0:00

On Tuesday, Prince and Princess

0:02

Privacy, Harry and Meghan Markle,

0:04

claimed to have been involved in

0:07

a quote, near catastrophic

0:09

car chase at the hands of a

0:11

ring of highly aggressive paparazzi.

0:14

A quote, relentless pursuit

0:17

lasting over two hours, resulting

0:19

in multiple near collisions involving

0:21

other drivers on the road, pedestrians,

0:24

and two NYPD officers.

0:26

Wow, quite the

0:29

story. I was just waiting for

0:31

the part where Meghan held onto her subway

0:33

sandwich, while the Nigerian white supremacist

0:35

paparazzi told her that Manhattan

0:38

is MAGA country. And I was not

0:41

the only person, perhaps,

0:43

to be skeptical of the story. For

0:46

starters, the story resembled

0:48

the car chase that ended with

0:50

the death of Harry's mother, Diana, almost

0:53

perfectly. Few other facts that

0:55

raised some doubts about the Markle's claims

0:58

include the testimony of the NYPD,

1:02

which observed that the couple quote, arrived

1:04

at their destination and there were no reported

1:06

collisions, summonses, injuries, or arrests.

1:09

As well as the testimony of the cabbie who said

1:11

quote, I never felt like I was in danger.

1:14

It wasn't like a car chase in a movie.

1:17

As well as the fact that it's New York City,

1:19

one of the most congested places on earth,

1:22

where it is not possible to

1:24

have a two hour or even a two minute car

1:26

chase, because the traffic is always so

1:28

bad. Even the liberal mayor

1:31

of New York

1:32

was not buying it.

1:33

I would find it hard to believe

1:36

that there was a two hour high speed

1:39

chase. That would be, I find

1:41

it hard to believe, but we will find out the

1:43

exact duration of it. It's

1:45

a very diplomatic way of saying

1:47

it's just total BS. And

1:50

it's not just the Markles, okay?

1:52

If it were just the Markles, I'd let it go. We

1:54

wouldn't open the show this way. But it's not just

1:56

the Markles.

1:57

It's the Markles and the media.

2:01

and the FBI and

2:03

pretty much the whole regime. We

2:06

are ruled by a bunch of BS

2:08

artists. That is the inevitable

2:11

consequence of a culture

2:14

that shirks duty and

2:16

favors fantasy and rejects

2:19

the very notion of truth.

2:22

I'm Michael Knowles, it's The Michael Knowles Show.

2:28

Welcome back to the show.

2:31

We've

2:33

got breaking news. I

2:35

don't know if you got a push notification on your phone.

2:38

Starbucks India has gone trans.

2:41

We'll get to that in just a moment,

2:43

to that very important story.

2:45

First though, speaking of

2:47

lovebirds, did

2:50

you feel it? Did the wind blow

2:52

through your hair as we slid

2:55

further down that slippery slope? Because

2:58

you can go over to the chalkboard, you

3:00

can put down another

3:02

correct prediction for the social

3:05

conservatives.

3:07

We've slid further down the slippery slope. I think the

3:09

score right now is 10 bazillion to

3:11

zero in terms of predictions, but it doesn't really

3:13

matter because the social conservatives continue

3:15

to be right and the liberals continue to get

3:17

whatever they want. This time on

3:21

polygamy and polyamory.

3:23

Remember when the conservatives, those crazy,

3:25

fuddy, duddy, neurotic

3:28

conservatives, they

3:31

said when the libs were trying to redefine marriage that

3:33

if we redefine marriage to include two

3:35

men and

3:37

two women, that pretty soon

3:40

we're gonna redefine marriage to include polygamy

3:43

and polyamory, and it's gonna be not just

3:45

one man and another man, but one man and

3:47

three women and two billy goats and a sheep.

3:51

And guess what happened? That's exactly what happened from

3:53

the New York Times. Quote,

3:55

interested in polyamory?

3:58

Check out these places. sub-header,

4:01

laws granting rights to people in

4:04

polyamorous relationships are being

4:06

recognized in more cities. Now to be clear,

4:08

this

4:09

isn't polygamy yet. This

4:12

isn't redefining marriage yet. This

4:14

is the first step. This is the civil unions

4:17

of orgies. Okay,

4:20

the first step

4:23

is we're just going to give some rights. What does it

4:25

matter? Love is love. Who cares? Why are

4:27

you such a fuddy-duddy? We're not redefining

4:29

marriage to include polygamy, okay you crazy

4:31

person. And

4:33

then within

4:35

a matter of years at most we're going to

4:37

start seeing these new rights

4:39

that we're extending to some people who are just a little

4:41

bit different. That's going to be extended

4:44

to

4:45

redefining marriage if it hasn't been

4:47

totally abolished already.

4:48

Article Jace Knight had heard

4:51

about Somerville, Massachusetts while working

4:53

on a PhD at the University of Alabama

4:55

in 2020. The small

4:58

city

4:59

had recently passed a law granting

5:01

domestic partnership rights

5:03

like the ability to receive employment benefits

5:05

or make hospital visits to people in

5:07

polyamorous relationships.

5:09

Mix Knight, that's what they do now instead

5:12

of mister and miss

5:14

and missus, even the feminist

5:16

miss, now the people

5:18

who are confused about their sex they do mx

5:20

period. Mix Knight, who is non-binary

5:23

and has been non-monogamous since 2014,

5:26

was impressed.

5:28

In late March Somerville passed two more laws

5:31

extending the rights of non-monogamous residents,

5:34

this time banning discrimination

5:36

on the basis of family or relationship

5:39

structure in

5:40

city employment and housing. Similar ordinance

5:42

focused on housing is currently being discussed

5:44

in Somerville City

5:47

and that's because Mix Knight

5:49

has two partners and

5:51

a partner of one of those partners

5:54

and the you get the point. There are a bunch of

5:56

other people like this, a

5:57

bunch of other towns doing this. It's

6:01

always the same script. It's always, we just want

6:03

to visit people in the hospital. You know, you can change

6:05

hospital rules. But you don't need to fundamentally

6:08

redefine marriage

6:10

and man and woman. You can just

6:12

change visitation rules within

6:15

the hospitals themselves. Well, and we want

6:17

certain non-discrimination rights.

6:19

I don't know, if you're a complete degenerate

6:22

who has orgies all the time and

6:25

is living in this bizarre

6:27

arrangement where no one knows anybody's

6:29

sex and you're all doing weird stuff all the time

6:32

with multiple people, I

6:34

feel I should be able to discriminate

6:36

against you.

6:38

It discriminate meaning distinguish

6:40

from one thing to another. If

6:42

I got two candidates for a job, thank

6:44

goodness I'm not in the position to hire anybody

6:47

or the NLRB would probably be on my back already

6:50

before the end of this show. But if I were, I'm

6:52

just saying this hypothetically in principle, if

6:54

I were going to hire somebody

6:56

and I wanted to hire, I don't know,

7:00

a guy to look after my house. Someone

7:02

to look after my kids, let's say especially, but

7:05

let's say just someone to look after my property.

7:07

And I had two choices. I had a guy who was

7:09

an upright family man, married, took

7:12

care of his responsibilities, went

7:14

to church on Sunday,

7:16

said just a good guy all

7:18

around. And then I've got this other guy who doesn't

7:20

know that he's a guy and who's constantly

7:23

engaging in weird bacchanals and orgies

7:26

and is just so hyper-focused

7:29

on sex and porn and obscenity that's

7:31

the only thing that goes between one ear

7:33

and the other that's basically melted his brain. Which

7:36

person do you think is gonna be more responsible

7:39

to do the job? Which person is going to have a better

7:41

grasp on reality and

7:43

morality and the

7:46

way that people are supposed to behave?

7:48

But according to Somerville,

7:51

Massachusetts, you're not

7:53

allowed to even perceive

7:55

that distinction. Haven't

7:58

we gone a little bit far? Wouldn't

8:00

you say there's a little bit of drift

8:03

here from,

8:05

hey, don't unjustly discriminate against

8:07

the El Salvadorian over

8:09

the

8:10

Italian or something,

8:12

versus, hey, don't

8:14

discriminate between people

8:17

who can't even understand the difference between men and women to

8:19

say nothing of the fundamental political structure. If

8:22

you cannot

8:23

discriminate on

8:26

the basis of what

8:28

people think a family is, then

8:30

what you're saying is you can't discriminate

8:34

on the fundamental political structure, because that's

8:36

the basic political unit. But

8:39

the libs are discriminating. Of

8:41

course the libs are discriminating. If you think that marriage

8:43

is and family is what it always has been, you're

8:46

out, man.

8:47

Your views are not accepted anymore.

8:50

You will be discriminated against in the

8:52

culture and through the law.

8:55

And what will be discriminated for

8:58

is going to be Mick's night

9:01

with his 17 partners and their 22 partners and

9:04

the billy goat. Not good, okay? It doesn't

9:07

make our culture look good. Now when you wanna look good, you

9:09

gotta check out GenuCell.

9:12

Right now go to genucell.com slash nulls.

9:14

Did you know our friends over at GenuCell have upgraded

9:16

their most popular package to feature their

9:18

top-selling, deep-firming vitamin C serum

9:21

plus ultra-retinol moisturizer with

9:23

natural retinol alternative? Right

9:25

now

9:26

you can take advantage of this limited-time package

9:29

upgrade for 70% off.

9:32

Why waste time and money to go

9:34

get work done on your face when you can

9:36

get GenuCell skincare shipped right to your door?

9:39

Here is a GenuCell.com review from Robert

9:42

in Blessing, Texas. Quote, I purchased GenuCell

9:44

as a gift for my girlfriend. She said she saw the

9:46

results so fast. Her skin is noticeably

9:49

softer and smoother. I can see and feel a difference

9:51

too. She was already beautiful

9:53

and GenuCell has made her more beautiful. And

9:55

I'll tell you, I assumed GenuCell, I

9:58

figured it was just for the girls, right? No, it turns out.

9:59

Actually, guys tend to use it even more

10:02

than women do. We just don't like to admit it. Great company,

10:04

fabulous product, and the founder

10:07

is a great guy, Coptic Christian from Egypt, who

10:09

came over here for the American dream. Go

10:11

to GenuCell.com slash Knowles. Try GenuCell's

10:14

most popular package for 70% off, featuring

10:17

both GenuCell's Ultra Retinol and

10:19

GenuCell's Firming Serum. Get a complimentary

10:21

Spa Essentials box with every package order,

10:24

plus free upgrade to priority shipping. That is

10:26

GenuCell.com slash Knowles. GenuCell.com

10:29

slash K-N-O-W-L-E-S.

10:32

Speaking of slippery slopes,

10:35

some good news on this front. Bud

10:38

Light continues to

10:40

collapse. This is now, I think,

10:42

the fifth week in a row.

10:45

Retail data from Bump Williams Consulting and Nielsen

10:48

IQ

10:49

indicate that Bud

10:51

Light sales have declined 23.6% in

10:55

the week ending May 6th relative to the

10:57

same period last year.

10:59

This is an even worse decline

11:02

than for the week ending

11:03

April 29th,

11:05

which was an even worse decline than the week before, and

11:07

the week before, and the week before.

11:10

Not only is Bud Light dealing with

11:12

this decline in sales, but the other

11:15

trans-Heiser Bush companies are also

11:17

dealing with this decline in sales. Budweiser,

11:19

Bud Heavy sales have fallen 11.4%,

11:24

the week ending April 29th, 9.7%, the week ending May 6th.

11:28

Michelob Ultra fell 4.3%, 2.9%, respectively. Natty

11:32

Light has

11:34

fallen 5.2% and 2.5%, respectively.

11:38

So

11:39

all of those companies are feeling the downstream

11:42

effects of Bud Light.

11:43

They continue to lose ground, though

11:46

at

11:46

least for them it seems to be leveling off.

11:49

For Bud Light,

11:50

not only are they losing sales massively,

11:54

it's still getting worse. It shows

11:57

no sign of letting up. Conservatives are

11:59

showing no sign of letting up.

11:59

showing no sign

12:01

of giving up.

12:03

Bud Light is not the only company going pro-trans.

12:05

Obviously, we'll get to Starbucks India in just

12:07

a moment.

12:09

But this is a message. This to

12:11

me feels a little bit different than other times

12:13

that conservatives have pushed back a little bit against

12:15

the culture.

12:17

And the reason for that is that conservatives are

12:19

keeping it up. I think Bud Light

12:21

is just kind of done.

12:25

Bud Light could fix it, of course. Bud Light, if

12:27

the CEO came out and just apologized

12:29

and said, sorry, we don't support the trans stuff. It's

12:32

obviously a false anthropology. Sorry

12:34

to offend you guys. Please buy our product

12:37

again. We're going to put John Wayne on the can. Forget

12:39

about Dylan Mulvaney. We'll put John Wayne on the can.

12:41

I think people would go back and buy it. But

12:43

Bud Light can't do it. This

12:46

is the point that I was making with

12:48

ESG and DEI

12:51

and

12:52

the international institutions

12:55

like GARM that are partnered

12:57

with the World Economic Forum, that are

12:59

partnered with all of the woke

13:02

asset managers that are investing

13:04

on the basis not just of what is going

13:07

to increase profits to shareholders and not just

13:09

what's going to please customers, but what is

13:11

going to appease the radicals

13:13

who are writing these

13:15

ideological prescriptions for businesses.

13:18

Bud Light is caught between a rock and a hard place

13:22

because the more they appease the radicals

13:24

who write the rules for the industry

13:27

and for their company,

13:29

the less the customers are going to like it. The

13:31

more the customers like their product, the less the woke-minded

13:35

investors are going to like the product. So

13:37

what are they going to do? They can't apologize. If

13:40

they could, they would have by now.

13:42

But they feel that they

13:44

cannot. The other thing that's really

13:46

great about this story and people aren't focusing on it too

13:48

much is how much this has damaged the

13:50

Dylan Mulvaney brand.

13:52

Yes, he's still getting partnerships. Yes,

13:54

he's still getting sponsorships.

13:56

But

13:57

I think companies are going to think twice now.

14:00

If one picture of this dude

14:02

on one can of Bud Light

14:05

was able to destroy the most

14:07

popular beer in America, and conservatives

14:10

are not giving up on it, that is going to make, maybe

14:12

not make-up companies, maybe not niche companies,

14:15

but that is going to make

14:17

normal big mainstream

14:19

companies think twice before giving

14:23

that guy any attention or any

14:26

money. And that is a very, very good

14:28

thing. We need to make this ideology,

14:30

well it is not that we need to make it toxic

14:33

for advertisers. It is

14:36

a toxic ideology. We just

14:38

need to

14:39

demonstrate. We need to get it through the skulls

14:42

of the advertising executives

14:43

to see how toxic the ideology

14:46

of transgenderism really is.

14:49

Speaking of the relationship between

14:51

leftism

14:52

and business, Elon

14:55

Musk continues to

14:58

speak more and more clearly on political

15:00

issues. He is going after George

15:02

Soros, who is one of the biggest funders of

15:05

leftist causes, and he is one of the clearest

15:09

and most coherent in his radicalism.

15:12

And because he is such a big hedge fund guy, he

15:14

is able to fund a lot of those issues. Not

15:16

just a few bucks to Joe Biden here and

15:18

there, but funding for instance a plan

15:21

to install radical DAs in major

15:23

American cities and then not prosecute crime.

15:25

Really clever, really effective kind of left-wing

15:28

activism. So

15:29

because he is so effective and because he has got such

15:31

deep pockets and because he is

15:33

so radical, the Libs hate it when we call

15:36

him out. Elon does not care. Elon is going after

15:38

George Soros and the

15:40

liberal establishment, the guys on CNBC, they are

15:43

begging him, they are saying, please Elon,

15:45

please stop talking about George Soros.

15:47

We

15:48

cannot allow you to do that. You

15:51

tweeted this thing about George Soros. Well,

15:54

I am looking for it because I want to make sure I quote it properly.

15:57

I mean, you know what you wrote, but you basically...

15:59

I just made my betos. It's like, you know, calm down people.

16:02

This is not like made up of a pivotal case out of me. You

16:04

also, you said he wants to

16:06

erode the very fabric of civilization and

16:09

Sora's hates humanity. Like when you do

16:11

something like that, do you think about it? Yeah, I think that's

16:13

true. That's my opinion. Okay, but why share it? Why

16:15

share it? Especially because, I mean,

16:18

why share it when people who buy Teslas

16:20

may not agree with you, advertisers on

16:22

Twitter may not agree with you. Why

16:25

not just say, hey, I think this. You can tell me. We

16:28

can talk about it over there. We can tell your friends,

16:29

but why share it widely? I

16:33

mean, this is freedom

16:35

of speech. I'm allowed to say what I want to say. You absolutely are,

16:37

but I'm trying to understand why you do because you have to

16:39

know it's got a, it puts

16:41

you in the middle of a, the partisan

16:44

divide in the country. It makes you a lightning

16:46

rod for criticism. I mean, do you like that?

16:50

You know, people today saying he's an anti-Semite.

16:52

I don't think you are. No, I'm definitely not. I'm

16:54

like a pro-Semite, if anything.

16:58

That's a threat. Notice

17:01

it's not an argument. It's not that the liberal establishment

17:03

typified by that CNBC guy. They're

17:07

not saying, well, here's where you were wrong on the facts, Elon.

17:10

Or actually, George Soros doesn't fund any left-wing

17:12

causes. Or actually, fact

17:14

check. No, it's not an argument.

17:18

The guy's admitting, yeah, okay,

17:20

fine. Your points might be true.

17:23

But why say it? Why

17:25

are you saying it? Some

17:28

investors might not like it if you say that.

17:31

Elon, now look, maybe it's true,

17:33

but some advertisers might not like that.

17:36

They, actually, you know what they might do?

17:38

Now, I would never do this, Elon. Not me.

17:41

Look, I'm your buddy, Elon. But they

17:43

might call you an anti-Semite

17:46

if you keep talking out about

17:48

the guys who fund all the liberal causes.

17:52

You might, anti-Sem, what the hell? Where'd

17:54

you get anti-Semite from? They might

17:56

call you a racist, Elon. They

17:58

might call you a bigot.

17:59

In America, the worst

18:02

thing that you can be called is

18:04

a racist. Anti-Semitism

18:07

is one shade of

18:10

racism. And George

18:12

Soros is Jewish, so he said, well, that's the way

18:14

we're gonna do it. If George

18:16

Soros, if the big funder of

18:18

this particular kind of radicalism were

18:21

black, he would have said, we wouldn't wanna be called an anti-black

18:24

racist, would you?

18:26

Or it doesn't even

18:28

have to necessarily be about race. If the big

18:30

funder were a homosexual, you wouldn't

18:32

wanna be called a homophobe,

18:34

would you? If the big funder were a transvestite,

18:37

you wouldn't wanna be called a transphobe. It's

18:39

just a threat, there's no argument here. He's not

18:41

saying, Elon, you're wrong on

18:44

the points. He's saying, shut

18:46

up or we will ruin your business and take

18:49

all your money away. And Elon,

18:51

to his credit, says, okay,

18:54

do your worst. See, you just

18:56

don't care. You

19:00

wanna share what you have to say. I'll

19:02

say what I wanna say, and if

19:05

the consequence of that is losing money, so be it. Okay.

19:10

Great answer.

19:11

First of all,

19:13

just tactically, I think this is a great answer

19:15

even to preserve his wealth,

19:17

because it shows confidence, it shows

19:19

leadership, it shows a clear vision, it

19:22

shows this guy's not gonna be bullied by

19:24

some

19:26

cable news anchor, certainly. So

19:28

tactically, I think that's very effective, just

19:31

from a business standpoint.

19:34

But at a deeper level, Elon is totally

19:36

right. What Elon is saying here is,

19:39

look, I'm the richest guy in the world,

19:41

I've got all this power, I now own

19:43

one of the companies that controls speech in the public

19:45

square. I'm a powerful guy,

19:48

and you're all threatening me, and you're saying, if I don't tow

19:51

the line, then you're gonna try

19:53

to take some of my money away.

19:56

Well, if I tow the line, and

19:58

I don't wield my influence,

22:00

Good Ranchers.com, Good Ranchers American Meat

22:03

Delivered.

22:04

You know, despite the lackluster economy, the

22:06

Daily Wire is thriving. Not

22:08

only that, we are hiring. We are currently

22:11

looking for a video editor to join our fast-growing

22:13

post-production team. This person will get the opportunity

22:15

to work on a variety of content, including

22:18

our daily podcasts, long-form interviews, YouTube

22:20

videos, as well as shows such

22:22

as Ben Shapiro's Debunked, documentaries

22:24

from Jordan Peterson, and more. Four plus

22:26

years of professional video editing experience

22:29

and familiarity in working at a very

22:31

fast-paced environment with high turnaround

22:33

times is required.

22:34

Bonus points for experience

22:36

working on viral YouTube content. This is the perfect

22:39

role

22:39

for someone who can expertly follow standardized

22:42

video editing formats while also processing,

22:44

or rather, also possessing a strong

22:47

creative skillset. A link to your

22:49

reel is required for consideration. The

22:51

position is based in Nashville,

22:54

Tennessee, because obviously our exes are

22:57

in Texas. For more information

22:59

and to apply, visit dailywire.com slash

23:02

careers. That is dailywire.com

23:04

slash careers

23:06

today. Speaking

23:10

of money, people

23:14

who don't have money are being encouraged

23:16

to kill themselves in Canada. New

23:19

poll out. This is a result of

23:22

the National Post poll

23:24

in Canada. Shows that 28%

23:26

of Canadians approve of assisted

23:29

suicide

23:30

for homeless people. A

23:33

fifth of respondents said that medical

23:36

assistance in dying, which is the real

23:38

clinical jargony way of saying assisted

23:40

suicide, should be offered

23:43

as an option to anyone regardless of

23:46

medical or psychological condition. But

23:48

then a greater number than that, not quite a third,

23:50

but getting pretty close,

23:52

said that homeless people should

23:55

be permitted to kill themselves.

24:00

This always happens. I guess the theme of

24:02

the show today is the slippery slope, which is

24:04

always right. And you will hear philosophers

24:07

and you will hear social scientists, and you'll hear

24:09

politicians say, oh please, please stop

24:11

making those silly slippery slope

24:13

arguments. Why? I can barely make

24:15

a slippery slope argument right now because the wind is going

24:17

so fast in my face. Wind's going through

24:20

my hair. I'm going down that slide so fast.

24:23

This always happens. This is what happened in the

24:25

Netherlands. In the Netherlands, when they legalized

24:27

medical assistance in dying,

24:30

known as killing troubled people,

24:33

we were told this is only for a handful

24:36

of people. It's just for a handful of

24:38

very, very old people who are going to die within weeks,

24:41

days, hours, and they're in such terrible

24:44

pain. And I know we have palliative care, but let's forget

24:46

that for a second. That's not going to help my argument. We,

24:48

these people, they're begging to be

24:51

released from their pain, please.

24:53

As a compassionate person, you have to allow them

24:55

and respect their choice.

24:58

Okay, this convinced a lot of people who

25:00

didn't think too broadly about the issue. We'll

25:04

never open this up to a ... And then slowly,

25:06

the age requirements started being

25:08

lowered. The medical requirements

25:11

started being lowered. All of a sudden, people with

25:13

depression, just depression, not

25:16

terminal cancer, deeply painful, going to kill you

25:18

in three days. No, no, just a little bit depressed.

25:21

You could kill yourself. Then it came

25:24

for children, children

25:26

under the age of 12. Then

25:29

it came for the

25:32

handicapped, the disabled. Then

25:34

it came for the mentally ill. Then,

25:38

in the Netherlands, there was a woman who

25:40

had,

25:41

at an earlier stage, consented to dying.

25:43

And then a doctor came to her and said, Okay, you're ready to die?

25:46

Now that, you know, it's been a while, your condition

25:48

has progressed, so

25:51

I think it's time for you to die. And the woman said, Not

25:53

yet.

25:55

And then the doctor said, Nope, now's the time.

25:58

And he secretly ... Slipped her

26:01

and a more an abortion. That's

26:03

another way of dying a a Suicide

26:07

pill

26:08

in her coffee. She realized what was happening she said

26:10

spit it out was fighting was fighting back her family

26:12

ended up holding her down

26:14

as the rest of the

26:16

murder continued

26:19

In Canada now

26:21

3.3 percent of Canadians die by

26:23

assisted suicide. That's up in just one

26:26

year. That's up by almost 50 percent

26:28

from something like 2.4 percent You've

26:30

seen this now in the United States. You're always falling

26:33

down the slippery slope

26:36

Now we're just gonna kill the homeless now We're just gonna kill

26:38

the people who are inconvenient. They're a little bit of a burden

26:40

Oh, do you really you've got to go visit granny on Saturday?

26:43

Can't we just get this over with?

26:46

That's what happens. That's what happens to a society

26:48

that doesn't have a principle to hold

26:50

on to

26:51

something tangible to

26:54

Bring it back to the marriage example If

26:57

marriage is a discrete thing if

26:59

marriage is the union of a man and a woman For

27:02

the sake of the generation and education

27:05

of children if marriage is what it has always been

27:07

then

27:08

we have marriage But

27:10

if we can just pull

27:12

away at that bedrock moral

27:15

anthropological principle

27:17

Then marriage can be whatever the radicals

27:19

want it to be

27:21

if we can't if we can pull away at

27:23

the Commandment thou shalt

27:26

not commit murder If

27:30

we can pull away at the aspect of

27:32

natural law which tells

27:35

us about our Obvious right

27:37

and inclination to preserve ourselves The

27:42

radicals can redefine whatever they

27:44

want speaking of homeless people Or

27:47

people seeking new homes

27:50

the numbers are in on Biden's migrant surge

27:52

and

27:56

According to Alejandro Mayorkas

27:58

and the DHS There

28:00

was a record inflow on

28:03

May 17th.

28:05

During the month,

28:07

during all of this time, we've

28:09

got 137,374 migrants admitted.

28:16

And then

28:17

on top of that, you have roughly 40,000 new

28:20

migrants through the border in the days

28:22

just before May

28:23

11th. The April

28:25

inflow exceeded 135,211 migrants who were admitted in April of 2022.

28:30

Compare

28:34

that all to Donald Trump. You see the numbers going up under

28:37

Biden, especially in the last couple of weeks.

28:39

But

28:39

what does that mean? Is it up 5%, 10%, 20%?

28:44

Joe Biden's April 2023 inflow is 87 times as many

28:46

migrants as were admitted

28:48

into the country

28:55

on Trump's watch in April 2020. It's

28:59

not 20% higher, 50% higher, 100% higher, 200% higher, 300%, 400%, 500%. It's 87

29:09

times higher. Since

29:12

January of 2021, when Joe Biden took office,

29:15

the Biden administration has

29:17

admitted roughly 4.5 million

29:20

migrants across the southern border. We

29:22

lose sight of the scale of this

29:24

stuff.

29:25

So we think, OK, the libs get elected

29:27

and things get a little bit worse. The conservatives

29:30

get elected, things get a little bit better.

29:33

That totally denies

29:36

the radical difference in scale. There's

29:38

a difference in degree to the migration

29:41

problem that almost seems to be a difference

29:43

in kind. If you're talking about 87

29:45

times the number of people, that's very, very

29:47

different.

29:50

Joe Biden gets elected, we don't have a border.

29:52

Donald Trump gets elected, we overturn Roe

29:54

v. Wade and save hundreds of thousands of babies lives per

29:56

year. Those are very significant

29:59

differences.

29:59

differences.

30:01

In the past, it used to be, okay, one guy's

30:03

got a red tie, one guy's got a blue tie, whoever gets

30:06

elected, nothing really changes all that much. But we're

30:08

living in a much more polarized time. We're living in a time

30:10

when people don't know what marriage is, when people

30:12

don't know what an American is, when people

30:14

don't know what men and women are. And

30:17

so just necessarily

30:20

the swings that are going to occur

30:23

when one party gets elected or the other party gets elected

30:26

are going to be much, much greater. Even

30:28

with the bureaucracy and

30:30

other power centers in our society not

30:33

shifting based on those elections, even though it's just the elected

30:35

government and some of the appointed officials who shift,

30:39

the less your society agrees on

30:41

basic stuff, the wider the swings are

30:43

going to be and the less social order

30:46

and stability you are going to have.

30:49

Speaking of lawlessness,

30:50

the Supreme Court right now is going to

30:52

determine the fate of the abortion

30:55

pill in the U.S. Here

30:59

is what New Jersey Governor Phil Murphy

31:01

has to say about the prospect

31:04

of regulating a pill that kills babies.

31:06

If you get a bulk

31:10

order of mythopristone, would you

31:12

be then prescribing it out in

31:15

defiance of the Supreme

31:16

Court? To be

31:18

determined. When

31:21

I say everything is on the table, Katie, I mean

31:24

that. I think when you've got,

31:26

this is going to cost this action generally,

31:28

whether it's mythopristone or

31:30

whether it's North Carolina, South Carolina,

31:32

Florida, by the way, it's six weeks. My

31:35

wife and I don't think that we knew we were pregnant

31:37

with any of our four kids at six weeks.

31:41

So people need to understand that.

31:43

But this is going to cost people's lives. It's

31:46

going to cost them health. It's

31:48

also going to cost people's lives. Women

31:51

in particular, sadly. And so

31:53

that's what's at stake. We'll do

31:55

whatever it takes to save lives.

31:58

People's lives obviously are at stake.

31:59

when we're talking about a drug that kills

32:02

babies. People's lives are always at stake when

32:05

women take drugs that can kill their babies. That's

32:07

why it's being litigated. So it's not actually at

32:09

the level of the Supreme Court yet. It's

32:11

now just being litigated before federal court in

32:13

Louisiana. It seems like it's gonna make it all the way up

32:16

there.

32:17

And what does the New Jersey governor say? The

32:19

New Jersey governor says, okay, let's say

32:21

that in the future the Supreme Court makes its decision.

32:24

Let's see them enforce it. What

32:27

the New Jersey governor is saying is I will engage

32:29

in an insurrection. That's what it means. What's

32:31

an insurrection?

32:32

Insurrection is a violent uprising

32:35

against the established political order.

32:37

And what this guy is talking about

32:40

is violent because the very act

32:42

of taking this drug involves killing somebody,

32:45

killing

32:47

the type of person who is the most innocent

32:49

person in society,

32:50

a little tiny baby.

32:53

That's what the libs are saying.

32:56

That's a different kind of insurrection than

32:58

the one we saw on January 6th,

33:00

sorry.

33:02

January 6th, the

33:04

worst day in the history of our

33:06

country. Because on that day, which we're

33:09

told it's the most violent, horrific,

33:11

blood-soaked day in history, on that day,

33:13

some guy from Florida took a selfie sipping a

33:15

cord's light in the Capitol Rotunda and another

33:18

guy waved at a camera while holding Nancy

33:20

Pelosi's lectern.

33:22

And the only person who was killed was one of the Trump supporters

33:24

killed by a trigger-happy cop.

33:27

And in this case, we're talking about the governor

33:29

of New Jersey saying that

33:32

the Supreme Court

33:33

of the United States can go to hell. They're going to

33:36

keep killing babies willy-nilly sent in the feds.

33:40

The insurrection, much, much more

33:42

intense on the liberal side, as it always is,

33:44

as we saw during BLM, as we see with

33:47

leftist violence around the country.

33:50

That is not conducive to

33:53

civil order and political flourishing.

33:56

But we know this, speaking of political lawlessness,

33:59

what did we get?

33:59

this week we got the Durham investigation

34:02

which shows that not only was there no

34:04

basis for the government to spy on

34:06

Donald Trump's presidential campaign, not only

34:09

was there no basis for the entire liberal establishment,

34:11

including the media, to go after Trump as

34:13

a Putin stooge for years and years and try to undermine

34:16

not only his election, but also

34:18

his presidential administration. But we found

34:21

out this week that the CIA director was

34:23

in on it, the FBI director was in on it, the vice

34:25

president was in on it, the vice president

34:27

who is now the president of the United States, Joe Biden, and

34:29

the president himself, Barack Obama. They were

34:32

all in on it. So one

34:34

of the top dog Democrats to

34:36

push the Russia nonsense was this guy Adam

34:38

Schiff, this congressman from California. Here

34:41

I am in California right now in New Saline's

34:43

hellscape.

34:44

Adam Schiff, maybe not even so far down the

34:46

street.

34:48

And what is his answer on

34:51

being shown to be a complete

34:53

liar

34:55

on the Russia hoax? Here's what he has to say.

34:57

This is an investigation that started

35:00

in a flawed manner. It was conducted

35:02

in a flawed manner. And its conclusion

35:06

is a flawed conclusion. It

35:09

began a flawed way because this was

35:11

the result of Donald Trump badgering

35:13

Bill Barr to investigate the investigators.

35:16

So it was brought really with no predicate,

35:18

except this is what Donald Trump was demanding.

35:21

And this is what Bill Barr wanted to have

35:23

undertaken. So we have four

35:25

years of wasted effort

35:28

and worse than that, we have four years, I think, of

35:30

undermining the

35:32

department in a political prosecution.

35:35

Adam Schiff, I don't think

35:37

he's Italian, but he's clearly learned a lesson

35:40

from those New York Italians on the other side of the country.

35:42

Deny till you die. That's

35:45

his answer.

35:47

Congressman Schiff, what do you make of the fact that

35:49

this long years long investigation

35:51

into the origins of the of the Russia

35:54

investigation showed that

35:57

it was all fake and it was all cooked up and we

35:59

have on the run.

35:59

the biggest leaders in your party and in

36:02

the government

36:03

cooking it all up. I

36:07

suppose my answer to that would be, la

36:09

la la la la, can't hear

36:11

you, la la la la la. That's

36:13

his answer. His answer, oh, the special counsel investigation,

36:16

yeah, it was always flawed, it's fake.

36:19

Don't look here, nothing to see here, move

36:21

along, move along. And this is actually

36:23

the best shot

36:25

that Democrats have.

36:27

Anything, I'm getting past the Durham report. The

36:30

best shot they have, the

36:33

best shot they have of maintaining their political influence

36:35

and not seeing the pendulum shift back

36:37

a little bit, is just to say, oh yeah, it's fake.

36:40

That Durham report, yeah, no, it's fake. John Durham, he's

36:42

bad, don't trust him, it's all, nope.

36:45

Don't believe your lying eyes. They

36:48

can't apologize. They actually

36:50

can't apologize, according

36:52

to their premises

36:55

in politics. And the reason they can't apologize

36:58

is because

36:59

apologies and grace

37:02

presuppose a shared theology. If

37:04

we had a shared religious view in the

37:06

United States, as we had from our

37:08

founding long before the 1776 founding, up

37:12

through just a few decades ago, if

37:14

we had that shared religion,

37:16

a politician could come out and say, hey, I'm sorry,

37:18

I got this wrong, please forgive me,

37:21

I'll try to do better next time. And

37:24

the politician would have had a shot at surviving.

37:26

We now live in an age

37:27

where much of the country

37:30

views itself as post-Christian,

37:32

which there's no such thing as post-Christian, that just means not

37:34

Christian.

37:36

And so in that kind of culture,

37:39

there is no grace, there is no mercy, there is no forgiveness.

37:44

Adam Schiff knows if he admits that he was wrong in any way, he's

37:47

done,

37:47

he's toast, it's like Kevin Spacey.

37:50

It's like any of the Me Too

37:52

movement people, the ones who

37:54

in any way acknowledged that they did

37:56

something wrong, which is, I don't know, every single

37:58

person in Hollywood.

37:59

The ones who admitted that,

38:02

their careers were over. And the ones who just stuck

38:05

by their story and they denied,

38:07

they're the ones who got to survive. Give

38:09

you a little tease for tomorrow, because I want to get to the most important

38:11

story, which is Starbucks, India,

38:14

Transing, everybody. But just a little

38:16

tease, we got some polls out on 2024.

38:18

President

38:22

Kofefe, who we were told could never possibly

38:24

win reelection. Donald Trump, he's

38:26

just gonna drive us all off a cliff.

38:30

His numbers are looking pretty great. I'll just leave

38:32

it there with that, because I want to get to a much more

38:34

important story than who is the President of the United States.

38:37

I want to get to

38:40

Transvestites in India. My favorite comment

38:42

yesterday is from K2BNY,

38:44

who says, I

38:47

thought the Libs' favorite talking point was incoherent

38:49

screaming. It is, you're

38:51

right. The most articulate spokesman

38:54

for the Libs in recent years was that lady,

38:56

right after Trump got elected the first time, who

38:58

was staring at the sky and

39:00

she was screaming, no, no.

39:02

So you're right, that

39:04

is their favorite talking point. Okay, Starbucks, what

39:07

are you selling me? You

39:14

got a dad, he's calling his son,

39:16

Arpit. He's

39:19

looking kind of irritated. There's

39:22

Mama, looking over at her husband.

39:25

Listen, don't get angry this time, please. And

39:28

in walks a woman. Wait a second,

39:31

that woman looks a little weird. That

39:33

woman kind of looks like that dude that the dad was

39:35

just calling.

39:38

And then, wait a second, that woman, she's got kind

39:40

of broad shoulders. Okay,

39:42

dad, he's not

39:43

feeling it. But

39:48

you still mean the world to me. And

39:52

then dad is there. He

39:56

misses his son. Go, Fi. Even if his

39:58

son's wearing a dress. Three

40:01

coffee coffee for Arpita. Do you want coffee? Three

40:05

coffee for Arpita. Arpit

40:09

is the man's name you see. But

40:11

Arpita is the girl's name. The

40:15

dad says for me you're still my kid.

40:18

Only a letter has got added to your name.

40:20

Something

40:24

got subtracted to by the way. That's

40:27

the grizzlier part. Letter was added.

40:30

So we had one letter added and then we had some

40:32

other body parts

40:34

subtracted. So on the whole, same person.

40:37

Okay. Starbucks India. I'd

40:40

be curious to see what kind of commercial Starbucks

40:42

Pakistan is putting out. Do

40:44

you think Starbucks Pakistan is putting out the pro-trans

40:47

commercials? I'm a

40:49

little bit skeptical of that. But

40:52

in the West and in more pro-Western

40:55

countries, even in the subcontinent, in

40:58

India

40:59

you see this pro-trans

41:02

propaganda.

41:03

The most jarring

41:05

part of this commercial to me

41:07

is this man who

41:10

now thinks he's a woman

41:11

saying hey dad I know it's been years.

41:15

I know it's been years. What does that mean? Does

41:17

it mean this guy hasn't talked

41:19

to his father for years? I don't care what

41:22

dress you're wearing or what delusions

41:24

you're entertaining.

41:26

That's wrong. That's not a nice thing to do.

41:29

Not a nice thing to just not talk to your father

41:31

for years.

41:32

So the father here, you really

41:35

feel for the guy because he's sitting there. His

41:38

son is engaging in

41:39

bizarre deviant and destructive

41:42

sexual behavior.

41:44

But he loves his son and he wants to have

41:46

a relationship with his son. So he says okay I guess

41:48

I have to lie.

41:49

I guess the only option I'm left with right now

41:52

that this culture is leaving me with is

41:54

I've got to just lie and go tell

41:56

the barista to get me three coffees for Arpita.

41:59

Okay, and now I lied, and now my son will

42:02

accept me again, and now we can all sit

42:04

and talk. It is so

42:06

sad. It

42:08

reminds me of that clip from Family Guy

42:11

where Quagmire's dad is

42:13

a transvestite, and he's sitting at a bar, and

42:16

the bartender comes up and says, excuse me, ma'am, you can't

42:19

look at pornography on your phone

42:21

at the bar.

42:23

It's just there, he's just watching porn at the bar. So

42:25

you can't do that, we don't allow that at this bar.

42:27

And then Quagmire's dad, who is

42:29

dressed like a woman, he says, no, no, you don't

42:31

understand, I'm trans.

42:33

And then the bartender says, oh, okay, in that case, do

42:35

whatever you want. You can just do whatever

42:37

you want, and you'll never be held accountable for anything

42:40

because you have a delusional perception

42:42

of yourself.

42:43

Okay, that's fine. That's

42:46

where we are. As though if you can

42:49

claim this

42:50

defect of perception,

42:53

then you can get away with anything. You

42:56

can get away with murder, okay? In

42:59

the eyes of the media, you literally can get away with murder.

43:03

That seems

43:05

wrong, doesn't it? In the old culture,

43:07

what we would have done

43:09

is we would have said, hey, Arpita,

43:13

no, you're a

43:15

man.

43:17

And no, I know you're doing bad things, and

43:19

you've done some bad things, in part because

43:21

of your defective perception, so we're gonna fix

43:23

your perception.

43:25

And in our modern culture, what do we do?

43:28

We say, if you wanna be a good person, you wanna get along

43:30

in society at all,

43:32

you wanna be allowed to function even according to the law,

43:35

oh, you just have to lie.

43:37

Write Arpita in the cup of coffee, and then

43:40

you're

43:40

fine.

43:41

Also, in more trans

43:44

pop culture news, because even as the

43:46

people recoil against transgenderism,

43:49

even as Pew Research shows that 60% of Americans

43:51

recognize that transgenderism is fake, even

43:54

as Bud Light continues to lose

43:56

market cap and sales.

43:59

Still,

44:01

companies are peddling transgenderism because

44:04

the ideologues who hold on

44:06

to the purse strings, they continue to push it. Now

44:10

for a pride ad,

44:12

some dudes are modeling women's bathing

44:14

suits for Adidas.

44:15

Okay, there, okay, you get the picture. I don't

44:17

need, we don't need to see anymore. I've seen enough, I've

44:20

seen enough. I'm not even totally

44:22

opposed, in theory,

44:25

to men wearing bathing suits that look

44:27

somewhat like this

44:28

because that's what men did in the 1920s in

44:31

really old-timey beach bathing suits. But they shouldn't

44:33

be wearing these kind of thong-like, it should

44:35

be full-body bathing suits,

44:37

like the Burkini almost, but for men. I

44:40

could understand that, but that's not what's going on here. The

44:42

suits are stylized to be

44:45

as womanly

44:46

as possible, and

44:49

then the dudes who are being picked to model

44:51

them are fairly masculine.

44:53

These are intentionally masculine-looking dudes,

44:56

and it's just to shove it in your face.

44:59

It's just to beat you down into submission.

45:01

The purpose of these commercials is not,

45:04

as the transgenderists would pretend, to

45:06

convince you that these dudes are actually chicks.

45:09

The purpose of these commercials is to shove

45:11

right in your face that these are dudes. They

45:13

are so obviously dudes, and to force

45:15

you to lie.

45:17

And they say this is all for Pride Month. Here

45:19

we go, we got another month. I told you,

45:21

you know I hate to say I told you so. You know

45:24

those slippery slope fallacies. They're always

45:26

so fallacious, but what happened? Back

45:28

when Pride Day was a day,

45:32

we all said, you know, this is gonna spread. And

45:34

then Pride Day became Pride Week, and then Pride

45:36

Week became Pride Month, and that was the month

45:38

of June. But June wasn't enough. So

45:41

then the LGBT element

45:43

of people, they took October.

45:47

October became LGBT History Month.

45:50

So now that meant that the LGBT

45:53

movement had one sixth of the calendar year.

45:55

But I don't know if you've checked your calendars recently. It's

45:57

not June yet, it's May.

45:59

It's mid-May

46:01

and we're already seeing all of the Pride stuff, which

46:03

means that the LGBT element of Pete, they

46:05

have colonized one quarter of the year

46:08

and they are showing no signs of stopping.

46:11

We are headed toward Pride year. We are headed

46:13

toward Pride

46:15

perpetuity.

46:16

That's where we are. Get your bathing

46:18

suits ready, fellas.

46:21

Now we've got a lot more show coming up. But this is

46:23

only for the Krem de la Krem. This is only for the

46:25

inner circle of people, not you hoi polloi

46:27

out there on YouTube and elsewhere. This

46:29

is for the people who are Daily Wire members. If you're not a member yet,

46:32

head

46:32

on over to dailywire.com slash

46:35

Knolls. Use code Knolls, K-N-O-W-L-L-E-S,

46:38

and check out for two months free on all

46:41

annual plans.