Podchaser Logo
Home
Highlights from O'Reilly's No Spin News

Highlights from O'Reilly's No Spin News

Released Saturday, 27th April 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Highlights from O'Reilly's No Spin News

Highlights from O'Reilly's No Spin News

Highlights from O'Reilly's No Spin News

Highlights from O'Reilly's No Spin News

Saturday, 27th April 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:00

The Talking Points Memo this

0:02

evening, we're going to begin

0:04

with this amazing, and I

0:07

don't use

0:18

that word a lot, political weekend.

0:22

So we had four bills voted

0:24

on in the House, all

0:26

fairly controversial, and I just want to run them

0:28

down and tell you what happened. So

0:31

the first bill was $26.38 billion from the USA to

0:33

Israel for their security. Now

0:40

that passed 366 to 58 in the House. You

0:46

know, the House of Representatives

0:48

basically saying, okay, we understand

0:51

the Israeli situation. There are strongest ally in

0:53

the Middle East, so we are going to

0:55

allocate 26 billion plus. Then

0:59

comes Ukraine. Now this

1:01

is, yeah, it's, the

1:03

vote was pretty much the same, a

1:06

little bit less, but it's

1:08

more controversial. So we're sending $61 billion

1:11

to Ukraine, mostly weapons,

1:14

but some humanitarian aid as

1:16

well. And the

1:18

far right does not like

1:20

this, okay? The far left

1:22

doesn't like the Israeli aid, but I'm going to

1:25

name the names in a minute. All right, so

1:27

the far right does not like that expenditure, the

1:30

$61 billion going to Ukraine.

1:33

Vote was 311, yes, 112, no. Then

1:39

there was the Indo-Pacific Security Supplement

1:42

Appropriations Act, which is basically giving

1:44

nations close to China some

1:47

money to develop themselves. It's

1:50

only 8 billion, okay? But

1:53

it passed 385 to 34. And

1:56

the final one was the TikTok bill. sanctions

2:00

on Iran, freezing assets

2:02

of Russia, that

2:06

was 360 to 58. So those are the four bills

2:09

all passed. All will go to the Senate

2:11

now, Senate will pass them, and

2:13

then Biden will sign all fours. So it's

2:15

a fait accompli. Now

2:18

let's take a look at the

2:20

Ukraine bill. All right, so the

2:22

hard right in the House, Marjorie

2:24

Taylor Greene, Lauren Boberg, Chip Roy,

2:26

Matt Gaetz, Andy Biggs, on and

2:28

on and on. They do not

2:30

like this expenditure. They believe that

2:33

the United States should not be

2:35

funding the Ukrainian war. Okay. Now they're

2:38

perfectly, that's a

2:41

position they have the right to take and the

2:43

voters of their district will decide. As

2:45

a historian, I know this is

2:48

a foolish vote against A.E.T. Ukraine,

2:50

because it's almost exactly like

2:52

1938, when the far

2:55

right in America didn't want to bother

2:57

Hitler. Okay,

3:00

so understand that. Far

3:02

right in 1938 in America want

3:04

to be isolationist. So

3:06

what some people don't understand is that

3:09

America is the world leader, and

3:12

that's not going to change, no

3:14

matter if you don't want it or not. Now

3:16

I will understand that spending is out

3:18

of control, which is why we need

3:20

a balanced budget amendment in Congress. There's

3:23

no doubt about that. $34 trillion

3:25

debt, come on. But if

3:27

you allow Putin to win in Ukraine,

3:30

and that means control the country, all

3:32

right, you're going to pay 10 times more

3:35

than $60 billion the first year, because

3:38

Putin's just going to cause trouble in

3:40

all of the former Soviet republics, all

3:42

of them. They'll just go

3:44

in, they'll do the same thing, they'll

3:46

undermine and the world will be in

3:49

economic chaos. Everything

3:51

is intertwined today. Our economy is

3:53

good in America right now. Inflation's

3:56

terrible. Thank you, Joe Biden.

3:59

But the economy good. People are working.

4:02

You get wars everywhere. That's going

4:04

to change fast and it's going to

4:06

come to your house. But

4:09

these hard right people don't seem to understand why they

4:11

disagree with me. Okay? Okay.

4:14

So that's tolerable.

4:17

You can disagree with me, but

4:19

I'm right. Okay? I know

4:21

Putin. I know what

4:24

he wants. He wants to

4:26

destabilize the whole world and

4:28

reimpose Russian domination in

4:30

his former Soviet districts. That's

4:32

what he wants. What?

4:34

Why is he in Ukraine anyway? Hundreds of

4:37

thousands of Russians dead? Come on.

4:39

There's no reason to be there. No benefit

4:42

to you. You war

4:44

criminal. All right.

4:46

So that's that.

4:48

I just have a disagreement with these people.

4:50

I don't tie it into border security. You're

4:52

never going to get border security under Joe

4:54

Biden. No matter what they

4:56

pass. No matter what

4:59

executive order, it'll never happen.

5:01

He's got to go by in order

5:03

for there to be border security

5:06

and immigration law enforced. He's

5:08

not going to do it. All

5:10

right. Israel. So it's

5:13

the same crew. The hard

5:15

right bigs, bobergates, telegreen, Roy,

5:17

same crew. But they're

5:19

joined by the squad, the far left

5:21

nuts. Okay. Kaseo, tortez, Omar,

5:24

Tlaib, Presley, Bowman, Bush. The

5:26

same. They just don't like

5:28

Israel. Okay. They don't

5:30

like America and they attach America

5:33

to Israel and vice-versa. So

5:36

they don't want any money going over there. I'm

5:39

going to use one sound bite. I debated on

5:41

doing this, but I'm going to do it. This

5:43

is Congresswoman Green. Go.

5:47

Last Monday was tax day, April

5:49

15th, and Washington betrayed the American

5:51

people by sending $93 billion

5:54

to support foreign wars while doing

5:57

nothing, absolutely nothing to secure our

5:59

border. That is a complete betrayal.

6:03

I, you know, I don't know what to

6:05

say. Okay. I want border

6:07

security. You want border security, not going to

6:09

happen under Biden. The two are not intertwined.

6:12

You're not going to blackmail Biden over Ukraine.

6:14

He's not going to enforce the border, no

6:17

matter what you do. And

6:19

again, to alleviate massive

6:21

problems in the world, down the

6:24

road, you've got to blunt

6:27

Putin here. Now they say, well, what's the end game?

6:29

There is no end game. All right.

6:31

It's a matter of if

6:33

Trump is reelected in

6:36

November, Trump will get

6:38

Putin to the table. They will make

6:40

some kind of an agreement, which will

6:42

probably be Putin keeps some

6:45

Don boss in some areas, but

6:48

if Biden wins, Putin will just keep going.

6:51

That that's pretty much where it is. Okay.

6:56

That's the memo. So

6:59

Michael Douglas, Kirk Douglas's son, I know, or I

7:01

knew Kirk Douglas. I

7:04

corresponded with him and I know Michael Douglas and I

7:06

liked him. I

7:09

liked him very respectful

7:11

and intelligent and all that,

7:14

but they're fervent

7:16

liberals, both of them, the late Kurt

7:18

and Michael Douglas, they understand who survive

7:20

in Hollywood. You

7:23

have to be a fervent liberal. You really

7:25

can't survive in that industry, the

7:27

entertainment industry, if you're not. So

7:31

Douglas goes on CNN and says this, go. So

7:34

you and Biden are about the same age. What do you, do

7:36

you think, you know, are you one of those people who wished he had bowed

7:40

out, let the field choose somebody else? How

7:44

do you, how do you think about that? Well,

7:46

I think, I think that I walk

7:49

a little similar to him. And the people

7:51

that I've talked to and everybody that I

7:53

have say he's the sharpest at

7:56

times. He's

8:00

fine. We all have an issue of memories

8:03

as we get older. We forget names Something

8:06

he's overcome a stunner in

8:09

his life Sharp

8:12

is attack. Okay. Number one.

8:14

That's hearsay. There's a no Biden Number

8:16

two, apparently he's not watching the news Michael

8:19

Douglas isn't but really this is what he

8:22

wants to believe we go back to people

8:24

believe what they want to believe All

8:26

right, and the people who

8:28

are supporting Biden they want to believe

8:30

that he's right on top of everything

8:33

He's got no cognitive problems. It's

8:35

fairyland We

8:37

get it. You have eyes and you

8:39

see the president United States on the

8:41

road You know, I wrote

8:43

a column Called

8:46

zone of comfort and I said

8:48

one of the senses in a calm was Biden

8:50

needs a cheat sheet just to wish

8:52

you a nice day He said

8:55

the men cannot articulate anything sharp

8:57

is attack. What kind of attack

8:59

is that Michael? But

9:03

I don't hold it against them. I'm not mad at

9:05

him People believe what

9:07

they want to believe that's

9:09

it. I got I can go back to

9:11

Ukraine The hard right is never

9:14

gonna believe That

9:16

allowing Putin to take over that

9:18

country will lead to Chaos

9:21

in the world. They won't believe it no

9:24

matter what you do no matter how many

9:26

historical lessons you put up there Joining

9:29

us now is an evangelical. All right, but he's

9:31

also already a talk show host and he's got

9:34

a new book out Twilight's

9:36

last gleaming can America be saved? I've

9:39

known Todd storms Dot-com for

9:42

a long time. I just

9:44

recently met the dot-com, but I've known Todd

9:46

as a human being for I hope He

9:49

joins us from Memphis, Tennessee All

9:51

right, so you might expect

9:54

with Donald Trump's flamboyant life multiple

9:57

marriages You

10:00

know, he runs around, does what he wants,

10:02

as I said. But evangelicals might look

10:04

askance at him. Why is

10:06

that not happening? It's

10:10

a great question. And Bill, I

10:12

remember back in 2015 when then

10:16

Mr. Trump had

10:18

invited all of these evangelicals to come

10:20

to New York City there at the

10:22

Marriott Marquee in Times Square. And I

10:24

was there in that meeting when it

10:26

was basically an opportunity for some of

10:28

these big religious leaders to ask some

10:30

pretty pointed questions of Donald Trump. And

10:32

look, it was clear that he's

10:35

not a holy roller. He

10:37

is certainly not a Southern Baptist. But

10:39

it seemed like he was able

10:41

to really hit those issues that

10:43

impact a lot of evangelical voters

10:45

like myself. And look, it

10:47

was a matter of faith for a lot

10:49

of these evangelicals to step out and cast

10:51

their vote for him back in 2016. And

10:55

I'll be darned, Bill, if he didn't

10:57

deliver on pretty much all of the

10:59

promises he made to the evangelical community,

11:01

standing up for the big issues like

11:03

religious liberty, like the culture

11:05

war issues that you really brought to

11:07

the forefront of the nation's conscience with

11:10

the going back to the war on

11:12

Christmas. OK, so

11:14

Trump governed

11:16

in a fairly conservative manner,

11:19

socially speaking. That's true.

11:23

So that's enough to override his

11:25

private life? I

11:28

think so. And the reason why,

11:30

and you mentioned earlier on, I happen

11:32

to be a Baptist and like you,

11:34

I'm a center saved by grace. And

11:37

I think we've all seen that in our lives. I

11:39

mean, we know the president's not perfect. But

11:42

going back to the issues of governance,

11:44

you know, when you look at our founding documents and

11:46

I write about this in Twilight's Last Gleaming, our

11:49

foundational freedom in this country is freedom

11:51

of religion. Everything else is built on

11:53

top of that of that freedom. And

11:56

I think we've seen that freedom come under assault

11:58

for many years now. And I

12:00

was very happy to see the president coming

12:03

into office and really helping to shore up

12:05

and bringing to the table a lot

12:08

of the evangelical leaders, like

12:10

Pastor Robert Jeffress or Tony Perkins

12:12

from Family Research Council. That

12:14

really said a lot to me because

12:16

these men were giving President Trump good

12:18

and wise and biblical counsel. All

12:21

right, but he's doing that because he knows

12:23

that they're going to get him votes.

12:26

I don't want to be cynical about it, but

12:28

I know Pastor Jeffress very well. And,

12:30

you know, Trump went out of his way to bolster

12:33

him in Dallas. And there

12:36

was a reason why. But when

12:38

in the next few

12:41

weeks we're going to hear Stormy Daniels,

12:44

you don't get much. I

12:47

don't even know what word to use here. But

12:50

you don't get much more

12:54

dubious than

12:56

Miss Daniels. And another one

12:58

is going to come in from Playboy and

13:02

they're going to describe stuff that's going

13:05

to be pretty shocking

13:08

to religious based people. And

13:11

how do you think the reaction is going to go down? Well,

13:15

I think, you know, I think a lot of

13:17

evangelicals have seen a lot of that fornication on

13:19

TV. And look,

13:22

I think there is there is something to

13:24

that as far as this

13:26

is an issue for some people. But

13:28

I think by and large, Bill, I

13:31

think the average American voters are going to dismiss

13:33

all of this. They see

13:35

it as nasty, ugly politics. They

13:38

see it as smears. And at the end of

13:40

the day, I go back to something President Trump

13:42

said a couple of weeks ago. He was catching

13:44

a lot of heat for promoting the God bless

13:46

the USA Bible, this special

13:49

gift Bible. And I

13:51

think the problem was not necessarily promoting this

13:53

Bible, which had been in existence for a

13:55

couple of years. But it

13:57

was what he said afterwards where he said that if we

13:59

really want to do this, we're going to do it. to

14:01

make America great. We've got to get back to church. We've

14:03

got to get back to praying, and we've got to get

14:05

back to reading the Bible. And I thought that was really

14:08

quite unique and interesting. Come

14:10

on, anybody can say that.

14:13

Sure. You know, politicians are

14:15

politicians. I'm not demeaning what

14:17

he said, what Trump said,

14:20

but that's easy to say.

14:23

Now, the final question is what I'm going to

14:25

do tomorrow is Biden

14:28

Catholic abortion. Okay.

14:33

So evangelicals, 100%

14:35

are pro-life. Is that

14:38

correct? That's correct. Okay.

14:40

So you can't be an evangelical

14:43

if you believe in abortion. That

14:46

would seem to override a Stormy

14:48

Daniels. To me, if I were

14:51

an evangelical, I'm not. The

14:54

abortion is so much more serious

14:57

than any kind of thing

15:00

that Trump may or may not have done

15:02

with Ms. Daniels. But

15:05

the press is never going to frame it that

15:07

way ever in a million years. Will they do

15:09

that? No.

15:12

And I think that's a, look, that's a fair assessment.

15:14

I, and again, I'm with you. I'm not going to

15:16

judge another man's, you know,

15:18

relationship of God, but you look

15:20

at president Biden and you wonder how

15:22

in the world can this man profess

15:24

to be a practicing Catholic and then

15:27

stand in sheer opposition to the pro-life

15:29

movement? I did more than that, Todd.

15:31

He promotes it. Yes.

15:34

He promotes it. The

15:37

Biden-Harris ticket has made

15:40

abortion noble. That's

15:43

so far beyond the pale. I'm

15:46

just stunned. We'll get into that tomorrow.

15:49

I want to read the audience. This

15:51

is on page 251. You're wrapping up

15:53

your book, Twilight's Last Gleaming. You

15:55

say, I wrote this book so

15:57

that God-loving patriots would

16:00

no longer be silent in the face of evil.

16:04

Why do you think so many evangelicals

16:06

and other people of faith are

16:09

silent? They don't rise up.

16:11

You don't see mass demonstrations like

16:14

you do on the left. Why?

16:17

Well, many of us have jobs, so we can't take off,

16:20

to go march in the streets and burn down

16:22

things. That's not who we are. At

16:25

the heart of an evangelical Christian, there's this

16:27

idea that we are to

16:29

be peaceful, loving people, which, yes, that's what

16:31

we're called to do. But we're also called

16:34

to stand up in the face of evil.

16:37

And there's the great Dietrich Bonhoeffer, quote,

16:39

silence in the face of evil is

16:41

evil itself. I go back. I

16:43

got the title of the book from a

16:46

Ronald Reagan speech he delivered, making an observation

16:48

about our national anthem, Bill. He said, our

16:50

national anthem, it starts with a question, not

16:52

with a declaration. Is the flag still flying?

16:55

Can you still see the flag? And that's

16:57

really a question that every generation of, I

16:59

believe, God-loving patriots will have to answer for.

17:01

We've got to stand up. And I think

17:04

Christians of all denominations have

17:06

a responsibility to stand up and be

17:08

counted in the culture. All right. Well,

17:10

Todd, the book is Twilight's Last School

17:12

Evening. We recommend it. We appreciate your

17:14

time tonight. And I hope we talk

17:17

again soon. Thanks for coming on. Thanks,

17:19

Bill. OK. Now

17:22

let's go to Chicago, a very

17:24

troubled city, worse

17:27

than New York City. Not

17:29

by much. New York City is tottering.

17:32

Chicago's already fallen over the

17:34

cliff. So Chicago

17:37

owes this

17:39

year, 2024, $538 million. City

17:46

owes. OK? That's

17:48

a deficit. Can't pay. So

17:53

if all of the Chicago bonds

17:56

and all the munis and all that were called,

17:58

they'd have to go for money. bankruptcy.

18:01

So they're living on borrowed money

18:03

in Chicago. Five hundred

18:05

and thirty eight million

18:07

dollars. It's the third largest

18:09

city in the country. Population 2.7 million.

18:14

Now they announce they're

18:16

going to spend 70 million dollars,

18:20

money they don't have, to

18:23

house feed and care for migrants that

18:27

are pouring into Chicago because they know,

18:29

the migrants do, that they'll

18:31

get everything once they get in the city limits

18:33

of the migrants. They'll be housed,

18:36

you'll get food, you'll get

18:38

whatever you need medical care, education,

18:40

boom. So you say

18:42

how can this happen? How

18:44

can it happen? It happens because these

18:47

cities and states, right,

18:51

they borrow and borrow

18:53

and borrow and borrow and

18:56

then when Armageddon

18:58

and it's happening in New York City,

19:01

the city is going to go over the cliff, then

19:03

they go to the federal government for the bailout. But

19:06

either way, we the taxpayers

19:09

are paying. I bring this to your attention because

19:13

these politicians, the mayors and the governors, all of

19:15

us are doing all this in the progressive states.

19:17

They don't give a whit about you or

19:19

how much tax you pay. They

19:22

want more and more and more and more

19:24

of your money. They could pass a wealth

19:26

tax, they would tax everything you had, they

19:28

seize it. You should understand

19:30

what's happening. Campus

19:33

update. Okay, so

19:37

NYU today, the students walked

19:39

out of class

19:41

to be anti-Israel, Columbia,

19:43

Yale, on and on.

19:45

Okay, now it is

19:49

a bit confusing to some people.

19:52

They don't know why this is happening.

19:55

So I went on News Nation last

19:57

night, Leland Vitter, okay, and here's what

19:59

I said. Go. So

20:02

this is how it goes. The

20:04

far left, which manipulates

20:06

these students and runs these

20:09

protests, hates America. They

20:11

feel that the USA targets

20:15

and denigrates minorities,

20:17

particularly African-Americans. They

20:19

feel that Israel does the same

20:21

thing to Arabs. They

20:24

feel that Israel has stolen their land, has

20:27

persecuted them for centuries. They're

20:29

as evil as the patriarchy

20:32

that runs America. There's a

20:34

linkage. So the far

20:36

left, which has a database

20:38

of all their sympathizers at universities,

20:41

blasts out, this is what we're

20:43

going to do, and the lemmings

20:45

do it. So

20:47

unlike Vietnam, which was an

20:50

organic protest, and I count

20:53

myself in this crew, I was

20:56

raised in Levittown, Long

20:58

Island, New York, a working class town.

21:03

And when we

21:05

all graduated from high school, some

21:07

of us went to college, I did, but

21:11

most of the men at

21:14

18 got drafted and

21:17

went to Vietnam. And came

21:19

back and told me exactly what

21:21

was going on there. And

21:23

I knew these guys since I'm five, six

21:25

years old, and I saw one commit suicide,

21:27

and a bunch of them get addicted to heroin, and

21:30

their lives are shattered. Nobody came

21:32

back in Levittown and said,

21:34

this is great, we're doing the right thing. Nobody.

21:38

So that's how I formulated my view. This

21:41

is Israel-Gazza thing,

21:44

totally apart from

21:46

that. The protests are not even close.

21:49

One was a real negative experience the

21:52

United States was going through that was

21:54

killing tens of thousands

21:56

of young men. The other is a

22:00

situations going on for 2,000 years

22:03

that these college students have no blank include about

22:05

and don't care. It's like a big social

22:07

thing for them there and being

22:09

manipulated and that is the story. We

22:12

got an eye on it all these

22:14

protesters being arrested nothing gonna happen

22:16

to them and that's part of the problem.

22:18

I said look

22:20

I'm president of Columbia or

22:22

NYU or Yale you

22:24

think that happens on those campuses? I'm

22:26

president? You think it happens? Very

22:30

simple. You can protest here's as

22:32

we set aside this place for you to

22:34

go. You can protest between

22:36

nine and eight at night so you

22:38

don't disrupt the campus or disturb the

22:41

neighborhood surrounding. You

22:43

go off that place we gave you

22:45

you're expelled. You don't

22:47

stop at the hour we

22:49

designate you're expelled. That's

22:52

it. You

22:54

think those campus things are continue

22:57

and then once you're expelled you're not entitled to be

22:59

on the grounds of the university

23:01

so the security removes you and all

23:03

your stuff in your

23:05

dorm room is put in a box.

23:09

That's put it into it right?

23:12

Yes. Not hard. Joining

23:16

us now from Washington is John

23:19

McLaughlin. We've had him on before.

23:21

He's a pollster. He's worked with

23:23

Donald Trump since 2011. He's advised

23:25

him and he's been

23:29

Trump's pollster for eight

23:31

years. Wow. Yeah I think you're the

23:34

one of the longest-running Trump guys. They

23:36

usually Trump throws you into

23:38

the Potomac or you know

23:40

how he is. You have survived with

23:42

him. So we just gave the Marist

23:44

poll numbers and it looks like there's

23:46

a shift nationally and Biden

23:48

is kind of just creeping ahead by

23:50

a little. It's still within the margin

23:52

of error. But what do

23:54

you trip that to? Well

23:57

first of all we have

23:59

a poll. that Trump in March

24:01

was up 49-43 nationally. We

24:04

do a thousand likely voters. In April,

24:06

as of Friday, we posted Trump

24:08

was up 49-45. So Biden went

24:10

up two points and he got

24:12

him from undecideds and the

24:15

undecideds went down a little. Well, we still

24:17

have them up, but it's apples to oranges. That

24:21

Marist poll that you're talking about was

24:23

not likely voters. It was done among

24:25

1192 adults and

24:31

then they screened the adults for

24:33

registered voters. So when you think

24:35

of the universe in the United States, you

24:37

have 260 million eligible adults

24:40

who could vote and you

24:42

have only 160 million came

24:44

out in the last presidential race, which was a

24:46

record compared to 139 million in 2016. So they're

24:52

coming down from a much bigger universe and

24:54

they also, when you go through it, when

24:56

you look at, they have a

24:58

little higher level of college graduates.

25:01

They also have, what's interesting is they have

25:04

Biden's disapproval much lower than the other polls

25:06

like 1551, depending on the universe

25:09

of registered voters. I

25:11

don't put much credence in the Marist polling. They're

25:13

associated with NPR and we

25:16

know what NPR is now. I don't think

25:18

this poll was taken in conjunction with them,

25:20

but I'm not, I don't

25:22

think this is a solid poll historically figured,

25:24

but NBC came out over the weekend. With

25:27

it pretty much the same and I

25:30

don't know whether we are seeing a trend

25:33

away from Trump, perhaps because of

25:35

his trial. Do you see

25:37

any trends developing? By

25:40

the way, I'll give you, I'll give you the

25:42

one last point on that. They also, the Marist

25:45

poll said they asked who they voted

25:47

for in 2020 because we modeled our poll for

25:49

the turnout of the 160 million in the actual

25:51

race, but then they don't tell you

25:53

in the demographics what vote they had. So

25:55

they may have a lot more Biden voters

25:57

than the actual 4% that they voted for.

26:00

that these other polls have like NBC and stuff. But

26:02

the core of the problem right now is

26:05

Trump went up, we won

26:07

a record historic primary in March,

26:10

where Trump certainly

26:13

got some benefit from that where

26:15

his numbers, he often kids and says, he's

26:19

better numbers than Washington or Lincoln. Well,

26:21

he had better numbers than Ronald Reagan

26:23

and better results than Ronald Reagan. And

26:25

it was historic primary victory the way

26:28

he won Iowa, New Hampshire, Nevada, South

26:30

Carolina and sealed the nomination wasn't

26:32

even close. So we got a little

26:34

bump out of that. And he was

26:37

playing aggressive offense against Joe Biden all

26:39

that time, all through the primaries. Now,

26:42

okay, we won the primaries, we got the

26:45

nomination. What happens? They

26:47

put us in court. They're tying Donald Trump.

26:49

And by the way, 66% of all

26:51

voters in

26:53

my poll that we released Friday say

26:56

that politics played a role in the

26:58

Trump indictments. Another 56% say Biden played

27:00

a role. They

27:04

get it. They know that Colangelo,

27:06

who's doing the prosecution for Bragg,

27:08

was the number three guy in

27:11

the Biden administration justice department. And

27:14

they sent him to

27:16

Bragg to bring this indictment of Trump.

27:19

Well, I don't think there's any question

27:21

about the unfairness of this,

27:23

but the question for you and for Trump

27:26

is the ill-informed

27:28

American, and

27:30

there are, you know, tens of

27:32

millions, they kind of

27:34

go with the flow. And if they see

27:38

a trend developing toward Biden, that's

27:40

gonna help Biden. Last

27:42

word. Well, what they're

27:44

doing is this is a strategy. It's

27:47

not an accident. Four indictments, they want

27:49

four convictions. They wanna put Trump in

27:51

jail. And what's in

27:53

the immediate happening right now is

27:56

they're taking Trump off message. Trump cannot

27:58

campaign around the country. talk

28:00

about inflation, talk about the border, talk

28:02

about rising crime, talk about these endless

28:05

wars that Biden's getting us into. So

28:07

we don't have the campaign we had a

28:10

month ago. We are bogged

28:12

down by the Biden supporters

28:14

and Biden's henchmen. So

28:16

that's what's going on. We need Trump to

28:18

get back on the stump and

28:20

go back to the battleground states to win

28:23

this. But first, he's got to defend his

28:25

freedom, defend his integrity from people that are

28:27

trying to put him in jail. Yeah, the

28:29

whole thing is unprecedented. John, we're going to check in

28:31

with you like once a month. I hope you don't

28:34

mind and we'll make the time for us. In

28:37

September, that's when it really kicks in. Summer

28:39

is going to be in. And I think something big is going

28:42

to happen. As I said, I don't know what it is. So,

28:44

John, thanks very much. You're a good guy. You

28:46

always help us out. And we really appreciate it. Thank

28:49

you, Bill. Thanks for the opportunity. All right.

28:52

Let's move ahead now to a

28:54

story broken by Politico. I don't entirely

28:57

trust that website. But

28:59

they say that a group of

29:01

anti-Trump pundits that you

29:03

see on television and in

29:06

the newspapers meet weekly to

29:09

discuss how to attack Trump. And

29:12

here are the attendees, according to

29:14

Politico. CNN Jeffrey

29:16

Toobin and Eli Haneg,

29:19

I guess he says his name. George

29:22

Conway. MSNBC's Andrew Weissman.

29:25

Barbara McQuaid and Joyce White

29:28

Vance. Washington

29:30

Post's Jennifer Rubin. Harvard's

29:33

Lawrence Tribe. And the

29:35

bulwarks, Bill Crystal.

29:39

Isn't that an interesting name there?

29:41

Okay. So these are all Trump

29:43

haters. And apparently they get together

29:45

on Zoom or something every week

29:47

to coordinate their coverage. Now,

29:50

this is against every journalistic rule in the

29:53

world. Let's go to California,

29:55

where the madness is

29:57

worse than any state. The

30:00

latest is that

30:02

crime is so bad in California

30:04

all over the state that

30:07

there is a proposed ballot

30:09

measure to put

30:13

a vote up in November

30:16

that would strengthen laws

30:18

against criminals. They

30:21

need 900,000 Californians to

30:23

sign a petition.

30:25

They have the signatures. Now it goes

30:28

into they have to verify the signatures.

30:31

They will get it on the

30:33

ballot. So

30:36

this ballot measure says

30:38

that if

30:40

you are a drug addict or

30:42

need mental health treatment, it

30:45

will be provided by the state of

30:47

California. For

30:50

that, if you're seeking treatment, you should be able

30:52

to get it. And then

30:54

fentanyl is added because it's not

30:56

in there now to the list of dangerous drugs

30:58

that you can be punished, but you're not punishing

31:01

California if you sell drugs. They don't punish you.

31:05

Okay. It permits judges to use

31:08

discretion to sentence drug dealers to

31:10

stay prison instead of counting jail

31:13

when they are convicted of trafficking hard

31:15

drugs in large quantities or

31:18

armed with a firearm while engaging in

31:20

drug trafficking. So right now you

31:23

can sell narcotics in California. You go to county jail for

31:25

a couple of days or whatever, and you're out and you

31:27

sell more drugs. They just stops

31:29

that. Okay. Warren

31:32

convicted hard drug dealers

31:35

and manufacturers that can be charged with murder

31:37

if they

31:39

continue to traffic in hard drugs or

31:41

if someone dies as a result of

31:43

drugs they sell. Okay.

31:45

Now you can sell fentanyl. Eighteen

31:48

people can die and you're not

31:50

charged in California. Okay.

31:53

So that is the

31:55

proposed law that people

31:58

in California could. vote on in

32:00

November. Who opposes this law?

32:03

George Soros's foundation.

32:07

Okay, so a group

32:09

called Action for Safety and Justice, which

32:12

is funded by the Tides Foundation, and

32:15

Tides is funded by George Soros, who gave

32:17

30 million dollars

32:19

to Tides, is

32:21

fighting that ballot

32:24

proposal. And

32:26

I have to say, and I've said

32:28

it before, my

32:30

definition of evil, just my definition

32:33

of evil, Soros

32:35

top the list. But

32:37

that's my opinion, my definition. Top.

32:43

Also in California, you

32:46

can buy a program

32:50

called CLEAR to

32:53

get around the long lines at the airport,

32:55

security lines, cost $189. They

32:58

do background checks on you, make sure that

33:01

you're not an al-Qaeda or a Hamas. You

33:03

get a card for $189 a year, and

33:05

you can skip the line, go to a CLEAR line,

33:10

which is shorter and faster. California

33:12

wants to outlaw this because

33:19

of equity. This

33:22

is unbelievable. Here's the quote. It's

33:27

a basic equity issue when you see people subscribe

33:30

to a concierge service being escorted in front of

33:32

people who have waited a long time to get

33:34

to front of the TSA line. Everyone

33:37

is beaten down and CLEAR

33:39

escorts a customer in front of you. I'm

33:42

sorry, it's really frustrating. Well, then

33:44

get CLEAR. But

33:47

no. The

33:49

government in Sacramento wants to

33:51

control every single thing that

33:54

California residents do. That's what this is

33:56

about. And because more white people have

33:59

CLEAR than black people and

34:01

Hispanic people, they wanted Outlaw

34:03

Clear. Okay,

34:05

a footnote. When I went

34:07

to Europe a couple of weeks ago, I had

34:09

Global Entry, which is just

34:11

like Clear. Okay, you pay a fee,

34:14

they check you out, and you get a

34:16

card for the same reason, that

34:19

you can get through customs faster.

34:21

You get security faster. They

34:24

ignored my Global Entry card.

34:27

Nobody, and I said, hey,

34:29

where's the Global Entry line? Go, we don't have

34:31

one. We don't look at that. So

34:33

if you're thinking about Global Entry, not

34:36

helping in Europe, just so

34:39

you know. San

34:41

Francisco, so one time San

34:43

Francisco was the hottest, most

34:45

lucrative real estate market in

34:48

the country. Alright, everybody wanted to go

34:50

to the city by the bay. Why? Because beautiful,

34:52

or used to be. I

34:54

love going to San Francisco, and

34:57

my last trip there was just

34:59

in under the wire before it

35:01

totally collapsed, and I took

35:04

my son, and we went

35:06

to Alcatraz and Fisherman's Wharf, and I

35:08

know San Francisco very well. Chinatown.

35:13

So it

35:15

was ridiculous to buy a house in

35:17

San Francisco. The prices

35:19

were, they peaked at 1.66

35:21

million in April 22, and for 1.66 million, you got a

35:28

two-bedroom apartment. Condo.

35:31

Not a house. Okay,

35:33

you want a house, you better bring 5-6 million. Now

35:37

it's dropped dramatically, okay? Ends

35:39

because of the crime and the homelessness, and the

35:42

far left took over. So 18% of the homes

35:44

that sold in San Francisco for

35:46

the first three months of this year, 24, okay?

35:48

18% sold

35:51

at a loss. People

35:54

lost an average of $155,000, and the market is

36:00

flooded with sales. Flooded.

36:02

People want to get out. Well, they can. Because

36:05

things are not going to get better in San Francisco. They're

36:08

not. They're going to go

36:10

worse and worse and worse and worse and worse. And

36:13

pretty soon, you're going to have so

36:15

much anarchy there. I

36:17

don't know how you can have any more than you have now,

36:20

but it's possible. When

36:24

I go to San Francisco now, I don't

36:26

stay in the city. I stay in Marin.

36:29

I go right across the Golden Gate. There's

36:31

some very nice hotels in Marin.

36:34

And I take the ferry when I have

36:36

to do business in San Francisco. Okay.

36:40

UK. So everybody

36:42

thinks England, Great Britain,

36:45

and America are simpatico

36:47

like this. Well, very,

36:50

very apart

36:56

on the migrant issue. That's

36:59

the reason Great Britain left the EU.

37:01

They want to be flooded with

37:04

people from all over the world. Once you're in the

37:06

EU, there's no passport control.

37:08

Anybody can go wherever they want,

37:10

including if you're an illegal migrant.

37:12

Nobody checks you. England,

37:16

London said no. And I pulled

37:18

out. Okay. Now they

37:20

still got migrants coming all the

37:22

time. Some of these

37:24

people, these poor people are so desperate,

37:26

they go on top of the trains

37:28

through the tunnel from France

37:31

to London. They're literally on

37:33

top of the train holding

37:36

on. That's how

37:38

desperate these people are. So

37:41

England's been overwhelmed by

37:44

migrants. Here's what they've done. And this is

37:46

a story, again, not reported in the United

37:48

States. England made

37:51

a deal with the African country

37:53

of Rwanda. Remember

37:56

Rwanda was the genocide place and

37:58

all that. Okay, it's

38:00

a little bit better now. And

38:04

they gave Rwanda $300 million,

38:07

or pounds, whatever,

38:10

to take all

38:13

of the asylum seekers that find

38:15

themselves on British soil. So

38:18

if you get to Britain and

38:21

the authorities round you up, you

38:23

can't stay in Britain. You

38:25

go to Rwanda, and

38:27

that's where you wait. And

38:30

trust me, you're going to be waiting for a

38:32

long time. So

38:34

the deportation flights are

38:36

expected to begin this

38:39

summer. You put all

38:41

of the asylum people on. It's

38:43

like the wait in Mexico. But Mexico, you're

38:45

waiting just across the border. Here you're flying

38:47

1,000 miles south to

38:50

Rwanda. And

38:53

expect to be in the summer. Totally

38:56

Rwanda is going to make about $700 million out

38:58

of this. So

39:01

that's why Kildari, that's the capital of

39:03

Rwanda, is doing it. 700

39:07

million, I'm not going to get that anywhere else. So

39:09

they're going to take the migrants. I

39:11

feel desperately sorry for these people.

39:14

They have nothing. And now

39:16

they're going to get booted out

39:18

of England or Scotland or any part

39:21

of the UK, and

39:23

they're going to show up in Rwanda.

39:27

Did you know that? No. This

39:32

is the kind of stuff that should be reported. OK,

39:35

back to the USA, 25% of Americans

39:37

over the age of 50 say they

39:40

never expect to retire. They're going to

39:42

drop dead in the workplace. Most

39:45

of it's financial. And this

39:47

comes from the AARP survey of

39:49

more than 8,000 adults. So

39:53

they go, we can't retire. All

39:55

right, 25%. 70%

39:58

say we're going to retire. We can't

40:01

meet our expenses now. That's

40:04

because of Biden. Everything's

40:06

higher. So Biden goes, oh, we're

40:08

good, get ready. Bunch of lies. All

40:11

right, you just go down a list. You wanna

40:13

buy a car, it's more expensive than it was

40:15

four years ago. House, way more expensive. Insurance

40:19

on anything, way more expensive. Food,

40:21

30% more. On

40:24

and on and on and on and on.

40:26

So the older people in America, senior citizens

40:28

go, can't keep up. Our

40:32

retirement funds and our social security can't keep

40:34

up. So we gotta work. So

40:36

that's what's happening there. Now I'm surprised

40:39

the AARP is doing this because

40:42

that's a very pro-Biden outfit, very

40:44

left wing AARP. That's why we're

40:46

at AMAC. Okay,

40:49

AMAC does pretty much

40:51

the same thing that AARP, but AMAC

40:53

is traditional and leans

40:55

right where is AARP is left.

41:01

Okay, now because of this and

41:05

your computer looking

41:08

at it all day, every day, nearsightedness

41:11

myopia is booming.

41:14

By 2050, half the people on earth are

41:19

gonna be nearsighted because

41:21

of the screens. Well,

41:24

get ready. And if you wanna

41:26

buy, I just had to buy sunglasses, 400 bucks.

41:32

400 bucks. The

41:35

prescription, but come on. All

41:38

right, here's a final thought. I wrote a message of the day

41:40

and I hope you read that. It's free, let's go every morning.

41:43

I've had a phone call I have with Donald Trump in 2016. And

41:47

the phone call concerned

41:50

his, at the time, lawyer,

41:52

Michael Cohen, who's now involved

41:54

at Trump trial in New York City.

41:57

And on that phone call, I

41:59

called. Michael Cohen

42:01

a weasel. That

42:04

was eight years ago. And

42:07

I write the message of the day and

42:10

explain why. And I'm

42:13

an oracle. I told

42:16

Mr. Trump, this guy is

42:18

a weasel. You better not trust him.

42:22

That is the message of the day. Should

42:24

you want to check it

42:26

out on Bill O'Reilly.com. We

42:29

will have a new column on Sunday. We

42:31

thank you very much for watching and listening

42:33

to the No Spin News. We'll see you

42:36

again on Monday.

Rate

Join Podchaser to...

  • Rate podcasts and episodes
  • Follow podcasts and creators
  • Create podcast and episode lists
  • & much more

Episode Tags

Do you host or manage this podcast?
Claim and edit this page to your liking.
,

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features