Podchaser Logo
Home
State of the Apps 2024

State of the Apps 2024

Released Friday, 27th October 2023
 3 people rated this episode
State of the Apps 2024

State of the Apps 2024

State of the Apps 2024

State of the Apps 2024

Friday, 27th October 2023
 3 people rated this episode
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:00

Welcome

0:00

back to State of the Apps. State of the

0:02

Apps! 2024 edition! Every year on State

0:04

of the Apps

0:06

we talk about the tools and services that we

0:08

use to manage our work and our lives. We've

0:12

been doing this for many years now. I'm

0:14

absolutely horrified because I was like, wait

0:16

a minute, and I just googled myself,

0:19

right, CGP Grey State of the Apps.

0:21

When did I do this? And I wrote that

0:23

article in 2014. Yeah, I

0:27

didn't want to mention it. I did

0:29

look this up that

0:30

it has been a decade since you wrote

0:32

the article on your blog that became

0:34

like the reason that we do this episode.

0:38

10 years of State of the Apps for me. Oh my

0:40

god. Well, I think there was a gap

0:42

of like two or three years where there wasn't

0:44

another one. And then I was like, that's

0:47

a good idea. Let's do an episode of Cortex about

0:49

it. And then here we are.

0:51

I'm doing a quick scroll down the list of

0:53

like how many of these apps have still survived.

0:55

And the answer is not zero. That's surprising.

0:58

You know what? It might be fun actually throughout

1:00

this episode, considering we are

1:02

on like the decade of State of

1:05

the Apps. If there's any that

1:07

you pick today that are on that original list, I

1:09

think it would be fun if you mentioned that. One that's definitely

1:11

not

1:12

Evernote. Were

1:14

you positive in 2014 about Evernote? Okay,

1:18

here's what I wrote in 2014. Evernote is my dumping

1:21

ground for lots of random video related

1:24

pre-research. I use it,

1:26

but reluctantly. The

1:29

real shock of today's episode is if Evernote's

1:31

found its way back. Anything could

1:33

happen. Hold on to your seats, everyone. The

1:36

traditional way of starting State of the Apps

1:39

is with home screens. Home screens.

1:41

Although now it's home screens and

1:44

lock screens. Yeah. And focus

1:46

modes. And I think also standby?

1:49

See, there's a lot in this now.

1:51

I mean, Mike,

1:52

what even is a home screen anymore?

1:55

Honestly, that is becoming a harder and harder

1:57

question. It totally is becoming a strange

1:59

kind of question.

1:59

about what is the home screen, what do we

2:02

mean by this? Yeah, like as well,

2:04

from this year, with Interactive Widgets, home

2:07

screens aren't even just a static

2:09

thing anymore, they're not just a launcher anymore,

2:12

they are actually a place to perform

2:15

actions. Yeah, I haven't a ton

2:17

of apps that are doing Interactive Widgets

2:19

yet, but it is suddenly realizing

2:21

like the home screen is

2:24

an app now, kind of? Like

2:26

that's clearly the direction it's

2:28

going into, so what even is

2:30

a home screen? How is it connected to focus

2:32

modes and your watch and everything else? It's

2:35

like it's all kind of getting muddled together

2:38

and also partly being apps

2:40

at the same time. So what do

2:42

your home screens look like, Mike? Right, well

2:45

let's start with my regular home screen.

2:48

This is like the default home screen, I also use

2:50

these set of home screens for Do Not Disturb,

2:53

and I've also included the corresponding

2:56

lock screens for these home

2:58

screens in the image, so you can kind of get the whole

3:00

view. Yes, that's always so

3:03

overwhelming when I click on one of these links to

3:05

see all of Mike's things. It's

3:07

a visual treat, it's a little experience.

3:10

It is visual, that is true, yeah.

3:12

Visual treat. I've

3:14

gone way more widget focused

3:17

this year. For a long time, I had

3:20

like big widget on the top and

3:23

I had a little widget in the corner and then I

3:25

had like 12 apps. This year, I've

3:28

actually reduced my apps to eight

3:30

and I have two square widgets and

3:33

the large widget on the top and this

3:35

is because of interactive widgets. So

3:38

the widget I wanted to kind of like blow up

3:40

everything for was the Do widget.

3:43

Tell me about your use case of Do because Do

3:45

is one of these apps that for me has

3:48

disappeared over the years because

3:51

mainly for me, like I was looking for an app years ago

3:53

that related to timers that also had really

3:55

good shortcut support. So previous

3:58

lightning round pick for me. an

4:00

app called Just Timers, which I'm still using

4:02

to this day. Fantastic timer, shortcut

4:04

support, really good. And that

4:06

just blew due out of the water

4:08

for me. It's like, oh, I just never used it again.

4:11

So it looks like you're actually using it as a task

4:14

manager here. Like what's your use case for this? Okay,

4:17

so the types of tasks that go into

4:19

due are always personal

4:22

focused. So

4:25

I use Todoist as my to-do app, which I'll talk

4:27

about a little bit later on in the show. And

4:29

I have a personal project

4:32

in Todoist, but they're for like quite

4:34

large things. The stuff

4:36

that goes into due are very simple,

4:39

often recurring tasks. So

4:41

for example, I have take out the

4:43

trash, do the dishes, do

4:46

my evening stretches, take my

4:48

pills, text my mum,

4:50

like these little things that happen

4:53

on a daily basis, on

4:55

a weekly basis, go in here.

4:58

Remember to set my time tracker

5:00

when I go to the gym. Remember

5:02

to get cash out for my barber when I

5:04

see him next week. Do my exercises,

5:07

like these little things that are just,

5:10

I don't want all of these tasks messing

5:13

up my Todoist to-do list. And

5:16

then also all of these types of

5:19

tasks benefit from

5:21

due's nagging, right? That

5:23

you can set in due if I do

5:25

not mark this complete, keep

5:27

reminding, keep reminding. And

5:30

a lot of these things, they're like, it has

5:32

to be done today. So like, I want the phone

5:35

to keep asking me to do this stuff

5:38

until it's done. Like if I don't

5:40

remember to take the trash out, that's

5:42

going to be a problem. I have to take out

5:44

the trash, right? So like it's going to keep

5:46

telling me every 10 minutes,

5:49

have you done this? Have you done this? Have

5:51

you done this? These are the kind of things. And it

5:53

can also be like a very simple

5:55

task that might be a one-off that

5:58

will go in here. Like for example. I

6:00

had to disable the automation

6:03

of our Roomba

6:04

for a few days

6:05

because we were having a like a treatment to the floor

6:08

and so I disabled it and then I've put it back in

6:10

there to Enable it in like a week's time and

6:13

so that kind of thing. It's just like it's

6:15

just like a very simple thing I want to make sure

6:17

I remember to do it on that exact day so I can

6:19

have it actually go out and do the cleaning So that's the

6:21

kind of thing I'll just throw it into do and it

6:23

will remind me every 10 minutes

6:25

until I've done it on the day that I've asked for and

6:29

One of the things about these due tasks is that

6:31

because they are frequent things often

6:34

I just do them because I remember so

6:36

having them as a little widget They're

6:39

just there and I can very quickly check them off

6:41

from the interactive widget And I don't need

6:43

to open that app do you right

6:45

so to me this felt like a really good

6:48

Thing to just have there on my home screen

6:51

all the time. They're not work tasks

6:53

So I don't feel like the impending not

6:55

having done work And it's very easy

6:58

for me to just check these off and get them done and

7:00

so I like this widget a lot actually Hmm.

7:02

I feel like I've underappreciated

7:04

the role that do used to play in

7:06

my life and I

7:09

might borrow this from you. I think do

7:11

deserve the second view I need to take a look at

7:14

that again the other little square

7:16

widgets time Aree and now the

7:18

iOS 17 shortcuts widget

7:20

underneath has two actions

7:23

rather than one action, which is awesome and Underneath

7:26

that little timer which it is like the stack

7:29

and I've got two Timer-related

7:31

shortcuts one is a shortcut

7:34

I have where I can just add an

7:36

increment of time to my

7:38

time tracker So I can tap it and be like

7:41

I just did 15 minutes of this kind of work

7:43

But I forgot to press the button so

7:45

I like that. Oh, huh, okay.

7:47

I didn't realize that was a feature That's nice. You can build

7:49

a shortcut like I built the shortcut years ago.

7:51

It just like looks at the current time

7:54

Subtracts it by the amount of time not ever asked

7:57

and then adds it as an entry to timer e And

8:00

then I also have one more which is my recording

8:03

or editing shows timer where if

8:06

I hit it it says you're recording or editing if hit

8:08

recording it looks on my calendar and Creates

8:10

a new time entry with that as the tag

8:12

that set the naming up correctly if

8:15

I'm editing It just gives me a list of

8:17

shows to choose from and I'll choose that show and it'll

8:19

start a timer based on that Those are just

8:21

like my two most often Time

8:24

tracking shortcuts and now they just live on that little

8:26

stack underneath the time re widget, which

8:28

I'm really happy about And now the

8:30

time re widget has a nice stop button on it too, which is

8:32

great. Oh, you can stop it from that widget Okay, great

8:34

I would look up on a bunch of the widgets

8:36

have an option in the configuration

8:39

settings to add a stop button to them

8:42

This is a request that I gave to the developer

8:44

Joe that like I felt like the stop

8:47

button should be available everywhere That a timer

8:49

was incrementing. Yeah, that's

8:51

a good feature outside of that There's no

8:53

other app changes here from year

8:55

to year and I've ended up with these eight

8:58

as the ones that I'm using most from My home

9:00

screen so it's no discord Google Maps

9:02

city mapper the camera and Instagram

9:05

Messages and slack and then my talk is to do

9:07

ist spark safari and overcast

9:09

so that's all remain very similar

9:12

to previous years Yeah, I think I'm always surprised

9:14

that discord is ranked so high on your

9:16

home screen here But like I know we have different

9:18

use cases for that like every year we do this. I'm

9:20

like discord really It's

9:22

work and social for me Like the fact

9:24

that I have slack there says I should have discord

9:27

there the fact that I have Instagram says

9:29

I should have discord Cuz it like it's

9:31

almost all of those kinds of things It's like

9:33

a social network in a way But it's also work

9:36

and it's also like it's an interesting

9:38

like straddling of all of this stuff I

9:40

spent a lot of time in discord now I think the

9:43

only one I would question is do

9:45

you really need the camera on this

9:47

home screen people always say this? What

9:50

I use camera as both

9:53

the camera and how I get to my photos

9:55

Okay, so you're using it for the recently taken photos

9:58

thing where you can get it up and click on the corner Yeah, it's

10:00

like a double duty. Can't you get to the recent

10:03

photos from your lock screen? You can but if

10:05

I'm using my phone and I want to take a picture. Well,

10:07

I lock the phone. Yes That's what I always

10:09

do. Yeah. See I that doesn't make any sense to me.

10:12

Hmm Like I'm using my phone or

10:14

I want to get a picture press the Glock button

10:16

now press the camera button. No,

10:18

you here we go Plus

10:21

as well when you look when you lock the phone

10:24

it turns the display off into always-on display

10:26

So you have to tap the phone to wake the phone

10:29

then press the camera bond. That is inefficient

10:31

I guess you're right I was like this is one of

10:33

these like when you have shortcuts that you just

10:36

Your fingers know how to do and your brain doesn't

10:38

I was like Mike I don't need to tap the screen Oh,

10:40

I do need to tap the screen in order to wake it up and then

10:43

swipe over I didn't even realize I was doing just like tripled

10:45

my taps, you know, yeah. No, that's

10:47

true camera on the lock screen man Steve

10:50

Jobs was right He

10:53

was right the whole time get it on there, okay.

10:55

All right, I'll let you keep the camera I will probably once

10:57

again next year be like do you really need that? Everyone

11:01

always says it to me but I think it's a

11:03

good thing to have and right in the top I

11:05

have my long fantastic in a widget underneath it

11:07

is the carrot weather widget The perfect

11:09

pairing carrot weather widget is like it's you

11:11

always got to find a way to sneak it on there somewhere

11:13

or another On my second screen.

11:16

I've got a bunch of widgets. So I have notion widgets.

11:18

I'll talk about notion later I have a

11:20

bunch of widgets Smith widgets for photos

11:23

as well as Apple's photos I

11:25

have peak which is another

11:27

app I'll talk about later on which shows me some health

11:29

stuff then I have the best widget

11:32

as part of iOS 17 the home Widget,

11:35

which is just like the best thing.

11:38

Are you for real? Are you for real suggesting that the home

11:40

app is the best widget? It's so good Really?

11:43

Let me tell you what makes it good It's like sell me on

11:45

the home widget because I've tried

11:47

it and it only ever just shows me things

11:49

I never want It doesn't seem like I have

11:51

any way to grow it which things I use Cg

11:54

be gray. I'm gonna change your life

11:56

man. You ready? Please please do long

11:58

press on the widget Press

12:01

edit widget, untick recommended,

12:03

and choose what you want. Oh

12:05

my god! This

12:09

is why State of the Apps exists. It's

12:11

for these nuggets of wisdom. You

12:14

have changed my life. That's why I love

12:16

it. So now I have the

12:18

four lights that I always want to

12:20

be turning off most. The two in the bedroom, the two in

12:22

the lounge. I have the TV and the

12:24

most active scene that I use. It's fantastic. Oh,

12:28

okay. All right. This is definitely

12:30

going to change some things then. It's so good.

12:32

I love it because I hate the way

12:34

it works in Control Center. Because

12:37

especially what's complicated for me is I have

12:39

a home at the studio and

12:42

a home at home. And quite

12:45

often, even though it's supposed to change

12:47

based on location, it doesn't. So I'm at home

12:49

and I want to turn on the light and I pull it down

12:52

and it's showing my lights at the studio. This is not helpful

12:54

to me. There's no reason why this should

12:56

be happening. They're not even remotely close to each other. But

12:59

then also just like the phone deciding

13:01

what it wants to show you are fine,

13:04

I suppose, but it's not what I want. The

13:06

only downside with the widget is you can only

13:08

toggle things on and off, right? You can't

13:11

adjust the amount of brightness,

13:14

but I guess you could set up a scene to do that. I

13:16

run everything through scenes.

13:18

My home philosophy is you should basically

13:21

never be controlling an accessory directly.

13:24

Everything should be a part of a scene. I

13:26

have a ton of scenes, but

13:29

maybe that's also why I've tried that at the home

13:31

widget. And it's like something about my brain didn't

13:33

even process that I could tell it, don't

13:35

recommend. It never occurred to me

13:37

to untick that box. I

13:40

was just disappointed that it was constantly

13:42

like, hey, do you want to hard turn

13:44

off your Apple TV with the smart plug that

13:46

you put behind it? No. How about

13:49

these scenes that you know that I'm

13:51

telling you to set every day at this

13:53

time? Do you want to suggest me one of them? No,

13:55

no, it never wants to suggest one of them. That's

13:58

funny thing as well for that smart plug controller. on

14:00

your Apple TV. Your Apple TV is probably

14:02

the dominant HomeKit

14:05

hub in your house? Yeah, the

14:07

reason it's extra funny to me is because this is

14:09

a holdover from when, I don't know

14:11

if it was tvOS or what, but like when

14:14

we first got the Apple TV, it would

14:16

just freeze quite a lot and the

14:18

only way to fix it was to unplug

14:20

it and I plug it back in. I got so

14:23

tired of this, I bought a smart plug

14:25

just so from the couch, right? I could press

14:28

the button to like physically

14:30

cut the power to this Apple TV to then force

14:32

it to turn back on. But if that switch

14:34

was in HomeKit, if you turn it off,

14:37

you probably can't turn it back on again via

14:39

HomeKit. We have HomePods though, right? Like

14:41

so the HomePods will take the right place. Ah, there hubs

14:43

as well? Yeah, there hubs as well. Okay. We've got

14:45

like a million things in the house that are acting as hubs.

14:48

Yeah. But my wife and I joked that like buying

14:51

that smart plug, eventually

14:53

the Apple TV learns. We have like a

14:55

hard threat here, Apple TV.

14:57

You better just freaking work. Yeah. And

15:00

it slowly was like, okay, like I guess I'll

15:02

be a good Apple TV and not just completely

15:04

freeze audio all the time. So the threatening plug.

15:07

That's why it's extra funny to me that HomeKit was

15:09

like really aggressive about recommending

15:11

maybe my least used accessory

15:14

currently that like I forgot even existed

15:16

was always like front and center. Do you

15:18

want to hard cut the power to the Apple TV? No, HomeKit.

15:21

I don't. I then have a Bode,

15:24

which is my home security system. That's

15:27

a camera widget. They also have an interactive widget

15:29

for setting the state of the alarm system, which

15:31

is pretty cool. Then I have

15:33

one of the new Widgetsmith widgets, which

15:35

I love. So with the interactive widgets,

15:38

when I tap that photo of the pool, it

15:41

slides up and shows me a countdown to my

15:43

next vacation. Oh, huh.

15:45

Cause you can have these widgets stacked on

15:47

top of each other now. So like you

15:50

can take what were two widget types that were

15:52

in Widgetsmith and you can like put

15:54

them one on top of the other. So you can like

15:56

have a photo hiding time zones.

15:58

I have a photo hiding. countdown and stuff

16:00

like that. This is like one of the things that Underscore

16:03

put in is the interactive stuff. And

16:05

I really love that. Because I like having the countdown,

16:07

but sometimes the image I wanted to use,

16:10

text didn't look good on it. But now I can

16:12

have it hidden there. And we did this for

16:14

the podcast-a-thon. So I had an image of the podcast-a-thon,

16:17

and I would tap it, and it would slide up and show me the

16:19

time, which is also good for an event like that, so

16:22

I don't see how many days it is all the time. Just

16:25

what I want to see. I didn't realize David

16:27

had put that in Widget Smith. I

16:29

mean, again, as far as I could tell, he's built an entire

16:31

operating system inside of Widget Smith.

16:34

The number of things he's done is insane. So

16:36

is that an inspirational photo for you for your next

16:38

vacation, this pool photo? Yeah, it's like, here's

16:40

where you're going. Ah, OK. And

16:42

then you tap it, and it will show you. It's nice. That

16:46

is my regular home screen.

16:49

So when you say your regular home screen,

16:51

does this not exist within a focus

16:53

mode? Correct. So this is just the default state

16:55

of the phone. Yes, I also use these

16:57

home screens in do not disturb and

17:00

in my recording focus mode. Ah,

17:02

OK. I have recording as one of

17:04

the options in here, so you can look at that. And

17:07

my recording one is exactly the same

17:09

home screens. I just have a different lock

17:11

screen. So

17:14

my regular home screen, lock screen, that's confusing.

17:17

I just have an image of Adena, and I have

17:20

the very top lock screen widget

17:22

is Fantastic Al. And then I have weather.

17:25

I have widgets from a step counter, and I have a timer

17:27

timer, like it's the little circle one. And

17:29

then on my recording lock screen, I

17:32

use the photo shuffle thing,

17:35

which is the same as last time. And I just have a widgets

17:37

with time zone thing and a larger

17:39

timer time tracker on

17:41

my recording one. OK, huh. So it's

17:43

basically the same there. And I don't

17:46

have anything special for do not

17:48

disturb. It's just all

17:50

the same stuff as my regular lock screen.

17:52

Oh, OK. You mean like this is just, it

17:54

looks like this for do not disturb as well. Yeah, nothing

17:57

changes. Travel.

18:00

My travel lock screen, which is one of my

18:02

favorite lock screens. I think

18:04

this is exactly the same as before. So

18:06

I have like the globe lock

18:08

screen because I think that's really cool. Show you where you are in

18:10

the world. Oh, I added the batteries

18:13

lock screen widget, which was your recommendation

18:16

from last time. This is funny to me

18:18

because my travel focus

18:20

mode, literally exactly the same, right?

18:22

It's like clock, weather, battery,

18:25

flighty, and the zoomed in

18:27

thing for the earth. It's a little bit like

18:30

the correct travel setup

18:32

just manifested itself into

18:35

the universe. Like this is the correct answer

18:37

for if you need a lock screen while

18:40

you are traveling, this is what you should just

18:42

do. This is the one that looks the best. Those are the

18:44

most obvious options for what to have. Well, I think

18:46

the two of us who just perfected it, you cannot

18:49

argue with the arrangement. It's unarguable. Yep.

18:52

And then the home screen itself, I use way more

18:54

widgets here. I have four widgets

18:56

and they're just like weather and calendar.

18:59

I have the fine mind, just like a stack of the

19:02

things that I might have. And I can change those around

19:04

depending on what I'm taking with me, like

19:06

what suitcase I have, what bag I have. I

19:10

used to have a notes note

19:12

for both my scan and my passport

19:14

and also my packing list. This

19:17

is now in things, which

19:19

I'll talk about later. So I have a things widget

19:22

underneath the notes widget, which is where my packing list

19:24

lives. And then, you know,

19:27

for apps, they're very similar to my usual

19:29

apps, but I add wallet on there because you

19:31

use a bunch of wallet passes when you're in travel

19:33

and also like airline apps. And I change those

19:36

out depending on which airline I'm flying. Right

19:38

now, listening to you, I'm just I'm totally

19:41

stealing the find

19:43

my widget for my own travel setup. I

19:45

didn't think about that one for bags and things or

19:48

like you can even set it for people. Like if you're meeting someone,

19:50

I think like I didn't consider

19:52

that. And that's great. I'm going to add

19:55

that one straight away. You know, we've

19:57

spoken about having air tags on the

19:59

luggage and how. helpful that can be. Yeah air

20:01

tags on everything. It's super good and then just

20:03

having them right there it's just like a very quick and easy

20:06

way to get to that thing that I'm gonna need and

20:08

that's what my travel lock screen is

20:10

really. It's like a lot of widgets

20:13

because it will give me information at a glance but

20:15

also very quickly allows me to get to the apps

20:17

that have the corresponding information if I need to

20:19

dig into them. You know so I've got like these are all in

20:21

stacks but I have flighty in there

20:24

and I have Tripsy in there like so these are apps

20:26

that have got that information in them. And I

20:28

can just get to them as quickly as possible.

20:29

Alright

20:30

well when you're traveling you're traveling

20:33

to go on vacation. Yes. Do you

20:35

have a vacation set up? I do now because

20:37

last year you showed me your vacation home

20:40

screen and lock screen I was like oh that's a good idea so

20:42

I do that. And I would

20:44

say that this builds on the

20:47

travel one so I still have

20:49

like a lock screen which has now

20:52

has like an image and this will be some kind of like

20:54

image taken whilst on vacation somewhere. This

20:56

is a perfor overdina taken on a trip we took a

20:58

couple of years ago and I've got weather

21:01

there which is very important and I also brought batteries

21:03

in because that's also very important when you're on your vacation.

21:07

And then on the home screen again I have

21:09

the batteries widget very helpful

21:11

I have the Tripsy widget very helpful so

21:13

I have Find My there and I have the

21:16

basic apps that I'm going to need while I'm traveling

21:18

with two spots that are spare

21:21

and that will be related to the trip

21:23

that I'm on. Like when I was at WWDC

21:26

I still use the vacation one and I would add the Apple

21:28

Developer app there and the wallet app

21:30

because I was gonna need those. And so depending

21:32

on the trip that I'm on I will add apps

21:35

that are relevant to this vacation

21:37

lock screen which I find to be like a very

21:39

helpful thing to do. You know like if

21:41

you go into a theme park and they have an app and

21:43

put it on your home screen and it's there whenever you need

21:45

it you know. Yeah yeah for any of that kind of like

21:48

holiday stuff you need that spare space for

21:50

whatever it is. Like I'm a big believer

21:52

in spare space on your home

21:54

screens or lock screens. I've just got to say

21:57

though like you're killing me

21:59

here with with the wallpaper

22:01

being the same for all of these

22:03

modes. You change your lock screen wallpaper,

22:06

but you don't want to change the background wallpaper.

22:08

I know you love that literal wallpaper that

22:11

is your wallpaper, but doesn't

22:14

it like mess with your brain, right? That you're

22:16

on vacation and the wallpaper

22:18

is still exactly the same? Not at all.

22:21

Because the apps are different. It grabs your attention,

22:23

that wallpaper, right? It really dominates

22:26

the scene. So I feel like it

22:28

has such an impact that you

22:30

might want to change it for different, but you

22:32

just don't. I can tell you just don't. Okay. It's

22:35

like if you change all the furniture inside of your house,

22:37

you know it's different. If you leave the paint or

22:39

the wallpaper on the walls, it's not like, you know? I

22:43

don't approve of this analogy. I know you don't. I

22:45

also, if I got halfway through it, realized I didn't know

22:48

how I was going to finish it. But the

22:50

point still stands. I

22:52

changed the lock screens. I don't know why

22:54

I do that. I just do that. Like it's fun

22:56

to mess around with them. No, you change the lock

22:58

screens because you do it to mentally

23:01

reinforce that you're in a different mode. That's why you change

23:03

the lock screens. Yeah, but my app layout does that on

23:06

my home screen. I guess I'll just have to believe you. But

23:08

it's like, I can't believe it's like, oh

23:10

my God, you've shown me four focus modes in

23:12

a row and the wallpaper is the same on all

23:15

four focus modes. Oh buddy, you got another two. Don't

23:17

you worry. We're going to go for

23:19

a perfect 10 here, you know? No, we're not,

23:21

it can't possibly be a perfect 10. We'll find out. I

23:24

have a weekend focus mode now. This is new,

23:26

year of the weekend, weekend focus mode. Okay,

23:28

right. So this is different thing that you're focusing

23:31

on related to your theme. I'm sure I'm going to click on

23:33

this and I'm going to see a different wallpaper. You're going to see the

23:35

same wallpaper. Oh God, God. You're going to see

23:37

the same wallpaper. Mostly the same app. But

23:40

it's also a photo of Adina in front of that

23:42

wallpaper. That's my average, like

23:44

that's a regular lock screen. This is the

23:46

regular lock screen. Really

23:49

the main difference here is I

23:51

do actually need to change this. I've just looked at this now

23:53

and realised I have not updated this lock

23:55

screen because I still have dew there

23:57

and I want to remove that and put the little dew. widget

24:01

in instead so I need to change that around. I'm going

24:03

to do that today actually. It's kind of funny

24:05

in preparing for this episode

24:07

I have made multiple changes to multiple lock

24:10

screens and this is one that has

24:12

not been done so I would do that. So the due app

24:14

will be gone and I'll put where I've got Widget

24:16

Smith right now I'll put the due widget there as well in

24:18

a little stack. And then on the second

24:21

screen here it's just kind of a simplified

24:23

version showing me the home thing my widget thing

24:25

and also box box which is a Formula

24:28

One app. So it has the times of

24:30

the next races which always happen on the weekends so

24:32

I want to know and then also have the Sonos app. Is

24:35

that a little picture of the racetrack? Is that what that is?

24:37

That's a visual layout of the racetrack

24:39

yeah. Cool right? Yeah that is

24:41

cool. Very Mario Kart. This app is really

24:44

nice like I like it. It also has a live

24:46

activity in there which I enjoy so like there's

24:48

a live activity for the

24:51

race if you are not

24:53

watching or whatever you can enable live activity

24:55

into you's winning. I'm only laughing because like

24:57

oh someone I know who actually uses

25:00

the pitched use case of live activities

25:02

which was like you can follow the sports game. Yeah. Because

25:05

it just sewn not into sports. My brain filed

25:07

that away as like ah yes what a lovely

25:09

developer example of like how to make a test

25:12

case. It's like no no people actually do that right this

25:14

is very important to them. One of those people. Nice.

25:17

Sports. Okay so when you're going

25:19

to sleep sleep's got to look different.

25:21

Nope. Yep it does. It's different widgets.

25:26

So everything's

25:28

different. I only have one page for my sleep

25:31

home screens and basically

25:33

what we're seeing here is YouTube and Audible

25:35

are being added. It's like YouTube I watch

25:38

videos at night to wind down same as audiobooks

25:40

at night to wind down and then I also have

25:42

a little home little square home one and these

25:44

are the lights I need at night right make sure the lounge

25:47

lights are off downstairs and maybe

25:49

the bedroom lights are on while we're getting

25:51

ready to sleep and then turn them off and it's just like an easy way

25:53

to get that done. It's really fine that YouTube winds

25:55

you down at night that feels like a bad choice for

25:58

I'm gonna go to bed so I'm gonna watch some

26:00

YouTube videos. Yeah. If

26:02

that works for you? I mean, it's not all

26:04

like, hey guys,

26:06

you know, it's not all, you know, sometimes it's like,

26:09

oh, watch me make these knives. If

26:11

that works, I just feel like the related videos are

26:13

always there trying to just like keep you focused

26:15

on the app forever as opposed to something like Audible.

26:18

Great, you're talking to somebody who

26:20

doesn't pay attention to related videos. Oh,

26:23

okay. I'm very good with YouTube. Like,

26:25

I don't watch things that are on the front page. I

26:27

just watch stuff from my watch later queue.

26:29

That's my world subscription.

26:32

And then I only watch things from the watch later queue. So

26:35

it's very easy for me to ignore most

26:37

of what YouTube is trying to give me. It's

26:40

like, good try, YouTube. Do

26:43

you want to watch shorts? We've got shorts for you, please. None

26:45

of that stuff finds its way to me. Please watch

26:47

the shorts. Okay, good. I still feel like, I don't know,

26:50

for a sleep focus,

26:52

you might want to have a, like a dimmer wallpaper,

26:55

you know, something that's just a bit more, okay,

26:58

can I negotiate with you here? Would you consider

27:01

taking your current wallpaper, which

27:03

you obviously love, but just

27:05

like, why? In, I

27:07

would even said it. I'm

27:10

not interested in what you're telling me. I was just gonna

27:12

say, like, put a little vignette on it. Why? You

27:15

know, pull the saturation down or, so

27:17

it feels more like bedtime, that's why. I don't

27:19

need it. Oh, God. I don't know why

27:21

this really bothers me. I don't know why it bothers you

27:23

either. It's fine, like, it's

27:26

not a problem. Okay. I

27:29

also have some watch faces for you. I'm

27:31

glad you can't put wallpaper on watch faces. All right,

27:33

let's take a look at your watch faces. I'm unhappy. Oh,

27:37

yeah, really? I think like you and everyone else

27:39

on Earth. Because I have a new watch now, right?

27:41

I have the Apple Watch Ultra. And the

27:43

watches, faces I've used before, don't look

27:45

good on the Apple Watch Ultra. I used to like a lot of

27:47

the round watch faces. The round watch faces

27:50

do not translate very well to the Apple Watch Ultra. So

27:53

I've decided that the best thing for me to do is

27:55

just do what the Apple Watch Ultra wants me to do,

27:57

and I use the modular Ultra watch

27:59

face. And what I will say is

28:02

while I do not like the look of this watch face,

28:04

it is very utilitarian.

28:07

It is helpful because

28:10

I have like a billion complications on this

28:12

watch face, right? So I have

28:15

top left, carrot, then dew, then

28:17

a fantastic cow showing me the date, then

28:19

I have the big fantastic cow in the middle showing me my next appointment,

28:22

then I can see my activity rings, I can get to my medications

28:25

app, and timer-y. Ton

28:27

of information, which is good, and I can access

28:29

the things that I am doing most often right

28:31

there. And I just don't like the way it looks,

28:34

but this watch is so huge,

28:36

I figure I have just got to lean into it. I cannot try

28:39

and fancy it up anymore. This is just what it is. That is

28:42

a rewind back in time. The Apple

28:44

Watch has just been released, and someone

28:46

shows you and they go, someday

28:49

here will be all

28:52

of the watch faces that you can use. And then I

28:54

was able to see the current slate of

28:56

watch faces. I go, wow,

29:00

I cannot believe how many they are going

29:02

to have by next year. And then

29:04

the time traveler would say, oh no, no,

29:07

this is going to be ten years

29:09

later. We

29:12

have mentioned it a million times, but it

29:14

is just mind-blowing to me,

29:17

still, how limited and locked

29:19

in time these Apple Watch

29:21

faces are. What you have just said

29:23

is the truth of trying

29:26

to make it look good is this

29:28

endless battle. And it always

29:31

feels like they find a way to

29:35

force you to decide between two different things. But

29:38

no, I would like this watch face to do these two

29:40

things and it would look much better. So it is like, no,

29:43

no, no, no, no. You can have this

29:45

part be colored, but not that part be

29:47

colored, or whatever it is. It is just incredibly

29:50

frustrating. This new Apple Watch Ultra

29:52

face, yep, we have

29:55

got a new one, but it is still the same. It

29:57

is still the same as all of them. Yes,

30:00

it was just very frustrating. What I do

30:02

like about this new one compared to some of the other ones

30:04

It's like it has that ring around the outside

30:07

and there's a few things you can do with it Mm-hmm, and

30:09

I have it set to ticking seconds, which I do

30:11

find to be helpful Yeah, you

30:13

know a decade in the future,

30:16

but we can put a ring on it that shows you the

30:18

seconds Thanks guys. I

30:20

also have a travel watch face. These

30:22

are the only two watch faces. I have only two

30:24

interesting What I'll say is I've this is the first time

30:27

I've ever set another watch face So maybe I'll

30:29

do more in the future Hmm because before

30:31

I really was just trying to make it look the best it could

30:33

be when now I'm trying to lean into The utility

30:36

right, but this is my like traveling

30:38

watch face And I'll probably

30:40

set one up for maybe for vacations too

30:43

But it's the first one I've done and the

30:45

reason I did it was because there was a flighty watch

30:48

app now And that's what the middle

30:50

complication is but it's blacked out But

30:52

that's the I put the flighty one there so

30:55

that shows me my next flight information Then

30:58

I also have removed due

31:00

and added a quick access to my find items,

31:03

right? So like I can find my air tags

31:06

and then in the bottom right instead of timer

31:08

II I have Time zone in

31:10

London like the time in London or I might set it to

31:12

where I'm going to for example to have

31:15

arrived there So that is my

31:17

travel watch face This

31:20

episode of cortex is brought to you

31:22

by member fall Monetizing

31:24

your passion takes work you have

31:26

to have the right platform in place to build

31:28

a membership business That's best for your

31:31

audience, but it's hard when you're already

31:33

busy working with other projects That's

31:35

why member fall makes it simple to build

31:38

and run a membership business And it's why

31:40

we chose them when we wanted

31:42

to build a membership program of our

31:44

own with more text The longer

31:46

ad free version of the show this is powered

31:49

by member fall They have everything

31:51

that we needed and everything that you

31:53

need to run a membership program of your own

31:56

including a streamlined and powerful Checkout

31:58

process an easy to use Memberful

32:00

portal, we have a member management

32:02

dashboard as well, and transactional

32:05

emails. Memberful also

32:07

allows us and will allow you to tailor

32:10

a program that is best suited to your audience,

32:12

with custom branding, options for newsletters,

32:15

podcast feeds, gift subscriptions,

32:18

Apple Pay support, free and paid trials,

32:21

automatic referral discounts, and so much

32:23

more. They have analytics as well to

32:25

give you an easy to use in-depth view of what's

32:28

working, what's not, and where to double down.

32:30

Memberful seamlessly integrates with the tools that

32:33

you're already using, like MailChimp, WordPress,

32:36

and Stripe, and also very important

32:38

to us is Discord. So when you become

32:40

a Modtech subscriber or a RelayFM member,

32:42

you get access to the RelayFM membership Discord,

32:45

which is a great community of people who

32:47

have a lot of fun talking about things that they care

32:49

about. And this is all very easily

32:51

managed with no work from us by

32:54

Memberful. If you ever need them,

32:56

you can contact Memberful's world-class support

32:58

team that are ready to help you simplify

33:00

your membership and grow your revenue. They

33:03

act as support for you if you need it, if you have any

33:05

questions, but they're also a support in

33:07

making your membership program the best that it

33:10

can be. They're passionate about your success

33:12

and you'll always have access to a real human.

33:15

Go and check it out for yourself right now and see

33:17

how Memberful can work for you. You

33:19

can get started with no credit card required

33:21

by going to Memberful.com slash

33:24

Cortex. It could be the next

33:26

great move for your business. That's

33:28

M-E-M-B-E-R-F-U-L Memberful.com

33:32

slash Cortex. Our thanks to Memberful

33:34

for their support of this show and RelayFM.

33:38

Alright, so the number one rule that everyone

33:41

would know is if you're

33:43

going to have different focus

33:45

modes and different setups

33:48

for doing different kinds of things in life, you

33:51

want them to look different. You want them

33:53

to be visually, immediately,

33:57

obviously different. Interesting. You

33:59

can do that with... app arrangement

34:01

is one tool, but it's not a sufficient

34:03

tool. You want to also try to use color,

34:06

and you want to try to use imagery, so

34:09

that it's just immediately obvious

34:12

that you are in a different mode. Communicate

34:15

that instantly. Mm-hmm. Mm-hmm.

34:18

That's for sure. So I've

34:20

pulled out the main focus

34:23

modes. I've sent you a copy of all

34:25

the different things that I have. So on

34:27

a high level, I have a lot of the similar

34:30

modes that you do. So I've got like

34:32

weekend, I've got travel, I've got sleep, a

34:35

do not disturb mode, and then I've

34:37

got a mode for health, a

34:39

mode that I call core for

34:42

what I think of as core work, like the most important

34:44

stuff that usually means writing. And

34:47

then I have a mode called open, which

34:49

is basically like my default mode for the phone.

34:52

Now, a bunch of modes. How do you distinguish

34:55

them? Well, Apple this

34:57

year added these absolutely

34:59

lovely planetary image backgrounds.

35:02

And so I've decided to go through

35:05

all of my focus modes and pick one

35:07

of the planets, with a slight exception,

35:10

to represent each of these modes.

35:12

Oh, a planet? How

35:14

on earth can you discern between the different shapes?

35:17

Because the planets look different. If it's all the same shape

35:19

and a black background, surely these

35:21

planets don't look that different. I've never bumped

35:24

into a square planet before, have you? No,

35:27

I have not bumped into a square planet before. But

35:30

I will say, if you decide

35:32

to go with this mode, you will realize we

35:34

don't actually have a lot of different colors for

35:37

the different planets. There's obviously the standout

35:39

of Saturn, right? We have the rings that makes it

35:41

more visually different. Earth looks quite

35:43

different. But then if you're like, oh, right,

35:46

Neptune and Uranus look like basically like

35:48

the exact same planet. Mercury

35:50

and the moon are quite difficult to tell

35:53

the difference, like at a glance. So I've

35:55

eliminated the similar ones. But

35:58

it did make me feel like... Ah,

36:00

we could use more colors in these planets, right?

36:03

We could use more differentiation for different ones.

36:05

Why do they all have to be planets? Why can't you just use

36:07

completely different images or like things

36:10

that all relate to the thing that is? Here's

36:13

the problem, Mike. If you're trying to

36:15

pick, like in my case here,

36:18

six, seven different wallpapers

36:21

to represent these different modes,

36:24

I would want them to be distinct,

36:28

but also related. And

36:31

that's actually quite a difficult task

36:33

to find wallpapers that go together

36:36

nicely,

36:37

but

36:38

also are visually distinct

36:40

in their colors. And so this was the

36:42

kind of task where I

36:44

was driving myself crazy because I would find

36:47

like, Ooh, I've got four good

36:49

wallpapers that work together, but these

36:51

two just don't quite fit and it's

36:53

like, well, let me try to fix this problem

36:56

by finding a new set of six wallpapers

36:58

that can work perfectly well. And so

37:01

when Apple came out with those planets, I made the

37:03

decision for my own mental sanity.

37:05

I was like, you know what? I'm just going to work

37:08

with what Apple gave me. There's enough choices

37:10

here. So I'm just going to stick with the planets for

37:12

each of the different focus modes. And I think

37:15

it looks really nice. And there's enough of them that are

37:17

enough different with the colors that

37:20

it can be just immediately obvious,

37:22

which thing are you doing? Sure. So yes,

37:25

this is what I do for me. As

37:27

you can see, many of these focus

37:30

modes are quite bare. So

37:33

like if we take a look at do not disturb,

37:36

which I've used as the moon, leave

37:38

me alone, right? Nobody come here. I

37:40

just don't have anything on

37:42

my phone for the do not disturb mode because

37:45

the only circumstances in which

37:47

I use that are circumstances basically,

37:49

which I shouldn't be using my phone

37:52

anyway. So like we're recording the podcast

37:54

right now, but the phone and do not disturb mode.

37:57

I'm not going to do anything with the phone because we're

37:59

recording. a show. I don't need anything here,

38:02

so I'm just going to not have

38:04

anything on the screen at all. And I

38:06

really like having it like that. It's good

38:08

to know where you're going to serve when the sun's going to go

38:10

down. Just have a little lock screen,

38:12

cut out the old sun

38:15

down there. Why are you making fun

38:17

of me for that? Because you started

38:19

it. We're a perfect recorder, and then

38:21

you're like, oh, look at your wallpaper. The

38:25

doc here, we have three shortcuts,

38:27

I'm assuming. Oh, yes,

38:30

right. Okay, yes. The only thing that I can do in any

38:32

of these modes that have nothing on them

38:34

is, yes. The doc, I've got three shortcuts.

38:37

Years ago, I used to have a launcher down here,

38:39

which brought up a list of a bunch of different

38:41

things that I could use, and I decided, you

38:44

know what? I can easily 80, 20, or 90, 10, which of

38:46

these am I actually using

38:49

basically all of the time, and just search for the rest

38:51

and get rid of this launcher. I've

38:53

gone down now to three things. They're

38:56

all input shortcuts. One

38:58

is for OmniFocus, one is

39:00

for a new note, and one is

39:03

for Cortex, for something to talk about on

39:05

the show. Those are the three that I leave on the bottom

39:07

as just like input. I have a thought.

39:09

It needs to go somewhere. Basically,

39:13

all of the time, it's going into one of

39:15

these three things. I

39:17

mean, there's a little problem that we'll get to

39:19

later, which is stuff should also

39:21

be going into Obsidian, but we

39:23

can get to that at a later point. This is like

39:26

most of my use case for just

39:28

about absolutely everything. So those are my items in

39:30

the doc. So I guess later on, we'll find out where they're

39:32

actually going. Because

39:35

that didn't sound too good. I also like

39:37

that you've had what I consider as

39:39

the very typical shortcuts experience,

39:41

which is like, I'll start one shortcut.

39:44

Now I'll make a shortcuts menu. Yeah,

39:46

yeah, yeah. So I'll make my shortcuts, and then I'll realize

39:49

I don't use them all. And so I'm just

39:51

going to go back to the ones that I really need, rather

39:53

than like my multi

39:55

shortcut, the Omni shortcut,

39:58

every shortcut possible. You know and people

40:01

end up like pairing that back over time This

40:03

is the exact same experience that people have when they

40:06

get into time tracking right is the

40:08

like oh, I'll just track Work

40:11

and it's like oh, just how many work hours I do

40:13

and then it grows into like incredibly

40:15

fine Distinctions for absolutely everything

40:18

and then you get paired back to like no wait

40:20

a minute. It's really only four things I care

40:22

about I don't care about Everything

40:24

in my life. I don't need to time track these

40:27

really subtle differences. So yeah hang

40:29

on Don't you track everything?

40:32

I'm always running a tracker But there's a

40:34

distinction here of like how fine grained

40:37

are the differences between the trackers? And

40:39

I just see this with everybody and I also

40:41

went through with time tracking Yeah, like you wildly

40:44

expand to like I'm gonna time

40:46

track the individual books that

40:48

I'm reading It's like really you

40:50

don't need to do that That doesn't make any sense and

40:53

people then pair it back and go like just reading

40:55

is fine, right? Yeah, it's the same

40:57

thing with shortcuts. Like you said you sort of explode into a

41:00

billion number of shortcuts and then you go Yeah,

41:03

but 90% of the time

41:05

I'm using these three and that's fine And

41:07

then you also have a corresponding empty

41:10

watch face what we call this watch face empty.

41:12

We have the weather on it Well, I'm assuming that the other

41:14

ones maybe have more complications on them Well,

41:16

I just wanted something that was non distracting.

41:18

Okay, like I've just gone with

41:21

a you know No numbers watch face just

41:23

the weather Basically black and white

41:25

matching the moon. It's actually a slight subtle

41:28

gray there naturally but yes once

41:30

again trying to pair watch

41:32

faces with modes is Exercise

41:36

in disappointment. Yeah, this is probably one

41:38

of the better ones and we're going to get to like

41:40

sad ugly ones later Well, I look forward to it.

41:43

So where next on the tour? Which

41:45

planet are we going to now if we're on

41:47

the moon, then I guess we'll go to earth

41:50

next Slightly disappointing because I

41:52

could see that I have travel set up exactly

41:54

the same way that you have travel

41:56

set up So that's completely uninteresting, but I

41:58

do cheat and I use Earth

42:01

twice, which I'm just like a little

42:03

bit upset at having to use the same planet

42:05

twice. But Apple does provide

42:08

this thing where you have two options, like the

42:10

zoomed in Earth and the zoomed

42:12

out Earth. Yeah, because the zoomed in one is good for

42:14

travel because it is showing you where you are. Yeah,

42:17

so the zoomed out Earth is what

42:19

I use for my open

42:21

mode. And this is

42:24

basically like the default

42:26

mode on the phone almost

42:28

all of the time. Basically, the way my day works

42:31

is like I start out in the core

42:34

for like doing my actual work or it's

42:36

the weekend. And then in the afternoon,

42:38

this rolls over into open

42:41

mode. And I call it open and

42:43

I use the Earth because this is the

42:45

period of time in which notifications

42:48

will actually reach me. This is

42:50

when you will communicate with people on Earth.

42:52

That's exactly why it's shown here. Well,

42:54

I like it because then in the other ones, look, if

42:57

you are from Mars, I'll speak to you. If you're not,

42:59

I want to know. I get it. Yeah,

43:02

so the open mode is the only time I'm having

43:04

anything to do with other Earthlings,

43:07

hence the Earth mode. And I guess it also works for

43:09

travel, too, right? It's like I'm having to like get

43:11

through all of these other Earthlings around me to get

43:13

wherever I'm going. So this

43:15

is the time where notifications

43:18

can come through, apps can have

43:20

like badges and things. This

43:22

is the one that's the afternoon one. I

43:24

don't have anything wildly interesting here.

43:27

Again, I like to try to keep things relatively simple.

43:30

So I would like to ask on the lock

43:32

screen, what is the complication with the little

43:34

flame? OK, yeah. So on the lock screen, I've

43:36

got batteries, activity, the weather.

43:39

The flame one is zero,

43:42

which is that fasting application that I've

43:44

mentioned in previous years. So with a little

43:46

timer and it just shows a little icon,

43:49

which tells you like which phase

43:51

of the fast are you in. So that's

43:53

just something that I want to do. What does a flame have to do with it?

43:56

Are you burning calories now? What's

43:59

going on? That's basically. Basically what they mean is

44:01

like, yeah, you're in the fat burning zone

44:03

of your fast. That's

44:06

basically what it means. If I was doing that

44:08

and I was hungry, I would not appreciate that little countdown.

44:11

Yeah. I mean, this is like a whole other thing, but

44:14

yeah, I've just been sort of keeping track of this. This

44:17

is part of my, people know, like I've always skipped breakfast

44:19

for forever. I guess this falls

44:21

in the same category of I'm always

44:23

running a time tracker. And so this

44:26

little timer of like, when

44:28

are you done eating for the evening?

44:31

Just start it with like slipped right

44:33

into my routine super easily. Yeah.

44:36

This to me is actually the primary benefit because I

44:38

feel like the danger is always

44:41

evening time. Like you're snacking for the whole

44:43

evening. So this is also more about

44:45

like, it's not really so much for me about when

44:48

the timer runs down. Like I don't care and I will

44:50

blow past this at all times, right? It's

44:52

like, oh, you've got two

44:54

hours left to hit your whatever goal.

44:56

It's like, I don't care, right? I don't care a timer. It's

44:59

much more about making a little

45:01

decision of like, okay, it's 8 PM.

45:05

I'm like done eating for the day. And

45:07

I know that because I press the button to start the

45:09

little fasting timer. So that's what that thing is.

45:12

And then on the home screen itself, I

45:14

just have the weather and

45:16

I have an OmniFocus

45:19

widget, which is showing me

45:21

a list that I call now, which

45:23

is basically most of the

45:25

things that are available to me just

45:28

sorted in the kind of project

45:30

slash priority order. You've got

45:32

a lot left to do today. Yeah.

45:35

23 tasks. That's like three days

45:37

for me. That's rough stuff.

45:40

Good luck. It's why I was intrigued

45:42

by the do thing that you were mentioning

45:44

before is because I think

45:47

I should experiment with pulling

45:49

out some of the more smaller personal

45:52

tasks that might fit into

45:54

this category of like, it needs

45:57

to be done today. It doesn't really

45:59

make sense. major project

46:01

and it helps to be nagged. So

46:04

I have a ridiculous number of things

46:07

in my OmniFocus and so

46:09

it always looks like, oh, Gray has a crazy

46:12

number of things, but I

46:15

rarely ever think that, oh, I'm going

46:17

to get to the end of this list today. It's just not

46:19

how I use the system and it's more like

46:21

they're ranked in priority and you just

46:23

work your way down the list and

46:26

a bunch of huge numbers of very

46:28

small things like take

46:30

out the trash, take your vitamins

46:32

or whatever, a bunch of things like that are in

46:34

there as well. So it's just a different

46:37

use for a task manager. Yeah,

46:38

okay.

46:40

So I guess we're going to go to Mars

46:42

next, which

46:45

is obviously, Mars is

46:47

for sleep. Why wouldn't the moon be for sleep?

46:50

Okay, so I'm glad you

46:52

asked, Mike, why isn't the moon for sleep?

46:54

Because it does seem like the moon should be

46:57

for sleep, but it's not

46:59

for sleep because in the actual real

47:01

world, when you're using your phone,

47:04

the moon's color is basically

47:07

bright white, like in the evening time,

47:09

right? It's the end of the day or like you're

47:11

getting ready for bed and you look at your phone and there's

47:14

like a circle of a flashlight just

47:16

shining into your eyes that is your

47:18

phone drawing the moon. So

47:21

I basically chose Mars because it is

47:24

the reddest planet. It is the darkest,

47:27

sleepiest color of all of the planets

47:29

to choose from. So that is why Mars is

47:32

the sleep focus. Okay, because it's

47:34

a sleep focus, you don't have the image of Mars on the

47:36

lock screen to send the home screen. It is very

47:39

faintly on the lock screen. Really? Oh

47:41

yeah, I can kind of see that. Right, it's

47:44

barely there. It's like

47:46

doing the sleep thing and the always on, I get that. They've

47:49

really, really dims the wallpaper in sleep

47:51

mode. Yeah, so you could easily miss it, but

47:53

you won't miss it if you're actually in like a completely

47:55

black room. Then you're like, oh, you can't actually see that

47:57

it's there. But yeah, the sleep mode, I have that setting

47:59

where It dims the wallpaper, which, so

48:02

here's the thing. I do like that for the wallpaper,

48:04

for dimming the wallpaper, but, okay.

48:07

Apple Watch frustrations. I have an Apple

48:09

Watch face for sleep

48:12

mode. So this is the

48:14

same face that you were talking about, like

48:16

the modular ultra face. Is

48:19

it? It is. So

48:21

I actually really

48:23

like this watch face. I think this is super

48:25

classy. You get like big tall numbers

48:28

in the middle. You can turn off basically

48:31

all of the complications, but

48:33

this is the ultra face. And

48:36

I feel like if you remove

48:39

basically everything and expand

48:41

the numbers in the middle, I

48:44

kind of think it's one of the nicest watch faces

48:46

that Apple makes, but this

48:48

is what I was talking about before with Apple

48:51

forces you to make decisions that

48:54

are very frustrating. So

48:57

I use this face for sleep because

48:59

it has an option which says, oh, do you want

49:01

this watch face to go into sleep mode? You

49:03

can make it red. So instead

49:05

of having the time being white numbers,

49:08

you can make them red numbers. I love

49:10

it. When I found that, I was like, oh, cool.

49:13

I can't wait to use this watch face and I'll just

49:15

set different colors for

49:17

all of the different focus modes that I use.

49:19

No, you can have it white or

49:22

you can have it red. Those are your only

49:24

two choices. Like, God damn

49:26

it, Apple. Like, let

49:29

me make it like this, but yellow?

49:31

No, you can't do that, right? Because

49:33

you can change the color, but it changes

49:36

the color of everything except the numbers

49:38

which are always white. Everything

49:40

is exactly that. Why does it do that? Numbers.

49:44

So frustrating. Like this again is

49:46

the thing of like, it's the most

49:49

obvious thing that people might want

49:51

to change and they always get to you,

49:53

right? It's the same thing with like the watch heads.

49:55

Like, oh, we can change everything except

49:57

the watch hands. No, you can't change. the

50:00

watch is so frustrating.

50:02

And so like, I really

50:04

like this as a super simple digital

50:07

watch face, but I just, I

50:09

use it on one other thing, but I

50:11

would use it everywhere if I could just change

50:13

the color of the actual numbers.

50:16

It's like, no, red or white, that's it.

50:18

Very weird. Yeah. This watch

50:20

on your wrist that has more computing power

50:23

than has sent actual people to the

50:25

moon cannot draw these numerals

50:27

in a different color. So

50:30

frustrating. What next take

50:32

me to another planet, Gray? So my very easy

50:35

method, just so Jupiter, let's go

50:37

to health. Why? I guess I'm realizing

50:39

in this conversation with you, I feel like I have

50:43

strong feelings about the planets that you

50:45

just don't.

50:47

No, of course I don't. Why would I associate

50:49

Jupiter in health? Why would I do that? Jupiter

50:52

is like the biggest and burliest of all the

50:54

planets, right? It's like, if any planet lifts,

50:56

Jupiter totally lifts, bro. Like it obviously

50:59

does. But maybe like Jupiter is just for

51:01

show, you know, another planet is actually

51:03

stronger, but Jupiter just like bulks up.

51:06

I was actually just mentally flipping through the roster

51:08

of planets, like, who could that be? And I was

51:11

like, no, I don't think anybody else does. What about Saturn?

51:13

Saturn's like holding the rings up. Saturn is

51:15

the planet that's like for looks, right? It's got the flashy

51:17

rings. Fair enough. Okay,

51:20

so for the Jupiter one, this

51:22

is where things are actually kind

51:24

of useful. So Jupiter is the coolest looking

51:26

planet, right? With the frigging

51:28

storm going on. You're like, what are you doing, man?

51:30

The storm is very interesting. It's super cool.

51:33

It's like, oh, it's always there. It's like, oh, wow.

51:35

Okay. So because Jupiter obviously

51:37

lifts on the home screen, this

51:40

is where I have all of the apps related to health.

51:43

So particularly when I'm

51:45

doing an exercise, it triggers

51:48

to flip into the health mode. So this is

51:50

also like what you would

51:52

have for fitness, right? Yeah,

51:54

I originally called this fitness,

51:57

but I ran into a problem where Apple

51:59

has... fitness hard coded

52:01

as a mode. And

52:03

I cannot remember what it is now, but that

52:06

caused some problem for me with

52:08

some automation. The fact that it was

52:10

hard coded just didn't work. I cannot remember

52:12

what it was now, but I had to change it to a more

52:14

generic name. Yeah, I have a fitness

52:18

focus mode, but all it does is just turns

52:20

off my notifications basically. Right,

52:22

right. Although, it stopped working

52:24

with the new watch. I don't understand why,

52:26

but that's the thing I need to work out for another

52:28

time. But yeah, I don't have anything special

52:30

for it. It's purely just like, I

52:33

just don't want any notifications when I'm working out of

52:35

any kind. And I just leave it at that.

52:37

Yeah, so it's the same thing here. I feel like you,

52:40

I just don't want any note. Whatever

52:42

it is, it can wait until

52:44

after. It will wait 45 minutes, right? Like

52:46

it just will, and I just don't want the distractions.

52:49

Yeah, completely agree. So I've got

52:51

Fitbot on here, which is my

52:54

exercise app that I mentioned before. Just totally

52:56

love life-changing sponsor of this

52:58

episode, I believe. Hugely important

53:01

life-changing app for me. I also have

53:03

the regular Apple Fitness one, and

53:05

I have the Apple Health app on

53:07

here. The Health app is ruining the aesthetic of this

53:10

home screen. God

53:12

damn it, Mike, you're right. Everything is

53:14

fit. Even the fitness app, because it's got

53:17

like the good hue that fits with the other colors,

53:19

and then Health is just like, yo,

53:22

I'm here too, you know? You

53:24

know what, you're totally right. Right

53:26

now, I'm going to add OmniItem,

53:29

create shortcut, because it's going to bother me. Create

53:33

shortcuts for

53:35

Health app. You're totally right. I can't

53:37

unsee it now. I

53:39

feel like maybe if it was black

53:41

with the heart that was pink, that might look kind of

53:43

nice, because then it would fit with the fitness app a

53:45

little bit. That might be kind of cool. Yeah, you're right.

53:48

Okay, so this gets filed under bugs in OmniFoC.

53:50

A lot of calculators. Pounds

53:53

to kilograms, kilograms to pounds. Smith

53:55

plate calculator. I don't know what that means.

53:58

Plate calculators, there's a lot of things going on here. Okay,

54:01

so what's happening here is the weights

54:03

that I use that I have at home, the power

54:06

block stuff, they are in pounds.

54:09

But in the UK, this is crazy

54:12

to me, in most, but

54:14

not all gyms, weights

54:16

are given in kilograms. But

54:19

a surprising, like when I go on gradations,

54:21

a surprising number of gyms

54:25

actually use both systems, and

54:27

you won't know unless you ask someone to

54:29

be like, wait, what's going on with these weights over here? Like 90%

54:33

of stuff is in kilograms in the UK, but I would

54:35

say 10% of stuff is in pounds. So

54:39

by sheer number of times,

54:42

I am most frequently exercising

54:44

at home with my weights that are

54:47

in pounds, especially this year

54:49

because of some of my theme stuff. I've also been

54:51

going to my local gym a bunch because

54:53

they have equipment that I don't. Where most

54:56

things are in kilograms. So anyway,

54:59

the long story short is in FitBOD,

55:03

the setting for changing between

55:05

pounds and kilograms is

55:07

in kind of a weird spot. And

55:10

changing back and forth in FitBOD is basically

55:12

kind of a pain. And even

55:15

within the same gyms in

55:17

the UK, I sometimes need to calculate between

55:19

pounds and kilograms, right? That's weird.

55:22

It's very weird. When I made a decision, I was like, okay,

55:24

what's the easiest thing that I can

55:27

do? I should, in theory,

55:29

because I'm in the UK, just do everything in kilograms.

55:33

But since the weights in my house were pounds, and also

55:35

since I grew up with pounds and still think in

55:37

pounds, I was like, no. Just

55:39

like Fahrenheit, right? I'm holding

55:41

the line on pounds are the correct

55:44

unit of weight. And so I made

55:46

a bunch of shortcuts. I don't agree with that at

55:48

all. Well, look, I'm not interested

55:50

in your view. I know. Here's the thing.

55:53

I know what you want. And I just need to state that I disagree.

55:56

No one's going to have to try and convince anyone of

55:58

anything. I just feel like I'm going to have to. I need to just

56:00

come out in favor of Celsius and

56:02

kilograms. I mean, look,

56:04

Fahrenheit is the best in height. We all know this. And

56:07

pounds are the worst in height. Fahrenheit is the worst in height.

56:11

I'm actually quite movable on pounds. I'm not particularly

56:14

wedded to pounds. I think kilograms are fine. But

56:16

so I spent a little time and I just made

56:19

some shortcuts to do the quick pounds to

56:21

kilograms back and forth conversions. The reason

56:23

I like kilograms is

56:26

that the smaller

56:28

is a gram and there's 100 in a kilogram. I've

56:30

got some bad news for you about how many grams

56:32

are in a kilogram and what the word kilo means.

56:35

And there's a thousand in a kilogram, let me allow them forever. But

56:37

like you've got pounds and ounces, like how many

56:40

ounces are in a pound? God damn, we don't need to have this

56:42

conversation right now. Okay. This

56:44

is why I also don't like feet and inches. It's

56:46

like the similar thing. I was like, I can't remember all of this. You

56:49

know? It's a simple thing of like there's 100

56:52

or a thousand who could know between these

56:55

things. I just

56:57

appreciate you demonstrating the mistake

56:59

that all of my physics students did.

57:01

I'm like, this is one of these things that drives me

57:03

crazy when people are like, the metric system is amazing. The

57:06

person saying that is almost always a nerd

57:09

and overestimates how rarely

57:12

normal people will make a mistake going back and

57:14

forth. But the thing is though, great. Okay.

57:17

I can see that I've made the mistake very quickly,

57:20

right? I can't do the same thing

57:23

for feet and inches or like pounds

57:25

and ounces. If I say it's six

57:27

and it actually is nine, it's just

57:29

not as easy to realize that I've made the mistake.

57:32

Yeah, it's totally fair. Yeah, yeah. Like

57:34

making the mistake is fine, but like how quickly can you correct it?

57:37

And like I will realize very quickly

57:39

that, you know, if I'm trying to do something, oh no,

57:41

wait, this is nowhere near enough. And

57:45

I'm like, I can't do that. With pounds

57:47

and ounces, you could be really close. I

57:49

made the mistake and I'm not adding it out. So

57:53

I've at least got to try and defend myself, you know?

57:55

Yeah, that's totally fair. Totally fair.

57:57

And the conversion system is better. Imperial

58:00

overestimates how often you actually switch

58:02

between the units. Like, this is a much rarer

58:04

thing. I mean, I did grow up with Imperial.

58:07

The UK has a weird mixed system. I

58:09

don't understand why. I know, and there's this weird, like,

58:11

counterculture of people trying to bring it back

58:14

as well, which is like, get over yourself,

58:16

man, it's gone, alright? Like, Imperial's

58:18

gone. Nobody wants to deal in that anymore.

58:21

Stop trying to bring gallons back into the equation.

58:23

Yes, but you've literally picked the example where,

58:25

again, the UK has this great mix of stuff. There's

58:28

gallons and quarts back for milk, and it's

58:30

like, what are you doing? Just like, get over

58:32

yourself. We've moved on. Oh, I'll agree

58:34

with you there. That ship has totally failed.

58:36

Yes, no one wants to live in this world. Everything's

58:39

in liters and milliliters. Yes. Although,

58:41

I still kind of hate milliliters. There's

58:44

a hundred milliliters in a litre. There's

58:48

a thousand milliliters. Where

58:50

are we going? Ah! Anything

58:54

with milliliters is like, why does this tiny

58:56

bottle have such a big number? I

58:59

hate it. No, I know. I hate it

59:01

so much. Like, oh, this tiny bottle of water,

59:03

how many milliliters? Three hundred! Here's

59:05

what I think we can all agree on. None of these systems

59:08

are good. They're just like, different forms

59:10

of, okay. What we can all agree on

59:13

is you shouldn't have a mixed system, right?

59:15

Yes. Which a surprising

59:17

number of countries do. That's like

59:20

the UK, India, Canada.

59:22

Like they've got these mixed systems. Like

59:25

guys, pick a size, right? Pick

59:27

a size. Anyway, apps. Apps,

59:30

let's get back to apps. Anyway,

59:33

unit conversions. You know what? They're

59:35

really annoying, so you can make shortcuts to

59:37

do it for you. I'll just

59:39

point out, the two you asked

59:41

about there is like plate calculators and Smith

59:44

plate calculators. So I was

59:46

really just doing the math in my head and I was like, this

59:49

is dumb, right? This is what machines are for. Just have the machine

59:51

do it for you. And the advantage of making your

59:53

own little shortcut is when

59:55

doing things like the bench press or whatever, you

59:58

can have the shortcut. Because

1:00:00

I'm thinking in pounds right, but it's like I want to think in kilograms

1:00:03

also then round to the correct Unit

1:00:07

of the plates in the gym that you're in

1:00:10

and kind of like spit out the number in a format

1:00:12

that you want Right because you're putting plates on the bar. So

1:00:14

that's partly why I have these shortcuts there is like

1:00:16

there's the regular machines There's

1:00:18

the Smith machines, which I don't love

1:00:21

and for incomprehensible reasons They have a different

1:00:23

bar weight than just like a regular Olympic

1:00:26

bar I always feel like curse you

1:00:28

Smith inventor of this stupid

1:00:31

machine I hate it, but oftentimes

1:00:34

it's if I don't want to wait around in the

1:00:36

gym forever Like the Imperial version of the weight

1:00:38

equipment Yeah, I don't know what it is. Like I hate it

1:00:42

It's like it's clearly designed so that people don't

1:00:45

injure themselves But I like I just don't

1:00:47

understand how it's been elevated

1:00:49

to be like every gym has one

1:00:51

of these and it always feels like It'd

1:00:53

be much better just to have a regular Olympic bar

1:00:55

here. That's what everybody wants Nobody wants this

1:00:58

fifth machine, but whatever I'll

1:01:00

use it if it's the only thing that's free So that's why I have

1:01:02

it there These are like shortcuts

1:01:04

that do real work for me all

1:01:06

the time, right? It's like just I'm putting in a number

1:01:09

give me the thing great. Boom. Boom. Boom. Those

1:01:11

are the three plates I need put them on fantastic

1:01:14

the last little thing there which I'll talk

1:01:16

about later in the year But I've been very intentionally

1:01:19

doing a lot of like zone to heart exercise

1:01:21

this year Yeah, and on

1:01:23

the list of things that's incredibly frustrating It's

1:01:26

like Apple doesn't track

1:01:28

this as a separate metric like they'll

1:01:30

tell you after each exercise How much

1:01:32

time you spent in zone to heart rate?

1:01:35

But there's nowhere to get this data

1:01:37

just as an aggregate out of the app I

1:01:40

was even looking into with shortcuts

1:01:42

like time manually pull out like

1:01:44

the heart ranges and backwards cut No, you

1:01:47

can't get access to this very frustrating So

1:01:49

because I want to keep track of how much time

1:01:52

per two weeks am I spending in

1:01:54

zone two? Again, just made a little shortcut

1:01:57

that asked me for a number of minutes

1:02:00

which I'm getting at the end of the exercise.

1:02:02

And then that shortcut just, boop, it spits it into

1:02:04

a little spreadsheets in numbers. So

1:02:07

you're doing some manual entry. Doing manual entry here. So

1:02:09

you're going to the health app, looking

1:02:12

at your workout, it tells you the

1:02:14

zone breakdown and then you're putting that in.

1:02:16

That's an annoying system, isn't it? I'm putting that

1:02:18

number in. It's incredibly annoying,

1:02:21

it's very frustrating. It's like, if I didn't care

1:02:23

so much, I wouldn't bother doing

1:02:25

this, but I actually really care about this metric.

1:02:27

But every time it makes me curse the

1:02:29

Apple health app, like again, all

1:02:32

year there's been this theme of like, Apple health

1:02:34

app, right? I give you like my anti-app of

1:02:36

the year award. Like there's nothing that I use

1:02:38

more that is also more frustrating.

1:02:41

And this is like one of these key things

1:02:43

of like, you know this number.

1:02:46

I know you know because you're telling

1:02:48

it to me when I'm done with the exercise.

1:02:50

I wonder if it's in the API. Yeah, it's an

1:02:52

interesting question. I wonder if you can. Under school,

1:02:55

can you let us know? Yeah. Can

1:02:57

you tell us? See if anybody knows,

1:02:59

David. Yeah, you can copy

1:03:01

paste some code just to make it work. Right, just like copy

1:03:04

paste the thing. So that's what I'm doing with Input

1:03:06

Zone 2 there is just like throwing it into my own

1:03:08

spreadsheet. So then I can just see like, okay, cool. I'm like

1:03:10

above or below the average that I'm looking for with this number.

1:03:12

Yep. Okay, so that's that blowing

1:03:15

past my very easy method, just speed.

1:03:17

So we're up to Saturn. So

1:03:19

Saturn, now Mike,

1:03:22

what

1:03:23

mode is going to be Saturn? This

1:03:25

one you must associate it, please.

1:03:28

Well, I guess based on what you said, it's like the most showy

1:03:30

off of all of your focus

1:03:33

modes. Do you have fashion focus?

1:03:35

What is it? It's the weekend, Saturn.

1:03:38

Okay. For Saturday. Saturn

1:03:40

day. Yeah, Saturn day, that's where it comes from.

1:03:42

Oh. Don't you say

1:03:45

that to me because I'll tell that to other people. Did

1:03:47

you be great, told me. Oh

1:03:52

boy, okay. There's not much to

1:03:54

say here. Saturn is for Saturday for the weekends.

1:03:57

Again, other like pretty clear thing. I just want

1:03:59

the weather. I have a little yellow watch

1:04:01

face that I kind of hate to match that

1:04:04

just shows me like the top thing in OmniFocus.

1:04:07

I don't like this color for the watch face. Yeah, though.

1:04:09

We're just in general the yellow I don't

1:04:11

like yeah, it's like puce

1:04:14

almost like it's not even really yellow It's

1:04:16

got like too much green in it. I feel like I

1:04:18

don't like it This is a this is kind of

1:04:20

like a compromised color. Yeah, this is what

1:04:23

it is Like I've got too many things clashing up against

1:04:25

each other I've always used yellow

1:04:28

as free time and all of my calendar blocking

1:04:30

and I'm tracking This is a problem

1:04:32

just with human eyes. We don't perceive enough

1:04:35

colors, but you really only have seven

1:04:37

and It's a surprisingly few

1:04:39

number to work with for lots of different things So

1:04:42

I go with the yellow Saturn is like basically

1:04:44

a yellow we kind of planets But if

1:04:47

I actually as I did with a little eyedropper

1:04:49

match the exact color of Saturn

1:04:52

to be the yellow That's going to be displayed. It

1:04:54

doesn't look right at all. It doesn't read as yellow on

1:04:56

pure black. So Yeah,

1:04:58

this is my least favorite aesthetically. It's

1:05:00

a compromise. I acknowledge that Well, I

1:05:03

got a goldy color, but then I'll do the job. I

1:05:05

could try something like that. Yeah, I might

1:05:07

want to try that the real frustration is

1:05:11

when we go over to the watch face that

1:05:13

I

1:05:14

can't quite get a yellow that works right

1:05:16

for the focus mode And so it has to have like

1:05:19

this little green dot on the top This

1:05:21

is another one of these things Apple, please

1:05:23

I'm begging you your watch faces are

1:05:26

so ugly so often already

1:05:28

Do we have to show the icon

1:05:30

for the lightest mode on top of the

1:05:33

watch? It's just there

1:05:35

to ruin the look of the watch constantly

1:05:38

You know what goes on the top of the

1:05:40

watch is the notification dot right? Yeah

1:05:43

So why is there now something else up there?

1:05:45

Yeah, I hate that. I hate it

1:05:48

So much right on the watch.

1:05:51

Why does that to persistently tell me? Yeah

1:05:53

what focus moment? It's crazy because again when

1:05:55

you pull up a control sensor on the watch It's

1:05:57

also right there like which focus mode are you

1:05:59

in? And I don't understand. The only way

1:06:02

to disable this, as far as I can tell, is to

1:06:04

disable the watch paying attention

1:06:06

to focus modes at all, which completely

1:06:10

cripples all of its functionality.

1:06:12

It's infuriating. I swear,

1:06:15

if I could lift up the screen

1:06:17

of my Apple Watch and with a pin,

1:06:21

manually blind and

1:06:23

break every one of the pixels that

1:06:26

displays the focus mode, and

1:06:28

just have them be permanent, black, I

1:06:31

would do it. I would do that to get rid

1:06:33

of this and just deal with a black hole

1:06:35

on the top of my watch. I hate it so

1:06:37

much. I think we have one more? Yeah,

1:06:40

I was going to say, we've got just the final one, also

1:06:42

boring, which is Core. So

1:06:45

we go out to Neptune. Core.

1:06:48

Core. Neptune,

1:06:50

another perfect,

1:06:53

perfect emotional planet here. Oh,

1:06:56

great. I've just gone to the home

1:06:58

screen. They have such

1:07:00

little on this home screen. But

1:07:03

just so you know, for the next 54 days,

1:07:05

St. Nick's Day is coming. Make

1:07:09

sure you don't forget, you count it down every day,

1:07:11

you know? St. Nick's Day. So Mike

1:07:13

is making fun of me because last year you

1:07:15

recommended a little app called Up ahead, which

1:07:18

is just a simple little like, hey,

1:07:21

what's up next kind of app. I

1:07:24

really like it. And I am

1:07:26

indeed counting down to St. Nick's Day. You

1:07:30

laugh. I do. I

1:07:32

do. You're right. But it's

1:07:34

very serious to me because St. Nick's

1:07:37

Day is for me basically

1:07:41

the mark of the end of the year. Like

1:07:43

all serious work should

1:07:46

really be wrapped up by St. Nick's

1:07:49

Day. It's not that like work doesn't

1:07:51

happen after that, but this

1:07:53

to me is really like big

1:07:56

things are done now and you

1:07:58

need. to set aside

1:08:01

some time to actually enjoy

1:08:03

the holiday season. So that's why

1:08:05

I have it there. That's why it's on my

1:08:08

core work screen is it

1:08:10

is a countdown of like, how much

1:08:13

time do you really

1:08:15

have left for serious

1:08:17

work? If you're going to have a video

1:08:20

up in December, you should really

1:08:22

try to have it done before St. Nick's day, if

1:08:25

you don't want to ruin your

1:08:27

whole month, right? Trying to get this done

1:08:29

before the end

1:08:29

of the year. That's why that's up

1:08:32

there. It's the sixth of December.

1:08:34

I didn't know this. I had to Google it and I'm just helping

1:08:37

people who were like, what is St. Nick's day?

1:08:39

Uh-huh. Cause I also didn't know what St. Nick's day was.

1:08:42

I have St. Nick's day as the fifth of December,

1:08:45

but different places celebrate St. Nick's

1:08:48

day on different days. And there's

1:08:50

a St. Nick's Eve, which is on the fifth.

1:08:52

Wait. So do you observe Imperial

1:08:54

or Metric St. Nick's day? I observe

1:08:56

Imperial St. Nick's day

1:08:58

as all good Dutch descendants do. Ah,

1:09:03

okay. I wondered why, like, why have I

1:09:05

no idea about this, but I guess. Again,

1:09:07

as the child of a Dutch immigrant,

1:09:10

St. Nick's day was an annual thing every

1:09:12

time growing up. It's like similar to how like

1:09:15

a lot of European countries, they celebrate Christmas

1:09:17

and Christmas Eve. Like it's when people open their

1:09:19

presents and stuff. Yeah. So we also basically

1:09:22

did Christmas on Christmas Eve for the exact

1:09:24

same reason. Yeah. This is how things were done in the

1:09:26

old world before we emigrated to the

1:09:28

United States. I have no idea what

1:09:30

happened there where like it's the same

1:09:33

traditions, but people do them on different days.

1:09:35

Like in the days off by one, like I have

1:09:37

no idea how that happened. And I need

1:09:39

to know. But yes, you're exactly right. It's like

1:09:41

St. Nick's day is kind of like Christmas and

1:09:43

this, is it St. Nick's day or is it

1:09:46

Christmas Eve or is it St. Nick's Eve? Like

1:09:48

this same confusion has totally happened

1:09:51

in different places. Well, only 54 days

1:09:53

to go. So. Don't remind

1:09:55

me. I don't need to. I don't need enough every

1:09:57

day. I don't need to. You have an app

1:09:59

that does it. Yeah, so that's the core one.

1:10:02

Then just lastly, my watch face

1:10:04

for the core. Kind

1:10:06

of happy with it. Again, it's that ultra face. I

1:10:09

think it looks pretty good in blue. I've got OmniFocus

1:10:11

in the center for what I need to do. And that's

1:10:13

it. That's it. What is that on the bottom, right?

1:10:16

On the bottom, right? That's the fasting timer. Again, in

1:10:19

the middle is a very

1:10:21

old app, which is called Better Date,

1:10:24

which just shows the current date, but it has

1:10:26

a little progress slider for how

1:10:28

far you are in the month. I

1:10:31

should probably have this more prominent because I'm just constantly

1:10:33

forgetting when it is, but I do

1:10:35

like this one of like, oh, we have a progress bar

1:10:38

throughout the month. How close are we to the end? I don't

1:10:40

just want the number. I want to see the little visual indicator.

1:10:43

And so there we are. We've wrapped up the

1:10:46

introduction to state of the app.

1:10:49

We've done an entire episode already.

1:10:51

We could just

1:10:53

be done and that's it. But

1:10:56

yet this, we just introduced it, but

1:10:58

we're not done. This

1:11:01

episode of Cortex is brought to you by FitBod.

1:11:03

When you want to change your fitness

1:11:05

level, it can be hard to know where to start.

1:11:08

That's why I'm pleased to let you know that FitBod

1:11:10

is an easy and affordable way to build

1:11:13

a fitness plan just for you. You have

1:11:15

heard us talk about FitBod, I think every

1:11:17

year in state of the apps for a very

1:11:19

good reason. FitBod is the very

1:11:22

best fitness app out there. It's incredibly

1:11:24

easy to use. They have over 1,400 HD video

1:11:28

tutorials shot from multiple angles to

1:11:30

make sure that learning every exercise is a breeze.

1:11:33

They have achievements that you can keep track of

1:11:35

and personal bests with that a great progress tracking

1:11:38

chance in the app. It integrates with

1:11:40

your smartwatch and other apps like Strava,

1:11:42

Fitbit, and Apple Health. But ultimately

1:11:45

what makes FitBod so great, it's a great

1:11:47

app. It looks good to use, but what makes them so great

1:11:50

is the algorithm that they have built to

1:11:52

make sure that you are keeping on

1:11:54

track with your fitness goals. FitBod

1:11:57

knows that everybody has their own path to personal

1:11:59

fitness. That's when it sticks and it's

1:12:01

when you actually see a difference. So they

1:12:03

learn about you, your goals and your training ability

1:12:06

to create a custom dynamic program based

1:12:08

on your experience and any equipment you have. This

1:12:11

is all within an app that is so easy

1:12:13

to use. Superior results are

1:12:15

achieved when a workout program is tailored

1:12:17

to your unique body, experience,

1:12:20

environment and goals. They understand

1:12:22

that you don't want to overwork muscles or underwork

1:12:25

muscles. This can negatively impact your results

1:12:28

so that you design a well balanced workout

1:12:30

routine that is for you. They mix up

1:12:32

your muscle groups, exercises, sets, reps

1:12:34

and weight over time. This will increase your

1:12:36

overall strength, keep your body sharp and

1:12:38

keep your sessions fresh

1:12:40

and fun by mixing up your workouts

1:12:43

with new exercises. Gray and I have spoken

1:12:45

about the big impact FitBod had

1:12:48

in our personal fitness journey. If

1:12:50

you've yet to try it out, now is a great time.

1:12:53

Personalized training of this quality can be expensive. FitBod

1:12:56

though is just $12.99 a month or $79.99 a year but

1:12:58

you can get a huge 25% of your membership

1:13:02

by signing up at fitbod.me slash cortex.

1:13:05

So go now and get your customized fitness

1:13:07

plan at fitbod.me

1:13:09

slash cortex. That is F-I-T-B-O-D

1:13:13

dot me slash cortex. So 25% of

1:13:16

your membership are thanks to FitBod for

1:13:18

their support of this show and Relay FM. Productivity

1:13:22

apps. The cornerstone of our productivity app

1:13:24

system is the Todo app. It

1:13:27

is the Todo app. That is

1:13:29

the absolute core. You know when

1:13:32

I sat down this year, Gray, to start

1:13:34

my notes, I thought to myself, I'm

1:13:37

very content with Todoist as my Todo

1:13:39

app. It does everything the way

1:13:41

that I want and I have no desire

1:13:43

to move apps anymore. I'm very

1:13:45

happy with Todoist. Gray, how are you

1:13:47

feeling? I'm feeling

1:13:50

nervous, Mike. Yeah. I'm

1:13:52

not going to lie. I'm feeling a little nervous. Honestly,

1:13:54

I feel nervous for you. Really? Yeah.

1:13:58

So the situation is, obviously I've been using OmniFocus for years. years.

1:14:01

But also for what is now a

1:14:03

like growing percentage of

1:14:05

those years, I have been hearing

1:14:07

about OmniFocus 4, which

1:14:09

is in the works. The OmniFocus 4

1:14:13

first look was published

1:14:16

on May 10th, 2021. Right.

1:14:20

That was when they started the beta for

1:14:22

OmniFocus 4. That's when they started the

1:14:25

public beta of it. But I know

1:14:27

like I spoke to people in person about

1:14:30

OmniFocus 4 before then, when

1:14:33

I was a bit like, hey, what's going on

1:14:35

with this thing? Yeah.

1:14:38

So the OmniFocus blog

1:14:41

has been over this time, like publishing

1:14:43

updates about what's going on and like how

1:14:45

they're moving forward. And the

1:14:48

entire time they have been insisting

1:14:50

that they are like on schedule to release

1:14:52

the next version of OmniFocus and that

1:14:54

this is not any different than

1:14:56

the amount of time between the previous

1:14:58

versions of OmniFocus. And I think all

1:15:01

of that is true. I kind of take them at their word for

1:15:03

this, but the

1:15:05

end result though is like, boy,

1:15:08

if it is going to

1:15:10

be years between

1:15:12

major updates, it starts to become

1:15:14

a problem. And I feel like the

1:15:17

latest release of iOS and

1:15:19

particularly Sonoma has just like

1:15:22

pushed this really over the edge.

1:15:24

And I was feeling like, boy, I just,

1:15:27

I hope OmniFocus is there like right

1:15:31

after the OS goes out

1:15:33

and it wasn't. And boy, OmniFocus

1:15:37

just feels so old

1:15:39

and creaky on the current operating

1:15:41

systems. They're saying later this year. I

1:15:43

know that they're saying later this year, but I

1:15:45

feel like it's really bad to miss

1:15:48

the iOS launch and the

1:15:50

Sonoma launch. Even if

1:15:52

that was always your plan, like, oh, we're going to do it

1:15:54

later this year. I just don't think it's good.

1:15:56

And it particularly doesn't look good because

1:15:58

there's no. interactive widgets

1:16:00

like none of that widget stuff works. The

1:16:03

widgets that exist on iOS

1:16:05

like they are fine

1:16:07

but they feel very crowbarred into

1:16:10

the system and they just kind of don't look

1:16:12

good they don't scale properly with

1:16:14

anything. I will say to do ist widgets

1:16:17

are terrible. Okay. They're really bad

1:16:19

they've always been bad but I don't want

1:16:21

a widget of my to-do app

1:16:24

on my home screen anyway but

1:16:26

they are very bad. Yes like

1:16:28

on my Mac I was trying to

1:16:31

use the widgets but like OmniFocus

1:16:33

was showing up as a like you could see

1:16:35

the square block that was getting rendered

1:16:38

for the widget like inside the round borders

1:16:40

is like ooh that does not look good.

1:16:43

Wow. Anyway it's just one

1:16:45

of these things of like boy they're just slowly

1:16:48

adding up things where it feels like it just

1:16:50

does not work

1:16:52

great in the system. Again I want to emphasize

1:16:54

I've stuck with it because nothing is

1:16:57

broken but it just

1:16:59

feels increasingly like

1:17:01

oh my god this is very

1:17:04

out of step with the current operating systems

1:17:07

and like little things just keep adding up

1:17:09

just like the the minimum

1:17:12

physical size that OmniFocus will

1:17:14

take up on the screen is like quite large

1:17:16

it's like trying to you know make it fit in the little corners

1:17:19

can be really frustrating. So what I dream

1:17:22

happens is like oh OmniFocus 4

1:17:25

gets released between the time that we record

1:17:27

this episode and when it goes live

1:17:29

and I don't have to worry about anything anymore

1:17:32

but the truth is I am

1:17:34

just concerned and I was

1:17:36

concerned enough that last

1:17:39

month I did a kind of tour of

1:17:42

the other to-do systems that exist

1:17:45

I was like I just want to I want to like refresh

1:17:47

my view of the field like what

1:17:50

is out here what's available this

1:17:52

tour went all the

1:17:55

way back to remember the milk. Let

1:17:59

me survey. everything

1:18:01

that I would reasonably use. Remember

1:18:04

the milk was extra hilarious because

1:18:06

I found my super old

1:18:08

account and logged into it where it had

1:18:10

to-do's left over from my

1:18:13

teaching career. Like to-do

1:18:15

list archaeology of like wow look

1:18:17

at this whole system that's amazing. I mean

1:18:20

the truth is though I have one

1:18:22

just such an incredible deal

1:18:24

breaker for to-do systems and it is

1:18:26

this concept of the start date, I

1:18:29

am still just blown

1:18:31

away by how many apps don't

1:18:33

have this implemented at all or

1:18:35

implement it very badly.

1:18:38

Like there are lots of things that OmniFocus does

1:18:40

that are great but like this

1:18:43

to me is the key and it is the single

1:18:45

thing that makes it the hardest to move from absolutely

1:18:48

anything else. So after

1:18:51

my survey of the field I kind of had to make

1:18:53

a decision. I was like all right assume

1:18:55

that OmniFocus will

1:18:58

not release this year. Will you still

1:19:00

use it? And the

1:19:02

answer I came to was yes. I

1:19:05

will still use it because the other

1:19:07

options are significantly

1:19:09

less appealing to me but boy

1:19:12

I would not be happy about that. So I

1:19:14

have not used OmniFocus for

1:19:16

a long time. I was on the beta but I let my app

1:19:18

have it or expire at some point sometime

1:19:20

last year or whatever. And I will

1:19:24

be frank and say like I did not like

1:19:26

the way the app felt to use. They

1:19:30

were moving to SwiftUI and

1:19:32

that's what they have stuck with and the

1:19:35

app just didn't feel right to use.

1:19:38

And maybe they've changed it I

1:19:40

don't know but let's just imagine that enough

1:19:43

has changed about the application that you don't like

1:19:45

using the application anymore. Well then what do you do? Because

1:19:49

it is a new design. The

1:19:51

design is changing. You can see it

1:19:53

in the imagery that I've shared. It

1:19:56

is very similar of course to

1:19:58

the OmniFocus that you know. But

1:20:01

it's different. Yeah, I mean

1:20:03

I haven't used it in the beta. I've only

1:20:05

seen the screenshots. I actually don't

1:20:07

really have any problem with the screenshots. I'm not quite sure

1:20:11

why people don't seem to like the design

1:20:13

of that. I didn't like the way the app

1:20:15

felt to use. But again, it was in

1:20:17

beta, right? Like I've got to be fair and

1:20:19

say like it wasn't finished and it was a

1:20:21

long time ago. But there

1:20:24

was just something about it where it did not

1:20:26

have the pleasant feeling

1:20:28

that I'd had using the app before. But who knows

1:20:30

where it is right now. I genuinely don't know. Yeah,

1:20:32

but this is a problem with like so when I was

1:20:35

surveying the field of to-do list apps. This

1:20:38

is a recurring problem where lots

1:20:40

of these apps because they have an idea of

1:20:43

working with teams or whatever like they're using

1:20:45

different systems. So some apps like did

1:20:47

have start dates, but it would be

1:20:49

the same thing where I feel like I just

1:20:51

clearly don't like using this. Like this

1:20:53

is unpleasant to use in a way

1:20:56

that is difficult to pin down. Like

1:20:59

I can't exactly articulate

1:21:02

why, but I don't like it. It's

1:21:04

a funny thing. Like we used to say on the show that

1:21:07

the market for to-do apps was

1:21:09

infinite. But I think I was also

1:21:11

quite surprised in how

1:21:15

remarkably unchanged this whole

1:21:17

world is since the last time I really

1:21:19

went to look around. Like

1:21:21

I kind of thought, oh, I'll find some new apps that

1:21:23

I was unaware of since the last time. The answer

1:21:26

is like, no, not really. Like it's the

1:21:28

same few ones that are the

1:21:30

default answers for absolutely

1:21:32

everyone. So you've got OmniFocus,

1:21:34

you've got to-doist and like, and

1:21:37

all of the friends and like, these are the things to choose from. So

1:21:40

I might have to amend that to be something like, oh,

1:21:43

the desire for to-do apps is

1:21:46

infinite because everybody always wants them to

1:21:48

work in their own specific way. But

1:21:50

maybe something about the actual market

1:21:52

market just can't support

1:21:55

a large number of these things or there's

1:21:57

other like non-obvious reasons. there

1:22:00

aren't a ton of brand new ones that

1:22:02

have popped up. So that's

1:22:05

my situation is I am using

1:22:07

OmniFocus. I will probably still continue to

1:22:09

use OmniFocus, but I

1:22:11

am concerned at this point

1:22:14

in time where things

1:22:17

feel potentially uncertain.

1:22:19

And even if there is a transition, like

1:22:21

I'll have to see what it is actually like

1:22:24

for the next version when

1:22:26

it comes out later this year. I

1:22:29

hope for success for them and for you. Me too.

1:22:32

I really do. And I understand that

1:22:34

like, you know, this takes a long time,

1:22:37

but it's, I feel like they're going

1:22:39

in a different direction and I hope it plays off.

1:22:41

So that was a bummer. Yeah. Tell me about

1:22:44

how you are happy, Mike. Oh yeah. Well,

1:22:46

I mean, just in general, to do it does exactly what I

1:22:48

need. Lucky you. Because I

1:22:50

keep things relatively simple and

1:22:52

you don't. People have different systems. I keep

1:22:54

mine relatively simple, you know, tasks.

1:22:57

All of them have a due date and they

1:22:59

all go in a project. That is essentially all I'm doing.

1:23:02

And I like that Todoist

1:23:04

has a couple of views. She can show me my tasks for

1:23:06

today. She can show me all my upcoming tasks

1:23:09

in a chronological list. And then if I want

1:23:12

to, I can go into any of my projects. It's

1:23:14

just a simple system, but

1:23:17

it works well for me. So I'm

1:23:19

happy with it, you know? Yeah. And like a

1:23:21

good Todo manager should in many ways

1:23:23

be kind of invisible. Yeah. Like

1:23:25

it's not the thing. Exactly. It's the thing

1:23:27

that's pointing you to what you actually

1:23:30

need to do. Again, I will ding them for the

1:23:32

poor widget support. I think that that is a very

1:23:34

strange thing that they haven't done it because a lot of people would

1:23:36

like it and their widgets last year

1:23:39

weren't good anyway. Like the widgets

1:23:41

that they added, like it was just like a weird list

1:23:43

of things that was like cropped in a strange

1:23:45

way, just like lines of text. As

1:23:48

of right now, they've not added any kind of interactivity

1:23:50

to their widgets. I don't understand

1:23:52

why, but that's where they are. But the

1:23:54

thing that I am most in love with when it comes to my

1:23:56

Todo system right now is the action button

1:23:59

on my... iPhone 15 Pro Max. Oh,

1:24:02

okay. So on the Mac,

1:24:05

it's very easy to put tasks

1:24:07

into Todoist. I just hit Command,

1:24:10

Option and the space bar, and it brings

1:24:13

up the Todoist Quick Entry window. And

1:24:16

I can just add a task, no matter what

1:24:18

I'm doing, right? There

1:24:20

is no way to do

1:24:22

such a thing when I'm using my iPhone. I

1:24:24

can have a shortcut,

1:24:26

but

1:24:27

I have to go somewhere else to activate

1:24:29

the shortcut. Like if I'm in Slack

1:24:32

and I wanna add a task to Todoist, I

1:24:35

have to leave Slack. Oh,

1:24:37

right, okay. Or

1:24:39

I have to pull down my notification shade,

1:24:42

slide to the left and hit a shortcut or

1:24:44

whatever, or like pull it down and maybe I can hit the

1:24:46

shortcut from the lock screen, whatever. But there's always a leaving

1:24:49

of the app to do this.

1:24:52

Enter the action button, where

1:24:54

now I can just press and hold

1:24:56

the action button and it will

1:24:59

pop up a shortcut that I have written to

1:25:02

add a task. And it doesn't leave

1:25:04

the app. I can still see things

1:25:07

that are in the window. Oh, right,

1:25:09

okay. So it's just pulling down the text entry

1:25:11

from the top. Yeah, and I just use

1:25:13

the keyboard. So this

1:25:16

was a suggestion that our friend Federico

1:25:18

made when we were thinking about the action button.

1:25:20

And I've kind of adapted it a little bit further

1:25:23

as well. So at first it was just like, give

1:25:25

me a little Todoist task. Awesome,

1:25:27

I would do that. But then it

1:25:30

became like, well, what about if

1:25:33

I wanna add something to do as

1:25:35

well? So what I've done

1:25:37

is it says, what's your task? I type out the name

1:25:39

of the task. It says, what time do you

1:25:41

want it to be? And I can put that time in natural

1:25:43

language if I want to. It can make it look very

1:25:45

simple. And it says, what app do you wanna

1:25:47

add it to? And I choose either Todoist

1:25:50

or Do. Hmm, and

1:25:52

then it will just add it to the app that

1:25:55

I've chosen. So it's just like a pretty simple

1:25:57

shortcut that just uses the native shortcuts

1:25:59

for Todoist. do to just add in the information

1:26:02

that I'm putting in a text box. It's very simple.

1:26:05

And then also Federico built a shortcut

1:26:07

called MultiButton which lets

1:26:09

you add a second action to

1:26:11

the action button based on a timer.

1:26:14

So like if you press the

1:26:17

action button and like do the action or press

1:26:19

cancel and then press it again within

1:26:21

seven seconds it will run a second

1:26:23

action that you've chosen. It's very clever. Certainly

1:26:26

I have this set to reminders but I'm thinking of adding

1:26:29

that into the first one. I'll get

1:26:31

to reminders in a minute. But like I'm enjoying

1:26:33

playing around with the actual button stuff.

1:26:35

Federico's thing is super cool. I'll put a link in the show

1:26:38

notes too if you want to read more about it. But my very

1:26:40

favorite thing is just how easy it is for me to add

1:26:42

things to my to-do system now. Okay.

1:26:45

I think you've totally sold me on what should the action

1:26:47

button be. Yeah. Because

1:26:50

I just haven't – so bored

1:26:52

by the colors and the new phone

1:26:55

stuff. So I haven't even like ordered the phone. I don't have

1:26:57

the action button or anything. So I

1:26:59

haven't really thought about it. I'm just like in a vague

1:27:02

way I was like what might one

1:27:04

do theoretically with an action

1:27:06

button? And I was like I guess the camera?

1:27:08

The camera makes most sense? But you've totally

1:27:11

sold me on. No, the correct thing here is input.

1:27:14

This is a button for inputting into other

1:27:16

systems especially if T.G. has

1:27:19

magicked his way into doubling

1:27:21

the functionality of the action button then

1:27:24

I feel like yeah it's very clear like this is a default

1:27:26

input button. Yeah. I really like

1:27:28

it. It's just like I could just press that button

1:27:31

and add a task to my system

1:27:33

and it works very well. I mentioned

1:27:35

reminders using this for family tasks

1:27:37

now. We previously used Trello. I didn't like

1:27:39

Trello. But now reminders

1:27:41

has their kind of column Kanban

1:27:44

view. It's finding the middle

1:27:46

ground but who both want me and Nadina wanting. She really

1:27:48

wants a column view. I don't really want to use

1:27:50

Trello. And so – Yeah.

1:27:53

I really like the way that reminders works from an entry perspective.

1:27:55

It's very simple and I can access

1:27:58

it from anywhere in the system. like

1:28:00

reminders as much as I like to do it. I think for

1:28:02

a lot of things reminders you have to tap

1:28:05

too many things. If you want to add

1:28:08

a time to a task you first have to slide

1:28:10

a toggle to bring down the time thing which is

1:28:12

just very strange to me. But I

1:28:15

like this more than I like Trello

1:28:18

as a system. So that's

1:28:20

working fine. And then because why

1:28:22

not just put another one in the mix. I also use Things.

1:28:25

I love to do apps. I love to use all of them. I use them for

1:28:27

very different things. Things is used

1:28:29

and has been for years for just checklists

1:28:32

for me. I use it for my Cortex

1:28:34

checklist. And I mentioned earlier

1:28:36

I also am now using it for a

1:28:38

packing checklist that I moved out of

1:28:40

Notes. Things made some new shortcut

1:28:42

actions to make it very easy

1:28:45

to duplicate a template project in

1:28:47

Things and keep all of the formatting

1:28:50

like the headers and all that kind of stuff.

1:28:52

So I now just have these two shortcuts. One

1:28:55

for Cortex editing and posting and one

1:28:57

for my packing list to

1:28:59

just very easily duplicate these projects

1:29:02

and have them become active. And so I use Things

1:29:04

for that. It's very nice. Yeah I mean

1:29:06

Things wins clearly the award of

1:29:09

best looking sort of most pleasant

1:29:12

to do app to use. Like it's just

1:29:14

the design of things is amazing. And

1:29:16

I always find myself like drawn

1:29:18

to things and also just kills

1:29:20

me because they sort of but

1:29:23

not fully have start dates. Like they have

1:29:25

fuzzy start dates might be the way to describe

1:29:27

it. But yeah like I find things is like

1:29:29

just a great looking app. It's been around for a long

1:29:31

time. And it is also interesting to me how

1:29:34

Reminders does keep improving year

1:29:36

on year. It's also something I was like oh if

1:29:39

Reminders ever added start dates like I

1:29:41

would be willing to simplify my

1:29:43

system down to maybe use something

1:29:46

like that. Because yeah I guess Reminders is for me

1:29:48

the only other task manager I really use.

1:29:51

And that's purely because the Siri

1:29:54

integration is just so dead

1:29:56

easy. I will just constantly

1:29:59

buy voice. throw to Siri

1:30:01

things that I want to be remembered like in

1:30:04

X units of time. Remind me in

1:30:06

two weeks, remind me later this afternoon,

1:30:08

remind me tomorrow morning. Like for those kind

1:30:10

of one-off things, talking to Siri to just add

1:30:12

stuff into reminders at a time is

1:30:15

amazing. Like I use that constantly. Do I even

1:30:17

want to ask what notes app you use?

1:30:19

I always feel like this is such a minefield that

1:30:22

I step into every time I ask you this question.

1:30:24

I use the notes app, like what else would I use?

1:30:27

Okay. No complicated conversation to be had

1:30:29

here. What do you do in the notes app

1:30:31

then? What goes in there? Notes

1:30:34

go in there, all sorts of notes go in there. I feel like this

1:30:36

is like a logic puzzle. Because

1:30:40

like I use the notes app for

1:30:42

everything,

1:30:43

right?

1:30:44

I have a bunch of show notes stuff in there, I

1:30:47

have personal notes in there, you

1:30:49

know I have 762 notes in the notes app.

1:30:52

I'd never delete anything, it just all goes in there

1:30:54

and it's great. The

1:30:56

only work stuff that doesn't go into notes

1:30:58

is Cortex brand stuff which goes into Notion.

1:31:02

Right now what are you using? Like what is going

1:31:04

into, I'm assuming, Apple notes.

1:31:07

What are you putting in there? I'm not using it for

1:31:10

notes really. It's more like I

1:31:12

throw stuff into the notes app

1:31:14

that needs to be properly sorted

1:31:17

later. 80 to 90% of that

1:31:19

stuff is really a question

1:31:22

of where in obsidian

1:31:24

should this go slash does

1:31:27

this deserve to be put into

1:31:29

obsidian. So I do

1:31:32

use it as a kind of junk

1:31:34

drawer for stuff that's later.

1:31:36

Like oh here's a thing to read,

1:31:39

here's a paper that's related to a video

1:31:41

topic that you might want to look at later. I don't,

1:31:44

for reasons we might get to later, I

1:31:47

don't have a good way to throw that into obsidian

1:31:49

directly. I'm not a hundred percent sure I would even

1:31:51

want to because a lot of this

1:31:53

stuff exists for me as a kind of limbo.

1:31:56

Like notes is a very transitory

1:31:59

area. Nothing should ever permanently

1:32:01

live here, but it's a useful place to put

1:32:03

all of the stuff before I decide

1:32:06

where does this go slash

1:32:09

do I just delete this because future me doesn't

1:32:11

care at all, which probably happens to the majority

1:32:13

of stuff I put into notes. It's like,

1:32:15

oh, this might be interesting. It's like, no, it's not

1:32:18

really. Then I just delete it. So that's how I use

1:32:20

the Notes app. Where do they go? Okay.

1:32:22

So like here's an example, right? Earlier today, we were

1:32:25

talking about a Future Cortex brand project.

1:32:28

And you showed me an example of like,

1:32:31

here's a thing that we could do that's like this. And you showed

1:32:33

me a website. And so I said,

1:32:35

ah, great. I want to check that out later. And

1:32:37

so what I do with that is I just like, boop, share

1:32:39

it. So it just becomes a note in

1:32:42

my notes folder. Okay. Because

1:32:45

this to me is the perfect example of what happens

1:32:47

all the time. It's like, there's not

1:32:49

really a task that's associated

1:32:51

with this. We're not on any kind of remote timeline.

1:32:54

It's just like, Future Gray should

1:32:57

take a look at this website and he

1:32:59

will decide if any actions

1:33:02

come out of this. Do we need to get in touch

1:33:04

with anybody? Like what's the next step in this project,

1:33:06

right? But right now it

1:33:08

isn't anything. It's just like, oh,

1:33:11

hey, take a look at this at some point.

1:33:13

And I go, I will. Where do I put

1:33:16

that? I think where this threw me a little bit

1:33:18

is like, this is the like inbox

1:33:21

model, right? Yeah. It's totally the

1:33:23

inbox model. That's how I use notes. Why

1:33:25

not use the inbox

1:33:28

in OmniFocus for this? I

1:33:30

don't like using the inbox for that kind of stuff because

1:33:32

it's not flexible enough. I

1:33:34

hear a lot of people have these kinds of things. They have like a

1:33:36

scratch pad note or whatever, right? Or

1:33:39

like this little note where there's just one note

1:33:41

where stuff gets added. But what I don't

1:33:43

understand, like for me, is what

1:33:46

prompts you to ever look at it? Like,

1:33:49

why does it not just become like a

1:33:51

graveyard of things? What

1:33:54

prompts me to look at it is that in OmniFocus,

1:33:57

I have a repeating task, which is

1:33:59

like clear out your notes. That's

1:34:01

the only reason that this system works. If

1:34:04

I didn't have an actual reminder

1:34:06

which is like, clear this out,

1:34:09

it would just be a graveyard of like, oh,

1:34:12

stuff I thought once and never

1:34:15

thought about again. Goodbye

1:34:17

thought. So that's the only reason that this works.

1:34:20

There's a task. All right, fair enough. There

1:34:22

is a task. But again, the other reason I don't put it as an inbox

1:34:25

item in OmniFocus is because

1:34:27

I have learned from experience,

1:34:29

right? I can't always count on future you

1:34:32

to know like, what was the thing about

1:34:34

this, right? I will often just

1:34:36

like, write something quick in the notes

1:34:38

itself about like, what is this for

1:34:41

future me? What are you even thinking about? Or

1:34:43

like, who gave this to you? So I

1:34:45

like the free formness of it. And

1:34:48

also for me, it kind of does just

1:34:50

act like a traditional to-do

1:34:53

inbox because I'm not adding things

1:34:55

to a single note. Each

1:34:58

item is an individual note

1:35:00

so I can delete them one at a time as I'm going through

1:35:02

things. So that's the way that I use it.

1:35:04

To be productive, you must spend your time well. How

1:35:06

is time management going for you? Well,

1:35:09

how is time management going for you, Mike? Oh, no change.

1:35:11

It's great. I use Time-Rey, full

1:35:14

of Time-Rey widgets. I will,

1:35:16

maybe some point next year, we'll do my little

1:35:19

review of how I've been spending my time.

1:35:21

But you know, Time-Rey is just continues

1:35:24

to just get better and better and better all the time. I

1:35:27

don't understand how Joe

1:35:29

manages to do it, but I just am

1:35:32

more and more happy with the app. I

1:35:34

love having the Time-Rey widget

1:35:36

on my Mac now, like on

1:35:39

the desktop of my Mac. Another

1:35:42

quick way to get to it. I

1:35:44

have a little widget on my watch as well

1:35:46

as on the complication. It's

1:35:48

everywhere I need it to be and it's super important

1:35:50

to me that it's easy to access in

1:35:53

so many different ways, whether it's through a

1:35:55

shortcut or whatever. It's just

1:35:57

a good way for me to keep track of what I'm doing.

1:36:00

I think for me right

1:36:02

now, the reason that I time

1:36:04

track is so I can review

1:36:06

it on an annual basis. That's

1:36:09

my reason now. That data

1:36:11

to me is so important when

1:36:13

I'm thinking about my theme. It's so

1:36:15

important when I'm thinking about how I want to spend

1:36:18

the time in my life and in my work. I'm

1:36:21

just so happy with the fact that this is an important

1:36:23

tool to me, but what's important

1:36:25

is the data. So what needs to be good

1:36:28

is the way in which the data is collected. And

1:36:30

so that requires TimeRee to be easy to

1:36:33

use, easy to access and exactly where I need it

1:36:35

on all the platforms that I use. And it is. And

1:36:37

that's why I continue to use it religiously

1:36:39

every day. Yeah. TimeRee is

1:36:42

amazing. I have an upset though this year. Oh!

1:36:45

Right. So I have switched from

1:36:47

TimeRee. Wow! I'm using

1:36:49

an app called Timelines.

1:36:52

This is huge news. Huge

1:36:54

news! So

1:36:57

TimeRee is amazing, but there is

1:36:59

one specific use case where

1:37:01

it does not work. And it does

1:37:04

not work if you're offline.

1:37:06

I've been doing a thing this

1:37:09

year where I'm having

1:37:12

big blocks where I'm just

1:37:14

completely disconnected from the network

1:37:18

at all. And so when

1:37:20

I started doing this, I realized very

1:37:23

fast, I need to find

1:37:25

a time tracking app that can work

1:37:28

offline, that does not require

1:37:31

an internet connection to start and stop

1:37:34

a timer.

1:37:36

I looked around, there's a bunch of

1:37:38

time tracking apps, but for me there was one

1:37:40

that just clearly stood above

1:37:42

all of the others and it is called

1:37:45

Timelines. The interesting

1:37:47

thing about this is the difference in our

1:37:50

use cases. So like you said, you

1:37:52

really care about the data. For

1:37:54

me, I do not care about the data at

1:37:57

all. This year in particular

1:37:59

is... like, Oh, wow, my data is just totally

1:38:02

messed up, right? Because I was trying out a bunch of different

1:38:05

time tracking apps. And when

1:38:07

you do that, things don't work right. So

1:38:09

you get timers that are running for like 36 hours

1:38:12

and you miss all kinds of stuff. So like my data

1:38:14

this year is totally messed up, but

1:38:17

I don't care because I have

1:38:21

always viewed the time tracking as

1:38:23

much more a tool that assists

1:38:26

in intentional decision-making.

1:38:28

And it's a tool that I use on a

1:38:30

scale of how

1:38:33

is this day going compared

1:38:35

to other days. And the thing about timelines

1:38:38

is that it's clear that

1:38:40

the developer of this app also

1:38:43

kind of thinks about time tracking

1:38:45

along the lines of how

1:38:47

I do it, where they

1:38:50

have things like, do you have

1:38:52

a goal for how much time you want to spend

1:38:55

on this task today? If you do,

1:38:57

cool. We can put a little

1:38:59

widget on the home screen that fills in a bar

1:39:01

for like, how much time did you spend writing

1:39:03

today? How much time did you spend exercising

1:39:06

today? The one that I always feel like

1:39:08

I'm fighting against is what I call like transition,

1:39:12

which is I'm between two tasks.

1:39:16

How much time in my day do

1:39:18

I spend in transition? And

1:39:21

so that one's a bit like, okay, I want to try

1:39:23

to set a limit of like, don't go over

1:39:26

this amount of transition time in a day.

1:39:29

And then I can see a little bar of like, Oh,

1:39:31

you're getting close. So I think

1:39:33

it's, it's a very nicely done app. It

1:39:35

looks good. Like I said, for me,

1:39:37

the main thing is that it works offline. I

1:39:40

will say like, there

1:39:43

are so many features from

1:39:45

Time-Ree that I do miss. And

1:39:48

there are some decisions that I find

1:39:51

kind of weird sometimes

1:39:53

in the way that like, for example, when you're looking at

1:39:55

a pie chart of how you spend your time, it

1:39:57

doesn't automatically sort. the

1:40:00

wedges by size, which I

1:40:02

find just a very strange

1:40:04

decision on how to actually show information,

1:40:07

but again, because

1:40:09

it is not critical for me to review

1:40:12

at the end of the year, how my time

1:40:14

was spent. I've really been liking

1:40:17

this app is like solving a

1:40:19

particular problem of I'm

1:40:21

spending more time, like not connected to

1:40:23

the internet at all, but I still want

1:40:25

to have a time tracker that works for

1:40:27

me. And this one is

1:40:29

somewhat more aligned with the

1:40:32

general way in which I'm wanting

1:40:35

to use these apps anyway. So,

1:40:37

uh, yeah, I've been using timelines

1:40:39

for I think about two

1:40:42

or three months at this point, and,

1:40:44

uh, I like it. I like it a lot. Yeah. Interesting.

1:40:47

Visually. I do not like this app. Yeah,

1:40:50

I can totally get it. Yeah. It looks

1:40:53

old. So yeah, I think when you dig into

1:40:55

some of the screens, like

1:40:57

it definitely has a kind of older

1:41:00

feel for it. This is also

1:41:02

a case where with the new live

1:41:04

widgets and things, so like on my

1:41:06

standby lock screen in my office,

1:41:09

I can just have it set to be like, show

1:41:11

me the pie chart of how I've spent my day and

1:41:13

then show me the bars of have I gone over

1:41:16

or stayed under the times that I want. And it's like, that's

1:41:19

what I want, right? That is like a hundred percent

1:41:21

of my interaction with this thing. Maybe in fairness,

1:41:24

this is being skewed by me looking

1:41:26

more at the website than the app store screenshots

1:41:28

because the website, I mean, they use anything

1:41:30

iPhone six and so that's skewing

1:41:33

by like, how does it look? I

1:41:36

mean, what I say is when looking at the app store

1:41:38

screenshots, it's just a plain app,

1:41:41

which is not a bad thing. It's just a

1:41:43

different. Very functional design. One

1:41:45

of the things that I really love about Timery

1:41:48

is I think that the app is very attractive, which

1:41:51

I haven't in the app quite a bit. So I like

1:41:53

how it looks. Yeah. I mean, this is

1:41:55

interesting. If that is

1:41:57

a use case that you want, you're right. Timery does not want.

1:42:00

work offline. It's not really

1:42:02

a thing that I run into very often, but

1:42:04

I guess again it comes down to the very different

1:42:06

ways in which we time track. Like if

1:42:08

I don't have an internet connection, I probably

1:42:12

don't really have anything to track. For me

1:42:14

very often I do my most important

1:42:16

work when I'm not connected to the internet.

1:42:18

There used to be much more of an obvious

1:42:21

thing for when I was flying. I was

1:42:23

always a bit aware then of like, oh right, I

1:42:25

can't run Time Marine now. And

1:42:28

very frequently it's like I do my best writing on

1:42:30

an airplane. This is amazing. Obviously

1:42:33

flights have been a less frequent

1:42:35

thing in most recent history,

1:42:38

but I've sort of recreated

1:42:40

that in my own life for a few

1:42:42

reasons. It's more self-imposed, no

1:42:44

internet connection. Yeah, and that's why

1:42:47

I realized like, ah okay,

1:42:49

I actually do need this. I

1:42:51

can't work around this because the

1:42:53

most important stuff to track

1:42:56

is also correlated with I'm not actually

1:42:58

on the internet. So that's why I took a look and

1:43:01

switched to timelines. That is the shock

1:43:03

of the episode I think. I don't

1:43:05

know if I'm going to get much more of a shock than

1:43:07

that. This episode

1:43:10

of Cortex is brought to you by Squarespace,

1:43:12

the all-in-one platform for building your brand

1:43:14

and growing your business online. You

1:43:16

can stand out from the crowd of a beautiful website,

1:43:19

engage directly with your audience and sell

1:43:21

your products, services and the content that

1:43:23

you create because Squarespace has got

1:43:25

everything you need all in one

1:43:28

place. You get started with

1:43:30

one of their beautiful best-in-class

1:43:32

website templates that you can customize every

1:43:35

design detail of with a reimagined

1:43:37

drag and drop system called FluidEngine.

1:43:39

This is Squarespace's next generation

1:43:41

website design system to allow you to

1:43:43

unlock your creativity more easily than

1:43:45

ever before. This works on desktop

1:43:48

or mobile. You can stretch your imagination

1:43:50

online with FluidEngine. It's all built

1:43:53

in and ready to go on any new

1:43:55

Squarespace site. So you've got that

1:43:57

going. Maybe you've got a blog set up. Maybe it's

1:43:59

a site for your business. since you've got a bunch of information. But

1:44:01

then you're like, hey, I'd like to sell some products.

1:44:04

You can sell physical or digital goods for Squarespace

1:44:06

in their online store. They have all of

1:44:08

the tools that you need to start selling online.

1:44:11

And then you're able to keep track

1:44:13

of your site and your business with their awesome

1:44:16

in-built analytics platform. You

1:44:18

can learn where your visitors are coming from, where your

1:44:20

sales are coming from. You can analyze which channels

1:44:22

are most effective for you. This allows you to

1:44:24

improve your website and build a marketing strategy

1:44:27

based on your top keywords or most popular

1:44:29

products and content. Then take it another

1:44:32

step further with Squarespace email campaigns.

1:44:35

You can stand out in any inbox by

1:44:37

encouraging your visitors to sign up as email

1:44:39

subscribers, starting them on a journey

1:44:41

to becoming long-term loyal customers

1:44:44

and visitors. Just start with an email

1:44:46

template, customize it by applying your

1:44:48

brand ingredients like site colors and your logo.

1:44:50

And they also have analytics there as well to

1:44:52

measure the impact of every send. Squarespace

1:44:55

is the full package for building

1:44:58

a site of any kind online. It's why

1:45:00

I've been using them myself for over a decade. When

1:45:02

I have something I wanna put online, I go

1:45:04

to Squarespace and so should you. Go

1:45:06

to squarespace.com slash cortex and

1:45:08

you can sign up for a free trial today. And

1:45:11

when you're ready to launch, use the offer code cortex

1:45:13

to save 10% off your first purchase

1:45:16

of a website or domain. That is squarespace.com

1:45:19

slash cortex and the code cortex when you decide

1:45:21

to sign up to get 10% off your first

1:45:23

purchase and show your support for the show. Our

1:45:25

thanks to Squarespace for their support of this

1:45:27

show and RelayFM. All

1:45:30

right, team and communication apps. I

1:45:32

don't know about you, but I feel like we've both kind

1:45:35

of ended up in exactly the same

1:45:37

space here with the different apps that

1:45:39

we're using. Well, probably not email. Email

1:45:41

might be an outlier here. Are you still

1:45:44

with Spark for email? Yeah, I was very

1:45:46

upset last year with

1:45:49

Spark because they had just gone through their big

1:45:51

new version of Spark for

1:45:53

the Mac mostly, which

1:45:56

changed a lot of the way that they wanted

1:45:58

to talk about. and handle email,

1:46:01

you know, like the change from archived,

1:46:04

done, and all that kind of stuff.

1:46:06

And, you know, after another year

1:46:09

of using their new system, I'm

1:46:11

getting used to some of the decisions that they've

1:46:14

made or have been able to hide away

1:46:16

enough of them. As you can

1:46:18

imagine, they've added AI to the

1:46:20

app, you know, you want to have

1:46:23

your AI email written

1:46:25

for you, but a request

1:46:27

that I made, they made those options able

1:46:30

to turn off because I just didn't want them, but the

1:46:32

button was always there. And it's like, if I'm not going

1:46:34

to use this, I don't need the button to be there.

1:46:37

And so they added a toggle that if you turn it off, it removes

1:46:39

the respond with AI button

1:46:42

from every single email that you were sending.

1:46:45

And I would say that like, now that

1:46:47

I've kind of been able to force the

1:46:49

app back into a relatively sane

1:46:52

state, like I don't see their

1:46:55

inspirational home screen and all

1:46:57

this kind of stuff, like I am benefiting

1:46:59

from some of the features that they added. Like

1:47:02

being able to block a sender

1:47:04

is a great feature. I get so much

1:47:06

crap email, right? And, you

1:47:09

know, I get these email

1:47:11

newsletters that I've been put on that are PR

1:47:13

newsletters that I can't get away from because it

1:47:16

is someone just sending me an email, but

1:47:18

I'm able to block a sender and

1:47:20

also block every email

1:47:22

from that domain. Oh,

1:47:25

that's nice. And it stops me from ever

1:47:27

seeing them. So that is good. It reduces the amount

1:47:29

of spam that I get. And it's across, you

1:47:32

know, all of my email accounts that I might

1:47:34

have. This is similar to their

1:47:36

automatic sorting that they do of email

1:47:39

into newsletter or notification

1:47:41

categories. This is good. Like I

1:47:43

can categorize them myself as

1:47:45

well. You know, like if something has been miscategorized,

1:47:48

it's easy to change. This works well

1:47:50

to keep my inbox clean. Again,

1:47:52

like some of the ways that they did that first was

1:47:54

kind of frustrating to me, like this categorization

1:47:57

moves around inside of the chronological

1:47:59

list. based on the most recent email

1:48:01

that got added to the category rather

1:48:04

than living in a fixed place which I initially

1:48:06

found very weird but again after

1:48:08

a year of using it I'm now just used to it even

1:48:10

though it is weird as I say it aloud. The

1:48:14

strange thing about that is it actually doesn't

1:48:16

reliably match some of these between my Mac and

1:48:18

my iPhone. Sometimes things that

1:48:20

I categorize as a notification on one device

1:48:22

might be a newsletter on another device because it's

1:48:24

not seemingly syncing them and I

1:48:26

don't know what's happening there. But

1:48:28

this is again like kind of the way that Spark

1:48:31

has always been for me which is like it's always been a bit

1:48:33

janky in its own way but the

1:48:36

core features that it has when used well

1:48:39

are used well. Like these two features

1:48:41

I mentioned I like them. The team

1:48:44

sharing is the big thing that I love and

1:48:46

will continue using forever but it's

1:48:48

still strange like every update

1:48:51

on the Mac is 250 megabytes every

1:48:53

single time because it's an Electron

1:48:55

app and so you just read it and load it in

1:48:57

the app every single time which is to me a

1:48:59

bananas way to do an update considering

1:49:02

they update the app pretty frequently. It's

1:49:04

just like 250 megabytes every

1:49:06

single time and like the update process

1:49:09

every time I open it the first time it doesn't work

1:49:11

I have to quit and reopen it again before my inbox

1:49:13

will load. It doesn't remember the

1:49:15

size of the window from the way it was before.

1:49:18

There's just all these little things. I did

1:49:20

at least add a sidebar and a column

1:49:22

view but I got so used to using

1:49:24

it in a smaller view I just kind of use it that

1:49:26

way. I don't really know what the future

1:49:28

of Spark is. I'm going to continue using

1:49:31

and paying for it for as long as it's around

1:49:33

because it is so helpful to the way that

1:49:35

I deal with my email. However

1:49:38

I'm also thinking that maybe just a

1:49:40

fundamental change to my email is just a way

1:49:43

to handle it. I mean like as I do less

1:49:45

and less and less in sales

1:49:48

for Relay FM in fact I do none and like

1:49:51

I still work for a couple of our long clients

1:49:54

but basically every

1:49:56

year it's less. Maybe

1:49:58

I just don't need this feature. here anymore? Like

1:50:01

if Spark was to go away tomorrow,

1:50:04

it would probably just be a case of like, I

1:50:07

would just not replace

1:50:09

it. Surely as you were doing less

1:50:12

sales, you would need the team features

1:50:14

more? Why is it the reverse? Why

1:50:16

would I need it more? I guess I'm thinking you would need it more

1:50:18

so that you're still in the loop of what's

1:50:21

going on. But I don't want to be in the loop. Okay.

1:50:23

That's the point. You're explicitly trying to get out of it.

1:50:25

I'm getting out of the loop. Okay. All right. We're

1:50:28

still using it and it still works. But like I guess

1:50:30

what would happen is those communications would

1:50:32

just go back to Slack again and we'd lose

1:50:34

the context. But to be honest,

1:50:37

Kerry and I have less and less and less conversations

1:50:39

inside of Spark all the time. But

1:50:42

Spark overall, I enjoy as an email

1:50:44

app for the features it has. Like there

1:50:46

are no good email apps. Right. This

1:50:49

is the one that I use and the one that I'm used to. And

1:50:51

I get benefit from it, from the other things

1:50:53

that I've mentioned. If I

1:50:55

was to have to leave, I mean I'd probably just go

1:50:57

to mail, which is not a good experience. Speaking

1:51:00

as someone who is still using mail, I agree.

1:51:03

Because Spark has snoozing. Like

1:51:05

it has like a bunch of stuff in it, right? I

1:51:08

know that Apple has that remind me thing, but

1:51:10

I also don't think that that's super

1:51:12

great. Yeah. So I don't really know

1:51:15

what the future is for Spark, but I'll keep using it forever.

1:51:17

But I do think at the same time, I also

1:51:20

just need to change the way that I use

1:51:22

email as well. So I'm working on that. I

1:51:25

do also use MimeStream on the Mac

1:51:27

for my Cortex brand email. It's Gmail

1:51:30

only. This is the best

1:51:32

email app around in my opinion. It

1:51:34

just works very well. It's very

1:51:36

well made. It's very

1:51:39

good native feeling application with all

1:51:41

of the features that you'd want from Gmail that at

1:51:43

least I've ever wanted to use. I

1:51:45

really like it. It's got tons of settings so you

1:51:47

can customize it to work the way you want. The

1:51:50

problem is it's only Gmail. It's

1:51:52

such a killer. It's such a killer.

1:51:54

And as well, it's also only on the Mac. But I know

1:51:57

they're working on an iOS version. I've

1:51:59

seen them say that they are looking at other

1:52:18

the API you can't mix and match

1:52:20

that Gmail API with other services

1:52:23

it's just such a squirrely unique system but

1:52:25

I would love them to make an app for everything because

1:52:28

it is a very very good app with a

1:52:30

bad name last

1:52:32

year we added kind of team and project

1:52:34

management to state of the apps and I have

1:52:36

been on a journey oh yeah

1:52:39

well last year I was using craft oh

1:52:41

god right that feels like a thousand years

1:52:43

ago and in the middle I used obsidian and

1:52:46

now I'm using notion I

1:52:48

can't believe we skipped over a whole state

1:52:50

of the apps and you never made it to using obsidian

1:52:53

on that I can't believe we went from craft to obsidian

1:52:55

to notion in the course of the year oh

1:52:57

wow okay that's quite some migration

1:53:00

you've been doing between those systems yeah notion

1:53:03

is my third attempt at home

1:53:05

for cortex brand information and

1:53:08

I listened back to last year's

1:53:10

state of the apps mm-hmm and I

1:53:13

am really surprised at how

1:53:16

much of a turnaround I have had in my

1:53:18

feelings about notion over the last 12 months

1:53:21

okay tell me I said something along the lines

1:53:23

of like I could never imagine my self using

1:53:25

it well it has obviously changed

1:53:27

because I use it and the

1:53:31

thing that was stopping me is like I didn't like

1:53:33

how notion felt yes but

1:53:35

it is so incredibly powerful

1:53:39

and that trumps all it's

1:53:41

like the same with spark right I don't like

1:53:43

the way spark feels but it's so powerful

1:53:46

for me and it's such an important

1:53:49

way for me to collaborate with people that

1:53:52

I will overlook all of it okay so when you say power

1:53:54

what does that mean to you well

1:53:57

at the moment there's a lot

1:53:59

of information information going in.

1:54:02

And I still feel like at the moment, all

1:54:04

I am with a lot of the stuff that

1:54:07

is in Notion is like we

1:54:09

took things from Obsidian and we put them in Notion.

1:54:12

I do not

1:54:14

feel that at the moment I am best

1:54:16

using Notion

1:54:18

for project management, say. So like if

1:54:21

we're working on a new project,

1:54:23

how do we take that from start to finish? I

1:54:25

think that we can use Notion very powerfully

1:54:27

for this. But I'm kind of at the moment

1:54:30

building Notion as the information

1:54:33

and knowledge database. And

1:54:36

I want it to become closer to our project

1:54:38

management pool as well in the future. But

1:54:40

I'm trying not to force it too much. Like

1:54:42

right now because it's mostly just me managing

1:54:44

production, so I'm doing it in a more simple way.

1:54:47

But I feel like with Notion I'm building the foundations.

1:54:50

The way I have seen the power is

1:54:53

in the way we are doing the Cortex-Shown

1:54:55

nuts now all in Notion. Because

1:54:57

this is something brand new, right?

1:55:00

So like I haven't had to force

1:55:03

something, right? Well like right

1:55:05

now if I take the notes that I've already previously

1:55:07

made, say about Psychic Notepad and then

1:55:09

try and force them into a new model

1:55:12

to fit the Notion project

1:55:15

management, I just feel like it's more work than

1:55:17

is needed. Like the project is already running.

1:55:19

Like I don't need to try

1:55:22

and reinvent the wheel with it. For

1:55:25

our next project from the start,

1:55:27

I will try and adopt more of the Notion

1:55:29

project management tools to make that

1:55:32

a reality, right? And to bring that

1:55:34

to life. But right now the

1:55:37

thing that I started from ground zero with

1:55:39

is first it was let's create

1:55:41

a Cortex content calendar.

1:55:44

Map out the year, map out the episodes,

1:55:47

move topics around,

1:55:49

move promotional items around and really

1:55:52

try and get a good flow for what

1:55:54

the year is going to look like. And

1:55:57

as I started doing that I was like, hmm,

1:55:59

maybe I should

1:55:59

Maybe we should put topics in here. Wait

1:56:02

a minute, let's do all of our show

1:56:04

notes in here. And I think this

1:56:06

has been so good for

1:56:08

me when it comes to planning the show. I

1:56:11

feel like I have a great place to put ideas

1:56:13

and then those ideas just stay

1:56:15

in the same database and they can be moved

1:56:18

into different columns of in the same database

1:56:21

of different months and different episodes. And

1:56:23

then also I can take all this information

1:56:25

and show it in different views and in

1:56:27

different ways based on different metadata.

1:56:31

I'm really enjoying this

1:56:33

and it's opening my eyes to just how much

1:56:36

power there is in this system for

1:56:38

when I want to dig into it further

1:56:40

for different things. So it's

1:56:42

also just super good and super easy for collaboration.

1:56:46

This is the thing I lost going from craft

1:56:49

to obsidian. And

1:56:51

then I hired

1:56:53

a new assistant. We brought

1:56:56

more people into the company for design and

1:56:59

for marketing and I

1:57:01

needed to have a system where everyone could work on the

1:57:03

same documents. So Notion

1:57:05

is also just so simple for that

1:57:08

for the team to manage the projects. But

1:57:10

I look forward to over the next year

1:57:13

doing even more to making

1:57:16

it like a real start

1:57:18

to finish project management tool

1:57:20

as well as just a team collaboration

1:57:23

and knowledge tool which is a bit more of

1:57:25

but I'm starting to like weave in

1:57:28

the Notion-ness of it all which I'm excited

1:57:30

about. Yeah, I think the reason I asked you

1:57:32

about the power, let me put the podcast

1:57:34

share notes aside for a second, is just there's

1:57:38

this whole world of these personal

1:57:41

knowledge management systems. The Pickhams.

1:57:44

Pickhams. Yes, Pickhams. So

1:57:47

I think of it, PKMs, the old Pickhams. Pick your Pickham.

1:57:50

I don't know, like I haven't used a ton

1:57:53

of these but with Notion

1:57:55

and with other things I feel like they

1:57:58

do feel very powerful

1:58:01

when you are in the process of putting

1:58:03

things into them, but

1:58:05

they can often be like a kind

1:58:08

of quicksand in my experience for

1:58:10

getting stuff back out. Well yeah, people get too lost

1:58:12

in this, right? Which is why

1:58:14

I'm not trying to push it too far. Yeah. Like

1:58:17

I'm not trying to push it too far, too fast, and then everything

1:58:19

gets lost. I have mixed

1:58:21

at best feelings about all of these

1:58:23

kinds of systems, but I mean I will say

1:58:25

I feel like we have discovered

1:58:28

a thing here with how to

1:58:30

do podcast show notes. I

1:58:32

feel like the Kanban system

1:58:34

for podcast show notes works

1:58:37

surprisingly well. I think especially for

1:58:39

a show like ours. Yeah, where there's more modular

1:58:41

topics for sure. Yes. If there's little

1:58:43

sections where you know that you're going to talk about something. It's

1:58:46

one of these rare cases where it feels like this

1:58:48

is clearly the correct way to do it. There's

1:58:51

skepticism about it and I don't love it

1:58:53

to feeling like, no, no, no, this

1:58:56

is actually proving its value, right?

1:58:58

It's becoming more valuable as we use it more.

1:59:01

Me realizing like, ah, right. I

1:59:04

have my own weird squirrely show

1:59:06

notes that I keep sort of separate

1:59:09

from everything, but realizing like, no,

1:59:11

it makes sense even for me to put

1:59:13

this stuff in here and add

1:59:15

to this as well so that it's all

1:59:18

in a single place. The value

1:59:20

of me having separate things is

1:59:23

getting gobbled away by like, no, no, no, this

1:59:25

system is just good and it just makes sense to do

1:59:27

this way. I kind of imagine

1:59:29

a world where I have all

1:59:31

of our different products and

1:59:34

we could have a product

1:59:37

or project Kanban

1:59:39

board where everything's moving

1:59:41

around. And I've like roughed this out,

1:59:43

but I've not been very diligent with it. We

1:59:46

could have things where they are in the process,

1:59:49

but then also when you click them, you also get all

1:59:51

of the notes. It's kind of like I imagine

1:59:54

this scenario in which we have all

1:59:56

of the information we're ever going to need, but also

1:59:58

a bunch of different ways to. see where the business

2:00:01

is at any one point. That

2:00:03

is intriguing to me. And I feel like Notion

2:00:06

is a tool that can be wrangled

2:00:08

to make that happen. It's

2:00:11

just a case of doing the work

2:00:13

to make it happen. Yeah, I think that's possible.

2:00:16

And if we're using Notion for

2:00:18

the show notes anyway, like it 100% makes

2:00:21

sense, like everything else that's Cortex related should

2:00:23

go in here for sure, 100%. Well,

2:00:25

for me it worked the other way around. It was

2:00:28

like Cortex brand's in here, this podcast should

2:00:30

be in here too. I remember like Mike,

2:00:32

the podcast can event is the main feature. Meanwhile

2:00:36

on the sideboard it's like one of 10 things.

2:00:40

I feel like if I don't use it for anything other

2:00:42

than just like it's a place where all of the team

2:00:44

can see all the information, then it's done its

2:00:46

job. But I do feel like

2:00:48

it has the ability to expose information

2:00:51

in different places and in different ways to

2:00:53

help us try and keep track of everything

2:00:55

we've got going on. And it

2:00:57

needs someone to do this, like there

2:00:59

needs to be a person in charge of managing this and

2:01:02

like we'll make that work

2:01:04

over time. But I think this is

2:01:06

the one. I would be surprised if I was to move

2:01:08

away now. If anything now, just

2:01:11

because of the inertia of it, well, we've got like four

2:01:13

people in here now. So it seems

2:01:15

very unlikely. Speaking

2:01:17

of which,

2:01:19

last year, Grey Industries, Notion

2:01:22

was the best tool for managing information

2:01:25

and video production is what you said. Did I say video

2:01:27

production? I don't think I did. Well, you said it's the best

2:01:29

tool. Yeah, information. You said it's the best tool.

2:01:31

I said managing information and video production, but

2:01:33

I got the sense that fact checking

2:01:36

was happening inside of Notion.

2:01:38

Okay, so what am I trying to express

2:01:40

here? I think a conclusion that I've come

2:01:42

to with some

2:01:45

of these pickums, as you have

2:01:47

dubbed it, which I feel is kind

2:01:49

of gross, but also kind of perfect

2:01:51

as a word to use here. I feel

2:01:54

like there's some tension in

2:01:57

all of these tools, which

2:01:59

is is the tension

2:02:02

of the archive of everything is

2:02:06

a bad place for also

2:02:08

actionable items. I

2:02:10

just feel like there's something about the

2:02:13

design requirements for those two

2:02:16

things, or even just your psychological

2:02:18

state using a tool. These

2:02:20

two things are naturally

2:02:23

in tension with each other, but

2:02:25

they also come up against an additional

2:02:27

problem, which is I kind

2:02:30

of always view it as like, whatever

2:02:33

you're doing to organize your life, if you're

2:02:35

duplicating information anywhere,

2:02:37

that's a problem. You should not have

2:02:40

any place where you've written

2:02:42

the same thing twice. These

2:02:45

tools are trying to solve that problem

2:02:47

by having these functions where it's like every

2:02:50

single line of text that you write within the system

2:02:52

can be accessed by any other part of the system.

2:02:55

You can look at all of the information in all of these different ways. I

2:02:58

think they're trying to solve that problem of like,

2:03:00

you don't need to duplicate information because

2:03:02

it's accessible from anywhere

2:03:04

in all of these ways. That's

2:03:07

where I just feel like it comes back to this tension

2:03:09

for me of tools

2:03:11

related to information and archive

2:03:14

shouldn't be the same tools that are related to

2:03:16

action. It feels like,

2:03:18

again, like a kind of one,

2:03:21

two, three impossible Trinity situation.

2:03:23

You can't get all of these things. You

2:03:25

have to sacrifice information duplication or

2:03:28

you have to sacrifice other parts of the system. I

2:03:30

think that's why I'm just fundamentally always

2:03:33

a little bit grumpy about these

2:03:35

tools. Now, one

2:03:37

of the things that we did last year to try

2:03:41

to, from my perspective, resolve this,

2:03:44

and also my assistant felt the same way of like,

2:03:46

okay, Notion is great for us and we still use

2:03:48

it for company information,

2:03:50

right? Where do we keep all of the information about

2:03:52

everything? So we do still use it for

2:03:54

research and fact checking kind of stuff, but

2:03:57

we did decide to

2:03:59

try to. pull out action

2:04:01

items into Asana to

2:04:04

use for the team. And

2:04:07

personally, I just absolutely

2:04:09

hate this too. Oh, okay.

2:04:14

So here's the thing. This is one

2:04:16

of these like intangible problems

2:04:18

of like, there's not

2:04:20

really anything wrong with Asana. It's

2:04:23

totally me. I just do not like

2:04:25

this application for no good

2:04:27

reason at all. And it comes back to

2:04:29

the kind of just feel of things. Something

2:04:32

about the way information is displayed, something

2:04:34

about like the way the buttons fill

2:04:37

in when they click, I just don't like this

2:04:39

at all. We have a problem with

2:04:41

being software nerds. We do, we

2:04:44

do, 100%. It's a problem. It's like I talk

2:04:46

about the feel of it. It's just like, and as you're saying

2:04:48

it, I'm like, there is a jankiness

2:04:51

sometimes that I just can't get my head around.

2:04:54

But I mean, it is because a lot of these tools

2:04:56

are using web technologies

2:04:58

and da da da da, right? It's the reason

2:05:01

you don't like Trello and the same reason

2:05:03

I don't like Trello. There's nothing

2:05:06

really wrong with Trello. It works

2:05:08

perfectly fine. There's no problem.

2:05:11

But something about the way

2:05:14

things move, something about

2:05:16

the way things, when you click on them, it's just

2:05:19

off. I'm not saying that this

2:05:21

is true, but it gives a kind of feeling

2:05:24

of jury-rigsness underneath

2:05:26

the system. What is underneath here?

2:05:29

And again, just to be clear, I'm not saying that that is

2:05:31

representative of the reality of the

2:05:33

programming. This is just a pure

2:05:36

feel thing. And Asana just really

2:05:38

gave me that. Opening up Asana, I

2:05:41

feel like, and I get this with Notion a little

2:05:43

bit, but not as strongly, I come back

2:05:46

working as a teacher in a school on

2:05:48

a joint database with everybody else.

2:05:51

The system has to sacrifice

2:05:53

a lot of niceness because

2:05:55

it also has to work with 200

2:05:58

teachers. whose technical

2:06:00

skill ranges from expert to

2:06:03

idiot. I don't think there's a way around it. Even

2:06:06

Croft, right? People say Croft is the

2:06:08

best one, but it's still janky. Yeah,

2:06:10

they all have this. If you have

2:06:12

to have it shared with other people, that's

2:06:15

where it starts. That's where the jankiness starts. And I

2:06:18

think it is an unavoidable thing.

2:06:20

Yeah, I do think it is unavoidable. But you know what thought

2:06:22

has been creeping into my mind? Oh, I

2:06:25

can't wait. While we're recording

2:06:27

this podcast? All

2:06:29

right. I have not thought about it until just

2:06:31

what? An hour ago, when we first started

2:06:34

talking about to-do managers. And

2:06:37

if my assistant is listening right now, she's

2:06:39

going to have a cold sweat breakout

2:06:41

as soon as she hears me say this. But I'm

2:06:43

thinking, couldn't we just

2:06:46

use reminders? Wouldn't reminders

2:06:48

work for this? No. Why

2:06:51

don't you think reminders could work for this? Because doesn't it have

2:06:53

the feature now? You can assign a task

2:06:55

to someone, right? That's a thing you can do in

2:06:57

reminders. Let me see.

2:07:00

Yes, I mean, yeah. I'm opening up reminders.

2:07:03

Oh, you can do that. I mean, this is how me and Indian

2:07:05

are managing the house stuff. We assign things to

2:07:07

each other. Honestly, I just reflexively

2:07:10

said no to be

2:07:12

in support and defense of your assistant. Right,

2:07:14

OK. I just don't want you to bring

2:07:17

this to heart, to be honest. Right. So you don't want me

2:07:19

to say like, oh, hey, you spent four months

2:07:21

moving everything out of notion and into

2:07:23

a sauna that was actionable. But what

2:07:25

if you, a Windows

2:07:28

user, try to move all of that stuff

2:07:31

onto your Apple phone in reminders?

2:07:33

No. I mean, she has an iPad,

2:07:35

so that would make it easier. The reason we use these

2:07:38

tools is because we need to work with other

2:07:40

people.

2:07:40

Right.

2:07:41

So that means there

2:07:44

is compromise needed. I just feel like

2:07:46

reminders could work. It's

2:07:48

the nicest one if I have to share something.

2:07:50

If she was a Mac user, maybe you could make this work.

2:07:53

She's not. You have

2:07:55

to use a cross-platform tool. Like, there's just

2:07:57

no way around it. There just is no way around it.

2:08:00

Like, you have to just pick your poison.

2:08:02

Right. We're getting into the why can't

2:08:05

we just share obsidian problem again.

2:08:07

Because like, it is exactly the

2:08:09

same problem. It's just like, there's just no

2:08:11

way around it. Like, I genuinely

2:08:13

feel, right, so this segment, Communication

2:08:16

and Team Apps, this is the most pain.

2:08:19

It is, it's so painful. This is

2:08:21

the pain segment. Because this is

2:08:23

the apps we have to use

2:08:25

because of people we work with, which

2:08:28

means we can't just

2:08:30

choose. Like, there has to be a

2:08:32

consensus. And also, the

2:08:35

choice you made whenever you made

2:08:37

it might have been a good one, but eventually

2:08:40

you don't want, so one of these

2:08:42

is Slack, right? So Slack is also

2:08:44

like the communications. Slack

2:08:47

is so expensive. Yeah. But

2:08:49

for Relay, there's nothing we can do about it now. Mm-hmm.

2:08:52

Right? I would prefer to use Discord. There's no

2:08:55

reason why I couldn't use Discord instead of Slack.

2:08:57

If you were starting Relay today, would you use Discord instead?

2:09:00

Probably. Or Teams, right?

2:09:03

But like, I wouldn't pay for Slack. It's

2:09:05

so expensive. We have like 40 people

2:09:08

or something in our Slack. I do think that sometimes,

2:09:10

I see everybody happily chatting in there and

2:09:12

I'm like, cha-ching, right? Like, look at all

2:09:14

that stuff. Yeah, it's so expensive. And it was fine

2:09:18

when it was good, right? Like, because

2:09:20

there are other tools which are as good as

2:09:23

Slack. And so the

2:09:26

price of Slack, I don't think is

2:09:28

worth it anymore

2:09:29

for us. Right.

2:09:31

When we could use Teams, which is essentially free

2:09:33

because who doesn't have Office 365? Yeah,

2:09:36

yeah. Right? Or we can

2:09:38

use Discord, which, you know, to get all of the features,

2:09:40

you just need like one person to be nitro.

2:09:43

Like, Slack also just redesigned,

2:09:45

right? Ugh. And like, the Slack

2:09:47

redesign is not terrible, but

2:09:50

like, it doesn't help me. And like, I don't even know

2:09:52

why they've done it. Like, I

2:09:54

don't understand the point of the Slack redesign

2:09:57

when it didn't really seem to do much of benefit.

2:10:00

And what it's done is like change my muscle

2:10:02

memory about like where things are Like

2:10:04

they had this new view called activity,

2:10:07

right? But like it doesn't even have

2:10:09

all the activity. I don't understand

2:10:11

why they did this what kills me the worst about

2:10:14

this So slack does this redesign

2:10:16

and I discover the fact that they did this what

2:10:18

I logged into the cortex slack to

2:10:20

message you Something yeah, what's like what

2:10:22

the hell happened? Yeah, it's a rollout

2:10:25

all blacks will get this but they're rolling it out

2:10:27

But so I was like, oh, okay The

2:10:30

app must have updated or whatever and

2:10:32

then I switch over to the gray industries one I

2:10:34

go Oh, no, like the

2:10:36

my gray industries slack is still

2:10:39

the old design Yeah, and this

2:10:41

is like weeks now switch

2:10:44

between these two They're doing a very

2:10:46

slow rollout of this and they've

2:10:49

been changing it I will give it to them like

2:10:51

they have made changes you

2:10:53

have made it better Because

2:10:55

they're listening to what people have to say. I would

2:10:58

just say I don't really know why you

2:11:00

did it because it just isn't Really

2:11:02

enough different like the activity

2:11:05

view is an interesting idea, right?

2:11:07

And the idea is like you've got so many channels,

2:11:09

right? We're just gonna put it all into one but

2:11:12

like I don't really feel like it's pulling

2:11:14

everything in Like

2:11:16

I would like to say show me all the activity

2:11:19

for a certain subset of channels that I choose Every

2:11:22

message put them all in there, but

2:11:24

they don't it's just like did someone at you

2:11:26

or did someone give you a reaction? Like that

2:11:28

is interesting stuff But

2:11:31

that's still not enough for

2:11:33

me and like I do not

2:11:35

need to see drafts as Prominently

2:11:38

as you show me them on the iPhone. It is

2:11:40

like a massive section On

2:11:43

the iPhone app and I also don't

2:11:45

like this later whatever that means

2:11:47

I don't use that but it's like right there and I can't

2:11:49

get rid of it And it's just like okay, so

2:11:52

I completely agree like you should be able to customize

2:11:54

this stuff up top Let me slightly

2:11:56

defend slack before I complain again. They

2:11:59

rolled out this later feature. And

2:12:01

for me, this was the feature where it's like,

2:12:04

okay, I have finally made

2:12:06

peace with Slack. Of all

2:12:08

of the tools that we're discussing in this

2:12:11

uncomfortable corporate section

2:12:14

of the state of the apps, Slack

2:12:16

is the one I'm happiest with. And it's because

2:12:19

they added this later feature where now when

2:12:22

anyone messages you or like any message that

2:12:24

you see, even if you're not part of it, there's a little

2:12:26

bookmark you can click and that says,

2:12:28

save for later. And then it shows up in that

2:12:30

little later thing on the top of the screen. Maybe I

2:12:32

should use this. Yeah. So for me, this

2:12:35

solves the problem I was complaining about

2:12:37

for years with Slack of it's

2:12:40

too easy to lose stuff.

2:12:42

Like you just go look in a channel and

2:12:44

like everything gets marked as red and you just like,

2:12:47

you miss it, right? Oh, you know what? This is actually kind

2:12:49

of nice. It's great. This is kind

2:12:51

of nice. You can complete them. Yeah. So

2:12:54

it basically acts as a kind of pseudo

2:12:56

to-do list for every

2:12:59

message in the whole system. So you can just like

2:13:02

bookmark this thing. And then when

2:13:04

you've taken care of it, you hit complete. I

2:13:07

think this is also partly why like I'm a little bit

2:13:09

grumpier about Asana in some ways

2:13:11

is because like, well, like my assistant

2:13:13

messages me with stuff that needs to get done. And it's

2:13:16

kind of easier to just bookmark

2:13:19

it for later. And then like mark it as

2:13:21

completed within Slack and never have to

2:13:23

go out to this secondary system. I

2:13:25

would like it to do more to highlight that

2:13:27

I have things in there rather than just a number,

2:13:30

like maybe color it. I mean, yeah,

2:13:32

something like that could happen. Maybe they can take

2:13:34

that into account for the redesign. The ongoing

2:13:36

redesign. Yeah. So like, I'm a big fan of

2:13:38

the later feature and I do feel like I

2:13:41

am at peace now with Slack. This is the team communication

2:13:44

tool. I don't lose things anymore.

2:13:47

Great. I don't need to switch to anything.

2:13:50

And just as I felt content like,

2:13:52

ah, thank you. Later comes this rollout.

2:13:54

And look, listen, guys, it's like,

2:13:57

if you're going to do this, if you're going to have

2:13:59

this.

2:13:59

slow rollout. For the love of

2:14:02

God, roll it out

2:14:04

by users, not by

2:14:06

Slack. It is wild that

2:14:08

I like, I'm in like four slacks,

2:14:11

two of them have been updated, two of them haven't.

2:14:13

It's a very strange feeling. Crazy.

2:14:15

It's like the core of your product

2:14:18

is that people can have multiple

2:14:21

slacks for the different teams

2:14:24

and companies and whatever that they're involved

2:14:26

in, don't have a

2:14:28

slow redesign rollout

2:14:31

when you know you must hit a huge

2:14:33

portion of the users living halfway

2:14:36

in both worlds. It's maddening. The

2:14:38

thing that is the most surprising to me is

2:14:41

that they would make any big change and

2:14:43

would not do the one thing that

2:14:45

makes sense, which is let me have

2:14:48

one overview of all of them.

2:14:51

Yeah. Now, I understand

2:14:55

the logistical problems of that. I understand

2:14:58

the security problems of that. But

2:15:00

if I don't have a heightened

2:15:03

corporate security level thing

2:15:05

in a Slack, which is obviously like the if I'm not

2:15:07

enterprise, let me choose.

2:15:10

And the fact that I don't have

2:15:12

one dashboard, here's all of the messages

2:15:14

you've received today, I can't believe

2:15:17

that they have not found a way to make that

2:15:19

work. That is absolutely

2:15:21

wild to me. They have done such

2:15:24

a big change. But I would imagine

2:15:26

so many users of Slack would love

2:15:29

to not have to keep going

2:15:32

one to the other, to the other, to the other,

2:15:34

to the other all day, which

2:15:36

is how I spend my life. I only get to avoid

2:15:38

that because I'm in just three slacks.

2:15:41

So two of them, I'm in a work, two of them

2:15:43

are social. So the two that are social, I don't do

2:15:45

this to. But going between Relay

2:15:47

and Cortex brand, like, I don't want

2:15:49

to keep doing that all the time. Just

2:15:52

show me in one view, all

2:15:54

the messages I need to deal with in

2:15:57

both places. I don't know why I don't do

2:15:59

it. I have a quick question for

2:16:01

you. Where does the save for

2:16:03

later exist? Oh, it's in the left

2:16:07

But

2:16:07

it doesn't have a little thing on the Mac

2:16:09

version to tell you the stuff in there. Oh

2:16:12

my god on This

2:16:14

redesign. Are you Kidding

2:16:17

me flack. They don't put an

2:16:19

indicator to show you

2:16:21

you have things in the later On

2:16:24

the iPhone it does On the

2:16:27

iPhone it says later

2:16:29

one item but on the Mac version Nothing

2:16:33

just says later. Okay, so on the Mac

2:16:35

when I save things for later like I do

2:16:37

all the time It doesn't actually

2:16:40

tell me how many things are in later.

2:16:42

It's just an icon to it's another

2:16:44

place to manually check and look

2:16:46

Oh, do I have things say great? Okay,

2:16:49

cool. So now I know I'm not gonna

2:16:51

use that feature then I'm gonna go back to doing

2:16:53

what I was doing before which is just marking

2:16:55

things as unread great I

2:16:58

didn't notice this terrible design

2:17:00

flaw in the new design because my

2:17:02

gray industry slack is still on the old design

2:17:05

where it says Later three so

2:17:07

I know that I have three to-do items in my

2:17:09

slack But on the Cortex brand

2:17:11

one I cannot freaking believe this. There's

2:17:14

no way to see. Oh Do I

2:17:16

have something that I saved in later? I don't

2:17:18

know. Let me go Manually

2:17:20

check and see if something is there.

2:17:23

Oh another place to hover over. So now

2:17:25

I know They're

2:17:30

just all hell I

2:17:32

can't believe this I can't believe after I'm like, oh

2:17:34

slack I finally made peace I was like, hmm

2:17:37

have you though We

2:17:40

now enter the obsidian hour as

2:17:42

we talk about writing apps no, this

2:17:44

is not the obsidian hour using a different writing

2:17:46

app now I'm still using

2:17:48

obsidian. I just feel like actually Don't

2:17:52

have a ton to say about obsidian compared

2:17:54

to last year. This is again a place where I'm

2:17:58

Really happy with this app I feel like it just

2:18:00

lines up with my brain in the way that

2:18:03

I want to Be writing

2:18:05

and the way that I want to use text being able

2:18:07

to like flip back and forth between files super

2:18:09

fast Or have like the way they do multiple

2:18:11

windows on the screen the only

2:18:14

part of this which is still kind

2:18:16

of killing me is Related

2:18:20

to our communication and teams app

2:18:23

is the question about Collaboration

2:18:26

with obsidian. There's no question What

2:18:29

do you mean? There's no question because it's not possible Like

2:18:33

there isn't a question right but you can

2:18:35

force it right? How much do you want

2:18:38

to force it? How much do you want to take

2:18:40

I don't know the most

2:18:42

mission critical app that I

2:18:44

use and Force it to do something

2:18:47

that it doesn't want to do that's the question

2:18:49

that seems like a really good question Do

2:18:51

you have any sense of like is? collaboration

2:18:55

any Kind

2:18:57

of concern for obsidian actually you know it's

2:18:59

funny ask that I don't know I don't even know

2:19:01

if they publish a roadmap or anything

2:19:03

ever roadmap today I just wondered

2:19:06

like yeah, cuz I wondered if you kept up to date with

2:19:08

that, but like they do have a public roadmap

2:19:10

I just know this from them being

2:19:12

around for a while like I remember when the

2:19:15

iPhone app was on the roadmap and people were excited

2:19:17

about that

2:19:18

back in the day I will ask you are you looking

2:19:20

for this? What do you think of the new obsidian icon the

2:19:22

logo? I think it's fine Yeah,

2:19:26

I probably slightly preferred the

2:19:28

old one they went the reverse direction right

2:19:30

it seems like every company on earth takes their logo

2:19:32

And they and every couple years they like

2:19:34

scratch their chin, and they go could

2:19:36

we make it? Less yeah,

2:19:39

could we make it simpler could

2:19:41

we make it less identifiable? That

2:19:44

is why I like it. I think they added Personality

2:19:48

to it. That's what I like about it. They made it look

2:19:50

more like a rock yeah Yeah, no city and

2:19:52

did the reverse they took their abstracted notion

2:19:54

of a rock and said but what if it was more rocky?

2:19:57

What if it looked like an actual rock and

2:19:59

they didn't make? it yellow, green, blue,

2:20:01

and orange. You're looking blue and

2:20:03

red. You know, the purple.

2:20:06

The corporate colors that everything becomes.

2:20:10

I mean, like quickly looking on the public

2:20:12

roadmap that they have, I'm not surprised to see that

2:20:14

there's nothing about collaboration. I'm

2:20:17

not surprised because I do just

2:20:19

feel like the architecture

2:20:22

of Obsidian is just

2:20:24

fundamentally opposed to the notion that multiple

2:20:26

people are working in one of these databases.

2:20:29

Like, I think Obsidian fairly does fall

2:20:32

into the pick-em category as a tool,

2:20:35

but it is clearly the most

2:20:38

you as an individual have had

2:20:40

your brain explode into a thousand

2:20:43

text files, and that is what this

2:20:45

program is for. Yeah. I mean, just the reason

2:20:48

that I consider it to be a possibility

2:20:50

is it is built on web technologies the

2:20:52

same way as these other apps that we're talking about.

2:20:55

So like, I have no doubt that it would be complicated,

2:20:57

but even if they added just like, this

2:20:59

is the collaboration area, that

2:21:03

all of the notes in here, you can

2:21:05

collaborate, but not all of your notes.

2:21:07

You know what I mean? Yeah. No, I completely

2:21:09

agree. It's a different business, right? Which

2:21:11

might not be why I want to do it, but it's interesting.

2:21:14

Yeah. So the fundamental trade-off right now is

2:21:16

that you can use their sync tool, and that

2:21:19

will allow you to sync across all of your devices,

2:21:22

including phone and iPad, or you

2:21:25

can use Dropbox to sync,

2:21:27

and if you do that, you have to give up

2:21:30

sync on the phone and on the iPad,

2:21:33

but with Dropbox,

2:21:35

you can just share a folder

2:21:38

or a subfolder with another Dropbox user,

2:21:40

and then they can have access to just

2:21:42

the files that you put in that folder.

2:21:45

It says right here, shared

2:21:47

vaults. Collaborate with

2:21:50

your team. Invite your team

2:21:52

to a shared obsidian vault. Notes

2:21:54

are updated in real time across your team's devices

2:21:57

without compromising the privacy of your company

2:21:59

data. How is that not what you're looking

2:22:01

for? God damn, Mikey, you're dragging me into the details.

2:22:04

Okay, right, so this is what I'm saying. There

2:22:06

is a thing where multiple people can work

2:22:08

on a single vault. Uh-huh.

2:22:11

Right, but this is what I'm saying about the structure

2:22:14

of the app. You

2:22:16

lose a huge

2:22:18

number of advantages of the way this app

2:22:20

is designed the moment you

2:22:23

have to break up information across

2:22:25

multiple vaults. Like, I

2:22:27

cannot stress enough, this is a

2:22:29

huge sacrifice in functionality.

2:22:33

Everything about this app screams. You

2:22:35

want to keep everything that you're working on in

2:22:38

one spot. Right, but if... why

2:22:40

don't you just give all of the notes

2:22:42

to the Sync system? I could give all

2:22:45

of the notes to the Sync system, but then

2:22:47

that also means the entire

2:22:49

database has to be shared with my

2:22:51

assistant. It's an all or nothing

2:22:54

deal. For you, why is that a problem? It's

2:22:56

a problem for me because I don't

2:22:59

want to share all of the notes with my assistant. Like,

2:23:02

some of this stuff is just private, and

2:23:04

I'd rather not have it be shared. But

2:23:07

even there, there's a thing of like, this

2:23:09

is just a mission critical and

2:23:11

also, I also cannot emphasize enough, super

2:23:15

squirrely system. The moment

2:23:17

it has to be like, the two of us need to

2:23:19

use this thing that I use for writing. Like you

2:23:22

said here, like, it immediately causes compromises

2:23:24

of like, oh, okay, I

2:23:27

have to arrange the files in a different way if

2:23:29

this other person is ever going to find

2:23:32

anything in here. And again, the big

2:23:34

advantage is, I don't need to arrange

2:23:36

anything. Like, I can just search for anything using

2:23:39

my brain to remember what it is that I was trying

2:23:41

to find. But like, forcing

2:23:44

my obsidian vault on another

2:23:46

person is just inhumane.

2:23:49

So I would want to just share a portion

2:23:51

where I can be like, look, here's a very small

2:23:54

amount of the actual active stuff, and

2:23:57

this is what you can have access to. trying

2:24:00

to be annoying here. No, no, no, no, it's fine.

2:24:02

Why not create a second vault? No,

2:24:04

ugh, no. That is shared.

2:24:07

And when you're ready to share something, move

2:24:09

the file to the shared vault.

2:24:12

Like once something's ready to be shared,

2:24:15

does it need the context of the

2:24:18

other notes that are related to it? You're not

2:24:20

wrong in that like this seems like it's

2:24:22

a reasonable thing. But the

2:24:24

reason why you need to keep stuff in one

2:24:27

vault is that in Obsidian, you

2:24:29

get these benefits from linking stuff together.

2:24:31

And what happens is you

2:24:33

can break

2:24:36

the cross links if you change

2:24:38

something in another document,

2:24:42

which the document you have temporarily

2:24:44

moved out of the sync system

2:24:47

references. So it

2:24:49

basically causes this problem of the moment

2:24:51

you pull something out, you now

2:24:54

have to be careful, right?

2:24:56

You have to be careful and make sure while

2:24:59

this document is with my assistant, I

2:25:01

have to make sure that I don't accidentally

2:25:04

modify anything else in this system

2:25:07

that references that document,

2:25:09

because then things can get broken. So

2:25:11

this is the problem of like, yes,

2:25:15

you could pull something out, but

2:25:18

it just it raises the possibility

2:25:20

of danger. Ideally, what you would like

2:25:24

to exist is it's all

2:25:26

the same vault, but you have like a folder

2:25:29

that you can share. You just

2:25:31

move things to the folder, but it means

2:25:33

that nothing's gonna break. It's the same

2:25:36

note, you move it back. Yes. But if you

2:25:38

moved it to a different vault, now

2:25:40

it's like it has no context of where

2:25:42

it came from. And when it comes back,

2:25:44

it's like it's a new baby boy in there, right?

2:25:46

Like, it doesn't know anything about anything.

2:25:49

Yeah, it's brand new. Yeah. And also the

2:25:51

problem is like, while it's gone, Obsidian

2:25:54

will act as though that missing notes still

2:25:57

exists within the system. Like you can

2:26:00

end up with like, oh, I've just created a blank

2:26:02

version of this document. Right?

2:26:05

Like this is the kind of like weird problems that can happen.

2:26:07

It's going to create a blank file with that

2:26:09

name just because other things reference

2:26:11

it. And then when it comes back, no, you've got two

2:26:14

files with the same name. Yeah, I can

2:26:16

see that it becomes a bit of a mess. This is the

2:26:18

kind of problem, right? It's like Obsidian, this

2:26:21

is a great feature. Obsidian

2:26:23

treats things that have not yet been

2:26:26

created as though they exist.

2:26:29

And so that's why if you pull something

2:26:31

out of the system, it goes from this document

2:26:34

exists to this kind of like ghost

2:26:37

document that is waiting to pop into

2:26:39

existence the moment you touch it. Right? And

2:26:42

it's like, oh, okay, great. Now you write into a problem

2:26:44

where it's like, now you've lost the history

2:26:46

of this document if you ever want to go back and try

2:26:48

to like track where a change happens. So like,

2:26:51

there's just like lots of complications with this. So

2:26:53

I'm currently using Dropbox to

2:26:55

sync my Obsidian stuff, which means I don't

2:26:58

have it on my iPad and I don't have it on my phone,

2:27:00

which is mostly a minor

2:27:03

annoyance, but it does mean like I'm

2:27:05

very aware of because

2:27:08

it doesn't exist on those devices. I'm

2:27:10

also not plugging in

2:27:13

like getting information into Obsidian

2:27:15

through things like shortcuts in ways that I otherwise

2:27:18

would say like, you know, Hey,

2:27:20

append this information to this file. And

2:27:23

that's the thing that is like becoming

2:27:26

increasingly irritating. And I think I probably

2:27:28

will just eventually move. So

2:27:32

I've worked myself into a situation where I'm

2:27:34

not really using either

2:27:36

of the two things that I want to use. I'm

2:27:38

not really using the collaboration with

2:27:40

my assistant in Dropbox because I keep thinking

2:27:43

like, Oh, I'm going to move this over into the sync system,

2:27:45

but I don't. So I don't also

2:27:48

just start setting up shortcuts and things

2:27:50

to make a bunch of my Obsidian life easier.

2:27:53

So, yeah, I think no matter what happens, you should move

2:27:55

to Obsidian saying can just take the benefit of that

2:27:57

and then try and find some of what's going on. always

2:28:00

do with a collaboration. Although I think realistically,

2:28:03

you just need to give up on the idea of collaborating

2:28:06

in Obsidian. But you should try and see

2:28:09

if there is like using Obsidian sync

2:28:11

and collaboration tools. Maybe there's some

2:28:13

kind of thing that we're not thinking about, but

2:28:16

I think other than that, you should just give

2:28:18

up on the idea. This is one of these things. Clearly

2:28:21

the direction over time is I should just be

2:28:23

using Obsidian's sync system, and

2:28:25

I'm just dragging my feet on it for a bunch

2:28:28

of reasons. I'm sure there's other features

2:28:30

that you're missing that would otherwise be cool that they

2:28:32

put into their system because that's what they

2:28:34

want you to use. Yeah, and also I just think you

2:28:36

have the benefit of, I

2:28:39

would rather use the sync system that was custom

2:28:41

designed exactly for this tool than

2:28:44

using Dropbox, which this is sitting

2:28:46

on top of. But again,

2:28:49

this is relatively speaking

2:28:51

within Obsidian, a fairly minor

2:28:54

problem in the scope of the benefit

2:28:56

that this app provides me. Like I have, the

2:29:00

overall picture is I have nothing but thumbs

2:29:02

up to give to Obsidian. Like I

2:29:04

just really

2:29:07

love it. And after years of trying

2:29:09

to find what is the writing app that

2:29:11

works best for me, this is the answer.

2:29:14

It is Obsidian. A very 2023 thing

2:29:16

for writing would

2:29:19

be to use some kind of AI. I

2:29:23

will say it is for me. What

2:29:25

are you using it for? One of the things that

2:29:27

I have to write, which I find to be

2:29:29

one of the more difficult things that I need to write is

2:29:32

the description for this

2:29:35

show. Really? For

2:29:38

a long time, it followed a format,

2:29:40

which was great as this, Mike does this, they both do

2:29:42

this. This is like hundreds of episodes,

2:29:44

like over a hundred episodes did this. I

2:29:47

wanted to change that this year to actually

2:29:49

make the descriptions be a little more

2:29:52

fuller, to give people

2:29:54

an idea of what the episodes were about, also

2:29:57

to make it easier when going through.

2:30:00

previous episodes to find it. I

2:30:02

haven't gone back and done this. I might at some

2:30:04

point actually go back and fill

2:30:07

them out a bit more, but I

2:30:09

don't know about that. But I decided

2:30:12

to change it up, because we made changes

2:30:14

to the show this year, we did special episodes and stuff

2:30:16

like that, and so I thought this

2:30:18

might be a time to change stuff up and I've done

2:30:21

it. So what I'm doing is writing more descriptive,

2:30:25

basically longer descriptions

2:30:27

for the episodes. So they just talk about more

2:30:30

of the things that we talk about, rather than

2:30:32

just limiting it to three. I

2:30:35

don't really like this kind of writing in

2:30:37

general, like this like short sentences,

2:30:40

short paragraphs, that is not how I write.

2:30:42

Like I write in long sentences, long

2:30:45

paragraphs, if

2:30:47

I ever do write. And I also

2:30:49

find it complicated to

2:30:51

try and get all of the right punctuation

2:30:54

for this kind of writing. So what

2:30:57

I do now is I write a verbose,

2:31:01

poor grammar

2:31:03

version of the description

2:31:05

and I go to chat GPT and

2:31:07

I'm like, can you rewrite this for me?

2:31:10

And it does, and that's what I use. I was just thinking

2:31:13

when you mentioned the old episodes, I

2:31:15

was wondering if you could do something like, here's

2:31:18

a transcript of the episode, write

2:31:20

a summary of it. But to

2:31:23

be honest, the way if I was ever going to

2:31:25

do something like that, I could use the chapters.

2:31:28

Oh yeah, yeah, that'd be good. They're

2:31:30

the topics, really. So like it would just be

2:31:32

a case of being like, we spoke

2:31:35

about this, this, this, this, and this, write me a description.

2:31:37

Right. And that might be slightly easier

2:31:39

for a chat GPT to ingest than

2:31:42

a totally insane,

2:31:44

not speaker marked out transcription of the podcast.

2:31:47

So I don't like the chat GPT voice

2:31:50

the way that it writes. So I like to give

2:31:53

it my writing first.

2:31:56

So like if I feel like I have found better

2:31:58

success, if I, if I give it bullet I

2:32:00

tend not to like what it gives me. If I have

2:32:02

written a bad description

2:32:04

and give it that, I think it does

2:32:06

a better job of matching the tone that I

2:32:09

want. And so giving it a transcript,

2:32:11

I don't know what nonsense it would throw out

2:32:13

on me. Yeah, that kind of writing feels like the good

2:32:15

sort of thing to use chat GPT for.

2:32:18

It's funny you mentioned how you hid the AI thing

2:32:20

in Spark because using mail

2:32:22

for me, this is like the number one place that

2:32:24

I want a button that says write

2:32:26

a first draft of an email response. Well,

2:32:29

I mean, you don't like, I

2:32:31

want to deal with my email if I'm going to deal with it,

2:32:33

you know, but you don't. This is for

2:32:36

me like what's the actual problem that I'm trying to solve?

2:32:38

It's not that I would send that email,

2:32:40

but it's just a hundred million times easier

2:32:42

to be like, okay, let me tweak this

2:32:45

to be more of what I'm actually trying to

2:32:47

do. Obviously, I can just like copy

2:32:49

and paste stuff out into chat GPT and be like,

2:32:51

right, me and you. Well, great. Honestly, you should check

2:32:53

out Spark because like it's what it does. They

2:32:56

do AI drafts.

2:32:57

You know what? That's

2:32:59

a great idea. I am going to check out Spark.

2:33:01

I think I don't know why I had mentally written it

2:33:03

up. I think whenever you talk about it, I

2:33:06

think in my head I put it under the category

2:33:08

of our section of pain on

2:33:11

communication and corporate. Well, it is funny.

2:33:13

It is funny. But like, you

2:33:15

know, as we said, all of these apps that causes pain

2:33:18

do have useful features until you find

2:33:20

out that they changed the usual feature that you liked

2:33:22

and then it wasn't useful anymore. Yeah. Okay.

2:33:24

I wasn't, you know what, I will check out Spark. Like if you genuinely

2:33:27

want that, it does it.

2:33:28

Yeah.

2:33:29

So yeah, I feel like for that kind

2:33:32

of serviceable

2:33:35

kind of writing, you just need a thing

2:33:37

that's descriptive. Chat GPT is

2:33:40

good at that. This has been a year

2:33:42

of AI for sure. People ask me all

2:33:45

the time if I use chat GPT

2:33:47

to help with the writing. They're like, oh, hey, couldn't

2:33:49

this help with the writing? Wouldn't this speed things up? And

2:33:53

in my experience, it's terrible

2:33:56

at

2:33:57

what I would want it to do. Like,

2:33:59

hey, write something interesting about this topic, it's

2:34:02

just the worst. Like I hate it. I

2:34:04

hate it so much. It's not

2:34:06

interesting when I was trying

2:34:08

it out and had it work on things that I like know the

2:34:10

topic area. It just gives

2:34:13

you all of the common misconceptions

2:34:16

about a thing. It's terrible at this.

2:34:18

I can't imagine there

2:34:20

is a world in which you would feel

2:34:23

comfortable using it. Yeah.

2:34:25

Because you are so focused

2:34:29

on facts, right? Like could you trust

2:34:31

it? No, I couldn't. I also

2:34:33

just think its style

2:34:36

is terrible. It's actually,

2:34:38

this is weird, has a terrible

2:34:40

sense of humor. It's just not

2:34:42

funny. Everything that it tries

2:34:45

to do that's funny is in the range

2:34:48

of dad joke territory

2:34:51

or jokes for children. It's just awful.

2:34:55

I haven't found Chat GPT useful for that in

2:34:57

the slightest, although much

2:34:59

to my horror, I know full well

2:35:02

that there are plenty of YouTube channels already

2:35:04

that just ask Chat GPT for scripts

2:35:06

on topics and then give that to a voice generator

2:35:09

and just give that next phase

2:35:11

to a video production thing and slap

2:35:14

up tons of videos. Like here

2:35:16

we are. Those videos are all terrible,

2:35:19

but it's already begun. But

2:35:21

like whatever. People have been making

2:35:23

low effort content on YouTube for a really, really

2:35:26

long time. Like it doesn't matter how much of it there

2:35:28

is. Good stuff will still be wanted by

2:35:30

people. That's how I feel about it. Yeah, I do think there's

2:35:32

a slight difference here just in that it can

2:35:35

fool more people. It's like it's slowly raising

2:35:37

the bar on this. But anyway, for the time being, it's

2:35:40

just like it's not a remotely useful tool

2:35:42

for me for writing with like

2:35:45

one key exception, which is

2:35:47

where I do actually use Chat GPT

2:35:50

a lot when I'm working on a script. And

2:35:52

it is that Chat GPT is the world's

2:35:55

best thesaurus. It is

2:35:57

like insanely good.

2:36:00

at thesaurizing. When

2:36:02

people use any kind of AI system,

2:36:04

the thing I'm always trying to tell them is like, look, the

2:36:07

value is not in your initial

2:36:09

question, the value is

2:36:12

in your follow-up questions. And

2:36:15

so when I write scripts, I used

2:36:17

to just 100% of the

2:36:19

time, I always had the Apple thesaurus app

2:36:21

just open on my computer and I would be looking

2:36:23

towards like, I'm looking for a word like this,

2:36:26

like what options does it have? I used that

2:36:28

for years. But now the thing that's so

2:36:30

amazing with chat GPT is, you

2:36:33

can say like, I'm looking for words that

2:36:35

are similar to this word and that spits out a bunch

2:36:37

of words. But the real power

2:36:39

is being able to say, okay, but

2:36:43

I want something that has a more positive

2:36:45

valence to it or I want something

2:36:48

that has a more negative sound to

2:36:50

it. And that's where it's just like, God

2:36:52

damn, is it so good at being like,

2:36:54

what about these words? What about these words? Or

2:36:57

being able to skip the things that thesauruses

2:36:59

do where they're often

2:37:02

giving you much more than you want. So you

2:37:04

can specify like, I want a different word for

2:37:06

this, but this exact

2:37:08

meaning, right? Not all of the meanings of

2:37:11

this word, just like this narrow way

2:37:13

in which it's used. What are other ways that you

2:37:15

could say that? And so boy, boy, has

2:37:18

it just like taken my thesaurizing

2:37:21

to next levels. Like this is by

2:37:23

far and away the most frequent

2:37:26

and common use of chat GPT

2:37:29

for me by far. I think next most

2:37:31

common use for me, because chat GPT basically

2:37:33

is an app, right? It is on my iPhone. Yeah,

2:37:35

it's on my iPhone. Next most useful

2:37:38

thing for me is tech problem

2:37:41

debugging. So in my

2:37:43

life, I am the person that everyone

2:37:46

I know asks for technical

2:37:48

assistance to fix whatever it

2:37:50

is in their life. Right? My computer

2:37:52

isn't working. Like it's not doing this thing. Help

2:37:54

me fix it. If you're the tech support person

2:37:57

in your world,

2:37:59

you know,

2:37:59

No, that very frequently the hard

2:38:02

part of the problem is

2:38:05

not fixing the problem.

2:38:08

The hard part of the problem is understanding

2:38:12

what the problem is based

2:38:14

on the description that the

2:38:17

non-technical person is giving

2:38:19

you. It's very frequently, like

2:38:21

with my wife, who in our

2:38:23

house, it's like, I will take care of

2:38:25

all of the technical problems because she has no

2:38:27

patience for dealing with any of it. And

2:38:30

frequently I will be handed an iPad with

2:38:33

the sentence, it's not

2:38:35

working. Like, okay,

2:38:37

right? Like let's start trying to drill down what

2:38:39

is the it? What should it be doing? What

2:38:42

should it not be doing? And you try to turn those

2:38:44

descriptions into like actionable things. This

2:38:46

is a totally sensible problem, right? Because

2:38:49

it's unreasonable to expect

2:38:52

average users to know the names

2:38:54

of all of the things. What's the name

2:38:57

of the strip on the top of your computer, right? What

2:38:59

are all these different things? Nobody knows. What

2:39:01

has been absolutely magical for

2:39:03

me now using

2:39:06

chat GPT to try to solve

2:39:08

my problems is realizing

2:39:11

I can do to chat GPT what

2:39:13

everybody else does to me, which

2:39:16

is basically give it a very

2:39:18

badly phrased description of

2:39:20

the problem and trust that it can

2:39:23

work it out. And

2:39:25

here is my pro tip on this, right? This

2:39:27

is a total life changer for me. Wait, just to work it, you

2:39:29

use chat GPT for this, not Bing. So

2:39:31

they're both the same systems behind the scenes. I know.

2:39:34

I just wonder what app you're using. I'm just, that's not important. I'm

2:39:36

just intrigued. It depends.

2:39:39

The actual chat GPT app is often my first

2:39:41

go, even for solving technical problems. Like

2:39:43

it's surprisingly good. Bing is still

2:39:46

optimized for searching for things,

2:39:48

which is not always really what I'm trying to do. I

2:39:51

think whatever version of chat GPT they have in the actual

2:39:53

app feels smarter

2:39:55

to me than the Bing version does. The

2:39:57

Bing is optimized in a particular way.

2:39:59

I just opened the chat GPT app and I now

2:40:02

have the chat with voice setting, which I've

2:40:04

not tried yet, but they just

2:40:06

gave me that.

2:40:07

Okay, yeah. So here's my pro tip. They've

2:40:09

rolled out this chat with voicing. I think you should do

2:40:11

something else. So this is what I

2:40:13

have done. I am just using

2:40:17

Apple dictation to record what

2:40:19

I'm saying and turn it into a blob of text

2:40:21

and send it to chat GPT. And

2:40:23

if you do it that way, chat GPT

2:40:26

doesn't talk back to you. It

2:40:28

just types back and you can read. So

2:40:30

I think for most people, you

2:40:32

will be able to read and skim

2:40:35

and frankly get through a lot of chat

2:40:37

GPT's boilerplate nonsense of like,

2:40:39

well, it's a large language model. I have some thoughts about

2:40:42

the iOS subsystem. It's like, shut up, right?

2:40:45

But I will tell you, it has been

2:40:47

such an amazing game changer to

2:40:49

be able to just speak

2:40:52

out loud in sentences. I

2:40:54

would never type, sort of change

2:40:57

what you're saying in the middle, not have

2:40:59

any of the technical words, right? About like what

2:41:01

problem it is you're trying to solve on the computer and

2:41:04

just hit return and chat GPT

2:41:06

can freaking nail it like 99% of

2:41:08

the time. It understands

2:41:12

not what you have said, but what

2:41:14

you are trying to say. It's

2:41:17

amazing. And it's also to me, it was like, oh wow,

2:41:19

I can be much lazier in the way

2:41:22

that I talk to this thing because I can trust

2:41:25

that it gets it, which made

2:41:27

me instantly realize, oh,

2:41:29

I have encouraged this behavior

2:41:32

in everyone I know in my whole life

2:41:34

because they're all like, I can just say whatever

2:41:36

to him and I can trust it. You're a little more language

2:41:38

model. Exactly. I

2:41:41

like the thought of like in the future someone goes, Gray,

2:41:43

I have a technical problem. You just get your phone out

2:41:45

and hold it up to them. Go on.

2:41:48

You speak to chat GPT. Let's take me out

2:41:50

of the middle.

2:41:51

Yeah,

2:41:52

it has really been quite

2:41:55

a unique experience to have this feeling

2:41:57

of I understand how

2:41:59

everyone.

2:41:59

everyone uses me in their

2:42:02

lives because I now have this thing

2:42:04

for me. chatgbt debugged

2:42:07

this problem on my computer

2:42:09

that was like absolutely shocking to

2:42:11

me that like went straight down into the absolute

2:42:13

core of my computer where there was a problem

2:42:16

with like a Python installation. This

2:42:18

again is where I don't know the technical word. It's

2:42:20

like, oh, there's different shells

2:42:23

that you can use at the terminal, which is always

2:42:25

the level where I'm like, I don't know why this

2:42:28

is a thing that exists. It's like, oh, ages

2:42:31

ago when I set up a Mac and you used to be

2:42:33

able to dual boot them into Linux, like I caused

2:42:36

a problem with my Python installation

2:42:39

that has been following me for forever.

2:42:42

And when I was trying to run some Python

2:42:44

scripts, like I couldn't get them to run and I could

2:42:46

not figure out why. And it's like chatgbt

2:42:49

debugged and walked me through this

2:42:52

just insane series

2:42:54

of terminal commands to fix

2:42:56

like the deepest subsystem on my

2:42:59

computer. No one on earth could

2:43:01

have debugged this in this way from

2:43:03

my description. I am trying to change

2:43:05

my relationship to these tools. It

2:43:07

is inevitable what is happening to the world. I'm

2:43:09

not going to dig my feet in on this forever. I

2:43:12

have concerns and they continue,

2:43:14

but I'm not going to be like a Luddite. I'm

2:43:16

not going to be like, no, I refuse to

2:43:19

use these tools. I will use them and

2:43:21

I will find the ways to use them that I think are right.

2:43:23

Like for me, but just

2:43:26

because I've had feelings and thoughts

2:43:28

and they're complicated about this stuff, I'm not going to

2:43:30

be like, well, now I'm just going to refuse to do it. No,

2:43:33

of course. And that's what I'm trying to figure out is where

2:43:35

is this actually useful? And

2:43:38

that's sort of what this conversation was for me is what

2:43:40

seems like it might be the most useful at first.

2:43:43

Oh, it's useful for script writing has not

2:43:45

remotely been useful at all, but there are

2:43:47

totally other ways in which it has

2:43:49

been very useful. I

2:43:51

mean, especially like I

2:43:54

cannot convey to you how

2:43:57

much chat GPT

2:43:59

has sped up. my ability to work on spreadsheets.

2:44:02

The amount of complicated and

2:44:04

crazy things that I have done in addition

2:44:07

to just the raw amount of work

2:44:09

that I have gotten, being able to ask chat GPT

2:44:11

questions or just some specifics

2:44:14

of formulating formulas,

2:44:17

it's like a 20 to 50 fold

2:44:20

productivity increase like in the domain

2:44:23

of spreadsheet work. It's insane.

2:44:25

I've seen these spreadsheets. They're bananas.

2:44:27

There's thousands and thousands of

2:44:30

rows and I don't understand what's

2:44:32

going on in there. Now

2:44:34

you said that kind of makes sense that chat GPT is helping

2:44:36

you do it, right? Because it's very complicated stuff.

2:44:38

With the spreadsheets, there's nothing that it's helped me with

2:44:41

that I couldn't do on my own. It's

2:44:43

just cutting down the time enormously,

2:44:46

which is the same thing as a productivity

2:44:48

boost. It's insane. It's

2:44:50

very interesting that these two areas,

2:44:54

being a thesaurus and also

2:44:57

being able to produce

2:45:00

technical answers that I am

2:45:02

able to verify are

2:45:04

correct, that I don't have to trust

2:45:07

is what the thing said true. No, no,

2:45:10

I can see if it worked. That

2:45:13

is also where it's just been an absolutely huge

2:45:15

advantage. I will just say it's

2:45:18

made me think a lot about the future

2:45:20

of Apple's apps because

2:45:23

I don't know if this is true, but I

2:45:25

have a suspicion and a feeling that Apple

2:45:27

might be more culturally

2:45:30

resistant to AI than other

2:45:32

companies. I just think like

2:45:35

they absolutely have to

2:45:37

be incorporating some AI tools into

2:45:40

their production

2:45:42

apps like Final Cut Pro

2:45:45

and Logic, and they have

2:45:47

to be doing it right freaking

2:45:49

now or I think they're going to be in real

2:45:52

trouble very soon. I think they

2:45:54

are. I do. I understand the

2:45:56

thinking behind the cultural resistance. I

2:45:58

think I felt that at first. too, but I

2:46:01

don't think they're stupid. I mean,

2:46:03

they just they put a transformer model in the keyboard.

2:46:06

Like, to me, that was a sign. I

2:46:08

hope you're right. I just my hesitation is like,

2:46:10

you know, there are two big apps that I use, Final Cut

2:46:12

Pro and Logic, have both

2:46:15

had obvious places where

2:46:17

you could use even just the basics of

2:46:19

machine learning for like five years,

2:46:21

and they haven't put in any of that. Like,

2:46:24

it's insane to me that in Final Cut Pro,

2:46:26

the workflow is still in

2:46:28

theory that you need to manually

2:46:31

tag all of your clips with

2:46:33

what's in them. And like,

2:46:35

guys, this should have been solved

2:46:38

half a decade ago. Yeah, yeah,

2:46:40

that's a good point. Or similarly with Logic, like

2:46:43

a bunch of modern audio editing apps are

2:46:46

doing things where it's like, we'll just write the transcription

2:46:48

of what you've said above the audio, which

2:46:50

makes it a hundred million times easier to edit.

2:46:52

Logic could have done that years ago, but they haven't.

2:46:55

So yeah, but Logic's a bad example.

2:46:58

Why do you say that? Well, Logic is not a podcast

2:47:00

editing or audio editing. It's music.

2:47:02

It's a music creation tool. I would say the Final

2:47:04

Cut example, that is weird. Like, they should

2:47:06

add something like that. But you know,

2:47:09

I know you have used Dscript

2:47:11

and we were talking about it offline

2:47:13

a while ago. And that's one of the

2:47:15

apps that does that thing that you're talking

2:47:17

about. But like, Dscript is a podcast editing

2:47:20

tool. Logic is not that. It's

2:47:22

just what we use it for. Yeah, I know.

2:47:24

But I still think even if you're doing music, you're

2:47:26

moving the playhead around constantly. Being

2:47:29

able to see where does a word start and

2:47:31

where does a word end is still something a music

2:47:33

editor would want to do. I don't

2:47:35

think that's limited to podcast editing. But anyway,

2:47:39

yeah, so a little sidebar on AI,

2:47:42

which is sort of an

2:47:43

app.

2:47:46

Maybe next year we might have a lot more AI-based

2:47:49

apps on our list than we do right now.

2:47:51

They'll probably be a category. I mean, even if

2:47:54

that even makes sense. It won't even make any sense

2:47:56

anymore. It might be there in every single app that we're

2:47:58

using. I mean, honestly, like... AIs

2:48:00

in Notion. I mean, I already said AIs

2:48:02

in Spa. I mean, there's probably multiple other

2:48:04

apps that it's in. Yeah, you know what? Actually, now

2:48:06

that I think about it, with the speed

2:48:09

of AI, we may push through it so

2:48:11

fast that it would be like highlighting

2:48:13

apps that can do calculations. Like,

2:48:17

no, they all do calculations. You don't need

2:48:19

to highlight this as a feature. It's actually,

2:48:21

yes. I don't think we will have

2:48:23

an AI category next year. I think this is might be

2:48:25

the only time we ever do a sidebar on AI apps.

2:48:28

But I think next year,

2:48:31

more and more of the apps that we use will have

2:48:34

AI and machine learning features, and we'll

2:48:36

be talking about them more. That's what I reckon will happen. Okay,

2:48:40

Mike. We got to start wrapping up this show here,

2:48:42

okay? Let's go.

2:48:44

Let's go. Go. Media apps and entertainment.

2:48:46

What do you want to talk about? All I have is

2:48:48

games. Okay, great. Me too. Go. The

2:48:52

only one that's on a smartphone

2:48:54

is an app called Finity, which is on Apple

2:48:56

Arcade. It is a very good

2:48:59

match three app. I love

2:49:01

it. It's hard to explain, but if you

2:49:03

have Apple Arcade, download this app. It's

2:49:05

fantastic. Oh, okay. And then I'm going to talk

2:49:08

about my two games of the year so far. Legends

2:49:10

of Zelda, Tears of the Kingdom. They

2:49:12

did it. How could it be possible to

2:49:15

make a better game than, in my opinion, the

2:49:17

best game ever made? Just

2:49:19

make it better. It's what they did. Tears

2:49:21

of the Kingdom is a better game than

2:49:24

Breath of the Wild in every way you could

2:49:26

measure, in my opinion. Which is truly

2:49:29

outstanding that they pulled it off, but

2:49:31

they pulled it off. It is superb.

2:49:34

A game that I have recently started playing, which

2:49:37

is currently as of today when

2:49:39

we were recording on October the 12th. The

2:49:42

only game that seems to be in true contention

2:49:45

for Game of the Year other than Tears of the Kingdom

2:49:47

is Baldur's Gate 3. It's like I've

2:49:49

literally never heard of this game. It is essentially

2:49:52

what's called a CRPG,

2:49:54

which means Computer Role-Playing Game, which

2:49:56

means Dungeons and Dragons-style

2:49:59

rules. in a video game. Is that using

2:50:02

AI to do that? How do they do that? It's been

2:50:04

in development for a really really really really

2:50:06

long time. So they have, you

2:50:09

know, apparently there are like thousands of ways

2:50:11

the game can end like the pause that you can take

2:50:14

because you can do things like you can attempt

2:50:16

to do a thing and you roll a dice and it fails and now

2:50:18

the character dies. Right? Just like

2:50:20

well there's nothing you can do about that the character is dead now. Right?

2:50:23

Like it's really fun

2:50:25

and really weird and really cool. It's

2:50:27

got all of the RPG mechanics you might want from a game

2:50:30

but it adds dice in and it's turn based combat

2:50:32

with dice throw in and like the spells. It's

2:50:34

Dungeons and Dragons but a video game. It's

2:50:37

really cool and it's very inventive

2:50:39

and you can feel the hard long

2:50:42

work that went into this game. The

2:50:45

story's really interesting like I'm

2:50:47

enjoying it. I'm like I don't know 10 hours in

2:50:49

or something. It's very hard. It's

2:50:51

very good. I like it a lot. Okay

2:50:54

I want to bring attention to three games for

2:50:56

my own selfish reasons because I want

2:50:58

to promote more things like this. The first

2:51:00

game is called Isle of Arrows.

2:51:03

If you've listened to this section in the past you will know I'm

2:51:05

a big fan of the tower defense genre

2:51:08

and I feel like this is a an anemic

2:51:10

genre that could always use more attention

2:51:12

and people doing interesting things. You've chosen

2:51:15

a recent one this time which

2:51:17

is great and I'm familiar

2:51:19

with this game because it was very popular

2:51:21

and like I'm very well reviewed when it came out last

2:51:24

year. Yeah I missed it the first time around and

2:51:26

I think this is one of these things where I something

2:51:29

about when I saw it I was like ah I don't think that's for

2:51:31

me but I just wanted to mention it

2:51:33

because it does interesting things

2:51:36

in the tower defense genre

2:51:38

and might be kind of newbie friendly if

2:51:40

someone hasn't gotten into that

2:51:42

before. It's dangerously

2:51:46

close in some ways to a puzzle game but

2:51:48

not so close that I don't want to play

2:51:50

that because I hate puzzle games so anyway I just think

2:51:52

it's really interesting I like to promote tower

2:51:54

defense schemes that do different kinds of stuff.

2:51:57

Along the similar lines I stumbled

2:51:59

upon vampire survivors a while back

2:52:01

and that game has since given

2:52:04

birth to a genre that people are calling

2:52:06

bullet heaven as in the opposite of

2:52:08

bullet hell which I really like. Oh I

2:52:11

haven't heard that phrase because I remember when it was called

2:52:13

reverse bullet hell but I prefer

2:52:15

bullet heaven. Right we were trying to struggle

2:52:17

with how do you describe what this

2:52:19

game is because it's the opposite of a bullet

2:52:22

hell and so yeah we're like reverse bullet

2:52:25

heaven it's like this is not good. So

2:52:27

people have created the phrase bullet

2:52:29

heaven which is like perfect. That's so good.

2:52:31

You are the object that emanates

2:52:34

all of the weapons and there's a million enemies

2:52:36

around you. Since vampire survivor

2:52:38

a bunch of games have come out in this

2:52:41

category. I just wanted to draw

2:52:43

attention to army of ruin

2:52:45

which is a game made by

2:52:47

a seemingly very small team that

2:52:50

it's really high quality and I think

2:52:52

it just had super unfortunate

2:52:55

timing when it came out between a couple of other

2:52:57

games like this but I really like

2:52:59

it. It's very visually pleasing again

2:53:02

very interesting weapon mechanics a

2:53:05

very interesting upgrade system that I like that

2:53:07

doesn't feel like it locks you into

2:53:10

a particular build. Unlike

2:53:12

a lot of these things I really feel like you have the

2:53:14

freedom to try different stuff.

2:53:17

Yep. So I'm going to recommend army of ruin.

2:53:19

This has also just been a terrible

2:53:21

year to be an indie game developer

2:53:24

because there are so many

2:53:26

good big games coming out this

2:53:28

year. Yeah. That trying to get attention

2:53:31

in 2023 seems to have been a bit of a

2:53:33

nightmare. Yeah so when I was looking

2:53:35

around for army of ruined stuff I was like

2:53:38

oh like the number of reviews they have and

2:53:40

the size of their subreddit do not reflect

2:53:42

like how good this game is. So yeah

2:53:45

I just I really like this one if you like vampire

2:53:47

survivors totally give this one a try. Then

2:53:49

I will because I do. Yeah it's cute

2:53:52

I think it's

2:53:54

a cuter version of this like it looks

2:53:56

really nice. It's been like the

2:53:58

real go-to for months. steam

2:54:00

deck like playing on the couch. I've been very

2:54:02

much enjoying it. The thing about Vampire Survivors, the

2:54:05

one thing it does not have is looks. I

2:54:08

find Vampire Survivors has a certain kind of

2:54:10

retro pixel charm. I think it's the best

2:54:12

version of this, but

2:54:15

yeah sometimes I could feel like I just want

2:54:17

something like a little bit more aesthetically pleasing. Do

2:54:19

you know Vampire Survivors on the iPhone now? I

2:54:22

don't know how you'd play that on the iPhone, but I

2:54:24

don't know how people play anything on the iPhone. Fair

2:54:26

enough, but it is. The last

2:54:29

and increasing scale of cuteness is

2:54:31

a game called Voxel Tycoon. This

2:54:33

is like a sort of semi-early access

2:54:36

game. There's a game

2:54:38

called OpenTTD,

2:54:41

which is like a town train

2:54:43

simulator kind of game that is a billion

2:54:45

years old, and I have felt for

2:54:48

like a decade I'm trying to find the

2:54:50

modern replacement for that game, and

2:54:53

Voxel Tycoon is this.

2:54:56

It's the kind of thing where you're

2:54:59

just connecting up towns with

2:55:01

trains and trucks and buses, and

2:55:03

you're moving passengers around, you know, you're

2:55:05

delivering coal from the mine

2:55:07

to the factory, and then that factory

2:55:10

is producing iron bars that you're delivering

2:55:12

somewhere else. The furniture company

2:55:14

needs wood, so it's your job for like

2:55:16

how to transport that stuff around. I

2:55:18

find this just so satisfying

2:55:21

and so relaxing. There's

2:55:23

been a lot of games that try

2:55:27

to do this, but I feel like Voxel

2:55:29

Tycoon is hitting the version of this, which

2:55:31

is in my dreams of, again, very

2:55:34

cute little towns, sort

2:55:36

of interesting mechanics, but not

2:55:39

too crazily complicated. I just

2:55:41

really like it. I wanted to just draw attention

2:55:44

to it as a game that I feel could

2:55:46

totally use more players supporting it in

2:55:48

development. There's also a delightful feature where

2:55:50

after you've built all your trains, you can click

2:55:53

on a train and then have the first

2:55:56

person view of driving around

2:55:58

on all the little tracks and going through the forest

2:56:00

or going through the mines or whatever. It's delightful.

2:56:03

That to me feels like, what do you benefit

2:56:05

for making a game like this today? Yes,

2:56:08

exactly. That's what it is. Like, ah, but

2:56:10

we can zoom the camera down so

2:56:12

that you can see what the bus driver in

2:56:14

your tiny town sees. So, really

2:56:17

love it. That does remind me of like, theme

2:56:19

park world when I was a kid where like, you

2:56:21

could ride the roller coaster, but it was

2:56:23

like, super janky. But

2:56:25

you could do it. And it was like, ah, I'm riding my roller

2:56:27

coaster. It's going way too fast. Yeah,

2:56:30

so those are my three game recommendations from the year.

2:56:33

This episode is brought to you by Sidekick

2:56:35

Notepad from Cortex Brand. Sidekick

2:56:38

Notepad has been designed to be your companion

2:56:41

for taking notes while getting your most productive

2:56:43

work done. It is ready to be with you all

2:56:45

day for you to write down your ideas,

2:56:48

your notes from your meetings, and to keep

2:56:50

track of your tasks and action items.

2:56:53

It's been carefully designed to fit perfectly

2:56:55

between you and your keyboard, and

2:56:57

has been tested to provide a comfortable and

2:57:00

ergonomic experience in use. Sidekick

2:57:02

Notepad is the perfect accompaniment

2:57:05

to your meetings. Its quality construction

2:57:07

means that it will be durable in transit from place

2:57:09

to place, and gives you an ideal space

2:57:11

to keep track of what you're working on and who

2:57:13

you're working with without distracting you of

2:57:15

notifications or incoming messages.

2:57:18

We worked incredibly hard to engineer a

2:57:20

construction that will provide rigidity

2:57:22

and comfort so you'll look professional when

2:57:25

carrying and using it. Sidekick

2:57:27

Notepad has a minimal and beautiful cover,

2:57:29

but is designed to stay open and in front of

2:57:31

you all day when you're at your desk. It's

2:57:34

intended to be ready for whenever you have

2:57:36

anything to write down, acting as a constant

2:57:38

guide of what you have going on today. It's

2:57:41

made for what is happening right now, a

2:57:43

tool to help you with what you're working on. Then,

2:57:45

when you're done, just tear off the page and

2:57:47

start fresh. In your daily life,

2:57:50

you deserve space to think and to brainstorm,

2:57:52

to write down your ideas and to iterate on

2:57:54

them. Pen and paper dust is better than

2:57:56

anything else. Sidekick Notepad

2:57:59

is the in-between. part from your brain

2:58:01

to your computer. Oh and speaking

2:58:03

of pens, why not check out the Cortex

2:58:05

brand Mark 1 pen available

2:58:08

in two colors with the very best refill

2:58:10

we found. It features perfectly balanced

2:58:12

aluminium construction coated in a premium

2:58:15

Cerakote finish. Sidekick

2:58:18

notepad is made and assembled by hand

2:58:20

in London England. We use high quality

2:58:22

paper with exceptional printing and perforation.

2:58:25

The cover material is made from recycled

2:58:28

coffee cups using a highly specialized

2:58:30

process. These cups would have otherwise

2:58:32

be destined for landfill but we use them here

2:58:34

in this product. Sidekick notepad

2:58:37

is made to sit comfortably with you all

2:58:39

day and be ready and waiting for whatever

2:58:41

you're working on. It helps turn your ideas

2:58:43

into actions becoming the perfect companion

2:58:46

for getting things done. Capture all

2:58:48

of your tasks, action items, notes

2:58:50

and thoughts. Sidekick notepad will be

2:58:53

there throughout the day. Then tomorrow, tear

2:58:55

off the page and start again. Sidekick

2:58:58

notepad is available now at cortexbrand.com.

2:59:02

That is cortexbrand.com.

2:59:04

All

2:59:06

right on to lightning rounds and we've

2:59:08

got a really kind of speed up now. It

2:59:11

is the lightning round so it should in

2:59:13

theory be the fast round. I will start with

2:59:15

Raycast. It is my new

2:59:17

launcher on the Mac. It's replaced Alfred

2:59:20

for me. Oh wow. It's got a very nice simple

2:59:22

modern UI and it has tons

2:59:24

of integrations available. I don't use

2:59:26

a ton of them but they're there and I add more

2:59:29

in over time for different services and

2:59:31

stuff like that and I like that you can

2:59:33

do things like if you want to, window

2:59:35

management tools and a bunch of conversion stuff.

2:59:37

It's just I like Raycast a lot. It's

2:59:40

nice and simple but can be complicated

2:59:42

if you want it to be. Alfred's the one that I use. I'll

2:59:44

check that out. All right little app on the App

2:59:47

Store called Wallet Creator.

2:59:49

I think a long-forgotten

2:59:51

feature of Apple Wallet is that you

2:59:53

can with apps help

2:59:56

get your own custom passes into

2:59:59

Apple Wallet.

Rate

Join Podchaser to...

  • Rate podcasts and episodes
  • Follow podcasts and creators
  • Create podcast and episode lists
  • & much more

Episode Tags

Do you host or manage this podcast?
Claim and edit this page to your liking.
,

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features