0:00

Today, the Matt Walsh show Disney decides that Peter pan is not appropriate for young children due to its racism.

0:05

We seem to develop some very strange ideas in our culture about what is and is not appropriate for kids.

0:10

So we'll talk about that. Also five headlines, including Milo coming out as ex-gay the left says he's not allowed to do that.

0:16

Apparently. And a New York times journalist says online harassment has destroyed her life and our daily cancellation.

0:23

We'll talk about the famous musician who apologized and stepped down from his band.

0:27

After committing the sin of reading a book, all of that, and more today on the Matt Walsh show,

0:39

We're running a business. One of the things that can really kill you, one of the issues that's gonna be the most difficult to deal with in business owners will tell you this is, is HR issues.

0:47

HR issues can kill you. Wrongful termination suits, minimum wage requirements, labor regulations, and HR manager salaries.

0:53

On top of it. Aren't cheap and average salary is about $70,000 a year.

0:57

It's a lot of money that you're dishing out.

0:59

As a business owner, Bambi spelled B a N B E was created specifically for small businesses.

1:04

You can get a dedicated HR manager, craft HR policy, maintain your compliance all for just $99 a month.

1:10

With Bambi, you can change HR from your biggest liability to your biggest strength.

1:13

Your dedicated HR manager is available by phone email, real-time chat.

1:17

They're there for you. They can do what you need done from onboarding determinations.

1:20

They customize your policies to fit your business.

1:23

This is not a cookie cutter approach.

1:25

This is customized, and they're doing all this for just $99 a month, month to month.

1:30

No hidden fees. Cancel anytime. So go to bambi.com/walsh right now to schedule your free HR audit.

1:36

That's bambi.com/walsh, spelled B a M B e.com/walsh.

1:43

It has, of course been decided by the people who decide these things that the issue most urgently requiring our attention right now is that offensive cartoons even, or especially cartoons that have been around for decades and never really offended anyone until right now, we have now a new salvo in this newly launched war on animated characters.

2:03

Kate tla.com has the story. It says Disney plus has removed several movies, including Dumbo, Peter pan, the Arista cats and Swiss family Robinson from children's profiles on its service over negative depictions and stereotypes.

2:15

The Walt Disney company had previously placed content warnings on the films for quote, negative depictions and or mistreatment of people and people and cultures in October.

2:23

But now it has removed access to the films by children under seven, according to T KTL LA sister station WTO in Rockford, Illinois, adults with Disney plus accounts can still access the films with the content warnings, which appear on screen for about 10 to 12 seconds before the unedited content that advisory reads in part, this program includes negative depictions and or mistreatment of people or cultures.

2:45

These stereotypes were wrong then and are wrong now, rather than remove this content.

2:48

We want to acknowledge its harmful impact, learn from it and spark a conversation to create a more inclusive future together.

2:56

Okay. Now, any confused users of the streaming are sent to the stories matter page on their website to learn more about why children under seven must be insulated from this objectionable content.

3:08

If you're curious, the explanation they give for Peter pan is this is what they say.

3:12

The film portrays native people in a stereotypical manner that reflects neither the diversity of native peoples nor their authentic cultural traditions.

3:21

It shows them speaking in an unintelligible language and repeatedly refers to them as Redskins and offensive term, Peter and the lost boys engage in dancing, wearing head dresses and other exaggerates Rose.

3:31

Peter pan in the lost boys are culturally appropriating those little bastards.

3:37

I mean, literally they're bastards.

3:39

Anyway, this is a, this is a big problem.

3:42

You know, you have to admit, you don't want the movie about a magical boy who flies around with a ferry named Tinkerbell and fights a pirate whose hand was eaten by a crocodile with a clock in its belly to have any absurd or silly depictions of native Americans.

3:54

I mean, well, the depiction of everyone in the movie is absurd and silly.

3:58

It's a cartoon that used to be like the whole point of a cartoon.

4:04

Everyone is a caricature.

4:06

Everyone is ridiculous.

4:08

All of the depictions are cartoonish because again, it's a cartoon.

4:15

Why looking for authenticity in an animated film made for kids in 1953, but this is a reasonable question and you cannot expect reasonable answers in an age of unreason, by the way, it's worth noting.

4:29

The reason that's Swiss family Robinson had to be removed from the sight of children.

4:34

Disney says the pirates who antagonize the Robinson family are portrayed as a stereotypical foreign menace, many appear in yellow face or Brown face and our costume and an exaggerated and inaccurate manner with top-notch hairstyles, robes, and overdone, facial makeup and jewelry reinforcing their barbarism and otherness inaccurate and inaccurate representation of whom exactly for my memory of the movie.

4:59

And it's been a long time I admit, but these are just generic pirates with no specified cultural background.

5:05

And if the foreign pirates and Swiss family Robinson representing foreign menace, then why aren't we castigating Peter pan because of captain hook representing a white man, again, reasonable questions, unreasonable age.

5:20

Now, people who are determined to miss the point or distract from it will respond to all of this with a kind of a scoff and say, well, why do you care so much about these cartoons?

5:29

Why are you making such a big deal about it?

5:32

The answer of course is that I am not the one making a big deal about it.

5:37

I made nothing at all out of Peter pan or Dr.

5:39

Seuss or Pepe Le Pew or any of the rest of it.

5:41

These are innocent and harmless things that I enjoyed as a child and my children enjoy.

5:47

Now, that's the extent of the deal I made out of it.

5:51

I never thought never gave Peter panacea thought.

5:54

I'm not the one doing that.

5:56

It is Disney and the media and the left generally that have decided to make an issue out of these things.

6:02

They're the ones who decided to find deep, moral significance and all these different things.

6:07

But here the left again pulls its favorite maneuver, which I'm always pointing out.

6:11

They make a mountain out of a molehill and then accused us of blowing everything out of proportion.

6:15

When we simply object to their blowing it out of proportion, the other counterpoint will be that that will be made about this latest development with Disney is that the films can still be viewed.

6:27

You know, your child can still watch them.

6:30

They haven't been erased, right?

6:31

They're just not on the children's profiles.

6:33

They're, they're being put behind kind of a parental filter.

6:38

Okay? Well, to that, I respond in two ways. Number one for now, for now, Peter pan still exists, but anyone who's been paying the slightest bit of attention already knows where this is headed given another few months, and these films will be taken out of circulation entirely.

6:53

I don't need to look into the future to know that guaranteed that will happen after all Disney has itself said that the movies are hateful and racist.

7:03

Disney is saying that for now.

7:06

They hope to have their woke cake and eat it too, labeling their own content racist, but still making money off of it.

7:12

But that's not going to last for long.

7:14

They can't last for long.

7:15

The precedent has already been set a number to that.

7:22

And by the way, just backing up there for a minute.

7:24

What's what's going to, if I, if I were to try to look into the future a little bit, I think what's going to happen is you're going to start having retail outlets that say, well, we're not going to carry Peter pan, you know, merchandise anymore.

7:38

We're not going to sell the kids book bag with the Peter pan image on it because it's, it's from a racist movie.

7:44

And you know, someone's some big retail outlets going to say that target or somebody.

7:48

And then when that happens, then Disney is going to take all those movies away because then there's no reason for them to have them the way they make their money on something like Peter pan is through the merchandise.

7:59

If they can't sell the merchandise anymore, then, then there's no reason to, and then they'll take their stand and say, you know what, actually, this stuff is totally hateful.

8:07

We're not going to let you watch it at all.

8:08

So that's the first point.

8:10

Second, the main point is it's not that the movies aren't available, the main point isn't even about these specific movies or Dr.

8:20

Seuss or Looney tunes.

8:22

There's a larger principle at work here.

8:24

A number of larger principles that matter one of them is this as a culture, we are adopting a very backwards inverted idea about the nature of childhood and what sort of things are appropriate for children as has been pointed out many times by myself and others, the very people who have panic over the objectionable content in innocent children's cartoons will defend with passionate intensity, the sewage spewed into our kids' ears and minds by modern pop artists and modern pop culture.

8:53

Generally they'll us for worrying that 12 year old girls are listening to songs like wop while in the next breath, insisting that great damage is being done to these same children by like a cartoon French skunk.

9:05

This

9:05

reveals

9:05

a

9:05

deep

9:05

confusion

9:05

about

9:05

what

9:05

sorts

9:05

of

9:05

things

9:05

children

9:05

are

9:05

equipped

9:05

to

9:05

handle

9:05

what

9:05

kind

9:05

of

9:05

content

9:05

they

9:05

can

9:05

process

9:05

mentally

9:05

and

9:05

what

9:05

they

9:17

can't. And if I'm wrong about any of that, I'm only wrong in calling this the result of confusion rather than, rather than a deliberate effort to subvert and corrupt our children.

9:26

And in fact, let me back up and say, I was wrong about that.

9:29

It's not confusion. It is deliberate, but it gets worse.

9:33

Consider that Disney is a full-on proponent and advocate for gender theory.

9:38

What this means is that the company believes and many on the left belief that a five-year-old is old enough to choose his own gender, but not old enough to watch Peter pan a boy in kindergarten has the mental capacity to become a girl.

9:55

If he, if he so chooses, but does not have the capacity to watch Swiss family Robinson.

9:59

The

9:59

goal

9:59

here

9:59

is

9:59

to

9:59

entirely

9:59

alter

9:59

our

9:59

view

9:59

of

9:59

childhood

9:59

innocence

9:59

so

9:59

that

9:59

they

9:59

can

9:59

destroy

9:59

childhood

9:59

innocence

9:59

without

9:59

us

10:12

noticing. That's the point.

10:12

If

10:12

they

10:12

get

10:12

us

10:12

focusing

10:12

on

10:12

something

10:12

else,

10:12

if

10:12

they

10:12

get

10:12

us

10:12

focusing

10:12

on

10:12

protecting

10:12

the

10:12

innocence

10:12

of,

10:12

of

10:12

our

10:12

kids

10:12

with

10:12

regards

10:12

to

10:12

Peter

10:12

pan

10:12

and

10:12

Looney

10:12

tunes

10:12

and

10:12

all

10:12

this

10:12

kind

10:12

of

10:12

totally

10:12

innocuous

10:12

stuff,

10:12

then

10:12

they

10:12

can

10:12

set

10:12

out

10:12

doing

10:12

their,

10:12

you

10:12

know,

10:12

corrupting

10:12

our

10:30

kids. And we're not going to notice because we're going to feel like, well, you know, we were really Manning the Fort here and then w we were protecting our kids because we're making sure they don't watch Peter pan, if all goes to plan.

10:42

And it is so far, they'll have a generation of children who are emotionally and psychologically destroyed, corrupted beyond recognition.

10:50

And all of the adults will look at these kids and see what they've done and what they've allowed to happen, and still feel proud because at least the kids were protected from Dr.

11:03

Seuss and Peter pan.

11:05

Let's

11:05

get

11:05

down

11:05

to

11:05

our

11:05

five

11:08

headline.

11:15

Before we get to five headlines, you know, hiring as a business owner, finding a right candidate, hiring someone, the person, finding the person you're looking for and hiring them can be very complicated.

11:24

So what you have to do is take advantage of places that make it easier for you to take advantage of the services.

11:29

They're going to take some of that burden off your shoulders.

11:31

You've got enough to deal with already finding great candidates to hire.

11:33

It could be like trying to find a needle in a haystack.

11:36

Sure. You can post your job to some job board, but then all you can do is hope the right person comes along, which is why you should try ZipRecruiter for free at ziprecruiter.com/walsh.

11:44

ZipRecruiter does the work for you when you post a job on ZipRecruiter, it gets sent out to over a hundred top job sites with one click.

11:51

Then ZipRecruiter's magic technology finds people with the right skills and experience for your job and actively invites them to apply.

11:57

You get qualified candidates fast.

12:00

You're not just putting it out there into the ether and hoping that someone finds it.

12:03

So while other services may overwhelm you with applications and sift through ZipRecruiter finds you what you're looking for, the needle in the haystack.

12:09

And right now you can try ZipRecruiter for free at ziprecruiter.com/walsh.

12:12

That's

12:12

ziprecruiter.com/w

12:12

a

12:12

L

12:12

S

12:17

H. Just go to ziprecruiter.com/walsh, ZipRecruiter, the smartest way to hire.

12:23

Number one, there's a crisis on the border there.

12:25

Well, there's always been a crisis. It's worse now, a surge of illegals coming over, flooding the system ending up in cages.

12:31

I mean, not cages. What are we calling detainment facilities?

12:36

It's almost like all of this could have been predicted almost.

12:42

It, it, it, it all, it always seems to happen with Democrats.

12:44

That's why maybe you could predict it. Cause this is the way it always goes.

12:46

If you send the message that you're weak on border security and immigration enforcement, you'll end up with a lot more illegal immigration to enforce or to not enforce as the case may be.

12:56

So here's Jen Saki, I'm dodging.

12:59

I was going to say addressing the issue, but not so much addressing it as dodging it yesterday.

13:03

Let's watch The reports out there that the number of unaccompanied migrants detained at the border has tripled in the last two weeks to 3,200 plus, is that number accurate?

13:14

I'm not going to confirm numbers from here.

13:16

Obviously the department of Homeland security and others are oversee the programs and the engagements that happen at the border.

13:22

I will say that there are a couple of reasons.

13:24

I know I'm are asked about our kind of change in policy, but there are a couple of reasons why we think people are coming to the border.

13:31

Of course, individuals are fleeing countries where individuals and families are, you know, they're fleeing prosecution, fleeing violence, fleeing economic hardships, and other things.

13:41

The region has also experienced two hurricanes in the fall putting further stress on the conditions in these countries and the circumstances that are facing individuals.

13:50

And all of this is taking place during a global pandemic that has impacted other countries, economies, placing undue hardships on its people, just as it did in the United States.

13:58

So there are also a range of factors that are leading individuals to come to the border.

14:02

You confirm that number. That's a very important number.

14:05

I, I, we've been very clear that there is an increase that there are more children coming across the border than we have facilities for at this point in time, those numbers are tracked by the department of Homeland security.

14:17

So I'm certainly, I'm just suggesting that you talk to them about specifics from jumping woke from the numbers.

14:22

So she's not going to confirm, I, I, if I didn't hear her wrong, I th I think what she said, unless I miss her.

14:29

I think she said that the illegals are coming here to fleet, to fleet prosecution.

14:34

Is that what you said? Not British, or she meant persecution, but prosecution was a little bit of a Freudian slip there because in fact, as Donald Trump famously said, when he was announcing his campaign back in 2015 or 16, many of them that are coming here are so they are actually fleeing prosecution.

14:53

So if that's what you said, that was a, that was an example of accidentally telling the truth.

14:57

But when you think about this, you know, that the main thing I always go back to with the situation on the border, what annoys me the most.

15:04

And of course, we always get this from Democrats where all of their policies, even though their policies often lead to directly lead to immense human suffering, they still will say, it's a PA it's compassionate.

15:18

We're the compassionate ones.

15:20

We have the compassionate policies with immigration, or if the economy or anything else looking over all of the, just, just the, the devastation wrought by those same policies.

15:37

Now this is not compassion. We don't know what's happening at the border border right now.

15:42

It's not compassion to allow that to happen, to set the stage for that.

15:50

And in fact, probably I don't want to get splitting hairs too much, but probably we should move away from the word compassion when we're talking about policies in general, because really compassion.

16:00

And this is a word that's been, that's been overused to the point of, of, of meaninglessness, like so many other words, but the word compassion actually means CO's suffering.

16:08

That's what it means. And so, so what, what, what compassion actually means if you're really compassionate towards someone, it means that you're, you're suffering alongside them.

16:15

You're taking on, in some sense, they're suffering, you're doing something for them.

16:20

And, and so supporting a policy, whatever the policy is, that's not an act of compassion on your part because you don't have to do anything.

16:28

It requires no sacrifice on your, on your end, whatever your view is on immigration.

16:33

Most likely, it's just a view that you have.

16:35

It's, it's your opinion.

16:37

You're not actually most of us not actually doing anything one way or another.

16:41

So there's no compassion in supporting a policy.

16:43

That's the first thing. But so it's not really what, what policy is the most compassionate.

16:49

The question is what policy is.

16:51

We should be using words like the most prudent, what policy is the most wise, what policy is most likely to minimize human suffering.

17:04

So we can start thinking in those terms.

17:07

And it's pretty clear that having a border, protecting that border, enforcing our laws, that is going to be the most prudent, the most wise thing to do.

17:21

And it's in the, in the long run, going to most minimize human suffering.

17:25

All right. Number two, CBS brought out a trans journalist to talk about the issue of trans people in sports and the, the Republican state legislatures that are trying to bar men from women's sports, those bigots, how dare they actually, the CBS tweet where I found this video says Republicans in at least 25 States have introduced over 60 bills, targeting trans youth, limiting access to school, sports and gender affirming health care.

17:49

Now that's totally wrong in every way.

17:52

Every part of that is wrong.

17:54

This is the way it's framed by the media, but we hear, Oh, it's an anti-trans bill.

17:59

No, it's not. If anything, it's a pro woman, bill, a pro science bill, a pro sanity bill.

18:08

But it's also in no way, there, there are no bill.

18:11

So far as I'm aware, someone can correct me if I'm wrong.

18:14

I don't think there are any bills in the works in any state, anywhere that would stop trans people from competing in sports.

18:22

No one is trying to do that. I've never met any conservative advocates for that.

18:26

I've never talked to a single conservative who says, you know what? I think we should just, I think trans people shouldn't be allowed to compete in sports period.

18:34

No, if you're a biological male, however you identify, we're throwing up in the doors and saying, you are welcome to try out and compete over here with, with other biological males.

18:45

You're welcome in the bathroom with other biological males.

18:48

Well, we welcome all biological, but it doesn't matter how you identify.

18:51

So that's a very equitable policy.

18:54

Do you use the popular buzzword?

18:57

So that's completely wrong, but I'm speaking of being completely wrong in every way.

19:01

Here's what the reporter says about these policies.

19:04

So many of these bills, Orion center around transgender student athletes.

19:10

What's the argument for proponents of the bill, which attempt to exclude trans youth from teams that align with their gender identity.

19:18

And what evidence do they have if any, to support their claims.

19:22

I note that governor Kristi Noem of South Dakota has just recently introduced a bill.

19:30

Yes, exactly. Mississippi and South Dakota are the two States that look like they're going to pass these bills into law very soon.

19:38

But it's governors, both Republican governors have said that they plan to find these bills.

19:42

And the argument that lawmakers are bringing today is that transgender inclusion in cords that would harm women's equality would harm equality for girls.

19:53

But I would know that as the associated press, as reported, they talked to over 24 lawmakers and the majority of them failed to bring evidence, to actually find examples within their state to say, this has been a problem that we found students who say, this has been a problem.

20:10

That's not to say there is zero evidence as the lawsuit that I mentioned earlier, that it's three Connecticut high school runners said they were denied scholarship opportunities based on trans inclusion in sports.

20:24

Right? So what the question was, what happens do they have whatever it is do they do they possibly have that says that a quote, unquote, trans girls shouldn't be competing in female sports.

20:36

What, what, what, what evidence could they bring to the table?

20:38

I don't know a biology textbook.

20:41

That's all the evidence they really need.

20:44

I mean, I think they can still bring a biology textbook to the eventually the biology textbooks.

20:49

We'll, you know, we'll, we'll eventually those, those books will go on the burn pile to actual biology textbooks.

20:55

But as far as I know right now, kids are basically still taught human biology in school.

21:02

So that's it. That's, that's the evidence.

21:06

It's an obvious case of what you heard there, that the Republicans in most of these States, they haven't been able to bring evidence of girls really being harmed by these policies.

21:17

Well, if there's been no evidence of that, and that's not the evidence we need, but yet what would the evidence we need again, is, is simply the science of it to establish that girls are one thing.

21:27

Boys are another thing. These are two categories of people.

21:30

Boys have an unfair biological advantage in principle in girls sports.

21:34

That's why they don't belong. There. That's all the evidence you need. But in terms of evidence of girls being harmed by these policies as was admitted, there is some really compelling evidence of that, like in States like Connecticut, but in other States, if, if there are no examples of that yet it's because it hasn't happened yet.

21:49

And these laws are trying to stop it from happening.

21:53

The laws are looking to prevent this thing from happening.

21:57

The whole point is we don't want to wait for the damage to be done.

21:59

We don't want, we don't want to wait for a whole generation of girls to be deprived of athletic scholarships and all of that.

22:06

And then we can circle back and say, see, I told you, this is a foreseeable outcome.

22:12

And so we're going to prevent that outcome with these laws.

22:15

That's the point number three from the New York post, it says right-wing provocateur.

22:19

Milo Yiannopoulos says come out as ex-gay announcing that he would, would like to help rehabilitate what the media calls conversion therapy over the next decade.

22:28

According to the report, the 36 year old British political commentator declared himself no longer gay and quote, sodomy free in a, in an interview with life site news Yiannopoulos told the outlet that he is now leading a daily consecration online to St.

22:44

Joseph. Now it's been a lot of chatter about this online.

22:47

What I'll say is, first of all, the accusation is that this is all a giant troll on Milo's part.

22:55

That's all this is. He was he's looking for attention.

22:58

I think that could be it. I don't know how am I supposed to know?

23:03

But also that's the point?

23:06

How am I, how are you supposed to know?

23:09

The internet has simply declared, this is what they have declared.

23:11

When I say the internet, mostly the left, although not just the left, a lot of people in the right, too, from what I've seen on social media, what has been declared is that no, Milo is not allowed to do this.

23:21

He's just, he's not allowed to not be gay anymore.

23:24

He can't, he can't make that choice.

23:28

And we in the public, we know more about Milo's sexual orientation than he does.

23:34

That's the attitude from many in the public.

23:37

And it's ridiculous.

23:40

It also, of course, it's like, there's no point even, even, even making this observation, but I will.

23:46

The double standard here is, is quite quite apparent.

23:51

I thought, well, we've heard from the left for so long is, you know, someone's private life is their private life who, the people they choose to be in a sexual relationship with that.

24:02

That's up to them, right?

24:05

Consenting adults.

24:07

So who are you to have any opinion at all about this?

24:11

If, if he says this is the lifestyle that he wants to lead, now we're supposed to accept that.

24:16

Who are you to have any opinion or to say, no, I don't really think, I don't think that's true.

24:20

I don't think he's right about his own orientation.

24:25

I mean, the arrogance is pretty astounding that you can't see inside someone's heart and mind to know they're real, but that's, that's true for Milo.

24:35

That's true for anybody. I can't see inside.

24:37

You can't see inside my heart and mind, you know what my motivations are.

24:40

I don't know what your motivations are.

24:44

And that's precisely the point here.

24:48

Number four. And of course it mixed in with, with this reaction, this mixed into the reaction to the story about Milo.

24:56

There's also a lot of anti-Catholic stuff thrown into it because he says he is consecrating his life to St.

25:00

Joseph, which is a perfectly wonderful thing for anyone to do.

25:04

And so there's a lot of anti-Catholic bigotry being tossed into it as well.

25:08

All right. Number four, Taylor, Lauryn's a journalist in the New York times has gotten some attention recently for some claims that she's made about the ways that online harassment have impacted her.

25:19

So she tweeted this on international women's day, which hopefully, as you know is a couple of days ago.

25:23

I hope that you commemorate it and celebrated it as, as I did.

25:27

She said for international women's day, please consider supporting women enduring online harassment.

25:32

It's not an exaggeration to say that the harassment and smear campaign campaign I've had to endure over the past year has destroyed my life.

25:39

No one should have to go through this. It's not an it's not exaggeration.

25:42

Taylor, are you sure about that?

25:44

I think it is. It sounds like an exaggeration to me.

25:47

She says I'm slightly open about some of what I deal with, but the scope of attacks has been unimaginable.

25:52

There's no escape. It's taken everything from me.

25:55

The only mild solace I've found is with other women who have had their lives destroyed in the same way.

26:01

We've developed deep trauma ponds, deep trauma bonds, because by the way, the trauma bonds sounds like maybe like a indie band.

26:14

Anyway, I'll return to that later trauma because of mean comments on the internet.

26:22

And this is what you so often get from feminists, especially feminist journalists, where they really seem to believe this is not a put on much of what they're doing here as much of this as performative, but the part that's not performing as I think she really believes that she is uniquely suffering this, or at least that women and especially women journalists, uniquely suffer this kind of thing that doesn't happen to the rest of us, certainly doesn't happen to men.

26:53

Men never have to endure any of this.

26:58

No men, anyone in the public eye.

27:01

I'm not saying it's a good thing. I have no doubt that Taylor Lauryn's gets a lot of really mean comments, really vile comments.

27:09

I have no doubt about that.

27:11

I'm sure she gets many messages that are, that may be quite upsetting to her.

27:16

I have no doubt.

27:18

Now I have no doubt because I get that kind of stuff all the time, myself.

27:24

Most of the time, it's not upsetting to me because I don't allow myself to be upset.

27:29

And that's really what it comes down to. It, it, it's, it's a question of how are you going to respond to this?

27:35

What is your reaction going to be? Cause you're going to get it on the internet.

27:42

All you can decide is how you'll respond.

27:46

If it really has destroyed your life.

27:47

I don't even know how that could be the case.

27:50

If it is the case that it's destroyed your life, then why don't you simply get off the internet and go do something else for a living.

28:00

Now I wouldn't normally say that you should do something else for a living simply to avoid mean comments on the internet.

28:05

But if you're saying it's destroyed your life and caused trauma and you can't get over it and it's unimaginable, there's no escape.

28:12

Well there isn't, as you know that, you know what the escape is from, from comments on the internet, the escape is this I'll show you a demonstration.

28:19

Here's the escape. Watch I'll show you.

28:24

That's how you escape. I'll show you again. If you're watching.

28:26

So to escape me and comments on the internet, you do this, put the phone down, that's him and all of that stuff.

28:34

It's happening here. And I can put it down and live my life.

28:40

That's the great thing. This has happened to me many times where people are attacking me on Twitter and all of this stuff.

28:46

And it's so great that I can just click off, put it down, go read a book to my kids.

28:53

Doesn't matter. Let the internet freak out.

28:55

It doesn't matter to me.

28:57

So there is an escape, but it happens to all of us.

29:02

If, if there's an impression that it doesn't happen to men as often, I think the reason is that we don't talk about it as much.

29:12

You know, that has to be the reason I don't go around talking about it all the time and talking about how it's destroyed my life.

29:19

It doesn't mean it doesn't happen.

29:22

All right, fine. Finally, number five, an Uber driver was assaulted by a group of women after he requested that one of them put on a face mask.

29:31

Now I'm not a big fan of the mask thing, as you know, but I fully respect the guys right?

29:38

To tell you the rules for riding in his car, fully respect that if you don't like it, get out of the car.

29:45

Really simple to me, it's his car has every right to, to, to set the rules.

29:49

Don't like it don't ride in the car.

29:52

She didn't like it, this woman, but she refused to get out of the out of the car.

29:56

And instead she communicated her dislike for this policy by assaulting him.

30:01

Let's watch that video.

30:45

I think you get the idea there.

30:47

These women, these women are, are surely scholars.

30:51

So he, he asked her to put the mask on shit at one two.

30:55

So she started coughing in his face, ripped his mask off and tried to steal his phone perfectly reasonable reaction.

31:05

Right? And here she is now. She, she's not, she's not apologizing for that.

31:10

Here. She is addressing this controversy and kind of explaining why she reacted the way that she did.

31:17

Let's let's listen, My

31:19

boyfriend taught me.

31:22

He taught me. Don't let nobody play with you.

31:24

Smack them. That's what I was taught.

31:27

So if y'all boyfriends told y'all to let this Uber let y'all get out the car and get robbed or whatever would have happened.

31:35

And I felt like y'all, ain't lucky as hell.

31:39

I ain't have nothing on me on mama's.

31:41

Cause if you want to play with me, bro, it would've been a whole different story for real you.

31:46

Not about to kick me on the freeway. I, everybody, I know 75% of people.

31:52

I know what a smack the shit out of him or done some crazy off the wall.

31:56

All I did was smack, take his mask off and cough a little bit, but I ain't even have Corona.

32:03

So at the end of the day, Sorry,

32:06

I just got, I got so wrapped up listening to her because she's so eloquent.

32:10

And I, I just enjoy listening to her express her express herself in, in, in that really poetic and profound way to two observations.

32:21

Well, number one, I guess it's nice.

32:23

Anyway, there's a little bit of chivalry going on here. A little bit of old fashioned chivalry talking about her boyfriend is teaching her the things that our boyfriend teaches her.

32:32

I think I'd prefer to hear like the things that her father taught her.

32:34

It sounds like maybe there's, there's a lack of that.

32:37

So, which is, which is how this happened in the first, but the other two that does, I think number one, what you see here is female privilege.

32:45

Okay. That she's, she's walking around to Al smack anyone.

32:48

I don't care. I'll smack you.

32:51

Well, just about any man and any, any male over the age of like 12 could beat the hell out of her in a second if they wanted to, but they're not going to for the most part.

33:05

And so she knows that she could walk around smacking whoever she wants.

33:08

I mean, we can be pretty sure it's not the first time she's done that.

33:12

And she smacked that guy who could easily take her in a boxing match.

33:15

I'm sure, but he didn't respond physically.

33:17

And he knew this, this is female privilege because he knew, even though he was the one being attacked, he knew that if he had responded physically, he'd be the one in jail.

33:25

And she knows that he knows that. And so that's why she's assaulting him female privilege.

33:31

And number two, we need to talk a little bit about dumb person privilege because what you just saw there, this is why I always go back to the need to weed out dumb people from voting that person right there probably votes.

33:47

And that's exactly what we need to address in this country.

33:51

There is no hope for the future.

33:54

As long as people like that are helping to determine it really simple fifth grade level civics exam.

34:02

She's not going to pass that easily done something to think about.

34:08

All right, let's move on now to reading the YouTube comments.

34:11

First common says Matt is cynical, paranoid, unwilling to take responsibility, pessimistic, uncaring, overly cancel, happy unfeeling and completely awesome.

34:21

Well thank you for that, but you also forgot that I am ill tempered.

34:24

So I'll make sure to put that in there.

34:26

Nick Miller says I'm a wall SHEEO sexual.

34:29

I'm in love with Matt wall show. I'll take that.

34:31

You know, if we're inventing sexualities, then that one, that, that one needs its own pride flag.

34:37

Lindsey road says, Matt, do you think the creation of all those genders are an effort to regain some sort of individuality by these people?

34:44

The left is always trying to strip away individuality and lump everyone into broad categories.

34:48

Is it really surprising then the people would grasp at the opportunity to distinguish themselves the only way that the left has deemed acceptable.

34:55

Totally crazy. Yes, but not surprising to me.

34:57

Oh, you've put your finger on it. I think that's exactly right.

34:59

That's that's what drives a lot of this.

35:02

The need, the desire to be an individual, which we all desire to be individuals and to differentiate ourselves from the crowd to assert ourselves individually.

35:14

And this is the way that they've been conditioned to do that.

35:20

And that's why we went through yesterday. Some of the new, the newer invented sexualities, including aloe sexual.

35:25

I think that's what it was aloe sexual.

35:28

And that's a sexuality where if you're sexually attracted, period, if you have any sexual attraction at all to any individual person or any group of people, then you're an Allo sexual.

35:40

And I looked it up. There is even, I believe in allosexual pride flag.

35:45

Demisexual, you know, that's someone who needs an emotional attachment, which again, that's those women, okay.

35:50

Women need emotional attachment order to really feel that attraction.

35:55

And so the reason that we're making up all these sexualities is partly because there's real privilege in being included in the LG, under the LGBT umbrella.

36:06

But also I think people, yeah, it makes people feel like they're more of an individual.

36:10

They're more interesting. You know, it's too boring.

36:13

You don't want to say that you you're, you're simply a quote cis-gender straight person.

36:19

You want to be a more complicated and interesting person with more gray areas.

36:25

And obviously the irony is that in this rush to be an individual and to be so interesting, they end up just like everybody else.

36:34

Little Polly says, Matt, you're missing the most important point about BLM.

36:38

They aren't harassing random people on the street.

36:40

They're harassing random white people on the street.

36:42

It's a racist anti white movement.

36:44

I agree. I don't think I missed that at all. I think that's a point I've made many times, but certainly I agree.

36:49

William Ferrario says isn't Cal cuddling prohibited in Leviticus.

36:54

Some are toward the back or in a footnote or did Moses just figure it wasn't worth mentioning?

36:58

Well, I don't know. Cal cuddling certainly violates the spirit of many biblical laws.

37:02

I would think it's an attack on nature and attack on God.

37:06

You might say. I mean, God made cows big and fat and slow and not so that you could cuddle with them, but so that they could more easily be slaughtered and turned into quarter pounders with cheese.

37:21

Amen. One of those moments of panic, I think that you might have in life that I know I've had too many times to count is when you're driving in a car or you're on a plane or somewhere, and you start to get that motion sickness, you start to feel nauseous and you're thinking, Oh my gosh, am I going to, am I going to have to ask them to pull over the plane so I can hurdle you don't want to deal with that.

37:38

And that's why I use relief. Band relief band is the number one FDA cleared anti-nausea wristband.

37:43

That's been clinically proven to quickly relieve and effectively present nausea and vomiting associated with motion sickness, anxiety, migraine hangover, morning sickness, chemotherapy, and so much more the product.

37:55

The great thing is it's a hundred percent drug-free it's non-drowsy provides all natural relief with zero side effects for as long as needed.

38:02

The technology was originally developed over 20 years ago in hospitals, and now it's available to the public and you got to try it.

38:08

Relief band is the only over the counter wearable device that's been used in hospitals and oncology clinics to treat nausea and vomiting.

38:15

I use it to work so I can testify to that this new year in short nausea is never the reason to miss out on life's important moments.

38:21

Right now relief band has an exclusive offer just for Matt Walt's listeners.

38:24

If you go to relief band.com and use promo code Walsh, you'll receive 20% off plus free shipping and no questions asked 30 day money back return guarantee.

38:32

So head to R E L I E F B a N d.com and use our promo code Walsh for 20 sent off.

38:42

And you know, on election night, we announced that Candace Owens would be joining the daily wire with a new show.

38:46

Now, the wait is finally over. The moment is here.

38:48

Candace's new show appropriately titled Candice will premiere next Friday, March 19th.

38:53

You may remember Candice from well many things, but we know Cardi B ranted about her criticizing wop.

38:59

Harry styles was upset when she had the Udacity to suggest that maybe mentioned wear dresses.

39:05

All of that, we know that that Candice has always has interesting things to say, which is why you got to check out Candice, it's got to be exclusive to daily wire members.

39:13

If you're not yet a member of go to daily wire.com/subscribe use code Candice to get twenty-five percent off again, that's daily wire.com/subscribe use code Candice for 25% off.

39:23

Now let's get to our daily camp installation.

39:29

Just when you think we've made it to the furthest reaches of cultural lunacy and of the cowardice that enables that Lindsey, we find still deeper depths to plunge Winston.

39:37

Marshall plays did play rather the banjo and the lead guitar for Mumford and sons, a group famous for being everyone's third favorite band in the summer of 2011 and this past weekend, Marshall ignited controversy and accusations of bigotry.

39:52

And Nazi-ism by publicly confessing to having read a book, yes, the musician tweeted an endorsement of journalists.

40:00

Andy knows Antifa expos a, which is called by the way, if you want to pick it up unmasked inside Antifa his radical plan to destroy democracy, the tweet addressed to know said finally had the time to read your important book.

40:12

You're a brave man. That was it.

40:14

That was the tweet. And it was enough to set the cancel wheels in motion fans.

40:19

The media fellow musicians came out, swinging, labeling him a racist calling for him to be fired and so on and so on and so forth.

40:25

They made it clear that there is essentially no difference between reading and enjoying a book critical of Antifa and pledging allegiance to Hitler after reading mine comp to hint and even the mildest disagreement with the most radical fringes of the far left is to profess far right views, which is to be a bigot, which is to reveal yourself unworthy of inclusion in civilized society.

40:46

That's the formula clear and simple and totally insane.

40:51

In fairness to the cancel mob, we should say, this is not Marshall's first infraction he has in the past, showed other ominous signs of possessing, a mind of his own and article in the Hollywood reporter notes, quote.

41:05

This is not the first time Marshall and Marshall and Mumford and sons have courted controversy for associating with the Taurus right-wing personalities.

41:11

Back in 2018, the band invited Canadian academic Jordan Peterson, who has been accused of transphobia mysogeny and Islamophobia to visit their London studios.

41:21

After pictures of Peterson and members of the band appeared on social media.

41:24

Marshall told a Canadian radio station.

41:26

I don't think having a photograph with someone means you agree with everything they say, primarily I'm interested in his psychological stuff, which I find very interesting.

41:33

There, you have it. One minute. Marshall is taking a picture with a famous psychologist.

41:38

Three years later, he was reading it the book.

41:41

I mean the left could not allow this dangerous dissident, a strike three.

41:45

They didn't cancel them now. Now who knows what he'd do next?

41:47

He might go out and mis-gender a potato head toy.

41:50

You never know what this guy will do.

41:52

There's no telling what sort of dastardly deeds needs.

41:55

This villain might get up to.

41:57

Actually the cancel mob was able to ran him, reign him in then without much, without much trouble after deleting the offending tweet and then apparently bleeding all of his other tweets.

42:06

So he deleted that tweet. And then, and then it seems if you go to his page, he deleted all, all of his tweets.

42:11

Along with it. Marshall then issued the standard, ordered a PO order apology.

42:16

This is what he said in his statement.

42:19

So you almost know exactly what he's going to say before you hear me say it, but he said over the past few days, I have come to better understand the pain caused by the book I endorsed.

42:30

I have offended, not only a lot of people, I don't know, but also those closest to me, including my bandmates and for that, I am truly sorry.

42:37

As a result of my actions, I am taking time away from the band to examine my blind spots for now.

42:43

Please know that I realize how my endorsements have the potential to be viewed as approvals of hateful, divisive behavior.

42:48

I apologize as this was not at all my intention.

42:52

Now, if you thought you would live your whole life and never encountered the phrase pain caused by the book I endorsed you are sadly mistaken.

43:01

Indeed. I feel it must be emphasized and really cannot be emphasized enough that this man is begging for forgiveness and stepping down from his position because he read and recommended book he has come to believe, or at least is pretending to believe there's decision to read a book caused not only offense, but actual damage to other human beings prior to this, the most, the most pathetic and deranged bit of groveling we'd ever witnessed was the bachelor host.

43:30

Chris Harrison's apology for advocating forgiveness.

43:32

Winston Marshall managed to show a level of stomach churning obsequiousness that outdid even that.

43:39

And I have faith that some brave pioneer will come along in the very near future to debase themselves and surrender their dignity in such a way as to make Marshall look like Davy Crockett, defending the Alamo by comparison.

43:50

It's all for not of course, as all the graveler gains nothing from his masochistic performance, he is no less canceled at the end of it, the emotional blackmailers who demanded an apology for something that did not affect them or harm them to begin with, have no plans to actually accept that apology like any schoolyard bully.

44:08

They get off on the act of imposing their will on another person.

44:12

If you let yourself become a source of this perverse high, they're going to keep coming back for more hits.

44:18

You can't get them to stop taking your lunch money by giving them your lunch money.

44:23

Your only hope that is to stand up for yourself.

44:25

Stand here, ground, refuse to play their game and to send that message with a punch in the nose.

44:31

Now, admittedly, in the case of the cancel mob, this is much easier said than done.

44:36

There's certainly no guarantee that they'll leave you alone just because you have made it clear that you're not going to be an easy target.

44:42

It's quite possible that no matter how you respond, they will still come and take your job and your livelihood and your reputation away.

44:50

But the one thing they can't take is your dignity.

44:54

They can't take that.

44:56

That is something that a man, most willfully forfeit, if everything else is taken from you, that you could take solace and knowing that they absent, no one can take that from you ever.

45:08

You have to give it up. You have to offer it.

45:12

You have to say, here you go. Here it is.

45:16

Winston. Marshall is not the first. And certainly won't be the last to offer up his dignity on a silver platter and get nothing in return.

45:24

And for that he's canceled.

45:26

And he is doubly canceled for being a disgrace to the banjo playing community, which as you know, I'm going to take that especially personally, so canceled again for that.

45:36

And we'll leave it there for today. Thanks for watching. Thanks for listening.

45:38

Have a great day Godspeed.

45:45

Well, if you enjoyed this episode, don't forget to subscribe.

45:47

And if you want to help spread the word, please give us a five-star review.

45:50

Also tell your friends to subscribe as well.

45:53

We're available on Apple podcast, Spotify, wherever you listen to podcasts, we're there also be sure to check out the other daily wire podcasts, including the Ben Shapiro show Michael Knowles show.

46:01

Andrew Klavan show. Thanks for listening.

46:03

Matt Walsh show is produced by Sean Hampton, executive producer, Jeremy boring.

46:08

Our supervising producers are Mathis Glover and Robert Sterling.

46:11

Our technical director is Austin Stevens, production manager.

46:14

the show is edited by Danny D'Amico.

46:17

Our audio is mixed by Mike Corey Amina.

46:19

Aaron makeup is done by Mika Geneva and our production coordinator is McKenna waters.

46:23

The Matt wall show is a daily wire production copyright daily wire, 2021, The

46:28

white house stonewalls reporters on the record.

46:30

Number of illegal alien kids being held in cages.

46:33

Right-wing provocateur. Milo Yiannopoulos is now ex gay and the Cuomo scandals get even worse.

46:40

Check it out on the Michael Knowles show. Today, the Matt Wall show, Disney decides that Peter Pan is not appropriate for young children due to its racism. We seem to develop some very strange ideas in our culture about what is and is not appropriate for kids. So we'll talk about that. Also, five headlines including Milo coming out is The left says he's not allowed to do that apparently. And a New York Times journalist says online harassment has, quote, destroyed her life. In our daily cancellation, we'll talk about the famous musician who apologized and stepped down from his band after committing the sin of reading a book. All of that and more today on the Matt Wall Show. You know, when running a business. One of the things that can really kill you, one of the issues that's gonna be the most difficult to deal with in business owners will tell you this is, is HR one of the things that can really kill you. One of the issues that's gonna be the most difficult to deal with and business owners will tell you this is is HR issues. HR issues can kill issues can kill you. Wrongful termination suits, minimum wage requirements, labor regulations, and HR manager wrongful termination suits, minimum wage requirements, labor regulations, and HR manager salaries on top of it. Aren't cheap and average salary is about $70,000 a it aren't cheap. An average salary is about seventy thousand dollars a year. It's a lot of money that you're dishing It's a lot of money to out. As a business owner, Bambi spelled B a N B E was created specifically for small As a business owner, Bambi, spelled BIMBEE, was created specifically small businesses. You can get a dedicated HR manager, craft HR policy, maintain your compliance all for just $99 a you can get a dedicated HR manager. Craft HR policy maintain your compliance all for just ninety nine dollars a month. With Bambi, you can change HR from your biggest live leading to your biggest strength. Your dedicated HR manager is available by phone email, real-time Your dedicated HR manager is available by phone, email, real time chat. They're there for They're there for you. They can do what you need done from onboarding They could do what you need done. From onboarding determinations. They customize your policies to fit your they customize your policies to fit your business. This is not a cookie cutter approach. This is customized and they're doing all this for just ninety nine dollars a month. Month to month. No hidden no hidden fees cancel anytime. So go to bambi.com/walsh right now to schedule your free HR So go to bambi dot com slash walsh right now to schedule your free HR audit. That's bambi.com/walsh, spelled B a M B That's bambi dot com slash walsh. Spelled BAMBEE dot com slash walsh. That It has, of course been decided by the people who decide these things that the issue most urgently requiring our attention right now is that offensive cartoons even, or especially cartoons that have been around for decades and never really offended anyone until right now, we have now a new salvo in this newly launched war on animated of course been decided by the people who decide these things that the the issue most urgently requiring our attention right now is that of offensive cartoons. Even or especially, cartoons that have been around for decades and never really offended anyone until right now. We have now a new salvo in this newly launched war on animated characters KTLA dot com has the story. It says Disney plus has removed several movies including dumbo, Peter Pan, the Aristocats, and Swiss family Robinson. From children's profiles on its service over negative depictions and stereotypes, the Walt Disney Company had previously placed content warnings on the films for, quote, negative depictions and or mistreatment of people in people and cultures in October, but now it has removed access to the films by children under seven. According to KTL, L. A. SISTER Station WTV0. In Rockford, Illinois, Adults with Disney plus accounts can still access the films with the content warnings, which appear on screen for about ten to twelve seconds before the unedited content. That advisory reads, in part, this program includes negative depictions and or mistreatment of people or cultures. These stereotypes were wrong, then in a wrong Now rather than remove this content, we want to acknowledge its harmful impact, learn from it, and spark a conversation to create a more inclusive future together. Okay. Now any confused users of the streaming service are sent to the Stories Matter page on their website. To learn more about why children under seven must be insulated from this objectionable content. If you're curious, the explanation they give for Peter Pan is, this is what they say. The film portrays native people in a stereotypical manner that reflects neither the diversity of native peoples nor their authentic cultural traditions. It shows them speaking in an unintelligible language and repeatedly refers them as red skins in offensive term. Peter and the lost boys engaged in dancing wearing head dresses and other exaggerated shows. Peter Pan and Lost Boys are culturally appropriating. Those little bastards. Mean, literally, they're bastards. Anyway, this is a this is a big problem, you know, you have to admit. You don't want the movie about a magical boy who flies around with a ferry named Tinkerbell and fights a pirate whose hand was eaten by crocodile with a clock in its belly to have any absurd or silly depictions of Native Americans. I mean, Well, the depiction of everyone in the movie is absurd and silly. It's a cartoon. That used to be like the whole point of a cartoon. Everyone is a caricature. Everyone is ridiculous. All of the depictions are cartoonish, Because again, it's a cartoon. Why are you looking for authenticity in an animated film made for kids in nineteen fifty three? But this is a reasonable question and you cannot expect reasonable answers in an age of unreasonable. By the way, it's worth noting the reason that's Swiss family Robinson had to be removed from the sight of children. Disney says, the pirates who antagonize the Robinson family are portrayed as a stereotypical foreign menace. Many appear in yellow face or brown face in our costume in an exaggerated and inaccurate manner with top knot hairstyles robes and overdone facial makeup and jewelry reinforcing their barberism and otherness. Inaccurate, an inaccurate representation of whom exactly. For for my memory of the movie and it's been a long time I admit, but these are just generic pirates with no specified cultural background. And if the foreign pirates in Swiss family Robinson represent a foreign menace, then why aren't we castigating Peter Pan because of captain Hook representing a white menace? Again, reasonable questions, unreasonable age. Now, people who are determined to miss the point or distract from it will respond to all of this with a kind of a scoff and say, well, why do you care so much about these cartoons? Why are you making such a big deal about it? The answer course is that I am not the one making a big deal about it. I made nothing at all out of Peter Pan. Or doctor Seuss or pepe lip pure or any of the rest of it. These are innocent and harmless things that I enjoyed as a child and my children enjoy. Now, that's the extent of the deal I made out of now. That's the extent of the deal I made out of it. I never thought and never gave Peter Pan a second thought. I'm not the one doing that. It is Disney and the media and the left generally that have decided to make an issue out of these things. They're the ones who decided to to to find deep moral significance and all these different things. But here the left again pulls its favorite maneuver, which I'm always pointing out. They make a mountain out of a Mohill, and that accuse us of blowing everything out of proportion when we simply object to their blowing it out of proportion. The other counterpoint will be that that will be made about this latest development with Disney is that the films can still be viewed. You know, your child can still watch them. They haven't been erased. Right? They're just not on the children's profiles. They're they're being put by put behind kind of a parental filter. Okay. Well, to that, I respond in two ways. Number one, for now. For now, Peter Pan still exists. But anyone who's been paying it the slightest bit of attention already knows where this is headed. Give it another few months and these films will be taken out of circulation entirely. III don't need to look into the future to know that. Guaranteed that will happen. After all, Disney has itself said that the movies are hateful and racist, Disney is segment. For now, they hope to have their woke, cake, and eat it too, labeling their own content racist, but still making money off of it. But that's not going to last for that's not gonna last for long. They can't last for long. The precedent has already been set. Number two, that. And by the way, just backing up there for a And by the way, just backing up there for a minute, what's what's gonna if I if I were to try to look in the future a little bit, I think what's gonna happen is you're gonna start having retail outlets that say, well, we're not gonna carry Peter Pan merchandise anymore. We're not gonna sell the kids' book bag with the Peter Pan image on it because it's it's from a racist movie. And, you know, someone's some big retail outlets gonna say that target somebody. And then when that happens, then Disney is gonna take all those movies away because then there's no reason for them to have them. The way they make their money on something like Peter Pan is through the merchandise. If they can't sell merchandise anymore, then then there's no reason to and then they'll take their stand and say, you know what? Actually, this stuff is totally hateful. We're not going to let you watch it at We're not gonna let you watch it at all. So that's the first point. Second, the main point, it's not that the movies aren't available. The main point isn't even about these specific movies or Doctor source or looney tunes. There's a larger principle at work here, a number of larger principles that matter. One of them is this. As a culture, we are adopting a very backwards inverted idea about the nature of childhood and what sort of things are appropriate for children. As has been pointed out many times by myself and others, the very people who have panicked over the objectionable content in innocent children's cartoons will defend with passionate intensity The sewage spewed into our kids' ears and minds by modern pop artists, and modern pop culture generally. They'll mock us for worrying that twelve year old girls are listening to songs like WAP. While in the next breath insisting that great damage is being done to these same children, by like a cartoon French skunk. This reveals a deep confusion about what sorts of things children are equipped to handle, what kind of content they can process mentally and what they can't. And if I'm wrong about any of that, I'm only wrong in calling this the result of confusion rather than rather than a deliberate effort to subvert and corrupt our children. And in fact, let me back up and say, I was wrong about that. It's not confusion. It is deliberate. But it gets worse. Consider that Disney is a full on proponent and advocate for gender theory. What this means is that the company believes and many on the left believe that a five year old is old enough to choose his own gender, but not old enough to watch Peter Pan. ABOYAN KINDAGARDEN HAS THE MENTAL CAPACITY TO BECOME A GIRL IF HE SO CHUSES BUT DOES NOT HAVE THE CAPACITY TO WATCH SWISS FAMILY ROBBENSON. The goal here is to entirely alter our view of childhood innocence. So that they can destroy childhood innocence without us noticing. That's the point. If they get us focusing on something else. If they get us focusing on protecting the innocence of our of our kids with regards to Peter Pan and Loney tunes and all this kind of totally innocuous stuff, But they can set out doing their, you know, corrupting our kids and kids. And we're not going to notice because we're going to feel like, well, you know, we were really Manning the Fort here and then w we were protecting our kids because we're making sure they don't watch Peter pan, if all goes to we're not gonna notice because we're gonna feel like, well, you know, we're really manning the fort here. And then we're protecting our kids because we're making sure they don't watch Peter Pan. If all goes to plan and it is so far, They'll have generation of children who are emotionally and psychologically destroyed, corrupted beyond recognition, and all of the adults We'll look at these kids and see what they've done and what they've allowed to happen and still feel proud. Because at least kids were protected from doctor Seuss and Peter Pan. Let's get now to our five Before Before we get to five headlines, you know, hiring as a business owner, finding a right candidate, hiring someone, the person, finding the person you're looking for and hiring them can be very we get to five headlines, hiring as a business owner, finding a right candidate, hiring someone the person, finding the person you're looking forward, hiring them, can be very complicated. So what you have to do is take advantage of places that make it easier for you to take advantage of the So what you have to do is take advantage of places that make it easier for you. Take advantage of the services. They're gonna take some of that burden off your shoulders. You've got enough to deal with already finding great candidates to You got enough to with already finding great candidates. hire. It could be like trying to find a needle in a can be like, I'm not trying to find a needle haystack. Sure. You can post your job to some job board, but then all you can do is hope the right person comes along, which is why you should try ZipRecruiter for free at can post your job to some job board, but then all you could do is hope the right person comes along, which is why you should try zip recruiter for free at zip recruiter dot com slash walls. ZipRecruiter does the work for you when you post a job on ZipRecruiter. It gets sent out to over hundred top job sites with one click then. ZipRecruiter's magic technology finds people with the right skills and experience for your job and actively invites them to apply. You get qualified candidates get qualified candidates fast. You're not just putting it out there into the ether and hoping that someone finds You're not just putting it out there into ether and hoping that someone finds it. So while other services may overwhelm you with applications to see if ZipRecruiter finds you, what you're looking for, the needle and the haystack. And right now you can try ZipRecruiter for free at And right now, you could try ZipRecruiter for free at zip recruiter dot com slash walsh. That's zip recruiter dot com slash H. Just go to ziprecruiter.com/walsh, ZipRecruiter, the smartest way to Just go to zip recruiter dot com slash walsh. ZipRecruiter, the smartest way to hire. hire. Number one, there's a crisis on the border. Although there's always been a crisis. It's worse now. A surge of illegals coming over, flooding the system, ending up in cages. I mean, not cages. What do we call it? Detainment facilities, it's almost like all of this could have been predicted. Almost. It it it it always seems to happen with Democrats. That's why maybe you could predict because this is the way it always goes. If you send the message that you're weak on border security and immigration enforcement, you'll end up with a lot more illegal immigration to enforce or to not enforce as the case may be. be. So here's Jen Saki, I'm So here's Jen Saki dodging was gonna say addressing the issue, but not so much addressing it as dodging it yesterday. Let's watch. There are reports out there that the number of on accompanyed migrants detained at the border has tripled in the last two weeks to thirty two hundred plus. Is that number accurate? I'm not gonna confirm numbers from here. Obviously, the Department of Homeland Security and others oversee programs and the engagements that happen at the border. I will say that there are couple of reasons. I know I'm more asked about our kind of change in policy, but there are a couple of reasons why we think people are coming to the border. Of course, individuals are fleeing countries where individuals and families are, you know, they're fleeing prosecution, fleeing violence, fling economic hardships and other things. region has also experienced two hurricanes in the fall, putting further stress on the conditions in these countries and the circumstances. That are facing individuals, and all of this is taking place during global pandemic that has impacted other countries, economies, placing undue hardships on its people just as it did in the United States. So there are also a range of factors that are leading individuals to come to the border. Why won't you confirm that number? That's a very important number. number. I, I, we've been very clear that there is an increase that there are more children coming across the border than we have facilities for at this point in time, those numbers are tracked by the department of Homeland We've been very CLEAR THAT THERE IS AN INCREASE, THAT THERE ARE MORE CHILDREN COMING ACROSS THE BORDER THAN WE HAVE FACILITIES FOR AT THIS POINT IN TIME. Those numbers are tracked by the Department of Homeland Security. So I'm certainly I'm just suggesting that you talk to them about specifics to them, Jim, they won't confirm the numbers. numbers. So she's not going to confirm, I, I, if I didn't hear her wrong, I th I think what she said, unless I miss not gonna confirm. III if I didn't hear her wrong, I I think what she said unless I misheard, I think she said that the illegals are coming here to flee to flee prosecution. Is that what she said? Now I'm pretty sure she meant persecution, but prosecution was a little bit of a Freudian slip there because In fact, as Donald Trump famously said, you know, when he was announcing his campaign back in twenty fifteen or sixteen, many of them that are coming here are criminals. So they are actually fleeing prosecution. So if prosecution. So if that's what you said, that was a, that was an example of accidentally telling the what you said, that was a that was an example of accidentally telling the truth. But when you think about this, you know, that the main thing I always go back to with the situation on the border. Well, it annoys me the most. And of course, we always get this from Democrats where all of their policies, even though their policies often lead to directly lead to immense human suffering. They still will say, It's it's compassionate. We're the compassionate ones. ones. We have the compassionate policies with immigration, or if the economy or anything else looking over all of the, just, just the, the devastation wrought by those same We have the compassionate policies with immigration. Or at the economy or anything else. Looking over all of the just just the the devastation wrought by those same policies. Now this is not compassion. You look what's happening in the border border right now. It's not compassion to allow that to happen, to set the stage for that. And in fact, probably I don't wanna get splitting hairs too much, but probably we should move away from the word compassion when we're talking about policies in general. Because really compassion, and this is a word that's been that's been overused to the point of of meaninglessness out like some of the other words, but the word compassion actually means co suffering. That's what it means. And so so what what what compassion actually means if if you're really compassionate towards someone, it means that you're you're suffering alongside them. You're taking on in some sense. They're suffering you're doing something for them. And and and and so supporting a policy, whatever the policy is, that's not an act of compassion on your part. Because you don't have to do anything. anything. It requires no sacrifice on your, on your end, whatever your view is on requires no sacrifice on your on your end. Whatever your view is on immigration, most likely it's just a view that you have. It's it's your opinion. You're not actually most of us, not actually doing anything one way or another. So there's no compassion in supporting policy. That's the first thing. But so it's not really what what policy is the most compassionate. compassionate. The question is what policy question is what policy is we should be using words like the most prudent What policy is the most wise? What policy is most likely to minimize human suffering? We can start thinking in those terms. And it's pretty clear that having a border protecting that border, enforcing our laws, that is going to be the most prudent, the most wise thing to do, and it's in the in the long run going to most minimized human suffering. Alright. Number two, CBS brought out a trans journalist to talk about the issue of trans people in sports. And that the Republican state legislatures that are are trying to bar men from women's sports, those bigots How dare they? Actually, the CBS tweet where I found this video says Republicans in at least twenty five states have introduced over sixty bills targeting trans youth. Limiting access to school sports and gender affirming healthcare. Now that's totally wrong in every way. Every part of that is wrong. This is the way it's framed by the media, but we hear it's an anti trans bill. No, it's not. If not. If anything, it's a pro woman, bill, a pro science bill, a pro sanity it's a pro woman bill. A pro science bill, a pro sanity bill. But it's also in no way. There there are no bills bill. So far as I'm aware, someone can correct me if I'm far as I'm aware. Someone could correct me if I'm wrong. I don't think there are any bills in the works in any state anywhere that would stop trans people from competing in sports. No one is trying to do that. I've never met any conservative or advocates for that. I've never talked to a single conservative and says, you know what, I think we should just I think trans people shouldn't be allowed to compete in sports period. No. If you're biological male, however you identify. We're throwing up in the doors and saying you are welcome to try out and compete over here with with other biological males. You're welcome in the bathroom with other biological males. Well, we welcome all biological, but it doesn't matter how you identify, it's it's identify. So that's a very equitable a very equitable policy to use the popular buzzword. So that's completely wrong, but SPEAKING BEING COMPLETELY WRONG IN EVERYWAY. HERE'S WHAT THE REPORTER SAYS ABOUT THESE POLICIES. policies. So many of these bills, Orion center around transgender student MANY OF THESE BILLS ORION CENTRE around transgender student athletes. What's the argument for proponents of the bill? Which attempt to exclude trans youth from teams that align with their gender identity? AND WHAT EVIDENCE DO THEY HAVE IF ANY TO SUPPORT THEIR CLAIMS? claims. I note that governor Kristi Noem of South Dakota has just recently introduced a I NOTED THAT GOVERNOR CHRISTIE KNOWN of South Dakota hes just recently introduced a bill? Yes, exactly. Mississippi and South Dakota are the two states that look like they're going to pass these bills into law very soon. But governors, but Republican governors have said that they plan to find these bills And the argument that lawmakers are bringing today is that transgender inclusion in sports would harm women's equality with farm quality for girls. girls. But I would know that as the associated press, as reported, they talked to over 24 lawmakers and the majority of them failed to bring evidence, to actually find examples within their state to say, this has been a problem that we found students who say, this has been a I would note that as the associated press as a bread, they talked to over twenty four lawmakers and the majority of them failed to bring evidence to actually find examples within their state to say, this has been a problem. We found students to say, This has been a problem. That's not to say there is zero evidence. There's the lawsuits that I mentioned earlier. The three Connecticut high school runners said they were denied scholarship offer to these based on trans inclusion and support. Right. Right? So what the question was, what happens do they have whatever it is do they do they possibly have that says that a quote, unquote, trans girls shouldn't be competing in female what the question was, what evidence do they have? What happens do they do they possibly have? It says that, quote unquote, trans girls shouldn't be competing. In female sports. What evidence could they bring to the table? I don't know, a biology textbook. That's all the evidence they really need. I mean, I think they can still bring a biology textbook to table. Eventually, the biology textbooks will, you know, will will eventually those those books will go on the burn pile too, actual biology textbooks. But as far as I know right now, kids are basically still taught human biology in school. school. So that's it. That's that's the evidence. It's an obfuscation of what you heard there. That the Republicans in mostly states, they haven't been able to bring evidence of girls really being harmed by these policies. Well, if there's been no evidence of that, and that's not the evidence we need. The evidence we need again is simply the science of it. To establish that girls are one thing. Boys are another thing. These are two categories of people. Boys have an unfair biological advantage in principle in girl sports. That's why they don't belong there. That's all the evidence you need. But In terms of evidence of girls being harmed by these policies, as was admitted, there is some really compelling evidence of that, like in states like Connecticut. But in other states, if if there are no examples of that yet, it's because it hasn't happened yet, and these laws are trying to stop it from happening. The laws are looking to prevent this thing from happening. The whole point is we don't wanna wait for the damage to be done. We done. We don't want, we don't want to wait for a whole generation of girls to be deprived of athletic scholarships and all of want we don't wanna wait for whole generation of girls to be deprived of athletic scholarships and all of that. And then we could circle back and say, see, I told you. This is a foreseeable outcome, and so we're gonna prevent that outcome with these laws. laws. That's the point number three from the New York post, it says right-wing the point. Number three, from the New York Post, it says right wing provocateur Milo Yiannapolous says come out as exgay announcing that he would quote, would like to help rehabilitate with a media call's conversion therapy over the next decade according to the report. The thirty six year old British political commentator declared himself no longer gay and quote, sodomy free in a in an interview with LifeSight News Yiannapolous told the outlet that he is now leading a daily concentration online to Saint Joseph. Now, it's been a lot of chatter about this online. online. What I'll say is, first of all, the accusation is that this is all a giant troll on Milo's I'll say is, first of all, I the the accusation is that this is all giant troll on Milo's part. That that's all this is. He was he's looking for attention. Think that could be it. I don't know. How am I supposed to know? But also, That's the point. point? How am I, how are you supposed to How am I how are you supposed to know? The Internet has simply declared. This is what they've declared. When I say the Internet, mostly the left. Although not just the left, a lot of people on the right too from what seen on social media. What what it what hes been declared is that, no, Milo is not allowed to do this. Hes just he's not allowed to not be gay anymore. He can't that can't make that choice. And we, in the public, We know more about Milo sexual orientation than he does. That's the attitude from many in the public, and it's ridiculous. It also, of course, it's like there's no point even making hes observation anymore, but I will. The double standard here is quite apparent. apparent. I thought, well, we've heard from the left for so long is, you know, someone's private life is their private life who, the people they choose to be in a sexual relationship with thought what we've heard from the left for so long is, you know, someone's private life, is their private life? Who who the the people they choose to be in a sexual relationship with, that's up to them. Right? Consenting adults? So who are you to have any opinion at all about this? If if he says this is the lifestyle that he wants to lead now, we're supposed to accept that. Who are you to have any opinion or to say, no, I don't really think. I don't think that's true. I don't think he's right about his own orientation. I mean, the arrogance is pretty astounding. Yeah. You can't see inside someone's heart and mind to know they're real, but that's that's true for my low. That's true for anybody. can't see inside. You can't see inside my heart and mind. You know, my what my motivations are. don't know what your motivations are. And that's precisely the point here. Number four. And of course, mixed in with this reaction mixed into the reaction to the story about Milo. There's also lot of anti Catholic stuff thrown into it because he says he's concentrating his life to Saint Joseph, which is a perfectly wonderful thing for anyone to do. And so there's a lot of anti Catholic bigotry being tossed into it as well. Alright. right. Number four, Taylor, Lauryn's a journalist in the New York times has gotten some attention recently for some claims that she's made about the ways that online harassment have impacted four, Taylor Lorenz, journalist of The New York Times, has gotten some attention recently for some claims that she's made about the ways that online harassment have impacted her. So she tweeted this on International Women's Day, which hopefully, as you know, is a couple of days ago, ago. I hope that you commemorate it and celebrated it as, as I hope that you commemorated and celebrated it as as I did. did. She said for international women's day, please consider supporting women enduring online said for International Women's Day, please consider supporting women enduring online harassment. It's not an exaggeration to say that the harassment and smear campaign I've had to endure over the past year has destroyed my life. No one should have to go through this. It's not it's not an exaggeration, Taylor. Are you sure about that? I think it is. It sounds like an exaggeration to me. She says, I'm slightly open about some of what I deal with, but the scope of attacks has been unimaginable. unimaginable. There's no no escape. It's taken everything from me. me. The only mild solace I've found is with other women who have had their lives destroyed in the same The only mild solace I've found is with other women who have had their lives destroyed in the same way. We've developed deep trauma bonds. Deep trauma bonds because, by the way, the trauma bonds sounds like maybe like in indie band. Anyway, I'll return to that later. Trauma because of mean comments on the Internet. And internet. And this is what you so often get from feminists, especially feminist journalists, where they really seem to believe this is not a put on much of what they're doing here as much of this as performative, but the part that's not performing as I think she really believes that she is uniquely suffering this, or at least that women and especially women journalists, uniquely suffer this kind of thing that doesn't happen to the rest of us, certainly doesn't happen to is what you so often get from feminists, especially feminist journalists. Were they really seeing to believe this is not a put on. Much of what they're doing here is a put much of this is performative. The part that's not performing is I think she really believes that she is uniquely suffering this. Or at least that women and especially women journalists uniquely suffer this kind of thing. It doesn't happen to the rest of us. Something doesn't happen to men. Men never have to endure any of this. No. Men, anyone in the public eye. I'm not saying it's a good thing. I I have no doubt that Taylor Lourens gets a lot of really mean comments, really vile comments. I have no doubt about that. I'm sure she gets many messages that are that that may be quite upsetting to her. have no doubt. doubt. Now I have no doubt because I get that kind of stuff all the time, have no doubt because I get that kind of stuff all the time myself. Most of the time it's not upsetting to me because I don't allow myself to be upset. And that's really what it comes down to. It's question of how are you going to respond to this? What is your reaction going to be? Because you're gonna get it on the Internet. All you could decide is how you'll respond. If it really has destroyed your life, I I don't even know how that could be the case. If it is the case, then it's destroyed your life, then why don't you simply get off the Internet? And go do something else for a living. Now, I wouldn't normally say that you should do something else for a living simply to avoid mean comments on the Internet. But if you're saying it's destroyed your life and caused trauma, and you can't get over it and it's unimaginable there's no escape, Well, there isn't You know the you know what the escape is from from comments on the Internet? The escape is this. I'll show you demonstration. Here's the escape. Watch. I'll show you. That's how you escape. I'll show you again if you're watching. So to escape mean comments on the Internet, you do this. Put the phone down. That's it. And all of that stuff, it's happening here. And can put it down and live my life. That's the great thing. This thing. This has happened to me many times where people are attacking me on Twitter and all of this happened many times where people are attacking me on Twitter and all of this stuff and it's so great that I can just Click off, put it down, go read a book to my kids. Doesn't matter. Let the Internet freak out. Doesn't matter to me. So there is an escape. But it happens to all of us. If if there's an impression that it doesn't happen to men as often, I think the reason is that we don't talk about it as much. You much. You know, that has to be the reason I don't go around talking about it all the time and talking about how it's destroyed my that has to be the reason. I I don't go around talking about it all the time and about how it's destroyed my life. Doesn't mean that doesn't happen. happen. All right, Fine. Finally, number five, an Uber driver was assaulted by group of women after he requested that one of them put on a a face mask. mask. Now I'm not a big fan of the mask thing, as you know, but I fully respect the guys not a big fan of the mask thing as you know, but I fully respect the guy's right right? To tell you the rules for riding in his car, fully respect that if you don't like it, get out of the tell you the rules for riding in his car. Fully respect that. If you don't like it, get out of the car. Really simple to me. It's his car. He has every right to to to set the rules. Don't like it, don't ride in the car. car. She didn't like it, this woman, but she refused to get out of the out of the didn't like it, this woman. But she refused to get out of the car. And instead, she communicated her disliked for this policy by assaulting him. Let's watch that video. You you don't talk to my comedy. I think you get the idea there. These women these women are are surely scholars. So he he asked her to put the mask on. She didn't want to. So she started coughing in his face, ripped his mask off, and tried to steal his phone. Perfectly reasonable reaction. Right? Right? And here she is here she is now, she she's not She's not apologizing for that. Here she is addressing this controversy and kind of explaining why she reacted the way that she did. Let's let's listen. My boyfriend taught me. He taught me. Don't let nobody play with you. Smack the that's what I was taught. So if y'all boyfriends told y'all to let this Uber, let y'all get out the car and get robbed or whatever what happened, And I saw y'all, hell no. Hes, is that why you have nothing on me all, mama's because if you wanna play with me, Brad, It would have been a whole different story for real. You're not about to kick me on a freeway. I everybody I'd know. Seventy five percent of people I'd know would have smacked out of him or done some crazy ass off the wall. All I did was smack take his mask off. And cough a little bit, but I ain't even have corona, so at the end of the day. Okay. Sorry. I just get I get so wrapped up listening to her because she's so eloquent. And IIII just enjoy listening to her express her express herself in in that really poetic and profound way. Two two observations of it. observations. Well, number one, I guess it's number one, I guess it's nice anyway. There's a little bit of chivalry going on here, a here. A little bit of old fashioned chivalry talking about her boyfriend is teaching her the things that our boyfriend teaches bit of old fashioned chiller talking about hes boyfriend is teaching The things that her boyfriend teaches her. I think I'd prefer to hear, like, the things that her father taught her. It sounds like maybe There's there's a lack of that, which is which is how this happened in the first place. But the other two are the things number one, what you see here is female privilege. Okay. The she's she's walking around. I'll smack anyone. I don't care. I'll smack you. Well, just about any man. Any any any male over the age of like twelve could beat the hell out of her in a second if they wanted to. But they're not going to for the most part. And so she knows that she could walk around smacking whoever she wants. We could be pretty sure it's not the first time she's done that. And she smacked that guy who could easily take her in boxing match, I'm sure, but he didn't respond physically. And he knew that this is female privilege because he knew even though he was the one being attacked. He knew that if he had responded physically, he'd be the one in jail. And she knows that he knows that. And so that's why she's assaulting him. Female privilege. And Number two, we need to talk a little bit about dumb person privilege because what you just saw there, this is why I always go back to the need. To weed out dumb people from voting. That person right there probably votes. And that's exactly what we need to address in this country. There is no hope for the future as long as people like that are helping to determine it. Really simple. Fifth grade level civics exam, she's not going to pass that. Easily done. Something to think about. Alright. Let's move on now to reading the YouTube comments. First comment says Matt is cynical, paranoid, unwilling to take responsibility, pessimistic, uncaring, overly cancel happy, unfeeling, and completely awesome. Well, thank you for that, but you also forgot that I am ill tempered. So I'll make sure put that in there. Nick Miller says, I'm a Wallshio Sexual. I'm in love with Matt Wallshow. I'll take that. You know, if we're inventing sexualities, then that one That that one needs its own pride flag. Lindsey Rhodes says, Matt, do you think the creation of all those genders are an effort to regain some sort of individuality by these people? The left is always trying to strip away individuality and lump everyone into broad categories. categories. Is it really surprising then the people would grasp at the opportunity to distinguish themselves the only way that the left has deemed Is it really surprising then the people would grasp at the opportunity to distinguish themselves, the only way that the left has deep acceptable. Totally crazy. Yes, but not surprising to me. Oh, you've put your finger on it. I think that's exactly right. That's that's what drives a lot of this. this. The need, the desire to be an individual, which we all desire to be individuals and to differentiate ourselves from the crowd to assert ourselves need the desire to be an individual, which we all desire to be individuals and to to differentiate ourselves from the crowd to assert ourselves individually. And this is what the way that they've been conditioned to do that. And that's why we went through yesterday some of the new the newer invented sexualities, including aloe sexual. I think that's what it was. Aloe sexual. And that's a sexuality where if you're sexually attracted, period. If you have any sexual attraction at all to any individual person or any group of people, than you're an allosexual. And I looked it up. There's even, I believe, an allosexual pride flag. Demis sexual, you know, that's someone who needs an emotional attachment, which again, that's those that's women. K? Women need emotional attachment or we really feel that attraction. attraction. And so the reason that we're making up all these sexualities is partly because there's real privilege in being included in the LG, under the LGBT the reason that we're making up all these sexualities is partly because there's real privilege being included in the under the LGBT umbrella. But also, I think, yeah, it makes people feel like they're more of an individual, individual. They're more more interesting You know, it's too boring. You boring. You don't want to say that you you're, you're simply a quote cis-gender straight don't wanna say that you You're you're simply a quote cisgender straight person. You wanna be a more complicated and interesting person. With more gray areas. And areas. And obviously the irony is that in this rush to be an individual and to be so interesting, they end up just like everybody the irony is that in this rush to be an individual and to be so interesting, end up just like everybody else. Little Polly says, Matt, you're missing the most important point about BLM. They aren't harassing random people on Street. They're harassing random white people on the street. It's a racist anti white movement. I agree. I don't think I've missed that at all. think that's a point I've made many times, but certainly, I agree. William Ferraro says, isn't cow cuddling prohibited in leviticus? Somewhere toward the back or in a footnote, or did Moses just figure it wasn't worth mentioning. Well, I don't know. Calcuddling certainly violates the spirit of many biblical laws. I would think it's an attack on nature, an attack on God, God. You might you might say. I mean, god made cows big and fat and slow, and not so that you could cuddle with them. But so that they could more easily be slaughtered and turned into quarter pounders with cheese. Amen. One of One of those moments of panic, I think that you might have in life that I know I've had too many times to count is when you're driving in a car or you're on a plane or somewhere, and you start to get that motion sickness, you start to feel nauseous and you're thinking, Oh my gosh, am I going to, am I going to have to ask them to pull over the plane so I can hurdle you don't want to deal with those moments of panic that you might have in life that I know I've had too many times to count is when you're driving in car or you're on a plane or somewhere and you start to get that motion sickness, you start to feel nauseous and you're thinking, oh my Am I going to am I going to ask them to pull over the plane so I can hurl. You don't want to deal with that that. And that's why I use that's why I use relief relief. Band relief band is the number one FDA cleared anti-nausea Relief ban is the number one FDA cleared anti nausea risk that's wristband. That's been clinically proven to quickly relieve and effectively present nausea and vomiting associated with motion sickness, anxiety, migraine hangover, morning sickness, chemotherapy, and so much more the been clinically proven to quickly relieve and effectively present nausea and vomiting associated with motion sickness, anxiety, migraine, hangover, morning sickness, chemotherapy, and so much more. The product, the product. The great thing is it's a hundred percent drug-free it's non-drowsy provides all natural relief with zero side effects for as long as great thing is, it's a hundred percent drug free, it's non drowsy, provides all natural relief with zero side effects for as long as needed. The technology was originally developed over twenty years ago in in hospitals and now it's available to the public and you gotta try it. Relief band is the only over the counter wearable device that's been used in hospitals and oncology clinics to treat nausea and band as the only over the counter wearable device that's been used in hospitals and oncology clinics to treat nausea and vomiting. I vomiting. I use it to work so I can testify to that this new year in short nausea is never the reason to miss out on life's important use it. It works. I can testify to that. This new year, ensure nausea is never the reason to miss out on life's important moments. Right moments. Right now relief band has an exclusive offer just for Matt Walt's now relief ban has an exclusive offer just for Matt Walsh listeners. If you listeners. If you go to relief band.com and use promo code Walsh, you'll receive 20% off plus free shipping and no questions asked 30 day money back return go to relief ban dot com and use promo code walsh, you'll receive twenty percent off plus free shipping and no questions asked. Thirty day money back return guarantee. guarantee. So head to R E L I E F B a N d.com and use our promo code Walsh for 20 sent So head to RELIEFBAND dot com and use our promo code walsh. For twenty percent off. And, you know, on election night, we announced that Candice Owens would be joining the DailyWire with a new show show. Now, the wait is finally wait is finally over. The over. The moment is moment is here, here. Candace's new show appropriately titled Candice will premiere next Friday, March new show. A property titled Candice will premiere exgay March nineteenth, You 19th. You may remember Candice from well many things, but we know Cardi B ranted about her criticizing may remember Candace from, well, many things, but we know Cardi B ranted about her criticizing WAP. wop. Harry styles was upset when she had the Udacity to suggest that maybe mentioned wear Styles was upset when she you know, had the audacity to suggest that maybe mention wear dresses. All of that, we know that the the canvas is always as interesting things to say, which is why you gotta check out Canvas. It's gonna be exclusive to daily wire members. members. If you're not yet a member of go to daily wire.com/subscribe use code Candice to get twenty-five percent off again, that's daily wire.com/subscribe use code Candice for 25% If you're not yet a member, go to dailywire dot com slash subscribe. Use code Canvas to get twenty five percent off again. That's daily wire dot comsubscriber. Use code Candice for twenty five percent off. Now off. Now let's get to our daily camp get to our daily cancellation. When you think we've made it to the furthest reaches of cultural lunacy and of the cowardice that enables that lunacy, we find still deeper depths to plunge. Winston Marshall plays or did play rather. The banjo and the lead guitar for Mumford and Sons, a group famous for being everyone's third favorite band in summer of twenty eleven. In this past weekend, Marshall ignited controversy and accusations of bigotry and naziism By publicly confessing to having read a book. Yes. The musician tweeted an endorsement of journalist journalists. Andy knows Antifa expos a, which is called by the way, if you want to pick it up unmasked inside Antifa his radical plan to destroy democracy, the tweet addressed to know said finally had the time to read your important Nodes and Tifa which is called, by the way, if you wanna pick it up, unmasked inside antifa's radical plan to destroy democracy. The tweet addressed to no said, finally had the time to read your important book. book. You're a brave a brave man. That was it. it. That was the was tweet. And it was enough to set the cancel wheels in motion. Fans, the media, fellow musicians came out swinging, labeling him a racist, calling for him to be fired, and so on and so forth, they made it clear that there hes essentially no difference between reading and enjoying a book critical of Antifa and pledging allegiance to Hitler after reading Mind Comp. To hes, at even the mildest disagreement with the most radical fringes of the far left is to profess far right views, which is to be a bigot, which is to reveal yourself unworthy of inclusion in civilized society. That's the formula clear and simple and totally insane. In insane. In fairness to the cancel mob, we should say, this is not Marshall's first infraction he has in the past, showed other ominous signs of possessing, a mind of his own and article in the Hollywood reporter notes, to the cancel mob, we should say, this is not Marshall's first infraction. He has in the past showed other ominous signs of possessing a mind of his own. An article in the Hollywood reporter notes, quote, this quote. This is not the first time Marshall and Marshall and Mumford and sons have courted controversy for associating with the Taurus right-wing is not the first time Marshall and Marshall and Mumford and Sons have courted controversy for associating with notorious right wing personalities. Back in twenty eighteen, the band invited Canadian academic, Jordan Peterson, who's been accused of transphobia, misogyny, and Islamophobia to visit their London studios. After pictures of Peterson and members of the band appeared on social media, Marshall told a Canadian radio station I don't think having a photograph with someone means you agree with everything they say. Primarily I'm interested in his psychological stuff, which find very interesting. There you have it. it. One Marshall is taking a picture with a famous psychologist. Three years later, he's reading a book. I mean, the left could not allow this dangerous precedent, a strike three. If they didn't cancel him now, who knows what he'd do next? He might go out and misgender potato hes toy. You never know what this guy will do. There's no telling what sort of dastardly deeds this villain might get up to. Fortunately, the council mob was able to ran him rain him in then without much without much trouble. After deleting the offending tweet, and then apparently deleting all of his other tweets. So he deleted that tweet, and tweet. And then, and then it seems if you go to his page, he deleted all, all of his and then it seems if you go to his page, he deleted all of his tweets along with it. Marshall then issued the standard ordered order apology. This is what he said in his statement. First of all, you almost know exactly what he's going to say before you hear me say it. But he said, over the past few days, I have come to better understand the pain caused by the book I endorsed. I have offended not only lot of people I don't know, but also those closest to me, including my bandmates. And for that, I am truly sorry. As result of my actions, I am taking time away from the band to examine my blind spots. For now, now. Please know that I realize how my endorsements have the potential to be viewed as approvals of hateful, divisive know that I realize how my endorsements have the potential to be viewed as approvals of hateful, divisive behavior. behavior. I apologize as this was not at all my I apologize as this was not at all my intention. Now if you thought you would live your whole life and never encounter the phrase, pain caused by the book I endorsed, you were sadly mistaken. Indeed, I I Indeed. I feel it must be emphasized and really cannot be emphasized enough that this man is begging for forgiveness and stepping down from his position because he read and recommended book he has come to believe, or at least is pretending to believe there's decision to read a book caused not only offense, but actual damage to other human beings prior to this, the most, the most pathetic and deranged bit of groveling we'd ever witnessed was the bachelor it must be emphasized and and really cannot be emphasized enough that this man is begging for forgiveness and stepping down from his position because he read and recommended a book. He has come to believe or at least is pretending believe But his decision to read a book caused not only offense, but actual damage to other human beings. Prior to this, the most the most pathetic and deranged bit of groveling we'd ever witnessed was the bachelor host Chris Harrison's apology for advocating forgiveness Winston Marshall managed to show a level of stomach churning of Sequiableness that outdid even that. And I have faith that some brave pioneer will come along in the very near future to debase themselves and surrender their dignity in such a way as to make Marshall look like Davey Crockett defending the Alamo by comparison. comparison. It's all for not of course, as all the graveler gains nothing from his masochistic performance, he is no less canceled at the end of it, the emotional blackmailers who demanded an apology for something that did not affect them or harm them to begin with, have no plans to actually accept that apology like any schoolyard It's all for not, of course. As always, the Groveller gains nothing from his masochistic performance he is no less canceled at the end of it. The emotional blackmailers who demanded an apology for something that did not affect them or harm them to begin with, have no plans to actually accept that apology. Like any school yard bully, bully. They get off on the act of imposing their will on another get off on the act of imposing their will on another person. If person. If you let yourself become a source of this perverse high, they're going to keep coming back for more let yourself become a source of this perverse high, they're gonna keep coming back for more hits. hits. You can't get them to stop taking your lunch money by giving them your lunch You can't get them to stop taking your lunch money by giving them your lunch money. Your only hope that is to stand up for yourself, stand your ground, refuse to play their game, and to send that message with a punch in the nose. Now admittedly, in the case of a cancel mob, this is much easier said than done. There's certainly no guarantee that they'll leave you alone just because you made it clear that you're not gonna be an easy target. It's quite possible that no matter how you respond, they will still come and take your job and your livelihood and your reputation away. But the one thing they can't take is your dignity. dignity. They can't take They can't take that. That is something that a man must will fully forfeit. If everything else is taken from you, that that is you could take solace in knowing that the absent no one can take that from you ever. You have to give it up. up. You have to offer have to offer it. You have to say, here you go. Here it is. Winston Winston. Marshall is not the is not the first and certainly won't be the last to offer up his dignity on a silver platter and get nothing in return. And for that he's canceled. And he has doubly canceled for being disgrace to the Banjo planning community, which as you know, I'm gonna take that especially person. So cancel it again for that. And we'll leave it there for today. Thanks for watching. Thanks for listening. Have a great day. Godspeed. Well, if you enjoyed this episode, don't forget to subscribe. And if you want help spread the word, please give us a five star review. Also tell your friends to subscribe as well. We're available on Apple PodcastSpotify wherever you listen to podcasts. We're there. Also, be sure to check out the other daily wire podcast in putting the Venture Piero show, Michael Knowles show, and show. Andrew Klavan Clayton show. Thanks for listening. The Matt Wall show is produced by Sean Hampton, Executive producer, Jeremy Booring. Our supervisor is our Mathis Glover and Robert Sterling. Our technical director is Austin Stevens, Production Pavel Vodosky, the show is edited by Danny D'Amico, our audio is mixed by Mike Coramina, Aaron makeup is done by Mika Geneva, and our production coordinator is Makena Waters. The Matt Wall show is a daily wire production, copyright daily wire twenty twenty one. The White House StoneWall's reporters on the record number of illegal alien kids being held in cages, right wing provocateur, Milo Yiannapolous, is now exgay, and the Cuomo scandals get even check it out on the Michael Knoll show.