Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
Did I just put you on the spot like that, like all
0:02
the time? The professors, yeah, they
0:05
tend to do that Socratic method.
0:07
So if you don't know the answer, they're just going to kick you out.
0:11
Hey,
0:14
everyone. This is Leon from Prolog
0:16
Projects. On this episode of
0:18
5 to 4, Peter, Rhiannon, and
0:20
Michael are taking your questions. This
0:23
is an extremely heightened moment in American
0:25
politics, and the questions you all sent
0:28
in very much reflect that. So
0:30
the host will be addressing a range of issues, why
0:33
the liberal justices seem to be taking a
0:35
laissez-faire approach to the conservative takeover of the
0:37
judiciary, what to do with your
0:40
vote in the 2024 elections, and
0:42
why law professors still seem to think it's fine
0:44
to date their students. This
0:47
is 5 to 4, a podcast about how
0:49
much the Supreme Court sucks. Coming
0:56
to 5 to 4, where we dissect and
0:58
analyze the Supreme Court cases that have ignored
1:00
our civil rights, like the Pulitzer Prize Board
1:02
ignoring journalists in Gaza. I'm
1:04
Peter. I'm here with Michael. Hey, everybody.
1:07
And Rhiannon. Hello. Congratulations,
1:09
of course, to the New York Times for
1:12
their 150th consecutive year of winning a
1:16
Pulitzer or whatever, just a
1:18
guess, for their, quote, wide-ranging
1:21
and revelatory coverage of Hamas's lethal
1:23
attack in southern Israel on October
1:25
7th. You know
1:27
that that coverage was good, because for the
1:29
good coverage to outweigh
1:31
the objectively false coverage, that's
1:34
something. Yeah. So
1:36
again, congrats. Congrats. Yeah.
1:39
To the New York Times. Pat
1:41
on the back, everybody. Great
1:44
work. All right. So
1:47
we are doing a mailbag episode
1:50
today. We have
1:52
your questions. We
1:55
have reviewed your questions. We've
1:58
chosen our favorite questions. Then
2:00
our least favorite questions were not gonna read
2:02
them but we have talked about them amongst
2:04
ourselves and we laughed at the first or
2:06
last you for sending them in. Another
2:10
the only two categories for three that
2:13
he regrets and read on the spot
2:15
does so I will say up top
2:17
we got a good amount of questions
2:19
about like protesting and what's going on
2:21
on campus and because we did the.
2:24
Episode About The Campus Protest last
2:26
week. We're gonna have more or
2:28
less leave those alone. They should
2:31
be addressed by our harrowing. Episode.
2:34
Comprehensive coverage. Site not pure
2:36
lead. Surprise winning. Weird. They know
2:38
it has been released yet. I think
2:40
that's the only reason for it. It's
2:42
up for our my my five guaranteed
2:45
zip zip code. It's over room and
2:47
yourself right now of with yeah. So
2:50
jumping in our first class in
2:52
friend James is there good seat.
2:54
Reason the liberal establishment isn't playing
2:56
the Scotus game as aggressively as
2:59
they really should. Are they really
3:01
just clinging to the idealized nonpartisan
3:03
institutions that they believe. The Supreme Court
3:05
ought to be. This is a good question. We
3:07
had a few questions. Along these
3:09
lines like what are the Libs
3:12
doing? yes, why are they so
3:14
seemingly sort of still embracing the
3:16
institution? My they have lead
3:18
poisoning? Acid Somebody Troponin Bill
3:20
Rice All the questions that
3:22
their conduct would naturally me
3:24
today is is it correct?
3:26
So first things first. I
3:29
think it's very hard for
3:31
the average five to four
3:33
listener. To. Put themselves in
3:35
a mine space of the average
3:37
liberal Supreme Court justice Roseanne. For.
3:39
The most part, yes, these people really do
3:42
believe in the institution of the court. And.
3:44
Adjust to the court, but courts
3:46
generally the law generally. They
3:49
are deeply entrenched in the
3:51
politics and culture of the
3:53
institution. If. You're like a
3:55
young law student. Or.
3:57
Even any one like under forty.
4:00
It's. Probably a lot. Easier for
4:02
you to shed your prior understanding of what
4:04
the court is or was. Because.
4:07
That understanding as a few years old,
4:09
right? I mean, if you were. Forty.
4:12
Right now you worth thirty two
4:15
when Merrick Garland happened. Rates which
4:17
means like you weren't that deep
4:19
into paying attention to politics, right?
4:21
Yeah, this is one of the
4:23
first major events that in the
4:26
history of the Supreme Court in
4:28
your adult life. So. I
4:30
think a lot of people including and like
4:32
our age group, but especially if you're a
4:34
bit younger. A
4:37
look at this and they're like
4:39
isn't a so obvious what's happening,
4:41
but you have to think about
4:43
someone who has believed one thing
4:45
about the court for forty plus
4:47
years and that's a major part
4:49
of their life, right? Be major
4:51
part of their lines. And that's
4:53
decades of understanding and analyzing the
4:55
court. As. Like a largely
4:57
a political actor, right? a noble
4:59
idea or that's not something that
5:01
you can be easily shake if
5:03
you're in. their shoots right and
5:05
they have been rewarded Know their
5:08
approach to the law into politics,
5:10
has been rewarded with career advancement,
5:12
with fame and with good fortune
5:14
like bearer at the peak of
5:16
their career like it's very hard
5:18
to turn around and look at
5:20
it and be like yeah but
5:22
it's all trash specific. you know
5:24
that is area you're. Asking a lot
5:27
a folks. If you want to hear the rest
5:29
of this episode, you're going to have to subscribe.
5:31
There. Are a few ways to
5:34
subscribe to and support. Five
5:36
for get our premium episodes
5:38
and you can learn about
5:40
them all at I. For
5:42
pod.com/support subscribers get a whole
5:44
bunch of benefits including exclusive
5:46
episodes. members only events. first
5:48
dibs on live show tickets
5:50
and access to are very
5:52
lively Slack channel Surf that
5:54
sounds good It had over
5:57
two five, Four, Pod all
5:59
spelled out.com. Thanks.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More