Podchaser Logo
Home
Is Israel Breaking the Laws of War in Gaza?

Is Israel Breaking the Laws of War in Gaza?

Released Friday, 3rd November 2023
 2 people rated this episode
Is Israel Breaking the Laws of War in Gaza?

Is Israel Breaking the Laws of War in Gaza?

Is Israel Breaking the Laws of War in Gaza?

Is Israel Breaking the Laws of War in Gaza?

Friday, 3rd November 2023
 2 people rated this episode
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:06

Fear of darkness, general tension,

0:09

a flashback, nightmares,

0:12

avoidance, difficulty sleeping,

0:15

and a recollection of their trauma.

0:17

These are just some of the debilitating

0:19

mental health symptoms of the children in Gaza.

0:22

Iman Farjala is a psychologist who lives

0:24

in the U.S., but she grew up

0:26

in Gaza.

0:27

Most of her family is still there. She

0:30

knows firsthand what it's like to live in the center

0:32

of a deadly conflict. The experience

0:34

was so vicious,

0:38

so scary, so

0:41

harmful that there's no words that

0:43

you can actually describe it. How

0:46

can you describe when the Israeli

0:48

soldiers, they come and jump from

0:50

the walls to our home, beating

0:53

up my brothers, beating up my mother?

0:55

Farjala works with refugee kids at a community

0:58

clinic in San Francisco, but she

1:00

also goes back to Gaza from time to time

1:02

to talk to kids there and document how

1:04

the violence is affecting them. It's

1:07

completely debilitating, and their sense of the world

1:09

is shattered. Eric Dubow is a professor

1:11

of psychology at Bowling Green State University.

1:14

They don't feel secure in their families.

1:16

They don't feel secure in their relationships with

1:18

others, constantly on guard. Israel

1:20

has continued to pound Gaza with airstrikes

1:23

since last month. That's when Hamas

1:25

militants crossed into southern Israel, killed 1,400

1:27

people, and took more than 200 hostage.

1:29

The Israeli army

1:32

now says its troops have surrounded Gaza

1:34

City, where they say Hamas is headquartered.

1:37

According to Palestinian health officials, of the 9,000

1:40

Palestinians killed so far, nearly half

1:42

were children.

1:45

When I see a Palestinian

1:48

child, a boy, a girl, pulled

1:51

from the rubble of a collapsed building,

1:54

that hits me in the gut as much as seeing

1:56

a child in Israel or anywhere else.

1:59

Secretary of State Antony Blinken. He

2:02

spoke with reporters before he traveled to Tel Aviv

2:04

to meet with Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin

2:06

Netanyahu and other Israeli

2:08

leaders. After meeting with Netanyahu,

2:11

Blinken emphasized at a press conference that the Biden

2:13

administration stands in solidarity with

2:15

Israel's right to defend itself against Hamas,

2:18

which Israel says is hiding among civilians.

2:21

I also emphasize that the protection of civilians must

2:24

take place not just in Gaza, but

2:26

also in the West Bank, where incitement and extremist

2:29

violence against Palestinians must be

2:31

stopped and perpetrators held

2:33

accountable. Just this week, the Israeli

2:35

military launched airstrikes which hit the Jabalia

2:38

refugee camp in northern Gaza, twice.

2:41

And conditions in Gaza continue to deteriorate,

2:44

with only a trickle of humanitarian aid available.

2:48

Consider this. As U.S. leaders continue

2:51

to underscore Israel's right to defend itself,

2:53

there are growing concerns as the death toll of Palestinian

2:56

civilians goes up. One

2:58

question that's being asked, what are the rules

3:01

of war? The answer to that is just

3:03

ahead. From

3:08

NPR, I'm Adrian Ma. It's Friday,

3:11

November 3rd.

3:13

Hi, it's Terry Gross. I just interviewed

3:15

David Byrne. It was so much fun hearing him talk

3:18

about his life before, during, and after

3:20

Talking Heads. Now I know why

3:22

I never understood the lyrics to Burning Down the

3:24

House.

3:24

It's basically a lot of non-sequiturs

3:27

that have some kind of emotional impact.

3:29

Listen to the Fresh Air podcast

3:31

from NPR. Hey,

3:37

it's Kamilah Khashoggi from NPR's StoryCorps podcast.

3:40

I'm one of thousands of NPR Network voices coming

3:43

to you from over 200 local newsrooms across

3:45

the country.

3:46

We bring all Americans closer together through

3:48

free and independent journalism, music, politics,

3:51

culture, and

3:52

so much more. The NPR

3:54

Network.

3:55

What you hear changes everything.

3:57

Learn more at npr.org slash network.

3:59

It's Linda Holmes from NPR's

4:02

Pop Culture

4:02

Happy Hour podcast. I'm one of thousands

4:05

of NPR network voices coming to you

4:07

from over 200 local newsrooms across

4:09

the country. We bring all Americans

4:11

closer together through free and independent

4:13

journalism, music, politics, culture,

4:16

and so much more. The NPR network,

4:18

what you hear changes everything.

4:26

It's considered this from NPR. Earlier

4:30

this week, Israeli military forces bombed

4:32

a refugee camp in Jabalia, just

4:34

north of Gaza City. They

4:36

said the area was a Hamas stronghold

4:39

that included underground tunnels and a command

4:41

center, and the Israeli military

4:43

blames Hamas for embedding itself

4:45

in crowded civilian areas or tunnels

4:47

underneath them. United

4:50

Nations human rights officials have said Israel's ground

4:52

invasion of Gaza could be a war crime.

4:55

So, are there rules that govern

4:57

how wars are waged? My colleague Mary

4:59

Louise Kelly spoke with Tom Dannenbaum

5:01

about this earlier this week, following the strike

5:04

on the refugee camp. He's an associate professor

5:06

of international law at the Fletcher School of Law

5:09

and Diplomacy. So I know there are entire

5:11

tomes and law school classes designed

5:13

for this, but can you briefly walk

5:15

us through what are the key laws

5:18

that might apply to an incident like

5:20

this in a densely populated urban area? Yeah.

5:23

There are

5:24

a set of rules that one has to

5:26

comply with in this kind of situation. The

5:28

first is the rule of distinction, which means

5:30

targeting military objectives

5:33

and not civilians or civilian objects. Second,

5:36

the prohibition on indiscriminate attacks, which is

5:38

to say that one has to have a discrete

5:41

military target, not target an

5:43

area in which there are military

5:45

objectives and also civilian

5:47

populations and civilian objects. Third,

5:50

one has to take adequate precautions, which

5:52

is to say, do everything feasible

5:54

to minimize the expected civilian

5:57

loss of life, injury, and damage to civilian objects.

6:00

And finally, not to engage in the attack at

6:02

all if the civilian loss of

6:04

life injury or damage to civilian

6:07

objects that would be expected from the

6:09

attack would be excessive

6:11

in relation to the military advantage

6:14

that the commander authorizing the attack anticipates

6:17

from that attack.

6:18

Who makes these laws?

6:20

These laws are codified

6:23

in various treaties going back to

6:25

the Geneva Conventions and updated in

6:27

the additional protocols in those conventions in 1977. But

6:30

also they are embedded in

6:33

what's called customary international law, which is the

6:35

practice of states understood

6:37

by those states to be legally determined,

6:40

which is reflected in how states articulate

6:42

these rules in their military handbooks and in

6:44

other expressions of their understanding

6:46

of the law. And then the follow

6:49

up question, who enforces these laws? Well,

6:51

there are various ways they can be enforced. They can be

6:53

enforced by domestic courts either within

6:56

the state that is engaged in a particular

6:58

action or indeed in any other state. And

7:00

additionally, in this particular context, the International

7:03

Criminal Court has jurisdiction over

7:05

any war crimes occurring on

7:08

the territory of Gaza. And

7:10

that includes in this particular context

7:12

the crime of engaging in a

7:14

disproportionate attack, an attack where

7:17

the expected

7:17

civilian loss of life or injury

7:19

or damage to civilian objects would be clearly

7:22

excessive in relation to the military

7:24

advantage anticipated. There

7:26

are a whole lot of details about this

7:28

incident that we don't yet know that

7:31

we're trying to pin down exactly what

7:34

happened, where how many people were injured

7:36

or killed by this. But we do

7:39

know Israel says,

7:41

look, we have been warning civilians to

7:43

leave this

7:44

area, northern Gaza. And Israel

7:47

also says we have the right to defend ourselves.

7:50

From a legal perspective, how

7:52

much weight do those defenses have? The

7:55

first thing to say is that acting in

7:57

self-defense doesn't justify

7:59

our own actions.

7:59

acting without constraint. The

8:02

law of armed conflict, including all of the rules

8:04

that I mentioned earlier, apply as

8:06

much to the actor

8:09

engaged in self-defense as any

8:11

actor engaged in aggression, both

8:14

in restrained by the same set of the

8:16

rules on the conduct of hostilities. The

8:18

second thing to say is, with respect to

8:20

warnings, issuing warnings

8:23

can be part of the required precautions

8:26

that I mentioned, taking all feasible measures to minimize

8:29

civilian harm that would be expected

8:31

from an attack. But complying

8:33

with the rule on precautions does

8:36

not itself relieve the

8:38

duty

8:38

to comply with the other rules. And

8:41

again, with the caveat that there's a lot we don't

8:43

know about what happened, I am curious for

8:45

someone with your background. As you

8:48

followed news of this incident, what are the questions

8:50

that spring to mind?

8:52

Well, the biggest question that springs to mind is,

8:56

what exactly did they expect in terms

8:58

of the civilian casualties?

9:01

They seem to be very high

9:04

for the targeting of a single commander.

9:07

The second question is, who was

9:09

that specific commander? What was the specific

9:11

military advantage anticipated

9:14

from taking that individual out? And

9:16

the third question that I think is worth bearing

9:18

in mind when making the proportionality

9:20

calculation or performing an analysis

9:23

of proportionality is, would

9:26

the same decision have been made were

9:29

the civilians that were harmed in this particular

9:31

context Israeli civilians? Civilians

9:34

are protected as civilians,

9:36

regardless of nationality, regardless of the party

9:38

with which they're associated. Would

9:41

the commander justify this attack,

9:45

regardless of the identity of the

9:47

civilians, and instead recognizing

9:49

them as having values inherent to

9:51

their humanity?

9:53

That was Tom Dannenbaum, Associate

9:56

Professor of International Law at the Fletcher School

9:58

of Law and Diplomacy.

10:00

I'm meeting with my colleague, Mary Lewis Kelly.

10:08

It's Consider This from NPR.

10:10

I'm Adrian Ma.

10:12

Want all of NPR without relying on

10:15

your radio? Visit npr.org

10:17

to be connected to your local station wherever

10:19

you are and wherever the news takes you.

10:22

Get your vital mix of rigorously

10:24

reported local and national stories

10:26

all live, free, and at your fingertips

10:29

at

10:29

npr.org.

10:33

The world is changing every hour,

10:36

and catching up once or twice a day might not be enough. For

10:38

quick updates throughout your day, there's

10:41

the NPR News Now podcast. Every

10:44

hour, on the hour, we bring you up

10:46

to speed on the latest news from around the world

10:48

in five minutes. Listen

10:50

now to the NPR News Now podcast

10:53

from NPR.

10:56

Here's

10:56

the thing. Science isn't only

10:58

for the PhDs of the world. It's for

11:01

everyone. On the Shortwave podcast,

11:03

we

11:04

dig into the latest research with a

11:06

humorous touch. In under 15 minutes,

11:09

it's serious science, even if it doesn't sound

11:11

like it. Listen now to the Shortwave

11:13

podcast from NPR.

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features