is
48:19
it? It is. So
48:21
I actually really
48:23
like this watch face. I think this is super
48:25
classy. You get like big tall numbers
48:28
in the middle. You can turn off basically
48:31
all of the complications, but
48:33
this is the ultra face. And
48:36
I feel like if you remove
48:39
basically everything and expand
48:41
the numbers in the middle, I
48:44
kind of think it's one of the nicest watch faces
48:46
that Apple makes, but this
48:48
is what I was talking about before with Apple
48:51
forces you to make decisions that
48:54
are very frustrating. So
48:57
I use this face for sleep because
48:59
it has an option which says, oh, do you want
49:01
this watch face to go into sleep mode? You
49:03
can make it red. So instead
49:05
of having the time being white numbers,
49:08
you can make them red numbers. I love
49:10
it. When I found that, I was like, oh, cool.
49:13
I can't wait to use this watch face and I'll just
49:15
set different colors for
49:17
all of the different focus modes that I use.
49:19
No, you can have it white or
49:22
you can have it red. Those are your only
49:24
two choices. Like, God damn
49:26
it, Apple. Like, let
49:29
me make it like this, but yellow?
49:31
No, you can't do that, right? Because
49:33
you can change the color, but it changes
49:36
the color of everything except the numbers
49:38
which are always white. Everything
49:40
is exactly that. Why does it do that? Numbers.
49:44
So frustrating. Like this again is
49:46
the thing of like, it's the most
49:49
obvious thing that people might want
49:51
to change and they always get to you,
49:53
right? It's the same thing with like the watch heads.
49:55
Like, oh, we can change everything except
49:57
the watch hands. No, you can't change. the
50:00
watch is so frustrating.
50:02
And so like, I really
50:04
like this as a super simple digital
50:07
watch face, but I just, I
50:09
use it on one other thing, but I
50:11
would use it everywhere if I could just change
50:13
the color of the actual numbers.
50:16
It's like, no, red or white, that's it.
50:18
Very weird. Yeah. This watch
50:20
on your wrist that has more computing power
50:23
than has sent actual people to the
50:25
moon cannot draw these numerals
50:27
in a different color. So
50:30
frustrating. What next take
50:32
me to another planet, Gray? So my very easy
50:35
method, just so Jupiter, let's go
50:37
to health. Why? I guess I'm realizing
50:39
in this conversation with you, I feel like I have
50:43
strong feelings about the planets that you
50:45
just don't.
50:47
No, of course I don't. Why would I associate
50:49
Jupiter in health? Why would I do that? Jupiter
50:52
is like the biggest and burliest of all the
50:54
planets, right? It's like, if any planet lifts,
50:56
Jupiter totally lifts, bro. Like it obviously
50:59
does. But maybe like Jupiter is just for
51:01
show, you know, another planet is actually
51:03
stronger, but Jupiter just like bulks up.
51:06
I was actually just mentally flipping through the roster
51:08
of planets, like, who could that be? And I was
51:11
like, no, I don't think anybody else does. What about Saturn?
51:13
Saturn's like holding the rings up. Saturn is
51:15
the planet that's like for looks, right? It's got the flashy
51:17
rings. Fair enough. Okay,
51:20
so for the Jupiter one, this
51:22
is where things are actually kind
51:24
of useful. So Jupiter is the coolest looking
51:26
planet, right? With the frigging
51:28
storm going on. You're like, what are you doing, man?
51:30
The storm is very interesting. It's super cool.
51:33
It's like, oh, it's always there. It's like, oh, wow.
51:35
Okay. So because Jupiter obviously
51:37
lifts on the home screen, this
51:40
is where I have all of the apps related to health.
51:43
So particularly when I'm
51:45
doing an exercise, it triggers
51:48
to flip into the health mode. So this is
51:50
also like what you would
51:52
have for fitness, right? Yeah,
51:54
I originally called this fitness,
51:57
but I ran into a problem where Apple
51:59
has... fitness hard coded
52:01
as a mode. And
52:03
I cannot remember what it is now, but that
52:06
caused some problem for me with
52:08
some automation. The fact that it was
52:10
hard coded just didn't work. I cannot remember
52:12
what it was now, but I had to change it to a more
52:14
generic name. Yeah, I have a fitness
52:18
focus mode, but all it does is just turns
52:20
off my notifications basically. Right,
52:22
right. Although, it stopped working
52:24
with the new watch. I don't understand why,
52:26
but that's the thing I need to work out for another
52:28
time. But yeah, I don't have anything special
52:30
for it. It's purely just like, I
52:33
just don't want any notifications when I'm working out of
52:35
any kind. And I just leave it at that.
52:37
Yeah, so it's the same thing here. I feel like you,
52:40
I just don't want any note. Whatever
52:42
it is, it can wait until
52:44
after. It will wait 45 minutes, right? Like
52:46
it just will, and I just don't want the distractions.
52:49
Yeah, completely agree. So I've got
52:51
Fitbot on here, which is my
52:54
exercise app that I mentioned before. Just totally
52:56
love life-changing sponsor of this
52:58
episode, I believe. Hugely important
53:01
life-changing app for me. I also have
53:03
the regular Apple Fitness one, and
53:05
I have the Apple Health app on
53:07
here. The Health app is ruining the aesthetic of this
53:10
home screen. God
53:12
damn it, Mike, you're right. Everything is
53:14
fit. Even the fitness app, because it's got
53:17
like the good hue that fits with the other colors,
53:19
and then Health is just like, yo,
53:22
I'm here too, you know? You
53:24
know what, you're totally right. Right
53:26
now, I'm going to add OmniItem,
53:29
create shortcut, because it's going to bother me. Create
53:33
shortcuts for
53:35
Health app. You're totally right. I can't
53:37
unsee it now. I
53:39
feel like maybe if it was black
53:41
with the heart that was pink, that might look kind of
53:43
nice, because then it would fit with the fitness app a
53:45
little bit. That might be kind of cool. Yeah, you're right.
53:48
Okay, so this gets filed under bugs in OmniFoC.
53:50
A lot of calculators. Pounds
53:53
to kilograms, kilograms to pounds. Smith
53:55
plate calculator. I don't know what that means.
53:58
Plate calculators, there's a lot of things going on here. Okay,
54:01
so what's happening here is the weights
54:03
that I use that I have at home, the power
54:06
block stuff, they are in pounds.
54:09
But in the UK, this is crazy
54:12
to me, in most, but
54:14
not all gyms, weights
54:16
are given in kilograms. But
54:19
a surprising, like when I go on gradations,
54:21
a surprising number of gyms
54:25
actually use both systems, and
54:27
you won't know unless you ask someone to
54:29
be like, wait, what's going on with these weights over here? Like 90%
54:33
of stuff is in kilograms in the UK, but I would
54:35
say 10% of stuff is in pounds. So
54:39
by sheer number of times,
54:42
I am most frequently exercising
54:44
at home with my weights that are
54:47
in pounds, especially this year
54:49
because of some of my theme stuff. I've also been
54:51
going to my local gym a bunch because
54:53
they have equipment that I don't. Where most
54:56
things are in kilograms. So anyway,
54:59
the long story short is in FitBOD,
55:03
the setting for changing between
55:05
pounds and kilograms is
55:07
in kind of a weird spot. And
55:10
changing back and forth in FitBOD is basically
55:12
kind of a pain. And even
55:15
within the same gyms in
55:17
the UK, I sometimes need to calculate between
55:19
pounds and kilograms, right? That's weird.
55:22
It's very weird. When I made a decision, I was like, okay,
55:24
what's the easiest thing that I can
55:27
do? I should, in theory,
55:29
because I'm in the UK, just do everything in kilograms.
55:33
But since the weights in my house were pounds, and also
55:35
since I grew up with pounds and still think in
55:37
pounds, I was like, no. Just
55:39
like Fahrenheit, right? I'm holding
55:41
the line on pounds are the correct
55:44
unit of weight. And so I made
55:46
a bunch of shortcuts. I don't agree with that at
55:48
all. Well, look, I'm not interested
55:50
in your view. I know. Here's the thing.
55:53
I know what you want. And I just need to state that I disagree.
55:56
No one's going to have to try and convince anyone of
55:58
anything. I just feel like I'm going to have to. I need to just
56:00
come out in favor of Celsius and
56:02
kilograms. I mean, look,
56:04
Fahrenheit is the best in height. We all know this. And
56:07
pounds are the worst in height. Fahrenheit is the worst in height.
56:11
I'm actually quite movable on pounds. I'm not particularly
56:14
wedded to pounds. I think kilograms are fine. But
56:16
so I spent a little time and I just made
56:19
some shortcuts to do the quick pounds to
56:21
kilograms back and forth conversions. The reason
56:23
I like kilograms is
56:26
that the smaller
56:28
is a gram and there's 100 in a kilogram. I've
56:30
got some bad news for you about how many grams
56:32
are in a kilogram and what the word kilo means.
56:35
And there's a thousand in a kilogram, let me allow them forever. But
56:37
like you've got pounds and ounces, like how many
56:40
ounces are in a pound? God damn, we don't need to have this
56:42
conversation right now. Okay. This
56:44
is why I also don't like feet and inches. It's
56:46
like the similar thing. I was like, I can't remember all of this. You
56:49
know? It's a simple thing of like there's 100
56:52
or a thousand who could know between these
56:55
things. I just
56:57
appreciate you demonstrating the mistake
56:59
that all of my physics students did.
57:01
I'm like, this is one of these things that drives me
57:03
crazy when people are like, the metric system is amazing. The
57:06
person saying that is almost always a nerd
57:09
and overestimates how rarely
57:12
normal people will make a mistake going back and
57:14
forth. But the thing is though, great. Okay.
57:17
I can see that I've made the mistake very quickly,
57:20
right? I can't do the same thing
57:23
for feet and inches or like pounds
57:25
and ounces. If I say it's six
57:27
and it actually is nine, it's just
57:29
not as easy to realize that I've made the mistake.
57:32
Yeah, it's totally fair. Yeah, yeah. Like
57:34
making the mistake is fine, but like how quickly can you correct it?
57:37
And like I will realize very quickly
57:39
that, you know, if I'm trying to do something, oh no,
57:41
wait, this is nowhere near enough. And
57:45
I'm like, I can't do that. With pounds
57:47
and ounces, you could be really close. I
57:49
made the mistake and I'm not adding it out. So
57:53
I've at least got to try and defend myself, you know?
57:55
Yeah, that's totally fair. Totally fair.
57:57
And the conversion system is better. Imperial
58:00
overestimates how often you actually switch
58:02
between the units. Like, this is a much rarer
58:04
thing. I mean, I did grow up with Imperial.
58:07
The UK has a weird mixed system. I
58:09
don't understand why. I know, and there's this weird, like,
58:11
counterculture of people trying to bring it back
58:14
as well, which is like, get over yourself,
58:16
man, it's gone, alright? Like, Imperial's
58:18
gone. Nobody wants to deal in that anymore.
58:21
Stop trying to bring gallons back into the equation.
58:23
Yes, but you've literally picked the example where,
58:25
again, the UK has this great mix of stuff. There's
58:28
gallons and quarts back for milk, and it's
58:30
like, what are you doing? Just like, get over
58:32
yourself. We've moved on. Oh, I'll agree
58:34
with you there. That ship has totally failed.
58:36
Yes, no one wants to live in this world. Everything's
58:39
in liters and milliliters. Yes. Although,
58:41
I still kind of hate milliliters. There's
58:44
a hundred milliliters in a litre. There's
58:48
a thousand milliliters. Where
58:50
are we going? Ah! Anything
58:54
with milliliters is like, why does this tiny
58:56
bottle have such a big number? I
58:59
hate it. No, I know. I hate it
59:01
so much. Like, oh, this tiny bottle of water,
59:03
how many milliliters? Three hundred! Here's
59:05
what I think we can all agree on. None of these systems
59:08
are good. They're just like, different forms
59:10
of, okay. What we can all agree on
59:13
is you shouldn't have a mixed system, right?
59:15
Yes. Which a surprising
59:17
number of countries do. That's like
59:20
the UK, India, Canada.
59:22
Like they've got these mixed systems. Like
59:25
guys, pick a size, right? Pick
59:27
a size. Anyway, apps. Apps,
59:30
let's get back to apps. Anyway,
59:33
unit conversions. You know what? They're
59:35
really annoying, so you can make shortcuts to
59:37
do it for you. I'll just
59:39
point out, the two you asked
59:41
about there is like plate calculators and Smith
59:44
plate calculators. So I was
59:46
really just doing the math in my head and I was like, this
59:49
is dumb, right? This is what machines are for. Just have the machine
59:51
do it for you. And the advantage of making your
59:53
own little shortcut is when
59:55
doing things like the bench press or whatever, you
59:58
can have the shortcut. Because
1:00:00
I'm thinking in pounds right, but it's like I want to think in kilograms
1:00:03
also then round to the correct Unit
1:00:07
of the plates in the gym that you're in
1:00:10
and kind of like spit out the number in a format
1:00:12
that you want Right because you're putting plates on the bar. So
1:00:14
that's partly why I have these shortcuts there is like
1:00:16
there's the regular machines There's
1:00:18
the Smith machines, which I don't love
1:00:21
and for incomprehensible reasons They have a different
1:00:23
bar weight than just like a regular Olympic
1:00:26
bar I always feel like curse you
1:00:28
Smith inventor of this stupid
1:00:31
machine I hate it, but oftentimes
1:00:34
it's if I don't want to wait around in the
1:00:36
gym forever Like the Imperial version of the weight
1:00:38
equipment Yeah, I don't know what it is. Like I hate it
1:00:42
It's like it's clearly designed so that people don't
1:00:45
injure themselves But I like I just don't
1:00:47
understand how it's been elevated
1:00:49
to be like every gym has one
1:00:51
of these and it always feels like It'd
1:00:53
be much better just to have a regular Olympic bar
1:00:55
here. That's what everybody wants Nobody wants this
1:00:58
fifth machine, but whatever I'll
1:01:00
use it if it's the only thing that's free So that's why I have
1:01:02
it there These are like shortcuts
1:01:04
that do real work for me all
1:01:06
the time, right? It's like just I'm putting in a number
1:01:09
give me the thing great. Boom. Boom. Boom. Those
1:01:11
are the three plates I need put them on fantastic
1:01:14
the last little thing there which I'll talk
1:01:16
about later in the year But I've been very intentionally
1:01:19
doing a lot of like zone to heart exercise
1:01:21
this year Yeah, and on
1:01:23
the list of things that's incredibly frustrating It's
1:01:26
like Apple doesn't track
1:01:28
this as a separate metric like they'll
1:01:30
tell you after each exercise How much
1:01:32
time you spent in zone to heart rate?
1:01:35
But there's nowhere to get this data
1:01:37
just as an aggregate out of the app I
1:01:40
was even looking into with shortcuts
1:01:42
like time manually pull out like
1:01:44
the heart ranges and backwards cut No, you
1:01:47
can't get access to this very frustrating So
1:01:49
because I want to keep track of how much time
1:01:52
per two weeks am I spending in
1:01:54
zone two? Again, just made a little shortcut
1:01:57
that asked me for a number of minutes
1:02:00
which I'm getting at the end of the exercise.
1:02:02
And then that shortcut just, boop, it spits it into
1:02:04
a little spreadsheets in numbers. So
1:02:07
you're doing some manual entry. Doing manual entry here. So
1:02:09
you're going to the health app, looking
1:02:12
at your workout, it tells you the
1:02:14
zone breakdown and then you're putting that in.
1:02:16
That's an annoying system, isn't it? I'm putting that
1:02:18
number in. It's incredibly annoying,
1:02:21
it's very frustrating. It's like, if I didn't care
1:02:23
so much, I wouldn't bother doing
1:02:25
this, but I actually really care about this metric.
1:02:27
But every time it makes me curse the
1:02:29
Apple health app, like again, all
1:02:32
year there's been this theme of like, Apple health
1:02:34
app, right? I give you like my anti-app of
1:02:36
the year award. Like there's nothing that I use
1:02:38
more that is also more frustrating.
1:02:41
And this is like one of these key things
1:02:43
of like, you know this number.
1:02:46
I know you know because you're telling
1:02:48
it to me when I'm done with the exercise.
1:02:50
I wonder if it's in the API. Yeah, it's an
1:02:52
interesting question. I wonder if you can. Under school,
1:02:55
can you let us know? Yeah. Can
1:02:57
you tell us? See if anybody knows,
1:02:59
David. Yeah, you can copy
1:03:01
paste some code just to make it work. Right, just like copy
1:03:04
paste the thing. So that's what I'm doing with Input
1:03:06
Zone 2 there is just like throwing it into my own
1:03:08
spreadsheet. So then I can just see like, okay, cool. I'm like
1:03:10
above or below the average that I'm looking for with this number.
1:03:12
Yep. Okay, so that's that blowing
1:03:15
past my very easy method, just speed.
1:03:17
So we're up to Saturn. So
1:03:19
Saturn, now Mike,
1:03:22
what
1:03:23
mode is going to be Saturn? This
1:03:25
one you must associate it, please.
1:03:28
Well, I guess based on what you said, it's like the most showy
1:03:30
off of all of your focus
1:03:33
modes. Do you have fashion focus?
1:03:35
What is it? It's the weekend, Saturn.
1:03:38
Okay. For Saturday. Saturn
1:03:40
day. Yeah, Saturn day, that's where it comes from.
1:03:42
Oh. Don't you say
1:03:45
that to me because I'll tell that to other people. Did
1:03:47
you be great, told me. Oh
1:03:52
boy, okay. There's not much to
1:03:54
say here. Saturn is for Saturday for the weekends.
1:03:57
Again, other like pretty clear thing. I just want
1:03:59
the weather. I have a little yellow watch
1:04:01
face that I kind of hate to match that
1:04:04
just shows me like the top thing in OmniFocus.
1:04:07
I don't like this color for the watch face. Yeah, though.
1:04:09
We're just in general the yellow I don't
1:04:11
like yeah, it's like puce
1:04:14
almost like it's not even really yellow It's
1:04:16
got like too much green in it. I feel like I
1:04:18
don't like it This is a this is kind of
1:04:20
like a compromised color. Yeah, this is what
1:04:23
it is Like I've got too many things clashing up against
1:04:25
each other I've always used yellow
1:04:28
as free time and all of my calendar blocking
1:04:30
and I'm tracking This is a problem
1:04:32
just with human eyes. We don't perceive enough
1:04:35
colors, but you really only have seven
1:04:37
and It's a surprisingly few
1:04:39
number to work with for lots of different things So
1:04:42
I go with the yellow Saturn is like basically
1:04:44
a yellow we kind of planets But if
1:04:47
I actually as I did with a little eyedropper
1:04:49
match the exact color of Saturn
1:04:52
to be the yellow That's going to be displayed. It
1:04:54
doesn't look right at all. It doesn't read as yellow on
1:04:56
pure black. So Yeah,
1:04:58
this is my least favorite aesthetically. It's
1:05:00
a compromise. I acknowledge that Well, I
1:05:03
got a goldy color, but then I'll do the job. I
1:05:05
could try something like that. Yeah, I might
1:05:07
want to try that the real frustration is
1:05:11
when we go over to the watch face that
1:05:13
I
1:05:14
can't quite get a yellow that works right
1:05:16
for the focus mode And so it has to have like
1:05:19
this little green dot on the top This
1:05:21
is another one of these things Apple, please
1:05:23
I'm begging you your watch faces are
1:05:26
so ugly so often already
1:05:28
Do we have to show the icon
1:05:30
for the lightest mode on top of the
1:05:33
watch? It's just there
1:05:35
to ruin the look of the watch constantly
1:05:38
You know what goes on the top of the
1:05:40
watch is the notification dot right? Yeah
1:05:43
So why is there now something else up there?
1:05:45
Yeah, I hate that. I hate it
1:05:48
So much right on the watch.
1:05:51
Why does that to persistently tell me? Yeah
1:05:53
what focus moment? It's crazy because again when
1:05:55
you pull up a control sensor on the watch It's
1:05:57
also right there like which focus mode are you
1:05:59
in? And I don't understand. The only way
1:06:02
to disable this, as far as I can tell, is to
1:06:04
disable the watch paying attention
1:06:06
to focus modes at all, which completely
1:06:10
cripples all of its functionality.
1:06:12
It's infuriating. I swear,
1:06:15
if I could lift up the screen
1:06:17
of my Apple Watch and with a pin,
1:06:21
manually blind and
1:06:23
break every one of the pixels that
1:06:26
displays the focus mode, and
1:06:28
just have them be permanent, black, I
1:06:31
would do it. I would do that to get rid
1:06:33
of this and just deal with a black hole
1:06:35
on the top of my watch. I hate it so
1:06:37
much. I think we have one more? Yeah,
1:06:40
I was going to say, we've got just the final one, also
1:06:42
boring, which is Core. So
1:06:45
we go out to Neptune. Core.
1:06:48
Core. Neptune,
1:06:50
another perfect,
1:06:53
perfect emotional planet here. Oh,
1:06:56
great. I've just gone to the home
1:06:58
screen. They have such
1:07:00
little on this home screen. But
1:07:03
just so you know, for the next 54 days,
1:07:05
St. Nick's Day is coming. Make
1:07:09
sure you don't forget, you count it down every day,
1:07:11
you know? St. Nick's Day. So Mike
1:07:13
is making fun of me because last year you
1:07:15
recommended a little app called Up ahead, which
1:07:18
is just a simple little like, hey,
1:07:21
what's up next kind of app. I
1:07:24
really like it. And I am
1:07:26
indeed counting down to St. Nick's Day. You
1:07:30
laugh. I do. I
1:07:32
do. You're right. But it's
1:07:34
very serious to me because St. Nick's
1:07:37
Day is for me basically
1:07:41
the mark of the end of the year. Like
1:07:43
all serious work should
1:07:46
really be wrapped up by St. Nick's
1:07:49
Day. It's not that like work doesn't
1:07:51
happen after that, but this
1:07:53
to me is really like big
1:07:56
things are done now and you
1:07:58
need. to set aside
1:08:01
some time to actually enjoy
1:08:03
the holiday season. So that's why
1:08:05
I have it there. That's why it's on my
1:08:08
core work screen is it
1:08:10
is a countdown of like, how much
1:08:13
time do you really
1:08:15
have left for serious
1:08:17
work? If you're going to have a video
1:08:20
up in December, you should really
1:08:22
try to have it done before St. Nick's day, if
1:08:25
you don't want to ruin your
1:08:27
whole month, right? Trying to get this done
1:08:29
before the end
1:08:29
of the year. That's why that's up
1:08:32
there. It's the sixth of December.
1:08:34
I didn't know this. I had to Google it and I'm just helping
1:08:37
people who were like, what is St. Nick's day?
1:08:39
Uh-huh. Cause I also didn't know what St. Nick's day was.
1:08:42
I have St. Nick's day as the fifth of December,
1:08:45
but different places celebrate St. Nick's
1:08:48
day on different days. And there's
1:08:50
a St. Nick's Eve, which is on the fifth.
1:08:52
Wait. So do you observe Imperial
1:08:54
or Metric St. Nick's day? I observe
1:08:56
Imperial St. Nick's day
1:08:58
as all good Dutch descendants do. Ah,
1:09:03
okay. I wondered why, like, why have I
1:09:05
no idea about this, but I guess. Again,
1:09:07
as the child of a Dutch immigrant,
1:09:10
St. Nick's day was an annual thing every
1:09:12
time growing up. It's like similar to how like
1:09:15
a lot of European countries, they celebrate Christmas
1:09:17
and Christmas Eve. Like it's when people open their
1:09:19
presents and stuff. Yeah. So we also basically
1:09:22
did Christmas on Christmas Eve for the exact
1:09:24
same reason. Yeah. This is how things were done in the
1:09:26
old world before we emigrated to the
1:09:28
United States. I have no idea what
1:09:30
happened there where like it's the same
1:09:33
traditions, but people do them on different days.
1:09:35
Like in the days off by one, like I have
1:09:37
no idea how that happened. And I need
1:09:39
to know. But yes, you're exactly right. It's like
1:09:41
St. Nick's day is kind of like Christmas and
1:09:43
this, is it St. Nick's day or is it
1:09:46
Christmas Eve or is it St. Nick's Eve? Like
1:09:48
this same confusion has totally happened
1:09:51
in different places. Well, only 54 days
1:09:53
to go. So. Don't remind
1:09:55
me. I don't need to. I don't need enough every
1:09:57
day. I don't need to. You have an app
1:09:59
that does it. Yeah, so that's the core one.
1:10:02
Then just lastly, my watch face
1:10:04
for the core. Kind
1:10:06
of happy with it. Again, it's that ultra face. I
1:10:09
think it looks pretty good in blue. I've got OmniFocus
1:10:11
in the center for what I need to do. And that's
1:10:13
it. That's it. What is that on the bottom, right?
1:10:16
On the bottom, right? That's the fasting timer. Again, in
1:10:19
the middle is a very
1:10:21
old app, which is called Better Date,
1:10:24
which just shows the current date, but it has
1:10:26
a little progress slider for how
1:10:28
far you are in the month. I
1:10:31
should probably have this more prominent because I'm just constantly
1:10:33
forgetting when it is, but I do
1:10:35
like this one of like, oh, we have a progress bar
1:10:38
throughout the month. How close are we to the end? I don't
1:10:40
just want the number. I want to see the little visual indicator.
1:10:43
And so there we are. We've wrapped up the
1:10:46
introduction to state of the app.
1:10:49
We've done an entire episode already.
1:10:51
We could just
1:10:53
be done and that's it. But
1:10:56
yet this, we just introduced it, but
1:10:58
we're not done. This
1:11:01
episode of Cortex is brought to you by FitBod.
1:11:03
When you want to change your fitness
1:11:05
level, it can be hard to know where to start.
1:11:08
That's why I'm pleased to let you know that FitBod
1:11:10
is an easy and affordable way to build
1:11:13
a fitness plan just for you. You have
1:11:15
heard us talk about FitBod, I think every
1:11:17
year in state of the apps for a very
1:11:19
good reason. FitBod is the very
1:11:22
best fitness app out there. It's incredibly
1:11:24
easy to use. They have over 1,400 HD video
1:11:28
tutorials shot from multiple angles to
1:11:30
make sure that learning every exercise is a breeze.
1:11:33
They have achievements that you can keep track of
1:11:35
and personal bests with that a great progress tracking
1:11:38
chance in the app. It integrates with
1:11:40
your smartwatch and other apps like Strava,
1:11:42
Fitbit, and Apple Health. But ultimately
1:11:45
what makes FitBod so great, it's a great
1:11:47
app. It looks good to use, but what makes them so great
1:11:50
is the algorithm that they have built to
1:11:52
make sure that you are keeping on
1:11:54
track with your fitness goals. FitBod
1:11:57
knows that everybody has their own path to personal
1:11:59
fitness. That's when it sticks and it's
1:12:01
when you actually see a difference. So they
1:12:03
learn about you, your goals and your training ability
1:12:06
to create a custom dynamic program based
1:12:08
on your experience and any equipment you have. This
1:12:11
is all within an app that is so easy
1:12:13
to use. Superior results are
1:12:15
achieved when a workout program is tailored
1:12:17
to your unique body, experience,
1:12:20
environment and goals. They understand
1:12:22
that you don't want to overwork muscles or underwork
1:12:25
muscles. This can negatively impact your results
1:12:28
so that you design a well balanced workout
1:12:30
routine that is for you. They mix up
1:12:32
your muscle groups, exercises, sets, reps
1:12:34
and weight over time. This will increase your
1:12:36
overall strength, keep your body sharp and
1:12:38
keep your sessions fresh
1:12:40
and fun by mixing up your workouts
1:12:43
with new exercises. Gray and I have spoken
1:12:45
about the big impact FitBod had
1:12:48
in our personal fitness journey. If
1:12:50
you've yet to try it out, now is a great time.
1:12:53
Personalized training of this quality can be expensive. FitBod
1:12:56
though is just $12.99 a month or $79.99 a year but
1:12:58
you can get a huge 25% of your membership
1:13:02
by signing up at fitbod.me slash cortex.
1:13:05
So go now and get your customized fitness
1:13:07
plan at fitbod.me
1:13:09
slash cortex. That is F-I-T-B-O-D
1:13:13
dot me slash cortex. So 25% of
1:13:16
your membership are thanks to FitBod for
1:13:18
their support of this show and Relay FM. Productivity
1:13:22
apps. The cornerstone of our productivity app
1:13:24
system is the Todo app. It
1:13:27
is the Todo app. That is
1:13:29
the absolute core. You know when
1:13:32
I sat down this year, Gray, to start
1:13:34
my notes, I thought to myself, I'm
1:13:37
very content with Todoist as my Todo
1:13:39
app. It does everything the way
1:13:41
that I want and I have no desire
1:13:43
to move apps anymore. I'm very
1:13:45
happy with Todoist. Gray, how are you
1:13:47
feeling? I'm feeling
1:13:50
nervous, Mike. Yeah. I'm
1:13:52
not going to lie. I'm feeling a little nervous. Honestly,
1:13:54
I feel nervous for you. Really? Yeah.
1:13:58
So the situation is, obviously I've been using OmniFocus for years. years.
1:14:01
But also for what is now a
1:14:03
like growing percentage of
1:14:05
those years, I have been hearing
1:14:07
about OmniFocus 4, which
1:14:09
is in the works. The OmniFocus 4
1:14:13
first look was published
1:14:16
on May 10th, 2021. Right.
1:14:20
That was when they started the beta for
1:14:22
OmniFocus 4. That's when they started the
1:14:25
public beta of it. But I know
1:14:27
like I spoke to people in person about
1:14:30
OmniFocus 4 before then, when
1:14:33
I was a bit like, hey, what's going on
1:14:35
with this thing? Yeah.
1:14:38
So the OmniFocus blog
1:14:41
has been over this time, like publishing
1:14:43
updates about what's going on and like how
1:14:45
they're moving forward. And the
1:14:48
entire time they have been insisting
1:14:50
that they are like on schedule to release
1:14:52
the next version of OmniFocus and that
1:14:54
this is not any different than
1:14:56
the amount of time between the previous
1:14:58
versions of OmniFocus. And I think all
1:15:01
of that is true. I kind of take them at their word for
1:15:03
this, but the
1:15:05
end result though is like, boy,
1:15:08
if it is going to
1:15:10
be years between
1:15:12
major updates, it starts to become
1:15:14
a problem. And I feel like the
1:15:17
latest release of iOS and
1:15:19
particularly Sonoma has just like
1:15:22
pushed this really over the edge.
1:15:24
And I was feeling like, boy, I just,
1:15:27
I hope OmniFocus is there like right
1:15:31
after the OS goes out
1:15:33
and it wasn't. And boy, OmniFocus
1:15:37
just feels so old
1:15:39
and creaky on the current operating
1:15:41
systems. They're saying later this year. I
1:15:43
know that they're saying later this year, but I
1:15:45
feel like it's really bad to miss
1:15:48
the iOS launch and the
1:15:50
Sonoma launch. Even if
1:15:52
that was always your plan, like, oh, we're going to do it
1:15:54
later this year. I just don't think it's good.
1:15:56
And it particularly doesn't look good because
1:15:58
there's no. interactive widgets
1:16:00
like none of that widget stuff works. The
1:16:03
widgets that exist on iOS
1:16:05
like they are fine
1:16:07
but they feel very crowbarred into
1:16:10
the system and they just kind of don't look
1:16:12
good they don't scale properly with
1:16:14
anything. I will say to do ist widgets
1:16:17
are terrible. Okay. They're really bad
1:16:19
they've always been bad but I don't want
1:16:21
a widget of my to-do app
1:16:24
on my home screen anyway but
1:16:26
they are very bad. Yes like
1:16:28
on my Mac I was trying to
1:16:31
use the widgets but like OmniFocus
1:16:33
was showing up as a like you could see
1:16:35
the square block that was getting rendered
1:16:38
for the widget like inside the round borders
1:16:40
is like ooh that does not look good.
1:16:43
Wow. Anyway it's just one
1:16:45
of these things of like boy they're just slowly
1:16:48
adding up things where it feels like it just
1:16:50
does not work
1:16:52
great in the system. Again I want to emphasize
1:16:54
I've stuck with it because nothing is
1:16:57
broken but it just
1:16:59
feels increasingly like
1:17:01
oh my god this is very
1:17:04
out of step with the current operating systems
1:17:07
and like little things just keep adding up
1:17:09
just like the the minimum
1:17:12
physical size that OmniFocus will
1:17:14
take up on the screen is like quite large
1:17:16
it's like trying to you know make it fit in the little corners
1:17:19
can be really frustrating. So what I dream
1:17:22
happens is like oh OmniFocus 4
1:17:25
gets released between the time that we record
1:17:27
this episode and when it goes live
1:17:29
and I don't have to worry about anything anymore
1:17:32
but the truth is I am
1:17:34
just concerned and I was
1:17:36
concerned enough that last
1:17:39
month I did a kind of tour of
1:17:42
the other to-do systems that exist
1:17:45
I was like I just want to I want to like refresh
1:17:47
my view of the field like what
1:17:50
is out here what's available this
1:17:52
tour went all the
1:17:55
way back to remember the milk. Let
1:17:59
me survey. everything
1:18:01
that I would reasonably use. Remember
1:18:04
the milk was extra hilarious because
1:18:06
I found my super old
1:18:08
account and logged into it where it had
1:18:10
to-do's left over from my
1:18:13
teaching career. Like to-do
1:18:15
list archaeology of like wow look
1:18:17
at this whole system that's amazing. I mean
1:18:20
the truth is though I have one
1:18:22
just such an incredible deal
1:18:24
breaker for to-do systems and it is
1:18:26
this concept of the start date, I
1:18:29
am still just blown
1:18:31
away by how many apps don't
1:18:33
have this implemented at all or
1:18:35
implement it very badly.
1:18:38
Like there are lots of things that OmniFocus does
1:18:40
that are great but like this
1:18:43
to me is the key and it is the single
1:18:45
thing that makes it the hardest to move from absolutely
1:18:48
anything else. So after
1:18:51
my survey of the field I kind of had to make
1:18:53
a decision. I was like all right assume
1:18:55
that OmniFocus will
1:18:58
not release this year. Will you still
1:19:00
use it? And the
1:19:02
answer I came to was yes. I
1:19:05
will still use it because the other
1:19:07
options are significantly
1:19:09
less appealing to me but boy
1:19:12
I would not be happy about that. So I
1:19:14
have not used OmniFocus for
1:19:16
a long time. I was on the beta but I let my app
1:19:18
have it or expire at some point sometime
1:19:20
last year or whatever. And I will
1:19:24
be frank and say like I did not like
1:19:26
the way the app felt to use. They
1:19:30
were moving to SwiftUI and
1:19:32
that's what they have stuck with and the
1:19:35
app just didn't feel right to use.
1:19:38
And maybe they've changed it I
1:19:40
don't know but let's just imagine that enough
1:19:43
has changed about the application that you don't like
1:19:45
using the application anymore. Well then what do you do? Because
1:19:49
it is a new design. The
1:19:51
design is changing. You can see it
1:19:53
in the imagery that I've shared. It
1:19:56
is very similar of course to
1:19:58
the OmniFocus that you know. But
1:20:01
it's different. Yeah, I mean
1:20:03
I haven't used it in the beta. I've only
1:20:05
seen the screenshots. I actually don't
1:20:07
really have any problem with the screenshots. I'm not quite sure
1:20:11
why people don't seem to like the design
1:20:13
of that. I didn't like the way the app
1:20:15
felt to use. But again, it was in
1:20:17
beta, right? Like I've got to be fair and
1:20:19
say like it wasn't finished and it was a
1:20:21
long time ago. But there
1:20:24
was just something about it where it did not
1:20:26
have the pleasant feeling
1:20:28
that I'd had using the app before. But who knows
1:20:30
where it is right now. I genuinely don't know. Yeah,
1:20:32
but this is a problem with like so when I was
1:20:35
surveying the field of to-do list apps. This
1:20:38
is a recurring problem where lots
1:20:40
of these apps because they have an idea of
1:20:43
working with teams or whatever like they're using
1:20:45
different systems. So some apps like did
1:20:47
have start dates, but it would be
1:20:49
the same thing where I feel like I just
1:20:51
clearly don't like using this. Like this
1:20:53
is unpleasant to use in a way
1:20:56
that is difficult to pin down. Like
1:20:59
I can't exactly articulate
1:21:02
why, but I don't like it. It's
1:21:04
a funny thing. Like we used to say on the show that
1:21:07
the market for to-do apps was
1:21:09
infinite. But I think I was also
1:21:11
quite surprised in how
1:21:15
remarkably unchanged this whole
1:21:17
world is since the last time I really
1:21:19
went to look around. Like
1:21:21
I kind of thought, oh, I'll find some new apps that
1:21:23
I was unaware of since the last time. The answer
1:21:26
is like, no, not really. Like it's the
1:21:28
same few ones that are the
1:21:30
default answers for absolutely
1:21:32
everyone. So you've got OmniFocus,
1:21:34
you've got to-doist and like, and
1:21:37
all of the friends and like, these are the things to choose from. So
1:21:40
I might have to amend that to be something like, oh,
1:21:43
the desire for to-do apps is
1:21:46
infinite because everybody always wants them to
1:21:48
work in their own specific way. But
1:21:50
maybe something about the actual market
1:21:52
market just can't support
1:21:55
a large number of these things or there's
1:21:57
other like non-obvious reasons. there
1:22:00
aren't a ton of brand new ones that
1:22:02
have popped up. So that's
1:22:05
my situation is I am using
1:22:07
OmniFocus. I will probably still continue to
1:22:09
use OmniFocus, but I
1:22:11
am concerned at this point
1:22:14
in time where things
1:22:17
feel potentially uncertain.
1:22:19
And even if there is a transition, like
1:22:21
I'll have to see what it is actually like
1:22:24
for the next version when
1:22:26
it comes out later this year. I
1:22:29
hope for success for them and for you. Me too.
1:22:32
I really do. And I understand that
1:22:34
like, you know, this takes a long time,
1:22:37
but it's, I feel like they're going
1:22:39
in a different direction and I hope it plays off.
1:22:41
So that was a bummer. Yeah. Tell me about
1:22:44
how you are happy, Mike. Oh yeah. Well,
1:22:46
I mean, just in general, to do it does exactly what I
1:22:48
need. Lucky you. Because I
1:22:50
keep things relatively simple and
1:22:52
you don't. People have different systems. I keep
1:22:54
mine relatively simple, you know, tasks.
1:22:57
All of them have a due date and they
1:22:59
all go in a project. That is essentially all I'm doing.
1:23:02
And I like that Todoist
1:23:04
has a couple of views. She can show me my tasks for
1:23:06
today. She can show me all my upcoming tasks
1:23:09
in a chronological list. And then if I want
1:23:12
to, I can go into any of my projects. It's
1:23:14
just a simple system, but
1:23:17
it works well for me. So I'm
1:23:19
happy with it, you know? Yeah. And like a
1:23:21
good Todo manager should in many ways
1:23:23
be kind of invisible. Yeah. Like
1:23:25
it's not the thing. Exactly. It's the thing
1:23:27
that's pointing you to what you actually
1:23:30
need to do. Again, I will ding them for the
1:23:32
poor widget support. I think that that is a very
1:23:34
strange thing that they haven't done it because a lot of people would
1:23:36
like it and their widgets last year
1:23:39
weren't good anyway. Like the widgets
1:23:41
that they added, like it was just like a weird list
1:23:43
of things that was like cropped in a strange
1:23:45
way, just like lines of text. As
1:23:48
of right now, they've not added any kind of interactivity
1:23:50
to their widgets. I don't understand
1:23:52
why, but that's where they are. But the
1:23:54
thing that I am most in love with when it comes to my
1:23:56
Todo system right now is the action button
1:23:59
on my... iPhone 15 Pro Max. Oh,
1:24:02
okay. So on the Mac,
1:24:05
it's very easy to put tasks
1:24:07
into Todoist. I just hit Command,
1:24:10
Option and the space bar, and it brings
1:24:13
up the Todoist Quick Entry window. And
1:24:16
I can just add a task, no matter what
1:24:18
I'm doing, right? There
1:24:20
is no way to do
1:24:22
such a thing when I'm using my iPhone. I
1:24:24
can have a shortcut,
1:24:26
but
1:24:27
I have to go somewhere else to activate
1:24:29
the shortcut. Like if I'm in Slack
1:24:32
and I wanna add a task to Todoist, I
1:24:35
have to leave Slack. Oh,
1:24:37
right, okay. Or
1:24:39
I have to pull down my notification shade,
1:24:42
slide to the left and hit a shortcut or
1:24:44
whatever, or like pull it down and maybe I can hit the
1:24:46
shortcut from the lock screen, whatever. But there's always a leaving
1:24:49
of the app to do this.
1:24:52
Enter the action button, where
1:24:54
now I can just press and hold
1:24:56
the action button and it will
1:24:59
pop up a shortcut that I have written to
1:25:02
add a task. And it doesn't leave
1:25:04
the app. I can still see things
1:25:07
that are in the window. Oh, right,
1:25:09
okay. So it's just pulling down the text entry
1:25:11
from the top. Yeah, and I just use
1:25:13
the keyboard. So this
1:25:16
was a suggestion that our friend Federico
1:25:18
made when we were thinking about the action button.
1:25:20
And I've kind of adapted it a little bit further
1:25:23
as well. So at first it was just like, give
1:25:25
me a little Todoist task. Awesome,
1:25:27
I would do that. But then it
1:25:30
became like, well, what about if
1:25:33
I wanna add something to do as
1:25:35
well? So what I've done
1:25:37
is it says, what's your task? I type out the name
1:25:39
of the task. It says, what time do you
1:25:41
want it to be? And I can put that time in natural
1:25:43
language if I want to. It can make it look very
1:25:45
simple. And it says, what app do you wanna
1:25:47
add it to? And I choose either Todoist
1:25:50
or Do. Hmm, and
1:25:52
then it will just add it to the app that
1:25:55
I've chosen. So it's just like a pretty simple
1:25:57
shortcut that just uses the native shortcuts
1:25:59
for Todoist. do to just add in the information
1:26:02
that I'm putting in a text box. It's very simple.
1:26:05
And then also Federico built a shortcut
1:26:07
called MultiButton which lets
1:26:09
you add a second action to
1:26:11
the action button based on a timer.
1:26:14
So like if you press the
1:26:17
action button and like do the action or press
1:26:19
cancel and then press it again within
1:26:21
seven seconds it will run a second
1:26:23
action that you've chosen. It's very clever. Certainly
1:26:26
I have this set to reminders but I'm thinking of adding
1:26:29
that into the first one. I'll get
1:26:31
to reminders in a minute. But like I'm enjoying
1:26:33
playing around with the actual button stuff.
1:26:35
Federico's thing is super cool. I'll put a link in the show
1:26:38
notes too if you want to read more about it. But my very
1:26:40
favorite thing is just how easy it is for me to add
1:26:42
things to my to-do system now. Okay.
1:26:45
I think you've totally sold me on what should the action
1:26:47
button be. Yeah. Because
1:26:50
I just haven't – so bored
1:26:52
by the colors and the new phone
1:26:55
stuff. So I haven't even like ordered the phone. I don't have
1:26:57
the action button or anything. So I
1:26:59
haven't really thought about it. I'm just like in a vague
1:27:02
way I was like what might one
1:27:04
do theoretically with an action
1:27:06
button? And I was like I guess the camera?
1:27:08
The camera makes most sense? But you've totally
1:27:11
sold me on. No, the correct thing here is input.
1:27:14
This is a button for inputting into other
1:27:16
systems especially if T.G. has
1:27:19
magicked his way into doubling
1:27:21
the functionality of the action button then
1:27:24
I feel like yeah it's very clear like this is a default
1:27:26
input button. Yeah. I really like
1:27:28
it. It's just like I could just press that button
1:27:31
and add a task to my system
1:27:33
and it works very well. I mentioned
1:27:35
reminders using this for family tasks
1:27:37
now. We previously used Trello. I didn't like
1:27:39
Trello. But now reminders
1:27:41
has their kind of column Kanban
1:27:44
view. It's finding the middle
1:27:46
ground but who both want me and Nadina wanting. She really
1:27:48
wants a column view. I don't really want to use
1:27:50
Trello. And so – Yeah.
1:27:53
I really like the way that reminders works from an entry perspective.
1:27:55
It's very simple and I can access
1:27:58
it from anywhere in the system. like
1:28:00
reminders as much as I like to do it. I think for
1:28:02
a lot of things reminders you have to tap
1:28:05
too many things. If you want to add
1:28:08
a time to a task you first have to slide
1:28:10
a toggle to bring down the time thing which is
1:28:12
just very strange to me. But I
1:28:15
like this more than I like Trello
1:28:18
as a system. So that's
1:28:20
working fine. And then because why
1:28:22
not just put another one in the mix. I also use Things.
1:28:25
I love to do apps. I love to use all of them. I use them for
1:28:27
very different things. Things is used
1:28:29
and has been for years for just checklists
1:28:32
for me. I use it for my Cortex
1:28:34
checklist. And I mentioned earlier
1:28:36
I also am now using it for a
1:28:38
packing checklist that I moved out of
1:28:40
Notes. Things made some new shortcut
1:28:42
actions to make it very easy
1:28:45
to duplicate a template project in
1:28:47
Things and keep all of the formatting
1:28:50
like the headers and all that kind of stuff.
1:28:52
So I now just have these two shortcuts. One
1:28:55
for Cortex editing and posting and one
1:28:57
for my packing list to
1:28:59
just very easily duplicate these projects
1:29:02
and have them become active. And so I use Things
1:29:04
for that. It's very nice. Yeah I mean
1:29:06
Things wins clearly the award of
1:29:09
best looking sort of most pleasant
1:29:12
to do app to use. Like it's just
1:29:14
the design of things is amazing. And
1:29:16
I always find myself like drawn
1:29:18
to things and also just kills
1:29:20
me because they sort of but
1:29:23
not fully have start dates. Like they have
1:29:25
fuzzy start dates might be the way to describe
1:29:27
it. But yeah like I find things is like
1:29:29
just a great looking app. It's been around for a long
1:29:31
time. And it is also interesting to me how
1:29:34
Reminders does keep improving year
1:29:36
on year. It's also something I was like oh if
1:29:39
Reminders ever added start dates like I
1:29:41
would be willing to simplify my
1:29:43
system down to maybe use something
1:29:46
like that. Because yeah I guess Reminders is for me
1:29:48
the only other task manager I really use.
1:29:51
And that's purely because the Siri
1:29:54
integration is just so dead
1:29:56
easy. I will just constantly
1:29:59
buy voice. throw to Siri
1:30:01
things that I want to be remembered like in
1:30:04
X units of time. Remind me in
1:30:06
two weeks, remind me later this afternoon,
1:30:08
remind me tomorrow morning. Like for those kind
1:30:10
of one-off things, talking to Siri to just add
1:30:12
stuff into reminders at a time is
1:30:15
amazing. Like I use that constantly. Do I even
1:30:17
want to ask what notes app you use?
1:30:19
I always feel like this is such a minefield that
1:30:22
I step into every time I ask you this question.
1:30:24
I use the notes app, like what else would I use?
1:30:27
Okay. No complicated conversation to be had
1:30:29
here. What do you do in the notes app
1:30:31
then? What goes in there? Notes
1:30:34
go in there, all sorts of notes go in there. I feel like this
1:30:36
is like a logic puzzle. Because
1:30:40
like I use the notes app for
1:30:42
everything,
1:30:43
right?
1:30:44
I have a bunch of show notes stuff in there, I
1:30:47
have personal notes in there, you
1:30:49
know I have 762 notes in the notes app.
1:30:52
I'd never delete anything, it just all goes in there
1:30:54
and it's great. The
1:30:56
only work stuff that doesn't go into notes
1:30:58
is Cortex brand stuff which goes into Notion.
1:31:02
Right now what are you using? Like what is going
1:31:04
into, I'm assuming, Apple notes.
1:31:07
What are you putting in there? I'm not using it for
1:31:10
notes really. It's more like I
1:31:12
throw stuff into the notes app
1:31:14
that needs to be properly sorted
1:31:17
later. 80 to 90% of that
1:31:19
stuff is really a question
1:31:22
of where in obsidian
1:31:24
should this go slash does
1:31:27
this deserve to be put into
1:31:29
obsidian. So I do
1:31:32
use it as a kind of junk
1:31:34
drawer for stuff that's later.
1:31:36
Like oh here's a thing to read,
1:31:39
here's a paper that's related to a video
1:31:41
topic that you might want to look at later. I don't,
1:31:44
for reasons we might get to later, I
1:31:47
don't have a good way to throw that into obsidian
1:31:49
directly. I'm not a hundred percent sure I would even
1:31:51
want to because a lot of this
1:31:53
stuff exists for me as a kind of limbo.
1:31:56
Like notes is a very transitory
1:31:59
area. Nothing should ever permanently
1:32:01
live here, but it's a useful place to put
1:32:03
all of the stuff before I decide
1:32:06
where does this go slash
1:32:09
do I just delete this because future me doesn't
1:32:11
care at all, which probably happens to the majority
1:32:13
of stuff I put into notes. It's like,
1:32:15
oh, this might be interesting. It's like, no, it's not
1:32:18
really. Then I just delete it. So that's how I use
1:32:20
the Notes app. Where do they go? Okay.
1:32:22
So like here's an example, right? Earlier today, we were
1:32:25
talking about a Future Cortex brand project.
1:32:28
And you showed me an example of like,
1:32:31
here's a thing that we could do that's like this. And you showed
1:32:33
me a website. And so I said,
1:32:35
ah, great. I want to check that out later. And
1:32:37
so what I do with that is I just like, boop, share
1:32:39
it. So it just becomes a note in
1:32:42
my notes folder. Okay. Because
1:32:45
this to me is the perfect example of what happens
1:32:47
all the time. It's like, there's not
1:32:49
really a task that's associated
1:32:51
with this. We're not on any kind of remote timeline.
1:32:54
It's just like, Future Gray should
1:32:57
take a look at this website and he
1:32:59
will decide if any actions
1:33:02
come out of this. Do we need to get in touch
1:33:04
with anybody? Like what's the next step in this project,
1:33:06
right? But right now it
1:33:08
isn't anything. It's just like, oh,
1:33:11
hey, take a look at this at some point.
1:33:13
And I go, I will. Where do I put
1:33:16
that? I think where this threw me a little bit
1:33:18
is like, this is the like inbox
1:33:21
model, right? Yeah. It's totally the
1:33:23
inbox model. That's how I use notes. Why
1:33:25
not use the inbox
1:33:28
in OmniFocus for this? I
1:33:30
don't like using the inbox for that kind of stuff because
1:33:32
it's not flexible enough. I
1:33:34
hear a lot of people have these kinds of things. They have like a
1:33:36
scratch pad note or whatever, right? Or
1:33:39
like this little note where there's just one note
1:33:41
where stuff gets added. But what I don't
1:33:43
understand, like for me, is what
1:33:46
prompts you to ever look at it? Like,
1:33:49
why does it not just become like a
1:33:51
graveyard of things? What
1:33:54
prompts me to look at it is that in OmniFocus,
1:33:57
I have a repeating task, which is
1:33:59
like clear out your notes. That's
1:34:01
the only reason that this system works. If
1:34:04
I didn't have an actual reminder
1:34:06
which is like, clear this out,
1:34:09
it would just be a graveyard of like, oh,
1:34:12
stuff I thought once and never
1:34:15
thought about again. Goodbye
1:34:17
thought. So that's the only reason that this works.
1:34:20
There's a task. All right, fair enough. There
1:34:22
is a task. But again, the other reason I don't put it as an inbox
1:34:25
item in OmniFocus is because
1:34:27
I have learned from experience,
1:34:29
right? I can't always count on future you
1:34:32
to know like, what was the thing about
1:34:34
this, right? I will often just
1:34:36
like, write something quick in the notes
1:34:38
itself about like, what is this for
1:34:41
future me? What are you even thinking about? Or
1:34:43
like, who gave this to you? So I
1:34:45
like the free formness of it. And
1:34:48
also for me, it kind of does just
1:34:50
act like a traditional to-do
1:34:53
inbox because I'm not adding things
1:34:55
to a single note. Each
1:34:58
item is an individual note
1:35:00
so I can delete them one at a time as I'm going through
1:35:02
things. So that's the way that I use it.
1:35:04
To be productive, you must spend your time well. How
1:35:06
is time management going for you? Well,
1:35:09
how is time management going for you, Mike? Oh, no change.
1:35:11
It's great. I use Time-Rey, full
1:35:14
of Time-Rey widgets. I will,
1:35:16
maybe some point next year, we'll do my little
1:35:19
review of how I've been spending my time.
1:35:21
But you know, Time-Rey is just continues
1:35:24
to just get better and better and better all the time. I
1:35:27
don't understand how Joe
1:35:29
manages to do it, but I just am
1:35:32
more and more happy with the app. I
1:35:34
love having the Time-Rey widget
1:35:36
on my Mac now, like on
1:35:39
the desktop of my Mac. Another
1:35:42
quick way to get to it. I
1:35:44
have a little widget on my watch as well
1:35:46
as on the complication. It's
1:35:48
everywhere I need it to be and it's super important
1:35:50
to me that it's easy to access in
1:35:53
so many different ways, whether it's through a
1:35:55
shortcut or whatever. It's just
1:35:57
a good way for me to keep track of what I'm doing.
1:36:00
I think for me right
1:36:02
now, the reason that I time
1:36:04
track is so I can review
1:36:06
it on an annual basis. That's
1:36:09
my reason now. That data
1:36:11
to me is so important when
1:36:13
I'm thinking about my theme. It's so
1:36:15
important when I'm thinking about how I want to spend
1:36:18
the time in my life and in my work. I'm
1:36:21
just so happy with the fact that this is an important
1:36:23
tool to me, but what's important
1:36:25
is the data. So what needs to be good
1:36:28
is the way in which the data is collected. And
1:36:30
so that requires TimeRee to be easy to
1:36:33
use, easy to access and exactly where I need it
1:36:35
on all the platforms that I use. And it is. And
1:36:37
that's why I continue to use it religiously
1:36:39
every day. Yeah. TimeRee is
1:36:42
amazing. I have an upset though this year. Oh!
1:36:45
Right. So I have switched from
1:36:47
TimeRee. Wow! I'm using
1:36:49
an app called Timelines.
1:36:52
This is huge news. Huge
1:36:54
news! So
1:36:57
TimeRee is amazing, but there is
1:36:59
one specific use case where
1:37:01
it does not work. And it does
1:37:04
not work if you're offline.
1:37:06
I've been doing a thing this
1:37:09
year where I'm having
1:37:12
big blocks where I'm just
1:37:14
completely disconnected from the network
1:37:18
at all. And so when
1:37:20
I started doing this, I realized very
1:37:23
fast, I need to find
1:37:25
a time tracking app that can work
1:37:28
offline, that does not require
1:37:31
an internet connection to start and stop
1:37:34
a timer.
1:37:36
I looked around, there's a bunch of
1:37:38
time tracking apps, but for me there was one
1:37:40
that just clearly stood above
1:37:42
all of the others and it is called
1:37:45
Timelines. The interesting
1:37:47
thing about this is the difference in our
1:37:50
use cases. So like you said, you
1:37:52
really care about the data. For
1:37:54
me, I do not care about the data at
1:37:57
all. This year in particular
1:37:59
is... like, Oh, wow, my data is just totally
1:38:02
messed up, right? Because I was trying out a bunch of different
1:38:05
time tracking apps. And when
1:38:07
you do that, things don't work right. So
1:38:09
you get timers that are running for like 36 hours
1:38:12
and you miss all kinds of stuff. So like my data
1:38:14
this year is totally messed up, but
1:38:17
I don't care because I have
1:38:21
always viewed the time tracking as
1:38:23
much more a tool that assists
1:38:26
in intentional decision-making.
1:38:28
And it's a tool that I use on a
1:38:30
scale of how
1:38:33
is this day going compared
1:38:35
to other days. And the thing about timelines
1:38:38
is that it's clear that
1:38:40
the developer of this app also
1:38:43
kind of thinks about time tracking
1:38:45
along the lines of how
1:38:47
I do it, where they
1:38:50
have things like, do you have
1:38:52
a goal for how much time you want to spend
1:38:55
on this task today? If you do,
1:38:57
cool. We can put a little
1:38:59
widget on the home screen that fills in a bar
1:39:01
for like, how much time did you spend writing
1:39:03
today? How much time did you spend exercising
1:39:06
today? The one that I always feel like
1:39:08
I'm fighting against is what I call like transition,
1:39:12
which is I'm between two tasks.
1:39:16
How much time in my day do
1:39:18
I spend in transition? And
1:39:21
so that one's a bit like, okay, I want to try
1:39:23
to set a limit of like, don't go over
1:39:26
this amount of transition time in a day.
1:39:29
And then I can see a little bar of like, Oh,
1:39:31
you're getting close. So I think
1:39:33
it's, it's a very nicely done app. It
1:39:35
looks good. Like I said, for me,
1:39:37
the main thing is that it works offline. I
1:39:40
will say like, there
1:39:43
are so many features from
1:39:45
Time-Ree that I do miss. And
1:39:48
there are some decisions that I find
1:39:51
kind of weird sometimes
1:39:53
in the way that like, for example, when you're looking at
1:39:55
a pie chart of how you spend your time, it
1:39:57
doesn't automatically sort. the
1:40:00
wedges by size, which I
1:40:02
find just a very strange
1:40:04
decision on how to actually show information,
1:40:07
but again, because
1:40:09
it is not critical for me to review
1:40:12
at the end of the year, how my time
1:40:14
was spent. I've really been liking
1:40:17
this app is like solving a
1:40:19
particular problem of I'm
1:40:21
spending more time, like not connected to
1:40:23
the internet at all, but I still want
1:40:25
to have a time tracker that works for
1:40:27
me. And this one is
1:40:29
somewhat more aligned with the
1:40:32
general way in which I'm wanting
1:40:35
to use these apps anyway. So,
1:40:37
uh, yeah, I've been using timelines
1:40:39
for I think about two
1:40:42
or three months at this point, and,
1:40:44
uh, I like it. I like it a lot. Yeah. Interesting.
1:40:47
Visually. I do not like this app. Yeah,
1:40:50
I can totally get it. Yeah. It looks
1:40:53
old. So yeah, I think when you dig into
1:40:55
some of the screens, like
1:40:57
it definitely has a kind of older
1:41:00
feel for it. This is also
1:41:02
a case where with the new live
1:41:04
widgets and things, so like on my
1:41:06
standby lock screen in my office,
1:41:09
I can just have it set to be like, show
1:41:11
me the pie chart of how I've spent my day and
1:41:13
then show me the bars of have I gone over
1:41:16
or stayed under the times that I want. And it's like, that's
1:41:19
what I want, right? That is like a hundred percent
1:41:21
of my interaction with this thing. Maybe in fairness,
1:41:24
this is being skewed by me looking
1:41:26
more at the website than the app store screenshots
1:41:28
because the website, I mean, they use anything
1:41:30
iPhone six and so that's skewing
1:41:33
by like, how does it look? I
1:41:36
mean, what I say is when looking at the app store
1:41:38
screenshots, it's just a plain app,
1:41:41
which is not a bad thing. It's just a
1:41:43
different. Very functional design. One
1:41:45
of the things that I really love about Timery
1:41:48
is I think that the app is very attractive, which
1:41:51
I haven't in the app quite a bit. So I like
1:41:53
how it looks. Yeah. I mean, this is
1:41:55
interesting. If that is
1:41:57
a use case that you want, you're right. Timery does not want.
1:42:00
work offline. It's not really
1:42:02
a thing that I run into very often, but
1:42:04
I guess again it comes down to the very different
1:42:06
ways in which we time track. Like if
1:42:08
I don't have an internet connection, I probably
1:42:12
don't really have anything to track. For me
1:42:14
very often I do my most important
1:42:16
work when I'm not connected to the internet.
1:42:18
There used to be much more of an obvious
1:42:21
thing for when I was flying. I was
1:42:23
always a bit aware then of like, oh right, I
1:42:25
can't run Time Marine now. And
1:42:28
very frequently it's like I do my best writing on
1:42:30
an airplane. This is amazing. Obviously
1:42:33
flights have been a less frequent
1:42:35
thing in most recent history,
1:42:38
but I've sort of recreated
1:42:40
that in my own life for a few
1:42:42
reasons. It's more self-imposed, no
1:42:44
internet connection. Yeah, and that's why
1:42:47
I realized like, ah okay,
1:42:49
I actually do need this. I
1:42:51
can't work around this because the
1:42:53
most important stuff to track
1:42:56
is also correlated with I'm not actually
1:42:58
on the internet. So that's why I took a look and
1:43:01
switched to timelines. That is the shock
1:43:03
of the episode I think. I don't
1:43:05
know if I'm going to get much more of a shock than
1:43:07
that. This episode
1:43:10
of Cortex is brought to you by Squarespace,
1:43:12
the all-in-one platform for building your brand
1:43:14
and growing your business online. You
1:43:16
can stand out from the crowd of a beautiful website,
1:43:19
engage directly with your audience and sell
1:43:21
your products, services and the content that
1:43:23
you create because Squarespace has got
1:43:25
everything you need all in one
1:43:28
place. You get started with
1:43:30
one of their beautiful best-in-class
1:43:32
website templates that you can customize every
1:43:35
design detail of with a reimagined
1:43:37
drag and drop system called FluidEngine.
1:43:39
This is Squarespace's next generation
1:43:41
website design system to allow you to
1:43:43
unlock your creativity more easily than
1:43:45
ever before. This works on desktop
1:43:48
or mobile. You can stretch your imagination
1:43:50
online with FluidEngine. It's all built
1:43:53
in and ready to go on any new
1:43:55
Squarespace site. So you've got that
1:43:57
going. Maybe you've got a blog set up. Maybe it's
1:43:59
a site for your business. since you've got a bunch of information. But
1:44:01
then you're like, hey, I'd like to sell some products.
1:44:04
You can sell physical or digital goods for Squarespace
1:44:06
in their online store. They have all of
1:44:08
the tools that you need to start selling online.
1:44:11
And then you're able to keep track
1:44:13
of your site and your business with their awesome
1:44:16
in-built analytics platform. You
1:44:18
can learn where your visitors are coming from, where your
1:44:20
sales are coming from. You can analyze which channels
1:44:22
are most effective for you. This allows you to
1:44:24
improve your website and build a marketing strategy
1:44:27
based on your top keywords or most popular
1:44:29
products and content. Then take it another
1:44:32
step further with Squarespace email campaigns.
1:44:35
You can stand out in any inbox by
1:44:37
encouraging your visitors to sign up as email
1:44:39
subscribers, starting them on a journey
1:44:41
to becoming long-term loyal customers
1:44:44
and visitors. Just start with an email
1:44:46
template, customize it by applying your
1:44:48
brand ingredients like site colors and your logo.
1:44:50
And they also have analytics there as well to
1:44:52
measure the impact of every send. Squarespace
1:44:55
is the full package for building
1:44:58
a site of any kind online. It's why
1:45:00
I've been using them myself for over a decade. When
1:45:02
I have something I wanna put online, I go
1:45:04
to Squarespace and so should you. Go
1:45:06
to squarespace.com slash cortex and
1:45:08
you can sign up for a free trial today. And
1:45:11
when you're ready to launch, use the offer code cortex
1:45:13
to save 10% off your first purchase
1:45:16
of a website or domain. That is squarespace.com
1:45:19
slash cortex and the code cortex when you decide
1:45:21
to sign up to get 10% off your first
1:45:23
purchase and show your support for the show. Our
1:45:25
thanks to Squarespace for their support of this
1:45:27
show and RelayFM. All
1:45:30
right, team and communication apps. I
1:45:32
don't know about you, but I feel like we've both kind
1:45:35
of ended up in exactly the same
1:45:37
space here with the different apps that
1:45:39
we're using. Well, probably not email. Email
1:45:41
might be an outlier here. Are you still
1:45:44
with Spark for email? Yeah, I was very
1:45:46
upset last year with
1:45:49
Spark because they had just gone through their big
1:45:51
new version of Spark for
1:45:53
the Mac mostly, which
1:45:56
changed a lot of the way that they wanted
1:45:58
to talk about. and handle email,
1:46:01
you know, like the change from archived,
1:46:04
done, and all that kind of stuff.
1:46:06
And, you know, after another year
1:46:09
of using their new system, I'm
1:46:11
getting used to some of the decisions that they've
1:46:14
made or have been able to hide away
1:46:16
enough of them. As you can
1:46:18
imagine, they've added AI to the
1:46:20
app, you know, you want to have
1:46:23
your AI email written
1:46:25
for you, but a request
1:46:27
that I made, they made those options able
1:46:30
to turn off because I just didn't want them, but the
1:46:32
button was always there. And it's like, if I'm not going
1:46:34
to use this, I don't need the button to be there.
1:46:37
And so they added a toggle that if you turn it off, it removes
1:46:39
the respond with AI button
1:46:42
from every single email that you were sending.
1:46:45
And I would say that like, now that
1:46:47
I've kind of been able to force the
1:46:49
app back into a relatively sane
1:46:52
state, like I don't see their
1:46:55
inspirational home screen and all
1:46:57
this kind of stuff, like I am benefiting
1:46:59
from some of the features that they added. Like
1:47:02
being able to block a sender
1:47:04
is a great feature. I get so much
1:47:06
crap email, right? And, you
1:47:09
know, I get these email
1:47:11
newsletters that I've been put on that are PR
1:47:13
newsletters that I can't get away from because it
1:47:16
is someone just sending me an email, but
1:47:18
I'm able to block a sender and
1:47:20
also block every email
1:47:22
from that domain. Oh,
1:47:25
that's nice. And it stops me from ever
1:47:27
seeing them. So that is good. It reduces the amount
1:47:29
of spam that I get. And it's across, you
1:47:32
know, all of my email accounts that I might
1:47:34
have. This is similar to their
1:47:36
automatic sorting that they do of email
1:47:39
into newsletter or notification
1:47:41
categories. This is good. Like I
1:47:43
can categorize them myself as
1:47:45
well. You know, like if something has been miscategorized,
1:47:48
it's easy to change. This works well
1:47:50
to keep my inbox clean. Again,
1:47:52
like some of the ways that they did that first was
1:47:54
kind of frustrating to me, like this categorization
1:47:57
moves around inside of the chronological
1:47:59
list. based on the most recent email
1:48:01
that got added to the category rather
1:48:04
than living in a fixed place which I initially
1:48:06
found very weird but again after
1:48:08
a year of using it I'm now just used to it even
1:48:10
though it is weird as I say it aloud. The
1:48:14
strange thing about that is it actually doesn't
1:48:16
reliably match some of these between my Mac and
1:48:18
my iPhone. Sometimes things that
1:48:20
I categorize as a notification on one device
1:48:22
might be a newsletter on another device because it's
1:48:24
not seemingly syncing them and I
1:48:26
don't know what's happening there. But
1:48:28
this is again like kind of the way that Spark
1:48:31
has always been for me which is like it's always been a bit
1:48:33
janky in its own way but the
1:48:36
core features that it has when used well
1:48:39
are used well. Like these two features
1:48:41
I mentioned I like them. The team
1:48:44
sharing is the big thing that I love and
1:48:46
will continue using forever but it's
1:48:48
still strange like every update
1:48:51
on the Mac is 250 megabytes every
1:48:53
single time because it's an Electron
1:48:55
app and so you just read it and load it in
1:48:57
the app every single time which is to me a
1:48:59
bananas way to do an update considering
1:49:02
they update the app pretty frequently. It's
1:49:04
just like 250 megabytes every
1:49:06
single time and like the update process
1:49:09
every time I open it the first time it doesn't work
1:49:11
I have to quit and reopen it again before my inbox
1:49:13
will load. It doesn't remember the
1:49:15
size of the window from the way it was before.
1:49:18
There's just all these little things. I did
1:49:20
at least add a sidebar and a column
1:49:22
view but I got so used to using
1:49:24
it in a smaller view I just kind of use it that
1:49:26
way. I don't really know what the future
1:49:28
of Spark is. I'm going to continue using
1:49:31
and paying for it for as long as it's around
1:49:33
because it is so helpful to the way that
1:49:35
I deal with my email. However
1:49:38
I'm also thinking that maybe just a
1:49:40
fundamental change to my email is just a way
1:49:43
to handle it. I mean like as I do less
1:49:45
and less and less in sales
1:49:48
for Relay FM in fact I do none and like
1:49:51
I still work for a couple of our long clients
1:49:54
but basically every
1:49:56
year it's less. Maybe
1:49:58
I just don't need this feature. here anymore? Like
1:50:01
if Spark was to go away tomorrow,
1:50:04
it would probably just be a case of like, I
1:50:07
would just not replace
1:50:09
it. Surely as you were doing less
1:50:12
sales, you would need the team features
1:50:14
more? Why is it the reverse? Why
1:50:16
would I need it more? I guess I'm thinking you would need it more
1:50:18
so that you're still in the loop of what's
1:50:21
going on. But I don't want to be in the loop. Okay.
1:50:23
That's the point. You're explicitly trying to get out of it.
1:50:25
I'm getting out of the loop. Okay. All right. We're
1:50:28
still using it and it still works. But like I guess
1:50:30
what would happen is those communications would
1:50:32
just go back to Slack again and we'd lose
1:50:34
the context. But to be honest,
1:50:37
Kerry and I have less and less and less conversations
1:50:39
inside of Spark all the time. But
1:50:42
Spark overall, I enjoy as an email
1:50:44
app for the features it has. Like there
1:50:46
are no good email apps. Right. This
1:50:49
is the one that I use and the one that I'm used to. And
1:50:51
I get benefit from it, from the other things
1:50:53
that I've mentioned. If I
1:50:55
was to have to leave, I mean I'd probably just go
1:50:57
to mail, which is not a good experience. Speaking
1:51:00
as someone who is still using mail, I agree.
1:51:03
Because Spark has snoozing. Like
1:51:05
it has like a bunch of stuff in it, right? I
1:51:08
know that Apple has that remind me thing, but
1:51:10
I also don't think that that's super
1:51:12
great. Yeah. So I don't really know
1:51:15
what the future is for Spark, but I'll keep using it forever.
1:51:17
But I do think at the same time, I also
1:51:20
just need to change the way that I use
1:51:22
email as well. So I'm working on that. I
1:51:25
do also use MimeStream on the Mac
1:51:27
for my Cortex brand email. It's Gmail
1:51:30
only. This is the best
1:51:32
email app around in my opinion. It
1:51:34
just works very well. It's very
1:51:36
well made. It's very
1:51:39
good native feeling application with all
1:51:41
of the features that you'd want from Gmail that at
1:51:43
least I've ever wanted to use. I
1:51:45
really like it. It's got tons of settings so you
1:51:47
can customize it to work the way you want. The
1:51:50
problem is it's only Gmail. It's
1:51:52
such a killer. It's such a killer.
1:51:54
And as well, it's also only on the Mac. But I know
1:51:57
they're working on an iOS version. I've
1:51:59
seen them say that they are looking at other
1:52:18
the API you can't mix and match
1:52:20
that Gmail API with other services
1:52:23
it's just such a squirrely unique system but
1:52:25
I would love them to make an app for everything because
1:52:28
it is a very very good app with a
1:52:30
bad name last
1:52:32
year we added kind of team and project
1:52:34
management to state of the apps and I have
1:52:36
been on a journey oh yeah
1:52:39
well last year I was using craft oh
1:52:41
god right that feels like a thousand years
1:52:43
ago and in the middle I used obsidian and
1:52:46
now I'm using notion I
1:52:48
can't believe we skipped over a whole state
1:52:50
of the apps and you never made it to using obsidian
1:52:53
on that I can't believe we went from craft to obsidian
1:52:55
to notion in the course of the year oh
1:52:57
wow okay that's quite some migration
1:53:00
you've been doing between those systems yeah notion
1:53:03
is my third attempt at home
1:53:05
for cortex brand information and
1:53:08
I listened back to last year's
1:53:10
state of the apps mm-hmm and I
1:53:13
am really surprised at how
1:53:16
much of a turnaround I have had in my
1:53:18
feelings about notion over the last 12 months
1:53:21
okay tell me I said something along the lines
1:53:23
of like I could never imagine my self using
1:53:25
it well it has obviously changed
1:53:27
because I use it and the
1:53:31
thing that was stopping me is like I didn't like
1:53:33
how notion felt yes but
1:53:35
it is so incredibly powerful
1:53:39
and that trumps all it's
1:53:41
like the same with spark right I don't like
1:53:43
the way spark feels but it's so powerful
1:53:46
for me and it's such an important
1:53:49
way for me to collaborate with people that
1:53:52
I will overlook all of it okay so when you say power
1:53:54
what does that mean to you well
1:53:57
at the moment there's a lot
1:53:59
of information information going in.
1:54:02
And I still feel like at the moment, all
1:54:04
I am with a lot of the stuff that
1:54:07
is in Notion is like we
1:54:09
took things from Obsidian and we put them in Notion.
1:54:12
I do not
1:54:14
feel that at the moment I am best
1:54:16
using Notion
1:54:18
for project management, say. So like if
1:54:21
we're working on a new project,
1:54:23
how do we take that from start to finish? I
1:54:25
think that we can use Notion very powerfully
1:54:27
for this. But I'm kind of at the moment
1:54:30
building Notion as the information
1:54:33
and knowledge database. And
1:54:36
I want it to become closer to our project
1:54:38
management pool as well in the future. But
1:54:40
I'm trying not to force it too much. Like
1:54:42
right now because it's mostly just me managing
1:54:44
production, so I'm doing it in a more simple way.
1:54:47
But I feel like with Notion I'm building the foundations.
1:54:50
The way I have seen the power is
1:54:53
in the way we are doing the Cortex-Shown
1:54:55
nuts now all in Notion. Because
1:54:57
this is something brand new, right?
1:55:00
So like I haven't had to force
1:55:03
something, right? Well like right
1:55:05
now if I take the notes that I've already previously
1:55:07
made, say about Psychic Notepad and then
1:55:09
try and force them into a new model
1:55:12
to fit the Notion project
1:55:15
management, I just feel like it's more work than
1:55:17
is needed. Like the project is already running.
1:55:19
Like I don't need to try
1:55:22
and reinvent the wheel with it. For
1:55:25
our next project from the start,
1:55:27
I will try and adopt more of the Notion
1:55:29
project management tools to make that
1:55:32
a reality, right? And to bring that
1:55:34
to life. But right now the
1:55:37
thing that I started from ground zero with
1:55:39
is first it was let's create
1:55:41
a Cortex content calendar.
1:55:44
Map out the year, map out the episodes,
1:55:47
move topics around,
1:55:49
move promotional items around and really
1:55:52
try and get a good flow for what
1:55:54
the year is going to look like. And
1:55:57
as I started doing that I was like, hmm,
1:55:59
maybe I should
1:55:59
Maybe we should put topics in here. Wait
1:56:02
a minute, let's do all of our show
1:56:04
notes in here. And I think this
1:56:06
has been so good for
1:56:08
me when it comes to planning the show. I
1:56:11
feel like I have a great place to put ideas
1:56:13
and then those ideas just stay
1:56:15
in the same database and they can be moved
1:56:18
into different columns of in the same database
1:56:21
of different months and different episodes. And
1:56:23
then also I can take all this information
1:56:25
and show it in different views and in
1:56:27
different ways based on different metadata.
1:56:31
I'm really enjoying this
1:56:33
and it's opening my eyes to just how much
1:56:36
power there is in this system for
1:56:38
when I want to dig into it further
1:56:40
for different things. So it's
1:56:42
also just super good and super easy for collaboration.
1:56:46
This is the thing I lost going from craft
1:56:49
to obsidian. And
1:56:51
then I hired
1:56:53
a new assistant. We brought
1:56:56
more people into the company for design and
1:56:59
for marketing and I
1:57:01
needed to have a system where everyone could work on the
1:57:03
same documents. So Notion
1:57:05
is also just so simple for that
1:57:08
for the team to manage the projects. But
1:57:10
I look forward to over the next year
1:57:13
doing even more to making
1:57:16
it like a real start
1:57:18
to finish project management tool
1:57:20
as well as just a team collaboration
1:57:23
and knowledge tool which is a bit more of
1:57:25
but I'm starting to like weave in
1:57:28
the Notion-ness of it all which I'm excited
1:57:30
about. Yeah, I think the reason I asked you
1:57:32
about the power, let me put the podcast
1:57:34
share notes aside for a second, is just there's
1:57:38
this whole world of these personal
1:57:41
knowledge management systems. The Pickhams.
1:57:44
Pickhams. Yes, Pickhams. So
1:57:47
I think of it, PKMs, the old Pickhams. Pick your Pickham.
1:57:50
I don't know, like I haven't used a ton
1:57:53
of these but with Notion
1:57:55
and with other things I feel like they
1:57:58
do feel very powerful
1:58:01
when you are in the process of putting
1:58:03
things into them, but
1:58:05
they can often be like a kind
1:58:08
of quicksand in my experience for
1:58:10
getting stuff back out. Well yeah, people get too lost
1:58:12
in this, right? Which is why
1:58:14
I'm not trying to push it too far. Yeah. Like
1:58:17
I'm not trying to push it too far, too fast, and then everything
1:58:19
gets lost. I have mixed
1:58:21
at best feelings about all of these
1:58:23
kinds of systems, but I mean I will say
1:58:25
I feel like we have discovered
1:58:28
a thing here with how to
1:58:30
do podcast show notes. I
1:58:32
feel like the Kanban system
1:58:34
for podcast show notes works
1:58:37
surprisingly well. I think especially for
1:58:39
a show like ours. Yeah, where there's more modular
1:58:41
topics for sure. Yes. If there's little
1:58:43
sections where you know that you're going to talk about something. It's
1:58:46
one of these rare cases where it feels like this
1:58:48
is clearly the correct way to do it. There's
1:58:51
skepticism about it and I don't love it
1:58:53
to feeling like, no, no, no, this
1:58:56
is actually proving its value, right?
1:58:58
It's becoming more valuable as we use it more.
1:59:01
Me realizing like, ah, right. I
1:59:04
have my own weird squirrely show
1:59:06
notes that I keep sort of separate
1:59:09
from everything, but realizing like, no,
1:59:11
it makes sense even for me to put
1:59:13
this stuff in here and add
1:59:15
to this as well so that it's all
1:59:18
in a single place. The value
1:59:20
of me having separate things is
1:59:23
getting gobbled away by like, no, no, no, this
1:59:25
system is just good and it just makes sense to do
1:59:27
this way. I kind of imagine
1:59:29
a world where I have all
1:59:31
of our different products and
1:59:34
we could have a product
1:59:37
or project Kanban
1:59:39
board where everything's moving
1:59:41
around. And I've like roughed this out,
1:59:43
but I've not been very diligent with it. We
1:59:46
could have things where they are in the process,
1:59:49
but then also when you click them, you also get all
1:59:51
of the notes. It's kind of like I imagine
1:59:54
this scenario in which we have all
1:59:56
of the information we're ever going to need, but also
1:59:58
a bunch of different ways to. see where the business
2:00:01
is at any one point. That
2:00:03
is intriguing to me. And I feel like Notion
2:00:06
is a tool that can be wrangled
2:00:08
to make that happen. It's
2:00:11
just a case of doing the work
2:00:13
to make it happen. Yeah, I think that's possible.
2:00:16
And if we're using Notion for
2:00:18
the show notes anyway, like it 100% makes
2:00:21
sense, like everything else that's Cortex related should
2:00:23
go in here for sure, 100%. Well,
2:00:25
for me it worked the other way around. It was
2:00:28
like Cortex brand's in here, this podcast should
2:00:30
be in here too. I remember like Mike,
2:00:32
the podcast can event is the main feature. Meanwhile
2:00:36
on the sideboard it's like one of 10 things.
2:00:40
I feel like if I don't use it for anything other
2:00:42
than just like it's a place where all of the team
2:00:44
can see all the information, then it's done its
2:00:46
job. But I do feel like
2:00:48
it has the ability to expose information
2:00:51
in different places and in different ways to
2:00:53
help us try and keep track of everything
2:00:55
we've got going on. And it
2:00:57
needs someone to do this, like there
2:00:59
needs to be a person in charge of managing this and
2:01:02
like we'll make that work
2:01:04
over time. But I think this is
2:01:06
the one. I would be surprised if I was to move
2:01:08
away now. If anything now, just
2:01:11
because of the inertia of it, well, we've got like four
2:01:13
people in here now. So it seems
2:01:15
very unlikely. Speaking
2:01:17
of which,
2:01:19
last year, Grey Industries, Notion
2:01:22
was the best tool for managing information
2:01:25
and video production is what you said. Did I say video
2:01:27
production? I don't think I did. Well, you said it's the best
2:01:29
tool. Yeah, information. You said it's the best tool.
2:01:31
I said managing information and video production, but
2:01:33
I got the sense that fact checking
2:01:36
was happening inside of Notion.
2:01:38
Okay, so what am I trying to express
2:01:40
here? I think a conclusion that I've come
2:01:42
to with some
2:01:45
of these pickums, as you have
2:01:47
dubbed it, which I feel is kind
2:01:49
of gross, but also kind of perfect
2:01:51
as a word to use here. I feel
2:01:54
like there's some tension in
2:01:57
all of these tools, which
2:01:59
is is the tension
2:02:02
of the archive of everything is
2:02:06
a bad place for also
2:02:08
actionable items. I
2:02:10
just feel like there's something about the
2:02:13
design requirements for those two
2:02:16
things, or even just your psychological
2:02:18
state using a tool. These
2:02:20
two things are naturally
2:02:23
in tension with each other, but
2:02:25
they also come up against an additional
2:02:27
problem, which is I kind
2:02:30
of always view it as like, whatever
2:02:33
you're doing to organize your life, if you're
2:02:35
duplicating information anywhere,
2:02:37
that's a problem. You should not have
2:02:40
any place where you've written
2:02:42
the same thing twice. These
2:02:45
tools are trying to solve that problem
2:02:47
by having these functions where it's like every
2:02:50
single line of text that you write within the system
2:02:52
can be accessed by any other part of the system.
2:02:55
You can look at all of the information in all of these different ways. I
2:02:58
think they're trying to solve that problem of like,
2:03:00
you don't need to duplicate information because
2:03:02
it's accessible from anywhere
2:03:04
in all of these ways. That's
2:03:07
where I just feel like it comes back to this tension
2:03:09
for me of tools
2:03:11
related to information and archive
2:03:14
shouldn't be the same tools that are related to
2:03:16
action. It feels like,
2:03:18
again, like a kind of one,
2:03:21
two, three impossible Trinity situation.
2:03:23
You can't get all of these things. You
2:03:25
have to sacrifice information duplication or
2:03:28
you have to sacrifice other parts of the system. I
2:03:30
think that's why I'm just fundamentally always
2:03:33
a little bit grumpy about these
2:03:35
tools. Now, one
2:03:37
of the things that we did last year to try
2:03:41
to, from my perspective, resolve this,
2:03:44
and also my assistant felt the same way of like,
2:03:46
okay, Notion is great for us and we still use
2:03:48
it for company information,
2:03:50
right? Where do we keep all of the information about
2:03:52
everything? So we do still use it for
2:03:54
research and fact checking kind of stuff, but
2:03:57
we did decide to
2:03:59
try to. pull out action
2:04:01
items into Asana to
2:04:04
use for the team. And
2:04:07
personally, I just absolutely
2:04:09
hate this too. Oh, okay.
2:04:14
So here's the thing. This is one
2:04:16
of these like intangible problems
2:04:18
of like, there's not
2:04:20
really anything wrong with Asana. It's
2:04:23
totally me. I just do not like
2:04:25
this application for no good
2:04:27
reason at all. And it comes back to
2:04:29
the kind of just feel of things. Something
2:04:32
about the way information is displayed, something
2:04:34
about like the way the buttons fill
2:04:37
in when they click, I just don't like this
2:04:39
at all. We have a problem with
2:04:41
being software nerds. We do, we
2:04:44
do, 100%. It's a problem. It's like I talk
2:04:46
about the feel of it. It's just like, and as you're saying
2:04:48
it, I'm like, there is a jankiness
2:04:51
sometimes that I just can't get my head around.
2:04:54
But I mean, it is because a lot of these tools
2:04:56
are using web technologies
2:04:58
and da da da da, right? It's the reason
2:05:01
you don't like Trello and the same reason
2:05:03
I don't like Trello. There's nothing
2:05:06
really wrong with Trello. It works
2:05:08
perfectly fine. There's no problem.
2:05:11
But something about the way
2:05:14
things move, something about
2:05:16
the way things, when you click on them, it's just
2:05:19
off. I'm not saying that this
2:05:21
is true, but it gives a kind of feeling
2:05:24
of jury-rigsness underneath
2:05:26
the system. What is underneath here?
2:05:29
And again, just to be clear, I'm not saying that that is
2:05:31
representative of the reality of the
2:05:33
programming. This is just a pure
2:05:36
feel thing. And Asana just really
2:05:38
gave me that. Opening up Asana, I
2:05:41
feel like, and I get this with Notion a little
2:05:43
bit, but not as strongly, I come back
2:05:46
working as a teacher in a school on
2:05:48
a joint database with everybody else.
2:05:51
The system has to sacrifice
2:05:53
a lot of niceness because
2:05:55
it also has to work with 200
2:05:58
teachers. whose technical
2:06:00
skill ranges from expert to
2:06:03
idiot. I don't think there's a way around it. Even
2:06:06
Croft, right? People say Croft is the
2:06:08
best one, but it's still janky. Yeah,
2:06:10
they all have this. If you have
2:06:12
to have it shared with other people, that's
2:06:15
where it starts. That's where the jankiness starts. And I
2:06:18
think it is an unavoidable thing.
2:06:20
Yeah, I do think it is unavoidable. But you know what thought
2:06:22
has been creeping into my mind? Oh, I
2:06:25
can't wait. While we're recording
2:06:27
this podcast? All
2:06:29
right. I have not thought about it until just
2:06:31
what? An hour ago, when we first started
2:06:34
talking about to-do managers. And
2:06:37
if my assistant is listening right now, she's
2:06:39
going to have a cold sweat breakout
2:06:41
as soon as she hears me say this. But I'm
2:06:43
thinking, couldn't we just
2:06:46
use reminders? Wouldn't reminders
2:06:48
work for this? No. Why
2:06:51
don't you think reminders could work for this? Because doesn't it have
2:06:53
the feature now? You can assign a task
2:06:55
to someone, right? That's a thing you can do in
2:06:57
reminders. Let me see.
2:07:00
Yes, I mean, yeah. I'm opening up reminders.
2:07:03
Oh, you can do that. I mean, this is how me and Indian
2:07:05
are managing the house stuff. We assign things to
2:07:07
each other. Honestly, I just reflexively
2:07:10
said no to be
2:07:12
in support and defense of your assistant. Right,
2:07:14
OK. I just don't want you to bring
2:07:17
this to heart, to be honest. Right. So you don't want me
2:07:19
to say like, oh, hey, you spent four months
2:07:21
moving everything out of notion and into
2:07:23
a sauna that was actionable. But what
2:07:25
if you, a Windows
2:07:28
user, try to move all of that stuff
2:07:31
onto your Apple phone in reminders?
2:07:33
No. I mean, she has an iPad,
2:07:35
so that would make it easier. The reason we use these
2:07:38
tools is because we need to work with other
2:07:40
people.
2:07:40
Right.
2:07:41
So that means there
2:07:44
is compromise needed. I just feel like
2:07:46
reminders could work. It's
2:07:48
the nicest one if I have to share something.
2:07:50
If she was a Mac user, maybe you could make this work.
2:07:53
She's not. You have
2:07:55
to use a cross-platform tool. Like, there's just
2:07:57
no way around it. There just is no way around it.
2:08:00
Like, you have to just pick your poison.
2:08:02
Right. We're getting into the why can't
2:08:05
we just share obsidian problem again.
2:08:07
Because like, it is exactly the
2:08:09
same problem. It's just like, there's just no
2:08:11
way around it. Like, I genuinely
2:08:13
feel, right, so this segment, Communication
2:08:16
and Team Apps, this is the most pain.
2:08:19
It is, it's so painful. This is
2:08:21
the pain segment. Because this is
2:08:23
the apps we have to use
2:08:25
because of people we work with, which
2:08:28
means we can't just
2:08:30
choose. Like, there has to be a
2:08:32
consensus. And also, the
2:08:35
choice you made whenever you made
2:08:37
it might have been a good one, but eventually
2:08:40
you don't want, so one of these
2:08:42
is Slack, right? So Slack is also
2:08:44
like the communications. Slack
2:08:47
is so expensive. Yeah. But
2:08:49
for Relay, there's nothing we can do about it now. Mm-hmm.
2:08:52
Right? I would prefer to use Discord. There's no
2:08:55
reason why I couldn't use Discord instead of Slack.
2:08:57
If you were starting Relay today, would you use Discord instead?
2:09:00
Probably. Or Teams, right?
2:09:03
But like, I wouldn't pay for Slack. It's
2:09:05
so expensive. We have like 40 people
2:09:08
or something in our Slack. I do think that sometimes,
2:09:10
I see everybody happily chatting in there and
2:09:12
I'm like, cha-ching, right? Like, look at all
2:09:14
that stuff. Yeah, it's so expensive. And it was fine
2:09:18
when it was good, right? Like, because
2:09:20
there are other tools which are as good as
2:09:23
Slack. And so the
2:09:26
price of Slack, I don't think is
2:09:28
worth it anymore
2:09:29
for us. Right.
2:09:31
When we could use Teams, which is essentially free
2:09:33
because who doesn't have Office 365? Yeah,
2:09:36
yeah. Right? Or we can
2:09:38
use Discord, which, you know, to get all of the features,
2:09:40
you just need like one person to be nitro.
2:09:43
Like, Slack also just redesigned,
2:09:45
right? Ugh. And like, the Slack
2:09:47
redesign is not terrible, but
2:09:50
like, it doesn't help me. And like, I don't even know
2:09:52
why they've done it. Like, I
2:09:54
don't understand the point of the Slack redesign
2:09:57
when it didn't really seem to do much of benefit.
2:10:00
And what it's done is like change my muscle
2:10:02
memory about like where things are Like
2:10:04
they had this new view called activity,
2:10:07
right? But like it doesn't even have
2:10:09
all the activity. I don't understand
2:10:11
why they did this what kills me the worst about
2:10:14
this So slack does this redesign
2:10:16
and I discover the fact that they did this what
2:10:18
I logged into the cortex slack to
2:10:20
message you Something yeah, what's like what
2:10:22
the hell happened? Yeah, it's a rollout
2:10:25
all blacks will get this but they're rolling it out
2:10:27
But so I was like, oh, okay The
2:10:30
app must have updated or whatever and
2:10:32
then I switch over to the gray industries one I
2:10:34
go Oh, no, like the
2:10:36
my gray industries slack is still
2:10:39
the old design Yeah, and this
2:10:41
is like weeks now switch
2:10:44
between these two They're doing a very
2:10:46
slow rollout of this and they've
2:10:49
been changing it I will give it to them like
2:10:51
they have made changes you
2:10:53
have made it better Because
2:10:55
they're listening to what people have to say. I would
2:10:58
just say I don't really know why you
2:11:00
did it because it just isn't Really
2:11:02
enough different like the activity
2:11:05
view is an interesting idea, right?
2:11:07
And the idea is like you've got so many channels,
2:11:09
right? We're just gonna put it all into one but
2:11:12
like I don't really feel like it's pulling
2:11:14
everything in Like
2:11:16
I would like to say show me all the activity
2:11:19
for a certain subset of channels that I choose Every
2:11:22
message put them all in there, but
2:11:24
they don't it's just like did someone at you
2:11:26
or did someone give you a reaction? Like that
2:11:28
is interesting stuff But
2:11:31
that's still not enough for
2:11:33
me and like I do not
2:11:35
need to see drafts as Prominently
2:11:38
as you show me them on the iPhone. It is
2:11:40
like a massive section On
2:11:43
the iPhone app and I also don't
2:11:45
like this later whatever that means
2:11:47
I don't use that but it's like right there and I can't
2:11:49
get rid of it And it's just like okay, so
2:11:52
I completely agree like you should be able to customize
2:11:54
this stuff up top Let me slightly
2:11:56
defend slack before I complain again. They
2:11:59
rolled out this later feature. And
2:12:01
for me, this was the feature where it's like,
2:12:04
okay, I have finally made
2:12:06
peace with Slack. Of all
2:12:08
of the tools that we're discussing in this
2:12:11
uncomfortable corporate section
2:12:14
of the state of the apps, Slack
2:12:16
is the one I'm happiest with. And it's because
2:12:19
they added this later feature where now when
2:12:22
anyone messages you or like any message that
2:12:24
you see, even if you're not part of it, there's a little
2:12:26
bookmark you can click and that says,
2:12:28
save for later. And then it shows up in that
2:12:30
little later thing on the top of the screen. Maybe I
2:12:32
should use this. Yeah. So for me, this
2:12:35
solves the problem I was complaining about
2:12:37
for years with Slack of it's
2:12:40
too easy to lose stuff.
2:12:42
Like you just go look in a channel and
2:12:44
like everything gets marked as red and you just like,
2:12:47
you miss it, right? Oh, you know what? This is actually kind
2:12:49
of nice. It's great. This is kind
2:12:51
of nice. You can complete them. Yeah. So
2:12:54
it basically acts as a kind of pseudo
2:12:56
to-do list for every
2:12:59
message in the whole system. So you can just like
2:13:02
bookmark this thing. And then when
2:13:04
you've taken care of it, you hit complete. I
2:13:07
think this is also partly why like I'm a little bit
2:13:09
grumpier about Asana in some ways
2:13:11
is because like, well, like my assistant
2:13:13
messages me with stuff that needs to get done. And it's
2:13:16
kind of easier to just bookmark
2:13:19
it for later. And then like mark it as
2:13:21
completed within Slack and never have to
2:13:23
go out to this secondary system. I
2:13:25
would like it to do more to highlight that
2:13:27
I have things in there rather than just a number,
2:13:30
like maybe color it. I mean, yeah,
2:13:32
something like that could happen. Maybe they can take
2:13:34
that into account for the redesign. The ongoing
2:13:36
redesign. Yeah. So like, I'm a big fan of
2:13:38
the later feature and I do feel like I
2:13:41
am at peace now with Slack. This is the team communication
2:13:44
tool. I don't lose things anymore.
2:13:47
Great. I don't need to switch to anything.
2:13:50
And just as I felt content like,
2:13:52
ah, thank you. Later comes this rollout.
2:13:54
And look, listen, guys, it's like,
2:13:57
if you're going to do this, if you're going to have
2:13:59
this.
2:13:59
slow rollout. For the love of
2:14:02
God, roll it out
2:14:04
by users, not by
2:14:06
Slack. It is wild that
2:14:08
I like, I'm in like four slacks,
2:14:11
two of them have been updated, two of them haven't.
2:14:13
It's a very strange feeling. Crazy.
2:14:15
It's like the core of your product
2:14:18
is that people can have multiple
2:14:21
slacks for the different teams
2:14:24
and companies and whatever that they're involved
2:14:26
in, don't have a
2:14:28
slow redesign rollout
2:14:31
when you know you must hit a huge
2:14:33
portion of the users living halfway
2:14:36
in both worlds. It's maddening. The
2:14:38
thing that is the most surprising to me is
2:14:41
that they would make any big change and
2:14:43
would not do the one thing that
2:14:45
makes sense, which is let me have
2:14:48
one overview of all of them.
2:14:51
Yeah. Now, I understand
2:14:55
the logistical problems of that. I understand
2:14:58
the security problems of that. But
2:15:00
if I don't have a heightened
2:15:03
corporate security level thing
2:15:05
in a Slack, which is obviously like the if I'm not
2:15:07
enterprise, let me choose.
2:15:10
And the fact that I don't have
2:15:12
one dashboard, here's all of the messages
2:15:14
you've received today, I can't believe
2:15:17
that they have not found a way to make that
2:15:19
work. That is absolutely
2:15:21
wild to me. They have done such
2:15:24
a big change. But I would imagine
2:15:26
so many users of Slack would love
2:15:29
to not have to keep going
2:15:32
one to the other, to the other, to the other,
2:15:34
to the other all day, which
2:15:36
is how I spend my life. I only get to avoid
2:15:38
that because I'm in just three slacks.
2:15:41
So two of them, I'm in a work, two of them
2:15:43
are social. So the two that are social, I don't do
2:15:45
this to. But going between Relay
2:15:47
and Cortex brand, like, I don't want
2:15:49
to keep doing that all the time. Just
2:15:52
show me in one view, all
2:15:54
the messages I need to deal with in
2:15:57
both places. I don't know why I don't do
2:15:59
it. I have a quick question for
2:16:01
you. Where does the save for
2:16:03
later exist? Oh, it's in the left
2:16:07
But
2:16:07
it doesn't have a little thing on the Mac
2:16:09
version to tell you the stuff in there. Oh
2:16:12
my god on This
2:16:14
redesign. Are you Kidding
2:16:17
me flack. They don't put an
2:16:19
indicator to show you
2:16:21
you have things in the later On
2:16:24
the iPhone it does On the
2:16:27
iPhone it says later
2:16:29
one item but on the Mac version Nothing
2:16:33
just says later. Okay, so on the Mac
2:16:35
when I save things for later like I do
2:16:37
all the time It doesn't actually
2:16:40
tell me how many things are in later.
2:16:42
It's just an icon to it's another
2:16:44
place to manually check and look
2:16:46
Oh, do I have things say great? Okay,
2:16:49
cool. So now I know I'm not gonna
2:16:51
use that feature then I'm gonna go back to doing
2:16:53
what I was doing before which is just marking
2:16:55
things as unread great I
2:16:58
didn't notice this terrible design
2:17:00
flaw in the new design because my
2:17:02
gray industry slack is still on the old design
2:17:05
where it says Later three so
2:17:07
I know that I have three to-do items in my
2:17:09
slack But on the Cortex brand
2:17:11
one I cannot freaking believe this. There's
2:17:14
no way to see. Oh Do I
2:17:16
have something that I saved in later? I don't
2:17:18
know. Let me go Manually
2:17:20
check and see if something is there.
2:17:23
Oh another place to hover over. So now
2:17:25
I know They're
2:17:30
just all hell I
2:17:32
can't believe this I can't believe after I'm like, oh
2:17:34
slack I finally made peace I was like, hmm
2:17:37
have you though We
2:17:40
now enter the obsidian hour as
2:17:42
we talk about writing apps no, this
2:17:44
is not the obsidian hour using a different writing
2:17:46
app now I'm still using
2:17:48
obsidian. I just feel like actually Don't
2:17:52
have a ton to say about obsidian compared
2:17:54
to last year. This is again a place where I'm
2:17:58
Really happy with this app I feel like it just
2:18:00
lines up with my brain in the way that
2:18:03
I want to Be writing
2:18:05
and the way that I want to use text being able
2:18:07
to like flip back and forth between files super
2:18:09
fast Or have like the way they do multiple
2:18:11
windows on the screen the only
2:18:14
part of this which is still kind
2:18:16
of killing me is Related
2:18:20
to our communication and teams app
2:18:23
is the question about Collaboration
2:18:26
with obsidian. There's no question What
2:18:29
do you mean? There's no question because it's not possible Like
2:18:33
there isn't a question right but you can
2:18:35
force it right? How much do you want
2:18:38
to force it? How much do you want to take
2:18:40
I don't know the most
2:18:42
mission critical app that I
2:18:44
use and Force it to do something
2:18:47
that it doesn't want to do that's the question
2:18:49
that seems like a really good question Do
2:18:51
you have any sense of like is? collaboration
2:18:55
any Kind
2:18:57
of concern for obsidian actually you know it's
2:18:59
funny ask that I don't know I don't even know
2:19:01
if they publish a roadmap or anything
2:19:03
ever roadmap today I just wondered
2:19:06
like yeah, cuz I wondered if you kept up to date with
2:19:08
that, but like they do have a public roadmap
2:19:10
I just know this from them being
2:19:12
around for a while like I remember when the
2:19:15
iPhone app was on the roadmap and people were excited
2:19:17
about that
2:19:18
back in the day I will ask you are you looking
2:19:20
for this? What do you think of the new obsidian icon the
2:19:22
logo? I think it's fine Yeah,
2:19:26
I probably slightly preferred the
2:19:28
old one they went the reverse direction right
2:19:30
it seems like every company on earth takes their logo
2:19:32
And they and every couple years they like
2:19:34
scratch their chin, and they go could
2:19:36
we make it? Less yeah,
2:19:39
could we make it simpler could
2:19:41
we make it less identifiable? That
2:19:44
is why I like it. I think they added Personality
2:19:48
to it. That's what I like about it. They made it look
2:19:50
more like a rock yeah Yeah, no city and
2:19:52
did the reverse they took their abstracted notion
2:19:54
of a rock and said but what if it was more rocky?
2:19:57
What if it looked like an actual rock and
2:19:59
they didn't make? it yellow, green, blue,
2:20:01
and orange. You're looking blue and
2:20:03
red. You know, the purple.
2:20:06
The corporate colors that everything becomes.
2:20:10
I mean, like quickly looking on the public
2:20:12
roadmap that they have, I'm not surprised to see that
2:20:14
there's nothing about collaboration. I'm
2:20:17
not surprised because I do just
2:20:19
feel like the architecture
2:20:22
of Obsidian is just
2:20:24
fundamentally opposed to the notion that multiple
2:20:26
people are working in one of these databases.
2:20:29
Like, I think Obsidian fairly does fall
2:20:32
into the pick-em category as a tool,
2:20:35
but it is clearly the most
2:20:38
you as an individual have had
2:20:40
your brain explode into a thousand
2:20:43
text files, and that is what this
2:20:45
program is for. Yeah. I mean, just the reason
2:20:48
that I consider it to be a possibility
2:20:50
is it is built on web technologies the
2:20:52
same way as these other apps that we're talking about.
2:20:55
So like, I have no doubt that it would be complicated,
2:20:57
but even if they added just like, this
2:20:59
is the collaboration area, that
2:21:03
all of the notes in here, you can
2:21:05
collaborate, but not all of your notes.
2:21:07
You know what I mean? Yeah. No, I completely
2:21:09
agree. It's a different business, right? Which
2:21:11
might not be why I want to do it, but it's interesting.
2:21:14
Yeah. So the fundamental trade-off right now is
2:21:16
that you can use their sync tool, and that
2:21:19
will allow you to sync across all of your devices,
2:21:22
including phone and iPad, or you
2:21:25
can use Dropbox to sync,
2:21:27
and if you do that, you have to give up
2:21:30
sync on the phone and on the iPad,
2:21:33
but with Dropbox,
2:21:35
you can just share a folder
2:21:38
or a subfolder with another Dropbox user,
2:21:40
and then they can have access to just
2:21:42
the files that you put in that folder.
2:21:45
It says right here, shared
2:21:47
vaults. Collaborate with
2:21:50
your team. Invite your team
2:21:52
to a shared obsidian vault. Notes
2:21:54
are updated in real time across your team's devices
2:21:57
without compromising the privacy of your company
2:21:59
data. How is that not what you're looking
2:22:01
for? God damn, Mikey, you're dragging me into the details.
2:22:04
Okay, right, so this is what I'm saying. There
2:22:06
is a thing where multiple people can work
2:22:08
on a single vault. Uh-huh.
2:22:11
Right, but this is what I'm saying about the structure
2:22:14
of the app. You
2:22:16
lose a huge
2:22:18
number of advantages of the way this app
2:22:20
is designed the moment you
2:22:23
have to break up information across
2:22:25
multiple vaults. Like, I
2:22:27
cannot stress enough, this is a
2:22:29
huge sacrifice in functionality.
2:22:33
Everything about this app screams. You
2:22:35
want to keep everything that you're working on in
2:22:38
one spot. Right, but if... why
2:22:40
don't you just give all of the notes
2:22:42
to the Sync system? I could give all
2:22:45
of the notes to the Sync system, but then
2:22:47
that also means the entire
2:22:49
database has to be shared with my
2:22:51
assistant. It's an all or nothing
2:22:54
deal. For you, why is that a problem? It's
2:22:56
a problem for me because I don't
2:22:59
want to share all of the notes with my assistant. Like,
2:23:02
some of this stuff is just private, and
2:23:04
I'd rather not have it be shared. But
2:23:07
even there, there's a thing of like, this
2:23:09
is just a mission critical and
2:23:11
also, I also cannot emphasize enough, super
2:23:15
squirrely system. The moment
2:23:17
it has to be like, the two of us need to
2:23:19
use this thing that I use for writing. Like you
2:23:22
said here, like, it immediately causes compromises
2:23:24
of like, oh, okay, I
2:23:27
have to arrange the files in a different way if
2:23:29
this other person is ever going to find
2:23:32
anything in here. And again, the big
2:23:34
advantage is, I don't need to arrange
2:23:36
anything. Like, I can just search for anything using
2:23:39
my brain to remember what it is that I was trying
2:23:41
to find. But like, forcing
2:23:44
my obsidian vault on another
2:23:46
person is just inhumane.
2:23:49
So I would want to just share a portion
2:23:51
where I can be like, look, here's a very small
2:23:54
amount of the actual active stuff, and
2:23:57
this is what you can have access to. trying
2:24:00
to be annoying here. No, no, no, no, it's fine.
2:24:02
Why not create a second vault? No,
2:24:04
ugh, no. That is shared.
2:24:07
And when you're ready to share something, move
2:24:09
the file to the shared vault.
2:24:12
Like once something's ready to be shared,
2:24:15
does it need the context of the
2:24:18
other notes that are related to it? You're not
2:24:20
wrong in that like this seems like it's
2:24:22
a reasonable thing. But the
2:24:24
reason why you need to keep stuff in one
2:24:27
vault is that in Obsidian, you
2:24:29
get these benefits from linking stuff together.
2:24:31
And what happens is you
2:24:33
can break
2:24:36
the cross links if you change
2:24:38
something in another document,
2:24:42
which the document you have temporarily
2:24:44
moved out of the sync system
2:24:47
references. So it
2:24:49
basically causes this problem of the moment
2:24:51
you pull something out, you now
2:24:54
have to be careful, right?
2:24:56
You have to be careful and make sure while
2:24:59
this document is with my assistant, I
2:25:01
have to make sure that I don't accidentally
2:25:04
modify anything else in this system
2:25:07
that references that document,
2:25:09
because then things can get broken. So
2:25:11
this is the problem of like, yes,
2:25:15
you could pull something out, but
2:25:18
it just it raises the possibility
2:25:20
of danger. Ideally, what you would like
2:25:24
to exist is it's all
2:25:26
the same vault, but you have like a folder
2:25:29
that you can share. You just
2:25:31
move things to the folder, but it means
2:25:33
that nothing's gonna break. It's the same
2:25:36
note, you move it back. Yes. But if you
2:25:38
moved it to a different vault, now
2:25:40
it's like it has no context of where
2:25:42
it came from. And when it comes back,
2:25:44
it's like it's a new baby boy in there, right?
2:25:46
Like, it doesn't know anything about anything.
2:25:49
Yeah, it's brand new. Yeah. And also the
2:25:51
problem is like, while it's gone, Obsidian
2:25:54
will act as though that missing notes still
2:25:57
exists within the system. Like you can
2:26:00
end up with like, oh, I've just created a blank
2:26:02
version of this document. Right?
2:26:05
Like this is the kind of like weird problems that can happen.
2:26:07
It's going to create a blank file with that
2:26:09
name just because other things reference
2:26:11
it. And then when it comes back, no, you've got two
2:26:14
files with the same name. Yeah, I can
2:26:16
see that it becomes a bit of a mess. This is the
2:26:18
kind of problem, right? It's like Obsidian, this
2:26:21
is a great feature. Obsidian
2:26:23
treats things that have not yet been
2:26:26
created as though they exist.
2:26:29
And so that's why if you pull something
2:26:31
out of the system, it goes from this document
2:26:34
exists to this kind of like ghost
2:26:37
document that is waiting to pop into
2:26:39
existence the moment you touch it. Right? And
2:26:42
it's like, oh, okay, great. Now you write into a problem
2:26:44
where it's like, now you've lost the history
2:26:46
of this document if you ever want to go back and try
2:26:48
to like track where a change happens. So like,
2:26:51
there's just like lots of complications with this. So
2:26:53
I'm currently using Dropbox to
2:26:55
sync my Obsidian stuff, which means I don't
2:26:58
have it on my iPad and I don't have it on my phone,
2:27:00
which is mostly a minor
2:27:03
annoyance, but it does mean like I'm
2:27:05
very aware of because
2:27:08
it doesn't exist on those devices. I'm
2:27:10
also not plugging in
2:27:13
like getting information into Obsidian
2:27:15
through things like shortcuts in ways that I otherwise
2:27:18
would say like, you know, Hey,
2:27:20
append this information to this file. And
2:27:23
that's the thing that is like becoming
2:27:26
increasingly irritating. And I think I probably
2:27:28
will just eventually move. So
2:27:32
I've worked myself into a situation where I'm
2:27:34
not really using either
2:27:36
of the two things that I want to use. I'm
2:27:38
not really using the collaboration with
2:27:40
my assistant in Dropbox because I keep thinking
2:27:43
like, Oh, I'm going to move this over into the sync system,
2:27:45
but I don't. So I don't also
2:27:48
just start setting up shortcuts and things
2:27:50
to make a bunch of my Obsidian life easier.
2:27:53
So, yeah, I think no matter what happens, you should move
2:27:55
to Obsidian saying can just take the benefit of that
2:27:57
and then try and find some of what's going on. always
2:28:00
do with a collaboration. Although I think realistically,
2:28:03
you just need to give up on the idea of collaborating
2:28:06
in Obsidian. But you should try and see
2:28:09
if there is like using Obsidian sync
2:28:11
and collaboration tools. Maybe there's some
2:28:13
kind of thing that we're not thinking about, but
2:28:16
I think other than that, you should just give
2:28:18
up on the idea. This is one of these things. Clearly
2:28:21
the direction over time is I should just be
2:28:23
using Obsidian's sync system, and
2:28:25
I'm just dragging my feet on it for a bunch
2:28:28
of reasons. I'm sure there's other features
2:28:30
that you're missing that would otherwise be cool that they
2:28:32
put into their system because that's what they
2:28:34
want you to use. Yeah, and also I just think you
2:28:36
have the benefit of, I
2:28:39
would rather use the sync system that was custom
2:28:41
designed exactly for this tool than
2:28:44
using Dropbox, which this is sitting
2:28:46
on top of. But again,
2:28:49
this is relatively speaking
2:28:51
within Obsidian, a fairly minor
2:28:54
problem in the scope of the benefit
2:28:56
that this app provides me. Like I have, the
2:29:00
overall picture is I have nothing but thumbs
2:29:02
up to give to Obsidian. Like I
2:29:04
just really
2:29:07
love it. And after years of trying
2:29:09
to find what is the writing app that
2:29:11
works best for me, this is the answer.
2:29:14
It is Obsidian. A very 2023 thing
2:29:16
for writing would
2:29:19
be to use some kind of AI. I
2:29:23
will say it is for me. What
2:29:25
are you using it for? One of the things that
2:29:27
I have to write, which I find to be
2:29:29
one of the more difficult things that I need to write is
2:29:32
the description for this
2:29:35
show. Really? For
2:29:38
a long time, it followed a format,
2:29:40
which was great as this, Mike does this, they both do
2:29:42
this. This is like hundreds of episodes,
2:29:44
like over a hundred episodes did this. I
2:29:47
wanted to change that this year to actually
2:29:49
make the descriptions be a little more
2:29:52
fuller, to give people
2:29:54
an idea of what the episodes were about, also
2:29:57
to make it easier when going through.
2:30:00
previous episodes to find it. I
2:30:02
haven't gone back and done this. I might at some
2:30:04
point actually go back and fill
2:30:07
them out a bit more, but I
2:30:09
don't know about that. But I decided
2:30:12
to change it up, because we made changes
2:30:14
to the show this year, we did special episodes and stuff
2:30:16
like that, and so I thought this
2:30:18
might be a time to change stuff up and I've done
2:30:21
it. So what I'm doing is writing more descriptive,
2:30:25
basically longer descriptions
2:30:27
for the episodes. So they just talk about more
2:30:30
of the things that we talk about, rather than
2:30:32
just limiting it to three. I
2:30:35
don't really like this kind of writing in
2:30:37
general, like this like short sentences,
2:30:40
short paragraphs, that is not how I write.
2:30:42
Like I write in long sentences, long
2:30:45
paragraphs, if
2:30:47
I ever do write. And I also
2:30:49
find it complicated to
2:30:51
try and get all of the right punctuation
2:30:54
for this kind of writing. So what
2:30:57
I do now is I write a verbose,
2:31:01
poor grammar
2:31:03
version of the description
2:31:05
and I go to chat GPT and
2:31:07
I'm like, can you rewrite this for me?
2:31:10
And it does, and that's what I use. I was just thinking
2:31:13
when you mentioned the old episodes, I
2:31:15
was wondering if you could do something like, here's
2:31:18
a transcript of the episode, write
2:31:20
a summary of it. But to
2:31:23
be honest, the way if I was ever going to
2:31:25
do something like that, I could use the chapters.
2:31:28
Oh yeah, yeah, that'd be good. They're
2:31:30
the topics, really. So like it would just be
2:31:32
a case of being like, we spoke
2:31:35
about this, this, this, this, and this, write me a description.
2:31:37
Right. And that might be slightly easier
2:31:39
for a chat GPT to ingest than
2:31:42
a totally insane,
2:31:44
not speaker marked out transcription of the podcast.
2:31:47
So I don't like the chat GPT voice
2:31:50
the way that it writes. So I like to give
2:31:53
it my writing first.
2:31:56
So like if I feel like I have found better
2:31:58
success, if I, if I give it bullet I
2:32:00
tend not to like what it gives me. If I have
2:32:02
written a bad description
2:32:04
and give it that, I think it does
2:32:06
a better job of matching the tone that I
2:32:09
want. And so giving it a transcript,
2:32:11
I don't know what nonsense it would throw out
2:32:13
on me. Yeah, that kind of writing feels like the good
2:32:15
sort of thing to use chat GPT for.
2:32:18
It's funny you mentioned how you hid the AI thing
2:32:20
in Spark because using mail
2:32:22
for me, this is like the number one place that
2:32:24
I want a button that says write
2:32:26
a first draft of an email response. Well,
2:32:29
I mean, you don't like, I
2:32:31
want to deal with my email if I'm going to deal with it,
2:32:33
you know, but you don't. This is for
2:32:36
me like what's the actual problem that I'm trying to solve?
2:32:38
It's not that I would send that email,
2:32:40
but it's just a hundred million times easier
2:32:42
to be like, okay, let me tweak this
2:32:45
to be more of what I'm actually trying to
2:32:47
do. Obviously, I can just like copy
2:32:49
and paste stuff out into chat GPT and be like,
2:32:51
right, me and you. Well, great. Honestly, you should check
2:32:53
out Spark because like it's what it does. They
2:32:56
do AI drafts.
2:32:57
You know what? That's
2:32:59
a great idea. I am going to check out Spark.
2:33:01
I think I don't know why I had mentally written it
2:33:03
up. I think whenever you talk about it, I
2:33:06
think in my head I put it under the category
2:33:08
of our section of pain on
2:33:11
communication and corporate. Well, it is funny.
2:33:13
It is funny. But like, you
2:33:15
know, as we said, all of these apps that causes pain
2:33:18
do have useful features until you find
2:33:20
out that they changed the usual feature that you liked
2:33:22
and then it wasn't useful anymore. Yeah. Okay.
2:33:24
I wasn't, you know what, I will check out Spark. Like if you genuinely
2:33:27
want that, it does it.
2:33:28
Yeah.
2:33:29
So yeah, I feel like for that kind
2:33:32
of serviceable
2:33:35
kind of writing, you just need a thing
2:33:37
that's descriptive. Chat GPT is
2:33:40
good at that. This has been a year
2:33:42
of AI for sure. People ask me all
2:33:45
the time if I use chat GPT
2:33:47
to help with the writing. They're like, oh, hey, couldn't
2:33:49
this help with the writing? Wouldn't this speed things up? And
2:33:53
in my experience, it's terrible
2:33:56
at
2:33:57
what I would want it to do. Like,
2:33:59
hey, write something interesting about this topic, it's
2:34:02
just the worst. Like I hate it. I
2:34:04
hate it so much. It's not
2:34:06
interesting when I was trying
2:34:08
it out and had it work on things that I like know the
2:34:10
topic area. It just gives
2:34:13
you all of the common misconceptions
2:34:16
about a thing. It's terrible at this.
2:34:18
I can't imagine there
2:34:20
is a world in which you would feel
2:34:23
comfortable using it. Yeah.
2:34:25
Because you are so focused
2:34:29
on facts, right? Like could you trust
2:34:31
it? No, I couldn't. I also
2:34:33
just think its style
2:34:36
is terrible. It's actually,
2:34:38
this is weird, has a terrible
2:34:40
sense of humor. It's just not
2:34:42
funny. Everything that it tries
2:34:45
to do that's funny is in the range
2:34:48
of dad joke territory
2:34:51
or jokes for children. It's just awful.
2:34:55
I haven't found Chat GPT useful for that in
2:34:57
the slightest, although much
2:34:59
to my horror, I know full well
2:35:02
that there are plenty of YouTube channels already
2:35:04
that just ask Chat GPT for scripts
2:35:06
on topics and then give that to a voice generator
2:35:09
and just give that next phase
2:35:11
to a video production thing and slap
2:35:14
up tons of videos. Like here
2:35:16
we are. Those videos are all terrible,
2:35:19
but it's already begun. But
2:35:21
like whatever. People have been making
2:35:23
low effort content on YouTube for a really, really
2:35:26
long time. Like it doesn't matter how much of it there
2:35:28
is. Good stuff will still be wanted by
2:35:30
people. That's how I feel about it. Yeah, I do think there's
2:35:32
a slight difference here just in that it can
2:35:35
fool more people. It's like it's slowly raising
2:35:37
the bar on this. But anyway, for the time being, it's
2:35:40
just like it's not a remotely useful tool
2:35:42
for me for writing with like
2:35:45
one key exception, which is
2:35:47
where I do actually use Chat GPT
2:35:50
a lot when I'm working on a script. And
2:35:52
it is that Chat GPT is the world's
2:35:55
best thesaurus. It is
2:35:57
like insanely good.
2:36:00
at thesaurizing. When
2:36:02
people use any kind of AI system,
2:36:04
the thing I'm always trying to tell them is like, look, the
2:36:07
value is not in your initial
2:36:09
question, the value is
2:36:12
in your follow-up questions. And
2:36:15
so when I write scripts, I used
2:36:17
to just 100% of the
2:36:19
time, I always had the Apple thesaurus app
2:36:21
just open on my computer and I would be looking
2:36:23
towards like, I'm looking for a word like this,
2:36:26
like what options does it have? I used that
2:36:28
for years. But now the thing that's so
2:36:30
amazing with chat GPT is, you
2:36:33
can say like, I'm looking for words that
2:36:35
are similar to this word and that spits out a bunch
2:36:37
of words. But the real power
2:36:39
is being able to say, okay, but
2:36:43
I want something that has a more positive
2:36:45
valence to it or I want something
2:36:48
that has a more negative sound to
2:36:50
it. And that's where it's just like, God
2:36:52
damn, is it so good at being like,
2:36:54
what about these words? What about these words? Or
2:36:57
being able to skip the things that thesauruses
2:36:59
do where they're often
2:37:02
giving you much more than you want. So you
2:37:04
can specify like, I want a different word for
2:37:06
this, but this exact
2:37:08
meaning, right? Not all of the meanings of
2:37:11
this word, just like this narrow way
2:37:13
in which it's used. What are other ways that you
2:37:15
could say that? And so boy, boy, has
2:37:18
it just like taken my thesaurizing
2:37:21
to next levels. Like this is by
2:37:23
far and away the most frequent
2:37:26
and common use of chat GPT
2:37:29
for me by far. I think next most
2:37:31
common use for me, because chat GPT basically
2:37:33
is an app, right? It is on my iPhone. Yeah,
2:37:35
it's on my iPhone. Next most useful
2:37:38
thing for me is tech problem
2:37:41
debugging. So in my
2:37:43
life, I am the person that everyone
2:37:46
I know asks for technical
2:37:48
assistance to fix whatever it
2:37:50
is in their life. Right? My computer
2:37:52
isn't working. Like it's not doing this thing. Help
2:37:54
me fix it. If you're the tech support person
2:37:57
in your world,
2:37:59
you know,
2:37:59
No, that very frequently the hard
2:38:02
part of the problem is
2:38:05
not fixing the problem.
2:38:08
The hard part of the problem is understanding
2:38:12
what the problem is based
2:38:14
on the description that the
2:38:17
non-technical person is giving
2:38:19
you. It's very frequently, like
2:38:21
with my wife, who in our
2:38:23
house, it's like, I will take care of
2:38:25
all of the technical problems because she has no
2:38:27
patience for dealing with any of it. And
2:38:30
frequently I will be handed an iPad with
2:38:33
the sentence, it's not
2:38:35
working. Like, okay,
2:38:37
right? Like let's start trying to drill down what
2:38:39
is the it? What should it be doing? What
2:38:42
should it not be doing? And you try to turn those
2:38:44
descriptions into like actionable things. This
2:38:46
is a totally sensible problem, right? Because
2:38:49
it's unreasonable to expect
2:38:52
average users to know the names
2:38:54
of all of the things. What's the name
2:38:57
of the strip on the top of your computer, right? What
2:38:59
are all these different things? Nobody knows. What
2:39:01
has been absolutely magical for
2:39:03
me now using
2:39:06
chat GPT to try to solve
2:39:08
my problems is realizing
2:39:11
I can do to chat GPT what
2:39:13
everybody else does to me, which
2:39:16
is basically give it a very
2:39:18
badly phrased description of
2:39:20
the problem and trust that it can
2:39:23
work it out. And
2:39:25
here is my pro tip on this, right? This
2:39:27
is a total life changer for me. Wait, just to work it, you
2:39:29
use chat GPT for this, not Bing. So
2:39:31
they're both the same systems behind the scenes. I know.
2:39:34
I just wonder what app you're using. I'm just, that's not important. I'm
2:39:36
just intrigued. It depends.
2:39:39
The actual chat GPT app is often my first
2:39:41
go, even for solving technical problems. Like
2:39:43
it's surprisingly good. Bing is still
2:39:46
optimized for searching for things,
2:39:48
which is not always really what I'm trying to do. I
2:39:51
think whatever version of chat GPT they have in the actual
2:39:53
app feels smarter
2:39:55
to me than the Bing version does. The
2:39:57
Bing is optimized in a particular way.
2:39:59
I just opened the chat GPT app and I now
2:40:02
have the chat with voice setting, which I've
2:40:04
not tried yet, but they just
2:40:06
gave me that.
2:40:07
Okay, yeah. So here's my pro tip. They've
2:40:09
rolled out this chat with voicing. I think you should do
2:40:11
something else. So this is what I
2:40:13
have done. I am just using
2:40:17
Apple dictation to record what
2:40:19
I'm saying and turn it into a blob of text
2:40:21
and send it to chat GPT. And
2:40:23
if you do it that way, chat GPT
2:40:26
doesn't talk back to you. It
2:40:28
just types back and you can read. So
2:40:30
I think for most people, you
2:40:32
will be able to read and skim
2:40:35
and frankly get through a lot of chat
2:40:37
GPT's boilerplate nonsense of like,
2:40:39
well, it's a large language model. I have some thoughts about
2:40:42
the iOS subsystem. It's like, shut up, right?
2:40:45
But I will tell you, it has been
2:40:47
such an amazing game changer to
2:40:49
be able to just speak
2:40:52
out loud in sentences. I
2:40:54
would never type, sort of change
2:40:57
what you're saying in the middle, not have
2:40:59
any of the technical words, right? About like what
2:41:01
problem it is you're trying to solve on the computer and
2:41:04
just hit return and chat GPT
2:41:06
can freaking nail it like 99% of
2:41:08
the time. It understands
2:41:12
not what you have said, but what
2:41:14
you are trying to say. It's
2:41:17
amazing. And it's also to me, it was like, oh wow,
2:41:19
I can be much lazier in the way
2:41:22
that I talk to this thing because I can trust
2:41:25
that it gets it, which made
2:41:27
me instantly realize, oh,
2:41:29
I have encouraged this behavior
2:41:32
in everyone I know in my whole life
2:41:34
because they're all like, I can just say whatever
2:41:36
to him and I can trust it. You're a little more language
2:41:38
model. Exactly. I
2:41:41
like the thought of like in the future someone goes, Gray,
2:41:43
I have a technical problem. You just get your phone out
2:41:45
and hold it up to them. Go on.
2:41:48
You speak to chat GPT. Let's take me out
2:41:50
of the middle.
2:41:51
Yeah,
2:41:52
it has really been quite
2:41:55
a unique experience to have this feeling
2:41:57
of I understand how
2:41:59
everyone.
2:41:59
everyone uses me in their
2:42:02
lives because I now have this thing
2:42:04
for me. chatgbt debugged
2:42:07
this problem on my computer
2:42:09
that was like absolutely shocking to
2:42:11
me that like went straight down into the absolute
2:42:13
core of my computer where there was a problem
2:42:16
with like a Python installation. This
2:42:18
again is where I don't know the technical word. It's
2:42:20
like, oh, there's different shells
2:42:23
that you can use at the terminal, which is always
2:42:25
the level where I'm like, I don't know why this
2:42:28
is a thing that exists. It's like, oh, ages
2:42:31
ago when I set up a Mac and you used to be
2:42:33
able to dual boot them into Linux, like I caused
2:42:36
a problem with my Python installation
2:42:39
that has been following me for forever.
2:42:42
And when I was trying to run some Python
2:42:44
scripts, like I couldn't get them to run and I could
2:42:46
not figure out why. And it's like chatgbt
2:42:49
debugged and walked me through this
2:42:52
just insane series
2:42:54
of terminal commands to fix
2:42:56
like the deepest subsystem on my
2:42:59
computer. No one on earth could
2:43:01
have debugged this in this way from
2:43:03
my description. I am trying to change
2:43:05
my relationship to these tools. It
2:43:07
is inevitable what is happening to the world. I'm
2:43:09
not going to dig my feet in on this forever. I
2:43:12
have concerns and they continue,
2:43:14
but I'm not going to be like a Luddite. I'm
2:43:16
not going to be like, no, I refuse to
2:43:19
use these tools. I will use them and
2:43:21
I will find the ways to use them that I think are right.
2:43:23
Like for me, but just
2:43:26
because I've had feelings and thoughts
2:43:28
and they're complicated about this stuff, I'm not going to
2:43:30
be like, well, now I'm just going to refuse to do it. No,
2:43:33
of course. And that's what I'm trying to figure out is where
2:43:35
is this actually useful? And
2:43:38
that's sort of what this conversation was for me is what
2:43:40
seems like it might be the most useful at first.
2:43:43
Oh, it's useful for script writing has not
2:43:45
remotely been useful at all, but there are
2:43:47
totally other ways in which it has
2:43:49
been very useful. I
2:43:51
mean, especially like I
2:43:54
cannot convey to you how
2:43:57
much chat GPT
2:43:59
has sped up. my ability to work on spreadsheets.
2:44:02
The amount of complicated and
2:44:04
crazy things that I have done in addition
2:44:07
to just the raw amount of work
2:44:09
that I have gotten, being able to ask chat GPT
2:44:11
questions or just some specifics
2:44:14
of formulating formulas,
2:44:17
it's like a 20 to 50 fold
2:44:20
productivity increase like in the domain
2:44:23
of spreadsheet work. It's insane.
2:44:25
I've seen these spreadsheets. They're bananas.
2:44:27
There's thousands and thousands of
2:44:30
rows and I don't understand what's
2:44:32
going on in there. Now
2:44:34
you said that kind of makes sense that chat GPT is helping
2:44:36
you do it, right? Because it's very complicated stuff.
2:44:38
With the spreadsheets, there's nothing that it's helped me with
2:44:41
that I couldn't do on my own. It's
2:44:43
just cutting down the time enormously,
2:44:46
which is the same thing as a productivity
2:44:48
boost. It's insane. It's
2:44:50
very interesting that these two areas,
2:44:54
being a thesaurus and also
2:44:57
being able to produce
2:45:00
technical answers that I am
2:45:02
able to verify are
2:45:04
correct, that I don't have to trust
2:45:07
is what the thing said true. No, no,
2:45:10
I can see if it worked. That
2:45:13
is also where it's just been an absolutely huge
2:45:15
advantage. I will just say it's
2:45:18
made me think a lot about the future
2:45:20
of Apple's apps because
2:45:23
I don't know if this is true, but I
2:45:25
have a suspicion and a feeling that Apple
2:45:27
might be more culturally
2:45:30
resistant to AI than other
2:45:32
companies. I just think like
2:45:35
they absolutely have to
2:45:37
be incorporating some AI tools into
2:45:40
their production
2:45:42
apps like Final Cut Pro
2:45:45
and Logic, and they have
2:45:47
to be doing it right freaking
2:45:49
now or I think they're going to be in real
2:45:52
trouble very soon. I think they
2:45:54
are. I do. I understand the
2:45:56
thinking behind the cultural resistance. I
2:45:58
think I felt that at first. too, but I
2:46:01
don't think they're stupid. I mean,
2:46:03
they just they put a transformer model in the keyboard.
2:46:06
Like, to me, that was a sign. I
2:46:08
hope you're right. I just my hesitation is like,
2:46:10
you know, there are two big apps that I use, Final Cut
2:46:12
Pro and Logic, have both
2:46:15
had obvious places where
2:46:17
you could use even just the basics of
2:46:19
machine learning for like five years,
2:46:21
and they haven't put in any of that. Like,
2:46:24
it's insane to me that in Final Cut Pro,
2:46:26
the workflow is still in
2:46:28
theory that you need to manually
2:46:31
tag all of your clips with
2:46:33
what's in them. And like,
2:46:35
guys, this should have been solved
2:46:38
half a decade ago. Yeah, yeah,
2:46:40
that's a good point. Or similarly with Logic, like
2:46:43
a bunch of modern audio editing apps are
2:46:46
doing things where it's like, we'll just write the transcription
2:46:48
of what you've said above the audio, which
2:46:50
makes it a hundred million times easier to edit.
2:46:52
Logic could have done that years ago, but they haven't.
2:46:55
So yeah, but Logic's a bad example.
2:46:58
Why do you say that? Well, Logic is not a podcast
2:47:00
editing or audio editing. It's music.
2:47:02
It's a music creation tool. I would say the Final
2:47:04
Cut example, that is weird. Like, they should
2:47:06
add something like that. But you know,
2:47:09
I know you have used Dscript
2:47:11
and we were talking about it offline
2:47:13
a while ago. And that's one of the
2:47:15
apps that does that thing that you're talking
2:47:17
about. But like, Dscript is a podcast editing
2:47:20
tool. Logic is not that. It's
2:47:22
just what we use it for. Yeah, I know.
2:47:24
But I still think even if you're doing music, you're
2:47:26
moving the playhead around constantly. Being
2:47:29
able to see where does a word start and
2:47:31
where does a word end is still something a music
2:47:33
editor would want to do. I don't
2:47:35
think that's limited to podcast editing. But anyway,
2:47:39
yeah, so a little sidebar on AI,
2:47:42
which is sort of an
2:47:43
app.
2:47:46
Maybe next year we might have a lot more AI-based
2:47:49
apps on our list than we do right now.
2:47:51
They'll probably be a category. I mean, even if
2:47:54
that even makes sense. It won't even make any sense
2:47:56
anymore. It might be there in every single app that we're
2:47:58
using. I mean, honestly, like... AIs
2:48:00
in Notion. I mean, I already said AIs
2:48:02
in Spa. I mean, there's probably multiple other
2:48:04
apps that it's in. Yeah, you know what? Actually, now
2:48:06
that I think about it, with the speed
2:48:09
of AI, we may push through it so
2:48:11
fast that it would be like highlighting
2:48:13
apps that can do calculations. Like,
2:48:17
no, they all do calculations. You don't need
2:48:19
to highlight this as a feature. It's actually,
2:48:21
yes. I don't think we will have
2:48:23
an AI category next year. I think this is might be
2:48:25
the only time we ever do a sidebar on AI apps.
2:48:28
But I think next year,
2:48:31
more and more of the apps that we use will have
2:48:34
AI and machine learning features, and we'll
2:48:36
be talking about them more. That's what I reckon will happen. Okay,
2:48:40
Mike. We got to start wrapping up this show here,
2:48:42
okay? Let's go.
2:48:44
Let's go. Go. Media apps and entertainment.
2:48:46
What do you want to talk about? All I have is
2:48:48
games. Okay, great. Me too. Go. The
2:48:52
only one that's on a smartphone
2:48:54
is an app called Finity, which is on Apple
2:48:56
Arcade. It is a very good
2:48:59
match three app. I love
2:49:01
it. It's hard to explain, but if you
2:49:03
have Apple Arcade, download this app. It's
2:49:05
fantastic. Oh, okay. And then I'm going to talk
2:49:08
about my two games of the year so far. Legends
2:49:10
of Zelda, Tears of the Kingdom. They
2:49:12
did it. How could it be possible to
2:49:15
make a better game than, in my opinion, the
2:49:17
best game ever made? Just
2:49:19
make it better. It's what they did. Tears
2:49:21
of the Kingdom is a better game than
2:49:24
Breath of the Wild in every way you could
2:49:26
measure, in my opinion. Which is truly
2:49:29
outstanding that they pulled it off, but
2:49:31
they pulled it off. It is superb.
2:49:34
A game that I have recently started playing, which
2:49:37
is currently as of today when
2:49:39
we were recording on October the 12th. The
2:49:42
only game that seems to be in true contention
2:49:45
for Game of the Year other than Tears of the Kingdom
2:49:47
is Baldur's Gate 3. It's like I've
2:49:49
literally never heard of this game. It is essentially
2:49:52
what's called a CRPG,
2:49:54
which means Computer Role-Playing Game, which
2:49:56
means Dungeons and Dragons-style
2:49:59
rules. in a video game. Is that using
2:50:02
AI to do that? How do they do that? It's been
2:50:04
in development for a really really really really
2:50:06
long time. So they have, you
2:50:09
know, apparently there are like thousands of ways
2:50:11
the game can end like the pause that you can take
2:50:14
because you can do things like you can attempt
2:50:16
to do a thing and you roll a dice and it fails and now
2:50:18
the character dies. Right? Just like
2:50:20
well there's nothing you can do about that the character is dead now. Right?
2:50:23
Like it's really fun
2:50:25
and really weird and really cool. It's
2:50:27
got all of the RPG mechanics you might want from a game
2:50:30
but it adds dice in and it's turn based combat
2:50:32
with dice throw in and like the spells. It's
2:50:34
Dungeons and Dragons but a video game. It's
2:50:37
really cool and it's very inventive
2:50:39
and you can feel the hard long
2:50:42
work that went into this game. The
2:50:45
story's really interesting like I'm
2:50:47
enjoying it. I'm like I don't know 10 hours in
2:50:49
or something. It's very hard. It's
2:50:51
very good. I like it a lot. Okay
2:50:54
I want to bring attention to three games for
2:50:56
my own selfish reasons because I want
2:50:58
to promote more things like this. The first
2:51:00
game is called Isle of Arrows.
2:51:03
If you've listened to this section in the past you will know I'm
2:51:05
a big fan of the tower defense genre
2:51:08
and I feel like this is a an anemic
2:51:10
genre that could always use more attention
2:51:12
and people doing interesting things. You've chosen
2:51:15
a recent one this time which
2:51:17
is great and I'm familiar
2:51:19
with this game because it was very popular
2:51:21
and like I'm very well reviewed when it came out last
2:51:24
year. Yeah I missed it the first time around and
2:51:26
I think this is one of these things where I something
2:51:29
about when I saw it I was like ah I don't think that's for
2:51:31
me but I just wanted to mention it
2:51:33
because it does interesting things
2:51:36
in the tower defense genre
2:51:38
and might be kind of newbie friendly if
2:51:40
someone hasn't gotten into that
2:51:42
before. It's dangerously
2:51:46
close in some ways to a puzzle game but
2:51:48
not so close that I don't want to play
2:51:50
that because I hate puzzle games so anyway I just think
2:51:52
it's really interesting I like to promote tower
2:51:54
defense schemes that do different kinds of stuff.
2:51:57
Along the similar lines I stumbled
2:51:59
upon vampire survivors a while back
2:52:01
and that game has since given
2:52:04
birth to a genre that people are calling
2:52:06
bullet heaven as in the opposite of
2:52:08
bullet hell which I really like. Oh I
2:52:11
haven't heard that phrase because I remember when it was called
2:52:13
reverse bullet hell but I prefer
2:52:15
bullet heaven. Right we were trying to struggle
2:52:17
with how do you describe what this
2:52:19
game is because it's the opposite of a bullet
2:52:22
hell and so yeah we're like reverse bullet
2:52:25
heaven it's like this is not good. So
2:52:27
people have created the phrase bullet
2:52:29
heaven which is like perfect. That's so good.
2:52:31
You are the object that emanates
2:52:34
all of the weapons and there's a million enemies
2:52:36
around you. Since vampire survivor
2:52:38
a bunch of games have come out in this
2:52:41
category. I just wanted to draw
2:52:43
attention to army of ruin
2:52:45
which is a game made by
2:52:47
a seemingly very small team that
2:52:50
it's really high quality and I think
2:52:52
it just had super unfortunate
2:52:55
timing when it came out between a couple of other
2:52:57
games like this but I really like
2:52:59
it. It's very visually pleasing again
2:53:02
very interesting weapon mechanics a
2:53:05
very interesting upgrade system that I like that
2:53:07
doesn't feel like it locks you into
2:53:10
a particular build. Unlike
2:53:12
a lot of these things I really feel like you have the
2:53:14
freedom to try different stuff.
2:53:17
Yep. So I'm going to recommend army of ruin.
2:53:19
This has also just been a terrible
2:53:21
year to be an indie game developer
2:53:24
because there are so many
2:53:26
good big games coming out this
2:53:28
year. Yeah. That trying to get attention
2:53:31
in 2023 seems to have been a bit of a
2:53:33
nightmare. Yeah so when I was looking
2:53:35
around for army of ruined stuff I was like
2:53:38
oh like the number of reviews they have and
2:53:40
the size of their subreddit do not reflect
2:53:42
like how good this game is. So yeah
2:53:45
I just I really like this one if you like vampire
2:53:47
survivors totally give this one a try. Then
2:53:49
I will because I do. Yeah it's cute
2:53:52
I think it's
2:53:54
a cuter version of this like it looks
2:53:56
really nice. It's been like the
2:53:58
real go-to for months. steam
2:54:00
deck like playing on the couch. I've been very
2:54:02
much enjoying it. The thing about Vampire Survivors, the
2:54:05
one thing it does not have is looks. I
2:54:08
find Vampire Survivors has a certain kind of
2:54:10
retro pixel charm. I think it's the best
2:54:12
version of this, but
2:54:15
yeah sometimes I could feel like I just want
2:54:17
something like a little bit more aesthetically pleasing. Do
2:54:19
you know Vampire Survivors on the iPhone now? I
2:54:22
don't know how you'd play that on the iPhone, but I
2:54:24
don't know how people play anything on the iPhone. Fair
2:54:26
enough, but it is. The last
2:54:29
and increasing scale of cuteness is
2:54:31
a game called Voxel Tycoon. This
2:54:33
is like a sort of semi-early access
2:54:36
game. There's a game
2:54:38
called OpenTTD,
2:54:41
which is like a town train
2:54:43
simulator kind of game that is a billion
2:54:45
years old, and I have felt for
2:54:48
like a decade I'm trying to find the
2:54:50
modern replacement for that game, and
2:54:53
Voxel Tycoon is this.
2:54:56
It's the kind of thing where you're
2:54:59
just connecting up towns with
2:55:01
trains and trucks and buses, and
2:55:03
you're moving passengers around, you know, you're
2:55:05
delivering coal from the mine
2:55:07
to the factory, and then that factory
2:55:10
is producing iron bars that you're delivering
2:55:12
somewhere else. The furniture company
2:55:14
needs wood, so it's your job for like
2:55:16
how to transport that stuff around. I
2:55:18
find this just so satisfying
2:55:21
and so relaxing. There's
2:55:23
been a lot of games that try
2:55:27
to do this, but I feel like Voxel
2:55:29
Tycoon is hitting the version of this, which
2:55:31
is in my dreams of, again, very
2:55:34
cute little towns, sort
2:55:36
of interesting mechanics, but not
2:55:39
too crazily complicated. I just
2:55:41
really like it. I wanted to just draw attention
2:55:44
to it as a game that I feel could
2:55:46
totally use more players supporting it in
2:55:48
development. There's also a delightful feature where
2:55:50
after you've built all your trains, you can click
2:55:53
on a train and then have the first
2:55:56
person view of driving around
2:55:58
on all the little tracks and going through the forest
2:56:00
or going through the mines or whatever. It's delightful.
2:56:03
That to me feels like, what do you benefit
2:56:05
for making a game like this today? Yes,
2:56:08
exactly. That's what it is. Like, ah, but
2:56:10
we can zoom the camera down so
2:56:12
that you can see what the bus driver in
2:56:14
your tiny town sees. So, really
2:56:17
love it. That does remind me of like, theme
2:56:19
park world when I was a kid where like, you
2:56:21
could ride the roller coaster, but it was
2:56:23
like, super janky. But
2:56:25
you could do it. And it was like, ah, I'm riding my roller
2:56:27
coaster. It's going way too fast. Yeah,
2:56:30
so those are my three game recommendations from the year.
2:56:33
This episode is brought to you by Sidekick
2:56:35
Notepad from Cortex Brand. Sidekick
2:56:38
Notepad has been designed to be your companion
2:56:41
for taking notes while getting your most productive
2:56:43
work done. It is ready to be with you all
2:56:45
day for you to write down your ideas,
2:56:48
your notes from your meetings, and to keep
2:56:50
track of your tasks and action items.
2:56:53
It's been carefully designed to fit perfectly
2:56:55
between you and your keyboard, and
2:56:57
has been tested to provide a comfortable and
2:57:00
ergonomic experience in use. Sidekick
2:57:02
Notepad is the perfect accompaniment
2:57:05
to your meetings. Its quality construction
2:57:07
means that it will be durable in transit from place
2:57:09
to place, and gives you an ideal space
2:57:11
to keep track of what you're working on and who
2:57:13
you're working with without distracting you of
2:57:15
notifications or incoming messages.
2:57:18
We worked incredibly hard to engineer a
2:57:20
construction that will provide rigidity
2:57:22
and comfort so you'll look professional when
2:57:25
carrying and using it. Sidekick
2:57:27
Notepad has a minimal and beautiful cover,
2:57:29
but is designed to stay open and in front of
2:57:31
you all day when you're at your desk. It's
2:57:34
intended to be ready for whenever you have
2:57:36
anything to write down, acting as a constant
2:57:38
guide of what you have going on today. It's
2:57:41
made for what is happening right now, a
2:57:43
tool to help you with what you're working on. Then,
2:57:45
when you're done, just tear off the page and
2:57:47
start fresh. In your daily life,
2:57:50
you deserve space to think and to brainstorm,
2:57:52
to write down your ideas and to iterate on
2:57:54
them. Pen and paper dust is better than
2:57:56
anything else. Sidekick Notepad
2:57:59
is the in-between. part from your brain
2:58:01
to your computer. Oh and speaking
2:58:03
of pens, why not check out the Cortex
2:58:05
brand Mark 1 pen available
2:58:08
in two colors with the very best refill
2:58:10
we found. It features perfectly balanced
2:58:12
aluminium construction coated in a premium
2:58:15
Cerakote finish. Sidekick
2:58:18
notepad is made and assembled by hand
2:58:20
in London England. We use high quality
2:58:22
paper with exceptional printing and perforation.
2:58:25
The cover material is made from recycled
2:58:28
coffee cups using a highly specialized
2:58:30
process. These cups would have otherwise
2:58:32
be destined for landfill but we use them here
2:58:34
in this product. Sidekick notepad
2:58:37
is made to sit comfortably with you all
2:58:39
day and be ready and waiting for whatever
2:58:41
you're working on. It helps turn your ideas
2:58:43
into actions becoming the perfect companion
2:58:46
for getting things done. Capture all
2:58:48
of your tasks, action items, notes
2:58:50
and thoughts. Sidekick notepad will be
2:58:53
there throughout the day. Then tomorrow, tear
2:58:55
off the page and start again. Sidekick
2:58:58
notepad is available now at cortexbrand.com.
2:59:02
That is cortexbrand.com.
2:59:04
All
2:59:06
right on to lightning rounds and we've
2:59:08
got a really kind of speed up now. It
2:59:11
is the lightning round so it should in
2:59:13
theory be the fast round. I will start with
2:59:15
Raycast. It is my new
2:59:17
launcher on the Mac. It's replaced Alfred
2:59:20
for me. Oh wow. It's got a very nice simple
2:59:22
modern UI and it has tons
2:59:24
of integrations available. I don't use
2:59:26
a ton of them but they're there and I add more
2:59:29
in over time for different services and
2:59:31
stuff like that and I like that you can
2:59:33
do things like if you want to, window
2:59:35
management tools and a bunch of conversion stuff.
2:59:37
It's just I like Raycast a lot. It's
2:59:40
nice and simple but can be complicated
2:59:42
if you want it to be. Alfred's the one that I use. I'll
2:59:44
check that out. All right little app on the App
2:59:47
Store called Wallet Creator.
2:59:49
I think a long-forgotten
2:59:51
feature of Apple Wallet is that you
2:59:53
can with apps help
2:59:56
get your own custom passes into
2:59:59
Apple Wallet.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More