Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
Believe Believe. It or not, Summer is
0:02
just around the corner. Luckily, Armor
0:05
All America's most trusted auto appearance
0:07
brand has what your car needs
0:09
to get that perfect summer shine.
0:11
Plus now you may thirty first
0:13
will give you Five dollars for
0:15
every twenty you spend on Armor.
0:17
All products. That means car wash,
0:19
pods, protected tire Shine, you name
0:21
it. Find out how to get
0:23
your five dollar rebate at Armor
0:25
or.com Armor or Less work more
0:28
Clean! Term Supply. Hey
0:30
there. Did you know Kroger always gives
0:32
you savings and rewards on top of
0:34
our lower than low prices? And
0:37
when you download the Kroger Ap, you'll enjoy
0:39
over five hundred dollars in savings every week
0:41
with digital coupons. And don't forget few points
0:43
to help you save up to one dollar
0:45
per gallon at the pump. Wanna. Save
0:47
even more with a boost membership you'll
0:49
get double few points and free delivery.
0:52
So shop and save big at Kroger today! Kroger,
0:55
fresh for everyone! Savings may vary
0:57
by state. Restrictions apply. Seasight for
0:59
details. With Lucky Land
1:01
Slots, you can get lucky just about
1:03
anywhere. Dearly beloved, we are gathered here
1:06
today to... Has anyone seen the bride
1:08
and groom? Sorry, sorry, we're here. We
1:10
were getting lucky in the limo and we lost
1:12
track of time. No, Lucky
1:14
Land Casino, with cash prizes that add up
1:16
quicker than a guest registry. In
1:19
that case, I pronounce you lucky. Play
1:21
Play for free at luckylandslots.com. Daily bonuses
1:23
are waiting. No purchase necessary. Boydware
1:25
prohibited by law. 18 plus. Terms
1:28
and conditions apply. See website for details. From
1:31
autosport.com and Autosport Magazine, I'm Bryn
1:33
Lucas and you're listening to the
1:36
Autosport F1 podcast. Well,
1:41
you know what they say, all good things in life
1:43
come in threes. And that was certainly
1:45
the case for Red Bull in Japan as
1:48
Max Verstappen took his third win in 2024
1:50
and in dominant fashion. It was his third
1:52
straight win in Japan and teammate Sergio Perez
1:54
followed Max home for a third Red Bull
1:56
One-Two finish of the year. So here's a
1:58
rundown of the results. As you say,
2:01
Max and Sergio coming home first and
2:03
second, then the Ferraris of Carlos Sainz
2:05
and Charles Leclerc gaining four places up
2:07
on his qualifying position. Lando Norris finished
2:09
fifth, then it was Fernando Alonso and
2:11
the Aston Martin in sixth. Russell
2:14
for Mercedes in seventh. Piaestri in
2:16
eighth. Yes, Lewis Hamilton way down
2:18
in ninth for the Mercedes. And
2:20
Yuki Sanoda scoring that valuable point in front of
2:22
his home fans. A great result for him. Bochenburg,
2:25
Lance Stroll, Magnuson Bottas, Arcon and
2:27
Gasly in fifteenth and sixteenth, then
2:30
Sargent bringing it home in seventeenth
2:32
and last place. The final three
2:34
drivers, Jo Gwen Yoo, Daniel Ricciardo
2:36
and Alex Alban, are all DNFs.
2:39
So joining me now to make
2:41
sense of all the action, Philip
2:43
Clearen and Jake Boxall, a.k.a. JBL.
2:46
We also have to put that in, don't we?
2:48
Gentlemen, how are you doing? JBL? Very
2:51
good, thank you. As you can see,
2:53
Brod, I'm currently wearing my Joval shirt. Now
2:55
Joval lost last night, but
2:59
one more game and I think we're about
3:01
to win the National League South if we
3:03
can just not concede a goal. So
3:05
I'm sort of feeling okay, I'm feeling relatively
3:07
fresh. Race was very sort
3:09
of tactical, very strategic. So
3:12
I'm just sort of like on a little bit of a, it'd be
3:14
nice to sort of have a chill chat about everything
3:17
that happened. I'm an all
3:19
shot town fan, so we're probably not
3:21
going to make the playoffs trying to get out
3:23
of the National League proper. So
3:25
hopefully we'll see you in the National League next year. Phil, I
3:27
don't think you support an English National
3:29
League team, do you? I
3:31
actually support Southampton, which I believe, because I studied
3:33
there for a little bit. So
3:36
not quite National League, but it's looking
3:39
a little bit tough now to go up. Anyway.
3:42
Play your cards right in Southampton to be
3:44
in the National League before you know it.
3:46
So there we go, that's our non-F1
3:49
based chat out the way. Let's talk
3:51
about this Grand Prix
3:53
we've all just witnessed. Max Verstappen took
3:55
another comfortable victory in the end. This
3:57
is 20th in the last 22. races.
4:00
It's a familiar line, familiar conversation
4:03
point but JBL just how easy
4:06
was it for Red Bull out there? I
4:10
think it wasn't let's say
4:12
as clear-cut as it was in maybe
4:14
a few other races. Ferrari
4:16
was a lot closer than it was last year. The
4:20
kind of science is only 20 seconds off of the Stappen.
4:22
I don't believe that the Stappen was really
4:25
pushing it in this race because tyre
4:27
degradation was such a mitigating
4:29
factor. I think it
4:31
was something that towards the end you know
4:35
they very much had a grasp on
4:37
but it wasn't his most vintage display
4:39
but it was just a sort of
4:41
relatively easy Sunday afternoon drive. He was kind
4:43
of sort of driving within himself because he
4:45
didn't really need to push anymore. There
4:48
was no point. So yeah it wasn't
4:50
an absolute barnstormer from for Stappen
4:53
by any stretch but it was just a
4:55
really good solid drive, did everything he needed
4:57
to do and he
4:59
got the win and shout out to Sergio Perez
5:02
as well for actually doing
5:04
a proper support driver job after
5:07
Melbourne last weekend where the
5:09
Stappen retired and he wasn't there to pick up the pieces. Really
5:13
good race from the both. Again nothing
5:15
special but you know sometimes you don't
5:17
need to do anything special. Yeah
5:19
the only drama that was there was Max
5:23
and his race engineer debating over whether he
5:25
needed to fewer clicks of front ring or
5:27
not which they disagreed about
5:30
and that was sort of the only thing that
5:33
you know represents any sort of drama for Red
5:35
Bull today so that tells you a lot.
5:37
Yeah it's a little
5:39
bit depressing that JVO as you say the gap
5:42
to signs was only 20 seconds. It's
5:46
still quite a chasm for me but yeah
5:48
it does show that Ferrari made a lot
5:50
of progress compared to last year and still
5:53
playing sailing on a
5:55
circle like this. We have lots of high-speed stuff
5:57
though. Red Bull is just untouchable. I
6:01
don't want to get moving away
6:03
from Red Bull too quickly, but we find
6:06
it very hard to find new things to say
6:09
about Red Bull. They're so dominant, they're so strong.
6:11
Max's drive is fantastic as always. Sergio did a
6:13
good job this weekend and that's the only thing
6:15
we ever really talk about, isn't it? How well
6:17
Sergio Perez has done comparatively to Max Verstappen who's
6:19
likely to win. But if there's anyone that's going
6:21
to really impact them,
6:24
it's the Ferrari and it's not the car
6:26
driven by the guy who is staying next
6:28
year. Carlos Sainz, he got his third podium
6:30
in 2024. Leclerc coming back,
6:33
gained four places from his qualifying
6:35
position on a one-stop strategy. But
6:37
is there any doubt really remaining?
6:39
I'm going for your former name
6:41
now, Phil. That's the Ferrari are
6:44
the second team. It's
6:46
very formal now, yes. You're my
6:48
uncle now. No,
6:50
that's a really dope doubt. I don't think
6:52
there has been across
6:55
the first four races of
6:57
the season. We've had a variety of circuits,
7:00
all very different content, low speed,
7:03
high speed, street circuit, whatever you
7:05
want, a rough time-ax, off time-ax.
7:07
It's clear that Ferrari is the
7:09
second fault, which speaks
7:12
volumes about how much they have improved
7:14
their woes from last year, whether it's
7:16
at higher management, whether it's just their
7:18
general consistency in the race, their susceptibility
7:23
to changing conditions and wins and what
7:25
have you. It is
7:27
interesting to see how Carlos
7:30
performs. He keeps saying
7:32
that he doesn't need to
7:34
prove himself. Everybody up and down the
7:36
panic knows what he can do. He's
7:38
absolutely correct. It does seem like he
7:41
lost his job. He's driving like a man possessed
7:43
at the moment. He's performing
7:46
at his
7:48
absolute peak. I'm really interested
7:51
to see if that is going
7:54
to sway any opinions of other team
7:56
bosses in terms of whether they will
7:59
try to do it. and snap him up. But
8:01
at the same time I think also, you know,
8:05
it all comes down to qualifying as
8:07
well because Charles didn't have the best
8:10
qualifying starting outside the top six. But then
8:12
if you look at what the difference
8:14
was, it was only like a tenth and a half
8:16
that covered the entire sort of top
8:19
six behind Red Bull at least. So it's
8:22
not like so many Charles and Noah, but if
8:24
you qualify poorly with such a tight grid, then
8:26
it's just really hard to move up even if
8:28
he tried to wear the one stop, that almost
8:30
worked. I think
8:33
Leclerc needs to be a little bit
8:35
more commended for his race because yeah,
8:37
qualifying wasn't very good. And
8:39
that's largely because there was
8:41
such a sort of fine margin with regards to tyre
8:43
preparation over the lap. Leclerc wasn't able
8:45
to quite hit that and science can kind of hit
8:47
it a little bit more. But
8:51
turning around that one stop strategy, that was really,
8:53
really strong effort from Leclerc. His
8:55
stint on the medium tyres was super consistent.
8:59
I think I've got the times up in front of me
9:01
somewhere. But yeah, he was
9:03
just able to rattle off a series
9:05
of laps in the 137, sort of
9:07
138 every now and again, just
9:10
brick keeping those tyres in, not taking too much out
9:12
of them. And then when it came to
9:14
the point where he needed to pit, he stayed out, Norris
9:17
was catching him. He
9:19
managed to stay out, go in ahead, come
9:22
out ahead. And
9:24
that really made it for him because
9:26
Norris, up until that point, was looking
9:28
like a potential podium contender. So
9:32
for Leclerc to kind of turn that around, that was
9:34
really, really strong effort. And I think he should get
9:36
a little bit more plauded for it
9:38
because it wasn't the optimal strategy,
9:40
it wasn't really the fastest strategy. I think
9:42
science had that. And
9:45
yes, as Phil said, science has
9:48
been driving out of his skin lately, seems
9:50
to have really just taken a liking to
9:53
this new car. Seems to
9:55
be a lot more balanced. He seems to be able to
9:57
kind of do what he wants to do
9:59
with it. without having to think about it too much
10:01
and that's giving him a little bit more mental latitude
10:03
to kind of, let's say,
10:06
optimize and work on the strategies that
10:08
Ferrari's giving him and that he's giving
10:10
feedback on. It's sort
10:12
of very much a kind of two-way thing with science.
10:15
He's really, really good at calling the shots when he's
10:17
out on track. So I think both
10:19
Ferrari drivers have done a really, really good job today.
10:21
They weren't going to have the pace to beat the Red
10:23
Bulls. It wasn't a race where, like Australia, where there was
10:26
quite a lot of tyre graining.
10:29
It was just a sort of standard, relatively
10:31
high tyre-deck race. Ferrari's
10:33
worked on that significantly over the winter
10:36
and their degradation relative to Red Bull
10:38
is so much better now. But
10:40
it's just out and out pace that Ferrari's lacking
10:42
a little bit compared to Red Bull. I think,
10:45
you know, maybe about four-tenths a lap
10:47
so if they can find a little bit more downforce
10:49
without ruining all the good work they've done on their
10:51
tyre-deck, they'll be in a really good place. Yes,
10:54
absolutely. I mean, if you look at Carlos
10:56
Sainz though for a moment, he's just out driving
10:58
his team out. I know you say Charles did
11:01
a good job today and he certainly did, but
11:03
Carlos Sainz, the three Grand Prix that he's taken
11:05
part in because he had that operation, didn't he,
11:07
at Saudi Arabia. He's been on the podium every
11:10
single time. Charlotte Clark has had two out of
11:12
those four races. So when you look at the
11:14
shop window, Carlos Sainz is making
11:16
his argument or the argument for him
11:18
to be in any seat next year
11:21
compelling, especially when you look further down
11:23
the line and you've got Daniel Ricciardo who was
11:25
one of those drivers that you think, okay, he might
11:27
be one that will go and step in here or
11:30
step in there. And there is Carlos Sainz saying, hang
11:32
on a minute, don't forget me. And it's a
11:34
tough one, isn't it? We'll come to Daniel Ricciardo, I'm
11:36
sure, in a bit. But Phil, your thoughts on this
11:39
Carlos Sainz situation and just where he can go, it
11:41
seems like he could just pick a team at the
11:43
moment. Yeah, it's intriguing. You
11:45
have to go back to what Christian Horner
11:47
said in Australia when he was asked about
11:49
Yuki Tinoda and his
11:52
prospect of graduating and he turned
11:54
the question into one about Carlos
11:58
Sainz, just unprompted. And
12:02
it's interesting, isn't it, what they're going to do,
12:04
because they've got a few options, Rebel do, and
12:06
science has to be one of them now. But,
12:09
you know, it's like, and
12:11
it's just kind of a good analogy that I
12:14
came up with during the race, during a boring
12:16
spell, was like, you know, it
12:18
held like Christian Horne is 50 now, but coincidentally, but
12:20
it's like, if like, imagine you have
12:22
your midlife crisis and you've got your comfortable
12:26
family station wagon, but
12:29
you're just browsing brochures and you see
12:31
like, you know, a couple of really interesting
12:34
looking sports cars, they're a lot quicker, but
12:36
not quite as comfortable for
12:39
your family, but you're like quite tempted to go for
12:41
them. I feel like in this case,
12:43
Sergio Perris is sort of the station wagon where you
12:45
know what you're going to get, and there's no dramas
12:47
in the team, but he's not quite
12:50
the quickest option. So do you
12:52
go for like the more sports car, Carla
12:55
Sauns, Fernando Alonso option, which
12:58
are an upgrade, but not
13:00
quite as, you know, there might be a
13:02
more exciting, but not quite as comfortable within
13:04
the team in terms of
13:06
the dynamics and everything going on. So
13:08
it's just sort of that question of,
13:11
is Checo going to be confirming his form?
13:14
That has to be very good. So far, let's be clear
13:16
about that this year. Once
13:19
Rebel makes a decision around the
13:21
summertime, will Checo have been able
13:23
to confirm that form? Or
13:26
is it another full storm, like you saw two years
13:28
ago, where he started off really strongly, once
13:30
he races and then he just disappeared? So
13:33
I think Rebel has a time on its side, but surely
13:36
they have to be considering Carlos. And
13:38
then as far as the other teams go, I'm
13:41
not sure Carlos is necessarily off of
13:43
the list at Mercedes, I don't believe, because
13:46
I think they really want Antonelli in the
13:48
seat as soon as possible. Now
13:50
they're not just going to chuck him in the
13:52
seat, unprepared. He's doing
13:55
testing a week from
13:57
now and they're going to give him the time
13:59
to prepare. But that does
14:01
mean, say that Antonelli only joins
14:04
in one year or two years, you need a
14:06
backup option that can sort of keep you seat
14:08
warm. And I just don't
14:10
think Carlos will be the man to accept
14:12
that at this stage of his career. So
14:15
you need somebody that is happy to just
14:18
be there for one or two seasons. Whereas
14:20
I think Carlos really wants a long term commitment.
14:23
It's going to be interesting to see how this
14:25
one really does play out. And as you mentioned,
14:28
the drivers that have done very, very well, or
14:30
certainly not surprisingly, it's
14:32
Fernando Alonso, isn't he? I mean, he's another
14:34
driver who's been on the block, around the
14:36
block, up and down the block. He's been
14:38
on the block for a very long time.
14:41
It was another great finished sixth place
14:43
for him. I think he described it
14:45
JBL as one of his best ever
14:47
drives. It was in his top five, certainly.
14:50
And I don't know, it's
14:53
always a thing with Fernando that he is incredibly
14:56
self aggrandizing and if he'll do an overtake or
14:58
something, and it might be sort of like a
15:00
relatively round in the middle of the day, oh,
15:02
that's the best overtake I've ever done. But you
15:06
do have to read between the lines a little
15:08
bit. And you do need to look at his
15:10
race. And it was actually, I'm not going to say it
15:12
is among his top five, but
15:14
it was generally very, very good. You're
15:17
really impressive. Especially
15:19
when you look at the Aston Martin, the
15:22
package is clearly the fifth best car
15:24
on the grid. There is quite a bit of margin
15:26
to the back five cars. There's
15:28
not too much of a gap to Mercedes
15:30
and perhaps to McLaren as well. But
15:33
it's still generally slower. And Alonso,
15:36
I think over performed what the
15:38
car realistically was capable of. It's
15:40
probably like P8, P9 material. So
15:43
for Alonso to put the race together
15:46
that he did, soft tires didn't at the start
15:48
was absolutely vital to that because, you
15:50
know, he got a good start made
15:52
up ground. And then it was
15:54
able to keep those tires in as well. It wasn't
15:57
like it got to lap five and they just died
15:59
and fell on. He was able to sort of
16:01
keep pace with everybody else around him. So that put
16:03
him on a sort of Relatively
16:06
even state of flux with with with
16:08
everybody else Then
16:11
he went to the the medium stint and the hard
16:13
stint I think that was basically he
16:15
said after the race that was the only real
16:17
option available to him But
16:20
at the end as well, it's just a
16:22
fantastic bit of gamesmanship and it was like
16:24
watching science in Singapore last year He
16:27
had Piaestri behind him Russell
16:30
was homing interview as well. And
16:32
long as it was like what? Yeah, you can have dare I ask
16:34
her I don't mind. I'm just gonna you know
16:37
Use my energy up recharge through the
16:39
rest of the light where it's a lot harder to pass And
16:44
then when Piaestri started to come under attack
16:46
from Russell Alonzo
16:48
was like right. Okay, I'm off now. Bye
16:50
guys fight it out amongst yourselves So
16:53
I thought it was just a really really Brilliant
16:56
Alonzo Ian Drive really
17:00
really strongly thought out he was
17:02
kind of Driving
17:04
everybody else's races for them in a sense, which
17:06
is when he's at his absolute best Yeah,
17:09
massive turnaround from Australia last week. Yeah,
17:11
really really good day from him Yeah,
17:15
if an under seems to think he's had
17:17
a top five driver every other week So
17:19
I think you'll find if there are 12
17:21
to 13 races in your top five You'll
17:23
find that it's a bit of an issue
17:25
mathematically But yeah, it does
17:27
seem like if he's not on the podium that
17:29
he's keen to remind people how good he was
17:31
in case they didn't see it but
17:34
yeah, he was brilliant today and especially
17:37
after the offensive Melbourne with the
17:40
penalty got for Indirectly
17:42
causing George George Russell's accident. I think
17:44
it was good to see him defend
17:47
properly within you know within the rule
17:49
book and questionably and Yeah,
17:53
I don't think I would disagree with
17:55
him that that chorus is faster. It's
17:57
probably around there It's not you know
18:00
He's no match from McLaren and he finished ahead
18:02
of one. So good job by him That's
18:05
fastest if you don't include Lance Stroll I
18:07
think is fair to say and we would
18:10
I was have to think and JBL We spoke very
18:12
briefly about this before we went and started recording this
18:15
but Keeping Flando Alonso, but
18:17
after Martin if you want success You almost need
18:19
to keep someone like that who's a regular point
18:21
scorer and a decent point scorer in the team
18:23
So you can actually develop and move on with
18:26
Lance Stroll and we talked about it too many times So
18:29
I'm not gonna dwell on it for too long. But Lance
18:32
Stroll in that team not point scoring He's
18:34
it's hampering Aston Martin being able to get
18:36
on the back of that fourth place in
18:38
the constructors and it's worth a lot of
18:40
money So I know that the finances in
18:42
a way is Aston Martin, but what do
18:44
we think about this? I mean, it's
18:46
Fernando gonna jump ship if Lance Stroll
18:49
stays is it as clear cut as
18:51
that JBL? I
18:54
don't know if it's as clear cut as that it
18:56
I do agree that he's costing the team points And
18:58
that was the case last year Aston
19:02
Martin probably should have beaten McLaren
19:04
in the constructors championship, but because of
19:06
Stroll's pretty poor
19:08
scoring record And
19:10
you compare that to Piastri That
19:14
was just where they fell down on points
19:16
and and the lonzos or carried the team
19:18
almost single-handedly into that position To
19:21
have to drive, you know, even a driver
19:23
that's you know, not quite on the lonzos
19:25
level, but you know that as say Somebody
19:27
like a Perez or an Ocon or a ghazly in
19:30
that second seat. They would have done it probably quite
19:32
easily so for
19:35
Aston Martin it's No
19:39
longer just it shouldn't just be a
19:41
Lawrence throw vanity project This should be
19:43
a genuine team that has genuine ambition
19:45
to fight for constructors championships When
19:48
you employ a driver, that's kind of an odds with that
19:51
Yes, but you know, what's what's the
19:53
game plan here? And I
19:55
think along they sort of has recognized that I
19:57
think his
19:59
ambition is to win a
20:02
third and final drivers title, let's say. But
20:05
he recognised the value of a Constructors Championship
20:07
and if the team isn't performing
20:09
and it's not getting the prize money in,
20:11
then that has an impact
20:14
on infrastructure and things like that. It
20:16
means the team can't quite do as
20:18
much with its
20:21
car. So it's a bit
20:23
of a catch-22. Alonzo did
20:25
say when he first joined the team, Lance
20:28
Stroll was the future of the team and he wanted to do
20:30
everything to support him and that kind of thing. But
20:33
he must again, I think this is
20:35
just classic Alonzo gamesmanship trying to curry
20:39
a little bit of favour so that he can
20:41
spend his points a little bit later when he's
20:43
moaning about something. So
20:45
it's just a difficult situation, isn't
20:47
it? I know
20:50
that he's the CEO's son,
20:53
but at some point, at what
20:55
point does a team's performance become more
20:58
important than for Millie's eyes? And I think
21:00
we've probably long surpassed that point. Yeah,
21:03
it all comes down to what's the goal here.
21:05
And if the goal
21:07
that Lawrence Stroll has set out is still
21:09
to be the new Red Bull, let's say,
21:12
and to produce a car that's so good
21:14
that it not only wins the championship, but
21:16
also Lance can be a contender and be
21:18
a regular race winner, then
21:21
as you see with Chaco Perez, he's won quite a
21:23
few races, not as many as he should have, but
21:25
he won a few races with Red Bull when
21:28
it was so dominant. So if you're trying
21:32
to emulate that, then that's not necessarily
21:35
conflicting with Fernando Alonzo's ambitions.
21:37
He also wants to be in the best car. So
21:40
I don't think he'll worry too much about Lance
21:43
or about the constructive championship, as
21:45
long as he sees the drive
21:47
that he didn't see at Elping, the
21:50
drive to really become the best in every single
21:52
area, and then compete for
21:54
the World Championship. And 2026 will be
21:57
the best opportunity for NASA Mars. starting
22:00
to do so. And now
22:02
it's up to Alonzo to decide, is
22:05
Aston still going to be the team to do
22:07
it? Is there
22:09
a different opportunity, whether that's at Red Bull or
22:11
Mercedes, if those options are not
22:13
even there, we
22:15
still don't know that 100%. It could also be
22:18
gain some of the ship by drivers and by managers
22:20
to get the, bring
22:23
the driver price up if you will. So
22:26
I don't think, I
22:28
don't think if Fernando thinks Aston
22:31
has what it takes to become the best team on the Great,
22:33
then I don't think he'll leave just because it's
22:35
not scoring all the points with his second drive. And I
22:37
think that's really his premium. Yeah,
22:40
and as we alluded to on this a little bit though,
22:42
that if you're not scoring the
22:44
points in the championship as a team collectively,
22:46
then you're appealed to the top designers. That
22:48
isn't quite so great. So you don't get
22:50
the very, very best, the very, very best
22:52
you're having to go to the B
22:55
team, but certainly you're having to fish
22:58
around a bit more for those that you want. Let's
23:00
move to a driver who's definitely moving. That's Louis Hamilton.
23:03
We know he's going to Ferrari in 2025. He
23:06
spoke of a breakthrough with the
23:08
Mercedes W15 despite its seventh
23:10
place start, but it was a difficult race for
23:12
him, wasn't it Phil? And it
23:15
just seems that it's another false dawn for the Bracte
23:17
team. We've spoken about this and you've written an article
23:19
about how they seem to struggle in different temperatures and
23:21
they've kind of got on top of this a little
23:24
bit, but it just didn't play into their
23:26
hands. Yeah,
23:28
and I think they expected to
23:30
do better if
23:33
you look at the temperatures this weekend, but then actually
23:35
on race day, I think the track was
23:37
about 14 degrees hotter than it was on
23:40
Saturday during qualifying. So maybe
23:42
this is another symptom where they
23:44
looked pretty okay earlier
23:47
on in the weekend, but then when
23:49
the temperatures ramp up, they start struggling
23:51
again. And that's
23:53
probably the main hypothesis right now. I
23:55
don't think they've, well, it's too early
23:58
to tell because of recording. the
24:00
night of the race so they won't have the
24:02
answers yet but they'll have to do some more
24:04
soul searching and see what's going on. It's
24:08
perfectly possible that during the
24:10
first stint when it was really sunny out there
24:12
they started just eating up
24:14
the tires too much and then I think
24:16
when it got a lot more
24:19
cloudy during the second part of the race they
24:21
seemed to be on the pace again. It
24:24
is quite curious and so
24:26
far temperature seems to be the main
24:30
factor here, at least that we can
24:32
identify. It needs to
24:34
be sorted though doesn't it because it's all well
24:36
and good racing in the cold places but it
24:38
doesn't happen all that often that they go to
24:40
places where we're off to Antarctica for the
24:42
next round of the Grand Prix and the next Grand Prix in
24:44
the World Championships so they're going to have to get on top
24:47
of it. I'm just looking
24:50
at Lewis Hamilton, his body language and the
24:52
way he seems to me, it's
24:55
been said he's not looking across the fence, he's
24:57
not looking over at what's going on at Ferrari
24:59
but of course he is, he's going to be
25:01
having a look isn't he? He's going to be
25:03
intrigued and be probably wishing he was sitting in
25:05
that Ferrari right now JBL. Yeah
25:08
I think so. I think
25:10
every race that goes by I think is
25:12
kind of cementing the right decision in his
25:15
mind, although I'd imagine if the results
25:18
in the simulator over the winter had
25:20
been more solicitous
25:23
let's say then he wouldn't have made that move. I
25:27
think it feels sort of touched upon the temperature
25:29
aspect but I think ultimately the
25:32
cars were just really really poor on the hard tyre
25:35
overall and that's something Hamilton sort of spoke
25:37
about, he wished he'd had more sets of
25:39
mediums. He
25:41
was sort of battling a little bit of damage, he
25:43
had a little bit of contact with Charles Leer early
25:45
on in the race which cost him a
25:48
little bit of time but when
25:50
you look at his stints compared to George Russell
25:52
on the medium tyre towards the end his
25:55
stint was a lot quicker so he had
25:57
pace and reserve, I Think
25:59
the damage was done very well. The very early on
26:01
I'm really really struggled on this hot
26:03
tires sickly read to to Russell rustle
26:05
us have like a little bit more
26:07
at ease with them. Hamilton said asa
26:10
we sought Am because the with a
26:12
nice little bit a team play I'm
26:14
but that economists says where Mercedes is
26:16
if they were challenging for race wins
26:18
or podiums. He'd never have made that
26:21
cool on the radio. Fighting over
26:23
seventh, eighth, and ninth them since when.
26:26
Winston and let's be honest, it's fag
26:28
him in his career am. See.
26:31
As is just not been of sixty
26:33
get their think they're still relatively optimistic
26:35
that they make breakthroughs rather says he
26:37
could weekend huge the improved over last
26:39
year and the the opening sites secular
26:41
the case that they're still getting to
26:43
grips with a very very different tar
26:45
and I don't really know what it
26:47
does. the only get kind of three
26:49
days of testing for season to learn
26:51
tidy new car and yet finding new
26:53
bit about it every weekend. The
26:56
so it doesn't need low it more time to
26:58
can understand the think think it's all doom and
27:01
gloom. Right now is just the case
27:03
of they've been working to us or
27:05
very different him she of last couple
27:07
years mess now and that's going to
27:09
take time to overcome. Yet
27:12
so him a hard time as a see
27:14
one is the hardest of all. Ties in
27:16
and didn't go to plan that install on
27:18
hearts are the stars on the mediums. but
27:20
the after a very very early red flag
27:22
they opted to move on to the hearts
27:24
are both him and your So a change
27:26
of strategy was talk about the red flag
27:28
and this is involving a driver who. Is.
27:31
Has any try? they need to but a lot. Or.
27:33
Who need something to go his
27:35
way? It's Daniel record. I was
27:37
never done ricardo involved in a
27:39
turn to. Incident: With Alex
27:42
album. Oh
27:44
do you apportion blame to all? Was
27:46
it just one of those racing incident?
27:48
Move on Jbl. Ah,
27:51
I think it will probably be said
27:53
that Mr some sorry sensitive I think
27:55
it's racing incident with a hint of
27:57
blame on Ricardo shoulders. that
28:00
you can't get the Porsche in
28:02
any blame to Albon in it really. He
28:04
was, he'd seen Ricciardo coming out of turn
28:06
two very very slowly, wanted to pounce on
28:08
it and quite rightly and he thought he'd
28:10
get the move done into turn three. Ricciardo
28:13
was looking to his left because he kind
28:15
of had sensed that Pat's Lance Stroll was
28:17
coming down that side, he zoomed
28:19
over to the racing line and just hadn't seen
28:21
Albon at all and that
28:23
was it and I think, you
28:26
know, I think it was fair to give it as
28:28
a racing incident but I do think that Ricciardo probably
28:30
could have avoided the incident by looking in the other
28:32
mirror. Wow. Yeah,
28:34
I agree. I mean, he was just looking in
28:38
his left mirror wasn't he? He wasn't expecting
28:40
end of beauty up the outside which you
28:44
could understand but you still want to check
28:46
probably before you close the door there. I
28:49
think actually the Sewitz put it well,
28:51
they said that if
28:54
this had been a first lap accident we
28:56
would have looked at this differently suggesting that
28:58
they probably would have pinged
29:00
Ricciardo for it but because he was a
29:02
first lap crash and they're a lot more
29:04
lenient than those they decided to let it
29:06
go and I think that's probably the right
29:08
decision this time. Yeah,
29:11
I mean it was a, let's just say
29:13
racing incident but Daniel Ricciardo needs to put
29:16
some different socks on or something because the ones he's got are just
29:18
not working for him. He needs to, I don't know, get
29:21
a different bed and wake up on the other side of
29:23
it or something. He's going to be trying everything over the
29:25
next couple of weeks, isn't he? Across the garage it doesn't
29:28
help though that he's having always this luck, should we say,
29:30
I mean, it's not always bad luck but
29:32
across the garage his teammate Yuki Tsunoda is
29:35
just doing it, isn't he? He
29:37
scored Japan's first point at the home
29:39
Grand Prix since Kamui Kobayashi back in
29:41
2012 and he got that amazing podium.
29:43
Just how good a drive was it
29:45
for Yuki Tsunoda, Phil? Yeah,
29:48
it was a great drive. It's very gritty, no
29:51
mistakes, very fast and on
29:54
a weekend where there would have been a lot of pressure on
29:56
him, not just for what
29:58
might happen or not. might not happen for him
30:01
in his career next year, but also just in front
30:03
of his home fans in Japan, there
30:05
was no hint of him feeling any sort of
30:07
pressure, which
30:09
was impressive. And obviously
30:12
the pit stop that he thanked the
30:14
team for, when he had this
30:16
whole gaggle of cars come in and he came out
30:18
first, that helped him a lot. But
30:21
yeah, he was very good. And again,
30:25
is he going to be
30:27
considered for a bull? I doubt it, especially not if
30:29
Christian Horda is going to be making
30:32
those calls himself, but
30:36
it does what he has to do. He can't do much more.
30:39
He can't do much more. He can't do much more JBL. And that's
30:41
the thing, you know, what does he
30:43
have to do to be looking at
30:45
the best seats in
30:48
the party? If that's the saying, we're going to call it
30:50
a saying from now on. The
30:52
best seat of the party. Well, I think
30:55
he just needs to keep doing what he's
30:57
doing because ultimately we're in
30:59
a situation where these
31:01
back five teams can't score unless one of
31:03
the top five teams has a real off
31:05
day. Today that was Stroll just being a
31:08
bit useless. So it's an ode made
31:10
the absolute most of that. His moves
31:12
at turn six around the outside, one
31:15
of them on Hulkenberg in particular was
31:17
stunning. I thought it was, you
31:19
know, you have a situation where
31:22
you're in front of your home fans. I imagine
31:24
there's a huge amount of pressure to perform. And
31:27
he just goes and pulls that
31:30
move off. And he looked, he was brave. Even
31:33
though the team sort of gave him a huge leg
31:36
up with that stop. The
31:38
fact that, you know, he put it on the
31:40
marks perfectly, got out the pits rapidly
31:42
without any real delay. It was
31:44
just like clockwork. It
31:48
was a huge, huge sort of marker
31:50
in his race that made the passes
31:52
possible. I thought it was just a really,
31:54
really good day. And
31:57
he's had such a, he's had
31:59
a really good start. of the season. Absolutely
32:02
blown Riccardo away. Riccardo the guy that was
32:05
saying, ah you know he'll come in and
32:07
replace Perez that's looking less likely by the
32:09
day. But I
32:12
just I don't know how if I was
32:15
it if I was at Red Bull I
32:17
would I would kind of considered Sonoda surely
32:19
but he just doesn't seem to, Horner doesn't
32:21
seem to rate him. Helmut
32:24
Marko sort of always sort of
32:26
seems relatively hot and cold he's always happy to
32:28
praise Sonoda when he's done a good job but
32:30
equally if he's had a less likely less good
32:32
day he does tend to stick the boot
32:34
in so you don't really know where he stands. I
32:38
think honestly the best opportunity for him
32:41
would be when Aston Martin links up
32:43
with Honda. Honda's batted
32:45
for him for a very long time and
32:47
if he keeps producing the goods then he
32:50
might have a shot there. If
32:52
they do eventually get rid of Stroll you
32:54
know something like let's say
32:56
if science goes there or somebody of that
32:58
caliber alongside Sonoda that would be a really
33:00
compelling driver line up. But
33:03
I'd like to see him in a Red Bull. I'd like to see him
33:05
give him a chance. Yeah and doing
33:07
it you know you're a Japanese driver he's doing it at
33:09
Suzuka or Honda track and you've got a V-Carb and Red
33:11
Bull and all the Honda links there so it's kind of
33:13
it's quite nice isn't it and if you want people
33:16
to take notice that's one way to do it. I just
33:18
want to touch on the on
33:20
the Yuki thing because he finished over
33:22
40 seconds behind Hamilton's Mercedes and the
33:24
lap off of Max. So
33:27
is it do you think a bad thing that we're
33:30
seeing such a big disparity between the top five teams
33:33
and the rest JBL? Yeah
33:37
honestly it's not great
33:39
it's not when
33:41
you go into a race weekend and you know probably
33:44
90% of the score who the scorers
33:46
are going to be it is
33:49
not a particularly sort of compelling reason to
33:51
watch and this is something I did
33:53
put to the drivers in Australia actually I was like
33:55
well you know that you're going
33:57
to go into a situation where somebody has to retire or
34:00
or Stroll has to have an off day for
34:02
you to score. How do you stay motivated? And
34:06
Valtteri Bottas suggested maybe bringing down the
34:08
points to P12 or something might spice
34:10
it up a little bit because
34:12
there's not really much glory for NQ12 at
34:14
the moment. But
34:16
the thing is, it might change next year and
34:18
that gap might be closed up. It
34:21
is, I think, artificially large because
34:23
Alpine has just started the season in such
34:25
a bad way, but it's
34:28
not great. It's not a particularly
34:30
good situation for,
34:32
I guess, for the fans of those teams as
34:34
well. You know, you like to have a little
34:36
bit of variance and variety in results and just
34:39
knowing who the top five teams are gonna be
34:41
every weekend. It's just not particularly
34:43
interesting. But hopefully,
34:45
you know, hopefully that will change. It's, you know,
34:48
F1's pretty dynamic when it needs to
34:50
be. Formula One's pretty good
34:52
at reinventing itself, JBL, and needs to
34:54
do something to maybe appeal
34:56
to the wider fan. I think those of us
34:58
that will watch it no matter what, they've got
35:00
us, haven't they? But those others that are maybe
35:02
sort of floating fans have gotta find some interest
35:05
elsewhere. Phil, let's move this
35:07
conversation slightly on, though, to the
35:10
tire choices that were available. And that was something that
35:12
Formula One has done in the Japanese Grand Prix. It
35:14
gave us a bit of opportunity
35:18
to see teams using alternative strategies as opposed
35:20
to the same strategy. So what are
35:22
your thoughts on the soft tire and the
35:24
approach that happened here in Japan? Well,
35:27
I think it just helps that it was a little bit
35:29
cooler than it was in September last year. So automatically,
35:32
the softest compounds become a bit
35:34
more viable for the race. So
35:36
that's something you can't really control
35:38
necessarily. And it remains
35:40
to be seen if you can replicate
35:42
these sort of three
35:44
tires being a good
35:47
option for the race that have a
35:49
sort of more demanding circuits. But obviously,
35:52
you know, if you have three compounds that
35:54
can all be used, then you've got way
35:56
more strategic options. And that
35:58
means you're going to see... a
36:01
better race by definition. You're going to see
36:04
people chance it on different strategies,
36:06
one-stop, two-stop, people
36:10
gambling on the sit-on
36:12
soft and see what happens. The
36:15
more variety you get there the better and
36:17
it's completely
36:20
deadly when you have like an
36:22
easy one-stop because that means that clearly
36:25
one strategy that's the best and everybody
36:27
will be on that and you see
36:29
nothing. So yes
36:32
it wasn't for the
36:34
lead today but we did see some
36:36
good battles and the
36:39
fact that the tyres were all usable were a
36:41
massive part in that. So
36:44
yeah that's good. Are
36:46
we going to see it a lot more?
36:48
Probably not in the likes of Miami but
36:51
maybe in China where there's a new asphalt
36:53
we have some unknowns so maybe it's possible
36:55
there as well where it's also going to
36:57
be cool. Yes
37:00
exciting that we got China coming up now first
37:02
time since 2019. Did
37:06
you both enjoy what
37:08
you saw in the Japanese Grand Prix JBL? I don't want you
37:10
to give it a rating out of 10
37:13
or anything like that but did you enjoy it because it was
37:15
one of those races that it's
37:17
a bit like an Indy car race where you don't quite
37:19
know what's going to happen till the end till everyone's sorted
37:22
out all the pit stops and you know what everyone's on.
37:24
It was intriguing at least. What do you think? Yeah
37:27
no I'd subscribe to that. Obviously
37:30
beyond the the top two it was all
37:32
it was pretty clear cut but behind
37:34
that yeah
37:36
it was you know everybody you know
37:38
people cycle out at different times the
37:41
undercut was very very powerful but it
37:43
couldn't necessarily be maintained throughout the race
37:45
so let's say when when Norris first
37:47
stopped he'd cycled out in
37:49
kind of a net third but
37:51
then his tie started to go
37:53
and you had the Ferraris coming up behind him you
37:56
had the Claire out front extending his
37:58
stints as well So that. Him
38:00
an extra that more in the pit stop basically.
38:02
Am. An enormous struck the fifth
38:05
so it was ready. Really interesting seeing
38:07
how everybody tackled a different name. I'm
38:09
still sad the last issued for different
38:11
trustees was was was really. Something.
38:14
That made the race I did enjoy it
38:16
was he acquired in the morning for beat
38:18
the kind of get my head around which
38:20
I think you know that maybe goods little
38:22
bit the brain teaser but yeah I'm I
38:24
think I did. To be honest with you.
38:27
Here. Same here with it all. Never
38:29
praise or a sweater. Zero jeopardy for
38:31
the win or even a top two
38:33
so all never give a high marks.
38:36
Spurts. Yard. Different sees the
38:38
ensure that there was always something to
38:40
watch for us yet been Norris on
38:42
the cats. Was I going to work
38:44
out that bitcoin and negate got negated
38:47
by him putting alongside the class? I'm
38:49
and then there were signs delaying sooner,
38:51
stop and then and I'm watching thirty
38:53
order at the end so there's always
38:55
something to watch serve. The fact that
38:58
the battle been on a rebel is
39:00
close to sort of saving grace I'm
39:02
but yeah it will never be our
39:04
a classic racists if this year. Know
39:07
died about the identity of the winner for
39:09
me. Not. A
39:11
classic but suddenly it was worth getting
39:13
up for. A you go Jbl i
39:15
think upper office, the thought process just
39:18
that's at now. Maybe funny away from
39:20
this but the gonna linking into the
39:22
Japanese Grand Prix. Just heading into the
39:24
weekend it was announced that the chief
39:27
designer David Sanchez, a Mclaren or. Formerly.
39:30
Of Mccown because he now leaving is
39:32
now see leaving for just three months.
39:34
Useful in in January wasn't it? which
39:36
is a bit strange. Both parties claimed
39:38
the role for David wasn't what either
39:40
of them were anticipating. So it's. What
39:43
the heck is happened. Internally.
39:46
At Mclaren fell. Whoop!
39:48
Or it's hard to see
39:50
him without question. But.
39:53
Of thing the main thing is that. You.
39:55
Have to remind keep in mind that
39:58
I get Sanchez signed up. well
40:00
over a year ago from Ferrari. So
40:02
I think the deal was done. Please
40:06
correct me if I'm wrong. I think it was February last year.
40:08
So it's over 12 months, 14 months ago. So
40:11
obviously since then a lot has changed. McLaren
40:16
have had this reorganization that Sanchez
40:18
was you
40:20
know cherry-picked to be a part of with triple
40:24
technical direct structure, but then
40:26
you know things move on. They
40:29
work without Sanchez for a year and you
40:33
know as Andrea Sellard took over I'm sure
40:35
he must have noticed how
40:38
it seems progressing and then when
40:40
Sanchez and Rob Marshall actually started in
40:42
January, maybe some
40:45
of what was agreed 14 months ago
40:47
has slightly shifted in terms of where they
40:51
fit in exactly and you know not
40:53
just that but also what's your responsibility
40:55
and what isn't your responsibility. And
40:58
it's perfectly possible for someone like Sanchez to
41:00
say like actually this isn't quite what
41:03
I signed up for is it doesn't quite my strength
41:06
to be in this sort of leadership
41:08
position or whatever it may be we don't know.
41:10
So it's unusual for
41:13
him to like depart after three months. It's
41:18
hard to say already but
41:21
it you can see that it's
41:23
really a very different structure to the
41:26
way he's used to working that maybe he's
41:28
noticed that actually this isn't really working for
41:30
me or for the team. And
41:33
you have to say well done to them if that
41:35
is the case it's not working out let's just pull
41:37
the plug on it before before it gets any
41:39
further on the process. We're looking
41:42
ahead at the Chinese Grand Prix the
41:44
first time since 2019 very quickly both
41:46
of you. What do you look forward
41:48
to? What do you look forward to?
41:50
That's interesting. English
41:52
is my first language how about that? What are
41:54
you both looking forward to the most JBL? Well,
41:59
I think And having sort
42:01
of just sort of have a brief
42:03
overview of what conditions to expect and
42:05
as Phil has already said it is
42:07
going to be relatively cold at this
42:10
time of year, new ash fart
42:12
as well. So the expected thing is there's going to be
42:14
quite a lot of graining like
42:16
there was in Australia. So that's something that if
42:18
Ripple still hasn't got on top of it that
42:21
could bring Fari back into it, that
42:23
could bring you know a couple of other teams sort of into the
42:25
mix so they can get their head around it. And
42:27
it's because it's a circuit we haven't been to since 2019. Data
42:30
for it is very, very
42:33
outdated. We've got nothing on it for
42:36
these 2022 cars and it's going to
42:38
be a sprint weekend. So everybody's
42:41
got to hope that there is not a
42:43
single blemish in practice because any
42:45
single red flag even for five minutes that's
42:47
going to throw so much data out of
42:49
the window. So we could have
42:52
a real topsy turvy weekend if one top
42:55
team doesn't you know hit it
42:57
quite right then it could
42:59
be really, really unpredictable. It might not be but
43:01
you know I like to live and hope. Yeah
43:05
it's interesting because there's also obviously a
43:07
different sprint format this year. So teams
43:09
will have longer before Park Fermi or
43:12
they have like a second Park Fermi
43:14
for you know for sprinting
43:16
and for qualifying for the race. So
43:18
it'll be interesting to see how they deal with that. As
43:21
you say, if you want it's going to be key so
43:23
you can't afford any sort of mistakes. Not
43:26
just like physical mistakes but also in terms of
43:28
your setup direction. You just don't have
43:30
any time to to
43:33
backtrack or to try and do something different. So
43:35
you have to be on it straight away. Which
43:38
could introduce some jeopardy. You could also argue
43:41
that well the best teams are more likely
43:43
to get their ducks in a row than
43:45
the others right because they have the best
43:47
resources. Also
43:50
possible but still there is a bit
43:52
of extra variance maybe that that's being
43:54
introduced. So as much as
43:56
I'm not really a fan of sprints in
43:58
general I think. the
44:00
lack of practice, you know,
44:02
it can introduce something new. So
44:07
we've seen that on a few occasions over the last
44:09
couple of years that some teams
44:11
just got it wrong and then they couldn't really recover
44:13
from that. And then, yeah, as
44:15
JBL said, it's not only have we not been
44:17
there for five years, it's also a new tarmac.
44:21
So it's really
44:24
a step into the unknown for a lot
44:26
of teams. But yeah, you
44:28
have to say that if
44:31
it is a race where graining is a
44:33
big issue, then if you
44:35
look at Australia as well, you would back
44:37
Ferrari to do better than they do on
44:39
sort of the high thermal degradation race like
44:42
here and like Bahrain. So maybe
44:44
Ferrari will fancy their chances actually. Well,
44:48
there you go. Maybe, but would it be Charlotte
44:50
Clark or will it be Carlos Sainz at fans
44:52
this charted even more? Gents, thank you so much.
44:54
That about wraps up for our meandering review of
44:57
the Japanese Grand Prix. We didn't get to any
44:59
cherry blossom or anything like that. I know JBL
45:01
was so disappointed. He didn't get to witness the
45:03
cherry blossom, but I don't want to open that
45:05
particular wound right now. That's for another day. Remember,
45:08
if you like what you heard on this podcast,
45:10
don't forget you can hit that follow button to
45:12
stay in the loop for all of our 2024
45:14
coverage of F1, as
45:17
well as our BTCC top 10 series
45:19
and Driven to Succeed, featuring the best
45:21
young up and coming talent in motorsport.
45:24
So we'll be back next week with
45:26
a preview when Formula One
45:28
returns to Shanghai and the first Chinese Grand
45:30
Prix since 2019. But
45:33
until then, thanks so much for listening. Lucky
45:42
Land Casino asking people what's the
45:45
weirdest place you've gotten lucky? Lucky
45:47
in line at the deli, I guess. Haha, in
45:49
my dentist's office. More than once, actually.
45:51
Do I have to say? Yes, you
45:53
do. In the car before my kids
45:55
PTA meeting. Really? Yes. Excuse me, what's
45:57
the weirdest place you've gotten lucky? I
46:00
never win in tell. Well there you
46:03
have it. You could get lucky anywhere playing
46:05
at Luckyland slots calm play for free right
46:07
now Are you feeling lucky?
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More