Podchaser Logo
Home
When M&A goes wrong

When M&A goes wrong

Released Wednesday, 24th April 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
When M&A goes wrong

When M&A goes wrong

When M&A goes wrong

When M&A goes wrong

Wednesday, 24th April 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:00

Today. I want to talk about

0:02

emanate that's mergers and Acquisitions.

0:04

Now to do this, I'm

0:06

gonna dive into a bit

0:08

of a hypothetical situation here

0:11

where I've spent years not

0:13

covering financial news, but rather

0:15

making and selling the best

0:17

pizza in New York. Now.

0:19

I call in the F T's Wall Street editors who

0:21

cheat end up to help me with the next part

0:23

here. So. Cg, Let's picture

0:26

this. I have this pizza restaurant

0:28

that I built up and run

0:30

it for years. Everyone loves my

0:32

pizza. I'm really proud of it,

0:34

but now I'm done with that.

0:36

I want to sell it and

0:38

I'm looking for a buyer. So

0:40

how does this process work with

0:42

a typical emanate deal? For.

0:44

Or imagine or her mother pizza chain

0:46

or I was just them Buster and

0:48

I want to restaurant in the location

0:50

and I came to you and said

0:52

of i'd like to buy it for

0:55

a thousand dollars or two. Thousand

0:57

dollar. Your terminal by for my needs. A

0:59

Russian is worth more than what they want

1:01

to buy from. Million dollars per and thought

1:03

John Wall your how will you like go

1:05

back for those of maybe it's a million,

1:07

maybe it's neither and seventy five thousand but

1:09

we settle Ultimately annoying dollars of and so

1:11

we sign a contract. Ah and contract says

1:13

I'm going to buy your restaurant four million

1:16

dollars and I'd write you a check. You'd

1:18

get the money, I get the restaurant and

1:20

we would go on our separate ways. Sounds.

1:23

Simple enough, right? That's.

1:26

How Emanate tends to work. You need

1:28

a buyer? You need a seller. They.

1:30

Agree to a price and then

1:33

handshakes. Money is exchanged for a

1:35

business. But. To

1:37

cheat says that's not what happened

1:39

with the deal he recently came

1:42

across. This particular case involved a

1:44

private equity firm that wanted to

1:46

buy a grocery store chain called

1:48

Save Mart and the deal. It's

1:50

normal. that is until the very

1:52

end. It's. So the money

1:54

changed hands but since this was a

1:57

private company or health can still break

1:59

loose out. The words and A did. That

2:02

how turned into a court battle

2:04

that. Had a surprising out.

2:06

Com The court has ordered a

2:08

seller's to pay the buyer hundred

2:10

nine million dollars which is not

2:13

how this normally works Meaning that.

2:15

The family that owns the grocery

2:18

store chain might actually end up

2:20

paying this from to take the

2:22

business off their hands. And

2:25

what's even more surprising is that this

2:27

one hundred and nine. Million Dollar

2:29

Dispute. With only brought

2:31

up after the deal had already

2:34

closed. That I think is actually

2:36

the most important, the most interesting aspect of

2:38

this whole points fight. Ah, why is this

2:40

speak? why are we talking about it after

2:42

the money has to stamps. I'm

2:59

in college and death from the financial times.

3:04

Mergers and acquisitions tend to follow

3:07

a set order. Of Operations.

3:09

But that wasn't the case for the owners

3:12

of the grocery store chain sleep. Sitting

3:15

behind. The much were playing inside

3:18

the mechanics of the fry them

3:20

feel making process set in this

3:22

specific case. When it's very.

3:31

Hazy. Welcome to the Shell. But. You haven't

3:33

begun to be here. So. Our listeners

3:35

who live in California's Central Valley places

3:38

like Sacramento or Modest still he probably

3:40

heard of Save Mark. It's

3:42

a grocery store chain like Kroger

3:44

or Sainsburys goes back several decades

3:47

and like any other gross chain,

3:49

it's really well known and just

3:51

part of the fabric of of

3:53

the Southern California community. For.

3:56

Many years the chain is owned by this

3:58

one family. The Pitch you need. But

4:01

in 2015, the long-standing patriarch of

4:03

the family, Bob Piccinini, dies.

4:07

Sad news out of Modesto, Bob Piccinini, a man

4:09

who started in his family grocery store as a

4:11

box boy at the age of 12 and

4:13

rose to become the owner of a 240-store chain known

4:17

as Save Mart and a number of other brand names worth

4:20

$2.3 billion, according to Forbes, in the latest survey.

4:22

He has passed away at the age of 73.

4:25

The family continues to own Save Mart for the

4:27

next few years. But then

4:30

in 2021, they decide, like I

4:32

did with my hypothetical restaurant, that

4:34

it's time to sell. If

4:36

you're selling any asset, whether it's your house or a

4:38

company, you obviously want the highest

4:40

price you can get. But

4:42

there's these other kind of social factors that will come

4:44

into play where you ideally want the buyer to take

4:46

care of your asset, feel like it's going to be

4:49

a good steward of it. So

4:51

a potential buyer pops up, a

4:53

private equity firm called Kingswood Capital

4:55

Management. The founder of

4:58

Kingswood is a gentleman named

5:01

Alexander Wolf, and he has a

5:03

distinguished career in private equity. He

5:05

had years ago been in a

5:07

firm called Cerberus Capital Management. And

5:09

then just prior to forming Kingswood,

5:12

he was at another firm called

5:14

Ares Management. Cerberus, famously in Greek

5:16

mythology, is a three-headed dog that

5:19

roams or guards the gates of hell.

5:21

And then Ares is the Greek god

5:23

of war. So Ares and Cerberus have

5:26

a reputation as being very shrewd,

5:28

very sharp, and not afraid to play

5:30

rough when necessary to win. But

5:33

Kingswood's efforts assure the Piccininis that they'll

5:35

take care of the Save Mart business.

5:38

And they win the family over towards the end of 2021. There

5:42

definitely was this sense between Kingswood and

5:44

Save Mart and the family that Kingswood

5:46

was going to be a responsible

5:49

owner of this business. They had great plans, they

5:51

were going to grow it, and that Save

5:53

Mart can actually not only get a good price, but they

5:55

could feel good about the party

5:57

that was going to take over this institution. For

6:00

a few months, Save Martin Kingswood go

6:02

through the typical sale process. The

6:05

due diligence, reviewing the books, valuing the

6:07

business, deciding what shape it should be

6:09

in when Kingswood takes it over. And

6:12

finally, in March 2022, the deal closes. Typically,

6:17

these private company deals are structured

6:19

in a way that is described

6:21

as debt-free, cash-free. Remember

6:23

that phrase, debt-free, cash-free.

6:26

What that means is the buyer essentially

6:28

just wants to buy the business

6:30

itself and does not want to

6:33

get stuck with either the existing

6:35

debt on the business or

6:37

the cash. The company's balance sheet

6:39

will typically just get swept up

6:41

by the owners. And so truly,

6:43

they're just buying the operations. So,

6:47

in this particular debt-free, cash-free

6:49

acquisition, it shakes

6:51

out that Kingswood gets the business, and

6:53

the Piccinini family gets about $30 million.

6:57

And this is typically where the story ends. The

7:00

buyer gets the business, and the seller gets a

7:02

check. That's not

7:04

what happened here. And

7:07

that's because this deal involves a

7:09

privately owned company. The

7:11

big difference is when a public deal closes

7:13

where there are shareholders and they get $50

7:16

a share and they're paid out at

7:18

closing, that is the end of the story.

7:22

That is not quite true in private company

7:24

deals. And the difference is

7:26

private companies typically have

7:28

only one or two or

7:30

a handful of shareholders. They're all known and easy

7:33

to find, whereas a public company

7:35

has thousands of shareholders, not millions.

7:37

For that reason, there is the

7:39

idea of post-closing adjustments in a

7:41

private company deal where a

7:43

buyer can say, hey, we agreed to there being $75

7:46

of eggs on the balance sheet, but in fact, there's

7:52

$73 or $77, and we just need

7:54

to resolve these differences, typically very small,

7:56

just so we get what it is

7:59

we each bargain. Before the very

8:01

typical process and usually it leads

8:03

to some very, very small minor

8:05

adjustments. Okay, that's what you you.

8:08

Typically see in this scenario, but

8:10

in this case it ended up

8:12

being. A. Nine.

8:14

Figure. Number. That they

8:16

need to sell a house. Try

8:18

to sell area and so in this

8:21

instance there's as he is a dispute

8:23

about the down seats are closing our

8:25

and it's not miner or it as

8:28

a hundred and nine million dollars Just

8:30

so does a very big number. ah

8:32

and of almost unprecedented. So.

8:34

Where'd it seems would get this hundred

8:37

nine million dollar figure? So

8:39

that see seem to understand

8:41

about the transaction is that

8:43

when kings would buys season

8:45

part they're actually buying to

8:47

businesses. One is the grocery

8:50

store which we've been talking

8:52

about. ah but also. Say.

8:54

Smart owned a stake in

8:56

another company which was a

8:58

food wholesaler distributor. Which basically

9:00

means to deliver groceries time.

9:02

There is grocery stores to

9:04

sell. That

9:07

business was called Ss Eye

9:09

and Say Mart owned fifty

9:11

percent of it. Now remember.

9:13

This deal with get free. Cash

9:16

free. So that meant

9:18

that when they sold to King's

9:20

what does family owners while they

9:22

were responsible for any outstanding debts.

9:24

So on as a sigh which

9:26

is the distributors balance sheets it

9:29

had his own death of a

9:31

hundred and nine million dollars and

9:33

so that was just his own

9:35

dead from its own operations And

9:38

so the dispute is this as

9:40

a side had it's own deaths

9:42

and said mart said oh we've

9:44

already accounted for that are on

9:47

our own financial statements from that

9:49

is what you kings would have

9:51

bought and there's no reason to

9:53

independently say. It's something that we

9:55

have to account for. Ah, and Kingswood

9:58

says no, In fact, the way. Contractors

10:00

written is that any dad had

10:02

any trademark company or subsidiary of

10:04

counts as a liability which you

10:07

need to pay for and you

10:09

need to come up with that.

10:11

Four hundred and nine million dollars.

10:14

Let's. Break this down even more because

10:16

there's an accounting part to the story

10:18

and a legal part. To this

10:20

story. So lipstick, Accounting part

10:23

First, Eventually.

10:25

Same. Rights as that based on the accounting

10:27

methods that they use to. keep their bucks.

10:30

The death of the distributor they

10:32

partially own ss I is already

10:35

baked into a single line item

10:37

on their balance sheets. And

10:40

that single line represented

10:42

the net value of

10:44

that subsidiary. Basically was

10:46

the assets mars liabilities.

10:48

Pretty straightforward stuff. nothing

10:50

unusual about that. Now

10:52

Sir Tom's the legal part of this.

10:55

Kings. Would take the close read

10:57

of their merger agreement. Their contract

10:59

the St Mark's and says. Wait

11:02

a second. the and things would

11:04

after closing Ended up calling this

11:06

technicality when he said hey look

11:08

at a size books it has

11:10

one hundred minute hold that on

11:12

the Us I books and in

11:15

fact the merger contract says you

11:17

the family have to pay off

11:19

all the trademark group that for

11:21

the steel to close on track

11:23

terms and maybe it's double counting,

11:25

Maybe it's not. but it doesn't

11:27

matter because it's not. Clearly

11:30

written and therefore we're going to coldest

11:32

reality and you're going to peel off.

11:37

Okay, so the pitch name is essentially

11:39

receive a one hundred and nine million

11:41

dollar bill from Kings. What? How

11:44

do they react to that? I. Think

11:46

said pal from my various conversations

11:49

with. Those. People involved are

11:51

overseas. Soft. See that

11:53

they would not have signed an agreement that

11:55

had them writing a check to rub to

11:57

the buyer. That doesn't make sense. Wouldn't piss

11:59

wind. by your house typically, right? Not

12:02

surprisingly, the two sides, Kingswood and Safe

12:04

Mart, can't agree on an outcome

12:06

on their own. So they take

12:08

this dispute to an arbitrator. So

12:11

Suji, how does the

12:13

arbitrator rule in this? So

12:15

the arbitrator, who is a former

12:18

Delaware judge, an expert

12:20

in corporate law, in fact

12:22

sides with Kingswood and agrees.

12:24

What? He does, yes. How?

12:28

How does he do that exactly? There's like

12:30

these two competing schools of thought that collide

12:32

in this case, which is what does the

12:34

actual contract say, the words and what does

12:36

it literally say? And

12:38

then what did the parties actually want to do? What

12:41

is the spirit of this agreement? And

12:43

in a perfect world, those would be perfectly aligned. The words

12:45

in the contract would say exactly what the deal that they

12:47

want. When they don't, a

12:50

judge has to say which one actually prevails. Is

12:52

it the words on the page or is it

12:54

like what they were like really trying to solve

12:57

for? And in this

12:59

instance, the judge or the arbitrator says, in

13:02

fact, the words on the page lead

13:05

me to believe the $109 million

13:07

falls into this formal definition of

13:09

indebtedness. It needs to be

13:11

brought into the transaction. And therefore the

13:14

family needs to send back the $109 million

13:16

to the private equity firm. So

13:20

the pitch and EMI seem backed into a

13:22

corner over this contract technicality,

13:25

but the battle isn't over yet. Coming

13:29

up, Sajit lays out what's

13:31

next and what other companies

13:33

can learn from the fiasco. With

13:44

the FT News briefing, get caught up on what's

13:46

important in the time it takes to drink your

13:48

coffee or tea. Our 10

13:50

minute podcast runs down the biggest stories

13:52

of the day, whether it's interest rates,

13:55

AI or private equity. If

13:57

you're one of those who were hoping for rate

13:59

cuts. then this looks like

14:01

bad news. The idea that

14:03

private equity is gonna die is probably

14:05

a little bit extreme. Tune

14:08

in every weekday to get a handle on

14:10

the latest business news. Before

14:17

the break, we heard the arbitrator's decision. They

14:20

ultimately sided with Kingswood. The

14:23

PE firm then got that decision blessed as

14:26

binding by a Delaware court. That

14:29

was the second nail in the coffin for the

14:31

Piccininis. But

14:33

the family isn't done fighting this dispute

14:35

yet. Their next stop

14:37

is the Delaware Supreme Court. So,

14:40

Suji, what

14:42

happens if this arbitration decision

14:45

is upheld by that court?

14:48

Does that mean that the Piccininis

14:50

have to pay Kingswood to take

14:52

their business essentially? They

14:55

have to do that and they will pay interest as

14:57

well in the 109 million because the transfer of money

15:00

is taking more time than the time of the decision.

15:02

So they are bearing the costs

15:04

of obviously not just their lawyers, but the

15:07

interest as well from delaying

15:09

the payment. And in a high interest

15:11

rate environment, that number is probably just

15:13

taking off. That's exactly right. Yeah, no, yes.

15:16

Yeah, yeah. What, in

15:19

your opinion, would have solved or

15:21

stopped this dispute from happening? Just

15:24

better contract writing, better

15:26

contract reading. Yeah,

15:28

I mean, it sounds like

15:30

there should have just been a more

15:33

explicit conversation before the closing on

15:36

saying, hey, SSI has this debt.

15:39

It's actually incorporated already in the SaveMart

15:41

balance sheet in this one equity line.

15:44

Therefore, it doesn't need to be accounted

15:47

for somewhere else or brought onto the

15:49

balance sheet for the purposes of the

15:51

purchase price calculation. SaveMart

15:54

and the family say, in fact, we had all

15:56

these discussions and there was no controversy and it

15:58

was all out there. There's emails

16:00

and financial statements flying

16:02

back and forth where everyone agreed on this

16:05

treatment. But

16:07

obviously, Kingswood felt differently. So

16:10

why did Kingswood wait until

16:12

after the deal closed to

16:14

say anything? So the

16:16

Save Mart lawyers asked the Kingswood executives

16:18

in depositions, why or how did

16:20

this $109 million issue come up after the

16:22

deal closed? And they both

16:24

said that, in fact, Kingswood knew all along

16:27

before the deal closed that the $109 million

16:29

was going to be an issue. But

16:33

they decided to stay quiet because

16:35

they thought it was

16:37

something that was better handled after closing and

16:40

the negotiations were already tense and

16:43

this would just raise the temperature.

16:47

And it was within

16:49

their rights to stay quiet because there

16:51

was this post-closing mechanism. So

16:53

that is all

16:55

interesting and theoretically correct. But

16:58

their answers, again, go back to the social

17:00

aspect of dealmaking. It

17:04

was contentious before closing, already did. It

17:06

certainly bringing this up after closing was

17:08

not going to lower the temperature. So

17:11

in some ways, it sounds like Kingswood

17:13

has made a great deal here. They're

17:16

going to get this windfall from this $109 million. I'm

17:21

curious, what do you think

17:23

this does for Kingswood's business in the long

17:25

term? Do you think that this is

17:27

showing other people what

17:29

savvy dealmakers they are or

17:32

what exactly? Obviously, having

17:34

an extra $109 million coming in is

17:36

going to be a huge victory

17:39

and seems like a great trade

17:42

for them with their canny lawyering

17:44

and accounting. But they

17:47

want to be in business for the next several

17:49

years and raise new funds and buy new

17:52

companies. And when they go out

17:54

and enter auction processes, sellers are

17:57

choosing between a bunch of private

18:00

firms who all look the same.

18:02

So there very much could be

18:04

some kind of reputational blowback as

18:06

Kingswood, oh, is that firm that

18:08

called that accounting technicality and made

18:10

off with $109 million against that

18:12

grocery store family in California, do

18:14

we really want to sign a

18:16

contract with them? And that is

18:18

something Kingswood I think is going to have to

18:21

confront and think about. And it

18:23

will be really interesting to see how it is

18:25

they respond to

18:28

this going forward. The Piccininis, as

18:30

you said, there was a

18:32

lot of due diligence that went into this

18:34

on both sides. The

18:37

family patriarch at one time

18:39

was on the four billionaires list. These

18:41

are not totally naive people. They

18:44

did not follow the turnip

18:46

truck. Yeah. So and

18:49

even they ended up kind of getting

18:52

duped in this situation. So I'm curious,

18:55

what can other business owners

18:57

with less experience learn

18:59

from this story? Typically

19:02

in an M&A transaction,

19:04

the buyer and seller

19:06

are both like ultimately

19:09

aligned. And even if the

19:11

negotiation is tough at the closing,

19:13

they're both happy, right? Because the seller is

19:15

getting money, which they want, and the buyer

19:17

is getting a business that they want. So

19:19

for that reason, sometimes I think maybe then

19:21

the parties are not

19:23

as careful

19:26

or as fastidious as they should

19:28

be, because they just don't

19:31

envision a scenario where they're

19:33

going to be potentially exploited.

19:36

And again, this whole reputational point, if

19:38

you're like a person that's known for

19:40

exploiting counter parties, you're

19:42

potentially going to pay for that down the road. So I

19:45

think there's real question marks for both sides

19:47

about how they should feel about how

19:50

this all went down. Sujit,

19:54

thanks For being here. Thanks for having me. Money

20:13

is hosted any become legendary

20:15

Sofia Athlete is our producer.

20:17

Cooper Forehand is an executive

20:19

producers sound design and mixing.

20:21

They can't even. Sell

20:24

family as the Global Hot Hot. Thanks

20:28

for listening Seen a freak? Hauling

20:42

a little. Are. A

20:44

lot. or a lot. Shopify helps

20:46

you do your thing however you chiching.

20:48

Shopify is the global commerce platform that

20:50

helps you sell at every stage of

20:53

your business. From the launch your online

20:55

shop stage to the first real-life store

20:57

stage, all the way to the did

20:59

we just hit a million orders stage,

21:02

Shopify is there to help you grow.

21:04

Shopify helps you turn browsers into buyers

21:06

with the Internet's best converting checkout. 36%

21:08

better on average 36% better on average

21:11

compared to other leading commerce platforms.

21:13

Because businesses that grow, grow with

21:15

Shopify. Get a $1 compared to other leading commerce platforms. per

21:18

month trial period

21:20

at shopify.com/work. shopify.com

21:22

slash work. Or

21:30

a global corporation. Farming

21:33

with think of America could be you're smartphone.

21:37

Teeming, With Makes America you

21:39

enjoy exclusive digital tools, award

21:41

winning insights and business solutions

21:43

so powerful. You'll make every

21:45

move matter. Position your

21:47

business to capitalize on opportunity. In

21:50

a moment's notice, visit. Bank

21:52

of america.com/thinking for Business.

21:55

To learn more, what would you like?

21:57

The Power To Do Bank of America.

22:00

Maybe read uniquely?

Rate

Join Podchaser to...

  • Rate podcasts and episodes
  • Follow podcasts and creators
  • Create podcast and episode lists
  • & much more

Episode Tags

Do you host or manage this podcast?
Claim and edit this page to your liking.
,

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features