Podchaser Logo
Home
Antarctica | Ep 5 | The Coroner's Verdict

Antarctica | Ep 5 | The Coroner's Verdict

Released Monday, 25th March 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Antarctica | Ep 5 | The Coroner's Verdict

Antarctica | Ep 5 | The Coroner's Verdict

Antarctica | Ep 5 | The Coroner's Verdict

Antarctica | Ep 5 | The Coroner's Verdict

Monday, 25th March 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:01

That's a sort of freedom, like

0:04

an intrinsic knowledge, like you

0:06

are part ocean, ocean is part you, you

0:09

have saltwater in your body, you

0:11

are part of this. Oceans,

0:15

life underwater. A

0:17

new podcast all about the oceans

0:19

and the mind-blowing life within them. Subscribe

0:22

now to Oceans, Life Underwater on

0:25

your favorite podcast app. This

0:32

is a Crowd Podcast. An

0:39

intriguing coroner's inquest into the death

0:41

of an Australian astrophysicist in Antarctica

0:43

six years ago has reopened in

0:46

Christchurch today. When Rodney's

0:48

body landed back in Christchurch in October

0:50

2000, the postmortem threw

0:52

up a shock result. The

0:55

subsequent inquest would be adjourned several

0:57

times and the investigation

0:59

would last eight long years. 32-year-old

1:03

Rodney David Marks died after methanol poisoning

1:05

at the South Pole station, but mystery

1:07

surrounds how he came to take the

1:09

substance. Mystery was the

1:11

right word. Rodney

1:14

was found with extremely high concentrations

1:16

of methanol in his system. Methanol,

1:20

a highly toxic, flammable liquid.

1:23

The postmortem showed he'd probably drunk

1:25

it, and a lot of it. But

1:29

how? Had he taken it himself or

1:32

was someone else involved? That's

1:34

the question that will hound Detective Wormold for

1:37

the next eight years. His

1:39

investigation will show just how difficult

1:42

it is to scrutinize what

1:44

really goes on in Antarctica. Complex

1:48

jurisdictional diplomatic problems

1:50

will make this one of the most frustrating cases

1:53

he's ever dealt with. Delayed

1:55

at every stage by the American

1:57

authorities. acknowledge

2:00

that although some sense of

2:02

finality is required for the family, it's

2:05

also important to establish the facts. And

2:07

he said that it appears there is some sort

2:10

of legal vacuum over deaths

2:12

in some circumstances in Antarctica. In

2:15

this episode, how did

2:17

a glass full of methanol end up in

2:19

Rodney's system? And

2:21

will Detective Wormald find out why?

2:24

So six years on, three hearings later,

2:26

still not over. This

2:29

is the secret history of Antarctica.

2:37

So I am Michelle Dupree, and

2:39

I am a retired forensic pathologist

2:41

and medical examiner. The forensic

2:44

pathologist who'd done the autopsy in

2:46

Christchurch was a man called Martin

2:48

Sage. He declined to take

2:50

part in the series, so Michelle

2:52

was stepping in as our expert. One

2:55

of the first questions I had for her was

2:57

where the Sage's task would have been

3:00

made more difficult by the fact that

3:02

Rodney's body had spent four months frozen

3:04

in ice. It makes

3:06

it initially more difficult, only

3:08

because we have to very

3:10

slowly thaw out the body

3:12

so that we don't damage

3:14

more evidence. But once

3:16

that body is thawed out and we are

3:19

able to do the autopsy, then we should

3:21

still be able to get all the information

3:23

we need to do a complete and thorough

3:25

investigation. If somebody dies and

3:27

you don't know the cause, then

3:30

of course it's always a potential

3:33

crime scene, isn't it? Absolutely.

3:36

And we always treat that as

3:38

a suspicious death and even possibly as

3:40

a homicide until proven otherwise. So

3:43

at this point it might be useful

3:45

to explain what, in layman's terms, is

3:47

methanol. Methanol is actually a type

3:50

of alcohol. It is the

3:52

poisonous version. Methanol is

3:54

a close relative to ethanol. The

3:57

chemical makeup is very similar, and

3:59

they're both highly familiar. but where

4:01

ethanol is found in most people's homes,

4:04

in bottles of wine or vodka, Methanol

4:07

is highly toxic. If

4:09

you swallow even a tiny amount, symptoms

4:12

can include headaches, dizziness,

4:16

agitation, acute mania,

4:18

amnesia, even falling

4:20

into a coma. And

4:23

if you take a high enough dosage, it

4:25

will kill you. Martin

4:27

Sage, the pathologist, thought that Rodney

4:29

had ingested the methanol one

4:32

or two days before he died. The

4:34

levels in his body were so high, Sage

4:36

concluded, that he must have swallowed between 125

4:38

and 250 ml of pure methanol, in effect,

4:40

a large glass. That's

4:48

an awful lot, yes. If you think of

4:51

a tablespoon, a small

4:53

tablespoon, that is enough to kill

4:55

you within a few hours. And

4:58

so this is a relatively

5:00

significant amount. In

5:02

your experience, would it have been

5:04

possible to ingest

5:07

that accidentally? I think

5:09

that it could have been possible only

5:12

because it is a clear liquid.

5:15

It does have sort of a fruity

5:17

taste. So if it

5:19

were mixed in with something else, unbeknownst

5:22

to the person, they could have possibly

5:25

consumed it without knowing it. Would

5:27

there have been any instant

5:31

pain or nausea at the

5:33

moment that you ingested the

5:36

methanol? There would have been sort

5:39

of a burning sensation. Again,

5:41

much like alcohol, sometimes if we drink

5:44

it straight or moonshine, shortly

5:46

thereafter there would have been

5:48

severe gastric issues, pain,

5:51

even impairment of vision. And

5:53

coughing up blood. Coughing up blood,

5:56

yes. If I wanted

5:58

to poison somebody, Could

6:00

I mix it with something else to disguise

6:02

it? Absolutely. Again, it

6:05

is sort of fruity and sweet.

6:08

You could mix it with some type of

6:10

juice or fruit punch or something of that

6:12

nature that would help to mask that. So

6:15

yes, it would be absolutely possible. I

6:19

don't know how he ingested

6:21

it. Tony Stark, Rodney's

6:23

supervisor. Methanol was everywhere

6:26

at the South Pole, Tony tells me. Rodney

6:28

needed it for his experiments. We

6:31

had kind of an office in the laboratory space.

6:34

And in that space, we

6:36

had a flammable liquids

6:39

cabinet, as laboratories

6:41

often do. And in

6:43

that cabinet were two liters

6:46

of methanol and we

6:48

had acetone and a couple of kind of

6:51

solvent things which we would

6:53

use to clean our equipment when

6:55

it needed cleaning. Originally,

6:57

Tony had wanted to use the

6:59

significantly less toxic ethanol as the

7:01

cleaning solvent at the station. But

7:04

he wasn't allowed, he says. There's

7:06

an alcohol tax on imports of ethanol

7:08

to the South Pole. Ten dollars

7:11

or something for a liter. So

7:13

Tony says the suppliers opted for

7:15

the more dangerous methanol instead. We

7:18

tried to confirm this, but we were

7:20

unsuccessful. Cleaning

7:23

the telescopes was crucial. Even

7:25

a single fingerprint might have ruined

7:28

the experiment Rodney was conducting. If

7:31

you were doing that with ethanol, you

7:33

didn't even have to wear gloves, right?

7:35

With methanol, you could absorb tiny

7:38

amounts of it through the skin and

7:40

that's not a good idea. And so

7:42

in the safety talk, I would say, well, you know, if

7:45

you're going to use methanol, you

7:47

know, make sure you wear gloves

7:49

because it's toxic. And, you

7:51

know, and I kind of would say

7:55

how much I regretted not being able

7:57

to get ethanol down there because...

8:00

the, well,

8:02

it was just against policy. But

8:04

also they would, it was, you said,

8:07

what, $10 or so tax

8:10

saved by using methanol.

8:13

Right. $10

8:15

of tax and a lot of red tape. What

8:19

containers were the methanol kept in? The

8:22

usual lab safety thing. The first thing is you

8:25

have to always have these

8:28

flammable solvents in well-labeled

8:31

containers. And in

8:33

this case, they were in

8:35

glass bottles, sort

8:37

of a brown one

8:40

liter bottle with a screw top and

8:43

labeled with the various hazard

8:46

symbols on it. So everything has

8:48

to be labeled and everything

8:50

has to be in its

8:52

own bottle. And the bottles have to

8:54

be stored in a flammable liquid cabinet.

8:56

You only take them out to use

8:58

them and then you put them back.

9:01

Otherwise it's potentially a fire

9:03

hazard. So no chance

9:06

of mistaking this for, accidentally mistaking

9:08

this for something non-hazardous. No, right.

9:11

I mean, you know, this is

9:13

a standard lab safety protocol. Was

9:16

there anything at all in your interactions

9:18

with Rodney and the lead up to

9:20

his death that indicated to

9:22

you that he was in any

9:24

way depressed or likely to

9:27

kill himself? No, I

9:29

mean, nothing like that. I

9:32

do not know how he wound

9:34

up ingesting methanol. I

9:36

mean, it is a mystery.

9:39

I do not at

9:42

all think that he

9:44

committed suicide. I mean, it's a

9:47

terrible way to

9:49

die. And it's definitely

9:51

not a way

9:54

that anyone I think would

9:57

choose to die because it's painful. awful

10:00

and takes 24

10:03

hours, you are

10:06

in agonizing pain and you go blind

10:08

and it's just

10:11

hideous. A

10:15

question which will hang over the inquest is

10:17

whether at any point during those 36 hours

10:19

in which Rodney battled

10:22

for his life he could have been saved.

10:24

Dr Thompson certainly had a

10:27

dilemma on his hands. Dr

10:29

Ron Shominski was the South Pole doctor

10:31

who took over from Dr Thompson in

10:33

November 2000. He had a

10:35

very sick patient and really not

10:40

much to go by especially not

10:42

any suspicion of methanol. We

10:45

heard in a previous episode that is

10:47

the afternoon of 12th of May dragged

10:49

on and Rodney's condition worsened.

10:51

Dr Thompson would have liked to have

10:53

run some blood tests but

10:56

he said later his blood

10:58

machine, the Ectocam, was broken.

11:01

The coroner will later conclude

11:03

these tests would have seriously

11:05

enhanced Rodney's chance of survival.

11:08

Dr Thompson couldn't run the tests so

11:11

he remained baffled as Rodney lay

11:13

before him, dying. If

11:16

you knew methanol poisoning, yes we had treatment

11:18

done. We had all the ethanol that you

11:21

could want. We

11:23

had all the ethanol that you could want. Astonishingly

11:26

there was something that might have

11:28

saved Rodney. The

11:31

only antidote for methanol poisoning was

11:33

right there readily available in

11:35

people's bunks at the bar at

11:37

their work desk. Ethanol

11:41

in the homebrew, the beer, the wine

11:43

and the spurts. It

11:45

turns out that ethanol is actually an

11:47

antidote for methanol poisoning. The methanol is

11:50

not the poisonous, it's the metabolites.

11:53

It's the breakdown products of methanol

11:56

that's poisonous. If

11:59

you can keep methanol from being

12:01

metabolized then it

12:04

will eventually be excreted by

12:07

the kidneys slowly but it eventually

12:09

would get out of the system

12:11

without causing any damage. The

12:13

way you do that is you give ethanol

12:16

and you just have to essentially keep the

12:18

person very drunk. The

12:20

methanol will eventually

12:22

be illuminated. You

12:25

just have to fly by

12:27

to see your pants and make sure you're

12:29

trying to give enough ethanol without causing

12:31

ethanol poisoning. The

12:34

pathologist Martin Sage will testify at

12:36

the inquest that Rodney's chances of

12:39

survival would have been considerably greater

12:41

if he'd been given ethanol. An American

12:44

medical journal gives us the stats. They

12:47

gave a group of people with methanol

12:49

poisoning a dose of ethanol to

12:51

see if it helped. The mortality rate

12:53

dropped to 21%. So

12:56

it would give you pretty good odds

12:58

of saving somebody. Was

13:00

there anything in Rodney's symptoms that may have

13:02

helped the doctor diagnose what was wrong from

13:04

the off? One of the

13:07

things they said that he had light

13:10

sensitivity, that he wore

13:13

dark glasses, that would

13:15

be a tip off that this

13:17

is methanol because it attacks

13:20

the retina. Other symptoms,

13:22

the stomach pain, these

13:25

are really nonspecific. From

13:28

what you're saying, it's fair to say

13:30

this was a very

13:33

difficult case to

13:35

diagnose. And I guess

13:38

also in a situation where people

13:42

understand that methanol is dangerous and only

13:44

use it for cleaning, that's not going

13:46

to be first in mind when somebody

13:48

gets ill. No, it's

13:50

not. You can absorb

13:53

methanol to the skin. You don't have to drink it.

13:56

But it takes extraordinary circumstances.

14:00

I said there was no index

14:02

of suspicion. He was, you know,

14:04

very intelligent scientist. He

14:07

knew that he'd prounced with methanol.

14:09

There's no reason for him

14:12

to have ingested methanol.

14:20

Beneath the veneer of the everyday, looks

14:22

the realm of the spy. From

14:25

Wandery, I'm Raza Jaffrey. This

14:27

is The Spy Who. The podcast

14:29

exploring true spy stories you were

14:31

never meant to hear, with

14:34

secret operatives playing to very

14:36

different rules. We'll reveal

14:38

the invisible work of the world's

14:40

intelligence services, unearthing daring missions packed

14:42

with danger, deceit, and double-crosses.

14:46

Follow The Spy Who wherever you

14:48

listen to podcasts. We last

14:51

left the cult,

14:53

Detective Wormald, back in Episode

14:56

3, having received a fax from the

14:58

coroner, Richard McElray, with a request to start investigating

15:00

this most curious of cases. The

15:02

detective was on board right away. Someone

15:05

should be required to give a damn, he said. But

15:09

giving a damn would prove far more difficult than

15:12

he could have ever expected. He was

15:14

a very good detective. A damn

15:16

would prove far more difficult than he

15:18

could have ever expected. By

15:22

the time the detective takes up the case, months

15:25

have elapsed since the death. The

15:27

potential crime scene is thousands of miles away

15:29

on the ice, reachable for

15:31

only six months of the year. Detective

15:34

Wormald has photos of the potential crime

15:36

scene, but even those are problematic.

15:40

Some pictures had been taken of

15:42

Rodney's body immediately after he died,

15:45

and not of the whole scene, which

15:47

would be standard practice anywhere else in the

15:49

world. And the

15:52

area was tidied almost straight away, and

15:55

Rodney's desk cleared. So

15:58

how do you start investigating this? suspicious

16:00

death with no evidence. Detective

16:04

Wimold needs to interview potential witnesses

16:07

but he has no idea where to start. He

16:10

has a statement from Dr. Thompson

16:12

and Sonia, Rodney's girlfriend, but

16:15

the other winter overs had walked straight

16:17

through customs at Christchurch Airport and flown

16:19

home. The only 49 people

16:22

in the world who might hold the

16:24

missing piece to the puzzle scattered

16:26

around the globe. So

16:29

the detective needs a list of names and

16:32

this is where the Americans enter the scene. First

16:35

the National Science Foundation,

16:37

the NSF. You've

16:40

heard this name before, they're

16:42

the US federal agency in charge

16:44

of scientific research in Antarctica. They

16:47

hold the purse strings and

16:49

are the overall boss of everything that

16:51

goes on at America's three polar bases

16:54

including Amundsen Scott where

16:56

Rodney died. The second

16:58

company is Raytheon, a

17:00

major defense contractor. Raytheon

17:03

had won the contract to run the

17:05

day-to-day operations at Amundsen Scott. They're

17:07

in charge of things like supply,

17:10

hiring and firing. These

17:12

two organizations have the information

17:14

the detective desperately needs and

17:17

they will become the biggest challenge in his search

17:19

for the truth. In July

17:24

2002, more than two years

17:26

after Rodney died, New Zealand

17:28

police email Raytheon. They asked

17:30

for a full list of everybody who was there

17:32

when Rodney died. Raytheon replies

17:35

suggesting they try the US Department of

17:37

Justice in Washington. A year

17:40

later New Zealand police email the Department of

17:42

Justice asking again for a list

17:45

of names. It doesn't

17:47

arrive. Then in November

17:49

2004, two and a half years after that

17:53

first email, Detective Wormald

17:55

writes again to the Department of Justice.

17:58

He asks for their help. He

18:00

says any aid would be informal and

18:02

voluntary. The Department

18:04

of Justice replies, in

18:07

that case, it's a polite no. The

18:12

back and forth continues. All

18:14

requests for help from the Kiwis are batted

18:16

away. As well as a list

18:18

of names, the police have also

18:20

been asking the National Science Foundation to

18:22

share any information with them that might

18:24

be helpful. In late

18:26

2005, the NSF writes to them. They've

18:30

reviewed all their files and have concluded

18:33

that, quote, they'd be

18:35

of little value to your inquiry. However,

18:38

a document will be produced on the

18:40

third and final day of the inquest,

18:43

a 27-page in-depth report

18:46

to Rodney's death commissioned by the

18:48

NSF just weeks after he died.

18:51

They'd been sitting on it all that time and

18:54

hadn't shared it with the police. According

18:56

to Macare, that report would have

18:58

been, quote, vital to the

19:01

investigation. Eventually,

19:03

the Americans had enough of this meddling

19:05

cop. As 2006

19:07

draws to a close, after

19:09

five years of to and fro, the

19:12

NSF sends an official letter to the New

19:14

Zealand Ministry of Foreign Affairs. It

19:16

reads like a complaint. Why has

19:18

he been such a nuisance? It

19:22

all comes back to that question

19:24

of jurisdiction. Who's in

19:26

charge? It looks

19:28

like the Americans certainly don't want it to be the

19:30

Kiwis. The

19:34

cop has one small victory. It

19:37

comes five years after Rodney's death. He

19:40

hasn't succeeded in getting a list of names,

19:43

but the NSF finally agrees, after

19:46

much delay, to send

19:48

out a questionnaire on his behalf. The

19:51

cop will write the questions, and the

19:53

NSF will send it to those 49 members

19:55

of staff. They've Agreed to

19:58

this not because New Zealand has any. Jurisdictional

20:00

Power Of the U S A

20:02

Stress. This. Is pure Goodwill.

20:05

But. They do send out the

20:08

form forty two questions written by

20:10

the police. Aimed. At ascertaining, how

20:12

wouldn't he came to doing the math and

20:14

all. Did he take

20:16

drugs? Did you have see the

20:18

mysterious porn bottle? To. Have any

20:20

photos of where he lived? A words. To.

20:25

Take the whim of waits and

20:27

waits. But. As the months

20:29

drag on, Only. Thirteen people

20:31

out of forty nine reply. Gene.

20:34

Is one. And. Davis another. I.

20:38

Felt. It was important. Most. Of

20:40

the answers aren't particularly enlightening. lots

20:42

of knows, I don't know. And.

20:45

I wasn't there. But. Days

20:47

stand out. This. Is

20:49

where he first aid his suspicions about some

20:51

of the behavior he saw on base. in

20:54

the days after one he died. This.

20:56

Is what they wrote kind of

20:59

stalking behavior. Don't have any hard

21:01

evidence, Just months and months of

21:03

watching this stuff. Just

21:06

a gut feeling. Something wrong happened. There

21:08

was a a media group that went

21:11

to see. Ronnie.

21:13

Get buried, talk with the family com

21:15

I didn't go that group, I just

21:17

needed a break from everyone. And then

21:19

a month later I went to Australia

21:21

and I met with Rodney sister. Com

21:25

and she had some

21:27

very concerning. Thoughts.

21:29

About the group and people's

21:32

behaviors which were very similar

21:34

to mine and the other

21:36

folks that. We

21:39

talked about who could potentially

21:41

do something things like that

21:44

if it were done So.

21:47

I. Felt it was important for

21:49

them. To know if

21:52

it was can be investigated Ominous. Spill

21:54

the beans as much as I know

21:56

and give them every bit of information.

21:59

I could. The. Help And in

22:01

your document that you have you

22:04

will. One is a few people

22:06

who suggested the possibility of foul

22:08

play. Yep. Did. You

22:10

pay attention at all then understand

22:12

Antartica and the stress people's go

22:15

through, how they deal with it.

22:18

And then leary just pay attention to. What's.

22:20

Going on around you. You. Could see

22:22

that. There was a potential

22:25

for something to happen. Nothing.

22:28

Ever came of Daves suspicions?

22:30

Nobody was ever charged and there

22:32

were no official suspects. To.

22:35

This day. Date finds his

22:38

theories strains that so many years

22:40

the lats before he was contacted.

22:42

Five years and all the while

22:44

he was worried he was sitting

22:46

on a vital piece of information.

22:49

And then out of the blue comes this

22:52

questionnaire with a note attacks from the in

22:54

a safe. Incredibly.

22:57

Even though this was still a former

22:59

Police Investigation and New Zealand. fetuses,

23:02

Stresses. And it's not

23:04

a criminal investigation. And. Returning

23:06

the question here is voluntary.

23:09

I found very concerned that time

23:11

that there was so middle investigation

23:14

and thought put into those use.

23:16

Move on and. Keep

23:18

things rolling and people forget about it.

23:20

The yes cause on that point and

23:22

I don't know whether you're aware of

23:24

this but I can tell you having

23:26

when will the files Certain the New

23:29

Zealand place did want to. Interview

23:31

he will personally. Ah and

23:33

and the in that they

23:35

even had to negotiate sending

23:38

you a questionnaire Sit! So

23:40

why do you think the

23:42

your thoughts sasso bad publicity.

23:45

And started program getting of

23:47

a bad rap bat summer

23:49

with the hammer incidents. I

23:52

I think that's all comes down to the

23:55

publicity, but. There are

23:57

several of us have felt there was a little

23:59

odd that. There. Is no not

24:01

a lot of follow up. Few of

24:03

us wanted to. Say

24:06

everything we need. Guys.

24:11

Not the only one who fills

24:13

the investigation was floored. Gene

24:15

return the questionnaire to. And. City

24:18

like to help where he can. But.

24:20

Was no follow up from the New Zealand place.

24:23

Now. That may be because he didn't

24:25

have any crucial information. He

24:27

still thinks that was nothing suspicious about

24:29

one this. Even so, two

24:31

decades old, he's still annoyed he

24:34

wasn't contacted. If someone

24:36

dies and suspicious circumstances and

24:38

then they choose I guess

24:40

not to question someone who

24:42

was there. To me that

24:44

to seems a little surprising.

24:47

I'll leave it at that for new are

24:49

certainly they never contacted me. Tony

24:51

Stark who are nice supervisor

24:53

are still have all of

24:56

the email correspondence with Rodney

24:58

in the last week and

25:00

no one ever. Talked

25:02

me about it. Period.

25:05

Okay, that's just that's fairly amazing.

25:07

So evil, One of the last

25:09

people to Vienna. You have wootton

25:11

correspondence with them and and nobody's

25:13

ever ask you to see it,

25:15

right? No one's ever asked. In

25:19

my conversations with Detective Were Mode,

25:21

we talked about how difficult it's

25:24

investigation was. The third

25:26

and final day of the inquest in

25:28

December, two thousand and Six said extensive

25:30

evidence from him about the lack of

25:33

cooperation from the Nss and Wakefield. He

25:36

stated he does seem silly heads for

25:38

fruitless years trying to get information from

25:40

them. Kono agreed

25:43

writing. The. Police evidence

25:45

understandably indicates of frustration they

25:47

experienced and tried to carry

25:50

out their invest skid row.

25:53

What does Family Agreed the New Zealand Police

25:55

had done the best to solve the case.

25:57

They thank them for the hard work and

25:59

investigating. The. The didn't

26:01

have the same praise for the in a safe and way

26:03

see on. In two thousand and

26:06

eight what nice father poll to the

26:08

spate of interviews. Said his

26:10

family was deeply disappointed with the way

26:12

the case had been handled. His.

26:15

Poll Speaking to New Zealand's public

26:17

Broadcaster Television. You sell And in

26:19

a case where a thirty two

26:21

year old man dies suddenly, the

26:23

first thing you do is a

26:25

traitor as a potential homicide, and

26:27

that's the case. To preserve sees

26:29

the same. You preserve all physical

26:31

evidence that you can possibly preserve

26:33

and you photograph over the none

26:35

of that was done. And

26:37

then he goes on to say nobody

26:39

from the Nss, nobody from Rice the

26:41

on the doctor that was with Rodney

26:43

when he died has made any attempt

26:46

to contact me at all. Would.

26:48

Try to reach Doctor Thompson. But.

26:50

We were unsuccessful so we couldn't

26:52

confirm this. We. Ask the

26:54

National Science Foundation for an interview,

26:57

but they declined. At

26:59

the time the in a safe said that

27:01

they'd quote. Consistently. Cooperated

27:03

with the investigation from the beginning.

27:06

They said they hoped this matter

27:08

will finally be concluded for everyone

27:11

involved. Particularly. The

27:13

family and friends of Doctor Marks. In.

27:15

An interview with the New Zealand Herald

27:18

newspaper pull Mark speaks to weekly

27:20

to the American authorities. Seven.

27:23

The sake he sees. A man

27:25

has died and Yukiya, why wouldn't

27:27

you help the police. The.

27:32

Corner release as his find a report into

27:34

the deaths of Wadi Marks. On. The

27:37

Twenty Fourth Of September. Two thousand And Eight.

27:39

It's an extraordinary read.

27:42

After eight long years of investigating how

27:45

Rodney and just admits and all. It's

27:48

inconclusive. There was no

27:50

indication of suicide. Mcelroy concludes to

27:52

any proof of foul play. However,

27:55

Foul. Play could not be moved out.

27:58

Without. full and prop investigation.

28:01

He criticizes the investigation. The

28:04

scene should have been preserved without

28:07

disturbance and photographs taken. Statements

28:09

should have been taken and personnel

28:12

questioned immediately before leaving the continent.

28:15

The New Zealand police did their best with what

28:17

they had, says Makohe. They

28:20

carried out as effective an

28:22

investigation as was possible, quote,

28:24

given the legal, diplomatic and

28:26

jurisdictional hurdles. But there

28:29

was an unsatisfactory hiatus in the

28:31

investigation, he says. He

28:33

writes, the death of

28:36

Dr Rodney Marks has highlighted an

28:38

investigative and jurisdictional void for

28:41

deaths in Antarctica. I have

28:43

the feeling they don't like press. We met

28:45

Robert in the first episode. He

28:47

spent an astonishing 15 years

28:49

on the ice as an astrophysicist. And

28:52

he knows what it's like to live

28:54

under the National Science Foundation's watchful eye.

28:57

Even innocent fun can be frowned on.

29:00

Yes, we are down there on taxpayers

29:02

money. The station

29:04

is run by taxpayers money, but we're

29:08

not there only for eight hours a day. We are

29:10

down there for 24 hours a day and that for

29:12

a year. So we also have

29:14

a life that goes on and

29:18

stuff like that is also important. But

29:20

yes, I don't really like

29:22

that too much. So

29:25

if the public picture should be we just

29:27

are working down there. Part

29:29

of me thinks I can't blame them. It's

29:31

the National Science Foundation. They don't

29:33

get shit for funding as it is.

29:35

It was very tough to keep that

29:38

place going based off of the budget. So

29:41

everyone wanted research to

29:43

happen down there. They want more grants.

29:45

They want more funding just

29:48

to keep it alive. So that

29:50

could hinder that. They rather don't

29:52

have any publicity whatsoever.

29:55

And if then they want to have

29:57

full control over it. I

30:00

think if it was roles reversed, it

30:03

would absolutely they'd be investigating and

30:06

want to know the truth. So

30:09

why not cooperate when

30:12

it's the other way around? In

30:19

our final episode, we go

30:21

through the theories. What

30:23

really happened to Rodney Marks? It

30:25

is very suspicious. There

30:28

is a strong possibility that this was

30:30

intentional, but by someone else.

30:33

And who ultimately is

30:35

responsible for the fact that

30:37

24 years later, we

30:39

still don't know the truth? The

30:42

general issue of jurisdiction bumbles

30:44

on with lawyers meeting

30:46

in darkened corners and discussing it probably over

30:49

coffee, but not much else happens, I don't

30:51

think. The

30:53

secret history of Antarctica is a

30:55

crowd network original. It's

30:57

presented by me, Steven Davis, and

30:59

produced by Anna Stauffenberg. Mixing

31:02

and sound design is by Rory Alsquerie.

31:06

The music we use is from

31:08

our partners, BMG Production Music. Thanks

31:11

to Lewis Rodriguez at Sonic

31:13

Space Lab Music for studio

31:15

recording. Additional material in

31:18

this episode, courtesy of Na

31:20

Tawonga Sound and Vision. To

31:23

bench the whole series ad-free and

31:25

for exclusive bonus episodes, subscribe

31:28

to the Crowd Stories channel on

31:30

the Apple Podcasts app. You

31:33

can also listen ad-free on Amazon Music.

31:37

If you haven't already, listen to

31:39

the first two Secret History series.

31:42

The Secret History of Flight 149 is the

31:44

tale behind how a passenger plane got

31:46

caught in a war zone, leaving

31:49

hundreds of people at the mercy of

31:51

Saddam Hussein. Hear from the

31:53

human shields who were held hostage in Kuwait, and

31:56

from those who spent years searching for the

31:58

truth. Series

32:01

2, The Secret History of the

32:03

Estonia, is my investigation into

32:05

what really happened when a passenger ferry

32:08

sank in the Baltic Sea, killing

32:10

852 people. A

32:13

story of secrets, smugglers and spies that

32:15

leads back to the Cold War. Find

32:18

both of those series on the same feed. Thanks

32:21

for listening. Crowd

32:41

Network, a place

32:43

where you belong.

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features